The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Monday June 3 - Full Show

Episode Date: June 3, 2024

Dr. Fauci testifies in the House over the COVID-19 Pandemic. Hunter Biden appears in court for lying on his firearm license application. Gay Pride attendees and pro-Palestine protesters have a standoff at the Philly Pride Parade. Dr. Fauci gets caught lying about social distancing and the efficacy of the vaccines. The press protects a radical Afghan refugee after stabbing a German police officer. Biden plans to grant mass amnesty to 350K migrants. Ukraine President Zelenskyy says Trump risks being a ‘loser president’ if he imposes a bad deal on Ukraine. Is the targeting of Caitlin Clark race-based? Will Trump’s conviction change anybody’s mind?Please visit our great sponsors:Ammo Squaredhttps://ammosquared.comEnsure you are prepared for whatever comes your way with ammosquared.comBlack Rifle Coffeehttps://blackriflecoffee.com/danaUse code DANA to save 20% on your next order.  Goldcohttps://danalikesgold.comGet your free Gold Kit from GoldCo today.Hillsdale Collegehttps://danaforhillsdale.comVisit DanaForHillsdale.com to start your National Survey on Presidential Selection today!KelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comSign up for the KelTec Insider and be the first to know the latest KelTec news.Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/danaGet free activation with code Dana.ReadyWise https://readywise.comUse promo code Dana20 to save 20% on any regularly priced item.

later is the issue of the six-foot distance, and I made the statement that it just appeared, and that got taken at like, I don't know what's going on, it just appeared. It actually came from the CDC. The CDC was responsible for those kinds of guidelines for schools, not me. So when I said that it just appeared, it appeared. Was there any science behind it? What I meant by no science behind it is that there wasn't a control. trial that said compare six foot with three feet with ten feet so there wasn't

that scientific evaluation of it what I believe the CDC used for their reason to say six feet is that studies years ago showed that when you're dealing with droplets which at the time that the CDC made that recommendation it was felt that the transmission was primarily through droplet not aerosol, which is incorrect, because we know now, aerosol does play a role. That's the reason why they did it. It had little to do with me since I didn't make the recommendation, and my saying there was no science behind it means there was no clinical trial that proved that. That's just one of the things that got a little distorted in the response to that. And I've learned and

watched you over the years. I have to go back to... that's that's ongoing that's one of the things that we're watching right now is this uh fouchy trial well not fouchy trial i don't want to say trial that's not what i mean i mean hearing right it's the hearing it's the fouchy hearing and whether and there's i mean a lot of this stuff is stuff that we know because it's it's stuff that everybody's already talked about and you know but a lot of this i think is important for people to hear simply because it's there's you know like the the whole thing the whole soundbite that he was just talking about which we're going to get into that's one of the things that you know he was saying that well you know there's no science i based on the masking for the kids and all this other stuff his remarks on that i get what he was saying on it but and like i said we're going to discuss it bottom line is that that that's how ultimately that's what that statement that he said meant i mean he can sit here and try to six ways to sunday try to figure out a different way to put it so So welcome to the program.

And Dana Lashed with you dealing with allergies. Why is it? What's rained? They should all be away. They should all be. Why am I dealing with allergies? Dana Lash with you. You can listen coast to coast.

You can also stream the radio program. You can watch the simulcast, Channel 347 DirecTV as well. So this, we have this, and we also have the Hunter Biden. trial. Aren't they, they're doing jury selection right now, I believe, correct? Yeah, so they're having, how's that going to go? How do you get on that jury? How do you get on the Hunter Biden jury? I'm just curious. Asking for some friends. Same way you get on the Trump jury. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. But I bet to get on the Hunter jury, you have to demonstrate

that you are a hardcore Democrat probably. Yeah, you would think so, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's how you had to get on the Trump jury, too. Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're going to be a hardcore Democrat. So we're going to, anything that comes up with that, we'll bring it to you. I just am endlessly fascinated by the way that his attorneys are arguing all of this. Because remember, as we've talked about on the program before, their whole argument is that because Hunter Biden was on drugs, that it was okay for him to lie about being on drugs when he filled out his 4473 to go and buy a gun. that's what they're arguing.

I'm not mad. I told you that last week. That's literally what they're arguing. It's the craziest thing I've ever seen. But, you know, there you go. So we're going to get into all that. We're going to find the, we're going to follow the Fauci hearing. We're going to talk about follow all of the stuff with the 100-bent gun trial.

We've got all the latest as it relates to the November. And the money that was raised by the Trump campaign with all of this. So we're going to, we're going to follow all of it. But first and foremost, though, this hearing that's ongoing. I was getting ready. I was kind of lingering and waiting to come into the studio because I was getting, I was watching Marjorie Taylor Green question Fauci and it seemed like they were going to fight for a moment, Kane. I thought that there was going to be a brawl for a second because they were getting very testy. They're really, Democrats are really trying to set him up as being this very sympathetic

figure and oh my gosh, it's so sad. You know, Anthony Fauci, you were, you were threatened and your family got threats and that's like so bad. Democrats had no problem doing that when it was someone speaking up in favor of the Second Amendment. They had no problem issuing threats and sitting in their in their Capitol Hill offices calling people domestic terrorists if they stuck up for Second Amendment rights. They had no problem with that. But hell, you fund a little gain of function. You know, I mean, how dare you? But they were really trying to rehabilitate him in the mind of the voter. And I was just thinking about how weird all of this is. Why are they so hardcore defending him? why I have a little Machiavellian idea you got might get mad at me for it I'm just saying this is where

Democrats are stupid as a box of rocks they are just some of the dumbest people when it comes to strategy they always overplay their hand they make the most you know the most obvious moves possible I mean if people are upset over the country that over the lockdown that you know engulfed the country why are you as a Democrat not trying to tie that to the previous administration why are you not trying to do that? I mean, there's not going to be any reckoning or accountability because we have to skip over that very inconvenient fact. I'm just saying this because I'm, it's being honest here.

But if Democrats were smart, they would do that. But if they were smart, that's the, you know, that's doing a lot of heavy lifting in this. But they've been trying to rehabilitate. I'm always just, can you believe it? It's just this poor man. And I was listening to him, try to walk around this statement that he made as it relates to the masking and all of this other stuff.

And he was saying the way that it was put in the headlines is that he confessed that he made up the COVID rules, including six feet of social distancing and masking kids. And he's been for the past like hour trying to walk that back. He's been trying to walk that back for like the past hour and say that, well, that's not what I meant. you know, I wasn't exactly talking about that. I was, you know, really ultimately, you know, the CDC made those rules up. I didn't make those rules up. That's not, you know, that's not, you know, not exactly what I said. But that's, but that is kind of what he said, though, isn't it?

I mean, that's, I mean, I was looking at this. It says he made up the six foot social distancing rule and other measures to protect Americans from COVID. He goes, no, no, no, that was something that the CDC actually suggested. And, you know, yeah, okay, well, let's just go with that. But then you suggested it as part of the coronavirus task force. Audio sound by 26. Listen to this. I mean, this is the sound bite.

Okay, well, that's where he came in. But there was more, because he was, his exchange with, it was the Texas representative that he was talking with. It was two people before Marjorie Taylor Green, where he touched on that again. And he was saying that, well, you know, they were talking about droplets versus aerosol.

and they had that whole conversation. And the congressman was trying to get him on the point of, okay, well, you were suggesting that this was based in science, but then you're saying that you didn't say this. So which is it? And then Fauci goes, Fouchi was explaining, well, you know, the reason that, you know, it seems like it's being said that they're not based in science is because there's no studies

supporting that any of these measures work. Okay, then. How is that not what you just said? Do you see my point? If Fauci is claiming that all of the masking and all of this other stuff, that none of this actually, there's no evidence at all whatsoever. There's no studies. There's been nothing done that shows that any of this actually was effective in terms of preventing the spread.

Then it's not wrong then for the headlines to say that there was no science behind any of these suggestions that you signed on to, correct? that's the claim that's being made. So he's trying to dance his way out of it. And he can't. I think he got high on his own supply, honestly. Like this guy was seeking media attention, and I always thought that was super dangerous to do that. It really was.

Then there was this back and forth. There's a several of these that I wanted to, Audio Soundbite 23. This was when he was asked about the effectiveness. He was so cagey on this response. Listen to this. Audio Sound by 23. The vaccine saved millions of lives,

and I want to thank you for, your support and engagement on that. However, despite statements to the contrary, it did not stop transmission of the virus. Did the COVID vaccine stop transmission of the virus? That is a complicated issue because in the beginning, the first iteration of the vaccines did have an effect, not 100%, not a high effect. They did prevent infection and subsequently, obviously, obviously transmission. However, it's important to point out something that we did not know early on that became evidence as the months went by is that the durability of protection against infection and hence transmission was relatively limited, whereas the duration of protection

against severe disease, hospitalization, and deaths was more prolonged. So you had this transcript when he testified, when Fauci had testified before the House, it was the House subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic. And it was just actually released Friday, the transcript, very conveniently. It was released on Friday the day after the verdict, you know. What did we tell you? You always got to pay attention to what they're going to be releasing on this and when, right? So this was about, this was when he, this, the testimony that he gave,

It was a closed-door session that was in January. So the transcript of that was released on Friday. And it all comes out that all of this was absolute garbage. There was no science at all whatsoever. And this gets to the crux of what they're talking about today. There was no science at all whatsoever behind any of this stuff. There was no science, even in the beginning when they were talking about the injections. And YouTube, I kid you not, if you're going to sit here and censor me,

I do not have enough middle fingers for you glorified rat bastard baristas who love to sit here knock our videos whenever we talk about any of this stuff. Every single damn time they demonetize us or they take our videos down whenever we talk about this stuff, you fascists can go get sideways blanked. You absolutely can. So there was not anything at all whatsoever. No science behind any of this stuff. That's what came out in this transcript, right? And he's being asked about this transcript now, and he's having to dance away from some of these answers. This honestly, are we so far removed from all of this that there aren't riots? If you're going to write over anything, you ought to be rioting over this. People's lives were ruined. We had a society that was irrevocably reshaped as a result of this.

