The Dan Bongino Show - Ep. 719 The Swamp Is Panicking
Episode Date: May 14, 2018Summary: In this episode I address the panic breaking out in the Swamp as the truth about the operation to take down Trump comes out. I also debunk liberal myths about health care and economics u...sing some troubling current news stories. News Picks: This piece nails it. It breaks down the inconsistent statements from players involved in the scheme to take down Donald Trump. This older piece covers the attempts of players in the scheme to cover up their tracks. Why did this UN nuclear inspector suddenly resign after Trump’s Iran deal decision? Single-payer health care continues to be a disaster. This isn’t a debate; the Left sees it as a fight. .Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
get ready to hear the truth about america on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host
dan bongino all right welcome to the dan bongino show on this five actually you know what not fine
monday it is a complete disaster down here in south florida where it hardly ever rains for more
than a half an hour an hour it has been raining um animals are lining up
two by two uh i see an ark floating down the street it has been raining forever and on the
weekends because i never get out of the house a little dan bongino trivia for those of you who
care to know it may be too much information for others but whatevs i you know i love you all so
yeah i feel like we have a personal relationship i like to go out in the weekends and hang out for like an hour outside and catch some sun
it's good it's good for your vitamin d because i never get out of my house ever because i'm
always working and this weekend nothing no sun nothing arcs coming by animals lining up there's
a i mean it is, there's water everywhere.
Noah's drinking already, you know.
He's up there ready to go.
Yeah, it's a little depressing, I got to tell you, Joe.
It's dark outside, everything.
Usually, Joe, behind me, you see the light creeping through the window.
None of that today.
All right, I got a really stacked show for you today.
I have a piece of audio.
And Joe, wouldn't you say being in the radio business
for almost as long as I've been alive,
that it's not customary to play a clip, say,
over, what, 45 seconds to a minute?
I mean, you try to avoid it
because you don't want to lose your audience, right?
You want to stick to usually no more than a minute,
unless it's a particularly interesting piece.
Well, when I sent you one this week,
this clip that we're about to play in a few minutes,
wouldn't you say this is worth the,
what, minute and 40 seconds,
two minutes or so it is?
Yeah, once I started listening to it
to see what you wanted,
most of the time you could stop
and get to work on the cut,
but I had to finish,
I had to finish listening to this thing.
It is so incredible.
Now, this is a clip of Henry Davis.
Just to be clear, if you have young ones listening now joe did his best to creatively bleep out there's a lot of expletives and i'm
certainly not um condoning that although i've been known to drop quite a few f-bombs myself
but joe bleeped them out so but if you have young ones listening, it's still, I get it.
I'm just warning you.
The clip is, it's a little rough, but it's worth hearing.
I'm going to explain that to you in a minute why, because it's really important.
Some of you may have already heard it.
It's a guy named Henry Davis.
And as I say, it is a red pill neutron bomb going off everywhere.
All right.
Today's show brought to you by buddies at WaxRx.
I had to use this this week.
When your ears aren't clean, they can get really uncomfortable.
They itch, they're painful and get plugged up, making it harder to hear.
That's what happened to me.
I was getting the ear.
I hate the ear itchies.
Many people use cotton swabs, candling, or drugstore remedies to clean their ears, but
they really don't do the job.
They can even be dangerous.
Now you can get a real solution for stubborn earwax.
The WaxRx earwash system is
doctor-developed and works safely when other products fail. The WaxRx system is the method
physicians trust the most, and it's just like the system they use in their office. It feels really
good too, Joe. When you clean your ears out with this, it feels awesome. WaxRx comes with everything
you need to safely clean out earwax and condition your ears conveniently at home for less than the
cost of a doctor's visit.
The doctor-developed WaxRx system uses special wax softening drops to break down earwax inside the ear.
It has a specially engineered pump fitted with a unique tip to gently deliver the perfect amount of cleansing pressure to flush wax away.
Finally, the pH condition formula rinses and soothes your ears, for the ultimate most complete earwax removal system
available visit gowaxrx.com to order your reusable earwash system today we love these guys
gowaxrx.com that's go w-a-x-r-x.com gowaxrx.com offer code dan free shipping this really works
it's a great you know and i bet it works better than a door key. Yeah, the door key, definitely NG. No good.
So I'm shopping in the Publix this weekend, and I see Candace Owens' tweet.
We follow each other on Twitter. I see a tweet from her.
And it's a tweet from a gentleman who happens to be black.
It's only relevant because of the ongoing debate about the black community in the Democrat Party,
started by Candace Owens from Turning Point USA and Kanye West. Now, for those of you who missed the story,
some quick background. Candace Owens, who I know, you know, full disclosure,
there's no full disclosure. I know Candace. I think she's great. She works with an outfit
called Turning Point USA that focuses on Charlie Kirk's group on college campuses and advancing free market ideology on college campuses. Candace Owens, because she is black,
has become a target, of course, of identity politics. Democrats, Joe, who can't stand
anybody who is black, not espousing the liberals are the greatest. Everybody else,
shut your mouth line, okay? Yeah. Candice received a tweet from
famous rap artist Kanye West
who said, I like the way Candice
Owens thinks. This happened about three weeks ago.
Joe, all hell broke loose.
Sure did.
One time with the Secret Service,
I was doing a
true story. I was doing a, for the G7
down in Georgia. Yeah, I think it was
G7 on Sea Island or something. I was doing some motorcade training for a local in Georgia was, yeah, I think it was G7 on Sea Island or something.
I was doing some motorcade training for a local police department.
It was hysterical, Joe.
And we're training like the Georgia State Troopers and others on how to handle transportation
motorcade type assaults.
And I'll never forget, we would do these mock attacks.
We would use like Roman candles and everything like that to simulate mortar fire and things.
And after every attack, if they did something wrong,
we'd do a debrief.
And there was this one guy.
He was hysterical.
I think he was a state trooper or a local cop.
