The Daily Beast Podcast - Real Reason My Uncle Trump Became a Monster: Niece

Episode Date: January 27, 2026

Mary Trump describes a nation at a breaking point, as the killing of a Veterans Association ICU nurse Alex Pretti by ICE agents and the administration’s response expose what she sees as the Trump playbook in its most dangerous form. Speaking with The Daily Beast’s political reporter Sarah Ewall-Wice, Mary Trump argues that her uncle’s instinct has always been to deny responsibility, attack victims, and escalate rather than restrain violence—and that this pattern is intensifying as his cognitive decline, rage posting, and detachment from reality become harder to disguise. Mary Trump traces how decades of family enabling, transactional loyalty, and unchecked power have led to a presidency she believes no longer fears consequences at home or abroad. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Trump regime is going to continue to double down on its tactics. It's going to become increasingly violent, and nobody in the executive branch, particularly not Donald, is going to do anything to raid them in. And we see also how the very first instinct of every single person in charge, from Donald to Nome, to Homan, to Bovino, is to attack and defame the very first instinct of every single person in charge, from Donald to Nome, to Holman, to Bovino, is to attack and defame the victims of the crimes perpetrated against them by federal agencies. I'm Sarah Ewell-Wise, political reporter for The Daily Beast. I'm filling in today for Joanna Coles, who is the host of The Daily Beast podcast.

I'm very grateful to be taking this opportunity while she's out of town. Today on the podcast, I interview Mary Trump. She is a renowned author, a clinical psychologist, and also the writer of the substack, The Good in Us. Today on the podcast, we discussed the horrific shooting in Minnesota and President Donald Trump and his administration's response. We also talk about the Trump family and their relationship with military service after President Donald Trump disparaged NATO troops on the world stage.

We also got into President Trump's relationship with his mother after he fondly remembered walking with her past what he called an insane asylum as he looked back on his life during a press conference. Mary Trump, thank you so much for joining me. We are coming at this today at a time of very deep tensions in the United States. The country does feel like it's at a bit of a breaking point with the latest killing by ICE of Alex Prattie, that ICU nurse who worked at the VA in Minneapolis. The president really does thrive in chaos. And we are seeing that chaos play out on the streets of the United States. But I want to ask you what you. What you are, you know, you fear about how it is playing out in this moment?

Well, first of all, sorry, it's great to be here with you. It has been, just this last week in particular, has felt indeed like some kind of either turning point or a worsening of the situation we find ourselves in the sense that we're on a precipice, and I'm still not quite sure where we're going to last. And that, of course, is in the context of this country feeling like it's fallen off a cliff since January 1st. And that's in the wake of what was up until now one of the worst years we'd ever live through in 2025. So there's so much to be concerned about. And I think what I'm most worried about in the context of what's happening in Minneapolis and with ICE in general is that the Trump regime is going to continue to double down

on its tactics. It's going to become increasingly violent, and nobody in the executive branch, particularly not Donald, is going to do anything to raid them in. And we see also how the very first instinct of every single person in charge, from Donald to Nome, to Homan, to Bovino,

is to attack and defame the victims of the crimes perpetrated against them by federal agencies. I do want to ask about that because it does feel like every instance that where we see these horrific tragic events and these violent events perpetrated by the administration, there's an immediate jump to go on offense. They're not defensive. They're not defending their actions in the same way as they're going after the person who, in this case, they shot multiple times and killed.

And I wanted to find out from you, is that the typical Trump playbook? Has that been his playbook as you've known him throughout his life? Yeah, precisely. And it's funny, I had a conversation with my aunt Marianne a few years ago during Donald's first term. And I was remarking on how incapable he, Donald is, of taking responsibility for anything. and I was sort of shocked to see that what used to be considered an admirable quality in adult human beings taking responsibility, apologizing had been turned on its head. And now it became sort of a sign of your strength and masculinity to deny all wrongdoing and

never take responsibility. And she said, oh, he learned that from your grandfather because apparently my grandfather there also never took responsibility for anything. It was always somebody else's fault. And it's the second part that is creating the problems now. It's one thing to say, hey, I had nothing to do with it. It's another thing entirely to go after other people and blame them for your transgressions. And we see that happening with increasing frequency, yes, but with increasing vitriol. I mean, we have a man, two people actually, were murdered, by ICE agents in the last two weeks and right out of the gate were being told by the Department

of Homeland Security and representatives from ICE and representatives in the White House that they are domestic terrorists who deserved what they got. I want to talk a little bit about that because the George Orwell quote from 1984 has been circling online to reject the party told you to reject what you see with your own eyes and ears, the evidence. And we, We've seen this quote come up after the killing of Renee Good with all the videos that came out with that. And now we're seeing the quote circulate this week in response to the administration saying what it said about the killing of Alex Pretti.

