The Dan Bongino Show - Disturbing Leftist Violence Erupts (Ep 1047)
Episode Date: August 19, 2019In this episode I address the explosive video of the anti-First Amendment terror group ANTIFA violently attacking people in Portland, Oregon. I also discuss the troubling revelations by John Solomon t...his weekend about the Obama administration’s role in Spygate. Finally, I debunk a liberal hit piece on gun owners. News Picks:A major update on the Jeffrey Epstein case. Astonishingly, this group is planning to support the alleged Philadelphia shooter who shot police officers. Anti-First Amendment group ANTIFA engaged in more ultra-violent attacks this weekend. Liberal Bill Maher doubles down on calls for a painful economic recession. Socialist Bill De Blasio is putting cops in danger. The Hillary email scandal is still getting uglier. Here’s a link to the study referenced in the show on the defensive use of firearms. Copyright Dan Bongino All Rights Reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
get ready to hear the truth about america on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host
dan bongino we are back in studio thank you all tuned in on friday for my road show
thankfully who's back as well our good buddy producer joe welcome to the dan bongino show
producer joe how are you today on Monday, my friend?
It's so good to see your smiling face.
And this Monday thing, every seven days, it comes back.
Monday, Monday, every seven days.
Monday's like a plague on humankind.
What?
Although Monday, you have to agree, for us, I think it's always the best show.
Because there's so much weekend content.
I sent Paula probably 30 stories.
She's like, dude, what are you going to use?
Just come on.
We're running out of time.
My smoke alarm went off at two o'clock in the morning, woke up the whole house.
Me and Paula didn't fall asleep till five o'clock in the morning.
So we got up a little late because I needed some sleep.
I went back to bed after Fox and Friends my morning hit.
And she's like, just give me the stories.
So I've got a stack show for you to run down quick here.
Antifa. No question in my mind, a give me the stories. So I've got a stacked show for you to run down quick here. Antifa.
No question in my mind, a terror group right now.
Also, as Joe called them before the show,
they are the double Ps.
We'll have to leave that for a not safe for work show
another day, but it was very funny.
Antifa update.
John Solomon blows it up this weekend
on Maria Bartiromo.
More Spygate stuff.
Also, some White House stuff about the Obama administration.
And PolitiFact, or PunditFact, I should say, blows it.
Again, stay tuned.
All right, today's show brought to you by our buddies at G-Code.
Best holsters out there.
G-Code.
We love G-Code.
Go to range5.com for the best holsters out there.
Like many of you, I am an owner of a firearm.
Many firearms, as a matter of fact.
I carry a Sig Sauer P365. an owner of a firearm. Many firearms, as a matter of fact, I carry a Sig Sauer
P365. Love it. Great firearm. Now, a great firearm requires a great holster. Ladies and gentlemen,
cheap holsters, frankly, can be dangerous. You don't want them getting snagged. You don't want
it with your carrying, if your pocket carrying, you don't want the, God forbid, the trigger to
get snagged because you have a poorly designed holster. Good holsters are imperative.
Do yourself a favor and go pick up a G-Code holster today at range5.com.
You get 15% off with promo code Bongino. For more than 20 years, G-Code has produced what many, including me, consider to be the
finest holsters in the industry.
They lead the pack.
They're 100% American-made products, all materials, all components
sourced here in the U.S. The owners of G-Code
holsters are military vets. They're meticulous
about quality, innovation, and
workmanship. Excellence drives everything.
Not something they do, everything.
Every product comes with a lifetime warranty.
They will last you for eons.
Whether you're military, law enforcement, or civilian,
G-Code has a holster for you.
Don't get fooled by the fakes.
Check out the raw new G-code phenom in the waistband holster.
It is a total game changer.
Comfort, concealability, everything.
Check out the phenom.
It's a must-have.
Again, order online at range5.com.
Range, the number 5.com.
Range5.com and use promo code Bongino for 15%.
That's a big discount, 15% off using promo code Bongino.
All right, let's go.
Nice.
Okay.
Antifa, the anti-First Amendment group.
They're not anti-fascist.
I don't care what they call themselves.
Antifa stands for anti-First Amendment.
That's it.
Yep.
I don't care what they tell you Antifa stands for. Antifa stands for anti-First Amendment. That's it. I don't care what they tell you Antifa stands for.
Antifa stands for anti-First Amendment
because that's what they do.
That is what they are. They are an
anti-free speech, speech suppression,
ultra-violent group of domestic
terrorists. They are a bunch of coward,
chump, basement-dwelling,
unemployed losers
with zero career prospects.
As I said this morning on Fox and Friends,
in an extemporaneous moment of anger directed at these complete buffoon loser tool bags,
they're professional s'mores roasters.
That's what they do.
They sit in mommy's basement with their s'mores.
They're about $1.30, maybe $1.10 with 70 pounds of sand on their back.
They've never lifted a weight in their lives.
They couldn't throw a punch watching a tutorial YouTube video 20 minutes long.
These are a bunch of lame losers with nothing.
Sadly, you know, I say sadly because I mean it.
I don't know.
These are probably kids.
I mean this.
I'm not joking around.
They're probably kids who were bullied a lot in school.
I mean it.
I'm not being like a jerk about it. They probably joe yeah you know and and they don't this is
their outlet like because they were bullied a lot instead of realizing that what happened to them
was wrong and they shouldn't replicate it what they do is because they're probably you know now
they're big wusses and they're s'mores roasters instead of adding positively to society they take
out their childhood anger being bullied
by working in packs themselves
and going and attacking innocent people,
contributing to the cycle of violence.
That's what they do.
These are losers.
They're not, and by the way,
if you ever hear anyone say,
I'm sorry about the rant, but this is important.
By the way, if you can just play in the background
some video of Antifa,
if you want to check out the video,
youtube.com slash Bongino,
I'm going to talk you through it on the audio don't worry um but there's a lot of video
i have today this one the audio is kind of tough but this is the antifa they're not packs of wolves
by the way okay anyone who calls them like a wolf pack they pack well no no they're packs of angry
poodles um this is them we can see them stalking uh young woman. By the way, hat tip, Elijah Schaefer from the Blaze TV.
This is his video.
By the way, a correction, I incorrectly tweeted this weekend about the video that it was a 10-year-old.
