The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Absurd Truth: Don Lemon Update

Episode Date: February 2, 2026

Don Lemon has been released from prison. Meanwhile, three Million pages of Epstein documents were released over the weekend, revealing shocking details about Bill Gates, Michael Wolfe and more.Thank y...ou for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…CovePurehttps://CovePure.com/DanaImprove your health with clean water this year. Get $200 off for a limited time.Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.com OR CALL 1-800-4-RELIEFTry Relief Factor's 3-week Quickstart for just $19.95—tell them Dana sent you and see if you can be next to control your pain!Patriot Mobilehttps://PatriotMobile.com/DANA or call 972-PATRIOTSwitch to Patriot Mobile in minutes—keep your number and phone or upgrade, then take a stand today with promo code DANA for a free phone!Humannhttps://HumanN.comSet yourself up with simple, delicious wellness support—pick up Humann’s Turmeric Chews at Sam’s Club next time you’re there and see why they’re such a fan favorite!WebRootTake your cybersecurity seriously! Get 60% off Webroot Total Protection at https://Webroot.com/Dana  Noble Goldhttps://NobleGoldInvestments.com/DanaThis is the year to create a more stable financial future.  Open a qualified account with Noble Gold and receive a 3 oz Silver Virtue coin free.Subscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Dana Lash's absurd truth podcast. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida man. That's right. It's time for Florida man on the Dana Show, D-Lash, Dana Lash Radio and X on Twitter. Great ways to stay connected to her. Here's a few quick Florida man stories out there.
Starting point is 00:00:22 A Florida man was sentenced for a high-speed chase in a stolen law enforcement vehicle. This happened over the weekend. 42-year-old James Marion Brady was found guilty on all charges related to the pursuit by law enforcement back in 2024. He had stolen an emergency vehicle
Starting point is 00:00:40 and then fled police in it, a Grand Theft Auto style, and actually Grand Theft Auto was one of the charges against him. I would just sort of surreal that a dude walking around is like, oh, I know how I'm going to run from law enforcement. I'm going to take an emergency vehicle. They're never going to find me.
Starting point is 00:00:55 They're never going to figure it out that way. I'm sure I'll be 100. represent fine. You are not, sir. And now finally you actually face the charges in court and are found guilty of the ridiculous thing you did there. The next time you see a crazy, a version of a emergency vehicle on a bunch of police following behind it in Florida, that might be stolen. That might not be people going to help somebody. Sadly, it might be something else. A man was arrested in Central Florida for impersonating a law enforcement official. I feel like there's a theme to the stories that are out there. Hillsborough County arrested a guy who was pretending that he was a police officer himself.
Starting point is 00:01:30 He drove around in a black car. He had a set of lights that he would hold up, which is sort of insane. Not actually on the vehicle or anything the right way. They would flash blue and red. And he just pulling people over. Just doing certain stuff, a suspicious vehicle was called in. The lights caused other drivers to believe that he was law enforcement. Of course they did. Mostly I think he did all this to just circumvent traffic. And I'll tell you, living in Houston, in Texas, where traffic is uniquely horrible,
Starting point is 00:02:00 almost as bad as I think is L.A. and pretty much anywhere else out there in the world, it's pretty terrible traffic here. Man, oh man, would I be tempted to do this to pretend as though I'm law enforcement just to get through traffic every once in a while? Of course, I'm not going to do it. I don't ever want to be in the news.
Starting point is 00:02:16 As someone who did this sort of thing, probably be bad for my radio career and quite a few other things. But it would great as far as not having to deal with traffic for the day. And so I get it. I understand the crime, this crime. I don't understand the guy who steals the emergency vehicle and goes in a chase with cops. That one doesn't make sense to me. This person, however, does. I get it. And the reasons that it makes sense to me are obvious and probably also make sense to you. There's also a viral video. I don't know if this is a Florida man in the same sense as the other. I don't, the guy didn't do anything
Starting point is 00:02:50 illegal. He's not been arrested for anything. I just thought it was funny. There's a dude who went viral because there's a video of him lying on the ground covered in a pile of frozen iguanas. Um, iguanas freeze in Florida when it gets uniquely cold. They're not dead. They're just frozen. And usually once it warms up, they start moving around again. For some reason, uh, either the man stacked the iguanas on himself or, um, they may have just climbed up there when he was passed out for whatever the decision was made. But he claimed to have created the world's first iguana blankets. I would be creeped out if there's other reasons for this that I don't want to know about for the man to do it. But he's a Florida influencer by the name Stax, who went viral
Starting point is 00:03:35 on social media again for having a blanket per se of frozen guanas. This is the weird stuff that happens out of that place and nowhere else. I can't think of another part of our country where you'd see a thing like this and be like, oh, yeah, Florida. Like my first reaction out of that story and the viral coverage of it, the dude who created his guana blanket is that, yeah, of course, that's Florida. That makes sense there. He probably wasn't alone. Probably there are other people that are going to do the same thing in the very near future.
