The Daily - Learning to Live With the Coronavirus

Episode Date: March 13, 2020

Now that the coronavirus is a pandemic, with both infections and deaths surging in many places across the world, we return to a reporter who has covered the story from the start and ask him how best to navigate this new reality. Guest: Donald G. McNeil Jr., a science and health reporter for The New York Times. For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Background reading: The World Health Organization now describes the coronavirus as a pandemic, and the number of cases continues to rise worldwide. These basic steps can help you reduce your risk of getting sick or infecting others.The global pandemic is affecting many aspects of daily life. Here are the latest updates on school closures, social distancing measures and event cancellations.

Test, test, test. Okay, just got to Donald's. It's okay to lock my bike in? Yeah, sure. Do you want to bring it inside? You don't think it's exposed? Okay, hello. Hi! There. We just, rather than shaking hands, bumped elbows.

Yes, the W-H-O elbow bump. Okay. You want to sit down? Should I wash my hands? Yeah, you probably should. As much for your protection as for mine. It depends on what you put your hands on. And I wanted to ask you, we heard you yesterday sanitizing the studio. What do you do when you come home?

I wash my hands. I mean, I know the inside of my house is clean because the only people in here are my girlfriend and myself, and we're both still healthy. But people who live upstairs, and this is a two-apartment building, we have agreed that we will tell each other if any of us has a fever or a cough, and we keep some alcohol wipes in the front hall to wipe down the doorknob and the light switch and the surfaces we might both touch. So just to make sure that there's no possibility of us passing it back and forth to each other. I know it sounds kooky, but this is actually the way the disease gets transmitted.

You know, you don't have to be a crazy germaphobe. Or actually, at a time like this, it helps to be a crazy germaphobe just by instinct. And here, I'll wash my hands in front of you so that you know that my hands are clean. But the danger for somebody else is, of course, that they're coughing. But I'm not. I'm fine. I've never been in someone's home in these circumstances. Yes. From the New York Times, I'm Michael Barbaro.

This is The Daily. Today. I'm Michael Barbaro. This is The Daily. Today, now that the coronavirus has gone from an epidemic to a pandemic, and both infections and deaths from the disease are surging across the world and the United States, we return to Times science reporter Donald G. McNeil Jr., who has covered the story from the start to understand how to navigate this new reality. It's Friday, March 13th.

Hey, Donald. Hey, how are you? Good. Okay. Welcome back, and thank you for letting us into your home. I know we've been hearing a lot from you lately, so let us know if we're beginning to exhaust your generosity. Okay, so far, so good. So far, keyword. So, Donald, when we first started talking to you about the coronavirus about two weeks ago, you gave us an overview of what it was, where it was headed. Since then, a lot has changed. Given the evolution of the situation, Since then, a lot has changed. Given the evolution of the situation, we have questions now related to this new phase of the epidemic, now that it's very much in our lives.

I'm working from home. You're working from home. So let's start with questions about precautions for people who don't have the virus, which presumably is the vast majority of us at the moment, and how we can protect ourselves from getting the virus. What kind of activities should be avoided right now? You know, you have to be aware not only of people around you who are coughing, but you also have to be aware that every, basically every hard surface you touch might potentially have virus on it, unless you know it's been cleaned

since the last, you know, last person that you don't know was there might have been on it. Well, let me tick through a couple of what we imagine from conversations with everybody on the Daily Team at the Times to be the kinds of scenarios I think people want to better understand how to approach. So, bit of a lightning round here. Is it dangerous at this moment to keep going to work? I mean, look, some people are going to have to go to work. Doctors have to go to work. But it's not so much the danger, and the reason the government's asking people not to go to work is because it creates what they call social distancing. The less interactions there are between people, the less exchange of virus there is. If you slow down the virus, you change what is sometimes called R-naught. And if you get people

to be more distant from each other, the virus is transmitted less. Can you translate that phrase R-naught? Yeah, it's called the reproductive number of the virus. And it's, if I'm sick, how many people am I going to infect? And you never know the real R-naught or the real fatality rate or anything about a disease until it's completely gone through the world. So we're never going to know the real answers to these things for at least a year or two because they're going to be different in Africa than they are in New York. They're going to be different anywhere.

