The Bulwark Podcast - Jonathan Lemire: A Bubble-Wrapped Trump
Episode Date: December 3, 2025Trump’s rallies have been his signature event, but since he returned to the White House, he has stopped doing them. And his allies are worried he’s losing touch with voters, as well as his politic...al antenna. Instead of traveling the country, he’s dining with billionaires, playing golf, and going abroad in search of his elusive peace prize. Meanwhile, he can’t stay awake in own Cabinet meetings. Plus, the heat is on Hegseth, the ex-Honduran president Trump pardoned bragged about stuffing drugs up the noses of Americans, and the results of the Tennessee special election are a good sign for Democrats—and a reminder for the party to go all-in on the gerrymandering war. Jonathan Lemire joins Tim Miller. show notes Jonathan's piece on Trump not doing rallies The Atlantic on Germany permanently stationing troops beyond its borders
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey, guys, quick scheduling note on what's been up with the podcast.
So you got two podcasts yesterday.
So in case you're one of those who wakes up in the morning,
it does this on the morning commute,
just goes to the most recent show.
I take to Amanda Carpenter yesterday morning and then Olivia Nutsi
yesterday afternoon.
So don't miss out on all caps, Amanda, yesterday.
That podcast was excellent.
The Nutsi podcast, we had some mixed views on the Olivia Nutsi podcast.
You'll be surprised to hear that.
And I'm going to have some more extended thoughts on that over on the next level.
But reason why we did that bonus podcast style, understand folks' views on it.
But, you know, when you have somebody that can personally testify to the horrific way in which the current Secretary of Health and Human Services handles a crisis and how he's hiding his drug use from his wife and a bunch of other stuff, I think that's some relevant information for us in this moment.
So I'll have more on that over on the next level, as I mentioned.
So please go check that out, me, Sarah, and JV.
are taping that every week.
It's where we get to let our hair down a little bit more.
On this show, it's a little tight because I'm flying to D.C.
I'm going to be doing the next level in person in D.C.
And so I had a short window this morning, and we have a little guest shuffle.
And so I appreciated Jonathan Lemire jumping on with me in between his morning Joe segments.
That dude works.
All right.
Well, you were in bed.
Jonathan Lemire was on TV, leaving TV, doing this podcast, going back to TV.
He's not a coal miner or anything.
but you got to respect the grind.
And so we had a little bit of abbreviated pod with Lemire
and that I gave you some extended remarks
at the end of the show
on the Tennessee special election results last night.
So there is no limit of content.
Carpenter yesterday, nutsy yesterday.
Today we got Jonathan Lemire.
We got the next level coming out later.
Stick around for all of that.
Appreciate you guys.
Up next, Jonathan Lemer.
Hello and welcome to the Bullwark podcast.
I'm your host to Miller.
I'd like to welcome to the show,
a staff writer at the Atlantic co-host of Morning Joe on MS Now.
He's covered the White House since 2016 for a bunch of outlets, Politico AP.
It's Jonathan Lamar.
What's up, man?
Hey, man, good to see you.
Good to see you, too.
You had a great piece for Atlantic this week.
I wanted to grab you on called the bubble-wrapped president regarding Trump.
And I think it's interesting because it's kind of like sort of a traditional type of piece.
that you could have written about Joe Biden or George Bush or, like,
Trump is different in a lot of ways and unique in a lot of ways.
But like this has been an issue kind of as oldest time with presidents.
Like how do you, you know, when you're inside this White House, like maintain touch with
what's happening in the country, Trump avoided that a little bit through his like rallies
in other ways throughout his time.
But it feels like he is now kind of receding into a problem that we've seen from more
normal politicians in the past.
What do you make of that?
Yeah. I mean, he's far from the first president, as you say, to struggle with the bubble. Some of that is the nature of the White House. Some of that's the extraordinary security measures that come with the job. But Trump is facing an extreme version of it now. And a big part of it is there's a number of reasons. But the biggest one I'd argue is he stopped doing his rallies, which frankly are the signature political event of our last decade, the Trump rally, right? It started in 2015 all the way through his reelection bid.
a year ago. And not only would he travel the country, but he'd use those rallies as like
testing grounds. He'd give a line. He'd see what kind of response it got. The crowd liked it.
Well, he'd say it the next night. And it would, you know, a line would become as part of the
speech, which sometimes would become policy. If something that, you know, he said that went over
like a dud, well, he'd usually would drop that. But also before and after the events, he would
meet with people, local officials, state party chairs, even just some regular supporters,
occasionally, and though he didn't love traveling the country, it gave him a real window into
what his base cared about.
He stopped doing that, and people around him are afraid he's now flying blind.
Why did he stop?
You writing the article that he told his aides after the Grand Rapids rally at the end of the campaign
in 2024 that that would be his last?
You said there that he didn't enjoy really driving the country.
