The Canadian Investor - Subprime Lending Skyrockets as Cyclical Stocks Face Challenges
Episode Date: September 12, 2024In this episode, we dive into the Bank of Canada's recent 25bps rate cut and its implications for the Canadian economy. With inflationary pressures persisting in shelter costs, we discuss whether the ...central bank’s decision could reignite the housing market while balancing economic slowdown. We also analyze Couche-Tard's ambitious bid to acquire 7/11, their Q1 earnings, and the potential risks of such a massive acquisition. Finally, we cover BRP's disappointing earnings and the rise of subprime lending, examining how companies like Affirm Holdings and Propel Holdings are faring in an economy where more consumers are struggling to make ends meet.  Tickers of Stocks & ETF discussed: PRL.TO, AFRM, BRP.TO, GSY.TO, ATD.TO NY Fed BNPL Survey Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com Our Website Canadian Investor Podcast Network Twitter: @cdn_investing Simon’s twitter: @Fiat_Iceberg Braden’s twitter: @BradoCapital Dan’s Twitter: @stocktrades_ca Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast! Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Web player - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools. Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back into the show. This is the Canadian Investor Podcast, made possible by our friends
and show sponsor, EQ Bank, which helps Canadians make bank with high interest and no fees on
everyday banking. We also love their savings and investment products like GICs, which offer
some of the best rates on the market. I personally, and I know Simone as well, is using the GICs, which offer some of the best rates on the market. I personally,
and I know Simone as well, is using the GICs on a regular basis to set money aside for personal
income taxes in April of every year. Their GICs are perfect because the interest rate is guaranteed,
and I know I won't be able to touch that money until I need it for tax time. Whether you're
looking to set some money aside for a rainy day or a big purchase is
coming through the pipeline or simply want to lower the risk of your overall investment portfolio,
EQ Bank's GICs are a great option. The best thing about EQ Bank is that it is so easy to use. You
can open an account and buy a GIC online in minutes. Take advantage of some of the best rates on the market today at eqbank.ca forward slash
GIC. Again, eqbank.ca forward slash GIC. This is the Canadian Investor, where you take control
of your own portfolio and gain the confidence you need to succeed in the markets. Hosted by Braden Dennis and Simon Belanger.
Welcome back to the Canadian Investor Podcast.
I'm here with Dan Kent.
We are back for our Thursday news and earnings.
There is quite a bit on the dock today.
A little bit of macro with interest rate cuts and then a few, I would say, Canadian darlings in terms of companies that are hitting a snag a little bit.
Would you agree with that? Yeah. It's kind of like it's the end of
earnings season, but there's still plenty of news to talk about. And it's probably,
it looks to be the end of high rates on savings as well. I just got a few notices that my accounts are getting cut. I would imagine
that's going to be coming down even further as we move forward.
Yeah, I got those same notices. So yeah, it's definitely, you know, it's too bad.
I did talk with Brayden earlier this week on the Monday episode for some options for people
looking to park cash. Obviously, I encourage people to go back to that episode
because I think it varies on, you know,
a lot of different things,
especially what you may want to do for that cash,
depending whether you're, you know,
you're able to lock it in versus not lock it in.
You know, there's also longer duration bonds and so on.
So if people missed that episode,
do like encourage you to go back to the Monday episode because Monday episode because I talk about a lot of different options available.
If you want to cash in on those higher rates, but again, also explaining the downsides.
Yeah, I mean, the U.S. is still, they haven't cut yet, so there's still higher rates in the U.S., but it's going to be interesting.
Yeah, and speaking of cut, that's a good transition here with the Bank of Canada.
I think everyone knows at this point that they cut by a 25 basis point.
It was an interesting, did you have the chance to listen to the press conference or no?
No, I didn't listen to the press conference.
Yeah, I mean, I like to be tortured, so I try to listen to them all.
But I mean, it wasn't too bad this time i'll be
honest um there were actually some decent questions overall from reporters in a earlier i would say
throughout the year so far unfortunately a lot of the questions were always like when's the rate cut
coming how big will it be and so on so it was very repetitive and it was also a waste of time because everyone knows what he was
going to answer. But this one was a bit better. TIFF said that it was reasonable to expect more
rate cuts, but as always, that they remain data dependent. They said that the economy
is in excess supply. I mean, in economist terms, I would say that just means that there isn't
enough demand for what is being produced, which is putting downward pressure on prices.
Or in other words, the economy is slowing and they are well aware of it.
They did know that shelter and service prices are putting upwards pressure on inflation.
So that's still something that they're keeping an eye on.
They also noted that CPI is expected to continue easing,
They also noted that CPI is expected to continue easing, but it could go higher towards the end of the year because of base effects. So this is actually, and Dan, you can vouch for me, this is something I've been very vocal about, especially when it comes to energy prices.
Because people tend to forget that energy prices have been pretty low now for the better part of a year, I would say, in terms of being quite low.
And that's always going to be a risk, not just oil, but obviously natural gas as well.
If there's especially some geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, if things escalate, it could put some upward pressure on the price of oil.
However, right now, I mean, it's the opposite that's happening. I think
the market is focusing more on the demand side of oil because they're seeing kind of slowing
the slowing economy in the US. And I think generally the markets are a bit worried about
that. Yeah, I mean, we have oil that I just looked it up. It's pretty much $65 a barrel, which is down 4.5% today.
Natural gas is up quite a bit.
Natural gas is rebounding, I'm pretty sure, quite a bit off the lows.
But yeah, I mean, commodity prices are pretty low right now,
which is pretty typical in this type of situation.
Yeah, hey, just keep talking about natural gas going up.
It's making me pretty happy with my term line position.
But I mean, obviously, I think you know my portfolio.
I've talked about it on the podcast and joined TCI.
Obviously, we share it there.
And that's something I've been pretty bullish for the longer term in terms of just holding
really good energy companies.
I think that's really important.
If you own the really good ones that have very low costs and can be profitable, even if prices go down, I mean, you may kind of trade sideways, shorter, medium term, but you should be fine longer term. And one reporter asked if they were concerned about cutting rates and how that could encourage Canadians to take on more debt.
And it was really interesting.
I encourage people to look at the press conference if they're interested in seeing the answer.
