The Daily Signal - Government Pushes Gender Ideology on Judges, Texas Sues Over Voter Information, Harris Denies Religious Exemptions for Abortions | Oct. 23
Episode Date: October 23, 2024TOP NEWS | On today’s Daily Signal Top News, we break down: The federal government is pushing gender ideology in the courtroom. Texas is suing the Biden-Harris administration over information a...bout the citizenship status of people on the state’s voter rolls. Vice President Kamala Harris says she doesn’t support religious exemptions for Christian doctors who are opposed to performing abortions. The US confirms Wednesday that North Korea sent 3,000 troops to Russia. Pennsylvania Senate candidate Dave McCormick slams his opponent for "retaliating against McDonald's.” Relevant Links https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/10/16/relentless-growth-obama-era-foster-care-policy-unmasks-transgender-orthodoxys-inherent-threat-parental-rights/ Listen to other podcasts from The Daily Signal: https://www.dailysignal.com/podcasts/ Get daily conservative news you can trust from our Morning Bell newsletter: DailySignal.com/morningbellsubscription Listen to more Heritage podcasts: https://www.heritage.org/podcasts Sign up for The Agenda newsletter — the lowdown on top issues conservatives need to know about each week: https://www.heritage.org/agenda Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The federal government is pushing gender ideology in the courtroom. I'm Elizabeth Mitchell,
and this is the Daily Signal Top News for Wednesday, October 23rd.
The Biden-Harris administration has pushed judges to insert radical gender ideology into their
courtrooms, according to a new report from the Daily Caller News Foundation. In 2023,
the Department of Justice issued a $1 million grant to integrate gender ideology into juvenile justice
in child welfare systems nationwide. The Justice Department is using the money to encourage judges
to adopt an ideological framework that ultimately pits children against parents who do not support
their self-selected identities. The grant established a resource center to train judges,
child welfare workers, and other professionals involved with the juvenile justice system on sexuality
and gender identity. The National Council on Juvenile and Family Court judges partnered with the
National Center for Youth with diverse sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression to create
the grant-funded Pride Justice Resource Center. The Center hosts several resources for juvenile justice
system professionals, which the website says are designed to support system change, family
engagement, and acceptance, identifying gaps in knowledge related to LGBTQ and the intersections of
multiple identities. According to a guide produced by the Pride Justice Resource Center,
judges who know that a child has chosen a gender identity different from his actual sex can ensure
services like so-called gender-affirming care are offered to the child. The government considers
such care a requirement for what it calls effective rehabilitation. The guide says decisions about
where to place kids in foster care should be made based on the person's gender identity
and where the young person feels the most safe. Texas joined Florida in suing the Biden-Harris
administration on Tuesday.
the administration failed to share with Texas the citizenship status of people on the state's
voter rolls. A coalition of state attorneys general called on Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to provide the citizenship status information last week.
Texas's 15-page complaint says, federal and Texas law prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting,
but non-U.S. citizens can nevertheless register to vote. Federal law prohibits Texas from
requiring documentary proof of citizenship from people seeking to register to vote. But federal
law requires the Department of Homeland Security to respond to inquiries from appropriate Texas
authorities about the citizenship status of persons registered to vote. DHS has failed to comply
with that duty. Vice President Kamala Harris says she doesn't support religious exemptions for
Christian doctors who are opposed to performing abortions. She said this in an interview with ABC News Now's
Halle Jackson. Here she is.
What concessions would be on the table?
Religious exemptions, for example.
Is that something that you would consider?
I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body.
To Republicans like, for example, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, who would back something like this on a Democratic agenda if, in fact, Republicans control Congress?
Would you offer them an olive branch?
Or is that off the table?
Is that not an option for you?
I'm not going to engage in hypotheticals.
Her comments have sparked outrage from Christian and Catholic leaders.
For example, Ralph Reed, chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, said, so she's not only pro-abortion, she is anti-religious freedom.
Duly noted. Tyler O'Neill from The Daily Signal is here to discuss this issue.
Tyler, what are some of the religious freedom concerns surrounding Harris's statements?
Yeah, there are a lot of concerns. Thanks for having me, Elizabeth.
The big issue here is that Harris is rejecting out of hand even the idea of religious exemptions for,
being involved in an abortion. So this is a complete rejection of all of the federal law. And there's a lot of
federal law that protects doctors and hospitals from being forced to participate in abortions or
host abortions on their property or, you know, all of these things. So it's funny. There are three
major laws, the church amendments, the Coat's Snow Amendment, and the Weldon Amendment. This is a very
well-established right to religious exemptions from being forced to carry out abortions. And yet,
Kamala Harris is suggesting that she would oppose any sort of exemptions.
Could you elaborate a little bit more on what those protections in U.S. law and the Constitution are
for religious freedom? Yes. So the First Amendment, very importantly, enshrines the right of religious
freedom from the get-go. It's one of the most important rights in the entire constellation of our
constitutional system. But from the 1970s up into the early 2000s, there were a whole bunch of
amendments that Congress passed to funding, to pieces of legislation that fund the government.
Some of these, like the church amendments, prevent the government from forcing health care institutions that receive federal dollars to make their facilities available for abortion or sterilization.
They also prevent entities that receive federal funds from discriminating against health care providers who refuse to perform abortions or sterilizations.
Very interestingly, the Weldon Amendment, which is passed as part of a bill funding the Department of Health and Heardons.
human services stipulates that HHS appropriations may not fund any federal agency a program
that discriminates against health care providers who refuse to provide, pay for, provide coverage
of, or refer for abortions, which means that if you are a health care provider, if you're a doctor
or a nurse in our country today, you are a Roman Catholic, evangelical Christian, or even just a
secular American who believes that abortion involves the intentional killing of an unborn human life,
you cannot be forced to kill those babies in the womb. You cannot be forced to pay for it. You cannot
be forced to pay for medical coverage of it. And you also cannot be forced to, you know, if a patient
comes and asks for an abortion, you can't be forced to refer that person to an abortion clinic.
Excellent. Well, thanks so much for talking to us about this, Tyler.
Thanks again for having.
And now for our quick hits where we outline two news stories of the day.
First, the U.S. confirmed Wednesday that North Korea sent 3,000 troops to Russia
out of a promised 10,000 to be deployed by December to fight the war against Ukraine.
Second, Republican Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, Dave McCormick, slammed his opponent,
incumbent Democratic Senator Bob Casey for, quote-unquote, retaliating against
McDonald's after former president Donald Trump visited one of the company's storefronts in the
swing state of Pennsylvania. Casey and two other Senate Democrats wrote a letter to the CEO
of McDonald's complaining about Trump's visit to the friar. Thanks for listening to this midweek
episode of The Daily Signal, Top News. Be sure to tune in tomorrow morning to our interview
edition where our executive editor Rob Bluey is sitting down with Brent Bozell. Also,
please make sure to subscribe to the Daily Signal wherever you listen to podcasts. And please
leave us a review so we know what we can do better. Thanks so much for listening. Have a wonderful
evening and we'll be back with you tomorrow morning. The Daily Signal podcast is made possible
because of listeners like you. Executive producers are Rob Blewey and Katrina Trinko. Hosts are Virginia
Allen, Brian Gottstein, Tyler O'Neill, and Elizabeth Mitchell. Sound design by Lauren Evans,
Mark Geinie, John Pop, and Joseph von Spakovsky. To learn more or support our work, please visit
daily signal.com
