The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Andrew Cuomo Runs [AGAIN], Another Epstein Turn & A Fauci Criminal Referral

Episode Date: July 15, 2025

Andrew Cuomo announces his independent run for New York Mayor. Dana explains how France’s Independence Day, Bastille Day, is BS since a monarchy returned not long after to clean up the mess they made. Radio Legend Mike Francesa absolutely TORCHES the new Superman movie for being weak. Trump’s tariff threat has yet to cause a substantial price level rise. Who are the potential future Federal Reserve chairs to replace Jerome Powell? A UK study shows that kids are turning to AI for friendship because they “don't have anyone else to talk to”. Sen. Rand Paul joins us to discuss his CRIMINAL referral for Dr. Fauci & the Secret Service’s failures report one year after Butler, PA. President Trump doubles down on backing Pam Bondi’s decisions while blaming Obama and Comey for “making up” the Epstein Files. Chip Gaines GOES OFF on people on social media who criticized him and his wife’s decision to feature a same-sex couple on their new TV show. Sen. Eric Schmitt joins us to discuss the rescissions package the Senate will be voting on to claw back the DOGE savings such as the subsidies to PBS and NPR.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Angel Studioshttps://Angel.com/danaStream King of Kings, check out fan-picked shows, and claim your member perks.Allio CapitalDownload Allio from the App Store or Google Play, or text “DANA” to 511511 to get started today.All Family Pharmacyhttps://AllFamilyPharmacy.com/Dana Medical freedom is American freedom. Use code DANA10 to get 10% off your order.Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.com OR CALL 1-800-4-RELIEFTurn the clock back on pain with Relief Factor. Get their 3-week Relief Factor Quick Start for only $19.95 today! Byrnahttps://Byrna.com/danaGet your hands on the new compact Byrna CL. Visit Byrna.com/Dana receive 10% off.Patriot Mobilehttps://PatriotMobile.com/DanaDana’s personal cell phone provider is Patriot Mobile. Get a FREE MONTH of service code DANA.HumanNhttps://humann.comFind both the new SuperBerine and the #1 bestselling SuperBeets Heart Chews at Sam’s Club!Keltechttps://KelTecWeapons.comSee the third generation of the iconic SUB2000 and the NEW PS57 - Keltec Innovation & Performance at its best.

We're going to highlight some of the New York stuff as well because Cuomo's decided he's staying in the mayor's race, even though he lost the Democrat primary. So that means they're going to split whatever, I mean, literally whatever independent run they could have against Mam Danny. I keep wanting to say, ma'am, dammy. They are going to obliterate it because you're going to have Eric Adams and Cuomo facing off against this guy. And I guess they're, I can't believe I'm saying this, they're the more moderate. They're the moderates. Good heavens. They're the more moderate people, which is a weird thing to say.

And they're facing off. And this is going to dilute that base, that voting block. That dude's going to win. And New York is going to go to hell in a handbasket. That's exactly what's going to happen. And then, of course, you have, well, here he announces it, audio sound by 19. Go ahead and play this.

Hello, I'm Andrew Cuomo. And unless you've been living under a rock, you probably know that the Democratic primary did not go the way I had hoped. To the 440,000 New Yorkers who voted for me, a sincere thank you. Thank you for believing in me, in my agenda, and in my experience. And I am truly sorry that I let you down. Well, you're a grandparents. But as my grandfather used to say, when you get knocked down, learn the lesson and pick yourself back up. and get in the game.

And that is what I'm going to do. The fight to save our city isn't over. Only 13% of New Yorkers vote. How stiff does he sound, right? Ooh. He sounds, yeah, he sounds rough. He sounds stiff. He sounds like, yeah, it's weird.

He's, he's, hello, I am Andrew Cuomo, and I am announcing my independent run for the New York mayoral race. comma, yeah, walks off frame. Oh, wait a minute. He's just, I think that he was really hip-checked hard with that whole scandal, which was rightfully a scandal, right?

But I don't know, they're going to get this guy. We're never going to be able to go to New York again. Not that I ever really, I mean, they have some good restaurants. I don't do theater, so that's not, that doesn't hold. I don't do theater. We, you guys know this. That doesn't really hold. any allure for me. There's nothing. I mean, what to drive

by the UN building and complain about, you know, the exorbitant, you know, cost of the land that they're, they have that dog and pony show situated upon. I mean, really, what else? New Yorkers who love New York are very hardcore about loving New York, but everyone else is like, meh. You got a Waterburger?

Don't think so. You know, that's kind of, you got to, do you got like a Wind Dixie or a Bucky? Do you got a Buckees? You all don't got no Buckees? That's the measurement. We should go by it. That is the measure. How many Buckees do you have? And that's, aren't they, they're expanding too, I'm going to get off topic. They're expanding too.

But so, I, they're, yeah, that's gone. New York's gone. I mean, I could sit here and spend, you know, however many days to, you know, kind of amp it up and, and say, oh, yeah, you know, this is going to be like really, you know, it's going to be a really fire, barnstorming race. It's not. It's not. He's going to win. The other guys, I think some of the polling, what is it?

I don't even think Cuomo. Cuomo's like barely in double digits against this guy. Because this guy is dominating social media. And people who are miles wide inches deep, they're going to, they love this stuff. They love it. They just like to have whatever they believe affirmed and they think that this guy does it for him. So that's that city's going to, how long do you think he's going to stay in office? That's the real question. Like after he has these heinous policies where it's free all the things and all the

hire owners leave this, leave the city. What do you think is what's going to, how long is he going to stay in office. It's the million dollar question. How long is he going to stay there? Now, in addition to this, there's a bunch of Newsom's really in the news a lot. And I got a question. There's like two ways to look at this. Because I get invites to go on different podcasts. And if I think the host is a cuck, I don't want to go on it. And then you have people that are in, you know, in this business that are like, oh, no, you should do it. And it's great for clicks. I can't tell you how many people that I have on my face every day telling me I need to basically whore myself out for clicks that's like what

it is I'm not kidding that's the best way to put it and I'm just like nah I just have never been interested in playing that game now I say this because Gavin Newsom has a podcast I thought he was governor but whatever and people are going on his podcast for what purpose cane do you think that Gavin Newsom is going to be in any way convinced by anybody no no No. No, he's not going to be convinced. It's a platform to push. Who's using whom when people on the right go on his podcast? He's absolutely using the right.

Yeah. So I just, I'm trying not to be brady about it, but I don't know why anybody would want to help mainstream him, right? Why would anyone want to legit, not mainstream? We're using that word incorrectly. legitimize. Yeah, I think it's one thing to claim we're legitimizing him. Another thing, when questions that he isn't asked by the leftist media are finally asked of him in these forums, I think that's what people want to see. They want to see the questions that he normally is not asked and the ones that make him uncomfortable because any little uncomfortable question, Gavin Newsom gets, you've seen it, the body language.

Yeah. He is not comfortable. He's not comfortable at all. Not at all. So I have just, I keep seeing him come out. I see Gavin Newsom, not in the news for the decisions that he makes as governor, really, except if it's bad. Like, I'm sure that you all saw the latest with some of how he's dealing and pull this up. Because they had the fire, right, in the Pacific Palisades.

They did this insane fire. Well, now guess what? Government's going to be buying up land. It's super cheap right now. With taxpayer dollars, right? Yeah, taxpayer dollars. So apparently the Senate in California passed a bill to allow Los Angeles to buy fire destroyed lots for low-income housing. They are taking 101 million taxpayer dollars for, quote, multifamily low-income housing developments in communities in L.A.

that are devastated by those wildfires. So they are taking taxpayer dollars and they're turning around and they're going to buy this land. to be specifically for low-income housing. And the funding mechanism is going to allow the, and this is what the fund is called, the resilient rebuilding authorities. That sounds like glorified hall monitors, doesn't it? The resilient rebuilding authorities? The heck is that? So they are, that's the entity that's doing this. Now they have the bills, it hasn't been passed past. It's been passed to the Senate. This thing's going to pass. It's going to pass. There's like no opposition to it. And it has a hearing in the state assembly for tomorrow.

And it's going to allow the quote unquote resilient rebuilding authorities to issue, receive and administer funds, including but not limited to tax increment, financing federal loans grants, state loans grants, philanthropic grants to support recovery. And they're going to use 101 million taxpayer dollars to oversee the construction process. And they're going to purchase lots. at fair price for land banking, purchase critical materials in bulk, et cetera, et cetera, facilitate reconstruction of lost rental housing stock. But the thing that a lot of people are scratching their heads over is how in a lot of these in the Pacific Palisades, up in the hills, so to speak, they're using that money, apparently for multifamily low-income housing. Now, that's kind of how, first off, I mean, these areas where these fires happened,

I mean, I don't, if you're not that familiar with California, the Pacific Palisades, Kane, that's a pretty bougie area. Don't like one of the Kardashians or whatever live there? I mean, that's, you know, they have the couple of these other areas. Now, the Eaton Fire, that was on Altadena, Altadina, that's in California. That's, that's kind of like a, it's a middle class area. So, I mean, when you're talking about, if you're talking about, if you're talking about, if you're talking about rebuilding rental properties, et cetera, there. I mean, I get it. That makes sense.

But one of the areas that's marked is the Palisades. And I'm like, oh, that's kind of weird. How does that work? How does the zoning work for that? I mean, the only times that I hear that area come up in the news are when, like a big construction company makes the neighbors mad because they build these monstrosity mansions on the edge of a cliff and the neighbors are worried about the cliff like tumbling down on their little mansion. Little mansion. I can't. even. That's usually how that area comes up in the news. So how does that work? Oh, and you also did not, and I have this in here too, that the rail project, bless them, they've had that real project plan for over a decade. It burned part of the area that that was

going to happen. Oh, well, Gish, can't do it now. Oh, shucks. It's going to be delayed for another decade, I'm sure. I read that as that it conveniently cleaned it out, but whatever. Now, it's going to be delayed, Kane, just so you know. It's going to be delayed. There's so many delays. right there's delays to the delays so we're going to get into all of this stuff we also have some of the latest on the budget because the rescissions package is apparently now uh going that we're going to have that fight in the senate and the house uh we have senator ran paul who's going to be joining us as well and of course a belated bestial day the folly of the dumbest revolution in history so uh we are going to get into all of that and more i said it we got more on the way as we roll towards headlines and

our partner, our friends over at Relief Factor, if you are an individual that deals with aches and pains, you're just tired of dealing with it, whether it's like your joints or whether it's, you know, you have bad knee, whatever it is, you need to check out the good folks at Relief Factor because they have a drug-free supplement that's designed to help manage aches and pains naturally. And my husband's used it. He's had sports injuries. It helps with inflammation, helps him lift weights without worry.

it combines a number of powerful ingredients like turmeric, omega-3 fatty acids, resveratrol, and more to target inflammation and support joint health. 100% drug-free and develop to support your body's natural healing process. So don't stay stuck living with pain. Try Relief Factors three-week quick start for just 1995. It's less than a dollar a day. And you can support a veteran-owned company in the process and see the difference for yourself. That's Relieffactor.com or call 1-800-4 relief.