And I feel like this administration has been empowered in ways to lie with impunity, with no real hesitation, no concern for consequences. And I want to ask you what you think that is in Dynamic 2. Is this really all an audience of one? Is this all for Donald Trump? Is it all to save their own hides? When you look at that, what do you think about this constant line? When we have video evidence that contradicts what they're saying to us on national television.

I think people in Donald's in her circle understand exactly what it is they have to do to stay there. And some of them are like him. You know, they are perfectly comfortable lying like they breathe. They are perfectly comfortable blaming victims. They are solely interested in maintaining their own power and proximity to power. And Donald has modeled this behavior for decades now, you know, be a bully, be a thug, be disrespectful, and then complain when other people behave or complain. when you think other people are behaving the same way. In fact, in the aftermath of Renee Goods murder,

Donald actually said, well, she was being disrespectful towards law enforcement as if that means that she deserved to be killed. So I think the broader problem here is that from the beginning, and I mean from the beginning of his adulthood, if not earlier, Donald was never ever held to account for anything, and he was enabled at every turn, and eventually that creates a monster. And we see that happening with increasing impact. We've got the corrupt illegitimate Supreme Court of the United States of a supermajority in the Supreme Court of the United States of America, basically saying to Donald, you're an imperial president. As long as you can claim that you're acting within your official capacity, you can get away with anything. And that

trickles down to other people in the administration. So we now know that you can be a participant in an insurrection against your own government. As long as you are in support of Donald Trump, you're going to get pardoned. If you're an ICE agent murdering American citizens in cold blood, as long as you are doing that in service to advancing Donald Trump's agenda, you're going to get pardoned. You are going to be given absolute immunity, which is a thing that doesn't even exist. and they're not even going to allow local and state law enforcement to be part of the investigation. So we're never even going to get the truth. And just one more point to the don't believe your own lying eyes thing.

Donald has been doing this for a very long time just most recently in terms of the economy. He's literally telling Americans, no, prices are going down, not up. Inflation is going down, not up. You are not struggling. You still, your paycheck checks are going further than they ever went before. and none of that's true. So we see it here, and it is a dangerous mix of delusion and propaganda. I do want to ask in terms of that, do you believe that your uncle, the president, fears any consequences in the future for his administration's actions at this point? No. And he has no reason to because he's gotten away with everything, not because he has any special powers or,

because he has any particular strengths. Again, he's like the weakest person I've ever known in my life. It's because his enablers find him useful still. And they also have their own agendas, like the corrupt, illegitimate of its supermajorie of Supreme Court. You know, they believe in this ridiculous, what used to be, fringe theory of the unitary executive, they believe that a president, as long as it's a Republican one, should have almost absolute power.

and the same thing with the Republican Party. So far, the Republican Party still believes that Donald is the only person who can retain the base and be successful electorally. So again, given the track record, why on earth would Donald fear any kind of accountability at this point? We know he got away with inciting an insurrection against his own government. He got away with stealing highly sensitive classified documents. He got away with massive amounts of business fraud.

And to date, he has not paid EG and Carol a dime, even though he was adjudicated to be a sexual assaulter and defamer. So I think for him, though, the bigger issue is as he gets older and weaker, and we see serious cognitive decline and psychological deterioration, his ability to protect himself against. the reality of who he is is weakening. And I think that's one of the reasons we're seeing him engaging in increasingly hostile and belligerent behaviors. On that front in terms of his cognitive abilities, it feels like a lifetime ago. But just last week, he appeared on the world stage at Davos in Switzerland and gave an address where he rambled a lot. He circled back to topics repeatedly. He appeared to mix up Greenland with Iceland multiple times throughout the speech, which is not the first time he has done this. And he attacked allies multiple times while

praising dictators. I'm curious when you see his performance on the world's stage at this point in time. What are your thoughts, particularly when everyone's eyes are on him at a place like Davos? Well, I think at the very least, it's deeply shameful and embarrassing. and humiliating to the United States of America. And we have to remember this, that when other world leaders listen to Donald, when they see how he's behaving vis-a-vis Venezuela and Greenland and Mexico and the Panama Canal, they're not just blaming him.

