The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - BONUS: Democrats Stuck After Latest Graham Platner Allegation

Episode Date: July 7, 2026

Senate Candidate Graham Platner faces a new damning sexual assault allegation as more Democrats have called for him to drop out. The Trump Accounts launch following America 250. Dana explains how this Socialist program will be a stain on Trump’s successes. A shocking study reveals just how much Biden’s open borders drove up housing costs for American families.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Byrnahttps://Byrna.com/DanaTrusted by law enforcement, security professionals, and everyday Americans—defend yourself and your family with Byrna.Patriot Mobilehttp://PatriotMobile.com/DANAVisit online or call 972-PATRIOT and use promo code DANA for a FREE month of service.Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.comDeclare your independence from pain with Relief Factor—start the 3-Week QuickStart for just $17.76Subscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

So the guy, how do we do this, that had the Nazi tattoo, the guy that had some, as I look at my notes, let's just put it, he had the Nazi tattoo. He repeatedly lied about the Nazi tattoo. The guy who was like, if you break into my house, I hope you do, I'm going to rape you. And then I, they don't know. He bragged about raping random people, like girls and men, boys and girls. He said that he liked to have solo romantical times. I hate everything right now. And the port of John.

That's a whole other topic. I could spend a whole segment on that. I'm not, but I'm just saying for cleanliness. I don't even like to eat at buffets. And this guy's like, I don't even like to wear bowling shoes. And this guy's like, I like to tube in it in a port of a lot. John, because the chemical smells attractive. I didn't say these things.

He said these things. Don't get mad at me. He praised Islamic terrorists. Repeatedly said he's a communist. Like all the time, he said, I'm a con. I mean, he just bragged about being a communist constantly. And then we've got, oh, by the way, he also joined an app. I almost forgot about this one.

It's a weirdo app that, that, um, Predators use, I can say, yeah, predators, like he got on this app that predators used to groom minors. Oh, what else? Oh, my gosh. All the sexual assault allegations. And, oh, and then he spent his entire short marriage life sexting with numerous other women. And then apparently he raped a chick. And the only time that the media decided that they were going to pay attention is when it came out that she was a Democrat.

at. They're like, hey, he's out there, raping Republicans, whatever. Wait a minute, he raped a Democrat, and then now it became a big thing. So that's where we're at right now with Graham Platner. He had, how many endorsements? He had Rocahanna who went out there. Rocahanna. They were double-checking with Graham Platner because there were at least three separate times they asked him. They're like, Like, okay, so nothing else is coming out, right? Everything's out about you? And he's like, yeah, everything's out. And then what is it?

Another sexual assault accusation. And he's like, no, I'm for sure. Everything's out now. And then the tubin it and the port of John. He's like, no, no, no, for real, though, now. Everything's out. And then this chick comes out and says, yeah, it's not all out. He raped me.

he was drunk he wouldn't take no for an answer and she went on camera with her name and everything I mean I think she's just as believable as all of the other ones I'm not a democrat so I'm not one of those women who's like well I don't know it's only believable if she thinks like me it's not really rape I guess unless they vote like you do I mean I'm not we don't do that so she came forward with these accusations so Politico had the story first breaking over the weekend. She said that he entered her home one night. This was back in 2021.

Her door wasn't locked. He entered her home. She was like, because she had texted him like a good hour or so earlier, I don't ever want to see you again. We're done. Don't come over. And she said that he came inside the house and she said no. And she kept repeatedly telling him no.

And he just didn't listen. He just said whatever. So she said that she realized, and what she told Politico, she said, quote, I am in a situation where there's no consent here. So that's how she put it. She said they connected on Bumble in 2019. They had on and off again, an relationship. And he came into her house, came up the stairs and basically attacked her on the couch. And she repeatedly said no. She said that he seemed, quote, almost blackout drunk. and that she said he wasn't listening to her, he wasn't hearing her. And she said, quote, I don't think I was safe to physically fight back. She said, I felt complying for my safety was the least worst option. Now, she was very briefly mentioned this girlfriend, this ex-girlfriend, in that New York Times story that ran about Platner last, yeah, it was last month.