I saw that on Twitter.
That's my fault for not fact-checking that, 100% my fault.
Apparently, it's a young lady.
She's not 10 years old.
She's just a little short in stature.
But this is, regardless, it doesn't matter.
This is Antifa stalking this woman and this guy, following, like, the pack of angry poodles they are.
This is not a wolf pack.
This is a pack of chumps.
This is a pack of loser cowards.
You can hear kind of some of the sound in the background and the audio.
Walk away.
Again, if you want to check out the video.
Walk away, they're telling them.
So they're walking away. Well, they are. Yes, keep in mind, this is Antifa telling audio. Walk away. Again, if you want to check out the video. Walk away, they're telling them. So they're walking away.
Well, they are.
Yes, keep in mind, this is Antifa telling them to walk away
as they're chasing them and trying to beat them.
Remember, only attacking impacts.
And if you notice, you watch some of the video,
you'll see the guys that are attacking them
always look behind them.
Yeah.
Why?
Now, follow me here, folks.
You are a coward.
Not you.
But try to put yourself in coward, loser, professional s'mores roaster mood for a minute.
You are a complete chump.
You're a loser.
You have no career prospects.
You have the intellect of a dead rabbit.
You're following these people around.
Why are they turning around the Antifa people and looking in reverse to see what's going on. Because the Antifa losers that are getting ready to attack this man and this woman want
to make sure they have their buddies behind them because God forbid the guy that attacks
them, they don't want to wind up in a one-on-one fight because they're coward losers.
Now, showing you that Antifa, anti-First Amendment, ladies and gentlemen, when you tweet about
them, always do what I do. I'm
humbly and respectfully requesting
you do this. When you put on Facebook
or you put on Twitter, make sure
you put every time. Antifa,
which is shorthand for anti-First
Amendment, I write that every time
because that's what they are. It's an
anti-First Amendment group. They are not
anti-fascists. They are fascists. Don't let them
gaslight you, okay? Here's some video.
A hot tip to the post-millennial.
I think it's at post-millennial on
Twitter. They took some video this weekend.
They are racist, too.
Antifa are not only fascists,
they're not only cowards and chumps, they are
also outright, downright
racist thugs.
We have three videos here. Here's the
first one here.'s them i think this
is the one of them calling a black police officer who actually works for a living unlike the
professional s'mores roasters in antifa here's them calling a black police officer uh disgracefully
calling him an uncle tom um and no listen to kind of now for the audio you got to listen close on
this a video viewers to it the sound is kind of low because it's being recorded by people on iPhones and that stuff.
But listen to this.
Check this out.
Race trainer.
Race trainer.
The badge is designed on everything.
The star.
Race trainer.
Yeah.
For you to be a race trainer.
For you to be part of the neocolonial machine.
For you to be downtown.
What?
What do you work for?
If you go down the block,
you probably get up there a lot.
Yeah.
It's fun.
Okay, sorry.
That's actually the video of them calling
the black police officer a race traitor
yeah a race traitor yeah if you're missing the yeah please watch our youtube today i i i know
i it's an audio podcast and will always be an audio podcast but i'm just i'm again i'm asking
with the greatest of respect that you check out our video today youtube.com slash bongino i'd like
you to check these out again these videos el Elijah Schaefer and the Post Millennial,
go check their Twitter accounts out as well
to see the originals.
They're really, really good.
Here is the last one.
Now, there's a term here used,
obviously this show finds abhorrent,
obviously hate-filled, disgusting,
and you will never hear ever
uttered out of the words of our mouths
other than to cite it
out of the mouths of racist, other than to cite it out of the mouths of racist
imbecile losers like antifa here is a black officer being called again you get ready for
those of you with kids at home um a coon you can tune back in now as children shouldn't even hear
these words and folks by the way for those of you on the left, can I just say something here?
Because this always offends me.
For those of you who send me emails, the liberals that listen to the show, you have my email.
It's out there.
It's on our website.
Goes to me.
We read it.
For those of you who think this is some kind of shtick, like, are you virtue signaling?
You don't know me.
And believe me, you don't know Joe or my wife either.
Nope.
So save your stupid emails.
We highlight this stuff because words like this,
hate-filled, disgusting, racist, nonsense,
this isn't virtuous.
This is doing the right thing.
I don't care if this came out of the mouth of anyone,
right-wing, left-wing, conservative, liberal,
communist, socialist, libertarian. I don't care.
You're filth.
I'm not your guy.
You're not welcome on our show.
Beat it.
I don't care who says it.
Here's a video of this racist Antifa filth calling this guy the word I just said.
Check this out.
You're up in Kentucky.
Look at this fool.
Oh, even worse.
Look at that coon.
Out of the street.
Man.
Look at this coon, she says.
Now, let me say, look at this slob on the street with no job,
who's a professional s'mores roaster following a professional police officer
working, by the way, for a decent
but not, he's never going to get rich salary,
putting his butt on the line
to protect this slob on the street.
Look at this.
No, look at this slob.
Slob.
Antifa slobs.
Losers.
Complete degenerate losers, disgusting human filth of the worst kind.
Human filth, a domestic terror group, no questions asked.
Do not tweet about them or Facebook about them without clearly citing this is an anti-First Amendment fascist group.
They are not anti-fascist.
They are the fascists.
Yep.
Pieces of garbage.
This cop has kids.
He's got a family.
This is a professional patriot.
You're calling him a yeah jerk wads a bunch of complete losers all right let me get to this because i want i gotta i've got so much to cover today
including john solomon again on maria bartiromo's absolutely terrific weekend show on fox sunday
morning futures where if there's anyone in the media
outside of, say, Hannity on Fox who is wired into this Spygate case, it's Maria Bartiromo
on the weekend.
She knows exactly the questions to ask, and Solomon lit it on fire.
All right, quickly, today's show brought to you by another great sponsor who's happy to
be here, happy to talk to you.
Lending Club.
Ladies and gentlemen, for decades, credit cards have been telling us, buy it now and pay later with interest.
Listen, that doesn't work. Despite your best intentions, interest, as you know,
can get out of control fast, causes a real problem for us. Here's the solution. With Lending Club,
Lending Club, Lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one,
one fixed monthly payment. Makes it real easy.
