The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz - The Big Suey: Shower Beer Math

Episode Date: August 2, 2024

Does Joel Embiid fit on the US Olympics hoops team - or is he just not suited for the international game. Plus, Tony shows his work on 'shower beer math'. Samson and Adnan join to give their Top 5 Mov...ie Soundtracks of all time and much more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 You're listening to Giraffe King's Network. Folks, Smirnoff, I love it. Smirnoff knows there's no I in football. It's a wee thing. Best enjoyed with good drinks and great company. Home or away, we rally together, cry together and always rally cry together because there's no I in fandom. Smirnoff, the world's number one vodka,
Starting point is 00:00:25 is perfect for easy, delicious cocktails for fans over 21. As the official vodka partner of the NFL, Smirnoff's award-winning taste has been igniting the collective spirit since 1864. Grab a bottle of Smirnoff at your local retailer and head to smirnoff.com to find recipes of delicious cocktails perfect for game day. Please drink responsibly.
Starting point is 00:00:41 Smirnoff, number 21 vodka, distilled from grain, 40% alcohol volume. The Smirnoff Company, New York, New York. Please do not share with anyone under legal drinking age. Now's a good time to remember where the story of tequila started. In 1795, the first tequila distillery was opened by the Cuervo family. And 229 years later, Cuervo is still going strong. Family owned from the start, same family, same land. Now's a good time to enjoy Cuervo, the tequila that invented tequila. Go to Cuervo.com to shop tequila or visit a store near you. Cuervo, now's a good time.
Starting point is 00:01:15 Trademarks owned by Becle, SAB, the CV, copyright 2024, próximo. Jersey City, New Jersey, please drink responsibly. Welcome to the Big Sui, presented by DraftKings. Why are you listening to this show? The podcast that seems very similar to the other Dan LeBattard podcast. I'm sorry, I'm not going to apologize for that. In fact, the only difference seems to be this imaging. I have been tempted in restaurants just walking past tables to grab somebody's fries if they're just there.
Starting point is 00:01:44 That hasn't happened to you guys? I've done it. And now, here's the marching man to nowhere, fat face and the habitual liar. We're going to onboard David Sampson and Adnan here, and they have a top five today that I already took issue with. We'll explain that in a moment, but Adnan is an Emmy Award-winning host for MLB Network. David Samson hosts nothing personal as baseball chops, you all know that. So I'm going to start with a baseball question and really something that's sad, which is Mike Trout. He's barely played. This is one that recognized as arguably his generation's greatest baseball player and we're seeing his
Starting point is 00:02:24 body betray him. Is this a deal where a change of scenery will all of a sudden make him healthy? What is going on here with Mike Trout? Adnan, we begin with you. Adnan, you're muted. Adnan, I'm going to take it right back and I'm going to begin with David now. David, you have the floor. Here's the problem with Mike Trout. It is no longer a situation where you say, oh, he's just injury prone. It's going to get better. He's played one game after the All-Star break and three of the last four seasons. Think about that. That would be a stat of the day. That's so why we don't have to do it because I'll do it. So the day's
Starting point is 00:03:02 that of the day. So where is this going with Mike Trout? If you were- It means that Mike Trout is now closer to Don Mattingly than he is to one of the best players who ever played. So give me the front office opinion. If you're doing an eval, let's say you have a different budget and you're approaching this much differently than you did from your time down here in South Florida. You guys were buyers occasionally. The Delgado move was a good one, you guys went
Starting point is 00:03:27 for it occasionally. You criticized me for all the buys we did where we traded away prospects who ended up being good. No, dude, let me tell you, like my favorite era of Marlins baseball were the few years after you won the World Series where you went for it. You made the LaDuca trade, the gray trade with the Dodgers. You went after Delgado. You guys were competing for it and that's all I really ever wanted from it. I gave you some credit there, but geez, all right, stop taking it so... How about Carlos Lee? Your show's called Nothing Personal. Remember Carlos Lee? Yeah, I do remember. And you guys, that was a good example. Like, I'm good with you guys
Starting point is 00:03:56 going forward and failing. So, separate yourself from how you used to do business because we just highlighted the success. You did a lot of sales and capitulated. Terrible, both ways. to do business because we just highlighted the success, you did a lot of sales and capitulated. So let's say you're the Mariners, all right, a team that's right there, you got a good pitching staff, you definitely need a bat and say this is next season, how do you evaluate his talent like Mike Trout? You have his contract, obviously, but where do you project this player? You just mentioned Don Mattingly and that would give you pause. Certainly.
Starting point is 00:04:26 Well, Don Mattingly was a certain Hall of Famer, except he just couldn't be healthy. He hurt his back. And I think about 213 million over six years. And I asked this question on nothing personal. I asked it of any baseball fan who loves baseball. Would you sign Mike Trout to 213 million over six years right now? Did you hear at Nanberg check his microphone? I apologize. David was making an excellent point. I just wanted to double check. A little quiet. Check, check, check. Okay, I am here as well. We heard you.
Starting point is 00:04:55 Listen, I went Samson. He's Don Maddly now, man. Three-time MVP and now you've got these injuries. He's, you know, I guess he's a Hall of Famer because how many three-time MVPs are there? But to your point, Mike, last offseason, remember there was rumors, stuff being leaked out, David remembers this, the Angels basically saying, hey, we wouldn't be averse to trading, Mike, if he was open to that, but he has all the cards in his hand, like, wink, wink, Mike, if you want to wave this thing, and everyone says, look at the Phillies. He's from Millville, New Jersey. He grew up a Phillies fan, South Jersey. We know Dave Dombrowski wants to buy, buy, buy. John Middleton.
Starting point is 00:05:25 So the time to make a move for Mike Trout would have been a season ago for the Phillies. Now he's really damaged goods. Like I feel horrible for Mike, and I feel horrible for the Angels. Like this guy has only played 48% of games over the past four years going into this year, and he barely played this year.
