The Dan Bongino Show - An Embarrassing Opening Night For the Democrats (Ep 1325)
Episode Date: August 18, 2020In this episode, I address the disastrous opening night of the Democratic National Convention, and the real story behind the ridiculous Michelle Obama speech. I also address predictions about what’s... next for the economy and the stock market in the coming months. Finally, I discuss AOC’s latest, economically-backward, suggestion. News Picks: Group of liberals meet in person to protest voting in person. The lockdowns are not working. The evidence is mounting. Some Arizona teachers have chosen to abandon the children. Teachers unions are falling out of favor with America as they abandon the children. Will Trump-Biden race reshape Minority voting? It was broken windows policing that saved New York City. Bill De Blasio has abandoned it. The Pentagon is investigating a drone incident near Air Force One.  Copyright Bongino Inc All Rights Reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
get ready to hear the truth about america on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host
dan bongino so the obamas are so excited about a joe biden presidency that there was a glaring
omission from michelle obama's widely lauded speech last night the media loved it but there
was a big omission the media of course it it was Michelle Obama. No matter what she said,
they would have loved it.
She could have read word for word
from a 1940s poetry book
and would have been like,
it's the greatest thing ever.
But did you notice Kamala Harris's name
didn't come up?
Why?
I'm going to get to that in the show today
because it just speaks to how
unexcited the Obamas are
about a Biden
presidency. I got that. I've got a video by AOC, which is peak AOC, but it's important because it
speaks to the Democrats' regress of politics. They want to go back to the horse and buggy.
I've also got the situation going on in California, which is really serious with their power grid,
but shows you again why socialist states or soon-to-be socialist states like California
can't handle anything.
Today's show brought to you by ExpressVPN.
Ladies and gentlemen, get a VPN today.
Protect your online data from those prying eyeballs.
Go to expressvpn.com slash Bongino.
Welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Producer Joe, how are you today
after that disastrous opening night
of the Democratic National Convention?
Well, I'm doing pretty well, you know, and glad you watch any of that, by the way.
Any of that mess?
Just very little bit of it.
I went to.
Yeah, yeah.
Me too. About as little as possible.
About as little so that I could comment on it responsibly for our show today.
And then I turned it right up.
What were we watching?
I think we were watching like Below Deck Med or something like that just to get out of it.
It was, so what were we watching?
No, no, the scam show, right?
There I did, the show about the scam.
Yeah, because it was that bit.
The show about the scam.
Nice.
But I just said that I watched the DNC.
Which show about scams?
I was an unintentional, horrible joke on my,
are we watching the show about the scams?
Yeah, you just said you're watching the DNC.
No, the other show, American Greed.
That show, same thing though.
All right, let's get right to it.
Today's show brought to you by our friends at Policy Genius.
With everything going on, a lot of people are asking,
hey, is it possible to buy life insurance at all?
The answer is, yeah.
It's still easy to shop for life insurance right now.
If you have loved ones, depending on your income, you easy to shop for life insurance right now. If you have loved ones,
depending on your income, you probably should shop for life insurance. Right now, you could
save $1,500 or more a year by using our friends at Policy Genius to compare life insurance policies.
When you're shopping for a policy that could last for decades or more, those savings really add up.
That's real money. Step one, head on over to policygenius.com. In minutes, you can work out
how much coverage you need, compare quotes from top insurers, and find your best price. Step one, head on over to policygenius.com. In minutes, you can work out how much coverage you need,
compare quotes from top insurers, and find your best price.
Step two, apply for the lowest price.
Step three, the Policy Genius team will handle all the paperwork and red tape.
Who's better than you?
Policy Genius works for you, not the insurance company.
So if you hit any speed bumps during the process,
they'll take care of everything.
They even have policies which allow eligible customers to skip the in-person medical exam and do it over the phone.
That kind of service is earned.
Policy Genius, a five-star rating across over 1,600 reviews on Trustpilot and Google.
So if you need life insurance, head to policygenius.com right now and get started.
They can save you $1,500 or more a year by comparing quotes on their marketplace,
on the marketplace.
Policygenius.com, policygenius.com.
When it comes to insurance, it's nice to get it right. Policygenius.com policygenius.com when it comes to insurance it's nice to get it right policygenius.com all right joe let's go by the way on a side note i may be getting my uh my my nose fixed soon because many of you've
noticed during the show i'm constantly like breathing funny i can't breathe anymore through
the left side of my nose at all i had it broken badly when I was boxing and trying to be like an MMA guy,
which wasn't really working out too well for me.
My brother broke it during a sparring session.
Bad.
Remember that, Paula?
Flattened the blood everywhere.
It was really gross.
So I can barely breathe.
So I'm hoping my doctor friend who watched the show can hook me up.
I'm telling you, I can barely sleep anymore either
because I can barely breathe through the left side of my nose so compressed i
had it fixed once and it didn't do any good just throwing it in all right so last night was the
opening night of the disastrous democratic national convention what a joke i mean what a total mess
this thing i'm sorry it was a disaster even partisan political commentators but who give
pretty sober analysis.
I don't want to say like non-passionate,
but guys like Guy Benson on Fox, who's a Republican,
but Guy doesn't get into like a lot of hysterics
and theatrics.
He's a pretty sober analyst.
I saw him on Fox and, was it Fox and Friends
or the news show this morning?
And he was like, listen, it was just kind of like a bus.
Like the energy's low.
And listen, to be fair, it's kind of hard to do a convention without a convention.
I mean, everything was done, looked like a big Zoom conference.
So it was bad, but there's a real benefit here to the Republicans going second.
And that's that they're going to be able to see this new convention,
it's like a Zoom convention, because there's no in-person
or relatively few in-person activities.
And they're going to be able to correct the mistakes.
The energy was low.
Obviously, I'm a partisan here, so I'm not even trying to be objective.
But if I was trying, it was just a bad performance.
The speeches were dull.
They were dopey.
You had total losers like John Kasich, fake Republican,
former governor of Ohio and congressman.
John Kasich, who was a— you're like, Republican, Dan?
It was the Democratic National Convention.
Kasich, who's a total loser, who is never, seriously,
he's one of the most unlike guys in Republican politics.
Kasich got blown out by Trump in the Republican primary
when he was running for president, never got over it.
So he decided to give some dopey speech last night about,
we're at a crossroads and joe very clever he was standing at a crossroad in a road when he
did it i'm not kidding i'm not even gonna show you speech was so stupid he was literally on
look look i'm at a crossroad wow look camera crossroad there's a genius the license bold decisive at a crossroad
so Kasich was given we're at a crossroads don't vote for Donald Trump but here was uh John Kasich
at the Republican National Convention um years ago talking about the guy he supposedly now loves
Joe Biden check this short one out this is. But Joe Biden told me that he was
a good golfer. And I played golf
with Joe Biden. I can tell you that's not
true, as well as all the other things
that he says.
Did the dipsy do?