He did seem to enjoy the rallies.
Oh, he loved being on stage, no doubt.
And it is a surprise to some people around.
him that they've stopped. I mean, yeah, he closes every campaign by suit. He's very superstitious
with an event in Grand Rapids, Michigan. And after the one in 2024, which was in the early
hours of election day, that Tuesday morning, he said, that's it, I'm done. Now, he's actually
had a couple of small sort of rally-like events early this year. He did one to mark 100 days
in office. That was also in Michigan. But it was nothing compared to what you'd consider a full-fledged
Trump rally. It's a couple of things. I am told that
You know, look, I mean, he continued to do rallies after the assassination attempt in Butler County, Pennsylvania, but understandably got spooked by that.
Secret Service also has made it that much harder.
You know, their qualifications for securing a venue that much higher now.
But also, I think he was sort of just worn out.
And we know the president doesn't like to talk about being tired or his fact that he's approaching 80, but it is exhausting.
And he has instead traded those for nights at the White House.
He's traded that for dinners with billionaires or business leaders who want something for him.
And we looked at his schedule in 2017, the first year of his first term, a pretty robust travel schedule within the United States.
This year, the first year of his second term, yeah, he's traveling overseas a fair amount, but he's done next to no domestic travel.
In fact, in October and November, the only times he left the Washington area to travel in the United States.
Mar-a-Lago, let me guess.
Boom, you nailed it.
It's golf clubs.
his golf courses. Yep, his own clubs.
You write in the article, it's interesting. It's not just the fake news, MS now, that is noticing this.
I mean, Bannon is complaining about this. Others, they're like, why are you traveling overseas so much?
It does take a lot out of a president. We're going to get to the age stuff in a second.
But also, it's literally the antithesis of what is right there in the name of the slogan of America First, right?
And he seems, I guess, so obsessed with the peace prize and the deal-making process that he has ignored the domestic
travel in favor of, you know, going overseas.
Yeah, it's not just those of us at MS Now.
I'm coming to you, by the way, from the darkest possible corner of the new MSNL offices.
Apologies for the backdrop.
Looking nice, I think.
It's a little ominous.
Yeah, it's sort of death starish, frankly, this room.
Now, look, again, this is where he's a little bit like a typical president.
A lot of second-term presidents who, you know, inherently are a lame duck,
find that they can't do as much with a domestic agenda.
They often shift focus to foreign policy.
Hell, that's where we'll make my leg.
that's where I think I can do more unilaterally. I don't need Congress's approval on the world stage. So in this case, President Trump is acting like that, but he also, you just said it, he's desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize. By the day, the number of conflicts he's allegedly ended. His tally seems to go up. But some of his most faithful supporters are saying, wait a minute, like, your focus should be here at home. That's what you promised during the campaign last year. I don't want to see you in Saudi Arabia.
You know, sure, it's important to talk about peace in the Middle East,
but, like, you know, don't forget here at home.
And Marjorie Taylor Green, right before she fully broke with the president,
she was one of those voices who said, look, leave Air Force One parked on the tarmac.
You know, stay here in the United States.
You would think that that would be a red flashing warning sign for him
that if Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Green are complaining about something
and Marco Rubio's happy.
And it's just another thing about the second term that's kind of related to the bubble wrap,
which is more than the first time,
he does kind of care about the feedback of the rich CEOs,
the people that are funding the ballroom,
you know, Marco, right?
It's kind of this weird dichotomy
where like the people that were in there last time
that were establishment that were kind of putting the brakes on him,
you know, those folks are not there.
But there's like a new class of kind of establishment suckups
that he seems to be gravitating to more than the traditional MAGA allies.
What do you make of that?
Yeah, and people around Trump have long said, and I mean, I've covered him for a long time now,
say like the one thing that impresses him is wealth.
And he loves the idea that these rich, powerful people are coming to him to kiss the ring or to ask him for things.
Or to donate money to whatever cause he suggests, whether that's the presidential library that allegedly is going to be built someday or the ballroom that's now in place of the devastated White House East Wing.
But you also make a good point in the first term.
he was surrounded by some establishment Republican figures, folks you know well, who would occasionally
tell him no, who would pump the brakes on some of his ideas.
That's just gone this time around, by design.
It's just true belief.
So therefore, no one is telling him, hey, you're actually out of touch here.
No one's saying this is a bad idea.
And even his media diet has become more and more that way.
There was, you know, in the first term, yes, of course, there's Fox News.
there's still Fox News, but now there's also O-A-N and Newsmax.
Last time, he was on Twitter,
where at least he'd occasionally encounter, you know, an opposing viewpoint.
He was watching you on Morning Joe.
He was live bleeding that.
I guess he was tweeting back then.
He was still on Twitter, you know?
I'm told he still does that a little bit this time around, but less.