And we would say, hey, man, what do you think happened there?
And every single scenario, he'd say,
we were driving down and then all hell broke loose.
Every single scenario, he would say the same thing.
We thought it was the funniest thing.
But all hell broke loose after Kanye sent this tweet.
Because the Democrats have a monopoly right now on the black vote.
Upwards of 90% of black voters will vote for the Democrats, despite the fact that the Democrats' policies are actively harming the black community.
are actively harming the black community. This has been a really troubling component,
I believe, of politics for a long time. The fact that they have so managed to persuade so many people that they're doing things in their best interest, even though they're not. I had said to
you, I don't know Kanye West. I've never met the man in my life. I don't know his politics. I don't
know his wife, Kim Kardashian. I know
nothing about him. I'm not suggesting he's a conservative because I don't know. I haven't
spoken to him. I'm simply suggesting to you that the Kanye West tweet was a very important moment
because, Joe, it did something we haven't been able to do in eons. It started a real conversation
where some people in the black community are out there saying
maybe kanye's right joe maybe republicans aren't the answer but maybe democrats certainly aren't
either maybe we should start looking at something else having said that this guy his name is henry
davis don't know the guy i don't know anything about him. All I know is I saw this video on Candace Owens' Twitter page.
And it is, again, forgive the language. We're going to play it in about 10 seconds.
So if you have kids, we bleeped it out. But I understand if you want to kind of fast forward ahead.
But I want you to listen. This is two minutes worth your time of an adult male black voter who has finally had enough of the Democrat garbage.
Play that cut.
black voter who's finally had enough of the Democrat garbage. Play that cut.
First of all, Kanye, you're damn right, Kanye. Make America godly again. Make America great again.
You said the right damn thing. It's about time some black people start standing up. Some rich black people start standing up and start talking about what the fuck is going on with all us other black people stuck on this plantation.
And then, uh, T.I.
said something to the effect of, oh, it sounds like Donald Trump.
If you just listen to the way he talked, he sounds stupid as a mother.
Fuck him.
And Kanye said the right thing when he said, oh, what I'm supposed to talk about?
Crack. What I'm supposed to talk about? Crack?
What I'm supposed to talk about?
F***ing your b***h?
What I'm supposed to talk about?
Killing each other because it's cultural?
Damn right.
Don't nobody want to hear that s***.
Every time somebody turn on the radio,
that's why I don't even listen to black rap no more.
Every time you turn on the goddamn radio,
m***er talking about either twerking their f***erking a booty or getting high or killing each other.
And then Tiago had a this one really pissed me off.
We talk about Donald Trump represent white supremacy and genocide.
We supposed to forget about all of that.
Man, if you don't sit your stupid ass down, genocide is every time you turn on your TV and you see a young black man or a young black
woman dead in the street at the hands of another black person. You damn right, Kanye. Damn right,
Kanye. Damn right, Kanye. I'm with you, brother. And just for that, I'm finna put you in my new
book called The Coon. Now, I ain't got shit to lose.
Talking about, aren't you, what did I say some shit about?
What you gonna, the risk you gonna lose or some shit like that.
Man, shut the fuck up.
Us grown ass black people tired of this shit.
This woke ass me before age slavery shit.
I ain't never been a motherfucking slave.
I don't know no goddamn slave.
I ain't never picked no goddamn cotton.
But I know one thing, I'm out here in these motherfucking streets
trying to make it at the hands of these old puss-ass,
punk-ass Democrats.
Damn right, Kanye.
Go Trump or cry.
Free him.
Well, now. It is a family friendly show.
And you have to understand, I really tortured myself over this.
And I fully understand if you're going to send me some negative emails.
You know, I read them.
My wife and I both emails on the website.
But I really feel it's important to put that on there, despite the language.
All right.
Now, I don't want to be a hypocrite again.
You know, I've been known to, you know, I grew up new york and i just being candid i'm not suggesting it's right
i'm just saying to you that's pretty common in new york people talk like that all the time and
it's not people talk like that in business meetings in new york um a lot of you from new
york understand the reason it's an important moment by the way, that clip has gone viral now. The reason that clip is
important is because I've said to you repeatedly, folks, that the Republican Party, more importantly,
the conservative movement, does not have a message problem. It has a messaging problem.
It has a marketing problem. The Republican Party message is quite popular. I know this. I ran for
office and I used to knock on doors in the black community. Folks, this happened. This isn't like a talking point. I'm trying to impress you. Oh,
he says he knocked on. No, I actually did it. Joe knows this. I actually went out and knocked on
doors. We were known in Maryland for our grassroots campaigning. Maryland has a significant black
population. And in talking to people, not just one or two folks hundreds if not thousands of black voters
male female teenage adults seniors i was always pleasantly surprised how not only right-leaning
their ideology where i don't mean they in like a collective sense i just mean proportionally
speaking the overwhelming number of black voters i spoke to had not only
right-leaning but very right-leaning ideological beliefs give me my own money get out of the way
let me work i you know the sanctity of life faith gosh you ever been to a largely black church i
mean they're packed on a sunday you know i went went to one, it was a mass on a Sunday.
It lasted like two hours.
I was like, wow, this is long.
My church, 45 minutes, you're out the door.
I used to go and I played in the praise band.
I know, right?
I know the church you're talking about.
The only white guy in the church.
It was right above the road from my house where I used to live.
I used to come there from my house on Sunday when we did the show on Sunday.
Loved it.
Folks, again, I'm not trying to make universal,
you know, that's what liberals do,
stereotypical comments.
I'm just telling you in my experience,
the percentage of black voters that had right-leaning,
faith-based, work-based, family-based beliefs
was overwhelming.
So if I'm telling you that those are largely
conservative beliefs, I'm also questioning to you, and I have for a while, why the heck we keep losing the fight for black voters despite the fact we're standing for things black voters, the ones I ran into, largely believe in.
The answer is because the conversation's never even started.
never even started.