They're blaming America because tens of millions of people put this deeply unqualified corrupt man back into power, despite all the evidence that he shouldn't be. in power. We have a Republican Party that continues to see their own constitutional authority to increase Donald's power. And again, the Supreme Court, just at every turn, siding with him, increasing the strength of the executive branch at the expense of the legislative and judicial branches, actually. So we can maybe, if we have the opportunity, turn things around in America. But Donald is unleashing forces in the world that we can't as Americans control. So humiliation aside, and quite frankly, I think at this point America deserves it,

we are watching him unravel the post-World War II order. And that's, again, something that we may not get back or we may not be able to participate in. And that is, I never actually thought that we would get to this point. And the fact that it's happened so quickly is also alarming because how do we put the brakes on that? So basically the only people who can do that is Europe who is increasingly inclined to see us as a bad actor and a country that can no longer be trusted because it's one thing to put somebody as somebody as, morally bankrupted as Donald in charge once. But to do it again means that there is no reason for any country we are currently allies with to trust us going forward. I wanted to ask you, because your talk about the dynamic with our closest allies, we did see the prime minister

of Canada sort of give a pushback, a strong pushback on the president and the direction the United States is taking without specifically naming the president in his own address. And the president lashed out at the Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, and attacked him all on the world stage during his address at Davos, also on social media. And it's been a regular occurrence where someone says something critical and he lashes out. But do you see that the way that the Prime Minister of Canada

responded trying to take a stand in some way, even though Canada has a huge relationship with the United States, in terms of trade, highly-deafield? dependent, very, obviously we share a northern border. We are allies through and through in most cases. Is that the only way to respond to the president? Is there any way you can navigate this besides just a harsh reality check? Yeah, Sarah, it's such a good point because time and time again, we've seen white true law firms, universities, corporate media organizations, and countries engage in appeasement, an appeasement strategy. And the end result of that every single

time is for Donald to end up with more power and the ability to extort entities and individuals to get what he wants. Because again, it's not just institutions, it's also individuals he goes after. So I think finally, hopefully, the EU and other countries that are at least for now, our allies are beginning to understand that Donald Trump and then therefore the United States of America is the enemy of democracy. As you mentioned, Donald is enamored with dictators and authoritarian. He clearly wants that kind of power for himself. His ridiculous Board of Peace is stacked with authoritarian regimes and weakened democracies that are on the brink of becoming authoritarian regimes, countries like Belarus and Hungary, et cetera. And I think his attacks or

threats, I should say, against Greenland and Denmark, he, he's, he. His absolutely vile and crazy remarks in Davos are maybe pushing people like Carney and McCrond, etc., to the point where they understand the only way through here is to present a united front against Donald and seek other avenues. We know for a fact that Canada is engaging in trade talks with China, which will we're down to China's benefit and be much to our disadvantage. So I hope it's a turning point because otherwise, what incentive would there be for Donald to stop? I want to talk to you if you could put your hat on as a clinical psychologist here maybe

and discuss the Board of Peace signing ceremony, the visuals that we saw from it. What I saw was a president surrounded by strong men, not our close allies. our close allies snubbed the event. But he also appeared very isolated and alone and upset during that event. Like it wasn't the prestigious grand operation that he had hoped for. He did not get the response he was hoping for from many world leaders. There was small players on that stage with him. What does that do to someone when you're snubbed by the big players, if you will, at something like this?

What does this do to someone like Donald Trump? Well, it's incredibly humiliate. which is good because he should feel humiliated. The problem is, though, that almost all of Donald's psychic energies over the last decades has been used in service to protecting himself from ever feeling humiliation. So that's why he always has to spin everything as a win is the greatest thing that's ever happened. It's like nothing you've ever seen before, right?

But I think, again, because of his deterioration and on, other areas, that's getting harder and harder and harder for him to do. The question remains, though, does he, is he able to recognize it because there is so much evidence now that there are times when he doesn't even seem to be oriented to time and place. And as you mentioned, he has difficulty keeping facts in his head, calling Greenland, Iceland once, okay, I get it. They're not far from each other. They're both remote, icy islands. fine. But four times when Greenland is at the forefront of your thoughts, that's problematic. And we've seen many other instances of this and his rambling and his deteriorating ability to, for impulse control

and his aphasias and all these other signs that all is not well with him. I wanted to ask you about that as well. I mean, you've mentioned how you watched your grandfather deterioration. over time. And can you speak a little bit in the context of just the past couple of weeks we've seen with things as obvious as Greenland being, he wants to invade or take over this territory, but still mixing it up with another country. Granted, Iceland, as you said, geographically similar. But it appears to be getting worse in these moments. And I want to ask you what your experience with the family has been like regarding this. You know, with my grandfather, it was slow and then fast, right?

But so there are a lot of similarities that dear, the headlights look Donald gets once a while, his forgetfulness. And again, sometimes it seems like he's not quite sure where he is or who he's around. Those are all things I saw happen with my grandfather. The difference, though, is that my grandfather's personality changed in a way Donald isn't. It's as if Donald is sort of leaning into the worst things about himself in an attempt, I think, to stave off the reality of his situation, his cognitive decline, his aging, his physical health, or his deteriorating physical health, I should say.

my grandfather actually, who was a sociopath, let's be clear, became docile. This was a man who had been in complete control of his world, which consisted of his business and his family. And all of a sudden, he was just this gentle man. And I've said this before, that my grandfather was never nicer to me than he was when he forgot who I was. So, yeah, see, I mean, he had vouts of rage and tantrums, but usually late at night when he was alone at home, but among people, like, he just was a completely different person. Donald, on the other hand, is getting to be more of a bully. He's getting more aggressive.

