The Curiosity Shop with Brené Brown and Adam Grant - Brené with Priya Parker on How We Return and Why It Matters, Part 1 of 2
Episode Date: May 17, 2021Join me for Part 1 of a two-part series with Priya Parker on gathering together again. Priya is a master facilitator, a strategic adviser, and the author of The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why I...t Matters. We talk about the big and small challenges we’ll see when we return to workspaces, the need we’ll have to use our creativity and ingenuity to figure out how to be together, and the opportunity we’ll get to ask how we can be together better. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, everyone. I'm Bray Brown, and this is Dare to Lead. Before I jump in to tell you about this
incredible episode, I want to give you a housekeeping note, church bulletin time. We are going to be
taking some time off. So we are going to take off the month of June. We'll be gone from Memorial Day
and then the whole month. And I will be back on July 12th with a very,
personal and vulnerable two-part solo series on the hardest feedback I've ever received personally
as a leader, how it felt, what it meant, what I did about it, what I fought about it.
I'm just going to be really honest with y'all and tell you, because I just don't think we talk
about it. We talk about feedback, but we don't talk about what it feels to be on the receiving
of it, especially when it's hard, and how we take that feedback, whether it's a skilled person
or often an unskilled giver of feedback and do something productive with it. We have incredible folks
coming on the podcast for great conversations through the rest of the year. And I am, as always,
incredibly grateful for you. If you are also an unlocking us listener, we are taking off from
2nd to June 16th on unlocking us too. I will tell you that I am finishing new research and working
on a new book that's going to come out either late this year or next year. So I'm excited about that.
I'm excited about some time with my family as well. And we're going to come back from unlocking
us with a five-part summer series that I'm doing with my sisters, Ashley and Barrett,
on the Gifts of Imperfection. So I'll put this all in the show notes. But I wanted to give you all
a heads up that I will be off the grid for Dare to Lead in June back in July and off for a couple
of weeks on unlockingness as well. All right. Take a deep breath, friends. I mean like a big,
let's do the box breathing from the books. A big four second inhale, hold for four seconds,
exhale for four seconds, and then hold for four seconds. This is part one of a two-part series
with my friend Priya Parker on the return to gathering. We,
are coming out of, quote, COVID quarantine. We are coming back together in our homes, in our faith
communities, and at work. And it is going to be tough. It's going to be different. And we need it
to be different. And we need it to be better than it was before. And I cannot think of a better
person to walk us through how we return to gathering than Priya. We're going to talk. We're going to
talk about how to navigate new spaces while creating an inclusive sense of belonging without
creating exclusion. We're going to think about how we don't go back to doing some of the
shit that was not working that we were just on autopilot and doing because that's what we
thought we were supposed to do. So part one is this episode and then part two. In part two, in part two,
I am doing one of the most vulnerable things I've ever done on a podcast. So vulnerable. In fact,
I had to get kind of the input, feedback, and permission from my team. We're going to do a meeting
makeover. I'm going to talk through a real problem we're having with one of our meetings and how it
needs to change and why it's not working. And this is real talk in real time. So Priya Parker,
part one of two. I'm, I cannot wait till you hear this. If you're walking, you'll probably stop a couple
times right in your tracks. If you're driving, you may need to pull over. She does not play.
Okay, y'all, before we jump into this conversation with Priya, let me tell you a little bit about
her. Priya helps us take a deeper look at how we can create collective meaning in modern life,
one gathering at a time. She is a master facilitator, which you will observe, a strategic advisor,
the author of The Art of Gathering, how we meet and why it matters. She is the executive producer
and host of the New York Times podcast together apart.
Priya has spent 15 years helping leaders and communities have complicated hard conversations
about community, identity, and vision, especially in the moments of transition and fracture,
really.
She is trained in the field of conflict resolution.
She has worked on race relations on American college campuses.
She has worked on the peace process in the Arab world, Southern Africa, and India.
Priya lives in Brooklyn with her husband and her two kids.
Welcome, Priya Parker.
Welcome back, Priya Parker.
Thank you for having me.
I love continuing to be in conversation with you.
I have to say it because I've been waiting to use this phrase, back actually by popular demand.
Wow.
Yeah, our podcast together on Unlocking S is hugely popular.
Wow, that's so lovely to hear.
I mean, I've gotten such amazing feedback from our conversation.
And I wrote this at the time you model.
the beauty of intentional structure of a host, I think it's one of the best interviews I've ever given
because of you. We pass through so much territory because of the questions you asked and how you ask them
and how vulnerable you were about your wedding. And it was such a delight for me as well that I'm so
happy to hear that. And I actually think about particularly our analysis of your wedding quite often.
You know what? I do too. And I think other people do too because we see.
still get comments about it. I really actually saw a tweet that said,
thank you so much for your conversation with Priya, planning my wedding,
will not make these mistakes and we'll do some of the things y'all did.
So it was very cool. What I want to do, if you're open to it,
if I'd like to record two things with you today. I have a lot of questions about
returning to gathering. My gut is that it's going to be more difficult than we
anticipate and I want to know what your thoughts are. And then I'd also like to record another episode
with you, a meeting makeover. This is something, yeah, this is something you've started doing.
We're having a meeting problem. Would you be willing to do both those things with me? Talk about
going back and a meeting makeover. Absolutely. All right. I think we did not do this the first time I
interviewed you. So I'm really excited to start with this question. Tell us your story.
Where does one begin? I think of my story as one that was made by and with multiple people and many ways of being.
And we talked a little bit about this in our first conversation, but I was raised for the first kind of nine years by my parents, by my mother, who was Indian and was raised in India.
