The Daily Beast Podcast - Why Trump's Crimes Require Punishment: Candidate

Episode Date: January 20, 2026

Graham Platner joins Joanna Coles for a blunt conversation about Donald Trump, power, and accountability, arguing that Trump’s abuses must be investigated and punished—not waved away. The insurgent Democratic Senate candidate from Maine takes on the Epstein files, the weaponization of ICE, tariff fallout, and why even Trump voters feel betrayed, while explaining why he’s challenging Susan Collins and defying the Democratic establishment in a race that’s become a test of whether the rule of law still applies at the top. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

So, Graham, if you were to be elected to the Senate, would you be up for using the law against Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump? Would you want to see the Senate opening investigations against them? Of course. If we regain power, there should not be a moment where we all just shake hands and decide that, okay, well, that was it. That was a weird little moment. No, absolutely not. The crimes that have been committed must be investigated and punished. the power that has been abused, those that did it need to be held accountable for doing so. Senate oversight is, I think, one of the most effective places to bring that about, which is one of the reasons I'm running for Senate. I'm Joanna Coles. This is the Daily Beast podcast, and we have for you an energizing conversation with an insurgent candidate who wants to see Pete Hexeth and Donald Trump not only brought to justice, but he wants to see them punished.

He's also causing a frisson in the Democratic Party because he's standing to be the Democratic candidate in Maine. I'm talking about Graham Platner, who is really challenging the Democratic establishment in a way that they are finding hard to contain. We had a far-ranging conversation. We delved into some of his past tweets, which he's embarrassed about, as he well should be, his ideas for universal health care, and the reason he believes that Donald Trump is extracting Venezuelan leadership, going after Greenland, sending ice into Minneapolis to escape, of course, the inevitable, the Epstein, Epstein, Epstein of it all. I think you will enjoy this conversation. I want you to leave your comments about him. Is this way you see the future of the Democratic

party going. Let us know. But welcome to Graham Platner, who is, as we recorded this, in Norway. And he will tell you why. Graham Platner, you are joining us from Norway. And at this point, the lighting in the Airbnb where you're staying is making you look like a Rembrandt painting. I think Rembrandt, for me, it's very Scandy anyway. Do you want to, you want to, tell us what you're doing there and I can say you're one of the few people I have interviewed where I probably know a little bit too much information about your sperm. That's fair. Yeah. I know they're strong. We can thank my wife for that one. You can even see in the video that that part I was not expecting us to talk about. Graham has great sperm. Can I say that on the

internet? It turns out that Graham is very healthy and the infertility was something that was part of my body. We're here because we are doing IVF in vitro fertilization. It is significantly cheaper in Norway than it is in the United States. We attempted to do it in the U.S. Frankly, it's kind of beyond our financial capacity. And a friend of a friend of a friend. and I think through my wife's doctor advised us to look into doing it abroad. And we called a clinic in Norway, and they've been spectacular to work with, and they cost about a fifth of the price. And so we actually scheduled this long before I decided to run for Senate.

So this was a set in stone schedule thing that we told all the campaign folks, we were not going to move around. So we're here. Okay. Well, good luck with it. And I'm sure just by you. being there, you are going to triple the size of the Norwegian IVF industry. How is it going? How is it going? How is it going so far? It's good. It's good. I mean,

we got here on Sunday. We've done a couple scans and tests, and we'll be here in total for about two weeks. So it's a, yeah, there's a lot of downtime for obvious reasons. We're kind of just waiting to know when things happen. But thus far, it's been great. I mean, Norway's a spectacular country, so there are worse places to be killing some time. So I can't complain. What are Norwegians talking about

when they hear you're from America and that you're running for the Democratic seat for Senate? Well, the second part, we don't talk about too much because I don't want to bore people with my life. The first part, though, when they find out we're from the States, everybody brings up Donald Trump in Greenland. It seems to be the topic on everyone's minds. In fact, one of our nurses informed us that her seven-year-old child is now afraid that Donald Trump is going to come to Norway after he goes to Greenland.

So Donald Trump has officially become a nightmare for a seven-year-old Norwegian child, which is fairly fitting these days. Yeah, I mean, you can definitely tell that the Northern Europeans are concerned about the future of NATO, but also the possibility of a, a war of imperialism in the North Atlantic, which I think it's quite fair to be concerned about that. Yeah, well, the Europeans have already sent craft across the North Atlantic, which feels like an astonishing development in his desire to take over and perhaps become acting president of Greenland, as he said, he is the acting president of Venezuela. What do you think about him saying that he wants to take over Greenland?