There are relationships that were changed. I had some real jack wagon people that I thought were friends that took the opportunity to be absolute just jack wagons. And they used this as justification for their egregiously ridiculous, horrible, immoral behavior. I mean, we saw the true nature of people. If there's one thing that you can be grateful for, maybe two things, is that you saw the silver lining, you saw what was going on in your kids' schools, and then you saw people for who they were, the people who were eager to follow this stuff, the people who were eager to step in line,

the people who were eager to drop the knee, you really saw people for who they were. So if there's anything in there to be grateful for, it's those two realizations. But the fact is, is that there was no science, and there wasn't any science, and he can sit here and try to revise what he said all he wants to.

But as he just said, about maybe 30 minutes ago, in this hearing, is that there were no studies out of all whatsoever that were supporting the masks, that were supporting any of this stuff. Remember, you all were called Nazis because you said the same thing. So there's a company that I just started using called Ammo Squared, and Ammo Squared helps you stay stocked up on ammunition, like automatically. It's a truly automated system. You set it and you forget it. It's an ammo purchasing program, and you can pick whatever caliber you want. You can set your budget. You can select your

shipping, and that's it. And the cool thing is that it builds up. your ammunition builds up over time and it's stored in this climate-controlled warehouse and it sends it automatically when you want it, when you have its selected descent. And ammunition is a hard asset. I mean, it's something that's tangible. I think we all remember the uncertainty like back in what, 2019, 2020 when there were certain calibers that were kind of hard to find. And we ended up call and we were calling some of our retail friends and saying, when you get a shipment of this, can we get some? Can we lay claim to some when it comes in? And in times of uncertainty and inflation, the value of all the stuff only goes up. So Ammo Squared is there to help smooth out the

rough spots of ammunition availability. It's like an ammo 401k or something like that. You set it up. You have ammo for that rainy day when store shelves are empty and ammo's hard to find. So you can learn more and you can sign up today at Ammosquared.com and ensure that you're prepared for whatever may come your way. That's Ammosquared.com. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So some artists are canceling shows, and the reason being is because the economy sucks. The economy is so bad that people can't even afford to go see live music at all. They have no discretionary income.

Thanks, Joe Biden. But go ahead and sit here and tell me how mean tweets are so much worse. Yeah, apparently NBC has this piece where they're saying consumers are having to make tough choices about how to spend their money. That's right. You know why? Because everybody's pulling purse strings. Everybody. Yeah, except for the government.

That can go absolutely pound sand. I'm telling you, maybe it is time for another revolution. They don't stop spending our money. Parents fear that trans ice hockey players pose a danger to girls. Yeah, they are because boys are using and their stupid parents who I think have Munchausen's by proxy. And they're looking to get attention by presenting their children as having, like, you know, something wrong with them. They are entering girls leagues and they're playing against females as young as 14. Boys are, males, like 18-year-olds even.

You know how, like, that's a very physical sport. There are going to be girls who get injured, but hey, doesn't care. Nobody cares. Society doesn't care. Who cares how many girls you give concussions to or knock in the face or knock on the ground? Honestly, I think people have a fetish for seeing women being violated. If you completely wholeheartedly support men entering women's sports like this, particularly very, very physical athletic disciplines. I think that some of people have a fetish and they, like, it can't beat your wife because it's illegal.

So we're going to go, we'll play in a sport and beat this chick like in UFC or something like, prove me wrong. You absolute sickos, prove me wrong. Let's see. China lands on the moon's far side in a historic sample retrieval mission. If there's one moon landing, I'm going to believe is fake. It's this one. You know why? Because it's China, right?

And then you also have Greek, they're trying to say that the ancient Greek fighting force was made up of entirely gay couples, which no one actually believes. They keep going this thing. I mean, there's like stuff with Sparta and Athens, etc. It's June. So,

everything's rainbow. They're going to be pushing the stuff Six Waste of Sunday. Did you see what? Who was it? They came up. Was it Department of Transportation that had the seatbelt thing? We're going to talk about, yeah, because they showed seatbelts with different rainbows, but only one of the seatbelts worked. You know that, right? Like, you can't have two of the, yeah, that was only

one of the seatbelts actually worked. And that's the thing it is, apparently. What is it? It's Pride Month. I thought Pride was. It was the Dutch Airlines. Do they not know how seatbelts work? The Royal Dutch Airlines. Do they not know how C-Belt work? We're going to get into all of this because they had the Navy SEALs that also apparently, yeah, they also apparently had a tweet up.

I was actually going to pull it up real quick. But anyway, we're going to get into that. Additionally, apparently Biden is going to be on the ballot in Ohio. Well, of course, they're also trying to get around all of this stuff by hurrying up and nominating and confirming Biden Harris earlier anyway. But they're saying that the Republican-dominated legislature concluded a rare special session in the Ohio Senate on Friday. It's a temporary fix, but they're trying to get it to where he can be on the ballot. They messed it up when they decided to hold their convention and then

their state event, like way, way late. Stick with us. We've got more in store. Hi, I'm Erica, an English major at Hillsdale College. Here's Hillsdale President, Dr. Larry Arne, with the Constitution Minute. James Madison writes in Federalist 51 that men are not angels. Their passions and self-interest often get the better of their reason and sense of justice. So we need government in order to protect our rights against those who would take them away. But for the same reason, Madison writes, government must be limited because people in government have passions and interests too. Many Americans today forget this,

supposing that we can do away with constitutional limits on government, supposing that the unelected bureaucrats being put in charge of our health care, for example, will rule as if they are angels. If Madison was correct about human nature, this is foolish and dangerous. To learn more and get a free pocket constitution, visit constitutionminute.com. Looking for the drive-through version of the Dana Show? Check out the best highlights from every show and Dana's absurd truth podcast posted daily from the Dana Show. Hunter Biden, the president's son, goes on trial for gun charges beginning tomorrow.

President Biden said last year, quote, my son has done nothing wrong. The Wall Street Journal, as you see here, the editorial board said at the time, quote, that's a highly inappropriate message from a president. He's essentially telling prosecutors that they are wrong to bring an indictment because Hunter is innocent of any criminal behavior. Why was it appropriate for President Biden to publicly comment on his son's case? President Biden commented as a loving father, as I would hope any loving father would do. Yeah, why would? just he loves his baby, Kane. He loves him.

I love my dad, gay. He loves him. He's a loving father. He loves his children so much to take showers with him. But only the girl ones. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash with you. That's Sakeem Jeffreys who runs the DNC. And he's like, oh, well, you know, there's no gag order, by the way, on Joe Biden on this. He's like, I know it's totally appropriate for Joe to weigh in on the criminal trial because he's a loving father. He's a loving father who loves. And like he loves, and like he loves, showers with his daughter. But he's because he's a loving father Kane. I mean, what loving

father doesn't regularly shower with his underage daughter? I mean, you know. All the other dads. That's right. That's right. Oh, welcome back. Dana Lash with you. But it's the trial's kicking off today and I still, again, I just want to state this out loud because I can't believe that anyone

somebody thought, you know what, this is the winning argument we're going with. It's a bold move, Cotton. They are arguing and by they, Hunter and his team, they're arguing that Hunter Biden was because he was high

and out of his mind on drugs, that that makes it legal and okay for him to lie on a federal form about being high and totally out of his mind on drugs when he bought a gun and filled out the form and lied on it that he wasn't high and out of his mind on drugs. Makes sense?

Makes sense, right? But an NDA gets you 34 felony counts. That's weird. An NDA. Yeah. basic, don't get me started. Don't get me started because it took all weekend for me to wind that back. Don't. I was like, do you find yourself, somebody says, well, you know, I mean, he was convicted.

Do you find yourself going, wow, like, just me? Is it just me? No, not really. So that's the argument that Hunter's making. Like, who among us hasn't been high and bought a gun? All of us? Again, all of us? But he's just, guys, he's just a loving father.

He's such a loving father that he let his kids be drug addicts, all of them. I honestly, I don't know about Bo, but did he have an issue? You don't get one square kid out of all these freaks. I'm sorry, they all got to be freaks or ain't none of them freaks. You don't have that. Your kids aren't that messed up, and then one of them's an angel. That's not how any of this works. See what I'm saying?

That's not how this works. That's the law of bad parenting. So he's at his trial. They're doing jury selection, I think this afternoon, right? Is that what they're doing, jury selection this afternoon? I'm just telling you, it's really, it's just one of those things that I, I don't see how, I think he needs to have the book thrown at him. I want to see him perp walked. I want to see Hunter Biden in shackles.

And I, that's what I want to see. I want to see the big perp walk. That's, I just feel like that's fair, you know, we need to, the law is the law, right? And by the way, you don't have. to like do yoga stretches with the law. No, you just like force the felony that's there. Right. That's it.

You don't even have to make anything up. You don't even have to take an expired misdemeanor and try to tie it to a mystery felony that no one's going to say actually what it was so that you can try it in a federal court because the time ran out and you trying to do it in state. You just go after the felony that's there. You just go after it. It's going to be really interesting when his, now hold up. Let me take a second to make sure I get all the relationships right.

It's like spaghetti noodles. The ex-lover. The sister-in-law. Wait, the late, former sister-in-law ex-girlfriend. How?

Yeah, her. She was married to his brother, and then when his brother kicked the bucket, he was like, I guess thought he could slide in there. Literally? And he did? Literally.

And then she took his gun and threw it in a trash can across the street from an elementary school. So when she goes up and testify, what's that going to be like? I hope that there's some really ignorant lawyers that they have prosecuting this. I want the meanest lawyers possible. I want some real just jerks. I want some jerk lawyers to go up there and just make everybody cry and get a conviction.

That's what I want to see. And don't forget that Biden actually visited her last week. Yeah, secretly. But it was just for the beau. At 8 o'clock at night. I mean, what do they call them? Because you say old people aren't innocent. And I think it's just because after the sun goes down, isn't the forgetfulness increase?