Did the flip-a-rooski? You know the dipsy do
flip-a-rooski? Yeah.
180?
185, 20, 740,
980, whatever.
Kasich, this guy's a total fraud.
And what I don't get about this
is having a bunch of Republican swamp rats,
Meg Whitman, Christy Todd Whitman,
John Kasich, Susan Molinari,
a bunch of deep Republican swamp rats
who have been swimming in the Republican D.C.
swamp or local political swamp forever, speaking at the Democratic Convention against Donald
Trump.
Serious question, Joe.
How does this hurt Trump, who's constantly running as outside of the traditional two
party model?
He is.
He's run a largely populist campaign, which some some things I disagree with.
A lot i do
but he's running as i am not a subject of this two-party model that's failed you for decades
is he not is that not trump's theme is that right i'm not missing this right joe is a normal
everyday voter who you know i mean i know you's not a politician. Right, right. That's always been. So how does this?
I don't I really don't get how John Kasich thinks he's not making Trump's point.
Let's trot out a bunch of Republican swamp rats at the Democrat National Convention to speak out against Trump and endorse Biden.
We got him now.
Good one.
And let's trot out the guy.
Put him at a crossroad.
Joe, he's at a crossroad.
He's at an actual road that has a crossroad in it. Joe, cross again. Put him at a crossroad. Joe, he's at a crossroad. He's at an actual road that has a crossroad in it.
Joe, crossroad.
He's at a crossroad.
Put him at a crossroad because it's so clever.
It is.
And let's hope everybody forgets the video of John Kasich calling Joe Biden a big liar at the last committee.
Let's forget that.
All right, let's go to this one.
Such a clown show.
It really was.
I know.
I know. I a clown show. It really was. I know. I know.
I'm not objective.
I'm seriously like trying a little bit.
And it was so boring.
And I'm a political commentator.
I couldn't watch it.
And then Eva Longoria, the Hollywood crowd comes out.
Yeah, we're going to all vote Democrat.
It's so wonderful.
This is like 2016 all over again.
Don't visit any of the swing states.
Trot out the Hollywood crowd.
Bore people to death and call everybody a racist. That worked out very well for the Democrats in
2016. So here's Michelle Obama. I want you to listen to just a quick clip here because the
media loves it. Transformative, epic, otherworldly, godlike figure, small G, Michelle Obama. The
media is going crazy. speech the speech seriously was boring
it had a couple of high notes in it it was boring it was just boring there was nothing
epic about it but the media loves it because it's Michelle Obama
doing my due diligence here's a short clip I'm sorry to subject you to this but I want you to
know you're not going to hear any mention of Kamala Harris
in this short clip.
And you're not going to hear a mention of Kamala Harris
anywhere in Michelle Obama's speech
if you go back and listen to the whole thing.
I'm going to explain to you why in a minute.
Remember, they're so excited, Joe.
They're so excited about Biden.
Everyone, John Kasich.
Joe, he was at a crossroad, at a road,
at an actual crossroad.
Did you catch that?
So clever.
So, so what? That's way Did you catch that? So clever.
That's way above me, man. You guys are good.
Me too.
Me too.
We couldn't even, it was so brilliant.
It took me a minute to figure, it was so brilliant.
I didn't even get the symbol.
And I was like, wow, so symbolic.
So they're so excited, Kasich and Michelle Obama, about Biden that she did this.
Check this out.
You know, Joe, he is a profoundly decent man guided by faith.
He was a terrific vice president.
He knows what it takes to rescue an economy, beat back a pandemic and lead our country.
And he listens.
He will tell the truth
and trust science.
He will make smart plans
and manage a good team.
And he will govern as someone
who's lived a life
that the rest of us can recognize.
Whoa.
That was my own Motley.
What?
It was good. What? That that was almost sounded like mutley there
do you have mutley how does that mutley compare to my mother let's see where's my
i'm just checking it's pretty close pretty close that was pretty close
well no no no that was funny no no no that was. No, no, no. She hates Muttley, Paula. Paula hates Muttley. This is a big controversy on my show for years.
Many of you older listeners know Paula hates Muttley like there's no tomorrow.
That actually sounded like Muttley.
So let's break that 30-second clip down because I can't subject you to any more of the absurdities, okay?
The speech was really, it was boring, and I'm not going to lose my audience.
But just a couple things.
Joe's a man of faith. He is. I'm not going to lose my audience. But just a couple of things. Joe's a man of faith.
He is. I'm just curious. Listen, I'm a sinner like all of us are,
but a man of faith who supports what? Late term abortion? I'm just checking. I don't know where
that is in the Catholic Christian faith doctrine. He claims to be a man of faith. I'm just checking.
I don't remember that one in church last weekend.
Yeah, pretty sure that wasn't there.
So I think we can scrap the man of faith.
He is a man who will seek out a quick buck
for him and his family, though,
as you can tell by Hunter Biden's sweetheart deals
and other family members
who've gotten sweetheart deals in foreign countries,
many of whom are enemies of the United States.
He has faith, faith in the almighty dollar.
That Joe definitely has faith.
Now, faith in a higher being, a capital G God,
I'm not so sure about,
given that he doesn't really practice anything he preaches.
Second point she makes, which is on a hilarity scale,
a 9.72 out of 10.
Joe Biden knows how to rescue the economy.
He knows how to rescue his economy by getting his son's sweetheart deals in China,
sweetheart deals in Ukraine,
having prosecutors looking into the sweetheart deals fired.
He definitely knows how to rescue
his own personal economic situation,
how to rescue an economy.
Did Michelle Obama forget that her husband, in conjunction with the hapless Joe Biden,
were in charge when the worst recovery based on GDP growth, the standard metric for an
economy in American history, happened from a recession?
The worst recovery from a recession in American history was her husband and Joe Biden.
He knows how to rescue an economy, his own. He knows how to rescue an economy, his own.
Knows how to rescue an economy.
Where did she get that?
Who wrote that dopey line for her?
Even worse.
He knows how to respond to a pandemic.
You mean when they blew it on the Ebola crisis?
And during the H1N1 crisis,
when he was like yanked off the stage for giving a speech
where he told everybody not to get on planes and the Obama administration freaked out on him?
You mean that one? Or you mean the one where they depleted all the personal protective equipment
and never replaced it and handed Trump a bunch of empty coffers with no face masks to respond?
You mean that one? Of course, Michelle Obama knows the media is going to celebrate her speech.
She can lie about Biden all she wants because no the media is going to celebrate a speech so she can lie about
biden all she wants because no one's actually going to fact check her especially like you know
facebook and the other fact checkers finally he listens he listens he listens to and he tells the
truth he listens to that that's hilarious he tells the truth you mean this is the guy who plagiarized
neil kinnick's speech who told you he graduated at the top of his class despite being at the bottom of his class?
The guy who said what?
He had two degrees.
He did not have two degrees.
I'd play that media research center clip again, but we've burned it so many times.
I think it's losing its luster.
