The Chaser Report - How To Build A Submarine
Episode Date: June 27, 2023Dom and Charles put on their DIY hats and plan how they would build their own submersible vehicle to visit the Titanic. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The Chaser Report is recorded on Gatigal Land.
Striving for mediocrity in a world of excellence, this is The Chaser Report.
Hello and welcome to The Chaser Report with Dom and Charles. Dom, what a day.
Again, you've started the last few episodes with that, and it's always true. It is always true.
There is so much news around today. It's just like a smorgasbord that looks unappetizing.
Which things shall we cram into our mouths in the hope of sustenance first?
Well, look, we could talk about.
the sort of bizarreness of what's happening in Russia.
We could, yeah, it's very hard to follow.
He did a good job a couple of days ago
trying to explain the whole thing.
It sounds as though he's turned up in Belarus
and I don't know what's going on.
Yeah, well, it sounds like it really was just office politics.
Yes.
It really, like that analysis,
which you heard first on the Chase Report,
seemed to have been incredibly prescient.
Yeah, well done.
And the other reporting that I think we can all say was world class was on the submersible.
So I thought maybe this episode should be a bit of an update on some of the new details that have emerged about exactly what they knew and didn't know as they headed towards the Titanic.
Well, as far as I know, Charles, we haven't been cancelled after the one last week.
Well, they were basically their location was unknown about Chalk's going on and made the point.
point that the whole venture was deeply stupid.
I think analysis, which was justified in hindsight.
So let's see if we can avoid lightning striking again in a moment.
Thank you for your patience.
Your call is important.
Can't take being on hold anymore?
FIS is 100% online so you can make the switch in minutes.
Mobile plans start at $15 a month.
Certain conditions apply.
Details at FIS.ca.
So, Charles, the submersible, the tragic and yet not entirely unforeseeable deaths that followed
from this extremely unstable, it seems, carbon fibre vessel.
Yes.
Well, this is what I want to talk to about, which is the nature of carbon fibre.
Oh, yeah.
I've used to carbon fibre, I think, for tennis rackets and other things like that.
Yes.
And so one of the interesting yarns that Daniel,
Feldman actually did a couple of days ago on Twitter was pointing out where carbon fiber in submarines
comes from, like the original idea for using carbon fiber in submarines.
So as you know, as we talked about on the last thing, one of the difficult things about
building a submarine is that for every, well, it was it 10 metres you go down, you double the
pressure that's on the hull.
It may have been every one.
It's certainly, it increases at an incredibly horrible rate.
A logarithmic, a logarithmic rate.
So you're talking about absolutely massive pressure on a whole.
And part of the problem is that you have this sort of collapsible thing.
Like when it does finally break, it sort of collapses in on itself.
And you're done.
And one of the things that has always been pointed out about carbon fibre is that it is a brittle material.
So it's always been seen that metal is a much better material.
material to make a submersible out of because instead of just like cracking and therefore
imploding, you know, catastrophically, metal at least gives you a bit of a warning system,
which is that it sort of crumbles.
Yeah, that's why they don't make cars out of carbon fibre because they would shatter
rather than crumpling.
And in fact, modern cars are designed to actually impact and, you know, fold in a bit so
that it doesn't get to your body.
Interesting point.
Maybe they could have, I don't know, accessed the dozens and dozens.
of years of car development in designing this submersible.
Well, the thing is, there are lots of incredible advantages to carbon fiber, though.
And the key one is just sheer portability, right?
So imagine if you have to do a submersible that has enough metal on it to, you know,
like, and we're talking like steel and stuff like that, to go down 4,000 meters.
You're talking about a fucking heavy vehicle, right?
Like, it's a vehicle that you can't even conventionally put on another boat.
Like, you can't just...
Because it'll sink the boat.
Yes, you'll sink the boat.
It gives you a start, though, and you're submersing.
Yeah, that would be fair.
Exactly.
So you've then got to design hundreds of millions of dollars of other equipment just to cart it around the country,
especially if it's a submersible, which by definition is not one that can just travel on its own.
No, that's right.
It's important to note that doesn't have much ability to sort of move around on its own.
Yes, that's right.
So the guy who came up with the idea to make it out of carbon fibre was not, in fact, Stockton Rush.
It was in fact Stephen Fossett.
Do you remember Steve Fossett?
Oh, yes.
The sort of adventure.
Another eccentric billionaire adventurer.
Millennium, millennial and gen sort of Z and Gen Y might not remember him because he died about 13 years ago.
