The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz - The Big Suey: Who Killed The Montreal Expos? (Starring David Samson)

Episode Date: September 11, 2025

"Why did you make that sweet old man angry?" David Samson joins the show and takes us inside the making of the latest episode of Pablo Torre Finds Out. Plus, David sat down for a nine-hour interview then realized he is the villain in the story he told. Plus, Greg Cote is legitimately mad about losing yesterday's Soup Off. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Now is a good time to remember where tequila's story truly began. In 1795, Cuervo invented tequila. Quervo. What are you doing here? Quervo. Anytime someone says quarevo, I show up. Well, I do know that to be true, but even during and reads, like... Quervo.

I think he could lay out, especially from one of our great partners. Sweet, delicious quervo. Since then, Cuervo is stayed true to its roots. The same family, the same land, the same passion. Quervo. So, enjoy the tequila that started it all. Quervo. Quervo.

A tequila. That invented tequila. Roximo.com. Please drink responsibly. Quervo. When you're with Annex Platon, you get access to exclusive dining experiences and an annual travel credit.

So the best tapas in town might be in a new town altogether. That's the powerful backing of. of Amex. Terms and conditions apply. Learn more at mx.ca.ca slash yMex. This episode is brought to you by Defender. With a towing capacity of 3,500 kilograms and a weighting depth of 900 millimeters, the Defender 110 pushes what's possible. Learn more at land rover.ca. Presented by Draft Kings

Why are you listening to this show? The podcast that seems very similar to the other Dan Levitard podcast. I'm sorry, I'm not going to apologize for that. In fact, the only difference seems to be this imaging. I have been tempted in restaurants just walking past tables to grab somebody's fries if they're just there.

That hasn't happened to you guys? I've done it. And now, here's the marching man to nowhere, fat face, and the habitual liar. As I mentioned, David Sampson and Amino, Hassan have been very helpful to Pablo Torre in helping contextualize what is a thicket of complicated subject matter. And David Samson joins us now, his podcast, nothing personal, as I've told you many times, covers terrain by himself that a whole lot of people are not covering.

Pablo is way out in front of this story. And David, you have familiarity with PR crisis. You have familiarity with scandal and how businesses can handle scandal. Have you ever seen your entire history in sports the documentation that Pablo has that can come this close to feeling like the most damning of circumstantial evidence on proving something is a rule break by a really powerful rich person and organization because I just cannot believe the amount of information that Pablo has that has everyone saying by consensus, I miss this kind of journalism.

I can't believe how locked down he has this story. Well, he's got the sources inside aspiration and inside the finance department of aspiration. And what the finance department has are documents like bank statements, like investor agreements. And what Pablo did, and this is, I took issue with this with Pablo, I don't like going into these tapings

and I don't know what, he wants to talk about. So I don't have time to prepare anything. And Amin and I are just looking at each other with a folder of documents that we can't look at. And then all of a sudden he's rolling and that becomes an episode. And so what he enjoys is that mystery box. Hey, look at the surprise of Samson and Amin. But what's in those folders, what you're seeing in the episode is my actual reaction to it because we didn't know that it was Dennis Wong who had put $2 million in or $1.99 in December of 22. We didn't know the payment that went to Kauai quarterly

for his $28 million for-year no-show contract with aspiration. And all of a sudden you see it and in real time you're trying to seem smart while you're live to tape and you're looking at something saying Adam Silver just met the media saying that the burden of proof is on the NBA and that the public doesn't know what it's talking about. And by the way, I've never heard of aspiration.

And I'm thinking to myself, God, is he getting bad advice? I can't believe this is what Silver's doing. And now we've got this information. It's game set match to me when it comes to the investigation. But I've seen leagues contort themselves to make a result they want very often. like with steroids. So I do believe that there's still an opportunity for the NBA and the clippers to get through this

because they'll just pretend that what Pablo did is not real. Okay, I think that's going to be hard to do, given what it is that we're about to play for the audience. But before I play more modulated voices, you mentioned Adam Silver. I didn't think he had a great week this week in a couple of different places. One, the way that he talked about streaming services and that the customer's going to get screwed

and the customer's got to deal with it, but also how he handled the Pablo investigation. Hold on, David. You'll be able to correct me in a second. Let's get to the Adam Silver Sound, where he's reacting to not even today's Pablo report, because that was today at 5 a.m., and it's more damning.