Starting point is 00:04:04 I feel bad about all of it. I was talking with Colin Plume over at Noble Gold Investments, and we were discussing how no one really knows what 2026 is going to bring, elections, markets, wars. But one thing we do know, gold and silver, have outlasted every empire. And that's why gold keeps coming up as a steady, reliable option. Every crash, every currency. And at the end of the day, it's about that peace of mind. Having a little gold in your strategy can make those wild market swings a lot easier to live
Starting point is 00:04:32 with. Because real wealth isn't flashy. It's being prepared and protecting what you've already built for yourself, your kids, and your grandkids. Create a more stable financial future. Visit noble gold investments.com slash Dana and download their free. gold and silver guide. And when you open a qualified account, you'll receive a complimentary three-ounce silver virtue coin. So visit noble goldinvestments.com slash Dana. Having a little gold in your strategy can make those wild market swings a lot easier to live with. That's noble gold investments.com slash Dana. The one thing that I can't get over from last week and this weekend is the needed discussion about Don Lemon. Now here's here's the part of information you most need.
Starting point is 00:05:21 Don Lemon definitely broke the law, in my opinion. That's my own opinion. That is not necessarily something that comes from any other expert on this. But if you watch the video of Don Lemon in a church disrupting people's right to practice their faith, which is what he and others were doing, and you listen to the things he's saying, he's absolutely a protester. There's no version of him being a media guy who's just capturing a story and doing the thing that you would have seen on television when television was more respectable. where it would have said, hey, there's people out in this church or whatever. Maybe you're even standing outside of it, as you say this. They're disrupting a service.
Starting point is 00:05:59 We'll let you know more of what's going on and why later. Instead, Lemon is saying this is what will happen all throughout the country. If ICE is allowed to keep operating, if blah, blah, blah, blah. He's absolutely echoing the sentiment of the protesters. You can't call yourself media if you have that strongly of an opinion on a certain side that is doing the illegal thing. You don't get to say, hey, First Amendment right for me, baby. I'm just a journalist.
Starting point is 00:06:26 If we did that, anyone breaking the law could turn their camera on while doing it and say they were an independent journalist not breaking the law. I'm just showing you guys a news update on the person robbing the jewelry store, who is me, robbing the store, but I can't be held accountable for this because I'm just journalism. I'm just media. I'm just a journalist letting you know that someone is robbing this jewelry store. That doesn't get you out of the crime people, but they're pretending as though it does. Todd Blanche and George Stephanopoulos had a bit of a argument on ABC discussing Don Lemon,
Starting point is 00:07:00 who was released after he was arrested for the church incident in Minneapolis, Minnesota, that I think is very likely to find him guilty of a crime because he seems to have recorded himself doing it. But here we go. Here's part of his audience. So when do you believe that Mr. Lemon crossed the line from reporting on what was going on to criminal activity. Conveniently missing from what you just show, George, is the appellate court and a judge on the appellate court who said just a few days later there was clearly probable cause and it wasn't even a close question.
Starting point is 00:07:32 So, and by the way, a grand jury, which is what our system has set up to determine whether probable cause concluded that there was probable cause. That indictment is now public. Everybody in this country can pull it up and read for themselves and see what the grand jury found that Mr. Lemon did. I am not going to comment on the charges specifically because it's not appropriate, but it's interesting that we talk about the first amendment right. You have a right of freedom of religion, which is just as important as any other right that we have. And George, I don't know if you've watched the videos or read the indictment about what it's alleged that Mr. Lemon did.
Starting point is 00:08:07 But if anybody in this country thinks that that is, quote, independent journalism, I would like to have a conversation with you. You're an idiot is what I would say in response to that. He didn't go that wrong. obviously has a very good lawyer. He can raise defenses in court to the extent he wants to. But nobody in this country should feel comfortable storming into a church while it's ongoing and disrupting that church service and thinking that we're just going to stand by and let that happen because there is a statute that does not allow that to happen. It doesn't matter if you happen to be a former CNN journalist.
Starting point is 00:08:40 It doesn't matter if you're a rioter. It doesn't matter if you think you're peacefully protesting. It doesn't matter. He's absolutely right. I want to play that beginning part again because I really do like that part a lot where Stephanopoulos is like, oh, what, at what moment did he change from being a journalist to being a rioter? And my answer would have been the entire time. He was never a journalist, it seemed, because he was providing an opinion that was completely aligned with the people who were disrupting the church service.