That's 1-800, the number four relief. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. Sad news. It was weird because watching yesterday all of the stuff with Chip and Joanna Gaines, we have more on that, watching that and then hearing the news about John MacArthur, what a study in contrast, right? One of the most, I think, of this era pastors and theologians, John MacArthur passed away at age 86 after a health battle. he led his congregation in California for, I mean, a long time, like over 50 years, the Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, California.

But they said that he faithfully endured until his race was run, and he had been hospitalized with his illness. He'd been fighting with some pneumonia, pneumonia. He'd been fighting with pneumonia. 86 years old, but what a, I mean, what a testimony. And his, I think that his life, I think it was said that. his life was his last sermon, which was pretty amazing. So our prayers are with his family. Also, the, this is an interesting thing, church hero who thwarted a potential mass casualty incident, got a new truck from a Ford dealership. You guys hear about this? He's a deacon who

helped prevent this shooting last month because he saw this armed, armed suspect entering the church. He saw that he was up to no good. And he, since he himself was on armed. he used his Ford truck and took the, I mean, he hit it. His F-150 ran over the guy and made himself a target in the process, but he saved the congregation. Pretty amazing. So he's getting a new truck. And gaming in the golden years, millions of seniors are playing video games. What?

Stick with us. Now you heard me talk about AI. I think that one of the things that AI can be very good at is in this instance with finance, with investing. Allio is macro investing for people who want to understand the big picture. It's not just some robo advisor. It is a next generation investing platform, Allio Capital, and you can go and get the app today. It uses Altitude AI, which adapts your portfolio in real time.

So I'm using Allio because it, and you can be as hands on as you want, or you can be hands off. I mean, it supports both of those types of investors. It doesn't get into meme stocks. it looks at durable, diversified strategies, sound investments over emotional trading. They have a macro dashboard that shows you how your portfolio is positioned in the real economy. They have calendar, their macro calendar that highlights the events that matter for your investments. Net worth tracker, you can track your progress in real time. But this is, if you want to understand the big picture, this is what ALEO Capital does.

And it is really, really easy to use. And it uses this top-down macro thinking to build your portfolio. There's no jargon, no hype. It's just very straightforward. So if you're ready to take control of your financial future, download the Allio app from the App Store or Google Play, text my name, or you can text my name Dana to 511-511. That's A-L-L-L-I-O Allio Capital. It is a great app. I use it. You need to download it today. You can also text data to 511-5-1-5-1. Investing involves risks. Include possible loss of principle. Past performance does not guarantee results. See terms and conditions. Text fees may apply. Not able to catch all three hours of the Dana Show? Subscribe to the full podcast and get news and laughs delivered in short, easy to digest episodes. Ideal for your busy lifestyle on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. So in France, they've got all their Bastille Day stuff out.

I mean, it's, you know, technically it's belated, but they celebrate it for several days. You know, they put their differently ordered red, white, and blue out. And they're all about they're celebrating Bastille Day, right? the storming of the Bastille, the very important day where they commemorate this from 1789, very close to our own American Revolution. What's weird is that when they finally did get to the Bastille, right, which they were saying was imprisoning a bunch of innocents, when they got to the Bastille and they stormed through, they only saved like seven.

There was only seven people in there. And it was already scheduled to be demolished. There were only seven people in there. They had some counterfeiters. Four of them were in trouble for forging financial documents and things like that. Two of the other men were dangerously mentally ill. And apparently their families and associates had them in prison. And then one, I think was like a count or something, some like a more noble dude who was found to be a sexual deviant.

and he was literally imprisoned at the request of his own family. Those are the people. It was, could you even say that that's for optics? I mean, if you're storing the best, that's all, it really wasn't a big thing and they're all excited about it. We did it. I mean, it's already, it was already scheduled to be demolished. Seven people were inside. That was it.

I think the way history makes it sound is that there were tons of people inside of the Bastille and that this was such a, you know, it's a holiday. celebrate. I really think, I think that the French Revolution was an exercise in idiocy and vanity. And it ended not with a freer nation. It ended with a dictator who did more to restore the reforms that they initially set out to champion than they themselves did. and then after Napoleon, they had a resurgence of the monarchy. And the monarchy came back. So what ultimately are they celebrating? Oh, well, it did kick off that. No, it didn't.

America did it better. I mean, I'm not just saying that Alexis de Tocqueville said that as well when he wrote about it. And he was fascinated with why it was that the. American Revolution actually had a lasting impact as compared to the French Revolution. And there were a number of different things that, you know, contributed to it. And we've talked about some of this before. But one of the biggest things was that people here, they really wanted to work. That we also respected, you know, our history, but we also really wanted, we wanted to work.

And we didn't, we didn't want a class of layabouts like the next. nobility. We wanted serious actual representation. It was ours, according to Alexis de Tocqueville, ours was a more studied sober approach. I mean, when you compare our founders and the people who led the cause to like the French Revolution leaders to people like Robespierre, who, by the way, they all turned on each other, the Thermadorian reaction, they all turned on each other part of the way through. They all decided to turn into the Spider-Man meme and everybody pointed fingers at each other. They all, and then they decided to start chopping off everybody's heads. Robespierre had his head chopped off. It was like Oprah where everybody gets a car, but instead

everyone gets their head chopped off. You could show, they love the guillotine. That was their thing. Surprise it's not on the flag. Guillotine, all the things. You know what? Kane, I just realized. Really was the, the guillotine really was the original slap chop. Sidebar. I don't have a lot of weaknesses. Okay. dogs, cute little dogs, love dogs, really any kind of animal that I can pet, and completely over-the-top sales pitches

on television. My grandma used to watch QVC, right? And she would leave it on during the day because she just liked hearing people talk, because she always had a million grandchildren running around. So she would leave it on during the day, right? And I would be down there in the summers. I'd be staying with my grandparents and I'd be helping them and I would hear themselves all these things. That's when I first heard, oh my gosh, Kane, what is it? The cleaning thing. And the guy with the beard, he's dead now.

Oxiclean? Yes, thank you. Oxaclean. I heard about that. I was like, what? Like, they made it sound like the most amazing thing ever. And I think I was like, I was in my early teens and I'm listening to some of the stuff on QVC and thinking, I need these items. I don't even, I mean, I don't even need a sewing machine, but I just, they're really making the sound amazing. You know what I mean? Things like that. Anyway, fast forward. When I first heard the commercial about the slap chop, guess who got a slap chop? This girl right here got the, I was like, that I also want to slap my vegetables into pieces.

Like, who wants to cut them like a dirty, unwashed proletariat? I want to slap, sloppity slap all my stuff into pieces. And so I got the slap chop. And I really did enjoy it, you know, with probably a little too much. And I think I still have it. I don't really use it as often because now I have like, you know, I've graduated to my fancy Japanese knives. And by mine, I mean Chris is because Chris gets the knives and I'll get all the other stuff. But I hear it and I immediately, I'm like, oh my gosh, what an amazing sales pitch.

Vince was a great. Yes, yes, he did get in trouble with crack and like hookers and all that later. Yes. That is a real thing. Don't Google it. Just live in the perfect, you know, just live in the perfect history of it. Don't Google it. But I love the slap.

I even got, Kane, I got a slap chop for my mom. I got a slapped. I purchased not one, but two slap chops because. You got it. Yeah, because you get, for the price of one, you get another. Yeah, I was like, what? So I had to do it. And I have no idea what this has to do with the French Revolution, but we wouldn't have these things if America wasn't great.

What? Makes a great gift. Well, I mean, it does. I mean, think about it. You just get all your frustrations out on whatever you're chopping. Bam! It's just amazing. But it was, you know, it was the, it's the new, it's the new modern guillotine smaller.

Everyone gets their own little guillateen. It's a very French thing. But Tocqueville, when he was analyzing the differences between the French Revolution and the American Revolution. And one of the things that he, I mean, one of the biggest things that he noted was the difference, the best way I can describe it is the difference in DNA in terms of what animates us as opposed to, as opposed to what animates the French. And this is one of the things that the founders really noted, that animating spirit of liberty, where you're not, you're not arranged around something that is tangible and that has a shelf life. It is that animating spirit of liberty that draws people. That is the thing that unites everyone. Instead of circling around something, we're united by this, this thing.

And he also understood like a fair representative republic, which is what our fact. founders really strive to do. I mean, you really start to appreciate and understand the founders and the founding of our republic and why they did what they did when you understand the history of the French Revolution. And I feel like whenever I look back, because it was trending it on social media and you can see all these people celebrating. And they act like, we look it, we did it. We invented freedom. We stormed the Bastille. You seven people were released. you know, and they were all criminals, including, you know, one pervert whose family demanded that he was, that he'd be in prison because he's so perverted. I mean, those are the people that you release.

And then you had a dictator come in and said, knock it off because they all got mad at each other and start chopping everybody's heads off. So Napoleon had to come in and be like, stop chopping everybody's heads off. And then he started instituting these little bitty republics all around France and then the larger republic and, you know, the Republic of France, the nation. It's weird to say or to note that he actually did more than they did for the cause of representation. It's weird to say it because as Americans, we are absolutely allergic to anything dictatorial. Some of us are, not the folks back in that man, Danny dude up in New York. But the rest of us, like, I am so anti-authoritarian that if you tell me no one, the smallest thing, I can't help it. It is in my nature to resist.

It is like if it like for instance, with COVID, because you guys know how such a germop I am. Well, when COVID happened and everyone was told to stay inside and wear your face masks, I was like, no. I don't really want to do it. And I would and I would purposely walk into businesses with my mask wrong. Like I'd have it over my eyes and walk into the door. Or I'd have it over my chin. I did the dumbest things. I will never forget.