This is before the damning of today's 5 a.m. report. The podcast came out. It was news to me. I'd frankly never heard of the company aspiration before, and I'd never heard a whiff of anything around an endorsement deal with Kauai or anything around engagement with the Los Angeles Clippers. So it was all new to me. I heard it.

I saw some of the follow-up information. We spoke internally, Rick Buchanan, our general counsel is here, who oversees any investigations. Rick had a conversation with Steve Barmer, and we quickly concluded this was something that rose to the level that necessitates an investigation, in fact, one that's done outside of our office. And again, I would also say I've been around the league long enough in different permutations of allegations and accusations that, you know, I'm a big believer in due process and fairness and you need to now let the investigation run its course.

David went from smiling to laughing. What are you doing? I've just, I've heard that clip so many times. I watched it and I talked about it on nothing personal. It just, it's not credible to me for him to say he's never heard of aspiration. They were on the seatbacks of a Clippers game in 2022 at Crypto.com Arena, number one, number two, when there's a $300 million sponsor of a club, which is what aspiration was,

they sponsored the Clippers for over $300 million. What the league does in that case is they call on the company and say, hey, you got any more for us? We'd like to do a national deal. So there is so much cross-pollination when it comes to the commissioner's office and the teams, when it comes to sponsors and companies, that for Adam to say he's never heard of aspiration, it just doesn't make sense. It would have been smarter of him to say nothing, to say,

Wachtell Lipton's investigating, see you later, let's talk about the heave rule, let's talk about the fact that we're a highlight league. But instead he kept going, and I don't understand why. And now he's got to wake up this morning, and the bat phone's going to ring. And it's going to be Dennis Wong putting $2 million in. And there is no denying this. This is a fact. Dennis Wong put $2 million into aspiration.

And that money was used to pay Kaua when it was when they couldn't pay the rent. When it was collapsing, he put $2 million in. You know, if you want to make a bad investment and throw good money after bad, okay, Dennis Wong had never invested in this company before. It was Balmer who had invested 50 million before. So Dennis Wong comes in, an LLP and Limited Liability Partnership, Tony, way to go. But that just means it's named DEA. You want to find something out?

Could you find out if the E and A and DEA 88 is maybe his wife's first initial and his daughter's first initial, not very original to name your LLP that? But if you look at his family, maybe you'll find what DEA is. it's Dennis Wong, a minority owner of the Clippers, the minority owner who puts $2 million in to a company that has no money, and then nine days later, 1.75 of that goes to Kauai Leonard for a quarterly payment that was late. How does the NBA ignore that? Forget what Adam says about burden of proof. I think that Adam's going to have to change his mind and you'll see it happen. I don't think you answered directly my question. Have you ever seen,

in a rule-breaking type of environment, this kind of documentary documentation produced by a journalist that is more information that the league has, more information than any of us have, and it's all there in paperwork you can see. All there that would be available in public through the bankruptcy filing and then through a source. No, we were looking for papers like this in baseball.

A quick Marlon story. We tried to find out with the Shohei Otani signing We would always try to find out what the angels had promised Otani that would have been against the rules. We'd try to find stuff out on the Yankees and the Red Sox who were doing things with their reporting of revenue. So we'd go to games and look around for sponsors that they may not have reported

or try to get to the bottom of things. But we could never get things in writing. And there were committees who were formed for the sole purpose of trying to make sure teams were being honest. And the NBA has one of those also. and Steve Balmer is on it. Steve Balmer is on the audit committee in the NBA, which is responsible for the financial reporting of the teams.

So there's great irony. But man, I spent a lot of time searching, but Pablo is not my employees, so we never found it. David, we're obviously not in a court of law. So the rules are different with the NBA and what they need to do and what they have to do or what they will do. But if we were in a court of law

and these documents are presented, this this case is over right well no there's rules of evidence when you have to go back to who where these documents came from how are they secured uh so there's a chain of custody of evidence and then there is someone who has to it can't be pablo reading this and putting into the record that which is reading of that document is it has to be someone who prepared the document or someone who can speak to the truth truthfulness of that underlying document so there's There's a lot different rules when you're in real court versus podcast court. But man, did we have fun in podcast court on Pablo show this morning?