But it took Tiff a bit of time to answer.
And he honestly did not really answer the question.
He did say that it would help alleviate the debt burden of Canadians like those who have variable mortgages or those who will be renewing their mortgages soon. So obviously,
we've talked about this time and time again. If you have a fixed rate mortgage or you're going
to be renewing your fixed rate mortgage, that's dependent on bond yields. And bond yields have
actually been coming down for some time now before the Bank of Canada started cutting.
So in terms of immediate effect, if you own, you have a mortgage, you're not renewing, you know, anytime soon.
It really only has an impact on you if you have a variable rate.
And the issue with those renewing and looking at the fixed rate is, like I said, it's really the bond yield.
So the Bank of Canada doesn't have that much control over that. I'll put an asterisk. Some people may argue that,
you know, they could start quantitative easing and just buying bonds massively and therefore
artificially push yields down. But, you know, for the time being, I think it's a bit harder to say
that will happen, but it's a non-zero probability.
And the answer was telling, in my opinion, because clearly shelter inflation is still a major concern for them.
And to me, it's clear that they're trying to balance easing the pressure that's being put on Canadians that are debt burdened by trying to obviously lower interest rates, but they're also very cognizant of how it could potentially stimulate the housing market.
They're not sure.
They've mentioned this risk now for a better part of this year
that they're very aware and they definitely have an eye on the housing market.
Whether it will stimulate or not, it's hard to say.
I mean, lower rates, sure, it will make the boring costs cheaper.
But at the same time, if people are losing their jobs, right,
like you can't buy a home if you don't have a job.
So it's going to be interesting what happens in that space.
But I think it's clearly a concern for them and something they definitely want to balance.
Yeah, and it's interesting to see, like we did our Canadian bank overview over the last few weeks and just like, you know, the Canadian arms of the business is doing so well,
like over the last while, which kind of leads one to believe that maybe, you know, declining rates
is spurring more people, more Canadians to take on debt. I mean, I can't remember.
It was GoEasy that had crazy, crazy growth in its HELOC products, which would be floating rate for the most part. So, you know, you could get, you would get pretty much instant relief in that
regard if they were to continue cutting rates, which could be something that, you know, people
would access, you know, immediately rather than like you said, you know, a fixed be something that, you know, people would access, you know, immediately rather
than like you said, you know, a fixed rate mortgage is, you know, it's not going to impact
you until down the line. But I mean, it's very interesting to see, I do believe they're in,
you know, a bit of a rock and a hard place. So shelter inflation is one of the key drivers now.
So you decrease rates because inflation in most areas has come down to a normalized level. But in doing so, do you reignite the housing market and fuel more shelter inflation and rent, mortgages, things like that?
But I think rate cuts are pretty much a necessity now.
We're sitting at, so outside of a very short stint during the COVID-19 pandemic. We're sitting at, you know, the highest levels of unemployment since 2017. I mean, credit card balance is going up. Discretionary spend is
pretty much collapsing. We'll go over that with BRP's earnings. Like it's crazy to see like the
shift there. But I mean, it looks like the Bank of Canada, you know, they made the right decision
to start cutting, you know, earlier when they did because it doesn't look very good right now.
No, exactly.
And towards the end of the show, I'll be going over firm holdings, which is a buy now, pay later earnings.
Also talk a little bit about GoEasy, like you mentioned, and Propel, which are two subprime lenders.
Propel is mostly in the U.S., but does have a Canadian arm.
And spoiler alert, they have seen businesses booming.
And without going into too much detail, when business is booming for subprime lenders, it's usually kind of a sign of things to come.
That's because you have those people with not as good credits or can't get financing with traditional financial institution
that are turning there. And that's usually a sign that people are getting more desperate
because the interest rates are, they're not good to say the least. So I think, yeah, go ahead.
Well, especially when we look at when I went over GoEasy's earnings, they reported the highest level
of credit rating they've ever had among
their borrowers, which is a good thing, but it also kind of shows you that more people with
higher levels of credit are having to tap into the subprime market, which I don't really think
is a good thing. They probably have too much debt as a whole. They're still able to pay for it,
but the banks don't want to lend to them anymore. Exactly.
That's why they're turning to them.
That would be my assumption.
And I guess for the last thing I'll say, so obviously we talked about the Bank Canada mostly.
So here I'm showing the CME FedWatch tool, a great tool to watch.
We've been looking at it for probably years now at the Canadian Investor Podcast.
And then the Fed, the market is pricing a whole lot of rate cuts for the Fed.
So the next meeting here, it's pretty much been like that for several weeks now.
So around two-thirds of a chance for a 25 basis point cut for the Fed
and about one-third for 50 basis points.
And then if you go all the way to December, so the last meeting of the year,
it's basically a 50-50 chance that rates will be either 4% or 4.25%. So the market is expecting
some rate cuts. So it's kind of funny when you do the math because there's only three meetings left
of the year, including the upcoming one in September. So if the market is pricing it that
many rate cuts, there's going to be a 50 basis point rate cut in there somewhere. So maybe it's
not September. And I've been pretty vocal that I did not think they would start cutting in September,
mostly because of the geopolitical situation. But at this point, I mean, the jobs numbers were not good. They were revised down for
the previous month. They also had a massive revision. I think they revised 800,000 down for,
I can't remember which quarter it was, but there was a massive revision done earlier this summer
as well. So I think the job numbers are really starting to turn the US and the political risk
at this point. I think it's fair to say that Trump will probably find a way to spin this to his advantage.
He'll probably say, like, look, they're cutting, like, they're, you know, the economy is so bad with the Democrats that the Fed has to cut like 50 basis point.
Like something like that, even though he's kind of warned them not to do that.
that, even though he's kind of warned them not to do that. But he probably doesn't understand the economy all that well, because if he knew, you know, a rate cut, whether it's 25 or 50 basis
points, like it will not turn the economy around before the election. So I don't think that's
he should be concerned about that. But it's interesting just to look at the odds. And I
will mention that the markets have been incredibly wrong about rate
cuts. So take this with a grain of salt. I mean, we've talked about it earlier this year,
they were anticipating a rate cut in March, right? So they were a bit early on that.
Yeah. And now they're pretty much predicting, not a guarantee, but what is it?
