The Canadian Investor - The Real Cost of Tariffs and What Comes Next for Canada

Episode Date: February 6, 2025

In this episode, we break down what happened over the last week with the threat of Tariffs on Canada and Mexico. From the initial 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico to the last-minute deals that temporarily paused them.  We explain how tariffs actually work, who really pays for them, and why Canada is particularly vulnerable in this trade battle. We also explore the broader implications, from potential job losses and a weakening CAD to how this could impact future trade deals, including USMCA.  Plus, we dive into Canada’s need for stronger entrepreneurship and touch on major market moves like NVDA’s $600B one-day crash and China’s growing AI dominance. Tickers of Stocks/ETFs discussed: NVDA, AMD Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com Our Website Canadian Investor Podcast Network Twitter: @cdn_investing Simon’s twitter: @Fiat_Iceberg Braden’s twitter: @BradoCapital Dan’s Twitter: @stocktrades_ca Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast! Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor  Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor  Web player - The Canadian Real Estate Investor Asset Allocation ETFs | BMO Global Asset Management Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools. Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

So not so long ago, self-directed investors caught wind of the power of low cost index investing. Once just a secret for the personal finance gurus is now common knowledge for Canadians. And we are better for it. When BMO ETFs reached out to work with the podcast, I honestly was not prepared for what I was about to see because the lineup of ETFs has everything I was looking for. Low fees, an incredibly robust suite, and truly something for every investor.

And here we are with this iconic Canadian brand in the asset management world. Well, folks online are regularly discussing and buying ETF tickers from asset managers in the US. Let's just look at ZEQT, for example, the BMO all equity ETF. One single ETF, you get globally diversified equities. So easy way for Canadians to get global stock exposure with one ticker. Keeps it simple yet incredibly low cost and effective. Very impressed with what BMO has built in their ETF business.

And if you are an index investor and haven't checked out their listings, I highly recommend it. I bet you'll be as pleasantly surprised as I was that BMO, the Canadian bank, is delivering these amazing ETF products. Please check out the link in the description of today's episode for full disclaimers and more information. The Canadian investor podcast. Welcome into the show.

My name is Brayden Dennis, as always joined by the iconic Mr. Simon Belanger. Dude, what happened? Okay. You and I, we hop off the mic for like a week and a half and a year of new, like, remember all that AI craze and stuff? That was a whopping four days ago, Simone. Like, it's just this new cycle here at the end of January 2025. We're recording this now in February, has been a whirlwind.

Yeah, it's been crazy. And just the fact that our schedules have been crazy for recording between me moving to a new place, you traveling all over the place, and Dan Kent going to the US for a golf tournament. It's been pretty crazy. And then all this news comes up and I've had people asking for an emergency pod with the tariffs. Not quite the emergency pod, but at the end of the day, I think it's good that we waited

because since the announcement came on Saturday, a lot of stuff happened since, right? So yeah, yeah, so much. So I mean, maybe that's a good place to start, but you have a nice little announcement here for the listeners of the pod first. Yeah, exactly. So you've known for a little bit.

I've been thinking about it, but I will be doing the podcast full time at the end of March so focusing on the business growing the the podcast here I just couldn't make it work working part-time and trying to do the podcast all the notes doing a lot of the operation stuff as well extra content so it does give me some more time to do some growth initiatives that you and I have in mind. Some more content for people, probably some content on YouTube that we're looking at too. So look for that in the spring, early summer, some new things coming online.

Pretty excited about it. It's a big plunge but I think it was time because I just couldn't end up doing both and not sacrificing time with my family. Well, I applaud you brother and congratulations on making what I call the leap. The leap, exactly. And you are now, congratulations, which might not seem like a compliment, but it is.

You are now officially unemployable because once you've made the leap and you get a taste, you are officially unemployable. And you know what? It's a great feeling, okay? It is a great feeling to be unemployable. Yeah, I'm pretty excited. To me, it's just the liberty or the extra,

I'm not quite sure how to put it, but flexibility of being able to manage your own time. That's something I definitely cherished and not having to work that nine to five. Obviously you still have to get the stuff done, but you can do it a bit more on your schedule. There's clearly still some deadlines, but there's a lot more flexibility when you're the boss and not reporting to anyone.

Well, you know, you and I have been talking a little bit about this, about what's next for the podcast. And I really want to start an entrepreneurship podcast, more business-y focused and stuff, because of course, I'm deep into that now. I have 22 employees with FinChat now. I wouldn't be surprised if it's closer to 35 or 40 by the end of the year here. And investing in public equities like we talk about is an amazing way to get rich slowly. It is like the sure path for the people who want to have a good savings muscle and be patient.

It is the most brilliant, most effective path to you're not having to be bound to time and equals money, like working, exchanging time for money. However, I think so many people get caught up and they lose that patience factor because they wanna be rich quickly and rich now and rich within a few years and not rich within 25 years. I say to them, okay, you have to start a business then.

You have to start and own equity in some sort of upstart to go from zero to rich quickly. I'm talking about like, not overnight success, but like less than five years. Yeah, I was going to say within five years is probably every listed. Within five years, it's not going to be overnight, but so many people want to just invest and then they go down gambling on options. They go super far down the risk spectrum because they go 25 years. I'm not waiting till retirement to be rich.

I say, okay, you must start a business then. And I encourage many people to try. It's a, you know, the odds are against you, but you know, you only got one shot at this life. And so I'd rather live with no regrets and try and fail and maybe try and succeed. Yeah, no that's well put. So stay tuned we will have some announcement throughout the year. There's definitely a lot of projects that we have in mind. Not sure we'll do all of them. There might be some that are worthwhile or not and you know I know you've thought about having that extra podcast for a while but stay tuned.

