The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Ms. Rachel MELTS Down, Jack Smith's Spying EXPOSED & Trump Lands Greenland Deal

Episode Date: January 22, 2026

Trump claims he has an “infinite” deal with Greenland. Dana explains how Trump’s political strategy was a complete success. GOP Rep. Brandon Gill EXPOSES Special Counsel Jack Smith for issuing a subpoena for Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s private flight records to pin him for January 6th. Green Day proclaims they are antifa at their LA concert.A labor and delivery nurse at Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital says she hopes Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt suffers a severe 4th-degree tear during childbirth. FBI arrests the rioters who stormed into the Minneapolis church. Famous YouTuber Ms. Rachel claims she “accidentally” liked an anti-Semitic comment calling to rid America of Jews.A Canadian reporter tries to bait American tennis players into bashing Trump at the Australian Open. Murders in the US have plummeted in the fastest annual rate recorded since 1900. A 3-D printing ban for firearms is proposed in some states. Stephen Yates from Heritage joins us to share his commentary over everything from Davos including the Greenland talks, EU's trade deal with India, the fawning over China & more.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Relief Factorhttps://ReliefFactor.com OR CALL 1-800-4-RELIEFTry Relief Factor's 3-week Quickstart for just $19.95—tell them Dana sent you and see if you can be next to control your pain!Patriot Mobilehttps://PatriotMobile.com/DANA or call 972-PATRIOTSwitch to Patriot Mobile in minutes—keep your number and phone or upgrade, then take a stand today with promo code DANA for a free month of service!Humannhttps://HumanN.comKick off the New Year with simple, delicious wellness support—pick up Humann’s Turmeric Chews at Sam’s Club next time you’re there and see why they’re such a fan favorite!Byrnahttps://Byrna.com/DanaMake 2026 the year you protect your family with solid options—Get the Byrna today.WebRootTake your cybersecurity seriously! Get 60% off Webroot Total Protection at https://Webroot.com/Dana  Subscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

Does it still include the United States having ownership of Greenland like you said you wanted? It's a long-term deal. It's the ultimate long-term deal. I think it puts everybody in a really good position, especially as it pertains to security and minerals of the United States. Sir, how important is it for your legacy? Have you been speaking to other European leaders? Have you really spoken to other European leaders?

Yes, I am. How long how much deal will be, Mr. President? infinite. Did you speak to Denmark? Did you speak to Denmark? So we kind of have a new bit of a deal. We're going to unpack some of that today. Welcome to the radio program.

Dana Lash with you. Make sure you sign up at Substack. All kinds of good stuff goes out there regularly. So some of the latest with this, because it went back and forth, as you know, at Davos, at Davos, the big weff event yesterday. And the, you know, potential

you might say the potential agreement that we have, which basically means we're not really going to, I mean, I don't think we were going to lose anything anyway to begin with, but we're going to dive into that. We're also going to look at some of the latest. I was watching some of the hearing just a little bit ago with the House oversight, looking into the investigation with all of the, it's all of the J6. fallout with all of that. It's all the, it's the Jack Smith and some of the answers that he gave. I particularly enjoyed Congressman Brendan Gill, who had just finished questioning. It was some very interesting key points in that in which he was needling in on Jack Smith's refusal to include the names of the lawmakers that they were getting these surveillance warrants for.

their toll warrants is what they were calling them to monitor their phone calls. And it was very interesting because he had refused to include the names of those lawmakers. And the reason, as it was coming out, that he had refused to include the names of those lawmakers is because, well, it makes it easier to hide from those lawmakers that you're watching them if you keep from them the fact that they're being watched. I mean, it's insane the way that he tried to play it off as just doing his job. And we're going to talk more about that. But, I mean, it is this Greenland deal. I mean, at least some of the initial details that we have of this right now.

Look at, you know, an indefinite time frame. U.S. involved in Greenland's Mineral. I mean, I really don't give a rat's ass about any of this because I just don't care. I really don't care. I think just take it, use it, however we need it. Because nobody is going to go on the weekend and sit around at the dinner table after church on Sunday and talk about the U.S.-backed infrastructure investment in Greenland. People just want to know, what does this mean for national security?

What does this get us? We're going into a midterm election cycle. You need to break it down just a little bit more. Otherwise, people get into these stupid debates about Greenland and Iceland and, you know, whatever. And the point is this. It's a key piece to national security in the United States. We, I mean, have a sharing of some mineral rights. We're involved in that.

And there's small pockets of land that we can utilize that we can utilize, that we, actually will have sovereignty over. So it's an acquisition. The other thing that's interesting about this, and we'll talk more about it, is it changes the scope of the discussion. Because what was the discussion going into this? The scope of the discussion was, oh, it's Trump is going to conquer. He's going to try to conquer Greenland. He's going to try to invade Greenland. That was, wasn't that what the discussion has been this whole time, is that, has been in that scope? But that's not what it is. This is now you're looking at a business acquisition. And that's actually really how he started it,

was it was always ever going to be a business acquisition. This is a business acquisition. And now the whole point is that we're looking at considering business, the 57,000 residents. What do they get out of this? It becomes a business. And it becomes really, I mean, something that pays for itself when you consider the acquisition

and the value of the mineral rights. So it's supply chain. I mean, that's it. It's supply chain. Someone said it was dressed in the costume of territorial ambition, which I agree. I mean, it's completely agree. I mean, two of the, what is it, the formations that are in southern Greenland have the rare, those heavy rare earth elements that you can't really, the way that I've read, you can't

build any kind of advanced weapons system without those minerals. and we are just, we just now, it's a win, it's a win, major securing of these minerals. So I think that, you know, going into this, everyone was saying Trump was crazy and his rhetoric was insane. And, you know, I said going into this week that we're, you know, we'll talk about whether or not people think that his tone, his rhetoric, his tenor, whether or not any of that is appropriate for this particular purpose. But now everyone's saying, oh, wow, this looks like a really good deal now. Well, yeah, because it was all about cementing, you know, tent-polling our national security in this region, securing these minerals so China doesn't get them, so Russia can't exploit them for China. I mean, I don't know how many different ways we can talk about this the same damn day. I mean, nothing's changed. We just, we have a nice understanding now.

Mission accomplished. Mission accomplished. And the other thing, too, is that it scoots, it pushes Europe out of the way and pretending that they're leading anything. That's the thing. Like, don't pretend to lead anything in the northern hemisphere when you're committing political sepacu, economic sepacu. Don't do anything like that when you're when you're leading your own countries off of the edge of a cliff. So it's, I think it's, I think it was a success for him. I mean, you even had the, you even had NATO saying, yes, you know, it is true. This is cut 28. He said Trump was right. and that we must defend the Arctic and Greenland from China and Russia. This is Mark Rout, NATO Secretary. Listen to this.

So statements from me will not add anything here. And when it comes to the Arctic, I think President Trump is right. Other leaders in NATO are right. We need to defend the Arctic. We know that the sea lanes are opening up. We know that China and Russia are increasingly active in the Arctic. There are eight countries bordering on the Arctic. Seven are a member of NATO.

That's Finland and Sweden and Norway and Denmark. Iceland, Canada and the US. And there's only one country bordering on the Arctic outside NATO, and there's Russia. And I would argue there is a ninth country which is China, which is increasingly active in the Arctic region. So President Trump and other leaders are right. We have to do more there. We have to protect the Arctic against Russian and Chinese influence. And that's exactly what NATO ambassadors decided to do in September.

We are working on that, making sure that collectively will we defend the Arctic region. That was pretty stunning that the NATO general secretary said that, incredibly stunning. That POTUS is correct. You have to, well, of course it is. Of course. I mean, that makes all the sense in the world. It was just you've never heard anyone from NATO say such on such a public stage in front of the entire world like that and agree. Yeah, of course, I will say this was after the understanding with Greenland essentially concluded.

But it was, I mean, so far, the deal was leaking last night on CNBC. And so it's, I mean, it worked under the deal. The Danes are giving the U.S. sovereignty. Now, it's over, like I said in the start of the broadcast, it's over some small pockets of the land where they can build military bases, etc. But it's a success. They gain control of it. We're involved in the mineral rights.

Greenland, I think, holds the reserves. some of these other natural resources. I mean, it's a win-win. And so in one deal, you have defense, you have minerals, you have the land, all in one deal, and on an indefinite clock. And it opens the door to a U.S.-backed infrastructure investment. So it's kind of like the Overton window, right? He's like, well, I'll just acquire the whole damn thing.

And as a way to push them into accepting this deal. So it makes it seem like they chose it. They chose it for themselves. That's a win. That's an incredible win. And I think it's probably why now you've seen the media immediately switch and everybody's focusing on the Jack Smith thing, which was entertaining. By the way, if you ever, if you get a chance, you should go. We should get, if we can't, get Brendan Gill's questioning of him on that just within the, towards the end of the last hour.