A 92% chance that we go cut, cut, cut
the next three meetings?
If it's only 25 basis points, yeah.
Yeah, I think it's almost a guarantee
that there's gonna be three cuts in a row.
It's just the size of the cuts at this point, yeah.
As do-it-yourself investors, we want to keep our
fees low. That's why Simone and I have been using Questrade as our online broker for so many years
now. Questrade is Canada's number one rated online broker by MoneySense. And with them,
you can buy all North American ETFs, not just a few select ones, all commission free,
all North American ETFs, not just a few select ones, all commission-free so that you can choose the ETFs that you want. And they charge no annual RRSP or TFSA account fees. They have an award
winning customer service team with real people that are ready to help if you have questions
along the way. As a customer myself, I've been impressed with Questrade's customer service.
Whenever I call or email, every support rep is very knowledgeable and they get exactly what I need done quickly. Switch for free today and keep
more of your money. Visit questrade.com for details. That is questrade.com.
So not so long ago, self-directed investors caught wind of the power of low-cost index investing.
Once just a secret for the personal finance gurus is now common knowledge for Canadians,
and we are better for it. When BMO ETFs reached out to work with the podcast,
I honestly was not prepared for what I was about to see because the lineup of ETFs has everything I was looking for. Low fees, an
incredibly robust suite, and truly something for every investor. And here we are with this iconic
Canadian brand in the asset management world, while folks online are regularly discussing
and buying ETF tickers from asset managers in the US. Let's just look at ZEQT, for example, the BMO
All Equity ETF. One single ETF, you get globally diversified equities. So easy way for Canadians
to get global stock exposure with one ticker. Keeps it simple yet incredibly low cost and
effective. Very impressed with what BMO has built in their ETF business. And if you are an index investor
and haven't checked out their listings, I highly recommend it. I bet you'll be as pleasantly
surprised as I was that BMO, the Canadian bank is delivering these amazing ETF products.
Please check out the link in the description of today's episode for full disclaimers and more information.
Calling all DIY do-it-yourself investors, Blossom is an essential app for you. It has been blowing up with now more than 50,000 Canadians plus and growing who are using the app. Every time I go on
there, I am shocked. The engagement is amazing. This is a
really vibrant community that they're building. And people share their portfolios, their trades,
their investment ideas in real time. And it's all built on the concept of transparency because
brokerage accounts are linked. And then once you link your brokerage account, you can get
in-depth portfolio insights, track your dividends. And there's other stuff like learning Duolingo-style
education lessons that are completely free. You can search up Blossom Social in the App Store
and join the community today. I'm on there. I encourage you, go on there and follow me,
search me up. Some of the YouTubers and influencers and podcasters that you might
know, I bet you they're already on there. People are just on there talking, sharing their investment ideas
and using the analytics tools.
So go ahead, blossom social in the app store
and I'll see you there.
I think it's enough about macro.
Let's switch over here, Dan.
So Alimentation Couche-Tard
and there's Seven and I,
which is the owner of 7-Eleven.
So they made an offer to buy the Japanese company,
got rejected. So what's the developments there? Yeah. So they made a pretty big offer to buy
7-Eleven Holdings, which again is they own 7-Eleven, but they also own supermarkets and
they have some financial institutions as well. I didn't know that. I knew
they owned like some grocery stores and things like that, but I didn't know they had a financial
arm, but apparently they do. So they made an offer. Custard pretty much made a takeover offer
for 42 billion US dollars, which would be effectively 80% of Custard's market cap right now. So 7i, and I'll
probably just refer to them as 711. I don't know. I'm just used to saying 711. They rejected the
deal saying the price was nowhere close to what they'd want in the event of a takeover. And I mean,
this would make sense to me, you know typical negotiation process like if i got an initial
offer even if it was probably pretty close i would probably say it's nowhere close you know
in order to try to maximize that you know shareholder value like who knows how far away
they truly are on this type on this price i mean they pretty much say that it's nowhere close. But yeah, who knows? And
Kushtar seems pretty adamant to get this done. Initially, the offer was rejected and they weren't
interested in negotiating even further. But there was an article released yesterday that says
Kushtar is highly confident further discussions would lead to the ability to find more value for 7i
shareholders so i mean if we read between the lines here this is pretty much saying kushtar
is probably willing to pay more uh for this and just to give you an idea how truly massive this
would be so kushtar currently operates 16 800 stores so a successful deal with 7-Eleven would add around 86,000 more stores to its network.
That don't stop at gas stations, but like I said, supermarkets.
I knew that element, but even financial service operators, which I don't know much about that end of the business.
And I made a few posts on this, including just an overall YouTube video of my thoughts.
Um, and I made a few posts on this, including just an overall YouTube video of my thoughts. And I feel, you know, they're maybe just biting off a bit more.
They can chew than they can chew here.
Um, the company CEO stated that it could comfortably double its leverage ratio and not impact their
credit rating.
If we consider the fact that the company has around 13 billion in long-term debt on the
balance sheet, you can already tell right away, a ton of this is going to be funded
via equity, which is obviously, which is obviously share issuances. They couldn't fund all of this through
debt, but I do believe that maybe they're trying to keep it on a friendly level in an attempt to
maybe keep 7i in as a large partner. So maybe there's not as much debt equity that needs to
be issued to make it happen. And I mean, the acquisition could be an amazing
one for CouchTard if everything goes right. But I mean, if you make the assumption that the deal
is probably going to come in higher, you're probably talking like nearly doubling the size
of CouchTard's overall business from a market cap perspective. And I mean, there's been a few of
these offers just right off the top of my head that I can think of for Canadian companies that have done something like this.
Like Savaria, they made a huge acquisition of Handicare during the pandemic, which is like Savaria is like a accessibility type company, like wheelchairs, wheelchair accessible vans, stair lifts, all that type of stuff.
So they bought Handicare, which is a European company, similar business operation that effectively doubled the size of the company. So for Savaria,
it worked out very well, but it can also end up being kind of a disaster. OpenText,
they made a huge acquisition of Microfocus, same thing during the peak of the pandemic.
As of right now, it has not worked out very well at all.
Interest costs have pretty much ballooned. Earnings are taking a hit. It's not really working out all that well. And at the time, OpenTex has a market cap of around $11 billion.
