The Confessionals - RELOADED | 185: Google Whistleblower Zach Vorhies

Episode Date: March 23, 2026

In Episode 185, we have a conversation with Zach Vorhies, who is known as the “Google Whistleblower.” Just a few months ago, Zach started to tell the world about the censorship Google has been conducting through its search engine results. He claims that Google has blacklists in their files that detail what keywords are to be promoted and what keywords are to be suppressed. He has also stated that Google has even gone as far as to delete words out of the dictionary to make political adversaries look less intelligent. And the worst thing about these revelations is that Google hasn’t stopped its censorship since Zach went public - in fact it seems like Google is just getting started.Please pray for Tony's wife, Lindsay, as she battles breast cancer. Your prayers make a difference!If you’re able, consider helping the Merkel family with medical expenses by donating to Lindsay’s GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/b8f76890Become a member for ad-free listening, extra shows, and exclusive access to our social media app: theconfessionalspodcast.com/joinThe Confessionals Social Network App:Apple Store: https://apple.co/3UxhPrhGoogle Play: https://bit.ly/43mk8kZThe Counter Series Available NOW:The Counter (YouTube): WATCH HEREThe Counter (Full Episode): WATCH HERETony's Recommended Reads: slingshotlibrary.comIf you want to learn about Jesus and what it means to be saved: Click HereBigfoot: The Journey To Belief: Stream HereThe Meadow Project: Stream HereMerkel Media Apparel: merkmerch.comMy New YouTube ChannelMerkel IRL: @merkelIRLMy First Sermon: Unseen BattlesSPONSORSSIMPLISAFE TODAY: simplisafe.com/confessionalsGHOSTBED: GhostBed.com/tonyQUINCE: quince.com/tonyCONNECT WITH USWebsite: www.theconfessionalspodcast.comEmail: [e-mail] ADDRESS:Merkel Media257 N. Calderwood St., #301Alcoa, TN 37701SOCIAL MEDIASubscribe to our YouTube: https://bit.ly/2TlREaIReddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/theconfessionals/Discord: https://discord.gg/KDn4D2uw7hShow Instagram: theconfessionalspodcastTony's Instagram: tonymerkelofficialFacebook: www.facebook.com/TheConfessionalsPodcasTwitter: @TConfessionalsTony's Twitter: @tony_merkelProduced by: @jack_theproducer

Merkel Media I guess it's time to go back in time Are you telling me you built a time machine Out of a Dolorean Time is but a stubborn illusion

I have a lot of memories Of the past People are time traveling Within themselves Time travel Is possible This was all circulating around the base that a giant had been killed, but no one was supposed to talk about it.

Reach up underneath the door, curl up to grab it, and then disappear. When he came over to me, dude, he slithered over to me. And this giant comes out of the cave, and they're all frozen. And he starts running and firing up this giant. With a giant moves, he's got a spear in one hand, and he's running really fast. And spears, Dan, holds him up like this. Somebody else. Shoot him in the face. Shoot him in the face. They basically decapitated. Person, when he got him out.

I feel something pulling at my leg. And I look over and there are two small, gray entities pulling it. And they're literally, I'm getting pulled off the bed. I reached my hand into this bush and I touch air. Couldn't breathe and I couldn't move because I know I'm seeing a monster. Okay. I reloaded. Yep. Welcome to the show, everybody. You're listening to The Confessionals. I am your host, Tony Merkel. Thank you for being here. If you've had an encounter or a story you like to share with me on this show, go ahead and shoot me an email.

Or go to the website, the Confessionalspodcast.com, hit the contact section, and you can reach us that way as well. Either way it works for me, just get a hold of me. And if you're interested in hearing more of the Confessionals every week, every Thursday we release a special episode on the website for members only. So if you want more of what you already hear on Tuesdays, Thursdays, go to the website, the confessionalspodcast.com, and become a member today. Now, today we have a great guest coming on the show. We have Zach Voorhees, who's also known as the Google whistleblower. About three or four months ago, he has come out of the shadows and blown the whistle on what Google has been doing when it comes to censorship and diverting search engine results to their desired destination. Zach has shown the world what Google is

all about and how things changed when Donald Trump took office in 2016. We are going to be bringing Zach on and he's going to talk to us for about an hour and a half about a lot of different things that he has uncovered being on the inside of Google. I will let you guys know that we are going to start working on changing our email address to this show because I don't feel comfortable operating with a Gmail account now that I know what I know from Zach. So let's get to Zach right now. Okay, today I have a great special guest on the show. This is somebody who many of you, when I brought the topic up, didn't even know who I was talking about. And I was really surprised by that. So I was really excited that he said he'd come on the show to talk about

his story. This is Zach Voorhees, also known as the Google whistleblower. Zach, how you doing, man? I'm good. Thank you for having me on the show, Tony. Absolutely. Absolutely. I'm glad that you came on. And so with your story, you're somebody who actually worked at Google. And really, I mean, you have come out with information that really fills all our suspicions. We all had suspicions that things were going on behind the scene. And we're just some crazy conspiracy theorists. And then you come out of the woodwork where you're actually working in Google and you uncover some serious violations. So if you could just walk a story, through this experience that you've been through, like you start out at Google. What kind of spawns

you to actually start looking around and snooping around? Because that's probably the way they look at it, snooping around the servers to find this information. And what kind of information do you find? Let me just put like the biggest disclosure up front. I caught Google deleting words out of its Arabic translation dictionary in order to make a Trump tweet sound crazy. That was the the straw that broke the camel's back. I had been tracking Google internally for some time prior to that, but it was that. It was seeing that Google manipulating the language in real time that made me realize, okay, I can't stay silent anymore. This is clearly seditious, and I need to step forward and disclose this information to the American public.

Yeah, and so that tweet that you're talking about and stuff was Caffe. And when I first saw that tweet, I was like, man, the guy can't spell coffee. That's what I thought he was talking about. That's what everyone thought. That's what the media was saying is that is this a typo? Is this a typo? Well, no, it wasn't just a typo. That word translated in translate.

com to we will stand up. So if you take that and you put it with the original tweet, despite the negative constant press, Caffe meant we will stand up to the negative press. And so people came out with this translation, this decode, and they went out to the internet, and they said, we figured it out. Donald Trump was giving us a coded message.

Well, the New York Times was like, actually, actually, that's not really true, right? And they created this article on June 31st, or maybe it was, I'm sorry, May 31st. And this article, actually, May 31st of 2017, the New York Times came out with an article that said, actually, Trump's tweet doesn't mean anything. And everyone decode. quoting it is a conspiracy theorist. And they don't know what they're talking about. And to prove this, what they did was they were able to find an expert that confirmed what the New York Times was saying, that confepet was not a word. Well, the only problem was that they were confirming it with someone that used to contract with the company, which is not an unbiased statement of fact.

You know, you can't just go and just call your employer, be like, well, my employee agrees with me. No, that doesn't count. But that's what the New York Times did. Google on June 1st, 2017, wrote a design document saying, we have to get rid of this phrase, confepa. We have to delete it from our Arabic translation dictionary. And they said that it's nonsense. And the reason why they knew was nonsense was because the New York Times said it was nonsense.

So the New York Times had a post in this design document to get rid of the word cafe. So they literally delete it out of the dictionary for attempts to make the president look stupid. Yep. So when it comes to this idea then that Donald Trump is just this raging lunatic moron that accidentally got into the presidency, how much of that, if not all, all of it, do you personally feel is manipulated by such types of efforts? All of it. All of it? It's so sophisticated.

It's far more sophisticated than I ever thought it was going to be until I started looking at the details. And what happened was I would try to search for things like immigration. And every single time I tried to find anything. what I would get what is I would get a link back to some news article that was negative about the president spinning it back into like his thing.