What else was interesting to you about the episode? Let's get to the voice modulations here real quick. Please, these are also damning. He's got seven sources inside of aspiration. And the way they talk about this, David, my God, it's just such an obvious open secret that everyone knew about. here is one of the modulated sources. But between those months when all of this is missing, so September, October, November, and leading up to December,

the actual certainty of the company existing is up for grabs at that point. Are we going to get paid as employees? Why does Uncle Dennis keep calling us? We have such bigger concerns that we're thinking about, which is our own salaries. Are we going to have to go through layoffs? Where is the money going to come from? but, lo and behold, Uncle Dennis gets paid.

So this payment was made December 15th, 2022. When was the 20% of the staff laid off? The same day. Pablo has documentation that just shows that the payment to Kauai from this bogus tree planting company, it just says right next to it, critical. The payment to Uncle Dennis is critical. Let's play the longer sound that offers.

for some of the context around what it was going on at this company and just how clear cut some of this stuff is. I knew the name Dennis Wong because I got two texts from this very senior, this very senior executive at the firm regarding Dennis Wong. So inside of aspiration, Dennis Wong's investment was identified as an investment with the clippers clearly attached as part of the identification. Yeah. Yeah, and I do have another text as well.

This is from November 13th, 2022, and it says, Wong is Balmer partner. How surprising is it that a new investor would put money in in December 2022, who had not already clearly been deeply invested into the company? So it is beyond shocking. And I will tell you, I knew that the board, which is Ibrahim Al-Husani, who's been indicted, and Joe Sandberg, who's been indicted,

I knew that they had put money in in December to make payroll and make rent and all that material. It is not a rational investment that someone would make. So it is very shocking to me that $2 million was made as an investment by Dennis Wong, who in my text is identified as the Clippers, Steve Ballmer's partner, a week before 1.7.5 million was paid to Kauai. David?

I think it's important to understand two things with what we just heard. One, when you associate Dennis Wong and the Clippers, I'm not using the fact that he got information, this source, she, they, whoever it was. We heard the modulated voice also during the show was that it said, Wong, open parence, clippers, close parenes. As I've told you, I have in my phone,

Steve dry cleaner. So I would not be surprised if it was associated so people just knew Dennis Wong clippers. So that's not evidence to me. What's evidence is the relationship between Steve Balmer and Dennis Wong. The close relationship that exists when they were roommates back in Harvard,

when they are with the clippers together, building into a dome together, going to games together. There is no way with Dennis Wong's daughter working at the firm. The question is, would he put too million dollars in to save his daughter's job. Would he put two million in because he thought he would save trees? Would he put two million in because he was asked to by Steve Bomber or by

his daughter or by Joe Sandberg? All of those are possible. But for the NBA's point of view and the investigation, the timing of the two million that comes in and then goes out to Kauai, that's what's going to interest Wachtel-Lipton, the investigators. Why did you, you put in two million at that point? And the burden is on Dennis Wong, who could end up being like IPE, could end up being the fall guy here for this version of Otani. He's going to have to say to Wachtell Lipton, I believed in this investment. I believed in helping out my friends, a company that was in need. And then it's going to be up to the NBA to decide whether that is rational and incredible because rational is what you need to prove to not have salary caps or

convention. This episode is supported by FX's The Lowdown, starring Ethan Hawke. Allow us to introduce you to Lee Raybon, a quirky journalist slash rare bookstore owner slash unofficial truth seeker who's always on the tail of his latest conspiracy. This time, his most recent expose puts him head to head with a powerful family that rules Tulsa, meaning only one thing. He must be on to something big. FX is the lowdown, premieres September 23rd on FX.

Stream on Hulu. Thursday night football is back, and it's only on prime video. Tonight, the Washington commanders take on the Green Bay Packers, with both teams determined to prove their worth. Coverage begins at 7 p.m. Eastern with football's best party. TNF Tonight, presented by Verizon. Not a prime member, not a problem. Simply sign up for a 30-day free trial.

It's the commanders and the Packers. Tonight, at 7 p.m. Eastern, only on prime video. Restrictions apply. See amazon.com slash Amazon Prime for details. Oh, folks, football season is here. It's your season, your shot. The NFL is rolling, and every touchdown brings you closer to a payout with Draft King Sportsbook. official sports betting partner of the NFL.

From first TD scores to anytime props or even the rush of live in-game betting, every snap is a chance to win. New customers, this is for you. Download the Draft King Sportsbook app. Use code Dan. That's code Dan to get $200 in bonus bets instantly when you place just a $5 bet. Plus, over $200 off NFL Sunday ticket from YouTube and YouTube TV. In partnership with Draft Kings, the crown is yours.