What is it called? The, what, amnesia? No, it happens when the sun sets. I have no idea. What is it called? There's a phrase for it. The internet is going to tell me to the point for three days. The next three days, the internet is going to be telling me this.

Where you forget something when the sun goes down? Yeah, it's like an old person thing. Like if you're a thousand years old, that happens. Dementia? No, it's like it's fine during the day. It's like how some flowers open during the day and they go to sleep and close up at night. That's like Joe Biden's brain. It's like, doesn't you forget stuff when the sun sets?

Somebody will tell me. I can't. I don't know. Day Mincher. Sundowners. God love you, Lorraine. Sundowners. I didn't know that.

It sounds like a beach bar. Hold up. That's an actual, how do I not know this? It sounds like a beach bar, doesn't it? Sundowners, you're like, I could get a drink there. No, that's what old people like Joe Biden deal with. So it was at 8 o'clock that he went to go visit her. Doesn't he have like the sundowner thing?

Yeah. Makes sense. Yeah. That's wondering. Okay, can we switch gears and talk about who do you have? in this big fight this month. You got the Gaza, the pro-Hamas protesters and the

gay folks in Philly. Who do you got? Who do you have? In one corner. Did you guys see this headline? New York Post. Hundreds of anti-Israel protesters bring the Philly gay pride to a halt. I mean, Kane, this is what folding chairs and popcorn was made for.

I just want to see people go at it. They had all of these, they had a gay pride parade in Philly. And then you had the Hamas people and they had this huge showdown literally in the street. And then you had the

pro-Hamas people screaming PPP KKK-I-O-F. They're all the same. Which didn't even rhyme losers. And then they had the Philly parade, the Pride Parade. And then some people were saying that people are dying at Gaza. There's no time for pride and all this other stuff.

man, some of these people in the parade need to, I just watched a guy walk past wearing booty shorts and heels and healed boots. And his belly hung so far over. It stretched over his thigh to the point that that's where his shorts ended. So probably from the front, he just looked naked. That's so bad. He's proud. Yeah. So they got into a big brawl.

They got to a fight because the Hamas people didn't want the gay people marching. And they're apparently. some of the pro Hamas people in New York had signs that read, killed the hostages now when they crashed their pride parade. So who wins? If it's pride, if it's the gay parade versus Hamas, who wins?

Where are the queers for the non-the fictional non-existing place called Palestine? Where are the queers for Palestine at? Because, you know, you'd get murked there in a heartbeat. I'm just curious. Where are they at and all this? Hanging from cranes. Yeah, they're hanging from cranes. You know, that's what, that's how Hamas decorates for Pride Month.

They take the Pride marchers and they hang them from cranes. You know, it's decoration. Goodness. So who wins in that? You know how difficult this is for the left? Think about it. You spend most of your time trying to compartmentalize and being everything to different identity groups instead of just having a set of principles that all, every group can subscribe to.

You try to make certain accommodations because you want to, you want to, you want to, lock. in votes, but you can't make accommodations to this group because then it makes this group upset. Like the Dear Bornistan's, you can't get, you know, Dear Bornestan, you can't promise them stuff and then turn around and promise the Pride Marcher stuff because they don't like each other. So what happens? Who wins in this? You see the mess that identity politics makes of everything. This is where Democrats are right now.

This is why he just hides away. He don't even know what to do. But for real, like who do you have? Like, if you had to put them all in an octagon, who wins? well one is basically surrounding sexual identity and the other one is anti-Zionist i guess so which is more important is it a the oppression of a people just because of i mean the prohamas people they've got violence down on lock but then the trans tifa they got violence down on lock too but that's a small portion, that's like a segment of the alphabet marchers. And a lot of the alphabet marchers don't

like Transita. So I don't know who wins. Like who's got people that are crazier and violent? I don't know. This is hard. This is like algebra. I like the self-cleaning of an aspect of this though. Yeah, I really like how it takes care of itself, right? Like you could just throw, it's like PCU, just get all the groups arguing. Why can't we just have all the groups on that? Why aren't Republicans doing this? Just like seating the left and getting all these groups. Look, Joe Biden's promising all alphabet people all these things did bonestan where you all look alphabet people joe biden's promising dear bono stand's all these things what are you going to do about it exactly what the left does that's what the left does in the right why are we not doing that to them it's so much easier to troll them

why are we not doing that to them we need like a department of ungentlemanly ungentlemanly political warfare that's what we need we would need media cooperation which is exactly what they have We don't have that. Do we, though? Do we? I mean, I feel like we don't anymore. It certainly has helped them. Well, yeah, they've had decades of it, I think, but do we really need the media with us?

Maybe. I don't know. Who watches the media? I don't watch any TV. You know what I started watching? I started watching this hysterical. I can't remember his name. He's a British guy.

He over-enunciates absolutely everything. But he's a great historian. And so I was, I've been watching this thing about the real history of the Renaissance and goes back to the Flemish masters, which they called, they called Flemish Primitives, which he said was Vasare's, you know, pro-Florantine bias coming through this apparently art history book of all art history books that is considered the Bible on art at that time and also like the standard of measure for art books to come. and Vasari just like rode out all of these other, all of these other people because they didn't fit this mold. Like, oh my gosh, you're not Florentine. You're not doing this, et cetera. But there was one aspect that was hysterical where they were getting into how so many babies that were painted. Like the baby Jesus.

Like hardly anybody got him right. Botticelli did really well. But anyway, it was fascinating. My whole point of bringing this stuff up is I don't even watch television anymore except real niche stuff like that. When's the last time you had the TV on? There was at one point, you know, like background, right? Now, sometimes I'll have C-SPANN news on in the background because it's my job and, you know, I have it on during the day. But if breaking news happens, remember when breaking news did happen previously, there was no other format but television that could really bring you that second by second capture, right?

that second by second you could see everything unfolding. You were right there in the thick of it. That, I think in the past, maybe definitely five years, but maybe 10 years, that's been entirely replaced. And now if something happens, you immediately go look and see,

okay, this is trending before they can even get video to production at news stations. And then you already see the raw video on social media and you're already getting it. The only difference between the stuff, that you would see on TV and the stuff that's on social media is the stuff that's on social media is just chaos and it's just it's unedited it's not even in chronological order all the time and you get tons of bias and the media you get the bias still but at least I will say

they you know maybe they'll they'll take out some of the more sensitive aspects of whatever footage is shown and they'll put it in chronological order and that's really it that's the only benefit I don't really consider that a big sell as to value that over just getting what you get online. But I think it's been replaced. So it comes back to my original point. What? I don't even think they would help. I don't think nobody pays attention to media anymore.

They've lost even that ability, that monopoly on bringing you the immediate up-to-date information. Everyone gets it online now. No one watches the, you know, watches TV for the breaking video or any of that stuff, right? I mean, hell, if you're going to watch a cop chase, you're going to watch the live video online. You're not going to watch the live video on television. So I just don't think that that's, and I had to destroy media bias I'm going to get into. It's really egregious coming up, speaking of media. So I'm going to share that one with you.

That's another reason why people, I just don't think that they keep it, they refer to it anymore. We've got coming up all the latest, the Fauci hearing, the Hunter Biden trial, getting started. They're doing jury selections today, all this stuff. So we're going to bring you all of that. We've got some culture and it's course, and it's the prime month. We're going to get into all of that. As we roll towards the bottom, or actually, I know a conclusion of this first hour, our friends at Black Rifle Coffee, everything else is garbage.

Everything else just tastes like swill and it's horrible and it brings sadness to the earth. That's, I don't know how else to put it. You need to be drinking actual good coffee and save yourself money because you're drinking good coffee. Bad coffee gets wasted. Bad coffee doesn't get brewed. And with Black Rifle Coffee, you're getting a very good coffee. you're getting a veteran-owned veteran-run effort into the best roasted coffee beans you could ever possibly get your hands on. They get the best beans and they roast them five days a week in Tennessee and Utah.

And everything that they do from like the roast to the bag art, everything pays homage to American culture and military history. Every bag roasted in the U.S. of A, you got ground, whole bean, K-cups, ready to drink, all that good stuff. You also have apparel, kettles, grinders, mugs, everything you need for the perfect cup of coffee. and they just have the best coffee that is out there. I've been into, I've been for like a month, over a month now into Tactic Squatch, but I'm starting to like slide into some other roasts. I'll let you know what my new favorites are as I do so. But their roaster, it's just the best coffee that you can get.

It's never bitter. It's never overroasted. And it's always delicious. And you can join their coffee club and you choose whatever roast you want, however often you want it delivered. And it shows up with free shipping on your front porch. And it's going to be more affordable than the, boozy coffee that you want to buy at the grocery store. I'm just saying you get free shipping.

You never run out of coffee with the coffee club. Try it for yourself at black rifle coffee.com. Order today and get 20% off using code Dana. That's 20% off using code Dana at black rifle coffee. Don't let FOMO get the best of you. Stay in the loop and ahead of the curve by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. Come to my fucking show and just said it price up, so you f***ish-fitted. It's ridiculous. Let's jump in! If it would not be nice to say, shut up, all right?

Do we have any husbands here tonight who will be dragged along? I will not be offended. You can cheer. Do you have any husbands here? He will thank me later because I'm really going to turn my phone tonight, right? Good grief. Can you just play and just like stop it? Like why are you screaming at your fans for?

I don't get that. Like why are you screaming at them? Everybody just, everybody's attitude, like all these people. You know, entertainment sucks because everyone thinks that they're, we have enough pundits and I say this is someone who, commentary for a living, but I can't sing so there's the tradeoff. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash with you.

Good to be with you. This Monday, get your week started off correctly. Now, the, because it is the pride. You know, because it is the Pride Month. We should remind women, you need to go have your prostate checked. Yeah, it's for your prostate health, ladies. And men, make sure you go and get your smears done, you know. You're well.