There's going to be more stuff but now let's talk about that. Just what I need on I know you've thought about having that extra podcast for a while, but stay tuned. There's going to be more stuff, but now let's talk about that. Just what I need on my plate, more stuff to do here. Yeah, I think you'd go crazy if you didn't have enough on your plate. So, knowing you like I do. Yeah, and I think there's some congratulations

in order for you as well. Oh yes, yes, thank you. Congratulations on getting engaged. So it's the first time we actually talk face to face. I know you texted me the night of, but I still had my nighttime notifications off. So I'm like, oh, look at Braden posts on Twitter and doesn't text me.

And then later on, I'm sorry you texted me. Yes, scumbag move, eh? No, well, thank you. Thank you very much. Yes, my now fiance and I got engaged in Barbados like a week ago-ish now, so thank you. Okay, so enough of the housekeeping. Let's talk about tariffs now.

I wanted to do a quick recap and also go down and explain how tariffs works just because I've heard a lot of information on tariffs, a lot of stuff on Twitter which I think people just don't really understand how tariffs work and frankly I'm not quite sure a government fully understands how tariffs work the way they're talking so I'll do an overview of that but just a little bit recap so people remember at the end of November Trump posted about his plan to impose a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico. A few days later, Trudeau went to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Trump. Obviously, Trump had been trolling him on, I guess, his truth social platform, but which is

typically posted back on Twitter as well about Canada becoming the 51st state and stuff like that. But still Trump after that said that he would implement those 25% tariffs on his first day in office. Once he took office, he said that they would be implementing them on February 1st, which was last Saturday, and then Trump signed an executive order imposing 25% on tariffs on Canada and Mexico, with the exception of Canadian energy products, which would see a 10% tariff. Now, later on that day, Trudeau announced and Canada announced a slew of retaliatory tariffs.

On Monday morning, Trump came into agreement with Mexico to pause the tariffs after the Mexican government committed to send 10,000 troops to the southern border and to tackle illegal immigration but also illegal drugs coming in. Later on Monday, a 30-day pause on tariffs against Canada was also announced. In exchange, Canada committed to a 1.3 billion border plan, additional personnel to enforce the border, a 24-7 eyes on the border and a phantom czar, which that term is just like every time I hear it, I start laughing. But it must be a term that Trump likes because there's that David Sachs, right? He's like the AI in crypto czar. The AIs are, yeah.

I'm like, he must like that term and probably asked Trudeau that like he had to put that or tweet that in order to have the deal something stupid like that. Yeah. Yep. That's the latest, the 30-day pause. The 30-day pause and obviously Mexico also got, the 30 day pause. The 30 day pause and obviously Mexico also got that 30 day pause. Anything you want to add there because what I'll do now is just go over a bit how tariffs actually work just so people get a good understanding over all these headlines that we've been seeing. Yeah, I'll start with the bad and you're going to talk, I'm sure this will be a long conversation,

but I'll start with the bad, which is of course, there's this 30 day pause now, but say this is in effect tomorrow. Canadian manufacturing, it's been really tough sledding for a long time now. It's kind of a shell of itself of what it once was on the Canadian manufacturing side. It's been really tough policy wise for the energy sector, more so than a unit economics sector, unit economics perspective. But either way, exporting has not been great. This would basically be awful for a few select sectors and a few select companies that are exporting to the US, of course. Catastrophic, if not, if anything, especially for I think of like a Magno or a Linamar.

That has so many plants in Guelph, Ontario. Terrible. Especially how many times those parts have to move across the border. It makes no sense for the US OEMs and also the Canadian manufacturers. Terrible across the board. There are many businesses that this would be very catastrophic for. Now, the positive is coming out of this. I tweeted this the other day, which is Canada has lost its freaking identity and needs a major kick in the ass, a major shakeup. And frankly, we deserve this kick in the ass.

I mean, let's call it a spade. We certainly deserve this kick in the ass. And I guess that's kind of the silver lining here. I have not seen Canadians rally like they have around this in a long time. Like a long, like I don't even know, remember I can remember when this, when it's felt like this. And so we've all known we need this kick in the ass

going into the selection year. It's been really bad for a long time. It's been horrible for 10 years. I'm going to talk about some statistics after this and what we need this kick in the ass going into the selection year. It's been really bad for a long time. It's been horrible for 10 years. I'm going to talk about some statistics after this and what we need to do. So I'll finish with the silver lining is. We deserve this, honestly, to say, hey, give your head a shake. You can do better. And maybe that's just what we needed here.

Maybe or maybe that's just me we needed here. Maybe, or maybe that's just me trying to cope. I'm not really sure. It's one of the two. Yeah. And I think it's, it probably shows that we also need to embrace what we have in terms of advantage. And a lot of it is our resources. Let's be honest, like it's a big, big advantage. We're lucky to have these resources where a lot of countries don't have those. There's probably a handful of countries around the world that are as fortunate as Canada, the US included, that have a lot of natural resources that would be envy of a lot of countries in Europe, for example, that don't have that. So I think we need to embrace that a bit more.

And it's not just fossil fuels. I mean, think of the uranium deposits for nuclear. Think of the amount of moving water for hydroelectric. I know I'm talking a lot about energy, but we do have a lot of resources. And I think people, when they hear that, they think of oil and gas, which we certainly have a lot of as well.