And you're spending $6 billion on an acquisition. I mean, it's material.
And then TELUS International purchased WillowTree. They paid quite a bit of money for the company in a pandemic environment.
And again, it just hasn't worked out all that well at all.
High interest expenses.
You know, Telus International has gotten absolutely thrashed since its IPO.
But yeah, I mean, it just it seemed, you know, CouchTard is very good at making small to medium type acquisitions.
You know, 300 stores here, a thousand stores there, merging them into the fold. it seemed you know kushtan is very good at making small to medium type acquisitions you know 300
stores here thousand stores they're merging them into the fold i'm really not sure this right now
if this would be the best time to go out and probably spend you know 50 billion plus us
dollars to do this but um i did take quite a lot of heat for suggesting that you know they might
have might be biting off more than they can chew here a lot of people want this deal to go through yeah i mean i mean i don't know why
you're getting a lot of heat because i agree with you i mean look people are kind of saying oh they
have this amazing track record i've seen what people are saying like they have amazing track
record they'll be able to you know just roll just roll it in, like find some efficiencies,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And on like, to me, it's it's just a big risk. And especially right
now. So they came out with their Q1 2025 earnings. And look, it wasn't good. It's not been good for
a little bit. We were talking about this before we started recording. The reality is people, a lot
of people are struggling financially. So if you're going to fill up your car at a gas station where
there's a convenience store, you're probably thinking twice about buying that snack or that
bag of chips, whatever it is that's overpriced because it's at the convenience store. You'll
probably hold off and you'll end up, you know, buying it at Costco or Loblaws or whatever
the, you know, where it's more cost effective for you. And that's been, it's clear in their
results here. Total revenues, they did increase 5.1%, but when you start out looking at same store
merchandise revenue, that decreased 1.1% in the US, 2.1% in Europe, and 3.9% in Canada. And they mentioned this because
essentially there's challenging economic conditions. And obviously, it's not that
surprising, like I just mentioned, and fuel volumes were also down. So they also said that
this is a result of consumer watching their spend. So I guess people are not traveling as much,
especially for the summer months, which tend to be a lot of people traveling, going places. I mean, we rented a cottage a couple
hours away, but I mean, I'm sure some people pulled back because obviously that's an easy
expense that you can actually cut out. And margins were also under pressure during the quarter for
both merchandise and fuel and earnings per share decreased 2.4% to 83 cents a share.
Now, I honestly agree with you.
And don't get me wrong.
Like Alimentacion Custard has a fantastic track record.
I'm not going to dispute that.
I mean, if you're looking, and you can go pretty far back.
But if you're looking back the last 10 years, I mean, it's crushed the S&P 500.
It's up for total
returns at amount that's not costal is up 349 percent the S&P 500 is up 226 percent and you
have the TSX 60 that's up 104 percent so it's clearly done something right here but at the same
time I'm with you they're trying to buy a bigger player.
They're clear. They clearly want this transaction to happen. I'm not sure exactly what's motivating that, but I have a suspicion that it could be kind of, you know, lackluster results for lack
of better word. But at the end of the day, that's a result of the economy. And I think if I was Alimentation Couchetard, I'd continue the
strategy of trying to buy smaller players. Because the reality is, people, you know,
these smaller players will probably be feeling the pinch even more so than a large company like
Alimentation Couchetard or 7-11. So why not take advantage of that, give them an exit strategy,
and 11. So why not take advantage of that, give them an exit strategy, and probably get a good deal on those transactions. Sure, they might not move the needle as much, but you'll probably get
way better return on your investment by doing that. I just don't understand that, you know,
how, why they want this deal to go through so badly. Um, their track record,
I'll be honest, means nothing. Like when you're looking at, you know, making, they've made
substantial acquisitions over the years as well, but you're looking at something that's completely
another level here. Yeah. You're effectively doubling the size of the company. It's, uh,
it's definitely a notable acquisition rather than the typical
add a few gas stations here and there. And the market is so fragmented. That's why they can do,
they could constantly do this, right? Buy those smaller companies, 250 stores,
or they'll buy the convenience store arm off some company, you know, a thousand gas stations or whatever it may be.
Yeah, yeah.
And they did this in, it was 2021.
They tried to buy Carrefour, which is, it was like a French grocer.
Carrefour, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, and it was grocery stores.
And everybody, that one kind of puzzled everybody like more than this,
because at least Seven Eye is a gas state. Like they're're convenience stores like kustard's bread and butter but that
that grocery store you know bid and you know they bid a bunch of money on that i remember the stock
absolutely bombed after that because people were kind of like what are they doing here
but this kind of seems like uh you know, what are they doing here?
Because they just like.
I'll say it.
Yeah, what are they doing?
Yeah, it kind of should be dead in the water because like Seven Eye just pretty much said,
no, not even entertaining it at that price.
And Kushtar keeps going, you know, like, okay, well, if you won't entertain it at that price.
Again, you read between the lines.
It looks like they're willing to pay a bit more here or possibly, you know, to make something work out and which like don't get me wrong it could they could buy this
everything could go right they could integrate the 7-eleven gas which i do believe cruistar does
have higher margins than seven i like if they technically do buy all these uh you know they
they they add the efficiencies in it It could work out really, really well.
But you don't just double the effective size of your company in terms of an acquisition when not there being huge levels of risk as well.
Yeah.
And then there's also the regulatory portion.
I think I read that they were probably divest parts of the business to make sure it would go through.
But again, there's no guarantee it would go through. And honestly, at this point, it feels like Seven and I would only sell if
Kushtal overpaid. And if Kushtal overpays, how good of an investment can it be? That's the
question. So I mean, I'm sure there's going to be more development in the next few weeks. So we'll
have to keep an eye on that. But the name of time let's move on here
and go over another canadian i would say a canadian darling to some extent that's also
been struggling quite a bit so do you want to go over brp earnings yeah so brp which is uh pretty
much bombardier recreational which has no affiliation with Bombardier. They kind of do,
but they separated out, I believe it was like probably 20 some, 25 years ago. So they're a
separate entity and they pretty much make recreational vehicles. They're struggling
quite a bit over the last while here. Revenue came in at 1.84 billion, which is a 33% decline from last year.