Joe Biden never tells the truth about anything.
Joe Biden now is incapable of telling the truth.
He doesn't remember what the truth is or what he said five minutes ago.
So we can't repeat what he said five minutes ago because he doesn't remember what the truth is or what he said five minutes ago so he can't repeat what he said five minutes ago because he doesn't remember
now before i move on the final portion of this why did she not mention kamala harris
it is joe biden's selection for the vice presidential uh candidate here on the
democratic ticket why not Why not mention her?
Kamala Harris is a friend of the Obama family.
Well, I'm hearing it happen because Michelle Obama taped this.
Taped the speech before Kamala Harris was selected.
So they love Uncle Joe.
Lunch bucket Joe.
Scranton kid.
The Scranton kid.
You know, like an old boxer name.
Maybe he's an MMA guy.
He's a big guard player in MMA. Just Scranton kid.
They love him so much
that they taped it
and didn't even bother to like recut
it after Kamala Harris
was picked.
Don't interrupt my yoga schedule.
Michelle Obama's like,
man,
listen,
hold on.
Let me check my schedule.
Let me go.
My calendar here.
Calendar app.
Yeah.
Pulling that up.
Let me see.
Do I have an open day?
No,
no,
no.
Let me scroll through.
No,
no.
Sorry guys.
I can fit you in on a Tuesday at between two 30 and two 45.
Send a camera crew to my house.
Hey,
we pick Kamala Harris.
Can you recut a line or two?
Maybe we're the same.
No,
no,
no.
I'm not even going to bother dude.
I don't want you to get into my busy coffee class schedule.
I got an appointment over there with my,
my friends at Starbucks.
This is how much they love the Scranton kid,
Joe,
the Scranton kid.
This is how much they love Joe Biden.
Who's honest and listens and is great on the economy and his captain pandemic response. That's how much they love Joe Biden, who's honest and listens and is great on the economy
and his captain pandemic response. That's how much they love him. They taped it weeks ago.
Loves Joe and he listens. Maybe you should have listened to Joe's team when they asked you to
recut it after Kamala Harris was selected as the vice president. I'm just throwing that out there. Small possibility.
Maybe you should have done that.
Man.
All right.
I want to get to this AOC thing.
I know.
I know.
I always get the feedback off AOC.
I get it.
I totally get it.
Many of you, I hit my calendar button.
It's fine.
I didn't realize I had a call today at four.
I'm going to remember that.
I forget.
I got to set alarms for myself.
By the middle of the day, I'm passed out.
But I'll always get emails when I do it.
Dan, don't highlight AOC.
No, folks, we have to.
Because you can't let this stuff ride under the current.
Oh, ignore her.
She'll go away.
They won't go away.
All four members of the squad just won their primaries.
They're not going away anytime soon.
The only way to fight back is to confront their really stupid ideas and use the Alinsky tactics against them, which is to humiliate
their really stupid ideas. It's important. I'll get to that in a second. Let me get to my second
sponsor. Got a cool new watch on today. You can see for my friends at Vincero. We love Vincero
watches here. Joe has one. They have great, great looking watches for women. Paula's got quite a few. I gave one to
my niece. It's her favorite watch, but I love Vincero. This is the Altitude with the blue face
and the black band. You'll see me wearing this one a lot too. You see, it's kind of, this one,
I beat up pretty good, but still going, still ticking, man. So this is the brown band with the
blue face, another one of my favorites, but this is my new one. They have a big sale going on right
now. You all know how I feel about Vincero watches,
the watches you see me wear every single day on the show.
Vincero watches are dedicated to the craft.
They put the time and effort into crafting timepieces you can love,
wear every day, and you're going to get tons of compliments on.
I get them all the time.
People always ask me,
what watches are you wearing during the show?
And I see them, it's a Vincero.
They're running a site-wide sale to celebrate their sixth anniversary,
the biggest sale of the year. Maybe the biggest sale in Vincero history. Up They're running a site-wide sale to celebrate their sixth anniversary, the biggest sale of the year.
Maybe the biggest sale in Vincero history.
Up to 30% off site-wide.
There's no code required.
Your discount will be automatically applied at checkout when you visit vincerowatches.com
slash Bongino.
Listen, this one, this Altitude watch screams manhood.
I'm sorry.
It does.
It just does.
I love this watch.
Everything on site's on sale.
No exclusions, including all four, or their new collections.
They're all available.
They're shipping orders directly from local U.S. distributors,
delivering all orders on time, no delays.
With Vincero, there's no brand name markup, no big time price tags.
Their promise to you is simple.
Solid, well-made, awesome looking, manliness and femaleness products
that you will enjoy wearing.
My wife loves hers.
She's got the woman like,
snakey band, she loves that.
Go shop their anniversary sale right now.
Vincero offers free shipping,
30-day returns,
guarantees your watch for two years.
This is why they have over 22,000 five-star reviews.
You won't find a better made watch anywhere.
These timepieces you'll enjoy wearing every day.
If you don't, Vincero will make it right.
That's their promise.
If you don't love it,
they'll make it right by you.
Go shop Vincero's biggest sale of the year. Go to Vincero,
V-I-N-C-E-R-O, watches.com slash Dan, excuse me, slash Bongino, Vincero watches.com slash
Bongino, Vincero watches.com slash Bongino. Do not pay full price on these beautiful time pieces.
Take advantage of this opportunity. Get one of them today. Check this one out,
the altitude with the blue face. It's a cool one. Vincero watches.com slash Bongino. them today. Check this one out. The L2 with the blue face is a cool one. VinceroWatches.com slash Bongino. Go today. So AOC is back. She's back.
I'm not going to use any analogies here because they'd be awful and I wind up
just getting myself in trouble, but she is back. She put out a video, I don't know,
on one of her social media accounts. I don't even know which one it was, but someone sent it to me.
And AOC has another idea.
Remember, she's got an economics degree.
Not really sure how that happened, but whatever.
So here's AOC.
She has an idea, Joe, on how to save the post office.
I guess she used her economics degree for this one.
You know, economics economics about using scarce resources
efficiently,
getting society to move
and allocate scarce resources
efficiently.
The whole idea
behind economics,
how do we make
more medicine,
more medicine better?
How do we make
vehicles more efficient?
Yeah, serious stuff.
Better price.
You know, that kind of thing.
You cannot be.
But here's her idea
about how to save the post.
This is just classic.
I got some other ideas after this one to propose to AOC too,
after this genius idea.
Check this out.
Hello, everyone.
I have been thinking about ways to help you help the post office.
And I think I've got an idea.
And I'm interested in hearing your thoughts.
So one of the best ways to support the post office is to buy stamps. What do you all think? Would you guys be down and
excited if I set up a national progressive pen pal program, do all the work of connecting you
to somebody else? We would offer maybe some conversation prompts
or postcard prompts,
and even like a printable postcard format.
You just send it out.
Would you guys be down?
Do you like that idea?
Would you guys be down?
