The Chris Cuomo Project - How Trump Could (And Might) Win The Hush Money Case
Episode Date: April 30, 2024Chris Cuomo explores the complexities of Donald Trump's potential to overcome the hush money case in New York, delving into legal nuances and political motivations, and arguing that Trump is likely to... win due to procedural weaknesses and the highly political nature of the charges. He emphasizes the discrepancy in prosecutorial discretion and how similar cases are typically handled, suggesting a strong possibility that Trump's notoriety and the prosecutorial approach may sway the jury towards acquittal. Follow and subscribe to The Chris Cuomo Project on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday: https://linktr.ee/cuomoproject Join Chris Ad-Free On Substack: http://thechriscuomoproject.substack.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
There's a lot of confusion about these Trump cases in New York.
People are confusing too, they're confusing the reasons behind them,
and they're also missing what is the most likely outcome in this alleged hush money case.
And I'm going to tell you what that conclusion is more likely to be.
Support for the Chris Cuomo Project comes from Cozy Earth. Did you know that 35% of us report experiencing poor sleep quality?
It's not that big a surprise.
But you gotta go a layer deeper.
Why?
Why?
Because I have something that will transform your sleep problem.
Cozy Earth.
Discover the secret to better sleep
with Cozy Earth's luxurious bedding products.
Little funny side note, my wife just left
to go from our apartment out to our house where we live.
Guess what she took with her in her bag?
The sheets.
I gotta get another set.
She took the Cozy Earth from the apartment. I don't know what I'm sleeping on tonight.
Cozy Earth bedding are temperature regulating.
That's the technology.
That's the key.
So what they do is literally adopt to your body's needs.
And that helps tailor the sleep experience to you.
They use only the best fabrics, materials, and weaves,
offering superior softness,
and that invites you to sink into a world of comfort.
Treat yourself to the ultimate in comfort and indulgence
with Cozy Earth Bedding and Sleepwear
and prioritize your self-care and sleep health.
Use my promo code, Chris, at checkout,
and you'll get 35% off at CozyEarth.com.
After you place your order,
be sure to let them know we sent you.
Select podcast in the survey
and be sure to write in the Chris Cuomo project, please.
Support for the Chris Cuomo project comes from AG1. Listen, my brothers and sisters,
you know that I take my health seriously, right? I'm an aging athlete, I'm dealing with long COVID. That's why AG1 is a big part of my game and I have been taking it for many years.
Why?
Because it's one and done.
I don't have to worry about the combinations.
I don't have to worry about the price the same way.
It's so much less expensive than taking all these things separately.
And it's the deliverability.
It's just a scoop and a glass of warm water for me,
but you can put a scoop of it in whatever you want.
And boop, down the hatch, and that's that.
People ask me all the time,
AG1, do you really take it?
Yeah, it's all over my house.
And I've been drinking it for a long time,
and I think it works.
I have partnered with AG1 for so long
because they make a high quality product
that I trust to have as part of my routine every day.
So, you want to replace whatever you're doing now? Start AG1.
Try AG1 and get a free one-year supply of Vitamin D3K2 and 5 free AG1 travel packs with your first subscription at www.drinkag1.com slash CCP. That's drinkag1.com slash CCP.
Check it out.
Support for the Chris Cuomo Project
comes from Done With Debt.
This is a big one, especially in America, man.
You need Done With Debt.
If you're one of us who's addicted to credit,
you need Done With Debt because you're going to bed,
thinking about how much you owe
and what the minimum amount payable is
and what are you gonna do
and you're never gonna get out from under it.
And look, is it your fault?
Yeah, in part, take responsibility for your spending,
but also the system traps you in debt.
High interest credit cards and loans.
It's almost impossible to pay off your debt
once you get into that cycle.
Insane inflation keeps you stuck paycheck to paycheck
and that's why you need Done With Debt
because Done With Debt is your lifeline.