He is doubling and quadrupling down on the tactics he's always used, but in a way that's becoming more I don't even know how to describe the fact that he and others in his administration are so willing to call American citizens who've been murdered at the hands of agencies they control

domestic terrorists, etc. But he's not exercising any kind of restraint. He's exercising no discriminatory. whatsoever. And I think part of the problem with that is that he never felt the need to, but in strategic moments, he was able to. And now that's all gone. And again, that is just, that is just permission for everybody underneath him to engage in the same kinds of behavior. I mean, we're looking at least, Bovino, Noam, Patel, Homan, what these people are doing.

is so destructive to civic life in America. It's difficult to quantify. You talk about them following his lead, but also there's this element of them enabling him, the administration and those around him enabling him. So it's kind of a top down, but also the people he's chosen to surround himself up situation here. Has there ever been a time in Donald Trump's life

where there was a clear enforcement entity that was not an enabler? I mean, we could talk about his first administration, like maybe some of the officials he surrounded himself kind of kept some things on the tracks we heard from people like his former chief of staff, Mark Kelly, after the fact, or excuse me, John Kelly, after the fact. But across his entire lifetime and the time you've known him growing up, was it all mostly enablers? To a person, to a person. Basically, as soon as my grandfather decided that Donald, not my father, was going to be the. the heir to the empire, despite the fact that my dad was the namesake and eight years older, almost eight years older, there was no turning back. Donald was made president of Trump management

at the end of 24, despite my dad's having 11 years of experience. And my grandfather financed his lavish lifestyle because, you know, my, sorry, Donald was working for my grandfather, which means that any money he was getting was from my grandfather. And we know from the New York Times that over the course of Donald's lifetime until my grandfather died, he received approximately $416 million in gifts and loans that were never paid back. We know that, yes, there was a time when he was struggling in the 90s, despite the fact that he owned casinos that the banks rained him in a little bit. But I don't know.

Personally, I don't really think giving somebody a $450,000. a month allowance is really punishment for anything because they needed him to maintain the facade of that lifestyle in order to trick people into thinking that the brand was still worth something. So no. And then it's just been this fascinating cascade from my grandfather to the New York media, to banks, to NBC, to the Republican Party, to the Supreme court. And here we are. And it isn't working out well for anybody except Donald. That is interesting. I mean, it feels like in some ways, maybe most ways, Donald Trump has been a tool for others to use

his entire lifetime. And at the end of the day, he's the one coming out on top with all of these different folks and entities that had tried to use him over decades. That's absolutely right. I think I wrote about this in my first book, Donald has always been of use to men more powerful and smarter than he is. And that remains the case except for, of course, he has more power now. But it's still working out for these other people like the tech oligarchs who are getting billions of dollars in government contracts as long as they donate money to the obsceneer. ballroom, the corporate media entities like Paramount Plus, who also are raking in billions of dollars as long as they stay on Donald's right side, as long as they do his bidding,

as long as they put unqualified hacks like Barry Weiss in charge of, you know, make her editor-in-chief of CBS and dismantle that once legendary news organization. So there's a lot of quid pro quo going on because. what Donald has made very clear to people, even in during the first administration, although as you mentioned, he was rained in a little bit then. He's for sale. And not even to the highest bidder, quite frankly. When it comes to who Donald Trump trusts, though, if anyone, it does feel like

it's still in the family. And I was curious if you could speak towards the dynamic within the family to the best your ability at this point. I know you haven't spoken with them in some time. But you see folks like Jared Kushner, who is on the stage at Davos, presenting the future plan for Gaza. He doesn't have a government position. He's not confirmed by the Senate. There's no title there.

He's not accountable to anyone, but he's being placed in these top roles by the president to pitch at Davos the rebuilding of Gaza. We saw him next to Steve Whitkoff speaking with Russian. President Vladimir Putin as they talk about the Ukrainian peace deal. At one point, there was this argument he's being brought in to deal with the conflict in Gaza because he had experience there, but now it just feels like he's showing up places. And is it still the dynamic that this president puts family members in these positions because he trusts them? He thinks they're loyal to him. What do you see as the dynamic here when you see that playing out these days? I didn't vote for Jared Kushner for anything, that's for sure.