Her father was in the government. And so they moved every two or three years all around India.
So within India, there were kind of nomads, which actually broke.
free a lot of their mindsets of how to be. And she immigrated to the U.S. She applied to graduate school
secretly because she didn't want to say in India and she didn't want to have an arranged marriage
and got in. Her parents blessed her leaving. And she met my father at Iowa State University
when he had just come back from Peace Corps volunteering in Cameroon. And they kind of found
each other. And they were each other's source of adventure and curiosity and took a red VW van from Iowa
down to Costa Rica and moved to Africa. And I was born in Zimbabwe. And for the first really sort of
decade of my life, my world and my story was at some level like the two choices these
individuals made, the world that they created together. And every two years we would move.
I was born in Zimbabwe. We lived in the Maldives. We lived in Indonesia.
we lived in India for a little bit. We lived in Holland and we eventually moved to the states,
back to the states. They eventually moved to Virginia, and I think we spoke about this the last time,
they eventually separated and then divorced and then each remarried other people. And these two worlds
were very, very, very different. And my experience growing up in many ways was for the next decade
trying to figure out how to belong to two almost opposite worlds. In my first,
father's family, we would go to church, the local Presbyterian church, two, sometimes three nights a week.
My summer camp was mission trips. I mean, and I would go to Christian revival camps. One of my most vivid
memories is going to one of these kind of massive stadiums where on the stadium floor,
there was sort of a jokey infomercial where the video was blowing up Hindu gods. And I was sitting there
and passing around caskets to put in all of your, I remember it was like Gen X stuff.
I didn't really understand what was happening, but I knew that for me it was not working
and it was not good and it was demonizing the other part of my family.
And then my mother and mother's side, they come from a line of theosophists.
And my grandfather was very, very committed to the Theosophical Society,
which meant practically every winter I would go to Madras in southern India and for a month go to,
the Theosophical Convention where they would open each session with five different prayers
from all of the world religions and study multiple texts and meditate and do all types of
different healing modalities. And I would basically toggle back and forth between these two
different worlds. And those realities and sources of meaning and also deep sources of love on both sides
really deeply shaped me. And I became a conflict resolution facilitator.
We just have to stop for a moment and let that washover.
everyone, right? Okay. So I've always been interested in how groups form, how they break, how they come back
together, and in what shape. And in my life, that happened to be three different family units,
the first one, and then the second and third. And then I realized that there was an entire field that
studied group formation and group dissipation. And I went to the University of Virginia and was very
frustrated by race relations there, now the kind of infamous Charlottesville, but this was 20 years ago.
And UVA has a very strong sense of what they call student self-governance. And students there said to me,
older students, do something about it. If you have a problem with race here, do something about it.
And so I sort of studied and asked what other students had done in the past, and I learned about
a process called sustained dialogue. And long story short, we launched this process called sustained
dialogue on September 10th, 2001.
And of course, 9-11 happened the next day.
Launched means we sent a letter to the community saying we're going to start these
dialogues, right?
It was a psychological launch, which is in the world of gathering.
That's what an invitation is.
It's a future promise of a happening.
And it was sort of the right place at the right time.
And my peers and I kind of learned how to facilitate complicated.
messy dialogues with people within our own communities to see if we could do something about
the culture of the place, the structures of the place. And that really deeply informed my work.
And so for the last 15, 20 years, the core of my story has been trying to use this very
specific craft that I have, which is group dialogue, and trying to figure out and help
people and communities and places of power and places.
without power, use it to change things.
God, it's amazing.
So let me ask you this question.
If we were on a flight together or if we were at a cocktail party and hopefully I'd have a
better question than what do you do, which is like one of my least favorite questions.
Although one time I was committed on a flight because like you, I travel all the time,
I was committed to trying something different and I was sitting next to this guy, you know,
kind of had his readers on.
It was pouring over Excel spreadsheets online.
Your wrists were getting tired for him.
Totally.
And I was like, do we start the small talk?
Do I say, what do you do?
But I promised myself, I wouldn't.
It's saying, so what do you love?
Aw.
You know what his answer was?
I'm scared.
Working in quiet spaces.
Oh, no.
You know what I said back?
I said, well, normally I say, what do you do?
But I was trying a new question, and that question seems like bullshit.
So work away.
I was like,
I'm just laughed.
And that made him more curious to want to be in conversation with you.
Yeah, it was good that I established a relationship with him because I held on to him because
the flight got really turbulent.
We were landing in Denver.
So I was like, I'm going to have to have some physical connection here.
It's like, I think you just said knock yourself out, lady.
Yeah.
I was like, all right.
That's amazing.
So if I were on a plane or at a party with you and I'd already had great other conversation
about more interesting things than career definition questions.
but I did happen to ask you, what do you do? What is your answer to that?
I think I would say something like, I help groups have really complicated conversations
that they need to have that they've been avoiding.
Ooh, that's really good filter because curious people will lean right in.
And I think like you, I also wear multiple hats. So my craft is as a facilitator.
My day job is doing what I just told you.
And then I think I have this other part because of my research side and my writing side,
which is also I help demystify how anyone can create meaningful, necessary gatherings for their people.
We really need you right now.
I have some questions for you about going back to work.
I had a funny conversation with a couple of folks from my team.
yesterday and I was like, we're going to be together maybe in September and the new offsite is going to be
the on site because we're going back to the office for the first time. What are you concerned
about as you think of all of us going back to share physical spaces? Let's jump into,
we're going to gather again. I can't wait and I'm scared to death.
