The Dan Bongino Show - Ep. 786 John Brennan Should Be Very Concerned
Episode Date: August 16, 2018Summary: In this episode I address the real reasons disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan is panicking about the revoking of his security clearance. I also discuss the liberal media’s disingenu...ous efforts to attack the Trump economic bump. News Picks: This Daily Caller piece addresses the George Papadopoulos plea deal. Why did this government employee lose his security clearance after reporting irregularities about one of the players in the Spygate scheme? This November piece from the Hill covers the leak investigations going on within the DOJ. Sara Carter has some interesting new reporting on newly revealed Bruce Ohr/Chris Steele texts. This Investors Business Daily piece throughly debunks the “Obama handed Trump a strong economy” nonsense. Denmark is not a socialist country. The American public trusts Trump, more than the Democrats, on the economy. Liberals are losing their minds because Jeff Sessions ate in this restaurant. Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
get ready to hear the truth about america on a show that's not immune to the facts with your
host dan bongino we're not gonna make america great again it was never that great yeah
we don't do this isn't saturday night live like we don't do cold opens on this show but uh joe
played that for me that was uh that's joe but that wasn't actually said the second part uh at
that event but that was andrew cuomo liberal uh joker clown hack governor of New York yesterday inciting a firestorm.
America's never great.
And then Joe, of course, added that in.
So, listen, I have nothing to add to this kind of stupidity.
Nothing.
I just think Joe does a great job pulling movie quotes, making these people look silly all on their own.
Producer Joe, how are you doing?
Doing well, Daniel.
Doing well.
This is the new democrat party folks this is
sadly who they are i'm not talking about all democrat voters let me be clear i mean that
i'm talking about the democrat party it's being hijacked by a bunch of looney tunes
andrew cuomo the governor of new york actually said that oh man well thank you yesterday for
our most downloaded show ever um sheesh the show is just growing so fast.
It is.
Every day we wake up with it.
We're like, I think we'd be happy with X number of downloads.
And then X number of downloads becomes old by the following week because it's growing so fast.
Thanks to you.
We really, really appreciate it.
You all make the show.
It's all for you.
So thanks a lot.
I got a lot to talk about.
Yes.
I missed some stories yesterday because yesterday the Rachel maddow story took over the whole show
but uh the media is trying to flip the script on the economy don't let them do it don't let
them do it they're trying to now give obama credit but i'm going to do a thorough debunking
and eviscerate this nonsense today because it was the media themselves excusing the obama economy
and blaming it on secular stagnation and other things you know excusing the obama economy and blaming it on
secular stagnation and other things you know in other words obama's economy was terrible and
blaming it on other things in the past and we're going to go back and we're going to make sure we
do that but i have some updates to uh on yesterday's show which are pretty fascinating
all right on today's show brought to you by buddies at the farmer's dog a dog food company's
claim to use all natural ingredients but what kind of beef or carrots can sit on a shelf for years some of that stuff really
stinks we can't i mean literally do we can't eat highly processed food every meal and be healthy
and neither can your dog the healthy the healthiest food for your dog is real fresh unprocessed food
that's right these are living organisms just like us. We love our dogs.
Introducing the Farmer's Dog, the company helping dogs live longer and healthier lives with fresh, ready-to-serve meals delivered directly to your door.
Clever marketing has convinced pet owners to feed unhealthy and highly processed kibble,
but the Farmer's Dog is different.
Just complete a short questionnaire and a vet-developed meal plan is created just for
your dog, your buddy.
Food arrives at your door in pre-portioned packs, ready to open and pour.
It's easy and looks and smells like real food because it is real food.
My mother-in-law's dogs love it.
Love it.
And food matters.
Studies show that even adding fresh food to your dog's diet can reduce cancer risks by 90%.
Start feeding your dog better today.
Get 50% off your two-week trial of fresh, healthy food at thefarmersdog.com.
That's thefarmersdog.com.
Plus, you get free shipping.
Just go to thefarmersdog.com to get 50% off your two-week trial.
Farmersdog.com slash Dan.
All right.
So, interesting development yesterday.
First, before we get to the economic stuff.
So, George Papadopoulos is our buddy.
Papa D, Papa Dizzle.
I told him, don't take this plea.
Do not take this plea.
This guy is clearly now the victim of an ongoing scam to set up the Trump team.
This guy is going, history is going to judge this man far differently.
So Papadopoulos' wife spoke to Chuck Ross at the Daily Caller.
I will, I'll make sure I put the piece up in the show notes.
Please read it.
And thankfully, Joe, this is great news.
This is a fantastic development.
Please read it.
And thankfully, Joe, this is great news.
This is a fantastic development.
Papadopoulos' wife is saying that she hopes that George does not, in fact, take this plea deal for these charges.
Now, you know George Papadopoulos.
You know the allegations that he met with this Australian official and disclosed that there was maybe some dirt on Hillary.
I'm telling you the guy was set up.
Do not accept this deal.
Everybody needs to fight back right now.
Everybody.
Mike Flynn too.
It is time to fight back.
The Mueller probe is clearly at this point,
a witch hunt.
This was clearly a setup.
The Trump team was framed.
It's now becoming obvious. And it is the obligation of people involved in this case right now.
Please.
I am begging you to not accept these deals.
Please don't do it.
This story is bigger than just the people involved.
This story is about the weaponization of government
to target a political campaign
and the appointment of a special counsel to later on
and turn the heat back on the Trump campaign
despite the fact that they were the ones victimized
by this nonsense.
Mike Flynn, Papadopoulos, they have to fight back.
This is the time.
This is the time now to turn the heat back on the government and make them come to the
table with what they've got.
Thank you all for the emails, by the way, to the Rachel Maddow show yesterday, disclosing the fact that Mifsud, I strongly believe at this point, was a U.S. intelligence asset.
I think here's what has to happen.
Let me give you just a simple path forward here.
Discovery motions need to be filed everywhere.
Everywhere, Joe. If you are Mike Flynn,
if you are George Papadopoulos right now,
discovery motions have to be filed everywhere.
