The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Elections Will Never Be The Same After This Ruling

Episode Date: June 29, 2026

Dana Loesch breaks down all of Monday morning's SCOTUS rulings including a crucial decision by Amy Coney Barrett about mail-in ballots. French political officials are BLAMING the United States for their summer heat wave because we cherish our air conditioning and are secretly controlling their weather. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun says the framework agreement signed with Israel is a first step towards restoring Lebanon's sovereignty. The New Yorker Magazine publishes an anti-Semitic piece slamming Israel for banning Gazan workers over national security concerns. James Talarico removes a quote from Ken Paxton completely out of context following Democrats accusing Paxton of cheating. Prada posts a video to their 33M+ followers of their new “Palestinian ambassador”. Plus more, commentary.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Concerned Women For Americahttps://ConcernedWomen.org/DanaFor a donation of $20 or more, Concerned Women of America  will send you their book: A Woman’s Guide: Seven Rules for Success in Business and Life.  Ghost Bedhttps://GhostBed.com/DANAShop Ghost Bed’s 4th of July Sale going on now. Get an EXTRA 10%Off with Code DANAByrnahttps://Byrna.com/DanaTrusted by law enforcement, security professionals, and everyday Americans—defend yourself and your family with Byrna.HumanNhttps://Humann.com/DanaSave $5 on HumanN Cholesterol Health Daily at Sam's Club. Head to your local Sam's Club and do more to support your cholesterol health with the science-first brand. Patriot Mobilehttp://PatriotMobile.com/DANAVisit online or call 972-PATRIOT and use promo code DANA for a FREE month of service.Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.comDeclare your independence from pain with Relief Factor—start the 3-Week QuickStart for just $17.76Subscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

Maldani endorsed Marxists dominate New York City Democratic congressional primaries. Texas Senator candidate James Tallerico says his whiteness and masculinity limit his imagination. His masculinity? Really? And Tucker Carlson leaves the Republican Party. Good riddance and don't come back. I'm Greg Corumbus, inviting you to join Jim Garrity of National Review and me each weekday for the Three Martini Lunch podcast. We'll give you the top news, some good laughs, and we'll be done in 30 minutes. Follow the Three Martini Lunch on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash with you going through some of these Supreme Court decisions. We're going to have some pieces coming up, but substack chapter and verse, Lorraine and I have divided up everything. Because, you know, when stuff rolls out in the morning, you're rushing to consume as much of it as you can for air. And all I will say is this. And I was talking to a friend of mine on break as an attorney.

And he was saying, I don't know if I look at the ballot thing as being that huge of an issue. But then Lorraine brought up a good point. And then Kane brought this up, too. What did you say about the post? Just so you guys know, what SCOTUS was saying is that mail and ballots, if they are, like, postmark on or before election day can still be included. But there have been suits, though, over postmarks that have been fraudulently applied after. And you brought this up during break, Kane.

Yeah, I think a lot of us have worked at companies that have those postmark stamp machines, right? where you just run the envelope through and it just prints the postage the way it's supposed to look on the outside of the envelope. And it is the day that it is of that day. So let's say you have a postmark machine and it's either election day or before election day and you run a bunch of empty envelopes into this postmarked machine. Now you have envelopes that are postmarked either the day of or before election day that you can handle these stuff after election day. That's my issue. I think that makes all the sense in the world. I mean, if they are, if Democrats are okay with it, then let's just let me do what I want then. I will handle the processing of those

ballots. You can trust me. Yeah. Yeah, put me in that position. I would love it. I'll be so good. Oh, I'll be lovey-dovey. I'll be so good. Just saying, this is why nobody would ever vote for me. Trust me, bro. Yeah, I will absolutely abuse the system to whatever nefarious end that I think is appropriate. Completely telling everybody this right now. I will. cheat your socks off, right? And if, if, if, this is, I've never wanted to be in elected office. People ask, and I'm, I kind of laugh. It will never happen.

I would rather pull my eyes out through my backside. It's never going to happen. I would rather pull my endocrine system out of my nasal cavity. It's just not going to happen. But if I was forced to, I would cheat so bad. I would, I would stuff ballots for Republicans. I would cheat so bad that the level of cheating would take years to unrighted. travel. Like Democrats think that they would cheat. You guys don't even know what I would do. I would

cheat in every state. I would game the system. It would be like a full on enterprise completely. And then I would jail everyone who objected. I'm just saying. I mean, I love my country because I'm not an elected official. Don't know if I would feel the same if I were. And I don't think I could represent anybody that would be dumb enough to vote for me. I mean, I'm not joking. I would engage in so much fraud and I would punish my enemies abusing the system completely. I'm a John Adams nightmare. Never. I could never. But I'm honest about it. Democrats are like, oh, no, that's the difference between like people like me and Democrats. We're honest. You know, we're honest about it. So this, my friend, long story long, my friend was saying, I don't know if that's that big of a deal.

I tend to think it is because of the what you just, the point that you just made, Kane, in previous legal fights over questionable postmarked ballots. And there have been a number of issues, especially in 2020, there were so many fights over that. Because you can't, especially if you have people that are in these positions of power that are overseeing this process and they themselves are compromised, ethically or legally, both usually. We got questions about it, right?

I would say, well, we can have post-smart. As long as only Republicans are in charge of it, yeah. So you know what this means? We're going to have to get involved in this. Now Lorraine, who's going to be writing a piece up about this over at substack. Because I think what they did is they were, so SCOTUS was basically intimating that they were not asked about specifically the legality of mail-in voting. only whether or not they could include the ballots that were postmarked buyer before. So they are setting it up like that's a separate issue that someone would need to bring a case forward about.

So that would be another years-long process because that's what this has been since, you know, 2020. This has been a huge years-long process. So that would have to be a separate case to be brought forward. Now, some of the other stuff that we've been looking at as well, With all of this, you've got the, well, I mean, a number of rulings here. Let me pull this up. I got so many notes. You have to forgive me because it gets a little chaotic right before the show when this stuff

drops, but I want to make sure that we covered as much as possible. So you also have the Federal Reserve takeover plan. Scotus has blocked POTUS on this, on this federal takeover plan. And the reserve, so this had to do with the federal takeover plan. firing of Lisa Cook, who was the governor of the Federal Reserve Board. And he's been, POTUS has been trying to kind of rein in central bank. It was another five, four ruling. You had Roberts and Kavanaugh that joined Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kintanji Brown Jackson, who's sidebar, I think is the dumbest justice that has ever been on the Supreme Court.