But it's more, he's existing truth social,
which is a site he owns.
It's completely synchofance.
It's all his acolytes.
We just saw him go on a, what was it?
He tweeted or truth to re-truthed over 100 posts.
the other night.
He posted once a minute all night long.
Do we know what the deal was with that?
Well, he likes to say he doesn't sleep very much.
I've long said that the best window into his soul is what he does on true social in the
middle of the night because that means he's not sleeping.
He's up and likely unhappy about something.
And in this case, look, we know what his poll numbers are.
I don't think it's a shock that this came after Gallup had him at the lowest mark of his
second term.
Melania should be cuddling him a little bit more, I would think, you know?
I'm going to
soothing him
comment on that,
yeah.
Yeah.
You don't have any thoughts?
You don't have any thoughts on that one?
Okay,
that's fine.
You know,
I'm going to keep throwing it out there.
Ever walk into a store and I have no idea what wine to get?
And, you know,
I don't even know what to say to the people sometimes.
It's like,
do I care about tannins?
I don't know.
So maybe just stop wasting time with all that and do what I do.
Go to our friends at Naked Wines.
This podcast is sponsored by Naked Wines.
Naked Wines is a wine club that directly connects you to the world's best independent winemakers.
So you can get world-class wine delivered straight to your door.
Use our code the bulwark for the code and password at Nakedwines.com and get $100 off your first order.
That's six bottles for just $39.99.
I had one last night.
I'm not usually doing that in the evenings, but it was a long day yesterday.
You know, so a friend over, one little glass can't hurt.
I'm still feeling fresh this morning.
And I can tell you, it's great.
the nice thing went naked wines you can ask him we get a bunch of different varadles try different
things see what you like you know for me i'm like the opposite of paul giamati on sideways okay
he ruined merlo in that movie he ruined below the whole market for maryl crashed because of the
movie sideways you'll know this if you're an elder millennial and uh and it was replaced by pino no
because you know he's a snobby wine guy talking about how great pino is that whole movie
i hate pino it's the worst of the wines it's a great movie sideways one kind of
bittered about it. And so I'm inverting it. I tell the Naked Wines people, send me whatever you
want. Just no Pino. Okay, no Pino for me. How do they do it? Naked brings you amazing wine straight
from the winery at up to 60% less than what you'd pay in the store by cutting out extra costs
like middleman markups, winemakers can pass those savings onto you without skimping on quality.
Naked wines have been around for over 15 years and backs over 90 independent winemakers around the
world. Now is the time to join the Nakedwines community. Head to Nakedwines.com slash the
Bullwork, click Enter Voucher and put in my code to the bulwark for both code and password for
100 bucks off your first order. That's six bottles for only $39.99 with shipping included.
That's $100 bucks off your first six bottles at Nakedwines.com slash the bulwark and use the code
and password to the bulwark for six bottles of wine for $39.99.
In addition to his diet, there's the bubble of the press pool itself.
Yes.
I wanted to talk to you about that in particular. I wasn't invited.
The bulwark didn't make the press pool the first time around.
were there, though, with AP and Politico.
And so, you know, he's doing a lot of press conferences still.
You got to just acknowledge that.
Like, he's still taking a lot of questions.
But, like, the makeup of the people questioning him has changed so dramatically from last time.
And, like, there are some handful of people mixed in.
Everyone's all to see, you'll see Caitlin Collins in there.
Vaughn was the Lighthouse yesterday.
You'll see some people.
But, like, a lot of, you know, MAGA blogger 420 also are asking him questions.
You know, this is a great point. And it's one of the things that he's done differently this time around is the White House has more or less hijacked the press pool over the objections of the White House Corresponds Association that kicked AP out early on for not saying Gulf of America. And since then, now the White House picks who's in the pool every day. So you're right. Trump still takes a lot of questions. But here's where it's changed in two ways. In the first term, he held a lot of like formal news conferences where everyone was in there.
and reporters from every outlet, even in his estimation, the lamestream media, could ask him questions.
He stopped doing formal news conferences this time.
He still takes a lot of questions, but only from the pool.
And since his staff is picking who's in the pool, largely he's facing friendly faces who are asking him less than tough questions.
There are exceptions.
There are days where whether it's on Air Force One.
Bloomberg was in there.
He's calling her piggy.
To be sure.
There are moments where he takes tough, he does take tough questions.
but there are fewer and farther between than last time around.
Some evidence of your thesis.
It's nice when you write a piece and then, you know,
it gets proven accurate to a degree the next day, you know?
Does that feel good as a journalist?
Trump has one of the cabinet meetings yesterday.
He said more of those this time it feels like the made-for-TV cabinet meetings.
Less time spent in Georgia, a lot of time having people tell them how great he is in the
cabinet meetings.