I want to see everything you got.
This is the United States of America,
ladies and gentlemen,
despite the ridiculous, outrageous comments
of Andrew Cuomo.
This is still the greatest country
in the history of mankind.
And damn it, it's worth defending.
The principles of the Constitution it it's worth defending the principles
of the constitutional republic are worth defending file discovery motions file them over and over if
they are going to prosecute you on a case where they're alleging you lied to them then make them
produce the information make them produce the 302s the interview summaries by the fbi make them
produce everything they have on missifsud. If the allegations
against Papadopoulos are that he met with Mifsud, this Maltese professor in April, that again starts
this whole thing by allegedly telling Papadopoulos about some Russian dirt on Hillary and the entire
bedrock of the case is that this guy is some Russian asset, then darn it, make the FBI produce
the information that led him to believe as such.
Because I'm telling you,
Mifsud was not a Russian asset.
Mifsud is linked deeply
to Claire Smith of the UK Intelligence Services,
the Joint Intelligence Committee,
to the Link Campus,
to the training of European Union law enforcement.
This guy's deeply connected through,
you see a bunch of photographs,
a bunch of prior contacts.
This guy is deeply connected, Mifsud,
to Western intelligence.
Ladies and gentlemen, he's connected to friendlies.
I'm telling you, this guy was set up.
I know this is hard, but we're in a real fight right now.
And it's very tough for me, Joe, understandably so,
not being in their predicament, whether it's Flynn or whether it's Papadopoulos.
It's very tough for me to give them advice.
I'm not going through what Flynn and Papadopoulos are going through.
They're under federal charges.
They've got the boot of Bob Mueller
on their necks right now.
They're probably being threatened
with greater charges if they don't plea out.
I can't say to you,
well, I understand what that's like
because I don't.
They're probably going to be bankrupted
by legal fees.
There's no easy way for me to say to you,
oh, don't worry about it.
I get it.
Me saying this is
I can't put myself in your shoes here
but your fight is a bigger fight right now
I can only fight the way I know how
you know I left my job in the secret service
my pension luckily things worked out in the long run
but as Joe well knows they didn't work out in the short run
no
things got tough for me
not as tough as they are for you right now.
But you've got to fight back.
Make them put their cards on the table.
Make them show what they've got.
The exposing of this scandal is a big deal.
It is a huge deal.
And now we're starting to see panics at it.
All right.
Moving on.
Because this is important.
It's related.
But just please, please
fight back. It is representative
of a much larger fight.
People will rally
behind you. People are
tired of the smaller probe.
They are tired of the switch on. They are tired
of the attacks on this president.
They are tired of it. They will rally behind
you and right now public opinion matters.
You know, for as much as I can't stand what the Clintons did in office,
remember Susan McDougal?
She spent, gosh, I don't know how many years,
but a lot of time in jail defending Bill Clinton at the time.
Listen, I don't agree with Bill Clinton,
and I don't know what McDougal's involvement was at the time or how much she knew or didn't know.
But the public will rally around you.
Please fight back.
Please do not take these pleas.
Once you accept these pleas, that you plead guilty, that you lied when we know you didn't at least in the context
of of of the way the fbi has framed this our fight gets more difficult because then joe the fight
when we start fighting for you what is the what do the liberals say well they pled guilty right
yeah please please please fight back this muller probe is a disaster all right on that front john brennan is panicking
john brennan yesterday had a security clearance um revoked by the white house
yes yes yeah all the liberals are freaking out authoritarianism tyranny yeah whatevs
yeah sorry trump he's a real authoritarian. Cutting taxes, cutting regulations, and cutting government power.
Yeah, that's the exact opposite of an authoritarian.
Folks, Brennan is panicking.
Why is Brennan panicking?
I have an article, hat tip to Steve, great article he sent in.
On the Hill, I want you to read in the show notes today.
From November 14th of 2017.
Why is Brennan panicking, Joe?
Brennan is panicking because Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department have active criminal
investigations into 27 classified leaks right now. Do you really believe John Brennan's
fingerprints are not on at least some of those?
Brennan is freaking out for a reason.
Brennan has to know he may be criminally on the hook for some of these leaks
if the evidence presents itself that he knew authorized it or, even worse, did it himself.
Brennan is in full panic mode, ladies and gentlemen.
There is a reason he had his security clearance stripped.
Trump is not the dope the liberal media wants you to believe he is.
Trump likely has this information.
There's probably a good, strong chance that Brennan at least has his fingerprints or his agency's fingerprints
while he was in charge on those one of those 27 if not more classified leaks to the media
he is in a world of trouble read the Hill article again I don't want to get into the
I know it's a flashpoint with everyone I'm just telling you on the Take It East front, there are things happening here.
They may not be happening at your pace.
I get it.
But there are things happening.
I believe that the investigation is about to come to an end on a lot of these classified leaks.
And that's what you think.
Trump just made this up out of nowhere.
Joe, this.
Hey, we're going to pull uh secret clearances from comey
from from uh hayden from from brennan he trump does not do these things uh impulsively like the
media he may say some things impulsively but he does not do these things without deliberating on
right there's a reason this came up the reason is is Brennan is probably going to be implicated at
a minimum, at a secondary level, in potentially authorizing some of these leaks. That investigation
is most likely coming to an end soon. But Brennan's freaking out because his fingerprints
are all over this. Don't forget this. Here's where Brennan's in a world of trouble, folks.
As far back as 2015,
The Guardian, a left-leaning UK-based paper,
was reporting on Brennan's contacts.
Brennan's contacts as far back as 2015.
The story came out later, just to be precise on that.
The Guardian was reporting on Brennan's contacts with the gchq head robert hannigan in
the uk who is the gchq why does this matter how does this relate to what's going on right now
the gchq is the united kingdom's equivalent of our nsa they hoover up and vacuum up a lot of signals intelligence why was brennan meeting with them
why was brennan exchanging information potentially as far back as 2015 with not only the gchq in the
united kingdom but other countries as well and information that may have been about the trump team folks what happened to bob hannigan now just to be clear bob hannigan is the head
of the gchq the again the uk equivalent of the nsa left-leaning papers themselves were reporting
on him meeting flying in fly this is all out there on the record. You can look this up yourself.
