The Dan Bongino Show - The Democrats’ Disturbing Plan Revealed (Ep 1306)
Episode Date: July 27, 2020In this episode, I address the deeply troubling new information surfacing about the connections between the Spygate plot to take down Trump, and the impeachment hoax. I also discuss the media’s sorr...y efforts to cover up the spread of the coronavirus in areas where rioting is occurring. News Picks: My appearance on Fox and Friends this morning about Spygate. Devin Nunes blows the doors off of the Spygate/Brookings connection. This article lays out the connections between the Brookings Institute and the Spygate plotters. Prominent pollster suggests Trump’s re-election hinges on these things. The Democrats are plotting to destroy the suburbs and your neighborhood. Mark Levin covered it last night. Liberal media hacks are oddly silent about the big spike in coronavirus cases in areas plagued with rioting. Don’t buy ANTIFA’s latest propaganda ploy. ANTIFA is a racist terror-group. The evidence is everywhere. The hapless Chicago Mayor makes more disgusting comments about federal agents. Copyright Bongino Inc All Rights Reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
After decades of shaky hands caused by debilitating tremors,
Sunnybrook was the only hospital in Canada who could provide Andy with something special.
Three neurosurgeons, two scientists, one movement disorders coordinator,
58 answered questions, two focused ultrasound procedures,
one specially developed helmet, thousands of high-intensity focused ultrasound waves,
zero incisions, and that very same day, two steady hands.
From innovation to action, Sunnybrook
is special. Learn more at
sunnybrook.ca slash special.
Get ready to hear the truth about
America on a show that's not
immune to the facts with your
host, Dan Bongino.
I mean, can you imagine a bigger
news day? The whole thing now, the whole thing.
We now know the big question about this whole spy gate thing.
We now know the big question.
We know the answers.
It was all made up all the time.
And the fake information was attributed to real people.
Fake information attributed to real people who had really, some of them, worked with the government in the past.
That is going to be the big scandal.
I got that.
I've got an update on more media shenanigans.
You're not going to want to miss that.
It's just a loaded news day, as always.
Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
Surf the web with peace of mind.
Get a VPN today.
What are you waiting for?
ExpressVPN.com slash Bongino.
Welcome to the Dan Bongino Show.
Producer Joe, how are you today?
I am doing well and glad to be here among the real people.
I know you are.
This is a genuine, authentic, small slice of Americana like nowhere else.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is such a stacked news day.
I don't even know where to start.
So let's get right to it.
Today show brought to you by our friends.
Seriously.
I have so much to do.
It's,
it's loaded.
Today's show brought to you by Helix sleep,
which makes a personalized,
personalized mattress for you right here in America.
Ship straight to your door.
Free,
no contact delivery,
free returns,
a hundred nights sleep shop.
What else can you ask for?
Come on.
What else can you ask for?
I have a Helix sleep mattress. That's why I'm so jumpy today because I slept like a champion
tonight. If there was a champion of sleep, right? Was I not snoring last night on my Helix mattress
when Miss Paula walked in? It was kind of like that. To choose a mattress, Helix, they have a
sleep quiz. That's why this is such a great mattress. You complete, it takes just two minutes
and it matches you and your body type and your sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
Not for someone else. Why would you want a mattress made for someone else? You a side sleeper,
a hot sleeper? Helix has a mattress specifically for you and your unique taste. Unique taste,
spit it out. I took the quiz and was matched to the Midnight Luxe Helix mattress because it's
the best. It's like sleeping on a cloud. I love love helix but don't take my word for it helix was
awarded the number one best overall mattress pick of 2020 by gq wired magazine apartment therapy
just go to helix sleep.com slash dan take their two-minute sleep quiz they'll match you to a
customized mattress for you for the best sleep of your life. Right now, Helix is offering an incredible $200 off all mattress orders for our listeners.
Go to Helix, H-E-L-I-X, sleep.com slash Dan.
That's Helix, sleep.com slash Dan.
Get up to $200 off your mattress order today.
All right, Joe, let's go.
The bell is back.
Sometimes we have some technical difficulties.
We gotta get a manual bell by Joe.
Kind of puts me in a mood.
I need to get my horse blinders on.
All right, so let's hammer this story first uh this one is an interesting one before i
get to the spy gate development which is i don't even like term explosive it let's just leave it
it's really really good stuff that's very fascinating okay but before we get to that
interesting article legal insurrection great. As a matter of fact,
the media,
the media,
you know,
the media that lies,
then lies about lying.
And then when caught lying lies about being caught about lying and then goes on and lies about that.
You know,
that media.
Yeah.
That one.
They're oddly silent.
The media as virus case numbers are rising in Portland and Seattle by the
great Stacy mass,
Matthews legal insurrection article will be up in the show notes today. Please check it out. Fascinating. Which again, quadruples and
quintuples down on my point that what Joe, um, the media only cares about the Corona virus when the
Corona virus doesn't impact their preexisting more important narrative and their preexisting
more important narrative now is there's street chaos everywhere
and it's Donald Trump's fault.
Don't stop it.
Shh.
Let's keep it going.
The chaos.
Till after the election.
And then after the election,
there'll be no chaos anymore.
It'll all disappear
because the media
won't cover it at all.
So just to be clear,
the media,
the lib media,
to be clear,
is enjoying this street chaos
because they think
it's a damaging political narrative to Donald Trump. You tracking? It's not that Trump is trying to stop. It's actually
working in his favor, but no one's ever accused the media of being smart. But so you understand
here, they think they can leverage this street chaos into an election victory for Joe Biden by
saying, look, the country's in flames because of Donald Trump. So they don't want it to stop.
So when things like the coronavirus
start rampaging through cities
where these riots are happening
and these mostly peaceful protests,
which is becoming just an embarrassingly
hilarious line by the media.
Only 17 stabbed in a mostly peaceful protest
last night, Joe.
Only 47 police officers injured
in a mostly peaceful protest. Only $50,000
in property damage in a mostly peaceful protest. Only six officers blinded in a mostly peaceful
protest. It's an embarrassment. But the media only cares about the coronavirus when they can
use it to damage Trump. And when it conflicts with another narrative
that's more important,
we got to keep the chaos going.
They suppress stories about the coronavirus.
So Stacey Matthews has, who wrote this piece,
it's up at my show notes, bongino.com slash newsletter.
If you'd like to subscribe to the newsletter show notes,
it's the same thing.
Read this article, it's a great one.
And in there, she has,
you can see screenshots of some of her tweets.
Stacey Matthews, who wrote the piece, who does really good work.
You hear it about this in the media, Joe.
So let's put up Stacey Matthews tweet number one.
You know, all these riots that are happening in Seattle and Portland.
