The Daily Signal - INTERVIEW | 'Just the Tip of The Iceberg,’ Expert Says of Secret Chinese Police Stations
Episode Date: April 19, 2023The FBI on Monday morning arrested two New York City residents “in connection with opening and operating an illegal overseas police station," according to a Justice Department press release. Lu... Jianwang and Chen Jinping were "charged with conspiring to act as agents of the [People’s Republic of China] government, as well as obstructing justice by destroying evidence of their communications with [a Chinese Ministry of Public Security] official,” the Justice Department said. Michael Cunningham, a research fellow in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, joins today's episode of "The Daily Signal Podcast" to discuss his thoughts on the arrests, China's dismissal of the allegations, and the leaked Pentagon documents relating to Taiwan. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's about time. I think this is a wonderful development, a wonderful because as disturbing as the
allegations are, we know that this stuff is happening. And it's just really good to know that they're
taking this seriously. This is the Daily Signal podcast for Wednesday, April 19th. I'm Samantha
Sherris, and that was Michael Cunningham, a research fellow in the Heritage Foundation's Asian Study Center.
Michael and I will be discussing the FBI arresting and charging two New York City residents
allegedly involved with an illegal overseas police station and the Washington Post reporting
on the leaked Pentagon documents and Taiwan.
We'll get to my conversation with Michael right after this.
I'm Mark Geinney from the Heritage Foundation, and we are very pleased to bring you the next chapter
in the Heritage Explains podcast.
Over the years, this show has been so loved by so many people,
and we want to keep bringing you the insights into policy
and current events that you've come to expect here
while updating the show with a new sound, a new format, and some new voices.
Most notably, we're excited to upgrade this show from a one-off format
where we bring you different topics each week to a serialized format,
where we craft deep dives into hot-button issues in the form of seasons,
series of shows that focus the intellectual weight of the Heritage Foundation on one topic.
First up, a six-episode series on the biggest,
existential threat to our nation right now, the Chinese Communist Party.
Check out the new Heritage Explains wherever you get your podcasts.
Michael Cunningham, a research fellow in the Asian Study Center here at the Heritage Foundation,
is here with us in the studio.
Michael, thanks so much for joining us.
Thanks for having me again, Sam.
Of course.
Now, let's just dive right in.
The FBI on Monday morning arrested two New York City residents in connection with opening and
operating in a legal overseas police station. That's according to a Justice Department press release.
They are charged with conspiring to act as agents of the PRC government, as well as obstructing
justice by destroying evidence of their communications with the Chinese Ministry of Public Security
official. Michael, let's start with your reaction to the arrests and the charges.
My reaction to the arrests and the charges is it's about time. I think this is,
a wonderful development, a wonderful because as disturbing as the allegations are, we know that this
stuff is happening. And to know that the FBI, based on the release, the FBI had been investigating
this since at least sometime last year. And it's just really good to know that they're taking this
seriously. Yes, absolutely. And when we take a step back and just think about some of the national
security concerns surrounding this police station and, you know, we'll obviously hear more and we'll
learn more over the next coming weeks. But from your perspective, what do you see as some of the top
national security concerns surrounding this case? Yeah. So the overseas police stations,
it's just part of the bigger problem. So these stations, you know, ostensibly they're there to
help out Chinese citizens overseas with their various clerical issues that in China they would go to
the police station for which generally should be housed in an embassy. And so what we see, though,
in these police stations is regardless of what they're doing, these are police functions that are
being done in an unregistered location. It's a complete disregard of U.S. sovereignty. The other thing
I would say about is they're not just doing these benign clerical procedures there. So I'm glad that the FBI
really investigated it before going after these people because they documented some of what was going on
and how they had direct contact with the Ministry of Public Security, the National Police Force in China.
they were being directed by the Chinese police authorities,
and they were literally going after people, dissidents, harassing them, surveilling them.
This is a very broad problem that's happening in the U.S.
These police stations are just one small piece of this problem.
Much of it is being done virtually from China,
but there are nodes in the United States and the other countries where they do this.
And any time you can actually go after one of them and investigate it and crack down on it and actually take people into custody.
That's a great thing.
It's just the tip of the iceberg.
There's a lot more where that came from.
We should really be taking it seriously.
But it's a great start, I would say.
Yeah, absolutely.