But we have a lot of as well. But we have a lot of natural resources and it is maybe just the kick in the butt we needed, to be honest. Yeah, it could be. Welcome back into the show. This is the Canadian Investor Podcast, made possible by our friends and show sponsor EQ Bank, which helps Canadians make bank with high interest and no fees on everyday

banking. We also love their savings and investment products like GICs, which offer some of the best rates on the market. I personally, and I know Simone as well, is using the GICs on a regular basis to set money aside for personal income taxes in April of every year. Their GICs are perfect because the interest rate is guaranteed. And I know I won't be able to touch that money until I need it for tax time. Whether you're looking to set some money aside for a rainy day or a big purchase is coming through the pipeline or simply want to lower the risk of your overall

investment portfolio, EQBank GICs are a great option. The best thing about EQBank is that it is so easy to use. You can open an account and buy a GIC online in minutes. Take advantage of some of the best rates on the market today at EQBank.ca forward slash GIC. Again, EQBank.ca forward slash g i c. Here on the show, we talk about companies with strong two-sided networks

make for the best products. I'm gonna spend this coming February and March in an Airbnb in South Florida for a combination of work and vacation and realized, hey, my place could be a great Airbnb while I'm away. Since it's just gonna be sitting empty, it could make some extra income. But there are still so many people who don't even think

about hosting on Airbnb or think it's a lot of work to get started. But now it is easier than ever with Airbnb's new co-host network. You can hire a local quality co-host to take care of your home and guests. It's a win-win since you make some extra money hosting on Airbnb but can still focus on enjoying your time away. focus on enjoying your time away. Find a co-host at airbnb.ca forward slash host. That is airbnb.ca forward slash host. As do it yourself investors, we want to keep our fees low.

That's why Simone and I have been using Questrade as our online broker for so many years now. Questrade is Canada's number one rated online broker by MoneySense and with them you can buy all North American ETFs, not just a few select ones, all commission free, so that you can choose the ETFs that you want. And they charge no annual RSP or TFSA account fees. They have an award-winning customer service team with real people that are ready to help if you have questions along the fees. They have an award winning customer service team with real people that are ready to help if you have questions along the way.

As a customer myself, I've been impressed with Questrade's customer service. Whenever I call or email, every support rep is very knowledgeable and they get exactly what I need done quickly. Switch for free today and keep more of your money. Visit questrade.com for details. That is questade.com for details. That is QuestTrade.com.

So just to go over what tariffs are exactly, like I said I've seen a lot of nonsense written over the last week so I thought it was important to just give a primer here. So the tariff is paid by the importer, the company that imports the goods into the country. From what I've seen is that these tariffs would only be on goods, so not on services. The tariff is paid at the point of entry and that's critical, that's very important. The tariff revenue goes to the government imposing the tariff, so in this case,

it would go to the US government. So for example, and I know I use a lot of bike example just because I know and it's a bit of a passion of mine too. So Trek, which is a pretty big bike company in the US imports aluminum produced by Alcoa in Canada to make bike frames. Trek pays a 25% tariffs on the aluminum that imports to the US.

Now, let's say that Trek only imports the aluminum for the bike frame. Every other component of the bike is fully made to the US. Now let's say that Trek only imports the aluminum for the bike frame. Every other component of the bike is fully made in the US. The total increased cost of the tariff, assuming that Trek passes that on to the customer fully and there's no currency changes just to keep things simple, will be much less than 25%. And I think that's important because a lot of people are seeing the 25% and will freak out. That's because only part of that bike is actually tariff, not the full bike, and I think it's important because a lot of people are not making that nuance. And that goes both ways though because on the other hand, and I know you talked about that and you reference Magna, the tariffs can be massive on other products because if you take autom cars that are being built

in Canada, in the US, mostly Southern Ontario, with Michigan, the cars will actually go back and forth multiple times between both countries and they would face potential tariffs every single time that they cross over to that country. Obviously it could be both ways if there's retaliatory tariffs as well. face potential tariffs every single time that they cross over to that country. Obviously, could be both ways if there's retaliatory tariffs as well. So I think it's just something I wanted to clarify because it doesn't necessarily mean that it is 25% increase for the US consumer for

US tariffs. It depends on the quantity of the finished product that is actually tariffs. In a lot of cases, it might not be the whole product like I just mentioned here. Yeah. I mean, the auto is a great example because the supply chain is an absolute nightmare to manage. It's so messy. And there's tier one, tier two, tier three suppliers. Mexico is a huge manufacturer of auto parts. Look at a Magna has like 50 plants in Canada, like 80 to 100 in the US and another 80 to 100, if I recall correctly, in that ballpark in Mexico as well. This is a massively important supply chain for every single part and it's moving. It's really just being assembled by the OEM.

The OEM is only making a few handful of things. They're really a designer and an assembler of these vehicles. Yeah, very similar to the aircraft manufacturers, right? Airbus and Boeing, that's what they do. They assemble the aircraft, the parts come from hundreds. They do the engineering, the design, and the assembly. Exactly.

Now, some key points about tariffs. Historically, most of the costs would be passed on to the consumer. So if the U.S. imposes tariffs, those costs would be passed on to U.S. consumers. If Canada does counter tariffs, the costs would be passed on to Canadian consumers. However, in the example I gave from Alcoa and Trek,

you could potentially see company absorb some of the increased costs with lower margins if they're very profitable. And that's a big if, right? If the company has razor thin margins, probably not because it's just an immediate pass through. Exactly. Because then that's the difference between being profitable and not profitable. Think of groceries, low margin, yeah. Yeah, and currency changes can also either absorb or increase the magnitude of those tariffs. So if the US dollar straightens, then it makes the Canadian goods cheaper

and can offset some of the impact. So a lot of people may be wondering, okay, so why is Canada freaking out since the additional tariffs would be passed on to US consumers? Well, that's where the US is in a very in a position of strength here. We're yeah, we're definitely fighting Goliath and I'm not sure we would qualify as David, but let's just say David and Goliath. More than 75% of Canada exports go to the US. On the other hand, Canada is one of the major exporting countries for the US. So the US exports a lot to Canada, but it's still only 17% of their exports that

go to Canada. That's based on 2022 US government data. So the idea is that if the US imposes tariffs across the board, it will make Canadian companies less competitive or businesses that operate in Canada. It would then likely result in lower sales, lower profits or potential losses, and then potential job losses, which would put a drag on the Canadian economy. And the problem here is that the Canadian economy was not doing well to begin with. So it would be one thing if the US imposes it and the Canadian economy is growing at three, four or five percent a year. That's not the case.