Me too. You too? Both are true. Absolutely. I'm so excited about being able to gather again with the people that I love. And I also think it's going to be super complicated. I mean, I'm starting to realize that for a year I didn't really have to make any decisions of that kind. Do we say yes? Do we say no? Do I say no? Do I get a sitter? I mean, we had a thousand other terrifying decisions to make. But that's that.
set of decisions, we're just kind of on pause for a year. And I'm feeling the decision fatigue
start to creep back in. And it's like, oh my gosh, I forgot that the way we spend our time
has changed and the number of invitations. I mean, you get Zoom invitations, I guess,
but just very simply, how do I or we as a couple or family allocate our time? And frankly,
a lot of the saying noes went away for a year because no one was asking anything and it was
totally understandable why you wouldn't go. And so this idea of, I mean, we talked about this a little bit
in our other conversation, this idea of having to deal with not wanting to reject someone.
Yes. Even just through the social interaction or meeting interaction of how do you navigate why you
don't want to go to something is reentering our lives. I would say that at the deepest level,
I'm concerned about people, organizations, teams, default racing back to assuming that they're trying to race back to something.
Without pausing and asking, what have we learned during this time about our work, about how we work, about at the core of it, what it is we do and what is needed right now?
what have we learned about things like access and equity in this year of reckoning?
And I'm not worried about the conversations people are having to figure out how do we do this.
I'm worried about people skipping those conversations and just focusing on the logistics.
And what I mean by that, so just very specifically, I think a lot of organizations are starting to think about companies, groups,
Like, where should the choice be about whether or not employees go in person to work?
Should there be a blanket policy that everybody needs to come back?
Should we put the choice on the individual?
And then, based on how that then filters out, if the core is to have meetings or gatherings
or work together in ways that are not punishing the people who decide not to come back,
how do we actually run those hybrid meetings?
So for example, a lot of the studies that show both of who has disproportionately lost jobs in the pandemic, women, and who is disproportionately likely to take the option of working from home continually, women and parents.
And so I'm concerned about people assuming that we go back to in-person meetings and you just kind of let people zoom in or choose your verb, zoom into those meetings, but you're not actually restructuring your meeting in.
a way that allows for true hybrid participation. Because otherwise, we're punishing those who
decide to choose to work from home versus actually asking things like, when do we meet? How do we
meet? If not everybody is in the room, is it important to have two facilitators or two hosts,
an in-person host and a hybrid host, a hybrid host with some amount of power in the organization?
If there are certain people who are working from home and zooming in via hybrid work,
do we have everybody in the office actually take the call through their computer in separate rooms
to not basically exclude those who are choosing to work from home? There are so many questions
around power and access and equity that I think need to be worked through. And my worry is that we
skip those conversations. Oh my God. You've rendered me both.
speechless, which is rare, and worried.
And you've kind of pissed me off a little bit in a way that you do sometimes when you call
to our attention how we need to be thoughtful.
Jesus.
It's not like we're going to race back and then everything's going to be solved.
It's like we are actually in this extraordinary moment that resulted from a lot of pain and
devastation, in which at some level, like, the decks have been cleared, right? For decades,
we have been gathering in very specific ways that in a lot of cases haven't been working for
people. And rather than rushing back to those formats, we actually have an opportunity to
pause and to ask, like, how do we want to do this now? What are the meetings we've longed for?
What are the things that even though we couldn't do on Zoom, that we couldn't do in the Google meetup,
that we should absolutely bring back. Also, what are the meetings that were canceled and literally
everybody quietly celebrated, right? What are the meetings we should actually not bring back because
they actually could have been an email? But then I think there's this third part,
which is during the pandemic, we have invented new ways of coming together, right? And that was so
much of our previous conversation. But what have we learned in this pandemic that we actually
want to bring with us, that we want to move forward? And then finally, what do we want to
want to reinvent or invent a new in this moment where this does not happen very often, we can
decide how we want to be together and what we want that to look like.
So I'm not just hearing everything you're saying. I'm really as a leader as someone who is
the CEO of an organization. I'm really feeling everything you're saying in a very
uncomfortable way because I'm tired.
And I don't want on the racial reckoning front, on the equity and power over versus power
with and two front, I do not want to just go back. But this is a heavy lift that you're asking
right now. You are asking for some considered, reflective, hard questions about what is it going
to look like. And when you said, if we have a hybrid model for those of us that are going to be back
in the office physically, are we going to join from our offices so that the people who've chosen
are staying at home, there's a little bit more equity there. I just wanted to start crying
when you said that. I mean, I'm just being really honest. And I think each of these elements have
tradeoffs. And I think part of the conversation, and I think these are conversations at some
level we have with our teams, right? Part of figuring this out is choosing what I would call
legitimate priorities. Say more. We build legitimacy. We build legitimate priorities through
conversation, through including the people on our team who have different experiences than we do,
through including in conversation the people who are furthest from the epicenter of power,
that's what it means to center some of these different voices.
And then as a team or as a leadership team, it depends on how big your organization is,
you get really clear on what are the three priorities that we in this company, in this organization,
our people have agreed are the three elements we are most centering.
And so, for example, if equity, I'm making this up, but if equity or access is the number one
priority and everybody has agreed to that, then maybe the tradeoff of meaningful connection,
which is bodies in a room, that specific organization decides, yes, we're all going to sit in
separate spaces, but we're going to spend our budget, we're going to allocate resources to actually
bring everybody together twice a year for five days at a time in an offsite in a way that we would
never have before. Changing the way we gather isn't only the structure within each meeting.
It's actually allocating resources differently. It's actually allocating budgets differently.
And one of the tweets that has most stuck with me in this pandemic year is from the writer and media researcher, Sasha Constanza Shock.