So for example, I would type in executive order like immigration and then it would bring me back to kids in cages and saying, oh, Trump's a really bad president. You try to search for anything political and then there would be like this news article that would float to the top and it was just spreading, you know,

negative sentiment about the president. and what I saw was when things started to trend on Twitter about, you know, the true state of the world, the deep state would sort of respond by in the next news cycle at like 4 a.m. in the morning, they sent out this like, you know, this directive of what they're going to be talking about. What they would do is that they would take those hot, those trending topics and they would take the keywords that would represent those training topics and they insert them into articles that would be negative against the president. What would happen is that these negative articles would be the first thing that you searched for. And so what I saw is this rolling manipulation where as things started to trend, these articles would be generated by, you know, Slate or Vox, whatever, to try to capture the people searching for that and then be redirected towards hate of the president. It's like industrial scale propaganda in action. Absolutely.

And it's even so like you just brought the, I, idea of propaganda. So we're talking about big tech companies propagandizing current events and topics to sway us into a certain way of thinking. And I'm a very big Harper on the, I call it the mainstream propaganda, which is, you know, the mainstream media, doing the very same thing. So basically what you're talking about is we're taking an old stream of propaganda where it comes with the mainstream media. And we're adding to it now where now big tech companies are joining in on that propaganda. Yeah, they're colluding. And it's one big cycle, one big collusion. The mainstream media is colluding

with Google in order to control the narrative in real time. I got you. And it would make sense, though. It would make sense that if that's what your goals were to propagandize things, that you would collude with the big tech companies, because they are like Google, Facebook. I mean, they have our eyes more than even the mainstream media does today. So if they're trying to look to to maintain control over our minds, it would make sense that they would do such things. Now, when you started looking into all this stuff, I think it was what, 2016 is when you started really looking into all this when you're still working at Google? Yeah, end of 2016, like, you know, beginning of 2017.

Okay. So at that time, when you started, you know, seeing red flags popping up and you start, you know, just kind of making notes of everything, where were you standing as far as a mental mindset goes when it comes to your view of the political process as far as we just came out of the elections, Trump had just won. What were your thoughts about it? I mean, were you a Trump guy? Were you not a Trump guy? I mean, because that was- No, I didn't even vote. You didn't even vote. Didn't even vote. With that said, though, in those moments, were you like really just not bias on either side or did you have a particular side that you were leaning towards? Because I know that there's people out there that do have biases.

And if they came across the information that you came across and went against the way they were thinking initially at that time, it would rock their world or they would just hide it like Google's trying to hide things. Well, I guess I didn't really understand politics. It just was a mystery to me. And I knew that it was, I was being manipulated and I knew that everyone else was being manipulated. But I didn't really like understand like.

what was really going on, right? Like, it's until you start going deep, that you start getting an idea for how things really do work. And now seeing this coup attempt, I kind of have a better model of how the whole planet works in terms of, you know, there's these bloodlines,

these, you know, they ruled over Europe. they are few in number in relation to the rest of the world, but they've got all the wealth, and they own the money system, and they own all the gold. And so they're in battle with each other. And it looks like that Donald Trump and the military were the ones that were instrumental in the 2016 election. And so as a result, the people that are... in the losing position have been trying to reverse the election result ever since.

Now I'm really into politics because I'm like, oh, okay, so it's just a bunch of bloodlines going to war with each other. Okay, well, that now makes sense. And now I see basically a sense of cover-ups throughout history that we've done to hide the information from our public. And then now all of a sudden a lot of things are making sense. Like the way that the news talks makes sense. The Bible makes sense. It's just all one big giant cover-up of the truth to try to put us into this fake matrix world

that we operate in. Right? Like, oh, like, you know, drink fluoride, brush your teeth with it, get all these injections, pay attention to football, blow out your knee as a high schooler like doing football, whatever. and it's it's all there to to sort of keep us occupied and make sure that we don't interfere with the operations of the elite and if you're an outsider and you're trying to destabilize the incumbent force and all you're going to do is just start telling people about the truth right because you start telling it's like oh by the way all

your leaders are really bad people they're all blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein right like that truth reverberates and you don't need a megaphone to say it out loud you can just say it quietly whisper into someone's ear and then they'll activate and they'll be like oh this actually explains a lot of the world and then they'll continue to pass it on and then you get this like bottom up like truth narrative that is always you know right there burning in the background simmering trying to escape but the the people that run the society are like putting their foot down and trying to prevent it from ever emerging because they know that they'll have this exponential growth when the truth starts, you know, propagating because it's viral. And that's what we're seeing right now. Like,

we're having this amazing awakening. People are finding out about, yes, Jeffrey Epstein did some really, really bad stuff. And it was in snarling all of the highest politicians and royal family members across the world. And so, you know, this is all coming out. It's amazing. I never thought that we would live to see America take back its country from the globalists, you know? Absolutely. And I didn't either. You know, just five years ago, you talk about global elites and you're a crazy person that, you know, if anything, should probably be locked up. That's the way you were looked at.

I mean, and now you hear politicians on TV. talking about the elites and the shadow government. And it's just like the whole script has been flipped. Do you think that Google and these big tech companies are part of that upper elite? Or do you think that their strings are being pulled by the upper elite? I think it's a little both. And, you know, the people that are running both Google and YouTube, you know, they fled totalitarianism. and, you know, totalitarian communism, and the horrors of that.

And then they come to the United States. They use our freedom in order to get unimaginably wealthy. And then they shut the gate behind them. And they're like, okay, time to end free speech now that we got through the door. Kind of like, you know, get rid of all the information we don't approve of. and it's it's it's it's mind-blowing it's mind-blowing it's mind-blowing to see them come full circle like this oh yeah you know and i was looking into the whole facebook thing and because i'm not a big fan of facebook either i only use social media because of the show so uh but you know i was looking at

mark zuckerberg he was at harvard when he in 2004 when he started facebook And in two years before that, the NSA, the alumni that went to Harvard that were working for the NSA, donated 10% of the donations to Harvard two years prior. And I think it was like $30 million or something like that. And then all of a sudden magically, Facebook starts. And you start looking at the pattern here. And it becomes very clear, at least to me, that there are alphabet agencies that have their hands, deep into these big tech companies from their genesis. Is that how you feel as well?

Yeah. And the thing is, is that then they put these placeholders that are like, oh, this is the CEO of the company, right? Oh, Mark Zuckerberg, he's the CEO of the company. He built Facebook. But there's a little secret if you live in Silicon Valley, and you ever meet Mark Zuckerberg, you're always told, don't ask him how he created Facebook. He hates it. He doesn't want to talk about it, right? And this doesn't make any sense.

If you're normie and you're like, you know, you believe that the world is legitimately run, you're like, well, wait a minute, why would Mark Zuckerberg not want to talk about how he created Facebook? If I created Facebook, you could have got me to shut up about it. I would meet people on the subway, be like, oh, by the way, did you know that I created Facebook? How are you doing?

Right? Why? Because it'd be the most crowning achievement thing that I would ever have created in my life. I'd be so proud about it that I would just tell, you know, I would want to tell everyone. so that maybe they could even, you know, create some little social networking site, and then I would be the guy that helped them do it, and then I could absorb them, right? Like, the thing is, is I would want to create this network of information based upon the secrets

that I had discovered to create this large company. Well, as it turns out, Mark Zuckerberg hates those questions. Don't ever ask them that. And that doesn't make sense unless you consider that Mark Zuckerberg himself is a placeholder for this company. And it's like, well, if they can get a puppet inserted as the figurehead of one tech company, what are the chances that this can happen to other tech companies? Hello, Twitter, hello Google, hello, you know, company X, Y, and Z. And the thing is, is that the people that are really good, if they are not controllable,

then they're going to get kicked out. And nobody, you know, illustrates this better than Travis Kalanick, right? He's the Uber guy. He created Uber from the ground up. He is a very intense sociopath from what other people have told me. He is able to just nonstop, push the stuff, and he doesn't care what or who he breaks in the process of getting to that position. Well, you may remember that the New York Times started writing about how toxic the Uber

culture was. And what happened was, you know, Travis ended up getting kicked out after the New York Times ran six hit articles on him that were just, just ripped him apart. Well, he resigns from CEO of the company, and guess who gets placed in his place? One of the board members from the New York Times that had been writing all of the hit pieces.