Done With Debt has an ingenious new strategy
to help you deal with debt faster
than most of us would think possible.
Done with Debt analyzes your debt, gives you options that you'll qualify for.
Done with Debt knows how to reduce bills, cut interest rates.
They've got skilled staff at Done with Debt that will negotiate, figure out how to get
better deals.
So here's how easy they'll make it.
Go to donewithdebt.com, donewithdebt.com, and start getting out from under the problem
and toward the solution.
You got debt?
You need done with debt.
I'm Chris Cuomo. Thank you for being with me here at The Chris Cuomo Project. Done with debt. slow about the what kind of sentence, what does it mean? I'm not seeing it, okay?
Now, people are confused.
So let's remove the confusion.
You have Tish James, the AG of New York State,
and you have Alvin Bragg, okay?
Who is the Manhattan District's attorney, okay?
These are different people.
They brought different cases.
Now, they may both be
painted with the same brush of political ambition and perhaps animus here as
motivation for bringing those cases, but the New York case should not be this
cross-thatch of these two things. They're very different cases. Now again, you may
lump them into the same political pile of dung, but Tish James wanted
to be governor, campaigned ongoing after Trump, went after Trump with a case that seems to
make the former president an example of an industry standard that is almost never observed,
let alone investigated, let alone punished.
Okay?
And what is that?
That is guys playing with evaluations of properties
in two different ways.
One is to pump it up when you're looking to borrow against it
so that there's a bigger valuation
and a bigger equity cushion there potentially.
The other way is when it's tax time
and you lower the value when it's tax time
and you raise the value when you wanna borrow.
Okay, I like it, I don't like it.
Irrelevant, it happens a lot,
especially in commercial real estate.
So why isn't it ever punished
the way they're punishing Trump?
That's a good question.
And it leads you to what the motivations are.
Oh yeah, but he did it, so just so what
that they let other people go, he still did it.
Well, there should be prosecutorial discretion discretion and if you usually let it go and you didn't
let it go here, why?
And is it because he did it to a larger degree than anybody else?
Well, then let's look at the victimization side.
The banks didn't lose any money.
The banks were happy to do business with
Trump. The banks had an ability to blow up his valuation if they wanted to and
chose not to. So where's the victim? Oh, the victim is a public policy of a
specifically designed statute to punish fraud. Okay, well why do you punish fraud?
You punish fraud because people are lying
and they're getting over on the system. Ah, that's what Trump did. He got over on the
system. No, not exactly because the system was not taken advantage of because they were
happy with the outcome. The banks. Ah, yes. But that's money that they could have lent
to somebody else and couldn't because they gave it to Trump. Yeah, but they got the vig on the money they wanted.
So I'm not seeing the victimization side of this.
Now, within the letter of the law, is it accurate?
Yes, but this is not a law school exam.
This is not a bar exam.
This is not a theoretical test.
This is not a debate.
It is something that stinks of political motivation,
not least of which is because the attorney general
campaigned and told you she wanted to do this
and then found a way to do it.
That takes us to the second case,
which is a totally different case, okay?
One of them is about fines, humongous fines,
the likes of which we've never seen
in circumstances like this before.
And I get why people are upset about it and everything that went along with it.
But the other one, brag, is criminal.
Go to jail, that means, if you lose.
Now this on its own is a very different obstacle to entry.
We're talking about whether or not someone should
have their freedom taken away from them
because of what they did, okay?
Remember that.
That's what we're talking about here.
It's not as simple as you did it, it's wrong,
you did it, it's wrong, and it's illegal,
you did it, it's wrong, and it's illegal,
and it's so fucked up that we wanna take you out of society so that you can't do this again to somebody else.
Right? I mean, that's the basic theory. Now, you can say, oh yeah, but all these people get thrown
away. We have to stop justifying what we want in the instant case as a function of how that system
has performed poorly or unfairly in the past.
And too many are doing that.
