The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Absurd Truth: Michelle Obama Doesn't Stop Complaining

Episode Date: January 21, 2026

Michelle Obama says she is mindful to try to avoid white-owned brands and others also should be while also saying she’s NOT running for president because men “aren’t ready for a woman president���. Meawhile, Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson has another DEI moment after defending the racist “Black Codes” as precedent for what we should consider constitutional.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.com OR CALL 1-800-4-RELIEFTry Relief Factor's 3-week Quickstart for just $19.95—tell them Dana sent you and see if you can be next to control your pain!Patriot Mobilehttps://PatriotMobile.com/DANA or call 972-PATRIOTSwitch to Patriot Mobile in minutes—keep your number and phone or upgrade, then take a stand today with promo code DANA for a free month of service!Humannhttps://HumanN.comKick off the New Year with simple, delicious wellness support—pick up Humann’s Turmeric Chews at Sam’s Club next time you’re there and see why they’re such a fan favorite!Byrnahttps://Byrna.com/DanaMake 2026 the year you protect your family with solid options—Get the Byrna today.WebRootTake your cybersecurity seriously! Get 60% off Webroot Total Protection at https://Webroot.com/Dana  Subscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

Dana Lashes Absurd Truth podcast. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida man. All right. So where to even start? That's the big,

I got a guy having a tantrum over a leaf blower. So let's start here. So this has to do with two Florida men who got into a big giant fight because apparently someone used his leaf blower and blowed, blue, blue. Blue leaves on. someone else's car, which is rude. I mean, I don't think he did it on purpose, but,

and it was all caught on camera. Things went sideways really quickly. A man stomped on a worker's leaf blower because leaves kept getting on his vehicle. And the guy was very, very aggressive, and I was watching it. I don't think the guy was doing it on purpose. It was in Delray Beach, and it was in the parking lot, and the guy was cussing, and he, like, grabbed it and started stomping on the thing. And oh, my gosh. So now he's in the car. He's in the parking lot. He was in the now he's in trouble. You have to understand that if you're parking your car outside and it's next to trees or grass or anything and you have landscapers that are dealing with the grounds that your car could have stuff blown on it because they're there to deal with the grounds.

That's all there is to it. It's not those guys' fault. And in the video, it didn't look like the guy was, I don't know. I mean, it doesn't look like he was trying to do it on purpose. Maybe I'm wrong, but it didn't look like that. A man, a Florida man shot a kidnapper for trying to abduct his wife. Yeah, he did. That's a real man, Bradenton, Florida. A Bradenton, Florida man fended off a kidnapper who tried to kidnap his wife on New Year's Day. It was in Manatee County. Nicholas Palomo, a 36-year-old felon, had previously gone to prison for kidnapping and a bunch of other violent crimes, tried to abduct a woman who was walking her dog. She tried to escape by running from his car, made it to her home, warned her husband, and the

husband went outside. The guy, and apparently Paloma hadn't left. He was still trying to get her. So the guy went outside. He saw the guy still trying to threaten the wife. So the husband shot him once in the driveway. That was it. Sheriff's office said it was in a matter of minutes entirely self-defense. And he also prior, like just prior to him stalking this woman and trying to take her, he had caused a ruckus at a Circle K up the road.

So they're doing it. They were apparently doing the toxicology to see if he was under the influence of narcotics as well. If I hear of someone who's fashion that I like and I know that they're a person of color, I try to make it a point. But the clothes have to be available. You know, I think we can all do some work to think about that balance in our wardrobes, you know. What does our closet look like and who's in it? Who are we supporting in it?

Right. You know, and I think if you have the money to buy Chanel, then you have the money to buy everybody. right and so let us be mindful i think would be my advice just like you bought a oceanfront property in hawaii and ocean front property in martha's vineyard and a big old mansion in chicago i'll buy whatever the hell i want and you're going to sit down and you're going to take it because i don't give a damn it's not up to you to tell people how to spend their money does she ever stop being just bitchy does she ever stop every single i mean i have never seen a single clip of anything this woman is done where she's just having fun and she's just enjoying

life. She's got to come out and grievance and bitch and moan about everything and I just don't understand how someone who had such a silver spoon entitled life is so mad and hates everyone and wants everybody to be as miserable as they did. I would love to have the kind of upbringing that Michelle Obama had. I'm the poor girl. Not her. You all are. Not her. Her and her rich entitled husband. Both of them. Nepo babies growing up and very well-to-do families, bank presidents and university professors and driving parents driving new cars and being able to go to whatever college they wanted to, never having to worry about anything. People bending over and lifting them up from the very beginning of their professional existence, launching their political campaigns in their living rooms in Chicago,

raising the money, buying them a big old mansion so they can hold that status in Chicago, doing all this stuff. I'm so damn tired of it. I don't feel bad for you. You were never in any way aggrieved more than anybody else ever. It is a yarn that you spend to try to make yourself seem more special and to maintain control. These people try to gatekeep grievance. I'm so tired of it. And she's a racist. Michelle Obama is just an old bitchy racist.