There has never been a conversation about the viability of conservative values
because Democrats in the media
have been so effective at saying,
don't even talk to those conservatives.
They're a bunch of racists
that understandably,
when you're bathed in this propaganda,
the idea of even talking to a conservative
and hearing what they have to say, Joe, is stop.
That's why I'm telling you the Kanye moment and moments like this are important,
despite the fact that I don't know this guy, Henry Davis.
He may not even be a conservative. I have no idea who he is.
I don't know if Kanye West is a conservative. He may not be.
I'm telling you, folks, that the important point here is not that Kanye is a conservative or that the guy you just heard, Henry Davis, is a conservative.
By the way, he was talking about T.I., who is another rap artist who went after Kanye for his, I like how Candace Owens thinks, who's Candace, who happens to be a conservative.
T.I. went after him.
That's who he was ripping on.
But having grown up in the streets myself and i'm listen i'm
not trying to be a tough guy i don't i don't need i don't care i'm not sure impress anyone all right
everybody get over yourselves you know with that stuff i hope in the street but i did i grew up on
the streets of new york i you know 64th place of myrtle avenue it wasn't like uh you know uh
it wasn't a hellhole it was a you know middle lower middle class neighborhood i'm not trying
to impress anybody with that.
I'm just trying to make the point that
the people who are going to break through
into those communities,
middle, lower, middle class, poor communities
that are minority, Hispanic and others
that have traditionally voted Democrat only
because they believe Republicans are evil
are going to need people who talk the language
of the streets to break through.
Do you understand what I'm saying, Joe?
Sure.
One of my biggest complaints has been the Republican Party,
we walk into like a methadone clinic and we want to talk about the Laffer curve.
Listen, I love the Laffer curve.
The idea that there's a sweet spot tax rate where you can generate the most amount of revenue.
In other words, a 0% tax rate, you raise $0 because you're not taxing anyone. At 100% tax rate, you raise $0 too
because you've taken everybody's money and they have nothing left to invest or earn and they have
no business left. That's a great point. The problem is when you're talking to people in a
methadone clinic, you may want to start talking about their problems and travails on the street
with drugs. And if you've grown up with a silver spoon in your mouth, as a lot of politicians have,
Joe, they've never learned to talk that language. Right. I get it. I get it. The language is tough.
I understand. And I certainly, you know, for as much as I get it, I understand, you know,
using the Lord's name in vain always bothers me. And I'm not lecturing Henry at all.
Henry, I'm not anybody's preacher.
But I'm simply suggesting to you that sometimes,
not everybody talks about the Ron curve and the Laffer curve.
Sometimes people need, what do you call it, Joe?
A little bit of tough love?
Yeah, you can call it that.
People in the real world where people work really hard, what do you call it joe a little bit of tough love yeah you can call it that yeah you know
people in the real world where people work really hard sometimes people need to hear it and hear it
tough a little reckoning yeah and i think that's important i think that clip as i sent it to joe
and i was kind of questioning myself like for a number of reasons like the clip is long do we play
it i mean no one's really heard of this guy that i know of yet. But I think it's a critical moment.
Understand this.
And I'll leave it at this because I got a lot to get to.
There's been some more just unbelievably explosive developments in this case that keep blowing up.
But the minority coalition, the Democrats have assembled to fortify popular vote victories in the country.
fortify popular vote victories in the country.
Gay voters, black voters, Hispanic voters, women voters, young voters. That's their coalition, largely.
That will entirely collapse if they lose the black community.
And I'm telling you, the black voters, I have a large body of experience talking to real
people on the ground.
When the conversation actually starts like
hey you sure these democrats are fixing our problems or trying to maybe the problem isn't
you know the leska maybe the problem is too much government right yeah once that conversation
starts it's over the democrat parties we know it is finished and this guy i that's quite a
rant right there and it is now uh viral so go check
that out uh it's on the twitter feed is henry davis if you check out candace owens it's on there
and if you're on twitter you check out my feed i retweeted it as well okay um i got a lot to get
to today too i got some really terrific uh stories falling apart they're trying to desperately cover
up the source and it's not
working, Joe. And I got a great story for you from Andy McCarthy today that puts together a timeline
that shows you these people are in a panic right now in the DC swamp. All right. Today's show also
brought to you by buddies at iTarget. The iTarget Pro system is one of the finest systems out there
for upping your proficiency with a firearm. That's important. Anybody can pull a trigger on a firearm. God forbid you have to do so in a self-defense scenario. You have to be able to
hit what you're firing at. Now, one of the best ways to do is to go to the range, but the range
can get expensive. You have to clean your weapon. You have to get to the range. Sometimes you don't
have a range conveniently located close to your house. So what do we do? We can dry fire. Now,
dry fire, you have to safely unload your weapon. You check it, you check it twice, you check it three times, you make sure it's a safely
unloaded weapon. And one of the things we used to do on the Secret Service in the NYPD is with
that safely unloaded weapon, you would pull the trigger on a safely unloaded weapon, always
pointed, of course, in a safe direction. And you would practice your trigger pull, you would
practice your sight alignment. But there's a problem. Problem is you have absolutely no idea where the round would have gone because it's an empty
weapon. The iTarget Pro system has fixed that. They will send you a laser round. You will put
that laser round in a safely unloaded weapon. You don't have to make any manipulations. I can
hurt your gun, anything like that. If you have a nine millimeter firearm, they'll send you a nine
millimeter round. I have a Glock 43. I love this thing.
You put it in there, and when you depress the trigger on that laser round, it'll emit,
shockingly, Joe, a laser!
Hey!
Onto a target they send you.
It works with a phone app, and you will see exactly where those rounds would have gone.
It is a great system.
I have people, they send me pictures of their groupings on Monday, and then on like a Friday or next week, and you're like, wow, in a week, look at what happened. They're shooting the wings off a great system. I have people, they send me pictures of their groupings on Monday and then on like a Friday or next week
and you're like, wow, in a week,
look at what happened.