But they didn't mention her sexual assault accusation in that piece. And when she was asked by CNN whether or not she considers that rape, and she told them, quote, by definition, yes, absolutely, yes. Now here's where it gets crazy because I think a lot of people were wondering, why is this? Why was it just sort of glossed over? Here's the Politico piece. It wasn't that it was glossed over. I don't know if it was necessarily the media that just didn't want to report on it, but here's the politico part of it.

because they were also talking about his other ex-girlfriend, Lindsay Fyfield. And this is where I'm going to bring it all together. She said, this last ex-girlfriend, said she was torn over coming forward in part because she agrees with Platner politically, saying, quote, one of the reasons I didn't come forward sooner was the huge moral conflict that I had between. supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person, she said. Verbatim. I just want the truth out there, she adds. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person.

So is she a Nazi commie too when she says she supports his policies? I'm just curious. One of the things that the left does famously is they will excuse content or not content. but competency or miscompetency and they will excuse misconduct. Whereas Republicans will rip each other apart over it. So I'm just shocked at this because if you're a rapist, you're a rapist. I don't care if you vote the way that I do. There's certain things that, you know, if you're a rapist, if you're a gun grabber,

there's certain things that I just, those are lines I don't cross. And I'm just, I mean, I'm not really shocked by this. Does it shock you, Kane? I'm not really shocked by this. They will literally sacrifice themselves to protect access to power. That is insane to me. You wouldn't think I don't want him to do this to anybody else. Now, I don't believe that she put herself in that position at all whatsoever.

I don't know why in the world she feels as though. What kind of psychological makeup is it to believe that it's worth you suffering such? such an offense because you want to advance your politics. Like, who the hell convinced you that this was acceptable? That's just stunning to me. We're going to come back to this because some of the other things that I have on deck for you today, goodness. Our World Cup, we're out.

I kind of knew it was coming. I mean, it was 4-1. I mean, we knew. I think it would have been worse without one of our top scores, probably. But we're going to talk about how America's dad intervened. and some of Europe, not all, and a bunch of leftists are really upset over that. We've got that also. Zorae Mandani's wife, do you know that she entirely avoided Independence Day celebrations?

You're the wife of the mayor of the largest city in the United States, and you skip out on 4th of July, Independence Day celebrations. Of course she did. She went off for a spiritual wellness, spiritual wellness retreat in Spain. So we're going to dive into that as well. We've got a lot because in addition to all of that, we got some of the latest law and order. And what is going on with Mitch McConnell? Have you guys been hearing about this? Reportedly brain dead?

And his wife is going to meet with like a Chinese. Yeah, VP. We got questions about this. So we got a lot of stuff to unpack as we move. The folks who won't make the program possible, the partners over at Burner. I've told you guys a million times. I have no problem. I'll say it again.

I'm no problem. Throwing lead down range and using lethal force to protect myself. Absolutely none at all. Sleep like a sweet little baby on my giant fluffy bed. I don't care. But here's the thing. You realize that sometimes your rights are abridged, not by your choice, but by the choices of people who own private property or municipal restrictions. So if you're navigating restrictions such as this, you need to be able to have a workaround.

and that's how burn up fits in. They have other models, but I don't care about any of them, except for the CL, compact launcher, because that's what we're talking about for this purpose. It's roughly the size of an iPhone, and it shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can deter threats from up to 60 feet away. Now, if you compare that to an average stun gun or a taser,

you've got one or two rounds. But with this, you have a 15-round shot capacity per cartridge. It's very easy to use. There's no recoil, and here's the big thing. So, you know, like gun-free zones, it doesn't matter to a burner gun because it's not a gun. It doesn't care about gun-free zones. There's no background checks.