It is a great start that the FBI was able to investigate, make these arrests, bring these charges.
The station, I believe, was closed last fall.
but as you were just talking about, you know, this is kind of the tip of the iceberg.
Do you anticipate that there could be other Chinese, you know, secret police stations throughout the U.S.?
Well, we know there are at least two others.
These have been already found by a human rights organization.
There are probably many more.
I mean, the way this worked was it was one of the defendants.
He actually had an office.
I don't recall if he owned the entire building, but essentially, you know, he had a registered
business in America that he could house this operation in. Now, what I hope the FBI is doing
is actually understanding from the Chinese American community, the Chinese immigrant community,
where these things are occurring because it's not top secret information, you know,
these police stations, because of the clerical type work they're offering as well, they do reach
out to the overseas Chinese population. And there are people going there to process some of their
work. And so I do imagine we will see more of these coming out. But once again, I would emphasize that
these are just the tip of the iceberg. A lot more of what's happening is, you know, on university
campuses in just in society, people being surveilled, harassed. We're talking dissidents
from China, pro-democracy activists from China, Chinese ethnic minorities who are just being
essentially, they're in the United States illegally, they're physically present in the United
States. They are subject to all of the rights that are listed in our Constitution, and yet
America is not able to secure these rights for them because our sovereignty is being violated.
Michael, I'm sure everyone knows the answer to this, but what is the likelihood that the U.S.
could just go into China and set up a secret police station?
Essentially zero.
Now, you know, with that said, every country engages in espionage.
Every country has their own activities that are illegal in the countries where they operate.
I don't know how that works.
I don't have inside knowledge about that.
But, you know, every country also has police cooperation.
And there are legitimate channels for U.S. Chinese police cooperation.
There have been instances where the U.S. has collaborated with China
to extradite some of, you know, Chinese
outlaws who were in the United States.
In legitimate cases, this type of cooperation can happen.
This is not a legitimate case.
And, yeah, I mean, to answer your question, what is the likelihood?
I mean, when the United States, or let's say, I don't know, Canada arrests a Chinese
national in their own borders for committing crimes, China.
throws a huge fit about it and it's supposed to be perfectly fine for them to conduct their police
operations in other people's countries. I don't see how anyone can think that that's okay.
Well, just speaking of China throwing a fit, they did push back on these claims about the secret
police station, you know, saying that China maintains a policy of a non-interference in other
countries and these alleged police stations do not exist. Your thoughts? Well, I think we have two
people in custody who can prove that they do exist. You know, China, they did the same thing with
the spy balloon. They do it all the time. They will look at you, look you in the eye and say,
I am not here. They will be that blatant. And there's a reason for that. The Chinese Communist Party,
they don't believe in truth. They only believe in messaging. They think the whole world operates
that way. They're unable to really comprehend the concept of right and wrong and law.
and and whatnot, but they, it's all about messaging for them and laughable to us because we have
those people in custody, but let's remember that we're not necessarily their only target audience.
They have these police operations throughout the world.
They, in fact, brag about the operations that they conduct and about how many alleged outlaws
they get repatriated back to China.
but these things are happening throughout the world, and they don't want the rest of the world waking up as well.
Yeah, absolutely. I wanted to shift topics a little bit. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that Taiwan is unlikely to thwart Chinese military air superiority in a cross-strait conflict,
while tactics such as China's use of civilian ships for military purposes have eroded U.S.
spy agencies, ability to detect a pending invasion. That's according to leaked Pentagon assessments.
We've discussed Taiwan on the show before and China's aggression toward the island. Are you at all
surprised by these assessments? Like, what are your thoughts on that? I'm not surprised by the assessments
because we've been hearing similar things in, you know, the past couple years and because there's
so much focus right now on Taiwan. Now, what I would say is, as I did,
read the reports about these leaked documents. I did not read the leaked documents. But what I saw
in the reports basically was that the Taiwanese do not believe that they're prepared for an attack
by China. I would say, first of all, the Chinese also don't believe that they're prepared.
And they're not going to make a decision based on a leaked document from the Pentagon.
They're going to make a decision based on their own assessments.
They do not believe that they're prepared.
Even if they could eke out of victory over Taiwan, it would be, we're talking, a drawn-out war, massive damage.