And I think it's disgraceful. She is a disgrace. I will not say that about Sotomayor and Kagan because I disagree with them immensely, but they at least, even though I think that they're wrong because I question the virtue of their intellectual mooring, they are not idiots. I really think Kintaghi Brown Jackson is an idiot. I do not think that she's an intelligent person. So he's been the first person in the literal history of the Federal Reserve, to attempt to fire a sitting governor of the board, and they're supposed to be shielded from being fired without cause. So it allows them to kind of like similar to SCOTUS to allow to operate without that outside pressure. Anybody exerting pressure on them? She isn't at any charges brought to her. He tried to do this last August. She was accused by the housings are of mortgage fraud, right?

and his the SCOTUS was kind of signaling already during oral arguments earlier this year his Trump's attorney John Sauer when he was making the argument before SCOTUS the questions that they were asking according to SCOTUS blog and some others were

giving the impression that he was not that his petition, his case to fire this governor of this board was not going to be met warmly or was not going to be well received by SCOTUS. They were picking apart his arguments too much in the oral arguments earlier this year.

And so a lot of people, this was sort of expected, this ruling, just keeping in line with what they were arguing. They were grilling the administration about his ability to fire her without notice and apparently without her ability to contest her removal, which is something that apparently they're allowed to do. and that Justice Brett Kavanaugh, his main argument was that Trump allowed, Trump removing her so quickly, so abruptly was the word that was used, that that was going to eliminate the allowance for judicial review, right? And any kind of remedy if she wanted to challenge the manner or the basis for which she was removed. So that's, that was more, to me, it sounds like this was procedural. Not so much can he do it, but did he do it properly? You know, that's what I was really getting from this. And, but it was a big, I mean, that was a blow to him.

So she gets to stay in her role. And the, uh, Alito said that the allegations, he said, quote, no court has ever explored these facts because they were talking about the, the, the, the merit of the case. And Kavanaugh was saying that the president alone, you know, this is a, this is a low bar for cause for firing and one that the president alone determines. He says, quote, that would weaken, if not shatter the independence of the Federal Reserve that we just discussed. Alito responded, no court has ever explored those facts. Well, he was talking about specifically the allegations against Cook. And he said, quote, that it was a very hurried manner.

And that was about as harsh as Alito got. So it sounds as though it wasn't so much. whether he could, but it was about the process, the manner in which he did it. And their decision to keep her, they're going to review the case. Now, she's staying in place while they review the case. So they did allow him to fire Rebecca Slaughter. So that was a six-three ruling. And they allowed that to be greenlit. Now, that overturns precedent. And some people were saying, well, that puts us, You know, the president can clean house every four years, and that destroys our independent civil service. But isn't that, I mean, Article 2, though, the president has the ability to do that. I mean, if we're going to get bogged down in procedural, that's fine.

That just means that he just brings a more airtight just cause. But especially for something incredibly egregious. I mean, if she's committing fraud, I would say that that's egregious enough that is a pretty, if I have your judicial review, but a judicial review should not be drawn out. And the process would not allow for that unless it's highly politicized by Democrats. later. So I don't know if I consider that. I don't I don't I don't I'm not really too plagued about that. Not so much. They and we're going to come. We're going to have more of these SCOTUS decisions here coming up. I wanted to get to a couple of other things as well. This let's see let me get into the the, the pull this.

Let's get into this situation of musk and aid. This was another. situation that was going around over the weekend because of a lot of this has to do with the doge cuts, right? And people were saying, and I'm pulling up a lot of these pieces. There were a number, there were a couple of pieces that came out over Friday, and then there were a lot of editorialists that were going after Elon Musk because they were saying, well, a lot of these aid cuts, you know, he's killing millions of people. And then you had, even over at New York Times, you also had Nicholas Christoph, who said that Musk says that no one can name a person who died, who died from his aid cuts. And he's like, I have. And I've talked to all these people.

And he's literally saying Elon Musk killed them because of suggested aid cuts. For instance, he was talking about someone in Africa because they weren't able to get, or no, sorry, someone in Liberia because they, because Elon Musk cut funding for ambulance diesel, for diesel fuel for ambulances. And so Elon Musk killed this expectant mother in Liberia. I'm not. kidding you. This is an argument that they're making. Then they go off and they said, someone else, someone else because of malaria, because he cut a malaria medication. Oh, and then in Sierra Leone, all these people are dying. They're dying of AIDS because he cut HIV supplies. You know how you can avoid AIDS? Don't screw everything with a pulse.

I mean, we kind of know, and don't, like, shoot and reuse. Don't shoot drugs. That's pretty obvious, right? How the hell is that Elon Musk's fault for someone else's reckless behavior? This is insane. I cannot believe these are, I mean, I can. These are actual arguments that these people are making. This is ridiculous. I mean, why are our tax dollars going for diesel fuel in Liberia? We have gas, we have like gas prices we're dealing with here.

Why are we expected to purchase all of this for everybody all the time? We get, the United States get so much disrespect for being involved everywhere and doing all of these things. And you have the left that like, oh, well, why you're giving aid to Israel or doing this or that? No one says anything about the billions of dollars that go to all of these other countries for this purpose. I mean, why didn't Nick Christoph, if he was so concerned about lives lost, why didn't he send money for diesel fuel in Liberia? Nick Christoph killed those people in Liberia because he didn't send money for diesel fuel. If only Nick Christoph had sent a check for AIDS in Sierra Leone, then maybe people wouldn't have died from AIDS.

If only he had sent a check for a number of countries that were dealing with malaria, if he had personally written a check, but he didn't, so he killed those people. I mean, we can do this too. This can be a two-way street, right? If any of the left are complaining about this, if they didn't personally write a check to any of these causes,

they murdered these people. They killed them themselves. We have a lot more on the way as we move. Our partners that help bring you the program. It's our friends over at Ghost Bed. I love my bed. My bed is awesome. And I'm not saying this because they're advertising on the show. They're never allowed to go out of business or I'll find them and I'll make them work forcibly. So here's the thing. We're just talking about hot and how Europe is just dying.