Starting point is 00:05:40 It's really frustrating. Did we just wake you up? Like let's be honest here. You had the computer troubles. You battle through fl Flam. You got showing. The energy's there. The energy's there, but the Flam is also there. What did you do in the shower this morning? I've been up since 7, but I looked disheveled. So I didn't just wake up, but I look like hell because I've been up since 7. I have young kids and I've kicked them out. I'm in a hotel in Boston. I said, you guys have to stay outside. I'm on the
Starting point is 00:06:03 Dan LeBoucheard show. But no, I did not just wake up, but I look like they're just in the hallway Joking coding coding I came to my wife. They're down having breakfast. I'll show you the eggs. We had eggs over here We've got some let me see those eggs Before we get into the top five which is top five motion picture soundtracks, which has already gotten me fired up, I wanna talk to you about the 90s in general. I am revisiting the 90s right now, seeing some movies that I had maybe seen once in my life
Starting point is 00:06:40 or bits and pieces of. I hope you're gonna say Wild Things, Mike, but go ahead. Dude, I'd watch Wild, I don't need to refreshher course on Wild Things. Yeah, I burned Wild Things out through my most formative years. But I revisited films this week like Crimson Tide which I gave five stars. That was an absolute banger of a movie. draft which you know doesn't quite hold up but it's got an unbelievable cast and I started watching because I wasn't aware of this back draft 2 which was made in 2019 I wasn't there was a sequel in which many of the cast reprise our roles so I'm just I wanted to ask you generally how do you feel about the 90s because if you look at the best picture nominees you could make a very strong
Starting point is 00:07:22 argument for the 90s being the golden age of cinema. Listen, the 70s for me, Mike, is the best ever to be specific. It's 1967, 1977, Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, The First Two Godfathers, Taxi Driver, Main Streets, etc. But you're right, the 90s is outstanding because that was that great indie wave and you had Pulp Fiction and Fargo and Secrets and Lies and, you know, the Big Lebowski and like filmmakers taking chances and students willing to do that. Now this era right now kind of reminds me of the 80s. It's a lot of recycled movies and a lack of inspiration
Starting point is 00:07:51 and superhero movies, et cetera. So 90s movies have a real soft spot for me. Those are some of my favorite films. Magnolia back in 1999, Goodfellas in 1990. I'm sure David agrees with me, the 90s was a great decade. I can't imagine that you think the 80s were full of recycled movies. Just start and end with John Hughes.
Starting point is 00:08:09 Every one of those was original. Every one of those was all about what it is to grow up. And if you're an 80s child, I don't think you view the 80s as recycled at all. It was the sequel generation. You can ask anybody who knows anything about movies. The 80s was when they had these big budget moviesget movies blockbusters they make one-two look at Rocky one two three four I mean this was the era of the eighties of recycled sequels the 90s was more original filmmaking Miramax and the rise of
Starting point is 00:08:34 Harvey Weinstein etc we all know but Harvey off the field horrible guy but as far as cinematically speaking the 90s is a real boon I can't believe you think the 80s was like a rich fertile era. There's no way that was. You ask anybody, 70s and 90s, great, 80s, no. I've become a real admirer. I was when he was with us, Tony Scott, tragically took his own life. I'm revisiting a lot of his films right now because I love generally the narratives that he established, especially with action movies. He found a way to make you care about characters in ways that action movies all too often miss the mark. I think Man on Fire is a premier example
Starting point is 00:09:09 of how to get you invested in characters and still have a kick-ass action movie. Crimson Tide, when people recount all the great movies that Tony Scott did, I think should be possibly regarded at the very top of the heap because you have Tony Scott at the top of his game you have Zimmer scoring at the top of his game you have Denzel and Gene Hackman who might be the most Underrated actor of his generation because he didn't he the roles that he chose were interesting in that he never really wore Prosthetics he never really went for big historical Academy prosthetics, he never really went for big historical academy cash grabs. Are you talking Dinsdell or Hackman?
Starting point is 00:09:48 We're talking about Hackman in particular because- Mississippi Burning? Yeah, that was a great piece. Hackman- Terrible name for it. Hackman generally in his career avoided prosthetics, avoided going for roles that you would deem Oscar bait, and he still knocked it out of the park. And you had two actors that were playing off one another in spectacular ways.
Starting point is 00:10:05 And I think it holds up, especially with everything in the news stream. And then I look back at the year that was 1995 and I saw in the 96 Academy Awards, Babe got nominated for best picture, which Babe is a fine movie. Crimson Tide did not. It seemed as though Crimson Tide kind of got left by
Starting point is 00:10:25 the wayside as all these other movies. Braveheart won that year. I think Crimson Tide is actually better than Braveheart. Crimson Tide is an incredible movie. You should all rewatch it. I'm begging for you guys to have a good opinion. Gene Hackman. I love this crusade towards Crimson Tide. I get like this about movies. I get like this about heat. I get like this about collateral. When I find a movie that still resonates and connects and everything, you can't get out Crimson Tide Crimson Tide. You guys love it. Five stars. I happen to love Crimson Tide, but I do have it behind Braveheart. And although now looking back, I try not to watch Braveheart or think about
Starting point is 00:11:02 Braveheart, but at the time time, I had that well above. I was not a B.A.D.E. fan personally. I think it's because I'm a kosher. Gene Hackman's best role, clearly the birdcage. Gene Hackman was in a mid-90s heater. You have Denzel realizing that I've gotten this, I've gotten the Academy attention, let me go for biggest movie star on the planet,
Starting point is 00:11:25 sad to see if that's achievable. And I think everybody did a bang up job here. All right, so let's get to it. No way out. Great. Listen, unforgiven, obviously, we want a French connection the conversation. I'll say this, Mike, for Crimson Tide. There's some incredible scenes of Denzel Hackman just shouting at each other like all of them shouting Gina Hacquman is A+. A lot of racial tension that by the end, well throughout the movie is subtle and then by the end becomes a little bit more overt but I think you can make an argument in terms of like workplace dramas. This is a great film. There's a lot of great supporting cast.
Starting point is 00:12:00 Gandolfini understands the assignment and is seemingly too excited for it. It's just a great, great film. All right, the top fives here. We'll begin with Samson. That's how we do it, right, Chris? We do. You. This, I have a real bone to pick with this and I'll say it on the front end.
Starting point is 00:12:18 The soundtracks, the soundtrack has to be an original motion picture soundtrack. There are a lot of great soundtracks, especially in the 90s. Let me get my argument off the ground. A preemptive crapping of our list before Samson and I have even spoken. Cause I've made my own list because I was aware of the loopholes that you guys use. I love the preemptive crap.
Starting point is 00:12:35 There's a, I did it right before the show. Your soundtracks are more compilation albums. And I think an original motion picture soundtrack has to support the art, has to be created for the film itself. Original music meant to supplement the film. And now you can get music from the time that helps supplement a movie and that could be great.
Starting point is 00:12:58 But I think for this discussion, you have to provide that caveat. And I think that you could have had a top five that was of top five original movie songs or soundtracks. That's great. But this top five is top five movie soundtracks. All right, David, let's get underway. But leave me enough time.
Starting point is 00:13:15 Leave me the 40 seconds to do the OSTs. I'll go right through it and just tell you number five, Across the Universe. Across the Universe, it's Beatles songs, but it's sung. Wait a minute. This counts for you, Mike. It's sung by Jim Sturges and Evan Rachel Wood. We're great. So I assume that counts. No, is it great? I love the movie. Love the soundtrack.
Starting point is 00:13:35 Not an original motion picture soundtrack. These are Beatles songs. It's more of a so it has to be songs sung by people originally written like the Dirty Dancing soundtrack. The only one that counts is Hungry Eyes. David, I know your top five. You have a ton of jukebox musicals in there. This just like doesn't count in my opinion.