And the bubble element of this is just kind of a...
abundantly clear both in just obviously the oh you're so great sir you're so great like the
north korea stuff but also um he's dozing off he's seeming tired you can understand why he might
not have wanted to travel why it's easier just to go you know shuffle down to the to the cabinet room
have people tell you how great you are it seems like a night you know take a little cat nap i'm a
napper so that's fine but uh you know it seems like he dozed off several times it's usually
one little nap for me in a day but he's it looks like he got a couple of them
during that cabinet meeting.
Yeah, my own is I try, I usually inevitably have like a 15 minute, like early afternoon.
You're up on way too early.
Post line.
Yeah, I mean, I sleep in, look, the way too early days, the alarm would go off at 3.15.
Now, with just starting at 6th of morning, Joe, like, I get to sleep all the way into 4.30.
15 minutes for you.
So it's just, are you in the suit?
Honestly, Tim, it depends on the day.
I mean, this is going to, you know, some days it's just like leaning back in the chair.
Other days, it's more of a full-fledged.
I'm going to lay down for a few minutes and, you know, be in my workout gear, whatever
it might be. So we have two expert nappers here. So I think that we bring some expertise to kind of
assessing Trump's style yesterday. Where I don't know, Eugene, is in front of the press pool in the
cabinet. And that is where President Trump did yesterday. It's not the first time. There's been a few
of these in recent weeks. The Washington Post in particular has been on this beat, noting when he
was really chronically with video how long he appeared to have been asleep. But I think the timing
of this one is interesting because it comes just a week after the New York
Times did a big story about his schedule and how almost like a dovetailed piece with mine,
but they really focused on the hours of the day that he was working.
And they said, well, compared to the first term, he's starting later and his days are ending
earlier.
And the White House pushed back.
We know President Trump hates to ever acknowledge any bit of human frailty, including what
part of his body he received an MRI.
But in this case, they said, no, he's working all hours the day.
Look, look at how he's tireless.
He's got the stamina of a much younger man.
And then just days later, this happened in the White House where he was clearly dozing off,
you know, off and on during what was a marathon three-hour cabinet meeting.
He's pushing 80.
Yeah, he's pushing 80.
Like, objectively speaking, you have to, that has to explain part of the travel stuff, too.
I don't know.
Anybody that has anyone that's pushing 80 in their life can know that, like, it's a bitch.
You've got to change time zones.
You get tired.
I think that clearly they are either directed by him, himself, or, you know, in their management of him.
they're changing how to schedule. I think there's no doubt of that, that he is much more White House
centric in part because it is easier. Travel on anybody takes a toll. There were moments in his first
term where I'd be on a lot of his overseas trips. In the first year, we went to Asia for literally
two weeks, and we're all running on fumes at that point. Like, there's no question about how old
you are. Traveling is hard, even for a president. But it is striking just how little he has done here.
This isn't a quirk of the schedule because I reported this in the piece.
They talked about this summer putting them out there to support the one big, beautiful bill.
They talked about maybe doing some campaigning this fall.
None of that came to be.
He got distracted with foreign affairs.
He didn't want to be on the road and face questions about Jeffrey Epstein.
Because that story exploded just as he was going to be out there this summer.
And instead, he's opting for teller rallies, which of course have far, far, far less impact.
Although it's also kind of reminiscent of his OG strategy.
calling into the cable shows,
calling to the talk shows.
You've never fallen to sleep one time
during morning, Joe.
You know, Scarborough is on one of the soliloquies
where he's talking five minutes, six minutes.
You never just get a quick little doze in?
I mean, occasionally I'll look at my phone and do wordle.
No, I have not.
I haven't fallen asleep, at least not that I'm aware of.
I'm hanging on every word uttered by my co-host.
Delete me.
Makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online
at a time when surveillance and data breaches
are covered enough to make everyone vulnerable.
Data brokers make a profit off your data.
It's a commodity, and anyone in the web can buy your private details.
This can lead to identity theft, fishing attempts, and harassment.
But now you can protect your privacy with Delete Me.
New York Times wirecutter named Delete Me, their top pick for data removal services.
This is something that I care about.
I'm getting annoyed out there.
I just got to tell you, it's annoying.
People are finding my info.
I'm getting fished.
you're getting the annoying emails, phone calls, all of it,
and I've turned to delete me.
We're seeing progress.
We're seeing progress.
It's like a whackamil.
It's like a wackamil, so you've got to keep doing it.
They've got to keep monitoring because these fuckers are still trying to take your data no matter what.
But if you're looking to protect yourself, I turn to delete me.
Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete
Me.
Now to special discount for our listeners, get 20% off your DeleteMe plan.
When you go to join DeleteMe.com slash bulwark.
and use promo code bulwark at checkout.
The only way to get 20% off is to go to join delete me.com
slash bulwark and enter code bulwark at checkout.
That's join delete me.com slash bulwark code bulwark.