Because that was very illuminating, the way he was drilling down on the fact that Jack Smith had refused to include the name, the names of those lawmakers that they were getting those toll warrants on, the surveillance on, and then had actually put them as a flight risk, listed the Speaker of the House as a flight risk and didn't tell anybody. Yeah, no shenanigans there at all, right? I'm sure, no shenanigans at all whatsoever. So this is, like I said, that's, they're moving to that and glomming onto that today because this was a success yesterday. So now it's going to disappear off of the top. above the fold. Everyone's going to move to talk about everything else instead of, I mean, this is a big deal. They made it a big enough deal to act like it was going to be the end of the

world, the end of NATO in World War III. They acted like it was going to be the end of everything. And now, here we are, and it's a success. It is an absolute success. He got exactly, however he did it, maybe he made people think that he was a bull in a China shop. Maybe he got people to think that he was braggadocious and bullish about it. But what was the conclusion? He got the deal. He got it done. Now, I don't care how you get it done.

Just get the damn thing done. I think the people who sit here and quibble over how it was done after it was a success, those are the people that are distractions. We've got a lot coming up, including, can I just say, so the Oscars came out with their list of nominated films. Sinners is one of the films that was nominated, and I like a good horror film, and I like vampire stuff. But I couldn't even watch this movie. I just didn't think it was good. I didn't even finish watching it. How in the hell does it lead history with the most nominations ever? So we got a lot to dive into, including in Minnesota, some of the latest. Also, there was a raid on one of the church, the people leading the storming of the churches. We're going to discuss all of that. We got the Jack Smith stuff and more as we move. the folks who will make the program possible, it is our friends over at Burn a Gun.

Now, Burn a Gun, this is a great way to make sure that you're still protecting yourself even when you have private properties and municipalities and local restrictions, et cetera, et cetera, that are making it impossible for you to do it because of their constitutionally abridging edicts. But with the Burnagun, as you know, Burna is, it shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can deter threats from up to 55. feet away. It's about the size of an iPhone. You know, there's no, there's no recoil. You don't have to worry about target acquisition. And the cool thing is that, you know, for college kids especially, you know, think about it, you know, you're not old enough to carry yet, but you're still, you know, reliant upon yourself for your own security. You want to make sure that you have a way to get to

safety or to stay safe. And this is where a burn a gun can come in, diversify your weapons array. Sheets chemical irritant projectiles that can deter threats from up to 50 feet away. That gives you, And it has a 15-round shot capacity per cartridge compared to stun guns, which are just one or two rounds. So you have a lot of opportunity there to get yourself, like I said, to safety made right here in the U.S. of A. Doesn't care about gun-free zone signs. There's no background checks. You order it online. They send it right to your house.

Check out the CL. That's the compact launcher. That's the one that's best for this purpose. And you can find it at burner.com slash Dana. B-Y-R-N-A. Burna.com slash Dana. Ready when you are. So it was interesting.

last night at the Davos, they had an evak at the Davos event. The weft. The guests were left coughing. They said that they had to order an evacuation. And it was, of course, it was after POTUS had addressed the conference. And they said that they had a fire at a nearby hotel. Because everybody, I saw this trending on social last night. And it was a little crazy. People were like, what is happening? What is happening? So it was, they had a fire at a hotel. That's ultimately what happened. They said world leaders were not affected. So there you go. Also, a Delta flight returned to the gate after fluids leaked inside the aircraft and soaked a passenger.

My first thought was like, okay, what do you mean fluids? Because we've had horror stories of toilets and air, like dirty air conditioning, filtered water leaking on people. They said that the chemicals were non-hazardous and that it occurred just was at LaGuardia. So, I don't know. I've never seen anything. Thankfully, I've never had that happen on a plane before, but soaked somebody. Can you imagine traveling? You're on a Delta flight, and you're soaked from stuff leaking on you. An Amazon driver was caught stealing a customer's cat, and the owner is understandably

and are upset about it because the cat needs medication for a heart murmur. Amazon said that they're investigating, but he was caught on a doorbell camera, just literally picking up a customer's cat and walking away. Just right on a camera. I just, I would just assume, I don't know. why people don't, that everything is recorded anymore and that you're not going to get away with doing anything. Just know that you're going to probably be on video somewhere. Everybody has these things. Everybody has these doorbell cameras. So that catastrophic storm, there's still warning of it. The warnings persist. Forecasters are warning of potentially catastrophic storms,

but it's supposed to go all the way from Texas to the Carolinas. And they said that you're looking at some places like an inch of ice, half an inch of ice, things of that great swathes of heavy snow, sleet and freezing rain expected. I'm going to be really bummed out if it's nothing. Gotta be honest, I'm going to be super bummed out if it's nothing because we've heard so much about it at this point. Dangerously cold air is going to accompany it. A House panel votes to hold the Clintons in contempt of an Epstein inquiry. They're getting closer to actually being detained at this point. The votes by the oversight panel were by partisan, which is interesting because there were Democrats that were voting for this. The House Oversight Committee, they voted on this yesterday. They're recommending charging the Clintons with

criminal contempt of Congress because they refused to testify in the Epstein investigation. And so what this does, this starts the process of referring them to the Department of Justice for prosecution. They had nine Democrats join Republicans in this. Three of them backed it. I mean, it's going to go to the House floor in a couple of weeks for a vote. So interesting. They said that it'll pass and it's going to pass with Democrat votes on top of it, which is interesting. Let's see. In addition to this, I've got a couple of other things to get into. We're going to dive into some of the stuff that they have proposed in Virginia. We mentioned yesterday that Virginia had passed him looking at a laundry list here. New criminal

penalty overhaul recommendations as well as a bunch of other stuff, taxes, all of this. We're going to dive into that more, stick with us. Our partners that bring you the program. It's the folks over at Patriot Mobile, the only Christian conservative cell phone service that is out there. And they have premium, prioritized service on all three major U.S. network. So you get reliable coverage everywhere you go, no matter what. And it's all backed by a 100% U.S.-based customer support team. So you're getting unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots, international roaming, everything that you would expect from a top-tier carrier. but your money is not working against you. You've got to look at these political action committees of some of these big cell phone companies, right? Some of these political action committees,

they spend so much money on DEI and gun control and all kinds of stuff. That's not what Patriot Mobile does. Your money works for you. It propels the things that you support at the ballot box and beyond. Take a stand and make the switch today. PatriotMobil.com slash Dana or call 972 Patriot and use promo code Dana to get a free phone. It's PatriotMobil. global.com slash Dana 972 Patriot. Promocode Dana for your free phone. The Dana Show podcast. Your fast, funny, and informative news companion for those always on the move.

Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash with you. So as I was saying a little earlier, I found it the, and I was watching a little bit of it today, the Jack Smith, the House Judiciary, I said oversight earlier, House Judiciary, questioning Jack Smith in this ongoing case, investigating his actions and the witch hunt as it related to POTUS and J6 and all this stuff. Some of the testimony that he was giving, I'm like, are we living in dual realities right now? We were on air when all of that happened with J6. And I'm going to play this here in a minute.

Juan's got it ready to go. But I want to establish really quickly, just to recap, why people were protesting. testing in the first place. And Daryl Issa actually had touched on this when he, Representative from California, because he was saying that he himself had objected to the inclusion of results that came from two states. And these were the final ballots from the general election. And the reason that he had objected to those is because he said that they had violated the Constitution. Now, what do you mean? It violated the Constitution. Well, as you know, every state, states get to determine what they want their elections to be, right?

They get to determine how they want their elections to run. That is completely within their right. That's how it is constitutionally, right? That's how it opt. That's how the whole system works. However, and this is what I had mentioned before others have discussed. The issue here was the voting during COVID, during the lockdown. And you remember that a number of states, including Texas and Georgia and all of these other states,

they changed the parameters that dictate the processes for voting. So things that had previously required signatures like mail-in ballots where their state constitution had previously required signatures or, you know, a stamped envelope that did not exceed past the voting date, things of that nature. you know, basic protections to ensure the integrity of the vote. And in order for all of these other states, and again, states can determine that their own elections, they can run their own elections, that's what they do. But in order to allow or to convince other states to accept those results and to trust your vetting

and to trust the strength of your validation, you need to agree to certain things to uphold the integrity of that ballot. You need to be able. So if Texas wants Georgia to accept Texas's results, Texas can say, okay, here's what we're doing. Signature matching. We're making sure that all of these mail-in ballots are within a specific time frame and they all have signatures. We're making sure that ballots that come in are actually postmarked.

