The Daily Signal - Victor Davis Hanson: Signs of a ‘Total Systems Collapse’ Are Everywhere—Are You Paying Attention?
Episode Date: September 24, 2025There is no margin of error for the success of American society. On today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” Hanson explains the phenomenon known as a “total systems coll...apse,” in which a society metaphorically implodes when it casts aside values like common sense and meritocracy and replaces them with diversity, equity, and inclusion as the base for society. “ We are a very sophisticated society. We require meritocracy, empiricism, credentials. And we have very sophisticated transportation, education, health care, etc., etc. And if we don't follow the norms that gave us that prosperity, security, and freedom, then the system starts to break down. And we've seen the indices of that. “ We saw that same systems collapse with the tragic killing of Iryna Zarutska. And everything went wrong. First of all, why would you enter a light-rail car without having to have a ticket? This was an honor system. It encouraged people to abuse the system—to think that you really don't have to pay anything for a free ride. It said you couldn't have a concealed weapon, but what does that mean when you don't even have security to check people? You can't stop and frisk people, apparently, anymore. She came in there and there were four people around her, including the assailant. He killed her. But what kind of society is it where the four people adjacent, behind her just walk by her—watch the killer commit this horrific act of cutting her throat. And then after he leaves and he mutters, “Got the white girl,” then they don't do anything. They didn't do anything to stop it. They didn't do anything, just to walk a few feet over, a foot over, and try to help her in her death throes. What ideology is that that allows that to happen? 👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: https://www.youtube.com/dailysignal?sub_confirmation=1 👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@victordavishanson7273 👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: https://victorhanson.com The Daily Signal cannot continue to tell stories, like this one, without the support of our viewers: https://secured.dailysignal.com/ (0:00) Total Systems Collapse (2:14) Modern Indicators (2:47) Case Studies (5:43) The Role of Ideology (8:01) Conclusion Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At Desjardin, we speak business.
We speak equipment modernization.
We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets.
And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes.
Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do.
Business.
So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us.
And contact Desjardin today.
We'd love to talk, business.
When complex societies of sophistication and intricacy, bureaucracies become very vulnerable if some little quirk appears,
and the society no longer operates on empiricism, meritocracy, but it's governed by ideology or superstition.
In a sophisticated society like the United States, where we have complexities of travel and power,
and we have a diverse population from all over the world, if you don't have a margin of error.
And if we don't follow the norms that gave us that prosperity, security, and freedom, then the system starts to break down.
When you operate on anti-mericratic DEI orthodoxies and you have ideologies that overrule common sense and tradition, then you get something like a total systems collapse.
Hello, this is Victor Davis-Hanson for the Daily Signal.
I'd like to talk about a concept called systems collapse.
Anthropologists use it, historians use it.
It refers to complex societies that suddenly implode because the level of sophistication and intricacy, intricacy, bureaucracies, becomes such that it's very vulnerable if some little quirk appears and the society no longer operates on empiricism, meritocracy, but it's governed by ideology or superstition.
We usually look at systems collapse in terms of, oh, the Misenian Greeks, to take one example.
Very sophisticated, linear B tablets, palatial culture, and yet something went wrong in that concentrated structure of the palace and the entire society collapse.
We are a very sophisticated society.
We require meritocracy and puricism credentials.
and we have very sophisticated transportation, education,
healthcare, et cetera, et cetera.
And if we don't follow the norms,
it gave us that prosperity, security, and freedom,
then the system starts to break down.
And we've seen the indices of that.
The Pacific Palisites fire didn't have to happen.
It didn't have to destroy the entire beautiful
and ancient neighborhood of Palisades.
it didn't have to mean that they haven't even started rebuilding.
But when you operate on anti-mericratic DEI orthodoxies,
and you have ideologies that overrule common sense and tradition,
then you get something like a total system's collapse.
So the mayor knew it was fire season.
She knew that the Santa Ana winds were approaching.
She knew that the hills were dry, but she was in Ghana.
Why is Ghana important?
I guess it has some DEI connection to her.
We know that the hillsides need to be gleaned a brush and clean.
Green orthodoxy says you can't do that from global warming.
We know that the head of Los Angeles' power and water came from PG&E.