And earnings per share of $0.61 fell by $2.60 over the same time frame.
So there's a big slowdown here.
Full disclosure, I do own a position in BRP.
I believe it's an outstanding company.
I mean, cyclical stocks will be cyclical. And the company is just currently taking a pretty big beating on
large scale reduction in discretionary spending, especially in particular segments of the business.
So the company's ATV and side-by-side business seems to be holding up a little better than its
other segments. When we look to year over year sales in these departments, they're either flat
or down by single digits. And the company is just continuing to capture
overall market share in these areas i mean they continue to capture market share everywhere but
these areas of the business are holding up quite well and i'm not exactly sure why that would be i
mean maybe it's because atvs and side by sides can be used for you know non-recreational purposes
i don't know maybe that's that would be part of their power sport revenue right yeah yeah yeah which i have here obviously
that's also declining but not as much as i think the marine yeah yeah the the marine side of the
business it's much smaller than power sports but it is no doubt struggling so i believe the marine
end of the business is down 30 year over year so yeah sales
are down in the high 30 range for pontoons and high 20 range for personal watercrafts and personal
watercrafts would be like sea dues things like that like uh and i believe only like maybe single
or double use boats things like that but um i mean the the struggles in many segments resulted in a 71% decline in
earnings per share on a year over year basis, 86% decline in free cash flow. And this is despite
the company reducing capital expenditures by around 20% on a year over year basis. So being
honest, there really wasn't anything at all I could point out in the quarter that was a positive,
except for the fact that they're continuing know continuing to gain market share in north america which should bode
well for when when discretionary spending returns and i mean the thing about it is it's like not
really anything the company is doing operationally it's like it's unavoidable what's happening right
now is unavoidable which is kind of why i think, you know, the stock is definitely getting hit,
but it's not getting like you would figure with the results it's posting, it would be getting
obliterated. I mean, you're talking, you know, massive declines and, you know, reduction in
guidance, which I'll talk about in a sec, but yeah, it's, it's nothing, the company,
it's completely out of the company's control. They're probably also having some of their
dealers, they must have to put some
pretty substantial discount, right? Because I'm assuming they overproduce. That's usually how it
works. They are overproduce. And then, you know, there's excess inventory. You got to discount some
older models that you still have in stock. I mean, it's nothing against them. Obviously,
I'm pretty familiar. Like I mountain bike.. People know on this podcast I've been listening.
And the biking industry, I've seen the exact same thing.
They overproduced because demand was through the roof during the pandemic because everything was locked down.
Everyone and their brother and sister wanted to buy a bike, whether it was road or mountain bike.
There was, you know, shortages.
They started producing a whole lot to meet demand
and then everything started reopening. Demand fell off a cliff. And now, I mean, if you're
looking for a bike, now's the time to buy one. I'll just say that. And that's usually how it
works because now companies are adjusting and then the cycle kind of will restart eventually
where the companies will not be producing enough. Demand will start
picking back up and then you get into that cycle again. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. We saw the exact same
thing with Aritzia. They loaded up on a ton of inventory and that would have been 2022.
And then rates started going up, spending started slowing. They ended up with a ton of excess
inventory. And then you got to mark that inventory down. It kills your margins. It, you know, kills your sales overall. And then you,
like these companies always go through, you know, peaks and troughs, like it,
it's just going to happen. I mean, there's nothing the company could do. And I mean, the one,
the one thing is, uh, we'll go to their guidance. So when we go back to the final quarter of fiscal 2024 so right now this company is is
currently in the second quarter of its fiscal 2025 year they kind of they're like forward almost an
entire year it's pretty confusing for a lot of people but they they would have closed out fiscal
2024 three quarters ago so they issued guidance back then, which for the most part, their year round
products and power sports products would see a 5% reduction in sales. So that's kind of what
they ballparked. They projected 9.5 billion in revenue on the high end, 1.47 billion in EBITDA
and $8.25 in earnings per share. So through the next three quarters, the company has slashed its
guidance every single quarter. And typically the last two quarters, it's been like tiny amounts.
However, in this most recent quarter, it just cut guidance massively. So revenue is now expected to
come in at 8 billion on the high end versus, what did I say $9.5 at the end of 2024. EBITDA in the
$940 million range compared to $1.47 billion. So you're looking at a more than 33% decline there.
And earnings per share at $3.25 versus $8.25. So this is a 61 percent decline in earnings guidance over the
course of nine months they gotta pull guidance yeah exactly like we were talking about that
yeah because the revenue guidance i looked through the earnings report and if you take out you know
when they issued guidance for fiscal year 2025 because you can't you know you can't cut guidance
when you issue it yeah so if you take out that, it's actually four quarters in a row that they cut revenue guidance going back
to fiscal year 2024. So it's not good. And I totally agree with you at this point. I don't
think the market would blame them. Look, there's so much uncertainty about the economy and clearly
it's a cyclical business. Just, you know, cut the guidance, say, look, given the, you know, economic environment,
it's just too difficult for us to issue guidance right now
when things are better or something.
Like the market may kind of not like it
for, you know, a couple of weeks or something,
but I think it would definitely help over just,
you know, every single quarter cutting.
Yeah, like this just kind of shows you
that they
have absolutely no idea how bad it's going to get i mean when you're when you're taking it down
every single quarter i mean you may as well just pull it the market probably would not react very
well but the market also won't react very well if say you know next quarter you decide to slash it yet again i can't remember the
i think it was actually canada goose that ended up pulling guidance once like the pandemic hit
and uh the stock did take quite a big beating but it also like they had no idea what you know
what was going to happen moving forward so just y yank the guidance and, uh, you know, just until you get some sort of stabilization and you can say, Hey, now we can, you know, accurately predict
instead of, you know, what looks like to be complete guessing right now. Yeah, exactly. I
think there was a few airlines too, during the pandemic for rightfully so they, they just didn't
know. But I think that's the right thing to do is, unfortunately, when you don't know and you just it might be better just to buy the bullet and pull the guidance. But look, I think I'm with
you. And you have to keep in mind these cyclical business like this is, you know, if it's a
business that interests you, this one now should be the time that you have it on your radar,
because it's, you know, it's obviously experiencing a pullback, probably not as much as I would expect it. Then you mentioned that as well,
but it is definitely, these are the kinds of businesses you want to be buying when
there's some pretty strong headwinds and the PE looks high, especially, you know,
if you're looking at a backwards looking PE, it may look high because, you know, the price is still, you know, it's still somewhat
elevated, but the earnings are declining pretty quickly. So you have to keep that in mind. Even
the forward P may look high compared to, especially if things are, you know, going downwards, but it's,
I know it's a bit counterintuitive, but a high P is typically when you'll want to buy these businesses because when the P is low,
it's because usually like they're kind of mid late cycle and things are still growing pretty rapidly.