They wrote a book called Design Justice.
And at the beginning of the pandemic, when, I don't know if you remember this week, Renee, when South by Southwest is kind of at a standoff with the city of Austin trying to figure out, do they cancel, do they not?
And because it was such a huge conference, right, more than 400,000 people attend, it gives Austin, I believe, 250,000.
million dollar bump every year in terms of just revenue. Do we cancel? At the time, Sasha tweeted
something like disabled people. Could you get a live stream up? Abled people. No, no, no, it's too
hard. Disabled people. Could you just get a live stream up? Abel people. No, no, it's super complicated.
Coronavirus, we need to get a live stream. Abel people. We're announcing the state of the art
live stream for everybody all around the world. Wow.
And that tweet, it was so piercing and brilliant in what they do.
It was like an arrow at the heart of the system that just demonstrates what does it mean to center and who do we choose to center?
And I think as a facilitator, that is up for grabs.
The part of the debate that I will point my pointy elbows and defend space for is we need to argue.
We need to contest who and what are we centering based on who we are and what this work is.
But centering doesn't mean doing things the way that the people in the organization most think
something should run.
It's actually asking, like, what is our work?
What is the need?
And what are the bottom lines about how we gather so that the people we choose to pay in
this company can successfully do their most vibrant work?
One of the things that is really scaring me as a leader, but also as someone who studies shame,
a lot of us are really considering that you have to be vaccinated to come back,
that you can keep your job, but you'll have to work remotely.
It puts too many people at risk, especially people who have compromised immune systems,
taking care of the elderly kids that have compromised immune systems.
Do you think about this?
Have you thought about it? What's your line of thought?
I think it's super, super complicated. And I think that in a way, it's just a new line to consider that is about power and equity.
And in every generation, there are new lines that we become aware of because of this very unusual once in a century pandemic.
Vaccination is a new line of equity. We see it globally. As we're having this conversation, the U.S. is emerging.
and India is in its worst moment of the entire pandemic.
And so there's global equity around vaccines and vaccine access and the patent conversation.
But then even within the country, I think maybe you and I want to just, there are moments
you just kind of want to get in bed and put your cover over the head and just say like,
this is too much.
I can't think about this right now.
Someone else deal with it.
And so it's like, we both collapse.
And then once you're ready, take that sheet slightly below your face.
And then we start thinking the way that thoughtful people have always grappled with.
And I think for the vaccine, so I'll give a couple of examples.
I recently heard someone DMs me, I get a lot of examples from people experimenting with various ways to gather.
This isn't a workplace gathering, but it was an interesting example to me.
And this is a parent who was hosting a birthday party for their child.
And for safety, invited people to wear color-coded T-shirts based on web.
whether or not they were vaccinated. Oh, God. And it was like vaccinated, not vaccinated one weekend or
something like that. And the intention, and this is a social example, but if we extrapolate and think
about her goal as a host was to protect her guests. Yeah. Was to give them a code, right? Yeah.
A code to be able to protect themselves and safely interact with one another. And to make informed choices.
And to make informed choices. Yeah. Our instinct to that
experiment might be like, oh gosh, that's basically creating a caste system, right? But we have to run a number of
different experiments with care to basically figure out how do we keep each other safe fundamentally
and a health perspective and then counterbalance those with who either don't have access to the
vaccine or can't take it or don't want to take it for all of those elements to think about,
well, then how do we creatively have them also engage? Similarly, like race or like gender,
all of these different moments of reckoning, I think we're going to have a future series of
reckonings around this very question, and particularly in countries with even less access.
I mean, I think in New York, 50% of adult are now vaccinated. And so also we're going to live in
different realities in different states based on the current situation. But I think that it's something
to really think about as a host, which is as a leader, as a manager, as a CEO, as a president,
as an executive director, to deeply think about legally, what can you ask, but also how do we
create with safety experiences for people that minimize shame and maximize connection.
There's something else here now, something new.
From exclusively on Paramount Plus, it's the series.
Stephen King calls scary as hell.
Everything here is impossible, but it's also real.
Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now.
We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules.
Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch.
Saving those children is how we all go home.
From Binge All Episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus.
Laura Mays is the senior director for the podcast and she and I've been friends for
I don't know, 15 years maybe. And yeah, 15 years because we met when our boys were one. And we've both
been vaccinated and we decided to meet in person for the first time in probably 15 months. And we met in
Austin and I kind of opened the door and she was staying there. We both had our masks on. And I said,
I think we can take these off. And she took hers off and I took mine off. And then we touched
fingertips like ET. Like we were, but we were so, I mean, we're very, very.
close friends, but we were so uncomfortable about how to physically share space.
Yes.
And I've seen that again and again.
I've been in a couple of meetings outdoors now.
I'm very slow to come out of my protective zone, I can tell you.
But I've had a couple of outdoor meetings and people reach out to shake my hand and I kind
offer them my elbow.
And would you agree that there's going to be some awkwardness?
There's going to be so much awkwardness.
And I think also part of this time is we are physiologically retraining ourselves to enter.
So even when logically you think you reach out to your hand or reach out your elbow or someone
comes closer and if you're vaccinated, there's a sense of your body still leans back because for 14 months,
you've been basically trained to lean back or to step back.
And so there's the rational changing of norms.
I remember when Dr. Fauci declared the end of the handshake, I'm curious to see, do we actually end up just continuing the elbow bump?
What happens in 2040? How do people greet in 2040 or 2060?
But I also think that to me, you asked me earlier when people say, what do you do?