They're shooting the wings off a firefly.
It's the best system out there.
The website is itargetpro.com.
That's itargetpro.com,
the letter I, targetpro.com.
Use promo code DAN, D-A-N,
and you'll get 10% off.
Of course, if you ever forget our sponsors
or their websites,
go to bongino.com
slash sponsors, and you can see them all there with the promo codes as well. But check it out,
itargetpro.com, promo code Dan for 10% off. Okay. The big, big question, Joe, who's the source,
as we've said? Now, I have a pretty decent idea who this person is, but the story is falling apart and collapsing everywhere. There is an
incredible piece in a national review by Andy McCarthy I have in the show notes today at
Bongino.com. If you subscribe to my email list, I will send you these articles. It's a good,
I don't know, 900 plus words, but it is worth reading because it describes something
that has largely escaped the scrutiny of the hacks in the mainstream media.
Now we know, based on some inquiries by Devin Nunes and the House Select Permanent Committee on Intelligence,
we know that there was a human intelligence asset, think about what I'm going to tell you here,
embedded somehow in the Trump campaign. Now we know, Joe, they weren't just spying on them using
Pfizer surveillance. In other words, signals intelligence. In the arena here, we'd call it
humint and sigint, right? Sigint is signals intelligence, emails, phone calls, texts.
You're intercepting signals from Joe to his criminal handler
or terrorist handler.
Poor Joe.
Yeah.
Now, that in this case was bad enough
because there's still no evidence anyone on the Trump team
actually committed any kind of collusion with the Russians.
So it's a fake case altogether.
Doubling down on this this we now find out
thanks to newness that there was a human intelligence asset meaning somebody was dealing
with joe who was spying on joe for the fbi oh my spy who bugged me this joe whipping out the james
bond analogies i love i've seen every movie It's actually not the last few, but everything.
I don't like the Daniel Craig movies.
I'm sorry.
They're not my,
I liked Roger Moore.
He was my,
I loved Roger Moore.
Sean Connery,
of course,
is the icon, but I grew up with Roger Moore.
So now that's bad enough.
You already know that from last week.
There's no,
the breaking news last week was there was a human source.
Now last week shows,
we discussed who those sources may be.
I'm relatively confident. I know who it is. It's troubling, deeply troubling. Here's the
problem. Not only the FBI have a source, it appears that the FBI, although they had a source,
a human source working in an opposition political campaign, the Trump team, for the Barack Obama
Justice Department, it appears, Joe, that they passed this information to a foreign spy
working for Hillary Clinton. Yes, yes. I'm not making any of this up, okay?
Read the Andy McCarthy piece. Now, how do we know this, okay?, now I have this framed out because I like to take it out to 30,000 feet to keep you all grounded on where we're going with this. The question here, did the FBI actually pass sensitive information to a former British spy working for the Clinton team? In other words, did they tell the spy that they had a source in the Trump campaign? Do you understand how devastating that piece of information is? That the Federal Bureau of
Investigation had a human spy in the Trump team, passed it on to Christopher Steele, a former MI6
foreign spy who was working on behalf of the Clinton operation to nail the Trump team.
Now you say, well, what makes you think the fbi did
that well this is a screenshot of andy mccarthy's piece again which will be in the show notes cool
glenn simpson testified remember these dates this is going to be important on august 22nd of 2017
he testified in front of the senate he said said in that testimony, listen up, this is a quote.
Essentially, what Christopher Steele told me was that the FBI had other intelligence about this matter from an internal Trump campaign source.
This is Christopher Simpson, who's running Fusion GPS, who hired Christopher Steele, this British former spy, to nail the Trump team.
So just to be clear, Simpson's telling the Senate that Steele told him that the FBI told
him that there's an internal Trump campaign source.
I continue.
And that they, my understanding was that they believed Chris at this point.
Because Chris Steele had negative information on Trump too.
But why did they believe Chris Steele, the FBI?
They believed Chris's information might be credible
because they had other intelligence
that indicated the same thing.
And one of those pieces of intelligence
was a human source from inside the Trump campaign.
Oh, oh, oh, what?
So now not only is the FBI signals intelligence intercepting information, phone calls, emails, all kinds of things on the Trump campaign.
They're spying with a human spy on the Trump campaign, the political opponent of Barack Obama.
Trump campaign, the political opponent of Barack Obama.
And then they're sharing the information with a former foreign spy working for the Clinton team to basically drag Donald Trump along the bottom of the seafloor.
Folks, how did Christopher Steele, how did Simpson know that?
Now, Simpson immediately tried to walk this back.
Now, when did he walk this back?
Follow the dates.
This testimony, folks, August 2017.
In January of 2017, the testimony becomes public.
The testimony becomes public and immediately a according to the washington times
a source close to fusion gps said simpson mischaracterized the source in other words oh
no no um we weren't talking about a human spy inside why why why we weren't talking about a
human spy inside the campaign why would they do do this? Why does this matter? Folks, the entire time, the entire Russian collusion narrative has been fed
by a stream of BS from the FBI and the DOJ that these contacts with the Trump team, where
information was exchanged, there was talk of russian emails the entire time joe this
has been portrayed to us as accidental contacts oh this australian diplomat met with george
papadopoulos at a bar and they were just having beers and whoa papadopoulos said something about
russian emails this has been portrayed to us the whole time as a series of accidental, not deliberate contacts.
If you're a regular listener to this show, you know that's garbage.
The Trump team was framed and they were set up, I said this morning on Fox and Friends.
If a guy asked, I told Brian Kilmeade, if you're sitting on a park bench and a guy approaches
you on a park bench you've never seen before and asks you to go rob a bank with him and then he does it again the next day there's only two solutions
to this either he wants you to rob a bank or he's trying to frame you for robbing a bank
it's the latter with the trump team now if there was a human source, follow me here, a spy, a human spy inside the Trump team working for the FBI,
and this all happened before the Papadopoulos meeting, which was all, look, this was all accidental, Joe.