They reported themselves on the GCHQ head, Hannigan,
flying into D.C. himself for director-to-director level meetings.
What were they talking about?
What was Brennan doing visiting with a foreign intelligence entity while the left-wing media was reporting that they had information on the Trump team they wanted to pass?
Now, you may say to yourself, why would the left-wing media out Brennan like that?
Oh, no, no, no.
You're reading this thing all wrong.
no no no you're reading this thing all wrong you have to remember at that time late 2015 2016 and certainly through early 2017 don't forget this because i get this a lot they go dan i don't
understand obviously what brennan was doing with foreign intelligence was illicit immoral and
unethical why would the left-wing media out? You follow where I'm going with this show?
I get this question a lot.
I'm with you so far, yep.
You're making a mistake.
You're making a present-time bias error.
You're viewing it through the lens of what we know today,
not what was known back then.
In 2015 and 2016, the media is being fed these leaks,
these classified leaks, the information that would later become the dossier.
Trump is involved in organized crime in Russia, all BS.
They're being fed this.
Ladies and gentlemen, the media hates Trump and they believe this.
They start reporting on Brennan's contacts with foreign intelligence, grotesquely immoral
contacts,
unethical, and depending on the leaks, potentially illegal, on what he did with the information,
the media was reporting on them to buttress their claims about how serious this Russian
collusion and Trump's connections to shady figures were.
Do you see my point?
The media's reporting is, look, the Brits and everyone else, they're reporting all this
information about Trump.
This is so serious.
Trump is in so much trouble.
Intelligence agencies all over the world are telling John Brennan, the media doesn't know
at the time the information is junk, that it's a steaming pile of horse manure
now what's the problem now that the information has been roundly discredited and debunked the
source christopher steel's been debunked the information's been debunked and the information
has been roundly criticized as garbage and has been used to spy in a U.S. court despite being discredited information.
Now the media cannot go back and unwrite those stories.
The Guardian, CNN.
Do I have to read this CNN headline again?
You know what?
It's always worth reading again because this is that good.
CNN headline.
Here we go. This from april 14th as far as april 14 2017 they were still
reporting this look this up yourself british intelligence passed trump associates communications
with russians on to u.s counterparts by jim shudo pamelaela Brown, and Eric Bradner, CNN, April 14, 2017.
CNN was reporting on this.
CNN themselves thought they were buttressing the claims that this crisis was so severe
that even foreign intelligence entities were spying on Trump.
They never anticipated later on that this thing was going to turn out to be garbage
and that John Brennan was leading them around on a leash.
Does it make sense now?
The listeners can't get enough of that, by the way.
They love that.
Listen to what's going on now, and it explain why number one this is what i'm trying
to get to number one why his security clearance brennan was revoked yesterday secondly why the
media is losing their mind over it and and um and third why the media is actually going to be their
own worst enemy here his security clearance was revoked because they know what's going on. Sessions
Justice Department has been conducting these investigations since basically late last year.
They've been conducting investigations into 27 classified leaks of information,
potential felonies. Read the article yourself. It's in the Hill. That's not a right-leaning outlet. No one's making it up. Those cases have likely come full circle, Joe.
Because they've come full circle, they likely have a good case against John Brennan.
Therefore, Brennan's case and his security clearance is probably wrapped up, the security
clearance out the window. The media freaking out because brennan's team
and maybe brennan himself were likely sources for them in the past and the media is implicated
themselves in writing stories about the illicit passing of information between foreign intelligence
and u.s intelligence on u.s citizens They thought they were supporting the claim
that Trump was guilty as sin.
What they were really writing articles about
was John Brennan's guilty as sin.
Leading around foreign intelligence,
getting them to pass them information on the Trump team,
information that later turned out to be false.
Brennan's been the puppet master the whole time.
I told you this four or five months ago.
Now they can't retract these stories.
What are they going to do?
CNN going to pretend that story doesn't exist?
The big scandal here, the information laundering operation, the spying scandal, and the framing
of Donald Trump, the framing component and the information laundering operation, the spying scandal, and the framing of Donald Trump, the framing component
and the information laundering scandal
are interrelated. The framing
heavily involves UK assets.
Mifsud, the guy who starts this whole thing
with Papadopoulos, is connected
to UK intelligence assets.
United Kingdom intelligence assets.
Ladies and gentlemen,
let me just, because, you know,
it's unfair to you to keep
it going. I go into this in detail in my book, but I'm going to tell you this. I listen, I could,
we're going to hold it and tease it, whatever. Let me just get this out there.
When you read the book, it'll become crystal clear that there were two primary motivations
based on their own public statements, stuff we know about in the past.
United Kingdom intelligence assets
had two probable primary motivations for taking down Donald Trump.
Number one was the policy on torture, or what they call torture, what we would call enhanced
interrogation.
These are viable disagreements to have, but this would have caused a real problem with our relationship if what they thought Trump's policy was going to be actually came to fruition.
I know that's a little confusing, but the British had an actual reason people who were deeply involved and connected to their intelligence community to get invited would have hurt our information sharing relationship because our posture on enhanced interrogation and their
posture on torture had to marry up a bit to keep this information exchange going.
Does that make sense?
Secondly, former higher ups in British Intel, and this is where our book has information
you're not going to find anywhere else.
Former higher ups in British Intel did not like Donald Trump's approach to the travel ban
they saw it as anti-Muslim when it wasn't some of these people their own public statements
indicate strongly that they had an incentive to make sure Donald Trump was taken out the real
collusion scandal ladies and gentlemen is between intelligence representatives and connected people
in the United Kingdom and John Brennan which in turn were used by the FBI and our own law enforcement.
That's the scandal.
Now, making this thing even worse, doubling down on stupid.
Another incredible piece by Rowan Scarborough, who's been doing some just phenomenal investigative reporting at The Washington Times.