I mean, Maine is not far from Greenland. It's utterly absurd. But it also just goes to show how far the wheels have come off this presidency. I think it's pretty clear that after what happened in Venezuela, there's this feeling of total unaccountability. They get to do whatever they want, where they feel like they get to do whatever they want. And there's, I mean, it also is.

just goes to show how, I don't want to be too crass about it, but how utterly absurd this has all become. I mean, these are people who are, they're living in an alternate reality. Sadly, when you have the kind of power that comes with the presidency in the United States, whether you're living in an alternate reality or not, it becomes everyone's reality. And we have to deal with it. But it is a, I mean, the concept of the United States going to war with Denmark and possibly the rest of Europe in order to take Greenland is patently absurd. And yet here we find ourselves having to discuss it seriously.

So what made you, Graham, because you're throwing your hat in the ring to be the Democratic candidate for Senate for Maine, where you would, if you're successful in getting the candidacy, be up against Susan Collins, has caused quite a lot of Sturman drang in Maine, especially among the Democratic Party, and I want to come to that in a minute. But what was it that made you decide you want to run for Senate? I was asked. I mean, this is not a thing that I've ever aspired to. I mean, I've been living a very happy small life as an oyster farmer in my hometown for the past eight years.

I've really been focused on local governance and community organizing. However, I was approached over the summer by some folks affiliated with some labor unions in Maine with this idea. Their concept was Susan Collins is uniquely weak, which I agree with, and that the Democratic Party was likely going to choose a uniquely bad candidate to face off against her, which I also agreed with. And I think that is exactly in the end what happened. And this was not a thing that I wanted to do per se, but I've been waiting for years to see the kind of politics that I think is necessary, not just to win, but also to build a much better and brighter future for all Americans. I've been waiting to see it. We had glimpses of it here and there, but I had not really seen it the state of Maine.

And when this opportunity arose, it seemed like I just had this chance to do something that I thought was necessary. And there's a moment when you can only wait for, you can only wait for what you want. to see to come along for so long. Eventually, you kind of have to put some skin in the game, and I had the opportunity to do so, and so here I find myself. Okay, so explain to us why you think Susan Collins is weak. She's been there for, what, 30 years? She's very familiar to American voters, because she's often on the fence about all sorts of things. Why do you think she's particularly weak now when the Republicans have the House and the Senate and the executive? So one, it's that it's that being on the fence part that I think really is what makes her weak.

For a long time, she managed to maintain this charade, that she was a moderate Republican who would stand up to the, I would say, more insane elements of her party, that she would stand up to Donald Trump. I mean, that was something that she really pushed in the first couple of years of Trump's first presidency. You know, we had this idea that she was a pro-choice Republican who was going to represent the people of Maine. And the people of Maine very often, or not very often, people of Maine are very proud of the fact that we get to have politicians that don't look like everybody's politicians. We have an independent streak in Maine. The other senator from Maine, Angus King, right, is... is an independent. He carcasses with the Democrats, but he's an independent.

Mainers are always proud to tell you that they vote for both Republicans and Democrats. I myself have been one of those manors to be very proud to say that over the years. That's changed. One in her last delay in 2020, when she won, beat Sarah Gideon by a fairly substantial margin. Joe Biden also won the state, which means there are a lot of Republican, or sorry, there are a lot of Democratic voters that voted for Susan Collins. Now, in 2020, while Collins had confirmed Brett Kavanaugh, Roe versus Wade had not yet been overturned. It has been overturned now. We now know that Susan Collins is not a protector of women's rights. We know that

Susan Collins is not someone who's standing up to the Trump administration. It's become very clear that every time she, quote, quote, stands up to her party is when they already have the votes. she only votes against things when she knows they're going to pass everybody can tell that now I have a lot of Republican friends who don't like Susan Collins because they see her as a snake in the grass

who doesn't believe in anything which is true and so it's that it's that inability to really stand by any form of principles that I think at this point

everyone sees it for what it is that was not the case six years ago, but it is now. And I think that she is also very much tied whether she wants to be or not. She is tied to the economic situation we find ourselves in because her party, as you just mentioned, is in charge of all three branches of government at this point. But they've got the House, they've got the Senate, and they have the presidency. And yet, the economy is failing working people. And she is responsible for it. And she's going to try to say she's not. But I don't think, think the manors buy that story anymore.

Okay, so let's talk about the person you're up against because the Democratic Party have put up the current governor, Janet Mills, who is 77, so similar age to Susan Collins. You are by contrast 41, so you're a new generation of hopeful democratic leaders. What is your argument against Governor Mills? She's been a good governor. She stood up to Trump. Trump has picked on her. clearly like her in Maine?

People do not want the same kinds of politics that has gotten us into this mess any longer. The situation we find ourselves in was built by establishment politicians who have, in many ways, in both parties, built the kind of political apparatus that we live in that brought us to the point we're in now. I go around the state of Maine,

I talk to a lot of people. People are, yes, disgusted by Donald Trump, disgusted with the Republican Party, also discussed it with the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has for a very long time not done its duty of representing working people and working people only. It got in bed with the same corporate interests that the Republican Party has been in bed with for a long time. The people that are going to fix that, the leaders, the kinds of politics that is going to change that are not going to come from the political establishment. This is a playbook we have tried over and over and over again, and it fails us over and over and over again. The governor is very much part of the political establishment. She was chosen.