Starting point is 00:09:06 But I love the response back, that it's not a MAGA opinion. It's not something that a bunch of conservatives has gotten to a room together and said, well, we think that Don Lemon is guilty of something. So let's go and share that with the public. This actually went through the proper channels. A grand jury said, yeah, he seems pretty guilty of doing so. So when do you believe that Mr. Lemon crossed the line from reporting on what was going on to criminal activity? Conveniently, it's not my belief is another way to say that.
Starting point is 00:09:35 What you just show, George, is the appellate court and a judge on the appellate court who said just a few days later, there was clearly probable cause and it wasn't even a close question. So, and by the way, a grand jury, which is what our system has set up to determine whether probable cause exists, concluded that there was probable cause. Yeah, so it's not just my opinion. I'm not the only one as Deputy Attorney General saying this. There's a bunch of other people through the proper channels who seem to believe that Lemon committed a crime. And again, if you just watch the video, I'm not even going to play it because I'm so annoyed with Don Lemon and his attempt to be relevant and to be in the news. Like, part of him is thrilled that the news cycle is focused.
Starting point is 00:10:14 focused on him again. He says the reason they're attacking him, he's gay, he's a black man, anything other than I committed a crime inside a church, which is what I think definitely happened. And a lot of people seem to again, I'm just going to keep repeating it, I think definitely happened. But part of him is very thrilled to be at the forefront of a news cycle for any amount of time. And that annoys me because it is all performative and stupid and every part of it is designed to be, oh man, like here, you know what, let me say it this way. I bet you would ever meeting. Don Lemon has with who's ever a part of his social media team. I wonder if it's like one person or two other people. I don't know how much money he's throwing at this thing that I'm not
Starting point is 00:10:54 saying he's all that successful at right now. But anyway, that debate as to how much attention he'd get for being a part of this thing that was happening at this church in Minneapolis where people were accusing a pastor of being a member of vice and wanted him to stop doing his church service, all horrible, terrible, illegal things. But I wonder how much of their debate was, man, this is going to get us a lot of clicks, a lot of mentions, because no news is bad news or no publicity is bad publicity, is the version of think that so many people in digital media only believe to be what's important for them. Look, I was really happy.
Starting point is 00:11:32 I'll say it this way, at the reporting that Nick Shirley did in Minneapolis, when he uncovered all the fraudulent places and knocked on all the doors, and showed us how ridiculous and unapologetic the fraud is. But to be honest, Nick Shirley is going to be a person who disappears from our day-to-day conversation unless he does it again, unless he finds another controversial thing to be the first person reporting on and demonstrating how much news media is useless in today's society, even though they have the money and the means to easily do what any independent YouTuber does, like Nick Shirley. But the problem with that beast, with that monster of, of,
Starting point is 00:12:11 internet media is you have to keep feeding it. People ask the question, why did Tucker Carlson interview this guy and have this conversation with this person? Does he think what the other person thinks? Or is Tucker Carlson blah, blah, blah, blah? That happens all the time where people react to the platform that is shared from one known person to maybe a lesser known or probably just as well-known person in a lot of cases. And I laugh every time I see that because the platform conversation is ridiculous. The platform is ubiquitous now. Everyone has one. Anyone can have one at any time for whatever reason they want. And if the content is good, it'll go viral. If it's meaningful, if it matters, people will talk about it. And then eventually news, media, and everyone else will discuss it,
Starting point is 00:12:56 like they did with Nick Shirley. So the playing field has been leveled. I don't care why someone puts someone else on their show from a platform standpoint, because I believe I know why. I believe I know what the answer is. I don't care why they tell me is what I should say. I think it's just to get more clicks, more views, more people witnessing it, and then more money. Because the more people you have consuming your content in today's digital media world, the more money you make. I'll look at Candace Owens. As another example of this, I did this deep dive. I'm not in the thing she was talking about. I thought a lot of them were stupid, to be honest. And I don't know how many people in this audience agree with anything that Candace said or don't agree, but I think by and large,
Starting point is 00:13:38 the things she said were ridiculous and clickbait stuff that benefited her a lot. But I did a deep dive into how much her podcast jumped in consumption, in the amount of listeners or the amount of money she's making off of it based on that. And she went from the back end of the top 100 podcasts, like in the 70s or 80s, in the 30s. She got millions of additional downloads. That doesn't necessarily mean that everyone that downloaded her show agrees with her. That's another thing that's missing often in these discussions. There's probably a whole lot of people who heavily disagree with the person that they're consuming the information of.