I, um, we had our parents before everything was opened. We had our parents. Uh, and I took our mother. as some of the stores were open, they were visiting us. And I took our, I think it was Thanksgiving. And I took our mothers into, my mother-in-law wanted to go into, what is that bougie French store, keeping with the theme. Lassetaine.

I mean, you can just get you, if you can just get you some Avino, you know, at Walmart. Or if you really want, you can go and get some Lacetane. Do you know what Lossetane is, Cain? I do not. Tis very bougie lotions and soaps. Oh. For the boozy in you. You know, you hear about that dog in me?

It's that boogey in me. That's what it is. So I took them in there and they legit, like this very nice shop girl stopped us at the door. And she was like, before you can then, can you go and wash your hands? She wanted us to go to their little lacetine sink and wash our hands. Now, I don't do that because I battle eczema. I have, you know, mild eczema. So I can't do all that perfamy stuff on my hands.

I mean, it was basically like a bottle of perfume and a soap dispenser. And I'm like, yeah, I can't do that. And she's like, I'm like, I'm not going to go touch everything in your store. And she was so insistent on it. I was just like, oh, blank on this. And I walked out of the, I was like, I'm going to walk out of the store. And I told my mom and my mother-in-law, I'm like, you guys can go in. I'm like, I'm going to walk outside.

I was like, this is stupid. So I did. I walked outside. I've never gone into it again. I've never, I mean, that was the only, I think, time I actually went into it. but I've never had an interest in going in it again. But I was thinking there were people who came in after us that were like, oh, okay.

And I immediately, in my mind, I burned down the store already. But I just immediately was like, I don't even want to do, I'm not even doing that. Like there's just things that I just don't, in our spiritual DNA, we have this resistance to that. And we also have a BS detector. And this is what I think the French don't have. because they, I mean, how do you go from, we want equality for all to the point where we're going to chop off everyone's heads? And then you have a dictator that comes in. And then the monarchy comes back stronger than ever. We have a BS detector, whereas they do not. So they were immediately sold on turning on each other by other attention seekers.

And ultimately, that's the thing that made this whole thing fall apart. I mean, it, I saw, this thing. It said, happy best deal day, folks. Maybe it's time for Americans to learn from the French. And there was a picture of a guillotine. It says, once upon the time, the French had a real problem with the 1% and they solved it. No, you literally didn't solve it. You chopped everybody's heads off. You made a mockery of your cause. And you had to have, you know, a strong man come in there. And I don't say that necessarily is a compliment to come in and clean it up for you. Yeah, we did learn from the French. We learned what not to do from you. Right? We learned exactly what not to do from you. And I, well, most of us, I know, let me rephrase that. Most of us learned, Cain, most of us

learned. But have you heard of the Tocqueville effect? So this explains why I get nervous when things get too good. And there's a, there's actual, why are you doing that? There's science behind it. So it's based on Alexis de Tocqueville's observations on the American Revolution as compared to the French Revolution. And they were studying the link between, you know, the social equality and revolutions. And the

theory is that when things are going well and when you score wins, that's actually a prime point for a revolution. Because it's that whole theory of blood in the water, basically. Oh, you got something. So now you're going to be even more hard lined than before.

This is why I always get, you know, really nervous when things get real nice because that tends to does kind of tend to seem to go that way, doesn't it? We have a lot more to discuss. We're also going to get into, like I said, the recisions package. We've got, I just realized we had not one, but we're going to have all this sent it on today. Just might as well. We're going to talk about rescissions. We're going to talk about the budget. And one of the saddest headlines I've ever heard in my life, kids are turning to AI for friendship. I could just cry. That is, that headline's killing me. So we got a lot to depressing stuff

to get into apparently. Sorry guys. As we move, the folks who help set up this, this is the saddest thing ever, right? The folks who help partner with us, all family pharmacy. If you haven't taken advantage of all family pharmacy, you absolutely should. This is a website that I love. I've got, I mean, I can just type like all in my search bar and it immediately opens. All family pharmacy has all of the medications you need, not just your daily medications and your antibiotics, but also the emergency kits that you might need. You also have any medications and supplements for brain and cellular health, like methylene blue and so much more. The NAD plus, your body's natural energy booster, all of those things.

They have it. And, of course, the Ivermectin, the hydroxychloroquine, all of it, the emergency kits. It's a pharmacy that you can trust that doesn't gatekeep. And they make it easy to access all of these innovative treatments. Your doctor's prescription is included. Everything ships to your door. You can get it as quick as two to four days. Overnight as well.

If you're in a pinch, you can get things overnighted to you. I've done that before with some antibiotics. Medical freedom is American freedom, and this is what All Family Pharmacy understands, and this is perhaps one of the biggest things. Everything that they use, all of their materials, all of their medications, it's 100% domestically sourced. So you're getting USA materials and sourcing. That is so incredibly important. I can't understate it or overstated enough. Visit AllFamily Pharmacy.com slash Dana and use Code Dana 10 to get 10% off your order.

And while you're there, check out their full list over 200 medications available, including Ivermectin, antibiotics, and more. That's all family pharmacy.com slash Dana. Code Dana 10. Get the lowdown on the latest news with a side of laughs. Whenever you want, subscribe to the Dana Show podcast on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. What I'm getting into is this stunk as for someone who's a old,

time TV show Superman guy trying to get entertained for a couple hours and wants to see Superman, this movie was pure torture to sit through. Torture. I mean, I'll tell you this. If my name was on the critics, I'd hide it. That's how bad it was. This was two hours of this new Superman. It wasn't Christopher Reed, but he was okay, Superman. Two hours of him getting the crap beat out of him. Who wants to see Superman get beat up for two he's getting beat up by everybody. Plus, you have

other superheroes in the movie. I didn't go there to see some guy named Mr. Terrific. I didn't go there to see Leck, you know, the Green Lantern or some lady named Hawks or other, I don't know who even know who she was. Okay, these other superheroes who he calls on, who needs

other superheroes? I think that's hysterical. And I think he's right. Who are the other people? And you don't want to see Superman get beat up because it's Superman. He's literally the strongest thing on God's Green, well, not, off of God's Green Earth and on God's Green Earth. He's the super strong.

He's from Krypton. Why in the world would he get beat up by anybody? Do they think that makes it more realistic? Because you're talking about a space alien who was orphaned and adopted and wore his blanket, his indestructible blanket that he came to Earth in, that was his cape. Why would he be beaten up by anyone? Can I just say, I think the dog in it is stupid? I love dogs.

I don't want to see a super dog. You're just kidding me? They have a super dog? Stop it. I don't want to see no super dog. Mr. Terrific. What is that? Shut up.

No. You can't have anybody else when you have Superman. It's Superman or it's nobody. I just, I don't know. I get it that they're trying to, like, I guess, flesh out some franchises. That was a funny review, though. I'm no, I'm not going to go see it. I'm not going to go see that movie.

I don't like superhero movies anyway. I get tired of them. I liked it before there was one out every week. Stick with us. We've got more in store. Second hour up next. Like-minded folks who make great products. You guys know, these have been a long-time sponsor of the show, Superbeats, these folks. They have a new product called SuperBoreen. It's all about healthy metabolism and healthy blood sugar support. And you can get it at Sam's Club now for like less than a dollar a day when you go in. I mean, it's that affordable. And you're going to see the difference. It's such a great product. And they have really, really done everything possible to deliver a really good concentration without any GI distress with this. They use a unique. burbering. It's been clinically studied. It delivers nearly 10 times higher the absorption rate than standard burbering. And it's one easy to swallow capsule a day. You get all of the benefits in one concentrated capsule a day. And they include grape seed extract for greater tolerability so there's

no GI distress. Find both the new superbring and the number one best selling Superbeats heart shoes at Sam's Club. Restock your heart health support with the Superbeats and expand your routine with superbering. Start today and get on the road to better cardiovascular health support. But I wouldn't put too much emphasis on one number. I think it's the trend. And I think one thing that Wall Street, a lot of economists, market in general got wrong early on, was that tariffs were going to cause a substantial price level rise, which just hasn't happened. That's Scott percent who's discussing the inflation and the increase in prices,

because people have seen that and that, I mean, I think having these deals, keeping to make these deals is going to help so much with it. But people are, they're still struggling. Our economy is not all the way. It's not all the way back yet. Welcome to the program. Dana Lash, with you. We're at the top of the second hour. I was looking at some of the prices overall.

I mean, it's not going to go away overnight. And we got, yeah, we have Charles Payne who's going to be on with us this week to talk about some of this. I think, and I think that percent is, I feel like he's done a very good job. I like Scott percent. Can't you like Scott percent? I like him. I love Scott percent. I feel like he has a, well, first, I feel like he understands math.

I feel like, you know, he gets math. But I also feel like he is sort of, he tempers, I think, some of the more aggressive individuals within that orbit in the administration, who I think would play a little bit harder ball in terms of tariffs or who also want to slow the wheels on cutting spending, I think, as well. But I think he's, I like Scott Besant. And this still, though, is an issue. And it's going to be an issue for some time.

because I don't think, I mean, whether or not the price increases are related to tariffs, I think that's, you can debate that. I think you can, with some things. I think that in some instances, it doesn't affect anything. It's not, it hasn't yet. None of these tariffs have taken effect yet. So it's not even actually a thing. Yeah, but people can raise the prices in anticipation of it.

Yes, which is different than tariffs affecting prices. And that's the nuance that people aren't talking. talking about. Exactly. And it's not in every industry. That's the other thing. Certain things, people are making plans in anticipation of having of tariffs and their increasing prices. And then in others, they're not. I mean, it's not, so it's not, it's not something as simple as saying that it's affecting everything and it's contributing to, you know, price increases across the board. It just simply isn't. But I like Scott Busson. I feel like he's, um, he's like, he's like, the steady hand that you want on the wheel, right, when you're going over a rough terrain.

I think he's very good. And he also, when Trump was saying that Jerome Powell needs to leave, when Trump calls for someone to leave, I got to be honest, I don't take it as seriously as I would, a Scott Besant saying it, because Trump goes after like really good Republicans and is like, if you don't get on board with big spending, you need to be a primary. So I'm like, you know, he's mad. He's going to, you know. So when he says that someone needs to leave, I feel like he says it kind of a lot, And so I don't put as much stock in it. But when Scott is like, yeah, I think maybe he should leave. And he has been, he said this a while, he said that he thinks he should, that he thinks that, that Jerome Powell should go.

He suggested that he should step down when his, when his term is chairs up in May of next year. He goes, traditionally the Fed chair also steps down as governor. There's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination. And he goes, I can tell you, I think it would be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also. It makes sense. that's all you got to say. You don't need to be like, oh, they got to go there or whatever. That's fine and dandy.