Starting point is 00:13:56 Doesn't count. He's gonna hate our lists. I don't care. Number four, The Big Chill. Awesome. No, no, give him a big horn. Big Chill's awesome, David. Go ahead.
Starting point is 00:14:06 There's only one horn, Ed. I'm not even going to defend it. I will defend number seven. Incredible soundtrack. Number three is a movie called Harold and Maud. Harold and Maud is a movie with Ruth Gordon and a young boy whose name escapes me. And then like, Bud, his name is Bud somebody. It's about an octogenarian in a relationship with a younger boy, not inappropriate.
Starting point is 00:14:27 And the soundtrack is Kat Stevens. And it is a fantastic movie. Fantastic soundtrack. Hal Ashby, the director, very underrated. Obviously made a lot of great 70s films. It's a good call. Bud Court. Bud Court was his name. That's right.
Starting point is 00:14:40 Not that old. Number two. This has original songs, Mike. So this wins Moulin Rouge. It's got some mashups, but it does have some songs written just for the movie. That's a jukebox musical. Jukebox musical. Their singing smells like teen spirit.
Starting point is 00:14:54 Who you doing? What about Come What May? There are some original songs on there, but largely that is what is referred to as a jukebox musical. I don't think that you can come up with a top five list of soundtracks that are all original songs on there, but largely that is what is referred to as a jukebox musical. I don't think that you can come up with a top five list of soundtracks that are all original songs, the entire soundtrack. David, David, like the most romantic part of the movie, they're singing Elton John's Your Song. I know, I love that.
Starting point is 00:15:18 I watched that scene over and over again. And number one, Jim Broadbent, I love you. Number one, Almost Famous. That's can can can. And number one, Jim Broadband, I love you. Number one, Almost Famous. That's not disputable. Stillwater, that's some original songs. That's some. But it's also derivative of the time and there's plenty of songs that Cameron Crowe was a fan of that's in there so it's more of a compilation soundtrack in my opinion. But anybody would suggest if you're doing just a catch-all for motion picture soundtracks, that would be up there in anybody's list. And it's a great film.
Starting point is 00:15:46 It's my number one. It's my number one film of all time. Yeah, it's your favorite movie ever. And I think it counts because it does have some of the right music. Do you have the Stillwater t-shirt? I do. Where Billy Crudup is just like the only one that's in focus? He's in the front.
Starting point is 00:15:56 Yeah. Alright, go ahead, Ed and Ed. Leave me 40 seconds, okay? I will, Mike. Don't worry. You're going to hate my list, too. Philip Seymour Hopp and Lester Banks, all-time great. Number five.
Starting point is 00:16:04 It's basically just one song where they played over and over radio Raheem Let's do the right thing fight the power Blazing in 1989 the soundtrack the anthem of the summer David great song great soundtrack not known for its soundtrack though number four train spotting Not known for its soundtrack. It is. Iggy Pop right out of the gate. Lost for Life, Mike.
Starting point is 00:16:28 I knew you'd like this great, great soundtrack. Yeah, Lost for Life's not written for Trainspotting. Correct, but it is a great soundtrack, which I knew you'd back me up on. Lou Reed also in the soundtrack. Number three, you're going to hate this one. This is a jukebox music, I'll give you that one. American Graffiti. Great movie.
Starting point is 00:16:40 Great 60s, 70s music. Awesome soundtrack. Number two, I'm completely with David Motown for life big chill And number one Mike's gonna hate it people are gonna love it though I'm telling you right now 30th anniversary one of the great films of all time a great soundtrack from Quentin Tarantino It made Neil Diamond cool Paul Fiction Cool alright, so just let's get that out of the way Neil Diamond cool No, Neil Diamond was the saving Silverman mightx made Neil Diamond cool. No, Neil Diamond was, Saving Silverman might have made
Starting point is 00:17:05 Neil Diamond cool. When you compare number ones here, it's clear that David won because Almost Famous is about that soundtrack. Pulp Fiction's not about that soundtrack. It just happens to have a few good songs. If all the chips are stuck together. Not more than a few good songs.
Starting point is 00:17:17 Iconic soundtrack. Go ahead, Cody, go ahead, Cody, go ahead. It's one nacho if they're all stuck together. No Beverly Hills cop. Mike, I need your list badly because I can't think of five movies that would qualify with your rules. All right, so like non-Disney division because we were having a big argument about how Phil Collins absolutely killed it with Tarzan And I decided that if I included Disney in this it would all be Disney soundtrack So that's for a topic for another day. But before you give your list, Mike
Starting point is 00:17:41 I really hope you have one which is all just like orchestral music. I mean, it's all just Hans Zimmer score I'll love it. Go ahead. There are some like really good. I I should we'll do scores another day. But before you give your list Mike, I really hope you have one which is all just like orchestral music. I mean it's all just Hans Zimmer score. I'll love it. Go ahead. Oh there are some like really good... I should... we'll do scores another day. Number five. Number five. Grease. Tell me more. Tell me more. I got chills. They're multiplying. They're multiplying. So for number four, this Cape Crusader had so many great soundtracks that I wore out when I was a kid. So I had to basically decide one Batman album to eliminate the genre. I was torn between Batman 89, Batman and Robin, but I settled on Batman Forever as the number four.
Starting point is 00:18:20 Interesting, okay. Number three, super problematic, let's not stay here, but Space Jam was an absolute hitter. Peter! Number three, super problematic, let's not stay here, but Space Jam was an absolute HEATER! HEATER! Number two, underrated, Black Panther OST. And number one, Saturday Night Fever, shame on you for not being here. Wow! Spaceship watching, get Richard out trying Above the Rim juice, a bottle of black and black panther's...
Starting point is 00:18:39 Wow! Above the Rim, great one. That'll buy Juju. I'm watching the Summer Games and I can tell you that with all the blood, sweat and tears that these athletes lose during competition, they need all the hydration that they can get. I also know that the weekend warriors like myself need to have the electrolytes that Liquid IV can provide. Where there is a day at the ballpark of barbecuing, staying hydrated is crucial, especially in this heat. Liquid IV helps maintain optimal hydration levels, allowing me to enjoy these events to the fullest without the discomfort of dehydration. After I exercise, which for me is just mowing the lawn, I just pop in a stick of strawberry liquid IV in a cold glass of water.
Starting point is 00:19:12 It's perfect for coming in out of the sun. Cool off your summer with the reimagined flavors of iconic treats like Popsicle Firecracker. Or get a refreshing swallow goodness with zero sugar from the indulgent fruity flavors of Rainbow Sherbet. Tear, pour, live more. One stick plus 16 ounces of water hydrates better than water alone. If hydrating were an Olympic sport, you would win the gold. Get 20% off your first order of Liquor.iv when you go to Liquor.iv.com and use code DLS at checkout.