Oh, but there's so many people, especially poor people,
especially poor people of color who get cases thrown at them
that would never get thrown at a white guy
and they go away, why not Trump?
Two wrongs, seriously?
We gotta be better than that.
This is not about vengeance.
It's supposed to be about justice, right?
So if it's about justice, don't be Trump, right?
Don't abuse the system.
Don't debase everything.
Don't make it as bad as it can be just so it suits your interests.
Be better than what and who you oppose.
I know that's frustrating, but that's the political argument here.
And this is a political argument
because Bragg reeks of politics. He was literally bragging about doing this. That's why he and
Letitia James getting confused. Because they did both seem to come at this for the same
reasons. Ambition.
The Chris Cuomo project is supported by all American assets. Why? Because you need somebody
to help you make the decisions.
What do I do to get away from the markets? Should I just put my money in a
tin can? No. But what you can do is hold physical gold and silver. And I'm not
just talking about burying it in a chest like some pirate. You can put it in your
401k. You can put it in your IRA. Most people only think that you can get
stocks, right? You know, maybe some bonds or something like that,
but you didn't know that you could invest
in your retirement accounts
with these types of investments.
Hard silver, hard gold.
All American Assets offers a wide selection
of different gold and silver products,
all delivered right to your door or to a depository
in safe, discrete, fully insured packaging.
And if you got a 401K from a previous employer,
or if you got an IRA, an IRA,
you can just roll it over into physical gold and silver.
You can also make a purchase with cash
and fund your account by sending a check or wire.
Now is the opportune moment.
Start investing in precious metals,
safeguarding your savings against these volatile
markets.
Visit AllAmericanAssets.com for your free gold and silver investment guide or go and
call 888-390-2522.
And you can learn how to turn your paper savings into gold literally.
Again, 888-390-2522 or visit allamericanassets.com.
Now, the hush money case has never made sense to me.
And I'll tell you why.
Did he pay off these women?
Yes, that's not a crime.
Okay, did he pay off this women
in a way that legally you're not supposed to?
No. Okay. Did he pay off these women for a reason that makes it a crime?
Maybe. And this is such a sticky wicket. Because under the law, you can have multiple reasons
You can have multiple reasons to do something
and get punished for one among others. Meaning, why did you pay off the women?
Because let's just make up a couple of random ones
and then ones that we know from the record.
I was tired of hearing her about it or him about it,
whoever you're paying off.
Okay, fine. So convenience. Yeah,
she was threatening, he was threatening to tell the media, tell my family, tell whoever. Okay.
That's about personal interest. Okay. Ah, but Trump had something else. He wasn't just trying
to hide this from his wife, which by the way, is an assumption
that Melania didn't know.
I'm not sure about that.
Why? Several reasons.
One, they always know.
Two, Michael Cohen told me she had no idea about this,
that he had to tell her about the deal
that he was doing for Trump.
Michael Cohen is also a liar who would later say
she absolutely knew about all of it
and she was part of the discussions about it.
Now the problem with him is that he's a liar.
The good part about him changing the story
is that the second one makes a lot more sense, okay?
Donald Trump is not known for being a monogamist
and I'm not judging it, okay? I have no idea about what their marriage is about, Donald Trump is not known for being a monogamist.
And I'm not judging it, okay?
I have no idea about what their marriage is about.
No idea what makes it stay together
and what works for each other.
I don't know.
I do know that I hear on a regular basis
that Melania is well aware of what he does.
She may do the same thing,
depending on what rumor you want to hear that day.
And whatever it is, they're still together, okay?
So to me, it's like, I'm not in that game.
Too many of us wanna be in the,
let's judge other people by standards
we don't follow ourselves.
It's not my thing.
So I don't know that Melania didn't know,
so I don't know that he did this deal
to keep it from Melania.
Did he do this deal to keep it from you
for the campaign's purposes?