There's no permits. There's no tax stamps. There's no waiting periods. You buy it online. They send it right to your front door. It's not a replacement. It's an option that you'll be glad to have when your options are limited. So diversify your self-defense options today.

You can check out Burnah, B-Y-R-N-A, burna.com slash Dana to learn more. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. Another Waymo incident. One little Waymo. apparently drove through exploding fireworks and freaking out all of the passengers. Oh my gosh, can you imagine?

It was in San Francisco, a little Waymo drove through an exploding firework on Saturday evening. The video showed a passenger in a Waymo, videoing, recording a video out of the window, and someone on the sidewalk lit a firework in an intersection. The firework explodes. You can hear the passengers say, no, no, no, no, no. Is the Waymo just kept driving in?

It kept driving. and apparently it went underneath the car and one passenger asked, are we on fire? The passengers were unharmed. And then apparently in other parts of San Francisco where most of the problems seemed to be had, there were reports of Lo Waymo's Loaum, that's my rapper name. Loaum. Adding to traffic by blocking the roadways,

sometimes they would just stop and be stuck for hours. They would run out of power. They would require a toe. Oh my gosh, can you imagine? Oh, I don't like those. I would never, no. British Columbia police Someone had a grenade-shaped lighter

And the Canadians went crazy A? The grenade-shaped lighters, they said They're not clever or funny They had a public warning They said that apparently It was at a dog park The New Westminster Canadian Police

They said officers responded to a 911 Call because it was a possible grenade Someone had a grenade lighter That was it It was literally a grenade-shaped butane lighter And the police were going These lighters are foolish and dangerous. They create unnecessary fear.

Nothing about them is neither clever, no funny. Oh my gosh, these people are just insufferable. And apparently Vancouver is the first Canadian city to ban the sale of gun-shaped lighters. Because they think little lighters that small are real guns. They're Canadians. Sorry, I can't even. College students are testing to the,

level of 10-year-olds, meaning they're not smarter than a fifth grader. That's what that means. Wow. According to a survey of adult skills done by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development and reported in the Economist, there was 160,000 people that were in college that had 10-year-old like comprehension. Wow. We have more on the way. We've got to move. As we do so, the folks won't make the program possible. It's the Friends over at Relief Factor. You guys are very familiar with Relief Factor. And with Relief Factor, and with Relief Factor, this is all about having a 100% drug-free way to deal with aches and pains. You don't want aches and pains to hold you back.

There have been countless stories from relief factor customers who were tired of living with pain until they found something that helped them feel like themselves again. Because everyday aches and inflammation, and that's the thing. It's inflammation. That's the source. That's the body's natural response to pain, right? And this is not a temporary fix. Like I said, it's 100% drug-free research-based formula designed to fight inflammation.

which is the root cause of pain, and it works from the inside out to support your body's natural response to pain. Inflammation is what causes it all. Relief factor helps alleviate and gets you back to walking comfortably and staying active and living life without constant discomfort. I mean, you want to be independent of all of that. I mean, think of, you know, of any time now, 250th birthday of the United States. You want to be free yourself from this.

Special patriotic pricing right now, three-week, quick start for 1776. So to commemorate our country's birthday, Relief Factor, has a special patriotic price. You get it for $17.76. That's all it is to get started. And join millions of people. My husband uses it. I have a friend that uses it. Celebrate Freedom from Pain.

Visit Relieffactor.com. Or call 800 number four relief to get that special three-week quick start price. Relieffactor.com, 800 for relief. A couple of things to dive into. One of them is something we've talked about. quite a bit. I think I talked about this a lot last year because we had POTUS kicking off the Trump accounts, which I'm not a fan of. That was in the one big beautiful bill, the Trump accounts. I'm just shocked to see so many people who say they're Republicans chair this thing. This is the one thing. One of the things I like a lot of Trump does. This is not one of them. Because here's why. Remember, first off, the Trump accounts, you had a separate pledge from the Dell. that's separate from the $1,000 that's being taken out of the U.S. Treasury, that's our money, and ceded into the accounts that they're opening.