They're not just randomly dropped somewhere. These were things where, you know, we would put that out there. And Georgia would say, okay, we like that. That shows us you're working hard to make sure that no one's votes being canceled because you're upholding the integrity of the process. So that's what we're talking about. That was suspended during COVID, during lockdowns. All of those rules went down the, went out the window. Not all of them in every state. And in some states, it was county by county. Like in Pennsylvania, it was county by county. And there were legal fights over that, a lot of litigation over

that. So what they were discussing, and it was again mentioned in this discussion with the House Judiciary Hearing is that there were objections to two specific states because they had suspended all of those previous agreements that went to Assange fears about the integrity of the vote, meaning that they didn't want people to think that their votes were compromised because, you know, they had all of these protections in place. They suspended those for COVID. And in fact, they went beyond, some states went beyond that. Georgia actually codified some of these changes into their state constitution. I thought Georgia went way too far. far. But that's what they did. That's what they chose to do. They actually amended their own

founding, their own state constitution to incorporate some of those post-COVID changes in, which, you know, and despite the left rallying against it, I thought it actually went against the integrity of the vote, but that's another topic. But the point is that the objections were to those certifications of those ballots specifically that came from areas that had suspended agreed upon protections to consider the conclusion of that state's vote. It was never about overturning an election. People who tell you that are either stupid and they have no idea what they're talking about or they're lying to you for a malicious reason. And you should either way, you need to question their motives and their intellect. So this was mentioned because this was the very thing, one of the very things that Jack Smith was twisting and trying to manipulate in the press and in these requests, these documentation to get all of these warrants, these surveillance warrants, etc. And this was something that right before Brendan Gill was questioning him, Issa brought it up. And I thought it was a very good line of questioning.

And then it went into the issue of literally classifying the Speaker of the House as a flight risk and requesting surveillance on him without actually including the name in the documentation as to who was being surveilled. Listen to this line of questioning. says Congressman Brandon Gill from Texas. He's not letting Smith get away with any of this. This was very insightful. Watch. Feel back noting the presence of officers who were subpoena, then Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy's toll records?

Yes, sir, we did. Yes, you did. And the subpoena covered the time period between November 2020 and January 2021. Is that right? I'm sorry, sir. Could you say that again? We're not going to delay like this. The subpoena covered the time period between November of 2020 and January 2021.

How many days after Kevin McCarthy was sworn in as Speaker, did you subpoena his records? I don't recall, but those two things had nothing to do. It was 16 days after becoming the highest-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, you subpoenaed his toll records. Do you agree that that might reasonably be considered a violation of the speech or debate clause? I do not, and I want to be clear that the toll record... You were collecting months worth of phone data on the Republican Speaker of the House, the leader of the opposition, right after he got sworn in his Speaker, all around the time

of a major vote, that sounds like a flagrant violation of the speech or debate clause to me, and I think most people agree with me. And Speaker McCarthy had no recourse, did he? Because you issued a non-disclosure order ensuring that neither he nor any of the American people knew about these subpoenas. Is that right? The toll record, the non-content toll record subpoenas, we did secure non-disclosure orders for those subpoenas.

You did, and let me ask you, Mr. Smith, at the time you secured those nondisclosure orders, was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk? The non-disclosure order was based on concerns about... Was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk? He was not. He was not. Then why did your nondisclosure order refer to him as a flight risk? It says right here, the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure

will result in flight from prosecution. Sir, when securing a nondisclosure order, The risks don't have to be associated. You think that the Speaker of the House is a flight risk? No, this is not your time. This is my time. You think the Speaker of the House is a flight risk? You think he's going to hop on a plane and leave the country?

No. No, what I was trying to explain is with respect to a nondisclosure order. The risks aren't necessarily associated with the subscriber to the phone. There's the risks to investigation. I think that you were using. you were using, this was clearly in reference to Speaker McCarthy and you were using clearly false information to secure non-disclosure order to hide from Speaker McCarthy and from the American people the fact that you were spying on his toll records. But I've got more, more, so let's

move on. In May of 2023, you also issued subpoenas for toll records of nine U.S. senators and an additional representative. Is that right? In May of 23, we did issue. You did, and there were non-disclosure orders in conjunction with those subpoenas as well, right? So this was, this was, because Jack Smith did not want to answer these questions. And one of the tactics that they use in these hearings, especially if they don't really want to answer, is they, they're very slow in answering, they're pretending they're not understanding the question, or they're answering something ancillary, but not really directly to the heart of what's being asked, and Gil was just not having it.

The, he was looking specifically, and he filed this, this went through, uh, he had, had petitioned AT&T. He asked for his private personal cell phone. He wasn't talking about any kind of work calls or any kind of congressional phone. He was requesting private personal cell phone records. And anything, it was just a big giant catch-all, anything related to J-6. And the entire idea of a flight risk, I can't believe, to label him as a flight risk is insane. So AT&T turned over, and as you heard Gil ask, too, it was more than just McCarthy.

He went after a number of senators as well. And they withheld those names from the judge. This is a tactic that the left has used over and over again. So they withheld the names that were on these requests from the judge. And the judges and Jack Smith was forced to admit there in front of everybody that they did not have those names on any of the, any of the, any of the records that they had submitted, they had redacted the names so that the judges couldn't see, wow, okay, this is the Speaker of the House that you're asking for us, you're asking surveillance on, you're asking for the personal phone records of the Speaker of the House.

And his, remember, again, all part of the Arctic Frost investigation, his reasoning, Smith's reasoning, and I'm reading it here from his documents, was that it was hidden because it was necessary to avoid a grave risk of obstruction of justice. What? And they were asked, too, whether or not judges, are they typically made aware when they're with subpoenas, when people are demanding subpoenas and they're demanding that phone carriers hand over all of their call logs? Is that something that judges routinely? Don't they get to know who they're, the person who's being targeted by this, Smith could answer it. He said, quote, I don't think we identified that. He goes, I don't think that was department policy at the time. I don't care if you like Jack Smith or not.

You cannot deny that this was very underhanded. I don't care if you like Kevin McCarthy or not. This is nothing to do with any of that. This has to do with him weaponizing his office, his role for the Biden-Harris administration to go after their political enemies. This is not unlike what they did with Carter Page with the FISA warrants back in 2016. Remember it was completely omitted. There were a number of things omitted. First off, Carter Page initially was even omitted. How do you get a wiretap on somebody and you're not even going to give the judge the name of the person that you're surveilling? Are you kidding me? But then secondly, what was what was left out is where the information that they were using to base their request on where that was coming from. And if you remember,

because the FEC levied a fine on both the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign, it came from them. And they were funneling all of this, laundering this information through Fusion GPS, which should be registered under FARA, but is not. And so that was the information. They didn't say, oh, well, this is actually campaign information. That stuff is pertinent when you're putting together subpoena requests, but it was granted anyway. So this is the second time that we've seen. I'm sure there are more times. I would love to know. I feel like this is just like the picking of the tip of the iceberg with us. The folks who don't make the program possible.

It's the people over at Relief Factor. Relief Factor is all about helping you live pain-free. Take back your freedom, not just from pain, but also mobility. And you can do it with Relief Factor's three-week quick start. They support your body's natural inflammatory response that causes an aches, soreness and stiffness and discomfort from exercise and daily activities. And it targets inflammation that can keep you, from enjoying the things that you love with greater freedom and mobility. It's made with a 100% drug-free

formula using research-backed ingredients, including omega-3s, resveratrol, all designed to support relief from everyday exercise-related and age-related discomfort. And it helps maintain those healthy joints and muscles, so you get better movement and less pain over time. Try the three-week quick start for just 1995. Visit Relieffactor.com or call 800 number 4 relief to see if you could be the next person to get out the pain with relief factor. That's relieffactor.com or 800 number four relief. Tell them Dana sent you. Get the lowdown on the latest news with a side of laughs.

Whenever you want, subscribe to the Dana Show podcast on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. Don't his hand tight trash is on. The floor. This is a sub-performative.

Shut up, you dumb boomer. So tired of this. That's a Green Day, who I think is one of the worst bands that's ever lived. They're not punk. It's a petrified turd that wraps itself and sheet music. That's what they are. I just, I've never, I didn't like them when they came out with their first album. And I was like, why are they faking a British accent? But then that's when that's the first, I guess it's where Hillary Baldwin got it from. I don't know. But they were performing, as you can see, declaring that they were Antifa. The thing that sucks is that these guys are going to be, They're performing at the Super Bowl opening ceremony. So, I mean, it's already a super highly politicized half. I'm not going to watch it. I just, I've never given up on kind of getting mad at the NFL over this stuff. And Jay-Z now controls all of the halftime stuff. So all the halftime shows are just absolute political garbage.