Gambling problem? Call 1-800 gambler. In New York, call 8778-8-8-Hopen-Y or text Hope-N-Y 4667-369-4-6-6-9-4-6-9-6-9-7-7-7-7-7. Or visit ccccccppigee-PG dot-org. Please play responsibly. On behalf of Boothill Casino and Resorting, Kansas, fees may apply in Illinois. 21 and over. Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction.

Void in Ontario. Bonus bets expires seven days after issuance. See Sportsbook.draftkings.com slash promos. NFL Sunday ticket offer for new subscribers only in Ottawa renews until canceled. Digital games and commercial use excluded. apply. Additional NFL Sunday ticket terms at YouTube.com slash go slash NFL Sunday ticket slash terms. Limited time offer. Dan Lebatard. Taitas. Stugats. Taitas. This is the Dan Lebatar show with the Stugats.

I have a number of different questions and I will continue to tell the audience a couple of different things. First of all, nothing personal is growing at a very, very fast pace. And it is a perfect lead-in to what it is that we're doing. Your timing was terrible, so was the audio. So good work by you, Chris. David Sampson's Nothing Personal is getting more and more popular, and he's in the middle of this Pablo Tori finds out episode that a lot of people are saying is even more damning than the first one. So I've got a handful of questions. First of all. For you, more damning incrimination that Dennis Wong is a 1% owner and the only other percentage owner of the Clippers with Balmer's 99% ownership or the fact that he was Balmer's college roommate in 1975. Which of those two things do you take?

Which is more damning in terms of what this relationship is and how hard it's going to be for Balmer to say, I didn't know anything about this? E, none of the above, the fact that he's the alternate governor, the fact that he's the vice chairman of the Clippers, that means way more to me than whether he owns a percent or not, or whether he is his college roommate or not. He is a part of the Clippers organization, definitionally has a relationship with Steve Balmer. That proves it more than college roommates. Some people may not even like their college roommate. Let me say this about the scandal. You find yourself in the position where you have to handle this today on behalf of the clippers you are in charge of doing what's next what's the lie you're going to tell i'm going to make sure that media i'm not letting steve bomber do an interview and i am deciding i'm going up to steve bomber as his head of crisis

p r and asking whether he is willing to let dennis wong wear this because if he is then i'm going to the nba with a settlement offer which is i put money in and i got duped and conned no question you're not going to get anything more on me on that issue you're not going to get whether or not kawai's 28 million was above market or below market but this dennis wong thing oi i don't know how to get through that how about if we suspend dennis wong for a year how about if you find the clippers the maximum amount for appearance of impropriety and you can take away our first round draft pick in four years because that's the first one we have and i don't know tony when that's

the next first round pick is they traded so many of them to okay c but i would start negotiating the punishment once steve bomber agrees to let dennis wong wear it because the problem is what if pablo's not finished what if pablo has another episode ready to go i didn't consider that what if he has more and he is doing a torturous release of information for maximum detriment against the NBA and the Clippers and Bomber. The only way to stop this from happening is to have a punishment that satisfies Pablo. Is he satisfied today?

No. Does that mean he has more to find out? We're going to wait to see, but I would bet he does. David, there's two subsequent investigations going on in this studio regarding the investigation into Kawhi Leonard. I've texted Ramona.

One of them Tony is conducting because he thinks he has the motive behind. in Pablo's investigation. And the other is whether or not Steve Balmer and Ramona Shelburne's interview was actually, in fact, in Bristol or whether or not it was in Los Angeles. If we find out that it was not in Bristol

that was in fact in Los Angeles, does that undercut all of Pablo's reporting? No, it's just he said it was in Bristol and I happen to know that it was in Bristol, but I'm interested to hear what Ramona says, and if you're thinking that Steve Bomber had to travel across country. Wait a minute. Are you reporting that you happened to know? did you report did you report it a happen to know there's no way that i'm reporting that i happen

to know that steve balmer did not fly across country that he may have already been in the northeast when he went to riftlyan mike ryan's the king of happen to know are you alleging that you have a happen to know you are reporting this is a happen to know yes i am oh my god he knows he happens to know come everyone come and listen happens to know he happens to know well informed Now, I will say this. David said that he happened to know that Steve Balmer was already in the Northeast, which also goes against the reporting that Steve Balmer flew across the country for the interview. So I will say that there has been questionable reporting of the situation. I have now heard back from Ramona Shelburne. Wow, it's early.