Are you hearing anything about this?
So here's her first tweet where she notes an interesting phenomenon
from the New York Times' own Oregon page. She says, quote notes an interesting phenomenon from the New York Times'
own Oregon page. She says, quote, this graphic is from the New York Times Oregon page. You can see
how cases have steadily risen since early mid-June. This is Oregon where the protests are happening.
You know, Portland, it's in Oregon for the liberals checking us out for the first time.
You see that? There's a chart there. And Joe, it shows an interesting trend going up.
Yeah.
That's up like the opposite of down.
Now, keep in mind,
you may see this on the Oregon page
because they can't avoid it.
But where have you heard this in the national media?
Like, hey, maybe we should get a hold of these riots
because, you know, coronavirus and all,
you're not allowed to get a haircut.
You're not allowed to go to church.
You're not allowed to see your grandmother.
But definitely you should riot, you know, rioting because it has nothing to get a haircut. You're not allowed to go to church. You're not allowed to see your grandmother, but definitely you should riot,
you know,
rioting because it has nothing to do with coronavirus.
Well,
that's not what that chart shows.
That chart clearly shows Oregon cases going up.
You see,
you see,
you see that interesting now,
Joe,
because liberals always have a BS line because they don't know what they're
talking about.
And not all liberals,
but a good portion are largely morons.
I'm very sorry, folks.
If that offends you, you're probably listening to the wrong show.
I'm done playing nicey-nice.
I told my friend this yesterday.
You want nicey-nice, cutesy stuff?
I'm sorry.
This isn't for you.
I don't mean to offend anyone.
I love having people here.
I love my audience.
But this show, we're done nicey-nice time.
Nicey-nice time, go to a different show.
I'm not the nicey-nice guy guy that's a different guy who's not me you know dan bongino that's the not
dan bongino but knowing liberals and their lies and media hacks who lie about lying and then lie
about knowing they got caught lying what do you think their line will be joe well those are just
cases in oregon dan yeah oregon not portland portland's you know small place in oregon oregon's
a large it is a rather large state okay well stacy matthews did that too because you know you always
have to be prepared for liberal stupidity here's tweet number two this graphic also from the times
oregon page shows that the case breakdown by individual counties over the last seven days
the counties with the highest number of total cases are, forgive me if I'm saying this wrong, Multnomah, I'm sorry, Portland, where Portland is located,
and Washington, which is next to the county where Portland is located.
Again, you have to prepare always, Joe, for liberal stupidity. They'll say, well, yeah,
cases in Oregon are spiking and protests are in Oregon, but we don't know if it's attributable
to that exact area in Portland.
No, no, it is.
That's where the most cases are in that county where Portland is.
Do you see that?
You know, charts, liberal.
We believe in science.
You do?
You believe in data too?
You know, liberals, the science party, right?
The science party told you there's 7,426 genders
that thinks the coronavirus doesn't impact people in protests,
but will definitely spread in your church,
especially if it's a Christian church.
That, you know, those guys, the science guys,
you want me to laugh at these idiots?
Because they're not, this is real.
They really do want you to believe they're the party of science,
despite science absolutely destroying their stupid narratives.
You haven't heard about this, have you?
About how the virus is...
Wait, we did hear something.
That's right.
We did hear something.
That's accurate, Joe.
We haven't heard that effect at all.
That is the crickets you're hearing from the media describing the explosion in cases around the riots in Portland. You may say, because again,
you have to know liberals, folks. Liberals are liars. That's what they do. Not all of them,
but a good swath of them are just liars. They'll say, well, that's isolated to that one area because of like aliens or something,
whatever. More on that tomorrow, by the way. Right? I have no time today.
Well, let's go to Seattle where some more riots are happening. And again,
Stacey Matthews' Twitter feed, which is really great on this. Here's another graphic from the
Times Washington State page, showing the rising case numbers in the state of Washington. You know, Washington lives where
Seattle is. And in case you're listening on audio only, it's not complicated. The cases are going up.
Again, for the liberals on the radio dial listening and listening digitally,
that means the opposite of down. Means coronavirus cases are rising.
Now you may say, well, maybe they already forgot about the Portland example.
The liberals will say, what, Joe?
That's definitely not in Seattle.
It's just statewide, but not in Seattle where the riots are happening.
Okay, let's check that out too.
Here's the county by county breakdown.
Over the last seven days days the counties with the highest
number of total new cases are king where seattle's located in pierce which is next to king
you're not you didn't you didn't you didn't hear that anywhere you're not hearing that anywhere are
you the national media msdnc cnn they reporting this? How the riots are causing a rampaging coronavirus infections?
You're not hearing any of that, right?
Because they love the riots.
They love the riots.
It's good for them.
It's a chaos narrative, which they think works for them because they think they can pin it
on Trump.
But Trump's not dumb enough to fall for it.
Trump's pinning it back on them because these are Democrat cities and everybody knows it.
You haven't heard that story now, have you?
Well, you heard it on my show.
And thankfully, our audience is significant enough that we can make a real difference about the national conversation.
Showing you how crazy it's actually become in these places, including Portland, which is totally in chaos.
Do not listen to the media liars.
Like, it's only a few blocks of Portland burning down.
Only a few blocks.
So just to be clear,
if these people showed up in your neighborhood
and only burned down your two blocks,
you'd say, don't worry, police, public, media folks,
don't even report on this.
It's just my two blocks burning down
there's a full-blown assault war going on in portland for the federal courthouse
which the media refuses to report honestly about but it's gotten so crazy that when trump does
respond which he did he sent in the federal law enforcement officials
to preserve the courthouse from being taken and sacked by like the Visigoths or something,
as I said on Gutfeld show this weekend. This is insane, Joe. The Oregon attorney general is
actually suing the federal government for trying to defend its own courthouse. Washington Post, you think I'm messing with you?
Oregon Attorney General sues federal agencies for allegedly violating protesters' civil
rights.
Which ones?
The civil right to burn the courthouse down?
Is that anywhere in the Constitution?
The Amendment 4.6, you now have the right to violently assemble and burn down government property at will using lasers, firearms, incendiary devices, hatchets, and shields.
I didn't read that in the Constitution.
I don't know if you did.
I missed that somehow.
So Oregon's actually suing the federal government for protecting federal property
in the middle of a riot zone in Portland.
Yes, this is actually happening.
