The Chaser Report - We Enshittified Macquarie Dictionary

Episode Date: November 27, 2024

Last year we had a humble plan. This year our dream became a reality. Thank you, dear listener, for helping us get 'enshittification' to become Macquarie Dictionary's word of the year. Hosted on Acas...t. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 The Chaser Report is recorded on Gadigal Land. Striving for mediocrity in a world of excellence, this is The Chaser Report. Welcome to The Chaser Report. Dom here. Look, it's not often that we here at the Chaser Report get the chance to claim victory. But today is one such day. Yes, okay, it's another replay. Charles is still out of action and I've got a bit on this week.
Starting point is 00:00:23 But this is really a victory lap for something we were on to earlier, a trend that we called before. I'm not going to say anyone else, but certainly most others. Macquarie Dictionary, you owe us, because your word of the year for 2024 is something we've been on to for a very long time indeed. And that is inshittification. A long time listeners will know, Charles and I ordered this, I think it must have been last year, to be honest, and talking about the insidification of everything using the word
Starting point is 00:00:54 beyond the original context, where it was pitched by Corey Doctro, he was talking about the way that digital platforms, things like Instagram, Facebook and certainly Twitter slash X get worse as they go along. And it goes from being a service that's designed to appeal to users to a service that takes advantage of users to make profits. Anyway, it's a good theory. But we thought the notion that everything turns to shit over time was one that really applied to other things as well. So simply going to say it, we called it pretty much the gurus of word of the year 2024. Stay listening to the podcast. I'm sure we'll get onto the word of 2025 long before everybody else. But in the meantime, please have the tolerance and kindness to look back on us
Starting point is 00:01:35 repping in shittification before the Johnny Come Lately, the Macquarie Dictionary got onto it, and enjoy what we had to say. I've got a bit of a task for us and all the listeners. Oh, great, okay. You're putting us to work? Yes, because the listener emailed us actually a few weeks ago, but I've only just to read the email. And it turns out that one of the words that we use on a podcast back in August, which was we were talking about the incitification of Twitter. Oh, that's right. And then we extended it to the incitification of everything. It was one of those bleak episodes that we tend to specialize in here at the Chaser Report. Yeah. So that had such a profound impact on one of our listeners that he then immediately emailed the Macquarie Dictionary and said, you need to put
Starting point is 00:02:21 incitification into your dictionary. It's such a great word. That's such a great word. That's such a It's a cultural moment. It needs to be codified in the dictionary. And they wrote back and said, look, we note that the word in shittification that was not in fact invented by the chaser, but in fact by Corey Docterotero. Yes, the fantastic. I don't even know what you call him writer and kind of internet theorist. But they said outside of Corey and the chaser, we can't find a single reference to the term in shittification. But they'll put it on their watch list. And if over the next 12 months it starts being used more, then they'll put it in their dictionary. This is the kind of challenge we can get behind. I think this is the insidification of a nation. And it's worth noting, Charles, that Cori Doctro, when he originally used the term, he used it about that exact thing, which is why I enjoyed it so much and brought it to the table, about how Twitter and other social networks, in fact, become shit over time.
Starting point is 00:03:15 It's like a basic process that over time, they just become terrible. Every social network I've ever joined has become terrible with the passing of time, except Instagram, which was terrible when it began. I feel. But yeah, it's just a thing that happened. Well, it's not just a thing that happens. I read his article this morning. What his actual point is, is that actually, in shittifying, actually happens to platforms
Starting point is 00:03:37 when you yourself, the user, is actually the product. And his point is that if the platform is merely just trading your eyeballs for advertisers or sellers or whatever it is, so he uses both the example of TikTok or Twitter or things of that. But he also uses the example of Amazon, right, and says, well, they've built up this amazing platform where they subsidised everything to get everyone on there. And then they're just trading the eyeballs
Starting point is 00:04:07 to make huge amounts of money off you, right? Just as a footnote, this is actually a theory that I've come across before. That Amazon is not actually just a buying and selling platform. It's a social network for what humans are interested in. So they have the best data of anyone on the planet about what people want. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:04:21 That's so valuable to them that they sell things at a discount to get it. Oh, and they treat their work as a bomb and oblivious as well. So if the user themselves are the product that are being sold, then eventually every corporate capitalist enterprise will just go, okay, how can we make it more and more worse for the user to juice our profits, right? Yeah. So that's the incitification principle. But I think that we can actually widen the use of this term. Yes, absolutely. Because what it's referring to essentially is monopolistic control of things, right? So it doesn't just apply to social networks. can also apply to things like political party.