But then you have a percent that comes out. And it's like, well, traditionally, so yes, he needs to leave. Do you see how calming that is? How nice it is. But he says he did confirm, and this was something that Fortune reported this morning, that they are already moves underway to replace Powell. And he said it's a formal process. It's already started.

He said that, and again, because his term expires in May of next year, he said it's a formal process already started he said there are a lot of good candidates inside and outside the federal reserve so interesting who would it be i'm curious and how would it i've never paid attention to well i mean i've noticed it but i've never obsessively scrutinized it you mean who would be fed chair that's outside of the sphere of government you mean or after power i mean i don't think that's can i be honest i don't think that's something that americans are like okay let's talk about who the i mean a lot of people just don't like the No, you're right. The people that are paying attention see what Powell did when he lowered rates just before the election last year in hopes to give Democrats a bump. Well, the same justification he used to lower rates then. It was a much worse economic climate than we are now. And he's leaning heavily on the tariff excuse, even though we have a trend since tariffs were announced of inflation coming down. I think it is very political. And I think it's rightfully, he's called the leave.

Yes. Now, who are the other people that are in the running? Kevin Warsh is, and I'm saying his name properly because there's an R in it. There's a W-A-R-S-H-H-K. I was going Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor and Wall Street veteran. He apparently has crisis management experience. He's close to the Trump administration. Michelle Bowman, who's the current vice chair of the Fed. Christopher Waller, sitting Fed governor. He's got academic credentials and some policy expertise. So they apparently have like, there's no shortage of names.

I mean, it's pretty wonky. Gets into the, I mean, is anybody, like you all know these people, right? You guys know them, you obsess? No, nobody knows who these people are. Nobody knows. People, because everything is too damn big. There's too many things. There's too many things to keep track of. My gosh. Too many things. We need it simple. We need government to be made more simple instead of bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger. Now, you guys are many of the saddest headline ever. This is so depressing. Kids are turning to AI for a friendship. This is a British study. They quoted one kid as saying, I don't have anyone else to talk to. A new UK report reveals children are turning to chat bots, not just for homework help,

but for emotional advice, because they have nobody else. Some are saying that this is going to give TikTok a run for its money. I think TikTok needs to die personally. I'm so tired of it. I think people obsess over everything. I was reading this piece that was questioning the standards of American beauty

and the destruction that social media has wrought. And I agree with it. And I think this is, This is all the chatbots, all this stuff. This facilitation is going to take over TikTok, I think. But there's this report published as a nonprofit called Internet Matters. They surveyed over 1,000 children and 2,000 parents across the UK. 64% of kids are using AI chatbots for everything from schoolwork to practicing tough conversations.

Over a third said that talking to the chatbot feels like they're talking to a friend. And remember, these chatbots have no built-in safety checks at all. And they said that 42% of children said they use it to help with schoolwork because they get quick answers. Can I just pause that for a minute? Do you know why people like chatbots for research and getting quick answers? Because the algorithms of the search engines are heinous. Progressive partisanship has pushed us into the arms of AI. It absolutely has.

disagree with that? It's, it's absolutely, I think it absolutely has. Think about it. When you research, I can't use Google to research anything. Google is one of the most useless things ever right now. It is useless. And it's AI feeds off of that same partisanship. When you ask AI a question, if you're wanting to get an answer, you have to be so specific with your prompt. and I think people are still figuring out, you know, the specificity of prompts and what works better and what doesn't. But if you don't put in a few key words, you're going to get just a bunch of progressive garbage. Google is horrible to use. It is one of the worst things ever.

It is a horrible search engine. It's horrible to use for research. It is as unreliable as Wikipedia. And by the way, Wikipedia is so unreliable. it is barred from consideration in a courtroom, just so you know. Wikipedia is disallowed in courtrooms because it doesn't meet their standard, their evidentiary standards. That's how bad Wikipedia is.

So all this progressive partisanship has really pushed us into this. So people, instead of, you know, trawling the Internet, trying to find one fact-based thing so you can learn more about something, they think, well, if I just ask a, AI and then I can get it quicker with AI. And depending on how you prompt AI, you can. You can prompt AI from, you know, explain XYZ from American conservative perspective. Well, if you don't, if you just leave it at that, you're going to get a bunch of cringy, hokey, red meat platitudes. You got to even be more specific and drill down. It is, it's wild. I don't really use AI a whole lot. I mean, I have experimented with it. I think that people need to be careful with it when they want to use it for

quick answers because there are people that are being busted all over social media for using it really quickly. And remember, AI, AI can't observe the world and learn things by itself. The only way that AI is powerful is through human observation, and that's its weakness. It only observes what we observe. It observes what what humans observe. It observes through us and learns through us. And so this, you're, you're, it's limited in that respect. But I've, I've experimented with it. I've done certain things where, you know, I'm like, well, what happened and compare answers? You got to be real careful in using it, though, as, you know, like a formal response because he does get things wrong, like notoriously so. It gets things wrong. It will, and it depends on what it pulls from.

It could pull from a popular page or somebody's social media account where they have it wrong, but it, because it can cite it and say, oh, this is, this exists on the internet, so this must be accurate and present it to you as true. So it's not perfect yet. It's not perfect yet. So I don't know. I, um, I, I don't, do you use it a little? lot? Do you use, have you used AI a lot? No, I don't. Um, I used it for that one video where it was baby Dana, but that was just one time. Yeah, it was just like imaging and you know, some chat GPT's used a lot. Um, Grock used a lot. Um, I think AI, are you mean? Yeah, mecha hit. I think it's changed now. But how sad is it though that you have a quarter of kids,

they use chatbots for advice. They ask what to wear how to navigate friendships. So you know the other thing that people have been doing. So women in their late teens and early 20s have been using AI to, they like put a, they give it a photo of themselves and then they ask AI, how would you improve my looks?

And I read this story. So this is about this piece that I read. I'm going to send this. I'm going to have this as a separate thing for those of you who subscribe over at Substack because it's fascinating. Plastic surgeons have said that based on this idealized, like social media has ruined beauty. And they said that now they're starting to see people come in,

like women in their 20s go in with these like, um, AI generated images that are of themselves, but like they ask AI, what would you improve? And then AI changes and does all this stuff. How sad is this? So kids are lonely. Women are wanting to change their appearance due to AI. Where are we going? with this. I think it's a toxic brew when you have, there's some value in being a victim, right? So you sort of splint to yourself off in whatever category you think you are

so you can become this valuable victim. But then that also separates you from connecting with other people. So you're not really connecting with, so now you go to this chatbot thing because it's not judgmental and, you know, it's like a new thing. And it feels good, I guess, for these kids who aren't connecting.

AI and COVID have just killed. Yeah. socialization. They really have. It's so incredibly sad. But I mean, I think there's certain things that AI is good for, but then stuff like this, the human aspect of it, I don't know. Nothing beats meat space. But what is it going to take for humans to realize that again? I don't know. We got a lot more on the way. We're going to, I know we have Senator Eric Schmidt coming up on rescission specifically, and we're going to be talking with Rand Paul. So we inadvertently, we have two senators today on very different but should be very interesting. As we move, our partners that help bring you the program,

it's our friends over at Patriot Mobile. The only Christian conservative cell phone service that is in existence. They want to save you money. Patriot Mobile is like-minded. And I just got to tell you, I think it's so incredibly important to make sure that your money is being spent, you know, according to your values, right? Like, you want to work with like-minded companies. And that used to not be a big thing for me. But then over the past like 10 years, when you look at these, because everybody has a political action committee, when you go and look and see where these cell phone services are donating money, one of the reasons I left my cell phone service over a decade ago and switched to Patriot Mobile is because the pack for mine was donating

hundreds of thousands of dollars to gun control. Like, I cannot do this. I'm literally funding the thing that I vote against at the ballot box. Patriot Mobile makes it so easy to switch. They have a 100% US-based customer service team. You can keep your number, keep your phone upgrade. It is so easy. my mom did it in like 10 minutes, I think. Like switched her whole thing up to Patriot Mobile in like less than 10 minutes. It's that easy and if my mom can do it, you can do it. But they also have cutting edge technology. It's super

easy. No store visits, no hassles. You can even add a second line to the same phone. And they have the best nationwide coverage on all three networks. So you're connected wherever it is that you go. They have tailor-made plans for you and you can get a free month of service using promo code Dana.

So visit PatriotMobil.com slash Dana 9702 Patreon. Get a free month of service using promo code Dana. Switch today and defend freedom every time you call or text. That's PatriotMobil.com slash Dana 972 Patriot. And now all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. Where, okay, here's the headline.

Oh, horrible. Man dies after falling into burrito factory meat grinder. Okay, number one, there's a burrito factory? Number two, what kind of meat? And number three, I don't eat this, right? I don't think I do. It's, uh, he fell into a meat grinder at Vernon food processing at facility Sunday night, 19 year old. Tina's burritos.

He fell into the meat grinder. They said they're describing it as an industrial accident. OSHA was out there. Vernon is five miles south of downtown L.A. So he was in a, it's, I guess it's called Tina's burritos. That's where he, oh my gosh. I mean, you know, it's a gruesome way to go. But if there's other gruesome.

Throw away the meat grinder. Yeah. Throw it away. Yeah, you think it should just be. Yeah, because you can't really claim that, right? Yeah, it's not. Oh, whoa. A Charlotte man was jailed because someone used his lost ID to steal a car.