It is weird that since 2021, there's been a really big uptick in female testicular cancer. I know, yeah. I mean, the ball cancer with the women has been, you know, ball cancer is a real thing, ladies. You need to pay attention to that, you know. know what I'm saying? You need to, you know, watch your business. Just, you know, just saying. It's, you know, PSA. We're, you know, we're, we're, we're, we're very helpful here at the, at the Dana show. Excuse me, it's ma'am. It is ma'am. Yeah, it's ma'am. He ma'am, she ma'am. All right, we've got a lot coming up here. So the, a few things here. Actually, several things. I got a ton of things. We've got this latest, with all the Fauci hearing, the Hunter Biden hearing, because apparently Dr. Jill showed up there just a little bit ago to support Hunter Biden. We've got that for you.

WNBA. I think people are finally paying attention, but only because of the drama that's happening. We're going to get into that as well. Stick with us. You know, I'm telling you, I don't have any good news for you about the economy. I don't have any good news for you about, you know, spending, government spending or inflation or anything of that sort. But I do have some good news in that there are some. something that you can do to give yourself a hedge of protection against all of that. And that, of course, is our friends over at Goldco. Goldco makes it incredibly easy, not just to actually get physical gold and silver and make it an important part of your overall retirement savings strategy. But they also want to make sure that you completely thoroughly understand how the economy and these gold IRAs work. Because, you know, you need to have something to protect and diversify your savings and precious metals like gold and silver, this is the answer. They have this free 2024

wealth protection guide that's going to arm you with the facts about how precious metals can help you in the face of inflation and war or exploding national debt. And you could be eligible for up to a 10% instant match in bonus silver while supplies last. So don't sleep on this. They've got thousands of five-star reviews, an A rating with a perfect rating from the Better Business Bureau and they've felt people like us place over two and a half billion dollars in gold and silver. So visit Dana likesgold.com. Get your free gold kit from Goldco and learn how to get $10,000 in bonus silver and get your complimentary wealth protection kit. Visit Dana likesgold.com. And today, Dr. Fauci's testimony alongside the thousands of pages of documents and dozens of

hours of closed door testimony provided to House Republicans as part of this so-called COVID origins investigation will once again dispel these cartoonish claims and reveal that the people bowing down to a twice impeached convicted felon who told Americans to inject themselves with bleach want you to believe not only a big political lie but a big medical lie too now he literally didn't do that though welcome back to the program dan alas here with you top of the second hour that's jimi Raskin just ahead of them going into this hearing that they're having with Anthony Fauci. Can I just read for you so we can get this out of the way? The transcript of the press conference where they're saying that through this statement,

Trump told everyone to inject bleach. Because he never said drink bleach or inject bleach. Here's the full transcript that I'm going to read you. Quote, this is Trump speaking. So I asked Billy question that probably some of you are thinking of. if you're totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it.

And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can either do through the skin or in some other way, I think you said you're going to test that too. It sounds interesting. Acting under Secretary, Brian had said, quote, we'll get to the right folks who could. the president adds, quote, right. And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that so that you're going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds, it sounds interesting to me, end quote. So he didn't say, go drink bleach, inject yourself with bleach. He and his layman's terms way, because he's not a doctor, is trying to figure out how you could have the same effect medicinally, how that could be created, how doctors could create something like that to treat people. Tell me that people aren't so damn stupid that they don't know the difference between what I

just said and Trump going out there and telling people to drink bleach, which he didn't do. But then Raskin has the audacity to go, you know, these hoar, these clownish accusations, and then gives a clownish accusation. But that's the transcript of what Trump said verbatim. And that's what all the media is taking and they're acting as though this

he's telling everyone to go out there and drink bleach, which again, he didn't do. And ozone therapy as can notes, is a totally real thing. I don't even think that's what Trump was talking about. I don't even know if he knows that that exists. Yeah. I mean, he was discussing like ways to kill a virus. That's what he's talking

about. And he never at any point, did you hear at any point him say, go drink bleach or inject yourself with bleach? No. That's something that left made up and attributes to him. But then they get absolutely insane if you accurately quote Anthony Fauci. And they're like, golly, these crazy, horrible accusations. You claimed that Trump told people to drink and inject bleach and he never did. Again, I just read the transcript. You know that they also, you remember when the media was trying to say that, oh my gosh, poison control center saw the centers around the country saw an increase in people calling poison control after Trump told everyone to take bleach. Well, he never told everyone to take bleach. And secondly, what they didn't tell you is that there were increases

months before there was already articles out in New York Daily News and elsewhere, who then later tried to blame Trump months prior talking about it. increase in uptick in calls to poison control. So it had nothing to do with that. This is so stupid. This is the left. This is what the left does. This is the kind of stuff that they do. But he had never, at no point, never said any of that. But you did have Anthony Fauci say that masks work, while he knew that masks didn't work. And he was emailing about how masks don't work. I mean, that's, that's a, That's a legitimate thing. Hmm.

But it's amazing how he gets a pass for that. He gets a total pass for this. Or on funding gain of function. Audio sum by 27, this is a question that Fauci was asked about who was actually funding that gain of function research in Wuhan. Listen. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Dr. Fauci, did the National Institute of Health fund the potentially dangerous, enhanced potential, pandemic, pathogens, gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute

of Virology? I would not characterize it the way you did. The National Institutes of Health, through a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded research on the surveillance of and the possibility of emerging infections. I would not characterize it as dangerous gain. of function research, I've already testified to that effect a couple of times. So you're saying no, correct? In his May 1620...

I'm saying no because they've said no multiple times, including on the transcribed... In his... But that's not what he had said in his closed-door testimony. Very interesting. Is it not? There's a lot of things that changed with that. But the reality is coming out on this. I mean, this is the truth is coming out. And I, they're trying to make it about, oh, he's just such a sad character, the sad character.

And we must feel bad for him, et cetera. No, no, no. This is something people should be absolutely up in arms about still. And there's so much to be upset about with us, I mean, including the rerouting of, you know, the way our Republican functions. but everything, all of it, came out that there wasn't any science behind any of the masking, which we knew, but now it's official, and he's admitted it. There are not a single, not a single bit. I mean, I was reading the transcript of this.

Again, the transcript was released Friday the day after their verdict very conveniently. He testified towards the end of day two in this January closed-door hearing, and again, the transcript released Friday ahead of the public testimony that's happening today, and that's how this all works. This is what Hunter Biden, by the way, was trying to avoid. There's always a closed-door testimony, and then they do a public testimony, and Hunter Biden didn't want to do the closed-door one. Fauci was asked in the transcript about where did the masking and all of that? Where do those suggestions come from?

What's that based on? And Fauci said, you know, and this is the transcript, quote, you know, I don't recall. it just sort of appeared. I don't recall like a discussion of whether it should be five or six or whatever. He was asked, do you see any, did you see any studies that supported six feet? In fact, you conceded I was not aware of studies that.

In fact, it would be very difficult to study. It'd be a very difficult study to do. He said it was an empiric decision that wasn't based on data or even data that could be accomplished. That's his direct quote. No evidence at all. In fact, NIH health director

Francis Collins had already admitted earlier in the year that there was zero evidence to support the six feet rule. There's zero evidence to support the masking, even though Keynes got audio of Fauci going, yeah, I wore a mask. Sometimes I wear too. But they all knew it was, it was nonsense. But there's a quote that he said. And he was asked about this.

Can we play this or is it censored? The BS quote. There's this exchange. that gives a little bit of insight as to really what what was this about what was it really about because if it's not about science and it's not based on science then this sounds like it's the use of fraudulent science as a way to subdue an ideology in a way doesn't it listen to this exchange this was this was an exchange that happened earlier and then was played again at the hearing today listen are all objections to covid vaccinations idealizing

biological Dr. Fauci? B.S. 27. No, they're not. And that's not what I was referring to. Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context. And I take great offense to this. Ms. Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, which came from recommendation from. So we had, there was, there was, there's, I want to make sure that we get this. There was audio of Fauci who had said this quote. That makes it make sense.

So we'll come back to this. Do you have, okay, can we play this? Powered and protected legally, you were going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get vaccinated. It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull-h-and-they get vaccinated. Hmm. That's what they were referring to in that hearing. They lose their ideological BS and they get vaccinated. Interesting. Without further question, without further exploration, without even testing and any kind of long-term studies to go on, they just do it. It's about bending the knee. It's about subjugation. I'm telling you, people already showed you who they were. If there's any bright, side to glean from the pandemic and the ridiculous way our government reacted. During a Republican

administration, I don't deny that. It's part of the rage. It was shown how easy people can be hurted still. But that's always been the case. Don't think that back in the days of your, you know, at the founding of our country, and this republic was established that it was the majority of people. It was a tiny minority of people, actually, who were fighting against the crown. It was a minority. The revolution was the contrast and ideals and the much smaller percentage, the minority percentage of people who believed in being free and out from under the yoke of the monarchy and the people who did not. It's always been that way. People are easy to manipulate. And the more people you have together, the easier they are to manipulate. You just got to

give them some sort of mind virus, whether it is the virus of obedience or the virus of rioting, of anger, et cetera. It's very easy to push people's buttons and even more so when a bunch of people are together because nobody wants to stand out. There's this desire, I think, with a lot of people that they want to be homogenous. They want to all do the same thing. They don't really want to stand out. and that's why the people who stand out are kind of, you know, they're on the periphery. It's, it's weird to see. People already showed you who they were. You saw what was going on in your kids' schools, and you saw who amongst you was the sheep and who isn't.

I mean, I just, there are certain things I'm not going to be able to get past with the pandemic. There's just certain things I'm never going to be able to get past. And I don't think that that's a small thing, and I don't think we should be required. to do so that the way that Democrats are like, oh, well, just let's get on. It's in the past. They don't want to reexamine anything. They don't want to reexamine anything. They don't want to, they don't want to take assessment. They don't want accountability because they want to do it again. You can't, I just can't get past it. And I can't get past the people who enabled it. Folks over at Patriot Mobile, it's the only Christian conservative cell phone service in the country.

and they want to make sure that your money is not going towards the things that you vote against, right? They want to make sure that your money is actually going towards, I don't know, like in my area, they've helped grassroots parent groups take back their school boards. They've helped really good candidates. They've helped support issues like, you know, Second Amendment and free speech, all of that. And Patriot Mobile, in addition to doing this, they're giving you the best service that you're going to get anywhere. They have the best coverage on all. I mean, I've never had an issue with any of my coverage.