This is money that's taken from you because it has to, it's only applied applicable to kids under age 18. So my kids, I mean, I assume my kids that aren't eligible. Some of you have kids that aren't eligible. Can you have kids that aren't eligible? I mean, this is wild. And here's the thing. Illegal immigrants can take advantage of it. Because the status of the parents, whether or not the parents are here legally, is irrelevant as to whether.

So anchor babies, absolutely. Anchor babies will have Trump accounts. I have written about this a million times we've talked about it. And I read the bill. I'm going to tweet this link out once more for you. I read the bill and I read the whole Trump account and I screenshotted and annotated this bill for you to read for yourself. So the eligibility, it's a $1,000 federal contribution. The child must be a citizen.

The parents do not have to be. That's it. The parents don't even need a social security number. So this is all, all these people that are like, I have been a Trump account. You literally are cheerleading anchor babies getting taxpayer dollars. This is wealth redistribution. This is an Obama type scheme that I have no idea why Republicans are cheering. And there were two different sets of requirements.

The Dell contribution from the couple that owned Dell computers, that is a $250 per child pledge from them. that's separate from the $1,000 that is explicitly taken from the treasury and seated. It's absolutely Republican championed welfare. That's it. And by the way, lawmakers are already looking how to expand it. They have this hyper-romanticized version that Hungary implemented back in 2021, remember, where they paid women to have babies in order to boost their sagging birth rate. But the result was a disaster because it didn't work.

They just accumulated more debt and any immediate modest gains stalled and then their birth rates reversed to post-21 rates. And now it's decades below, decades low below replacement. So I hear people say, well, it's an investment. That's exactly what socialists say to you when they want to steal your money and use it for something and redistribute. They call it an investment. If lawmakers want to invest and buy votes, they can use their own paychecks, right? And some go, well, it's not welfare per se because it's a one-time payment.

Frequency doesn't define, frequency of welfare doesn't define whether or not it's welfare. You either believe in taking taxpayer dollars and redistributing to others or you do not. And by the way, especially redistributing it to people who either don't pay taxes or pay far below those being forced to contribute to this social quasi-Ponzi scheme. It's a literally socialist economic policy. That's what this is. Absolutely what it is. Now, you're looking at about $8 billion initially required for the subsidy. And I hear people say, well, this is a great thing. I know there's, there's, there's, there's, it's, I mean, it's not perfect, but this is a great way to, no, it's not a great way because there's a million other ways. If our government wanted to make it easier on families and incentivize,

births, they just throwing money around like Chris Rock in the champagne room is not the way to do it, right? Not the way to go about it. It doesn't avail us of the causes that created the situation, guys. Paying down our debt would. Reducing the size of government would. Reducing government spending would. reducing or eliminating outright property and income taxes, but redistributing the hard-earned dollars of our over-taxed citizens who see our money go to early layering centers in Minnesota and Porsches in Ohio for people fleecing Medicare and Medicaid. We see our money going to Ukraine and al-Shabaab and illegal aliens,

but we never see our money going back to our own family. I mean, remember, this isn't the first time that Republicans have flirted with this type of Obamacare expansion, right? I mean, they acquiesced to expanding Obamacare subsidies in one of the last budget battles that we had. And instead of persuading their coalition to join their cause, they're watering down their positions to accommodate the left-leaning elements of this coalition. Hmm. I mean, part of being America first starts in the American home with respect for American income. So no, the Trump accounts are a horrible thing. It's going to be a blight on the reputation of Republicans, and it's absolutely socialism.

It's not even up eligible for argument. If you support Trump accounts, then you endorse socialism. I don't want to hear anything about America first. I don't want to hear anything about strong economy. You literally are talking about taxing people right on the heels, by the way, of this birthright citizenship, to steal from taxpayers give to anchor babies and people who don't pay into the system as much as you do, and we're having this money taken and redistributed. It is one of the worst Republican policies ever proposed in my lifetime.