Now, just when you think this story couldn't get more
embarrassing, morons are chiming in about this lawsuit, the moron class, you know, Susan Rice
and the whole Spygate crew and the Obama administration. Yeah. If I tie those stories
in, yeah, the moron class. So hat tip to the great undercover Huber. I saw this on his Twitter feed
this weekend. Susan Rice, Joe, fighting against
the Trump administration, who's trying to defend Portland. Susan Rice claimed this weekend that
federal officers are secretly working for a private security firm, ZTI. Wait, keep this up,
Paula. Get a load of this. See, if you're on YouTube youtube you get to read ahead because some blue tick uh blue check
marks on twitter misread a shoulder patch that says zt1 which is a unique identifier for the
officer which she'd know if she actually listened to dhs so just to be clear how stupid susan rice
is you know the former national security advisor from the Obama
administration. One of the officers on the scene had a marking unique to him that said ZT1.
Wait, wait. Joe, the liberal media told us that Trump's stormtroopers, as Nancy Pelosi described
them, these are federal agents and officers. They're not military.
She said they were unmarked, like ninjas out of The Last Samurai.
She said that, right?
Did she not say that? These are unmarked stormtroopers, the media.
That's right.
They're unmarked stormtroopers, ninja style, ninja style.
So what's weird is they're not unmarked.
They have markings specific to them so they can be identified readily.
It's not their last names because they're afraid of being doxxed, but it's specific to them, like a badge number.
And one of them was ZT1, which Susan Rice, because she's an idiot, misread thinking it was ZTI, which is a private security firm.
Oh, my gosh.
Ladies and gentlemen, you're talking about, oh my, this is like frustrating with the moron class.
Now you're like, how did they fall for the dossier?
Fall for it.
One, they're idiots.
And number two, they didn't fall for it. They thought we were going to Fall for it. One, they're idiots. And number two, they didn't fall for it.
They thought we were going to fall for it.
They were dumb enough to believe we would believe it.
Susan Wright,
look at this patch.
ZTI, that's a private security guy.
No, it's ZT1.
It's a unique marking
to a federal agent you're telling us
is unmarked. You dunce.
Dunce. Private security guards are kidnapping civilians. That's a federal agent, you idiot. Can this get worse? It always gets worse.
Hat tip again, the great undercover Huber, great account to follow on Parler, Twitter.
So the lawsuit filed by the moron Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum in Oregon, because she wants her city to burn down, apparently.
In the lawsuit, they use videos, Joe.
Hey, Paula, before you put this up, I see you on the phone.
You got to listen.
This is funny.
I see you on the phone.
You got to listen.
This is funny.
The Oregon attorney general used a bunch of videos,
Joe,
to show that these federal agents who Susan Rice thought were private security that weren't because she can't read a marking she said was
unmarked.
They use videos,
the Oregon attorney general.
There's these videos of,
of people being kidnapped off the streets by the private security firm.
That wasn't a private security firm.
They actually showed the videos to the court.
This is from the actual lawsuit.
Hat tip again, undercover Huber for pointing this out.
Footnote in the lawsuit,
the state initially included a third example
talking about these videos,
but it withdrew that video
because it recorded events that occurred in san diego if you ever ever if you know, remember the idea of great warrior kings?
We are not living in that time right now.
We are being led by political figures, both elected and outside of formal elected politics, but running to be part of politics.
Susan Rice is unquestionably trying to be the vice president of the United States under Joe Biden.
We are being led by the dumbest group of human beings at any point in human history.
So Susan Rice, who can't identify a marking she said was unmarked on a federal agent,
she's telling you as a private security person who's not.
Susan Rice chimes in on that one.
And then the Oregon attorney general produces video evidence of
alleged federal agent kidnappings
in Oregon, and the
video's not even from Oregon, it's from San
Diego.
Oh!
Oh!
This is the class of
morons you're being led by
right now.
You know, I listened
to a fascinating podcast this weekend i like econ talk it's
it's good one and i was an older one but i was listening to a
cuban american who does some homework he used to work for the cia martin gory
and he was saying how this i don't to, I'm probably being unnecessarily harsh.
His evaluation is a little nicer.
As I said, nicey show time is over.
But the gist of it is, you know, we're being led by idiots.
And the digital era we live in now has exposed those idiots.
And that on some good news, he felt like,
and if I'm mischaracterizing his position,
he should email me
and I'd be happy to interview him on the show,
but that this may lead at some point
to a peaceful breakup of the United States
at some point in the future,
or could,
where people are just going to be tired of this.
They're like, you know what?
If Susan Rice wants to run
to be vice president of the United States
and lead the whole country, knowing she's one of the dumbest people to ever
hold a position of power in the United States, as evidenced by her actions, Benghazi, Bo Bergdahl,
she's just on the wrong side of everything, which makes her either dumb or complicit.
Then let her do that. But you guys can have your own federal government here,
because now we're exposing her like I just did on this show.
We're exposing her.
You guys do your own thing and there'll be some regional breakup.
You'll have a Southwest United States, a Northeast, California,
the country of California, whatever it may be.
But we're not going to be led by you morons.
We'll pick our own local morons and figure it out ourselves.
Seriously. We'll pick our own local morons and figure it out ourselves seriously we'll pick our own local idiots that way we have more control over the idiots interesting very interesting
all right let me get to my second sponsor and i gotta move on to the spy gate story which
seriously exploded like totally exploded it's over for that it's over the media won't tell
you this but it's over there matter of, the media is desperately trying to cover up what happened.
Today's show also brought to you by our friends
at Bravo Company Manufacturing.
Listen, when our founding fathers crafted the constitution,
the first thing they did was ensure the right of an individual
to defend themselves without being limited by the government.
You know how strongly I feel about this?
Ladies and gentlemen,
if you're going to buy a firearm,
buy from Bravo Company Manufacturing.
Their rifles are the best in the business.
Now, you know, they always tell you in advertisements, don't say what a company isn't.
But in this case, it matters.
Bravo Company Manufacturing manufactures life-saving equipment.
Please understand that.
Their rifles are designed to defend your life.
God forbid it's at risk.
You or the life of your family.
This is not.
It is not a sporting arms company.
If you want a hunting rifle, there's a lot of great companies that do that, but that's not Bravo. They build life-saving
equipment to the highest standards possible, assembled by hand right here in Heartland,
Wisconsin, America to a life-saving standard. They've always put their people before their
products. Their rifles are the finest in the business. I have two of them and I love them. On point every single time. Precision accuracy. BCM knows that making reliable life-saving tools
is their mission. That is their mission. Go check them out today. Learn more about
Bravo Company Manufacturing by heading over to bravocompanymfg.com. That's Bravo Company MFG.com,
where you can discover more about special offers
they have coming up.
They're incredible, unbelievably good products
and upcoming news.
The best rifles and firearms in the business.
Bravo Company MFG.com.
Check it out.
Also check out their YouTube channel.
Important.
YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA. YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA.
YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA.
The best in the business, hands down.
All right.
So, you may again be saying to yourself,
how could this Spygate story possibly get any worse?