Starting point is 00:14:15 Anyone else can be used as an example of that other than Candace Owens. But it's funny to think that the amount of downloads you have actually provides credibility to the thing you're saying, because that's not true. It just means that people are interested in what you're saying, and it might be for the exact opposite reason. But nonetheless, I just thought that was fascinating, that the thing she did and the way she did it, and how long she and still is,
Starting point is 00:14:40 dedicated to some of the conspiracy theories around the tragic death of Charlie Kirk, has tremendously financially benefited her. And so many people say that now. The best way to make money in media, in digital media, is to be as controversial as possible. Because unless you get sued, who cares? You're just going to get more clicks, more likes, more views,
Starting point is 00:14:59 and that'll be great for you. you. Not great for society, but great for you. All right, quick break, a lot more. Craig Collins filling in on the Dana show. Folks who don't make it happen. It's our friends over at WebRute. This is a great thing to have running on your computer in the background, protecting you, keeping your identity, your finances, and just your digital life safe. There's so many antivirus programs out there, but one of the reasons that nobody likes putting them on their computers is because they're clunky. They make everything run slow, and they're just not as effective. This is where WebRut calls. comes in. Webroot, first off, scans six times faster and takes up 33 times less space than those other
Starting point is 00:15:35 antivirus programs. But WebRood Total Protection is an all-in-one everything. So it's not just, you know, device and privacy protection. It's identity protection as well. You can protect your entire digital life with what they have, the VPN, the identity protection, the antivirus, the cloud backup, everything in one easy-to-use subscription that you can add your kids and your parents on to as well. It's an all-in-one way of protecting yourself online and it just works quietly in the background. You don't have any stress over data breaches or
Starting point is 00:16:06 scammers or identity theft. So start off, you're your right, 60% off of WebRoot. It's protection for your whole digital life and you can get 60% off right now at webroot.com slash Dana. That's 60% off for limited time only at webroute.com slash Dana live a safer digital life
Starting point is 00:16:22 with WebRood. And now all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. That's right. It's time for a quick 5 on the Dana Show, a D-Lash, Dana Lash Radio on X on Twitter. A great ways to stay connected. Producer Stephen and I were just joking about Puxatani Phil and how often he is horribly, horribly wrong in his predictions.
Starting point is 00:16:42 And as Stephen made a great point, he's like, hey man, but we can only play the audio today. So let's go ahead and do it. The pomp, the circumstance, the stupidity of all this, and the fact that Pucsatani Phil has an amazing Hall of Fame batting average, but not a great actual predicting the weather average, 35% or so. He's hitting over 300. He's not actually doing that great, but this is beyond stupid, so we should play it here.
Starting point is 00:17:08 Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye. Now on this February 2nd, Punks of Toney Phil, the Seer of Sears, prognosticator of all prognosticators. Wrong 60-70% of the time. Was the waking from his wintry nap at dawn on Gobbler's Knob. Uh-huh. Phil, look to the skies. Got to really think about changing the name of that.
Starting point is 00:17:27 That's not a great name. And then, speaking in ground hogies, directed President Dunkle to the proper scroll, which reads, it's my great honor to answer your annual call. And do it wrong. So I rise again this morning to greet you all. Yeah, thank you.
Starting point is 00:17:43 But today, I wake thinking of numbers and time. America turns 250, and I'm at least 139. Let's celebrate all, young, old, babies or millennial. Sure. And kick off America's semi-quincentennial. I'm already annoyed by this.
Starting point is 00:18:06 I don't know why. We look to the future and not just the past. So I suppose this party could use a forecast. A wrong one. It is my job this February 2 to look to the skies and report back to you that there is a shadow here on my ground. Six more weeks of winter abound. I don't know why people are cheering for that, by the way. They should absolutely not be cheering for six more weeks of winter,
Starting point is 00:18:36 which is what he normally predicts and is why he's usually wrong still very, very often. I really poohed that whole thing, but it was indeed fun to play it. Steve was right. That was a good time. Other things out there, Melania crushed at the box office compared to what people might have thought was going to happen. I think it's got like a 6% on rotten tomatoes, but it made 7 million. in its opening weekend. It beat a Jason State film movie,
Starting point is 00:19:02 which is incredible. And also, this is kind of crazy. At least one person online showed a photo of a different ticket that they were given, where instead of giving a movie theater somewhere, I think this was in Arizona, instead of giving them a ticket for Melania,
Starting point is 00:19:18 gave them a ticket for Zootopia, and then wrote a different screen for them to go to on it, and said, oh, it's just a computer glitch. It was the only movie they were doing this with, but it seemed to be. trying to dull the numbers of people who actually went to see it. I wonder how many theaters around the country resisted printing out Melania tickets because they didn't want the movie to be successful. How dumb is that? In all honesty, like how petty and stupid are those kind of things
Starting point is 00:19:43 if they happened any more than this one time it was shown? I have no idea if it did, but that is uniquely dumb. I did not go see Melania, by the way. I'm not sure if it's great. I'm not sure who cares, but I do think it's interesting that it did as well as it did. Maybe I will go see it now. That word on the street is pretty good. Those are two of the quick five stories. Got a bunch more to get to later on in the show. This is Craig Collins filling in on Groundhog Day on the Dana Show.