We're barely growing. So the potential impacts of tariffs would be pretty significant. Everything I've seen from economists even though no one really knows and anyone who tells you that they know what would the impact would be, they don't know. They're just making some assumptions and projections but this is very novel so yes there's been some historical example but we don't know exactly how this would play out but the consensus seems to be that you could see GDP contract of between 1 and 3 percent, depending on the impact. And another issue here is with counter tariffs. So one of the issues with it

is you risk escalating the trade war. So if you put on counter tariffs, if you're Canada, you just risk that the US will say well okay we'll just increase the tariffs like Trump has threatened Canada. Canada has more to lose than the US. Our economy as it stands is doing worse than theirs. We are much more reliant on the US as a trading partner than the US is on us. It risks raising inflation while the economy is in contraction and that's a major risk because if the economy slows down and because of the US tariffs but then Canada puts counter tariffs it will

increase the price of a lot of the items that have been counter tariff and one of the things that I thought was incredibly stupid by the Canadian government, and I'm not mincing my words here, I think it's no secret that the people that have the lowest income in Canada have been struggling the most. And the fact that they would put counter-tariffs on fresh fruit, frozen fruit, vegetables and things like that. Like in what world does that help the most vulnerable people in Canada? I understand they want to stand up for Canada, but and you know, you want to do counter tariffs, that's fine.

But especially if you put on top of that a weaker Canadian dollar, can you imagine if you're like scraping by how devastating this would be? Yeah, I mean it's it's it's highly inflationary. That's why the markets reacted the way they did. Mm-hmm, exactly. And it's just the food part is what I have a big problem is because you and I will be fine. Like we can absorb that cause we won't be happy about it, but we can absorb that cause. But people that most of their income goes to lodging and food, the vast majority, they can't afford those increases. So that's where I think it's ill advised. And I do hope that they at the very least reconsider that because it will hurt people that are the most vulnerable

in the Canadian society. It feels like most developed, global, globally, people have been writing, running this treadmill against inflation since the post-COVID M2 money supply just dumps the entire float of currency onto the markets. Everyone's been kind of running this treadmill to get out of it. This is highly inflationary. To your point, you have an increasing wealth gap between the top earners and the non, and wages have not kept up with inflation. You get an election like just happened in the US, an election like that's about to happen in Canada. It's like, why are the markets so up if people feel so bad?

Or if there's so many recessionary fears? And you have had such an inflationary environment that affects the lower income that are not getting wage increases as much as the currency has debased. And you get this just huge mismatch in wealth concentration into the select few. And I'm not here to say capitalism is bad

or there's some sort of better option out there, but this is the answer to why you see markets rip, climb that wall of worry, and people feel generally, anecdotally feel so bad. And so then you get something like this, right? You've ran this treadmill of inflation to get it into a place where it's not like your buying power and your purchasing power is getting completely destroyed every year. It's not like your buying power and your purchasing power is getting completely destroyed every year. And then you see this and it's very inflationary. That is why you see markets panic the way that they did for a day.

That is why if you're wondering, the Americans are like, oh yeah, this is great for America. Why is the stock market down 3%, 4%? It's like, that's why. It's inflationary. Yeah, exactly. And businesses will be put in a tough spot because what will... There's different outcomes that can happen. Either people, maybe people will keep spending, they'll have to spend more on items that they need, but they may forgo some purchases that are discretionary because they just don't have the money to pay that additional cost and this would impact businesses in time. And there's other

potential impacts. The first one is maybe this is a wake up call we needed. The Canadian provinces needed to remove some of the trade barriers within Canada. So that's been a big call. I think I've seen the CEO of Shopify even mentioned that. What's his name? I'm drawing a... Toby. Toby. Toby Lukey. He mentioned that. I think that would be a great potential outcome of all of this is if you start removing that. I think technically they'll quote me on that, but obviously I live in Ottawa. Anyone familiar with it It's very much on the border with Quebec and a lot of people will go and shop in Quebec and or in Ottawa and vice versa

And I'm pretty sure technically it's illegal to go and buy alcohol on the Quebec side and bring it back to Ontario Although they don't enforce it. So this is there a Supreme Court precedents on that by the way. Oh is there okay? Supreme Court precedents of a I Believe New Brunswick man who was doing booze runs for cheaper alcohol Crossed province and he lost that battle in the Supreme Court About the taxation here. So how stupid is that if you ask me? Like most people, idiotic, idiotic. Most people wouldn't even do it like that's the thing right? You're just and the police really enforce that like that's

the other thing they probably don't they don't really care so that's the kind of thing that it just creates extra red tape extra regulation that's not really needed. Now for businesses considering, and this is really a side effect, opening offices or operation or expanding in Canada, they may reconsider that if the US is a large export market for them, even if tariffs never materialize

because just a threat of tariffs creates uncertainty and Braden you know as well as I do businesses hate uncertainty so if they have to choose they may reconsider expanding or an opening an office in Canada and instead doing it in the US so that is something to consider even if the tariffs never materialize in the near future. So then- Yeah, that's well put. I mean, businesses hate uncertainty, markets hate uncertainty. It's a dirty word.

Yeah, exactly. I mean, it's hard to run a business to begin with and to have that extra uncertainty is definitely not great. Now, it may make countries, not only Canada, and this is a potential side effect, a downside for the US, I don't think they fully considered. Countries may get reluctant to sign trade deals with the US

because think about it, Trump is the one who signed the US Mexico Canada, so the US MCA free trade agreement in his first term. The agreement I think is up until 2036, but is set for a joint review in 2026. Despite this agreement Trump still threatened tariffs with its two closest trading partners and you could argue allies because they are so close in terms of countries and neighbors. He did this by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and at the very least

it will likely provide an incentive to countries and I hope Canada is doing that to diversify their trade away from the US. So yes you can still keep the US as a major trading partner but it's good to maybe not be as reliant on the US because you never know what will happen. And that's, I think, something that Trump and his team may not have fully thought out of. Sure, they want to encourage companies to come back and build in the US and manufacture in the US, but when you start doing that, people take notice.