Yeah, so they stole the guy who had already been victimized. Jordan Walker, he spent several nights in jail. He's a high school teacher. And he lost his driver's license. Someone stole it, and they used it to commit a crime. And it took him a year to clear his name. And he said, I felt like I was drunk. dreaming. He was at a food festival and he went to pay something for something he noticed he didn't have

his driver's license. He flagged down Park Security, reported it. And then when he went back to Florida for a cruise, he got held up at customs and they requested, they arrested him. He spent three days in jail. Can you imagine? Oh my gosh. We got a lot more. I went a little long last segment, so apologies because this segment is shorter. But we have Senator Rand Paul. He's coming up next. Stick with us. Burn a gun. It's always good to have a diversified weapons array. I mean, I will always tell people to carry, learn how to use a firearm, go get trained. And if you, you know, you have to get your concealed carry. If your state requires it, then get it. But I also realize, too, that there are instances where you might be disarmed because of gun-free zones or private

property restrictions or other municipal restrictions. And so instead of being left to the fates of criminals, then maybe just be more proactive with your protection. You still have options. And this is where Burna comes in. They have all different kinds, but I think for this specifically, you should check out the Burna SD or the Burna CL. CL is the newest. It stands for Compact Launcher. It's smaller than the Burna SD by 38% reduction in size. But you also have that legal flexibility. It's legal in all 50 states. There's no background checks or permits. They can ship it right to your door. There's no waiting periods. And like I said, it doesn't care about all those restrictions. This is a great idea, too, as college kids think about going back to school, if they're too young to carry a handgun, but they're

living on their own. They want to make sure that they have something that can deter threats and give them, you know, some increase their chances of survival of heaven forbid they're facing a serious serious criminality against them. It's an effective deterrent. You need to check it out. It's B.YRNA, berna.com slash Dana, the SD, which is their most popular pistol or the CL. And again, it shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can disable deter threats from up to 50 feet away. Burna.com slash Dana. The CL is the newest one compact launcher. BYRNN. dot com slash dana burn out ready when you are the dana show podcast your fast funny and informative news companion for those always on the move subscribe on youtube apple or wherever you get your podcasts

welcome back to the program dana lash with you we're at the bottom of the second hour and you can listen coast to coast and one of our hundreds of affiliates and check out the stream channel 347 direct tv also on x rumble where the chat is so one of the things that we've learned especially about this auto pin stuff is so many of these signatures from former President Biden. It was done by an auto pen. I mean, thousands of them. We're talking about thousands of them. This New York Times piece, can't believe I'm citing them, but give credit to where it's due, was stating that his surrogates were trying to excuse it by saying, oh, well, we, during these meetings, he would, you know, he'd orally say, yes, you know, he'd say that this is, this is the process. We're going to go ahead. We'll either

issue a commutation. We'll grant a pardon. And then his secretary, who managed the auto pin would note it without any other record for taxpayers or for members of Congress. And then that was the procedure that they used for this. So how do you how do you fact check it? It's one of the most bizarre things ever. And it brings up the question as to, well, how many of these were legitimate? The only one that he actually signed was that of Hunter Biden. You know who else's had an auto pen? It was Anthony Fauci. Fauci's, pardon, had an auto pen. And this is something that Senator Rand Paul brought up in a tweet. He retweeted it and just simply said,

I'm going to reissue my criminal referral of Anthony Fauci to Trump's DOJ. Senator Rand Paul of the great state of Kentucky joins us now via video. Senator Paul, always a pleasure to have you. Tell us about this. Because this is not the standard operating procedure for use of an auto pen,

to just mention it in a meeting and then the secretary manages it. You know, and for all we know, they could have been asking if he wanted jello for dinner. You know, I mean, the thing is, we have no idea what said or when he said it. Now we have this assistant named Jeff Seitz and it's like, well, gosh, I guess the president was this guy named Jeff Seens. And it's like, really? No, and these are pardons that are also preemptive for any crime. They don't even specify a crime and they're

preemptive for a period of time like Hunter Biden. So no, it's a crazy notion. And we've compiled the evidence for him committing a felony and lying to Congress. We submitted it several times to the Biden administration, at least twice, without results. We've submitted it before to the Trump DOJ, but now we're submitting it again, because I think it would be a good test case, too. The only way you can tell whether or not these auto-pinned pardons are valid would be to go to court. And then the people have to testify, and they have to say under oath, who gave them permission

to do it? And the question is, will they say under oath President Biden told him to do it and directed this when maybe he didn't? So I think we do need to get this under oath. And the Fauci case would be a perfect example to get it started. I think I completely agree with that. And it really comes down to, as you were mentioning, you touched on this consent. I mean, was because if you don't have consent for this, then you don't have a pardon.

You don't have, you don't have clemency. You don't have any of this. Yeah. So there's a lot of questions this raises. But I can remember the first time the auto pen came up on legislation. It was during President Obama's term. And I can't, I don't think it was Obama care. but there was a big bill that passed, and he was on a plane to India.

And, you know, if you don't sign a bill physically within a certain period of days, it's called a pocket veto. It has to be affirmed. And it wasn't going to be affirmed in time. It would have been a pocket veto. And he just announced he was doing it by autopen, but he did agree to sign it in person when he came back at least. So they acknowledged that there were problems with an auto pen,

and that the problems would ultimately be cured by the president, signing the bill. But in this case, we have pardons that were never signed, no documentation, other than the words that we're getting from assistance. And really, the pardon power didn't go to an assistant to an assistant to the president. The pardon power goes to the president. That's a great point. We're talking with Senator Rand Paul.

And you have, have you reissued it officially? Have you sent it back to the DOJ, this criminal referral? Yes. We've sent it to DOJ. and we're hoping that this GOJ will be more open to doing something on this. We think there is an investigation going on still of Anthony Fauci within either DOJ or FBI. We want that to continue.

But at some point in time, I think there should be an indictment and a challenge of whether or not this pardon is valid or not. I completely agree with that. And his general Millie, there's a number. It's very interesting to me that only Hunter Biden was the one that got the actual signature. And all of the other thousands of them are identical. One of the other things that you had issued was this, you have, you tweeted out the report on Secret Service and the failures that were a year ago now. I am, I think I can speak for a lot of people.

I'm really shocked as to how little we still know. I feel like in any other circumstance, we would know not just everything about, you know, this, this attempted killer involved, but we would know exactly why is it that regular average everyday people were seeing holes in security that Secret Service trained to do this should have noticed the moment they were boots on the ground in Butler. I mean, to not have the rooftop secured, the water tower secured, tree lines. I mean, I'm a civilian and I'm looking at the lay of the land thinking, I can't believe there's all these gaps. What is the most shocking thing you found, Senator? The errors were inexcusable and the errors were multiple. It was a cascade of failures that led to this. Probably the most worrisome is that for

six months, the Trump team and the Trump security team, Secret Service, advocated for having snipers or counter-sniper's there. The counter-sniper's ultimately did take out the shooter this time. As the shooter popped up to shoot again, he would have certainly killed the president and other people. They took him out at that time. This was the first rally that the counter-sniperes were granted. They'd been denied time and time again. And as you know, President Trump had these enormous rallies, likely unprecedented in the history of the country, at least in the modern history of the country, we've not seen anything like it, and he needed those counter-sniper's and they were denied time after time.

But then they lied about it. Speaker says, oh, we never denied any assets to him. That was a lie. But then as we investigated and we asked people, who was in charge, no one was in charge. One female agent said she wasn't in charge, another woman was in charge. That woman said, no, this man was in charge. And he went around in a circle with everybody pointing a finger and nobody's saying they're in charge. Ultimately, when there was a walkthrough, we said, who's in charge for that building?

Who was supposed to make sure that that building with a clear line of sight had one of our people on it? Nobody would admit to it. They couldn't get their own drone up. Their technology didn't work to put their own drone up for surveillance. But then the worst of it is common sense should have stopped the president from being on the stage. 45 minutes before he took the stage, they see this suspicious person, large backpack, and a range finder. Now, that alone is not enough, obviously, to use violence against this person, but it's enough to look for him. And if you can't find him, it's enough to stop the procedure. That would be common sense. But even as you get closer with about three minutes ago, people are pointing at the roof saying, man on a roof, man on

a roof. No one sees a weapon yet, but obviously that's enough to remove the president, too. you have three minutes is a long time in a situation like this. Nobody takes him off. Finally, someone yells, man on a roof with a gun. That is relayed to the main tent where the security is. You've got 45 seconds, and he doesn't tell anything. And he was never even fired or even suspended, the guy that was in charge at the security tent,

who should have immediately radioed the people around the president on the dais, the stage. He should have immediately, there were so many chances to remove him. And it probably would have saved, you know, if the president weren't there, he probably wasn't going to shoot, you know, the bystander, the Trump supporter who died that day might have survived as well. So it's just a tragedy.

But to my mind, they didn't fire anybody so one of these people could be in charge of the next rally somewhere. Oh, my gosh. That's a terrifying thought. That's terrifying. Because from what I understand, I mean, just a temporary suspension on a wrist slap and that's pretty much it. I don't even think there hasn't been any.

reports of top-down reevaluation of their protocol, even for future events. I mean, we, what are assurances are given to taxpayers? Even the suspensions, they wouldn't tell us anybody was getting suspended. We agreed that we wouldn't print the names because we thought it was unfair to print their names, because often people try to do the right thing and they messed up, but I don't think we have to vilify them in the press. So we agreed not to use the names, but they still wouldn't give it to us. Some of the suspensions only happened two weeks ago. I sent a subpoena to them and said, if you will not tell us what you did to punish the agents that messed up, I'm going to subpoena it. That's when they decided to actually punish a couple of the agents with a two-week unpaid suspension.

But the person in charge of security in the tent that day was allowed to retire with no punishment. Two weeks. Two weeks. And this is a year later that this happens. This is absolutely stunning to me. because when you have negligence, Senator, this bad, people, you know, people who are not prone to conspiracy theories, regular average everyday people see this and they ask, was this on purpose or are they just so negligent and everyone knew that they were negligent that it was allowed to happen, which also seems malicious? I mean, there's no way to slice it to where it looks good or redeemable. My conclusion is incompetence and just not good at their job. And I think some people were promoted for reasons other than their skill.

And I think that's always a mistake in a very sensitive job like this. It's sort of like my wife responds and says, you know, somebody my size, I'm not very tall, shouldn't protect the president who's six three. So you really, you know, nothing against women protecting him. I agree. But a five three woman is not big enough to block a shot. And that's a sad part of what you say someone's job is, but that's what their job is. And they are protected.

Hopefully they block the shot with, you know, an armored vest or something. But really, the people around someone need to be their size are bigger. I completely agree. If you can't pick up your principal and you can't shield your principle, you shouldn't be protecting your principal. And if you're there anyway and you're not able to see threats or gaps in security, that's doubly bad. I think that way you're, that's completely correct. What is there anything in place? Because you were saying that now, I mean, they haven't even held anybody accountable until a year later.

to improve this or to like message to the public that, yes, we are improving this. We have re-evaluated our security. This is never going to happen again. Well, they got more money. That doesn't mean anything. So when someone fails in government, that's usually what we do. We either promote them or give them a pay raise or give them more money. So they got a bill.