It'll be in the show notes today upon Gino dot com.
Again, please subscribe to my email list.
It really helps us get the information out there.
The spy that was used, who was deeply connected again to UK intelligence sources and the United States, Stefan Halperjo.
and the United States, Stefan Halper, Joe.
So there's a guy, Adam Lovinger,
who notices some very shady-looking contracts between representatives of the United States government,
very specific offices, and Stefan Halper,
who Chuck Ross indicates to his reporting,
is the spy we used to spy on the Trump team.
This guy's connected to the CIA,
to family relationships and a past history of working
with them, and to British intelligence. He goes and he talks at conferences with his British
intelligence friends. He's deeply connected to people over there in the United Kingdom
Intelligence Service, Halper that is. So Joe, this is crazy. A whistleblower, Adam Lovinger,
So, Joe, this is crazy. A whistleblower, Adam Lovinger, notices that Halper was paid $411,000 from September 26, 2016 through March until last March.
Wow.
What was he paid for?
You know what's really incredible?
That's roughly the same amount of time that the FBI is using the information
from British intelligence, Christopher Steele,
a former British intelligence guy,
and contacts in the United Kingdom
when they're also shuttling information on Trump.
Was Halpern the conduit?
Now, when the contract's exposed,
the whistleblower, Joe, has his security clearance stripped.
Instead of them actually looking into this grotesque amount of money paid to this guy, they has his security clearance stripped. Instead of them actually looking into this grotesque amount of
money paid to this guy, they strip his security
clearance. What the heck are
these people hiding?
How deeply,
how deep does this intelligence
sharing operation between
the United Kingdom and the United States
go?
Folks, it's time to take
a bath on this and come clean. It is time for Papadopoulos to drop
this plea, for Flynn to drop this plea, and make them all fess up with discovery motions on what
they've got. Put your cards on the table. This Mueller probe is going to be over soon. Public
opinion has turned on this thing dramatically. Bob Mueller and his team cannot continue this
witch hunt forever. This tyrannical witch hunt, violating all the rules of judicial legislative
decency at this point, doing their own thing whenever they want. This cannot continue forever.
Discovery motions, make them bring the information to the table. Expose what Halper was doing.
Expose who Mifsud was working for.
Expose how deeply the channels between the United Kingdom and the United States were.
Expose Brennan's leaks.
Expose this whole thing.
All right.
Sorry, I spent a little longer on that than I wanted to.
But it's an important story, ladies and gentlemen.
And it deserves sunlight. That is, and gentlemen, and it deserves sunlight.
That is, after all, the best disinfectant.
We all know that.
All right.
Now, today's show also brought to you by Blinkist.
If you're like me, the list of books you want to read or those that people suggest you read
is never-ending.
I have a stack of them back here and always expanding.
You simply don't have time to read them all.
Our sponsor, Blinkist, has solved your long list of must-reads once and for all.
Blinkist is the only app that takes thousands of the best-selling nonfiction books
and distills them down to their most impactful elements
so you can read or listen to them in under 15 minutes all on your phone.
With Blinkist, you will expand your knowledge and learn more in just 15 minutes
than you can in almost any other way.
Plus, you can listen anywhere.
In your car, it's the easiest place for me to do it.
In my car, I enjoy that. You know, they have Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, and the Simtaleb, two can listen anywhere. In your car, it's the easiest place for me to do it, in my car. I enjoy that.
You know, they have Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, and the Simtaleb, two of my favorites.
The Blinkist Library is massive, growing by the day.
I always appreciate their books on economics.
Blinkist is constantly curating and adding new titles from best of lists, so you're always
getting the most powerful ideas in a made-for-mobile format.
Five million people are currently using Blinkist to expand their minds 15 minutes at a time.
Get started today.
Right now, for a limited time, Blinkist has a special offer just for our audience.
Go to Blinkist.com slash Dan to start your free 7-day trial.
That's Blinkist, B-L-I-N-K-I-S-T dot com slash Dan to start your free 7-day trial.
Blinkist.com slash Dan.
Go check it out.
A lot of successful people read a lot of books.
Get started.
Best way to do it.
All right.
So moving on to the economy here for a moment.
These are important stories I wanted to get to yesterday.
So the new,
new,
new narrative on the economy is the Democrats are get to yesterday. So the new, new, new narrative
on the economy is
the Democrats are in a real bind
on the economy, Joe,
and the bind is this.
Their messaging is off,
and it's off because
they really don't have an easy out.
You think?
Yeah, because what they,
here's the,
put yourself in the Democrat Party's
shoes right now
on the messaging front.
If they talk the economy up, whether for better or for worse, I'm not saying this is right, even though it's a Republican president, but the president, the executive usually gets credit for the economy.
Again, I'm not suggesting that's even true.
The president can do things to get out of the way of the economy like Trump's been doing and let the American entrepreneur take off.
And it could do things to slow it down like Obama did.
But really, it's the American entrepreneur that grows the economy.
Having said that, the president gets credit.
It's just the way it works.
You don't have to agree with it.
It just is.
The Democrats' option one is to be optimistic and talk up the economy, but they can't do that because Trump is in the White House and they can't stand Donald Trump.
They hate Donald Trump.
Oh, you know what?
Folks, I'm sorry.
I missed something.
This is important.
I just want to close.
I'll redo this in a second.
But Hannigan, I forgot to add this before hannigan
the gchq the british nsa guy that was talking to brennan at the director to director level
sorry i missed this before right after trump's elected by the way he suspiciously resigns he
says oh for personal reasons.
Guy's the head of the NSA.
Out the door like that.
How about that?
How about that?
What happened?
Google it.
Hannigan resigns.
You can read the stories yourself.
They were stunned.
Again, I'm just telling you that's the real scandal,
the exchange of information
between the United Kingdom and the United States.
Sorry to throw that in there like that haphazardly, but I didn't want to leave that point hanging.
That resignation is highly suspicious and should open up.
That alone you should be very suspicious about.
He was the guy dealing with Brennan.