Since 2007, Lending Club has helped millions of people regain control of
their finances with affordable, fixed rate personal loans.
No trips to a bank.
No high interest credit cards.
Just go to LendingClub.com.
LendingClub.com slash Dan.
LendingClub.com slash Dan.
LendingClub.com slash Dan.
Tell them about yourself, how much you want to
borrow pick the terms that are right for you and if you're approved get a load of this your loan
is automatically deposited to your bank in as little as a few days lending club is the number
one peer-to-peer lending platform with over 35 billion in loans issued go to lending club dot
com slash dan check your rate in minutes borrow up to forty thousand dollars that's lending club
dot com slash dan lending club dot com slash dan, lendingclub.com slash Dan, all loans
made by WebBank, member FDIC, equal housing lender, check out the club. It is worth your time.
Okay. So I've got some killer video for you here. So John Solomon was on Maria Bartiromo's show this
weekend, and he makes two key takeaway points about the Spygate debacle. Number one, which I'm going to play now,
ladies and gentlemen,
what's starting to become transparent now,
and I believe what Senator Lindsey Graham
was hinting at this weekend,
when Senator Lindsey Graham said that this IG report
and the report being done by John Durham,
the United States attorney,
investigating this whole debacle, Joe,
Lindsey Graham is basically starting to filter
out that America is going to be shocked at what it is. Now, I'm asking you for forgiveness here
because kind of half-heartedly, because if you're a regular listener to the show, Joe and I and how
we do the show, a lot of this is anticlimactic because, and I'm not patting myself on the back,
I just, you already know this. We've been reporting on it for two years but it's going to come out formally
and some of what you're going to see is going to shock you now the first takeaway and this is video
number one for maria bartiromo show hat tip sunday morning futures great show can't recommend it
enough ladies and gentlemen let me sum up what you're about to hear.
This was a political spying operation on the Trump team the whole time.
In other words, what you witnessed with Fusion, foreign intelligence people spying on the Trump team, the Nellie Orr information, the Steele information, the Sussman information,
The Nellie Orr information, the Steele information, the Sussman information, who was over a prominent Democrat feeding information to James Baker at the FBI.
What you witnessed, I want to be crystal clear, Devin Nunes has brought this up multiple times, was not an official intelligence investigation in the sense that the goal was to get to the bottom of some attempt to attack the United States,
either its elections or physically.
Do you understand that, Joe?
Does this make sense?
Oh, yeah.
What Solomon gets at here is this was a political hit job the whole time. And the efforts by the FBI and the Spygate plotters to make you believe this started
on July 31st, 2016 and forget everything that happened earlier are nothing more than an
effort to hide all of their efforts to politically spy on the Trump team. Listen to this killer cut
by Solomon with Maria Bartiromo, and we'll kind of summarize it again after it's over. Check this
out. Your most recent op-ed goes through this triangle of people that were feeding information into the FBI. Tell
us about it. Absolutely. We used to have the Bermuda Triangle. Now we have the Fusion GPS
Triangle. One corner, you've got Christopher Steele, a British intelligence agent desperate
to influence the election because he's desperate to defeat Trump. He's also being paid by Hillary
Clinton. Then you've got Nellie, or the wife of a senior Justice Department official, being paid
by the same firm, Fusion GPS, on the same project to find Russia dirt on Trump.
And then the last corner, you got Glenn Simpson, the founder of Fusion GPS and a contractor for Hillary Clinton.
In the middle of those three is Bruce or senior Justice Department official taking highly uncorroborated,
highly partisan, highly conflicted information and the FBI and Justice Department.
And nobody saw a problem with that.
All because they just didn't like him and they just didn't want him as president.
So they decided to come up with a scheme to actually spy on American citizens.
Do you think John Durham is aware of all of this?
Where is that investigation today?
That's a great question.
I think Senator Graham did a good job of describing what the IG is doing.
I am hearing that John Durham and Bill Barr focused on the part before the FBI officially got started on July 31st, 2016,
the period of March to July, and whether intelligence assets, Western, private, or U.S.,
were deployed in an earlier effort to start probing the Trump campaign and its Russia ties,
maybe lay the breadcrumb trail of evidence that Christopher Steele then collected up and gave to the FBI.
That's where I think when you heard the term the other day from the attorney general,
I believe there was political surveillance going on.
I think that's what he's referring to.
Oh, oh, red flag on the field.
There's a flag on the field there's a flag on the field holding 10 yards spygate conspirators
repeat first down folks there's so much and i had to cut that i have another one in a second i had
to have joe cut it up because there's so many nuggets in here uh i was ashamed i missed it
live i had to catch it uh my wife and i had to go to church. So we missed it live.
But I always watch it on tape.
I'm like, how did I miss this?
This is amazing.
Okay, he points out a couple things.
Number one, he leaves the piece by saying,
and it's always how you leave the segment
that really leaves a mark, right?
He leaves the piece by saying,
this was political surveillance.
I was listening to a great podcast this weekend, Russ Roberts, Econ Talk, and he was saying
how Joseph Schumpeter's creative destruction about economics, how the term is always misinterpreted
by the left because the last word you hear is destruction and people always remember
the last thing, but it should be destruction, destructive creation, right?
That's the same way here.
Solomon knows how to leave these things off.
This was political surveillance.
Now, he calls it the triangle.
He's like, well, we have the Bermuda Triangle.
Now we have the Fusion GPS Triangle.
And he points out three players, and he indicates how all of their motivations, ladies and gentlemen,
keep in mind my setup I did before.
Their motivations, this is your talking point for the day, because it's the point you need
to take away from this, the data point that matters.
All of their motivations were political they were not in official intelligence gathering mode trying
to prevent an attack they were trying to take down an opposition politician let's go through
them one by one he mentioned yes he nailed it on that there were three players player number one he
mentions christopher steel How do we know
Christopher Steele's motivations were political?
Joe, let me think about this.
Ruling on the field
is Christopher Steele told everybody
his motivations were political.
He told multiple people,
Bruce Ohr of the Department
of Justice, Kathleen Kavalec at the
State Department, that he was, quote,
desperate to see Donald Trump not get elected.
That his quote, not mine.
He told them his motivations were political.
He mentioned an election when he was talking about his motivations.