That's the truth of it. I'm not going to pretend that it's not for clicks. I mean, there are a bunch of harlots out there. I mean, if you want political only fans, then there are a ton of people who will lie to your face because they either have no idea what they're talking about or they're actually leftists pretending to be on the right so they think that this is a great thing. I am neither of those. So not happy about this at all. And it's going to get bigger and it's going to turn into a slush fund because a number of lawmakers, especially Democrats, are already talking about how to just expand it to a million different things. It's already happening. There's literally legislation in numerous states in the works to make it happen. Everybody that hates

Obamacare, guess what? You just got another version of it. And Republican, gave it to you. It's insane. And then they go, golly, I wonder why we're struggling in the polls. Maybe it's because when people see that they have a choice between socialist and fake socialists, I mean, why would they go with a fake socialist? I mean, why do you think that you're struggling in the polls? I wonder why, because of stuff like this, you know? I mean, there's a million different things they could do, but those require actually the skill of legislating, which we've pretty much given up legislating anything and we just have executive order everything that's all going to be blown to hell god help us if we lose in 28 which we will if we run a candidate who's so inarticulate

that we creates absolute messes and chaos every time he opens his mouth about foreign policy god help us now a few other things to get into we've um oh i wanted to get to this story uh this Oh man, I think I passed it. First off, this real estate, speaking of anchor babies and illegal aliens and all this stuff, there was a federal reserve paper that came out. And it said the Biden era, illegal immigration, drove up housing costs astronomically. They found a surge in illegal immigration during the Biden-Harris administration triggered higher home prices, triggered higher rent. Insane.

It's stunning by up to like 30 percent in some instances. It didn't, they, and Democrats go, well, it helps labor shortages. Remember, they were the ones who were talking about picking stuff in the fields, etc. In fact, researchers, though, behind this paper, they found that the influxive illegal immigrants, the employment had little measurable effect, particularly on wages, but it significantly increased the housing demand. A 1% increase in illegal alien workers relative to a local labor force corresponded, they wrote, with roughly a 1% increase in overall employment with no

evidence that the immigration surge reduced average wages. They also were, they were saying that, the, or improved average wages. Everything was static. But they said that the increase, you're looking at, actually it's over this, 30% increase in terms of demand for housing, 20% jacked up rent. And that was in the average metropolitan area. And they measure between March of 21 to March of 24. But we were told that, remember when they were telling us, well, we don't have enough houses. We're going to have to have the government start building houses. It wasn't that we have a housing shortage.

It was that we had a flood of illegal aliens that were driving up a demand for housing. I'm going to tell you something. I heard, you know how I talked about last week, we had this fight for a couple of weeks, and we won, ultimately, now we got another one on our hands, where they were trying to put high density, hundreds of apartments in our town. That does not allow apartments. It's single-family dwellings for a reason.

And it's a very red area, and they are trying every which way they can to dilute the conservative voting block that is our district. It's the last large urban red district in the entirety of the United States. And we are being targeted every time we turn around. This is the area that had the big school board fight. all with the first one to take it to, uh, court all of it and put it on the ballot. And so

they keep trying to do this. And one of the, some of the arguments that I hear from people who say that they're Republicans are, well, you know, we do have a housing shortage. So we've got to do something about it. No, we don't have a housing shortage. In fact, it was our former mayor that was saying that we had a housing shortage. I'm like, no, we don't. We do not have a housing shortage. There are tons of houses that are sitting on the market here. What you're talking about are, uh, like short-term lease apartments and transient, you know, populace that comes in and out and then dilute your voting block because Democrats, numerous studies have been shown, have been done and conclude that Democrats like high density. So the higher the density, the blue or the vote. That's a fact.