Oh, ladies and gentlemen, it has.
Let's get right to it. So the New York Times,
which is an embarrassing rag, cornucopia of stupidity populated by discredited collusion
hoaxers with no careers left to speak of anymore. You know, Charlie Savage, Adam Goldman, the other
ones who history is going to laugh at these idiots who just propagated all the spygate myths in an effort to gaslight you.
So instead of giving up on this thing and finally admitting they lied to America, there was no reason to spy on the Trump team.
The Trump team was spied on. They had nothing to base it on.
And that they took part in actively promoting propaganda used to do it.
They're doubling and tripling down. So backstory before I show you this New York Times headline, because it's important.
Christopher Steele, who wrote the fake, you know, the dossier, had attributed the information
to a PSS, a primary subsource.
In other words, Steele puts together a dossier, says, I got all this information from this
guy.
Who that guy was, was a mystery to many outside of a limited few groups of people, a limited
group of people I correspond with. They knew who he was a long to many outside of a limited few groups of people, a limited group of people I correspond with.
They knew who he was a long time ago.
But who that primary subsource was was a mystery for a long time.
You tracking me?
Primary subsource allegedly feeds information to Steele.
Steele gives it to the Clinton campaign.
They use the information of the FBI to spy on Donald Trump.
Right with you.
We now know.
Right with you, brother.
We now know who that primary subsource
is. Was he a Russian? A Russian in Russia connected to Putin in his inner circle,
as was claimed by so many in the media? A sensitive source? No, he was a guy down the
street from the White House and the Brookings Institute. A think tank. Yeah, a left-leaning liberal think tank.
Wait, Dan.
Dan, Steele said he got this information
from high-level sources
inside Putin's circle.
No, they were inside a building
a mile away from the White House.
So now instead of the New York Times,
again, which advanced all this BS forever,
high-level information,
Trump's colluding with the Russians.
We got it, folks.
We got the big story.
They were given Pulitzer Prizes for this.
It's hilarious.
They were given Pulitzers.
Instead of now coming clean and going,
hey, all right, none of this information
was actually attributed to high-level Russians
and the Putin government,
but a dude a mile away from the White House in a Democrat think tank?
The New York Times is now mad at you.
No way.
Yes, yes, you know, Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman, discredited, debunked, collusion hoaxers.
They're mad at you for uncovering who the source, Steele's source was.
You think I'm kidding look at this
this is the cover of new york times they're they're upsetting there he is adam hack a hoaxter
hack adam goldman and gaslighter extraordinaire gold medal gaslighter charlie savage again
two clowns headline new york times the fbi pledged to keep a source anonymous trump allies aided in his
unmasking oh it's us now this is great this is great joe so now it's not the president was spied
on his campaign was spied on by an opposing political party and a sitting president who
took a role in it along with the vice president who's now
running for president against Trump again. And yet all of this stuff, this spying scandal run
by this group of clowns, Obama, Biden, Clinton, and others, the DNC and elsewhere, God forbid,
we trace it back to one person who says it's all a lie. And the real scandal is that we traced it back to the person we outed him oh my
gosh it's our fault trump allies shame on you the garlic chain around your neck and put the cross up
like we're a bunch of nosferatu or whatever that name for vampires is we're the bad guys
we're the blood-sucking demons.
Is this real?
Is this even real?
Are we even living in the real world where newspapers that, you know,
prided themselves on uncovering sources for real information that exposed scandals over the last hundred years,
real newspapers, not the New York Times and stuff.
They're now at the point where we've uncovered
the biggest scandal of the century,
that the whole reason for spying on the Trump team
was a lie based on this one guy's information.
We find out who the guy is,
and instead of you wondering how we relied on information
from a guy that was fake,
the big story is how we're wrong because we outed him.
Is this real?
It gets even worse.
By the way, Adam Goldman and Charlie Savage
are an absolute disgrace to journalism.
Folks, I'm not kidding when I say this.
I know it's become slightly personal at this point
because of the damage they've done to this country.
Real damage.
These journalists have printed lies for years, have done've done to this country. Real damage. These journalists have printed lies for years.
Have done significant damage to this country.
Debunked, discredited lies.
They just won't stop.
I'm warning you.
Do not trust anything they print anything there is a significant chance what they
are printing is propaganda fed to them that they know is a lie in an effort to cover up the biggest
scandal of the century if you're reading it and you're believing it i feel really bad for you
nothing they're telling you on this topic shouldn't be questioned three and four times.
There's a significant chance it's a lie.
From their piece, it gets even worse.
The dossier did play an important role in a narrow part of the FBI's early Russia investigation.
What?
A narrow part of the FBI's early Russia investigation? What? A narrow part?
So now that we have the source of the dossier
who fed it to Steele,
and we know it's all discredited nonsense
from a guy who was a mile away from the White House
in a Democrat think tank,
not in Russia or Putin's inner circle,
we know the information's false.
We know the information was used in the dossier.
Now your line of attack is,
you bad guys shouldn't have uncovered him. And secondly, it only played a narrow part.
That's a quote. Ladies and gentlemen, the entire dossier and warrant to spy on the Trump team through Carter Page. The entire thing, the significant parts of it,
the most significant parts of it
were all the dossier.
All the dossier.
But even more importantly,
a big hat tip to Stephen McIntyre,
who cited, by the way,
extensively in my next book,
Follow the Money,
which, again, we'll
totally thank you to all who purchased it on Friday.
We blew up the Barnes & Noble charts, Amazon and elsewhere.
My next book blows the doors on all this.
It's stuff I'm talking about now, but it's just in a lot of detail and in one place.
Not like hiding anything from you.
Hey, I'll read my book later.
It's covered.
It's all in one spot, though.
Thank you, hey, I'll read my book later. It's covered, it's all in one spot though. Thank you,
Paul. Gonna be a handy dandy guide to all the deep state connections.
I'll get to in a minute too. More to how
the impeachment hoax has everything to do
with what happened here too.
I want to make this important point.
So we now found the source
of the discredited information that wound
up in the dossier that was not a narrow part
of the case against the Trump team.
It was the whole case.
But hat tip Stephen McIntyre,
it's not so much the FISA warrant now
that's the big scandal against Carter Page.
We've already uncovered most of that.
It was fake. It was always fake.
They renewed it when they knew it was fake.
We get that. That's huge.