In case you missed it, liberals, that happens to be a political event, not an intelligence
event.
Steele said this multiple times.
He mentions another player in this out of
his trifecta of stupidity. For Steele, the second person he mentions is Glenn Simpson. Now, again,
I'm going to ask you with the greatest of respect, because I don't make too many asks of my audience,
please, please pick up my book. It is available for pre-order now. We put a lot of work into it.
I just finished reading the audio, which will be available on Audible.
It's going to be great.
Exonerated.
It's available for pre-order now.
It's coming out very shortly.
We got about three weeks left.
Please check it out.
Available on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and elsewhere.
I talk about this in here.
How Simpson's motivations were the movie script.
Simpson, they'd already done this, ladies and gentlemen.
The book lays it out in detail. This
attempt to attack political enemies
by attaching them to Russia was a
tried and true strategy and the
one guy who had a movie script
already pre-prepared with the same
players, Manafort, Furtash,
Oleg Deripaska
was Simpson who had already written the movie
script in 2007 in the Wall Street Journal.
Well, you say, well, that doesn't prove Simpson's motivations were political.
Ladies and gentlemen, who was paying Glenn Simpson?
Hillary Clinton.
Donald Trump's political opponent.
Of course his motivations were political.
Are you a knucklehead?
And hopefully I'll get to this Chuck Russ tweet later.
We'll point out how it's funny how the fec and others aren't investigating that how hillary clinton basically laundered money to
a law firm which in turn paid fusion gps to hide the fact that they were paying them to rewrite the
movie script with donald trump in it glenn simpson already told this story about the russians in 2007
if you read the article the wall Street Journal article we cite here often,
and I cite in the book, you'll be astonished the parallels
to the Chris Steele dossier that Simpson paid for.
It's the same story.
Different players and a few details changed.
Now, he mentions a third player as well, Bruce Ohr.
How do we know Oh or's motivations were political
because or tells handlers at the fbi that the information he's getting from steel
is from steel and that steel doesn't want to see trump get elected so or instead of
um canning starts with an s this information instead of doing that, what does he do?
He feeds it to an FBI handler.
They used to get a Pfizer warrant.
Number one point.
Number two,
why or his motivations are political.
His wife,
Nellie is working for fusion GPS.
It's being paid by Hillary.
Oh,
Nellie,
their personal financial situation is greatly enhanced.
Nellie and Bruce.
Listen, this is not Little House on the Prairie, these two, okay?
These two, their motivation.
How did you get that?
They're not of pure heart.
They're not like the dad's name in Little House.
That guy was good.
We should love that show growing up.
Do you remember?
What was his name?
Michael Landon was the guy that played it, I think.
Michael Landon, he was Paul. I remember Paul. Hey Yeah. Michael Landon was, yeah, he was Paul.
I remember Paul.
Hey, Paul.
This is not Little House on the Prairie.
Their motivations aren't Michael Landon's.
They're not pure.
Bruce and Nellie are making money off a politician paying them to attack Donald Trump.
Nellie Orr is not engaging in a sophisticated intelligence operation.
There are so many takeaways.
The third takeaway here.
So we have number one, it was political spying.
Number two, there's a trifecta of stupids here
who all have political motivations,
who are feeding information to the FBI
to spy on Trump for political reasons.
The third takeaway.
Again, forgive me for bringing this up again,
but this story gets so big and out of
control sometimes we forget the takeaway this was politics not intel and we roped in a bunch of
players to advance the political narrative and we faked it as intel cnn piece from a while ago
check this out the title of this piece. I cite it all the time.
You can see UK intelligence partners,
in other words, friendlies,
were passing intel to the Obama administration.
Excuse me.
CNN Politics, April 14th, 2017.
CNN.
This isn't some right-wing outlet.
British intelligence passed Trump associates communications with Russians on to U.S. counterparts. CNN is reporting what we already know. How does this fit in to the John Solomon video piece we just played? Solomon mentions another takeaway. You can rewind it and watch it again if you need to.
Solomon says at one point that the investigators looking into this now,
United States attorney,
John Durham and Horowitz are looking at the period of March to July.
Joe,
how's that possible?
How are they?
How could they be looking at March to July?
We've been told repeatedly by the FBI and others.
Nothing happened then that the case started when Joe July 31st,
2016. Yeah.
They've told us this repeatedly.
Don't look at anything before there.
The case started in July.
We've had lunatics like Chris Silliza at CNN,
who's wrong so often, I don't know how he still has a job,
who questioned on Twitter,
you right-wing nuts,
the case started on July 31st with a tip about George Papadopoulos.
Okay, well, why then are we looking at the period of March to July?
Because that's what gaslighting liar lunatics like Salism want you to believe.
Because the real dirty work, what do they call it, the wet work?
The real wet work started March to July.
Yeah.
Where they tried to kill off a political campaign.
Ladies and gentlemen, what was happening in March to July?
Well, what was happening was what I just showed you, what CNN actually reported on.
There were transfers of intel from foreign governments being transferred in the United States to bypass U.S. restrictions on spying on political campaigns and U.S. citizens.
You may say, well, Dan, if they were spying on him, what happened?
Ladies and gentlemen, what happened is nothing.
The information being given was a bunch of hogwash.
That's why they had to move on to the Fusion GPS movie script.
Is this audience ombudsman Joseph?
Is this making sense?
Oh, yeah, yeah.
But you got to remember, I've heard this a number of times.
Yeah, okay. I know.
Yeah, I go. You're probably a poor ombudsman.
You've heard it so many times. It probably instinctively makes
sense. But Paula, yell in here
if this doesn't make sense. So here's what's going on. Let me
just walk this through you very simple.
The Obama administration wants the Trump
team and others gone. They can't spy on
Trump because he's a U.S. citizen. He's done nothing wrong
or his team. What
do they do? They wink and a nod. Well, we can't spy on him, but you in US citizen. He's done nothing wrong. Or his team. What do they do? They wink
and a nod. Well, we can't spy on him,
but you in the UK can.
You are
other foreign intel partners. Australians
as you guys can help us out.
They start feeding information about
conversations happening between the Trump
team and people connected to
Russia. What's the problem, ladies and gentlemen?
Nothing. None of these conversations are illegal.
None of it.
How do we know?
Because nobody's been arrested for any of it or charged with any crime.