Starting point is 00:19:36 That's 20% off your first order when you shop better hydration today using promo code DLS at Liquor.iv.com. Don Lebatard! Dan is getting to his microphone real quick. Sorry about that. Thank you, Stugatz. I appreciate it. My apologies.
Starting point is 00:19:52 I had to run out for a moment. Stugatz. Did you eat something? I did. I grabbed some turkey. You can hear it in my mouth. Yeah, you made it seem like you were doing something urgent and said you were just stuffing your face.
Starting point is 00:20:01 I was doing something urgent. I went upstairs and grabbed some turkey and then I ran back down here. I'm sorry that I'm late It's very unprofessional. Why do you have an entire turkey leg in your pocket? I do I walk around here like it's like it's Disney World with one giant piece of turkey at all times This is the done libertar show with the Stu guards Today's episode is sponsored by DraftKings stay tuned because you'll hear more about DraftKings and all it has to offer throughout the show. DraftKings, the crown is yours. So Mike, I wanted to get into basketball, Olympic basketball with you because you're wearing the hat.
Starting point is 00:20:34 But I had just gotten a text during the break from my buddy Warren and all it said was, shower beers are amazing. And then I turned back to this math that Tony was doing. And speaking of amazing, alright, I want Tony to this math that Tony was doing and speaking of amazing. All right I want Tony to explain right but when you get to the part about how often you hang out or nights per week I want you to pause for me Okay Okay
Starting point is 00:20:54 Give me the math on you figuring out how many shower beers you have had Since and we're just gonna keep it this way since you've turned 21 years old Yes, of course because you should you can only drink after even in the shower. The rules are you can only 21 and over. Yeah, exactly. So a prime going out years, 21 to 27. So we're given a six year sample here of going out. I feel like we could agree though. Normally college years are the biggest years of going out where you're going out multiple general consensus, but is he definitely an outlier again? We do this for the average, not the outliers. So 52 weeks in a year.
Starting point is 00:21:30 Last time I checked, we've got about two and a half nights out per week. Pause. Okay. You're talking first of all, every single week that rule, you mean your weekend already booked every single week from 21 to 27. You're going out every single weekend and then one other night. Two and a half is key because Wednesday was boogies, Thursday was grow. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:21:53 And then you had your weekends too. Also you had wing it Wednesdays at Flannys. Yes. Zero exceptions. Every single weekend. Going to wing it Wednesday counts as going out. All Flannys counts as going out. Because you're having beers.
Starting point is 00:22:04 Yeah, you're standing. Okay, so this is like, you're counting going out? Yeah, because you're having beers. Yeah, you're slaving. So this is like, you're counting going out as any social gathering where you're having a drink, not like going to a club. I'm with Jess. I think of pre-gaming as a major event, right? If I'm drinking in the shower, I better
Starting point is 00:22:17 be staying out till 5 AM. No, I don't drink in the shower to pre-game. I drink in the shower because I find that beer enjoyable. OK. This is on the basis of pre the basis of regaining. We fundamentally disagree on the premise of shower beers and that that's fine for the sake of Tony's argument. It's a pregame shower. I do because I like it. There's more math involved here too though. Tony likes it too. I'm getting in the weeds here, but Tony is it twenty one through twenty seven or stopping at twenty seven
Starting point is 00:22:42 stopping at twenty seven. Okay, twenty Stopping at 27. So 21 through 27. It's the same thing. It's a prime range. Through 27, it's actually seven years. And you got an extra year there. If you do the math. Okay, well I did it to 27. Okay, so six years. So you're stopping at 27.
Starting point is 00:22:53 Yeah, so we got six years somewhere here. Back out of the weeds. Your 26th Eve birthday where you turned 27 is the last night. Right, correct. Yeah, so you're not born one years old. Right, exactly. Although some people consider the nine months that you were in the womb. Hmm, so you're not born one years old, right? Exactly. Although some zero some people consider like the nine months So you were in the womb? Hmm
Starting point is 00:23:08 52 weeks two and a half nights out per week again Friday Saturday But then you can also mix in a Thursday Wednesday Monday depending on what the situation was We minus two weeks out if you're sick, right something else happens I love this, you know Like you have to have a buffer of two weeks where you're not at your a game going out, right? Otherwise that's crazy. Exactly. That's too much number for you. 50 easier to multiply with. I see what you, I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but so we've got an average of about,
Starting point is 00:23:36 remember one point, one point two five shower beers per week. So not every time I'm going out, am I having a shower beer? Shout out to the squiggly equal signs. You don't see that many more times after college. Exactly. I'm definitely paying attention. So 1.25 shower beers per week on two and a half nights out per week.
Starting point is 00:23:53 So we may not be having a shower beer every time we go out, but we're averaging about 1.25 shower beers per week. So that's an impressive number. You're going to have more than one in the shower? No, that's half the time. Guys, if he goes out 2.5 times a week and he's only having 1.25 shower beers a week, that means half the time he goes out during the week he's having a shower beer.