She was pressured by people at Washington, B.C, by the D.S.C. to run. I mean, this was the whole point. She is Washington's chosen candidate. That is not what people want now. And they don't want it because it doesn't work. we've all seen it not work. That's why we find ourselves in the position that we're currently in. And I just think in this moment, it's, we need to re-engage with a politics that is built around being representative of working people and representing working people.

And that is not the kind of politics that we've seen coming out of the Democratic political establishment for the past 30-odd years. and that's very much what my run here is. I don't come from establishment politics, as all of my detractors left to point out. I don't think it's a bad thing. People who come from that world who are experienced in that world, they're the ones that got us into this mess. They're not going to be the ones that are going to get us out of it.

So, Graham, do you hear anything from your constituents about the president's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein? And what are your thoughts on his relationship with him? Well, it seems very clear he had a very close relationship, with them. It's very obvious that the reason we are not reading the full Epstein files is likely because of that and to protect other wealthy, powerful people. But it seems at this point there's no question. That's why we're not getting to look into the documents because the president's in them. It is an issue that, of all the things that people I know who supported Donald Trump are angry about,

this is the one, this was like the straw that broke the camels back. They were told for years that it was the Epstein files were going to be released and that in that it was going to target all the Democrats and all these people. And instead it's turned out that it's very likely Donald Trump himself. And that's why they refused to release the doc. People feel betrayed. And they should. I mean, they were lied to.

They were sold this whole bill of goods. I mean, the entire Trump apparatus relied heavily on the Epstein story for so long. Now that they have the power to do it, they're stonewalling it. And let's be very clear, one of the reasons why we are seeing both ICE in Minneapolis and one of the reasons why I think the executive started a war in Venezuela is so we stopped talking about the Epstein files because they don't want us to be wondering why right now the administration, the DOJ, are breaking the law in not releasing the files as they have been directed to by Congress. They're not doing that because they know what's in them.

They don't want us to read it. And they're going to hope that they can pull everyone's attention away by bringing about more chaos and more insanity. Sadly, in some ways, we have to deal with the fact that we invaded Venezuela. We're talking about invading Greenland. and that we have ICE agents killing American citizens and American streets. Those are things that we have to talk about. But it's also important to remember one of the reasons this is happening is to take everyone's eye off the Epstein ball, which is, it's an insane thing to say. But I think at this point it's fairly clear that's exactly where we find ourselves.

Okay. So Donald Trump also doesn't come from a classic Republican politician establishment. He is also an outsider candidate. how do you assess his success and what do you think, do you think he has mental health issues? Oh, I mean, I think the man is a clear narcissist. So, yes. But his success, I'll say this. I live in a small town, a small rural town.

A lot of my friends voted for Donald Trump three times. I don't agree with them. I know why they did it, though. They did it because they're sick and tired of politics as usual. They're angry. They're angry at a system that they feel does not represent them. And they're right to feel that way because it doesn't represent them. You know, Donald Trump's political success, I think, comes from one very specific thing.

He came along and told people that the one thing they knew was true was true. And that was that they were being screwed. They gave them all the wrong people to blame. He's not pointing the anger in the right direction. But he at least acknowledged the thing that everyone knows is true. When I go around the state of Maine, Republicans, independents, Democrats, when you talk to everyone, you ask a single working person in the state of Maine, do you live in a political system that you think has your best interest at heart? Nobody says yes to that. Graham, can I push back on one thing? Because people are living longer. People have access to all sorts of things that they never had before. Is this a relative thing that people feel. less well off than actually they are?

I would urge you to go around the state of Maine where the hospitals are literally closing in rural Maine. But isn't the reason that one... But Graham... It is difficult for you to... It's difficult for a person to think that things are getting better when we are losing birthing units in eastern Maine.

We're down to two. When I was born, there were six. Like, there is absolutely no way that I... that you can tell people living in my part of Maine, that things are getting better. They're not. We are seeing fewer hospitals. We're seeing our education system collapsing. We're watching our wages remain stagnant while the cost of goods and services that all of us rely on just to survive continue to go through the roof. So it's a, I don't think

it is relative. Things are not getting better out here for regular people. They're getting worse. Okay, So let me push back one more time on something specific, which is hospitals closing. Because medical treatments have changed. When I had an appendicitis 40 years ago, it was a week's stay in hospital. When my assistant had one a month ago, she was in and out the same day. We don't need hospitals in quite the same way. Medical treatments have completely transformed. They're going to transform more with AI. I hate to say this. If you get to drive three hours for that treatment, it doesn't matter how long it takes. Okay. That's where it is where I live.

