The Daily Signal - Sen. Mike Lee: You Can't Learn From History If You Banish It

Episode Date: July 22, 2020

"If we tear down every statue of every person whose viewpoints and whose behavior wasn't always ideal, wasn't always perfect, we're ... not going to know about many of the historical figures who, for ...better or for worse, shaped who we are and how we got here," Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, says. That's his perspective on the tearing down of statues such as Ulysses S. Grant, George Washington, and Abraham Lincoln. Protesters have vandalized and attempted to topple statues in the weeks since the May 25 death of George Floyd. Lee says peace is a more effective plan than violence, and even introduced a resolution condemning mob violence which was rejected by the Senate. He joins The Daily Signal Podcast to discuss. We also cover these stories: Two Chinese hackers have been identified and charged with stealing large amounts of data and information, including COVID-19 research, from the U.S. government.  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says that the next coronavirus relief package will include stimulus checks, similar to the package passed in March.  House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., asked Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., to apologize to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., for reportedly calling her "disgusting" and an expletive. “The Daily Signal Podcast” is available on Ricochet, Apple Podcasts, Pippa, Google Play, and Stitcher. All of our podcasts can be found at DailySignal.com/podcasts. If you like what you hear, please leave a review. You can also leave us a message at 202-608-6205 or write us at letters@dailysignal.com. Enjoy the show! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:05 This is the Daily Signal podcast for Wednesday, July 22nd. I'm Virginia Allen. And I'm Rachel Del Judas. Senator Mike Lee of Utah recently introduced a resolution condemning mob violence. He joins me on the podcast today to discuss. Don't forget. If you're enjoying this podcast, please be sure to leave a review or a five-star rating on Apple podcasts and encourage others to subscribe.
Starting point is 00:00:29 Now, under our top news. Two Chinese hackers have been identified and charged. was stealing large amounts of data and information, including COVID-19 research from the U.S. government. John De Mares, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, said during a press conference Tuesday that the hackers stole terabytes of data from hundreds of targets, establishing themselves as a prolific threat to U.S. and foreign networks. Li Chung-Yu and Dong Jiazzi hacked individuals, government agencies, and company. De Maers explained that China is using cyber intrusions as part of its rob, replicate, and replace
Starting point is 00:01:19 strategy to technological development. And he added that China has now taken its place alongside Russia, Iran, and North Korea, in that shameful club of nations that provide a safe haven for cyber criminals in exchange for those criminals being on call to work for the benefit of the state here to feed the Chinese Communist Party's insatiable hunger for American and other non-Chinese companies, hard-earned intellectual property, including COVID-19 research. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that the next coronavirus relief package will include stimulus checks, similar to the package passed back in March.
Starting point is 00:02:03 Here's what he had to say Tuesday on the Senate floor via C-SPAN. With the majority of businesses expected to exhaust their initial paycheck protection funding this summer, We'll also be proposing a targeted second round of the PPP with a special eye toward hard-hit businesses. And speaking of building on what worked in the CARES Act, we want another round of direct payments, direct payments to help American families keep driving our national comeback. Helping to create more American jobs is an urgent moral priority. And these are just some of the policies we're discussing that will help that happen. In addition to kids and jobs, our third major focus is health care. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a Democrat from Maryland, spoke on the House floor on Tuesday and asked Representative Ted Yoho, a Republican from Florida, to apologize to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for calling her disgusting and an expletive.
Starting point is 00:03:06 Yoho reportedly confronted Ocasio-Cortez on the steps of the Capitol on Monday regarding her. claim that the violent crime spike in New York City is directly related to poverty. Yoho told the New York City representative that she was, quote, out of your freaking mind. Hoyer told reporters that Mr. Yoho owes not only the Congresswoman an apology, but also an apology on the floor of the House of Representatives. In response to the incident, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Tuesday, I never spoke to Representative Yoho before he decided. to accost me on the steps of the nation's capital yesterday. Believe it or not, I usually get along fine with my GOP colleagues. We know how to check our legislative sparring at the committee door.
Starting point is 00:03:55 Planned Parenthood of Greater New York has reportedly rejected its founder Margaret Sanger over her support of eugenics. In a statement, Karen Seltzer, chair of the New York Affiliates Board said, The removal of Margaret Sanger's name from our building is both a necessary and overdue step to reckon with our legacy and acknowledge Planned Parenthood's contributions to historical reproductive harm within our communities of color. Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmidt is stepping in to dismiss a case brought against a Missouri couple, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who brandished their guns outside their home when protesters walked onto their property last month. Missouri Circuit attorney Kim Garner filed a suit against the couple, claiming it illegal for the property owners to waive their guns at the intruders. The Attorney General joined Fox News on Monday night to explain why there are no grounds for the lawsuit and why he is getting directly involved. Well, the truth of the matter is this is nothing more than a political prosecution brought by a St. Louis prosecutor, Kim Gardner. The right to self-defense is deeply rooted in our Constitution.