Most mattresses, and when I look back, because I told you we got this boogey mattress a few years ago, and one year into it, I hated it. It was like the worst purchase ever. And they literally was an upgrade for cooling tech, which I, I was shocked at. They had like literally there was, there was an, that you had an upgrade for that. That's not what Ghostbud does. Hot sleepers are some of the happiest customers because cooling tech that they use is built into every single mattress. It's not an expensive upgrade that you have to pay extra for. And if you're waking up stiff and you're tossing and turning, you're sleeping hot or you're reaching for pain relievers or whatever, that's your mattress. You need to get the Ghost Bud because Ghost Bud is made to purposefully alleviate these exact issues. support, cooling, real comfort so you can actually rest. You don't have to waste your summer on bad sleep and the best part you get 101 nights to try it in your home. And if you don't feel the difference, you can send it back risk-free. Right now, GhostBed is having the Fourth of July sale and all of you get an

extra 10% off using Code Dana. Shop at ghostbed.com slash Dana and use Codeana. That's ghostbed.com slash Dana, promo code Dana for 10% off. Welcome back to the program. We are at the bottom of the second hour. and we have AC. I just got to talk about this because I am fascinated. Let me look at my weather app real quick. Hold up, hold up, hold up, blah, da, da, I've got, what do we got for you? Let me just a second. It is 91.

It's going to be a high of 97. It's going to be in the 90s, like mid-90s all week. And I think after we're going to start hitting triple digits, right? I think that's what one of the meteorologists is usually right about 3% of the time. We've already hit heat indexes of triple digits all last week. and it'll happen this week too. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I love AC.

I read that, I think it's like 13% of the French have AC and I was, I mean, it gets hot there. You would think that there would be more. Of all of Europe, like let's look at Europe as a whole.

Of all of Europe, only about 19 to 20% of them have air conditioning. Now, it's anywhere between 90 to 95% in the U.S. Oh, now, in Italy, now, if you look at the southern part, most of that is driven by the portions of Europe that are closest to the Mediterranean, right? So in southern Spain, it actually rises southern Spain, 40% of specifically southern Spain have AC. in Italy, southern Italy, about half of the households in southern Italy. In southern France, it's about 28%. Now, it's when you go north in these countries that it drops dramatically and it reduces

the average to about 19 to 20%. So in the UK, it's like fewer than, or it's like less than 10 to 15% of home. in the UK and Germany as well. That is crazy because on average, one of my friends who was British was telling me over the weekend. It's like in the 70s and 80s, but they've been in the 90s and so it's crazy. And they're dealing with an insane demand from their governments to remove their ACs. Now, we see this like every year. But for some reason, now, some of these European government officials have blamed us in the United States for their heat. I'm not kidding you.

Paris's deputy mayor says that, quote, the U.S. bears the significant amount of responsibility for the deadly heat wave gripping France. What? Yeah, I need more. Okay. So, according to Audrey Pulvar, who is the socialist deputy mayor of Paris? Audrey took to social media over the weekend, Kane, and she addressed a letter to the dear American journalist. Les Itas Unis who have been making fun of Paris because the city lacks the air conditioning.

Audrey wrote, and I quote, You bear a significant amount of responsibility for the global warming and the consequences we and France are experiencing. your cities which are 90% air-conditioned are not unrelated to this." I didn't know that me sitting here having, you know, an apparel spritz in my kitchen while I'm cooking and I'm loving my AC was making Paris hot. But China and India, particularly China, which drives the overwhelming amount of noxious chemicals in the atmosphere and in the environment, they are completely off the hook because everyone doesn't,

nobody wants to, they like communists and they don't want to criticize them. That is stupid. It's their whole entire war on air conditioning. That's what they think is, you know what, we totally need that graphic because that's hysterical. This explains it with one picture. That's the French argument.

The countries that emit the most carbon dioxide per capita are China. 8.1 tons per capita. Total in megatons, 11,535. In second place, all the way down to 5,107 in terms of total megatons is the United States. Followed closely behind by the European Union, which is 3,304, followed by India, which is 2,597, followed by Russia, which is 1,792. This source is from the emissions database for global atmospheric research. as originally published a year ago by the BBC.

So this is 20, 25 figures. Huh. So it's not us, the U.S. That's driving any of this. They have one, they have this, they have a heat wave. It's, and what they say, it's the omega block.

So they said that one meteorologist says, it's an, okay, this is where it gets real sciencey for me. I'm just going to deliver you the information. One meteorologist said, quote, it is the omega block that caused the heat wave, not CO2. Omega blocks get their name because they resemble the Greek uppercase letter Omega. The contour lines resemble the omega shape due to an enormous high-pressure ridge in the mid-troposphere that sandwiched between two low-pressure systems to its east and west. Hot Saharan air has been advected, that is, horizontally transported northward into Western Europe, due to anti-cyclical. chronic clockwise airflow, and as that air mass moves north, it is compressed in a way.

I can't, that's a word I don't even know. That's unusual. Beneath the ridge where air is sinking. Oh my gosh, there's a bunch of other science in here. The last sentence, this is Chris Martz, a meteorologist, quote, the process is natural and has nothing to do whatsoever with climate change or greenhouse gas emissions, end quote. So it's not that at all. It is a natural phenomenon. on. That's the omega block. That's the omega, and that's the jet stream. That's how that works. And there was another one. This is actually from a, I can't, this is the week, which is the leftist publication, which also wrote about the omega block, the great overheating. Europe is stuck with an

omega block weathered pattern. And it dives into, and Reuters wrote about this. I think that they were actually genuinely curious, which is shocking that they were genuinely curious, and they wrote an article from that perspective, because normally it's a bunch of propaganda nonsense. So there are a couple, I mean, I, there are other pieces where it gets really into it, and it looks at the, because this is not a historical either. This type of weather pattern occurs with somewhat, somewhat regularity. It's not really a pattern, and it has nothing to do with climate change, it's just every now and then that is the weather pattern. It has nothing to do with the United States using air conditioning. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump. Why does the

left go all the way back into the dark ages whenever they're not in power and something with the weather happens? I will never forget. When Hurricane Katrina took place, the left acted like George Bush himself went down to the Gulf and stuck a finger into the Gulf and like twisted it around, stirred it around, and then there was a crazy, crazy hurricane that came out. They acted like he did that. That he had the power to do that. Like he controlled the weather. That's not how it works. Even, I will say, even the media in Europe, half of the media has been like, oh gosh, this is the omega pattern. And they've talked about when they've experienced this several years before. This is the left trying to seize upon this, what they look at as an opportunity.