I wonder what he knows.
All right, forgive me again.
Getting back to the economy.
So the Democrats, option one, talk up the economy, be optimistic.
They can't do it because Trump will get credit.
Well, what's option two?
Well, it's obvious.
Well, we could talk down the economy.
We could crap all over the economy, say how awful things are and blame it on Trump, run
against Trump, drive up his negatives.
And there you go.
We win.
Isn't this all great?
Well, what's the problem with that the
problem is obvious nobody wants a negative message nobody wants a negative the economy stinks message
by the way when it's getting uh pretty obvious to people across middle america that the economy's
doing quite well how do they know that because they're living it they're seeing themselves get
raises they're seeing themselves get bonuses they're seeing in some places home values go up. They're seeing their availability of disposable income in
their households go up. People are starting to feel what the economy, a powerful economy,
feels like, and it doesn't feel like it did under Obama. Believe me, the Democrats know this.
Public sentiment, consumer confidence, right direction, wrong direction polls for the country
are all turning in the Republicans' direction, and they know Trump is going to get credit.
The Democrats do not want to be seen like Debbie Downers, so they don't know what to do,
so they lash out.
The lashing out takes the form of identity politics.
This is why you're seeing, by the way, this doubling down on Trump's a racist, Trump trump's a xenophobe he's a misogynist this is all they have the democrats
don't have a coherent message because they don't really stand for anything but but concentrated
government power the only thing they have the best way to sum this up is the democrats at this
point can't get you to vote for them they can only get you to vote against the other guy.
And they think it's working because when you look at generic ballot polls, Joe, like, you know,
generic Republican, generic Democrat in the midterms, you'll see that the Democrats are
still ahead by 43, 43 to 32 percent, and they're up 11 points, but they're still not at even close to 50% approval in these generic
ballots. It's 43, 32. Now they're trying to figure out a new track, track three. And here it is. I'm
always here to break the news to you. We're about two weeks ahead of the cycle. So I brought this
up a little while ago. This is going to be the new line of attack. You're seeing it. You're hearing
it now. It's starting to appear. We brought this up
in a show, what, about a month ago?
That this is where they were going to go with this.
The new line of attack is, well,
the economy may be doing well,
but Obama did it, and the media's
jumping right on board. But the media
has to answer, Joe, just like
they will for having reported on the
UK intelligence, United
States, John Brennan connection. Remember they reported on that, and they can't unre reported on the UK intelligence United States John Brennan connection.
Remember they reported on that and they can't unreport on it.
The media reported on the crappy economy under Obama and they tried to excuse it away.
Investors business daily piece will be in the show notes today.
This is terrific.
And I quote the New York Times again, which is now alluding to along with the left-wing
media. Remember the new narrative. Narrative one, the economy's great. The Democrats can't use it.
Narrative two, the economy's bad. The Democrats can't use it because they don't want to be Debbie
Downer. Narrative three, the economy's good, but Obama did it. Okay. Investor's Business Daily
quote. In fact, the New York Times itself described Obama's economy this way in August of 2016.
For three quarters in a row, the growth rate of the economy has hovered around a mere 1%.
In the last quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the economy expanded at feeble annual rates of 0.9 and 0.8 respectively.
The initial reading for the second quarter of this year released on Friday was a disappointing 1.2%.
So let's just go some of the adjectives here.
Feeble, hovered, mere, disappointing.
This is the New York Times themselves.
hovered, mere, disappointing.
This is the New York Times themselves.
The same New York Times whose editorial folks right now
are trying to turn a corner
and claim that the Obama economy
was rocking and rolling.
But it wasn't rocking and rolling
in August of 2016
when the New York Times
was trying to excuse away
the Obama economy.
I got more.
But the reason I talked about this today
in light of the UK United States intelligence channel, that is going to be the major, major scandal when this all comes out.
Hannigan, Brennan, all this, why Brennan's panicking, why Brennan's security clearance is revoked is because the media themselves reported on it.
And when you ask questions, understand, I like that. I love your emails. But when you ask questions, well like that i love your emails but when you ask
questions well why would the media make themselves look foolish why would they report on this
intelligence channel because they thought it was reaffirming their claims about how serious of a
criminal donald trump was do you understand that the same narrative applies here the same narrative
applies with their reporting on the economy what's that don't view it through today's
lens go back to august of 2016 the obama economy is unquestionably stagnant the media needs to
defend obama the media writes these stories in order to set up a bigger narrative the bigger
narrative which i'm going to get to in a second with some other quotes, is that, well, you know what? This may just be the new normal. Are you tracking, Joe?
Yes, sir. Just like the Intel story was written to buttress the claims about how serious foreign
intelligence reporting on Trump. It was fake. The stories being written about the economy at the end
of the Obama administration were stories trying to get Hillary elected.
Like, ah, don't worry.
It's not Obama's fault.
It's not his policies, Joe.
This is just a new normal.
But now they can't unwrite these stories.
Oh, you think I'm making this up?
Here's more.
Wait, there's more.
Here's more.
Wait, there's more.
On January 27, 2017, after the government reported that GDP growth for all of 2016 was a mere 1.6%, the weakest in five years.
Keep in mind, this is right as Obama left office.
So all your lefty friends, oh, Obama handed him a flaming football of an economy.
It was awesome.
We were driving the ball down the field.
It was 1.6%, the weakest in five years when he handed the economy off to Trump.
Please stop the nonsense and stop humiliating yourself.
You're embarrassing yourself, okay?
The New York Times show announced after that that,
quote,
President Trump's target for economic growth
just got a little more distant.
In other words, the Obama economy was stagnant.
The Times had to acknowledge it.
But what they were trying to insinuate by writing about Trump is,
well, it's not Obama's fault.
This is the new normal.
There's not much Trump's going to be able to do.
Go back and view it through the lens at the time.