I love this, by the way.
Would you be down?
Like, let me show you, man.
I'm still cool.
Were you down?
You down with the pro?
You down?
So, yes, A who has an economics degree she wants you to start writing letters again i i know i know i know i know i'm
sorry i get it i get it i know i know some of you are like get me that neuroprotective brain supplement because
I got 10 IQ points dumber just listening to that folks there's a reason we don't
write letters anymore to people largely using stamps because Joe wait for, wait for it. Wait for it. Calm your nerves.
Sit back.
Wait for it.
We have a new technology.
Stand by.
Stand easy.
Do not get excited.
You may not have heard of this, Joe.
Yeah.
It's called email.
Email?
Oh, my gosh.
I almost forgot about that. Yeah.
That thing once in a while in the morning
I send clips on you on?
Is that what that is?
I can't do the show.
I can't take this anymore.
Just to be clear, AOC, who
supposedly has a degree in economics,
where we're supposed to be looking for efficiencies,
how to decrease inputs
and increase outputs.
You know, that kind of thing they teach you in economics.
She wants to turn back time.
So she wants you to pay.
I had to take some notes on this because I want to be sure.
I'm sorry.
I'm legit crying.
I'm legit crying right now.
Oh, I got to take a second here.
Really?
I was surprised I go to my computer because I need to take a second here. Really? As long as I go to my computer,
because I need to take a second to gather my thoughts here.
So just to be clear what she wants,
she wants you, the pen pal-ers,
to go out and write letters to each other.
She wants you to pay for communications
that are now free.
Model of efficiency, Joe.
So you can communicate for email,
email, computer, phone,
tablet, iPad thingy.
The way Joe and I and Paula and Drew
produced the show,
electronic communication.
She wants you to pay to communicate with your pen power socialist friends
using a technology from 20 years ago,
a pen and a paper and a stamp that you can do for free now.
It should generate trillions.
Yeah.
Yes, dude. It's hilarious she wants you to waste your money it gets worse to pay for something
that is currently free sounds like a model of economic efficiency to me please turn in your
degree stat secondly so let me underline first pay, pay. Pay for something that's free.
She's a real genius, this one.
Secondly, here, let me underline this one.
She wants you to wait for a service that's now instantaneous.
Email, send, instantly.
She wants you to wait weeks to hear back from someone you could hear back from in seconds
via the snail mail system that nobody uses anymore because they don't want to wait
i've got an idea i've got an idea aoc this is just i do have other ideas but this this idea
just came out of the blue right now on the show extemporaneous thought i've got an idea
aoc lead the way on this because you're a brilliant economist of course i want you your next campaign
to lead from the front and run it exclusively by snail mail.
I want that.
The AOC pledge.
I pledge to run my campaign exclusively by snail mail.
Of course she won't do it because it would be idiotic.
Because she would be spending money on input she doesn't need to spend money on, on an output mail that has a wait time she doesn't need to wait for because she could have used email
for free. Finally, so pay for something you don't have to, wait for something you don't have to,
and waste your time using equipment that you don't need to use, i.e. a pen. Do we have any envelopes? No, no envelopes here.
I do have stamps though. Stamps, a pen, envelopes, and licky, licky envelope. Lick the envelope.
That's what my mother-in-law always says to the dogs. The dogs come over. They always lick my
feet. Licky, licky. They're always licking my feet. Stop licking my feet, dogs. I love the
dogs, but stop licking. It's gross. The dogs don't even care. You got to lick the envelopes.
It's gross.
Don't lick the envelopes.
Use a sponge.
You don't have to do that.
Just use the email.
The email, the computer.
Send.
Email address.
AOC at AOC whatever dot something.
It's not hard.
The National Pen Pal Program.
So I've had some other ideas.
So considering that wasting money is not a big deal to her,
she should pay for something that's free,
waiting for a product you can get instantaneously,
she loves that too,
and wasting time using outdated equipment
in the AOC school of economics.
Doesn't matter.
I got some other ideas,
Joe.
What do you think?
Let me run these by him.
So Paul,
I want,
I need your input on this too.
It's important.
We got to get her.
One of these days we will get her.
Might be a lot of requests for Paul on the microphone.
I know it's her.
She don't want to do it.
Don't want to do it.
She really does exist though.
Had some interesting suggestions,
by the way,
about yesterday's show.
I'm going to have to leave out because it's family-friendly after yesterday's show.
If you missed it, it was a gem on YouTube.
Idea number one, Joe.
I think we should ask U.S. Postal Service mailmen to workers to go around and basically destroy mailboxes as they deliver mail.
Because it would do a great thing it would get mailbox production companies to produce more mailboxes which would hire more mailbox people which would save the entire snail mail industry
just terrific right what an idea i like it what an idea yeah destroy break the flags off whatever
too much down like put firecrackers they want to be and be dangerous you know break the flag or
maybe put a dent in it take a little gavel, hammer the mailbox a
little bit so people don't like it and the HOA gets involved. You all got dents in your mailbox.
Buy a new mailbox. The mailbox industry would explode. It's a great idea. It uses AOC rules.
Pay for a new mailbox you don't need. Wait for a new mailbox you didn't need because it wasn't
broken and waste a bunch of money on assets, new mailbox, new mailboxes that didn't need to be wasted and it could have been put to more efficient use, but it
doesn't violate any of AOC's new rules of economics.
That's a great one.
I like that one.
Here's another one.
We should start a, you know, she wants a national pen pal program.
We need a national equestrian program.
Why would we national?
We need to train kids how to ride horses.
We can scrap the cars.
We can save a bunch of gas.
Keep the fossil fuels.
We don't ride horses around.
Wild, wild horses.
We can all be on horses to school.
We had a little hay, the little like things around their butts.
So when they, you know, when they do their thing in the school parking lot,
you can saddle on up and they don't have to drop their stuff all over the place.
Horses.
This is super efficient, man.
It basically scribes in stone and sanctifies AOC's three rules of economics.
Pay for something.
You don't need a new horse.
Wait for a service, right?
Transportation service.
It's going to take you a lot longer.
You'll have to wait a lot longer to get to school because a horse doesn't go as fast
as the car and waste a lot of time using old equipment.
Horses that you didn't need to use.
You could have been in your car.
AOC rules of economic one, two, three meets them all.
Let's wreck the mailboxes.
Let's get a national horse riding equestrian program.
One more.
This is a great one.
We can ask the kids to train carrier pigeons.
Who the hell needs snail mail, folks?
Why waste your time on that?
Joe, we can get it even slower.
We can do it even slower.
Slower than that.
How do we do that?
Snail mail, that's way too fast.
If we use carrier pigeon, we can double the time to get the communication.
That's AOC's rule number two.
Wait really long for a service that's now instantaneous.
We can wait even longer.
Carrier pigeon, put the little message on there.
You know, the little feet you get, you send it over.
Go.
And it's fun.
Come on.
Mike Tyson loved pigeons, right?