as a way to further browbeat people and try to push this garbage green agenda, which is a Marxist agenda designed to redistribute wealth and subvert power. More Europeans die from heat every year than Americans die from illegally possessed criminally used firearms. That includes the suicide numbers that they pack in to try to fake you out and make you more afraid. That's true. That is absolutely true. And by the way, if you want to know where that figure comes from, let me share it with you. The CDC, ISA Global Nature Medicine, which looked at June and September of last year, specifically European summer heat, the EU firearms fact sheet, and the EU itself, criminal statistics. So it has nothing to do with climate change. And now they're demanding that people get rid of their air

conditioning. I was reading a story that went viral over the weekend, a British guy who put in an AC unit, put it improperly in order to control the temperature, obviously, of his flat, and then somehow a neighbor found out and snitched because they were jealous that they didn't have one, and the British government is now demanding that he take out his unit or he's going to have to pay an exorbitant fine or like go to jail or something. It is crazy. In the middle of a heat wave to take it out in the middle of a heat wave. Like they would rather people die so that they can pretend that they are following this cult religion of climate change. That is recklessly irresponsible. And the crazy, this is one, by the way, here's a paragraph

from Reuters. So Reuters had a story where they were talking about the Omega Block, and then they had another one right after it where they were talking about climate change. Listen to this. Scientists have not yet agreed upon how climate change is affecting the frequency of blocking events. But the consensus is clear that climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of heat waves. End quote. That is an actual story from, that's an actual paragraph from Reuters. What? I felt like I just heard that lady, the Somalian from Minnesota, talk about bananas and rice. It's more than just like bananas and rice. But if you ask me, well, it's like bananas and rice. That's literally this.

It's the summer of realizing stuff. They have no idea how climate change is affecting it. But the consensus is clear that it's climate change. What? You people are a cult. That's a cult. And you have all of these other meteorologists that are like, it's actually not.

Look, here it is. And then here is the historical pattern of this phenomenon, this weather cycle, this weather pattern. It has happened before. Nothing contributes to it that is manmade. It is not, it doesn't have anything to do with any of that. There is no consensus. Just because Reuters found a dude to say, yeah, there's a consensus.

That's like making a whole story about outrage of one rando on Twitter. It's the same thing. I'm so tired of this. It's such cherry-picking confirmation bias. It's infuriating. And then they go, then that same article, Freuders try to say, Europe is the fastest warming continent. They're so affected.

How? They are literally putting themselves back in the dark ages so that China can continue to pollute more. China derives in every measure, in every metric. China drives pollution. This is indisputable. And so Europe is like, well, I guess we'll all die. It's okay if some people die because of the heat.

Whatever we have to do to keep the climate gods, A.k.a. CCP. Happy, we'll do it. They make themselves miserable. They take themselves back to the dark ages for this nonsense. This is so ridiculous. And so they've had, I mean, they've had, like the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre, they all had early closing times. They had schools that are closing, the ones that go year round. They had the Buckingham Palace. They scaled back in the hours of operation. They don't have. have the soldiers in their scarlet tunics, the red coats, and then those heavy furry bear skin hats, they don't have those guys out right now because it's too hot to wear a heavy bear skin hat in 90 degrees when you disallow air conditioning. This is crazy. We're capitalists. God bless

America, so we can't do it without our partners. Burn a gun is one of those partners. Now, I've told you before, I sleep like a happy little well-fed baby at night knowing that if I needed to and I have no issue doing it using lethal force to protect myself or my loved ones. I also know that sometimes you've got to go to places where you're told you cannot exercise your Second Amendment rights, be it private property, which we respect private property rights, or municipal property. Now, whether or not they should have people there to protect you when they disarm you, that's a whole other debate.

But regardless, you have to prepare for everything. You don't have the luxury of living in an environment where you don't, where you can't, don't want to. You have to be prepared for anything that happens. And so this is why it's important to diversify your defensive options. And Berna is a good addition for this. When you can't carry, you can have a Berna gun. Now, they call it a gun, but it's, well, I mean, you guys, you can call it that. The one that they have different models, but disregard all of that for this purpose of the CL. This is what we're talking about for on the go, going places and you need a defensive tool. The Berna CL, which stands for a compact launcher, it's about the size of an

iPhone. It shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can deter threats from up to 60 feet away. There's no recoil. But here's the thing. Here's the thing. It doesn't care about gun-free zone signs. Uh-uh-uh, because it's not a gun. So it doesn't care about those. There's no waiting period. There's no background checks. There's no, there's no like tax stamps. None of that. You order it online and they send it right to your house. And like I said, doesn't care about those gun-free zones because it's not a gun. It is not a replacement. This is an option to have when your other options are limited. You carry different calibers for crying out loud. You carry blades even. I do. So why would you not carry something like this when your options are limited unconstitutionally? So diversify your

self-defense options today. Visit berna.com slash Dana to learn more. That's b-y-r-r-n-a.com slash Dana ready when you are. There's so much stuff for you guys because why does everything happen over the weekend? So like we're apparently also back. How do I put this? we are, I guess, back in the memorandum of understanding, sort of for Iran, right, just in time for the week. So it doesn't affect the markets. That's kind of what it feels like. I mean, at least that's what I wrote down on the rundown because that's what it feels like. It just feels, I mean, we're going, I mean, I'm, it was, we, we, we, we, we, we, we, we, we,

Like we were firing rockets off. We were all firing at each other. And then everything was going sideways come Friday evening after the market's closed. And then now all of a sudden, no, we're back in. It's all good again. I'm a little confused. Can't I'm confused. Maybe I'm missing something.