And it's the same thing, and I've been consistent on this ever since the the war between Ukraine and Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine. I said look whatever you know your stances on the war and I still keep the same the same words today is that the fact that US weaponized the financial system was a big mistake because it did it provided notice to countries around the world that may be on good terms with the US now but be careful having too many US denominated or US dollars or US treasuries because you never know what will happen five ten years down the line and we could decide to freeze your asset so this is a move that could I think backfire a little bit on the US that they're not fully

thinking this part out because countries will act in their best interests. And if this is a fear of other countries, they'll start making arrangements outside of the US. You have to think about this from a, I completely agree what you're saying. I guess I'll counteract it with Trump is in his first two weeks of office and is on a- Feels like it's been more than that.

Yeah, right. Is on a one, take credit for a bunch of stuff that was already happening mission. And two, how can I let the people know who voted for me that I am putting America first, right? You have this country that is, it's hugely unpopular how much money they're sending abroad, namely Ukraine. It's hugely unpopular how many migrants have moved into their country.

It's hugely unpopular to not be America first in this campaign that he put forward together, right? And so he's doing everything he can, whether it's smart or dumb, to send that message. And let me tell you, it is hugely popular in America, what he is doing right now. And so I see what you're saying. You're taking that 10,000 foot view,

but why would we expect he does anything else, right? Like it would be insanity to expect that he wouldn't do anything else. And you know what? He's gaining popularity from this, not losing popularity. The people who already hate Trump will hate what he does regardless. And the people who are in the middle,

who are like, I'm tired of not being in America, America first, the same way Canada is now rallying around this, you know, buy Canada first, buy Canada first, let's not rely on anyone else. They feel that to an extreme measure, and they think that it's actually possible to have complete not dependence on some of these trading partners and namely China.

So I think expecting anything else and expecting change on that mission, especially in his first three, six months in office, would be just foolish in my opinion. So we have to kind of expect this moving forward, at least his first year in office. Yeah, it has been quite the rallying cry, it's true, because I've had friends that know

I have an investing podcast, I text with them on other subject all the time, and I've had a few that were asking me about tariffs, if I was doing like a special episode on it. So it just tells you, and it's people that I know they're not that interested in this kind of stuff. So I think I totally agree with you. It's not just in the business economic, you know,

enlightened folks. It is on everyone's timeline, whether it's LinkedIn or Instagram, it's like rallying around this like Canada, like, you know, if they're saying, okay, America first, like, well, we should be too. And that's where I started the show with, hey, maybe this is the kick in the ass we needed because we are sitting in an amazing position, natural resources was. Yes. And it feels like we've just blundered it for so long. So maybe this is the kick in the butt. Yeah. And probably just to wrap this up, the way, I don't know how this will play out. And

obviously what I was saying in terms of the impacts, it's more long-term, right? Where countries may start making other agreements. I think you're totally right, short term, he wants to show people who have voted for them that he's, you know, promises have been kept and look what I'm doing on the border, even though I don't, I think it's debatable to what extent Canada is actually a big problem there

in terms of the stats I've seen. But again, it's whatever he promised to his base that he wants to show that he's getting stuff done. Look, Canada is sending people at the border. Mexico is sending too, so we're not paying anything for this and we're reducing the amount of people coming into the country and the amount of drugs. So that's what he's able to say.

But I think when it's all said and done, I think Canada and Mexico will be fine. I think they'll be fine if we look at two, three, four years down the line, there's probably going to be some economic terms that will be renegotiated. I think that's inevitable. But I think you're going to see a regional fragmentation around the world. So I think you're going to see the US, Canada, and Mexico work closely together. Even though, yes, you have the tariff threats, but I think he's just using that as wielding the big stick and trying to get some concessions on the things that are important that are not even economically related right now. They may become. I know we have other

gripes about some different trade deals and the terms. For example, I know dairy products is a big issue. That is one thing. And that might be renegotiated with the US. But I really think that you'll see down the line almost a closer partnership between the three countries, that's my prediction, and more restrictions on other countries around the world. So I think that's what we'll see, is you'll see more protectionism, almost as a block in North America against the rest of the world,

not just China, Europe included, that's my prediction. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's where I think things will head. Welcome back into the show. This is the Canadian Investor Podcast, made possible by our friends and show sponsor, EQ Bank, which helps Canadians make bank with high interest and no fees on everyday banking. We also love their savings and investment products like GICs,

which offer some of the best rates on the market. I personally, and I know Simone as well is using the GICs on a regular basis to set money aside for personal income taxes in April of every year. Their GICs are perfect because the interest rate is guaranteed. And I know I won't be able to touch that money until I need it for tax time. Whether you're looking to set some money aside for a rainy day or a big purchase is coming

through the pipeline or simply want to lower the risk of your overall investment portfolio, EQ Bank's GICs are a great option. The best thing about EQ Bank is that it is so easy to use. You can open an account and buy GIC online in minutes. Take advantage of some of the best rates on the market today at EQBank.ca forward slash GIC. Again, EQBank.ca forward slash GIC. Here on the show, we talk about companies with strong two-sided networks make for

the best products. I'm gonna spend this coming February and March in an Airbnb in South Florida for a combination of work and vacation and realized hey my place could be a great Airbnb while I the way. Since it's just going to be sitting empty, it could make some extra income. But there are still so many people who don't even think about hosting on Airbnb or think it's a lot of work to get started. But now it is easier than ever with Airbnb's new co-host network. You can hire a local quality co-host to take care of your home and guests. It's a win-win since you make some extra money hosting on Airbnb

but can still focus on enjoying your time away. Find a co-host at airbnb.ca forward slash host. That is airbnb.ca forward slash host. As do it yourself investors, we want to keep our fees low. That's why Simone and I have been using Questrade as our online broker for so many years now. Questrade is Canada's number one rated online broker by MoneySense. And with them, you can buy all North American ETFs, not just a few select ones, all commission free so that you can choose the ETF American ETFs, not just a few select ones, all commission free, so that you

can choose the ETFs that you want. And they charge no annual RRSP or TFSA account fees. They have an award-winning customer service team with real people that are ready to help if you have questions along the way. As a customer myself, I've been impressed with Questrade's customer service. Whenever I call or email, every support rep is very knowledgeable and they get exactly what I need done quickly. Switch for free today and keep more of your money. Visit questrade.com for details.

