The Bulwark Podcast - S2 Ep1008: Jon Lovett: A Worst Case Scenario Comes Into View
Episode Date: March 27, 2025Trump so far is not delivering on his promised spike in deportations, but he is creating a permission structure where we lock up people without due process in a foreign gulag—and where masked, plain...clothes officers in unmarked cars can grab an international student off the street because of her speech. Meanwhile, a Rolex-wearing Kristi Noem is shooting videos in front of people we've turned into hostages, the mainstream media is struggling to respond to the moment, we can't count on judges siding with the Constitution, Republicans refuse to be honest, and far too much of the public is not paying attention. Jon Lovett joins Tim Miller. show notes FDR's "Rendevous with Destiny" speech
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello and welcome to the Bulldog Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller, delighted to have
back former speechwriter for Hillary Clinton and Barry Obama, co-founder of Crooked Media,
host of Love It or Leave It, as well as the YouTube show, Taking the World by Storm called
Speech Center. He does it with me. Go check it out if you haven't. It's John Lovett.
How you doing, man?
Hi Tim. It's good to see you. Our show, Speech Center, by the way.
Yeah.
It's the hit of the channel. It's actually kind of hurting my feelings.
It's the hit of the Lovett or Leave It channel?
Yeah, that's right.
I like praise, just as a general matter, but this type of positive feedback is particularly
meaningful to me because the other guests you have on the channel are like way more famous than me and like
More talented like you have all these like a list or celebrities
You know kind of people famous on gay tic-tac you have on and you make jokes together and and and yet the people still want
Me that's nice. They want you they want they want the the gay Republican versus
gay Democrat anti-Trump,
I don't know what you'd call it, the frisson.
You know, they want that.
They want the kind of faux tension that we offer.
Okay, well, that's great. I love it.
Everyone should check it out if they have it.
Last time you were here on our side of the inner tubes,
on the Bullock side, that was one week after the election.
You cried famously as covered by Fox News primetime.
They didn't discover it.
You put it in the fucking thumbnail.
So, uh, they, they, they were, they were like Columbus discovering America.
You know, people, it was set up for them.
It was ready.
So, you know, there's only a couple of times I played on Fox.
First of all, I'm pro crying.
So I didn't think I was insulting you.
I've yet to cry myself since the election.
I'm assuming that that means like I'm going to completely break down at
bourbon pub and parade at some point this year.
It hasn't happened yet, but I wanted to like take the lens back today instead
of getting like specifically into the fucking signal gate news and the micro.
Sure.
And just see like what you're feeling and seeing after 67 days of this shit. What's
most acute to you? Are there any surprises, any changes since you cried?
So first of all, that was sort of my one and done. I regret that it happened with you,
but it sort of hit me in that moment and haven't felt that come since, it is strange, right?
Because we had that conversation before we saw what is now unfolding, which is
basically a worst case scenario.
Like I was talking about this with John and Tommy yesterday, because obviously
there are many ways in which what we could be
seeing unfolding there are many ways it could be worse there are many ways it
could be more destructive they could be more vile more feckless about basic
rights and due process but it's hard to imagine a version of the Trump
administration unfolding in which they are doing more and bad things without getting
the blowback that might hurt them.
They are on this sort of razor's edge.
They're pushing the bounds, obviously, of due process and deporting people without evidence,
including people that have nothing to do with the roundups they're claiming that they do. They are playing footsie with the Constitution and just sort of claiming they're following
orders, not following orders. They're ignoring Congress completely on spending. They're putting
on tariffs. They're taking tariffs off. It's all very destructive, but it is like in a
way it's, I hate to say that it feels designed I hate it's really much more of a kind of gut instinct on Trump and a bunch of lackeys
at random kind of operating on what they think he wants but the end result is
they are marching us down this path towards authoritarianism in a way that
is not eliciting as big a response as you would hope right I like that's how I
would feel about it I'm just angry all the time, I think, more than I am scared.
And maybe that's because I can't accept what's happening
or can't really feel where it's going.
And then yet the strangest part about all of it is,
then you go out to dinner with some friends, right?
And then you have a great night
and then you buy new placemats for the table and you,
it's as bad as it could be
plan wedding.
Things are as bad as they could be without it feeling insane that normal life is still
happening.
And normal life is still happening.
And I don't think it should stop.
But I don't think it's wrong.
But it is, there is a dissonance there.
There is something confusing there because we have spent years saying this is how bad
it could get and it is getting that bad.
And yet, like, you know, the life carries on around it.
Yeah.
And yet the reaction is kind of less
than you would have expected.
Frankly, I guess, on the surprises standpoint
from me from now versus when we last spoke,
is the surprises is more about the mundane reaction
than about the actions.
Because I really do think it's about as bad as it could have been for now.
I mean, like, I think it's going to get worse.
And I think if you asked me to predict what 2027 would look like, it's not as
bad as I would have predicted when we talked, but I mean, to think that in two
months and a week, they would have already created this type of economic instability.
That's pretty shocking.
Already had a scandal as stupid as Signal Gazi.
That would already be like putting people in a foreign gulag that didn't, without due
process.
I mean, the Elon stuff, I went back and actually listened to our whole pod to level set myself.
And you mentioned, I guess it's kind of funny actually in retrospect, you were mad about
the fact that Elon was on the call, a call with Zelensky.
Yeah.
And I don't even really remember that happening now at this point. That was only four, three
months ago. But we didn't talk at all about like the Elon dismantling of the government, right?
This total destruction of any sort of research for medical research, the willy-nilly firing
of people, we really didn't project that.
So in some ways it is worse, and yet that is kind of the dissonance, right?
That is sort of why I'm yelling at my phone sometimes and doing selfie videos where you can see
my anger veins popping because it's like,
it does feel like the reaction
is not matching the action, I guess.
Yeah, well, there's the parts that I actually do think
feel like what you would have expected.
Honestly, them texting about imminent bombings over Signal with Jeffrey Goldberg in the chat
does feel very 2017 to me.
Yeah.
Yes.
And-
You can imagine Reince actually being the one
to have invited Jeffrey Goldberg.
Absolutely.
Like a total queen switch there.
And then, you know, Donald Trump threatening tariffs,
turning them on, turning them off,
causing the markets to be roiled,
but not so much as to create like a true crisis like that does feel like what we could have expected
Doge going this quickly. I think was it caught everybody by surprise their willingness to just claim an authority
They do not have over the budget and just start eliminating agencies that to me is was shocking
We obviously knew that was the plan.