I don't think I am. Nope. But I could be, right? Also, over the weekend, and this was interesting, I don't know if you saw this. I had tweeted about it. Lebanon is they would like to speak up for themselves. You know, they're kind of tired about, they're tired of having everybody else speak for them, whether it's Iran, whether it's, you know, members of podcastistan, whomever it is,

they're tired of everybody speaking for them. And they've had their own president come out. They've had their own members of government come out repeatedly, and especially when it was announced that we've launched into this another peace agreement. Well, we've brokered another peace agreement. Lebanese President Joseph Anun says the framework agreement that they signed with Israel was the first step towards restoring Lebanon's sovereignty after the war between Israel and Hezbollah. Now, this is one of the things that Joseph Oon says, and the way that he refers to it is that it is between Hezbollah and Israel. Because everyone else, the Western media, which is led by Iran propagandists, and we're going to talk about this,

You guys, sidebar, I don't think people appreciate the extent to which Iran and Qatar have infiltrated our government and politics. I really don't think people appreciate this. It is a serious thing, and it's actually something I think we should have hearings on. But the Lebanese president says that this was a, this is another brokered agreement led by the United States facilitated to try to assist Lebanon. in restricting Hezbollah. Remember, I've told you, the Lebanese government hates Hezbollah, hates them. They recognize them as the terror entity that they are. And so they're speaking out, why is it that the Western media ignores them? Because they would rather placate Iran. It's the wildest thing. When the Lebanese president announced us over the weekend, all of the left, and podcastistis, the word displeased. Lebanon wants to take their country back, and Hezbollah and all of

the terrorist simps want to remain in charge. These people that argue this stuff, particularly when it comes to Hezbollah and Israel, and they always omit Hezbollah, and they say Lebanon instead. These people are not anti-war. These people are just on Hezbollah side. they're anti other people being able to return fire against Hezbollah. That's the whole point of it. And so this was a positive step. This was a good step. Now, what happened the last time that the United States was leading an agreement,

they tried to broker any kind of peace between Hezbollah and Israel. That was back in April. Hezbollah immediately, immediately violated that ceasefire. Immediately. Are we going to be back lobbing rockets again over the weekend? I'm curious. I think we all would like to know. It feels like this is a rinse and repeat type thing. It's been a back and forth the entire time. We had Iran that attacked Bahrain, Kuwait, and there was craziness in Iraq. This has been some maritime drama. We had additional, this was on June 27,

so this was just on Friday when we had other CENTCOM release that we conducted additional strikes against multiple targets. And this was in response, and we talked about this, the Iranian attack on one of our, on another vessel in the straight under our protection. Iran chose to not honor the ceasefire. And they launched a one-way drone attack, and it hit a vessel.

And I think that was a Panama flag tanker, and it was exiting. It was with more than two barrels of crude oil. Now, the commercial traffic is still happening. Vessels are still going back and forth in between. So all of this, obviously the president wasn't pleased. He had said the, quote, United States aircraft struck Iranian missiles and drone storage location radar sites for violating the ceasefire again. It's very possible. They'll never learn. And there may come to a point, he says, when we're no longer

able to be reasonable and be forced to militarily complete the job that we very successfully started. the Lebanese government went along the road. This is how bad it's, how much they're fighting in their own government. They went along the roads in their airport in Beirut, and they took down all of the pro-Iranian regime signs that had their hominy and then the dead hominy, and then the Hominy Jr.

Oh, you don't remember which one he is? He's the burnt one that's one naked and gay. Maybe dead. I think the jury's obviously. on that one? Kane? Might be kind of dead? Yeah.

Probably is. Yeah. So they took down all those signs because on the road to Beirut, they just had like billboard after billboard of the mullahs, right? So the Lebanese government went and took all of those down.

They're hardcore about this. They've released statements. They've had videos. They've given interviews, the whole nine yards. But what's crazy is that there is that there is, is like a new alliance, really, that has formed as a result of this in the Middle East.

And it's between the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. You're not hearing a lot about this because all of the people that are promoting the Iranian propaganda. And I cannot tell you guys how deeply infiltrated the Western media is. And I'm not talking about the traditional legacy media. I'm also talking about the mainstream media. that you know on and podcasts in that. They don't want to tell you that Israel and Lebanon

have basically an alliance at this point. And that actually could be a game changer in this area. And the United States has been helping to facilitate that alliance. And the Lebanese government, they absolutely don't want Hezbollah involved. You know, the other thing, too, I was seen over the weekend. Let me pull this up because I had this in my... I think I had tweeted about this. I saw this New Yorker piece that was going around to this extent.

And it was about Lebanon and getting into Israel and how Israel, like the New Yorker had a story. It said Israel's ban on quote unquote Palestinian, made up word, workers, Gazan workers, has left families hungry and parents unable to pay for their children's school fees. And the ban is being justified in the name of security and shows no signs of abating. You mean there might be legitimate concerns about people coming from Gaza? You know, Gaza, where not a single citizen that was keeping hostages after October 7th volunteered their location. And there were actual just citizens working with Hamas, the government, they overwhelmingly elected, and also still leads in the polls and is more popular than Fata. That one? That area?

By the way, the Arab League resolution, this was done in, this was a resolution 1547 passed in 1950. member states were cautioned about granting naturalized citizenship to Gaza refugees. Now, why is it that they just say that Israel does this? Do you realize this is the exact same status quo in Lebanon and Syria? And in Egypt for Gaza workers? Oh, and in Jordan. Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt. I haven't even looked at UAE or Bahra.

rain, but I'd pretty much wager that it's similar. So you're telling me that all of these other nations do the same thing, but the New Yorker only just did a story on Israel? Yes, I am telling you that. The New Yorker omitted any mention in their peace of any of these other countries and all of the restrictions and prohibitions they have on Gaza workers. They ignored all of them because they wanted to focus on just the Jews. That's what the New Yorker did. And that's fact. by the way, all of those other nations have those exact same restrictions in place. For good reason.