But if you create more distance between people so that I infect, hopefully no people, you've substantially slowed my part of transmitting the virus. And if you do that across the entire population, you really slow down the movement of that virus in the population. Because when a lot of people are infected and a lot of people have pneumonia, a lot of people all need to get to the hospital at the same time. A lot of those people need to get on oxygen or on ventilators,

and eventually you run out of ventilators. And then they're making the triage decisions that they're now making in Northern Italy, which is to say, okay, this is Donald McNeil, 66 years old, and I've got a choice between saving him or a 25-year-old mother of two. Goodbye, Mr. McNeil. I'm sorry, there isn't any time for your family to say goodbye to you because

we can't have visitors, but that's it. See you later, which is the right thing to do. That's the right decision for a doctor to make, but those are really tough decisions for doctors. Okay. Let me return to our lightning round that has not yet turned into a lightning round. Sorry. And I think based on some of what you just said, I'm intuiting where this may be headed, but take the bus or the subway at this moment. Is that wise? I don't think it's terribly wise.

I did it yesterday to get home. I ride the subway standing up with my face close to the vent. I have one glove on my hand, one gardening glove, and I use that if I have to hold onto a rail. The other hand I make sure never touches the surface, and I use that for my phone, or mostly I keep it in my pocket. And I won't get into a crowded car. I'll let the train go by. But if you don't have to take the subway? Oh, if you don't have to take the subway, don't. Staying on this theme, lots of people are curious about plane travel. I would avoid plane travel if I could help it. I have friends who were about to

fly to Kentucky to visit their son. And I said, you know what? Why don't you drive? You know where all the surfaces inside your car have been. You don't know where all the surfaces inside that plane or that airport have been. I know it's going to be 11 hours instead of two hours, where all the surfaces inside that plane or that airport have been. I know it's going to be 11 hours instead of two hours, but I'd say do it. And that's what they're doing. Okay. How about trips to familiar retail establishments, a grocery store, a restaurant? Well, you have to have food. So go to the grocery store and be super careful about the handle of the cart. And remember that every box you touch has been placed on that shelf by somebody who might've coughed into their hand. Now, restaurants, you know, I did eat in a

restaurant a couple of nights ago. We looked for one that was really pretty empty and we sat at the bar, which had just been wiped down. But as this pandemic progresses, I'll worry more and I'll probably avoid going to restaurants. Okay. The gym. Yeah. The gym. I go to a gym. I play squash, which means all I have to touch in common with the other player is the ball.

And I know my partner. I would be real reluctant to start grabbing a bunch of weights, not knowing who else had touched them, grabbing a bunch of handles on machines, not knowing who would touch them. I would be reluctant to play basketball with a dozen other guys because you can't have 10 guys handling the same ball. If one of them is spewing virus, if I was going to get on the ball and then everybody's got it on their hands. How about movies, concerts, things that might be open air, but where people are sitting quite close to each other? Open air is safer than enclosed. But even in open air venues, if you're sitting on a seat, the handles of the seat might have virus on them. The railings when

you walk down to your seat might have virus on them. The ticker taker might, as he takes your ticket and hands it back to you. I know it's paranoid sounding, but these are all the ways that virus can be transmitted in large gatherings. It's not just the coughing, it's the many surfaces and get touched. I mean, in general, I'm hearing you say that going out and interacting with other people poses risks. So I wonder if you can help us understand the calculations behind your thinking in these particular categories. Does it have to do with the lifespan of the virus? Does it have to do with recommendations around social distancing? Kind of what is the underlying logic? Yes, they're related to all these things,

but I think people get way too obsessive about numbers, about exactly how many hours or days does the virus live on a surface, exactly how many feet do you have to stand away from somebody else? I mean, you can't run around through life with a tape measure trying to figure out is three feet safe enough, is six feet safe enough?

But stay away from people who are coughing, stay away from people who look feverish. And if you have to communicate with somebody, keep your distance. That's what I'd say. Just sort of generally keep your distance. You've talked about social distancing. How do you socially distance yourself from your family, from your children, from your partner, your spouse, your boyfriend, your girlfriend? Does that really work? You can't. I mean, you know, my girlfriend and I still kiss each other. We just trust each other enough to believe we're not infected. It's impossible to socially distance yourself from your children.

They're going to come up and hug you. I mean, that's why the whole idea of home quarantine, home isolation, rather, is virtually impossible. Donald, there's a strong sense that very young people and people in their teens, 20s, early 30s are at a much lower risk level for the coronavirus. And I think that's been borne out, correct me if I'm wrong. So do all the recommendations that we keep hearing apply as stringently to the young? Yes, unless you're totally selfish.