We can waste time using equipment we don't need.
We can waste time using pigeons we never used before,
training the pigeons and everything.
This is great.
And we can pay for something that used to be instantaneous.
We can pay for the privilege of buying a bunch of pigeons
and pigeon tracers.
Those are just my three ideas that subscribe to AOC's three rules.
And we'll add the fourth, which is she should commit
to leading from the front and running her next campaign exclusively by carrier pigeon. It's only fair.
Now, I was listening to Fox yesterday on my phone, sometimes when I work out afterwards.
By the way, I was working out yesterday and I got back into grappling this week. It's been a few months because of the Rona.
So one of my buddies came down.
I got a mat in my house, like a full zebra mat.
And man, did I get my caboose kicked.
It was bad.
My grappling skills have diminished dramatically, folks.
I took three months off and at 45,
I'm going to say to you, this guy's really good,
but that's not an excuse.
He's been a black belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu since 2008.
So this guy's forgotten more stuff about jiu-jitsu
than I even know.
But oh, did he wipe the floor with me bad.
So I woke up yesterday.
Some of you may have known.
I was like this.
Paula had a, you know, the tin man with the squeaker and the oil.
Paula had to do the tin man routine.
A little squeaker.
I was like, oh, I took a beating.
But when I work out in my mat room in the gym down there, I was listening to Fox.
I heard Marie Harf on Fox.
And she was touting this.
She happens to be a liberal, pretty far left liberal.
And this thing about, you thing about the post office hoax
that Trump is slowing down the mail
to mess with the election
that we addressed yesterday for 20 minutes
and totally dismantled in a segment
we got a lot of good feedback on.
She knowingly or unknowingly
released the Democrats' new talking point.
What is the Democrats' new talking point
in the postal service?
Because the hoax, the postal service hoax, that the hoax Trump is slowing down the it's so idiotic and every American's like wait wait liberals you just figured out now that the
post office is inefficient if you just figured out yesterday the post office is losing money
and is inefficient then you might be a liberal or you might be a media moron I'm just saying
because everyone else in America,
like literally everyone else in America knew that other than you,
not even figuratively.
Like everyone got that but you.
So if you just figured that out yesterday,
you may be a liberal or a media moron.
So they need a new talking point because the new PP hoax,
the post office hoax, which is the equivalent of the PP dossier,
was going
nowhere and falling on its face and people were laughing at them yeah the post office gonna mess
up the election some of the states are doing that all on their own right so marie said here's their
new talking point she said well the post office has been losing money you know basically it's
been inefficient and all but it's a service it's a service so
for the american people oh oh okay just so we're clear so the new talking point joe is if it's a
service efficiency doesn't matter at all you know a service like providing food and stuff we don't
and by the way the post office is an independent agency just to be crystal clear so even that
doesn't work but their new line of attack is the government should do it.
Even if it's some quasi independent agency like the post office, the government should do it because it's a service.
Well, Joe, that begs common sense questions like, well, isn't providing food a service as well?
I'm just saying, I mean, why doesn't the government take over all the farms too and lose money there?
Well, why?
Because we actually want people to eat.
And when the government takes over the food supply, you get the great famine like you had with Mao Zedong.
You get mass starvation like you had in the Soviet Union or you have in North Korea today where they are literally taking people's dogs to eat them.
Not kidding.
Google the story yourself.
North Korea dogs.
It's really gross and really disgusting and very tragic.
Not a joke.
They are eating people's dogs in North Korea.
That's what happens when you declare something a service and you allow the government
to take it over. So Marie was unintentionally making free market libertarian and conservative
folks points, not hers. That yes, it's a service and of course it loses money because the government
does it. Thanks Marie, you made our point, not yours. That's their new talking, shockingly,
that's their new talking point. No, point no no no it's a service that
loses money only because the government does it excellent excellent point paula does that not make
sense come on asking her about the marie question for a reason it's a service so is restaurant management
we don't have the government
managing restaurant
oh we do
they put them out of business
in New York
that's right with the Rona
now showing you how dumb
this whole postal service thing
is from AOC's backwards economics
to save it
to Marie's point that,
oh, it's a service the government runs.
So it's A-OK that they lose a bunch of money.
Hat tip, my friend Eddie Zipperer on Twitter
who listens to the show a lot.
I found this clip on his Twitter feed here.
This is Obama back in the day
when he was pretending to be a serious person
before he was into the whole weaponizing government,
spying on his political opponents thing.
Remember that show?
Um,
that was just before that he was pretending to be a serious person.
Here's Obama counteracting Marie's point that,
Oh,
don't worry.
It's a service.
So the government should do it because they'll run it so much better.
Ah,
really?
Check them out.
If you think about it,
UPS and
FedEx are doing just fine.
Right?
No, they are.
It's the post office that's always having problems.
Huh?
I don't know.
There is Obama himself.
Well, again, when he was still a serious
or trying to be a serious person.
Is the post office always having problems?
Yeah, yeah, because the government is involved.
It's an independent agency in name only.
They want a government bailout.
UPS, FedEx are doing fine.
They figured out an efficient way to pay less
with a less of a weight to deliver your package while not wasting
capital. They violated AOC's three rules of economics, pay more, wait longer, and waste a
lot of stuff. FedEx and UPS have violated all of Economist AOC's rules. They pay less for less weight and less waste. All right. Here's what's coming up.
I got a bunch more. I'm going to get to my third sponsor, but California. There's a serious
problem in California with these rolling blackouts. California is becoming a Venezuelan-like power
grid. I've got that story. It's important you understand why this happened. And I'm reading it.
I'm going through the story after this.
So you understand like it's people like AOC and their backwards economics that are causing
your blackouts in California right now.
That's 100% the reason.
Just get that.
I've got that.
And I've also got an interesting story about these lockdowns and how the evidence is now
mounting that these things were a total epic disaster.
All right.
Our third sponsor today are friends at Job Creators Network.
Folks, this is important.
They're a new sponsor.
So please, if you wouldn't mind, give me just a minute of your attention on this.
It's super important.
I'm getting this question in email a lot.
A lot.
Like 100, 200, 300 times a day between all my platforms.
Dan, we got to save the country in November.
What do we do?
In various forms, that question comes in all the time. Joe and I got it at the country in November. What do we do? In various forms,
that question comes in all the time. Joe and I got it at the gym. We went up there, a bunch of
people. What do we do? Like you, I know America itself is on the ballot in this election. Our
freedoms, our free enterprise system, our way of life. The 2020 election is about turnout. You
don't vote, it doesn't matter. You don't vote, you don't show up, we're going to lose.
Our opponents have to get out their own,
they have their get out the vote machine.
It's time for a massive get out the vote effort
of our own sponsored by my friends
at Job Creators Network.
Here's how it works.
Go to 10for20.com and take the 10 for 20 pledge.
You'll receive a link and it'll give you
the most trusted voting information
and tools you can use
to become part of the largest
conservative get out the vote effort
ever.