So, like, I'm, yeah, I'm sorry. I just said that I can't, yes, medical treatments change. But geographical access to medical care, that, that doesn't change. Well, but except there's going to be, there's all sorts of, there's telehealth now. I mean, you can have doctors operating in the states on people in Africa. Robo doctors are going to change everything. medicine itself is on the cusp of enormous changes. When I see that existing in Eastern Maine,

I'll believe that it's changing things. That doesn't exist where I am. None of my friends have been going in for robo surgeries. Okay. So it's a, but I will say I do know people who now have to drive two and a half to three hours to get medical care, which didn't used to be the case. We used to have medical facilities

in these parts of rural Maine that we no longer have now. And like giving birth, giving birth still requires a place to give birth. And like I said, where I live, we have two birthing centers, both of which are now owned by the exact same corporate entity. When I was a kid, when I was born, we had six, all of which were independently owned. So it is very difficult for me to think that things are getting better where I live when they demonstrably are not. Okay, so what are you going to do about it?

If you get the democratic selection and you get to Washington, what are your priorities for Maine and what are your priorities for national democratic politics? Universal health care. So I get universal health care. I'm a disabled veteran. I get my health care through the VA. The VA in Maine is very good. And I don't think about co-pays.

I don't think about premium. I don't think about dealing with insurance companies. When something bothers me, I go to the hospital. I call my doctor. I get it checked out. That's what allowed me to start a business. It gave me the freedom to not have to go find a job that would give me health insurance, and it gave me the time to sink energy into learning a skill.

And I got to become an oyster farmer, and I make my living on the sea. And it's a living I love very much. That is the kind of foundational support that every single American deserves. and we can pay for it. How do you propose to pay for it? But we already do pay for it. We have the most expensive health care on earth with some of the worst health outcomes.

We just have a wildly inefficient system that's not built around providing care. It's built around extracting profit. Profit in a health care system is inherently inefficient. They're dollars that are going not towards paying nurses or doctors or support staff

or going towards equipment or surgeries. they're dollars that are going towards some CEO or shareholder getting third yacht. That's not an effective use of funds in a health care system. That's what we have now. And we need to reallocate those resources. We need a single-payer universal health care system, Medicare for all. It's a bill that already exists. And that is what we need to push for.

I firmly believe that if you provide that, kind of baseline support, that frees up Maynors and Americans in general to take risks at starting businesses. It frees up small businesses and medium-sized businesses from having to deal with health insurance companies. Because right now, if you're a small business or medium-sized business owner, you spend a lot of time dealing with your employee's health care plans. We should take that. That shouldn't be the responsibility of a small business. That would free up a lot of energy and money to exist in a real economy that would improve our communities. I think for me that is pretty foundational to the future that we have to build.

I would love to see significantly more than just a universal health care system when it comes to how we support ourselves and how we reallocate resources in our society. But I think at this moment, knowing how much health care impacts all of my community members, knowing how much the money associate with health care impacts all of my community members. That to me is fundamentally one of the first things we have to change. Okay. Well, I think you'll have a lot of listeners and viewers agreeing with you on that. So let's talk about one of the reasons why you've become a sort of lightning rod for the Democratic Party,

not only because you represent a new generation, but also because once you'd thrown your hat in the ring, a ton of, well, not a ton, but a series of, of tweets and comments on Reddit surfaced, some of which are not very flattering. And it's hard to reconcile the person I'm talking to now with the person that tweeted or redited, if redited is a word, put out some of those comments. So in answer to a specific thread six years ago, which was titled, White People Aren't as Racist or as Stupid as Trump thinks, you wrote, living in white rural America. I'm afraid to tell you they actually are. And Susan Collins has been using that against you. You also said, I think, 13 years ago in a thread, why don't black people tip?

And then you, when you were talking about the police, you referred to the police as all police as bastards. What was going on in your life that you felt like commenting those things? We're taking a quick break to get some messages from our sponsors. And I am back with the insurgent Democratic candidate for Maine Senate, Graham Platner. Well, I think we do have to put all these things in the context. The tipping question was in a thread in which it was asked, if there's a question you could ask people of another race, that you don't have the ability to do so, usually, what's the question you would ask?

it was a question that I was wondering about. And, you know, I don't want to, this is a, I mean, there are studies from MIT on this. Nobody calls, nobody calls the people that authored those studies racists. So I think it was mere curiosity at that point in my life. You were a barman at the time, right? Yeah, it just started bartend. Okay, so was this something you'd personally noticed? Did you read the comment?