Not to belabor the point here, but another thing that you might look to on evidence that he is a little bit out of touch.
He starts talking about the affordability also yesterday during the academy.
You see this.
And he says that he thinks that voters are getting fake news from people like you about affordability.
Affordability is a hoax that was started by the Democrats.
This actually dovetails with another piece that I wrote recently
where suddenly Trump 2.0 is starting to feel a lot like Trump 1.0,
where for the first, you know, seven or eight months of this term,
I mean, you know, you can argue whether you agree with what he did was good,
but he was effective in sort of enacting his agenda,
facing no pushback from Congress, very little from the courts, etc.
In the last two months or so, he said a ton of roadblocks,
including with a lot of unforced errors.
And this moment yesterday is just the latest time
where he's really downplayed the affordability crisis.
And that reminds me of so many times in the first term
where the White House would be positioned.
Staff around him would be like, okay,
we're going to talk about this issue, X, Y, or Z, it's important.
And Trump would just be like,
ah, I don't want to, and just blow it up in the moment.
And that's what happened here, too.
The White House is actually prepared.
After the election results of a month ago,
recognized that affordability is a crisis.
Republicans are going to have a problem.
next year during the midterms on that issue.
They're trying to prepare Trump to talk about it, and he simply won't.
He'll use the word affordability, but it's always, you know, joined by the words hoax
or con job.
He simply won't acknowledge that Americans are feeling the pain right now.
They tried to do a cleanup on the Venezuelan boat strike yesterday at the cabinet meeting
as well, where Hankseth says, of course, as Secretary of War, I was watching the first strike,
and then I walked away.
Then an hour or two or later, this admiral makes the decision to shoot the people out of the sea.
I guess that's their kind of spin on the Washington Post story
and trying their defense of why they initially pushed back
and said it was a total lie in their enemy of the people.
But I don't know if you had anything else on that.
Pete Higgseth's under a lot of intense pressure right now.
And we saw the day after, I'll remind everyone listening here,
the day after that September 2nd strike,
he went on Fox and Friends and boasted that he was there,
saw the whole thing, oversaw the operation,
and it was under his authority, he got this done.
I paraphrasing only slightly.
And that's a very different tone that we've heard from the last couple of days
where he's clearly trying to point the finger at this admiral and say,
look, that was his call.
You know, I support him, but like I wasn't in the room.
I wasn't involved.
But look, the White House itself, Caroline Levitt, the press secretary, said this week,
like the order to kill them all, as it were, you know,
the sort of umbrella order was issued by the Secretary of Defense.
and then specifics were carried out by admirals and the like.
So Heggseth is still very much in the focus here.
And this week is going to be potentially really tricky for him.
That Admiral, Admiral Bradley is going to be testifying on the hill behind closed doors tomorrow.
Also this week, the Signalgate report, the IG report from the Pentagon, is being released to Congress this week.
And at least a redacted version will be made public.
So HegSeth is certainly that the temperature's up.
Yeah, and Laura Lumer, who is, you know, besides you, the best reporter on the beat of letting us know what's happening inside the White House is talking about how there's a coup for Hague Seth, the Secretary of Army potentially trying to angle for the slot.
All right, guys, I don't know if you're like me and you're ever waking up and you're just sweating.
Why am I sweating when I'm waking up so much?
I don't know.
Am I stressed?
Is it like, is my body just secreting the water that is built up over the course of the day?
Hard to know.
But I'm trying out some new sheets.
Thanks to our sponsor at Miracle Made,
and they're inspired by NASA technology
and use silver-infused temperature-regulating fabric
to help you sleep perfectly all night long.
Here's the goodness.
In addition to the fact that I haven't been sweating as much lately,
is it a miracle?
It might be the Miracle-made sheets.
I've noticed that.
They also have luxurious comfort without the luxury price.
They feel just as good, if not better,
than the sheets you'd find at a five-star hotel,
but without that price tag.
They're also good for your skin.
This matters.
You know, we like to moisturize it,
We like to have good pillow cases.
Men, we're moisturizing, and we're doing good pillow cases for our skin.
And with Miracle-made sheets, they don't have that hidden bacteria that you got in the regular sheets that are making you all splotchy on your face.
Something to think about.
Upgrade your sleep or give the gift of better rest.
Go to try miracle.com slash the bulwark.
To try miracle-made sheets today, you'll save over 40%.
And when you use promo code the bulwark, you'll get an extra 20% off plus a free three-piece towel set.
They make an amazing gift.
And with a 30-day money-back guarantee, there's no risk.
That's tri-miracle.com slash the bulwark.
Code the bulwark at checkout.
Thanks to Miracle Made for sponsoring this episode.
Just kind of briefly run through a couple of other things.
You wrote about the DMZ for Ukraine and what the plan is there.
Talk to us a little bit about what the White House is thinking about on that.