I mean, heaven forbid, you have people come together and watch a game and then enjoy a halftime performance. No, we're going to. Let's put in some like late 50-year-old fake punk rockers. They're pop punk. They're never punk. Anybody who says that they're punk are posers. Green Day are horrible. They play the same stuff over and over again.

That's it. I don't get it. But they're like, our song is anti-fascism. And then they do this stuff with their shows. I mean, I guess, you know, that's what you do when you don't write any other good material. And you don't have any other hits. I mean, whatever. I don't care.

But I don't want it on my Super Bowl half. So I'm not going to have it in my house. I'm not having it in my house. I'm not debasing myself by having it play in my house. I'm just not. I'm so tired of this. So I have a video that I'm going to play coming up next hour. You're going to need to sit down for this one. I think we're at a tipping point. I am really done with these self-aggrandizing cultish leftists who record themselves saying insane things online. And then they post it online. And then they're shocked that people have a reaction to it.

The latest one, though, is really bad. And it has to do with Caroline Levitt, the White House spokesperson. She's going to have a baby, as you know. And a woman who works as a labor and delivery nurse at Baptist Health at Boca Raton Regional Hospital. Her name is Lexi Lawler, L-A-W-L-E-R. she made a video or posted, she put it up on TikTok, where she said that she hoped the press secretary during childbirth, quote, suffers a severe fourth degree tear during childbirth. And she hopes that she blanking rips from bow to stern, bow to stern, and never anything normally again, you redacted. Do you trust a woman like that to deliver your child or your grand?

grandchild or your niece or nephew or your friend's baby. Why in the world, first off, would you record yourself saying that, having your name out there online and you publish it? I wouldn't be able to go to Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Baptist Health SF on X. I wouldn't want to go there. I would be afraid that I would have this psycho in my labor and delivery room. We're going to talk about this and so much more coming up next. Stick with us. You want to make sure that you're protected when you're online. So many people make purchases online. I mean, you schedule your kids stuff online.

Schools have portals. I mean, there's a lot of stuff. And you want to make sure that all of your devices are locked down plus your finances, plus your identity. So this is where web route comes in. They have web root essentials. They also have web route total protection, which is an all-in-one device, privacy, identity protection. That takes the guessing game out of cybersecurity. You can protect your entire digital life with this stuff.

VPN cloud backup, they watch out for your private information, making sure it doesn't pop up on the dark web. But you can protect your entire family with WebRut Total Protection, multiple devices, multiple users. And it runs, it scans six times faster and takes up 33 times less space than Norton, McAfee, and all of these other popular antivirus softwares that are out there. You really need something that is sophisticated that watches multiple fronts, and that is what WebRut total protection does. And right now you can get 60% off by visiting webroot.com slash Dana. 60% off limited time only though at webroot.com slash Dana. Live a safer digital life with Weberidge. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash, with you. And we are at the top of this

second hour. And don't forget, go to sign up for the podcast as well. You can download that. If you missed anything, you can find it in the podcast. Also, YouTube, Facebook, like, and subscribe to chats at Rumble. There was a story that I read, I think it was pulling it over here, the New York Post, I think it was a New York Post, where they were discussing, you know, you have the second lady who's expecting, and then you have the White House Press Secretary that's expecting, and, you know, there's a lot of, you know, talk about babies and all this stuff within the administration. And I was just thinking back, you know, that was, that's like a very nervous time for a woman. You know, she's expecting a child, whether it's your first or second. doesn't really change, especially if you're in a high-powered position, as one might expect of a press secretary for the president of the United States. And I say this because it's something that it's a concern shared by all women. It doesn't matter what your politics are. It's a concern that all women share. You know, they're all nervous about childbirth. That's why it doesn't make it any

better when you allow politics to seep into and tribalism, to seep into every aspect of American life that not even prenatal care is exempt. That's the danger of hyper-tribalization. That's the danger of all of these different ideological silos. You can't get away from it. We were just talking last hour about the Super Bowl halftime show. I mean, it's a bunch of bunch of artists that are hyper political, that always say very hyper political things, and you know that that's what the show is going to be. It's going to be a big, giant political mess. It's going to turn people off. It's going to help drive division, not heal it. It's in law. I mean, for Crown Out Loud, you have it present in our courthrooms now,

where it should be everyone is equal before the law and under it when it's broken, but now we have, we apply certain things based on politics, not evidence. But I think one of the scariest things, and we saw this during COVID, is that it seeped into our health care. It seeped into medicine. It is now influencing the way people who are in positions of authority, whether they're doctors, whether they are nurse practitioners, whatever it is, people who really ultimately

decide if you're living or dying during care. Now it's even coloring their perspectives. Now you have to question whenever you go into a medical facility whether or not you're actually getting the best care possible or if it's being denied you because of what your politics are. We saw, again, like I said, we saw it with COVID jarringly. People who didn't wear masks or people who maybe they even had the virus so they didn't really need to get a non-existing vaccine, they were ridiculed, even by medical professionals. And they were, some people were talking about denying them care. I mean, when politics seeps into, I read a story of just how I'm pulling this up right now, how a canine that was being housed in a kennel, this came from

Homeland Security, anti-ice rioters were targeting canines. At the kennels where they were staying, they were making marks on their feeding chart to starve the dogs. That's how bad it is. That's how hyper-tribal people are. And like I said, the scariest thing is when it's in medicine. Now, back to my point, we're talking about, you know, the White House Press Secretary and women who are expecting. It's just a nervous time. This is especially nervous time when everything is so political. Now you're wondering, okay, well, does my labor and delivery team, are they going to do something mean to me or my child because of my politics? And before you say, no, that could never happen. I think it already is. And you have these people who are completely unconcerned about the consequences

that may follow because there aren't any. Case and point. A labor and delivery nurse at Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital. Her name is Lexi Lawler. And she had something really horrific to say about the White House Press Secretary. Now, this woman delivers babies. This woman

delivers babies. Watch her behavior here. As a labor and delivery nurse, it gives me great joy to wish Caroline Levitt a fourth degree tear. I hope that you f*** rip from. Bow to stern.

And never shit normally again, you B-B-E-B-H- Now, part of me wants to drag her by her extensions back to the parking lot of the hospital and beat her ass so ferociously that she's unidentifiable to her loved ones. That's my first inclination because she's a demon. That's ghoulish. That is one of the most ghoulish things. And I am tired of courteously just weathering the storm with these people.

I think that if you are going to allow your policy, to influence your job in health care of all things. If you are going to allow your political zealotry to lead you or to act like this, or if you're just nuts and you're using it as a way to justify it, then your politics deserve to be used against you to disqualify you from any and all future employment in the medical field. I hope that she is never employed again and I hope she greatly suffers for it. I hope that she suffers horribly and her life is horrible because I feel like that's the only thing that's going to make this stop.

There's never any kind of deterrence for people who do this. If I was a woman, and I was going to deliver at Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital, I would be changing my birth plan immediately. If I was a patient of Lexi Lawlers, I would be immediately filing a complaint to the state medical board and demanding an investigation into this United States. Lucy Lettby. I wouldn't trust her to safely deliver a child. I wouldn't trust my health

in Lexi Lawler's hands. I would be worried that she would murder my baby and I would be worried that she would cause me to bleed out and die on the bed. That's what I believe. I wholeheartedly believe that she has a murderer's heart completely.

Only people who have that do that kind of stuff. This is what she records and puts online publicly. imagine what she's like privately. I hope she's investigated by every state agency possible because this is an actual serious community issue. You're a labor and delivery nurse at a hospital and you are literally responsible for

assisting bringing life into this world and you're talking about wishing potential death on someone because you don't like their politics and childbirth. What in the hell is wrong with you? I am so tired of this. I'm so tired of these people who create this system where now the rest of us have to question whether or not we're going to be killed by these people when seeking routine medical care. Isn't that crazy? Do you know that how many times do you guys do this? Do you find yourselves doing this? I've had to do this since Parkland. I had to evaluate every time I go to if I see a new medical professional, if I see anybody for service, hell, if I go and get my

eyebrows threaded, I have to double check and make sure that the person that I'm going to receive the services from isn't a zealot, not just making sure that they're just not a Democrat. I just need to make sure that they're not a crazy zealot like this woman. Because I don't trust the left not to abuse whatever authority they're given to hurt people. They've already shot and killed somebody that we know. They already tried killing Trump twice. And now you have a woman sitting here talking about she hopes that basically Caroline Leavitt bleeds to death during delivery. What a horrible person.

So yes, I hope that Legsy Lawler suffers horrifically economically. I hope she can never get employed again. I hope that she has to issue an apology. And I hope that through her pain and struggle of this consequence that she finds Jesus because she needs to. This is how bad it is. And this is why I get so mad at some of the folks in the middle and some of the folks on the left who don't have to live with this day-to-day reality. It is not unique to me. Everybody that I know, every single, every single one of my contemporaries has to do the same thing.