So if you want to know whether someone's legitimate or not, All you got to know is whether they've been forced out of the company. Once they're forced out of the company, then you're like, okay, I know that this person is good. Travis Kalanick, you're really talented. And if you ever see this, like hats off to you, you built one of the greatest technology companies, Uber. And I have a lot of admiration for that, even if you do happen to be an emotionalist sociopath. But if they are this puppet individual that doesn't have a lot of attention, talent, it's more of a figurehead, then as long as they're controllable, then they're going to be

kept in the company. And that's what you see with people like Mark Zuckerberg. Yeah. And you know, if you think about the timeline of his life, when he supposedly created Facebook, he was probably about 19 years old. If you were 19 years old and the government comes to you and says, we're going to help you create this amazing technology and we're going to fund it, an unimaginable wealth. What are you going to do? What every 19-year-old... I'm going to grab my pen. I'm going to grab my word I sign. Exactly. Exactly. And so when you look at Mark Zuckerberg and the way you just described how he doesn't like talking about, it's because he knows something that he's not allowed to talk about. And the

proof in that very thing is the fact of what happened to Alex Jones. You have Spotify, Facebook, what was it, Twitter, iTunes, all in one day within hours kicking him off the platform. That's not by chance. That's not a random thing. That is somebody or some entity above these companies organizing a hit. It's not like Zuckerberg called those companies up one day and said, hey, let's just talk about this and think about what we could do here because I really think he's a bad guy. They didn't do that. They just carried out orders. It was very very. very clear it was a hit job from somebody above their pay grade. Yep.

And this is the thing is who's really controlling these puppet strings, right? Like, who's controlling all these people? You know, who's controlling the CEO? And once you realize that they're puppets, that's when you realize the reason why they do the things that they do. Like, Susuichicki, the CEO of YouTube, she got on stage and she's talking about all these things, about how we're for the user and helping them express themselves because this is, what we believe, and this is what's really important, until the wrong person gets elected president, then it's throwing all that away so that they can do something else, so that they can now lock down

the internet. And they don't even change CEOs. They do it with the exact same CEO that said that freedom is intrinsic to the nature of the company. Now they're saying, oh, we got bullfinal the Nazis. It's whatever they have to do to seize power. Like, words are not a space for truth. They're a battleground where combat for power takes place. Wow. That's incredible. So Google censors. Yeah, Google censors.

I mean, we're talking about, this is like the modern version of 1984 with George Orwell. Am I wrong in that? I mean. Oh, 100%. Right. Controlling the speech, redefining speech. And you hit it right off the top of the show with Caféfe. They're literally taking words away.

And when they do that, we turn around and we're supposed to say, yes, okay, two plus two is five. That's what they want. That's what they want, right? They want to instill a sense of learned helplessness where we don't even know what's a boy and what's a girl unless we get the definition for what the state says. And if they can switch, you know, more rapidly, cycle through what's acceptable, then the thing is, is that you don't even know it's acceptable until you go in, right? Because it's like, Blackface was okay. And they even had it in a movie up until 2008. And then, what was it, Tropic Thunder? Yeah, with Robert Downey Jr. Yeah. So he was in Blackface, and that was all right. And that was

acceptable to everyone. And now all of a sudden, Blackface is no longer cool. Like, in the span of a decade, Blackface becomes like this really, like, unacceptable thing. And now if it's a lot of, anyone's ever done it, they can be canceled from their whatever position. And this whole thing of like, come on, state, tell me what's right and what's not, right? Like, white face totally appropriate. Why? Because that's what the state says. And the more that we get into this position, the more that we realize that we can't understand what's good or not, other than what this mainstream media is telling us at this time. So what's up with these blacklists that you came across within Google.

Were these things literally like blacklists, as in certain people's names are to be suppressed on Google searches? Or was it more complex? I know you've mentioned in the past about something to do with the Vegas shootings in these blacklists. Am I right? Yeah. So off the top of my head, there's like three blacklists that I was able to release. One of them was for Google now, since I've got a bunch of news.

One of them was the YouTube query blacklist. And then there was another one, which was specifically for Google News on Google News and the Google Search linking to news. And the latter was really, really, really interesting. It was created on October 2, 2017 when the Las Vegas shooting massacre occurred. And Google made this emergency declaration saying that they needed to filter the Internet for bad news. And so that's what they did. And they did that by the creation of these two blacklists, the YouTube query blacklist, and then something else that I can't remember what the name of it is right now, but it escapes me.

What do these blacklists get populated with? Stuff involving people searching for false flag information. And so, you know, what you see with YouTube query blacklist is like half of it, maybe even a little bit more, is dedicated to covering up false flag searches. Right. So, for example, anything involving Stephen Paddock, multiple shooters, et cetera, are being blocked. Another thing is blocked is the fact that, well, this is not really well known about Las Vegas, but there was an ISIS group that claimed responsibility for the attack. And the whole media, which in the past had told me that ISIS doesn't mess around.

They don't make declarations unless they really mean it. All of a sudden declared unilaterally that, this was fake, this was not true, ISIS could not have been involved with this. It was a white male shooting from this Mandalay Bay slash Four Seasons. And so they created these blacklist to hide that information, hide the fact that ISIS was claiming responsibility for this attack, hiding information related to people trying to find the fact that this was an assassination attempt on Muhammad bin Salman, who would later become the future king.

Many people don't know that this was an assassination. You're talking about suicide. Because the building happened in the Mandalay Bay. And the top four floors of the Mandalay Bay is not the Mandalay Bay. It's actually the four seasons. And the royal family from Saudi Arabia had rented out the building at that time. And they were there. And in fact, we've got video of Muhammad bin Salman,

being escorted out of the Topicana that night after the shooting started, surrounded by armed military personnel. There's also a rumor of a firefight that was happening at the Las Vegas shooting. And so Google decided that they were going to blacklist a whole bunch of this information. But something that I didn't expect is that in the midst of all this chaos, they inserted a bad URL so that they could covertly take down a free energy site. Okay? The name of the energy site was e-catworld.com. And all they do is that they focus their efforts on reviewing information coming out about this physical process called cold fusion.

And so, this website, which doesn't talk about the Las Vegas shooting, was entered into this blacklist as one that did. As a result, the whole site got removed from the index. Okay? I knew about this because I happened to just go to the website. And the website, when I went to it one day, said, we've been not. knocked off the Google Index. People can't even search for any part of our website. I went, no way. I got on the computer, and I typed it in, sure enough, I couldn't even type in the exact URL in Google. It didn't know that this site existed for some reason. Right? So I went through

and I made a stink to get them relisted, because I said this was a bug. I got them relisted. and then I started thinking to myself, who and why would want to take this website offline? Because obviously, according to the media, Cold Fusion is fake. So if someone's just talking about pure nonsense, then who cares? Why would there be this sophisticated hack

to take down a website that was talking about nonsense unless it wasn't actually talking. talking about nonsense. Maybe this cold fusion was real and someone on the inside wanted to take it out. Now, why would Google want to take out cold fusion? This was something that I thought to myself. And I started to come to a couple of realizations. I said, if we assume that cold fusion is a real physical process, then we can come to a couple of predictions. One, Google's got the money

to fund their own research and keep their finger on the pulse of this industry. Two, Google would invest their money, but they wouldn't tell the world because they are in on the collusion for global warming. Nothing would make the global warming, house of cards fall down quicker than the announcement of a clean source of abundant nuclear

energy that was completely safe, could be miniaturized, could be put in your home, could be put in a city center, could be scaled up, could be scaled down. Something like that would end the whole global warming climate alarmism immediately. We wouldn't even need to use anything. We wouldn't even need to use anything like solar panels. Solar panels are really bad for the environment, right? You have to rip up a lot of Earth in order to get those rare Earths to make these panels. Well, now you just make, you know, this thing, and all you need is palladium to, like, run your nuclear chemistry, for lack of a better term.