It is early. It is early for her, but Pablo's dropping these episodes at 5 a.m. and making everybody scamper. Lord's Time Zone needs to happen. I'm saying Ramona reports that the interview that she did with Balmer

was in Bristol because they were all there for the Hall of Fame they were all in the Northeast for the Hall of Fame so he didn't make Steve Balmer fly across the

but the Hall of Fame is not in Bristol so it's essentially Pablo did specifically say I made him fly across the country Wow

which kind of I would have preferred him not to have said that part because he was already in the northeast but it doesn't

take away from the show in any way it's somewhat discredits him. He does take a bit of a credibility hit, but not quite as much as the clippers are today

because honest to God, I want people to understand your level of shock when you processed live on camera the idea of, holy shit, he's got a minority owner here who is really close to Balmer that makes it impossible

to think that Balmer didn't know what was happening here. Should you believe the credibility of the reporter, which now is in question? So it's the big thing here, Billy, which is when I'm sitting there, I am tempted to not want to remember my background with teams. I don't want to believe the media knows more than I do. I don't want to believe the media is smarter than I am. And so I'm sitting across from Pablo and I'm not wearing my nothing personal hat. I was wearing my executive hat.

And I was trying to discredit everything he's been saying. That's been sort of my de facto position during the course of recording these episodes because that's how I, That's my experience. 18 years of no, no, you don't know shit. So what did I do? I opened this document and in real time, I'm trying to come up with a possible explanation. What can I say that we'll be credible

is the reason that Dennis Wong put $2 million in in December of 22 into a company that no one would have invested money in unless it was the two guys who were indicted and I came up with nothing. And this was in real time. Want to keep his daughter's job. safe. His daughter worked there. I thought

about that. There were tons of layoffs happening and he knew very well. Did we find out whether she's the A and DEA? Do we know the name? Tony still looking it up. I know you want Tony finds out it's an important thing that he's trying to try and get to the bottom of, but we don't have that answer right

now. David, are you about to be a villain in this Exposed Doc that's coming out? Oh, that's a funny one. I got notified. this is over a year ago, I was called by someone in Montreal and had a conversation in French with one of the producers, whether I'd be willing to do an interview about the expos. And I said, sure.

And then when they said, hey, we'll come to your house. I thought to myself, hmm, they're going to travel to me. All right, that sounds good. Then it was nine hours long. And I thought to myself, what's this about again? And I didn't know the title until yesterday. and it's called Who Killed the Montreal Expos?

I was like, oh no. That's a bad sign. So I had to call my agent. I had to call my lawyer. I had to call my kids. And I said I may have made a small mistake. A nine hour mistake. I was sitting there just talking about the expos and,

you know, the guys and stories, et cetera. And then there's a release from Netflix Canada. And I was on to something. something was strange when I may have gotten an email from Netflix saying, and I thought it was a form letter, but it was an email that said, dear David, would you be interested in doing media and potentially attending the premiere of a new movie about the Montreal Expos? Yeah, why not? I thought that it was from my time in Montreal. I did not even put it together until I saw the release of the name of the movie. and I said, oh my God, that's what I did. Shite.

So my family is from and still lives in Montreal. They are huge. I didn't say I lived there, David. They are huge Expos fans or were huge Expos fans. Dan, whenever my family sees David here on screen with me, they text me vomit emojis. Oh, come on. Yeah, they do. It's 20 years ago.

Tell him to get over it. Wait a minute. There's a movie coming out. Who killed the Expos that you're starring in? What do you mean? Get over it. Listen, hold on. If they interviewed you for nine hours, I'm sorry.

I've got the answer. Look, spoiler alert. Who killed the Expos? This guy did. Like, if they interviewed you for nine hours, they're blaming you for it. This is a potential problem. I absolutely get what you're saying. However, I still.

I still could end up on the edit room floor. Is it not so insulting that we're having this conversation about who killed the expos and David's just like he's cackling. No, I assure you he's the star of this movie. It's so insulting, no? A star I don't know, but the opening scene of this thing is going to be David sitting down at the seat. Yeah, with one of those clacking things.