I'm done with it. I'm so, don't buy from white-owned brands. That's what a racist would say. How about you just buy whatever you want to buy because you like it? Doesn't matter if it's black or white or whatever. That's not something that I do. First off, I don't have the type of cushy existence that she does where I eat bonbons all day and I sit on my ass. and I don't work.

I don't have the type of free time where I'm like, let me look into the life of this designer and find out their whole backstory before I commit to a purchase. If I like it, I just buy it. It's very easy. Pretty amazing, right?

If I like it, I just buy it. I don't care about what their backstory is. They either make things that are nice or they don't. That's it. But can you imagine, yeah, if you had anybody, any Republican first lady.

Oh, well, I try to avoid black-owned brands and others should also. Can you imagine if they had said that? Can you imagine? Good heavens. I mean, it would have been never ending. You would have had a nonstop

news cycle about it. That's racist. What she's saying. It's divisive. It's racist. Who's she trying to convince that she just has it so hard? I mean, I think they have issues in their marriage. You never see them together. He never seen, you don't see him anymore. It just seems like he tries to stay away with her. Her and her lookalike brother do these podcasts. Oh, I don't care if it's mean. I'm tired of being lectured by this old entitled woman who had such a

great life and had such a cushy entitled life that she wants to look down on everyone else because you're not, you don't share her skin color or you don't share her retconned history. What is, I mean, it's like Pam Greer. What is with these women that try to, makeup to where they have such a hard coming up. They try to rewrite history and act like, oh, we had such a hard. You had no idea. Michelle Obama does not know struggle. She does not know poverty, not in the way some of us do. I don't want to hear it. And I'm not going to feel bad and be told that I have to shut up because of my skin color, racists, not going to have it. Good heavens. How about, you know what would be great if she went out there and just said, you know, just buy whatever you want to buy. It doesn't

matter. Support who you want to support. Support whatever brand you want to support. That's, that's it. That's all I got to do. That would be a lot more unifying and a lot, but it doesn't get clicks. I don't know. I guess there's a portion of the population out there that loves this grievance peddling. Like, I can't get into it. It just annoys me to no end. I just can't. Then she says this, cut 30. She would never consider running for president because she's not likable. She doesn't have the credentials and she's not likable. So I don't even know why we're entertaining this stupid idea listen to this is 30 you said don't even look at me about running because you all are lying you're not ready for a woman you're not there are men out there

that we're not going to vote for a woman let's just be real about it and let's put that on the table and talk about well what's that about let's not be mad because I made the statement the young women that we're talking to keep climbing we need you and know that you may come up short but keep going What does this even mean? Nobody cares. All I heard was a bunch of word salad that was miles wide and inches deep. Shalowness that's supposed that's like, that's like playing as some sort of analysis or some sort of intellectual deep dive. No. What is this? First off, you're just not likable. That's why they would never vote for you. Like Hillary Clinton wasn't likable. Like Kamala Harris wasn't likable. There are women out there who are likable. Margaret Thatcher was likable. There's other women in the United States that are Sarah Huckabee Sanders is likable. They're likable people. They come across. They're amiable. They're friendly.

They're not constantly trying to put you down by acting like they've had it so much harder than you, even though they actually haven't. They don't say racist things like you should avoid brands based on skin color. They don't say stuff like that. That's why people don't want to vote for you. And you're just not qualified to do it. Sorry, but, you know, working as an attorney and being a nepo baby, that's not enough of a qualification.

Can we get, can we just move past the Nepo baby age? That would be great. We have a, it's a problem that's pervasive in every aspect of society, including politics and especially right-leaning politics. It's so bad. Can we just get past it? I get so tired of this. It's so tired.

So I don't, I don't know. I wish that the, it's, it's, there is a subsection of the American population that just is grievance mongering. I feel like, though, it's kind of dissipating our partners who help bring you the program, our friends over at WebRood. They want to make sure that you're protected because there's so many ways. Just to be frank, swindle you out everything you got. I'm not kidding.