Starting point is 00:24:12 That's an incredible cadence, by the way. I look at a shower beer as a treat. This is something that only happens a handful of times a year for me. Let the subject turn to shower beers and all of a sudden a mathematician over there, Chris Cota. You're having 60 shower beers a year, give or take, so we're looking at, don't jump ahead. I've never had that many in my life. So we've got about 50 weeks per year that we're going out. Obviously we minus the two weeks. So we're at 50 weeks per year at about two and a half nights out per week, right. Okay. Which gives us the, uh,
Starting point is 00:24:41 possibility for 125 shower beers. Okay. Okay. We divide that by what we have an average of per week on beers, which is 1.25 shower beers per week with 125 possibilities of shower beer. Why didn't you just multiply 50 by 1.25? Yeah, because I had to show me look as impressive. Exactly. Thank you. It's a beautiful mind. It's not just two exactly. I can't. When you want me to put just 600, is that what you want? You just wanted me to write 600. No, that's not how we've been showing his work. Okay. Thank you, Chris. One, uh, 125 shower beer possibilities to a hundred. Yes. SBB. Thank you. Uh, 1.25 shower
Starting point is 00:25:17 beers per week equals about roughly a hundred shower beers per year. Now we multiply a hundred shower beers per year on average by six years that we did 21-27 we're looking at seven if it's 327. Yep 600 shower beers over a six-year span again. That's not every time you're having a shower beer when you go out That's one point two five shower beers per the 50 52 weeks per the six years I'm a little confused because I thought we were going to you on why the shower beer just hits better. Hmm. How many calories in a Miller light? 95. Can we go back? How did you get the 100 per 12? How many ounces? 12 12 Tony, where did 100 come from? Where did 100 100 SB certainly less premium regular beer. We divide 125 shower
Starting point is 00:26:03 beer possibilities by the 1.25 average shower beers per week, which gets us to 100 shower beers per year. Let's just agree that it's an approximation because some people just don't drink backwash. Hmm. It's also approximately 57,600 calories you've taken in just in the shower. Yeah, but the shower is working some off because he's taking a hot shower here. Okay, 57,500. Again, it's a six-year span though. If you have 1.25 shower beers per week and you're drinking 50 weeks of the year,
Starting point is 00:26:30 that's 62 shower beers, not 100. I'm trying to see what your math is. I don't get what you're mathing. I don't get that. Well, you said there's 52 weeks in a year, minus two weeks if you're sick or you're not going out. Exactly. You average 1.25 shower beers per week. Yeah, but see, here's if you're sick or you're not going out exactly you average 1.25 shower
Starting point is 00:26:45 Yeah, but see here's here's where here's where you're doing it wrong. You have to get the 50 weeks times Your 2.5 nights out per week that gives you a hundred and twenty five shower rear possibilities Which then you average right right which then you get one one point two five. What is it? Just because I think it's the mix of the heat from the shower. Yeah. The coldness of the Miller light. Yeah. And then the anticipation of more Miller lights post shower. Yeah. That just gets you to a shower. Time. I'll tell you why it hits differently because you're thinking about, Hey, look, I can drink naked. Yeah. And then maybe if I go out, maybe I'll
Starting point is 00:27:21 get naked and drink there too. This is going to be awesome. Yeah. Well, good. Well done. Thank you. The math checks out. So I'll get naked and drink there too. This is going to be awesome. Yeah. Well done. Thank you. The math checks out, so I'm going to retire this. Oh. Good math thing over there. Thank you. I was really hoping we could quantify why it connects,
Starting point is 00:27:33 but you did well. I can only state why it hits different. I do the math on how many we can have. Yeah, naturally. Why it connects is more vibes. Still a little confused. I'm confused, too. But 600, I mean mean that's a big
Starting point is 00:27:45 number. I wish he would have just ended with bam and then it could have transitioned right into the next time. We can transition right into bam and you know. I'm not Emeril. I think many people think that I'm anti-bam and I understand that because at times I've been like. You and Brian Windhorst, anti-bam for life. I'm not anti-bam I just didn't Dan do something like that on PTI. Yeah, and it was like a whole thing with emerald Yes, exactly it wait. We got to get the camera on Chris cuz he did it better than damn man. Yeah Camera on Chris I think BAM is an exceptional international center I think he's a great center regardless my whole thing with BAM is not even a thing on BAM is an exceptional international center. I think he's a great center regardless.
Starting point is 00:28:25 My whole thing with BAM is not even a thing on BAM is like, I just want better talent around BAM. Because I think if you look at international basketball, you're seeing that he gets unlocked in ways that he'd probably ask him to do too much and his teammates are a little bit too limited. So I'm not anti-BAM. I'm anti not getting more help from BAM.
Starting point is 00:28:43 I've heard you talk about like, he's willing to let anyone be the guy. That's why everyone wants to be here. That's true. We've taken shots at him. Like he's on this team of stars. And I know it's a different style of play, but we got to give him his flowers.
Starting point is 00:28:55 I do. And I think that these are fair criticisms in that I think a lot of alphas want to play in Miami in part because Bam compliments their skillset. And they know that they don't necessarily have to rip the team away from from BAM but on the international game I think it actually gives my argument a little bit more steam in that if you put different type of players around them, better players around them, you get an even better BAM and if you make BAM your
Starting point is 00:29:20 third best player as opposed to arguably your first best player, now you're cooking. Well, regardless of who's at fault, I'm not saying that you guys are responsible for the national discourse or perhaps international discourse about Bam Adebayo. But it made me laugh when Brian Winhorse got into this conversation, that's why I mentioned it to him, where he was talking about the South Sudan team and how they're athletic and they've got these wings that, you know, your big guys are going to have to switch on to. And then he said somebody like Bam Adebayo might not get playing time or as much playing time because the whole discussion being Jason Tatum didn't play last time, he will play
Starting point is 00:29:55 this time. I'm a little confused by that, not to cut you off, but I think he's a, anytime I watch Joel Embiid start and it seems as though they've tried to force feed Joel and Bede in the early going. I think out of the three bigs that are getting playing time on this team, Bam, Anthony Davis and Joel, he's the one least equipped for the international game. Joel. Yeah. And I'd rather see Bam and Anthony Davis, who I think is probably underrated in this
Starting point is 00:30:22 discussion, get more PT. Which if you asked people who just watched any of Team USA or even just know international basketball at all and know how Joel Embiid plays, if you would have started with the premise that there's going to be more South Sudanese players, wings that need to be defended, immediately you have to think Joel Embiid is the guy of the bigs who's not going to get the minutes. The fact that Brian Windhorst, who knows more basketball than most people will ever know, he saying bam would be the guy to sit
Starting point is 00:30:52 just is mind boggling to think that that is what the national opinion of him is when he is most suited to do that and frankly the best of those three bigs to do so. We totally agree. I'd like to get Juju and Tony's thoughts on this because they know ball. Juju, what is your experience in watching Joel Embiid and understanding that you're
Starting point is 00:31:09 more of a Celtics fan anyways? But on the international game specifically with Joel Embiid, it seems as though he tries to lean on some stuff that he does in the NBA. It's not necessarily working out for him. You see defenders that are better equipped for the international game really taking advantage of the lack of three seconds And I think that it kind of sticks out in the international game Whatever golf is there in the NBA between perceived golf between Joel and BAM and Anthony Davis
Starting point is 00:31:37 It's not there in the international game. That's at least what my eyes are telling me For sure I think that his style of play combined with his injuries that he has right now that he's fighting through, it just doesn't make sense for him to be here at all. I think someone like Paulo Banquero or just someone younger with fresh legs and just gold in their eyes, you dig me,
Starting point is 00:31:58 would have been a better option. But it looks goofy at times in the international game because referees ain't falling for that man. You look crazy as hell. Falling out over this little man. He in your arm. You feel me? What you think, Tony? I think that there's, it's okay to have some players more suitable for an international game than an NBA game.
Starting point is 00:32:16 Like that's the reason. You don't think so, Izzy? I think so. I think, I think Joel is more suited for the NBA and what the NBA brings as far as the game style Then he does internationally. He looks too big. He looks just in the middle of the lane move enough. He doesn't move enough That's the thing like the the Sixers have a very specific bill to have Joel as their centerpiece team USA has 19 killers on them that can get a bucket at any second Joel's's just kind of clogged in the lane, always in the middle.
Starting point is 00:32:46 Somebody's trying to drive and he's just kind of there like, Oh, excuse me. Sorry. Where do I go? By the way, the US has several times in recent history have gotten specialists that don't make all star teams, but show up on international basketball teams specific to certain roles. But as a work with a big, like Joel. The thing that sticks out specifically about Joel outside of everything that we've outlined is they're force feeding him in the early going to get him in rhythm.