I must tell you that I was doing the interview thinking to myself while I was going on. Man, I'm doing great. And it's sort of like you thought on Survivor when you're doing those confessionals that take a really long time and then they're edited into the show to be like 10 seconds. And you're like, wait a minute. I said way more cool stuff, but they only took what I said about this or about that that makes me look like a brain or an idiot or a first guy to be voted out. So I'm slightly concerned with how the edit's going to go. But I'll keep in touch. I don't think anyone's going to hear about this movie until just now. at home. Or a protein latte at Tim's. No powders, no blenders, no shakers. Starting at 17 grams

per medium latte, Tim's new protein lattes, protein without all the work, at participating restaurants in Canada. Summer's here, and you can now get almost anything you need for your sunny days delivered with Uber Eats. What do we mean by almost? Well, you can't get a well-groom lawn delivered, but you can get a chicken parmesan delivered. A cabana? That's a no, but a banana. That's a yes. A nice tan. Sorry. Nope. But a box fan. Happily, yes. A day of sunshine? No. A box of fine wines? Yes. Uber Eats can definitely get you that. Get almost, almost anything delivered with Uber Eats. Order now. Alcohol and select markets. Product availability may vary by Regency app for details. Hit pause on whatever you're listening to and hit play on your next adventure. This fall get double points on every qualified stay. Life's the trip. Make the most of it at Best Western. Visit bestwestern.com for complete terms and conditions. Oh, I like firing people.

So I take the opportunity to fire whenever I possibly can because I can use it as a learning experience for them and try to help them out and try to point out what they did wrong. But in this case, the employee was enough levels below where I was that I did not do the firing, but I had it done within moments of discovery. I'm just like firing people. It's just absurd. It's absurd.

Stugats. I'm talking about people who I fire who deserve it, who have done something that actively requires me to fire them. It is my unadulterated pleasure to do so. This is the Dan Levitar show with the Stugats. Mark Cuban was one of the Pablo Tori finds out episodes. And I found interesting the other day that all of a sudden he was being quoted as saying, I had no power when it came to the Luca trade.

What did you make of those comments? Well, listeners of nothing personal know that we said at the minute the deal was announced. Mark Cuban was rumored that he's going to keep running basketball and he's going to keep being the governor after selling the team to Miriam Adelson's son-in-law. Well, really, Miriam Adelson. And I said at the time, there's no way that he could. can do that. When you sell the team, you're gone. Even these step transactions that we pretend happen, like with the Celtics, in real life, like Wick at the Celtics, see you later. Mark Cuban,

done. And he wanted people to think he had the power just in case maybe the Mavericks were good. But then the minute they traded Luca, he comes out and says, oh man, I had nothing to do with that. And I wanted power, but Nico didn't want me to have power. That's pathetic. The GM has zero say in a purchase agreement, zero. And in the purchase agreement for the Mavericks, it outlines exactly what the powers will be of Mark Cuban and his retained 27%. And it's about as much power as you have, Dan, with the Mavericks.

Nico, it's like saying that Mike Hill would have been involved in the sale of the team to Derek Jeter. He had nothing to do with it at all. I want to play this Silver Sound that you were making faces how I framed it earlier and I want to get your correction on me after I've played the sound for the audience on. It feels like Adam Silver saying, you know, tough customer. We're going streaming. We're going to grab all the dollars and it doesn't matter. The customer doesn't matter. There's a huge amount of our content that people can essentially consume for free. I mean,

this is very much a highlights based sport. You know, so, you know, Instagram, TikTok, you know, Twitter, you name it, any service, you know, the New York Times, for that matter, to the extent that your content is not behind a paid firewall, there's an enormous amount of content out there, YouTube, by another example, that people, that is advertising-based that consumers can consume. You're not allowed to have highlights on YouTube. It gets taken down unless you pay the league for highlight rights. For crying out loud, what Adam was trying to respond to was someone asking, hey, is it really too expensive to watch NBA games? And his only answer was, Yeah, but let's talk about the fact that you get highlights for free, like by watching