Starting point is 00:04:56 If you look at the Australian political system, you go, the insidification of Australian politics is entirely bound up in the fact that there is a sort of duopoly effect where you've got the coalition or the labour. There really is only two choices. And there's a sort of lock-in thing where you've got to go with one or the other. Both sides know that. And so incidification ensues. You see what I mean?
Starting point is 00:05:20 I think that's a shot article, Charles. I really do. Dot.net.com. But no, but you're quite right. And the point is, you see this from Labor all the time. They can take 80% of their base for granted. Yes. Because they've got no rules to go.
Starting point is 00:05:33 They don't want to go to the Greens. I can just imagine Greens. People are like Tom Ballow going, oh, what about the Greens? They're so pure. They can afford to be pure because they don't have to win government, right? Yeah. And so basically built into Labor's business model now is disappointing 80% of their supporters
Starting point is 00:05:46 to go after the people in the marginal seats. To inshitify their product. Yes. To actually thrive. Because they don't need those voters anymore. Yeah. So they can just abandon them and have a shit product that isn't going to completely... And this is why Kevin Rudd was so successful.
Starting point is 00:06:00 Because Kevin Rudd's version of anything, like he's an inshitification machine. Yes. I mean, when he was leader, the thing immediately became far duller just by his involvement. Insidification personified. He is, he is. But very successfully so. But it's not just politics, right? So you can then look at, say, mobile phone networks, right?
Starting point is 00:06:18 Oh, wow. Charles, you really thought about this. And so, you know, we had 3G and 4G. And in actual fact, for a while, there wasn't just the three major players, but there were always those sort of little bit players. Yeah, there was orange and three and various other little players. And then there was sort of like One Till. And some of them were just...
Starting point is 00:06:37 Remember, One Tell was born and shitified. It was like, that was Lachlan Murdoch and James Packer's big attempt to show that they could do better with the technology stuff than their daddy's good. They could not, my friends. But then, you know, TPG brought out I-I-Net and Vodafone. And that's all just one company. And Vodafone had already bought out three, who were the only innovative people. And then they did a deal with Telstra over the rural network.
Starting point is 00:07:02 So essentially, that's all a lock. So it's basically two things. And then Optus is the shittest network anyway. Oh, I don't know. Optus, the people who sell my details on the dark web. I mean, you know, that was an amazing piece of insidification. I mean, Optus is just shorthand. In fact, that should be in the McCory dictionary for just like,
Starting point is 00:07:23 Shit. Surely the word floptis is in there, because I really enjoyed that during the when they had the World Cup rights for soccer. Anyway, point is that, again, we've reached the situation where 5G has come along. And instead of actually building networks that actually give you data, which is what 5G promised, they've gone, we don't have to anymore because there's a sort of monopoly going on. Yeah. We can just insidify our product.
Starting point is 00:07:50 It is amazing how, because I've had a 5G phone for a year. It's amazing how totally indistinguishable it is from the regular 4G. Except if I think it takes longer to connect. There's more black spots everywhere. And they've tried to lure everyone from the NBN onto 5G, which we've done at home now. We've got 5G at home. Oh, really?
Starting point is 00:08:06 And it is much faster once it's actually connected. But it's cheaper. And so they've gone, well, we've got so much 5G, we can load everyone's home internet onto it as well, which, of course, they can't. So it's absolutely groaning. So you're the reason why near our house for 5G shit. Yeah, absolutely.
Starting point is 00:08:20 That's tough. But Charles, there's another example. as well. There's an obvious example of this, which is possibly the most inshittified inshittification of all the inshittification burgers we've ever inshittify. Are we talking in supermarkets? We can soon. Coles and Woolworths? No, no, there's an even worse
Starting point is 00:08:34 one. Okay. Charles, you know what it is. Oh, the chaser? The chaser and Batuta, right. Because the shovel is actually really good. Have you know how good the shovel is, buddy? No, Charles, it's airlines. Airlines. The airlines are the worst to offer of course. You're right, yes. You and I spent hours.