It wasn't really fully expressed,
but presumably Congress was going to be involved.
The deportations, the deportations,
the idea that we are sending people to a Salvadoran prison
without due process, that seems like a joke.
That was the kind of thing that would
seem like the kind of thing people would make as a kind of dark joke about Trump 2.0 a
year ago, right? That was the kind of thing people would say, oh Trump's
threatening that but I'll never do it. That's the kind of thing Trump just says.
And then not only are they doing it, they're doing it without anyone ever
coming before a judge and they're claiming these
broad authorities over non-citizens without giving those non-citizens an opportunity to
prove who they are or who they're not.
And obviously that is a disgusting, vile, immoral, dangerous act, even if it only ensnares
non-citizens who have rights in this country.
The Constitution, the 14th Amendment due process, these things don't apply to citizens,
they apply to people, if you read the documents, it's for people.
But that's both because we understand that human beings have basic rights,
but also if non-citizens never get a chance to say to a judge,
Hi, here's who I am, here's why this is wrong.
What about a citizen who has a tattoo?
What about a citizen who came a tattoo? What about a citizen who, uh, came from Venezuela or for whatever
country they target next?
We also aren't a hundred percent sure that there are no citizens.
Right.
Of course.
Uh, how could we be?
How could we be?
They won't tell us who these people are.
Even the most recent reporting says around 261 people around around.
You don't know the number.
You don't know the exact you don't know the exact
number of people you've sent to a fucking Gulag in Central America that
you have Kristi Noem posing in front of I mean those things are moving faster
right like this is a line that a lot like I regret to use it we're not using
it only because Elon Musk I think also thinks it's a great line to use but like
you know the future right now is not evenly distributed
Parts of what we are seeing are what we would have expected parts of it are actually moving slower and then parts of it are
racing ahead There isn't been some great rise in deportations, right?
They are not implementing their broader policy very quickly that they claim they were going to implement right which is removing
Undocumented people to remove whatever their their economic claims about what that would do.
They are targeting people and they're doing it in such a way that only makes sense if
what they are trying to do is build a permission structure for a host of deportations and efforts
to lock people up without due process, not just non-citizens, but citizens too.
I have some very detailed thoughts about the El Salvador thing I want to get
to but I want to play a clip of you because this is actually very quiet.
No, no, no, it's good.
This is a compliment.
We're going to this is a mutual compliment society today.
It's us praising each other.
This was the you when when we talked after the election and I think that it is prescient
about kind of the problems that you're talking about right now.
Let's listen. My main fear right now is
that in facing a million different versions,
a million different threats
from a million different directions,
we will win some battles, lose some battles,
but by the end of this four years,
we won't really recognize the country.
To me, I think that is what we're getting at, right?
Any of these individual things we can obsess kind of the particulars of them, but like you're seeing
this come into reality like very fast. Like everybody hates the fucking word normalization.
I hate it. But like you can just see just everybody becoming accustomed to all of this
very fast. I think that's the thing that's like making me the most crazy about this.
Like where there is not, you know, like they've backed off some of their things,
right?
Like, you know, they touched the stove on the, on the nuclear guys, they fired them
and brought them back and well, everybody will talk about, you know, what's
happening on the signal chain for a couple of days and then who knows what
happens next, but like, meanwhile, that, meanwhile, that's what you're talking about,
that the country will just be unalterably changed
because so many of the underlying things
that held it together will have changed.
Yeah, a couple years ago, it was early 2017, 2018,
maybe 2019, I don't know, but we were at a live event
and this woman asked a question
and it stuck with me and she said,
are we really gonna have to hang Donald Trump's portrait
with all the other portraits of the president?
And I understood what she was saying.
She's like, can we just get past this
and pretend it never happened, right?
Can we just-
Now we gotta hang it twice.
Yeah, right, now we gotta hang it twice.
And I remember saying, no, actually,
we're not gonna get to do that.
Like, this is happening. It does reveal something important about the country.
And we can't pretend that it was some anomaly.
Like, yes, this is changing the country, but I think what I'm realizing, too,
is it's revealing something about the country.
And not in the way we're like, oh, wow, I didn't know this many Americans
would love what Donald Trump is doing. Of course, of course. But realizing that we have made a lot of assumptions about democracy to
process the rule of law that we've treated as if they were like self
reinforcing, right? That oh like kids get a good, they get a dose of democracy, of
education when they're growing up and they learn about the Constitution and
the founding fathers and then we just assume people are
Kind of immunized against fascism because they love America and they love American principles
but then we watch this unfold and then you see Mike Johnson someone who I am sure thinks that he is a
Patriotic American who loves our founding principles and then he says well if these judges keep it up
We're gonna have to think about defunding parts of the courts that don't do what Donald Trump says.
Or, you know, the national security advisor goes
on Fox news and says, actually, I think Jeffrey Goldberg
snuck into our signal channel.
And we're going to investigate him for that.
And-
Espionage.
And so there's like two big pieces of it.
First, there's, I mean, actually, let me say there's three.
First, there is just the fact that these Republicans
are willing to go along with this
or are starting to fully embrace it, right?
It's like they weren't in the mood for sex when it started,
but by the end they're having a blast.
You know what I mean?
It's like that seems to be like kind of their vibe.
They didn't think he was their type, you know?
Until he got in the middle of the act. And all of a sudden they're like, I love mushroom. They didn't think he was their type. Right.
Until he got in the middle of the act and all of a sudden they're like,
I love mushroom dick actually.
That's right. That's great.
That's perfect. That's the image we want to create right now.
Then there's the capitulation of institutions,
the Colombias and the law firms.
What's interesting about what Trump is doing there is yes,
he's finding the issues where
there's divisions inside of these institutions, right? Like there are the, you know, the lawyers that represent the big,
like the ExxonMobiles, and then there are the litigators taking on the pro bono clients or the
kind of political clients that then these lawyers that just want the money are like, what the fuck
are you doing? Like stop jeopardizing my bag. And then at Columbia, I'm sure there are tons of alumni who are sick of seeing the protest,
hate the fact that Columbia has been the center of this controversy.
But even in a deeper way, these are institutions that have not had to defend their basic values
that they claim to hold, right?
Columbia claims to be this institution of higher learning, of kind of small L liberal
values, freedom of expression,
exploration, curiosity, like core kind of values about what an educational institution
is meant to do.
But they violate them all the time.
But like these institutions have, are illiberal in many ways that they don't really grapple
with or think about.
And, and all of a sudden they're called, they're called upon to live up to their values and
they don't know how.
They just don't fucking know how.