Starting point is 00:33:13 And I kind of harken back to my experience watching soccer in that you have an athlete that had a choice to make. And it almost seems, although I don't think that international basketball is this competitive, like you almost made a promise to Joel Embiid that if he picked the United States, he would start, you would feed him the ball. Cause I see that in soccer all the time, that if someone chose the United States over Germany, they're on that team sheet. They're one of the first names. They're going to get the opportunities here because that's sort of the recruiting promise that you made. Kind of like college basketball promises, college football promises. I just thought that first names, they're going to get the opportunities here because that's sort of the recruiting promise that you made.
Starting point is 00:33:45 Kind of like college basketball promises, college football promises. I just thought that Team USA and basketball would be above that because everyone's entering it with the same amount of ego. Maybe I'm naive for having that approach to it, Izzy. No, I think to Tony's point, the idea of there being specialists that is okay for the Olympic team, I think it makes all the sense in the world. There are enough rule changes between the NBA and international game to make it a different enough game
Starting point is 00:34:11 that you don't just throw all the best NBA players in there. Like you mentioned about Joe LMB not moving enough. That is the international game, man. There's not many people just, unless it's on a major switch or something and it's obvious, that just dump it in and go to work. And so I think, yeah, you can do that without insulting the players.
Starting point is 00:34:28 It could be the best player in the NBA. Maybe it doesn't work for Team USA. It's why Mello was so good, right? He could get his game in the international game and be an all-star superstar at the Olympic and international level, where, again, he was great in the NBA at what he did, but he could flow so much easier when there was more motion.
Starting point is 00:34:44 It just feels like Joel stuck in the mud. I would rather see a guy like Jared Allen, for example. He has this trim body up and down the court and he can knock them balls off of the rim like in national play. Yeah, are you saying specifically that you wouldn't even have him beat on the roster because that's a take?
Starting point is 00:34:59 Yeah, I wouldn't have him on the roster. If I'm the coaches, why have him beat on the roster? He's shown you like, he's been through so much over the past couple of months from the cerebral palsy to just the knee injury. Bro, rest up, you got PG-13 coming on the way and the process should be trusted. You mentioned the differences in the games
Starting point is 00:35:15 and I feel like I was just getting accustomed to how like the WNBA refs were using the whistle this season and then now I'm watching the Olympics and I don't know what the hell's going on. Like it is so physical, but even watching yesterday, it's and I don't know what the hell's going on like it is so physical but even watching yesterday it's sort of the similar conversation to the women's game like the US is really good because Brianna Stewart and Asia Wilson run the floor and they're super fast and long and like they can kind of just play ahead of everyone else and so it's giving
Starting point is 00:35:36 them the advantage there but I do not envy any coach that has to manage a roster with this many superstars on it. It's happening with men and women. Fans getting really upset. They're not seeing their favorite player play. They're not getting enough minutes. They're not getting enough time to get in rhythm. So they're just not shooting well right off the bat. And then they're on the bench.
Starting point is 00:35:53 Like, man, that has to be a really hard position to be in if you're a coach, cause you want to win the game, but you want to keep players, you know, healthy. And you want to keep people energized for the next round. But at the same time, you're managing egos, you're managing minutes. Like it just seems like a complete, uh, like mental game. I also don't want to just harp on Joel Embiid. I think it's a style thing with big men 2004, Tim Duncan.
Starting point is 00:36:16 Many people think he's the greatest big man ever did not do anything for that team. When you're hiring for your small business, you want to find quality professionals that are right for the role. That's why you have to check out LinkedIn Jobs. LinkedIn Jobs has the tools to help find the right professionals for your team, faster and for free. As Metal Art Media continues to grow as a content studio, we strive to hire only the best and most qualified candidates. Thankfully, with LinkedIn, they've made it easy for us to find them. LinkedIn isn't just a job board.
Starting point is 00:36:45 LinkedIn helps you hire professionals you can't find anywhere else, even those who aren't actively searching for a new job but might be open to the perfect role. In a given month, over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites. So if you're not looking on LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place. On LinkedIn, 86% of small businesses get a qualified candidate within 24 hours. Hire professionals like a professional on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash prep.
Starting point is 00:37:15 That's linkedin.com slash prep. Post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. Don Lebatard. Listen, it could be Julius Randall's building. I'm a that. The Mecca. could be Julius Randall's building. Remember that? The Mecca. Or it's Julius.
Starting point is 00:37:28 The Mecca. Stugatz. Steve Martin was a prop comic. You said that? I said it two seconds earlier than you. This is the Don Lebatard Show with the Stugatz. Presented by Smirnoff, we do game days. Please drink responsibly, the Smirnoff Company, New York, New York.
Starting point is 00:37:47 That's Bale's policy by the way. Sorry for that incorrect assumption. Back to you Michael. Well, I don't know what the secondary ticket market is in Paris. I would love the opportunity to watch Team USA play meaningful games. I really wish game time were available for that. Thankfully, here in the United States, game time is available and I've used it so much. You know that.
Starting point is 00:38:08 I mean, we made a Stanley Cup run that really made me tighten up my summer budget. No more trips until Gainesville, folks. Download the Game Time app, create an account and use the code DAN for $20 off your first purchase. Why should you do this? Because you get to see what your seat looks like through their interface, you get low price guarantees
Starting point is 00:38:26 Flash deals doesn't just work for sports you can do it for concerts terms apply last-minute tickets lowest price guaranteed again Redeem code D a n for $20 off your first purchase love Mike if I ever went to any of the Stanley Cup finals games and my answers have been pretty consistent. No, I went to one last year they lost. This year I didn't go, but boy, my buddy Mike spent a pretty penny on games five and seven. And I tell them that story real quick. I'm just now seeing the gravity of what I did.
Starting point is 00:38:57 And we'll make it to year's end. But, you know. Cancel Christmas. Yeah. But thankfully, I knew I had the best deals with, with, with game time there. But one of the things that I did during that Stanley Cup run was I consumed every bit of content that I could about hockey, the tremendous NHL playoffs. And one of the, two of the shows that I would turn to were 32 Thoughts and the Jeff Merrick
Starting point is 00:39:19 show. Jeff Merrick, a part of both, uh, essentially co-hosting 32 Thoughts with Ellie Freeman, a tremendous reporter on the NHL side. He's basically woge for the NHL. Jeff Merrick, even keeled host, has covered the sport for so many years and a lot of hockey fans like myself and Roy were bummed to hear this news. What was weird about the separation of Jeff Merrick and Sportsnet because these shows are no longer going to exist with Jeff Merrick on them. Certainly it'd be tough for the Jeff Merrick show to continue without Jeff Merrick. We had a lot more questions than answers, and it was very strange.