And yeah, it is just another abuse of his power that the Republicans in Congress are not clamoring about this because it's just not done. This is not the way things are supposed to work. But no, there's no loyalty or trust in this family. every single relationship is transactional. And we've seen some people in the family kind of recede from view, and that's because they have made the calculation that being publicly linked to Donald in any way does not redound to their benefit. Jared Kushner is back in the picture, clearly, because he sees an opportunity here to make

money. And Donald sees that Jared is an avenue for him to make more money. So, because, you know, Jared Kushner has, has connections in Saudi Arabia that may be closer than Donald's own connections. And Donald's busy, you know, he's busy destroying the post-World War II order and civic democracy. So he needs somebody else to kind of lay the foundations for these corrupt deals in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, et cetera. it is, again, has nothing to do. There's no, there's no love among these people. It is purely, what can you do for me?

And what can I do for you? Mary Trump, pause right there. We're going to take a quick break to hear from our sponsors. And we're back with Mary Trump discussing President Donald Trump, her uncle, as well as the administration's actions. When you say that, we know from the New York Times that the president made about $1.5 billion off of his first, during his first year in office. He's profiting off the presidency.

At the end of the day, is this all about the president's own personal bottom line? Is that what you're saying here? Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Power is secondary, for sure. Although, you know, money is power. I mean, I think the simplest way to think about it is that money in my family was the only currency, literally and metaphorically speaking. So it stood in for everything else, love, affection, et cetera.

If you were valued in my family, you were given more money. So we know how much my grandfather gave Donald. He did not give that to his other children. He certainly didn't give any of it to my dad. So that's how you know what you're worth. And if you have less than that, if you give something away, you're worth less and the other person is worth more. So we know that Donald doesn't have a charitable bone in his body. The only reason my grandfather ever gave money away was to get the tax breaks.

So it is, it should be anyway, an object lesson for future elections that you never ever put in power somebody who believes. believes that the only thing that matters in this world is money and his own wealth. Because you end up with somebody in power who was willing to abuse the system, take advantage of the system, to steal from the U.S. Treasury, to empower his oligarch friends, and to grift off the American people in a way that is utterly shameless. But again, do we blame Donald for this? I don't think so because there are mechanisms in place to rein this kind of thing in and nobody's doing anything about it, Republicans in Congress. I'm curious in terms of you were talking about your grandfather and money is power. Did he ever discuss with you or were you around for any conversations,

were ever discussed his relationship with the government. Did you grow up in a family where you revered the president and the presidency or the principles on which this country was founded? Did that ever come up in your conversations growing up in the Trump family? No. No. I think my grandfather cared about nothing other than his business and making money, truly. So, you know, they were Republicans, but sort of in that way, people were Republicans back in the 40s, 50s, and 60s.

And it was less about politics than it was about connections, like how my political connections can help me get this funding or what have you. So my grandfather's only interest in the government was getting government grants in order to get funding for some of his bigger real estate projects. at like Trump Village. So that sort of, that plus despite how my grandfather was probably worth about a billion dollars when he died, or his empire was worth that much. Much of that money came from the government. On the other hand, though, the one thing my grandfather hated more than anything except perhaps my parents was paying taxes.

So he and his children, surviving children, because my dad wasn't around at that point, did everything in their power to rig the system so that they didn't have to pay taxes, especially when he and my grandmother died. So that was the extent of what I knew about how my grandfather felt. And honestly, I think that if my grandfather had been of sound mind, I'm not entirely sure he would have thought that Donald's being president was a good thing because he wanted his children, surviving children, to keep the empire going. And of course, shortly after he died, they sold the whole thing off. So so much for legacy. In terms of the thinking in the family also, I'm going to

bring up military service because the president disparage European NATO troops serving a alongside the US in Afghanistan. While he was in Davos, he basically said, paraphrasing that they weren't on the front lines, which is simply not true. The only time Article 5 was invoked was in defense of the United States, and we lost European troops on the front lines

in Afghanistan's hundreds of them. And so this was met with condemnation from world leaders, specifically the Prime Minister of the UK, but other European leaders as well. We had obviously, British troops were killed in action. And it brings back the reminder that the president was also accused of calling service members suckers and losers who were killed on the battlefield.

And I wanted to ask you what the Trump relationship was with military service based on your experience in the family growing up. Because he says one thing that obviously is a lie about the reality on the ground. And this isn't the first time he's disparaged troops. And I wanted to find out what was happening, what was the conversation in the family about military service, as you recall it. Yeah, I mean, his comments are just depraved. And that should be the line, you know. I don't think anybody should listen to anything else he has to say after that.