Now an interesting counter to that is, oh because but for him paying off Stormy Daniels and
whoever the other woman is who I always forget but that's probably a good thing because she
probably doesn't want to be known for just this. You would have thought that he was a man of high
moral standing. It kind of doesn't make sense if you think about it.
Everybody knew what kind of guy he was before this.
So yeah, you learned about this
and you learned about more things after it,
but this wasn't a game changer about Trump, was it?
So what makes it a crime?
What makes it a crime is this being
a fugazi campaign contribution
by Michael Cohen?
And that it was done for political purposes
and it wasn't recorded the right way.
So the 34 counts is not 34 deals, it's not 34 women,
it's not 34 even independent acts,
it's all the different iterations of the single act,
which is why I believe that this was at best.
I would argue it's not a crime. I would argue if it is a crime, it's a misdemeanor.
And that they boosted it up with all these different counts and things to make it a felony.
And I think that this is a really weak case. Now, what supports me in that?
The feds passed on it.
Oh, they don't have the same laws.
Yes, they do.
Most election law is federal.
Oh, well, but there are parallel state laws.
Yeah, but they passed.
Which by the way, a lot of you Trumpers and anti-system people, how come you never say
anything about that?
You only talk about what the feds do.
You don't talk about what they decided not to do.
Okay?
If there's some deep state and Biden pulling the strings
and all this other stuff to fuck Trump at every turn,
how come they didn't bring this case?
Food for thought, right?
Now, I think he beats the case.
Why?
I find it hard to believe everyone's saying
that you can't get a fair jury in New York
because everybody hates Trump.
I don't believe that.
I have more faith in all of us,
let alone people in New York.
I think people can do that.
And I think we're exaggerating
how much politics means to people.
This is different than somebody hearing
that you kicked a puppy.
Okay, this is politics.
Politics is dirty.
People have low estimations of everybody in politics.
Maybe more so with Trump, maybe,
but I think New Yorkers are sophisticated people,
used to having strong feelings,
and I think they can be fair.
That said, unlike what everybody is saying,
which is he can't get a fair trial,
they're gonna railroad him, I see it the other way.
I think that it is highly unlikely
that you get an entire jury
to see this the prosecutor's way.
There's so many holes in it
that I can easily foresee one or two people saying,
you know what, I don't like that he did it.
I don't like it morally.
I don't like how he did it.
I think Cohen is a dirt bag
and I think it was all shady and dirty.
But I don't think that this was about
helping his campaign per se.
I think that this was something he did on a regular basis
and it didn't really matter in terms of how people saw him.
And even if it was kind of about that,
it was really about something else.
And even if it was about his campaign,
it was like not something that I think he should go to
jail for. Now, people will say, well, that's not the jury's job. Well, it kind of is. No, no, no,
the sentence is about the penalty phase is about the judge. Well, yes and no, because as a jury,
when you make the determination that someone is guilty, you know what goes along with that, even if you are not defining what specifically it will mean
in terms of time or nature of consequence.
So I think he's gonna beat the case
because I think that it is weak
and I think that it is really pushing people's
understandings of reasonableness when it comes to actions
and what should be punished.
So I think he's gonna beat this case.
Now, what does that mean?
This is one of the big problems
with this case coming so soon,
is that the problem is not just the case,
it's what it does to the overall complexion
of all the cases. How so? Well,
people tend to look at it as a basket. People keep saying 90 whatever indictments, 90 whatever
charges, 90 whatever counts. Well, that's not really fair because they're all such different
cases, right? What was done civilly with the valuations
has nothing to do with like this kind of case
about hush money, which has nothing to do
with potential incitement of a riot on January 6th,
which is really related, but not the same as what he did
and asked not to be done with certification related but not the same as what he did
and asked not to be done with certification of the elections in Georgia,
which bears absolutely no connection
to the keeping of the classified documents.
Now, if you wanna look at a through line,
there is a through line.
It is not legal, it's not legal, but it's not about legality.
But it is true and it is part of the story we keep neglecting here.