And I've traveled internationally. I've never had any problems. But you get the best, most reliable nationwide coverage on all three major networks. You're getting great service. You're not funding the left, though. That's huge. But you're also helping to maintain and create U.S.-based jobs. They have a 100% U.S.-based team.

They make it super easy to switch. Visit patriotmobile.com slash Dana or call 972 Patriot and use promo code Dana to get free activation. Make that switch today. It's PatriotMobil.com slash Dana 972 Patriot. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. So Mexico now has a female president. This is very interesting. Claudia Scheimbaum has won the Mexican presidency, according to their electoral institute. It was a landslide victory. She became Mexico's first female president, now outgoing leader, is Manuel over door. His popularity

with the poor apparently her help drive her victory. And so she's a climate scientist. Former mayor of Mexico City. She got anywhere between 58 and 60% of the vote. It's apparently said to be the highest vote tally percentage in their

democratic history. So it's kind of interesting. Look at you. You got thoughts. You don't? You do? You got a lot? Okay. I would think the cartel had a lot to do it, but whatever. Meat spill, which Kane insists is a good band name. It's actually not bad. Apparently, that happened in Oakland, and they closed all the lanes of this highway.

Meat spill? Like, what kind of meat? Let's get specific. Well, chicken and beef parts. So what does that mean? What does that tell you? Beef parts. You know what it sounds like?

Lips and butts. That's what it sounds like. You know, that's hot dog meat. That's what it is, right? Because otherwise, they'd be like, steaks. We're all over the highway, right? Investors are worried. They cannot beat lawmakers in stock markets, so they copy them instead, according to an article from MSN, members of Congress.

Well, they do. They've been doing it for a long time, but it's a very interesting piece that buries the lead four paragraphs in. So I'm not going to read it anymore because it sucks. And that person needs to go back to J-School and learn how to write a balanced article. Let's see. This American Air Union tells flight attendants to prepare for a strike. Stop it. Right now.

They said that they should prepare for a strike. Federal mediators overseeing intense negotiations, ordered both sides to continue. continued talks in an effort to reach an agreement. The National Mediation Board sets additional dates, et cetera, et cetera. They said the delays are frustrating, but, so what is this going to do ahead of a summer travel season?

Right? Do you think they actually will go on strike? Says be prepared for a strike, but it's not the same thing as going on strike. No. Let's see, Tesla's shareholder sues Musk for $7.5 billion for insider trading. They still

keep going after him, whatever it takes. In the U.S. is now facing a shortage of energetics and propellants from munitions. That's a whole other story. Stick with us. We got more in store. Well, as we move, our friends over at ReadyWise, they just want to make sure that you're prepared. Should anything happen, heaven forbid. I don't know. Maybe you're living with 40 days of storms like we are in Dallas and your power keeps going out. I don't know, maybe. Or maybe, you know, there's something, heaven forbid, there's another supply chain disruption, whatever it is. You want to have peace of mind knowing that you have meals on hand to feed your family.

And so this is where ReadyWise comes in. They have an emergency one month supplied to bucket bundle, 36 pouches of premium survival food, 2,000 plus calories, 50 plus grams of protein daily. Freeze dried, dehydrated, no refrigeration required, easy to prepare, just add water, 25-year shelf life. The time to prepare is now. So visit readywise.com and use code Dana 20 to save 20% off of any regularly priced item. That's Readywise.com, code Dana 20. Craving a daily dose of intellectual adrenaline look no further than the Dana Show podcast. where curiosity meets courage

by following on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. I won't change your little town. Your own children will. Your children will see us. Your children will love us. And your children will join us. Excuse me, it's ma'am.

It is ma'am. I don't... That was weird. Is it Halloween? All month. Is it? All month. It's Halloween all month, guys.

Welcome back. That lady had some balls. Let me tell you. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash with you. Bottom of the second hour. Ladies and ladies. What is that?

I just can't. I cannot. That looks like some kind of dollar store, Mortisha, ad with Elton John glasses on. What in the ever-eleon hell was that? And your cult children will join us. And what? Spirit Halloween ain't even open yet, bro.

What do you mean? They're going to join you in what? Should we just call this Groomer Awareness Month? Because it sounds like that's the plan. Dude, I, yeah, apparently, yeah. I'm almost speechless, except for a bunch of stuff I can't say on air. I'm full of just really inappropriate jokes right now. That was, what March was that at?

I was at one of those marches. I think in Philly? Was it a Philly one? I think so. It was a Philly one? I mean, yeah, Groomer Awareness Month. And then the signs that are behind the dude, the signs that are behind him, trans rights or human rights, don't be a drag, just be a queen. And I, what do you mean trans rights or human rights?

What does that even mean? You're a human, you have rights. That's it. And? Some are natural, some are civil, depending on where you are. And? I don't understand what this even means. What are they talking to trans rights or human? What right does someone who wants to pretend that they're a member of the opposite sex, like not have, that someone who does not want to pretend to be a member of the opposite sex have? Explain this to me. What right does someone who wants to pretend to be a member of the opposite sex?

What right do they not have that someone who does not, want to pretend to be a member of the opposite sex have. They act like that just because you're not trying to force people into adopting your delusional self-perception that you're being denied a right. That's not how rights work. It's not how they work. It's not like, I'm a billionaire. And then I turn around and go and start beating the A double snakes of everybody who refuses to affirm my delusional billionaire status, right? It's not how to. this works. I'm going to browbeat the government into giving me free money to make me a billionaire. That's what they're doing. You realize this. It's just a variable. I want something that I don't have,

so I'm going to make it out to be a health issue, and I'm going to force the government to get it for me. It is for my health that I need a billion dollars, Kane. I'm a billionaire. I need a billion dollars for my health. You mean both. Yeah. I mean, we identify as billionaire. Juan, you went in on this too? You went in. One also identified Steve, you want to get up on on this? You want to be identified as a billionaire? We're all identifying as billionaires. It's four of us now.

I'll even settle for just being an illegal alien at this point. Well, I mean, hell the amount of money they give you, you know, you might as well. We all identify as billionaires. We demand that the government affirm our rights to a billion dollars. And if you don't, you're a bigot.

Now, you might think it's stupid, but that's because you're a bigot. Bigot and billionaire. Both begin with bees, and that means nothing except for a sign. See how goofy this all is? It's so goofy. It doesn't make any sense. Our children will join us in this billionaire status.

Yeah. I mean, if you're going to try to get kids to be something, billionaires is a good thing. But these people are like, they're recruiting. That's what it sounds like. And your children will join us in what? Sounds like it? That's a

Exactly what it is. Exactly what it is. In what? Why is it always the ugliest chicks who help support this stuff? Can we just have a very, a conversation that most y'all men won't have? I think the ugly chicks join because they know they're ugly. And they know that they have to because otherwise they're not going to get attention any other way. If you can't be pretty, be weird.

Right? It's usually how it goes. But that's what it's at. I mean, it's like a normal. of this. You don't need to be talking about people's kids when you're up there like glorifying the way that you get it get it on. That's so stupid. You don't need to be doing that. That's weird. That's why people think it's nasty because it's all about how you want to have sex and your genitals. And then when you start bringing kids into it, it's just really it's gross. Stop. But I do identify as a billionaire. And it's for my health that we need that and not just me, but also Juan Kane and Steve. We're minorities now. We identify as billionaires. We want to be a protected class and we need rights, instituted. to help protect our claim and you're going to adopt our self-perception and if you call it delusional you're a bigot see how this works there you go it's a it's i mean it's the same thing it's the exact same thing but it is the pride month it's the alphabet month oh where's my news article at i'm

going to pull this up because i was going to incorporate that into this so the headlines oh man check this out. So there was a, this was in Germany, Mannheim, Germany. They had a knife attack. They had a knife control. It was a knife wielding man. He stabbed several people. One officer was struck in the head and neck multiple times. He did not survive his wounds. And so the way that they did the headlines was wild. Like, let me give you an example. And then I'm going to, this is some of the police officer 29 dies after being repeatedly stabbed at in an attack at an anti-Islam rally in Germany police officers stabbed during attack at far right rally dies this is how they said far right rally site of German policemen stabbing German policemen dies after

being wounded in stabbing attack at an anti-Islam rally far right anti-Islam rally do you who did it? He was an Afghan, quote unquote, refugee, literally a radical Muslim, as it turned out, who murdered a police officer. He is literally a radical Muslim. He was screaming, and this is like this is something else that happened, like not even what, six months ago, they had something like this that happened in France where it was a radical Muslim that did it as well. It was near the Eiffel Tower and he was screaming Alu Akbar. And every, and, and, people were trying to act like everybody diluted all of that down in the headlines and by everyone I mean all the press this though this guy he was he was an he was an afghan radical

and the press tried to make it sound like that it was some kind of like radical right leaning protester that did it and apparently it's wild the way that the press is protecting this guy. The Times of Israel's a left-wing newspaper. Theirs was officer repeatedly stabbed while trying to intervene assailant, stabs five demonstrators. And he's, it says German policeman dies. He was wounded and attack at anti-Islam rally. I know. It's wild. All of the headlines about this,

it's crazy the way that they presented this. It is insane. Now, when you read it, you think, oh my gosh, it was probably like, They make it sound like a right winger, don't they? Like some kind of right winger and maybe, you know, they have no idea. That's what they make it sound like. And instead it was this radical Afghan refugee. That's our press, ladies and gentlemen. That's what they do.