It's so disgraceful that a man who got five or six deferments, so he didn't have to serve in Vietnam. although somebody had to serve in his place, should have anything to say. The fact that he's a commander in chief is just, I don't know. I don't know why anybody thought that was a good idea. So on the one hand, you have somebody who, as you said, disparages troops, lies about their service, and then on the other hand,

seems to want to bask in the glow of the generals and the U.S. military power, which he is throwing around in ways that are deeply, troubling and in some cases in contravention to international law and the U.S. military code of justice itself. So it's a weird dichotomy. But in my family, I, from especially my grandfather, military service was disparaged also. It was not seen to be a good use of one's time, you know, when you could just be in doing

real estate and making lots of money. Like, why would you do something that useless? They don't understand service. They don't understand honor or anything like that. So there was one exception to this, however. My dad was in ROTC when he was an undergrad at Lehigh, and upon graduating, he became a second lieutenant in the National Guard. I don't know how many years he served because, sadly, he didn't talk about it much.

but I think that service was thought about in the same way my grandfather and my dad's other siblings thought about his being a professional pilot for TWA. My grandfather called him a bus driver in the sky and a chauffeur, you know. So neither one of these things, both of which in their different ways were very, very, honorable professions to be engaged in was valued. And I think that was one of the things that destroyed my dad, that anything he did, if it was outside the context of working for the, for Trump management was disparaged and looked down upon. And I know that, you know, he was in, he was in the National Guard long enough to worry that he was going to be called up to serve in Vietnam. At the time, he was married and he had a very young child. So I think it's unlikely that

would have happened. But the fact that he was worried about it suggests to me that if he had been called, he would have gone because that's the kind of man he was. And in terms of how your family would have viewed deployment, that would have been a negative, despite him serving his country? Absolutely. Yeah. I mean, the way my grandfather always talked to you, if you did something that he thought was useless or a waste of time, like, this is exactly what he said to me when I told him I wanted to go back to college. I had taken a break and I desperately wanted to go back to school and he said, that's stupid. What do you want to do that for? That's exactly what he probably would have said to my dad. I know we've talked a lot about your grandfather. I want to discuss your grandmother and her relationship with,

Donald Trump. And I bring this up because we saw the president last week also felt like an age ago do a press conference at the White House to mark his one year back in office. And he spoke for 80 minutes straight while shuffling papers and getting basically engrossed in some of the images he was looking at. It was a very bizarre event to watch as he came out and stumbled through his remarks and repeated himself over and over again before finally getting to about 20 minutes of questions at the end. But in that time, he did bring up his mother once during this 80 minutes. And it was in a very bizarre context because he brought her up while talking about the idea of bringing back insane asylums. And he said that he used to walk through Queens with his

mom and they'd walk by Creedmoor. I said to my mother, mom, she would be there always there for me. She said, son, you could be a professional baseball player. I said, thanks, Mom. I said, why are those bars on the windows? Big building, big, powerful building. It loomed over the park, actually. But then he also went on this tangent while talking about insane asylums, and it's devolved into him also mentioning that she said he could be a professional baseball player

because it was on his way to and from Little League. It was a really all over the place couple of sentences, is, but it related to him and his mother's conversation, him fondly remembering his mother in this weird way, but also saying how she lavished praise on him in a backhanded way while talking about insane asylums. And I wanted to find out what is the Trump relationship, what was the Trump relationship with his mother, to your extent having observed or also being told about it? Yeah, well, first of a, he also said that she was always there for him, and that is not at all true. So as I mentioned, I think the last time I was on my grandmother for about a year when Donald was, starting with Donald was two and a half, was very ill and was not available to him physically or emotionally.

That is a critically important developmental period. And we are still suffering the consequences from what happened to him during that year because the wounds he suffered then were never healed. Like my grandmother never did what she would have needed to do to repair the breach in that relationship. So in my family, it was very weird. It was, I mean, I don't think it was unusual in the 40s and 50s for mothers to deal more with daughters and fathers to deal more with sons. But in my family, it was like a red line in between them. My grandmother had almost nothing to do with her sons. every year she would go to see family in Stornoway and she always brought my two aunts

but as far as I'm aware, never the boys. So it was almost like she just didn't think she had any role in raising them other than cooking for them and doing their laundry. So there was no relationship. I mean, as an adult, Donald had a sort of very contemptuous paternalistic attitude towards my grandmother. He never sought her counsel. And the fact that he has her saying that he could be a professional baseball player is kind of funny to me because I don't even know. Like, how would she know? She grew up in the outer herberties and probably didn't know much about

baseball. But the whole Creedmoor thing, the only way he would have known about Creedmore is if my grandparents belonged to a country club and it was farther east. So Creedmoor is right next to the Grand Central Parkway. So we all know what Creedmore was because we drove past it a lot. Cunningham Park, the park where he claims he played Little League, is nine miles away. It's a walk from where my grandparents' house was, but you can't get there without getting in your car. So maybe he was referring to Alley Pond Park, which is right next to Creedmoor. But the fact that he conflated these experiences is very bizarre.