And so I realized that Google would keep this a secret. And what I found out is that, well, what I really realized. that I could just go ahead and search for this company, and if my predictions were correct, I would find it. Well, I found it. Google had a secret Cold Fusion laboratory at the time. And I even talked to the scientists that were running it. And I went, okay, this model that I have of how the world works

has been predictive enough to realize that, yes, there is a full-scale conspiracy to lie to the people about the nature of our energy technology. We're way ahead of what has been disclosed to the public. And so part of my disclosure, giving all this information to the public, is to disclose the fact that this cold fusion technology was being attacked by some unknown third-party insider

that knew how to inject this fake URL to take them down. And you know what? It was probably just Google themselves because they had their own cold fusion laboratory. And it wouldn't be until about a couple of years after this that Google would finally acknowledge that, yes, they did have a cold fusion lab. They said that they haven't found anything that they're shutting it down, but that's not necessarily true. I think that that's sort of a piece of deception. I believe that Google has found out that they've got their own cold fusion thing up and running. In fact, the CEO, Senator Pachai, recently said that Google had some exciting investments within the alternative energy landscape that was going to make fundamental

changes in society. So I think that they're actually hinting that they've got the working technology and right now they just want to make sure that if the normies, the commoners, figure out how to do cold fusion that they've got their own thing ready to go, they're just going to roll it out, and then all of a sudden we'll be this abundant energy everywhere, but that it's going to be theirs. They don't want somebody that's not part of their cult to get this technology and get a head start on them. Yeah, they're monopolizing everything, whether it's the search engine or anything they want to have their hands on, they want to monopolize it. And so you're coming across this information, and you decide to come out and start speaking about it.

Now, you went to Project Veritas and you released a lot of information on there. At what point did you decide to take this to another level? And I believe what happened is you activated a kill switch, which was you giving, was it Veritas, the ability to release more information if you were to be killed? Yeah. So. Why did you?

fear for your life to begin with? Google was trying to make moves covertly on Twitter to let me know that they knew who I was. I started getting trolled by a user by the name of a one snowflake. And they started outing my real name and then outing that I was a leaker. And I was able to set up a honey pot

for this individual. They clicked on a link that was running off the server that we controlled, therefore we got the standard information that your web browser will send when it accesses a website, which is its IP information and also its user agent string. So from those two things,

we're able to find out the location and the computer that they were using, which was like a MacBook running Chrome, and they were accessing all of this from Google Indiana. So we were able to figure out this person is Google. So what I realized at that point was, you know,

there had been some heat on me prior to this by a law forum representing Google. And so what I did was I went to James O'Keefe and I said, hey, I've given you a lot of information. We've only released two pages. But in the event of my untimely death, I give you permission to release all of the, the files to the American public. And then I went to Twitter because I know that Google's been monitoring me and my handle.

I went on Twitter and I said, in the event of my untimely death, all files will become public. At that point, Google called the police. And they red flagged me. They said, you need to do a wellness check on this individual. And the reason why is because he looks like he's crazy. And so they decided that they were going to do a wellness check. But unfortunately, for Google, I have given them the wrong address when I left. I said, oh, my new address is here.

And it wasn't. And so when the police were given a wellness check directive by Google, they were given the wrong. address. And so they came to the wrong house. My friends were there. They gave me the heads up that Google was coming. And so, I'm sorry, the police were after me. And so 30 minutes later, the police were knocking on my gate. And I just decided that, you know what, I don't think there's anything good that's going to come from this. I'm just not going to answer the door. And I'm just going to let them do their thing. So they do. and they decide that they're not going to take no answer for an answer.

And so they find an excuse to call in a bomb threat. And the excuse that they used was a tin can filled with the nature of alcohol that was by my gate system. You see, my roommate is a fire spinner, and she goes to places like burning, burning, Burning Man and dances on stage. So she left this denature alcohol that she uses for fire spinning by her gate. So they saw this. They said, what could that be? It could be an incendiary unit, could be rigged up to explosives to explode on us.

So boom, they locked down the whole street, right? They locked down from like 20th to 22nd. The liquor store across the street gets evacuated. My neighbors get evacuated. The theater next door to me gets evacuated. And so they're escalating, and I don't even know that they've escalated to this point. I just know that there's police cars that I can see around the block up the street, and that for some reason there's this helicopter that keeps on circling around me really low.

And I'm sitting there, I'm like, okay, this would be a conspiracy theory to believe that Google escalated to the point that they sent a helicopter after me. But sure enough, that helicopter was for me. And there was a situation and it was on Twitter and it was breaking news. At this time, my friend who had gotten worried about me decided that he was going to come and check in on me in San Francisco. He saw that the street was shut down. He's like, are you guys here for Zach? And they're like, who are you? He's like, I'm his best friend. So they So he got into communication with me. He's like,

yo man, the whole street is shut down and they've shut it down because they're coming after you. And I went, no way. He's like, yep,

there's snipers on the rooftops. There's a bomb squad. Like getting through your gate right now. There's FBI. There's people on the route. Yeah, the whole mess. So after a negotiation,

I start to realize that they are not going to go away. They want to ask me about whether I'm going to kill myself. And if I don't talk to them in person, they're going to set up and keep there for several shifts. So I start realizing, well, you know, they're going to come up with an excuse. They're going to come into my house. And then, you know, who knows what could happen? Like, they may shoot me. Their body cams may not work correctly for some reason. So I realized. that the safest thing that I can do is to come out into the public with my hands up,

let them know that I'm coming. And if they're going to shoot me, let them shoot me with 20 cameras rolling. Because, man, that's a logistical nightmare to cover up. Let me tell you. So I decided I'm going to come out with my hands up, and I talk to them. And, you know, obviously I'm not trying to kill myself. Obviously, I don't want to hurt anyone. I just want to disclose the truth that I'm a whistleblower.

and I had the proof that was a whistleblower because I had a picture of the image that I had sent of a letter that I had sent back to Google. So I showed them the letter. They're like, oh, you are a whistleblower. I was like, yep. And so then they got really friendly

and things started to de-escalate. I got right back in the house. I got a plane ticket the next day and I was out to D.C. at 8 a.m. the next day. So that was my kind of brush with death if I hadn't done something the correct way. If my friend hadn't gotten there when he had done, then it could have been possible that they could have pot me one by storming into the house, pretending I was going to destroy evidence. Then, you know, that could have been it. Right.

So. And you know, Google should be held accountable for what they did that day because what they did is they could. called in a quote-unquote wellness check on you in hopes that two things would either happen. Best case scenario, you do something the wrong way and you get shot and you're dead. They're in the clear. At least what could come out of it then, if not that, is that they discredit you, that they had to call the police because they had an employee that was just little loony and they had to call the police to make sure he was okay.

And therefore, anything that Zach says shouldn't be held, you know, serious because he has mental issues. That's their goal that day. They waste a taxpayer dollars, sending in the police, bomb threats, all that stuff that came from that because they are just trying to cover themselves up. That's right. That's unbelievable.

And nothing is going to happen. That's the thing that drives. If you did that, you'd be in legal problems. Google? Ah, it is where it is. A trillion dollar company, what are you going to do, assume being court. I have my resources for five years to maybe get a small pittance, you know, in compensation. Not worth it. It's just going to take the lumps and keep on going.

So you went to D.C. What did you go to D.C. for? I needed to drum up support for this disclosure. So we got Sarah Carter, D.C., who's this fantastic reporter out of D.C. and also Fox News contributor. And we told her the story of what was going to go down and she got really interested. So she started writing. She's like, DOJ, you know, breaking story. DOJ has been receiving, like, received 950 pages of documents, right? And so she's been putting pressure on this.

And I credit her for helping me get the whole ball rolling with the DOJ. And now there's a bunch of people that are getting letters from the DOJ, tech companies, telling them that, you know, hey, we need to. get some information from you. We're investigating a very large company. We assume that that's Google. And so, you know, I don't know if that would have been possible for not, you know, Sarah Carter having trust in me and the story and doing it justice and coming out and talking

about it first. Did you ever have to be considered for like witness protection or anything after this Google incident with calling the quote unquote wellness check on you? I mean, if they're willing to do that, then who knows what they're willing to do? I mean, they have endless resources. Yeah, they do. But the thing is, is that I know that with the Colts, they're outnumbered $10 million to one. They can do whatever they want.