The New York Times actually believed this stuff
that it wasn't obama's fault the economy was in a new normal of slowness it wasn't going to recover
and that was the end of it the only thing that obama did to help the economy was leave office
leave office you're right that was the best movie yes thank god for term limits right
i'm still upset at myself for missing your joke the other oh that's okay i'm still getting emails on that i guess people are a few days behind now in case again you think we're
making any of this up august 2016 the new york times declared that quote the underlying reality reality of low growth will haunt whoever wins the White House. Yeah, baby, this is it. So now
the articles in the show notes today, please, I'm asking you to keep it up on your phone.
Take some screenshots like I do. If you don't want to keep the article up on the phone,
take some screenshots of it, right? Get those screenshots and show them to your friends when
they argue that Obama handed him a wonderful economy.
Take screenshot number one. Where the New York Times talks about the feeble, mere, disappointing growth rate.
Screenshot number two, that the 2016 growth rate was the worst in five years right before he handed off the economy.
Them also saying there was nothing Trump was going to be able to do about it basically and this one the underlying
reality of low growth will haunt whoever wins the white house but it didn't but low growth didn't
haunt whoever won the white house the growth rate turned around almost immediately wait wait one
more this is in the same article you may say oh is it, is it just the New York Times? Oh, no.
Oh, no.
No, no, no.
By the way, I got to get Matt Palumbo to do a debunk on this.
This would be great.
The next month, Joe, CBS News reported that, quote, with U.S. economic growth stuck in low gear for several years, it's leading many economists to worry that the country has entered a prolonged period where any expansion will be weaker than it has been
in the past. Wrong. Not what happened. All of a sudden, Trump gets into office, as Joe said,
Obama did us a favor by not passing the torch to Hillary Clinton. Right. And look what happened.
The economy almost immediately turns around. Growth rates pick up. They almost double.
And now the Democrats are left with they're sitting there
uh it's like they just got out of a rainstorm they're sitting out of the door and they can't
figure out how to dry off quick enough so they're sitting in the door because they don't want to get
the the foyer of their house wet what do we do what do we do what do we do you guys just stay
out there in the rain and the miserable weather you said was happening all right you guys just
stay out there don't get the rest of the house wet you guys can stay outside don't let them get away with this i think one of the things we can offer you in this
show not to toot our own horns or anything but having run for office and joe having been involved
in terrestrial radio for 20 years having heard every bs line from every politician known to man in the maryland region walking through the studio cbm we've been there i've seen it i've met with a lot of these
folks and people who try to sway you either way when you run for office i see the bs i see how
they write about you i've been interviewed by the washington post and the new york times and all
these folks politico they. They're BSers.
They're there for one purpose and one person only.
To protect the image of the Democrat Party.
That's it.
These aren't real journalists, these people.
They will now try to flip the script.
They can't deal with option one because they can't talk up Trump's economy.
They can't deal with option two because they don't want to talk down the economy.
They'll look like idiots.
So option three is going to be Obama did it despite the fact that the
media themselves reported that Obama didn't do it.
I love my job.
It's just frustrating. I covered this last night
at my NRA TV show too. It is just
frustrating dealing with these people
every day, but they're so easy.
All you have to do is know basic facts
and you'll be fine.
That's it.
All right, I got a couple other stories
I missed yesterday.
I want to get to.
They're really important.
But finally, today's show brought to you
by Truthfinder.
This is a really cool site.
I checked myself first, by the way,
which is amazing.
Go check yourself out on Truthfinder.
Do you ever meet someone for the first time
and have a bad feeling about them?
I do.
My secret service like antenna goes up.
Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
Could be just a look or something they said.
There's a way you can find out if your gut instinct is right.
Using the same research tools private investigators use.
Government public records.
Truthfinder provides access to background reports for almost everybody in the country.
Public records, information like criminal records, past addresses, contact information, birthdays, and a whole lot more. Protect yourself and your family by finding out
if someone has a few dangerous felonies on their record. Look up the address of an old friend or
find out if someone is lying about their age. Military veterans even use Truthfinder to get
in touch with people they've served with. My listeners can now get 15% off when you visit
truthfinder.com slash Bongino and become a member today.
It's a cool service.
You'll get unlimited background checks.
As a bonus, you'll get access to Truthfinder's dark web monitoring and protect yourself against identity theft.
Just go to truthfinder.com slash Bongino.
That's truthfinder.com slash Bongino for 15% off and enter a name to pull your first report.
That's truthfinder.com slash Bongino. You'll get 15% off, which is a nice savings. Go check it out.
It's really cool. Run yourself first. You'll be like, whoa, whoa, doggies. Love it. Truthfinder.com
slash Bongino. Okay. You know, debunking liberal nonsense gets quite easy but i have another story in that's in
yesterday's show notes actually but it's worth you reading you may have already seen it
but joe you remember the net neutrality debate oh yeah you know we this is something i've been
really fired up about and one of my main objections to the net neutrality debate has
been that there are some people who are conservative who i believe have been sucked
into this believing somehow that
the government is going to save us and create a free fair and open internet i think now uh what
we've seen going on with with uh with the censorship on the internet uh you're seeing kind of a revival
of this hey the government has to get involved the government has to get involved i did the show last
week i'm not going to repeat it but i'm telling you this is a huge mistake. Just look at Democrat Senator Mark Warner's 23-page report on proposed regulation,
Democrat Senator Warner, proposed regulations for the internet to show you that the Democrats
are suckering you. I'm telling you they're trying to bait you in to both net neutrality and hate
speech and Communications Decency act proposals online so
when the democrats take over the senate take over the house or take over the presidency or god forbid
take over them all there are going to be a massive volume of new quote hate speech stuff which is
going to be directed nearly exclusively at conservative online content and these laws
are going to be used as vehicles to kick you off the internet.
Folks, there's a reason a Democrat senator put this together.
The reason is not because any of this aligns with conservative values
or a free and open internet.
There's a reason the overwhelming majority of people
that support net neutrality are Democrats and liberals.
They are hoping and praying for the government to get involved as a primary regulator of
internet content as a way to suppress conservative thought.