They have to do the same thing. I had to evaluate whether or not when I was looking for a hairstylist just to get my haircut to make sure that the person wasn't going to butcher me. this is a routine thing. Conservatives don't act like this. People on the right don't act like this because we're not flipping nuts. But the left? This is like their thing. If you don't agree with them, they want to hurt you.

They want to hurt you however possible. They clamor to do it. It is like a contagion. They foam at the mouth. And I've seen it turn people from what I thought were normal people. into monsters. This is just, so yes, her name is Lexi Lawler and it's Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospitals, how it's being reported.

I wouldn't, man, I just think if you're going to go there and you're expecting, I would maybe change that. She's a registered nurse. Oh, her information is all out there. I think we need to make sure that the Attorney General is aware of this as well, James Uthmire in Florida, because I don't, do you believe that if she found out that somebody that she had previously worked with or delivered for was a conservative, I wonder if there's a history of complications during childbirth involving her because of

her political zealotry. I really do. I genuinely wonder this. This is how bad it is. So for the people who are like, oh, well, you know, just this stuff is online. It's not online. It's not just online. It's literally out there. everywhere. And it goes one way. So don't ask me to unite with people who do this kind of stuff, because it's not happening. In fact, I feel like the consequences need to be severe. And like I said, if this was my nurse, I beat her ass in the parking lab behind the hospital without hesitation. Would, and a heartbeat. I mean, there needs to be consequences for this kind of stuff. So I hope she's investigated. I hope she has her license suspended. And I hope she's never employed in medicine again.

I can't, I'm just, I feel this is enraging. Enraging. Now, a couple of other things. You know, they started raiding the houses of those people involved in the Minnesota church ambushing. We're going to talk a little bit about that. We're also going to get into some of the stuff in Virginia. So Democrats take over in Virginia. We made mention of this yesterday. There is a laundry list of things that they are proposing. I was not, I was shocked at how much Virginia Democrats have proposed not just to tax, but how much they've proposed to overhaul criminal justice in the worst way possible in that state. And now, all of the news you would probably miss.

It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So in Sydney, they've been dealing with some serious shark. bites. Australia has suffered its fourth shark attack in 48 hours. And they said if this one was a surfer who was left in a hospital, this was off of the, well, fourth in 48 hours, 39-year-old man. It was off their North-Southwest coast. Northside doesn't make any sense. Their NSW coast. The surf life-saving NSW chief executive issued a warning, a warning telling people, okay, maybe we need to stay out of the water for a little while. let's not go into the surf. Let's not go anywhere.

These are on their northern beaches. So it's the northern coast. And this came after, they said that, because they kept saying, well, there's a reason why. Okay, why is the reason? They bury it all the way that held on at the bottom of the graph because this person over at GB News can't write a proper story. They were saying that it's grizzly because the murky conditions from recent storms, it has limited the predator's ability to properly identify. you know, what is food and really what isn't. And so they said also the combination of untreated

sewage is messing with their ability, their sense of being able to determine, oh, this is food we eat and this is food that we don't eat. So it's a combination of murky water, heavy rainfall, and untreated sewage flowing into the harbor. This is in Sydney's Harbor. So that's how much rain. So it's basically they chummed all the water. That's so disgusting, but that's really, ultimately what happened. Pita wants Pung Satani Phil to be replaced by a hologram. I really don't care. I think that's dumb.

No one's going to come out for, I think it's weird that we look for a roundhog to predict weather, and I get that it's a fun tradition. I don't think that Punksitani Phil is treated poorly. I mean, he has a bunch of men in top hats that pet him and sing to him and all this stuff. So I don't know why of all of the things, that's the thing that they would want to focus on. I mean, you have an epidemic of dogs and shelters right now, and you're focusing on this.

Like, I don't know, just maybe get your priorities straight. Oxford's joined the rest of us. They've now determined that vitamin D protects you from flu. Welcome, 20, 30 years too late. Okay, there you go. Let's see, Bezos's Blue Origin is going to deploy thousands of satellites for a new communications network. The space company announced the plan to deploy 5,408 satellites, jumping into a market that's been thus far dominated by SpaceX. So he's getting into that game. That's going to be an

interesting competition. They said that they're going to serve a maximum of roughly 100,000 customers. And the network is called TerraWave. And this is all about creating data centers in space that can meet the sorting demand for large-scale AI. This is boy, oh boy, that's the business to get into, I think. I mean, you'll realize it maybe in 40 years, but still, a man charged in the largest jewelry heist in U.S. history avoids trial by getting deported. So they deported him. He stole a hundred million. It was a hundred million dollar Brinks truck.

Some people are saying, oh, we're letting them walk. I don't see why we need to pay to house them, pay for their trial and pay for their attorney when we can just deport them and prevent them from ever coming back personally. Lawlessness and disorder. murders plummet across the country. There's a reason why. Stick with us. Keep your finger on the pulse with the Dana Show podcast, delivering timely news with insightful analysis.

Whenever you want, straight to you on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. So coming in from the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, she says that so far, they've, she said earlier this morning, earlier today, that they've arrested a number of, a couple of the people who were involved in the storming of that church in St. Paul, Minnesota, and they also apparently were able to arrest William Kelly. And that's, these are the people, if you remember, who busted up, they busted up into this church and were screaming at the congregants. Here's the flashback of this. This was seven, this was CNN interviewing the nut job. This is cut 17. Listen. And I do want to correct something that was said in the beginning. We did not

rush into that church. We actually went and sat down and participated in the service. And after the pastor prayed, that is when I stood up and asked him a question and response to his prayer. And then I, and he responded to me. And then I proceeded to ask him about. The problem with what she's saying is that she gave another interview before this, where she literally said that the whole purpose was to disrupt the service and to be allowed. So her previous interview completely contradicts what she said to hours later. She gave an interview where she said that the purpose was to disrupt. And they also wrote online that they wanted to stop the services, disrupt the services. So don't try to retcon it now. That's assonine. They also got that guy who looks like the crazy homeless meth addict, the William

Kelly guy. He was the guy who was screaming at everybody with her. She's, so they, I'm pulling this up. So she was, they had, according to the AG, not only did they get, they got William Kelly, they got him that was announced maybe about 20 minutes ago, 25 minutes ago. And they also arrested that woman, Akima Armstrong. So they're sharing updates. They announced her arrest four hours ago. So that was this morning. And then about 20 minutes ago, they announced the arrest of that William Kelly. and it's deserved because, again, it's the FACE Act.

How are you going to apply that in some areas and not apply it in others? The shocking thing is, though, and I pulled this up, let me grab this really quickly. The shocking thing, though, too, is that a judge rejected the charges against Don Lemon over this. A Minnesota federal magistrate judge refused to sign the complaint that was charging Lemon in connection with the protest at the St. Paul Church. that is what CBS was told. They said that the AG has been in Minnesota for two days. They have been looking for prosecutorial law enforcement resources there, and the judge wouldn't do it. So when you have judges that are refusing to also uphold the law, then I think that it's time for us to pick and choose what laws we want to follow.

I mean, that's, I'm just done. At what point are we going to say enough is enough? Is it going to take a nationwide movement? of actual resistance. All these people on the left, they talk about resistance. You people don't have any idea what that is.

You have no clue what that means. None. You'll be resisting us because I'm done. This is just ridiculous. Not even going to charge the guy. I mean, he was part of the ringleaders.

He busted up into that church and helped lead it, along with this woman and along with this William, Kelly. These people, this is what I'm talking about, as I mentioned at this, at last our top of this hour with the woman in medicine, the nurse who's allowing her politics to infect her labor and delivery job.

Or it's in law. It's in, I mean, this, this isn't based on a rejection of law on merit. It's rejection because of politics. plain and simple. I mean, if you can charge pro-life protesters for silently praying on a sidewalk across from an abortion clinic, then you could, under the Faces Act, under the FACE Act, then you can charge Don Lemon who charges up with a bunch of meth heads into a church for the sole purpose of trying to terrify harm and intimidate congregants based upon their religious affiliation. That's it. That's the way it is. So this magistrate judge, and, a, Apparently the AG is still there in Minnesota, so I don't know if that's going to change or not, but the way it is. It's just unbelievable. So we are, I mean, the strength of the Republic is how equal we are before the law and underneath it when it's violated. One of those organizers of that Minnesota church invasion has a slush fund nonprofit.

I know you're shocked by this. You're absolutely shocked. In six years, the salary of this organizer has significantly exceeded. all of the money that the nonprofit distributed. You know who the biggest donor is to it? To that nonprofit? The Walton Foundation. Walton Family Foundation.

