The Daily Signal - Victor Davis Hanson: Obama Killed the Truth to Frame Trump

Episode Date: July 24, 2025

Despite repeated media claims that “17 intelligence agencies” confirmed the collusion, these documents show that no such consensus ever existed. Victor Davis Hanson breaks down how this deliber...ate misinformation campaign damaged Trump’s 2016 campaign, his transition, and his presidency, while undermining U.S. credibility on the world stage on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “ There's news about the Tulsi Gabbard release of documents, alleging that Barack Obama and our top intelligence head had conspired to create a false narrative that Donald Trump was, essentially, a Russian asset. “ But the problem is that, as I'm speaking, there's going to be new information. And these other subordinate intelligence directors that work variously for Clapper or Brennan are going to come forward in saying, ‘We found nothing. Clapper knew it. Brennan knew it.’ And what will Clapper and Brennan say? That ‘we knew it, but we lied,’ or, ‘We knew it and they told us to—Obama told us to lie,’ or, ‘He lied. We lied.’ It's not going to be pretty.” 👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: https://www.youtube.com/dailysignal?sub_confirmation=1    👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@victordavishanson7273    👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: https://victorhanson.com  00:00 Explosive Allegations Against Obama Intel 00:26 Obama's Response to the Allegations 01:15 Impact on Trump's Campaign and Presidency 01:46 Nunes, Horowitz, and Durham 02:54 The December 9th Meeting: Key Players and Revelations 04:01 Obama's Reaction and the Fallout 05:44 Ongoing Developments and Future Implications Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.
Starting point is 00:00:25 We'd love to talk. Business. There's news about the Tulsi Gabbard release of documents alleging that Barack Obama and our top intelligence head had conspired to create a false narrative that Donald Trump was essentially a Russian asset. And there's new information coming out. Essentially, the new narrative says that despite all the references to 17 intelligence authorities that had confirmed a Trump-Pooten collusion, there was no such consensus. What's new is Barack Obama was confronted with this. And he's basically said, this is beneath the dignity of the president. This is nonsense. This is crazy.
Starting point is 00:01:05 I don't have to reply to any of this. But what will Clapper and Brennan say that we knew it, but we lied? Or we knew it, and Obama told us the lie. Hello, this is Victor Davis Hansen for the Daily Signal. There's news about the Tulsi Gabbard release of documents alleging that Burr Barack Obama and our top intelligence head had conspired to create a false narrative that Donald Trump was essentially a Russian asset, and that that effort not only had damaged his 2016 campaign, it had damaged his transition to the presidency and his presidency itself in the first
Starting point is 00:01:57 22 months of the Mueller investigation. And there's new information coming out all the time. Essentially, the new narrative says that despite all the references to 17 intelligence authorities that had confirmed a Trump-Pooten collusion, there was no such consensus. Now, we have had the Devin Nunes Intelligence, House Intelligence Committee report, majority report. We've had Michael Horowitz's Inspector General's report. we have had various congressional Senate and House committees report, and we've had the long John Durham special investigation. And while there's some disagreement that the Russians tried to do this or tried to interfere, and let's be candid,
Starting point is 00:02:45 the Chinese and the Russians always try to interfere, there was never any evidence that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump colluded to throw the election to Donald Trump. And what's new, as I said earlier, is that foreign intelligence tapped into the Russians, and they were baffled that they were being falsely accused. That might have had ramifications for our strategic relationship with Russia, not that they're not adversaries, but they're kind of confused that we were using the same type of skullduggery that they do. And that undermined the high moral ground vis-à-vis Ukraine and other flashpoints with the Russians.
Starting point is 00:03:24 But it all boils down to this December 9th meeting of 2016. Remember, Donald Trump had won the election. Barack Obama was going out. His intelligence heads and others at this meeting, John Brennan, CIA director, James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, and James Comey, FBI Director, surrounded by Susan Rice, National Security Advisor,
Starting point is 00:03:54 Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, etc. They reported to Barack Obama, who would be out of office in six weeks, and they said to him, here is the intelligence update. And the intelligence update was, contrary to media reports and contrary to Hillary Clinton, these 17 subordinate intelligence authorities had not found evidence, either in the campaign or during the transition that Donald Trump was colluding. And so that's what they reported. They said that Barack Obama, or they have leaked that, or the documents handwritten notes, suggests that Barack Obama did not accept that, but said, no, we don't want that assessment. We want an assessment that he did collude.
Starting point is 00:04:48 In other words, in Soviet Berea fashion, find me the crime, and I have the criminal to insert into that false narrative. And they also were reporting at various times that, as I said, foreign intelligence sources thought that the Russians had no reason to lie internally in their internal communications, and they were baffled. So what's new about it, what's new is Barack Obama was confronted with this. And he's basically said, this is beneath the dignity of the president. This is nonsense. This is crazy. I don't have to reply to any of this. Why didn't he just say the following?
Starting point is 00:05:30 I, Barack Obama, when I was president, in the last few weeks of my term, I had a regularly scheduled intelligence committee meeting. People came in of various branches, and they gave me an assessment. and it said that there was no evidence, as the media had alleged, and has the Steele dossier had alleged, and as James Comey, who was in the room, had earlier alleged when he contacted Christopher Steele, that there was any Russian collusion. And when I heard that, I was dumbfounded, so I just simply disagreed with him, and I said, well, this is important, go back and find other things. Instead, he just completely denies it. But the problem is that as I'm speaking, there's going to be new information.
Starting point is 00:06:19 And these other subordinate intelligence directors that work variously for Clapper or Brennan are going to come forward and saying, we found nothing. Clapper knew it. Brennan knew it. And what will Clapper and Brennan say that we knew it, but we lied? Or we knew it and they told us to, Obama told us the lie? Or he lied, we lied? It's not going to be pretty.
Starting point is 00:06:46 Will they ever go to court? No, I don't think that they will be indicted because the so-called administrative state takes care of its own. But this had a lot of ramifications. It undermined confidence in our elections. It tried to disrupt the campaign of Donald Trump. It tried to erode his transition,
Starting point is 00:07:09 and it tried to sabotage his presidency. And when we were dealing with Russia, our nuclear adversary, on Ukraine, we didn't get anywhere, in part because Donald Trump could not be a forceful, a force in opposition to Putin, because he was under constant allegations from Clapper and Brennan, now as MSNBC and CNN contributors, that he was a Russian asset, that he was a Russian puppet. So they kept advancing this false narrative even after they left office and it undermined the credibility of American president to conduct foreign policy with Putin. And I think Putin's concluded, these guys are just as bad as we are. They lie, they lie. I'm not going to negotiate with them. And the rest is history as is simplified by the Ukraine war. Very sordid incident.
Starting point is 00:08:07 Worse than water grate, worse than Iran-Contra, worse than Monica Lewinsky, a scandal whose dimensions we can't even imagine. But we're going to learn a lot more, but don't expect any of these people to face the justice that they deserve. This is Victor Davis-Hanson for The Daily Signal. Thank you for tuning in to the Daily Signal. Please like, share, and subscribe. to be notified for more content like this. You can also check out my own website at victorhansen.com and subscribe for exclusive features in addition.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.