Now, one of the scams they used in selling you the net neutrality argument, and net neutrality,
just for those of you who are unfamiliar with what it is in a nutshell,
is net neutrality, they wanted to use Title II to regulate the internet like a public
utility.
In other words, their line is a bit is a bit is a bit.
In other words, a bit of information.
That's actually not what it was.
It was a nonsensical garbage thing meant to reduce pricing incentives in the market for basically internet and broadband content.
So what happened?
It would be like telling airlines that they couldn't change prices based on seats, based on buying behavior, based on timing.
You need a seat last minute.
It's typically more expensive.
The airlines do that.
Why?
Why would an airline do
that? An airline would do that because they need to plan. They need to know which routes are filling
up, which aren't. If everybody buys a ticket at the last minute all the time, the airlines are
going to have no idea how many people want that flight or don't up until the last minute. They're
not going to know how to plan. They like to sell the seats early. It's the same reason hotel rooms,
you know, hotel rooms, they want, you know, these hotel rooms want to plan out. They want to plan out their occupancy. The internet is priced no differently. You use a lot
of internet. They're going to have to somehow price that out to make the big users and big
demanders of the service somehow compensate them for what they're providing.
Now, one of the scare tactics used with net neutrality, Joe, was what?
Was, oh my gosh, if we don't do this, internet speeds are going to be slowed down for everyone.
They're going to throttle us.
These internet companies are going to slow us.
We're not going to be able to watch our Netflix.
Daily Caller article, yesterday's show notes, internet speeds are up
since net neutrality was dropped. So just to be clear, the liberal argument was, gosh,
if we don't keep this net neutrality, they're going to throttle us. Our internet speeds are
going to be slowed down. Internet speeds, Joe, we went from 12th in the world to 6th in the world in internet speeds since net neutrality has been dropped.
Guys, are we even interested in facts anymore?
If net neutrality was designed to prevent them from, in other words, if we pass this, this is going to guarantee fast internet speeds.
And if we don't pass, they're going to throttle us and slow us down. We didn't pass it. Internet
speeds are up. It entirely debunks and discredits your argument. The reason these companies,
that internet speeds would have slowed down if they passed net neutrality, Joe,
is they weren't going to expand broadband. And investment in broadband was even slowing down
because these companies couldn't make their money back for the investment if the government was
going to regulate them to death. is not a complicated argument please don't
get suckered into this net neutrality debate to thinking the government's going to solve your
problems it is not okay another story i missed yesterday kind of incredible again the hypocrisy
of the libs on this today is a media left-wing media
coordination day i don't know if you missed the story george you see this one so media outlets
across the country today are coordinating their op-ed sections their opinion sections
their editorial sections to write nasty op-eds about Donald Trump. I don't care.
They're private entities.
They can do what they want.
But I find it awfully hypocritical
when Sinclair Broadcasting,
which owns a bunch of stations around the country,
they had a coordinate...
Now, Joe, you're in broadcasting.
You know what must-read stuff is, right?
When you get a thing from...
Now, you're a privately-owned station,
but ladies and gentlemen,
what'll happen is, you know,
public service announcements
and things like that, right, Joe?
Stations, must-reads are nothing new.
Am I right on this?
Nothing new.
Must-read content is as old
as television itself.
News stations get it all the time,
with PSAs, whatever it may be. So Sinclair Broadcasting, Television itself. News stations get it all the time.
PSAs, whatever it may be.
So Sinclair Broadcasting,
which owns a bunch of television stations around the country,
a while back, you may remember this story,
but it points out again,
disgusting, disturbing liberal hypocrisy, right?
Sinclair got a must-read message,
which they read in their stations
across the country during the show,
which was basically about their commitment
to real news over fake news. I didn't even think what the what was said
was controversial joe the media the left-wing hacks lost their mind oh my gosh this is coordination
coordination look at these guys the sinclair why because sinclair is a considered at least
a conservative leaning company so it was a huge controversy then.
Today, we actually have editorial columns
at major newspapers all across the country
openly colluding and agreeing
to write nasty Donald Trump op-eds.
This is not a secret.
They've openly colluded to do this.
And where's the media on this
crickets yep these people are complete frauds
they're frauds these are not genuine actors they are frauds. They don't care about, the whole point of their argument was on Sinclair.
This is collusion.
This is a conspiracy to put out a coordinated message
on must-read stuff, which is, by the way,
has happened, as I just said, over and over.
And yet when they,
when liberal media outlets actively collude
and don't even hide it, they call for this.
Nobody cares.
These people are complete phonies
folks all right it's another story in the wall street journal yesterday which was important
jason riley put it together about the continued war this is important folks this is this topic
very sensitive to me i have said over and over over that I think the greatest untapped resource in the United States
are some of our failing cities.
When you drive through cities, and I've lived in a lot of them, that's why, and you just
see the despair and the poverty and the deprivation and the crime, you think to yourself, my gosh,
what happened here?
One of the reasons it's always been sensitive to me is I worked in them as police officers in one
of the worst precincts in New York City. And I always remember driving through Baltimore when
I lived in Maryland thinking, what happened to this place? Back in the 1950s, Baltimore's median
income was above the national average. Baltimore's median income now is 22% below the national average
Joe you've driven through Baltimore
it's tough
it's a tough place folks
you get out of the inner harbor
and start going through Baltimore and driving through
you see poverty and despair all over the place
it's sad to watch it really is
folks the Democrats have done this
it is their liberal far-left policies that have absolutely
destroyed any chance that people in the minority communities in some of these inner cities will
ever have at the america you and i have you know that that uh john edwards who was uh in an
unethical horrible actor uh in the political, the vice presidential candidate under John Kerry, right?
John Edwards did say one thing, though, that made sense, although it didn't make sense like he
thought it would make sense. He said there are two Americas. You know what? He was right. There
are two Americas, but John Edwards helped create it. Sadly, minority communities in Black and
Hispanic America and some of these struggling cities will have no chance at the economy you
have, will have no chance at the education system a lot of us have, will have
no chance at the quality healthcare system a lot of us have.
Why?
Because these cities have been run into the ground by liberals.