You'll be asked to send
the link and message
to 10 people you know
who care about America.
It's important.
You say, oh, I don't want to do it.
I don't get involved in politics.
Huge mistake.
You want to lose your country?
It's time we got to do something.
It's time to step up.
Send it to your family,
your neighbors, church and work friends. It's simple, it's easy, and it's the difference
between a win in 2020 and a loss. To join this army for freedom and save our country,
go to 10for20.com and take the pledge to drive 10 people to the polls in November.
How long I've been talking about this, by the way? 10 years? I called it 10, 10, 10. Now we get a website, 10for20.com. Don't let our opponents
outwork us. Do your part. Go to 10for20.com. That's the number 10. Let me just read it straight
through. So it's one, zero, the number 10, F-O-R-4, and the number 20, 20.com. 10420.com.
10for20.com.
Go today.
Turn out, turn out, turn out.
Don't let us lose this election.
Okay, I spent a little bit of time on that AOC stuff,
but it's important and it segues nicely
into my next story at the Wall Street Journal.
Folks, I really feel bad for you in California. And it segues nicely into my next story at the Wall Street Journal.
Folks, I really feel bad for you in California.
I do.
I traveled quite a bit to Los Angeles in that area.
I like it.
There's a lot of good people.
There's a shocking number of conservatives, by the way, in Los Angeles, even in areas like Beverly Hills.
Believe me, the only reason I don't talk about it more, and I'm being absolutely candid with you, and I don't mention names, is because, and you know
who you are, people who've approached me when I'm in California or like Beverly Hills and like the
foo-foo areas, Dan, we love your show, whatever. I don't even mention them on my show. And a lot
of them are pretty prominent people because I don't want them to get boycotted. I'm not even
kidding. Right, Paula? Remember that story? The restaurant? You know who you are. Poor guy. I'll leave it at that. They'll probably burn
his restaurant down otherwise. I feel bad for the people in California. You're really being
screwed over. Did you know in California, they're doing rolling blackouts? You're like, Dan,
that's a story about Venezuela and North Korea. No, it's a story about California. It's a real story. Wall Street Journal, not kidding.
They can't even keep the power on in new socialist California. Wall Street Journal
opinion from the other day, August 16th, California's blackout warning. Anti-fossil
fuel mandates are leading to electricity shortages. Folks, this is not a story about a Krogana,
Folks, this is not a story about Accra, Ghana,
Djibouti, Venezuela, or North Korea.
This is a story about California.
Do you find it mildly ironic, just a little bit,
mildly ironic that California,
home to basically every high-tech company on planet Earth or in the cosmos,
high-tech technology, can't even keep the damn lights on.
Do you find that even mildly ironic?
You shouldn't if you understand that California is run currently by socialists
who subscribe to the AOC three rules of economics,
pay more for things that are free,
wait longer for things that are instantaneous,
and waste a bunch of time on things you don't have to waste any time on.
If you subscribe to those three rules like the Californians do, that's how you get North Korea
like electricity production. So what's really happening in California? Let's go to screenshot
number one from the piece. They're practicing Green New Deal-like power management.
Screenshot number one from the piece.
They're practicing Green New Deal-like power management.
So California last experienced rolling blackouts in 2001 amid energy market manipulation by speculators.
This time, the cause is energy market manipulation by anti-fossil fuel politicians.
Democrats have mandated that renewables account for 60% of state electricity by 2030.
It's forced the power providers to invest in renewable energy sources
now meant to meet the deadline.
So here's what happens, folks.
During peak daylight hours,
California produces a surplus of solar energy.
Why?
Wait for it.
Joe, wait for it.
Because the sun is out during the day.
I know AOC's stunned by this.
So during peak daylight hours, Joe, there's a surplus.
Wow, that's great, Dan.
Huge success.
It goes on.
Hold on.
Because of the surplus, power generators may be ordered or paid to cut back their production
so the energy grid isn't overloaded.
Wait, what?
Then on Friday and Saturday, this California power agency reported that about 1,000 megawatt hours were curtailed, enough to power 30,000 homes.
This year, 1.3 megawatt hours of power have been curtailed.
You may be saying to yourself, that sounds like AOC's dream.
Suns going during the day, all this, so much, Joe, so much power.
They have to get rid of some of it. So what's the problem? What's going during the day, all this, so much, Joe, so much power. They have to get rid of some of it.
So what's the problem?
What's going on?
Well, of course, none of this obeys any simple rules of economics.
It obeys the AOC through three rules of economics, pay more, wait more, waste more.
And you get this.
Here's screenshot two.
Here's what's actually going on.
But this surplus during the day means, Joe, how this happens there's some wait for it joe
wait for it don't read ahead there are supply shortages at night because joe
yes joe yeah calm down you're getting ahead of yourself there's no sun at night joe
Yeah.
Calm down.
You're getting ahead of yourself.
There's no sun at night, Joe.
There's no sun.
Folks, I know you're stunned.
I know AOC is like, wait, what?
There's no sun at night?
This is crazy.
Back to screenshot number two.
I'm seriously crying.
I can't take this stuff anymore.
So back to screenshot number two. But here seriously crying. I can't take this stuff anymore. So back to screenshot number two.
But, here's the problem, Joe. Energy
demand is still high. Because
shockingly, people don't want
to sleep in 7,000 degree temperatures
at night. So they still need the power.
Yeah. I am seriously crying.
Like, tears of pollen can vouch for me.
So,
don't take this off.
No, no.
I know you want to come back.
It'll be better because the tears are coming down my face right now.
So that's what happened this weekend.
Many natural gas and nuclear plants that can generate 24-7 power have shut down in recent
years because they can't compete with the heavily subsidized green energy like the solar panels.
So a 10-year-old natural gas power plant,
California's Inland Empire,
is now being decommissioned
20 to 30 years earlier
than its planned lifespan.
The state water regulations
are also forcing the shutdown
of peaker plants along the coast
that can ramp up generation
when the sun goes down.
They were warned by that
there would be energy shortages
as early as 2021.
But as the Wall Street Journal
cleverly says,
this last sentence is great.
Remember, they were warned
they could have energy shortages
by 2021, folks.
AOC,
always beating the goals, Joe.
That day has arrived
a year early for energy shortages.
Congratulations to Democrats for beating their own forecast.
Nice job, AOC.
They predicted energy shortages by 2021.
You're a year early.
Nice.
Do we have like a trophy laying around?
No, no, no, no.
Oh, man.
We always have all these gadgets congrats you democrats are awesome
hard chargers beating your goals for energy shortages by one whole year nice awesome work
this is what you're in store for. We're the Biden presidency.
Oh,
well, you have a former bartender who,
by the way,
is an insult to Bart.
I told you one of the smartest guys I ever met was Pete from Glenn
Patrick's.
That bar.
I used to hang out.
Great life advice.
AOC's not that guy.
A former bartender who wants you to pay more,
wait more,
waste more.