The big beautiful bill gave them another billion dollars. I don't think this was ever money. This was lack of oversight, lack of having someone in charge, lack of responsibility. really like you say you're not a security expert neither am i but i could walk around at three o'clock two hours before this and say okay what are the different places where a shooter could be like a roof are all of them covered because half the people were saying oh no we told the local police to go up there the local police saying no no we told the secret service but really the bucksed off with who's ever in charge that person has to walk around on a final check and sometimes mistakes are made but you

point out the mistakes and you fix it and and no one ever did that and there was a lot of really people more concerned with covering their reputation and make sure they weren't punished than it was getting to the truth on this. I do believe we got to the truth. There are some reforms. They are putting someone, there's a name of someone in charge now at the rallies or at the protective detail. There's more a direct line of you report to this person, the buck stops with this person, which is it's a difficult job, but there has to be one person that the buck stops with. The communications was a disaster. They chose not to use the walkie-talkies and they could have gotten

from the local police. They choose to use cell phones. But if you've ever been in a sporting event and tried to use your cell phone, guess what? There are a lot of other cell phones. You sometimes can't get a signal. So a cell phone for your security is not a good thing. But they also should have had an immediate, like I would think that the one thing that saves a life is being able to say, take the president off the stage and it's announced to everybody. Every person hears it simultaneously instead of, well, maybe we might want to take it, you know, you have to act decisively. You have to say off the stage now, no one ever did that, nor do I think they were really prepared for something like that. And you could do it and be wrong. Let's say this guy turned out not to have

a gun in his backpack. He turned out not to be a shooter. Then it's an inconvenience. The rally gets delayed 20 minutes. They arrest him for questioning or stop him for questioning. But they never found him. But it was like two or three policemen saw him. And policemen have good instance. Local policemen have been doing this for a while. They just have good instincts for, so there's something wrong about this kid. Big backpack, range finder. And then my goodness,

half the two in the crowd are a yelling man on a roof. And that still was, I think, maybe 90 seconds left until the shooting happened. There was still time to get him off the stage. It is one of the most frustrating things to watch those videos where people are desperately trying to get the attention of Secret Service. And you were right.

Local law enforcement, they reacted. Secret service, I hate to say it. They were scratching their heads. And it's all visible in the video. Everybody can see it in the video. Senator Rand Paul, his book, The Great COVID Cover Up, we are going to be watching to see what happens with this criminal referral. Senator, you're one of our favorite people in Congress, and we appreciate you standing strong, especially on spending really quickly. Resisions package. Your thoughts on this, because you mentioned pocket veto. I know they're trying to do some of these pocket rescissions. You think that's going to be successful? We're going to vote today. The House barely passed it. It was $9 billion. Now, I'm voting for it.

it, but you have to realize $9 billion is a rounding error. It's a tiny, tiny little bit. The deficit this year is going to be about $2 trillion. So $9 billion is really a very small number in comparison to $2 trillion. It's not going to fix the deficit, but it has to be done. It's a start. And my point is, if the Senate cannot pass $9 billion, most of its welfare to foreign countries. If we can't cut welfare to foreign countries, how are we ever going to get started on looking at our own entitlement problems? So we have to be able to get started. to pass this. We have to get on it. And right now it hangs in the balance. We got somewhere between three and five people who are going wobbly on us and we're not sure if we can get on the bill.

We're going to find out later today, I think. Well, we'll be watching. Senator Rand Paul, always a pleasure. Thank you so much for your time, Senator. As we move, our partners that help bring you the program, it's the folks over at Angel Studios. Over at Angel Studios, they are making the films that you want to see. And so you can get free tickets to every theatrical release from their They have all different kinds of films, animated films for younger ages, films for families, dramas, everything. And when you become a premium member of Angel Studios' Guild, you get free tickets, like I said. You also get to stream all of their stuff whenever you want, but you're also helping to shape what they're green lighting. So what it is that they're releasing.

You're shaping the entertainment that is going out and circulating in culture. And that's incredibly important, especially if you've listened to us, talk about the importance of culture at all. it's unapologetically American. I mean, these stories, it's not, they're not, how do I put it? It's not like it's preaching to you or it's not like a lecture. You know how some people set out to make these sorts of films that have a conservative bent and they prioritize the ideology over the art of storytelling. And that's not what Angel Studios does, which is one of the reasons why I like them and wanted to work with them because I think they're one of the only ones that get it. But when you visit Angel.com slash Dana, you're joining over a million Americans that are taking back control

of entertainment. So join the Angel Guild and help fund. the future of the storytelling that you want to see that reflects your values. And plus premium members, get those free theater tickets, add free streaming. So much more. Become a premium member today at angel.com slash Dana. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida, man. So here's a headline.

Oh, and there's footage. Of course there is. Of course, Marion County, Florida. man shoots a flare gun and hurls money at a deputy on the highway, Marion County, Florida. So they did a welfare check on this guy who was walking down Highway 19 during early morning hours. And then he apparently fired a flare gun at a deputy's patrol car. This was like four in the morning that this was happening. It was a routine check, but then it went chaotic because they were concerned.

I mean, as any police officer would be. I mean, for crying out light, you see a guy who's in the middle of the road at night, like 4 a.m. walking without pants. And then when the cop pulls over to help, because clearly something's wrong, the guy turns around and fires a flare gun at the car. Okay. The deputy said that the individual, his last, let's see, what's his name, Jacob Caldwell, was acting erratically. He had his pants off through money at the deputy, wouldn't comply with orders. He was taken into custody.

Oh, he's like a repeated convicted felon. So, yeah, that's, uh, and tomorrow I'll tell you about the bungling beach thief who claimed to be a federal agent. and got his car stuck in the sandwall trying to get away we have eric schmidt senator schmidt coming up as well stick with us on the attorney general briefed on the d oj and fbi i review the findings of that review the attorney general on what on the on the on the on the joj and fbi on what subject on the review of the files a very very quick briefing did she tell you what did she tell you about the review and specifically Did she tell you at all that your name appeared in the fight? No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing,

and in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen. And I would say that, you know, these files were made up by Comey, they were made up by Obama, they were made up by the Biden. And we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia, hoax, with all of the different things that we had to go through, we've gone through years of it, but she's handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release. On Texas.

Interesting. So whatever he thinks, because it's weird, because his daughter-in-law was out there saying, oh, yeah, there's some files, and we're going to release some stuff. There's more to come. Welcome back to the program, Daniel Lash with you. We're at the top of this third hour. That was like just 15 minutes ago, POTUS, who was remarking on it. So he's backing Bondi up.

And I got to say, like, I'm critical of Pam Bondi. I don't think that this is at her direction to say that these, oh, well, they know these files aren't here. I feel like all of these people campaigned on this and then vied for these highly coveted administration jobs for which one must be appointed by POTUS. And then when they got there, I think that they, they, they, they, they. I think it's either two things. They realize that, oh, my gosh, we've got to keep everything under lock and key because so many people are implicated. Or it was all smoke and mirrors designed to agitate the base when POTUS wasn't in office. I don't know.

I mean, we've been talking about this stuff enough. He kind of points to the latter in his comment when he talks about Comey and Obama making all this stuff up. If he was in there, they would have here. Let me lay it out like this. And this is just me speculating and exploring, not speculating even, exploring the topic out loud. I don't think, and I've said this before, I don't think that he is implicated in any of this at all. Because if he was, they had to come out with it somehow, number one. They would have literally sacrificed one of their own if one of their own was also implicated just to take him out.

And if you don't think that they would have done that, I want you to look at how they ran their last presidential election or their last party's nominee. Biden and Harris. They will switch people out. They will sacrifice people. They don't care. So I think that it doesn't matter how many people would have had to fall on the sword if they could have gotten him. Right. So that's number one. But I don't think that he's implicated. I don't. I mean, nobody really knows. We were told the whole reason that people are even reacting to all of this is because all of these elected officials essentially assured us that this stuff existed. We didn't make this up. We didn't sit around and pull stuff out of the ether and go, oh, my gosh. Well, let's see. Was, you know, is there, is there a client list?

Do we have, we didn't do that. All of these elected officials were doing this. And I noticed that they say files and then client list. They're very separate things. Very separate things. Now, there's Jolaine Maxwell. She was saying that there was a client list. Now, she could be saying anything just to get out of jail.

I don't know. But she was trying to insist that there was some kind of a client list. And then there's the story going around that, oh, my gosh, no one's going to let her testify. Or no one's going to let her go before Congress and talk about it. I don't know if I believe that. I just don't know why people are saying get over it and move on. How do you tell people that? I've seen people say this now in different venues.

after I watch them in different venues, literally, like, go on stage and wind up the crowd by talking about the client list and how there is a need to go after every single one of these people. So you can see how people are very confused by this, right? And I think that Jolene Maxwell had said,

yes, she's ready to reveal the truth. She offered to testify before Congress, and there's questions as to you know, whether or not that's going to happen. I think Trump remarked on it as well. But he was saying that, you know, they've been talking about him forever. There's, you know, there's nothing here. He had, one of the sources said she was never offered any kind of plea deal.

She'd be more than happy to sit before Congress, tell her story. I think her story was already told in trial, right? Like, what else do you have to tell? It's like, what is it, that ginger and his can't cook a damn thing or cut a vegetable, zealous briefcase wife? Megan. Me, Me, Megan and the Wining Ginger. It's like them constantly going. I just, we need to tell our story after they did a series and multiple interviews and a book and all this stuff. It's like, no, everybody knows. There's nothing new here. I don't, I think

everybody knows her story. She, she could have, she could have thrown out a client list to save her backside during a trial and she didn't. So I don't know why this is, right? Am I just being too, like, you know? Yeah. I, the way I look at it is these files, I'm sure, exist. Now, wait a minute. Files, do you think files are a client list? Do you think there's a client list? Now, I don't know if there's a client list or not.

I believe that there should be. I mean, they had to keep track of something somehow. Yeah, there should be some sort of list of some sort of people. And I mean, we saw the manifest from the flights, right? Right. We saw all that. So we know there's going to be names involved. So there's probably some sort of.

sort of list. I think this is either, I'm hoping it's a ruse by this administration to kind of use it as distraction and maybe there are some information there that they may be holding back for midterms. But, oh no. You don't think so? I don't think so. No. You don't think so? No. All right. Well, you've been impressed with every October surprise that's ever been? Have I been impressed with it? Right. That's my point. I mean, it's not about being, it's about how effective it is just before an election. And I don't know. I think the longer they wait, if anything comes out of it, it's going to be suspicious because people waited so long.