But the bigger part of this scandal
is the role the dossier played
in the intelligence community
assessment oh where are we going where are we going with this yeah yeah where are we going with
this again hat tip steven mcintyre who's done an amazing job on this he makes the point that
listen while they spied on the campaign with the pfizer warrant and the pfizer warrants were renewed
knowing they were false, it were really located
on centralized onto Carter Page. Now we know there may have been hops there that infiltrated
the Trump campaign and it's all devastating. But the intelligence community assessment that's
released in January of 2017, remember that? The 17 agencies say Trump colluded with Russia
because the Russians hated Hillary Clinton. Remember that? That intelligence community assessment later on was as damaging, if not more damaging,
than the FISA warrants to spy on the Trump team.
Why?
Because that was the narrative, false narrative, that was used by Goldman, Charlie Savage,
the New York Times, the Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, Chuck Todd, and every single media hack to go and propagate the
myth that the Russians wanted Trump in office and the way they did it was by colluding with him.
I need you to be crystal clear on this. That was all based on what people thought
was a formal intelligence product from the intelligence community, the ICA,
Intelligence Community Assessment,
issued in January of 2017,
right as Trump's about to swear into office
and Obama's transitioning out.
That intelligence product,
which said Trump colluded with the Russians, basically,
and the Russians wanted, more importantly, I should say,
the Trump colluded was more based on that,
but it was in the dossier,
which stated that the Russians definitely wanted Hillary elected.
That was used by the media as the bedrock principle way going forward that they need to investigate this.
It was all fake.
How do we know?
Because that was based on the dossier, too.
This is from Stephen McIntyre's Twitter feed.
Look at this.
You don't believe me?
Look at dossier number 95 from Steele.
Paul Manafort, who was using foreign policy advisor Carter Page and others as intermediaries.
The two sides had a mutual interest in defeating Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, whom President Putin apparently both hated and feared.
So just to be clear, again, the media is saying, no, no, Trump colluded with the Russians because Putin hated and feared Hillary Clinton. Well, where are you guys getting that again the media is saying no no trump colluded with the russians because putin hated and
feared hillary clinton well where are you guys getting that in the media we're getting it from
the intelligence community assessment this is a 17 agencies all agree where did they get it
where did where did they get that that putin hated hillary clinton and feared her where
joe where did they get that did you just see that? I just saw it in the dossier.
You may say, Dan, that's not in the intelligence community assessment.
Really?
Let's just go to the intelligence community assessment and just read it verbatim.
No, I'm not reading the dossier again.
I'm reading the actual intelligence community assessment.
Putin ordered the influence effort with the aim of defeating Secretary Clinton,
whom Putin quotes.
They even quoted, feared and hated hated they even put the quotation marks so just just to be clear
the intelligence community 17 agencies agree putin wanted uh wanted trump not clinton
the media then went on to use that narrative they They got that from the dossier, which we now know is fake.
They even quoted it.
They put the quotation marks in the intelligence community assessment from dossier report 95,
which is fake.
It's not from a Putin inner circle guy.
It's from a dude down the block from the White House.
Not from a Putin inner circle guy.
It's from a dude down the block from the White House.
They made this whole thing up.
And Hack Goldman and Hack Savage from the New York Times are mad at you for figuring it out.
Oh my gosh, I just ripped the page.
You see that? Gotta ease up on those bicep curls.
Look at that.
Just my own page.
Ladies and gentlemen, this gets worse.
How can it possibly get worse?
Oh, it does.
You know what?
Let me get to my final sponsor here
because I want to rock and roll through this.
We got a lot of show for you.
So you're like,
the media relied on an intelligence community assessment
that was based
on the same fake dossier
that FISA warrants are?
Yes.
Yes, that's the scandal.
Yes.
That's it.
It's as simple as that.
But it does get worse.
Don't go anywhere.
We're not even
scratching the surface yet.
Final sponsor today,
Omaha Steaks.
Listen, they're offering
a steakhouse grilling package.
Listen,
I can't do this read
because my mouth waters all the time. I love Omaha. I'm a huge fan of Omaha Steaks. Their
burgers are the best in the business. And my mouth starts to work, so forgive me.
They got an exclusive offer, Omaha Steaks, for my listeners. Go to omahasteaks.com.
Enter code Bongino in the search bar. And this week, go this week, Omaha Steaks will add four
burgers and four gourmet jumbo franks free with your order.
Oh, your food is so good. It's called the Grand Summer Grill Out Package, and it lets you stay
at home and eat like you're at the best steakhouse in town. Ladies and gentlemen, these steaks are
amazing. We're talking Omaha Steaks, and they're bacon-wrapped filet mignon, pork chops, chicken,
kielbasa, and more delivered right to your door. Smoky sweet bacon, fork tender filet mignon.
Awful much less than going out to a restaurant.
Visit Omaha Steaks.
I'm starving too right now.
This is like I can't handle it.
Visit omahasteaks.com.
Type Bongino in the search bar to get this deal today.
Omaha Steaks isn't just steak.
It's the best steak of your life, guaranteed.
And don't forget, when you order the grand summer grill-out package,
you'll get four jumbo franks and four delicious, delectable, juicy Omaha Steak burgers,
free to complete your steakhouse experience.
You'll never eat a burger again outside of Omaha after eating one of theirs.
Go to omahasteaks.com, type Bongino in the search bar, and shop summer grill packs today.
They deliver quality and safety with
every order they come in a flash frozen vacuum
sealed and it's safely delivered to
your door in a cooler with dry ice
fresher than fresh again go to Omaha
steaks dot com type Bongino
B-O-N-G-I-N-O in the search bar take
advantage of this amazing
deal today go today
check it out
all right you Deal today. Go today. Check it out. All right.
You.
All right.
Good.
Just checking.
We good?
No.
Get the thumbs up.
You may say, how can this case possibly get any worse now?
So the federal government put together an intelligence community assessment under Obama.
the federal government put together an intelligence community assessment under Obama based on a pee-pee dossier from a guy a mile away from the White House and then quoted it exactly.
And then no one in the media thought to ask any questions. 17 agencies said so.
No, no. Christopher Steele said so in his kooky pee-pee dossier.
This does get worse. This is a little bit of a long clip, about two minutes, but it's worth your time.
This was Devin Nunes,
great congressman from California,
on Maria Bartiromo's fantastic show
this week on Fox,
talking about some key takeaways
from what this guy
in the Brookings Institution,
which is about,
don't they have an office
like a mile or so,
maybe two miles from the White House?
So we now know again,
Steele's source was not in Russia, was not Putin's pal,
had no real information he gave to Steele.
By the way, I'll get to the, don't blame fully the Brookings guy.
Steele, I think, made a lot of this up.
But it should be clear, the Brookings Institution knew who this guy was, Steele's source.
It's a think tank.
And Devin Nunes says, there's some really interesting things going
on with the brookings institution check out this clip and on the other side i'll tell you
the really strange connections between them the impeachment hoax and spy gate check this out
our investigation continues maria and i would i would i think draw your attention to your viewers
attention to something that happened last week.