Yes. It's those people. So the Nekima Armstrong, she's paid herself over a million dollars during the past six years leading the Slush Fund nonprofit her salary, as I just said, extends beyond any of the funds that the nonprofit has ever distributed. She's the founder and CEO of a cannabis company.

I mean, she just looks like trash. She's just thugged trash. That's all she is. The foundation is supposed to be dedicated to giving grants to anti-poverty community initiatives. And apparently she thinks that she is the only anti-poverty community initiative worth giving money to. because she brings in a six-figure salary. That's insane. Insane.

And she's, let's see, oh yeah, the organization gave just $161,000 in grants per the 22 filing. And she was raking in about $216,000. So she's milking it. And the stupid Walton Family Foundation, they're bankrolling it. They're the major donor. They donated $2.3 million during that same time period to the Wayfinder, Wayfinder Foundation, which distributed the money to this group as well. So the Walton family, they financed this. They financed it.

This is like the BLM stuff. What was it, the Patrice Collars, the woman who headed a BLM and it came out that she had three different houses and making all of this money, purchasing luxury items, living the good life. That's how all of this works. Now, I will add Lorraine notes that Lemon was on site after the disruption started. And she says in one of the videos, you can hear it. And he followed them in. And so that may, maybe, she's not saying, she's not adding this to that, but maybe that's one of the reasons why the judge didn't, I don't know, Maybe there was a new one. I still think he should be charged.

Absolutely. But this is all a grift. All of this is a grift. I guess, I don't know, maybe we should be thankful that these people are grifting off of the Walton Family Foundation and all of this other stuff to the extent that they are because then otherwise, you know, can you imagine if they'd actually been able to be effective with their money? I don't know. So the AG, they've arrested at least two people involved in this church attack. It's an attack. I'm calling it an attack. If J6 is an insurrection, this was a religious terror attack. And we're going to go with it. We're going to go with it. Apparently there was a photo posted of Armstrong and Cuffs. Glorious. I just think these people need to stop this. And there needs to be serious penalties. That's one of the reasons why they do it so much. It's one of the reasons why you see people attacking eyes. Nobody forgets that under Biden and Harris, there was no accountability at all whatsoever. All right, a few other things to touch on as well.

Let's, ooh, ooh, ooh, do you guys see? Let me pull this up. I don't watch this. She's a children's YouTuber. Good, help us all. Her name's Ms. Rachel. She's a big Hamas supporter. And she apparently liked a comment from the, quote, Palestine, which is a fake place, news

network where they, people were talking about, like, ridding the country of Jews or something like that. And she ended up liking the comment. She, and then she, and another one, they said, they made another comment and she replied underneath it, ooh, with all O's and H's. And she was saying that she accidentally did all of this, that it was, that she had accidentally on, you know, had liked a remark where they were talking about getting rid of all the Jews. And she made this video. I guess she also accidentally typed a whole bunch of O's and H's in another comment and left that directly underneath a previous comment. So insane. This is the video. She's trying to excuse herself. She's just mad because she got caught. Watch. So I thought I deleted a comment and I accidentally hit like and hide. I don't know how or why. I've accidentally liked comments before it happens. Like I'm a human who makes mistakes. I would never agree with an anti-Semitic thing like the comment. We have Jewish families.

a lot of my friends are Jewish. I delete anti-semitic comments. I have proof because yesterday somebody messaged me. There was a comment that said that. So I said, yes, I saw that and I deleted it because that's what I thought happened. And then I said I hate anti-Semitism. And so the internet, I guess, has picked it up, believing that that's what happened. No, she, first off, we're not idiots. Stop trying that old progressive ridiculousness with us. That's not how Instagram works. It's two very different functions. When you're deleting, you go to a separate, a different area on the thing to delete a comment than like it.

It's not difficult to do. And it's very difficult, though, to mess them up. It's not something where, oh, I meant to delete that and I accidentally liked it. That is not at all how Instagram works. She liked it because she approved it. The comment said free America of all the Jews, and she liked it. And then under another, the quote, Palestine News Network, where they were going on about it more, she typed, ooh, like she was in support of it. That wasn't

an accident either, but notice that she didn't include that aspect of it in her stupid little video. I think she's creepy. I think it's weird that a grown woman spends all her time on YouTube trying to talk to everybody else's kids and tries to politically condition them. This is some of the other stuff. This is cut 20. This is some of the other stuff that she does. She's a big fan of Mandani, And she's done videos with him before watch. The mayor on the bus says, Hello friends. Hello friends.

Hello friends. The mayor on the bus says hello friends. All through the town. Yeah, why? Money on the bus goes clink, clink, clink. The buses are going to be free, though. That's so wonderful. But this is like my song and the kids like to do it.

But they're not free, remember he had to walk that back. Yeah, I have another one. The babies on the bus. Let's go where, where, where, where. The baby's happy about the child care? They're so happy. Actually, the parents are really happy. This is like my big hit.

I need to like keep. This is your show. Okay, okay, let's go. This is so lame. I just think it's weird that she does this. Like she makes, does this and tries to like politically condition everybody else's kids through this kind of nonsense. And by the way, the buses aren't free.

They ended up walking that back. He's not going to be able to remember everybody was supposed to have, free housing, free everything. Lorraine says that she's all about grooming the next generation. She's, Ms. Rachel lady, she's an anti-Semite. She's a terrorist apologizing bigot. And I wouldn't want her anywhere near my kids. I think she's creepy as all hell. If it comes out later that she's a major child predator, I would be like, you know, I knew it. I thought something was off about her. She seemed a little creepy. I kind of had it figured out. You all know it. You all get that vibe from people. You know, when you meet

someone and you're like, you're off. Something's not right. She has that. She gets that. And she can't just cry away. Oh, I accidentally liked a comment when he meant to delete it. That's not how Instagram works. But then did you accidentally write, ooh, under another comment where you were supporting

the same kind of anti-Semitic bigotry. Yeah, I mean, that's what she did. This woman's a ghoul. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida man. This is an interesting headline. Mom Sue's Central Florida Clinic after giving birth to the wrong baby. Was it Lexi Loller?

I'm curious. She was actually given the wrong baby. It was an embryo mix-up. So she's suing this IVF clinic because it turned out the baby that she had wasn't hers. The couple, John and Jane Doe, that's how they went to. They went to this fertility center of Orlando last year. They had her embryo. she thought it was her and her husband. Apparently she struggled with fertility. And she gave birth to a baby girl. But

the, this is what the lawsuit reads. They said tragically, while both Jane Doe and John Doe are racially Caucasian, baby Doe displayed the physical appearance of a racially non-caucasian child. So then they sought out genetic testing and the baby had zero genetic relationship to either parent. So, excuse me, So it was a couple, a white couple that had a child of color. And it wasn't that they were trying to say, we don't want a child. It was like, that's not the baby that we actually had our embryo. And they were trying to figure out what had happened. So the court records say that the couple reached out to the clinic to try to find the baby's real parents and find their baby in the clinic.

Never responded. So they had to take them to court. That is crazy. The clinic didn't even respond. And they said, oh, it was just the attorney for the couple was talking to the local news there. And they were saying that, you know, they love this little girl, but it's someone else's child. And they don't know what happened to the baby that they've created. And they said apparently the clinic was entirely uncooperative and trying to undo the mess that they created.

Can you even imagine that couple is going to own everything? That couple, that clinic is not going to exist after that couple's finished. No way. maniac attacked a child with a knife at a school bus stop a day after he was released from jail. That's kind of a horrifying situation. You would think, just at the bus stop of all places. This Florida man had been released from jail just a day earlier. He's accused of choking a child and threatening bystanders with a knife at a school bus stop. Good Samaritans stopped him. Thankfully, in Deland. It was the Deland Police Department. They arrested Christopher Schwabell,

36 after he grabbed a child by the throat and pulled out a knife during a confrontation with the adults who stepped in. He apparently assaulted one child. He just stepped into a group of kids and hit one of the kids and then one of the adults intervened. And then he pulled a knife from his sleeve and waved it to try to stop them. And apparently he, one of the bystanders hit him with a toolbox and then restrained him until police arrived. Thankfully, there weren't, any serious injuries. One of the kids had a cut to the finger while he was a defensive wound. So the guy's being charged with aggravated child abuse, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a couple of other things. And he's a $5,000 bond. That's insane. That's, wow. We got a lot more on the way. Third hour. Stick with us. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash with you. Top of this third hour. You can find us the chat over at Rumble. Also, Facebook, YouTube, and then find the podcast, Apple podcast. I think it's Apple or wherever podcast. are. The thing that we were touching on a little bit earlier, the hyper tribalization. We played

that audio of that nurse who was saying that she had something horrible happened to Caroline Levitt and childbirth and getting into even with the judiciary, getting into the law and order with a judge that refused to sign off on charges with Don Lemon because everything is hyper political. Everything is hyper political. Including now just even asking questions. questions at the Australian Open. So this reporter, oh gosh, he's a Canadian reporter, Owen Lewis, Steve found his name. He's trying to get all of these athletes. He's asking them questions not about their athleticism. He's not asking them about matches. He's not doing anything of that. He's specifically trying to dial in to hyper-political topics, which that's not why

people are watching. That's not why people are watching the open floor. That's not what they're doing. But this guy, he didn't get it. And this is the first, he was trying to get one athlete to bash potus and ice. Listen to this exchange. This is cut 26. Hi, Amanda. Congratulations on the win. I've been asking a lot of the American players just how it feels to play under the American flag right now. And I'm curious how you feel. Yeah, I mean, I was born in America, so I'm always proud to represent my country. And yeah, a lot of us are doing really well, and it's great to see a lot of, you know, great athletes on the women's side, on the men's side. So, yeah, I feel like we're all doing a great job of presenting ourselves.