Yeah, that's exactly what the comment was. But that seems an odd thing to say, why don't black people tip? No, it was a curiosity that I had. And then I talked to some friends of mine. And actually, somebody in that Fred answered the question quite succinctly, which mirrors, by the way, all the studies and discussions around this. I feel like this one's definitely gets blown up, which is like out of proportion, to be frank. But, yeah, it was the curiosity that I had. I asked the question because I was curious.

someone answered it and that was that. I moved on with my life. Well, you thought you thought you'd moved on with your life. Then it came back to, it came back to haunt you. I will say this, I'm 41 years old. I grew up on the internet. I think a lot of people my age, who have not been planning to run for office their entire lives, are well aware that at earlier moments in their life they said some things of the internet they're not proud of. and if somebody went and had the resources and the money to dig through their entire background, things would be found that people aren't proud of. I just happened to be one of the first people to have to do this. If we litigate everyone's internet comments as part of political campaigns going forward,

we're not going to have much of a politics left. We're just going to do this forever. Now, I think if you have like a long history of, being a racist or being a homophobic or being a hateful person and it just continues for many, many years, I would say that's probably indicative of the kind of person someone is. I think if you have to go back 13 years to find one or two comments to take out a context, it's probably not indicative of who someone is, especially if when you read the rest of my comments, you'll find me rabidly advocating against racism and homophobia, against fascism,

and on behalf of people who I view as being, I would say, exploited and oppressed by the larger system we live in. Okay, so let me ask you just to wrap this up finally. What did you mean when you said you're afraid to say that actually white people are as racist and as stupid as drunk things? Some white people are. I mean, I don't know. I've met them. I also am a white guy who lives in rural Maine. So I don't think I'm stupid and racist.

The vast majority of my neighbors are not stupid and racist. There are some people in white rural America who are that. I don't think that's a very, what's the word, wild statement to make. I think a lot of us can agree that they do exist out there. You know, it's kind of funny. If you go through my comments and you don't just cherry pick them, you will find me advocating tirelessly saying that the people in my part of Maine are not stupid and racist. That a lot of people often would say that rural white Americans are all stupid and racist,

and you would find me in the comments saying that that is not remotely true. In that one comment, I said that people are, but I was saying it in the context that some people are. It's very clear that I don't think that everyone in white rural America is stupid and racist because that would include myself. One of the reasons or one of the arguments why the Democrats last, one of the reasons why people say the Democrats lost the last election is because they have this purity test and this kind of litmus test for what you are allowed to say. Is that something that you've heard when you've been in Maine, and these past comments of yours have surfaced? Oh, yeah. I mean, it's what most people bring up. I mean, most Democrats I run into, most voters I run into in Maine, they don't care. They know very well that people say dumb stuff, that people change over the years. I mean, it's a, that's a thing that most normal human beings understand occurs.

And when people, a lot of voters in Maine saw that stuff get taken by the media and blown into this huge scandal. And most people are like, yeah, there it is. This is like, this is that absurd litmus test where we're just going to go through someone's past, find one or two things, and then try to get all, you know, to clutch our pearls around it and act super offended. You know, it's, I'll just put it this way. The people that drugged that stuff up in my past, many of them are the people that also sent me to fight in Iraq. And it is really hard for me to take seriously that comments I made 13 years ago are some kind of unforgivable sin. While we have people in our government now that voted to make me go fight in an illegal foreign war. One of those seems really bad.

One of those seems like something that happens to people in their lives. And so it is, I think a lot of voters in Maine agree with me and see it for what it is. We had Congressman Seth Moulton on the podcast a couple of weeks ago, and he was talking about the claustrophobia, I think is the best word, of the Democratic Party establishment and how you have to wait your turn. and are you getting, well, who is supporting you in the Democratic Party as you go up against Governor Mills, who as we've mentioned is in her late 70s? I'm getting a lot of support from individual lawmakers, getting support from a number of excellent senators.

In fact, luckily for me, it's the senators I respect and like the most. So who would they be? Martin Heinrich, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff, Jeff. Merckley, Chris Murphy, these are people who I've had conversations with who have very much expressed interests in what we're doing up here. Bernie Sanders, not a Democrat, but Bernie has been a hardcore supporter from the beginning, and we remain close. Not much support from the democratic system, which I mean, that doesn't surprise me in the slightest. It's, I was not their chosen candidate. You know, we were told that we didn't have permission to do this because it

wasn't our term, yada, yada, yada. We ignored it because that's, I mean, I don't think that's how I don't think that's how most Democrats want their politics to be, that you need to be part of some system for a long time before you're allowed permission to enter into the political space. Like, if you're a Democrat in the state of Maine and you get the resources together to run in a Democratic primary, that should be up to the Democratic voters of Maine, not up to Democrats in Washington, D.C. to pick and choose. Congressman Moulton also said that he thought there was a great void of democratic leadership right now. What's your impression as you start, you know, embracing the Democratic Party?