That is questrade.com. Maybe this is a good way to go to our next segment. I got two things here. The fight that is worth fighting for them is the big news of last year, which is, of last week, which is the DeepSeek AI open source Chinese model that came out. This is shattering and sent a wild market cap shed of some of the biggest tech companies in the world losing hundreds of billions of dollars in market cap in one day. NVIDIA lost 600 billion in market cap in one trading day.

That is more than the market cap of RBC, Shopify, TD, BMO and Scotia combined more like another 50 billion in one day, right? Just, you know, oh, boom, here's another six, here's 600 billion off the valuation. The fight that they need to go after if we're talking about trade is this. And you mentioned the All Hin podcast. They shared a nice little Finchat chart on the podcast,

which is nice. That's obviously a huge podcast. Oh, did they? Yeah, nice. They did because we break down the segmented level data, no one else is doing it. And in Nvidia's statements, they share where revenue comes from. Okay. 22% as of their latest quarter of revenue from NVIDIA is Singapore. Yeah. Okay. Singapore. Okay. Singapore, wonderful country.

I was there not long, but I was there in 2019. It's beautiful, very futuristic, awesome place. I think it's great. It's worth going to. They are not buying tens of billions of dollars of chips from Nvidia H100s per quarter. They're not. There's no way. There is absolutely no way. And so where is that going?

This is the investigation. If we're talking about trade, that the US have fight that they should go down is where are billions of dollars of H100s going that are so allegedly Nvidia is selling to air quotes Singapore. I think we can probably make a good guess that those are back channeling to China. You don't have to be a journalistic accountant to figure out that those are not all being filled in Singapore. There's just no way we're talking about

an obscene order volume, 22% of Nvidia's revenue per quarter going to Singapore. You have up a map here of Southeast Asia. Yeah, just so people kind of know where Singapore is related to China. So it's very close and it's a major trading hub. I would say, I'm not sure, I don't have the data, but I would say it's probably kind of taking over

for Hong Kong in terms of trading hub. Ever since Hong Kong has gotten back into the hands of China. I don't have data, but that's my impression. It's kind of like a new, I don't know. To me it felt like a New York, it felt like the New York City financial hub. Like all the banks are there of Southeast Asia. And it rhymes a lot with the discussions around TikTok.

The CEO of their headquarters there are in Singapore, not China, which I think is very tactical from ByteDance. Saying, oh, we're not CCP. We're actually here in China. Our CEO sits in Singapore. I'm Singaporean, not Chinese. And it's kind of like a smoke bomb, right? It is a, ByteDance is a Chinese company.

Let's not kid ourselves. It is a Chinese company. It's not a Singaporean company. And it rhymes a lot like the TikTok conversation with 22% of Nvidia's H100 GPUs going to China that are definitely building super clusters. They're definitely building super clusters there with Nvidia chips.

No question. I think that you'd be insane not to suspect that they are. And so that is the fight they should be going down if they really wanna be the leaders in AI. Yeah, no, I think that the whole deep-seek definitely opened a lot of eyes and as someone who uses AI for FinChat, what's your take on that? Have you guys started looking at deep-seek, at the model potentially because Dan was asking me like oh like how's Brayden viewing this? I'm like oh I haven't talked to them but

yeah I would think it's probably a good thing for them because it could potentially reduce costs because it's not cheap in terms of computing credit. But feel free to enlighten me if I'm completely off track here. So there's been multiple different consensus around where the value accrues with AI. And it's changed multiple times down the stack with multiple iterations. And it'll change again. That's the nature of this business.

But for a while, people thought, oh wow, these closed LLMs, how's anyone going to compete with? Because they're raising hundreds of billions of dollars from like the Microsofts of the world, and you know, this project Stargate or whatever, they're raising all of this capital, that's gonna be the real moat, no one's gonna be able to compete with these LLMs, okay?

Boom, shattered with this idea from DeepSeek. Now I don't believe that everything I hear out of them in terms of what it costs. Yeah, me neither. I do not believe them. I just know what even lower end Nvidia GPUs trade for. Like they are not cheap either. So I think that that's a lot of smoke and mirrors.

But I do believe that there is a world where open source competitors, even with what Zuck is creating with Lama, there is a world where there's immense competition at the LLM layer and it gets commoditized. That's not new news, by the way. That has been my opinion for well over a year now. Okay? So then people think, okay, so application layer and cloud are the ones that, you know,

where all of these workloads are being run on, the actual infrastructure layer, the NVIDIAs of the world and the application layer benefit all from this. Now people are thinking, does this change the thesis on the GPU infrastructure? Do you need the most advanced two nanometer chip? Do you need that ASML ultraviolet lithography? Do you need TSMC to be the only manufacturer of this type of technology? So that is now evolving as well on that layer. So now the only consensus is, OK, cloud is still the big beast.

And two, application layer continues to get more and more valuable who touches the end user. So that's where we exist. We touch the end user on the application layer. People have gone from thinking, oh, we're just a wrapper, chat GPT wrapper. That's a load of shit. We're just using infrastructure from these large language models. And those things are going commoditized to zero.