How would you answer? I think part of how I do what I do is I encourage people when things are really complicated to make the implicit explicit.
it. And what I mean by that is if in any kind of in a meeting, in a offsite, in any type of gathering,
particularly when we're in a moment of transition and we are in a moment of transition right now.
Huge. It's a responsibility of the host to think about where are we meeting. How do I share with the
guests, all of the information that they need in order for them to make the decisions they need to
make. What time of day do we do this? Is there a rain day? I had a friend who got married this past year,
and subject line of her wedding was something like, instead of praying for no rain, it was like
praying for good Wi-Fi because it was a Zoom wedding. Yeah. And so I think that it's going to be
awkward. And one of the ways, as a host, to mitigate some of the awkwardness in the moment is to give
people handrails ahead of time. Yeah. And in the art of gathering, you write about how unhealthy
peace. And I would say unhealthy comfort is worse than unhealthy conflict. And the one thing I'm so
grateful for in our organization that just kind of defines us before COVID, just from the
beginning, is we do uncomfortable. We have uncomfortable conversations. We name like, oh, God,
this is awkward as hell. We don't know what to do. Like, we just name what's happening in the
room, which people are always scared to do because they think it makes it awkward, but it doesn't.
How important is it going to be, whether you're a leader or you're gathering people for,
you know, in a faith community, whether you're for social reasons, how important is it going to
be just to name what's happening? Naming is the most powerful tool that we have as
facilitators. It is 101 to actually name the elephant in the room. And even if the elephant is just
awkwardness, it just allows everybody to take a breath. And I'll give a simple example. And I think
you can name it in big ways. We're all trying to figure out exactly how to be. I mean, this sounds,
well, to you, this won't sound funny. But I think we will all experience micro moments of perceived
rejection over the next many months. Oh my God. You really,
reach out your elbow.
Say that again.
I want you to say that again for everybody.
We are all going to experience micro moments of perceived rejection over the next many months.
When I say micro moment, I mean, say the invitation is perfect, everything is going.
And then you walk into the room and someone reaches out your hand and someone leans their body back.
That's what I mean by a micro moment of rejection, right?
Or somebody walks over and somebody else moves away.
We don't fully know how to do this.
and it's going to be really clunky.
And I think part of naming that as a leader to depersonalize some of that perceived rejection
to allow the stumbling and fumbling around, to also, particularly for virtual meetings,
to, I'll give a simple example of naming, I did recently.
I was facilitating a large Zoom gathering for an organization.
And I had to stick my computer in my backpack.
And I took the wrong backpack.
It was not my backpack that I don't let my children touch.
It was a backpack that on weekends, there's snacks everywhere in that bag.
And I stuck my backpack in this bag.
I took it out for a meeting.
This was like a five-hour meeting that was very important to me.
And food had jammed inside the magnetized part of the power plug.
Oh, God.
I don't know if you, do you know what I'm talking about?
I do.
And I couldn't get my power plug into my computer to charge my computer to facilitate this 80 person meeting.
And I was freaking out.
Yeah.
And at some point, I just said, okay.
And I said, okay, I put my backpack in the bag that were used for my kids snacks this weekend.
I have no idea what is in there, but I cannot get it out.
And I'm doing a live poll in the Zoom chat.
what do you think is stuck in my adapter cord? And all of a sudden I had dozens of hilarious answers.
Crunch Cheerios. Yes. Zotar. Goldfish. Crackers. Goldfish. And it was a moment of levity. Also,
culturally, it was super interesting to see because at some level, they're also saying what's in their backpacks.
Yeah. And so it was this moment. It was a moment of naming. I mean, that's a micro moment where it's just my tech problem.
but my tech problem in this COVID world becomes everybody's problem.
And so similarly, how do you name what is and then help people come around to be like,
how do we help us together?
And then it was the solutions.
Can you vacuum the crackers out of all of these various elements?
But it was a human moment.
And I think, and this goes so deeply into your work, naming what is, naming what we're facing,
gives us all the courage to figure it out together.
And I think to me, this moment in time is such a beautiful, interesting moment for deep creativity.
It's like at the core of what we each have is human ingenuity to figure out how do we do this now and to radically experiment.
I gave that T-shirt example with the kids' school in part because she was testing.
It came from care.
She was trying to figure out.
And so then it's like, okay, maybe it's not T-shirts, but there was a principle behind that, which is how do we help people signal in ways?
that allow them to navigate a space without being excluded. Okay, interesting. So what's then T-shirt 2.0?
But I think we have to build on top of each other's experiments and then when they don't work to really learn and debrief with care, which is what I would encourage teams to do openly.
Yes. Man, will psychological safety be important when we come back or not? One of the things we talk about all the time is how do we build a culture where people can talk about what they feel and ask for what they need?
Completely.
And I think that's going to go a long way when we come back for people to actually be able to say,
here's what I'm feeling, here's what I need to feel okay. And I'm so keenly aware of I have very strong opinions about public health issues. I mean, I'm married to physician. I'm also very aware of how thoughtful I'm going to need to be.
And I think there's a difference between what.
you communicate and decide to say. And also then as a leader, what's the policy that you
institute? That's right. And at some level, at least for private companies and even public institutions,
leaders have always grappled with what is the fundamental foundation on which we are building.
And do no harm is a pretty strong one. And so at some level, how you get to the policy through
talking with your people, through understanding, through doing polls and surveys, but really having
meaningful conversations with focus groups. What is this last year been like? What are the most
powerful virtual gatherings or meetings we've held? What are the virtual meetings that have been terrible?