Well, for the record, I'm not embracing the Democratic Party. I think the Democratic Party needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. And my reasoning for that is that look around. like the Democratic Party has very little power. The Democratic Party seems incapable of using what power it does have. I think the Democratic Party, Democrats themselves, have nothing, I mean, the approval ratings of the party by Democrats are insanely low. People are not happy with the party. And I think they're not happy with it because the party finds itself in a place that you,

fundamentally impossible to be in. You cannot represent the interests of working people while also representing the interests of people who are exploiting working people. But for the past 30 years, 40 years, the Democratic Party in the United States has formed an alliance with some of the same corporate interests that the Republican Party is aligned with. This is why people say things like it doesn't matter if I vote or not, because both parties are the same. Now, I don't think both parties are the same, but there is an element in both parties that absolutely represents the interests of their highest donors, which are not working people. They're not regular folks. The Democratic Party needs to return to being the party of working people, the party of labor unions,

the party of community organizations. It cannot do that and remain the party of supporting corporate power of supporting billionaires who want to stay billionaires. You cannot do both of these things. It's impossible. And I think that's why the party finds itself in such a confused place now, because it's trying to thread this needle, but it's a needle that cannot be threaded. The only way for us to return to a Democratic Party that represents working people is to rebuild it with working people from the ground up. And that's what we're engaged in. So where does that leave a sort of potential presidential candidate for 2008 like

J.B. Pritzker. And what do you think of Gavin Newsom who's had two terms as California governor and is so far at least cutting through the noise with his social media campaign

against Donald Trump? Yeah, I mean, I would say I'm trying to get through a primary. I will talk about presidential elections once we get past the primary. But as a leader, but as potential leaders

of the party that you're running for, how do they strike you? Yeah. I think that they, I would very much like to see more like a Chris Van Hollen. Or we have Bernie and Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth Warren gave a

wonderful speech the other night at the National Press Club, which I recommend everybody listen to, in which she outlined the future of the kind of party I want to see. I think that Governor Newsom and Governor Pritzker are both very good governors. I like much of what they say. I would like to see some, I would say, probably a deeper dedication to big structural change, larger social projects in line with the kind of Democratic Party I want to see,

which is more like the New Deal Democratic Party than anything else. But it's personalities for me don't do it. It's much more about what are we talking. about what's the kind of politics and the kind of future we're talking about building. Okay, so you mentioned that Bernie Sanders was supporting you. He's an independent, obviously, from Vermont. Why aren't you running as an independent? Fundamentally, because I'm a Democrat. Well, you don't sound like a Democrat, or you sound so frustrated with the Democratic Party. I'm wondering why you're just not running as an independent, where you could easily have as much

influence as Bernie Sanders or Angus King. One, if I ran as an independent, we would not be having this conversation. I would just be some random guy from Maine who decided to run for Senate as independent. It would come and go. It wouldn't be that interesting. I have a theory of power and a theory of change in which you have to utilize the structures that exist in the most effective way that you can. The Democratic Party, whether we like it or not, we live in a two-party system. And if we are going to work within that system to gain power again,

I think the Democratic Party is the most effective way to do it. I've also been a registered Democrat pretty much my entire adult life, besides a couple of years where I underrolled out of disgust. I don't talk to any Democratic voters who think that the Democratic Party should be a party that supports, say, illegal wars, sending America's children off to fight in wars like I did in Iraq. You know, we have a lot of people in the party. who supported the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan, both of which I fought him.

And I don't find a lot of Democratic voters who like that about their party. I don't meet a lot of Democratic voters who think that giving tax breaks to fossil fuel companies is a good idea. This is a, the Democratic Party, if it was run by the people in it, it would be the party of labor unions. it would be the party of community organizations. It would be the party of talking about the future, like FDR used to talk about the future. But my frustrations with the kind of the higher echelons of the party,

that doesn't preclude me from wanting it to be the party it should be. I think it just means that I want to work hard to get us back to a Democratic Party that represents working people, and that should be its focus. Okay, so you mentioned that you were in Iraq and Afghanistan. You're a Marine. Pete Hegzeth is going after Mark Kelly and five other Democrats for putting out statements, reminding people in the military that they're under no obligation to carry out. In fact, they shouldn't carry out illegal orders. Pete Hegzeth has singled out Mark Kelly in particular saying that he's looking at revising his. retirement and also seeing if he can reduce his status from captain. And Mark Kelly is now suing Pete Hegseth. What do you think when you're looking at that? And we're taking a quick break to get some messages from our sponsors. I'm back with Graham Platmer. I mean, it's utterly

disgusting. One, what Senator Kelly and those other legislators set was just reiterating the same kind of training that I got, I think, almost monthly when I was in the service, reminding you that you are under no obligation to follow illegal orders. Like, we used to have the military lawyers, the Jags, come down and remind us of that on a regular occasion. So the idea that saying it as a legislator is somehow undermining good order and discipline is utterly absurd. Pete Heggseth is a The deeply insecure man who is now running around with an immense amount of power. That's what we're watching here. And he's using that power to target somebody who he feels made him angry.