If you ask any of those other countries to absorb Ghazan refugees, the answer is a big fat no. And in Egypt, it's a no with razor wire at the border. I wonder why that is. I wonder why the New Yorker didn't include any of that information and the piece that they wrote about when they were talking about the prohibition of Ghazan workers and other nations. Again, because there's no Jews in those other countries. So it seems like it's just because they wanted to do a hit piece on the Jews. It seems like that, doesn't it?

I mean, I think if you're going to make an opinion on something, if you're going to form an opinion on an issue. And I like, you know, for us on the right or that look at ourselves as being on the American right, then wouldn't you want to make sure that you are being. your decision on a fact and that you're not basing your decision on propaganda. I mean, I value intellectual honesty and integrity, not just as a Christian, but as a patriot. So I would imagine that others value those virtues similarly and that they also are really all about intellectual honesty.

So they would want to make their, they would want to also base their decisions on something similar. I mean, the New Yorker wrote this and did not say a single thing about any of those other nations. Also, they didn't share, you know what else they didn't do. They didn't talk about what happened in all of those other nations where they allowed Ghazan refugees and workers in. In Lebanon, you got Hezbollah. That's what happened. It was

such a destabilizing factor that they put the lockdown and they wouldn't allow any more refugees in. Jordan's and was like, nah, we don't want that. Egypt was like, nope, we're not going to do it either. Hmm. Interesting. But the New Yorker didn't write about any of that.

I wonder why. We have a lot more on the way. And by the way, watch how many people in podcasts to stand repeat that story as gospel truth without telling you any of the stuff that I just told you. It'll be every single one of them. If you have a teenage girl in your life, you already know the battle's real. Schools, social media, and entertainment constantly. fighting to shape what your kids see, hear, and believe. And too often, parents are the last to know

what's being pushed on them. That's why I'm proud to partner with Concerned Women for America, the nation's largest Christian women's public policy organization. And for 45 years, they've been fighting for faith, family, and freedom. CWA recently reported that 41% of Netflix's G-rated and child-friendly content contains LGBTQ alphabet themes, storylines, and characters. And they're asking a simple question, shouldn't parents have a greater say in what's marketed to their kids? The FCC is reviewing its outdated TV rating system and they're asking for public input. But activist groups, they're flooding the comment period with their feedback. The FCC needs to hear from parents like you. If you think children's programming should be transparent and that

parents should have the loudest voice, this is your chance to speak up. Visit concernedwomen.org slash Dana and submit your comment before the June 22nd deadline. Make your voice heard. That's concernedwomen.org slash Dana and do it before June 22nd. So I know you guys saw this over the weekend where he is accusing Paxton of saying that he would rather live in Texas or California. And that was all of the headlines. If you saw any of the headlines, this is what he had tweeted out.

And I have this on the rundown too. This is what he had tweeted out. Talariko had tweeted, Ken Paxton says he often doesn't want to be in Texas and prefers spending time in California where he grew up. Instead, quote, I like places in California,

even though I don't like to admit that I go to California, but it's beautiful, end quote. Here's the problem. The question that Paxton was asked that he was answering is this, what is your favorite place outside of Texas.

And they edited his answers out. Listen to this. Cut 26. This is what Tala Rico's been pushing. I love, like, Jackson Hole. I like Park City. I like the mountains. And I also like, you know, beaches. I like places in Florida.

I like places in California, even though I don't like to admit that I go to California, but it's beautiful. It's a, they have some just Laguna Beach. That area I love going there during the summer when it's, you know, 108 here. in Texas. So he was asked specifically, where would you live, where would you go outside of Texas?

That was the direct question. Tala Ricos people have been running out there going, no, no, no. He's saying that he doesn't like Texas and he doesn't want to live in Texas. And that's what he's saying. That's not what he was asked at all. That was the answer that he gave. Although I wouldn't say California Like outside of Texas

I wouldn't say California I would say Like I don't know like anywhere near Boka or Miami Beach It's very pretty there Or even on the Gulf side

Like 30A Gorgeous area I would say that Maybe like parts of Montana But I wouldn't say California Because I'd have to None of my can bring any of my guns there All my guns would be illegal

It would be illegal to possess So that was the question. That went viral. The way that Tala Rico was presenting it went viral of the weekend. Now, this is the guy who always falsely talks up a faith. Why is he bearing false witness here? Why is he bearing false witness? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense.

The other hit piece that I saw, because they keep saying, as it relates to the Senate race, and this is getting to be a really, an issue in Texas, trying to figure out how I'm going to address this. I get really aggravated. I see people who ran for office and they didn't succeed and then they're still trying to be influential within Republican politics in Texas and they say things like, well, you know, Paxton's people have to bring us in. Losers don't get to make demands first and foremost, number one. Number two, you're either a political warrior or you're not. If you have to be cajoled into doing something, and then you have to question whether it's your interest

or the nation's interest that you haven't at heart. But third, people keep trying to argue that Paxton's personal issues are somehow, even though they've never affected his votes, never affected his positions and how he's carried out duties in his office in terms of going right or left before, they're trying to act like somehow that means Tala Rica,

will be more conservative. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. That he'll be more conservative. So one of the hit pieces that I saw over, and full disclosure, I know Paxton quite well, and I've known him for a long time, there was this, this is a daily mail, and this was a hit piece that I, sometimes I'm like, is Cornans, the same people who ran Cornans, who horribly ran Cornans campaign, are they now running Tala Ricos? It seems like it. There was a headline that said, Mary Texas Republican caught on video, which mistress on secret romantic getaway. And it was a story on Paxton. Well, first off, him and his wife

have been separated for a couple of years. And I'm not going to, look, I understand he's got issues. King David also had issues. I'm not saying he's like King David, but the idea that God can't use people who have conveyed mistakes is a challenge to God's authority. And you need to take that up with your Lord and Savior. You have to, because that's a spiritual issue on you. But also, if it's your girlfriend and you've been separated for a couple of years and you're pretty much almost all and you're divorced at this point. Is that really your mistress? Or is it a girlfriend? I don't know. Am I just like nitpicking words? It's very misleading. Purposefully so. I'm going to be, look, there's, I don't really care who Paxton dates. I don't care if he dates 10 women at once.