Starting point is 00:20:09 Stick with us. All right. One other thing actually out there, this might not be on the radar for everybody, but I thought it was interesting. President Trump on Air Force One having a conversation went en route to Palm Beach, Florida. I had a discussion about Michael Wolfe. The Epstein documents that were released, a crap ton of them. I got, you know, flooded all over the place more than we've ever seen before.
Starting point is 00:20:31 This was a huge dump of information. None of it really proves anything negative about Trump, even if some media outlets are going to pretend that because that's all they ever wanted in this story. They didn't want to actually catch bad guys. They wanted to turn Trump into a bad guy again, regardless of what the truth is. But nonetheless, one of the things that emerged is that the filmmaker Michael Wolf was conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to create something. that would have been dishonest in attempt to do harm to President Trump. So he might sue them. President Trump likes suing people, like suing anyone that seems to break the rules in a certain way,
Starting point is 00:21:08 which, by the way, would also be celebrated by mainstream media if it were a Democrat doing it, keeping people accountable by going through the proper channel and system that exists in our society. If that were a Democrat doing that, they'd be thrilled. When Trump does it, it's awful somehow. But here he is, saying that he might sue some people. What did you think of the latest release of Epstein files, and do you think your critics will be satisfied with this release? Like this guy, Wolf, who's a writer, was conspiring with Epstein to do harm to me. And I didn't see it myself, but I was told by some very important people that not only does it absolve me, it's the opposite of what people were hoping.
Starting point is 00:21:49 Yes, it is. It is the opposite. There seems to be a bunch of pieces of information that demonstrate how much Epstein. and others were targeting Trump and trying to turn him into someone more in trouble than he deserved to be. There's absolutely nothing in the document dumps that have been put out there
Starting point is 00:22:05 that continues to show any version of anything that Trump did wrong. He's still not going to be charged with any sort of crime. No information has come out. This is all the stuff they're mad that is true. And it's funny. And I use funny loosely because it's not, I'm not going to laugh at this,
Starting point is 00:22:22 but it's funny to me in a dark way that as this information continues to get dumped out and we continue to see horrible things of terrible people connected to Jeffrey Epstein who seemed to just be awful and none of them are Trump that none of that media cares none of the Democrats who are begging for this stuff
Starting point is 00:22:40 to be made public care about any of those people they don't want to discuss it, they don't want to think about it, none of the royalty that's involved in this, none of the Democratic politicians or Democratic financial people or anyone behind the scenes within that party that's now being outed as someone who seems to have done, or at least even photos of people seemingly in very bad situations. None of that matters.
Starting point is 00:23:04 Media, by and large, ignores it because they're disgusting, as they often are. All right, we're going to take a break. After the break, we're going to do the quick five, but I'm also at some point in the very near future. Let's call it like 15 minutes. I'm going to discuss a data dump that is truly absurd. This is a data dump out of North Carolina that shows the amount of, anti-ice group members from different, you know, communication things online or whatnot that are actually also members of certain teachers' unions,
Starting point is 00:23:35 city council members, school board members, mayors of major cities. It's insane the amount of politically relevant and in the world of education relevant individuals who are closely tied to the anti-ice group or the, you know, Antifa groups that are out there causing all of these problems. It seems very obviously to be a thing created by a bunch of people in those positions of power throughout that side of the political aisle. And that's not going to get talked about a lot. So we're going to talk about it here, but a huge data dump and a crazy amount of people, hundreds of people that are connected to organizations that you would think would shy away from being at the forefront of this sort of a controversial movement that are absolutely 100% unapologetically trying to lead it and push other. to do crazy horrible stuff.
Starting point is 00:24:26 So we'll talk about that in just a little bit. I will do a quick five. All that coming up. Craig Collins filling in on the Dana Show. Thanks for tuning in to today's edition of Dana Lash's Absurd Truth Podcast. If you haven't already, make sure to hit that subscribe button on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.