So we've known that Steele supposedly had these sources. We've long speculated and a lot of times
joked that Steele basically made this stuff up, that he supposedly had six sources. And what's
happened is, is as things have been declassified and also there was a court case involving steel in London on Monday where we
now see direct links between the Brookings Institute leadership and the creation possibly
of the steel dossier and the dissemination of the steel dossier. So at the time we now know there
were text messages back and forth with one of the, I mean, it's basically the leading center left institution here in our nation's capital.
It has a number of fellows.
They focus on national security.
I think they have real answer questions that need to be answered here about what on earth
was the president of Brookings doing texting back and forth to Steele?
Why was he accepting the dossier?
There's a lot here. Then you also have to let's not forget for the last four years,
Brookings also was the cheerleader for the dossier. So they were out there defending this dossier. They have this like kind of fake group called this lawfare group that's been out there and
on a daily basis. All they were there for is number one, to attack House Republicans
in our investigation. Four years running, by the way, they got everything wrong. And they always
were defending one thing. They were always defending the dirty cops. So you have the
former president of Brookings. Now you have this group that was stood up that's sitting there
cheerleading on the dirty cops. They've got a lot to answer for and we also don't know are any of still sources
were they related somehow to brookings we i think brookings needs to answer those questions
joe do you have the newness translator handy yeah here we go initiating noon yes translator den
thank you we haven't used that in a while my job here because devin newness won't reveal
classified information because he has some dignity
unlike Adam Schiff and others.
He's a real congressman,
you know. My job
here is to translate for you what
Nunes is actually telling you.
Let me just sum it up in a sentence
here. The information
they used to spy on the Trump team
and for the intelligence community assessment
which made allegations of treason, was fake.
But it was tagged to real people in the Brookings Institution.
How did those people in the Brookings Institution make contact with Steele?
How did they know to?
Were some of the people Steele was using as sources, were they classified intelligence community sources that had worked with intelligence communities before?
How did Steele find them?
You think they just met up over tea and crumpets and accidentally bumped elbows in a Starbucks?
Oh, hey.
Oh, I'm Christopher Steele.
Hello.
I'm a sensitive source for the Central Intelligence Agency.
Really?
Yes, I am.
Can we talk about Donald Trump?
Yes, we can.
I know things about Donald Trump.
What a co-wiki-dink.
How did that happen?
We're always a few months, not years ahead of this.
Some of this stuff's in my initial book, Spygate, which we wrote four years ago.
But how is it that information we know is fake, the dossier information, is attributed consistently to real people?
The Brookings guy and other people, Sergey Milian and others.
and other people, Sergei Millian and others.
And yet the information's fake and the real people it's attributed to,
most of the time, Joe, say, I didn't say that.
That's just totally made up.
Was it always made up from the start?
Made up by people working within the Obama administration
and the Clinton campaign who fabricated the whole thing,
told Steele to tag it to real sources.
Those real sources were real informants for the Central Intelligence Agency, intelligence agencies overseas and elsewhere.
How did they get the names to tag it to?
Oh, boy.
Are you picking this up?
I got to be careful here, but are you picking up what I'm putting down?
Yeah, daddy-o.
That the names of these intelligence sources were classified.
Yeah.
There's a good chance Steele did not know them.
Someone gave them to Steele.
Classified sources. Who Steele said, that guy said it. And
then when I interviewed the guy, he said, I didn't say that. Who told you that? What was Brookings
Institution's role in this being that one of the primary sources Steele used had an affiliation
with the Brookings Institution, a left-wing think tank. Who was the president of the Brookings Institution
at the time this was all going down?
There's no way that the president
of the Brookings Institution,
where Steele's alleged source,
I'm telling you, I think Steele made this whole thing up.
Understand that.
But where Steele said he got the information,
he works in Brookings.
Who was the president?
There's no way it would be a senior diplomat in the Bill Clinton administration who then left and was at Brookings as president when it happened, right?
That would be just crazy, wouldn't it?
That would be nuts.
No, because that's actually what happened.
Oh.
Let's go to a great piece in National Review by Zach Evans about Shrobe Talbot, a name you heard on this show three and a half years ago.
Steele updated the Clinton ally on dossier progress in 2016.
Zach Evans, this article will be up in the show notes today.
You need to read this one.
It's back from April.
a former Bill Clinton ally,
Strobe Talbot,
one of his buddies,
who was a senior diplomatic official in his Bill Clinton's presidency,
was running the Brookings Institution
when a guy affiliated
with the Brookings Institution,
his name is used in a dossier
as a source,
his name is the primary sub-servicer,
to then spy on the Trump team?
Don't worry, Adam Goldman and Charlie Savage.
We're definitely the bad guys for exposing this.
You guys are real heroes for being stupid enough to fall for this.
Clinton ally, president of institution that allegedly feeds information
into a fake dossier the FBI used to spy on the president
and then uses for an
intelligence community assessment to allege that Donald Trump is a treasonous traitor to the country.
Let's go to screenshot number one from the National Review piece. This is just fantastic.
Talbot, the president of the Brookings Institution, indicated that he was told of Steele's work
by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice,
you know, Susan Rice, who thinks ZT1 means ZTI because she's too stupid to figure it out, or former State Department official Victoria Nuland,
who used to work for Talbot and then worked in the State Department. Wait, what? So Talbot,
who's running the place where this primary subsource is affiliated, feeding BS information,
Talbot says, I heard it from Susan Rice
from the Obama administration.
Now, Rice denies this, according to her attorney.
But he says he got it from them.
Wow.
That's really weird.
Susan Rice, who was Obama's national security advisor?
Joke.
Kind of sounds like maybe the Obama administration
was orchestrating this whole thing with Hillary Clinton. Yeah. This kind of sounds like maybe the obama administration was orchestrating this
whole thing with hillary clinton yeah this kind of sorta you're saying these connections can't
possibly get any worse you mentioned before dan something about how in your book you talk about
it's called follow the money my book because all these scandals are the same people. All of them. They're all the same people. Soros, Brookings,
anti-Trump cabal fake whistleblowers. The impeachment hoax and Spygate are the same people.
When Spygate didn't work, they spied on Trump. He got elected anyway.
Then they moved seamlessly into the Mueller probe, and that didn't work.
And then they moved seamlessly into impeachment over the Ukraine hoax.
It's the same people.
Can't possibly be.
Really?
Let's go to screenshot number two from the National Review piece.
Remember Fiona Hill, Joe?