The talks there have truly have stalled yet again, it would appear.
There was seemingly some momentum about a week or 10 days back when I wrote that piece in part
because the White House may was making a new push to get a deal.
Now, what we then learned is that they were doing so with talking points largely provided
by Russia.
And Ukraine, of course, wanted nothing to do with it.
Now, Kiev has learned their lessons.
They don't want to publicly disagree with Trump anymore.
They saw how that happened when Trump blew up at Zelensky in the Oval Office.
So they're being much more diplomatic about it, but they've made it clear.
They're things in that deal.
They just certainly could not agree to.
The Secretary of State Rubio stepped in the process, you know, struck a
more supportive tone for Ukraine than perhaps Steve Whitkoff has done. But yesterday, Whitkoff and
Jared Kushner were in Moscow. They met with Putin. Both sides acknowledged, okay, you know, we agreed
to kept talking and maybe small progress made, no breakthrough, unless Trump is going to be willing
to step in decisively one way or the other, and your guess is as good as mine as to whose side
we would come in on, I think that that conflict is going to continue as is for a while, and we're
going to do this all again in a month or two.
Sixth meeting between our Outer Borough, Russia-Ukraine envoy, and Putin, zero trips to Ukraine for him.
Not one.
Did he get any presents yesterday? Putin has been pretty good at butter and up Wickhoff.
Did he get any paintings of himself or anything?
Or a medal.
No, he's done that before, but I'm not aware of what he had to declare customs coming back this time.
Another, one of your colleagues wrote this today, so to pop this, it's kind of related to what you see happening in Europe.
Some of you've been covering is in Germany.
You guys right at the Atlantic, for the first time since World War II, Germany is permanently
stationing troops beyond its borders. Not long ago, these plans would have set off international alarms,
but as the U.S. upends the global border created, Germany may have no other choice. This is something
while we're doing Groundhog Day on the Russia-Ukraine negotiations, Europe is moving. Like,
things are changing. And I just think this is an interesting kind of tangible data point on that.
No doubt. My colleague, Isaac Stanley Becker, wrote a great piece on this. And this shows you just how
the world has changed because of Donald Trump's foreign policy. And,
And what Europe, the lesson Europe has learned over this last year in particular is they can't count the United States anymore.
And, you know, and it's not just because Trump's in office now.
It's that, you know, we had four years of President Trump.
Then President Biden is elected basically on, you know, he come out of the gate saying, America's back.
You can count on us again.
Well, that turned out not to be the case because Donald Trump was then put back in office.
You know, Europe has realized they can't just rely on us to be their security guarantor or their financial.
backing, like these nations are going to have to step up their own spending, and that includes
Germany, which, you know, even a decade or two ago would have been unfathable.
Well, I think, anything on this Honduras pardon you got? And it is pretty, it's so crazy.
President Juan Hernandez of Honduras was officially pardoned. We said this was coming early in the
week, but that's now happened. He was at the center of what authorities had characterized as one
of the largest and most violent drug trafficking conspiracies in the world. This is kind of a
DGAF a moment, I guess, for these guys.
Like in the middle of bombing Venezuela over imaginary fentanyl, they're doing this part in.
It's pretty crazy.
What are you hearing on that?
I mean, you'd be hard for us to find a Republican to defend this one.
That it comes as, first of all, just how discordant it is, that we're ramping up military
operations against these boats off the coast of Venezuela.
And Trump threatened, we might do land strikes in Venezuela in the coming days.
In the press conference yesterday, I should have mentioned that, yeah.
Yeah, and it's nominally about drug trafficking.
I mean, I think there's more to it than that.
At the same time, he puts out, releases this guy, gives a pardon to the president of Honduras,
who prosecutors say ran an international drug cartel and who bragged about stuffing drugs up the nose of gringoes.
Again, I paraphrasing only slightly.
That's what he said.
I think there's strange connections here with Roger Stone took his case.
You know, Trump is sympathetic to anyone who feels like he's been victim of a political prosecution.
There's no evidence that that's what this was, but that's what Trump has convinced himself.
Also, the investigation into this president started during Trump's first term.
There's a crypto angle here as well where Honduras under this president was a very offered safe space for some of these crypto tech leaders.
Creating his crypto city for, you know, Peter Thiel, it was like you can buy and sell twink blood with cryptocurrency there.
You know, there's just a lot of opportunities, potentially.
There's a lot of opportunities to make money, and that's probably at the end of the day what this was about.
But this is a head-spinning part in, and one, you know, that I'm waiting to hear from, like, police unions and other law enforcement officials say, hey, this guy flooded our streets with drugs.
How is this making us any safer?
Yeah, I should correct President Hernandez, though.
We live in a pluralistic multicultural society, okay?
The drugs are going up the nose of people, not just cringos.
Okay, not just cringos.