It's our press. Now, with Biden, I want to switch gears here. There's been a lot of, this started popping up in the middle of last week. Joe Biden's administration, this is not good. They are granting mass amnesty. New York Post, actually several sources on this. The first one's New York Post, though. They are quietly terminating 350,000 asylum cases.

So that's going to be 350,000 people that are just getting mass amnesty. Since 2022, more than 350,000 asylum cases filed by migrants were closed by the U.S. government. They said if the applicants don't have a criminal record, then they're going to be closed. Yeah.

So, they may not be granted or denied asylum. Their cases are terminated without a decision on the merits of their asylum claim is what it states. So they can, they're slipping through the cracks. They can just, you know, move wherever, do whatever. No, no fear.

And so they have amnesty. All these cases are being dropped. And this was a memo that was circulated by a top ICE agent, Carrie Doyle, instructing prosecutors to dismiss cases for those who they said, well, if they're kind of laying low and they're not, you know, not committing crimes and go ahead and grant amnesty. Now, back in 2022, they had that year, they had 103,000 illegal immigrants that had their cases dismissed. They could walk free into the U.S. without an immigration court judge's verdict on whether or not their claims on asylum were meritus. And now, so far into this year, 114,000 cases have been terminated without a verdict. It's going to be 350,000 total. unbelievable.

The question. It was at a low in 2019. Is it illegal to enter the country without being, you know, a citizen? Correct. It is illegal to enter the country without being a citizen, cane. Unless you're an illegal immigrant. And it's illegal. So then technically none of these people are without crime. Correct. But you can't say that because that's not the way that they press once it's said, kind of undoes

a claim of innocence, does it not? And 350,000. Do we remember when Joe Biden said that he will not deport illegals for drunk driving? Because he doesn't believe drunk driving is a felony? Or a number of other crimes. Right. So there's a number of other crimes, too. When they say, well, if there's no underlying crime, then we're not going to deport.

Well, then they've just reclassified what a crime is so that they can just keep these illegals here. Yes. Yes. He doesn't consider it a felony. That's pretty amazing. that was an interview he gave like not too long ago

yeah there he doesn't he wants they want to be able to redefine what is there is not a crime based upon what is most advantageous to them for political year or election year it's his life mission to make bad decisions

it's time for Florida man so a man who is accused of throwing feces at a Florida synagogue is appearing in court in Broward County Jeffrey Fleming, 39, faces charges of stalking, hate crimes, and literally throwing human waste at a synagogue. His attorney says his client's confused and he wants a mental health examination. Oh, and they recorded the feces stuff on video. Oh, my gosh, that's so gross.

And yeah, he's, I don't know. That's one of the most unsanitary ways to protest that I can imagine. Anyway, he apparently was harassing people as they came out of the synagogue and all kinds of stuff and trying to get in their faces. So he seems like a dangerous, hateful person. But he appeared in court this morning. A Florida man landed a helicopter on birds, a bird nesting site in Igmont Key. Florida Fish and Wildlife are not happy, according to WFLA. This is a Bradenton man.

So he had, he landed his helicopter apparently right on a nesting site. and the witnesses told officials the female got out, took a few photos, hop back in and they took off. They wanted to apparently take pictures of the birds, so they landed on their nest. And apparently all these birds had to flee the nest because there's a chopper that landed on it. That doesn't seem like the smartest way to go about that. Like you couldn't have approached it from the water. You know, you had to take a chopper to, this is dumb. Why do people do dumb stuff?

Like, stop. Ooh. this man-eating monster crocodiles have been found in Florida. So they got crocodiles and alligators in Florida, by the way. You know this, right? Now they said the presence of Nile crocodiles have been confirmed in the state now. University of Florida, like if it wasn't already terrifying, University of Florida has a news release.

They said, quote, man-eaters that can grow to 18 feet long and weigh as much as a small car have been found in Florida. They've conducted DNA analysis of crocodiles going back to the year 2000 and made their determination. They think there's a ton out there. They found juveniles in South Florida in the Everglades. They even found a juvenile relaxing on a house porch in Miami. These are the Nile Crocodiles.

And wow, that's horrible. They said that they eat everything. Zebras or Zebra, if you're British, small hippos, two humans in sub-Saharan Africa. And they said that Nile Crocodone. Rockodiles specifically were responsible for at least 480 attacks on people, 123 fatalities in a four-year span in Africa alone. That's crazy.

Can you imagine them getting that big in Florida? Now, think of like the attacks just in four years in Africa, and then that's kind of terrifying, isn't it? They think it's the pet trade. They think it's the illegal pet trade. That's like the most likely. I think we're scared. We're, you know, on the food chain, we're maybe knocked down a link or two.

Yeah, I mean, you know, we live by a lake called Grapevine Lake. And there's, I don't, I get weird, like, with lakes that gators can be in. Like, if a gator can't be in there, I'm okay with your lake. But if a gator could potentially be in the lake, I'm not okay with it. You know what I mean? I don't know what's coming up there. Gator could be coming up from the water and eat me. I don't know.

It's creepy. Like, I cannot get in this lake because I'm terrified of the gators. The gaiters, and there's literally somebody went jogging. They took video of a gator on the jogging path. And it looked like an eight-foot-long gaiters, like an eight-foot-long gator on the trail where they were jogging. And they stopped and they recorded the footage. They put it up on Facebook on like the town Facebook. That's a little terrifying.

It was a big gator. I'm like, how does it, what in the world? And just chilling, chilling there by the jogging path, you know, going to get a snack. Just saying. And that's a run away in a zigzag pattern. Yeah, zigzag, zigzag. That should be like your slogan if you're in Florida. Zigzag.

We got more coming out. Third hour on the way. And we got a lot to hit, including the latest with Hunter Biden, the Fouchy trial, so much more stick with. I am going to spend some time with the criminal justice system, with the justice system, asking them, tell us what's going on with the domestic terrorists. Are they preparing a civil war against us? Should we be concerned about our safety? What is he doing with this divisive language? It is dangerous, and we're going to have to make sure that we understand that we understand that.

we're not at risk with this man talking in the way that he's doing. Say something nice, Dana. Say something nice. Welcome to the show. Dana Lash with you, top of this third hour. If you listen coast to coast, you can string the radio program as well. That's Maxine Waters. I'm just going to say it.

She looks like some... Does she go to a mortician to have her makeup and hair done? You all thought it. Stop. You all thought it. She says the craziest stuff. She's like, oh my gosh, they're all his supporters. All Trump supporters are terrible.

they're preparing for a civil war. Wait, didn't she say a couple weeks ago that right wingers were training up in the hills somewhere? Yeah, you know, up in the hills training camp. Wherever that is. It's actually a great name for a gun range, by the way, up in the

hills, just, you know. Oh my gosh. So that's the latest. I do have a poll where it said the majority of independents actually don't view the trial. the way that we all do, which is that was weird.

And we'll see, you know, I don't know, that could be from a number of different things. I didn't deep dive onto it, into it, but I do think it was kind of, I thought it was interesting how some people are viewing this trial in New York and how it, I mean, it is, again, I still think it has to go through the appellate process, the appeals process,

it'll go through the appellate court, and then they're going to make the determination that, you know, whether or not it goes, it extends up to going to federal court that remains to be seen. But it doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in the legal system. I'll put it, I'll just leave it that way. Now, speaking of Trump, this seems like a very dumb decision by Zelensky from Ukraine. I was reading this piece just a little bit ago from the Guardian.

Zalinski, quote, Trump risks being a loser president if he imposes a bad deal on Ukraine. That's what Vladimir Zelensky has said, saying that it would mean the end of the U.S. as a global player if it imposes a bad peace deal on Ukraine. It was an interview that Zelensky did with The Guardian, where he said he had no strategy yet for what to do if Trump returned to the White House and that the former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson had approached him on his behalf. he said that he was reacting to the possibility of Trump's AIDS, sketching out a plan, getting Ukraine's

eastern, that would get Ukraine to Saddam with Russia, it would give the disputed dombus regions to Russia. Zelensky made it clear that, quote, Ukrainians would not put up with that. They would also not accept a Russian ultimatum forcing Ukraine to abandon integration with Europe and future

membership of NATO. They're not going to be a member of NATO. Stop. It's not going to happen. and he said that Ukraine barehanded without weapons would not be able to fight a multi-million Russian army. And he said, he was asked, well, if it happened, like what would the consequences be? You know, what scenario do you think is the most likely? What do you think is going to happen if, you know, Trump gets elected and ends the conflict in Ukraine or ends the United States as facilitation of it or a subsidy of it? And Zelensky said, quote, does he want to be? want to become a loser president. Do you understand what can happen? He says the ceasefires a trap is

what he says. He goes, this is not about him talking about Trump as a person, but about the institutions of the United States. They will become very weak. The U.S. will not be the leader of the world anymore. Yes, it'll be powerful. First of all, in the domestic economy, it has a powerful economy, but in terms of international influence, it will be equal to zero, end quote. I don't think, because we don't want to constantly pay for your conflict. That doesn't mean, would we, that, we, that, we, that, we, that, What are you talking about? You're a comedian. You're literally a comedian that through, I have no idea how,

ended up running Ukraine. You walk around in fatigues all the time, except every now and then you'll throw a dark jacket on. That's it. Like, why should we consider subsidizing? Why should we continue subsidizing this? He's not going to endear himself with the people who are very and justifiably suspicious of how much money we've spent over there in the first place.

I don't think this helps. And Kane, we're not going to become not a world player if we're not financing their conflict, which, by the way, they would have sat down and they were already ready to negotiate until the Biden administration and the left got involved. So we would look. He goes, Putin would go further. He would humiliate Trump and make him look weak in the eyes of the world. Do you see that this is, he's like this is so manipulative.

He's just trying to manipulate. He says that Putin would. violate any Trump broker deal. It's a trap. He's trying to, every which way he can manipulate this whole situation. Sounds like Biden. Yeah, he does sound like Biden. Huh. Interesting that. Yes, he's, it's, it's, don't buy the manipulation. And that's exactly what that is. So we've also had, in addition, talking about the Zelensky story, we've also had this issue. We've been discussing the ongoing Fauci hearing and the amazing audio soundbite that's been coming out of this. I mean, Fauci admitted that the vaccine, the injection mandates actually contributed to hesitancy about the shots.

