The Daily Signal - Victor Davis Hanson: The Trump Deranged “Experts” Were Wrong. Again.

Episode Date: July 1, 2025

Since his second inauguration, the “experts” have been relentless in their mission to minimize the Trump administration’s efforts with the economy, immigration, Iran, and beyond.   Meanwhile, the stock market has soared. There were ZERO illegal border crossings in May, according to CBP. Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was left severely damaged without the threat of war on the horizon. All this, thanks to the decisive and, at times controversial, actions taken by the Trump administration.   Despite these verifiable results, Victor Davis Hanson argues that much of the elite resistance to Trump stems not from data, but from disdain. And that bias has blinded them to basic common sense. He breaks it down on this episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.”   “Donald Trump is pretty commonsensical. If you take a million people away that were working in the shadows at cheaper wages and hurting American job opportunities and you make countries that had asymmetrical tariffs and were responsible for a $1.1 trillion trade deficit and you can stop that and they still want entry into the American market, then you can have an economic renaissance.   “You should try to shed your Trump Derangement Syndrome because it's really affecting your powers of judgment and analysis. And you're going to lose readers. You are so wedded to the idea that Donald Trump is going to destroy the United States because of your personal animus, you cannot see that most people have commonsense solutions.”   👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: https://youtube.com/dailysignal?sub_confirmation=1    👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/victordavishanson7273    👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: https://victorhanson.com    00:00 Questioning the Experts 00:29 Criticism of Trump: Reality vs. Perception 01:30 Iran Strikes: Media vs. Reality 04:02 Border Control: Trump's Approach 05:26 Tariffs and Economic Outcomes 06:34 Reflecting on the Experts' Accuracy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.

We'd love to talk. Business. I want to talk about our so-called experts. Recently, they made a series of statements that are absolutely confounded by reality. Let's take Iran. We get all of these stories that the United States strikes may not have done very much. David Albright, one of the most prestigious analyst of nuclear proliferation, he said there was serious damage.

We were told the tariffs, they were going to crash the stock market. Here we are in June, and the stock market is at a record high. No recession, no inflation. what am I getting at? Most of the criticism of Donald Trump was not based on reality. These so-called economic gurus, you are so wedded to the idea that Donald Trump is going to destroy the United States because of your personal animus. You should try to shed your Trump derangement syndrome because it's really affecting your powers of judgment and analysis. Hello, this is Victor Davis-Hanson for the Daily Signal. I want to talk about our so-called

experts. We know they've been wrong when they sign these collective letters, 51 intelligence authorities, as sure does Hunter's laptop was pretty much made up in Russia. But recently, in some of the marquee newspapers, sites, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, of course, the New York Times, they've made a series of statements by so-called experts that are absolutely confounded by reality. Let's take Iran. We get all of these stories that, that the combined Israel and the later United States strikes on the three key sites of uranium enrichment in Iran may not have done very much. We had a leak from the Pentagon, of course, that the media picked up, that there was marginal damage. Anybody who looked at the post-operational photographs could see that there was substantial damage.

And so we had David Albright, one of the most prestigious, an analyst of nuclear proliferation. He said there was serious damage. We had the head of the international AEC, Mr. Grossi, serious damage. We had Israel serious damage, Israel intelligence. And our intelligence agency said serious damage, except for this outlying one from the Pentagon that the left-wing media picked up. So there is serious damage. I don't know why the left especially tried to suggest there wasn't. Remember, this is very, very ironic and paradoxical.

The left told us before there was no need to strike Iran because they were months or years away from developing a bomb. There was no real existential danger now. As soon as we did hit, they said, oh my gosh, there might be uranium that could be quickly enriched. Think of that. they were hyping up the threat after this complete obliteration of many sites than they were before. The same thing, the same in exactitude is true of the reaction to the around war. People on the right, the Maga Base said there would be 30,000 people killed, could cause World War III.

We were told by the American and European left that we were going to mix up a caldwin of hate. We were in Iranian airspace for about 25 minutes. No Americans were killed, probably very few, if any, Iranians were killed. Immediately Donald Trump was able to enact a ceasefire when Iran retaliated and hit our base in gutter with some ballistic missiles. We had 22-year-old, 23-year-old skeleton crews manning those Patriot batteries. They'd knock them down. Trump did not reply. End of story. No World War III, no 30,000 killed, no endless wars. Then we get to the border and we were told that there's only one solution for the border and that was

comprehensive immigration reform. We heard that for years. In fact, all we needed was a new president to enforce existing laws. We were said, even Donald Trump, should he come in and get everything he wants. There's no way you can reduce 10. thousand people a day to zero. He did that. He did that. We were told that self-deportation was a myth. That was Mitt Romney's idea in the 2012 election. He kept saying, we can self-deport a lot of people. They will want to leave. But he had no plan how to do it. Donald Trump's ICE and Border Patrol and DOJ came up with a tripartite system. If you'd self-deport and you go back and you ever want to come back. You can legally. You can reapply. But if you're apprehended in the United States,

illegally, you can't come back, at least for 10 years. And we will give you $1,000 to go back. And we will pay your air ticket deep into your country. And you know what? Almost a million people have self-deported. And the immigration is now exclusively a problem of how to round up the people who came under Biden's administration, not to prevent new people. They're not coming because of these deterrents. Finally, the Wall Street Journal told us that the tariffs in March and April, they were going to crash the stock market. They were going to raise prices. We would have a hyperinflation. We were going to have a recession. We were going to lose jobs when coupled with deportation of a million people leaving and another three or four hundred thousand deported.

And yet here we are in June. And the stock market. is at a record high. The Japanese, the Chinese, their prices for their products, despite the tariffs that they are paying, are the same, if not lower. Job creation is good. What am I getting at? Donald Trump is pretty commonsensical. If you take a million people away that were working in the shadows at cheaper wages and hurting American job opportunities, and you make countries, that had asymmetrical tariffs and were responsible for a $1.1 trillion trade deficit, and you can stop that, and they still want entry into the American market, then you can have an economic renaissance.

So just to conclude on nuclear proliferation, wrong, on a forever war following the bombing of the uranium enrichment plants in Iran, wrong, wrong on the border. couldn't be defended, that you couldn't stop illegal immigration, you couldn't self-deport people. Wrong on tariffs, wrong on the so-called trade war, no recession, no inflation, no sudden loss of jobs. What is the analysis that binds all of us together? Whether it's the Wall Street Journal, as I said, or Bloomberg, or any of these so-called economic gurus who write on those pages, you should try to shed your Trump derangement syndrome because it's really affecting your powers of judgment and analysis, and you're going to lose readers.

You are so wedded to the idea that Donald Trump is going to destroy the United States because of your personal animus. You cannot see that most people have common sense solutions. Close the border. Tell people to leave who are here illegally. Tell countries not to put tariffs on our goods unless they want tariffs on theirs. and don't ever underestimate the U.S. Air Force when it flies into an undefended airspace. In short, most of the criticism of Donald Trump was not based on reality. Is this going to stop that fraudulent reporting? No, it's going to continue.

But we're going to be astute and awake for their inconsistencies. Thank you very much. It's Victor Davis-Hanson for the Daily Signal. Thank you for tuning in to the... daily signal. Please like, share, and subscribe to be notified for more content like this. You can also check out my own website at victorhansen.com and subscribe for exclusive features in addition.