What are you most excited by? How would you feel about this? And not so much their opinions,
but their experiences. So that when you set a policy, it's not a policy that's coming out of
left field. It's a policy that reflects people's deepest experiences. And then in my experience,
at least, people respect that. They want a decision. But it needs to be a participatory process.
to get to one that feels like people feel like this is the best way to coordinate their work.
Vibrant work. You said that. I love that. How do we support the people we choose to pay
to be able to do vibrant work in a culture where they feel seen and respected and cared for?
I guess if we hold that in front of us, Priya, it's the right North Star.
And it's complicated. I'll give an example. There was a team where one person found that the way for them to
most, not just handle the pandemic, but handle kind of Zoom call after Zoom call, but to have a
standing desk, but to also actually walk while they're on the call. They had a treadmill. And it was
very good for that person. And there were other people on the call who felt really dizzy and
disoriented and found it was really distracting if there's like six squares and one person's moving.
Yeah, I couldn't do that, actually. I couldn't do it either. And so that's an example of in a team,
How do you either tell the person and not, is there a policy of when we're internal?
You can walk or do whatever you want when we're client facing butts and chairs.
But it's not clear what should happen because you're always, it kind of comes back to my
original stories.
When and how do you balance the rights of an individual with the rights and the needs of the group?
And COVID is a gorgeous example that is putting that on bold letters.
That's what we're talking about here.
And as a leader, leadership is listening very deeply to the needs of the individual and the needs of the group and then making an intentional decision that gives clarity and comfort to all.
Call me prophetic, but I'm sensing some very uncomfortable, honest conversations coming up in the next few months.
You're going to be really busy, Priya.
Yeah.
We are in a moment of grappling.
And these are what I would call worthy conversations.
To run away, one of the things I often tell when I'm working with leaders or people
dealing group managers is like, don't be afraid of your people.
They often have the answers.
Listen and then make a decision.
It's not saying this would all be based on consensus, but don't be afraid of people.
They're the ones who are actually living these lived experiences.
Listen to them.
Take it all in and then make an intentional decision and explain it.
That's right.
Okay.
before we jump in to our rapid fire questions, I just want to say thank you for giving us handrails and guardrails
in a package that says we need to be building handrails and guardrails. I mean, you just modeled
for us what we need to do for the people that we're gathering. So thank you. I love how you're
framing that. You're welcome. And I think part of this moment is that.
realizing that we need handrails and the decisions about even how those handrails are built
contain power. Yeah, they do. And so design them well. Yeah, design them well. Design them from
power with and power to not power over. You'll appreciate this story. We'll take two minutes to
tell a story. When I was working on some parenting research probably, it was over a decade ago.
a woman gave me this really interesting advice. She said, we were talking about the need for boundaries
with children and setting expectations being clear about what's okay and what's not okay,
the why behind it. And she used this metaphor of one of those kind of rickety swinging bridges
that, to me, would be terrifying to cross, but the kind that go over the gorge that's,
you know, a thousand feet below you. And she said,
Parenting without boundaries is like sending a child across that bridge that doesn't have handrails.
Beautiful.
And I think it's so powerful.
And over the years, I've thought to myself, just as someone who studies fear and studies how we show up in fear, I think if any of us have to cross that bridge and there's no handrails, I think we do one of two things.
We, maybe one of three things.
We either get to the edge and just refuse to move forward.
We run across recklessly.
Or we kind of army crawl on our bellies just gripping the hell out of that thing, which is so not productive.
And so I think it's such a powerful metaphor for teams and organizations too.
No guardrails, no handrails.
You're asking people to cross some really dangerous territory.
And don't be shocked. If they either freeze, they are reckless, or they just inch across in ways that don't make sense.
And from the perspective of the bridge builder, I think of it when we relate it to gatherings, that every gathering at some level is a social contract. There is a purpose. It's almost like a constitution. There is a purpose. We are convening people for this purpose. This is what we promise in terms of
of protection and safety and creativity and work. And this is what we're asking you to bring to be
successful. And part of the bridge building to follow on that metaphor and the handrails is that
when you are a host to use my language or a leader, it's irresponsible to not create
handrails to let people to know if they want to walk across that bridge. And in any type of meeting,
any type of gathering, whether you think of coming back to work as the meta-gathering and just going
back into those doors and going back into those hallways or just one meeting at a time,
the role of the host is to create a social contract that people want to be a part of.
And 90% of the work of gathering happens before anyone enters the door.
It's that handrail that you're talking about, the bridging.
How are we going to meet here?
It is.
Why are we meeting here?
give the meeting a name that's not just a calendar invite saying TBD.
How do we set people up so that we can get to work when they enter the door, enter the Zoom
room, and that they know how to be successful when they come in.
And there's a thousand different ways to be.
And so part of the codes, whether it's understanding how we want to be in this new
semi-vaccinated world and giving people guidance of saying either this is going to be awkward
or we suggest whether or not you're vaccinated, we've all agreed we're going to wear masks
in part to feel, in part to center those who are not vaccinated.
We're still making up the rules.
But part of the preconditions for letting people come in and be successful is setting up those
guardrails, not because they're children, but because they are living, breathing adults
choosing to walk across a bridge.
And so that bridge should be well built.
Oh, my God.
Yes.
We could just work this metaphor for how many days do you think we could work this metaphor?
Definitely, three.
And I think guardrails in a lot of ways, my language is psychological safety, power analysis.
And the other thing I would say is, as I was thinking about this conversation with you and talking to some folks on my team, we use this term the bounce.
And I think I'm going to be really clear when we come back in person to work that we're in the bounce.
And what that means for us is it's probably a different way of saying beta that we're going to be trying things.
Yes.
Untrying them, learning from them, trying new things.