SportsCenter and highlights are what people are interested in anyway. We're a highlight league. Boy, season ticket sales, people are super excited to have him say that. People who work in in-game entertainment, people trying to advertise like aspiration in the Intuit Dome, trying to say, oh, people love going to games. Adams say, no, no, we just engage with highlights. found that to be again. Are his PR people like asleep at the switch? What is going on? So in a sport that is having a lot of trouble over the years in defending the importance of their

regular season, Adam Silver sold me on it there, you know? Just watch highlights. Look, Samson loves when the commissioners of the leagues don't care at all about the customers and just say so out loud. You can do it in such a nicer way. You know, they got billions of dollars for their broadcast rights and a deal that's starting their franchise value. are going up. I think what you say there, if you're Adam Silver, is we're trying to make it as easy as possible for you, the fan, to access our games, which is why there's so many more national games and more nights that you can access our games and all the other great content on these streaming services. We're doing this for you, the fans. I would rather you've gone that

direction than the, hey, we're a highlight league. Give us your review. We haven't had time for these because there's been so much news in all of your segments that we've been doing recently. And again, I urge the audience to listen to both. Nothing personal, which is growing at a very high rate of speed. And Pablo Tori finds out where they are using some of David's work to accentuate his expertise. What are you reviewing for us today in the way of a movie? Please tell me that some of you, any of you, have watched nobody, too. Oh, I saw the first one.

I saw Odin Kirk is one of the most offensive of the older than 50. action stars, but they're doing it tongue and cheek. Is Jim from taxi still in that? Is Dr. Brown from Back to the Future in Nobody 2? Did you forget Emmett just now? I'm forgetting the name. Christopher Lloyd. Thank you. I forgot the name of Christopher Lloyd. Yes. He may have also forgotten Emmett. Dr. Emmett Brown. Yes, he is, but his part is very small and nobody too. It is so ridiculous. And I'm not an ageist. It's not that I think he's too old or that I don't believe that saw would any in any way engage in this sort of funny action stuff the problem is they had no story and the script is so weak the premise is so bad that really it was hollywood saying hey

slap a numeric number two on nobody get odin kirk here from gleng gerry glen ross on broadway and let's make a movie it looks like it was shot in like 30 days and it just looks like they didn't care they were totally mailing it in and it crushed me because I really thought nobody part one, or the first movie, I was totally entertained. It was funny to see Odenkirk that way, by nobody too. I was

despondent that I had to watch the whole thing. I just saved you an hour and a half of your life, Dan. It's got very good ratings here. It's got the Rotten Tomato says it's 78% and 89% people like this movie. People like a lot of things that aren't good.

Okay, but you are taking an unpopular stance on a popular franchise. Ladies and gentlemen, now starring in Who Killed the Expos? David Sampson, uh, coming shortly, uh, in documentary form to wherever it is, you get your documentaries. Thank you, David. See ya. Uh, do you guys know that, uh, Greg Cody's anger yesterday was real? That Greg Cody, uh, was prideful and mad about losing soup of the day, at least in part, because you remember he had a segment. He prides himself on. very few things. Cooking and knowing soup are two of the things. Chris, how did you, how did you

feel with your father? He left here on his birthday seething. He was not, he was not happy how yesterday's show went. Yeah, I didn't feel great about it, especially because it was his birthday, and we talked after, and he did, I was expecting to talk to him after, and, you know, really, like, it stuck with him. It was really bad. He totally shut down. He totally shut down on the show after he lost. Fair and square, I might add. We had like our Greg Cody show weekly meeting and his tone was just like I've had a bad. I'm like, Dad, this is your birthday.

Please don't let this sit with you. It's a soup competition. Billy, are you with Greg? Do you think we mistreated him? And I don't think Billy thought it was fair and square. It was not fair and square. It was the most obvious thing in the world that he was going to lose that soup competition. But his soup wasn't as good. Because he had the worst soup? What are you doing?

What are you doing? Yeah, me, ultra popular figure on the Dan Levitard show. upsetting Greg Cody. Yeah, the fix was in, Billy Gill. Well, Dan had the deciding vote between you and Greg. Zazzlo decided. Zaslow decided. My wife said to me when I got home yesterday and I told her what happened, she said, why did you make that sweet old man angry?

It's a good question. I will also say this. Chris Cody was on this chain. There was a text chain that was sent. A tipster sent us a tip that accused Mike of using Hello Fresh in the soup thing. Someone sent me a photo of a Hello Fresh recipe that looked exactly like like soup. No, I use a lot of different things. I'm familiar with it. That's where I was like, who oftentimes I do use that as my source material to see if I like this. And then I save the

recipes. I'm like, let me build this thing out and add to it. And my dad defended you in saying there's nothing wrong with using a recipe, but he still went back to the coconut thing. He's like, he couldn't use a recipe, but I didn't taste the coconut. He was, he could not let that go. He couldn't wrap his mind around the fact that this is a different soup. Subtle taste. Yeah, coconut is but a layer of the, beautiful soup that I put together. So this was worst in the turkey cookoff, huh? A hundred percent worse.