Yeah. With cyclical stocks, I mean, obviously it's not an absolute guarantee, but the time
to buy them is when the P is high and the time to sell them is when the PE is low. Because obviously, BRP is now going to
report a huge decline in earnings. It's going to artificially, it's going to inflate the price to
earnings huge, which kind of shows you they're at the bottom of a cycle, right? Earnings are
declining, price is still a little bit higher, so PE goes higher.
But then when the price to earnings is really low, you've got high earnings, high price,
they could be entering into what we're seeing right now, which is a clear downtrend.
Yeah, the E is declining faster than the P, basically.
Exactly, which is like, it's the complete, when you think about it, it's the complete opposite
of what many would believe. They would believe that a high PE is an overvalued company, but with cyclical companies,
it's very difficult to ever gauge them off like a straight up price to earnings valuation,
just because earnings fluctuate so much. Yeah, exactly.
As do-it-yourself investors, we want to keep our fees low. That's why Simone and I have been using
Questrade as our online broker for so many years now. Questrade is Canada's number one rated online
broker by MoneySense, and with them, you can buy all North American ETFs, not just a few select
ones, all commission-free, so that you can choose the ETFs that you want. And they charge no annual
RRSP or TFSA account fees. They have an award-winning customer service team with real
people that are ready to help if you have questions along the way. As a customer myself,
I've been impressed with Questrade's customer service. Whenever I call or email, every support
rep is very knowledgeable and they get exactly what I need done quickly. Switch for free
today and keep more of your money. Visit questrade.com for details. That is questrade.com.
So not so long ago, self-directed investors caught wind of the power of low-cost index investing.
Once just a secret for the personal finance gurus
is now common knowledge for Canadians, and we are better for it. When BMO ETFs reached out to
work with the podcast, I honestly was not prepared for what I was about to see because the lineup of
ETFs has everything I was looking for. Low fees, an incredibly robust suite, and truly something
for every investor. And here we are with this iconic Canadian brand in the asset management
world, while folks online are regularly discussing and buying ETF tickers from asset managers in the
US. Let's just look at ZEQT, for example, the BMO All Equity ETF. One single ETF, you get globally
diversified equities. So easy way for Canadians to get global stock exposure with one ticker.
Keeps it simple yet incredibly low cost and effective. Very impressed with what BMO has
built in their ETF business. And if you are an index investor and haven't checked out their listings, I highly recommend it. I bet you'll be as pleasantly surprised as I was that BMO, the Canadian bank,
is delivering these amazing ETF products. Please check out the link in the description
of today's episode for full disclaimers and more information.
calling all DIY do-it-yourself investors blossom is an essential app for you it has been blowing up with now more than 50,000 Canadians plus and growing who are using the app every time I go
on there I am shocked the engagement is amazing this is a really vibrant community that they're
building and people share their portfolios their trades trades, their investment ideas in real time.
And it's all built on the concept of transparency because brokerage accounts are linked. And then
once you link your brokerage account, you can get in-depth portfolio insights, track your dividends,
and there's other stuff like learning Duolingo style education lessons that are completely free.
You can search up Blossom Social in the App Store and join the community today.
I'm on there.
I encourage you, go on there and follow me.
Search me up.
Some of the YouTubers and influencers and podcasters that you might know,
I bet you they're already on there.
People are just on there talking, sharing their investment ideas and using the analytics tools.
So go ahead, Blossom Social in the the app store and I'll see you there.
So I know, I think that was a great overview. Anything else to add or we'll go on to the
marvelous world of subprime lending? Nope, that's it. Let's get into the subprime lending.
Yeah. So I mean, I said subprime lending. For those not familiar with the term, I think I would encourage you to go and watch The Big Short.
I believe Margot Robbie has a great scene where it's basically it means, you know, hopefully we won't get banned, but it means shit.
That's what it is.
Subprime means shit.
So basically, I think that's a bit excessive.
Obviously, it's funny in the movie, but subprime is typically for people who can't get financing elsewhere.
And Affirm Holdings, it's probably not classified as a subprime lender.
I'm going to go ahead and say that's what they are because they're a buy now, pay later.
And the reason why I'm saying that is because the New York Fed had a very interesting study that they did.
They did a survey, a pretty extensive one.
They actually did several, but I'll put the link in the show notes.
I actually talked about that with Braden a couple months back.
It would publish in February.
And what they found with buy now, pay later is that, well, first of all, buy now, pay later,
there's a couple different ways they make money.
So they can make money on merchant fees for offering services the reasoning is that the merchant
might not make the sell without the user using buy now pay later so fees are actually as high
as five to six percent for the merchant there is interest on loan so there are loans offered by
buy now pay later services on a longer term and then there's the late fees if users don't
pay their full installment on time they can be charged late fees but most people know them more
as you know buy now pay later you buy it now and you have like four equal installment without any
interest so that's usually what people know them as now to be to be fair, during that study, one of the things is that they found
financially fragile households are more likely to be repeat user versus financially stable households.
They were also more likely to use BNPL, so buy now pay later, for smaller everyday purchases,
whereas stable households were more likely to use it for larger purchases to avoid paying interest.
stable households were more likely to use it for larger purchases to avoid paying interest.