But when we were growing up, he was a sort of Richard Branson-esque.
Dick Smith.
sort of guy who would, you know, go, oh, guy, I'm going to fly in a plane entirely around
the globe and, oh, I'm going to get in a, didn't he get in a hot air balloon?
I did a lot of that sort of stuff.
Yeah, all that sort of stuff.
Anyway, for a while there, he was the sort of go-to guy.
And he was actually, he did everything quite sensibly right.
But he came up with the idea in about 2007, he came up with the idea, why don't we make
a submersible out of carbon fibre because it'll be really light and,
easy right so he he started development on this he spent actually several years developing it up and then
unfortunately completely unrelated he crashed his plane into the side of a mountain stumbled out and
actually walked about half a mile from the wreckage and then died well he was in the he did said a lot
of records for flying plane circund navigating the globe and all that kind of stuff yeah and crashed his
plane anyway so at that point i think that was about 2012 the guy who picked that up
and who then bought out that project was Richard Branson.
Oh, really?
And he said, okay, well, this is an interesting idea.
Carbon fibre is submersible.
Let's see what we can do with it.
And then they realized,
and it was going to be called the Deep Flight Challenger.
Oh.
And it was a one-person sub with wings,
made of light white carbon fiber.
And his whole idea, because Fossett just liked breaking records.
His whole idea was...
Yeah, he's had a lot of world records.
I'll do the quickest underwater run or something.
But crucially.
I'll do the flimsiest vessel under the water.
No, but crucially, because Fawcett was not an idiot, right?
Like, he actually valued safety.
His whole design was based on that it would be a disposable sub
that you would only ever go once out in a carbon fibre thing.
Because the whole nature of carbon fibre and the whole point of this podcast
is to let you know that the way carbon fibre works
It is strongest when it's new.
Oh, so reusing the same carbon fiber submersible, which they did.
It gets weaker and weaker with every use.
I've heard several people say it's like, you know how, say you had something like a paper clip
or something like that had.
You know how, like when you bend it first of all, you can sort of bend it back,
but if you keep bending it quite a bit, it gets brittle, it snaps.
It sort of just, yeah, eventually snaps, right?
So, and it's a bit like that with carbon fibre.
in actual fact, the safest time, like, it's ironic, but the safest time to go in, say,
the Titanic was, not the Titanic, in the Titan, but the Stockton Rush submersible,
would have been on its first voyage, because it's the one that's least likely to have any
carbon fibre damage.
Well, there was a term that was used in the analysis of the crash, which was quite chilling,
which was delamination, which sounded like a very bad thing to happen to carbon fiber,
basically coming apart.
Have you heard what James Cameron?
had to say about the carbon fiber material.
He said it was a horrible idea to use carbon fiber,
that it's not at all sensible for vessels with external pressure.
And he just chucked in.
He's done a lot of interviews about this.
He just sort of threw in here and there that in his, you know,
untested submersible that he went in.
A, he didn't take passengers.
It was just him and his scientist.
He didn't sell tickets.
But also he went three times deeper or something,
down to the Challenger deep, and survived
because he didn't use carbon fiber.
So he called it.
Yeah, the critical failure of the whole thing was the carbon fiber.
And he was really worried about this because they used such a dumb material.
And this is someone who thought the Titanic was a good idea for a movie.
So, you know, James Cameron's not right about everything.
But even worse, Avatar.
Oh, yeah.
I'd imagine doing an Avatar and going, what I really need to do is four sequels.
It's all at once.
Imagine going, you know, I'm going to do a movie called Avatar,
but there's an even dumber idea out there, carbon fiber on submersible.
I think the next avatar is called The Way of Carbon Fiber.
But can I just quote?
He's just backing up what you're saying here.
He said, this is with George Stephanopheles.
He said, they fail over time because each dive adds more and more microscopic damage.
Why didn't they ask him?
No.
James Cameron knows this shit.
No, but the thing is, Dom, and this is the next point in the rave,
Stockton Rush also knew that, right?