And then you have the broader public who are either, you know, some are fully fucking engaged.
That's on the right and that's on the left.
There are people listening to this.
They're fully engaged.
They're fully bought in.
But there are millions of people that are just not paying attention and don't really
understand why they should.
And we've done a terrible job of building credibility with those people.
And they're just watching this unfold,
and the big challenge is figuring out how to wake them up.
But we've spent years waiting for them to wake up on their own,
and it's just not fucking happening.
Yeah, and I mean, this is one of his advantages
of just beating people down and wearing people down.
You know, there's this critique of the media and the left,
that's like, oh, if you're, you know, the boy who cries wolf, whatever,
if your hair is always on fire fire if you're always at 11, you know, you can't
You can't rouse people when there's a real alarm
Like the problem is like we have been at 11 for like a while now and like that's not our fault for observing it
I don't know what the solution is to getting people to understand that it's 13 now or whatever
yeah, I don't know either. And part of the problem is that there's so many places
where this required decades of like softening
of the defense systems.
One of which is obviously the right wing media
that has slowly shifted and then quickly shifted
from accusing the mainstream media of being liberal to
accusing it of being fake, right? That was a transition that was happening and then Donald
Trump really accelerated it, especially around January 6th. But then there's how the mainstream
media has reacted for decades. And one of the ways they fought against that is by either explicitly or implicitly believing that legitimacy comes from the right.
That on a Sunday show for years, and this is like years and years ago, like when I was a kid,
you would turn on the Sunday shows and when they did a round table of journalists,
it would be mainstream journalists, mainstream journalists, mainstream journalists, conservative.
Right.
There would never be somebody from the far left, but you'd have somebody as right.
It used to be Crystal. It used to be Crystal. It used to be Crystal.
It used to be Crystal.
My boy.
And by the way, Democrats do this too.
Like when, when we're trying to prove that we're strong on national defense, we
say, well, even Republicans like Colin Powell, right.
Or even Republicans like John McCain, right.
Like economist Mark Zandi.
Sure.
And, and you end up with Democrats claiming and mainstream media claiming
that legitimacy comes from being seen as legitimate from the left and from the right.
And now you have Republicans that even when they agree, even when they want that honesty, the story remains murky. That's true about
the debt ceiling. That's true about tariffs. That's true about
a bunch of different policy questions. And we talk about the
value of shame and how much shame played a role in our
politics. And when realize when they people realized if they
abandoned it, there was nothing to stop them from doing
whatever they wanted. That's obviously a big part of it.
There's a word I come back to over and over again, just in my There was nothing to stop them from doing whatever they wanted. That's obviously a big part of it.
There's a word I come back to over and over again, just in my mind, which is forbearance.
I didn't understand how important forbearance was in our politics.
That basically, if a judge ruled against you, even if you were pissed, you didn't go to
the cameras and say, you were going to defund that guy.
There was an understanding that in our system, you're going to win some, you're going to lose some,
and you can bear it.
You can take it.
You don't have to rant and rave about your enemies.
You don't have to declare war on anybody.
You don't have to look around the corner.
If you lose a budget fight and you
don't get to end the Department of Education,
you don't get to do it administratively, you wait.
You wait.
You show patience and restraint.
And that a lot of what we build in this country
was based on a collective understanding
that people would be patient,
that they would show restraint,
that they would have forbearance.
And these people have abandoned that.
And that's why Kristi Noem is standing
in front of a group of prisoners shooting a video.
That's why Pete Hegseth can go to the cameras
and claim it's all a hoax.
They have no sense of yes, they're shameless,
but they have no restraint.
There's one other element to this I wanna add,
which is, you're right, some of this is that we came
to believe that all these things that like made America
unique or somewhat unique, they started, maybe,
there are a lot of Western countries and some others
that started to adopt a lot of these same principles,
but that they were upheld by some kind of, you know,
the document of the Constitution or these people that practice forbearance or the rule of law or
the robed people or whatever. Like that there were people out there that protected this system.
So that led us to a place where when there were other examples of these types of corruption,
where people did not show
forbearance, where people acted inappropriately when they acted unconstitutionally, that
they would be restrained in some way or they would be held to account, right?
That Nixon eventually has to resign.
That what we did at Abu Ghraib, like there would be investigations into it that would
be bipartisan investigations, right?
That if the Bush administration decided to follow the John Yoo interpretation of the constitution,
that there would be people, you know,
either within the administration or within the courts,
within the national security courts that would check it,
right?
That there would be some other thing within the system.
And like to me, like over the first 67 days,
like in addition to having these guys
totally getting rid of shame and forbearance,
that's the other thing that is broken is that I don't,
I don't have any faith that
there will actually be any check or any accountability on anything they do.
And that they could do Abu Ghraib.
They are doing Abu Ghraib again in San Salvador and there's no, there's no option.
I interviewed Mark Warner yesterday for YouTube and I was like, what are
you guys doing about this?
And the answer is basically nothing.
I can, maybe we hope that the courts will intervene, but it's like the courts have no jurisdiction
here and TBD on whether the robed people actually side on the side of the Constitution.
Well, you had people like John McCain who had been tortured.
And people who had a value set and a mission that was not connected to their Republican
politics.
They were Republicans, they were Republicans,
but they were also Virginians and Arizonans and veterans.
And whatever, Irish, they had a core set of values
and principles that had led them into politics
in a different age.
They also, by the way, consumed a bunch of, as individuals, they
consumed the mainstream media.
I mean, we've talked about this before.
It was always a bit of theater, right?
Like Republicans would bash the mainstream press, but they would read it and care
about it.
And by the way, it was left.
It was, it was biased towards the left.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And the mainstream press to this day, it treats Republicans like
antagonists and, and Democrats like protagonists.
Democrats are inherently the heroes and Republicans are inherently there kind of
trying to stop their foil. Yeah, sometimes villains but mostly just foil.
Fine, all that was true. But they read it, they consumed it. There was a
basic understanding of reality. And what happened is the right-wing fringe
through the media slowly started eating more and more of your party Tim and
Its whole ethos is we are a rebellion within the Republican Party and within politics
Go look at a newt gingrich's speech to the college Republicans in
1978 it's about being outsiders inside of a broken system. They are pilgrims in an unholy land.
And everything about it is we are not in charge.
So we can be, go a little further.
We can make crazy claims.
We can say we're going to do things that if anyone actually did them
would be country destroying and now they are in charge.
And it's all the way down actually in charge.
It would be better if it was in charge,
but they're not just in charge, they're in total control.
Yeah.