And as you know, he seems to be obsessed. Yes. Like, he's constantly telling us that insane asylums in Mexico and Central America are releasing all of their sickest patients to flood the United States of America. He seems to have a close personal relationship with fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter. And, you know, he's talking about Creammore. First of all, Creammore, as far as last I checked, is still functioning. It's just much smaller. I did an externship there many, many years ago. So it's a modern psychiatric. hospital now. But yes, back in the day, it was vast. It had thousands of patients. This is before psychotropic drugs were invented. It was, it spread over acres. And it was this sort of looming presence, but he seems like obsessed with it in a way now that is almost inexplicable, except, again, for the fact that I alluded to earlier, the barrier between his between his conscious and unconscious seems to be eroding. And he seems, on some level at least, to be gaining some, I don't want to say insight,

because that's giving him too much credit. But some sense that all is not well and that he's losing control not just of the narrative, but of himself. So, yeah, it was wild to hear him talking about Creedmoor and my grandmother in the way did. And, you know, he maybe is also thinking about what happened to my grandfather. It does seem like he is a little reflecting in some way on his life. He brings up God more often than he has, to my recollection, in his first term. He talks about his life, as he's now remembering it, maybe it's revisionist history, more publicly at times. Mary, we're going to

going to hold it right there for a moment while we take a listen to our sponsors. And I'm back now with Mary Trump as we continue our conversation about President Donald Trump. But you also mentioned that your grandfather had these moments of rage. He became docile, you said, but there were moments of rage. And it reminded me perhaps a little bit of the president who does rage post on social media at all hours of the. night. And I'm curious in terms of when you look at that specifically, I mean, we've seen the outbursts in general, but he also uses social media. So it's very different, obviously, than how your grandfather would have gone through his experience. But what do you make of these moments where he's posting 50 posts one after another, or reposting, I should say, and throwing in these wild posts at 2 a.m. And what are your thoughts on? his cognitive ability when you look at those moments late at night, alone at the White House, when no one in his family is there.

Right. Well, I mean, it's another sign that his impulse control is deteriorating, although it's not necessarily anything new. Like, he's been posting unhinged tweets for years now. But I think the frequency and the volume have increased and the detourable. and the detachment from reality have increased, but we also do see in many of them what his priorities are. So just quickly with my grandfather,

because again, this typically happened at night when he was home alone with my grandmother and his Alzheimer's was advanced, so they had a guard there too, because on a couple of occasions, he had left the house in the middle of the night, you know, and in his pajamas. And also, I don't know why anybody thought it was a good idea for my grandmother to be

alone with him in his condition. So he fixated on this idea that my grandmother was stealing from him and hiding his checkbooks, and he was absolutely obsessed with being poor. So we see similarly Donald is telling us what his priorities are. In the wake of the murder of Alex Prattie, he was posting about his ballroom. You know, so he, again, is deeply concerned about anything that in his mind is sort of a monument. into his greatness, his ballroom, his, the balance in his checking account, et cetera. And that is becoming impossible to ignore to the extent that we could have ignored it anyway, right?

So I think most of it is just delusional and grievance and an attempt to gain the upper hand, but a lot of it is he's just telling on himself. I'm glad you did bring up the ballroom because as you mentioned, he was posting on truth social about his beautiful ballroom in the midst of this chaos happening in Minnesota, this horrific shooting by ICE agents. And he's talking about a ballroom. And he does that quite often. He was posting about his arc and giving out possible. It looked like it was potential examples of what it could look like as he goes to build this arc of the world. Trump, if you will. And I wanted to ask you, where does this obsession stem from? You discussed

kind of making himself the grandness, the power of Trump. But where does it stem from? Where did you see it growing? And is it also deeply rooted in how he was perceived by the family? Yeah, I think my grandfather is solely, not solely, but largely responsible for creating this particular monster, because despite all evidence of the contrary, he put Donald on a pedestal. He perpetuated the myth or created the myth that Donald was some genius, some savant, some self-made man. And with the exception probably of my dad, whose opinion they didn't care about anyway, everybody else and the family, understanding upon which side their bread was buttered, went along. You know, at family meals, my, Donald sat next to my grandfather, sat on his right side, and everybody else just listened and chimed in and, you know, when necessary.

But clearly Donald was the focus. And clearly Donald was the one with the power. So that just got worse over time as my grandfather bankrolled more and more of his projects and continued to bail him out, even during the Atlantic City years when Donald declared bankruptcy so many times. And then, you know, it's almost as if it sort of feels like a parallel to the government now. It's like the entire family and my grandfather's business was in service to propping Donald up and enriching him. definitely that feels like, you know, the Trump regime right now. That's from the DOJ on down, everybody in this administration is in service to enriching and protecting and enabling Donald. So, I mean, he comes by it honestly, at least.