That's absurd. Senator Kelly is retired. He was a fighter pilot and an astronaut. This is someone who served their country with distinction and has earned the retirement benefits that they have. The idea of calling him back to active duty simply. to reduce him and rank and take away his pension. That's just a weaponization of the system itself. That is not Bankston legality. It's not based in any kind of like real rules. This is just an abuse of power. But I mean, at this point, can we be surprised? I mean, that's what the Trump

administration has turned into. I mean, what recently has happened with the chairman of the Fed is the exact same thing. The DOJ is now opening up investigations into Jerome Powell over something about building, historic building, I forget the word. Well, yeah, not reducing interest rates fast enough and they've gone after him for renovating one of the Fed buildings. The president wants to reduce interest rates himself. That's it. He wants to be in charge.

He doesn't like the fact that he has to go through somebody. And he's just using the power of the office to target people who get in his way. Hegzat's doing the exact same thing with Senator Kelly. This is all absurd. It's illegal. It's unconstitutional, this kind of behavior. This is abusing power in its most obvious form. But we can't take it seriously.

I mean, we have to take it seriously because it's happening. But I don't think we should give it the seriousness of like thinking this is a real thing. These are just people who are abusing their power. They have power. They are using it. That's it. There's no basis in legality. So, Graham, if you were to be elected to the Senate and the Democrats were to retake the Senate,

which looks slightly less likely at the moment than if they were to retake the House. But let's play a hypothetical. Would you be up for using the law against Pete Hegsseth and Donald Trump? would you want to see the Senate opening investigations against them? Of course. They've abused their power. I mean, it's nobody should be above the law. We need to hold people accountable.

I mean, we can't just move on from this moment. If we regain power, there should not be a moment where we all just shake hands and decide that, okay, well, that was that. That was a weird little moment. No, absolutely not. The crimes that have been committed must be investigated and, the power that has been abused, those that did it need to be held accountable for doing so. It's not a, yeah, for me, it's a, this should not really be a question.

I think that we should absolutely hold those who have broken the law and who are abusing their power accountable for doing just that. Okay. The Senate is a good place to do that. Senate investing, like opening, Senate oversight is I think one of them. most effective places to bring that about, which is one of the reasons I'm running for Senate. Okay. So what is your impression of what's happening in Minneapolis right now? Ice obviously got involved in the shooting of Renee Good. You saw the video. Donald Trump has doubled down and sent

in a thousand more ICE agents. How do you see that and how do you think about it as a potential lawmaker? One, this is very much of exactly what I was just talking about. This is an abuse of power. This is weaponizing power against political opponents in trying to build power outside of the usual legal structures. ICE right now is being used essentially as a paramilitary force on behalf of the presidency. They went to

Minneapolis because of the fallout from YouTube videos made by conservative YouTube influencer. This is the president and those around him using ICE as a

political tool. They're trying to scare communities. They're trying to cow political opponents. And I mean, that's what we are witnessing. When you do that, when you send paramilitary units into American cities with the intent of sewing chaos, chaos is what you will get.

And that's what we are seeing here. Much like the investigations that need to happen into the abuses of power around Jerome Powell and Mark Kelly. As we move forward, we also need to have investigations and hopefully punishment for the people that brought about the murder of Renee Good. So one of the issues that saw Donald Trump win the 2024 election, as comprehensively as the Republicans did, was the border issue. People clearly don't think that the Democrats were monitoring the border or controlling the border effectively. Where do you think people are now when you talk to them? I mean, this was very much an issue on people's minds, whether or not Donald Trump, demonized immigrants.

And the promise was that he was going to deport the worst of the worst. But now we have ice patrolling Minneapolis, although it's, and obviously it's been, we've all seen the videos, these hideous videos of masked people taking people out of their cars. But this was something that was voted for. I don't think people voted for ice ripping American citizens out of their cars. and murdering American citizens.

That's not border. I'm watching videos of customs and border protection in Minneapolis. Last I checked, Minneapolis is not a border city. This is not border protection. This is not protecting America's, like, this is not bringing about a better immigration system. So when you talk, So when you talk to your friends in Maine who voted for Donald Trump, what's their assessment of him now?