So here's the stats, Simon. Our API cost 24 cents token last year at the beginning of the year. We finished the year at three cents. This is what we charge our customers. We kept the same margin the whole time, but that goes to tell you how much cheaper it got last year. This is just an acceleration of that. So maybe three cents goes to one, goes to half, goes to a penny, you know, so it goes to a fraction of a penny. That is the trend that we're on right now. Yeah. And one of the things I mentioned with Dan, and I liked your take on that is my sense

is that there's going to be a need for compute so those GPUs the demand for it may be a little different so it may take a bit more time or maybe companies will reevaluate in the short to medium term whether they need to spend as much or maybe they will start looking at alternatives and I mentioned an AMD which had always been right behind Nvidia in terms of GPU ever since they bought Radeon years and years ago. So I can see them even if they're not at the forefront even if their GPUs are just 80-85% of what Nvidia is but they cost

let's say more less than half or it makes a whole lot more sense for these companies to start. They're so far behind on the software layer though, Simon. Yeah. Like it's not even close. Yeah, but that isn't, was I off side reading that DeepSeek was able to do all of that without using CUDA language?

There are some elements of their white paper There are some elements of their white paper that are interesting and some that I just don't believe. I don't know, like, I, I, I, but this could just be my like CCP bias. No, well, the reason I'm saying that is because as new alternatives become, and especially if it requires, it's less compute intensive, I can see companies

trying to shift to options that are not as expensive that may not be as good, whether it's 80%, but they're just a fraction of the cost. That's more my main argument that I'm saying. And Nvidia, I think their margins have peaked. That is the one thing I will say, is that my prediction is I think their margins have peaked. And that's where I disagree with a lot of people

when it comes to Nvidia who are saying, oh, this doesn't change the thesis or anything like that. Maybe not, but the fact that- They're selling hardware at 76% gross margins. Exactly. It's hard to argue with what you're saying. That is absurdly high. Yeah.

And I think that's where the price of perfection, like we've mentioned, I think that's where people are missing a lot of the point and people say it's overdone. And I'm not saying that the business is cratering or anything, but even if there's a slight deceleration in the growth rate, when your price is so expensively, I think that's where you start getting an issue in terms of returns if you're an Nvidia shareholder. It's not the fact that the company, I'm not saying the company is going to zero. It'll probably keep growing, but its price like it's Those revisions are going to start trending down on Finch ad. If you look at the estimates, they're going to start trending down because it's just euphoria that the estimates that were out there. It's not euphoria if you think that the current thing continues to accelerate. That's not euphoria, but it is if there is

massive disruption or change to the thesis around you must use Nvidia H100s. Yeah, and keep in mind too, when a company is super profitable, like Nvidia is, you encourage competition. Other companies see that and they look at these fat margins and say, you know what, if we can get half of those margins, we'll be happy.

Let's get into this and try to develop, even if we need to put a lot of money, a lot of investment in it. That's the other thing that I think a lot of Nvidia bulls are missing the point is the fact that it's so profitable encourages competition. Yeah I just I don't know I don't know where I sit on that because it's it's it's really hard to compete with them like I agree with you but it's not easy like AMD's so far behind on like the full a full stack layer that it's hard,

but we'll see. We'll see, you and I both don't have a position outside of the fact that we are making the bet on, with ASML that you're going to need the most advanced lithography possible and that it is going to become weaponized by the Western world that you can't get that type of technology in China, which already exists by the way. You cannot buy EUV in China.

Yeah. So anyways, this all comes back to, do you really believe Singapore? Let me just figure out what that number is. Hold on. I'm gonna pull up on some chat. Was it a 20% or? I wanna know the nominal value, just for a scale of red. Which is another risk for Nvidia, by the way. Because if the US starts putting pressure exactly on Singapore, that's a big risk for them too. 7.7 billion last quarter. Out of?

7.7 billion last quarter. Out of? 7.7 billion last quarter to Singapore. We don't believe that, do we? I don't. I do not believe that. It's a lot for a small country, that's for sure. Or a small city state, sorry. Yeah, a small city state. I mean, where would they all put those?

Yeah, they have data centers, but not that many. All right, can I pivot to my last thing about back to Canada? Yeah, let's do it. OK, so there's been the Elon Doge Department of Gut Vermin Efficiency in the US. And again, another thing that is very popular supported on both sides of the aisle. I wouldn't say Elon is popular supported on both sides of the aisle. I wouldn't say Elon is popular supported on both sides of the aisle at this point, but

the idea of the taxpayer getting better value for what they pay for. That is very popular in the US right now, as it should be. I like small business, capitalism, and small government. You know, I like, I like small business, capitalism and small government. That's, that's what I like. And Canada has blown up our public sector employee base. The public sector since 2014 has grown 26% as of the 2024 numbers from stats Canada, government employees have grown 26%. Self-employed is flat to like a negative 1%. Private sector is up 15%. Now, if we get this on the back

of how much our population grew during that time, we've funneled a massive amount of what I think is trying to hide a really poor unemployment number into the public sector. And Canada needs a doge of our own. We don't have to make it Elon Musk, Trump bro thing, but we do need some common sense to the public sector right now. I believe that 25% ballooning in public sector employees could be slashed and no one would notice. Here's where I'm going to get kind of savage. I used to work in public sector, okay, out of university.

It was whinier and lazier than I could have ever imagined. And that's why I got out of there. I seriously think you could slash 25%. I know many people listening to this statistically are public sector workers. I know that there are many that work very, very hard. And those same people listening also know that many of them don't. And it is just a fact. I think you could slash 25%. And if you are one of those people listening hard,

listening right now that are hard workers, guess what? We should package people up and let them go just like the US is doing because the smart motivated people that can go Repurpose themselves in the private sector or with entrepreneurship Are we're gonna be the ones that take that package and go make a leap like you and I did and will actually go make something productive for this country So I believe 25% should be slashed right off the top. No one will notice package them up

They'll get pushed to other more useful things. The very motivated, good employees will take elsewhere. Okay. Next, that number is then going to get slashed again, down to 50%. I think the government should be 50% of its current employees tomorrow. And those people will adjust, they'll learn to do more with less. I know this sounds savage.