So, of course, the Obama administration, instead of saying, okay, guys, let's let this go.
It's a bad idea.
They're not doing anything wrong.
Of course, what do they do then?
They double down.
They go, well, if we can't get from foreign officials information to indict
and arrest these guys and spy on them, we'll just make it up. Here's our guy, Glenn Simpson. He wrote
a story in 2007 about this scandal. And some of the people on the Trump team, like Paul Manafort,
are now in that 2007 piece. Let's get Glenn Simpson to give us the information and he can
get it to the FBI.
Well, Glenn Simpson is a reporter though.
The FBI is not going to take his information seriously, Joe,
especially if they find out
he's working for Hillary.
So what do we do now?
Eureka!
I've got an idea.
Let's go hire Christopher Steele
who was a British spy
working on the Russia desk
who has credibility with the FBI.
Let's write up a dossier and let's have Steele, who was a British spy working on the Russia desk, who has credibility with the FBI. Let's write up a dossier and let's have Steele give the information to the FBI because the dossier
and the Steele information is not the same thing, folks. Steele's clearly feeding information to
Brennan at some point. That's why Brennan says, I didn't see the dossier until December. He's
probably not lying. What he doesn't say is, I have no information from Steele prior to December.
He's probably not lying.
What he doesn't say is, I have no information from Steele prior to December.
It's not the same thing.
Steele's feeding information to the FBI and the CIA, and Steele has the credibility the FBI needs to go in front of a judge and swear, hey, look, we got it from a legit source.
You dig?
This was a political operation. Now, one final point on the CNN piece.
You may say, why did CNN report this, Dan?
Why would CNN in April of 2017 basically blow up the fact that the Obama administration was engaged in the biggest spying scandal in United States history?
Folks, because CNN thought the collusion hoax was real.
I'm telling you, they thought
this was real.
Follow me.
They wrote this story thinking
they got
worked.
Oh, there's a flag on the field there's more laundry on the field they got worked yeah
everybody's feeding the cnn their democrat sources their fbi sources trump colluded with the russians
all of this based on a hoax dossier a total hoax cnn writes this story to hit trump and to hurt him they write the story joe to give a patina of
truth to put titanium in the spine of the story look cnn's got a story that even foreign intel
partners knew about the collusion yeah what's the problem the collusion story is later entirely
completely discredited it was a hoax but the cnn article
ladies and gentlemen to this day has not been retracted because they can't they can't retract
it they thought they were helping the democrats not hurting them look even foreign intel knows
about this collusion they didn't realize what the headline really says is Obama spied on Trump, circumvented U.S. laws by using foreign partners.
That story is still up because they can't take it down without massive egg on the face.
It's a beautiful thing.
Okay.
So video audio number two from Solomon.
This is important because again,
you've known this forever.
So ladies and gentlemen,
when they had a move from using foreign Intel,
that turned out to be who we nothing UK says,
this guy was on the phone with a Russian.
Was it illegal?
No.
Were they spying?
No.
Okay.
Well,
what do we do now?
Let's go to Glenn Simpson.
When the Glenn Simpson movie script angle and the dossier isn't panning out
the way they think it is,
they need more.
They need more evidence
to get over a probable cause hurdle
to swear that they have enough probable cause
to spy on the Trump team.
So they move from a foreign spying operation
to the Glenn Simpson movie script
to Christopher Steele being a front
for the Glenn Simpson movie script to now we Steele being a front for the Glenn Simpson movie script,
to now we need a little bit of icing on the cake.
I got an idea.
Let's move on to entrapment
where we try to set up Trump team members.
Let's tell this guy, Mifsud,
Joseph Mifsud, this professor,
to contact members of the Trump team
and pass off information
about the Russians having emails on Hillary.
Now, the Democrat narrative is Misford was working with the Russians, but that's not what Johnny
Solomon, who knows the whole story, says here. Check this out. And this is all we know that
there were informants thrown at certain Trump campaign people like George Papadopoulos.
Papadopoulos has been on this program and he told
me directly on this show that Mifsud was the guy that they wanted him to meet in Italy. He had this
job at the Center for Law, International Law, and they said, oh, don't quit yet to go work for Trump.
We want to send you to Rome. We want you to meet Mr. Joseph Mifsud. That is the individual who
told him Russia has emails of Hillary Clinton.
Why is that important, John?
Well, I interviewed Mr. Mifsud's lawyer the other day, Stefan Rowe,
and he told me, and he also provided some deposition evidence to both Congress and myself,
that his client was being directed, had long worked with Western intelligence, and he was being directed specifically, he was asked to connect George Papadopoulos to Russia,
meaning it was an operation,
some form of an intelligence operation. That was the lawyer's own words for this.
If that's the case, that means that the flashpoint that started the whole investigation
was in fact manufactured from the beginning.
Paula, how long have we been saying this?
But it was a streetcar. Stella, Stella, Paula, how long have've been saying this? But the streetcar, Stella, Stella, Paula, how long we've been saying this?
How long?
Listen, Solomon is one of the finest reporters in the business.
He just nails it.
Folks, Mifsud's lawyer provided under oath deposition evidence that Mifsud was working for friendlies friendlies you mean the
same friendlies that were spying on trump for the obama team um we'll see doesn't look good
for the leftist narrative folks it was a setup why was it a setup because their first plan of attack probing the NSA database using foreign
intel partners came up with nothing they were spying on the Trump team using every sophisticated
surveillance tool on the planet including foreign partners to circumvent U.S. law what did they get
goose egg zero then they move on to hey this guy Glenn Simpson's written about Manafort in the past.
He's got this movie script about Russians influencing politics.
Let's go to him. They pay him.
Simpson needs a front for his report that's credible with the FBI.
Let's get Christopher Steele. He worked with the FBI.
Steele puts together a dossier, tells the same movie script story, changes a few details,
feeds it to the FBI, Bruce Ohr and others,
acknowledges it's all political.
That doesn't work out either.
So now they have to do the hardcore entrapment scheme and set them up.
They move operators, Halper and Mifsud,
to contact the Trump team and try to set them up.
Hey, look, the Russians have this.
Are you interested?
Wink and a nod.
You interested?