Many of the people I know that voter forum are disgusted. I mean, a lot of them voted forum primarily around costs. They thought that he was going to bring down the costs of daily life. And instead, the tariffs and the tariff uncertainty has actually seen many of those costs go up. But I'm not just this is an example. I have a number of friends who are contractors. They build houses. They thought that Donald Trump was going to bring down their costs

and they were going to make a lot more money. Their costs have skyrocketed and they're being told by their suppliers that it's directly related to tariff uncertainty. That makes them angry. The thing that they thought they were getting, they're getting the opposite of it. And they are not happy about it. Also, what we are seeing with ICE,

this is not what people voted for. When people voted for a stronger border, they did not vote for paramilitaries roaming American communities and shooting American citizens. That is not what people voted for. And while obviously there are likely some who are cheerleading this, many of the people I know that even voted for Donald Trump on the immigration issue, they see what is happening now as a travesty. And they are not happy about it. And I think that come November, the Republican Party is going to learn that this was not the avenue the American people wanted them to go down. Okay, so I have a final question for you. You're an oysterman.

You're a fisherman. You're a diver. What is the best way to eat oysters? Which I have to confess, I am allergic to. Very sadly, because I think they are delicious. But if you're advising someone who hasn't had an oyster before, what is the best way to try one? Raw and on the half shell. It's the only way.

If you need a little squeeze of lemon or a little bit of minionette, by all means, cocktail sauce is heresy. But if the first time you're trying, especially in the Northeast, where we have very good oysters, raw and on the half shell is the best way to enjoy it. Make sure you chew them.

That's where the flavor is. So not the swallow. Not the swallow. No. I mean, oysters not in New England? That's a whole different ballgame. But where I'm from, you chew them because they taste good. Best of luck in Norway.

Will you keep us posted as to whether or not the treatment works? Yeah, yeah, we definitely will. And thank you so much for having me on. I really appreciate it. Yeah, no, it's interesting to talk to you. And good luck. And as you pointed out, good though Governor Mills is, she would be the oldest appointee to the Senate at the age of 78 were she to win.

Yeah. It's a, in an era where after what we just went through with the Biden, with the Biden Harris kind of disaster, it is fascinating to me that this is the direction the party really wants to go in. You know, Seth Moulton, I think was very correct when he, if he's, when he talked about the, what did he say? Not isolation, but. Well, the sort of claustrophobia and the grip that the, the, the, the, the, the, the, establishment has in the Democratic Party? It really does seem like there is just a group of folks who've been there for so long. They really just can't envision anything else besides the people they know in the kind of

politics they know. And it's clearly not working, but they don't really seem to understand anything else to do. And I think that's why we find ourselves in these places. It's also why the answers are not going to come from that group. All right, well, good luck and good luck in Norway and keep us posted. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. I hope you enjoyed the conversation as much as I did. A completely new voice for the Democratic Party.

And of course, he's antagonizing the Democratic establishment. Chuck Schumer, the minority leader of the Senate, is supporting Governor Mills. Bernie Sanders has thrown his weight behind Graham Platner, as has Elizabeth Warren. Maine may not be typical of the rest of the state. but it's a really interesting fight for the heart and the soul and the minds of the Democratic Party. If you have been, thank you for joining us. Let us know what you think on YouTube. Don't forget to subscribe to The Daily Beast. We are independent media. And so we really rely on your support. And we love hearing from you. We love hearing your opinions, your thoughts and who you would like to hear from. Joanna, hi. I have to tell you about something that we're obsessed with. I'm Kevin Fallon. And I'm Matt Wilstein.

And we are hosting Obsessed the podcast about all the TV shows, movies and entertainment newsmakers that we're all obsessed with. So make sure you subscribe to us on YouTube at the YouTube channel. Make sure you follow us wherever you get your podcasts. Just search for Obsessed the podcast. And we will see you there. Be Beast. Big thanks to our special Be Beast tier of members. Here they are.

Yvette Johnson, methinks, Batsy O'Farrell, Mills and Linz, Sh, Shelby, Max Kubit, David Sherry, Thomas Moore, Maria Voltaine, D. Cujewatz, Sinia Lund, John H. Overrocker, Deb K. Ostrander, Sandra Clark, travels with Carl, Andrew Beaver, Cappinator. Harry Clark, Dawn McCarthy, Daniel Dog Lover, M. Griner, Dye Stone, Fulvia, Orlando. Herbie, Andrew Meller, Tatnell, Val Love Francisco, Will Hutchison, Andrea Hodel, Bocococ, D.C., Sharon Shipley, Connie Rutherford, Karen White, and last but never least, Heidi Riley. And a big thanks to our production team, Devin Rodgerino,

Rachel Pasa, Heather Pissarro, and Ryan Murray. Want more great listens? Check out our comedy podcast, The Last Laugh, and our star-studded The Daily Beast podcast at the Daily Beast.com slash podcasts. If you enjoyed this episode, consider becoming a Daily Beast subscriber. Subscribing is the best way to feed the beast and support all of your podcasts as we cover what might become the darkest timeline. Head to the DailyBeast.com slash membership slash podcast and sign up today.