Russia expert testified in the impeachment hearing. Yeah of like hit donald trump pretty hard you're like fiona hell she
worked in the trump administration oh listen they should have got rid of her early like no way she
appears in this thing too okay let's just read from the article so steel went on to provide strobe
talbot you know clinton guy running the brookings institution with a copy of his dossier in November of 2016. That's weird. And Talbot, who was tapped in 2011 by Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton to chair the State Department's Foreign Affairs Advisory Board, then disseminated
the dossier to his Brookings colleague, Fiona Hill, in January of 2017 while she was serving
in the Trump administration. Come on, that can't be. She was the one with her high-minded BS routine
at the impeachment hearing.
She was above the whole fray.
Remember at the impeachment hearing
when she said she knew about Steele and stuff,
but couldn't really recall much of the details
about her relationship with him?
That's interesting because we can recall them now.
so fiona hill who testifies in the impeachment hearing against donald trump about the fake you know the fake quid pro quo that never happened who else was there
oh remember that other guy was his name david he's my book too, whose wife was on an email chain with Victoria
Newland. Remember that guy? His wife was on an email chain with Victoria Newland
about things in the dossier. Remember that? Remember the fake whistleblower who started
the whole thing? Yeah, that guy? Yeah, you know, the fake whistleblower.
You know, the fake whistleblower who started the whole thing
is on the record meeting with a Ukrainian lawmaker whose trip was funded by a Soros
group to the United States. Ukrainian lawmaker who meets with the fake whistleblower.
the United States, Ukrainian lawmaker who meets with the fake whistleblower.
She met with some of the same people involved in the Spygate scandal on that same trip.
Oh yeah, David Kramer, who worked for McCain, who was alleged to have passed the dossier off to the FBI.
Remember him?
So Ukrainian lawmaker met with that guy, met with Alexandra Chalupa, who was working with Ukrainians to spread
misinformation about Manafort and others. And she also meets with the fake whistleblower.
While people testifying in the impeachment scandal started by the fake whistleblower,
the same people are dealing with people at Brookings who are passing around the dossier.
It's the same people. There's another screenshot, by the way, from this piece,
the National Review piece.
You're like, these connections can't possibly get any worse.
No, they do.
Talbot, Strobe Talbot, Brookings Institute's guy,
his brother-in-law, Cody Scheer, who's a Clinton lieutenant,
by the way, also disseminated his own dossier,
alleging basically the PP stuff.
You may say, Dan, this is getting very confusing.
It doesn't need to be.
The exact same people who were making up the fake information in the dossier used to spy on the Trump team and later used to produce an intelligence community assessment
used by the media to claim Trump was a traitor guilty of treason to this country and that
the Russians wanted Hillary to win.
The same people involved in that were the exact same people who produced evidence of
a fake Ukrainian quid pro quo used in a hoax impeachment sham to try to get rid of the president after
the Mueller probe failed. It's the same people. It's the same people.
Who was marshalling all this, ladies and gentlemen? Well, it seems clear at this point,
it's Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. But who was paying for all this behind the scenes here's an interesting article
at the wall street journal a name you'll see in all three of my books on this my spygate
exonerated in my soon-to-be-released book follow the money wall street journal from march of 2015
clinton charity tapped foreign friends.
They did.
2015 article.
What does this have to do with anything?
Remember the name Viktor Pinchuk?
Viktor Pinchuk.
Ukrainian guy.
Runs a company called Interpipe.
Yeah.
Remember that guy?
Yeah, Pinchuk.
Viktor Pinchuk appears in a couple of my books. I think he makes an appearance in Follow the Money, too.
No, I know he does.
Pinchuk's a big donor to the Clinton Foundation, which they've been looking at since as far
back as 2015.
Clinton's got caught talking to Pinchuk and then disavowed any knowledge of knowing him,
even though he was scheduled to appear at Mrs. Clinton's house down in Washington, D.C. When those emails were uncovered, the Clintons and their people said,
no, no, no, Pinchuk, we don't know. That's not our guy. Really? That's interesting because this
Wall Street Journal piece from back in 2015 says he is your guy. It says that between 2009 and 2013,
including when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from Pinchuk?
Based in Kiev, Ukraine?
This foundation was created by Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from pipe making.
He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian parliament and as a proponent
of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
Mr. Pinchuk and his wife, the daughter of a former president, began donating
to Clinton charities in 2006 after being introduced to Mr. Clinton by Doug Schoen,
a pollster who's worked for both Clintons. You mean the same Doug Schoen,
who according to FARA filings, Foreign Agent Registration Act, was paid and is alleged to have arranged the meeting between the Ukrainian lawmaker, John McCain's guy, the fake whistleblower, and the woman who was putting out most of the fake information about Manafort's ties to Ukraine, which was used to foster the Russia hoax.
You mean Schoen is involved in all that?
The same guy being paid by Pinchuk,
who's a mega donor to the Clinton Foundation, who was a pollster for the Clintons? Yeah, that guy.
They all know each other, folks.
Let me just sum this up for you because it's important.
The dossier was fake.
It was always fake.
When the media ran with it and it didn't work,
they used Bob Mueller to try and scare Trump
into an obstruction charge.
That didn't work.
Trump didn't play into his trap.
Then they started a fake impeachment hoax
based on a phone call and a quid pro quo that never happened
using the exact same people who were involved in the Spygate hoax.
And the most damaging part of this whole thing is the intelligence communities that put out this intelligence community assessment.
Saying that Putin hated and feared Mrs. Clinton.
Literally quoted from a dossier everybody now knows is fake because we've tracked down the source.
quoted from a dossier everybody now knows is fake because we've tracked down the source who was affiliated with a brookings institution run by a clinton guy who's now said it's fake and he
didn't say any of that you'd never believe this could get any worse but it does all right my final
story of the day um is important if you didn't catch life liberty
and levin last night then go to whatever it is fox nation or tvo dvr whatever it may be you need
to watch it i think there's a replay next week levin show last night was incredible
they had stanley kurtz on who has been talking about one of the biggest domestic policy scandals in a generation that the
media, again, is not covering at all, but we've covered on this show for upwards of three years
now, how the Democrats are literally going to war with the suburbs. I'm not kidding. It's happened.
Look at the case of Westchester County, where they sued them, the federal government, and in 2009 forced
Westchester County to build a bunch of low-income housing in high-end suburbs because they felt
like it.
Because, you know, racism and all.
They made all that up.
It's actually happening.
Trump has stopped it.
It's called AFFH.
Tattoo it on your skull.
Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
It is a big government, far left, radical agenda to destroy the suburbs.
Destroy the suburbs because liberals hate the suburbs because it pulls tax money away from the big cities they want to dominate.
They hate the suburbs.
That's your house.
So to liberals watching,
the great Stanley Kurtz,
who's been all over this story for years,
if not decades now,
was on Life, Liberty, and Levin and for an hour broke down
how the Democrats and Joe Biden
are about to burn your neighborhood
to the ground with these programs.