Jonathan Lemire, man, thanks for hopping on this morning.
And everybody else to stick around.
I'm going to talk about the Tennessee 7 race.
Thank you.
Happy to come back anytime.
See, buddy.
Hey, everybody. I just wanted to nerd out with you a little bit on that Tennessee 7th special election last night.
The Republican there, Matt Van Epps, gets the win with 54% of the vote, basically, Afton, been 45%. So it's a nine-point victory for Van Epps.
But this is in a district that the margin in 2024 was 21 in the House, 22 at the presidential level.
So it's a 12 to 13-point gain for the Democrats.
I think that there's a lot of potential implications about that, looking ahead to the midterners.
First, I just want to talk about Nashville a little bit because I was interviewing former Vice President Harris there a couple weeks ago.
She had just done a campaign stop for Bain.
There's a little bit of controversy there in Nashville about whether, you know, the vice president was wanted there.
They didn't show up together, so there were no pictures.
This question of like, are we trying to focus more on turnout versus persuasion?
And then I thought it was interesting that after that whole dialogue, I believe it was the final day or final two days, she has a Zoom rally with AOC and with Al Gore.
Watched a little bit of that.
There were some commenters calling for Gore to run in 2028.
So you better watch out there.
Al Gore, I think, younger than Joe Biden or Donald Trump.
So you never know if we're going to continue the gerontocracy.
But, you know, in one of these special elections, I think at this point, you're like trying to pull any lever you can get, to try to get people to.
to realize that this is happening.
And you saw in Tennessee, like a little bit higher turnout than you have seen in other special elections.
It was, you know, I think about over 50% of the general election turnout showed up in a special
when you're usually seeing something more in the 30s and 40s.
And so on the one hand, I think that's a good sign for Democrats and kind of in a higher turnout special.
they still gain 12 to 13 points.
On the other hand, you see how you get kind of stuck
in these gerrymandered districts where the higher the turnout is
in a red district, the more that marginal voters
can end up being a Trump person.
But I think we learned a little bit here.
Afton Bain was, I think it's fair to see just kind of more left
on the left side of the party.
And the campaign itself was pretty focused on affordability
and so-called kitchen table issues in her advertising.
I think, you know, and the primary issue is the more progressive candidate.
I think she's doing an interview over at breaking points this morning because I tell
you anything for folks who are familiar with those guys or kind of more of the lefty type
horseshoe part of the media ecosystem.
So I think that's her spot.
And so you see like some arguments between the moderates and the progressives online
about how maybe a moderate could have done better here.
And I think that's probably true.
Like I don't think that a moderate would have won nine more points here.
Like, you know, you can sort of see this argument or the progressives like, we outperformed
by 12. The moderate's like, well, you need it outperform by 20. And so, you know, that's kind of a
never-ending fight that's always going to happen. I don't know that we learned a ton about the internal
civil war within the Democratic Party about the mods versus progressives. But I think we did learn a little
bit about kind of where Democrats should be thinking about and focusing about their gains. If you look
at the map of Nashville, Nashville is one of the most offensive gerrymanders in the country to make,
because Nashville doesn't have a Democratic rep, which is crazy. I mean, the Davidson County
which is the main county where Nashville sits,
they're in one by 56 points in the portion of the district that goes into Nashville.
Obviously, Nashville deserves a representative.
Instead, Tennessee is gerrymandered at like pizza style,
you know, the skinny part of the pizza slice going into Nashville,
and it gets out and gets wider and goes out into rural Nashville,
and then, you know, they're like three or four different pizza slices
that, like, meet in the middle of Nashville.
And so this, you know, this was just kind of one, one,
slice of that of that district and so you know this is why i've kind of been on the side of like
the democrats just need to go fully whole hog on the gerrymandering war we can talk in 2029 if we
you know if we're doing some reconstruction in this country we're doing some political reforms
i'd sure be for some federal gerrymandering reform but in the meantime you know you got to play
hardball if they're going to you know carve up tennessee to the point that nashville doesn't
have a fucking congressional district it's it's a total outrage but uh when you look at the
results last night. You have, like, the inner core of Nashville, you know, people that are like
really, really live in downtown. Younger people, it's going to be more diverse demographics. Big gains
from the Democrats last night. Pretty good. But, like, not as big as you saw in the inner
suburban core. Where you just see this massive, like the Democrats now are, I used to joke that
the Republicans get Saddam Hussein, like numbers in red parts of the country. The Democrats are getting
close to getting Saddam Hussein like numbers and like the suburbs that are the closest
to any big city in the country.
And the Democrats do that last night and run up the score.
In that next ring, though, in Williamson County, Williamson is a little bit of an outlier
nationally where if you're in New Orleans here, Williamson County is metery.
If you're in D.C., it's Fairfax.