I mean, I could probably do it if I was really mean and wanted to. This is why you need to protect not just your devices, not just your laptop or your phone or your iPad, but you also need to protect your identity. and you want to take all of the guessing games out of cybersecurity. It is not complicated. There's two ways to do it. You have two packages from our friends at WebRute, right? You have WebRood Essentials, which is one way to approach at Lightning Fast, Antivirus,

password manager, web threat shields. But then you also have WebRut Total Protection, which is an all-in-one, everything, protection. So this is like the full armory, right? You can protect your entire digital life, including identity protection. They even watch out for that, particularly on. on the dark web. VPN, cloud backup, the whole nine yards. Because let me tell you, by the time fraud happens, it's already negatively impacted you, and it is almost impossible to rectify it. So you would rather be proactive and make sure that you have Webroot total protection. And they make it

easy because it's 60% off right now, but just for a limited time. It is the number one antivirus on the market. And when you compare it to like the Nortons and the McAfee's, Webroot scans six times faster. It takes up 33 times less space. It's not some clunky thing that's going to slow you down because they realize it's 2026, not 2006. You need lightning fast, lightweight, antivirus protection, and that's what WebRood delivers. It runs in the back of my... I don't even know it's on. I forget it.

That's how I want to live my life. Protect yourself and your family from cybercrime with WebRoot. 60% off. Only right now for a limited time, though, at WebRut.com slash Dana. Live a safer digital life with WebRut. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. Hmm.

All right. So first, uh, oh, excuse me, almost sneeze for a second. K-pop demon hunters is Netflix most watched movies so far, and it's not even close. Before you freak out, it is literally one of the most conservative things you're ever going to watch. And for people who are like, yeah, but yes, there's a ton of religious overtones because a lot of the people that are involved with that are, like have Christian background. but if they're like, oh, well, they don't say Jesus specifically. Remember, neither did Lord of the Rings. I'm just saying, take it for what it is.

It actually is, I watched it. I actually watched it. It was great. I'm not into the music, but, you know, the animation was good. And the dialogue was very good. And you can feel okay about your kids watching it. I can tell you that. It's literally good versus evil.

But can you believe that that's like the most watched thing? Because they get a lot of filth on Netflix. I don't know if you've seen some of the stuff that they've, like, just launched this year, but it's so that was really nice. Christmas 2025 was the biggest streaming day ever in the United States. Says Nielsen. Interesting. Is it because of all the,

you know, it's probably because I watched Die Hard five times. There was a lot of hype around Stranger Things being released on Christmas too. I didn't. I don't watch it yet. I haven't either. But I like the Millie Bobby Brown girl because she seems nice and kind of trad. I mean like in a real trad way, not a fake Instagram click way. But NFL and Stranger Things. that's what they were attributing that to.

And their revenue and profits have risen. I just still, I don't think that, like, if I'm streaming something, Netflix is never where I go. If I, unless it's the Great British Baking Show, or the aliens thing. Not going to lie. But I watch Amazon Prime. That's what I do.

I watch, like, a lot of the old stuff on Amazon Prime. So, well, let's see, Pears Morgan gets a hip replacement. I don't care. Oh, threads overtakes. Tots and pairs. Threads overtakes X and daily mobile users. Threads overtakes X?

Threads? Wait, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa. That's the Instagram thing that I always scroll past and purposely ignore, right? Yes. Yeah, me too. Why does that take a... Why is that taken over X? That's kind of weird, right?

Are you okay, Kane? Kane's dying. King's got the plague. Kane is the plague. He's going to get us all the plague. We have more on the way, including Islamism and Nepo babies. Stick with us. Our partners that'll bring you the program.

It's our friends over at Relief Factor. Relief Factor wants to make your life pain free. I mean, everybody, it doesn't matter really what age bracket you fall in. It really has to do with how well you've taken care of your body. Your inflammatory markers, you know, are you getting enough exercise? Are you getting enough rest? And a lot of people, you know, especially if they work out a lot, or, you know, maybe you're like my husband and you played a ton of sports when you were in your teens and 20s.

and now you have like, you know, you're dealing with hockey knees. You want to make sure that you can control pain and also help with mobility. And this is where Relief factor comes in. Relief factor supports your body's natural inflammatory response that causes the aches and the soreness and stiffness and discomfort from exercise and daily activities. They have a three-week quick start. That could be your first step in alleviating this by targeting inflammation that keeps you from enjoying the things that you love.

It's 100% drug-free formula made with research-backed ingredients, including omega-3s and resveratrol, all designed to support relief from everyday exercise-related, anything related discomfort. Try the three-week quick start for Jost, 1995.95. Visit Relieffactor.com or call 800 number four relief and see if you could be the next person to get your pain under control with Relief Factor. That's Relieffactor.com 800 number four relief. Tell them, Dana sent you.