So Jason Riley wrote an interesting piece yesterday about another battle against minority
America in America's cities.
New York has gone to war with Uber.
Listen, I'm not a fan or not a fan of Uber or Lyft or any of them.
They've made some decisions I disagree with too,
especially getting involved in some of the political stuff.
I'm just telling you that New York is at war again.
They've been at war against school choice for minority children
against job opportunities for minority children
by taxing the hell out of their citizens
but Uber
here's the core of the article
Riley says this Joe Riley again who happens to be
black and doesn't matter to us but matters
to the left of course because that's all they care about
is identity politics and the melanin content
of your skin
black New Yorkers have had a hard time for years getting a cab they care about is identity politics and the melanin content of your skin.
Black New Yorkers have had a hard time for years getting a cab in New York.
That's true.
That's a fact.
I know I'm not going to give you these testimonials.
I can just tell you I've heard the stories.
They have, and we should not deny that.
They've had a tough time.
Getting around New York outside the buses and trains has been difficult historically
for a lot of black New Yorkers.
Riley writes this in the piece.
He's been a victim of it himself.
We can't pretend it didn't happen.
It did.
It does happen.
I'm not claiming every taxi driver is a racist.
That's not what I'm saying at all.
I'm just saying there are real stories
of real people who've had problems
getting cabs in New York
who happen to be black.
Uber
has largely eliminated
that problem
for working class minority
black and Hispanic folks
inside New York.
You queue up the app,
get in a car,
you go back home.
It has solved
a huge transportation problem for black New Yorkers.
So what does the New York City mayor do?
Oh, he puts a cap on the number of new Uber and Lyft vehicles
he'll allow in New York.
Why?
Because he was given a bunch of money by the Taxi Commission
who lobbied him to get this thing to go away.
Listen, I get it.
I understand.
The business world is tough.
Creative destruction happens all the time.
I get it.
I'm just telling you that the war against minority Americans in America's big cities
will never stop by the Democrat Party.
Almost everything they do, rent control, which drives up rent, doesn't drive rent down, drives
up rent because it decreases the supply of available rental and living units in a community.
Why? Why does it do that?
The same reason net neutrality drives down the availability of broadband.
Because net companies, internet companies, broadband companies
can't make any kind of a revenue stream
because the government's regulating them into oblivion by controlling their income.
The same thing happens with rent control.
People don't want to build new housing
units because rent control prevents them from making any revenue from the housing units. What
do you think they're going to do? Build it out of their own goodwill? Are you crazy?
Rent control drives up rents, doesn't drive down rents. Uber, now you drive people who are getting
rides are now going to have to wait extraordinarily long
amounts of time in new york to get back to some of the communities they live in because de blasio
decided to put a cap on it the war on cops the war on cops which disproportionately affects
minority communities where crime is running rampant you've got cops hesitant to get involved
in discretionary situations
because the mayor,
a lot of these police commissioners
and police folks who have become sadly,
a lot of them at the political level,
not the rank and file level,
who refuse to back up their cops when it matters.
Leaving these people in these communities prey.
Prey to the wolves in their communities.
The education system where they don't back up any more school choice and and allow uh families of young black uh boys
and girls who want just an opportunity at the education system you and i had a chance at
they're not allowed because liberal politicians get in the way hold out their hand and say stop
not here not in our community you're going to go to this crap public school because we told you, not because you wanted to.
This is a shame.
This is a sin.
This is a stain on our country.
If we could just rescue our big cities, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis, portions of New York, portions of California.
If we could just rescue Cleveland, our big cities, which have heavy minority populations.
Ladies and gentlemen, the economic battery, the education battery would be fully recharged.
We are draining down the battery of large portions of our population who live in
these places that have absolutely no opportunities like you have it is grotesquely unfair i listen
i'm not suggesting to you republicans have all the answers or that everybody needs to go out
tomorrow and vote in mass for the republican party in these cities why am i not saying it
because it's not realistic i'm just telling you the people you
have in there now are clearly not the answer but are absolutely clearly the problem
uber this is it this is what de blasio this is his new war almost everything these liberal
politicians do is a boot on the neck of minority communities who deserve better.
You are American citizens too. This is not news. You deserve the exact same opportunities we have
too. The fight extends to you too. Fight back. Do not accept this second class city status.
Let's be honest. If this was happening anywhere else in middle class communities in America,
they would be storming city council sessions in the state houses.
But because it's Democrats running these large cities,
it almost becomes,
Oh,
you know what?
This is just the way it is.
It's not the way it is.
You deserve better too.
All right, folks. Sorry haven't really ranted a while
I just get a little upset
you deserve better
I remember walking the streets as a cop
in the 75 precinct in East New York
Brooklyn down Sutter and Pennsylvania
Avenue and thinking gosh it doesn't have to
be this way these kids deserve
better they deserve a shot
this is our job as conservatives.
We believe in big R rights granted to all.
We don't judge people by the melanin component of their skin,
their creed, religion, race, none of that stuff.
That's a liberal thing.
These families deserve a shot.
We somehow, somehow have to get into these communities.
I hope Donald Trump's the vehicle to do that.
His black approval is up.
His black voter approval is up?
I think it's up to close to 30% now.
Please just take a look at the other side,
some other ideas,
because the ideas in there now are not working.
All right, thanks again, folks, for tuning in.
I really appreciate it.
Please subscribe to the podcast.
It makes a huge difference,
not just the downloads,
but the subscriptions drive us up the charts.
We've been up there for a long time now, thanks to you.
We appreciate it.
You subscribe on iTunes.
They have a Google Podcast app, Google Play, Amazon Alexa.
You can enable the skill, SoundCloud, iHeart.
You have a bunch of different options, and of course, they're free.
We really appreciate the subscriptions.
I'll see you all tomorrow.
Thanks a lot.
You just heard the Dan Bongino show. Get
more of Dan online anytime at conservativereview.com. You can also get Dan's podcasts on
iTunes or SoundCloud and follow Dan on Twitter 24-7 at DBongino.