When you have her running your economic policy and running your Green New Deal,
getting rid of gassy cows,
this is what you get.
Californians running the state
who haven't figured out
that the sun at night goes away.
Sun, night.
Sunday, connect. Sun, daytime, connect sun daytime sun night
visuals for the liberals watching sun day sun night
aoc hasn't really figured that out yet of. But she's figured out a way to pay more, pay more for solar panels
than they could with standard natural gas,
to waste more by basically throwing away electricity
during the day.
When the sun, day, sun's out here.
So they waste all of that
and to wait for a service
that you could have got instantaneously.
In other words, peak plants that would kick on,
peaker plants that would kick on automatically
when the sun goes down because it's nighttime.
Sun, the sun, when the sun goes down.
And let's decommission those too
because of our Green New Deal water regulations.
It obeys all three rules of AOC economics.
Pay more, wait more, and waste more.
Hmm.
All right,
let me move on.
So speaking of dopey economic plans that intersect with terrible public
policy,
when it's come to this plague from China,
which interestingly enough,
Andrew Cuomo during his dreadful speech last night,
during the terrible convention called it the European virus. I mean, if that's not gaslighting,
I don't know what is. But I saw this interesting article in Just the News, John Solomon's new site.
It'll be up in the show notes. Please check it out. By the way, the GoFundMe for Attila's gym
was in yesterday's show notes. It was at the bottom. A couple of people emailed me,
so they couldn't find it. It's there. Go to Bongino.com slash newsletter and just hit subscribe.
We'll send you these articles every day.
It's free, of course.
We won't charge you for articles or anything.
Bongino.com slash newsletter.
We'll send you these articles every day.
But check this one out.
Coronavirus spikes in regions with strict lockdowns.
It reignites the debate over effectiveness.
Ladies and gentlemen, these lockdowns have been a total disaster and the people imposing them on us cannot explain why some of the states with the strictest
lockdowns are now seeing a massive spike in new cases. Folks, as I've repeatedly over and over
for the five plus years we've been doing this show said to you, correlation does not always
equate to causation. It doesn't because you get more colds in the winter doesn't mean cold weather causes cold.
It may be through a third-party variable like more mucus in your nose,
appropriate for today's show, given that I've been crying the whole show in laughter,
and you touch your nose more in the winter, therefore transmitting viruses
into your nose where there's a moist environment.
It's not the cold weather per se.
Because two variables are correlated does not mean they're causal.
That doesn't mean they're not causal either.
As Nassim Taleb always says, the absence of evidence doesn't mean
it isn't evidence for absence of an effect.
Having said that, correlation is not irrelevant.
Because two variables are correlated
there may be cause
we know
that the states that have locked down the most
severely they haven't worked from this
just the news piece look at California
which went draconian
rather fast rather quickly excuse me
on the lockdowns
and now it's doubled down on lockdowns well what's
happening there if lockdowns work you now it's doubled down on lockdowns. Well, what's happening there? If lockdowns worked, you'd think they'd see
sloping down in infections.
Not so much the case.
Quote, in mid-July, talking about the governor,
he extended the reclosure statewide
while further shutting down indoor worship malls,
barbershops, and hair salons in counties
with high infection numbers.
He also ordered state citizens to wear face masks
starting June 18th.
All right, the hands that should have worked, right? Big dracon state citizens to wear face masks starting June 18th. All right.
The hands that should have worked, right?
Big draconian lockdowns, face masks.
Well, when you review the state's COVID-19 data, it indicates that cases in California continue to rise, whether it was locked down or partially reopened.
The state's COVID dashboard shows it only began seeing a sustained drop in average daily
cases in late July, though those numbers began increasing around August 10th. Again,
again, folks, I'm just asking us, are we doing data? Are we doing facts?
So if lockdowns and face masks are supposed to be, I'm not saying they're not, I'm not saying,
again, don't mistake this for an over interpretation of data either rather than
an under interpretation i'm simply suggesting to you we should be seeing some data on a mass scale
giving that so many places were locked down and had mandatory mask usage we should be seeing data
showing a decline in cases not an uptick. We're not seeing that.
We're just not.
I'm going to give you the reasons in a second, but just a second example.
Okay, oh, Dan, that's one state, Hawaii.
No, no, there's another one.
Excuse me, California.
There's another one, Hawaii, from Solomon's Peace.
Hawaii locked down, and they're relatively isolated.
You know, they're not exactly landlocked Hawaii, for the liberals listening.
They appear to have been spared the worst of it from late April onwards.
That's good news.
Yet, so is it yet, cases began to go up again in mid-June,
and from late July onward, they've been spiking according to their own statewide dashboard.
Unlike the first smaller wave in March, brought largely by travel-related cases,
most of the new cases so far have been from community transmission of the virus.
Folks,
what's going on here?
Well,
it looks like there's two reasons here,
two significant reasons why these lockdowns,
despite,
because I want to try to pull myself.
I don't want to make this partisan.
It's not,
these are serious.
People are dying.
It's a very serious disease for people with comorbidities and the elderly.
This is not some kind of thing we should just pass off and make a political football.
But we should be asking a question.
The lockdowns you would think would make sense, right?
I mean, it sounds almost commonsensical when you think about it.
If a virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets,
sneezing in close proximity to others for an extended time with people who are infected, when you think about it. If a virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets,
sneezing in close proximity to others for an extended time
with people who are infected,
then if you separate people
by locking them down,
it should stop it.
But it hasn't.
Right?
It seems to make sense.
On its face.
We're not liberals again.
We're like, yeah, yeah,
that sounds like it.
So why isn't it?
But when you think about it,
it's fairly obvious. Because ladies and gentlemen, no matter how harshly you lock down, that sounds like him. So why isn't it? But when you think about it, it's fairly obvious.
Because ladies and gentlemen, no matter how harshly you lock down, people have to eat.
People have to go out and get gas for their car.
And some people have to work to feed their kids who are essential workers.
They have to.
So you're going to see people go in a supermarket, see people in gas stations.
There's always going to be some mixing and matching of people who can't socially distance.
You can't stop it all.
People would die from isolation.
They'd starve to death.
People have to go to work to keep the water running in your house.
People have to pick up the garbage.
So you're never going to be able to.
The lockdowns are a myth.
Not a myth in that they lock states down.
Lockdowns, you can't permanently lock.
There's always going to be some mixing and matching of people because essential workers
have to show up and people have to eat.
Then when you do that and you go home, most of the data is pretty clear that the virus
transmits more effectively in a closed indoor environment rather than open air.
You're not going to stop it.
The only question is,
when are you going to get your peak? Or are you going to have a sustained level of community transmission over time that's going to be flatter? And again, when you ask these questions,
you should be asking yourself, well, okay, I'll choose the latter. I'll choose kind of a flatter,
more even infection level
because we're not going to be able to stop it
because it won't overwhelm our hospitals.
Well, then we have to ask ourselves,
okay, well, how are you going to get there?
