The Daily Signal - Victor Davis Hanson: Experts Were Wrong. The Economy’s Strong—But the Fed Won’t Budge.

Starting point is 00:00:00 At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.

Starting point is 00:00:25 We'd love to talk. Business. If you look at the three or four main categories that adjudicate the health or the malady of an economy, they're pretty good. GDP came in at 3.0. That was not predicted to be that high. So inflation is still tolerable. So you have a good GDP, you have a good jobs report. Of course, we expect the left to discount it. Chuck Schumer said that these figures are all bogus, even though they're from non-administration sources, government bureaucracies. Bottom line, things are going very well.

Starting point is 00:00:59 All of the experts were wrong, and yet the experts do not admit they were wrong. They say we were wrong privately, but we're going to be proved right because either we hope or we expect the economy to do poorly. Hello, this is Victor Davis Hansen for the Daily Signal. I'd like to talk about the economy here at the beginning of August. We've just finished July. We have some of the July reports, but mostly they're still from June. If you look at the three or four main categories that adjudicate the health or the malady of an economy, they're pretty good. GDP came in at 3.0. That was not predicted to be that high. The inflation rate may have just come out for July, and there's different reports, but it's about 2.7. It was 2.6.

Starting point is 00:02:00 in May, January was 3.0. For the year, it's about 2.4. So inflation is still tolerable. It's not growing, an annualized rate at 2.4. So you have a good GDP, you have a good inflation rate. You have a good jobs report. We're about 4.1 unemployment in the month of June. We picked up 150,000 new jobs. That wasn't predicted. far as money coming into the Treasury and going out, we had a historical May. We'll wait and see what June and July are like, but we actually had more money coming into the Treasury than the government spent. Now, that was conditioned. But my point is I want to gauge the reaction to this good news. Of course, we expect the left to discount it. Chuck Schumer said that these figures are all bogus, even though they're from non-administration sources, government bureaucracies. We had a member of Congress come on and say that Donald Trump fudge them. On the GDP, we had the Wall Street Journal say, well, that's just momentarily because GDP is measured also by imports and exports,

Starting point is 00:03:14 and we had fewer imports and more export. But isn't that good? But they said that was there an aberration. So we've had people attack this. Most of the people said, well, as far as more money coming in and going out. That's only because of May. It will never be true again. Well, we've had Mays in 2004, 23, all the way back to 2017, the first year of the Trump administration. This was the only one in which we had more money coming in a surplus. Then we get to the question of Jerome Powell. He's the head of the Fed. Usually the Fed cuts rates when they're worried about political and economic instability, and that means basically a recession. Now, remember that the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, and our main media organs all told us in May when Donald

Starting point is 00:04:11 Trump was talking about art of the deal tariffs, I'm going to announce a high tariff, then negotiate down to 10 or 15%, which is pricely what he did. But nevertheless, they said at this time, at the beginning of August, they said midsummer, we were going to be. We were going to to have high inflation or stagflation, bad job growth, static GDP, and a trade war, along with a Wall Street collapse, basically, a recession. Well, Wall Street stock prices are at historical highs. Every one of those predictions was wrong. So if they were wrong and the economy is not booming but strong, why would Jerome Powell keep interest rates at that 4.5 Fed rate that translates into almost over six and near 7% 30-year mortgages.

Starting point is 00:05:05 After all, the Fed is supposed to lower rates when we have recession. So with all this recessionary talk, you thought that he would lower rates. Now he says he's looking at the economy, and he's not lowering rates because he doesn't, what, yet see a recession, but he's been told that he was worried about the economy. If he's worried about a trade war and tariffs and soft job growth, which was predicted but didn't happen, why don't you lower interest rates? And the fact is that if you look at the interest rates that he did cut right before the 2024 election and his all over the map attitude toward interest rates today, there is no logic. because if he's worried that the economy inflation might, it's gone up one-tenth of a point, and it's steaming, and then he's going to what, keep interest rates that high,

Starting point is 00:06:01 so now he's rejected the earlier prognosis that we were in a recession. It makes no sense. Why is this important? Why is this important when the Washington Post says that the numbers are rigged or were really not as strong as we think we are with GDP or Jerome Powell can't be consistent? and adjudicate rates going up or down based on recession or boom. We're paying $3 billion a day in interest a day. Our defense budget costs less that trillion-dollar defense budget than the interest payments per year.

Starting point is 00:06:37 Donald Trump is trying to cut taxes and deregulate and grow the economy without increasing the deficit he inherited at about $2 trillion, $1.9, $2 trillion. He thinks that eventually an expanded economy will bring in new revenue, sort of supply, slide economics, but in the short time, he does not want to grow that deficit by giving tax cuts. So what is he doing? He thinks the tariffs will bring in without hurting GDP here or abroad about a third of a trillion dollars. He thinks if he can decrease the interest rate by a point or a point and a half, he might get another. third of a trillion, maybe cut the interest costs by a billion a day down to two billion from three billion. And presto, you're already at two-thirds of a trillion dollars of a two trillion

Starting point is 00:07:30 dollar. So you're about one-third of the way to cut the deficit. That's pretty good when you had tax cuts. That won't happen if the interest rates stay high and the economy stays solid and doesn't give you any reason or worry over an inflationary spiral, which it hasn't so far. Bottom line, things are going very well. All of the experts were wrong, and yet the experts do not admit they were wrong. They say we were wrong privately, but we're going to be proved right because either we hope or we expect the economy to do poorly. My guess is even if the economy cools down and does poorly, Jerome Powell will not cut interest rates. He has a personal stake in this. He feels aggrieved. He feels he has to be vindicated and he's stubborn and he will not show the same flexibility he did

Starting point is 00:08:27 during the campaign year, 2004. Thank you very much. This is Victor Day. This Hansen for the Daily Signal. Thank you for tuning in to the Daily Signal. Please like, share, and subscribe to be notified for more content like this. You can also check out my own website at victorhansen.com and subscribe for exclusive features in addition.

The Daily Signal - Victor Davis Hanson: Experts Were Wrong. The Economy’s Strong—But the Fed Won’t Budge.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.