Sorry, do you mind if I follow up for sure? Sorry, just to clarify a little, I mean, sort of in the context of the last year of everything that's been happening in the U.S., does that complicate that feeling at all? I don't think that's relevant. To 90. Hey, Amanda, what's like one of the unique things about? What a stupid question? So are you upset over the policies that I don't like?

And let's go ahead and feel it. He's like trying to, what he's trying to do is trying to hang her with. Oh, you might, are you a conservative? Do you support ICE? He tried this again. This athlete, Taylor Fritz, he made angry because he kept going on with it. Cut 27. Listen.

Hi, Taylor. Congratulations on the wind. You know, I'm asking all the American players this, and there's a lot happening back home in the U.S. and kind of has been for a lot of the last year, and I'm just kind of wondering how you're feeling about all of them. I mean, I'm not sure what we're like specifically talking about, but there is a lot going on in the U.S. and I don't know. I feel like whatever I say here is going to get put in a headline and it's going to get taken out of context. So I'd really rather not do something that's going to cause a big distraction for me in the middle of the tournament. All right. Thank you, guys.

Yeah, I would have got. And I think some of these coaches need to be like, all right, you know what, guys, let's stop with us. We're not going to sit here and force these athletes to answer these stupid questions. And just go, well, I mean, you know, there's a lot happening and, you know, what do you think about? What does that have to do with what we're here doing? What does it have to do? It's a Canadian reporter trying to set narrative tone for the United States.

Done with it. Absolutely done with it. I just can't even, and that guy just was like he's, he was visibly aggravated. I think the other athlete was visibly aggravated. And he was right that you, what you want to try to cause a problem. problem for these athletes in the middle of this tournament? How does that help them? Stop being an activist. Either be a reporter or don't be a reporter, but try not to do it. Try not to do both ways. You can't have both. It's not going to happen. So switching gears here, CBS reported that murders

plummeted more than 20 percent from the year before the single largest one-year drop on record. 2025 may actually be the lowest murder rate in the United States since 1900. That is significant. So what do we take from this? I would say maybe when you enforce the law, crime reduces. I also think that it's no accident that this coincides with you know, the precipitous increase in carry rights, people carrying, whether it's open or concealed carry in our nation's history, because you had a million, you have, well, not a million,

you had a ton of different states that adopted constitutional carry. You had, I mean, Texas went constitutional carry. And then, of course, you had the Bruin decision that a lot of states that were not issue to begin with, they had to start issuing. licenses. They had to start issuing carry permits. And if you remember, I remember back when Texas was getting ready to consider its constitutional carry and some other states were as well. All of the anti-second amendment advocates were insistent that this meant that there was going to, and I think there words were blood run in the streets and mass murders and it was going to be horrific and death everywhere and that never came to fruition. It was almost like they were trying

to fetishize it into existence. They wanted it to happen, but it really wasn't going to happen. And so now a huge plummet, more than 20%, the lowest, last year, the lowest murder rate since 1900. Huh. We closed the border. We began enforcing the law. We're trying to stamp out restorative justice. You know what? You would probably see crime decline even more. If you would, eliminated restorative justice. And you know, what's interesting, too, you still have tens of millions, just tons of guns purchased every year. I mean, that's one thing, too, NSF had reported, is that the purchase has always been pretty steady. It hasn't dropped. It increased before the last election. It's been incredibly steady. So even in that context, you still have the lowest

murder rate. And by the way, when you look at the latest data and the latest publicly available figures from that with FBI uniform crime reports are from 2024, it's always like a couple of years behind, it's still criminals driving the crime, repeat offenders, violent repeat offenders, and also when you look at firearms specifically, handfeeder fist still weighs out, but it's pistols. It's not the rifles and all that they want to go after. Very interesting. Very interesting indeed. One of the things though, and speaking of 2A that we're going to be talking about here coming up, I'm going to say, I'm going to just kind of

give you a primer right now, but it's something we're going to talk about more in depth coming up next week. It's a second, I'll pull up my notes on this. It's a Second Amendment issue. But it has to do with this Washington state law. Now, go back a little bit

to the very beginning of arguments on ghost guns and 3D printers and all of this other stuff because everyone has always said that this is going to be nothing more than a way to try to go after, you know, hobbyists and go after everything. So Washington State has, I mean, basically it's a 3D printing ban. It's House Bill 2321. Now, it's not like an outright ban on 3D printing ban. printers, but it's regulations that would require all of these printers to include blocking technologies in their printers so that they could not print things that the government doesn't want them to print. Hmm, like firearm parts. So I don't even know how that would work.

I don't even know it would require basically every, so that means like every, you would have to be installed on the machine and you would have to have every plan be like submitted to some kind of verification process. I mean, I'm trying to even figure out how in the world, this would even be enforceable. But the other thing too with this is that this could easily run a foul of established federal law, which is that you can always build your own firearms at home. You've always been able to do that. In fact, that's like the the heritage of our second amendment. It began as hobbyists. I mean, the puckle gun, the Belton gun. I mean, the Kentucky rifle. It began as hobbyists that propelled the advancement in firearm tech, boring, going back to the War of Independence, taken from the French.

You know, the Austrian gun that Jefferson ended up incorporating into his own private collection. I mean, it could go on and on. This is something that has always been a part of our longstanding American tradition, which the reason I say that is because that's what the Bruin test is all about, correct? The Bruin test is all about that hobbyists fit under that legal definition. But what's more is that it's already protected or affirmed federally. I mean, right now the federal statute is that you can, so long as you're not selling it, because then if you're going to sell it, you can do that, but it has to be serialized at that point. So as long as you're not becoming an arms manufacturer and you're not selling unserialized things, they don't care. Then it's affirmed federally. So how does that coincide, coexist with federal statute?

Furthermore, aren't you getting in the Commerce Clause and you're getting into speech and all kinds of stuff? Because previous litigation on this has centered around the speech aspect of 3D printing. So I'm, and you're also talking about printing things that are always cosmetic features as well. Like there's another guy, where is it at? I can't remember. I think he's out in Virginia maybe. He's proposing another thought weapons ban. He's a guy who's a first generation American.

I just feel like you need to be in the country a little bit longer before you start trying to obliterate our Constitution. And they want to go after the different accessories that you can attach to rifles because they think that that somehow increases the rate of fire, which is one of the stupidest things ever. But that's what they believe. It's, I don't even know how you, the bill, like the bill mentions integrated software controls process. Does anybody else think that that kind of sounds like they don't know what the hell they're talking about? I mean, like they don't know and they can't explain it to you so nobody knows. It's just a bunch of vagary. What a bunch of nonsense.

But that's the thing. They're going to try to do this state by state. It's House Bill 2321. And that's it's about, I mean, it's about the band, 3D printing ban. Again, not a ban per se, but basically all intents and purposes. But we're going to look at this more coming up next week and kind of do a deep dive on that. I believe we have Stephen Yates. He's going to be joining us later on today as well.

There's a lot of stuff to discuss, especially Greenland, China, et cetera. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. All right. First and foremost, this New Hampshire man is accused of breaking into homes and then pouring so on people's televisions and furniture. Alec Aranello of New Hampshire is 19, is charged. with multiple counts of first-degree burglary in connection with break-ins.

And it occurred in the early morning hours. He's a student at a nearby university. I mean, of all the things, like, he didn't steal anything. He just, like, destroyed everything. Like, smashed food into stuff. And at one point, he was almost captured by officers. He fleed, fled, but then they, finally, after they set up a perimeter, they were able to take him into custody. It's just, like, where do...