I often say that Trump gets from the media what he asks for.
He antagonizes members of the press, he demonizes them. He calls them out by name.
He lies about what reporting is about
and what's motivating it.
And therefore they get angry at him and they come after him.
And that's how human beings work.
And the idea that, oh yeah,
but they're supposed to be better than that.
They're professionals.
Yeah, remember that the next time a cop beats the shit out
as somebody who's not answering his commands
and threatens him personally.
Oh, he's supposed to be better.
He's supposed to deescalate.
These are human beings.
Okay?
And if it's a struggle for cops
when that's exactly what they're supposed to do,
how do you think it's gonna be for journalists
who have such a big index of subjective preference
that goes into their work in the first place.
Okay, so he gets what he asks for.
That's true with these cases also.
Okay?
That's true with these cases also.
It's even true about the investigation into Russian interference.
You have your people take meetings and to rub up against people who say they have access
to Russian intelligence and Russian operatives.
People know not to do that in politics. I've grown up in it my whole life.
You don't mess with foreign people, let alone inimical foreign actors.
But they did it anyway.
Because that's Trump.
Okay?
The documents. Everybody does it.
Yet, they don't fight the FBI about giving them back the way Trump did.
He was picking a fight
because he knew it would likely work for him.
And he was right, by the way, in my opinion.
So that's not usual.
Biden didn't do that.
Pence didn't do that.
You see what I'm saying?
You get what you ask for.
And there is a big aspect of that here.
And you got to remember that. Oh, the system doesn't do that. Oh, you asked Martha Stewart. When Comey went to
talk to Martha Stewart to try to clean up this situation and figure it out and
she said, get out of my office, she wound up going to jail and going to trial. Why?
Because she pissed him off. You get what you asked for. All right? You make phone
calls to state officials asking them to change the vote count, you're asking
for trouble.
You tell a group of angry people to go down to the Capitol and say a lot of really ugly
and incendiary things, you're asking for trouble.
That's why words matter.
That's why leaders use measured language. That's
why Trump's crazy antics and exaggerations and hyperbole are so unusual for us. Because
leaders usually think better and more about what to say. That's why every time you guys
want to play the gotcha game with the left you got to find really weak ass examples
You know like someone saying you go loud and you get in their face. Oh
Look, she's asking for violence to Biden. I'd like to take him out behind the gym
Well, which is it the guys a step from death and the other foot is on a banana peel or listen to him saying?
He's gonna beat up Trump. He's giving messages of violence.
Come on, you're picking this weak ass examples
because you know that Trump is aggressive
and abrasive and instigatory
in a way that we're not used to seeing.
And that's what he did on January 6th.
And there's a through line there.
And he paid off these women and did it in a way
with Michael Cohen where he knew it was kind of shady
and he did it anyway because that's what he does.
He's okay with shady things.
Just like with the money in his properties
and his valuations.
This is a man who believes in lie, defy,
and deny as a strategy.
Oh, but he's a great businessman.
The fuck he is.
What business has he ever run successfully except his own personal brand and image?
Perverse as it is.
Look at his casinos.
They all go down.
He runs nothing well.
That is a farce. Multiple bankruptcies. Come on. Oh, but he
ran government well. What are you talking about? You got the judges because the right
was in power and McConnell engineered it for you. That's why the Federalist Society put
up the names. Not Trump. Not anybody he put in there. Oh, but he was great with the economy.
The guy has multiple bankruptcies.
He's been bailed out by daddy and other people, including China, multiple times.
What are you talking about?
Oh, but the economy was so much better.
Even if that is the case, that's about policies that are universal to the Republican cause.
He didn't create any of that stuff. He's not even a real Republican. What are you talking about?
However, all that said, Cuomo's critical of Trump, I also think he's going to beat the Hush Money case.
Why? Because I don't buy it as a crime.
But he meant it. He wanted to cover it up for the campaign.
So what?