I'm not going to be able to have the resources to stop them. All I can do is use whatever action they're going to do to me and leverage that so that I can bring a great awakening to the rest of the individuals. That's what they're afraid of. And so as long as they know that I'm willing to leverage any action in order to bring it to the mainstream attention that I know that they're going to think twice and not want to make any mistakes. So they may, at this point, they may be getting a case. For all I know, I could still be totally destroyed going through a court case related to this. And that's a real possibility.

But my calculus is that if I just keep the heat on them, then if they try to do that to me, then we're just going to talk about how I disclosed. In every single article, I'm going to get them talking about how I disclose all this information, and then we're going to get more people to investigate,

and we're going to get more stories generated, and then I'm going to be the human interest focal point that will be the hook to get this information disclosed. Well, I mean, it takes a lot of guts to do what you're doing, man. It really does. I mean, I think there's a lot of times people sit down when they're by themselves and they think about being in tough situations and wondering what they would do. And you're following through on things that people think they would be able to do in the private moment when they're really not under the pressure. It would have been easier for you to keep your mouth.

shut is what I'm trying to say. I mean, and how many people out there would have kept their mouth shut? How many people out there are keeping their mouth shut? Oh my God, it's uncountable how many people have had the opportunity to disclose this to the general public, but instead of doing it, they just kept their mouth shut. It's disgraceful. And, you know, it is in the sense that they don't have this sense of higher obligation to disclose things that are harming people. like Google and what they're doing with suppressing search engine results and things like that. And they're continuing to do this. I mean, this is not something that you exposed and they stop.

They continue to do this. And it is hurting our country because Google is the search hub. Everybody goes to Google to search for things. And they're manipulating people's minds to think a certain way. They are getting their desired result out of that. They are literally controlling people's minds and how. they think. People will say, oh, you can't, they can't make me think things. Yes, they can because they choose what to show you. That's right. So, you are coming out as the Google whistleblower

here in America. Is this a global problem? Or just this is an American thing? Yes. It's all over the place. I caught them manipulating the elections for the Irish referendum related to abortion, right? They helped Ireland repeal their stance on no abortions. Can now get an abortion in Ireland, thanks in part to Google. The Supreme Court of Brazil ruled that Google had meddled in their election. And they know this because there was a secret agreement that was produced by the politician that lost, and Google. And then you go and you look at, you know, the work that Dr. Robert Epstein has been doing, showing how the manipulation of information would produce, well, in his estimates,

between 2.5 and 10.5 million additional voters for Hillary Clinton based upon hiding of information and the, you know, censorship. And then you can go back and you can see that there's other countries. like Egypt. Egypt was overthrown. I think it was like 2011 or 2012 during the Arab Spring. And then it came out that the person that was responsible for this was a Google employee. Just so happened that the person that started the Egyptian Revolution was a Google employee, you know, used to work for the CIA. And then with this democracy that, and then they, and then when, you know, things came to a head, they had an election,

and then the Muslim Brotherhood won. And then they started doing a bunch of evil stuff. And it was like, okay, so Google's now part of this conspiracy to overthrow a country to make it more Muslim. Like this cults that runs the globalists have a fetish with Muslims, they wanna push them everywhere that they can

around the world and flip those countries and turn them Muslims. So here is a Google employee turning Egypt, Muslim. And then the military had to take over and run out the Muslim Brotherhood guy out of office. And, you know, that was that. And I've also heard now, and I'm having trouble finding out this information. There doesn't seem to be a lot there anymore. But from what I've heard from others is that Google was running the communications infrastructure of Libya. And when when Libya was being overthrown by rebels,

Google shut down communication to the existing regime. And even though the media said that Gaddafi was a really horrible bad man that repressed his people, for what I've heard, Libya was the crown jewel of North Africa. It was the people loved him in that country. and the deep state didn't like him because he was trying to introduce a gold-back currency and that was going to interfere with the United States petrodollary. And so as a result, they engineered an overthrow of the dude's country. And the last video we got of Gaddafi was him being sodomized by the bayonet of a gun,

or maybe it was a sword. and so, you know, another instance. And so when people say, well, you know, is there any evidence of Google meddling an election, it's like, well, yeah, which country are you talking about? Because there's many. Yeah. Wow. That's pretty great. And not just these countries, but our country as well.

And they're doing it now. I know with Tulsi Gabbard, she had her issues. And even Stephen Crowder, I heard just recently had his issues as well. have you heard about that? I know you're not at Google when this was going on. Do you know? Yeah, and the methodology that they're able to show the bias is that they are able to look at something

in America and then they VPN to the UK and then they do the same search on the same search engine. And what happens is they get wildly different results. And so for example, Stephen Crowder, Laura Lumer, no, it was the Laura Lumber. Crowder and it was Tulsi Gabbard were both like suppressed the United States and they appeared as the

first result in the UK or Russia. So it's like, okay, we get it. It's a regional, it's a region based manipulation because you don't want the voter normies to hear the information that contradicts what the mainstream media is saying. You know, if they were not meddling with Tulsi Gabbard and if the DNC didn't actively suppress Tulsi Gabbard and the mainstream propaganda actively suppressed her, she would probably be the leading candidate right now. She is the most level-headed Democrat running for office there is right now. She has fantastic motives of heart when it comes to why she does what she does. unlike all these other politicians that are in it for their own personal gains, she is the only

one I've heard talk about how why she does what she does and it being something completely different than what you're seeing in the news. And of course, Google's going to prop up those things. And I know they took down her ad her ad sense, right? Is that like how they kind of destroyed her after the first presidential debates, right? Yeah, they disabled her ad account. And and everyone else was able to steal the first place in the search results, like Kamal Harris and, you know, Elizabeth Warren. Like, because Tulsa Gabbar was even buying her own keywords because her account was shut down.

So you worked for Google. You're not at Google anymore. I'm assuming you don't use Google. Is that true or no? As little as possible. Okay. So if you're, you say as little as possible, what are the other alternatives? is for the people listening that they're listening to the Google whistleblower himself,

talk about why he did what he did and the just, and we're just scratching the surface on things here. It's so deep. What would you suggest that people listening as to how to go about taking back their authority online? So first off, stop using Android. Android's bad. Android's finding all the information and sending it out to the entire. intelligence agencies around the world.

Like, do you want China to know, like, what you're doing, you know, and seeing all your dickpicks? Like, get rid of it. Go to iPhone. We think it's better. We don't know for sure. iPhone, Apple does not make most of their money by selling your data. They make most of their money by selling you an overpriced phone.

That works really well. Second thing, you got to ditch Chrome. Chrome is tracking you on the desktop all the time. Doesn't matter what computer you have. They're tracking you when you use it. And the way that I like to surf the web is with a browser called the Brave browser. Firefox used to be good, but then they went all SJW and they fired their CEO and founder. And then he left and then he created the Brave browser.

So the Brave browser is the old Firefox guy. The Brave browser is a fork of Chrome. And what they've done is they've trimmed all the fat, they've gotten rid of all the tracking stuff in it. Now they block a whole bunch of stuff. And this is really fantastic because it means that the browser experiences way faster. If you're not being tracked, it turns out that all that tracking stuff was clogging up pipes and giving a CPU burden and making it.

so that your computer couldn't go to sleep. You go to the brave browser. It's a much faster experience. Your computer will speed up by like a factor of four if you use web stuff all the time. It's great. The next is email. So Google's got Gmail.

The encrypting email is called ProtonMail. I like ProtonMail way better than I like Gmail. So that's another thing that I do. What else can I talk about in terms of Google Project? Google Docs. I have not gotten a good replacement for Google Docs. I tend to use other things than writing everything as a Google Doc now. It's just sort of a change in habit. I'd like to find something that is much better and doesn't have all the things associated with it. For file storage, I don't use Google Drive. I now use mega.nz. And it's a great upload file service. I love it.