She was a DEI appointment, and the result was there were fire hydrants that didn't work,
and there was a reservoir critical to the survival of the palisades that had been empty for,
months. We know that the fire chief herself had her budget cut by Karen Bass the mayor,
but we also know that she kept haranguing people about DEI rather than prioritizing, at least
publicly, and then her communicates the need for preventing fire protection. I could go on
about the zoning, but what I'm getting at is when you have a sophisticated society
living in a fire prone area with a known two-century history of Santa Ana Wins in the late fall and early winter,
then nothing can go wrong. It's an unnatural habitat. And yet what happened? D.E.I and Green Orthodoxy
overruled traditions of trial and error empirical knowledge about how to treat fires, how to prevent them,
how to get water to parched areas, how to glean hillsides, why the mayor has to be there,
why the deputy mayor, he was under house arrest for phoning in a bomb threat,
why was he even a deputy mayor, someone of that caliber?
Finally, we saw that same systems collapse with a tragic killing of Iranian Zara Utka,
and everything went wrong.
First of all, why would you enter a light rail?
car without having to have a ticket. This was an honor system. It encouraged people to abuse the
system to think that you really don't have to pay anything for a free ride. It said you couldn't have
a concealed weapon, but what does that mean when you don't even have security to check people?
You can't stop and risk people apparently anymore. She came in there and there were four people
around her, including the assailant. He killed her. But what kind of society is it where the
four people adjacent behind her just walk by her as he's watched the killer commit this horrific act
of cutting her throat.
And then after he leaves and he mutters, got the white girl, then they don't do anything.
They didn't do anything to stop it.
They didn't do anything just to walk a few feet over or a foot over and try to help her
in her death throats.
What ideology is that that allows that to happen?
Why would Van Jones say that this has nothing to do with race when 80% of the people around the killer were African American as he was, but he selected the one person who was white and the people around didn't do anything to help her?
Why did the mayor, why did the mayor almost Vi Liles almost immediately say, arresting our way out of this won't work?
We can't demonize the homeless.
We can't show this video.
Why didn't she say instead, as we know from the history?
of criminal justice. We've got to find this perpetrator immediately. We've got to make sure that
he faces stiff sentences. We can't let people who are 14-time felons out. This was a mistake,
and I promise that won't happen. Why didn't she do it? She didn't do it because she knew that
message would not appeal to the constituencies that had elected her because it was a total
systems collapse. And finally, Teresa Stokes, the magistrate, why did she live?
let Carlos Brown the killer out. He had 14 felonies. He had just committed a felony. Why did she let him
out? And the answer is the systems collapse. Why would you have Teresa Stokes, who had never passed
the North Carolina Bar as a magistrate? She really had no credentials in that sense as a legal expert.
More disturbingly, she co-owned an alternate treatment center. So when she was sentencing,
seen felons, convicted felons, or felons that were up for trial, she was in some cases,
what, directing them to a center in which she had a profit motive? Why did all this happen? Why did
the media suppress it, suffocate it? Because it disturbed the narrative. The narrative was that
there is no such thing as inordinate black crime, and to talk about it violates the canons of
un-empirical or non-empirical critical race theory, critical legal theory, the new anti-racism
of Professor Kendi.
And the result is that no one wanted to cover the story, even though had the roles we've been
reversed racially, it would have been a George Floyd moment.
What am I getting at?
I'm getting at that in a sophisticated society like the United States, where we have
complexities of travel and power and construction.
and safety, and we have a diverse population from all over the world, and we have 55 million people who were not born in the United States residing here.
You don't have a margin of error.
And the only way you can succeed in the way that prior generations have is to insist on common sense, knowledge of what worked in the past, and meritocracy, and empiricism.
But if you throw all that away and you go the superstitious route and adopt diversity, equity, inclusion
mandates in place of meritocracy, or you say that those hillsides are ready to go up in flames,
but I can't do anything about them because Green Orthodoxy says it would be contrary to nature,
then you're going to have a system's collapse.
And we saw that in both cases.
Thank you very much.
This is Victor Davis-Hanson for the Daily Signal.
Thank you for tuning in to the Daily Signal.
Please like, share, and subscribe to be notified for more content like this.
You can also check out my own website at victorhansen.com
and subscribe for exclusive features in addition.