He already admitted to that. And he also admitted that there were potential implications of the mandates that they should have been studied beforehand. He already said this. When he was talking about the number of lives lost and masks and how kids needed to be in. masks. He left out that kids were actually the least affected and all of the demographics by this virus. And I just

the left has been trying to make him out to be this very sympathetic character. And he's just saying in the very beginning, you know, we really didn't know what was going on. And then he said that he was defending initial school closures, but he was

seating the responsibility of closing those to the other decision makers. He's trying to share the blame here. And I'm not buying it. I'm not buying it. I don't think you are either. And they're just unhappening. It's been very interesting hearing with all of this. And I think we also have audio, this is what? Audio Soundbite 21. Well, we, no, I want to hear 21. This is Raskin saying that Fauci didn't light of Congress. And oh, he's honorable. He's this public servant. This is what every time Democrats have had the microphone during, they had the floor during the hearing, it all sounded like this, all their press conferences, they all sounded like this.

Listen. Just like the impeachment drive proved that there were no crimes, much less high crimes and misdemeanors committed by the president. This investigation of Dr. Fauci shows that he is an honorable public servant committed to the public health, and he is not a comic book super villain. He did not fund research to create the co-reveillance. COVID-19 pandemic. He did not lie to Congress about gain of function research in Wuhan, and he did not organize a lab leak suppression campaign to cover his tracks. But that's not with the receipt show cane. The receipts don't show that. Not at all. We're

going to come back to this because we got more on it. I also wanted to point out this story as well that I don't think you're going to be following. So you know that there have been lawsuits after Sandy Hook and after Uvaldi. In fact, there have been different manufacturers that have been sued. Well, it's lawfare for sure. And they've been sued by families who have, they've lost a loved one in these tragedies. And I'm just like, for instance, the people went after Remington. They've gone after Daniel Defense. They went after Daniel defense after Evaldi.

As though somehow, that's like saying that Ford was responsible for the Christmas parade massacre because that terrorist racist was driving a Ford SUV. It's stupid. But Remington outdoor, they went bankrupt and they had to be broken up and sold. They, I mean, they were sued. This was in the wake of, uh, this was in the wake of, uh, this thing was Sandy Hook, Daniel Defense, all of this, which amazes me because they act like it's a violation of the protection of lawful commerce and arms act, which is it's an act saying

that, first off, firearm manufacturers are just as liable as any other product or a manufacturer is if there is some sort of defect or, you know, anything of the like that contributes or results in or somehow makes possible, you know, an accidental fatality. And you can't illegally use a product and then state that it's the product's fault. And that's what essentially these lawsuits are claiming. So here's what's crazy. So aren't they suing, aren't some of these families suing Activision and Blizzard Entertainment? If you're under, if you're not familiar with those two companies, Activision and Blizzard are behind call of duty. And you know, a lot of people have claimed that video games also contribute to mass casualty incidents, which is stupid and it's gun control logic

that swaps out guns for video games. It's a dumb anti-freedom gun controllers logic. And I know that there have been suits by this because they've, in the wake of Evaldi, because they've been suing, Yuvaldi families have been suing Call of Duty and Instagram and Daniel Defense, all of these because they're trying to say that the video games recklessly encourage violence or that this recklessly encourages violence, etc. The reason I bring this up is because Call of Duty, which is owned by Activision, and Tencent, which is a Chinese, a communist Chinese company, which now owns Activision, they came out with what they call a skin, and it's like just basically a color and design. trans flag colored ammunition for Call of Duty. They chose to virtue signal so hard. Again, they are being sued by Yuvaldi families out of the claim that video games contribute to mass casualty incidents because they recklessly encourage violence.

And they literally put the trans flag on ammunition in the game. Now, you guys remember that the school shooting, because of that, happened because of a trans Tifa activist, a member of trans Tifa. Actually, and I have that, I put in slack actual screenshots of the ammunition that's in question. But they have the pink and the, that's the ammunition that has the skins, the skin for the ammunition. Why would you do that? To virtue signal during Pride Month. You're being sued. You had a trans Tifa terrorist. target a Christian school and shoot up kids because they were Christians, there have been other mass casualty incidents done by members of Trans-Tifa. Why in the world would you have, and you're

being sued? Why would you do that? Because you're trying to beat everybody in virtue signaling for Pride Month? I've never seen any. That's why in the world? I saw this first via Mark Kern, who is former team lead for the original world of Warcraft producer for Diablo 2 and Starcraft and all of that stuff. He's a video game CEO and designer. And I first saw this through him because we follow each other on social media. Someone said, what is this the Audrey Hale? The Audrey Hale pack? Like, what is this?

The killer in the Nashville shooting? That's just this crazy. I'm not even making this up. Can you imagine? They're being sued by. families of Yuvaldi and then they put the trans flag on the ammunition not even a year after this horrible tragedy in Nashville this is insane it's like they it's like they and the and Lorraine notes that it's also on one of their gunskins too one of the rifles that they have has that

pastel blue and pink and white I guess the blue pink and white that's the that's the that's the trans that's the trans that's the trans flag thing right that it's on that as well that's insane that is insane. You know lawyers are going to bring that up in court. They're literally in the middle of a court case. How is that not going to come up in court? Further fueling this whole thing about video games. Oh my gosh. We're going to have a piece on that soon over at Substack chapter and verse. So you want to go sign up for that. You need to be aware of all this stuff because like I said, it's variables. You don't have to play video games. It's all a variable. Things can get swapped out. Different rights and different attributes of your life can be absolutely effective.

and altered because they use this as a legal formula and they just swap out these pieces. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So no launch is the latest Instagram dating trend. It's when people are opting to not at all post about the relationship. Why do we have to have words for this? Why is this a thing? They give this example of this couple and they bury the lead like literally in the fourth paragraph. People don't launch their relationship online. That's what it means.

If you start a new relationship and you don't talk about it in social media, that's called a no launch. Just shut up and live your life. Why do people have to deep dive and go through all these interpretations on social media? I can't stand. I purposefully will not post certain things in social media just because. It's because this stuff. A cow elk attacks an eight-year-old girl in Estes Park.

in Denver. It had a newborn. The eight-year-old got too close. She had her bike. She was riding around her neighborhood. And the female elk charged the girl. Oh, by the way, elk are delicious. And the elk caught up.

It stomped on her multiple times. She was released from the hospital, so she's fine now. But oh, we have more to come, more to come, more to come, I promise. Stick with us. Elevate your commute, workouts, or downtime with the Dana Show podcast. Unleash the power of knowledge at your fingertips. by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Kind of on the play before bumping in with Caitlin.

It seemed like she turned to you a little bit after the feet of the war. I was there. No, Caitlin. Clark questions. Did she say anything to you? I don't know what she's at. What you say to her? I didn't say anything. That's enough. That's enough.

I am, like, fascinated by this. I don't follow W&B, like, most women. You know, because it's all men's fault that nobody watches women's basketball. but not only people are, I think, watching it. Caitlin Clark, I think, is getting a lot of hate for, I don't know why. I don't know why she's getting a lot of hate. Some people say it's because she's white and pretty. What does that have to do anything?

There are other pretty women on that court, so is it just because she's white? Like, I don't get it. I don't understand what all this is. Welcome back to the program. Dana last year with you. She plays for Indiana. She had a great college career. She's like, you know, fabulous player.

Steve said that she, you know, deserves all the accolades that she gets because he followed college ball. And he's like, she deserved all the accolades she got because she's a fantastic player. And it's now, now she's with Indiana. And she was playing, she had a, she's playing Angel Reese, who she also was a rival with in college. And Clark beat Reese. It was Indiana versus Chicago, Sky, it was like 71 to 70. And Reese didn't want to, she wouldn't, she didn't Reese get fined like $1,000 because she skipped the presser, the postgame presser. So she, I don't dislike Angel.

Reese, but I think if part of your personality and one of the reasons why people know you is because you're making your name off of being a rival, then you've got to answer questions about it. So what happened, apparently, is in this game that we just played the video for. This was

Caitlin Cook was playing and again, she's with Indiana. She was playing and you can see who is that? Is that Chennedy Carter? Is that the player who ran and who hit her? Chicago's guy. So this is when she was playing Chicago.

Chennedy Carter slammed, she had slammed her before on social media. She checked her and you can see that Juan was playing that for you earlier on Saturday. She called her a B and then hit her and knocked her to the floor. And then afterward didn't want to answer any questions about it. But she called her a B as she body checked her. Now I get that there's like, you know, you got all kinds. In sports, you got, you know, you get into the psychology of it, and you get into other players' heads.

I get all of that. Am I? Is she being, like, overly targeted? Do you think? Kane, do you think she's being overly targeted? It appears that way. I haven't seen anyone receive so much hate by every team than her up to this point. So, I mean, I guess it matters how you measure it,

but I haven't seen anything like this before. Steve, what do you think? Is it just like, is it weird to think that she's like getting, is she getting targeted more or is the media coverage of it making it seem like she's getting targeted more? She's definitely getting targeted more. I think the ones that are mad are, because they always point to the fact that she's a rookie and a lot of the veterans that have been there for a while. Now seeing the WMBA skyrocketed in popularity just because of her.

And I think that's just making her a target. I think the racing does come into it though, because I don't know, it just. Man. Yeah, it's, so it's jealousy. Yeah, I'd say it's more jealousy than it is race. It's just the way, I mean, look, at this level, you have to imagine that these women are highly competitive people, just in general. So I think that jealousy is going to ramp up their competitiveness and push, you know, push them over the line every now and again. And we saw that over the weekend.

That's just, what is that, what kind of, what do they think that that is, is telegraphing to girls? You spend all this time trying to get respect for your league and then you do bitch stuff. The only bees out there I see are the bees that are being dramatic about Caitlin Clark. That's all I see. They try so long to get respect for women's basketball and then they treat it like a junior high school girl's locker room.