This Australian just met with this Trump guy, and they said something about emails, and look, look.
Bingo, that's what
happened.
The investigation started to Trump.
If there was a human spy embedded in the Trump team before that moment, these contacts were
deliberate.
The Trump team was set up.
Do you understand the neutron bomb that would go off?
Let me get this straight.
These were not accidental contacts.
The FBI was actively trying to entrap the Trump team
in the most significant consequential entrapment case
in American history?
Joe, do you see where I'm going with this?
Yeah.
The reason Simpson... Now, remember, in January, the testimony becomes public, even though he said it in August.
He says it in August of 2017 that there was a human source.
I just read to you the quote.
Simpson tells the Senate there was a human source inside the Trump team.
How do we know that?
Well, he says Christopher Steele was told that by the FBI.
Steele's working with Simpson to gin up negative information on Trump.
The testimony becomes public.
Simpson, or as the Washington Times says, a source close to Simpson,
immediately dials this back and says, no, no, that was mischaracterized.
Why? Why?
Because I'll bet there was pressure from people up on the Hill who know this was an entrapment operation the entire time. And former Obama people said, listen, Chris, we cannot acknowledge there was a source inside the campaign. If we acknowledge it was a source, people will know these were not accidental contacts. These were deliberate. We were trying to entrap them. You have to dial that back.
were deliberate. We were trying to entrap them. You have to dial that back. Now, here's where the timeline gets screwy. And here's where McCarthy is really onto something in his piece.
How did Simpson in August know when he testified that it was downer?
When you say, what are you talking talking about Simpson testifies in August
there's a human source inside the campaign
August of 2017
in January the testimony becomes public
someone close to Simpson
immediately dials it back and says
no no we mischaracterized that Joe
the source we were talking about was probably
Downer or the Papadopoulos
it had something to do with the Papadopoulos
meeting in May of 2016
here's the problem Papadopoulos had something to do with the Papadopoulos meeting in May of 2016.
Here's the problem.
How would Simpson know during his August testimony about Papadopoulos or Downer?
Papadopoulos or Downer, Joe, the whole Papadopoulos-Downer story does not appear in the media or in the public domain until December of 2017.
When did Simpson testify in front of Congress?
August.
How did, in other words, Simpson had inside information.
Yeah.
He had to have inside information. Yeah. He had to have inside information. The whole Papadopoulos downer meeting where they talk about the emails and the bar in London.
The whole story, Joe, doesn't come out until December 30th. You may say, oh, well, he found out about it somewhere else.
It must be in some kind of congressional testimony.
Nope.
It's not there.
Papadopoulos's name is nowhere to be found.
Oh, well maybe it was in the dossier they created.
Nope, Papadopoulos' name isn't in there either.
Matter of fact,
this is interesting
from the Andy McCarthy piece.
On November of 2017,
after August, obviously,
remember, Simpson says
there's a human source inside the Trump campaign
in August.
In January of the following year, he dials that back when it becomes public.
And he says, oh no, I just must have been talking about Papadopoulos.
He had no way of knowing about Papadopoulos.
Do you see what I'm getting at, Joe?
When Simpson talked about a source in the Trump team, a human source, he was talking about an actual spy.
Boom!
Damn right!
He was not talking about Papadopoulos.
He had no way of knowing about him.
You doubt me?
From the Andy McCarthy piece.
Two weeks after the information became public,
Simpson was asked about Papadopoulos in a fleeting exchange during testimony,
this time before the House, Joe,
November of 2017.
All right.
After his August testimony, saying there's a source oh
no no i met papadopoulos really interestingly joe the subject came up in context of trump related
research simpson had done separate and apart from his collaboration with steel this is great
simpson claimed that he had been looking at papadopoulos for a while and regarded him as a clone of Carter Page.
But he admitted that he actually knew nothing significant
about Papadopoulos beyond what Mueller had included
in the information filed in court at the time of the guilty plea,
which was way after his testimony in August.
Someone's lying. Which was way after his testimony in August.
Someone's lying.
Now, the information Mueller filed in October.
October.
Again, after August.
After Simpson testifies in August about a source in the Trump campaign, he's now alleging, oh, I was just talking about Papadopoulos and Downer.
Then he says, oh, I just learned about Papadopoulos from the Mueller filing.
The Mueller filing was in October.
And from Andy McCarthy's piece, Joe, said nothing about Papadopoulos' meeting with Downer
or the subsequent purported transmission of Papadopoulos' claims from Australian authorities to the FBI.
He is making this up.
Simpson is making this up.
It is clear as day.
Now, this is where it gets even more hairy.
Remember after the testimony,
Dianne Feinstein at one point releases the testimony
of Christopher Simpson.
Yes.
She does an unauthorized release.
That's right.
Dianne Feinstein is a Democrat senator.
We now know a former staffer
for feinstein a guy by the name of dan jones is still apparently according to some public reporting
is still working on an opposition research campaign against the trump team
dan jones was a staffer from feinstein feinstein released the transcripts
feinstein released the transcripts of simpson's testimony right around january now people all over said well why would she do that why would diane feinstein
go around the back of republicans in the senate and release the transcripts
of christopher simpson's testimony folks i told you a long time ago, this is so
they could coordinate their stories, but I'm starting to wonder now as well if there's another
angle to this. Did Feinstein release Simpson's testimony to warn the source? Folks, this is why
this is so troubling. If the source is connected to the establishment gop along with
the democrats and was working from the beginning and potentially paid by the government to take
down donald trump we have one of the biggest crisis crises in modern american history
did diane feinstein release the testimony about simpson and the source to tell in other words to
warn the public and the source to get their story straight knowing it was going to become public
do you understand what i'm saying folks simpson outed the source in august
it was behind closed doors nobody knew about it except Except the Senate, Joe. Right.