Starting point is 00:05:06 it's a fundamental right. It actually predates our Constitution. The founders knew how important it was. It's a God-given right. It can't be taken away or given to us by government. It's something it's unalienable. And so it's in our Constitution. It's in the Second Amendment. It's in the Missouri Constitution. It's in our statutes. Missouri has a castle doctrine like a lot of other states. But Missouri's is very expansive. It gives broad authority to individuals to protect their lives, the lives of their family members, their homes and their property. And it's important to recognize this was on a private street. And so at a time when there calls to defund the police, at a time with skyrocketing violent crime rates, including in here in Missouri and in St. Louis, we've got a prosecutor now targeting individuals for exercising their fundamental rights under the Second Amendment.
Starting point is 00:05:51 And so enough is enough. The law is very clear. It's time as the state's chief law enforcement officer to step in. So we're entering the case and we're seeking to have this case dismissed, not just for the McCloskey's, but for every Missouri. whose rights are threatened by a rogue prosecutor who seeks to punish people for exercising their fundamental right to self-defense. A school in Michigan has fired a beloved teacher for saying Trump is our president. Justin Couserra, a varsity baseball coach
Starting point is 00:06:19 in social studies teacher, has been fired after voicing support for President Trump and opening schools. On July 6th, Cusera tweeted, I'm done being silent. At real Donald Trump is our president. Don't at me. He told the Washington,
Starting point is 00:06:35 Beacon. I was required to meet with Human Resources, the superintendent, and my principal on July 10th. They initially took my statement on why I tweeted those tweets, and they told me they would have a decision about my future employment in the upcoming days. When they completed the meeting, I was told I had the option to either be fired or resign. Now stay tuned for my interview with Senator Mike Lee on his resolution to condemn mob violence, which the Senate never ended up passing. conservative women, conservative feminists. It's true, we do exist. I'm Virginia Allen, and every Thursday morning on problematic women, Lauren Evans and I sort through the news to bring you stories and
Starting point is 00:07:19 interviews that are of particular interest to conservative leaning or problematic women. That is women whose views and opinions are often excluded or mocked by those on the so-called feminist left. We talk about everything from pop culture, to policy and politics. Search for problematic women wherever you get your podcast. I'm very honored to be joined on the Daily Signal podcast by Senator Mike Lee of Utah. Senator Lee, thank you so much for coming on. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:07:51 So in the weeks since the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, protesters have torn down or attempted to tear down statues of Confederate General Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S Grant, and even presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, among others. Senator Lee, what is your perspective on the attacks we've seen on America's history and founders? Well, my message to those trying to tear down any statue anywhere is stop. Mob violence just isn't the answer in a civil society, and it certainly shouldn't be in ours. Now, look, if New York City wants to take down a statue of Christopher Columbus on New York City property or any other statue, for that matter, the people of New York have a,
Starting point is 00:08:36 every right to do so, but they should do it peacefully and through the process set up by their system of government, through their elected officials, and not through mob violence. It's one of the reasons why I introduced a resolution in the Senate earlier this month, condemning mob violence because some Black Lives Matter rioters shot one of my constituents in Provo, Utah. Average, ordinary man just driving home, mining his own business. when Black Lives Matter rioters were blocking the street, surrounded his car, and they shot him. This was a problem, and it's unacceptable. And all I asked was for Senate Democrats to condemn mob violence, and they refused.
Starting point is 00:09:21 Well, in your resolution, you write that mob violence and the mob mentality that feeds it, including its cruel and intolerant cancel culture, should be condemned by all Americans. Why is this the case? Well, it needs to be condemned and hasn't been condemned. One of the reasons why it hasn't been condemned is that we've got a lot of people in America who seem to be applauding it. And many of those same people are being funded by our government. And that's why I think we need to start defunding those who hate America because they're hating America on America's dime. So colleges that punish free speech and discriminate against conservative viewpoints and religious students shouldn't get federal funding.