Starting point is 00:39:52 And some reporters got to digging, and Roy read up on it. And so, Roy, I'm coming to you here to explain to me the very latest development on one of the more beloved characters that covers hockey. All right. So we found out that Jeff Merrick was tipping the picks at the NHL draft. And apparently in Nevada, they actually have sports books now dedicated to the NHL draft.
Starting point is 00:40:13 He sent the tip picks to a friend of his. His name is Mark Seidel, who has a scouting service. And Seidel went to Twitter to correctly predict these draft picks. So the NHL went to the Nevada gaming control board and they both had separate investigations into the matter. And then we noticed between the NHL draft and last week that Jeff Merrick's content has slowly disappeared
Starting point is 00:40:41 up until finally Sportsnet decided the part ways with Jeff Merrick because he was giving proprietary information to somebody outside of the company. So it depends on how you view these things. Didn't Schefter do this or somebody else? So like you could say that well it seems as though there was a lot more there was a lot more lead time that that's where I initially like landed on this I'm like so so we so we're penalizing Jeff Merrick for doing something that we celebrate,
Starting point is 00:41:07 depending on how you view those things as spoilers, but that things that Woege and Schaums and Schefter do routinely. But this investigation suggests that you have the gambling element here in which the NHL, I certainly understand why they have to be more buttoned up here, but this also seems distinctly Canadian.
Starting point is 00:41:24 That's what I was. Yeah, well, beyond the scenes with any drafts, the league tells the production truck who the pick's gonna be from the team before they announce it to the audience so they can get the graphics ready, the video ready, the information about the player ready. But we're talking about a lot more lead time,
Starting point is 00:41:38 so much so that someone was able to actually win money on this inside information. So, especially with someone of Jeff's reputation, there's a lot of integrity there. They said that Jeff Merrick did not stand to having a financial gain from it. No, and is it clear as to whether or not he knew that this information that he was giving
Starting point is 00:41:57 would be used specific to gambling? No, it's not. And Jeff hasn't really been speaking about any of this. Oh, he's been buttoned up. He hasn't said, he went on a social media, he did not say anything on social media about it, up until when he said, hey, I'm leaving sports. Yeah, where my mind went to is like, how would this story go if this was one of the more prominent NBA writers?
Starting point is 00:42:18 Because I actually think that they could survive something like this. Now ESPN has its own sports bookbook and we're in a very murky place. They're league partners. When you add the gambling aspect of this, I understand how it's further complicated. I do hope, just because I'm a fan of his, that Jeff not only has an opportunity to explain himself, because I do think that there's a difference as to whether or not he knew that the information that he was getting was going to be used like this. And even if he did, I think he's still the type of person that deserves a second chance because I'm pro second chances. Also, selfishly, I was
Starting point is 00:42:49 a huge fan of his work and I would hate to see that go. They essentially broke up a Canadian corn hyzer and Wilbon here with Free and Merrick and we lose because of this whole very unfortunate situation. Thanks for cleaning that up. And speaking of cleaning things up, I want to circle back to a really polarizing segment that I'm not necessarily proud of that we had about Cocoa Golf earlier this week. Now Cocoa Golf, not a great Olympics for the co flag bearer, unfortunate there. I think Serena Williams really changed a lot of the math when it comes to women's tennis unfairly. Women's tennis in particular
Starting point is 00:43:24 has always generally been, unless there's a goat atop of it, very difficult to predict. In part because the matches are shorter, but you have a lot of Grand Slam winners that are relative flashes in the pan. You don't have someone atop the sport like you had with Serena, but because Serena existed, everyone was looking for the next Serena. We've done this a couple of times and we don't pay attention to how many times someone stumbles with that. And it's a lot of pressure that we're putting on these athletes in a sport that is relatively way more random than it is on the men's side. So Izzy, let's circle back to the cocoa thing that we were talking about. And I just want to say on the front end, I kind of feel like the
Starting point is 00:44:05 general point that I was trying to make was missing. That's my bad because I didn't communicate it and it became more of like a meltdown in sports. And I thought that my opinion came off a little dissenting when it was more of a mainstream idea. Basically, the point that I was trying to make, and I sincerely failed in doing so was. Basically I know that my daughter is going to face hardships when she plays sports. I know that there are going to be hormonal things as she gets older. There are going to be frustrations. There are going to be outsized reactions.
Starting point is 00:44:35 I don't want this to be a data point fresh in her mind that if she encounters a hardship for a four-year-old, a hardship could be, no, we're not gonna go to Chuck E. Cheese right now, that a 10 minute breakdown saying this always happens to me isn't because Coco did it, isn't an experience that you should borrow from. So I really miss the mark and being able to do that. And I really have my regrets in saying like things like, you guys don't really have children here.
Starting point is 00:45:02 But I think that is a contributing factor as to how like that message was missed because I was working under the assumption that that was assumed. So first of all, when we're talking about women's sports, don't say hormonal. Don't bring it up first. Don't be one of the first things you bring up first. It's just going to be jumped all over. Yeah, no, I understand that. I mean like with a four-year-old, I know that my daughter is going to change. There are both things that we can control.
Starting point is 00:45:28 It could be a boy or a girl, they could control their emotions, whatever you want to talk about. I get that, I get that. All right, fair enough. But the part about, like, I'm taking sports out of it. And I said this the other day, I felt like you, me and Jess the other day were almost having two or three different conversations because I'm taking the sports out of it, and all I'm saying is as a father, and I have bunch of nieces and nephews, I've raised kids that aren't even mine, you expecting your daughter to be perfectly formed
Starting point is 00:45:54 as she goes along, regardless of who she learns it from, is naive. She's going to learn bad habits, bad behavior, bad from somebody, it could be anybody. As a parent, if I'm watching her potentially learn that from somebody who even if it's somebody that she thinks is somebody that she should look up to, I'm glad I'm there. I'm glad I'm there because I want her to see it.
Starting point is 00:46:16 I want her to learn from it. And even if you're saying at this age she can't handle all that, fine. Maybe she takes it, downloads it, and it comes out back in the future. And you can be like, ha ha, I know where this is coming from. I was there. I watched that happen. So you have more knowledge as a parent on what your daughter is going through, what she's seen and what she's experienced. If you shield her from Coco, she might see
Starting point is 00:46:36 it in school from somebody else where you don't even have the fortune, the good fortune of being there to know how she took that in. I understood all good points. And I would say that I think it'd surprise you with how well equipped I am for very difficult conversations and random questions that a four-year-old would ask. I said that to you the day I said if that's what your experience is and that's what you believe you know you and your daughter are prepared for at the moment, fine. I'm not opposed to that. What I'm saying is you're speaking for in general and I feel like that is probably a little too strong from your side.