Where's that fraud alert thing? Fraud alert. I wish I could have shown this to you interested? Wink and a nod. You interested? It was a fraud alert thing.
Fraud alert.
Fraud.
I wish I could have shown this to Papadopoulos at that time.
A fraud alert, Bib.
That's what happened.
These guys were total frauds.
They were setup artists.
Halper and Massoud.
And now it's all coming out.
It was a scam the whole time. They pushed the information into the Trump team,
Dupopadopoulos and others, and tried to pull it out later to make them look like intermediaries
in a Russian information peddling scam about Hillary and the DNC's emails when it was a setup
the whole time. Biggest scandal in US history. All right. I got one final video, Brennan. I want
to hat tip Conservative Treehouse for pointing this out.
I read a piece where they, and this is good because I had forgotten about this as well.
Because there's another leftist fairy tale, you know, liberal police staters, Joe, is
that, oh, the Obama administration, well, they didn't know Obama.
Obama's the golden calf for them.
You know, they genuflect in front of them.
Obama didn't know.
He's pure of heart, Obama.
Really?
So I got this video coming up in a second that's going to debunk that nonsense.
You can put that baby to bed right now.
All right.
Our last sponsor of the day, but another great one.
My patron supply.
Listen, when you hear the word prepper, what comes to mind?
You're like, oh my gosh, he's Hollywood elitist snobs.
They're like, they're a bunch of paranoid freaks.
Really?
Well, let me tell you something.
I live in a hurricane zone.
I've seen some pretty nasty stuff down here.
You are, the paranoid freaks are the idiots who aren't preparing.
Folks, is it paranoid to insure your house?
Is it paranoid to insure your car?
Listen, thank God the likelihood of something happening to your home and your car is very
small, but we insure them anyway.
Why?
Because it would be catastrophic if we lost them.
How do you not insure your food supply?
It's insane.
All we're asking with MyPatriotSupply is you get a basic food emergency plan with their
emergency food that lasts 25 years in storage.
You can order now at preparewithdan.com.
That's preparewithdan.com.
Think about it.
When was the last time a natural disaster like an earthquake gave you a warning?
What tornado asked for permission?
Or a power outage made some kind of appointment?
It doesn't happen.
Don't be caught without an emergency food supply.
It makes no sense.
These things always happen at the last minute.
Grocery stores are empty.
All of a sudden, you're left without food.
Think about looking at your kids going,
Mommy and Daddy don't have any food.
No good.
I have tons of this stuff.
Thankfully, preparedness has evolved and leading the way are good people at MyPatriotSupply. I bought this. I can get this
stuff free from them. I buy it. I'm not kidding. I bought a lot of it. Bought. I'm always making
up new words. Bought. From emergency food storage to water filtration to survival essentials,
MyPatriotSupply stocks the items you need to survive a disaster so you can be ahead of the
mob and have peace of mind. We've all been caught off guard. Don't let it happen to you. Go online and check it out at
preparewithdan.com. That's preparewithdan.com, preparewithdan.com. Check it out today. They
have tons of good stuff over there. Get prepared. Get your food supply. Ensure your food supply.
Okay. All right. Again, left this myth. The White House didn't know anything.
Obama, Obama. we love Obama.
Obama was so great and wonderful.
He's so pleasant.
This guy couldn't have possibly done anything wrong.
Well, folks, we already know that FBI investigator Peter Stroke, who was involved in the illicit
operation to spy on Donald Trump and his girlfriend, Lisa Page, the FBI lawyer he was having an
affair with.
We already know that they tweeted each other in
that august to october period where they're putting together the pfizer warrant to spy on
trump because of other operations the entrapment operation and the foreign spying broke down
excuse me we already have these two texts they texted each other potus wants to know everything
we're doing that stands for President of the United States.
What do you think they were talking about?
Bocce ball?
Their weekend outings?
Their movie night on Friday night?
These two?
POTUS wants to know everything.
You think they're talking about, well, what?
Their review of the newest X-Men movie?
Erroneous.
Wants to know everything.
Erroneous is right, Vince. POTUS wants to know everything they're doing. What were they doing? Well, they were
doing a lot. But
professionally, I'm sure that's not what POTUS was
asking about. They were
working on the Trump case.
Second text. The
White House is running this. Okay.
Running what?
What? Running a lemonade stand on
the Corner Strokes' house?
Oh.
Now you may say,
well, we don't really know
what they were talking about.
It's amazing how uncurious
reporters are about these two texts, Joe.
It is.
But they're endlessly curious
about a collusion hoax
that's based on a fake dossier
that's been debunked
25,000 different ways from Sunday.
They believe that, but they don't know no no these
texts could mean anything yeah yeah okay sure nice work journalism here's a video again hat
tip conservative treehouse guys who had this on their um on their feed here is john brennan
testifying in front of congress in 2017 talking about a brief he gives to the intelligence members the gang of eight up on
capitol hill about this case notice what he says about who he did this brief in conjunction with
check this out through the so-called gang of eight process we kept congress surprised of these issues
as we identified them again in consultation with White House, I personally briefed the full details
of our understanding of Russian attempts
to interfere in the election to congressional leadership,
specifically Senators Harry Reid,
Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, and Richard Burr,
and to Representatives Paul Ryan,
Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes, and Adam Schiff
between 11 August and 6 September.
Oh, oh, you did it in, excuse me,
in consultation with the White House. Ah, oh. Again, oh, you did it in, excuse me, in consultation with the White House.
Again, media folks, don't worry.
No investigation here.
We know you don't.
Listen, journalism died 50, 60 years ago.
We get that.
But again, it is amazing how people
who call themselves reporters and journalists
are fundamentally not curious about the biggest
scandal of our time and overwhelming evidence that the Obama administration White House was involved
in a detailed, sophisticated political spying operation on the Trump team. The evidence is
everywhere. POTUS wants to know everything we're doing. The White House is running this. John
Brennan. I briefed them in consultation with the White house you may say okay dan i i know the reporters alleged reporters listening
who don't actually do journalism like well we don't know uh you cut that clip what was he
briefing them in consultation with well the august briefing he gives to the gang of eight about this
scenario contains information only contained in the dossier or from Steele's mouth.
How do we know that?