There's no mid-level DOJ person that's like,
I care more about my, of the political appointees.
That was part of the project 2025.
They have now the deputy fucking FBI director
is a meathead mega talk show host.
Like the attorney general is in a mini skirt today,
like at the arrest of somebody for a PR, you know,
like it's these people all the way down.
And these are people that their whole sense of the world
of themselves, of their politics,
it was all about being people who didn't have power,
that were kind of throwing spitballs at the system.
They were teenagers, they were teenagers with a curfew who were like like, I want to stay out late, and mom and dad won't
let me. And it's because they hate freedom. And it's because they don't understand what
it's like to be me. And they're terrible. And they're stupid. And they there's no reason
nothing makes sense. There's all crazy. And then all of a sudden, their parents go away.
And they stay out too late. they destroy the car and they ruin the
house and they come to realize in the movie version, oh, maybe some of these rules, maybe
mom and dad weren't so stupid after all.
Maybe all my yelling and screaming wasn't actually totally fair.
But these people are never going to realize that.
Mom and dad aren't coming home.
The house is burned to the ground.
It's a sad version of that movie.
Yeah, there are no, but there are grownups to beat the metaphor to death.
I guess that's my point.
They said, they said their parents tell Salvador.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's the point.
Right.
Even in the Nixon era, there was Larry Hogan's dad.
And as you said, in the Bush era, there was McCain.
Like, like there were still like, you know, even when bad actors took over or
people that, that had bad intention for a particular, you know, agenda item.
There were others around that were responsible.
And I think going back to your original point, it's like, that's the thing that feels like
it is, that is lost is like, I think when we were living through all that, we felt like,
well, that's just how it is.
Like, there are always going to be some responsible people around and there's always going to
be the rule of law and there's always going to be, right? And so there might be bad actors, but it's
always, it is always resolvable, right? Like we are always going to be able to, as a country,
overcome it because, you know, these other strong institutional powers and people's individual
forbearance will come to the fore eventually after some damage is done. And like, it feels
like that is all rotted now. All of these people, everyone, every one of them, right?
Like, why can RFK Jr. become the head of HHS
while being anti-vax?
Because we live in a world where vaccines work so thoroughly
that people don't fear enough what it would look like
to live in a world without them, right?
Why can we put someone like Pam Bondi
at the Department of Justice?
Because people take as a baseline, as table stakes,
that they don't live in a world
where political prosecutions are happening left and right.
Where the government can throw you in a jail
because of your tattoo.
Like that's not an acute risk to them.
Right, like Lutnick, Lutnick can say,
oh, buy Tesla stock, right?
Because he takes for granted that America is a society
where there's been tons of corruption.
There are tons of ways where big businesses buy influence.
There's lobbying, there's a whole bunch of problems.
But for the most part, we know that if there's somewhere
where you gotta give somebody a million dollars
to get a permit for a building,
or you need to know the right people
in order to do a startup,
if that became the normal in this country,
it would destroy the thing that made America's economy
the envy of the world,
the economy where he got personally rich.
They are children who don't respect or understand
the systems that were built
and how it made this country so great.
And now they are tearing at the foundations of that thing
because they are either stupid
or careless or vile and we will live with the repercussions.
I promise you people, we've got a little bit of, I don't know if I want to call it light,
but we've got some actionable things that we can do about this.
It's not utter despair, this podcast.
The end will have some stuff that's not utter despair, but we've got to go deeper into the
muck before we get there. It's not utter despair, this podcast. The end will have some stuff that's not utter despair, but we've got to go deeper into the
mug before we get there.
What I really wanted to have you on, my original plan actually was I was like, love it cried
a week after the election.
I want to have a month for the 100th day episode to get an update on whether he wants to cry
again after 100 days.
But I texted you earlier this week because I was having dinner with my friend.
As you mentioned earlier, life is going on. I do find joy. I do have joy in my life, other things I was having dinner with my friend. As you mentioned earlier, like life is going on.
I do find joy.
I do have joy in my life.
Other things I was doing.
I usually, when I'm at dinner with friends, I'm not like talking about Donald Trump.
Like I'm just finding other, other things in life where we can
celebrate each other's company.
But I was so upset about the particular case of this Venezuelan named
Andri, you know, who is the makeup artist.
We've now seen the pictures of
who has been sent to this since Salvador Gulag and
my friend was saying this in a nice way because he's also mad but he's like it feels like you're particularly mad about this because
like as a gay person, you know, you can like feel
in a more even more personal way
the plight of this young man right and like and that's true
I was having these visions of like what it would be like to just be like pulled out
to just be like grabbed by some cops and had your head shaved and like clothes stripped from you and
like and shackled and slapped like like he calls for his mother and it's just it's unimaginable and
even and so I was like I need another guy to talk about that with but even but since then
we have a couple of other examples that have come up.
A guy, a refugee guy, there was a refugee EM, went to Columbia, came here the right
way, came to America, and the Houston airport gets detained because of a tattoo.
No record.
Just today, Miami Herald is reporting this guy, Frenkel Mota, similar type story.
There's the guy that had the autism awareness tattoo.
I don't know if there's a ton of gang members
with autism awareness tattoos.
It feels a little out of, you know, out of type.
And I like the whole thing just has me so wrapped
around the axle and we're doing this.
And we have now, as you mentioned earlier,
Kristi Noem goes down there last night, stands in front of a cage
with all of these shirtless men that we've, that are shackled and used as props.
And it's like, we may have done these types of things before with internment,
but like doing this like type of propaganda, like this is what the Viet Cong did, right?
Like this is, this has taken from me what is fundamental
about the country. And that, combined with this particular story of Andri, like me both losing my
naivete about America as a shining city on a hill and imagining what it might be like as a gay makeup
artist to be sent to this gulag, I don't understand how like it can be tolerable.
I wonder where you add on it.
Just think about what had to happen, right,
for Gnome to get that shot, right?
They made those prisoners all line up
and face the cameras and stand there under, you know,
God knows what, only threat.
By the way, those pictures
in front of the Salvadoran prisoners, right?
Salvadoran prisoners.
Those are Salvadoran prisoners.
Those are notan prisoners.
Those are not the prisoners that she sent there or was part of sending there.
And you're just going to use them as props to film this video.
And what does she say in that video?
She says some version of, if you're a violent immigrant, this could happen to you.
This is where we might send you.
Now, that prison, it's only been open for a couple years, was opened by this right-wing government as part of a state of emergency to crack down on gangs.