Starting point is 00:47:07 So here's where my point missed the mark in that you explain that to me, and I think where you're missing the mark is I know all those things. I know that there are certain things I can't control. I know that there are things that can affect my daughter's behavior and how she reacts to things that I'm going to have to react to in real time. There are also things that I can control. For example, there was this YouTube show that she was watching on YouTube Kids
Starting point is 00:47:32 where I didn't like how the children were speaking to the parents in this and I started seeing her behavior replicate that of what she was seeing there. So I'm not suggesting, Cocoa is not a catch catchall, but Coco is a data point that in that moment I could have manipulated. In that moment, my thought process was like, let me establish a diversionary tactic here because not unlike this YouTube show that I saw where I didn't like how the parents
Starting point is 00:48:01 were talking to the kids. I don't want to have a very recent example where my daughter sees this reaction and because she is four and because she recognizes Coco, may replicate that behavior because in a world filled with things that I cannot control, this is one instance in which as a parent, I had decisions to make. And I thought I navigated it well.
Starting point is 00:48:21 And where I erred was I was explaining my thought process Instead of actually really trying to detail how I dealt with it, which was I played with slime But this is this is to Jess's point. I'd like to hear her opinion on this part This isn't Coco golf's fault. There's a difference between sport and a produced show that is aimed for kids Coco golf is not out there thinking I have to think about the four year olds out there. She might think about it afterward. Yeah, she might think about it other times. But at the time, that is not her at the moment responsibility.
Starting point is 00:48:53 I don't think I have anything to add. We were on the same page with it and you said the other day that, yeah, she had a bad day. Athletes have bad moments sometimes and I agreed with you and I thought we were on the same page with that. It's not her responsibility to be a good role model as she's playing a game because she's
Starting point is 00:49:14 thinking that there's a kid somewhere watching her. There's just all of these assumptions about women and female athletes that get made all the time that they're supposed to be role models and they're supposed to look pretty and look feminine. And it's the same conversation we had earlier today about boxing is that you make all of these assumptions about what women are supposed to be. And then when they go out there and compete
Starting point is 00:49:35 and people don't like what they see because it doesn't fit their ideals of what is supposed to be happening, everyone gets angry and mad at it. Yeah, I wasn't angry or mad. You looked at me with angry Nicholas Cage face. Well, because there was something that Jess said in particular that maybe my daughter isn't
Starting point is 00:49:53 ready for sport, and my daughter celebrates sports. My daughter actively participates in them, has tremendous relationships with athletes, and has plenty of sports. As adults, we don't know how to handle it sometimes. Yeah, but I would say, in a vacuum, outsize reaction and not a dissenting opinion, especially when in other variations of that sport, your reaction can shape potentially the decision there. It wasn't about that. And if you watched in that moment, it was clear that it was about other things there.
Starting point is 00:50:26 So while I appreciate everybody's perspective and I think I bridge some gaps here because we coded like we're on the same page, which kind of alludes that I'm on a different page, I think we're all on the same page. We're all seeing everybody's perspective. This is the part I'm talking about where I think we're having different conversations. You can have a conversation about the difficulties of parenting and not start the conversation by saying Coco Goff effed up and I had to hold my kid to the side for not watching it. I agree.
Starting point is 00:50:52 If someone said that, I would understand that. I didn't. I just explained a situation that I ran into as a parent in a rare instance, thought I could control the situation and you disagreed. But you called her a bad role model and that was where we started arguing. No, Jess, I didn't. You did. No, Jess, I didn't. In fact, you invoked role model.
Starting point is 00:51:09 In fact, what I thought was, in fact, you see some- I didn't make that up. What are you talking about? Jess, I understand the role model conversation and I thought that I had a pretty good response in that it's convenient for us to pick and choose when someone is a role model because I think Coco, in moments with my daughter where she hit an autographed ball to her was very cognizant of being a role model and I understand to
Starting point is 00:51:31 Project that onto any athlete and this is not a woman thing even though I'm not ignoring that as part of the discussion It's impossible to uphold that standard people. It's impossible for me to uphold that standard I check my behavior around my daughter all the time because it's something that I can control. This was an instance in a world full of things that I can't control that I felt like I could. And so I ran a diversionary tactic because as with any four-year-old,
Starting point is 00:51:59 as many people will know, as you may know with your nieces and nephews, they replicate behavior almost instantly sometimes. And that was a behavior in that moment that I did not want my daughter to replicate. I am telling you, as I said that day, as I'm saying today, I am not saying that that was a bad choice by you and I'm not disagreeing with you that that is what most parents would do.
Starting point is 00:52:19 But in Jess's defense, as I sat here listening to you, whether or not you said the word role model, that's what came across in what you were saying. Yeah, no, I probably said role model there. Right, so we're just trying to get that across to you. There are no infallible role models. And I understand that. And I understand that this is a moment in time where I could spin this into a positive. And what I'm saying is, there's a lot of fatigue with that. The world is throwing stuff at us constantly. And whether you're controlling something that's on a YouTube algorithm or trying to run a diversionary tactic with slime, there are certain things that you can control. And in that moment, I wasn't prepared to explain to my daughter as to why CocoaGolf
Starting point is 00:52:56 had an outsized 10-minute breakdown that anyone in the sport would tell you was outsized. Howdy folks. We're in August now. It's the dog days of summer, but the summer tours are still crescendoing and really consequential Major League Baseball games are going down. It's a great time to get Major League Baseball tickets. Where do you get them? Well, I've got just the place for you. Game Time. It's an authorized ticket marketplace in Major League Baseball, which makes getting tickets faster and easier. Prices on the Game Time app may actually go down the closer it gets to first pitch. With killer last-minute deals, all-in prices, views from your seat,
Starting point is 00:53:33 and their lowest price guarantee, Game Time takes the guesswork out of buying MLB tickets. Those seat views don't sleep on them. You get a panoramic view of exactly what the ball game might look like from the seat you're looking to buy. Take the guesswork out of buying MLB tickets with Game Time. Download the Game Time app. Create an account and use code DAN for $20 off your first purchase. Terms apply. Again, create an account and redeem code D-A-N for $20 off. Download Game Time today. Last-minute tickets, lowest price, guaranteed. When you're hiring for your small business, you want to find quality professionals that are right for the role. That's why you have to check out LinkedIn Jobs.
Starting point is 00:54:12 LinkedIn Jobs has the tools to help find the right professionals for your team, faster and for free. As Metal Art Media continues to grow as a content studio, we strive to hire only the best and most qualified candidates. Thankfully, with LinkedIn, they've made it easy for us to find them. LinkedIn isn't just a job board. LinkedIn helps you hire professionals you can't find anywhere else. Even those who aren't actively searching for a new job but might be open to the perfect role. In a given month over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites.
Starting point is 00:54:42 So if you're not looking on LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place. On LinkedIn, visit other leading job sites.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.