That's absolutely, there is not even an exception to that. I looked. There's not even an exception. And all of this is, it, it's like a giant lie that was pulled over the eyes of the American people, I think that they were really trying to target. And notice how they were going to these red areas and proposing high-density developments. Oh, well, we have to help with the housing shortage. There was one debate here because they were trying to do this into a town that was actually, well, I mean, Roanoke, King, you know that. I mean, that's a little bit more rural. You're telling me that people are going to want to get apartments all the way out there and then drive all the way to Dallas for work when they can get probably the same cost of living and the same. type of apartment way closer to Dallas? No. They were talking about trying to do everything that they could to infiltrate and diminish the voting block. That's what it was all about. But this,

I mean, you're talking about a 30% increase in housing, increase in rents, all of that, specifically from illegal immigration. Nothing else, illegal immigration. That is insane. I mean, it makes sense. It's not a housing shortage issue. And they were trying to, I mean, further restrictions and regulations just on this for a problem that they've created. I have a lot more on this. We've got more to get into. We've got to get into some of the culture stuff as well. The latest about the Charlie Kirk assassination trial day, Lorraine has a great piece up at Substack, by the way.

You should definitely go check it out. We got a lot more on the way as we move. Our partners that help bring you the program. It is our friends over at Patriot Mobile. The only Christian conservative cell phone service that's out there. Patriot Mobile not only wants to save you money, but they're not. They also want to make sure that you have the best dang service that you could possibly get. And that's what they provide.

You get premium priority nationwide service across all three major U.S. networks, unlimited data plans, international roaming, and a 100% U.S.-based customer support team. You also have dual network capability. You can have two separate networks on one phone for enhanced coverage and reliability. They also have strong service with a commitment to American values we all care about. And there's proof in the pudding. They've helped fight four Second Amendment rights. They've helped parents take back school boards from Marxists. They actively support the causes that defend freedom and our rights.

And here's the other thing. Every single call is answered by real people right here in America. This was a Texas founded and still based in Texas company. And I know the people who own it. They literally lived on the road from me. And this is a great company that I've used over 10 years. If you really, really want to put your money where your mouth is, the first thing you need to do is call Patriot Mobile.

They have a contract buyout program as well. It's easy to switch. You get superior coverage products and customer service. Visit PatriotMobil.com slash Dana or call 972 Patriot. Use promo codeana for a free month of service. That's PatriotMobile.com slash Dana 972 Patriot promo code Dana. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida, man.

Golly. Oh, man. I'm not so, oh my gosh. I guess I'm going to have to. This is WFLA. So, oh, man. A man was arrested for a support door dash driver. A delivery driver in Florida for DoorDash told authorities that the, when they were,

the woman was delivering food to this house. And the guy who came out to get it, 57-year-old David Thorson, open the door, wearing nothing but a t-shirt. Sheriff Grady Judd said, quote, when she's trying to do the door dash, he lifts his shirt and shows her his dash. That's what he said. Kid you not. She called law enforcement. And then they got another call about this guy walking around. This Franken beans all hanging out there in the wind. And he's naked. Any KKID, according to Sheriff's Office. And when they arrested him, because y'all can't be doing that, he said, well, it was a kitten that

scratched me. He was naked because of a cat scratch. I am not making this up. I swear to you that's literally yeah judge said really that's the best excuse you got we're going to take you to jail there are no cats and we're going to give you some britches to wear and we expect you to keep them on

I just love that he also says britches because my grandmother always said britches let's see here okay a Florida man fought off an alligator with a fishing pole and a bulldog with a bulldog's help I was very worried about this dog 71 year old

north Fort Myers said he fought off an alligator by targeting it, targeting its eyes after it dragged him into a canal. He was fishing behind his home, 71 years old. So he had his bulldog outside. He had his fishing pole. He made a cast into the canal behind his home. And then he said, it just, as I was reeling it in, it just jumped out of the water and grabbed. He grabbed his right leg, pulled him into the water.