And then what else? I think that's pretty much most of it. Like if people can do that, then they're going to be mostly there along the way of the Google detox. And it's just going to be good because you're not going to have that creepy feeling when you're using the web that they can see all the things that you're typing in. Yeah, exactly. And, you know, one search engine that I came across, I don't know if you've ever heard of it. It's called Swiss Cows. it says that it's supposed to be a privacy, you know, safe place to be searching and stuff. It's not as good as Google, but the logistics of it seemed to be really, really nice. And I actually like it better than Duck. Go, which is what I was using before as well. But yeah, those are some really great things. And hopefully the audience will utilize that. I wanted to ask you, you mentioned about how the whole police being

cold was like a brush of death. That wasn't the first brush of death though that you had because I know that you were at YouTube when the YouTube shooting, yeah. April 2018, Nassim, a person from San Diego got upset because her channel got deleted. Oh, no, I'm sorry, it got demonetized. She could no longer run ads. And so she got into a car and came to YouTube, ended up not making it all the way to YouTube,

making it to the Mountain View campus, falling asleep in her car. The police knocked on her window and checked her out, and then they let her go. And then she came to YouTube during lunch, came in and opened fire and tried to shoot a bunch of people and succeeded.

And then she took the gun with her last few bullets and fired on herself in the chest and killed herself. And I got the word of what this had happened when the fire alarm was pulled. So the fire alarm pulled and I'm like,

oh, what's going on? I hope this isn't a false flag. Ha, ha, ha. And so I grab my skateboard. I go out the back, and there's like a hill down to the exit area from the back. So I take my electric skateboard. I throw it on the ground. I jump on it, and I'm heading down the hill as fast as I can.

There's like everyone else is behind me, but I'm faster than them because I got a skateboard. I come down and I see that there's this person laying on their back. and it turned out that this was the girl, but I noticed that there had what looks like, like a five o'clock shadow or something. So, and it looked like a dude sitting on the back. So I ended up reporting to the news people later on after I got into safety that there was a guy that had been shot.

by the shooter. Well, they said, that's impossible because the only person that the shooter killed was herself and it was a woman. And I went, what? No, that's impossible. And so for a while, though, they actually thought that there was two shooters.

Well, it all clicked when I saw the shooter. and the seam had an Adam's apple and she was built like a dude so this is the really weird thing about this whole thing is that you know this whole shooting went down

and it turned out that it was a transvestite I don't remember they were saying that on the news at all they never said this on the news go look at it they won't say that it was a transvestite they still to this day reported it as a woman Yeah, I thought it was like some woman that was on YouTube.

I thought she's like doing some sexy videos or something like that. Like for, I don't remember what it was, but I just, I had this very clear distinction in my mind that this was a woman creating videos on YouTube and they took her money away and she got mad and, you know, went crazy. Yeah. Wow. Yeah. So nothing about this story makes any sense. The parents claimed that they had told and weren't the police that their daughter was coming to shoot up YouTube or Google, that she was very upset. And the fact that the police found her in her car in the Google parking lot with this information being known, and they didn't stop her.

It's like, what's going on here? Someone's not telling the truth. Something's not adding up. And so I did some research on her family and found out that her dad worked for the Iranian intelligence services. I'm like, oh, no, there's another rabbit hole yet again. Of course. Like, there's something weird going on. And so, yeah, that's the inside scoop. The shooter in 2018 was a woman.

Oh, was a dude. Wow. Isn't that a common thing? I mean, the Vegas shooter, or at least the supposed shooter, Stephen Paddock, And by the way, Zach, I interviewed two people that were in Vegas that night that... Oh, really? Yeah. Within less than a week of the shooting, I had them on my show. And the mainstream propaganda didn't want anything to do with people who are actually there

because they would actually give real information. And I had one guy come on who was actually in the concert. And I had another guy that was at the Bellagio, like a mile away from this shooting. And they had an active shooter in the Bellagio. There were a lot of things going on in Vegas that night that was unreported. Yeah. Yeah. And then a bunch of people started dying after the shooting happened, like a week after.

Well, the one woman who died was at the concert with the guy I interviewed. And I can't remember the full story, but she had a medical condition that this shooting really vamped up. And she wound up passing away from this previous medical condition. And then there's the conspiracies going around that she was taken out. She really wasn't taken out. She literally had a medical condition that this shooting really affected. Yeah.

She wasn't hit, though. Yeah, but there's like nine other people that died. Yeah, absolutely. Oh, yeah. There's so many holes in this thing. I had another family come on the show that were, they were underneath Stephen Paddock's room when this was happening. I think they were on the other side of the hall, though. But their daughter was in the concert, and she was on the phone.

with her parents when the shooting was going on saying that there was shooting from a helicopter. I have video of a helicopter flying around that night during the shooting. And so it's not, I know this is not, you know, what we're supposed to be talking about. But hey, you know, it is what it is. I mean, no, this whole, this whole censorship happened. I mean, I know what the story is. It was attempted assassination on Muhammad bin Salman. Like, that's why they were the black helicopters. That's why there was a mass shooting. That's why there was crisis actors. that were involved in this whole thing that blew over.

I lost my fucking mind researching this because all the people that the media had reported had died, I started doing background searches on them and figuring out that all of their Facebook profiles

were created by someone else. That their GoFundMe's were being created by someone else. That when they said, oh, they're being lost by their teacher, like they had a memorial for them in this, like, at the school where they're a teacher. And then I would go and I would look at what people were saying.

And they're like, did you know who this person wants? Like, no, I heard she was a substitute teacher that substituted here like once three years ago. And I'm like, wait a minute. So this person was a substitute teacher at the school. So now the media's reporting that they were part of this, like, intimately part of this district when they weren't. And then you go and you look at the memorial. And there's like three people there. And the agreement, this person who is beloved by her community had a memorial and like three to eight people show up.

And that's it. And I kept on seeing this over and over again. And it was the same thing. Like they had a Facebook profile for them. They had one video. They had like a bunch of pictures. And then it was all done the exact same way over and over and over and over again. Like every single one of like the 21 people that they had.

They had that they were venerating in all the different media stations. And it was like ABC, NBC, CBS, they all were talking about the same people, and all the people they were talking about had the appearance of being, you know, a fake person with a manufactured Facebook profile that was created three years ago. And when they died, there was no family members or friends coming out, pouring their hearts out, saying, oh, we were friends. we were 10 years old. Remember we did this? I'm going to miss you, buddy. Like, none of that. It was a bunch of people coming on Facebook saying,

you know, I never knew who you were. Like, I just met you over the internet from this thing, but rest in peace. It was this, like, anonymous people crying their eyes out over and over and over again. I couldn't find anyone that was their high school friend, that was like their childhood friend, or any person that was related to them. And it's just like, okay, like maybe one or two.

That's a little bit out there. but every single person that the media was talking about turned out to be like looked like that they were not even real. And then you look at the survival rate. It was told that like 400 people were shot with this high-powered machine gun, right? And then they got, but nobody could reach them for like an hour. And so they were brought to the hospital. And then something like, it was like a 99% recovery rate.

rate. Now, I don't know if you ever seen what happens with someone gets shot, but they bleed out and then they go into shock and then their brain undergoes brain death in the hospital because of all the inflammation from

hypoxia. And so what happens is that people start pulling the plug after a week. What's clear that the person's got overwhelming brain damage. Well, that's what I would have expected. I would have expected it was like a 10% death rate. Really horrible stuff.

You know, seeing someone that was healthy, shot to death, like, and then their brain starts, like, they start spasming their muscles go over the place because their brain is fucking dying. I never saw this happen here. 99% of the people had like a spunt, like had a recovery and left. And then it turned out that Laura Lumer, who was on location at the time, tried to get access to the morgue to find out who these people that had actually died were. And, it was top secret. They wouldn't let her figure it out.

They wouldn't answer any of her questions. They wouldn't say who these people were. I think it's still a mystery about who these people were dead. And it just turns out that it was, oh yeah, here's the cherry on the top. You ready for this? George Soros put a putt cell on August 14th, 2017. I verified this by looking through the SEC's website and seeing the transaction logs in the XML file that was able to download from that day.

And I'm like, wait a minute. So on top of all this, you got George Soros with the $33 million put option making a bet that the Belagio would have its stock crash. This was an assassination attempt, and they were trying to get as much money and extract as much value out of this as that they could, and they did it from all these different angles. And when I saw that, I don't know what I saw the people being assassinated,

I just, I broke down, I started crying. I couldn't take it. I said, is this really the world that we're living in right now that has this much control over the media? And it was. Yeah. You know, and even the, I don't know if you pay attention to numerology, but even the number 33 has a very significant meaning very deep within the occult, freemasonry.