Even if he did, people do stuff like that
in politics all the time.
They cover things up.
They quiet people down.
I really think you gotta be careful what you wish for,
because I'll tell you something.
My pop man in an argument once about this kind of stuff
that really stuck with me.
He was talking about why you gotta keep your religion
out of your policies.
And he was talking about reproductive rights,
which was only called abortion at the time.
Pro-choice, pro-life, as if someone's pro-death.
Well, a lot of people are pro-death.
You know, one of the big inconsistencies
when it comes to pro-life policies
is that people were pro-life in terms of anti-abortion
and pro-death penalty, which never made any sense to me.
And I argued that with my first boss
and he actually changed his position.
So here, when you put your faith onto people,
right now, you have the largest index of Christians
than you're ever gonna have, right?
That you're ever gonna have.
What happens if you set the precedent
that this is a Christian nation, Christian inspired nation,
Judeo-Christian ethics really found the basis of a lot of our laws, so we're going to stick with that,
and then it becomes a majority Muslim country.
Now isn't it okay for them to say, you know, we're really going to put in some more Ramadan practices.
You know, we're going to put in this little touch of shariaaria because you know, as a people, this is what we really are.
We all identify with this, right?
Hell no.
Why?
Because you got Islamophobia going for you there also,
right?
That's why Trump told you that Islam hates you.
But you don't want somebody else's religion put on you.
Oh, unless it's your religion.
You see what I'm saying?
That's why you keep it out of it.
And similarly, you don't want your own political animus to work for you in a moment, but then be
turned back on you. Remember, during the impeachments, if you were watching me at the time at CNN,
I was saying, man, the Democrats are going to get this back, both barrels. What happened? As soon as the other side came in, boom, Hunter Biden.
And another situation where the guy,
let's take the allegations on their face
and give some, let's give some dapp to them, okay?
Hunter Biden used his daddy's name to make money
he had no business making.
Maybe his uncle too, Biden's brother.
Okay, welcome
to politics. Okay, welcome to politics. I'm one of the only guys I know who didn't get
rich when their family was in power. Okay, people do it all the time, right, wrong, good,
bad, whatever judgments you want to have, it happens. So for you to go all in punishing
it in one place, when you turn a blind eye or even participate in it other ways, it's a bad look and makes
for a bad system. And that's how I see this hush money case with Trump. This is
something that people do, that they're allowed to do. This was not about
manipulating the impression of him and his campaign in a material way. Everybody
thought he was a dirtbag before this and they would have plenty of reason to
think he was a dirtbag after this. You see what I'm saying? I believe that one
or more jurors will agree with that proposition and they'll think that this
is just too much for too little and he is gonna win this case, and it's gonna influence the perception
of other cases that matter a lot more.
And why Trump, man, why Trump?
Why are they abusing the system like this?
They must be because Trump, you get what you ask for.
You refuse to deal with the feds
and won't give them documents that aren't yours.
You make phone calls to state officials
to try to rig the outcome of an election.
You tell people to get really angry and go down to the Capitol where they're certifying the votes.
And you give weight to ugly notions like hanging pence and all these other stupid things that those people believe Trump wanted,
whether they were right or wrong, they thought it for a reason, right?
You're asking for these things. You're asking for it. And you got to factor that in also.
It's not a coincidence that it's Trump. And it's not just not a coincidence because they're going
after him because it's a deep state in Biden. It's because he asks for it. But when it comes to the
hush money, I think he's going to beat worse or at least get deeper in terms of our understanding.
And I'll see you at News Nation every weekday night, 8p and 11p Eastern.
And you know what I want?
You want to make politics better?
Leave the parties, be an independent, be a critical thinking free agent and go get your
free agent gear so you can wear your independence.
We're going to be dealing with problems. This is going to be a hectic year.
I think Trump is going to beat this case in New York.
But we're far from over where his troubles are concerned
or our collective concerns as well with this election.
So what do you say? Let's get after it.