Everything that you see us put into place will talk about what we're looking for in terms of success indicators.
We want your opinions.
And if it's not working for all of us, it's not working and we change it.
So I'll, I think probably making, as you say, making explicit that we're in beta.
we're trying to figure out what works. No one has the playbook. And we're running a set of experiments.
And we're trying to determine what are the needs now. Right. And therefore, how are we solving or trying to address those needs? And going back to kind of gathering language in our first conversation back in November, gatherings are powerful when they meet a specific real need. And they get stuck. We get stuck in form. We get stuck in kind of autopilot. When we're solving a need.
that someone else had 20 years ago.
Oh, God.
Okay, yeah.
And so so many, whether it's a staff meeting or whether it's how we celebrate retirement,
when and the age people retire, how often they leave, how often you have to actually do farewells,
has completely changed from the 1980s because of how work, how many people enter and exit different firms at different times.
And so if you still are doing farewell parties the way you did 20 years ago,
you were probably not matching the need in front of you.
And right now we're in this moment of kind of a great reset,
where we all in our families, in our places of worship,
and in our workplaces have the permission and the space
to actually look up and say,
okay, what is our need in this moment?
And how might we experiment coming together in this way?
And then how might we learn and decide if that really worked
or if that was a terrible idea, we all laugh and we try something else?
It's got to be fun.
It's fun. It's interesting. It's a moment of deep creativity. It's wild. And I think part of your
bounce language and kind of being in beta is it gives everybody permission to play and try and
be curious and be truly creating something. We're in a moment of creation. And that is something
that few generations get at this level. Yeah. I love that.
I love that. And I always tell folks, when we talk about the bounce, we all have to bounce different.
When I'm in a bounce, Steve and I were thinking about moving to a different city. And when I was in the
bounce, I'm like, I have to find the house, find the neighborhood, emotionally move in, feel it out,
understand where the grocery store is. And he's like, that scares the shit out of me because
you're the microwave and I'm the crock pot. But you promise as you're doing this, you're in a bounce.
I'm like, yeah, that's the way I bounce. I really go all in and try things.
because if we decide tomorrow that we're not going, I can pull out really quick and that's not him.
So even acknowledging that people bounce different and beta different, I think is important.
Absolutely. And bouncing happens in entries and particularly in transitions, right? We're in a moment of deep transition. We are sort of exiting this pandemic moment. It's sort of not. I mean, it's sort of simultaneous. It's not clear how long it'll last. We're also entering and building this new world. And we bounce in different ways. I have a friend and a colleague who recently, she has allowed me to,
share this example with others because I found it so powerful, she took a new job in the
pandemic, probably nine months ago. And it was a big fancy job in a large organization.
And to celebrate her first paycheck from that job, she bought herself a kayak. You know,
it's like truly pandemic purchase. Right. Outdoor. Totally. But because everything was so backed up,
it didn't arrive until seven and a half months later.
Yeah.
And the day it arrived, she found out it basically was not a good fit.
It wasn't a good fit on her end and it wasn't a good fit on the organization's end.
And they decided to end the relationship.
And the day they decided that, the kayak arrived.
Oh, God.
Oh, Lord.
And so she hosted for herself, this was her form of bouncing.
She hosted a launch party of herself.
of herself in her kayak, inviting her friends, including the person who recommended her for the job,
including the person who told her about the job, to be the master of ceremonies.
And they popped champagne on the river all over the kayak and pushed her out into the river
to launch her into her next phase.
That is poetic, isn't it?
It's so beautiful.
That's poetry.
And it allowed her to acknowledge with her community.
and her peers and the people who are involved in that process that she is leaving and that this
is happening and that she wants to be seen and faced it and bear at a very deep level embodying
this idea that she's going back out into these waters and she's choosing to and she wants to do it in
community and that is somebody responding to a need in front of her inviting her community around
it being seen in that invitation and creating both her own farewell party as well as her own
for her own exit as well as her own entrance, but with the people in her community. It's both.
Yes, it's both. We're all exiting and entering so many parts in this pandemic from a work perspective,
but in so many other ways, and it's an opportunity to really, for lack of a better word, have bounce parties.
Yeah. To begin to think about what are we leaving behind and what do we want to actually embody
and perhaps even in ritualistic form. You can do this as teams. If there's some meetings that were just truly terrible and no one ever wants to do it again,
what does it look like to cancel a meeting? But at the meta level, not this one time. Yeah, right. You know, canceled. Can you hope to cancel? We're never going to do that again, party. We need ways to mark and mourn and celebrate and then also mark what we want to enter into. And it's a radical time of makeover, of invention. And when we do that, witnessed with others, we all then carry that memory with us as we move forward and invent. God, I love this. And,
if you're listening and you're thinking, what does that look like to challenge, to create something
new, to challenge, to rethink during this reset. Priya has offered to do another podcast with
me where we're going to work a real meeting that I'm worried about in our organization.
She's going to do a meeting makeover.
So look out for that podcast because that'll be really interesting.
I'm already kind of nervous about it, but I trust you completely.
So I'm ready.
I'm really looking forward to it.
Okay, you ready for the rapid fire?
I'm ready.
Vulnerability is?
Being seen.
What's one piece of leadership advice that you've been given that's so powerful you need to share it with us are so shitty you need to warn us?
I once had a business coach who was working with women entrepreneurs and working with us on pricing.
And she was looking at how we were charging for different parts of our services.
and all types of entrepreneurs.
And she looked at our prices and she kept on saying,
why is that number so low?
And different people, myself included, would say,
well, I can do that in my sleep or that's really easy for me.
And she said, if that's really easy for you, that is your gift.