And this stuff, there's a lot of symbology that goes along with this stuff. know where you stand on, like, the idea of, you know, the occult and things like that. And if it's, you know. One, I'm all into it. Oh, really? Let me know. Yeah. Okay. Well, I didn't, I didn't know if you were or not. But I, for instance, this is very recent. Okay. So my audience knows one thing that I am. I'm a huge basketball fan since I was a kid. And I graduated high school the same year as LeBron James. And so I've followed him closely because LeBron James was going to next Michael Jordan. I hereby publicly declare I am no longer a fan of that man. And it's because a video that I found just this past weekend, it was actually like an hour

before I contacted you, it showed LeBron James in one video in the warm-up line, he pounds his chest, gives the goat horns to the sky as he looks to the sky, brings his hand down, does the Illuminati symbol pointing to the ground, and then he brings his hands apart and gives a 666 sign on each hand, and then he does it, and then he does something else with his hands. And that told me right there that LeBron James, who hangs out with J. Z, who puts do as thou wilt with wilt, which is an Anton LeVay saying on his clothing line, it's been infiltrated mentally by Jay Z and that, that whole thing. But it's so deep that I go to Instagram, maybe an hour or two later, and I see a picture of LeBron James' son playing a basketball game. And Dwayne Weyne

LeBron James best friend in the picture cheering him on. And I zoom in on the brine Wade's hoodie. And it's the names of the kids on the team, including LeBron James Jr., in a circle. Inside that circle is another circle, connecting strand of DNA, making a circle. And inside that, a hand-doing goat horns. I'll send you the picture. Send me the picture. That's mind-blowing.

I will tell you this, too. They're addicted to their symbolism. 100%. And they'll put it right in front of your face because most people don't pay attention to it or they're scared to pay attention to it. What you'll see in this picture is the goat horns where in America, it's a sign for I love you in sign language. Here's another thing that I'll tell you.

Helen Keller defined that. So she took that sign. She said, this sign means I love you in sign language. Helen Keller was an occultist. she took that sign, which was an occultic sign, and made it I love you in sign language in America. I believe America is the only country in the world that uses that I love you as a sign. And she was an occultist and a theosophist. And so I bring all that up because the satanic element to all this is so deep that it's hard to fathom.

And there are people, because I'm a Christian, and I have a very, very wide-based audience. I know for a fact I have Satanists that listen to my show. And when I bring up the top of the God and I talk about Jesus too much or something like that, I get emails about it. But this aspect is so deep-rooted into our culture and society. This is something that isn't an old religion coming back or circling back around and making a comeback. This is an old religion that has been here the entire time in the shadows. And the only reason why we see it now is because we have more access to information. It's been here the whole time.

It's been here the whole time. I'm sorry, man. You're supposed to be talking. No, I'm 100% on with you, man. Like, they've been here for, they descend from the sons of Noah. You know, the Canaanites, Canaan Abel, the Canaanites, they mixed with the Jews. God told them to not mix with the Canaanites, but they did. They created a very smart race, and they've got a pact with Mollick.

They're these pantheists. They believe that if they keep the covenant with their God, that they can inherit the earth. And that's the way that they've been working. They're so unbelievably evil that people just can't comprehend that they would do something as bold as, you know, put in soft metals into our vaccines in order to, you know, destroy the brains of our children. Like, it's, it's beyond what people are able to imagine. And because of that, they are in total denial that that's the way that the world is. But for someone that's hyperrational like I, uses Occam's razor and sees like this phenomenon and all these people talking about these, you know,

pantheists that have been practicing child sacrifice. Then I go and I reread the Bible. I'm like, okay, well, here it is. It existed back then. At what point did it stop? And if I can't find a point that it stopped, then maybe it still exists. And then you start realizing, okay, it does.

And this is where we get our story from vampires from, right? It's an ancient cover-up story about why all the kids were appearing with blood drained out. And it's because, well, the elites have this adrenalized blood ritual that they perform. And that's the reason why we got vampires now. You know, and there's tons of ancient writings outside the Bible. Now, being somebody that I am, I give a lot of weight to the Bible and the scriptures there. But these things can be found outside the Bible, too. I will tell you, though, you brought up Moloch. Moloch is in the Bible. That's how old this thing is. In Leviticus 1821, it says, do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Moloch. This is in the Bible.

For you must not profane the name of your God, I am the Lord. That's what it says. And where do we hear? Who is the most prominent person to utter Moloch? Well, it was Hillary Clinton in the WikiLeaks when she said, I don't know if there's a joke or not. I, let's just say it was a joke. She's joking around an email about sacrificing a chicken in the backyard of Moloch. Who in their right mind, who does not look into Satanism, who doesn't know anything about the stuff, would think to joke about something like that in an email about sacrificing something to Moloch?

Nobody knows that. Like maybe a comedian would say that, right, as something that's like so out there. But like someone that's worried about, you know, the wrong thing being interpreted from their text would put this one in an email, like that may get intercepted. Like, what the hell is going on here? Yes. You know, so now we know the truth.

The reason why she was okay putting that is because they're running the whole, you know, New World Order thing. And thank God for Putin coming out there and saying the New World Order worship Satan. It blew my mind, and I thought that it was a Lutotech, and it turns out that he was just disclosing

the truth to us and we got to be hit with a bunch of times before we wake up and realize what's really going on. Yeah, and I'll tell you what, man, you know, we've been manipulated to think that Russia bad, Putin bad, and all that stuff. He may not be the greatest guy. In fact, we know he's not, just from his history

of his life and who he's been dealt with and the gangs pretty much that he's been involved in. He's not the greatest of guys. But he did speak truth there. and the fact is that the truth is ingrained into this stuff so deeply that you really do have to start looking. Like you have to open your eyes and look to it. And this is not a Tony rant against Democrats and I love Republicans.

I tell you guys all the time, I don't like any of them. I'm on Team Tony. I'm not Team Republican. I'm not Team Democrat. I'm T-Toney. I look at everything the way I want to see it. And this is just my honest-to-God opinion. that Satan, there's a satanic element that's running our world, not just our government,

but our entire world. And I don't go on these big rants out a whole lot on this show, but we have Zach Voorhe's here, and I'm just going off right now. So, but, Zach, I wanted to ask you one more thing, and then we're going to end this thing here, I think. Q, you're an internet sleuth, and you, actually, I wouldn't to ask you two more things. Before we go on to Q, what is your IQ? I tested it in college. It was 133.

I think it's probably like 143 now because of all the education that I've had. And also people that tend to use Adderall for a while have IQ shift in the positive direction. So I would say that I'm probably like 143 right now. I heard about the Silicon Valley guys, always on the Adderall. stuff. I got to get on it myself. I got to get smarter these days. No, the reason, here's the thing is that the way the health works is that you get a disease because of a vitamin deficiency or a parasite or whatever. And as a result, your brain's not working that

well and slows down. And so you take Adderall to like try to fix it, but now you're you've got this dependency. I've actually, I'm not using it anymore just because I was able to figure out that I had a vitamin deficiency and fix that. And once I fix that, then I dropped off a lot of weight and I didn't need the adderall anymore. So I've lost like 25 pounds in the last nine months just because of, you know, getting a better diet.

Well, I mean, I think I would lose 100 pounds going through what you went through, man. So I wouldn't be stress. I wouldn't be stressing. I'd be forgetting to eat. So, but yeah, I wanted to just bring up this idea of Q because I, I see it around. And a lot of people ask me to do a show on Q. And I just haven't found the right formula for me to do it yet. And I'm honestly not sure exactly how I feel about Q. And if I, if you put a gun to my head and said, you have to tell me what you think Q is, I would say personally, I lean towards the idea that Q being a possible AI bot, man. Like, I think that some of the things that this person or whatever it is is throwing out there, because what do we know about artificial intelligence right now?