I don't care. He's going to vote more conservative than Tolarico and you are not going to convince me that Paxton, whatever he does in his personal time, that these are the soldiers that you go to war with. Paxton has never moved to take away my guns. Tala Rico will. Paxon has never moved to increase my taxes. Tala riko will. Paxton has never moved to open the border. Tala riko will.

This is a really easy question as to who you're going to vote for in this. And the people who are like, well, I just don't know if I can, if you're not voting for Paxton, you're voting for Tala Rico. There's no gray area. And I understand, look, I appreciate the people who are like, well, I don't like the stuff that he has in his personal life. That's great. I don't think anybody does. I don't think anybody, but that's irrelevant. And first off, that's his issue. Those are his issues. I don't care. I literally do not care. I could not care less if I tried. Because these people are vessels for your will. What? Vessel is going to carry your will forward in Congress. That is the question. Do you think it's

going to be James Tala Rico? Oh, no, I don't think it's going to be Tala Rigo. I'm just not going to vote. Okay, so you're not going to vote. So that means you're voting for Tala RICO. There's no lukewarm here. There is no neutral here. It's too close. There's too much at stake. you're not voting to endorse a person's life, you're voting to endorse your agenda and what vessel is going to best carry your agenda through in Congress. You are allowing yourself to be manipulated by the left who will never observe the morals that you hold. And in fact, they will do everything to stab you in the back over them, once that they are able to trick you into allowing them to go forward. Do not allow yourself to be manipulated by the left, because that is exactly what's happening

in this race. It's very easy. These people are vessels for your agenda. That's all it is. You're not endorsing anybody's lifestyle. And if you think that God cannot use people who have made mistakes, he uses you. look at the entire lineage of Jesus if you think that God cannot use broken people to bring forward his will.

Now, a couple of other things. A couple of aside. I found this interesting. I think I put this. Did I put this in Slack? I think I did. So this, I know a lot of, everybody knows the brand name Prada, right? So Prada posted a video to,

this was on Instagram, where they have, and again, it's a Gaza ambassador, but they use the fake term Palestinian. A Gaza ambassador who is wearing a necklace that represents from the river to the sea, quote-unquote, Palestine will be free, the elimination of Israel. So the symbol that the guy is wearing on his necklace is the symbol that stands for the elimination of Israel. and it got a luxury campaign prodded. They posted a whole video of it to their Instagram account. Huh. And their beauty ambassador is a racist nepo baby, Bella Hadid, who would not have gotten a modeling contract,

has she not gotten a nose job? She did get a nose job. She admitted it. She had plastic surgery. She would not. and her mom and her dad, who's like this multi-million dollar developer, they got her a modeling contract. So interesting. Now, if that worries you about Prada, Mutia Prada, who is the, who ended up taking ownership

and the family, I think before selling a portion to, I think it was that French conglomerate, but is a hardcore communist. Like Malaparte is, and got into. to fascism, Malaparte is like one of her favorite authors. If you're unfamiliar with Malaparte, one of the things Malaparte's most famous for is having this huge crazy house on Capri. It's on a cliff in Capri and it's, sometimes it's open, mostly it's closed. And it was, I think it was in a James Bond movie, but it's like this brutalist structure on this outcrop of rock on the southern, southeastern point of Capri. It's a really, it's a realist. It's a

really insane structure, but he ended up being persecuted by both fascists and communists because he ended up flipping back and forth. And he was like exiled and all this stuff anyway. But he's a big famous statist. And she's a hardcore commie. She's a Marxist. You can say she's reformed, but she's not. I mean, I literally read an interview where she was talking about some communist authors and she once again included Malaparte. Some of his earlier works when he was still a hardcore commie. So yeah. But, but, but. That's not accurate at all. I'm not surprised.

But now it's being, it's, and you shouldn't be surprised that it's being mainstreamed in culture and fashion at that level. But they think that people aren't going to know. They think that people are too stupid and won't notice this stuff. But it's unsurprising. That's one. And a lot of, and by the way, so much of Prada, do you realize, so here's one little thing. Back during COVID, when Italy got shut down and when Prado, which was in Tuscany, which is a little bit north of Florence, that's where all the textiles are done. That's where all those Wuhan business people went in and bought all of

these Italian companies and all this stuff. One of the reasons why it exploded there was because of that arrangement. But also, do you know what they found out? Vogue even had a story on it that a significant number of Prada stuff wasn't even made by Chinese and sweatshops in Prado. It was actually made in China. That was a big, dirty little secret that nobody wanted to talk about. And Vogue was forced to touch on it because COVID wrecked the textiles industry because that was a hot spot in Italy. A significant portion of it was actually made in China. That was pretty crazy, huh? So who has the last laugh? We got a lot more on the way. We've got headlines coming up as we move the folks who make it possible. It's our friends over at Patriot Mobile. Look, this is the only Christian

conservative cell phone network that's out there. So if you're not using them, you need to realize you're funding the left. If you're using any other phone service, I'm not going to list names, but I can tell you how much they're donating to gun control, for instance, or how much they're donating to DEI, or how much they were actually donating. There was one huge cell phone company that was donating millions for open border advocacy, right? That's not Patriot Mobile. You get premium priority nationwide service on all three major networks, unlimited data plans, international roaming, 100% U.S.-based customer service team, dual network capability where you can have two separate networks on one phone. And they also have a contract buyout program and a device buyout program to get you out of your contract and get you on with them.

But in addition to that, their money does not go towards a single thing that you do not vote for. And they established this momentum. They partner with everyday Americans in towns across America to help them with everything from school boards to gun rights. And they have receipts to prove it and a string of victories. is easy to switch. You keep your phone and keep your number. Every call is answered by real people here in the US of A and you're getting dependable wireless service, but not compromising your values. If you have not switched today, you're literally handing money to your opposition. And I'm going to be honest, you're undermining America. You got to switch. Superior coverage, superior

product, superior customer service. There's no excuse. Visit patriotmobile.com slash Dana or call 972 Patriot. Use promo code Dana for a free month of service. That's patriotmobile.com slash Dana, 972 Patriot promo code Dana. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. All right. So first and foremost, the Mel Brooks turns 100. He turned 100 years old.