Starting point is 00:10:08 City councils who defund their police departments and who refuse to protect public safety shouldn't get federal grants. School districts that embrace the ahistorical nonsense of the 1619 project shouldn't get federal education spending. None of these organizations should get a single dime of taxpayer dollars while they are effectively backing some of these things. And it's a problem. Well, you also talk about how America's law enforcement officers do an extremely difficult job extremely well, despite, you know, some cases of excusable misconduct by some. And you just mentioned the efforts to defund the police. What is your perspective on this? Every city that's given in to the demands of the Black Lives Matter movement has seen violence go up in their city.
Starting point is 00:11:03 Murders are up in New York City. Murders are up in Minneapolis. Murders are up in Atlanta and in Seattle. You can't improve public safety by defunding the police. We need the police. The police stop crime. The tragic part is that the poorest communities, those that suffer the most, from the violence caused by the Black Lives Matter movement.
Starting point is 00:11:29 Those are the people in the communities who need the police the most. Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't problems that need to be addressed. There certainly are. But it does mean that the answer cannot be and certainly is not. Simply getting rid of the police, that doesn't make any sense. Well, in the resolution, you also talk about a loss of common decency. How did we get here, would you say, from a time to where, you know, at one point in this country, law enforcement was respected, and now, especially today, sometimes in the past, but especially today, we see everything but that. You know, there are a lot of explanations for that. There are a lot of reasons that have contributed to that.
Starting point is 00:12:13 I think you can point to a breakdown of the family as the fundamental unit of society. I think you can point to a, sometimes difficult to follow and difficult to trace lines of accountability. Law enforcement used to be primarily, if not exclusively, the domain of local officers who reported to local elected officials. And the more we've mixed state, local, and federal law enforcement funding, the blurrier those lines have become. And as a result of that, we've seen a proliferation of laws, and we've seen. different law enforcement styles that sometimes have aggravated the problem. The introduction of drugs and the acceptance of drug culture certainly hasn't helped in any of this, but we're in the situation in which we now find ourselves.
Starting point is 00:13:12 We have to address it. There are a number of ways that we can handle it, and I think all of those approaches need to take into account efforts to strengthen, not weaken families, to, to strengthen, not weaken the role of parents, to strengthen, not weaken the resources available to police, while at the same time reforming standards of law enforcement personnel to make sure that officers who do go rogue are held accountable. One of the things that's so unfortunate about what happened to George Floyd is that the officer who killed him had been subject to 17 formal misconduct complaints against him. And yet he was never held accountable for any of those. Had he been formally disciplined for any one of those complaints,
Starting point is 00:14:02 George Floyd would probably be alive today. That is truly tragic. And I think that's one of the reasons why we need a wake-up call for making sure that we don't have police and other public employee unions effectively insulating police officers who have engaged in repeated acts of misconduct from any kind of disciplinary reaction. You had mentioned the one person in your state that, you know, had violence put upon him by someone that was part of the mob. How about other people in Utah?
Starting point is 00:14:36 What about small business owners, others that you've talked to? How have they been adversely affected by all of the violence that we've seen happening in the country? Well, there certainly has been some private property damage. There have been people who have felt. like they can't go outside, who have felt like they've become prisoners in their own homes. You've had people whose automobiles have been vandalized or in some cases even destroyed. Now, we're fortunate in my state. We haven't had it nearly on the same level, but you've seen it in some other cities,
Starting point is 00:15:12 including places like Minneapolis and like Seattle and like Portland. but you have seen a lot of people feeling like they've lost their sense of community and their sense of hope and faith in their community to operate in a place where mutual respect and peace and tolerance and acceptance can pervade each community from one end to the other. That really is a tragic loss, and it's something that people feel very deeply. We've talked to a lot about your resolution. Would you say Congress has a role beyond your resolution?
Starting point is 00:15:50 in protecting statues and monuments? Well, I think Congress most of the time he's not the owner of the statue. As I've said in the past, look, if someone owns a statue, if it's their own personal private property, that person has the right to do anything with the statue. They want.