The Cantanji Brown Jackson, I don't even know where to start with us because I first I thought this was a joke. Actually, like every time, the last several bits of all. audio that we played legitimately. When I have seen them pop up and I see like a brief synopsis of her remarks, I immediately don't trust, even if it's a trustworthy source, what I'm reading, because it's so ridiculous. And this is again par for the course. So you have Wolford v. Lopez and it's a, it's a Second Amendment case that is being argued right now. And there's been a lot said about it. This has been going on for, you know, earlier this week. And,

in one of these instances, you had a discussion as to how to, what does permissible firearm regulation look like and, you know, who's free to carry, who is free to not carry, things like that. And you had these people inadvertently, starting with Justice Kintanji Brown Jackson, literally saying that, well, she's defending black codes as a precedent for, consideration as to constitutionality. Just listen. Justice Jackson. So I guess I really don't understand your response to Justice Gorsuch on the black codes. I mean, I thought the black codes were being offered here under the Bruin test to determine the constitutionality of this regulation. And it's because we have a test that asks us to look at the history and tradition.

The fact that the black codes were at some later point determined themselves to be unconstitutional doesn't seem to me to be relevant to the assessment that Bruin is asking us to make. So can you say more about that? Absolutely. Black codes were unconstitutional from the moment of their inception because they are pretextual laws that are designed to ensure that newly freed slaves are returned to a condition of sheer crop. Okay, let me stop you there. They were not deemed unconscionable. constitutional at the time that they were enacted. They were part of the history and tradition of the country. And when we have a test now that's asking us to look at what people were doing back then,

I don't understand why they should be excluded. Because they are outliers. They are by definition unconstitutional. They have found later afterwards, not at the time. And if the test says what's happening at the time tells us what's constitutional for this purpose, why aren't they in? respectfully, a law is always unconstitutional. When it's from its inception, it's, when it's... So the history doesn't matter. We should care about the history then. We should deeply care about the history.

So if you're, if you're scratching your head thinking, what in the world is she talking about? She's essentially saying that because an unconstitutional law was incorporated or in existence on the books at one particular point in time, that it can now credibly be used from here on out as a legal precedent. Well, it was always unconstitutional, first and foremost. It's the constitutionality of something that determines precedent, not the existence of whether, not the mere existence, it's the constitutionality of it. I just, she's, you know, she's so smart, we're told. We're told she's so smart.

I was amazed at that. And then this is the principal deputy solicitor. This is Sarah Harris. And, well, her reaction, as you can imagine, would be yours. Listen, this is 35. Sorry. There's been some discussion about the black codes. And maybe they should be relevant.

And maybe we really should consider them as significant here. In fact, they're a dead ringer. Thoughts. It is 2026. And it is somewhat astonishing that black codes, which are unconstitutional, are being offered as evidence of what our tradition of constitutionally permissible firearm regulation looks like. So it's Wolfer v. Lopez.

This is a case because it's going to, and it settles around Hawaii, and it's determining whether or not they can eliminate the Bruins standard, meaning does it comport with the founders establishment of our longstanding Second Amendment firearm traditions. That's the Bruin test. which it's going to go down. I mean, it's going to get it's, it's going to be wrecked. This, this, this, uh, court case for Hawaii. Hawaii is going to lose this for, they're going to lose this. It is going to be a wreck for them. To hear them try to argue this, um, and Hawaii is trying to do like an in run around all of this by saying, well, you have to be able

that you, you can't take your firearm basically anywhere, you know, basically it's all public spaces. You can't take your firearm, et cetera, et cetera. And that's where the whole, um, and that's where the whole vampire rule came from. So the vampire rule, that was what Hawaii had tried to implement as a way to in-run around Bruin saying, well, any kind of entity can prevent any sort of legally armed patron and you have to ask questions before, you have to ask permission before taking your firearm anywhere. And it's called the vampire rule because vampire folklore, in order to go in some place, you have to get permission. So it's like an in-run around that. And it applies to every space, every, everything. Like, it doesn't matter if it's public or private, whatever. And they're

trying to do an in-run around this. And they were arguing that somehow that goes along with the long, that they could, even though it violates the longstanding tradition that Bruin has already established. So that's that, that is the Wolfer v. Lopez case. I just, it was amazing to hear Kintanji Brown Jackson say, well, you know, even though it might be unconstitutional, it existed. So it can still be used as precedent. She's literally, she, I just can't even believe that she actually, I mean, I can. But it's still amazing to hear someone who masquerades as being an educated person try to argue that, well, because black codes existed and they were at one point historical,

that that's the legal precedent from here on out going forward. Oh, my gosh. By the way, you realize, and I wrote my first book on this, hands off my gun, that one of the reasons why the Dred Scott case went the way it did with that racist Judge Taney, who was a big-time far-left Democrat, is because he was using, Scott's inability to own a firearm as a free person as the final mark against his quote unquote personhood. And that was actually used as a litmus test to establish personhood was firearm ownership, which as you know, Democrats were they really advocated against any minorities being

able to exercise their second amendment rights, freed or not. So it's very interesting to hear someone on the bench argue that. Stunning. Thanks for tuning in to today's edition of Dana Lash's absurd truth podcast. If you haven't already, make sure to hit that subscribe button on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.