It's the big upper middle class suburb county next to the city.
and Nashville has like attracted magas
there's something about I don't know if it's country music
or Candace Owens and Theo Vaughn
or you know just kind of the reputation
that it is a place where if you're a conservative
and you live in a blue part of the country
that's a place that you're going to be welcome
if you want to move and so Williamson County
is the highest educated county
in the whole country that Trump won I believe
and Van Abs wins it handling by 20 points
after it only gained seven points there.
So you look at that and you think, well, that's really,
that's going to be where the Democrats are going to have to, you know,
focus on their overperformance there.
And I think that Williamson County is maybe a place where the moderate argument
that having maybe a more culturally right candidate might have helped a little bit.
But then you look at the city and you see there's still just a little softness
from the Democrats among young voters and among voters of color,
black voters, in particular younger black men, really,
particular, you see maybe the stuff is cutting both ways. It's like a little bit of a challenge
where you're trying to continue to run up the margins a little bit more with some of the
cultural conservative voters out in the exurbs while also juicing what had been a traditional
democratic base. Finding a candidate that can do both is a little challenging. But all in all,
if you gain 12 points, all of a sudden you start looking at the map for Democrats. As I keep
saying, you go back to 2018, Democrats win a House seat in Oklahoma.
city in Charleston, places that they'd never won seats before. And I think that if you're
looking at a place like this in Nashville and you're seeing these gains, you see there's a shift
from 24 to 25 blue everywhere, huge shift in Nashville, 20 points to the Democratic side.
But then even in the rural, you're seeing moves of Dixon County, 11 points, Humphreys County, 12 points,
Perry County, 15 points. You're seeing significant moves.
to the Democrats, and that, I think, opens up seats.
You know, if you're a Republican and you won in the midterm last time by 10, 11, 12, 13 points,
like you might have thought yourself safe.
I don't know that you should think yourself safe anymore.
So for folks who are looking for candidates and campaigns of support, if you're wanting
to support Democratic candidates where you think you can actually make a difference,
I get this question a lot from people.
I would just go ahead and pull up the cookpolitical.com ratings.
I had Dave Wasserman on over on Boer takes a few weeks ago,
and him and Amy Walter, they're extremely good.
And they're nonpartisan, but they have these rankings.
And if you look at their rankings and you go to the category,
it says lean Republican and then likely Republican.
Likely Republican is kind of these stretch seats.
Like these are seats that are probably going to go to the Republicans,
but in a big wave, your Democrats could win.
Look at Alaska at large, Begages.
You know, Mary Peltola had that seat for a while.
You look at that.
that's certainly winnable you look here at uh at colorado's third district which the district
bobert moved out of um that includes a lot of the western slope potentially that's winnable
montana zinkey you kind of go to the south north carolina edwards um you look at so i would look at
kind of those likely republican seats and you know finding kind of the potential democratic candidates
so there you go that's a little bit of analysis it's it's unfortunate for the democrats because
I think right now everything is very tenuous in the House with as far as potential retirements.
I think another result is you're going to see more Republican retirements, but you can't retire
and quit like Marjorie Taylor Green is doing because it's putting their current House majority
in jeopardy.
So, you know, I think that there are some implications you're going to see there.
But you look at this, the dark guy's like, man, if the economy stays in the trajectory,
it's on the political environment doesn't change for Trump.
If he stays bubble wrapped, it could be ugly next year.
and you start to see places like, well, let's just throw this out there.
Start to see places like these Senate races, Texas, Ohio.
I mean, these are states statewide that Trump was not, you know,
that was winning by about the shifts that we saw in that special election last night.
So it's not an Apple's Apples comparison,
but you can at least see that in theory those seem to be potentially in play
and it looks at least more plausible that the Democrats could compete
in a place like Texas and Ohio.
If these trends continue, then it would have seemed a couple weeks ago.
So that is some good news for the Democrats directionally.
Everybody, appreciate that.
I'm running to D.C.
We're going to have much more on this over on the next level feed.
So go ahead and check that out.
We're taping that this afternoon.
We'll be up.
I don't know.
Will that be up later tonight or tomorrow morning?
Just refresh.
Just refresh.
Just kind of refresh.
It'll come up soon.
And we'll be back tomorrow for a Thursday addiction of the podcast.
And we'll see you all then.
Peace.
Keep me intact
Smother me with 11 hands
When I stray from the path
If I get to those golden gates
And he says me a way now
You can say I told you so and I'll burn forever
Like the sun that will rise
Even after I die
Cover me in papal rat
But I'm peeking through cracks
In the old Tiffany glass
And I'm trapped behind
Mother, please
Can't you see that you're
Killing me, killing me
If I get to those loading games
And he says me well
You can say I told you throw it out
But forever more
Like the sun never rise
Even after I die
The secrets that I keep
Oh to keep you from sleep
The Bullwark podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.