We have now sent some unknown number, let's say it's like 260 some odd people there, because
they are claimed by this administration to be members of this gang, but not because they
were convicted of a crime that resulted, and by the way, they may have, these people were
in detention. I don't know what they did. I don the way, they may have, these people were in detention.
I don't know what they did.
I don't know who they are.
We haven't been told anything.
Some of these guys I'm sure are terrible
and unsavory figures, but they are now in a prison.
They're not just been deported to Venezuela,
their country of origin,
or deported to another country for some reason.
They're in a prison.
How long are they gonna be there, right?
The Salvadoran administration of this prison
about the Salvadorans, they are holding people indefinitely
as part of this state of emergency, right?
They're just holding people.
They're just saying,
these people are not fit for society, we're holding them.
In America, we don't do that.
We don't do that.
If someone's in a prison, it's-
Sometimes you get it fucking wrong.
But even if you get it fucking right,
you get it right, you-
That's part of the reason why we don't do that. Yeah, of course. Because sometimes you get it wrong wrong. But even if you get it fucking right, and you get it right, you are- That's part of the reason why we don't do that.
Yeah, of course.
Because sometimes you get it wrong.
People commit crimes, that's what makes them criminals.
They're not instinctively inherently criminal.
We don't lock people up because they are criminals.
We convict them of crimes that makes them a criminal,
and they serve some kind of a sentence,
maybe a long sentence, maybe a life sentence.
But we have now sent a bunch of people
to a Salvadoran gulag. The government has not said who they are, hasn't said how long they're meant to
be there, right? They have no sentences, right? We don't know what they're accused of. They
were in a public safety threat, right? Because they were in detention, the members of this
gang that they're claiming they have, right? And I'm sure many of them are members of this
gang. So they're just down there now. We'll see how long. We have no idea, we have no information.
And then it turns out that part of the way
they've been doing this roundup
is by just grabbing Venezuelan men
who are non-citizens who have tattoos,
even if they've applied for refugee status,
even if they've applied for asylum.
The one example about autism awareness that you mentioned
that's exceptionally chilling is he was cleared.
He did the background check.
They looked over the tattoos.
It's for autism awareness.
It's a fucking rainbow.
It's a rainbow ribbon.
It's a rainbow ribbon, right?
It's not like, it's not this, you know, I'm not a tattoo person.
Uh, but when I see a rainbow ribbon, I don't think Hardin gang member.
I'm sure there's some gang member somewhere in the world that has a brother with autism, that cares about autism awareness.
But I'm going to need a little bit more evidence than the rainbow ribbon tattoo
before we send the guy to a fucking concentration camp in another country
without any due process, without access to a lawyer.
And you know, and there's this aspect that's been playing out when these stories break,
which is that they grab somebody off the fucking street. They don't give you any information.
They don't get due process. Suddenly they go to El Salvador and they're like, these are hardened
criminals. And then you say, well, show us, prove us. And then you're, and there's a little part of
you, right? That's saying like, well, I'm going to say they got the wrong guy. And then they're
going to provide the evidence that says, actually, this person's terrible. Right? That's saying like, well, I'm going to say they got the wrong guy and then they're going to provide the evidence that says,
actually, this person's terrible, right?
And it's like, well, fuck you.
These people should be innocent until proven guilty.
And yeah, maybe that you, whatever the, whatever the standard may be
legally for deportations, which is different, right?
That should be our American instinct, which is no, we don't throw people on a
plane to a foreign country without putting them
in front of a fucking judge.
And until you give us that information,
we'll assume you got it wrong
because that's what we should do.
Yeah, and that's what fucking conservatives should do.
I just felt like it's just like, oh, trust us.
The jackbooted thugs can come into,
can go onto the street and pull somebody off
because they wrote an op-ed.
I can only get to the tough scale later,
but just like one more thing that's,
they're trying to do what you're saying, right? Like where they're trying to chill
the criticism, right? Like the spokesperson for the department of Homeland Security, Trisha McLaughlin,
you know, is like, is quote, I think she quoted Sam Stein as she's quoted a couple of other people,
like, oh no, we've got more info than the tattoos. But it's just that. And it's like, okay, well, show me,
show us the receipts, bring it to a court, bring it to a judge. A judge actually remanded you to
not do this until you offered evidence that you flew these people to San Salvador anyway.
So, I mean, the whole thing is, it really is, it's out of a communist like regime. And it's just fundamentally like oppositional to what America is supposed to be about.
We've disappeared these people.
And I don't know, man, like the pictures that the Time Magazine reporter and the story that
he wrote about this, where it's like, you can't imagine what is happening to the people
in these prisons.
If they were beating Andre, that we assume it's Andre, we can't imagine what is happening to the people in these prisons. If they were
beating Andre, we assume it's Andre, we don't know. I guess maybe there's another gay person
that was kidnapped. But if it's Andre who's like yelling for his mother, like imagine
how dark of a place you have to be in. If you're like, it's not helping you to scream
out, I'm gay, I'm a barber, I'm gay, this is not me.
And crying for your mother.
If they were doing that in front of a reporter.
So like, imagine what the fuck they're doing to him behind the bars.
Yeah.
He's still there.
He's still there night after night. I mean, that is like, like this person, right.
Is now scarred.
I mean, just scarred in a way we can't comprehend, right?
He just was by the way, doing everything we said to do, right?
Applying legally, following the rules,
doing what he was supposed to be doing.
He got on the app, the CBP One app,
we created an app where you sign yourself up.
This guy was not swimming, not that it would be okay,
but it's not like he swam across the Rio Grande
or climbed the fence or whatever.
He did everything right, And then this is the, it's the combination of cruelty and kind of chaotic incompetence,
which, you know, you can know about and read about in history, and then you see
it unfold in front of you and you see the way these things work together.
Right?
Like, did they sweep this guy up because they're stupid dummies?
Did they sweep this guy up because they're stupid dummies? Did they sweep this guy up because they actually want to make sure that among this group of gang members that they send to El Salvador, that there are a few people who applied for asylum, a few
refugees, a few green card holders, to scare the fucking shit out of anybody that might apply for
asylum or claim refugee status, right? Or are they just so careless that even once they find out
they make a mistake, nobody really owns fixing it
because they don't really give a fuck
what happens to people in their charge.
Or somebody just a sadist and didn't like this guy
when they held him, who knows?
Just doesn't believe people from Venezuela
should be in our country.
Or humans.
Right, either consciously or subconsciously
just doesn't care what happens to these people.
We just don't know, and it doesn't really matter, right?
Cause this guy's life has been destroyed by these people.
He's trapped.