And I would just counter that I don't think necessarily it's the worst fiber,
the worst material to use, if you're just going.
going to do it once because it is strong and the point is there are lots of good qualities to
it like for example if you build it out of metal then you have to also work out how it's going
to float back up to the top if you build out of carbon fibre it is incredibly light you can
literally fly through the water if you're in a in a carbon fiber submersible but yes you're right
it it has micro tears in the carbon fiber with every time you go down in it right so they
knew this. And so what Stockton Rush did is he invented a thing called the acoustic real-time
monitoring system. So during descent, the computer sends an acoustic ping to 20 sensors throughout
the carbon fibre hull to detect weakness. You know, every, every second or so, right? It's a real-time
monitoring system, right? And Stockton Rush actually painted this for the thing. I'm not sure that
patent's going to be worth much to his ears, unfortunately.
But the idea was the submarine would stop every hour or two.
Sorry, they did it every hour.
The idea was the submarine would stop every hour or two on its descent.
The computer would measure the integrity of the hull.
If it seemed like it was failing, the pilot would take it up to safer waters.
Every hour.
Now, note that none of Russia's engineers wanted to put their name on this invention.
So it was Stockton Russia's own invention alone, right?
So the point is that what happened was if you have a catastrophic failure in carbon fibre,
so say, I don't know, what's another brittle?
Say glass, right?
Does glass, Dom, because glass is brittle.
Yes.
When you break glass, does it just slightly break?
Or does it completely break?
No, it completely.
I think the term is catastrophic failure, isn't it?
It was used for what happens.
So the point is that actually, maybe the point is,
is that they knew that it was going to fail.
And some people have suggested that maybe even
the straw that broke the camel's back
could even have been them stopping down going,
okay, well, let's send some ping through this stuff.
Well, it might have exactly right.
It's sort of just like stress testing it.
Let's do an underwater stress test.
Crack!
Oh, God.
But apparently James Cameron made his sub
so that it could actually shrink.
So they used shrinkable glass and all the things.
So it knew, like, because the pressure is so great.
Yes.
I love that we're just.
talking about physics and ignoring the comedy simply because this is so fascinating.
Yeah, it's really how you design for that challenge.
And his went, again, three times deeper.
It's bizarre.
Apparently all the bolts had to be able to move around in the Cameron one to avoid the bitterness.
Again, there was a product out there that did this job before that Ocean Gate could have looked at if they weren't so ahead.
Stockton Rush have a carbon fibre tennis racket or something and just go, oh, great material.
Thank you for your patience.
Your call is important.
Can't take being on hold anymore.
FIS is 100% online, so you can make the switch in minutes.
Mobile plans start at $15 a month.
Certain conditions apply.
Details at FIS.ca.
The Chaser Report.
Less news.
Less often.
The other small detail, which I haven't verified,
because I didn't want to, the story was too good.
to verify either way
is that if you actually look at some of the photos
from early emissions on that thing,
you can see that the computer monitors
are actually screwed in to the hole.
And there was a suggestion of
was it actually screwed into the carbon fiber,
in which case...
Forget about it.
Forget about it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Forget about it.
The other thing that I'll just,
as a sort of coder to this story,
is guess what happened
to the Richard Branson version of the project
that he'd bought from Steve Fossett?
the years earlier.
Guess what happened to it?
Well, either it completely crumbled and failed
or we turned it into the spacecraft.
No, what happened was that in 2014,
Richard Branson decided to just write off the whole project
because he thought it was stupidly dangerous
and he'd done his risk assessment on it
and when there was no way to commercialise this
because it's a fucking stupid idea.
But Charles, Charles Stockton Rush,
where it was very clear.
I've seen him quoted.
Safety considerations.
and testing, slow down innovation.
Yes.
What you'd want to do is just speed it up.
If they try and slow you don't going,
oh, let's stress test this thing
that's going to go under unimaginable pressure
at the bottom of the ocean.
You'd say, fuck off, boffins, I'm doing it anyway.
Don't slow me down with your rules.
That was the kind of guy he was.
He probably should have explained a little bit more clearly
to the three people he sold sick tickets to, for instance.
By the way, you know the other detail we didn't mention
when we talked about this last week that I learned
is that the British guy, the British adventurer,
He survived Jeff Bezos's Blue Horizon.
So he went up.
He went up.
Before he went down.
Yes.
And so he was clearly used to eccentric, you know, billionaires doing
outlandish vessels that were completely safe.
Bezos's Blue Horizon was absolutely fine.
It worked really well.
Not so much this one.
Well, the thing is, the Stockton Rush was by no means a billionaire.
He was worth $12 million, Dom.
And some of the reports that have been coming out in the last week is that essentially
his company couldn't quite sell a number.
tickets. And that's why he kept on offering, you know, seats to journalists and things like
that to drum up business. I suspect he's not worth as much as he was before this happened.