And financially fragile households are more likely to make small and medium purchases that they could not otherwise afford if they did not use that. So just some context here. When I say
I see them more as a subprime lender, that's the reason because I'm not just basing that on what the temperature
is outside. It's actually the New York Fed had some very interesting data on that. Before I get
started, any comments there? No, I mean, it makes complete sense. I've even seen these where you can
buy now, pay later, like on a pizza. It's pretty alarming. yeah i mean i can see if they give you interest free like on
larger purchases i mean it makes complete sense if you're disciplined enough to actually put the
money in it like an interest bearing account exactly and then you know actually make those
payments that you they do that for a lot of you know like electronics companies you know you can
sign up for a 90-day interest-free period where you don't have to make any payments and everything and you know they're they're pretty
much banking on people or a year or something yeah exactly and then and then people forget and
then the interest rate is like 20 percent exactly alone once it kicks in yeah like they don't issue
these these setups you know they're making money they're pretty much planning on you you know forgetting
and then you get hit with a extremely high apr loan that you know you were you got interest free
for a year sure but now you're paying 20 on on your television but yeah it's um i mean it's
definitely something that you know lower quality you know higher risk borrowers are going to use, which is very
similar to the subprime market. Exactly. So revenues were up 48% over a year to $659 million.
They posted a loss of $45 million, but it's the lowest loss they've posted since going public.
Free cash almost doubled versus last year to $31 million. Now, gross merchandise volume,
versus last year to 31 million. Now, gross merchandise volume, that one was pretty interesting. So it was up 31% to 7.2 billion for the quarter. And if you're looking here at the
full year, because that was also their fourth quarter, their growth is just insane. So since
2019, so prior to going public, they've grown the gross merchandise volume so
that's just a sum of the total goods that are purchased using that so it's not like you know
it's not the revenue or anything like that it's just the volume but it's grown at a compounded
annual growth rate of 58 and it's grown even if you kind of look at the last, like, say, since 2022.
It's still grown at 31%.
And that's when interest rates started to go up.
So there's a lot of people still using this.
And I don't think it's about to stop anytime soon.
So this is a little bit alarming just to look at if you're thinking about the economy in general is that a lot of people are resulting to
this and it doesn't seem like it's going to be stopping anytime now. Active consumers were up
19% to 18.6% sorry to 18.6 million and what's interesting there is that New York Fed survey
I was talking about I remember them saying that the biggest obstacle for using buy now pay later was
using it once so keep that in mind when you see the consumers that are up 19 it means that there
is a likelihood of repeat users coming in i was confused by what that meant at first but yeah so
like yeah the biggest hurdle is using it once but but then after that, you're likely to use
it again.
To use it again.
Which makes sense.
Yeah, makes sense.
The number of merchant offering the services also grew 19%.
The transaction per active customer was up 22%.
So definitely everything seems to be up, know, up, up and up here.
The delinquency rates were also up.
So not great.
That's something it's hard to know because these the buy now pay later space is pretty new.
But the only thing we can really compare is those subprime companies.
But 30 plus days delinquencies was up 30 basis point to 2.4 percent.
That's year over year. 60 day plus was up 30 basis point to 2.4%. That's year over year.
60 day plus was up 30 basis point to 1.5%.
And 90 plus days was up 10 basis point to 0.6%.
So clearly, I mean, they are getting the money within that period.
That's what my, you know, I assume from those numbers.
But still, something to keep an eye on if you're interested in this
business. And in terms of guidance, they are forecasting gross merchandise volume, GMV to
grow at a whopping 26% next year to $33.5 billion. So it is something to keep in mind. I mean, to me, I think it just shows whether it's, you know, consumers getting more comfortable with these services or it's probably, yeah, consumers getting more comfortable with these services.
Like that survey said, once they use it, once they're more apt to use it again afterwards.
But it's probably a combination of that and people trying to make ends meet by using these services. So that's kind of my sense, my best guess. Before I continue here
and I talk about what we're seeing in Canada a little bit on the subprime, anything you wanted
to add? No, I mean, it seems like a pretty interesting business model. So pretty much
these guys pay out the retailer and they assume all the risk, I would imagine, of the loan. Yeah, I think they resell some of the loans.
Okay. But they do have some of the loans on the book as well. But yeah, they pay the retailers.
People can also, for firm holdings, they can, I think there's also a card that you can purchase
and essentially, like, I guess a little bit like a credit card in some sort i mean it's
funny because there there's all these products and they're almost like just a repackage of what's
already available elsewhere but um so those are kind of the things and also there's the yeah i
guess there's loans interest loans so they have like when you look at their earnings they'll have
the actual numbers and then excluding peloton because they do a lot of the peloton
financing yeah so um so they kind of give both numbers just uh so people get a little more
context here yeah and i've started noticing this i've started noticing this with my credit card as
well like i have a cibc like costco card and when i log into the statements there's like
particular transactions where i can split into like four different payments interest really yeah
but it's only particular it's not everything it'll be like you know every 10th transaction
there'll be a particular transaction where i'm able to if i wanted to cut it into four and uh
i believe it's interest free for a certain amount of period.
But yeah, I mean, I've never used it, but it's definitely, this is a very fast growing segment
of financial lending, I guess you would say. Yeah. And there's probably going to be some
regulatory kind of movement in the next couple of years too, because it's kind of a gray zone right now.
We don't know like exactly how much money there is tied up there. When you look at all the
companies, not all of them are publicly traded. One, you know, I think a square owns a afterpay,
if I remember correctly. So there's different, uh, different companies as well. Something to keep an eye on. Now, if we look at during this, so since March 2022,
GMV has increased at an annual rate of 31%. I think I mentioned that earlier, but during the
same time, if you look at GoEasy Financial, their gross loans have increased 34% at an annual rate.
So that is the numbers of an actual subprime lender.
And Propel Holdings, which is another subprime lender listed on the TSX,
has seen its loan receivable increase a whopping 41% year over year. Now, Propel is,
I think, around like 80%, 90%. It is US in the business, so their business. But if you look at
their financial statements,
they do break it down between their different arms. So their Canadian arm actually has seen
their loan receivable go from 11 million to 21 million, so almost double in the span of six
months, which is pretty crazy. I mean, obviously, it's a small base, so you have to keep that in
mind. But the products they're offering, they're actually lines of credits. And the interest rate starts at 19.99% and goes up to,
I believe, 46.9%, if I remember correctly. I'm assuming there's a regulatory thing in place for
the 46.9% where they can't go over 47%.'m gonna assume that and it's only offered in a three
canadian provinces i don't have them offhand but uh it just gives you an idea that there is more
and more demands for these types of loans right now even in canada oh yeah like if you look at
i've followed these two companies quite a bit over the last while and if you look at the two best
performing well two of the top four best performing stocks on the tsx index over the last while. And if you look at the two best performing, well, two of the top four
best performing stocks on the TSX index over the last 12, 18 months, it's Propel and it's GoEasy.