In terms of his anger, yeah, because I think he actually felt, he felt like you beat him that day. He felt like he won yesterday, even though I don't think anyone agrees. He likes you. Like, I got this weird adversarial thing with Greg Cody. That's honestly one way. I love the man, but it felt like losing to me in particular, especially when he's the soup guy, and I've never actually engaged in any of these.

I'm better than you contest. it felt like me beating him felt like it stung him more. It felt like he was mad at me too. I don't know if you're aware. There's a lot going on there. I don't know that he likes me so much. I don't know if you're aware about that.

And I feel like it's kind of bullshit the position that you put me in yesterday, Dan. Like, why did you vote before me? Yeah. Because Dan was giving away his vote. It was so clear how Dan was going to vote. He was totally putting it on me. It was obvious that Dan liked one soup more than the other.

And you hadn't really given away. So I was like, let's at least end with. You know, have you ever thought about how this makes me feel? Have you? Have you? Like, I knocked that shit out the park. In fact, the lime zest wasn't even on the soup. And after you guys added the lime zest afterwards, you're like, holy cow. Yeah, no, this adds another layer to it.

I agree. This goes extra level. This goes to another level. You guys are over here trying to taint my hard-earned victory. I'm not, you know what? There's no incentive for me to continue indulging this show in these activations. You have made me feel bad. I love you, Sue Ball.

Greg feels great typically after these So I'm sorry to hear that you feel bad I do I do What you're doing right now is hurtful to me Because I worked hard Alright I went to I went to Whole Foods I was skating in the aisles I was like no no no let me upscale every ingredient

That's what a good chef does Let me get this to be so quality I am attaching my name to this Let me pour my heart and soul into this And you know what my extra ingredient was Billy Despite your intentions right now Love I wanted you to love that too of this comment.

Game changer. That soup. It's a damn good soup. I will also say this. One of the voters in yesterday's contest said after the fact, and I'm trying to remember whether or not spoiler or it comes out on mystery crate or not. But one of the voters said that they were very much intimidated by Dan and trying to get their vote the way that they thought Dan wanted the vote to go. It was jamming. So that's why they voted for Greg.

Well, I actually think you voted for Greg just because you like Greg. That's what I think. And forget the votes. Greg continued to perpetuate this lie on the air that he made more soup than me. He did not. I made way more soup than he did. There was more soup at the end of Greg's. That's right.

That maybe he made more than you. No. It meant that people liked my soup more. You continue to do this. Why are you so divisive, Billy? I'm not. I'm just coming here. You make the soup the next time. Chris, Billy, you, Greg Cody's now winless in these competitions. Which was mentioned many times before the vote.

That's what he tried to tell me my dad yesterday. He's like, when do I get to win? I'm like, Dad, and this show, you're probably 745 and 4. The only losses you get around here are these competitions. Again, people hate me on this show. People love him. There's nothing sinister at play here. I disagree with you only here.

The sinister thing and the fraud in the voting, Chris voted for his dad. Chris was lying. Chris saw Chris saw how wounded and pride Chris wanted a good competition Chris Jeremy started voting for Mike Chris whose soup was better Hmm

They were both really good Chris They were different good Chris You guys are so full of it man Chris whose soup was better I liked my dad's soup I liked both

I'm not gonna do this I'm not gonna do this You're trying to intimidate another voter I voted for my dad I voted for my dad Now if Jeremy had voted for my dad Might I voted for Mike Maybe

Now is a good time to remember where tequila's story truly began. In 1795, Cuervo invented tequila. Quervo. What are you doing here? Quervo. Anytime someone says Quervo, I show up. Well, I do know that to be true, but even during an ad reads, like...

Quervo. I think you could lay out, especially from one of our great partners. Sweet, delicious, quervo. Since then, Cuervo is stayed true to its roots. The same family, the same land, the same passion. Quervo. So, enjoy the tequila that started it all. Quervo.

Quervo. The tequila. That invented tequila. Croximo, quervo.com, please drink responsibly. Quervo.