And the gang of eight members
who oversee the intelligence community.
Feinstein
knows the Republicans are onto something.
He knows the...
Excuse me, she knows. Dianne Feinstein
knows. By the way, she knows
one of her former staffers.
Yeah. Dan Jones. She knows him well,
obviously. He was a former staffer jones
is now working on an anti-trump project still funded by liberal donors uh largely liberal
donors from the coasts feinstein's terrified about her role in this she's probably also terrified
that a source out there has some really damaging information about democrats involvement in the
spying operation on Trump.
She has them release it.
In other words, hey, everybody, wink and a nod.
You've been outed by Simpson and his thing that there's a spy inside the Trump campaign.
You get what I'm saying?
Yeah, like, shh, shh, shh.
Everybody shut up.
Exactly, or get your story straight.
Yeah, yeah, get it right.
Yeah, scrap this thing.
Now, listen to me.
The timeline does not add up.
He could not possibly have known about that.
I'm going to move on in a second because I got some other stuff to get to, but it's important.
They are desperately now trying to change the story and change the story rapidly the initial story was that the dossier
was the start of this entire counterintelligence investigation against trump that story changed
when it came out the dossier was paid for by hillary clinton and had false information
then the story became no no this backbencher staffer papadopoulos told this australian
diplomat something who passed it to U.S. Intel.
Now that story's up in the air as well because Simpson already outed the fact that there's a source inside the campaign, which they're now trying to dial back again.
They can't get their story straight how this investigation actually started.
So two final bullet points on this in other words as andy mccarthy says at the end of his piece
when simpson said he had a source that they had a source inside the trump team that's
actually what they meant and astonishingly they shared this information
with a former british spy working for the Hillary Clinton team.
Second, what are they covering?
They're covering a chicken and egg problem they have now, Joe.
Because now they keep saying, well, the dossier started the investigation.
Well, what started the dossier?
A human source?
No, no, not a human source.
The Papadopoulos meeting.
Well, how did that happen?
Did somebody know about it in advance? Maybe. Because Simpson already said guys had a source that the FBI said they had a source. And apparently John Brennan said there's a source in this EC, this electronic communication, which started this thing.
This fake dossier, incentivized probably by an investigation started by a human source inside the Trump team, may have started a FISA surveillance operation and human spying on the Trump team.
And the Democrats can't find any way out of this now.
There's no way out, folks.
They cannot wiggle their way out of this. You know i i saw an article i think was it uh
i forget where it was forgive me but they brought up a point i've been bringing up over and over
the chicken and egg problem they're having joe is that there is no predicate crime no matter how
hard they try to spin this thing the any investigation is supposed to start, you would think, because a crime happened.
I can't investigate Joe for nothing and find a crime later.
The problem they're having over and over, the Democrats with this case, and why they keep changing the initial way it started, is because it didn't start with a crime.
It started with Trump.
with a crime. It started with Trump.
It started with somebody initiating an investigation against
Donald Trump with no
crime attached, no matter how much
they dig, no matter how many times
they change their story. They cannot
Marty McFly this and back to the future,
go back in the past, and
change history. No crime happened.
Please tell me you
understand this.
This is the critical component of this whole thing. There was no predicate crime. They can change the story.
They can change how it started over and over. They can never get past the fact that there was no
crime. There was an investigation into Donald Trump for one reason. He was Donald Trump.
They've manufactured the crime later.
That's why they keep changing the Genesis story.
Because the Genesis story in an actual investigation, Joe, would be, we saw Joe Armacost break into a bank.
Okay, we investigate him for bank robbery.
If I'm investigating Joe for bank robbery and he never robbed a bank,
I can change the story a million times.
It's not going to change the fact
that Joe never robbed
the damn bank.
That's why the story
keeps changing.
That's why,
in conclusion,
the identity of this source
is critical.
Because if the source fabricated this whole thing,
and these contacts with the Trump team were set up,
they were not accidental,
we have a major league crisis on our hands,
and the Democrats know it.
Big trouble ahead.
All right.
Got a lot more to get to today. Some other stories. Today's show,
finally brought to you by our buddies at Brickhouse Nutrition. Big fan of these guys.
They came through for me this weekend. I had a busy weekend. I don't get really the weekends
off anymore. So it's tough for me to eat my fruits and vegetables on the weekend.
So they came through with field of greens, my favorite supplement. It's real food.
It's just real food. It's not crap extracts, not garbage stuff. It's fresh vegetables ground up into a powder. They obviously take the water
out waters, but good significant portion of fruits and vegetables. And it's this great tasting,
fruity flavored fruit and vegetable powder. It's delicious. I put it in green tea,
put it in V8, sometimes orange juice, sometimes just plain old water. It tastes terrific. And
it's your fruit and vegetable insurance.
Everybody knows the key to a long, productive life are fruits and vegetables.
I love this stuff.
It tastes delicious.
My kids like it.
My daughter's like anything, anything.
She likes like chicken tenders, which every night we got tomatoes.
She'll eat tomatoes.
But she takes this, Field of Greens.
It's so good.
It's delicious.
It is your fruit and vegetable insurance, folks.
Give it a shot.
Go to brickhousenutrition.com slash Dan. That's brickhousenutrition. It's delicious. It is your fruit and vegetable insurance, folks. Give it a shot. Go to BrickHouseNutrition.com slash Dan.
That's BrickHouseNutrition.com slash Dan.
Pick up a bottle of Field of Greens today.
Won't regret it.
It tastes delicious.
Again, we all know from our doctors, dieticians, and your nutrition folks, you don't have some
expertise in the arena.
Fruits and vegetables are the key to a long, healthy, productive life.
We have chemicals in these fruits and vegetables we don't even know about yet.
People who eat a lot of them have better cognitive abilities, all kinds of, healthy, productive life. We have chemicals in these fruits and vegetables we don't even know about yet. People who eat a lot of them
have better cognitive abilities,
all kinds of different assets to your life.