I used to work in the public sector. I think half of them could go immediately. I know I sound very Elon, Vivek, Trump right now, but there needs to be a serious Department of Government efficiency in this next administration in Canada. Canadian entrepreneurship is very sad state, okay? Canadian entrepreneurship has declined massively. There's 121,000 fewer entrepreneurs today than there was in 2000. Think of how much the population has grown.

How is that possible? We have less nominal entrepreneurs in the country than the year 2000 and look how much the population has grown, ballooned to like 40 million people. Three things why. One very non-existent early stage venture capital, which is from a long list of reasons. Over hiring of public sector's employees, which is from a long list of reasons, over hiring of public sector employees, which I just mentioned. This is where ambitious dreamers turn into pensioners for life. This kills motivation, complete over hiring of the public sector, slash 50% and they need to go. And three,

atrocious capital gains tax policy. Atrocious capital gains tax policy, the so-called one-time lifetime event of a capital gains policy. Oh, it's not going to affect that many people. It's not going to affect that many people. That is true, but it destroys the incentive to build businesses here when they can go avoid all of that anywhere else. Not anywhere else, but a long, long list. Even the US. There's just not enough friction for the smart people to go there. And so those three reasons have been terrible for entrepreneurship. You need to incentivize the few people who will create massive amounts of jobs.

There needs to be a longer list than just Shopify on the TSX that has created tremendous value for this country. And so that's end of rant. Canada, oh Canada, we need to fix some things. So I'm going to be a bit more nuanced, but definitely share a lot of your thoughts there. So obviously I live in Ottawa. I know a lot of people that work for the government. My part-time job, I tried to keep that separate from here, but it's kind of a, it's a crown corporation without going too much in detail, but it's a very different culture

than most government kind of jobs. So I'll just leave it at that. But I did work for the city of Ottawa before this one about 10 years ago. And what I've noticed is similar to what you're saying is yes There's some very good employees But it gets very frustrating if you're a good employee because you see probably one out of four that is not pulling their weight They're very Just messing around not doing much, barely working.

And the way I see things is look, whoever is in power, you have to balance the budget. That's the way I see it. So you balance the budget and you decide what programs are important, but you have to make it work in the budget. And if that means that you have to reduce the workforce to be able to do so, if it means you have to cut some programs to be able to do so, that's my main preoccupation is you balance a budget because the path we're on right now will have some really bad consequences probably in the next five to 10 years, maybe even before that.

And that's that's where I stand from but again I think there is some room to make that more efficient and make sure that yes like you said maybe some good you offer some packages you get some employees that say you know what I'll take it I'll start my own business it creates new entrepreneurs or maybe some people that are like you know what I hate my job I don't do a good job, I know I'm not a good employee, you're giving me a year, year and a half severance, whatever. Sure, I'll do that and then I'll retire early and good riddance. That's the kind of thing. And by the way,

they might be close to their pension meeting their annual salary. Yeah, they're on well, it's not quite but with would take home pay Probably because then you adjust for you're no longer making pension contributions and all that stuff So yes, what I'm trying to say is it's not too big of a jump Mathematically to take that package if you're thinking about calling it quits retirement wise and And and moving on and not having that, you know, ever, you know, not having that bigger liability for the taxpayer, like to what you're saying, right? Like they have a fiduciary duty to serve the taxpayer.

And so we need to start acting accordingly. Yeah, yeah. I think to me, that's the biggest thing. And you have to properly evaluate employees too in the government. You have to make sure that they are doing a good job and that if they're not, I mean, eventually there's discipline and follow the proper process, but at some point, if you're not doing your job properly, you should not have that job. You should be let go. It's that simple. But again, I think we steered away from that with a lot of government agency,

whether it's federal, provincial, municipal, doesn't matter. But that's the way I see it is whoever's in place, balance the budget. I don't really care how you make it work. You decide what programs you think are the most important and then you make the budget fit. That's my perspective on it. Yeah. So just to recap here, because I don't want to whine with no suggestions here, even though my suggestions are kind of ruthless and savage, the math is simple. More than 25% public sector growth since 2014. So over the last 10 years, 2014 to 2024, you had 25, 26% public sector growth and only 15% private sector growth

and flat to negative self-employment. So that's that entrepreneurship piece. that's that entrepreneurship piece, that those numbers cannot, cannot continue to trend that way. Absolutely cannot tend to trend you, especially when you consider that private sector number is kind of rebounded off COVID, there's big hiring and it's basically been flat since, while the public sector government employee number

continues to climb. That cannot continue to happen. You cannot say, oh, employment is down because they've just been thrown into a liability for the taxpayer to take on. That absolutely cannot continue. We need to have some sort of massive overhaul into the public sector employee base. It's just, it is just the reality here. And then two, we need to seriously think about how we can parlay that into the ambitious dreamers that are in that pool of employees. How do we turn them from pensioners to ambitious again?

Because there's a lot of them. You know them, you've met them. I was one of them. There are people out there that I was working with. How do we get them from that 25% into actually creating something productive, creating other jobs, making things here in Canada? That would be my number one priority

if I was making the decisions. That would be, I don't think of anything more important right now because it does a lot of other things for the country, including going towards that balancing the budget. I don't have anything else down to that. So I think it's a good spot to wrap it up. Thanks for listening to the podcast, folks. We really appreciate you. This feels like a Dear Canada type of episode.

Maybe that should be the title, Dear Canada, dot, dot, dot. We really appreciate you listening to the podcast. I mean, the listenership is, I think, 95% Canadian based on the analytics, that's not right, Simo? Yeah, yeah, that's about right. Well, 90 plus. It varies a little bit, but 90%, yeah. All right, so everyone's rallying around Support Canada. Hey, support the show. The Canadian Investor podcast should not be construed as investment or financial advice.

The hosts and guests featured may own securities or assets discussed on this podcast. Always do your own due diligence or consult with a financial professional before making any financial or investment decisions.