He doesn't know, right, that there are lawyers fighting
for his release.
He doesn't know that his family has gone to the press.
He doesn't know that there was a Time Magazine story
explaining all this.
This is a place where you don't go outside, there's no visitation, there's no, there's nothing. He
is just locked in a cell, he is locked in a prison, he has no idea why, he has no idea
how long he's been there. That is a, that is a nightmare. And it could genuinely, we
are now heading towards a place where it could happen to any of us. And once again, that
sounds like the kind of thing that will be seen as Trump
Derangement Syndrome or hyperbolic, but if they can do this to people that applied legally,
they're slowly marching towards doing this to citizens. They're already talking about wanting
to denaturalize citizens for ridiculous reasons. You know, this is a small thing that's not getting enough attention, which is, so they grab Mahmood Khalil without evidence of anything other than just having views these people don't like.
And then they say, actually, we're looking at his application for his green card, and we think there are real problems there.
They know, right, that correctly, if you lie to get a green card, if you commit fraud to become a legal resident, they can withdraw
your green card.
That's of course the way it should work.
But again, back to like forbearance, it was understood that the government wouldn't go
after you and start combing through your records just because they don't like you.
They don't like what you said.
They don't like that you were at a protest.
They don't like your point of view, right?
This is what happens, right?
If the DOJ, the process is the threat.
Like when you have Pam Bondi and the Bonginos of the world
in there going after Trump's enemies,
you start having the FBI go through all your records
as a business, you have the FBI going through all your
information, all of a sudden you're in some kind of
discovery, all of a sudden you're, like,
they will find shit, right?
And they are gonna start making green card holders
across this country terrified.
They're going to make citizens who were naturalized terrified. You don't think this leads to citizens?
You don't think this leads to people who were born here, right? Or they claim birthright
citizenship isn't valid. So now they're going after American citizens who were born in this
country. They're working their way up the ladder to anyone and everyone. They are now
changing vandalism into terrorism. All of a sudden, citizens that are going to start getting,
these are terrorists.
They're going to be rounded up and sent to this Salvadoran gulag.
DHS is working on this.
Yeah, DHS working on this.
Kristi Noem with her little fucking Rolex watch
standing in front of our prisoners.
Rumi S. Ozturk, because I haven't talked about this yet on the pod.
Tufts University student. This is just exactly what you're talking about. Rumi S. Oztork, because I haven't talked about this yet on the pod, Tufts University
student. This is just exactly what you're talking about. There's video that has come out of plain
clothes officers, some of them masked, like six of them descending on her, handcuffing her. They're
in unmarked cars. A guy in a hooded sweatshirt grabs her, puts her in the back of an unmarked car.
This person is a 30 year old Fulbright scholar who is here legally.
They have not provided any, even in the case of Khalil, totally wrong, but he was the organizer
of the protest, right?
Whatever.
But in this case, she just wrote a thing for the school paper.
Yeah.
And by the way, why are they in plain clothes?
Why are they not in a fucking uniform?
Like what, what, what she's some kind of threat, right?
This is just a student of Tufts, a very bright person at Tufts who has a point
of view you don't agree with and you're grabbing her on the street.
She says like, can I call the police?
And they say, we are the police.
Again, it just, I mean, look, like fundamentally, just if you care about humanity, if you believe
about the dignity of every human person, like this is outrageous just in that case.
But I do think this layers on to me.
Like, these are the things, there may be things that are going to cause more damage broadly
or worse things, whatever that happened.
Like these are things to me that just go at the heart
about what the country is supposed to be about.
Can I just say, like, look, this is all horrible.
And I'm sure a lot of your viewers and listeners agree.
And it's like, I know, that's why I'm here.
I know it's horrible.
I know it's horrible.
And there's a lot of debate about how Democrats should
or shouldn't respond. And it's very tactical. And it's also, And I, there's a lot of debate about how Democrats should or shouldn't respond.
And it's very tactical.
And it's also, even when it is not tactical, even when it's sort of broader, it's still
quite political.
And like, you know, my, my general feeling right now is more is more, everybody should
be talking about everything and getting out there.
I think what AOC and Bernie have been doing is inspiring.
You know, John and Tommy went to this Rokana event. I think what Rok and Bernie have been doing is inspiring.
John and Tommy went to this Ro Khanna event.
I think what Ro Khanna's doing is great.
I like what Chris Murphy is saying.
And I was just in Wisconsin for the Supreme Court race.
It was great to see a lot of people come out.
And I just, like, part of what we need to do,
there's two bigger, kind of more broad
than politics pieces of this.
One is how do Democrats or anyone that believes in democracy
build credibility with people that aren't paying attention
just as trusted voices, right?
And that's a big, hard problem,
but it's actually quite a political problem.
I think the other big and deeper problem is
so much of what I think is happening,
like social media, the phones, the atomization of our society,
it is like the atmosphere in which all of this is unfolding.
And I think a deeper question is how do we build not just political solidarity,
but social and empathetic solidarity between people again?
And to me, part of what has to happen with this movement,
this small D democratic movement,
is it has to not just be about politics
and about winning and defeating these people.
It also has to be about what kind of world we wanna live in.
I'm getting like emotional again.
I can't believe they fucking do this to me.
We have lost something fundamental
about like how we treat each other, how we gather, how much of our time we spend looking at a screen and how much of our time we spent in public spaces not interacting with one another anymore.
And I don't know what it looks like and I don't know how it goes, but I do believe that part of what our politics is going to have to turn is not just saying hey I need you to knock on these doors. Hey, I need you to make sure you get your friends to vote
It's gonna be like I need you to go and get a group of friends together and sit in a park for a while
I need everybody to like we're all gonna read a book
We're all gonna choose a book together and we're gonna read a book together
We're gonna we have to learn not just political solidarity, but like a kind of human solidarity again.
And I, again, like I'm just, I'm rambling about this.
Let me try to direct it because it relates to what you're saying about the politicians.
Cause this is my frustration is you can't do that without showing real emotions about
this.
Right?
Like a bloodless, you know, kind of opposition is not going to achieve anything,
you know? And say what you want about the MAGA movement. Their emotions are probably,
you know, the part of the emotional color wheel that we don't want to incentivize,
but they do touch people's emotions. They make people angry. They make people prideful.
And I just like in situations like this, maybe I've missed
it, but I've not seen a single Democrat or any politician, obviously no Republicans,
like talk about what is happening with San Salvador with any sort of like depth of feeling.
And how are you going to draw people in if you don't do that? Like how are you going
to draw people in if you don't have that? How are you going to draw people in if you don't have that?