Give it a shot.
We don't all have time to cook these fruits
and vegetables every single day.
Give it a shot.
Feel the greens.
BrickHouseNutrition.com slash Dan.
BrickHouseNutrition.com slash Dan.
I felt absolutely amazing
since I've been taking this stuff.
I love it.
Miles sends me,
and I tell you, I can't go through it quick enough.
We're running out of it so fast.
We're going to have to buy some more.
Brickhousenutrition.com slash Dan.
Pick up Field of Greens today.
Okay, I have a couple other stories.
By the way, very suspicious resignation, Joe.
The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, their top inspector,
suspiciously resigned last week.
A guy named Tiro Varahanta suddenly resigned without reason
right after the Iran deal was signed.
Hmm.
Why would that be?
More on that coming soon.
I have some theories on that one.
But there have been some, interestingly enough, some tweets by the Iranians about some very suspicious activities surrounding the signing of the Iran deal.
So I have that story from ABC News in the show notes.
Check it out.
It's an interesting one.
I don't mean to leave you hanging on that, but you got to be very careful with things like this.
I don't want to impugn anybody's character, obviously, without any evidence.
I'm just saying the timing of the tweets and the timing of the resignation are extremely suspicious.
And, you know, ABC News leaves the details out, but read it anyway, because I don't think this is the last we're going to hear of this.
Okay, another one.
So Hillary Clinton's running around the world again on her Blame Everybody But Hillary tour.
And it's interesting.
She keeps talking about this short-termism thing.
This is a – listen, it's not a made-up problem.
To be fair to Hillary, which she'll never be to us and people she calls deplorables,
she was giving a speech a little while ago.
She was talking about short-termism, how, Joe, corporate America is basically failing us
because they're interested in the stock price of the company and not the long-term growth of the American economy.
Well, I believe in evidence, facts, and data.
So there's an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal this week.
And again, refuting and debunking a lot of these talking points that liberals go around talking about.
It's important you know this because it's a pretty common pretty common attack on capitalism joe oh short-termism nobody really
cares about long-term growth of the american economy and the american worker james freeman
piece in the wall street journal this weekend uh he says uh what is he cites a piece from the
journals james mcintosh he who uh it's a piece within a piece basically he notes that capital
expenditures at big public
companies joe are rising faster than for business as a whole and large corporations are funding
research and development at a historic pace so what is it dems i don't understand is it is this
short-termism or are they funding long-term growth of their companies in the economy again the
evidence is not there for you just making this up here we Here we go. R&D spending, Joe, by S&P 500 companies at the highest proportion of sales since at least 1990.
Business R&D is the highest proportion of GDP since the government started tracking it in 1959.
If short-termism is a problem, it obviously isn't hurting overall R&D spending.
This is what drives me nuts.
Democrats, this is why being a liberal involves living in an intellectual vacuum.
what drives me nuts democrats this is why being a liberal involves living in an intellectual vacuum almost nothing they say is backed up by any kind of sound solid facts and data at all
short-termism was something they developed in a focus group it sounded catchy short-term
companies short-term is not investing in the american work in the american economy
actually they are at the greatest pace since 1959 time out time out no good you're a racist you're a racist wait what we're talking
about short term it doesn't matter you're obviously a race okay i get it thousands of
americans would die thousands of americans will clearly die too because of this epidemic of
short-termism that isn't happening rnd this is based on actual numbers taken from the actual
economy in the real world, folks.
Listen, I'm not telling you we don't have issues, economic issues to overcome.
We do.
Clearly, it'd be great if American companies' productivity would expand at a greater pace
and wages would move faster.
I get it.
But the real economy is real challenges.
I'm just suggesting to you that these short-termism speeches they keep giving,
because it's a catchy focus group talking point, are nonsense. It's not based in any sense of
reality at all. Now, another story I want to get to before we leave for the day, but why this is
important. Productivity matters, folks. Productivity is the essence of a growing economy.
Productivity is everything. Productivity, the ability to produce products,
the ability of an economy to produce a growing number of products with the same or fewer inputs
is how we get richer. In other words, how do we produce more food at the same price or cheaper?
How do we produce more food on the same amount of land or even better even less land
hey we only need a quarter of the land to produce twice the food ding ding ding ding ding score
this is what productivity is widgets food medical supplies how do we produce more of it
now that doesn't only apply to products. It applies to services, too. We say,
services, how would that work? In other words, Joe, a doctor's time is limited. If a doctor's
providing medical consultation services to patients who come in the office, well, how's he
going to serve twice the number of patients? Well, that's the answer. Telemedicine. Oh, now all of a
sudden, he can, for an hour a day, he can serve people in India and Vietnam and all over the world over the internet doing a consultation online.
Even services can have their productivity enhanced.
More products, more services at the same or lesser cost.
This is important and these capital expenditures and R&D matters because the way we develop more products and services with fewer inputs is by investing in technology to produce more widgets.
What I'm trying to tell you is we're in a great spot right now.
The economy's motoring along.
We're below 4% unemployment.
It looks like we're going to have 3% growth this year.
We're approaching 3% growth quarter after quarter after quarter since Trump got into office. If we're investing now, investing, meaning next year, we may have better
equipment to produce even more stuff and productivity. We could be looking at 3%, 4%, 5%
growth. This is good news. If we could just get a hold on our darn spending, life would be peachy right now. Instead, these idiots in Congress who I can't stand, they can't get a hold on the spending.
Did you see that story in Politico?
The rescissions package I was all excited about.
We sent $15 billion in spending.
Essentially cuts, money they're not going to spend now, back to Congress.
$15 billion was nothing.
I said to you, your phone calls are working?
Well, the GOP's
balking on it now because this is what they do.
Sellouts. The worst.
I'll keep you updated on what happens with that. I'm hoping
they sign it, but McConnell, of course, is like,
we don't want to go back on our
promises. What promise? To bankrupt the United
States? Are you kidding me?