Junior high school girl antics on the court. Instead of playing the game, they got to be drama because they're jealous. Instead of letting their skills speak for themselves, they've got to be drama because they're jealous. Now, what little girl wants to grow up and playing a league where you're targeted like that? How do you sit here and profess and demand

that everyone take women's sports seriously when you can't even take it seriously enough to not act like a junior high queen on the court? It's stupid. That's so dumb. It just, it just looks like a soap opera. It's just, you know, I mean, it makes it look dumb. Someone's saying that fever needed to get an enforcer to protect her.

That's what Drayman Green said. Really? It would be fun to see that sort of stuff. I mean, if this is what's already happening to the point where they're finding players, I think people would like to see that. Is it going to get worse or better? I mean, can't the coaches be like knock that off? As more attention goes on to the WNBA, I don't know.

Could go either way. I mean, I know that men get dramatic. Okay, Steve, answer me this. Can you can too? Is it, I know the men can be just as dramatic. Is it because there's new attention on WNBA that it makes it seem like it's more dramatic than the men? Or is it just these women are way more dramatic than the dudes are? I mean, I've seen, I mean, if there was like a fight or something in the WMBA, we'd all know about it, right?

I don't think this is, it's had to a point where, like, I don't know, it's just getting out of control. Wow. And for Steve to say that. Like people don't know. Steve is like happy, go lucky, you know, joyful Steve. And for him to be like, wow, that's pretty, that's kind of significant. To your point, I just dropped something in Slack from Charles Barkley over the weekend where he actually commented on exactly what you're asking about. Yeah, he says they're petty. He's right. So if you want us to play that. Yeah, play that. He's right. Well, can we?

He's on TV, so hopefully he didn't cost. Hey, LeBron. You are. 100% right on these girls hating on Caitlin Clark. Y'all petty, girls. I expect men to be petty because we're the most insecure group in the world. Oh, you are. Y'all should be thinking that girl for getting y'all ass private charters. All the money and visibility she bringing to the Jem NBA.

Don't be petty like dudes. Listen, what she's accomplished, get her flowers. Stop being petty, all you women out there. She got y'all ass charters. She bringing all y'all this money to the kids. table but y'all being petty like dudes lebron you are 100% right y'all girls stop being petty he's right though i love it he's i mean he's right i and why and why are the chicks that are getting all mad at for him for saying that i mean that's you know yeah here's the thing if you're

going to sit here and do this stuff on the court you sit your backside down and you take questions from the press about it you don't get to go i'm not taking any to kalen car shut up you are too You're going to sit here and talk trash on the court and you're going to play this game on the court, but then you're going to try to hide it when you get up there and you talk to the press? No, that is lame as I'll get out. No, no, no, no, no. And you can't sit here and make your whole persona about being the rival against Caitlin Clark. And then, oh, I'm not going to go and take questions from the press.

No, we're not doing that either, Angel. We're not doing that either. Come on. Come on. I just, I don't know. If you're too weak to talk trash and answer questions after, then maybe you shouldn't be talking trash. You know, that's just the thought.

good heavens. Now, Charles Barkley's right. He is right. But this is not like the glamorous ladies of wrestling. Okay, this ain't glow. It's WNBA. If you want respect for your sport, then be a respectful player. Play the game and make it to where other women want to aspire to play as well.

But how sad is it that these women are so jealous of this chick that the drama, not their skills, or why other people are given it a second glance? Because they are so jealous. Is that not ladies? That is women to a T. Very rarely do you find women. And I love the women that are like it when I find them. I got to tell you, in my professional experience, I've only had like a couple problems of dudes.

And really, there's only one dude. Steve Bannon. But I only had one problem with one guy. I had all of my problems were women. All of them were women. Women. Women are catty. They are petty. They're backstabbers. They're disingenuous. They're just they will turn on you in a heartbeat. Not to say that men won't. But I always laugh when I hear all these other women trying to extol the virtues of a sisterhood. That's all a lie. There's no such thing. It's fake as I'll get out. The most problem that I had were women in the workplace. All the drama that I saw everywhere I have ever been professionally has been from women to the point where I used to like just either stay in my office or I would come in do my show and then leave because I could not handle the drama that all these women had with

each other. I could and I did not want to get drawn into it. I cannot stand it. But it's that's been my experience. It's not going to be any different with the WNBA, but if you're trying to make it to where you have this world class sport, then don't do that petty basic B stuff in your sport. don't do it. And Kane knows about the female stuff because you were there and you saw some of it and we were both like, okay, we're done, we're out. So, I

don't know. I just get in there and just do your job. But make it a sport that women want to aspire to. Good heavens. All right, so a few other things. We've been watching the Fauci hearing. And then, of course, the Hunter Biden trial. That's kicking off. They're doing

the jury selection today. and we'll see what, we'll see what happens there. I cannot wait for those arguments to start, though. I can't wait for that because remember the whole thing, they're arguing that, well, you know, sir, or your honor, my client was completely drunk and high. Therefore, I mean, he was drunk and high all the time. Therefore, it's perfectly legal for him to lie,

perfectly okay for him to lie on a federal form about being drunk and high. Because, see, he was drunk and high, so that made it okay to, that, you know, that's the logic. I can't, that's the actual logic they're using. I cannot wait. I cannot wait for those arguments to start. So there you go. Follow Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts, because knowledge is your

ultimate superpower. But I do think your reporter hit it right on the nose. This is going to take a while to sink it with the American people, but I believe the American people are not going to want a convicted felon running the country. They're not going to want to turn the country into some kind of a criminal enterprise. I see, they wanted just to be able to have that narrative, that talking point, just like how they wanted to impeach him. Remember, the impeachment that Democrats brought, he wasn't even charged with a crime. I mean, with Clinton, they brought up crimes. Democrats didn't even bother holding an inquiry.

They just went right, meaning they didn't have an investigation. They're like, now we're going to impeach him because they didn't even hold an investigation. That's like holding a trial. without ever having a case that was investigated and then charges from the results of the investigation brought to bear. That was never happened during the impeachment process. They wanted to be able to say, oh, he's been impeached. Just like now, they want to be able to say, oh, he's a felon. He's not really.

And this case is stupid. And anyone who thinks this case isn't stupid doesn't understand the case. And I don't care how offensive that sounds. I'm not going to sugarcoat it to make people easier in their ignorance. The bottom line is that it's a stupid case. You had an expired misdemeanor that they tied to literally a mystery felony. Nobody knows what it is. So that they could elevate it out of a state court to a federal one because statute

of limitations had already passed out and state couldn't do anything. So they needed it to be a federal case so that they could be actionable on it. That's why they did it the way they did. It's never been attempted before in any litigation. ever. This is the first time. So that's why it's going through the appeals process. I ultimately think it will be overturned. I just don't know how long it's going to take. But that's what happened with that case. That's the reality of the situation. So again, if you have people arguing with you telling you, well, he's convicted. He's a felon. Convicted of what? Well, he paid Stormy Daniels. Okay, that's an

expired misdemeanor and questionable even as to whether or not it merited that classification because the amount was so significantly under what New York State requires to even make it a misdemeanor. So what was he convicted of again? Because he wasn't convicted of just that expired misdemeanor alone. It had to be tied to a mystery felony that they actually never said what it was. So the people who sit here and tell you, well, he's convicted. Of what? Well, he paid Stormy DeNos, expired misdemeanor.

What was he convicted of? Well, that was no, no, no. He wasn't convicted of just that. It was just the jury was instructed to not consider the other thing that made this possible. Do you see how this works? Do you know why you need to be worried about that? Because this bastardization of law can sure as hell happen to you. And it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. Make no mistake. The rule of law is absolutely under attack. And what they want you to think is that in order to defend rule of law, you have to forfeit your opposition. If you don't like Trump, you have to forfeit your opposition of Trump. You have to endorse him if you're defending this. That's what Democrats want,

they want to drive a wedge on the right. Look, y'all know that there's people on the right that they'll hold their nose. This is like this is the any election. They'll hold their nose and vote for him or they'll vote for him begrudgingly. They want to slice that support off from you. They want to have that wedge in there and they want to make it, they want to make Trump and this the same thing. So that way people, will be too afraid of the association to defend this egregious act of who the lawfare was against. They don't want anyone criticizing it. So that's what they want to make it look like. You can't let them do that. And if you're one of those people out there who's not the biggest fan of Trump, you need to separate yourself from this for a little bit here. This isn't about Trump. It's about rule of law. This can absolutely be done to you. And it will be. And if it's not going to be done to you, then it'll be done to your. kids or your grandkids someday. So some people out there need to put on their big bridges and they need

to get over themselves a little bit and they need to look at this as an attack literally on one of the backbones of this republic. It has nothing to do with Trump. It's about the bastardization of the legal system. And it amazes me that some people cannot see the force for the trees for this. And I say this is someone who like DeSantis in the primary, which shouldn't have anything to do with it. But it's assonine that you've got to put it in those terms for some people to quite grasp this. it's actually kind of stunning to me. We're smarter than this. Today's stupidity, Kane, what do we got?

I wonder which is more of a threat to democracy, the way this trial is handled, or Trump paying stormy? Yeah, yeah. Anyway, cut 21. This is rep Jamie Doolagg Raskin. Dool-Rag. This is what he had to say about what Donald Trump didn't say. Listen to this.

And today, Dr. Fauci's testimony, alongside the thousands of pages of documents and dozens of hours of closed-door tests. testimony provided to House Republicans as part of this so-called COVID origins investigation will once again dispel these cartoonish claims and reveal that the people bowing down to a twice impeached convicted felon who told Americans to inject themselves. That's the that. Yeah, he didn't.

He said bleach there. You know who said that, right? It was saving the republic, a follower online said it was John Carl that actually said that. we'll talk more about that tomorrow find us at substack facebook youtube like and subscribe have a great night