I mean- What do you mean? Do you have a parent? Do you have a grandparent? Do you want to be the vector that carries that disease to them? Do you know anybody and love anybody, you know, who's older and might be frail? You know, you don't want to be your last memory of that person being that you gave them the virus that killed them. You'll kick yourself for the rest of your life if you did that. You gave them the virus, it killed them. You'll kick yourself for the rest of your life if you did that. And people who were hospitalized in China started at age 30 and went up to 70s and 80s.

Yes, on average, the outcomes are better. But if you want something to worry about, you might be the person who doesn't have a good outcome. You know, you're spreading a disease to your friends, your social circle. That's something you ought to feel guilty about. It's not something you ought to feel indifferent about. People have to take this seriously. We'll be right back. Okay, so we've been talking about precautions for people who don't have the virus and want to keep it that way. I want to turn now to what happens if you think you might have the virus. Based on your reporting and based on the publicly available information,

what are the first signs of illness that have been reported and that people therefore could be looking out for? All right. What the Chinese found in the large study of the first 45,000 cases is that it's not like a cold. It's fever is the number one sign, high fever, a dry cough. It's fever is the number one sign, high fever, a dry cough, and then after that, fatigue. Runny nose was only 4% of cases, and those people might have had flu or a cold at the same time. But there's something I wanted to say that was important. I described in our first interview that 80% of all cases were mild, and the other 20% were either severe or critical. Right. And that stuck in too many people's minds as if, oh, 80% of cases are practically nothing.

You don't even have it. Maybe it's asymptomatic. No, that's wrong. The Chinese study that was based on, everything was either mild or severe or critical. So mild included everything from barely any symptoms to pneumonia, but pneumonia not needing hospitalization or oxygen. Once you stepped over into needing oxygen, then you were severe.

Once you were an organ failure, you were critical. So if people think this is a mild disease, get over that idea. I'm sorry if I contributed to the spread of that idea. I should have been much more careful in describing the whole range of symptoms that came under the term mild. Right. In other words, mild doesn't necessarily mean mild. Nothing like what we mean by a mild cold. When is it recommended that no matter how mild or severe

the symptoms are, that a person be tested? Is there a threshold? I don't know if the authorities have set a threshold yet. I know what happens in pandemics is that ultimately you have to assume that a lot of people have the disease and that really when you reach the point where almost everybody

has it, you end up stopping even bothering to test them. You ultimately begin to assume that everybody has it because it's the most popular virus going around. And if you have no trouble breathing, if you've got a fever that you can handle at home, then stay home and take care of it. Although that's not the way the Chinese handle it. I mean, the Chinese said, if you think you have symptoms, and I hope we get to this point, the Chinese said, if you think you have symptoms, and I hope we get to this point, the Chinese said, if you think you have symptoms, if you think you're getting sick, get directed to a fever clinic where somebody who is in protective gear can see you and they will see you and sort out whether you have bacterial pneumonia or flu or whether you have coronavirus. And if you have coronavirus, you're going to go

into isolation with a lot of other people who have coronavirus. And if you have coronavirus, you're going to go into isolation with a lot of other people who have coronavirus. Even if you have a very mild case, you're going to go in with all the other mild cases because they know cases can crash. It's a pretty common phenomenon that people are going along okay with some breathing difficulty, and then in the second week, they crash. And their oxygen saturation drops, and they need oxygen. And in those cases, you know,

in the isolation centers in China, when you might be in a gymnasium with a thousand other people, when you crashed, they recognized it right there. There was no wait and they would move you to a hospital. And this is a bit of an ethics question, but let's say you get into a cab and you're on your way to get tested for the coronavirus or you hit your ride with a friend, should it be disclosed that you think you might have the virus? Should basically anyone you come in contact with be aware of your status? Yes, you're carrying a potentially lethal disease, so you've got to warn other people. There's no ethical question about this. You know, I mean, unfortunately, this has been the story of I don't know how many pandemics,

how many people have lied about having a sexually transmitted disease, especially in the five minutes right before they thought they were going to get lucky. And if they disclosed what they had, they were going to ruin the moment. Unfortunately, that's how a whole lot of sexual transmitted diseases, including HIV, get passed on. And it takes a lot of courage to be that ethical. And I hope during this epidemic, people will. And the test itself, it remains somewhat scarce, but to the degree you know it, can you describe the test? Is it a saliva swab? The point is to get a sample of where the virus is. So the different ways of getting that swab, typically for a while, they were doing nasopharyngeal swabs, which is basically pushing a Q-tip so far up your nose