Starting point is 00:16:09 Most of the time, they're not going to decide to destroy it, but if they want to, they can certainly do that. But it's not up to a third party to make that decision for them. By the same token, If it's owned by a corporation, corporate governance structure is going to decide who has the decision making power over that statute. If, on the other hand, the statue is owned by the public, then whatever government owns it has
Starting point is 00:16:33 the power to make and dispose of that. Most of the statues in this country, insofar as they're publicly owned, are probably owned by state and municipal governments and not by the federal government. Those statues that are federally owned ultimately are subject to. to disposal or disposition only insofar as an act of Congress authorizes that, or only insofar as a previous act of Congress has authorized particular executive branch officials. So I think there will continue to be reviews from time to time within Congress of what the policies should be and who should have the decision-making power. But in no circumstance,
Starting point is 00:17:16 Should we just hand this over to whatever group of people decides to engage in lawless activity on a particular day and say, if you feel strongly about something, you can take a statute that belongs to the American people and destroy it on your own initiative based on your own rage at the moment. That's never acceptable. Well, on that note, Senator Lee, is there a danger, would you say, in trying to erase physical representations of history such as these monuments? Absolutely. And look, I wrote a book a few years ago that touches on some of these points. It's called Written Out of History. And it explains the dynamic that occurs when we see history being written by the victors. And it almost always is. Our history books reflect the worldview of those who won certain conflicts. For example, our look back on the American Revolution, tends overall to take the view that it was a good thing that we defeated England in the Revolutionary War.
Starting point is 00:18:28 And other viewpoints sometimes get suppressed in the process. It is important, just the same, to go back and review historical texts on any topic, on any significant decision, and make sure that we understand both view. points. So as it relates to your specific question and statues, if we tear down every statue of every person whose viewpoints and whose behavior wasn't always ideal, wasn't always perfect, or wasn't always acceptable according to our modern worldview, we're going to have very few
Starting point is 00:19:09 statues to begin with, but we're also not going to know about many of the historical figures who for better or for worse shaped who we are and how we got here. I think it's a good idea, generally speaking, to have more of a knowledge of more historical figures in our country than it is to have less. Well, looking at the violence that we've talked about and just the attacks on history, what would you say has maybe stood out to you as one of the most troubling or upsetting parts of this whole situation that we've seen? play out in the past weeks and months? I think the single most upsetting aspect of it,
Starting point is 00:19:51 other than what I think everyone would agree is the most upsetting part, that is the loss of human life and the danger of life and limb, once you take it beyond that aspect of this violence, which is the most obvious and widely agreed upon consequence. If you're looking at the, the most troubling secondary feature. I would probably say it's that you've got people who consider themselves and are considered by society to be part of polite society, polite, educated society, the educational and corporate establishment of the United States and many government officials,
Starting point is 00:20:37 who seem to be just fine with this violence, and in many cases are defending it. in many cases are applauding it, at least to the degree that they're saying, you know, these people make some really good points, and I applaud them for showing how strongly they feel. Now, look, it's fine to accept the fact that there are legitimate viewpoints at play, and it's fine to say that those people who are rioting have a right, peaceably, to demonstrate. But insofar as anyone in polite society is suggesting that the mob violence is in any way, shape, or form acceptable is what I find so incredibly disturbing and disheartening. And we need to have a series of conversations as Americans, not just in halls of government and seats of power, but around the family dinner table with their friends, our family, our coworkers. our neighbors, even those that we don't know as well.
Starting point is 00:21:48 And we need to start coming together around the fact that regardless of where we might disagree, we should all agree on the fact that mob violence is never acceptable. It's one of the reasons why I've found the rejection of my resolution two weeks ago, so incredibly disturbing. Well, as we wrap up here, what is your message to those who continue to a lot, and even try themselves to tear down these monuments. My message to those who still would like to tear down monuments and engage in mob violence is that we today live in the greatest civilization the world has ever known.
Starting point is 00:22:37 We live in a country that while imperfect because it consists of human beings, has done more to elevate the human condition, has brought more people out of poverty, has educated more people than any other civilization that I know much about. It's a country that, while imperfect, has a form of government that was put in place in the age of enlightenment
Starting point is 00:23:07 and based on principles that, while not universally consistently followed, are themselves inspiring. The idea upon which America is founded was and is good. Insofar as we can unite behind those principles and respect each other's decency and dignity and right to live and exist will be much better off. Peace is a much better path than violence.
Starting point is 00:23:38 Accept peace, and let's move forward. Well, Senator Lee, thank you so much for your joining us today on the Daily Signal podcast. It's been great to have you. Thank you very much. And that will do it for today's episode. Thanks for listening to the Daily Signal podcast. Please be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcast, Google Play, or Spotify. And please leave us a review or rating on Apple Podcasts and give us your feedback. Thanks again for listening and we'll be back with you all tomorrow. The Daily Signal podcast is brought to you by more than half a million members of the Heritage Foundation. It is
Starting point is 00:24:12 executive produced by Kate Trinko and Rachel Del Judas sound design by Lauren Evans Mark Geinney and John Pop. For more information, visit DailySignal.com.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.