Just get it out there now. That's why I think Laura Trump said there will be files that will be released. Now, she used the word files. Files, not list. And that's why it was arbitrary as to when they'll be released. So this is the reason why I'm thinking that. Very interesting. It is important.

It's important to voters. It's incredibly important to voters. And I don't think that telling them, to get over it is maybe the best messaging. Right? It's not exactly that. Laura Trump did say there are more files to be out, but you're right. Essentially, they did say get over the fact that there's no client list.

When we, there's a damn client list. There has to. But I mean, if you are a sketchy pervert and you wanted to mask what you're doing, you would weave it in with like legitimate business to hide it and muddy the waters. You would. So I don't know. I've heard the excuse that, oh, well, there's investigations on going, there's this, that, you know, they're trying to, that, that, that, that, I just think it's all whatever.

I don't believe a damn word of it. Either release it or stop, or face the wrath of people. Because if there's nothing there, either way, some people deserve to get lit up, because you can't play people like this. You can't string them along like this. So, and voters are fickle. There is a limit. I saw this thing. I think I shared it in Slack. Idolizing politicians is like believing the stripper really likes you. So there is a cap, right? There's a cap on how far voters are willing to go.

I mentioned this yesterday, and I have a piece over at Substack about this. If you follow me over at Substack, it's called Worldly Gains. And I thought it was a very interesting contrast because we got word that, you know, the pastor and theologian John MacArthur had passed away. He was just, you know, a giant in this generation. He's like, you know, one of those once in a lifetime kind of pastors. And I was contrasting that with the Chip and Joanna Gaines story. I was digging into this more yesterday.

And I was really shocked by some of the stuff that I saw. I wrote about it. And there's even more. I'm going to have to update it. If you were unfamiliar, they had their own Magnolia Network. And they launched this show called Back to the Frontier. And one of them, it featured two dads and then the boys they adopted as part of the cast. And if you've ever watched any interviews,

of Chip and Joanna Gaines. I mean, and I've linked all of them, well, not all of them, but a bunch of them. They have said, you know, our family puts Christ first. We, our work is an extension of our ministry. The way that they have described their faith, they made it very certain that they were faith first and that everything that they do and work is guided by God. And that's, they really rose to massive success with us. And so their fan base is understandably confused because they, they executive produced, so they selected these people. This wasn't done by a casting director. According to the reporting and the people who are cast, the gains has selected them.

And so they were criticized prior for not featuring same-sex couples on their house flipping show. And then the press began investigating all of this stuff. And they, you know, obviously, I'm sure they're surprised to find out that their pastor holds biblical views on marriage. So I don't know why they decided to do a 180. And Franklin Graham responded to it and said he was disappointed, the American Family Association. But Chip Gaines started going off on social media. And I just, I was really shocked to see it. He said this. He said, quote, well, he goes, I appreciate that. If you admire and appreciate us so much, any chance there's more to this, no one knows. But the quote unquote Christians have certainly come out in full force.

as if they do not, as if they do know, quote, judge not and love one another is not too difficult. I had a major problem with this because first off, a lot of people go off and say don't judge as a way to defend against godlessness. And that's just, that is such an illiterate interpretation of what Jesus was talking about in his sermon on the Mount Matthew 7 because he was talking about hypocritical judgment. He wasn't talking about don't use discernment. Godly discernment is absolutely allowed and spoken of positively in the Bible, this hypocritical judgment, meaning by whatever measure you use against others, that same measure will be applied against you. That is precisely what Jesus was talking about in Matthew 7. He's not disavowing discernment. He's warning against hypocritical

judgment. And I was shocked that someone who is mature, I thought mature in their faith did not know this and misinterpreted this verse as a shield against godly correction. And what they're doing, and this is the crux, they're pitting non-biblical practice against a covenant between a man and a woman and a God and God as not a big deal because he said, this isn't a big deal. There's other shows. This isn't just alienating believers that help build their empire. It is diminishing the Christian view of marriage to the fringes and accommodating a godless worldly view. How does that reconcile with their previous statements where they say they put God first in their work as like an extension of their faith? How does that, how do you reconcile those statements? I mean, if anything,

if you want to talk about legitimizing or mainstreaming things, why not legitimize or mainstreamed the traditional American family? This is just a continuation of the Marxist war against the building block of society because without its society completely falls apart. I think, Gaines's reaction has been harsh to even the most minor good faith, godly correction. He is not grace under fire as he used to be. And apparently, one of the people that they do business with welcomed a man into their marriage, created a thruple, and then talked about raising their kids while the wife was still in the home.

And Joanna Gaines commented on it and said, you are so good. That's all over Twitter or X. So what in the, are they fake Christians? Are they just quote unquote cultural Christians? Like we're going to be a little Jesus. And then that's the thing because they built their whole empire on this. I was absolutely shocked to see Chip Gaines's reaction and his, his ungodly responses to some of this. It's not what I expected from them.

And it bothers me because we don't have enough of icons like this in society. I want you to compare and contrast Chip Gaines and John MacArthur. John MacArthur never bent any at the pulpit except to Christ. He never backed away and went with the current. He stood strong, even as churches were being pressured to make it be like buddy Jesus and to get people in the pews and make it more commercial instead of making about saving souls.

It is not easy to follow Jesus. Jesus said this. This is the hard road and not everyone can follow it. and that's something that Chip and Joanna Gaines are proving right now. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. A Wisconsin nurse has pled no contest to amputating a man's foot without permission. The nurse said that she had hoped to, oh, wow, display the foot in her family's taxidermy shop with a sign that says wear your boots, kids.

Oh, my gosh. She pled no contest. It was negligent abuse of a patient. Mary Kay Brown, Pierce County. So she has two felony charges against her physical abuse of an elder person intentionally causing great bodily harm and mayhem. She was working at a senior living home and a 62 year old was being treated after a fall in his home. And she, he had had severe frostbite in his feet. They became necrotic. And reportedly he was moved to hospice. And she apparently said that it would make the quality of life better for him, the amputation.

So she apparently did it herself. I can't even imagine. She didn't get permission and apparently didn't even tell his physician. And he died days after. He died days after the imputation. Oh my gosh. That's a horror film. That's like misery.

Oh, Kathy Bates. An experiment finds that what? Yogurt. Yogurt can lower the house temperature. What? I don't even know what this means. They said that applying yogurt to the outside windows could lower your tim. Who's going to put window?

Who's going to put yogurt on their windows? This is a stupid survey. It's like these people got drunk and decided to do crazy stuff. I don't know. German customs officials show images of tarantulas hidden in sponge cake boxes after a smuggling bust. No. No, thank you. Oh my gosh.

There's photos. I don't, I'm done with this story. If you guys want to know more, I'll put it in your headlines for a substack. I can't. It's spiders. I can't deal with it. We have Senator Eric Schmidt next. Stick with us. Brighten up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show podcast where every update comes with a little dash of Not So Serious on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash with you. And one of the things that we've talked about for quite a bit, several, like, I mean a lot, is this situation with the budget, right? the rescission package and the pocket rescissions. And if this is going to be something that actually goes through, we were talking to Senator Rand Paul about it. And he was in favor of it. I mean,

he's, he's all for cutting anything. I mean, obviously, the 9.4 billion recisions package is a drop in the bucket. I get that. But it is a cut. I'm not saying, I'm not, I'm not going, oh, it's a cut. It's a cut. And they're all, you have people already fighting about it. Congress is already, how, and Senate are already at odds. Of course they are. And this is one of the strategies, remember, that we were hearing about. You have the recisions package, put that out there, and then maybe get pocket recisions and allow that to expire, and then you'll get cuts that way. Feta compil. We're going to be talking with Senator Eric Schmidt from my beautiful show me state, home state of Missouri here. He's literally on the floor doing his job for voters right now.

So we got to let him do his job and he's coming off the floor and he's going to be joining us about this because he's already talked to POTUS about this rescissions package. And some of this is the federal spending that has already been appropriated trying to get some of that back and save taxpayers some money. And then the likelihood of a pocket rescission, that actually might happen. I think this is going to be a good indicator of whether or not, I mean, obviously, that's something that's doable. But already you have House and Senate kind of going at it. And Congress has to uphold their end of the deal. I think it's going to be a lot harder for Congress than it is the Senate with us. I wish they would give us a number on what those pocket recisions exactly would eliminate.

Because we know this rescission's package, $9.4 billion. What's the total amount that could be essentially expired out of the taxpayers' responsibility? Like, how much is that? I would like to know. I don't even think they, I don't even think that's anything that they can telegraph yet because that's, isn't that part of the strategy? Actually, that's a good point. Because you don't, you don't want, you don't want Congress to know. Yeah, exactly.

You want to drop it on them like, kind of at the last, you don't want it to know. You want to drop it on them at the last minute and then let it expire and then, you know. So yeah, you don't really, that's the one time where I'm going to be like, yeah, I think it's good to be surreptitious about this, you know. Right close to the chest. Yeah, yeah, yeah. House conservatives are, they're warning the Senate to leave the recisions package intact as the deadline is looming to mull this over to consider this. They have till Friday, right, to deal with us. I know Senator Paul was saying that they're voting today.

They have until Friday to deal with this. And this is the legislative version, if you don't know what the recisions package is, it's the legislative version of a White House request. It's basically the president saying these funds have already been allocated by Congress for spending. can we not spend it please it's like basically you're requesting to not spend the money that you have earmarked for things and so that's that's apparently what they're that well that's that's what they're considering 9.4 billion a lot of it you know is from what we've heard is you know you got a lot of foreign uh foreign spending things like that any cut could be any cut is good we got to get started somewhere they got to get used to the idea of cutting things they

so it's kind of weird for them, right? Because they spin, spin, spin. Now they have to pull back the purse strings and get used to the idea of cutting spending. It shouldn't be weird for them. It should not be weird for them. Well, I agree. I mean, yes, I agree that it shouldn't be weird.

And it did barely pass the House, 214 to 212. You had four Republicans that voted against it because they wanted to keep, you know, local, they wanted to keep public government stations they wanted to have funding for AIDS research in Africa. I mean, I think we know where it comes from. Yeah.

Do we still need to keep spending billions on it? No. Is there any other nation there that can spend money on it? Yeah. Okay. Then why aren't we doing that? Like, yes, make cutting spending. That doesn't sound as good.