Starting point is 00:08:52 With Virgin last year, I had to miss Halloween because Virgin fucked it up. And Qantas is, I mean, Quintas is so inshitified. It's astonishing Kevin Rudd's not on their board. It is the Optus of airline. I think Optus would sue us over that description. Quantis is now shorthand for, used to be great. Now fuck them, right? Well, the incitification, maybe they should have a Qantas logo
Starting point is 00:09:13 in their definition of the insidification. You can bring out your Qantas logo that you made. That would work. But the reason why I sort of say, there's a whole. lot of places that we can talk about incitification. Tell us what that reason is after this. The Chaser Report, news you can't trust. Well, the reason why I want to sort of expand the definition of incitification, one simple
Starting point is 00:09:38 reason, which is to get this word in the Macquarie Dictionary. Of course. We need this word to be, oh, you know who we need. You know who we need to appoint an official inshidification ambassador. Oh, yes. I've got to, there's only one person. Who, Charles, who in Australian public life, symbolises things progressively getting worse and worse
Starting point is 00:09:58 and more and more disappointing under the point of absolute disgust. And he's also on the public record, according to a very amusing story, having shat himself in a public place. I'm talking, of course, about Scott Morrison. Scott Morrison is the official ambassador
Starting point is 00:10:14 of inshittification. Yes. We should, there should be a t-shirt. It was Como giving two thumbs up and just going, Insidify this. I mean, because who knew? Who knew you could even swear yourself into 10 ministries at once until he did it?
Starting point is 00:10:27 No, yes. He found a way to make, you know. To monopolize ministries. He ran a duopoly with himself, basically. Yeah, okay. Yep. I think he'd be up for it. He hasn't got a lot on.
Starting point is 00:10:38 No. He's the member for Cook. Yeah, he's got his book. He's got his book about his walk with Jesus, which I think he'll still have some time on his hands after that. Yeah, I think he'd be up for it. Because the one thing that he's really made his own. Like, if we're looking back on his time as Prime Minister.
Starting point is 00:10:53 We should write to him. Let's write to him. Dear Scott Morrison, we're trying to promote the word inshittification as... Yes. And get it into the Macquarie Dictionary. And we felt you'd be perfectly poised to assist us with this task. We can even talk about the inshittification era, if you like, between when was it, 2018 and 2022.
Starting point is 00:11:09 So I think the thing is, what we need is for everyone who's listening to, on social networks, just slip the word incitification into their vocabulary. And at Scott Morrison as well. And it doesn't matter what you're talking about. Yeah, it's just sheer heft. We just need enough people. And it needs to be a sort of broad enough sample size of users of the word. Like I think the whole point is we've done our heavy lifting.
Starting point is 00:11:37 Yeah, you've got to use it in lots of different contexts as well. Not just the ones we've listed here. Yeah. Like you could have had a bad day and say, well, I'm inshitified. Yeah. But also it can be like the inshitification of your workplace. Yes. It could just simply be the arrival of your new boss or the arrival of your current boss.
Starting point is 00:11:56 Yeah, that's right. But most workplaces probably can be described in those terms. What would be really helpful as well? And I don't know if anyone's up for this, but maybe they should be. If there are any academics out there, writing academic papers, you should be using the words. You put it in the title of your paper. Yes. That's a really, I mean, admittedly, it might, you mightn't do as well in the paper.
Starting point is 00:12:15 But I just think, particularly if you're writing a book or something, I mean, shouldn't the next chance, She'll be called the inshittification principle. Yes, yes, we can totally do that. Maybe we need a side book. Yep, we need a side book. Do you think we could register inshidification.com? I think so. I think we should.
Starting point is 00:12:28 Trade market. Maybe we should get inshidification as a concept. Insidify this. Insidify this. Would be a great book. That would be. And also a great, on a movie with Billy Crystal and Robert De Niro. We also got to get it into Hansard.