Here's clip number one.
It's a two-minute clip.
This is one minute of the two minutes.
And this is Kurtz explaining how Joe Biden's about to bring back this program
that's going to take over your schools, your policing, put public transportation and
neighborhoods that aren't built for it. And they're going to claim you're a racist if you
don't meet racial quotas in your neighborhood and build low-income housing smack dab in the middle of your neighborhood. And if you dare speak out, you're definitely a racist.
Check out this clip. That brief mention and created out of it a transformative rule,
a little bit like Obamacare in that it's a massive rule that does a great many things, and you have to keep delving and delving. And the bottom line is that AFFH, the acronym for Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing,
would radically undercut the political and economic independence of America's suburbs.
It would allow bureaucrats in Washington, in the Department of Housing and Urban Development to control zoning laws, to control the placement of transportation and business districts, even to some degree the drawing of school districts.
In other words, almost every important local governmental responsibility could, under AFFH, fall into the de facto control of the feds.
Folks, you think he's making this up? You think this is hyperbolic?
Look up Westchester 2009 consent decree, where as a test case, liberals sued westchester county new york saying they weren't affirmatively furthering
fair housing and alleging basically that the citizens of westchester were racist you don't
have enough minorities in these neighbors keep in mind westchester i think is the fourth most
diverse county in the country i think stanley kurtz said that last night doesn't matter it is thankfully now and has been for decades illegal to discriminate
based on race gender anything selling someone your house you can't you can't do it's illegal
so no one had a specific case of racism they just said we don't like the racial makeup of your town
there's basically too many white people so we're're going to sue you. You may say, oh, that probably got thrown out.
No, no, it didn't.
It scared the hell out of Westchester
to the point where they agreed to build
tens of millions of dollars of low-income housing
smack in the middle of upper middle-class neighborhoods.
It's not coming to my neighborhood, AFFH.
It already has.
Well, what stopped it?
Why hasn't it expanded throughout the country? Well, there wereH, it already has. Well, what stopped it? Why hasn't it expanded throughout
the country? Well, there were lawsuits, thankfully, that stopped some of it, but the Trump administration
just put a big stop to it and said, we're not doing that. It's illegal to discriminate based
on race. Thankfully, it will continue to be forever in the same country. But unless you can
prove someone was racially discriminated against, you pointing out
the racial makeup
of a neighborhood
has nothing to do with anything.
People move to neighborhoods
for all kinds of reasons.
Cuban family moves in,
they bring in some
Cuban friends
who live next door.
You have neighborhoods
that have a lot of folks
who are Cuban.
Why they chose that neighborhood,
we have no idea.
Unless you can allege
racial discrimination,
you saying a neighborhood is racist it's kind of offensive no so they're going to use this now to sue you and rezone your communities
and plan a bunch of low-income housing right in the middle of your neighborhood
it's already happened they're also going to redistrict your schools. But by the way,
I'm all for school choice. So don't, I'm just telling you what's going to happen. But if you're
not, which you should be by the way, but if you're not for school choice, you're not on my kids. I
paid a lot of money to get in my neighborhood because the schools are good. That's fine. You're
perfectly entitled to your opinion. That's not what the federal government is saying. They're
saying, no, no, we're going to come in and we're going to redistrict your kids to different schools.
Oh, you didn't know that? Oh, you think this is a big joke? Biden's running on this.
Biden is running on reinstituting this. Even worse, they're doubling down. Watch cut two here.
If they can't redistrict your schools, take away assets from your police department,
and tax you to pay for big cities, they're going to institute regional governing consortiums
to take away your tax money from your local neighborhoods, the suburbs they're going to
destroy and give them to the cities? Check this out. You think I'm messing with you?
So effectively, in so many crucial respects to the people who live in these
communities or the people who want to live in these communities, the federal government would
nationalize, federalize decisions respecting the economy, schooling, law enforcement, housing,
zoning, commercial activity, transportation hubs. Have I missed something? You probably have, Mark. I've probably
missed something because there are so many things in the AFFH regulation. It's hard to keep track.
For example, I'll give you just one example of something we both missed, quote unquote.
The AFFH will allow the feds to push local governments into regional governing consortia.
Now what does that bit of gobbledygook actually mean?
It means that it will try to create a layer of government in between the federal government
and local government, a layer of government that corresponds to your greater metropolitan
area.
So if you are in say Montgomery County outside of Philadelphia, it will try to remove
your governing responsibilities and hand them over to the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area,
which will probably end up taking a chunk of your tax money. So there's a lot in AFFH.
So just to be clear, let's sum up what's in AFFH, which Biden has already openly pledged
to expand. It's not a secret. Look it up yourself. I don't like Trump's tweets. Good. You live in
the suburbs. Here's what's coming your way. Low-income housing, massive housing complexes,
big high-rises of low-income housing in your neighborhood, redistricting your schools. You
like your schools?
No more.
They ain't your schools anymore.
Your tax money is not going to be spent locally.
It's going to be spent in cities you don't even live in that you just moved out of.
And it's all going to be done under the guise of you're all racist, despite the fact they
can't actually point to any racism.
And one of the neighborhoods used as an example of neighborhood racism, again, not specific
examples.
They don't have any.
One of the neighborhoods, Joe,
here's the greatest irony of all, folks,
and we'll be done after this
because it's a mic drop moment.
One of the neighborhoods in Westchester
uses an example of a racist neighborhood
that needs low-income housing built in it
and its schools redistricted
is Ochapecua,
where Hillary Clinton lives, in the racist neighborhood?
Hillary Clinton, of all the places to live, picks the racist neighborhood the federal government made an example of as a racist neighborhood?
It's not.
But they just, why doesn't she move?
Why doesn't she, why does she support this? Because it's BS. There's nothing racist about Chappaqua
or anywhere else. They're just using it as a talking point. Sorry, phone's going. Always a
busy day here at Bongino Inc. Oh man, that was a loaded show. All right, folks, thanks again for
tuning in. I really appreciate it. Please subscribe to my YouTube channel, youtube.com slash Bongino.
We really appreciate it.
We had another terrific week
and please pick up my new book again on pre-order,
Follow the Money.
I promise you all of these ties
between the impeachment hoax,
the Mueller hoax and the Spygate hoax
are all laid out really convenient.
The book is written like a police file again,
just like Spygate.
So you can skip around between chapters if you want to find connections between all of
this stuff.
It's all there, all laid out for you in one spot.
Check it out.
Follow the money.
Available at Bonginoble.com, Amazon, bookstores, online.
Pre-order now.
Check it out.
You just heard Dan Bongino.