He stuck his thumb in its eye, jabbed his other eye. He said he's illegally hunted alligators before and says that his experience gave him the knowledge and how to deal with this attack. But he said that once the gator released him, the guy knew he could not crawl back to his house. He called his dog over. She stood there and let me get up on her back to where I could get stood up. And, yeah, he went to the hospital and they had fish and wildlife had to go and trap the alligator. Crazy.

Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. Did you know that it's been a hundred years since the Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced? And now, still, women don't have an explicit guarantee to equal rights under the U.S. Constitution. Okay. Can you believe that? I couldn't even believe that was real. Well, because it's not. I mean, women are not asking for special rights.

Do you believe that it's not real? Let's turn outrage into authorship. Oh, my gosh. If it's a 250th celebration of the country, isn't it time to update some things? Save me from stupid broads. What rights or guarantees do you feel all women should have in America? That's a good question. I'm glad she's wearing makeup.

I'm not here to speak for you. I just want to pass you the mic. So have your say at people. Okay, I'm already done with it. I can't deal with anymore. First off, I just, I'm totally fine if you're going to have an opinion. Just make sure it's based on a fact. Otherwise, you look like a moron and you sound like a moron.

And I really don't feel the need to temper my tone on this because this is like easily Googled stuff. I mean, I find it embarrassing that women are still buying into this low IQ nonsense. First off, the Equal Rights Amendment, especially if you're talking about equality for pay, the Equal Pay Act of 1963 already established that. So the Equal Rights Amendment was therefore redundant. All it did was expand federal power. You're talking about expanding the scope of the federal. federal government, actually at the expense of a number of things that feminists enjoyed at the time,

like not getting drafted and alimony and child support preference. By the way, all of which would have been completely undone by the Equal Rights Amendment. The Equal Rights Amendment was snake oil that was packaged and sold to Bimbos as somehow equality or equal rights. And it's not. There's a lot of smart ladies out there that saw through it and Phyllis Schlafly was one. And no, I'm not tempering my tone because dear sweet heavens, I cannot believe that we are still arguing about the inadequacies of this absolute joke of a proposal of frillion years after, even after the advent of the internet where all of this information is so easily accessible publicly. There's literally no excuse for anyone, especially someone that has millions of dollars

in assistance to do the research for her like Alicia Keys to make a video just spouting off absolute, like, BS. I mean, you owe it to people to at least know what the hell you're talking about if you're going to talk about it with that audience. So, yeah, women already have equality. What the ERA was doing was, it's like basically swindling women into thinking that they're getting something when they really weren't. They were actually losing things.

And it was really at the expense of those things that they were losing, that they were going to expand the federal government. The federal government loves to find and hold up people that it can use as victims so it can expand itself. And that's exactly what it was doing with these gullible fools with the ERA. That's it. That's the whole thing of it. And that's one of the reasons why it was defeated. I mean, women would have had to register for the draft. And I don't like the draft for men or women, period.

There were a lot of things that it would absolutely gut that women literally bank on today. So let's just be a little bit more educated when we're doing our start. Sorry, do I looking at the camera, putting it up for our insta audience videos because it's really getting old. Again, have all the opinions you want, but try not to be an idiot and base them on absolute fact. That's it. And then you can still oppose it if you want to. That's fine. But at least sound knowledgeable when you're talking about it.

Second hour on the way. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So apparently, per the New York Post, they said that the view. This is kind of crazy. They turned down, Mamdani, his request to bring on this, like, Israel-hating candidate because they were a little, they didn't want to deal with the FCC. Or probably because the candidate, Dary Elisa Chivalier, is a giant bigot and is a nut and is a terrorist apologist. Maybe that's why.

Also, because they were going to get into the equal time and they didn't want to bring on their opponent. So it's not so much that they oppose bigotry. It's that they like that candidate so much they didn't want to bring on that candidate's opponent. That's the real story. Also, California's 4th of July plunged into hell. Stores were looted. Police horses got hurt and apparently fires broke out. That's insane.

Yeah, that's right. Leave the horses alone for crying out loud. I think you should be whipped in the street if you do that.