Because just a couple days after that briefing,
Harry Reid, one of the people Brennan briefed in consultation with the White House,
Harry Reid writes a letter to the FBI demanding an investigation
and includes the ridiculous, now entirely discredited,
allegation in the letter that Carter Page took a bribe from a Russian gas company worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
A completely fabricated nonsense charge.
Carter Page has never been charged with that.
It is made up and they needed a criminal nexus to get a FISA warrant to spy on Page to use
the two hop rule to hop from Page to others to the Trump team so they can surveil the
entire Trump team network.
He says it.
Brennan's words.
I briefed.
He basically briefed Steele's information to the Intel community, which then wrote a
letter, Harry Reid demanding the FBI investigate Trump
for debunked Christopher Steele junk information
that was political in nature.
How do we know that?
Again, because the charge Harry Reid includes in the letter
is only from Steele.
So Steele is briefing Brennan's CIA
that he then briefs in consultation with the White House
to Capitol Hill.
Again, media types, don't worry.
There's nothing to see here.
You total losers.
You had one job in the media, one job.
Get the facts right.
That's the only job you have.
You're not opinion people, and you have blown it every single step of the way.
Can't say this enough.
Read my second book on this exonerated.
It's going to open your eyes.
It is a perfect addendum to Spygate, my first book.
It tells it more of a, it tells the story in more of a longitudinal narrative fashion.
It's the greatest spy story ever told, except it's a spy story run by idiots.
Spygate was written more like a police file.
This is written in more of a narrative format.
Spygate, you can jump from chapter to chapter.
This one reads straight through.
Disappointing, folks.
All right, I've got other news.
I had so much this weekend.
I'm going to filter it into tomorrow.
I've got so many great stories. Pundit fact blows it again. These pundit fact,
politifact, ladies and gentlemen, these fact checkers, they're in my bet noir. I can't stand
them. I hate them because I shouldn't say that's a strong word. I strongly dislike them. I always
tell my daughter not to say that, but it's just not nice. But I strongly dislike what they're doing because they're not fact checkers, folks.
Here's the latest where they just completely blow it.
A pundit fact by Tom Kircher.
Trump-backed ex-pitcher Curt Schilling misleads, saying self-defense gun use stops 2.5 million crimes.
Now, what's fascinating is that pundit fact, PolitiFact, I'm pretty sure they didn't check Beto O'Rourke's ridiculous tweet this weekend, or excuse me, speech this weekend, where he said the United States is a racist country.
We're still racist today.
That's a pretty outrageous charge.
Here's a tweet by Beto.
Our country was founded on racism and is still racist today.
In Arkansas, I said why I believe there's no
denying this reality and why it's on all
of us to change it. Clearly an outrageous,
hyperbolic, anti-American,
moron thing to say
by the worst candidate in a field
full of fools on the Democrat
side, Beto. Interesting how they didn't
fact check that and look at the actual data
of racism in the United States, which has dropped
so dramatically that racists are so isolated now that you would be laughed out of the public
conversation if you were ever to speak like Antifa speaks in front of other people, the known racist
anti-first amendment group. That thankfully that's racism, which still exists, but is isolated to
pockets of insanity that you are not accepted in any polite conversation anywhere anymore.
But we're still a racist country.
But politifact, pundit fact, they won't touch that stuff.
So what do they do?
They harp on Curt Schilling, who is a pitcher for the Red Sox and the Diamondbacks.
I know, Curt, full disclosure.
And the Orioles.
But Curt had tweeted this.
What's that?
And the Orioles.
Yeah, he was here.
Did he?
Oh, yeah.
You know what? You know what you know what
good pull but i totally forgot that yeah uh kurt schilling he's at garrick 38 so katie thulin who
i know on twitter she's at katie 121 tweeted you mean to tell me law-abiding responsible gun owner
actually did stop crime will butter my butt and call biscuit interesting tweet by katie there
kurt basically says about this defensive use of firearms happens 2.5 million
times a year per the CDC.
Now,
to be fair,
Kurt gets the citation wrong.
Wasn't the CDC,
but instead of pundit fact saying,
well,
there is some data to back up what Schilling said,
even though the citation is wrong,
they rate his claim as mostly false.
So we did a little homework this weekend
based on Pundit Fact's own citations in the piece. And we found this 1995 study, more than
credible study. Here, it's put up the title of the study. By the way, this will be in the show
notes with a bunch of other terrific articles at Bongino.com. Subscribe to my email. We'll send
you this stuff every day. But I want you to check out this study. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
Armed Resistance to Crime.
The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun
by Gary Kleck and Mark Gertz.
Now, the study is from 1995, to be fair.
But Gertz's data is not wrong.
Gertz didn't say this is recent data.
He just made the claim that happens
about 2.5 million times a year.
So instead of providing some actual fact-checking, saying, well, Kurt's data is not exactly wrong, but it may be a little dated.
It may not be.
That's the study.
I want to show you what the study actually says.
We can debunk these fact-checking nonsense liberals who have an agenda.
Check this out from the actual study.
nonsense liberals who have an agenda.
Check this out from the actual study.
The most technically sound estimates presented at this table are those based on a shorter one-year recall period that relies on the subject's firsthand accounts of their own
experiences.
These estimates appear in the first two columns.
Listen, folks.
They indicate that each year in the U.S., there are about 2.2 to 2.5 million defensive
uses of firearms of all types by civilians against humans, with about 1.2 to 2.5 million defensive uses of firearms of all types by civilians against humans,
with about 1.5 to 1.9 million of the incidents involving use of handguns.
So, ladies and gentlemen, Kurt's number is exactly right.
But again, PolitiFact, who is not a fact checker, this is a liberal activist group telling you a story not telling you the facts
can't have any of that be correct let's not focus on that here's another winner let's not focus on
on friday's show remember on friday's show joe we played the video of elizabeth warren
doubling down now on her claim that michael brown and ferguson was murdered despite the fact it is
categorically false murder is a you're talking homicide is a legal term for an unauthorized
killing of a human being michael brown was shot to death by a police officer the department of
justice studied the incident and deemed the use of force appropriate based on brown's actions
it was not a murder elizabeth warren keeps saying this because she's desperate for votes to rile up the liberal base and because she's a liar.
She's just a straight up liar.
Where's pundit fact on that one?
Obama's Justice Department deemed what Elizabeth Warren said to be false.