And I mean, they're just, they're exploding in popularity. Like a lot of Canadian financial
institutions haven't really done all that well, except these subprime lenders over the last bit.
And I know like Propel is a very interesting company,
but it's one I've never really decided to own
just because I have no idea how the US subprime market...
I don't know any sort of regulatory information on that.
I mean, I'll probably take the time eventually to dive into it,
but I know they do AI underwriting,
which is supposed to eventually completely remove any sort of human error when it comes to underwriting, is supposed to eventually you know completely remove
any sort of human error when it comes to underwriting which who knows I have my
yeah my doubts I mean especially since they're only 12 years old as a business
yeah so they haven't seen any like look 12 years from today that was right that
was what three four years out of the great financial crisis, or at least a couple of years.
So clearly, I hope they have their AI models well-trained, and I hope they are factoring that in,
because I think that is definitely a big risk for these companies.
And I think their Canadian arm for Propel Holdings, so it's foracredit.ca.
So it is, yeah, 19.99% to 46.9. The biggest risk
for these companies, and I think you said it, right, they've performed so well, is that if you
look back at history, when subprime really takes off and, you know, they see their loans kind of
grow, the origination and the loans they have on their books
really grow, which is good, right? It means that, you know, from a business perspective,
they're getting more and more money, more interest on these loans. But then again,
it's also a sign that there's more and more consumers that are resulting to these loans.
And I mentioned 19.99% up to 47%. I mean, you have to be pretty desperate to go for these
loans for a line of credits. Let's be honest. I mean, either you're desperate or you can't get
approved to a big bank, but either way, you're kind of between a rock and a hard place. So if
you're resulting to that, I mean, it's safe to assume that you're probably not in a great financial
situation to begin with. You probably have income
coming in, but at the same time, you know, you're probably having trouble making ends meet as it is.
So if we're going into an economic downturn, you can, people can probably start doing the math here
is that insolvencies will probably, or delinquencies will probably start rising pretty
rapidly in the next year or two.
And it's probably a sign that we're going into a recession.
I mean, if you look at all the recessions, most of the time like this happens, there's
a sharp rise in subprime lending.
And then the recession happens not too long after that.
Yeah, pretty much.
I mean, nobody willingly accesses the subprime market. It's usually a result of
them not being able to access better loans, better capital. I mean, the one thing I'll say
about GoEasy is they have been put through the ringer. They've been through the dot-com bubble.
They've been through the financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and they've come out of it
not unscathed, but they've returned,
you know, they've put up very strong results, whereas Propel hasn't really been around.
They haven't really had to take that, you know, big financial shock yet outside of like the COVID-19
pandemic, which really didn't turn out to be all that big of an issue for many of these companies
anyway. So, I mean, that's a big added element of it as well. But yeah, it's just, it's crazy growth
in these markets and go easy delinquencies have been going up. I know they trended around,
they target nine to 10%. And I believe over the last year, they've gone from 8.5 to,
you know, 9.2 or 9.3 and they keep ticking up. So it'll be interesting to see, you know,
what happens if they do get close to that 10, you know, 10% target, which would be their upper range of what they would view as comfortable.
For delinquencies?
Yeah.
Charge-off rates.
Charge-off rates.
Okay.
Yeah.
And here I have like the return.
So go easy.
Yeah, that's the name I would probably consider if I was looking that way, but not right now.
The time to buy these is when the economy rolls over
and when these delinquencies rates really start going up
because now they're trading, I mean, at pretty high valuations.
And keep in mind for those joining TCI,
this is only up until 2016, this chart.
I just wanted to show what happens when there is a downturn.
So you can clearly see here that the company is doing, you know,
posting the stock is doing quite well up till pretty much like mid late 2008. And then it just
takes a massive haircut. I'm just going to say like probably takes at least 50% haircut there.
So I just wanted to show that because subprime lender, that's going to be,
you're going to have to deal with that if you want to hold it long term. Or you can be opportunistic
and when you enter that big drop in stock price because delinquencies start rising,
then it could be a good opportunity to start into it. And like you said, I think GoEasy, the thing it has going for it is has been in the business for a long time. It has seen
recessions. So they're probably well prepared with what's coming. Whereas Propel Holdings,
I'm not so sure. Even Affirm Holdings, I don't know how well they will be prepared. So something
to keep in mind because you're, yeah, you're not dealing
with the best credit quality. That's for sure. No, you're dealing with better quality consumers
now in terms of credit, but that's just more so because they're having to tap into the subprime
market because of how crazy cost of living everything here in Canada is just getting a
bit outrageous. Yeah. Especially if you go to uh the
convenience store yeah exactly nine bucks for a bag of doritos yeah i think this summer i think
i mentioned it i went to i think it was a circle case so um alimentation costal there it was on
canada day so nothing else was open i go in for uh to get my daughter a drumstick yeah those ice cream cone i think it
was like 550 something like i couldn't believe it's ridiculous i was like yeah i still bought
it because obviously uh she wasn't too happy and needed something to soothe her a little bit but
um haven't gone back since yeah there's uh convenience is getting very expensive
yeah yeah that's for sure.
That's why they call them convenience stores,
but when money gets tight,
the convenience is not worth it.
Yeah, no, exactly.
Well, I think that's it for today.
I think it was a fun episode
between macro and I guess cyclical businesses.
It was good to look at that.
I'm sure we'll be back with more news about Arimanta.
It sounds like that's not over.
That's not over.
No, exactly.
So appreciate you listening.
You can look me up at fiat underscore iceberg on Twitter slash X and then at stocktrades underscore CA on there as well.
So thanks for listening and we'll see you next week.
The Canadian Investor Podcast should not be construed as investment or financial advice.
The hosts and guests featured may own securities or assets discussed on this podcast.
Always do your own due diligence or consult with a financial professional before making
any financial or investment decisions.