My last question for you, because we discussed that in terms of enabling and putting him on a pedestal, the reality is at the end of the day, we also have. this other history, if you will, that would be written about Donald Trump. And it's the reality that he is a convicted felon. And I bring this up because last week, we had former special counsel, Jack Smith, testifying about his own investigations into Donald Trump and in two indictments,

which in the end were dismissed or thrown out because he became president again, not because Jack Smith didn't think that they had a case to go to trial. But that's the reality that the president is now living with, is he's trying to boost himself on the world stage, make a name for himself in these ballrooms and slapping his name on things. But you also have the first convicted felon president of the United States. And he was watching the testimony of Jack Smith because he was posting about it as it was happening, which is what we were seeing in real time as this man went before Congress. And so I wanted to ask you last but not least, what does that alternate title that the president holds do you think mean for his psyche as he looks at his life as he's slowly starting to reflect in some ways?

Yeah, I mean, I'm not entirely sure he's reflecting so much as reluctantly recognizing certain things. but either way, he is aware that he is not completely in control of things on some level, right? So the fact that he's paying attention to Smith, I think he's of a piece with how he pays attention to other people who stand up against him. I don't know that he feels threatened by it because, again, he got away with it. It's more that he's just looking for another scapegoat. He's looking for somebody else that he can stick the DOJ on, just as he did with James Comey and Letitia James and others. So I think this is something that's difficult for people to wrap their heads around. You know, just as we often say, how can people be voting against their own self-interest?

Well, that suggests we know what other people's self-interest are. sometimes people's self-interest is to promote any administration that will act according to the needs of white people, for example. You know, their self-interest is white nationalism or Christian nationalism, what have you. Not so much the economy or the social safety debt. In the same way, I think things like being a convicted criminal, would make most of us ashamed, Donald wears that as a badge of honor. We know that as certain revelations came out, the Access Hollywood tape, the accusations from E. Jean Carroll and others, his numbers went up among his base. So calling him a rapist or calling him a criminal, those are things that

increases street cred. That doesn't bother him at all. What bothers him is being called a loser, or having his worth called into question, being called weak. He likes being called a bully. He likes being called a thug. So I think we need to recalibrate how we go about trying to dismantle or weaken him. And it is not by calling him a criminal or a bully or a thug. Because, again, that is a badge of opportunity. honor for him. Those things are a badge of honor for him. Mary Trump. Thank you so much. I really appreciate

you taking the time to speak with us. Thank you so much. This was great. One of the most interesting moments to me from our conversation was how Mary Trump described her father's military service versus how the Trump family, including her grandfather and her uncle, President Donald Trump, viewed military service versus it being unworthy of their time while they were going to make money and could be doing what she said they thought were better. things than serving in the military. For more from The Daily Beast, you can subscribe to the Daily Beast.com. You can follow us on social media. Please feel free to leave comments. We love hearing from you on what you found most interesting about our conversation. Thank you so much for

watching. Hi, I have to tell you about something that we're obsessed with. I'm Kevin Fallon. And I'm Matt Wilstein. And we are hosting Obsessed the podcast about all the TV shows, movies, and entertainment newsmakers that we're all obsessed with. So make sure you subscribe to us on YouTube at the YouTube channel. Make sure you follow us wherever you get your podcasts. Just search for Obsessed the podcast. And we will see you there. Be Beast. Big thanks to our special Be Beast tier of members.

Here they are. Yvette Johnson, Methink's, Batsio Farrell, Mills and Lins, Shelby, Max Kubit, David Sherry, Thomas Moore, Maria Voltaine, D. Kujewatz, Sinha Lund, John H. Overrocker, Deb K. Ostrander, Sandra, Sandra Clark. Travels with Carl, Andrew Beaver, Cappinator. Harry Clark, Dawn McCarthy, Daniel Dog Lover, M. Griner, D. Stone, Fulvia, Orlando. Herbie, Andrew Meller, Tatnell, Val, Love, Francisco, Will Hutchison, Andrea Hodel, Bocock, D.C., Sharon Shipley, Connie Rutherford, Karen White, and last,

but never least, Heidi Riley, and our production team, Devin Rodgerino, Ryan Murray, Rachel Pasa, and Heather Pissarro. Want more great listens? Check out our comedy podcast, The Last Laugh, and our star-studded The Daily Beast podcast at the Daily Beast.com slash podcasts. If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a Daily Beast subscriber. Subscribing is the best way to feed the beast and support all of your podcasts as we cover what might become the darkest timeline.

Head to the DailyBeast.com slash membership slash podcast and sign up today.