Starting point is 00:12:41 Yes, it's got to get into Hansard. I'm thinking the greens are probably the way to get it in. Because we can write to Scott Morrison, try and get him to. to slip it in. But don't you think that... That sounds so gross. It sounds unparliamentary, doesn't it? Yes, it does.
Starting point is 00:12:54 But that's... So we need a... We need a radical. You know who'd do it. Oh, Jackie Lambie! Jackie Lambie! I was thinking of Bob Catter, actually. Oh, Bob Catter!
Starting point is 00:13:03 Yes! Because they've got nothing to lose. They're mavericks. Just get a maverick on it, it'll get done. AI? Can we train a chat bot to... Can someone write an entire novel using the word a lot, which the AI then plagiarises?
Starting point is 00:13:17 That'd be very helpful. We're going to get it out there. It's going to get it out there. It's going to, the snowball is going to be released where you're getting in shittification into public life. And don't tell anyone that we asked you to because that won't count for the Macquarie Dixon. Off the back of this and a couple of other things that have shown up during the week, what I have done this morning, Dom, is I set up a Chaser report blog.
Starting point is 00:13:37 Have you? Yes, just on the Chaser website. Right. The idea is that we'll just occasionally update it from time to time. Whenever something comes up that perhaps it's mainly to do with, gloating, right. But I think it will be also a great place to sort of slip the word incitification all the time in. So it's going to be available at chaser.com.com.com slash report, but it's, I haven't published it yet. I thought it was going to be chaser.com
Starting point is 00:14:01 dot a u slash insidification. But it's a bit hard. You've got to work out whether it's one or two T's one question. It's not actually live yet because I just wrote the first. So in schudification, the official spelling of it is with double T by the way. Yeah, okay. Also known as platform decay. Oh, right. Okay. Yeah. Oh, there you go. It's a form of rent-seeking. Yes. We could use some money to help us pay the rent, actually.
Starting point is 00:14:22 So the insidification of the train system would be about the platforms getting worse and worse. Did it? No. Yeah, in public transport, it's probably a very good example. The insidification. But no, no, so I've set up this blog, check it out. If you go to chaser.com.com. And just click on the menu, you'll be able to see where it is.
Starting point is 00:14:40 And the whole idea is it's mainly set up there to gloat. Right, sure. And so, for example, earlier in the week, we, We talked about, well, we came up with the solution for the Middle East crisis. Yes. Which obviously was to transmit the Israeli flag onto Sydney Town Hall. Wasn't that influential? It was very influential because then the next day...
Starting point is 00:15:02 So Clover Moore scotch the idea. She stopped the idea. She stopped the vision, yeah. She stopped peace in the Middle East. And we came out and we slammed her for it, didn't we? Slammed. Yeah. That was heard in Tel Aviv, Charles.
Starting point is 00:15:12 And then, yes, exactly, because a day later, the Israeli military also came out again. Clovermore. So, you know, if you're wanting to listen to, you know, a podcast that sets the agenda, then you should probably download the Daily, which the New York Times says. But you could also listen to the Chase Report. And on this blog, we'll be able to, because I was pointing, like, the first injury on the blog, I pointed out all the times where we've been ahead of the news. We've set the agenda. And it's because the world is so satirical that if you describe things in satirical terms, then it usually turns out to be true later on. We're just always making a satirical exaggeration of things, which turns out to be what actually happens.
Starting point is 00:15:49 Charles, I love the fact. I love the fact that while they're on the verge of full-scale ground war, can we just note, while there are hostages who have been taken, and it's basically a huge national emergency in Israel, an IDF spokesman had the time to go on a Australian radio and slam clover more. Yeah, I know. Fantastic. Well, you know, it's eye on the prize. But what matters?
Starting point is 00:16:10 Hearts and minds, Charles. Yeah, exactly. Hearts and minds. All right, so help us chronicle the insudification of everything. Yes, and gloat on our blog. But my plan is for the blog to essentially take over the internet and become its own platform. At which point, we will be able to inshiti-vai it.
Starting point is 00:16:27 Charles, this is the least worst idea you've had in a long time. Our gear is from Road with part of the Icona-class network. Help us inshitify everything. There.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.