And sometimes some of these Democrats, it's one of these things where I ask them to show
feelings and they do and I'm like, ooh, maybe not that feeling. And I'm conscious of that.
But I don't know, I'd like to see some people try and maybe it doesn't have to be
the goody two shoes empathetic feeling about this. Maybe it can be anger on the free speech side representing
the woman from Tufts. There were supposedly a lot of guys that listened to Guy Podcasts
that were very mad that their free speech rights were being trampled on from the government
and they wanted to say, fuck you to the man. Can we not channel off some fuck you to the
man energy to the man that is pulling people off the street with six plainclothes
cops because they wrote an op-ed we don't like? Might that not resonate with maybe not
everybody but with some of the people who claim to be upset about their free speech
rights being trampled on during COVID? Maybe not, I don't know, but I just think that trying
to channel people on a more emotional level, I can't fucking hurt, I guess.
Yeah, I agree.
Part of it too is there's like a feedback loop here,
which is, I think voters obviously don't trust politicians.
That's a big part of why we're here.
But politicians really don't trust voters either.
And so they feel like if
they go to that place, right, that just purely moral, ethical, kind of
not political place of like, this is wrong, this is why it's wrong, like I need
you to join me, that the people won't be there, right? And they're not wrong right
now. They're just not wrong. They're not wrong. And so like, what do we do? Like
one of my favorite political
speeches, probably I would say my favorite political speech, what I view as the best
political speech is FDR's 1936 convention speech. It's the Ron David with destiny speech.
That's what people know it as. But he talks at the end of that speech about people in
other lands who once fought for freedom have grown weary of the fight. They've sold their democracies for the illusion of a living, something
like that, and we have to take on that fight for them. And that is what is now
happening here, right? A lot of people, a lot of Republicans, have given up their
core values for the illusion of a living, whatever that means. For Republican operatives, it's for power.
For a bunch of other people, they're buying this deal,
which is we need a strong guy like Trump
to come in and fix things, because things are so broken.
It's cultural power.
It's taking back some cultural power
from what they feel like has been lost from them.
I think it was actually in a conversation you had
with a historian about Ukraine,
which is that the Ukrainians were so willing to fight for their democracy in a way that surprised
Americans.
Right?
And it surprised us.
Yeah.
And that stuck with me too, because I think what undergirds a lot of the fear right now,
the unspoken fear is it's not that that millions of people will show up in the streets of DC
to stop this.
It's that they won't.
Right?
It's not that this will culminate in some great democratic movement that will be ugly
and scary.
It's that that democratic movement won't coalesce.
And I do think our project over the next six months, next year, is to try to figure out how to reawaken
that spirit of democracy.
And that's why, like, you know, I've been struggling to articulate this too, which is
like why I find the kind of Luigi fanfic so disgraceful.
And by the way, why I think throwing fucking Molotov cocktails at a Tesla is so stupid
It's not because I'm some liberal squish, although I am and I view those things as wrong
though I do
it is because
Fundamentally, I remember there was this historian Richard Evans
I believe his name I may be saying is maybe having his name wrong
But he wrote these three books
the coming of the Third Reich the Third Reich in power in the Third Reich at. And he gave an interview about the books about one thing he learned from them.
And he said, you will never out violence the fascists.
Why?
Well, because at root, what is right-wing authoritarianism?
What is the kind of the final form of right-wing authoritarianism?
It is one person deciding how the rest of us live.
And that's what an assassin does.
That's what a dictator does.
That's what a person who commits violence at a rally does.
It is someone deciding for themselves
what's gonna happen to the rest of us.
What is the core fundamental left expression of power?
It is solidarity.
It is millions of people coming together
to make a choice for themselves
and choosing what happens to the country.
That is a protest, that is an election, that is a Congress.
And so what we have to do is build towards that kind of mass mobilization, that kind
of solidarity and violence, individuals taking it upon themselves to decide what happens
and where is anathema to that and makes that harder because it will enable the crackdown
that we are already seeing unfolding.
What we have to think about every single day is how do we get to the point where millions of people are in the streets to send a signal to Republican politicians,
to send a signal to their fellow Americans, or by the way, a big enough protest that in
and of itself can help is power. In and of itself can shut down a city. In and of itself
can stop authoritarianism or force authoritarianism to reveal its horrible nature before the country.
I don't know where we're heading, but that's one of the places where we could be heading.
And if we are, it requires forbearance on our side too.
The other thing that would do, it would stiffen the spines of the people that are folding.
And whether that be at Columbia or at the law firms or across the board, like if they would,
if they felt like there were people that would have their backs, they would act differently.
And I think that it would also be the case for any Democratic elected officials that
you feel like are not living up to the moment.
And that's why that is my ask for today is that, and as I have before is I just, I think
that people need to call and pressure these folks to speak out more clearly about what
is happening, particularly in the Tufts case and with regards to the Gulag in San
Salvador.
Where are the protests right now?
There were student protests at Columbia.
Agree with them, don't agree with them as people standing up for what they believed
in.
Columbia just gave in to the most flagrant attack on free speech that I've seen in my
lifetime.
The President of the United States declaring himself basically provost of Columbia, dictating specific departmental rules, dictating
specific policies on a private university's campus.
Where is the protest?
Where is everybody?
Why don't people care enough?
Why isn't there a politics that is inspiring people to take to the streets when these kinds
of things happen?
Why are we more geared towards the political fights we've had for 30 years than the biggest
fight we've ever seen in our lives happening right in front of our faces and people aren't showing up?
There's some rallies coming April 5th. Hands off America. People can Google those.
But I know I'm with you. I'm not. I'm saying that because I'm trying to be helpful.
I'm not that I think it's going to take time to brew and we're going to have to rally people
to shake them from their slumber.
You were in Wisconsin?
I have not covered it.
And this is bad on me, but I want to explain why, because maybe this will resonate with
some listeners.
I thought it was great that James Malone won
the state Senate district in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. He's a Democrat that won as a Trump plus 15
district in this place in Pennsylvania. It's kind of between Philly and Harrisburg and
rural Pennsylvania. And I thought that was great. And I think it's great that people
are out there like you in Wisconsin, that you flew out there that Ben Wickler and others
are rallying in this
state Supreme Court race between Susan Crawford, who's the Democratic endorsed judge, and Brad
Schimel, who's the Republican attorney general.
It's just like we've fucking been here.
We just have been here and it's just like we had this brutal loss that is going to cause
so much damage over the next four years.