that it feels like it's going into your brain. But I've seen swabs that looked like they were just taken from the back of the throat. And I know that there's sometimes when people are coughing hard, they try to get them to cough up sputum so they can test that. You want to get a sample that's got virus from where the cells are infected. So you're looking for, originally attaches deep in the lungs. So you're trying to get a sample from there. But once it moves up into your nose and throat,

maybe you can get a sample from there. And so it's very dangerous for the person who's trying to get the Q-tip in or the sputum sample out to be standing right in front of them that they do that. So they have to be really protected in order to do that safely. And how long do the results generally

seem to be taking for these tests? I was told that in China, when they had the on-the-spot labs and the fever clinics, they could give you an answer in as little as four hours. But that's kind of ideal. There were other seven hours,

other times they had to send it off to someplace overnight. Until were other seven hours, other times they had to send it off someplace overnight. Until recently, you know, we've been having to send every sample to Atlanta. So that's several days. Right, to the CDC. Yes, to the CDC. Right, which is the least efficient version of this, it would seem. It's the least efficient version, but for a while, it was the only accurate version. And a positive wasn't considered a positive until the CDC had confirmed it. You know, we've got, got, got to solve this testing problem. You know, we've got to have it so the tests are literally right there

because you've got to diagnose people and then isolate them so they don't go home and give the virus to the family and they don't go back to work and give the virus to their coworkers. And we are not at that phase just yet, are we? Right now, we're not even talking about that phase. I mean, that's how they did it in China. Right now, we're still talking about home isolation. And the WHO and the Chinese and the South Koreans would

say, that doesn't work. That's too dangerous. There's no way you can isolate at home without infecting your family. The final phase of questions, Donald, are what happens when a person has been diagnosed with the virus? You've told us that there really is no cure for the coronavirus. It's going to run its course. Are there useful over-the-counter medicines that would help somebody get through this virus? This is kind of crazy because I don't think it's safe to think of it as something you can happily stay home with and treat like, oh, I've got the flu.

You've got to be aware that there's the possibility of crashing and you've got to have a number you can call and the state should be aware that you're a patient and that you're in home quarantine and there should be somebody checking in on you each day or you should be checking in with somebody so that they say, you know, how high is your fever? How fast are you breathing? How long can a person expect to be sick once diagnosed?

Mild cases were typically resolved themselves in two weeks. People who were on ventilators and in severe situations were usually three to six weeks. It's a long time. Yeah, it's a long time. It's a long time for one of your ventilators to be in use. And most of the time, even the severe and the critical cases, most of the time they ended in good outcomes. But for some people, death took several weeks too. People didn't just immediately crash and die. It would be a somewhat slow process. Don, once you have this virus, does it confer immunity on getting the coronavirus again

in the next couple of weeks, next couple of years, forever? Nobody knows about forever. Virtually all doctors assume that having recovered from this confers immunity because that's the norm. When you recover from a disease, you normally have immunity at least for a while. Once a person recovers from the virus, is there permanent damage? Do we know? Some people who have gone into severe pneumonia or ARDS, ARDS, adult respiratory distress syndrome, yes, will have permanent damage. They'll live, but they'll have permanently damaged lungs.

That can definitely happen. And what do we know about how the virus long-term affects people who I think would be justifiably quite anxious at this moment, pregnant women? The small numbers of women that have been studied in China who were pregnant think would be justifiably quite anxious at this moment, pregnant women. The small numbers of women that have been studied in China who were pregnant during this relatively short time period, there was a study that came out just a couple of days ago, nine women all delivered healthy babies. Something like six of the women were delivered by cesarean, which doctors may have chosen to do just for the extra safety

of knowing that the baby wasn't going to be infected in the birth canal. But some of the babies were born naturally too, and all the babies were healthy. So that's reassuring. That's good news. It's a very small sample, but it's good news from what we know from the small sample. It's really different from some other diseases. So finally, Donald, we want to tackle a few questions that we've observed from friends, family, and from the internet that may be in the territory of rumor or half-baked theories, but that are gaining some currency. So basically kind of a true or false section here. First off, are there multiple strains of the coronavirus and are some more dangerous than others?

and are some more dangerous than others? No. There are slightly different variants of the coronavirus, really variances by a couple of nucleotides. There's no evidence that one is more infectious than the other or one is more lethal than the other. Not so far, anyway. Okay. Next, this is a seasonal virus, or one is more lethal than the other. Not so far anyway. Okay, next.