And you should be charging the most for that.
I've never forgotten.
Let's just take a pause right there.
I can see people stopping, you know, just in their tracks on their walk
or pulling over the side of the road in their car. That's your gift. You should charge the most. Amen. Amen. Okay. I can't wait. I've been dying
to ask you this question. What is the hard leadership lesson that you have to keep learning,
that the universe keeps putting in front of you over and over again? I wish y'all could see her
face. We're on Zoom and she's covering her eyes and laughing. What is your hard one?
The real nub in this question, Brene, is that you still have to keep learning over and over again.
You're just really getting in there with this question.
I knew you'd appreciate it.
So, man, such a good question.
Okay.
We can cut some of the paws, right?
No, we're not going to cut any of the pause because I want people.
But you know why?
Because I did a podcast about a couple months ago with The Economist and she's like, wow,
we're going to have to rename this a pause cast with you.
And we're really hardcore about not cutting the pauses so people know that we're still there because
I want to model for people what it sounds like to be thoughtful in answers.
Beautiful.
Okay, then I'm going to pause and I'm going to think.
Good.
I think a leadership lesson I keep bumping into again and again is my boundaries around
when and how I work and when and how I close and turn it off.
And I think in part because I'm so interested in the work that I do.
And like you, it's about human beings that I keep learning and I keep practicing.
What does it mean to actually let work stay at work?
And particularly now that we're all on Zoom, and some of this is very practical ways.
Changing my shirt when I close my laptop and go out to meet my family.
Just literally having some kind of change, not allowing for the work that I do,
and particularly around the conflict resolution work, to finding ways to protect myself
so that I'm fully in it when I'm in it.
and then I can also not let it kind of carry with me as I go into the other parts of my life.
I think as a facilitator and as a leader, one of the things is that in part, in order to access
and really help a group, I let them in at some level.
I become part of the system.
And so I think the leadership lesson I keep learning is how do I do that and then also
continue to help protect myself and also protect them to be able to leave an exit when I'm then
entering a different part of my community in life.
And the last thing I'll say is a lot of this is very practical.
So as a facilitator and as a leader, I think one can have the experience, particularly if
you're holding a group or running a meeting of kind of being big, being powerful,
holding a lot of space, speaking a lot, taking more airtime, whatever it is.
Just the experience of just physically, now we are on Zoom and my hands are wide in the air and
I'm kind of showing, demonstrating, holding a group is I often try after I facilitated a large meeting
within 24 hours, giving myself the experience of physically being small to counterbalance that
energy. So going to a yoga class virtually or doing something where I'm a student so that I keep
on just integrating big, small, big small, big small. And I don't get so inflated at holding that
I either collapse or just become incredibly annoying. The space you're talking about that transition
space. It doesn't matter whether you're a facilitator or a researcher or an accountant. That
transition space is no joke. It is no joke. Okay. What's one thing that you're really excited
about right now? Despite our entire conversation and all of the things we need to worry about
with handrails, gathering again with people I love in ways that don't feel super formal and
through an internet line. Amen. Tell me one thing you're deeply grateful for.
right now. The vaccine rollout in the United States. Yes. They're doing an amazing job. Yeah. And at a really
macro level, also a gathering endeavor. Absolutely. Absolutely. Particularly in places that are,
I'm based in New York, the vaccination centers that are run by the National Guard are so,
it's like a powerful experience. You're going in and just literally getting a both,
a literal shot in the arm and a metaphorical shot in the arm. And sitting, there's often,
you have to sit for, I don't know, 14 minutes or 10 minutes to make sure that there's not an
effect afterwards. And that liminal space of knowing that you're exiting back into a world with
protection, these are gathering spaces, sitting with your fellow citizens six feet apart
in chairs and watching people literally get their life back or the life forward and knowing
that we've all with these strangers around us. It's like a civic.
ritual. And it doesn't need to be named, but there's people at the door watching and protecting us.
There's people holding this serum, this magical serum that's getting injected into our bodies
and that we are sitting and reflecting and then exiting back into the sunlight. I mean,
this is a powerful set of civic gatherings happening around the country. Yeah, I started crying.
I started crying. And the person that walked out the same time I did when we got released after
the sit down and make sure you're okay, period, kind of looked at me. And she just looked at me.
She goes, I know.
And she just gave me a fist bump.
It was very much a collective thing for me.
It was, yeah.
Me too.
Me too.
Priya Parker, you are welcome on any podcast I host.
It doesn't matter.
Unlocking us, dare to lead.
If there's another, you know, you're welcome all the time, anywhere, anytime.
Thank you for joining us again.
Thank you for having me.
It's such a treat.
Don't forget this is part one of two.
If you're like me, you're like, this is the conversation we need to be having.
This is what daring leadership looks like right now. You want to know what daring leadership
looks like right now? It looks like having hard AF conversations about coming back what's important
and what's not. We will put all the links to her books and how you can find her on the episode
page. Her website is simply pria Parker.com. She has something incredible that's new that lives
there called the New Rules of Gathering Guide. It's meant to help all of us plan a gathering
from a get-together party, a work event, meetings.
It's really masterful in helping us think about the right questions.
You can find Priya Online at Priya Parker on Instagram.
Her newsletter is incredible.
You can sign up for it on her website.
Always, always, extremely thankful to be here with you.
Stay awkward, brave and kind, folks, and I will see you next time.
Deerlead is produced by Brunee Brown, Education and Research Group.
Music is by the sufferers.
Get new episodes as soon as they're published by following Dare to Lead on your favorite podcast app.
We are part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.
Discover more award-winning shows at podcast.com.