But in particular, there is a suggestion that actually he knew that the carbon fiber thing was
getting weaker and weaker. But he didn't have enough money to build a second one. And so he kept
flogging this one that he knew was past its... So this is a big problem because normally,
the whole model for this Charles
is that the eccentric billionaires
fund the thing and blow massive amounts
of money chasing a stupid idea, as
Branson did. It's not meant to be that you've got
some sort of striver who doesn't have much money.
It sells tickets to the billionaires.
They're meant to do the funding. The narrative
is completely wrong if he can't afford
to just do more iterations of it.
Yes. And just to add to that
theory, there is actually
one piece of evidence
that Eugenie Lassingame came up with and reported on
is that Stockton Rush actually bought the carbon fibre hull
the sort of front bit.
At Bunnings.
From Boeing.
It wasn't far off, was I?
Yeah, I know.
Especially the guy going to Bunnings going,
oh, have you got any submersible stuff?
And it was from Boeing.
It was a Spencer-built composite cylindrical hull.
Right.
But it was actually, Boeing sold it off because it was derated in January 2020
because it was, they hadn't used it enough and it was past its shelf.
So essentially it was too old to use in a Boeing plane, which doesn't have to deal with any
pressure at all.
They sold it off.
Oh, right.
So it was seconds.
Yes, yes.
Oh, goodness.
So I'm just reading this here.
Seconds world.
Seconds world.
Yeah.
Yeah, the Deep Sea Challenger was made out of high strength steel and titanium,
but it also had a crew compartment inside it.
So they had a shell, but then inside it a second...
So that if the hole was breached, there'd be another thing to protect you.
Whereas the Titan had some titanium, no separate crew compartment,
and just went, yeah, heart carpet fibre.
That's fine.
So again, the Deep Sea Challenger already existed.
This had already been solved.
Yes.
I also wonder whether when you paid 250,000,
ran for your ticket and you got into the submersible
and you saw the Logitech gaming controller.
Was that a little bit of a clue
this was a bit of a Dodgy Brothers operation?
Well, there's a fine line
between Dodgy Brothers and Innovator
as shown by a little mask.
Yes.
And, you know, who are we to say,
who are we to judge, Dom?
Who are we to judge?
Us armchair critics sitting here
safely at one atmosphere.
sphere.
Yeah.
I've never done with it.
What have we done with our lives, Dom?
You know what it is, Charles.
We've lived.
It's the desire to adventure to push out the realm of human experience and do things that no one's ever done before.
That's what I don't understand about this whole thing.
Fuck that.
Why wouldn't you do that?
I have no desire to go to the highest mountain.
I've got, no, I desire to do the fastest second navigation.
It just sounds like a bore.
It just sounds incredibly tedious.
I mean, going to the bottom of the ocean.
Would you want to see the wreckage of the Titanic?
I just have no interest in that.
Maybe that's why they had to have the little JETEC controller to get people on this.
Oh, we can do some gaming.
That's great.
No, in all sincerity, if someone offered me a free ticket in a completely safe vessel
to gok at the wreck of the Titanic on which a huge number of people died.
And it's just sitting there with, you know, seaweed on it or something.
Fuck that.
Why would I bother?
It's just boring.
I mean, even the movie's boring that it lasted three hours.
No, I've never seen the movie.
I'm so uninterested in the Titanic that I refuse to watch the James Cameron movie.
And I certainly haven't watched any of the stuff about his trip,
although I'm actually now interested to see how a less stupid person goes about going to the bottom of the ocean.
Our gear is from Road.
We are part of the iconic less network.
Dom, I think we're becoming proper journalists.
I think you're becoming oceanographers.
Look, I don't want to be too mean.
I realize they paid the ultimate price for this.
And I feel sorry for the 19-year-old kid who apparently, you know, not the young guy.
He didn't want to go.
He was reticent.
He was just like, well, dad really wants me to go, okay, fine, he's paying all this money.
Moral of the tale, never try and impress your dad.
As a father, just don't, no.
We don't want you to, yeah.
I'm very, lucky I don't have.
That will most impress me if you don't.
I'm very fortunate not to have $20,000 to blow on a ticket to an experimental submersible that will kill both of us.
Thank you for your patience.
Your call is important.
Can't take being on.
hold anymore. FIS is 100% online
so you can make the switch in minutes.
Mobile plans start at $15 a month.
Certain conditions apply. Details at fizz.ca.