Alright. Last story.
It's in the show notes. A good one. Please check it
out. Oh, by the way, before you get there, there's another's in the show notes. A good one. Please check it out.
Oh, by the way, before you get the one, there's another story in the show notes from the American thinker. It's a short one, but it's a good one about how we're not in a debate right now
with the left, Joe. We're in a fight yet. They're the ones defining the fight, not us. And I don't
mean it, of course, in a violent way for the media matters, uh, goons who listen, I'm talking about
how the left defines us, but it's an interesting piece they're in a fight right and not a debate they're not interested in
the facts i have that piece up at the american thinker but it's read it it's a pretty good one
how once you recognize that how the radical far left they're not interested in no matter what you
say the guy brings up the point and what of what fact you bring up they'll change the topic they're
not interested in refuting facts they're're just interested in fighting you. Confrontation, that's all. So final story of the day, the single payer
scam. Single payer healthcare is a disaster, a debacle. It doesn't work because of the third
party payer problem. What is the third party payer problem? If there are two parties to a
transaction, a buyer and a seller, a doctor and a patient, a consumer and a car
salesman, those two parties work out a price they both agree on. When you have a third-party payer,
the government paying for stuff, you screw up the entire economic agreement process where there's
some kind of a clearing price you both agree on. Why? Because the consumer's not paying,
directly at least, they're paying through taxes
and the provider of the services let's say in health care the doctor the hospital knows you're
not paying so there's no reason to try to be competitive on price this is what single payer
is it's a third party payer disaster interesting piece i have in the show notes today about the
single party payer government-run health care system in the united kingdom the nhs their last minute cancellations show for uh for uh medical appointments are the highest in 25 years
they had 25 475 cancellations between january this is not funny i'm not laughing folks it's
just amazing how people get suckered by single single payer. 25,475 cancellations between January and March alone.
They have a target, Joe.
These government planners, they love targets.
Their target was to treat 92% of patients within 18 weeks.
92% that target's now been missed for two years.
This is an, here, I'm going to,
this number's just going to blow your mind about how crappy single payers.
2,755 people waited more than 52 weeks for medical services.
Folks, 52 weeks, you're probably dead by then.
This is the problem with single payer healthcare.
It is a single-payer disaster.
The disaster is that there's no...
When you disconnect the consumer
from the provider of the product,
the incentives for both sides
to seek efficiency and quality go out the window.
That's what the transfer of products and services is about.
It's about cost
and quality. Never forget that. If I buy a sweater from Joe, I care about the cost of the sweater,
and I care about the quality. That's ultimately going to determine the price I'm willing to pay.
Joe has to care about the cost of the sweater, because if it's too expensive,
competitors will drive him out of business, and he has to care about the quality, or else the
consumers of the sweater, the people who buy it, will not return the business and joe will be out of business shortly
right to understand when a third party intervenes this is the if there was one thing i could hammer
through to my socialist uh listeners out there i know you're there because i get your emails
and the liberals i still don't you've never explained to me why you think the government as a third party payer
is going to solve that cost or quality problem the government doesn't care about the cost of
the service because they're not spending their money they're spending taxpayer money you will
always care more the government doesn't care about the quality of the service they are buying for you, Joe, either, because it's not for them.
It's for you.
Why would they care?
Liberals can never, ever adequately answer that question.
The cost and quality problem cannot be overcome.
It can't.
There is no way you can frame to me in common sense terms that you will have a better grasp of the cost and quality of a
health care service and what it means to me if you've never met me in my life how do you know
you know milton friedman the four ways to spend money right what's government government is other
people spending other people's money on other people they're spending other people's money
taxpayer dollars so they don't care about the cost.
They're spending it on products they're buying for other people.
They're not even buying it for themselves.
They don't care.
There is a cost and quality problem, ladies and gentlemen, that simply cannot be overcome.
Look at this single payer article about the NHS and you'll see what I'm talking about.
It is a scam.
It has always been a scam.
It's been a scam from the start.
Don't fall for the trap.
They ration by time. You know what they say, Joe? They say, oh, we don't ration care. We allow
everybody access. When? Well, in some cases, 52 weeks later. Some of them are dead. This isn't
funny. Cancellation by attrition. Cancellation by attrition. You're right. Cancellation by death.
That's rationing by time. Now, for those of you
coming back, say, oh, well, in the United States, we ration by price. Yeah, and the market brings
the price down unless the government gets involved. Don't you find it slightly ironic
that the two spheres the government has the heaviest involvement in are the two spheres
where prices refuse to come down? Healthcare, where the government pays for about
40% of it, and education, where the government runs the student loan operation and public schools.
The prices for everything else that requires sophisticated assembly, iPhones, the prices for
flat screen TVs, that's all come down. The prices only stay elevated when the government injects
itself because the cost and quality problem. The prices only stay elevated when the government injects itself
because the cost and quality problem, the government doesn't care about the cost and
they don't care about the quality. Therefore, the cost doesn't come down and the quality
stays like crap. Don't be a sucker for this. All right, folks, I hope in the beginning of
the show, you're okay with that. I put that in there again. I know it's a family-friendly show,
but that was a red pill atomic bomb going
off. And I think, you know, sometimes
even the harsh language, we have
to hear that stuff and other people need to hear it too.
I appreciate all your support for the Chum Store.
We have Bongino's show merchandise.
You asked for it.
We put it out there. It's been selling like crazy.
Go to the website, Bongino.com.
Pick something up today and check out the show notes.
Don't miss the stories. And I'll be in for Levin tonight, by the way.
6P to 9P, Mark Levin filling in on the radio, so check that out.
I'll see you all later.
You just heard the Dan Bongino Show.
Get more of Dan online anytime at conservativereview.com.
You can also get Dan's podcasts on iTunes or SoundCloud.
And follow Dan on Twitter 24-7 at DBongino.