Did it work?
And what are the effects of the lockdowns on people's health too?
Are we losing more people due to the lockdowns?
And those are questions a lot of people sadly aren't willing to ask.
Reason, facts, data.
That's what real science is.
Testable hypotheses.
Teasing out correlated variables from causal variables.
We should be looking at this.
Most people aren't. All right, let me get to my next
story, kind of related to this. It's a great op-ed piece by Andy Kessler. Does some good work in the
Wall Street Journal. Kind of funny, really gifted writer. I mean, anybody can write a story, anyone,
right? We can all write, type, whatever, send in an article, but he has a real gift for this. He
has a great piece in the Wall Street Journal today. And I'm going to leave you today with this one because it's important.
Saying that about, hey, the lockdowns, you know, we talked about that.
What's the effect on your wallet, your economic situation, your wallet, and your job matters.
So Andy Kessler has a piece today.
Stock scenarios for a mad cap year, despite the strong market, investors are plotting
the what ifs.
Here are four to watch.
I'm going to talk about two.
The two I think are most likely.
So just to be clear, Kessler's piece, bottom line up front says, hey, you got money in the market.
You're working in a job that's a publicly traded company. This means something to all of you.
Here's what could happen in the coming year. He gives four scenarios. I pick two of the most
likely. They're very interesting though. And when I say interesting, I don't mean necessarily that it's all going to be Pollyanna-ish
some of the stuff here is not very good but if you know in advance it'll help you prepare so
here's takeaway number one he says listen money's ready to pounce there's a whole bunch of money
out there folks the money supply is up 25% so far this year. The personal savings rate, which has hovered between 7% and 8%, is now 19% in June, meaning
people have a lot of money they haven't spent.
It's sitting in their bank accounts.
Another trillion-dollar stimulus will add to it.
Ladies and gentlemen, all that unspent money is going to come flooding back into the economy,
which is why gold, by the way, is approaching $2,000 an ounce.
This is from Kessler's piece.
Other commodities keep rising.
The Federal Reserve raises rates.
Debt defaults will increase.
Higher inflation would make future earnings worth a lot less today, so PE ratios would
collapse.
And all those companies that are barely profitable but are highly valued based on future earnings,
Tesla, Zoom will get wrecked.
He says in his first scenario,
again, his advice, not mine,
buy consumer cyclicals,
maybe even beaten up hospitality and travel stocks,
sell everything else, short bonds.
Now, scenario one there he talked about
where the economy booms,
booms so much that all this money
sitting in people's bank accounts and banks,
we've printed so much of it, floods into the economy at the same time, is contingent
on a vaccine.
I should have mentioned that at the beginning.
That we get a vaccine, people feel safe going out in public again.
People feel safe with the vaccine, which is a big obstacle too.
They take it and that we're back to some sense of relative normalcy.
They say, well, what's the problem?
The problem, again, ladies and gentlemen, is people are sitting on boatloads of cash
right now.
People who are employed, people who've lost their jobs are struggling.
But the people who've retained their job, they're not spending their money.
They're not going out.
They're not going to restaurants.
They're not going to Disney World, whatever it may be.
They're not going to movies.
The movie theater's shut down.
That money has to go somewhere.
That money's in their bank account.
When all that stuff opens up again,
the damn breaks.
Where does the money go?
You have a whole bunch of money chasing,
chasing,
again, it's not AOC economics.
This is real economics,
chasing the same amount of products.
So the cost of those products goes up
because more money is chasing the same products.
So he's saying, you know what that does to companies like Tesla and Zoom who may not
be profitable now, but their stock prices are high because people are counting on their
profits in the future?
Well, their future profits are going to get flushed away due to inflation.
Interesting point.
So scenario one, you get a vaccine, people trust it.
Everything gets back to a relative state of normalcy.
Money floods into the economy.
Inflation, big problem.
Scenario number two.
This is a bad one.
Joe Biden wins and the Senate flips the Democrats.
Uh-oh.
What happens then?
Kessler says, well, stocks get nervous. President Biden
wants to raise the, oh gosh, I can't even say that. President Biden wants to raise the top
income tax rate to 39.6%, the same for dividends and capital gains, and increase the corporate
tax to 28% from 21%. Treasury Secretary Liz Warren and Fed Chairman Lawrence Summers lobby
Congress to make it happen. The Tax Foundation thinks this will reduce gross domestic product by 1.5% long-term,
so there won't be any inflation.
Good news, Joe.
There'll be nothing to buy because there'll be no products.
He goes on.
He says, the bad news is that the net return for stocks may drop by a third
from a combination of less earnings per share and less cash on cash returns
when a stock is sold.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's really simple.
Joe Biden wins. They win the Senate, God forbid. Money gets pulled out of the economy,
given to the United States government in the form of super high taxes. The stock market crashes,
businesses crash, GDP crashes. No inflation, but nothing to buy either because you have
no companies left to produce it. Again, here's a couple more, but I see these two as the most likely.
Obviously, I would prefer the first scenario
because we can deal with inflation.
You're not going to be able to deal
with an out-of-control, empty vessel Joe Biden presidency
where Elizabeth Warren and the hapless AOC,
whose three rules of economics,
pay more, wait more, waste more,
are implemented and grinded into stone.
We can raise rates at the Federal Reserve.
May cause some temporary economic dislocation and some pain, but we've been through it before.
Those of you who lived through the Volcker years in the late 1980s when inflation was
out of control after Ronald Reagan took over for Jimmy Carter, remember what it was like
to have 12%, 13%, 14% interest rates.
It's tough. Money gets expensive,% interest rates. It's tough.
Money gets expensive and interest rates are cost for money.
Interest rates, that's it, right?
Interest rates are cost for the price for money.
Money gets expensive to get.
Loans are expensive.
But what happens?
People start to realize they can make money on investments again, CDs and other things.
They put the money back in the financial institutions.
They get their interest.
All of a sudden, the price of money goes down as more money becomes available.
Simple economics, not AOC economics.
It'd stink for a while, but we can fix inflation as long as it doesn't get out of control.
We can't fix Joe Biden.
Vote.
10 for 20, right?
Go back, listen to my sponsor again.
Make sure.
Don't forget. All right, folks. Thanks again for tuning in. That was a lot of material my sponsor again. Make sure. Don't forget.
All right, folks.
Thanks again for tuning in.
That was a lot of material we covered today.
I had a few other stories.
I'll get to them tomorrow.
Hopefully, the story about New York City broken windows.
But it is in the show notes today.
If you want to read ahead a New York Post story about why the crime rate in New York
City for things like homicides and assaults are going through the roof, check that out.
Thanks for tuning in.
Please subscribe to my YouTube channel,
youtube.com slash Bongino.
Then go to my show on Apple Podcasts
and subscribe there, please.
I really appreciate it.
It is a free service, the subscription,
but they do matter.
Helps us move up the charts.
See you all tomorrow.
You just heard Dan Bongino.