And then they have to deal with their domestic and international security challenges from the countries that basically surround them that are not necessarily friendly with them.
And so they are very risk-averse that way.
They are not going to make a move unless they're confident that they can absolutely and fairly easily win.
With that said, these revelations also should be a wake-up call to America because things aren't always going to be that way.
We have China's military, which is developing very rapidly, and we're not following suit.
We're still stronger than they are, but they're really closing the gap.
Right now, last I checked, I believe, the backlog in military deliveries,
stuff that has already been approved for sale to Taiwan,
was around the order of $19 billion.
Essentially everything that the Trump administration approved to sell to Taiwan,
almost all of that has not been delivered,
and we don't know when it will be.
Biden has essentially, you know, the administration has made a big fuss about everything they sell to Taiwan.
But as far as numbers go, based on my calculations, it looks like they're on track to sell about as much,
about the same value in arms to Taiwan as the George H.W. Bush administration did.
So it seems like sales to Taiwan also have fallen off a cliff.
And so we really have to take this seriously our own ability to produce the ships, aircraft, weapons, ammo, everything that would be needed in a fight with China, both for ourselves and for the Taiwanese.
But we also have to get to the ability where we're able to actually deliver to Taiwan the military equipment that they need to show China that, and that, and,
an invasion will never be successful.
Yeah, definitely.
I also wanted to just ask a follow-up question with this backlog that I believe we've talked
about it before, but what is causing this backlog?
Is it from a manufacturing perspective, you know, the logistics of getting this equipment
to the island?
Like what's causing that backlog?
Yeah, so this is probably a more technical question than me as a non-military man than I can give.
But I would say that the backlog, it existed before the war in Ukraine, and it continues to exist now.
You know, what it really comes down to is back in previous eras, say, especially World War II,
we were able to mass produce these things, whether it's ships, ships, aircraft, other conventional weapons.
we were mass producing them, sending them off to battle.
We no longer have that capability.
Supply chains are scattered throughout the world.
Many are in China.
China does have that capability increasingly,
and so that's really scary.
But we don't have that right now,
and I think that's probably the main thing
that we need to focus on
so that we're able to supply Taiwan
and supply ourselves and supply Ukraine.
We have a lot of commitments.
And so, yeah, it's that industrial capacity that we really need to work on.
Absolutely.
Michael, just before we go, any final thoughts?
I guess my final thought might be with regards to the overseas police stations again.
Sorry to switch back again.
It's an important topic.
But, you know, one thing that I noticed on the Justice Department's release was they had, I believe,
It was the final paragraph, and it essentially highlighted the fact that the FBI has set up a web portal for people to report instances of transnational repression by foreign governments.
This is very important.
I know that the FBI is starting to try to send the message out, especially to the Chinese community in America, whether they're,
American citizens, Chinese citizens, or whatever, that they are, there is a high likelihood
that they could, or someone that they know, could be targeted by the Chinese authorities.
It's not just China.
Other countries are doing it as well, but China is a really big one.
And so I would just say, you know, I hope everyone realizes that this website is there and that
they will feel comfortable to report any instance that they're aware of to the, to the authorities,
to the FBI, because this is a very important issue. These are our neighbors, our friends,
classmates for people who are studying colleagues that could be targeted by their home governments.
And, you know, we shouldn't be, you know, profiling people based on this person's probably
targeted because of their ethnicity. But like, if we notice something,
and especially if we're being targeted.
It's really important.
I think it's great that the FBI is starting to do this,
and I hope that it can be successful.
Yeah, absolutely.
Michael Cunningham, thank you so much for joining us today.
Always appreciate your insight.
Thank you for having me again.
And that'll do it for today's episode.
Thank you for listening to The Daily Signal's interview edition.
Make sure you subscribe to the Daily Signal
wherever you get your podcast
and help us reach even more listeners
by leaving a five-star rating and review.
We read and appreciate all of your feedback.
Thanks again for listening.
Have a great Wednesday,
and we'll be back with you all this afternoon for top news.
The Daily Signal podcast is brought to you
by more than half a million members of the Heritage Foundation.
Executive producers are Rob Louis and Kate Trinko.
Producers are Virginia Allen and Samantha Asheras.
Sound designed by Lauren Evans, Mark Geinney, and John Pop.
To learn more,
visit dailysignal.com.