They did their own study.
Nowhere, Joe, because that doesn't fit their narrative.
Remember, ladies and gentlemen, liberals lie.
And just to clear up
something i said last week and i always appreciate your feedback even the negative stuff because you
all are very nice even when you're like dan you know i love your show but with all due respect
you don't have i mean i appreciate that it's very nice i don't mind the negative feedback
but a couple of you emailed me and said you know dan last week you basically said liberals are the
worst they're awful people and you're feeding Dan, last week, you basically said liberals are the worst,
they're awful people,
and you're feeding into your own narrative
where you say that the difference
between us and liberals are,
and I stick to this to this day,
we as conservatives think liberals
are people with bad ideas,
and we argue that way.
Liberals think we're just bad people with ideas.
In other words, they don't care about our ideas.
They just think we're awful.
I racist, misogynist.
That's it.
That's their whole argument.
Well, you're a racist.
That's their argument to everything.
He said, well, by calling liberals really awful people, aren't you feeding into that?
No, no.
I want to be clear.
If you're a regular listener to the show, you know this.
Joe, come on.
Vouch for me on this one.
I'm glad you're saying this.
How often do we say we are not talking about all Democrats?
Often.
I'm not.
All the time.
I have friends who are Democrats.
I have neighbors who are Democrats.
I'm not saying that.
The overwhelming majority of Democrats, I'm telling you this, are patriotic people who
candidly have just bad ideas.
Their ideas don't, it's not that they, you know, some of them, I don't agree with them
on the firearm issue at all.
But I don't believe that a lot of the Democrats, not the radical liberal nuts I'm talking about.
You know, they see these instances and they're just misinformed, folks.
They think gun control works.
There's no such thing as gun control.
It's only people control.
It doesn't work.
They just don't know.
And it's our job to debate them.
Radical far leftists just hate you they are and i stick to
it just plain awful people they're bad people they just hate you they lie to you all the time
i had four or five of these stories today but in the interest of time i want to get to one last
one by the wall street journal wall street journal piece there's a liberal lawsuit out there by states trying to sue i'm going to make this part
of it quick because it's not really takeaway but here's a piece in the wall street journal by the
editorial board august 16 2019 a kamikaze climate suit democrat states are suing the epa and it
could hurt their own emissions cause the bottom line is this the obama administration instituted
this massive regulation of carbon dioxide plan that would have forced the states to shut down most significant portions of their power grid.
The Trump administration repealed a lot of this nonsense. The courts blocked it.
Liberals are now suing. They basically want the states to be forced into a one-size-fits-all energy plan the problem is they're
probably going to lose this lawsuit and if they do it's going to significantly damage the epa's
ability to regulate carbon dioxide which joe would do damage to the entire liberal agenda
does that make sense yeah yeah now putting that aside for a minute because the takeaway from the
piece is not forget the lawsuit stuff and the machinations of that for a moment the important takeaway the piece is that liberals lie to you all the time
all the time to advance an agenda like the politifact people there's no evidence of that
2.5 million actually there's a study saying that here's the problem the united states is leading
the world in the reduction in the emissions of CO2, Joe,
and where liberals are in charge, the problem is getting worse, not better.
Check out this portion of the Wall Street Journal piece.
Again, because we do facts and data here, liberals lie all the time.
Quote from the piece.
Also note that energy-related CO2 emissions declined by 14%.
Declined by 14%.
Declined by 14% in the United States from 2005 to 2017, while increasing 21% globally.
Huh.
Yes, I read that right.
Now, get a load of this one.
Most of the U.S. reduction was due to natural gas replacing coal.
Carbon dioxide emissions. this is crazy,
fell five times more
in Ohio and four times
more in Pennsylvania between
2006 and 2016
than in California, which had
long banished coal.
How about
that?
How about that?
Twip notes. How about that? Twip notes how about that my gosh what do you even do facts so liberal
california which we're gonna banish coal the emissions the decrease in co2 emissions is going
at a slower rate than it's going in ohio and pennsylvania states that voted for Trump that don't have these restrictive anti-energy, anti-coal laws.
Folks, again, we're just doing facts.
CO2 emissions are going down in the United States.
They've been going down since before Obama got in office.
That's what capitalism does.
It's the rest of the world that's contributing to the CO2 emissions.
And by the way, CO2 is not a poison.
Carbon dioxide is a gas you expel from your lungs.
You inhale oxygen.
You use oxygen.
You exhale carbon dioxide as a byproduct of respiration, which plants then use and plants
take in.
Plants love it.
And their respiration process and emit oxygen.
This isn't hard. It's not a waste product it's not a waste product carbon dioxide oh you get more carbon dioxide you get
more plants liberals i know this is hard it's like oxygen for plants make sense
now you see why they're awful people?
Again, I'm not talking about all Democrats.
I say that on Fox, that caveat in there all the time.
Liberals say that about all of us.
Republicans, conservatives, libertarians.
You are racist.
I'm not doing that.
I'm telling you there's a pocket of the Democrat Party that's growing
that is full of nutbag liar losers.
Which I place the antifa anti-first
amendment racists in there too and they lie all the time that was a good show today i know self
praise thanks but i really enjoyed that i did too even though we only slept like two hours last night
crazy the middle of the night and paula knows i hate that. Since we've been in this house, we've been here four years. My smoke
detectors are
0 for 5 at detecting fires
and 5 and 0
for waking me up at 2 o'clock in the morning.
So, yes, we all need smoke
detectors, but change your batteries
because my system is completely busted.
I got to fix this thing. It's driving me crazy.
All right, folks. Thanks again for tuning in. Please,
please, please subscribe to my YouTube channel me crazy. All right, folks. Thanks again for tuning in. Please, please, please subscribe
to my YouTube channel,
youtube.com slash Bongino.
Subscribe to our audio podcast
on Google Podcasts,
Apple Podcasts, and SoundCloud.
It's all free.
And please pick up my book.
It's coming out very, very soon now.
Exonerated, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble.
It's available now.
Check it out.
It will tell you the whole movie script story
in a way I promise you've never heard before.
I'll see you all tomorrow. You just heard the Dan Bongino show. You can also get Dan's podcasts on iTunes or SoundCloud
and follow Dan on Twitter 24 seven at D Bongino.