We know that back in the day when the computer was beating people in chess, they were programming this, they were giving this artificial intelligence, a parameters to operate in. There are rules that they had and it mastered these rules and it started beating people. But now what we're doing is we have artificial intelligence doing machine learning and learning from other machines. And it's learning incredibly fast. And I just wonder, would it be possible for artificial intelligence to simulate and be able to almost predict and see what's coming down the road just because it has so much access

to information and playing the probability game of everything out there, that it might be able to function as a Q. And judging by the way, you looked at the camera, you probably never heard that before. I mean, no, no, no, I've thought about this a lot. And I've actually had this question a lot. I think that Q is a real, I think Q is a counterintelligence operation, right?

If you look at the disinfo coming out, what is that? That's intelligence operation. How do you counter that in order to get your revolution through? You're going to need to have a counterintelligence operation, what counterintelligence is going to do, it's going to say, hey, they're lying, right? That's what Q's doing right now,

is that when you look at Q, you look at the predictions that they're giving and the information that they're doing, it's like you can be years ahead of this whole thing, like this information about who is responsible for changing the 302s and the FISA report, like that turns out that it's all like Peter Straussack and Lisa Page,

and we were getting dropped all this information in 2017, 2018. We had a heads up on Jeffrey Epstein, that he was the keystone, and now all this stuff is happening, and Jeffrey Epstein is right in the middle of all of it, just like it was prophesized to be. And so I honestly just think it's a good old-fashioned counterintelligence operation done by the military and by private business. I actually have an idea about who it could possibly be, who part of the Q team is.

That's not because I've been told by any. it's because of certain things that are deleted immediately on the cueboard when posted, gives you a clue on who's got a stake in this. And the thing is, is that it's a partnership military service. So part military, part private, you know, a few of these billionaires are upset, and they want to get these child sacrificing pedophiles out of office, you know. And they realize that it's really cheap to deliver the truth. So they're all working together to disseminate real information.

And I think that there's some people behind it. And I'm fine with that as well. You know, I just one of the things that was like a flag to me was when the FBI, what, was it back in August or July or something like that, when they came out and they're like, you know, if you're basically a supporter of Q, they were going to come after you. That was just one office, though, giving a report. That's not the whole FBI. But either way, if they can find people that are supporting Q, why can't they find Q himself?

I mean, it's not the whole FBI that wants to out him or, you know, put it as a domestic terror target. It was on Wednesday run FBI, and then the media blew it up, which is what they always do. They always say, oh, this is the opinion of the whole FBI. Even the FBI says it's a cult. Yeah, whatever. One person, one holdover posted this out, and who cares? You know, it's really interesting is this idea that my friend Patrick Ryan came up with, which was auto cults. What would happen if we got AI so good that we could just spin up like a Q&OND cult automatically and then have to interact with everyone and then get them to band together under like desperate.

collections of people and then you get all those people to just sort of like fight and then you create a civil war by like insert quarter create civil war in a country and just do that and create chaos throughout the world. I thought that was really interesting. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely interesting. It's scary to think about because it's something that 20 years ago, we'd be like, oh, that's impossible. Now we're like, I could really see that happening. I could really see that happening. Especially with all the deep fakes. Yeah. And that. I'm telling you, the deep fakes, I am surprised that deep fakes aren't more of an issue today than what they could be. And I give it another five more years. And the deep fakes are going to be

such a mainstream talking point because of, you know, once that technology becomes more and more available where a kid in high school can do it from his phone on his app, that is a wrap. I mean, deep fakes are going to be a problem. Deep fakes are going to save our country. You want to why? Really? Uh-huh. So the way. The way. The way is a wrap. So the way. way that the currency of the elite is blackmail right right yeah okay so if you if you take the value of blackmail it's got a per unit average value and the blackmail has a supply and there's a demand for it there's a supply of it well with deep fakes you can basically just make blackmail on the fly just generate it's fake and if you start flooding in the market with counterfeit

fake blackmail material, what's going to do to the value of the real blackmail material. Devaluate. It's going to devalue it. So now all this currency that these elites are holding over the politicians, the operators of the government, becomes worthless, which means that all the strains get cut, which means you got your country back. That's just why the media is so, so worried about this deepfakes is because it ends the rule over our politicians. I've never thought of it that way, and that would actually give me the answer to what I was just saying about why it's not a quote-unquote bigger issue right now. Because they don't want it to be. Because it becomes a bigger issue, it actually frees so many people. Yeah. Wow. So, yeah, there you go. And by the way, by the way, the only blackmail that becomes valid at that point is the one that Julian Assange is holding. And he released it with an MD5. And if that gets decrypted, then they can't say that it's fake blackmail.

blackmail material because it was released to the public in encrypted form like years ago. So, you know, in this blackmail apocalypse that happens, Julian Assange's blackmail still retains its value. So things are going to get interesting. I hope you very. I'm stocking up on popcorn. Listen, man, I am like, I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I am looking forward to trying to follow all this. stuff as close as possible. I feel like it's my job with the audience that I have to try to be as educated as possible. And I'll tell you, Zach, when I knew you and I are going to be talking,

you know, I'm looking around online for some different things with you. I'm on, I go to Google or YouTube. Dude, they really are actively suppressing you on YouTube because there's stuff on there about you and stuff. But it's like, like, all right, for instance, the, the video look right now. The video of you, when you search your name, the video of you on that news report, it had like 1.8,000 views. Like, it was one of the first things that popped up. And I was like, I didn't know that you were in like there, let alone being on a news thing. And you would think more people would see that. The interviews that you do, a couple thousand views, there's been some that have more. But for the most part, I was like, wow, I couldn't believe that it was being

kind of pushed down as much as it was because of who you are. It makes sense, though, you know, because of, you know, what platform it is. And I tell people all the time with my show that one day, I might say something that gets me deplatformed with Apple or, because we're, you know, podcast first, and Apple's a giant and we know that they've de-platformed other people in the past, it might happen to me. And that's why I always tell people, you have to go into the website for, You know, if I'm gone one day, the website will be there. You can sign up for the newsletter, and that will always have you connected to me. You can sign up for my text messaging group so that if anything happens, I can shoot out a text message. You get that information. But deplatforming

and suppression of information when it's hurting their toes or hurting their pockets, it's a very real thing. And I just wanted to say that to you because, like, when I was looking around for you online and stuff, I just thought I would have saw more trash. on some of the things I was seeing than what I saw. Even, even, for instance, I found your,

your YouTube channel. Dude, like 600 subscribers or something. I was like, are you kidding me? Like, that's it? Yeah,

I'm not, I'm not really pushing my YouTube channel because, um, it doesn't matter. I just have this subject, I just have the assumption, they're going to wipe it out probably by December 10th or something. So I'm putting no effort into building anything out on YouTube.

I is just going to be gone. Dude, when I started my YouTube channel for the show, I barely touch it as it is. Like, because I'm a podcaster and sometimes I put my show on video form. I got like, I don't know, 4,500 subscribers on YouTube and I'm barely trying with it, you know? And as I'm saying, like, for what you're doing and stuff, to have not even a thousand subscribers, just people that are just randomly like, hey, let me just subscribe to this and just in case something pops off on it, you know? Like, I was shocked.

I was shocked. But anyway, Zach, I feel like I could talk to you forever. And I've had you long enough. And I want to let you get to bed. So I appreciate you being here, man. Well, thank you, Tony. It's been a pleasure to be on your podcast. Absolutely.

And you have an open door to come back anytime, man. In fact, I would love to sit down and talk with you some more about stuff because I feel like there's a lot of things that we could touch on. Maybe one day we could do a live show and have people call in and ask you questions. I think that'd be fun. I would love that. How many views do you usually get? video. I'm not sure about you. Like I said, I'm a podcaster first. I'll tell you my stats when we end

the recording here, which is right now. Okay. Bye guys. That's good. Bye. Well, that's sure, everybody. I really hope you enjoyed it. And if you did enjoy it, please share the show with your friends, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, email, water coolers, mail pigeons. I don't care where you share the show, but please share it if you enjoyed it because that is the best thing you can do to help support the show on a weekly basis. Until next week, friends, stay safe, take care, and remember, the truth was such a free, but first he'll piss you off. Bye.