This is a seasonal virus and it will more or less be gone in a few months. That would be lovely, but we don't know that. This is a new virus. We've never seen it in summertime. So we don't know how it's going to behave in summertime. I mean, respiratory viruses like influenza tend to disappear in the summer. We don't know what this virus influenza tend to disappear in the summer.

We don't know what this virus is going to do in the summer. So it's not a good idea to make predictions. And that's just, you know, that's just wishful thinking on the part of people who say, oh, it's all going to disappear in the summertime. And the last of these true or false questions, Donald, are the media, we hear this a lot, blowing the scale of this out of proportion given the relatively small number of infections compared with the overall populations in any given country? Look, I ask myself this question every day because I'm the media in this case. Normally, I get to blame the other jackals of the press for blowing things out of proportion. But this time, it's on my shoulders. I'd like to think there's nothing to worry about.

I never worried about Ebola coming to New York. I never worried much about SARS spreading in New York. much about SARS spreading in New York. I worried in the beginning about H1N1 flu in 2009, but then as the mortality data got clearer, I stopped worrying. I knew we'd mostly get it, but I knew it'd be mostly not a problem. This one, same as I said two plus weeks ago, really flips me out. This one reminds me of 1918, a dangerous virus that transmits easily between people. Yes, 80% of the cases are mild, but as I described, mild is a term that the Chinese use describing all the way up to pneumonia. That's not mild. We don't know what the fatality rate is.

It got as high in some weeks in Wuhan as high as 5%. That was during the chaos period in Wuhan. We don't know what it is in Italy now. And we won't know until it's all over what the total fatality rate is going to be. I'd love to be told I was wrong, I was an alarmist, I should eat my hat, but we'll see. So far, I've been right about every scary thing I said about this disease. And I've been worried about it ever since I looked at the numbers about how fast the epidemic was doubling in China and how fast people are going to hospitals. And I sat down and wrote it out on a piece of paper about how fast this could double. And I came into work the next day and said, this is going to go pandemic. And originally, nobody believed me. And I had to call 12 different experts and count which ones believed me and which ones didn't believe me. And it came out basically eight to two to two. Eight thought it had the potential to go pandemic. Two thought it was overblown and two didn't want to comment, didn't want to take a guess.

Well, it sounds like you're saying so far,, we haven't blown it out of proportion, and you have been a relatively successful prognosticator of this virus. So that's why we're going to keep talking to you about it. And I want to tell you how much I appreciate you giving us your time and your wisdom. Thank you. Thank you for inviting me. Over the coming weeks, we'll be answering your questions about the coronavirus and how to navigate the pandemic. You can send us your questions by voicemail at 646-598-6012. Be sure to tell us your name and where you're calling from. We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today. Wall Street experienced its worst day since the crash of 1987

as investors responded to President Trump's plan to severely limit travel between Europe and the United States. And general confidence faded that Western economies will quickly recover from the pandemic. In Washington, the Senate canceled a scheduled week-long recess so it could negotiate a major economic relief package to address the financial fallout. Meanwhile, closures and cancellations cascaded across the country. The NCAA called off its annual basketball tournaments, following a decision by the NBA to suspend its operations.

Both the NHL and Major League Soccer said that they, too, would pause their seasons. In New York, all 41 Broadway theaters began shutting down on Thursday night under instructions from the state's governor and will not reopen until April 12th at the earliest, while New York restaurants and bars have been ordered to operate at 50% capacity.

And in California, Disneyland will close its doors until the end of the month, its first closure since the September 11 terror attacks in 2001. The Daily is made by Theo Balcom, Andy Mills, Lisa Tobin, Rachel Quester, Lindsay Garrison, Annie Brown, Claire Tennesketter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon-Johnson, Brad Fisher, Larissa Thank you. Kelly Prime, Julia Longoria, Sindhu Yanasambandhan, Jasmine Aguilera, MJ Davis-Lynn, Austin Mitchell, Sayer Kavado, Nina Patuk, Dan Powell, Dave Shaw, Sydney Harper, Daniel Guimet, Hans Butow, Robert Jimison, and Mike Benoit. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsberg of Wonderly.

Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Michaela Bouchard, Stella Tan, Lauren Jackson, Julia Simon, Mahima Chablani, and Nora Keller. That's it for The Daily. I'm Michael Barbaro.

See you on Monday.