It's tough for me to get my dander up about state Senate races when
all of the shit we've been discussing for the last hour, you know, you only have
so much room in your heart for actions and for anger, and yet these local races
do matter and they're actually a place where people can have more control and
can rest back control in their lives and in their communities.
So talk about your trip to Wisconsin, what you saw there and, um, and what you
think folks can do.
Yeah.
So this is a Supreme court race in Wisconsin.
This is not just about a signal.
This is an, this is incredibly important.
Basically last year or I'm losing track of time.
I think this was last year, the beginning of last year,
there was a Supreme Court race in Wisconsin.
This Judge Janet Protasewicz, she won.
That shifted the balance of the court from right to left.
That's why Republicans were so upset.
That's why they've tried to stymie this court
now at every turn.
What that court has never been able to do
is kind of put in place fair maps for the assembly.
Right now, the Republicans
had a super majority because they drew their own maps, right? Wisconsin is a 50-50 state,
currently has six Republican House members, two Democratic House members. The assembly
was gerrymandered towards the right. They put in place fair assembly maps. They could
put in place, if we win this race, fair, ungerrymandered congressional maps. Also at stake is whether
or not they put it back in place, this 1849 abortion law.
Just to be clear, if Schiml is to win, if the Republican attorney general is to win,
that would flip the balance back to 4-3 Republican and in theory, they can enforce the old abortion
law.
In theory, they can enforce the old abortion law, they can put back in place the gerrymandered
assembly maps, they can prevent fair maps from redrawing the congressional districts.
They also will now have somebody in place that will rubber stamp basically anything they do to try to rig the electoral system towards Republicans, right?
This is a MAGA guy.
We got so close to their being able to toss out Joe Biden's win in Wisconsin.
If you have someone like Brad Schimel in place, who knows what could happen, but
now they would be in a position to throw out election results.
We're seeing this unfold in North Carolina right now.
Uh, Republican judge lost that race.
They are now trying to throw out votes.
They don't like purely based on the fact that they want to steal this thing.
That could happen in Wisconsin, but more than that.
So Elon Musk has put $13 million into this race. It's fucking crazy. He's just dumping money into
this race. Wisconsin came out and voted for Judge Protoziewicz because they didn't want
the 1849 abortion law. They just, they didn't want a right wing judge. If Donald Trump is
able to buy this seat for Brad Shimmel and they're able to put in place gerrymandered maps, have somebody in place that's going to rule in favor of Republicans
when they question the outcome of elections, that sends a signal.
First of all, that's terrible on its own, right?
It makes winning the presidency that much harder in the future.
But also, this sends a message, right?
Right now there are squishy Republican House members who are not sure what's more dangerous
to them.
Should they be more afraid of Elon Musk or their voters?
Should they vote for reconciliation, cut Medicaid, cut taxes for rich people, and hope that Elon
Musk's money protects them in the fall?
Or should they buck Elon, bear the attacks from the right, and trust that their voters
will protect them?
If Elon Musk can buy the seat, that's a big proof point for these Republicans to just
stick with the program. And we don these Republicans to just stick with the program.
And we don't want them to stick with the program.
We want them to be afraid.
We want voters to overwhelm and overcome the advantage
that comes from all of this money.
So the stakes for Wisconsin are incredibly high,
but the stakes for the country are very high,
both in terms of how this court could rule
in future elections challenges,
and also the message it sends about whether or not
Elon Musk's money can buy a seat
So if you're in Wisconsin, make sure you cast your vote
If you know somebody in Wisconsin shoot them a text elections on Tuesday election is on Tuesday
How did it feel to be out amongst the people out of the out of the studio?
It was great. We were in Madison
We were in Milwaukee a lot of that is just about making sure everybody gets their ballots in it was reassuring going to the doors
we went to I think a 150 doors, something like that. And everybody knew the election was coming. Every
lefty had gotten their ballot in and was making sure everybody in their life got their ballot in.
That's what we have to do in Wisconsin, so who knows what that means. The other little moment,
too, there were just moments of being out there with people that were just so gratifying and
inspiring and a reminder that even that just being among people is good for you
and good for the movement.
It's good for people to be out there talking to each other.
Get off your phones, get out of your house.
You will feel better about things.
Just, you know, you're knocking on doors
and you walk by a house
and there's just an older woman out there gardening
and she says something like,
oh, what are you doing?
What are you guys doing?
Oh, we're knocking on doors for Judge Crawford.
Oh, like, thanks for doing that. We gotta help Judge Crawford win. And then there's just a something like, oh, what are you doing? What are you guys doing? Oh, we're not gonna endorse for Judge Crawford. Oh, like, thanks for doing that.
We gotta help Judge Crawford win.
And then there's just a moment like,
I can't believe what's happening.
I'm like so scared.
And you realize that in our asymmetrical politics,
it is completely normal for Republican politician
to just go on television and say that people
that live in Madison, Wisconsin are fucking communist,
anti-American disgraces.
And obviously Elizabeth Warren never goes on
on Pod Save America and starts talking about the rubes
down there in Alabama, right?
Like that's not acceptable, but like,
it was like, oh, you know, the cities are out of touch.
The elites.
We can criticize Alabama on the board podcast,
but outside of it.
But all I'm just getting at is like,
oh, you know, the liberal enclaves, like we we already have them they're out of touch Democrats are out
of touch with the real people all that fucking shit and it's like okay yeah we
got to do work a lot of political work we have to do but like can we give some
due to the progressives in Madison and Milwaukee that have been doing their
best organizing who if more people voted the way that they wanted people to vote
the country be a much better place people that are like scared and worried
for their country and really fucking care.
Like, yeah, I get it. We have the engaged people. We need to do better than that.
Thank God for the engaged people. Thank God for the people paying attention.
They're doing the best they can just because their votes are assumed and accounted for.
Doesn't mean they don't deserve a little bit of fucking love.
Pete Slauson We'll leave it there. That's nice. That's uplifting. I'm smiling.
John Lovett Good.
Pete Slauson Thank you, John Lovett, for coming back on the podcast.
We'll do it again in 67 more days and see how dark things are then.
Can't wait, fucks.
Everybody else will be back here tomorrow with an old friend.
We'll see you all then. Peace.
A walker-lamp and a job that slowly kills you
Cruises that won't heal
You look so tired and happy Break down the government
They know they don't speak for us
I'll take a quiet life, I'll handshake a carbon monoxide No alarms and no surprises Silent, silent This is my final farewell
My final bellyache
With no alarms and no surprises, please. The Bullork Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason
Brown.