It's great again. MCSGA. Yeah. Yeah, it doesn't work as well. It doesn't work as well. So they have told July 18th to approve this rescission package. They're looking at 8.3 billion in foreign aid, 1.1 billion for a corporation for public broadcasting. That's NPR and PBS. And that's,

it's funny that Elmo got hacked. And then he went to do a video with, uh, uh, Robert, uh, who isn't he like a Robert Reich? Isn't he like a journalist over at New York Times? My friend, um, uh, Dave Burge was saying that, uh, Elmo went to the next Reich after he got hacked. So they need to John Thune, who I'm told just pulled Senator Schmidt, Majority Leader John Thune is delaying our interview right now. He's got to get a 53-seat majority. And already, it's getting wobbly.

It has to have a simple majority to pass, so they can't have a Democrat filibuster. But there are some Republicans that are kind of dragging their feet at some of these cuts. Why would you drag your feet at any of this? Thank you. Why, look, if you're upset, if you're a Republican senator and you're upset that NPR and PBS are the corporation for public broadcasting, which funds all of that with government money,

that they're getting cut, I've got a great idea for you. It's, you remember that viral video where it was, get out your checkbook. You know, don't Google it. Oh my gosh, don't do that because it's, and don't play it loudly at work. You'll so get fired. But I feel like they need to listen to that video, though, those lawmakers. Get out your checkbook, right? write that check to Corporation for Public Broadcasting yourself because the rest of us don't need to do it.

And 8.3 billion in foreign aid programs. Now, the foreign aid programs has nothing to do. I don't, I fail to see how anything, how any of that has to do with American interests because it's welfare programs. And yes, I'm using it just a universal term because that's all it is. It's not like we're putting a drone base inside of a nation. It's, which would be cool. it's all, you know, it's all welfare spending. That's what it is, $8.3 billion. And so, this is the tiniest of cut you could make. Now listen to me, this is, isn't this what we spend in a day, basically? A day and a half. I think it's a day and a half. We spend $9.4 billion a day and a half, I think. So it's the tiniest little cut. And you already have some, and I'm saying Republicans,

some Senate Republicans that are dragging their feet on this. So I don't know. This idea that, oh, this is going to impact public news. That is such a lie. Public news gets its money from local advertising and national advertising, right? And you don't need government-sponsored public broadcasting when you have the Internet. You have social media. You have different websites.

This idea of having a government. funded, like, news? This was before the advent of all of social media instant news at your fingertips. It is, it is completely anachronistic to keep this going. There's no reason for it. No reason. And we don't need to be spending, you know, good grief, AIDS research on Africa. Sorry, but no. We know where it comes from. We know where it comes from. Stop. I made the mistake of looking at the U.S. debt clock. don't do that. Don't do that.

Don't look at it. No, no, don't do it. Here, I'll send it to you. Did they add something? Oh, go ahead. No, can we quote Dana from two years ago? Maybe you need to spend less, Pimp. Maybe you do.

Some opinions never change. Some, you know, they never go out of style. I'm saying. But this idea that, oh, we need to make sure that we're spending money for corporation of public broadcasting. so local news isn't affected. Local news is not going to be affected. Like I said, these people don't even know how news works.

They don't know how local broadcasting works. If you have a local news station, you have a local news station that's always an affiliate of one of the big ones. You have your NBC, your CBS, your ABCs, you have all of the other, like Fox ones. You have the CNNs. You have all of these other affiliate networks that get national advertising. They sell local advertising. they also get financial assistance from some of these and resource assistance from

the bigger networks and they have their local affiliates that's why you have like oh affiliate we know NBC affiliate whatever NBC affiliate KSDK Channel 5 in St. Louis right that's an NBC affiliate so you don't need it's they it's not affecting public newsrooms it's not affecting how you get your local news that is that's a lie it is an absolute lie that they're telling you and there's so many alternatives to public broadcasting, right? It's made it, it has made the government sponsored public broadcasting entirely obsolete. So there is no excuse to not cut any of the funding for this, none at all whatsoever. He came in off the floor, fresh off the floor from doing his job from Missouri voters. Missouri Senator Eric Schmidt, one of our favorites. He joins us now

via video. Senator, we know you're working hard. We appreciate your time. We need. know that you got pulled over by Majority Leader John Thune. How is this 53 majority with the rescissions package? I read it was getting a little shaky. Is it a little solid? Is it getting solid? I feel good about it. You never know until the votes are actually cast. By the way, it's good to see you again, my friend. But yeah, look, this is the, I think this is, you know, you talk about appointments and the nominations. You talk about reconciliation. Now I've got rescissions. This is a big part of President Trump's agenda to try. try to rein in this ridiculous spending we saw with USAID, but also with NPR. I mean, there's just no

excuse for the corporation public broadcasting to be getting taxpayer funding, funded dollars. Not to interrupt me, but let me ask you this, because I read that there were some, and I was shocked that they didn't name everybody, but some Republican senators that were a little nervous about cutting, because they keep thinking that it's going to affect local programming. And it doesn't affect local news at all. Why are they, they can just write a check themselves if they're worried. Right. I think some of that was trying to, in fact, form. There were a lot of questions last week, which is probably where that information's coming from. They're like questions about how would this impact their states. And what we really spent a lot of

time on the last couple of days, especially, is explaining of how this doesn't touch the emergency broadcast system. This doesn't touch at all how FEMA communicates with people in emergency situations or weather events. This has nothing to do with that. PBS is glomming on to this idea with the hopes of saving themselves when they've completely lost the trust and the faith of the American people. It's not what they, they don't do anything different than what, you know, a local station would do in St. Louis or in Dallas or in Houston. They don't, they don't serve any particular purpose in that way beyond what a normal station does because we have an emergency response system that's out there that informs people outside of PBS. So I think that's an important point. Once we clarified that and walk people through, I think they got a lot more comfortable with it.

And also included in this is 8.3 billion in foreign aid programs. And I was explaining to our audience, you know, this is not defensive. spending. This isn't anything about securing American interest. I mean, it's really welfare spending. Well, it is. And it's actually crazier than that. I mean, this is the stuff like DEI and Burma and Iraqi Sesame Street and

Guatemala and sex changes. I mean, this is what happens when you have a wandering foreign policy establishment here in Washington that's super liberal and super woke and they find ways to spend taxpayer money and nobody in, well, very few people in America would actually support

that. So that's what's being clawed back. all that craziness. So it's not getting rid of all foreign aid. We're just going to make sure that that foreign aid with President Trump is aligned with American interest and cut out this woke crazy nonsense. So this, I mean, it seems like this is an easy thing to get both chambers behind.

I mean, I don't know why anybody, I mean, you have, you know, even the Rand Pauls and the Massey's that like this. I mean, it's,

I know they want more, but this is, it's a cut. I mean, and I, from what I understand, there's also, and I don't want you to give away any of your cards.

You know, there's also the possibility of further cuts with pocket recisions too. Yeah. Well, and by the way, there's also opportunities for successful here, which I hope we are, for more recisions to come down. This is, this is the, when everybody talked about having the trifect of the Republican House, Republican Senate and the White House, there are opportunities that you have, particularly in the Senate, because we don't need 60 votes to do this.

We only need 51 votes to do this. And so that's why we were able to move reconciliation with our priorities. That's why we should be able to move this rescissions package. It's why we could have more rescission's packages, and it's also why we could theoretically have two more reconciliation packages between now and November of last year. So in my view, Dana, we need to take full advantage of this opportunity. The American people have given us and operate with a sense of urgency, which is why we need to pass this recisions package. Tomorrow is likely when we would vote on it after the voterama, and then we'd have time to go to the House because it has to be done by Friday. Yeah, it has to be done by Friday.

We're talking to Missouri Senator Eric Schmidt. And this, it looks like you're going to keep, you know, the votes needed to keep together the votes needed to pass this. For future rescissions, it sounds like you kind of already have a game plan as to what would be included in those. Yes. I mean, I think, again, this is a very, very important first step in that. So we need to make sure we do that. But then, yeah, I think there's more that could be identified. I guess to put it in perspective, if you notice the first thing that Doge and that whole effort kind of went after was USAID. because the fraud and the abuse and the laundering really of money.

And by the way, money that goes to NGOs, Dana, that fueled mass migration, it goes to NGOs that fueled censorship of Americans and in Europe. And all these kind of crazy ideas the left has had, that's kind of been their piggy bank and their sandbox. And so Doge went after at first. It's why it's the first precision package here. This is some of the lowest hanging fruit that is out there, along with Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

And then once we get past this, I think you can move to some more things because there's more savings to be had. Yeah, absolutely. Last quick thing, before we go, I know you're introducing legislation to double the maximum federal penalty for assaulting or impeding ice agents. Great to see. We have like less than 60 seconds left. I'll give you a last word on that. Yeah, we've seen assaults on ice agents rise, you know, go up 700% in recent weeks.

They're under attack. Democrat politicians won't condemn it. They won't say let these ice agents do their job. So the concern is that this is going to continue. they need to be able to, they're doing dangerous work. They have families. They deserve to be protected. And if anybody assaults an ICE officer, we want to double those penalties so you can

potentially spend 80 years in prison. That's good to see that. All good things. We're going to keep our eyes on this and hope this precision package passes and we've got more to come. Senator Eric Schmidt, we're short on time right now, but we'd love to have you back. God bless my friend. We'll do it.

We'll do it. Thanks, Dana. Subscribe to the Dana Show podcast. Because who says you can't make fun of people? while staying informed on your own personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Well, we're going to watch how that rescissions package goes. In the meantime, Mike Johnson poured some gas on the Epstein fire saying that Pam Bondi needs to come forward.

I don't think that that story is going to go away. Yeah, it's not going to go away. We're going to see how this unravels. In the meantime, today's stupidity came. Ooh, it's Anna Navarro, who is, she's made up. Her blood type is 100% hyperbole. burrito supremes. Yeah. I think this is what she has to say. Listen to this. Now is to oppose something. I am hoping that next year there will be policy debates between Republicans and Democrats running

for Congress, and we will get to hear real policy differences and policy proposals. Also, I want to respond to you saying that I was hyperbolic when I talked about a reign of terror. No, it might be hyperbolic for you as a white man. Oh, my gosh. Not hyperbolic for me. Latino. No, I'm not being racist. Anna, what's her face? Cannot go for 60 seconds without trying to invoke her ethnicity because that's the only reason that she's

sitting at that table. Let's be real. Because it's not for smarts. That does it for us today. Find us over at Substack Chapter and Verse. Also, YouTube, Facebook, like, and subscribe. I'll be back behind the mic with you tomorrow.