It's the shorts. My first introduction of Mel Brooks wasn't blazing saddles. It was Spaceballs. That was my, why was a kid, though, when Spaceballs came out? I don't think, when did Blazing Saddles come out? Hang on, let me look. We were talking, yeah, I think that was before my time. Oh, wait, yeah, that was totally before my time.

But Spaceballs was not. So Spaceballs, I remember when that came out. And it was hysterical. And I love that. Oh, my gosh, I love that movie. I watched it so many times. I can quote it. Like Pizza the Hut, everybody.

I love that film. But he's 100 years old. He's not allowed to die. And you know why he's not allowed to die? Because I really feel. like that kind of humor and the, you know, devil may care. Who cares if we're making front of everybody so we don't care if you're offended. He was like one of the, he like really thrived in that. And I, we need that more than ever, got to say. Also, let's see, a strong

summer box office could mean Hollywood's first 10 billion years since the pandemic. But how much of this is from Hollywood movies and how much of it is from the YouTube creators? That's one of the things I noticed that really wasn't explored. They looked at Toy Story 5, which I didn't think a lot of people went to see Toy Story 5, did they? I don't know. It wasn't bad. I didn't read a lot about that.

I have not gone to see any of these movies because all of it looks like they. Well, so they say the backrooms, that's the one they said that. So it's Devil Wars Prada obsession and the backrooms. So the backrooms, that was a YouTube thing. That has nothing to do with Hollywood Studios. So they're losing it. They're losing it. I would go see the backrooms, but I would go see the backrooms, but I would.

wouldn't go see any of that other stuff. Airlines are installing new luxury seats, but nobody's allowed to sit in them because they haven't yet been certified by aviation authorities. So when they launch their inaugural flight with the seats in September, nobody, I mean, they're going to be empty because nobody's allowed to sit in them, per the Wall Street Journal, one of the dumbest things ever. And this is something that's a Dutch airline, KLM. So they've got 34 live flat seats equipped with, so basically it's like a pod.

So they have privacy doors, the whole nine yards. and yeah nobody's going to be able to sit in them because bureaucracy we love bureaucracy yay I don't think so a plane carrying skydivers crashed in France

this is after one crashed in Missouri where you had nine people on board this was 11 11 people on board this was a tragedy it happened on Sunday when a German registered plane found a spot of difficulty

and it came down 11 people I'm not by the way five of the people that were in the crash were in nurses from the local area that were going skydiving for the first time. That's awful. That's horrible story. I could not be prevailed upon to skydive,

I think. Especially after watching that lady with a bungee cord and there was no cord. I still can't get over that. NASA is going to launch a daring rescue to save an aging telescope from falling to Earth. This sounds like a job for Bruce Willis and Aerosmith. $30 million cents.

You guys are, tell me that you guys know that reference. Steve, you know that reference, right? Is that Armageddon, right? No, he doesn't. Oh my gosh. You're right, it's Armageddon. So that was when Ben Affleck was dating Bruce Willis's daughter, Liv Tyler, and Steve Tyler, Liv Tyler's real dad. Erasmuth, they sang the whole theme song for it, and they had to shoot up,

yeat themselves into space on a rocket to go, like, blow apart and drill apart this asteroid. And only Bruce Willis's crew were able to do it out of all of Earth. That's the plot. True story. Anyway, $30 million salvage operation underway. They're launching a robotic lifesaver. They don't want it to fall to the, they don't want China to get it either. Interesting.

Interesting. I don't think China would ever be able to actually get it, but we'll see. So I felt it was very important. Kane, in case you had any questions as to what it's like being a man, Michelle Obama is here to explain. This is cut 15. She just wants to be helpful. Yeah.

Go ahead. We're at a time when there's a lot of talk about what it means to be a man. You know, it's all out there. There's a lot of mansplaining going on. And what you feel in those conversations is what we understand is that men struggle. What the hell is she even saying? It's a bunch of word salad nonsense. Mansplaining, you know.

She didn't even say mansplaining. She said mansplain. Like, I don't mean. even know what the hell of that is. Like sitting like a dude. I guess? Well, there's a reason for that. The obvious one? Yeah. Okay. I don't begrudge

a dude for that. I mean, you know, I, you have to hate men to want them to hurt that. Just saying. I think you nailed it. Yeah, I did. That was some word salad stupidity. I don't understand what she was actually saying there. That's like Kamala Harris.

Exactly right. Was that her podcast or was she a guest on somebody's thing? I think she just does her little podcast to make money and she has no content. So she just like sits there and says stupid, just word salad stuff. I could not get, I could not glean a single point from that other than she was talking about mansplaining. And men struggle. I mean struggle. Did you learn anything about being a man from that, Kane?

I did not. You sure? I did not. There's no like kernels of insight. I mean, I do like taking advice from other men, but she's not. I mean, there's rumors. She's a man, but she's not. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

So, no thanks. Well, it's not, though. Ronnie Jackson said that's not true. And I trust Ronnie Jackson because if anybody would shout up from the rooftops, it would be Rep Jackson. I'm sorry, Rep Jackson. I remember that dinner, and I was like, I can't even believe you. right there and I asked him point blank.

I was like, I'm going to shoot my shot, man. I'm going to shoot my shot. Like when we had Pompeo on, I was like, I got really smart questions for you, but let's just be real. What about the Malians? That's when he was head to CIA. I'm like, I'm going to take my shot every time. Every time.

All right. Today's stupidity. All right, Juan, can we play cut 20? Because there was so much stupidity today. I had to land on something. This is Texas Democrats who apparently are fine with being trans, vegan, and going to hell as long as Tala Rico's doing it. So listen to this.

Next time they say that James is trans, we're all trans. No. Listen to the cheers. When they say James is a gay tofu eating vegan, we're all gay tofu eating veg. No, sorry. No, we're not. I draw the line well before that. I've never, I don't really think I've ever eaten tofu.

food. It's against my religion. Yeah, we're doing that. Folks, that does it for tonight. For us today, I'll be on waters tonight, like 730 Central. Find us at Substack, the podcast, YouTube, Facebook, like and subscribe back tomorrow.