I don't know where people get some of this stuff. really don't. Thieves took $10,000 worth of hot sauce from a business. That's a lot of, that's a lot. I mean, that's not going to be something that you can turn around incredibly easy. But they said that, yes, it was Pike Street drummer, the guy, I don't know, he's, I don't know, I don't care. This story's stupid. He stole $10,000 worth of hot sauce. Okay, all right, whatever. This is one I do want to look at. So you guys have heard of murder hornets. You've heard of zombie flies. Have you heard of flesh-eating flies, though? Apparently, that's the new thing. They're working their way through Mexico, according to the CDC. It is the New World screw worm. Sounds like I remember

the woke rike. They said it's a savage flesh-eating parasitic fly that's approaching the Texas border, and it's also felling an increasing number of animals around a bordering Mexican state. They said that, oh, I can't even, I'm not even reading this. This is so gross. But it twists and bores into its victims while eating them alive. And they're pretty much indiscriminate killers. That's kind of it. But they have a 21-day lifespan.

So, I don't know. Can we just bomb it all? Just burn everything. Let's just burn everything. Let's do it. They were eradicated from the U.S. around 1966 and cleared out from Central America in the decades after. They were declared eradicated from Panama in 06

and actively held at bay with continual sterile fly releases, sterile in the Darien Gap. Remember that little hard to cross spot down there in Central America? But now that was breached in 2022 and they've been coming up. Yay! So that's something to look forward to. There you go.

Let's see. A driver was caught speeding and a car held together with duct tape and wishful thinking. That's at least how it was described by police. This was in British Columbia. The 22-year-old literally had his car duct-taped together. I mean, there's the photo. It was an Accura, early model Accura, and it included rebar and duct tape in place of a rear window

and a welded gate latch to secure the driver's side door. So one of the law enforcement said it looked like it had been chewed up by a robosaurus. The guy got a ticket for speeding, and he had to fix the defects. Stephen Yates joins us next. Why Greenland is so important in countering China. We'll talk to him next. Brighten up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show podcast, where every update comes with a little dash of Not So Serious, on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.

So statements from me will not add anything here. And when it comes to the Arctic, I think President Trump is right. Other leaders in NATO are right. We need to defend the Arctic. We know that the sea lanes are opening up. We know that China and Russia are increasingly active in the Arctic. There are eight countries bordering on the Arctic. Arctic, seven-armed member of NATO, that's Finland, Sweden, and Norway, and Denmark, Iceland, Canada and the US. And there's only one country bordering on the Arctic outside NATO, and there's Russia. And I would argue there is a ninth country, which is China, which is increasingly active

in the Arctic region. So President Trump and other leaders are right. We have to do more there. We have to protect the Arctic against Russian and Chinese influence. And that's exactly what NATO ambassadors decided to do in September. We are working on that, making sure. that collectively will be defend the Arctic region. That's with, that was surprising to hear with the secretary there, with NATO,

to hear him kind of back up everything that POTUS has been saying as it pertains to Greenland and as it pertains as well to the threat that China and Russia pose. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash, with you. We're at the bottom of this third hour. We missed him this week. He's being very generous with us because, you know, your girl got sidelined with a serious ear infection here. But we're back.

And we really missed Stephen Yeats. A's expertise on this. I'm like, oh my gosh, we have to have him way in on this. You guys know Mr. Yates at Steve Yates on X, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. And he's worked with not one, but two, presidential administrations advising them on these issues. So good to see you, my friend. Thank you so much for being generous and giving us your time on a Thursday. I'm so interested in your take on this because I feel like a lot of people. And it makes sense when you when you hear a you know the expansionism of china and south seas their their desire to for the lack of a better way to put it colonize central and south america go after those rights you and i've

talked about this a lot the belt and road initiative but why do people keep greenland out of it because china has made direct overtures to do exactly there what they've done elsewhere well then i I think that the immediate diagnosis is Trump derangement syndrome. If you begin your conversation with, do you like, believe, or trust Donald Trump, and you're in Europe, you've got kind of the New York Times, CNN times 1,000 blaring in your ear every single day, and you have to think, well, if he wants it, then it must be bad. And that allows you to think in very simplistic and delusional terms that, well, maybe we should send troops to defend Greenland and that will keep the Americans at bay as if that would be more than a mosquito bite on the rump of an elephant.

It is not going to have any consequence at all. What Trump had done over and over, and I don't know why it takes people so many times to watch this movie, is he takes out a position that upsets the table, shocks the world, they go in angry disbelief saying all kinds of crazy stuff they're going to do, and then he enters the room, reshapes things, and he makes a deal, and he's advanced the ball from where it was before that people said couldn't be done. And so I think we've made incremental progress on Greenland, and it's not the whole enchilada that have been talked about,

but it's pretty far down the road. But why do people keep reacting this way and suspend disbelief and maybe go and try to lick the boot of the CCP to balance against America? I think it really just comes back to Trump-Darrangement syndrome, which is an amplified version of being anti-American. Well, and with this too, and I wrote about this earlier this week, I've grown up my whole life, and I understand the important, I understand NATO alliance, I understand having healthy alliances, and that's not at all in question. But one of the things that does seem to come to the forefront most often, particularly with these European member nations, is they don't seem to have accepted or adapted to the fact that China is the threat. Not that Russia is a good guy, but I think that Russia has already slipped into twilight. They are not the big imperial threat, in my opinion. I mean, I know you'll correct me on this if I'm wrong in any way. But I feel like China, that is the big threat. That is the biggest foe. And European member

nations, you know, NATO members, they don't seem to want to adapt to that. I mean, you have Emmanuel Macron begging for Chinese investment, Mark Carney doing the same thing. You know, you have Kirstarmer with the Diego Garcia, you know, the islands in the Indian Ocean and making all of these deals that run contrary to the national security health of their. ally and really the nation that's carried the burden of NATO resources and spending while they expanded welfare spending. So I feel like this is a very lopsided arrangement. And it seems to me that they're offended, that this is even remotely discussed. Like they don't want to allow the United States to acknowledge that, you know what, no, we need to start shifting, adjusting, and adapting to China as the

threat, not Russia. And they don't want to go along with it. Well, that's hard for them because, and we should have deep empathy for them because we've loved them into slumber of 30 years of being welfare queens. They have not had to invest. They have not had to be strong. They could hide behind the dream of globalism where there's some rules-based international order that was going to take care of things. And the funny thing about a rules-based international order is that's not human beings, that's not hard power, that's nothing you have to do or invest in. It's some borg that exists above our atmosphere and somehow magically problems are solved. And what, what Trump was doing, people will say, well, China's far away. Well, they're not that far away

if you get into the polar region. And the other thing is, if you've, at the same time, you've taken the dream of globalism, you pray at the high church of the sun god climate change, then you should be even more up in arms about who's going up into the Arctic and what they're going to do. And if you haven't invested in being able to police those waterways yourselves, then what is this NATO talk you're trying to raise? The United States is NATO when it comes to being able to do anything meaningful on those areas. And if you think that the time to rally is after Russia or China or together, they have challenged us and taken a toll hold, it's a lot harder to kick people out than it is to keep them out in the first place. And I think that's the deep truth that Trump was unearthing. They don't like it.

Makes them uncomfortable. It's sort of a skunk at their garden party in the high mountains of Switzerland. but whatever. This is basically where he rolled that boulder. And I don't know. I mean, people can like them or not, but this stuff's working for the most part. Yeah, it is. I was shocked, too, to see Emmanuel Macron call for more Chinese investment because we all remember, and Stephen, I think you were the one who brought it up, you know, that amazing Chinese tech, right? The, anti-air and all of the security systems that Venezuela supposedly had in place from China. It worked so well. you know, that we were able to get a guy in his jammies. He couldn't even get to his safe room. Did Macron think that through?

No. Well, again, you know, we have these leaders that just in a bygone ideological world just is not relevant to sort of what's running the world today. And so I think Macron has sort of the schizophrenia with Trump. He'd like to have a bromance by text, but then try to talk tough and be opposition in public. Carney didn't even play that. Carney's just gone full left-wing bat-crazy person, and I don't think that's going to work out too great for Canada in the long run. But, you know, I just think this playing with China is delusional. I had my first taste of where Europe's wake-up call might be when I went to Eastern Europe and they were telling me on this EV stuff,

they might be on board with the ideology of climate change more than I was, but they had an entire economy based on the internal combustion engine and making parts that went into the big German outfits. And that the big German outfits outsourced everything they did to the Chinese supply chains for EVs, then it smokes the Eastern European foundation of their economy. And so this has been a slow motion train wreck, and they felt it in certain places. You would have thought that COVID breaking out in northern Italy and destroying The textile industry of northern Italy would have been a good wake-up call, too. But it just seems to be over and over.

They're clinging to the failed ideology. They're clinging to failed civilizations that have allowed outsiders to come in and transform their countries and cultures. And so if they're not going to get serious about themselves, then Trump's right. You're not going to be able to do anything about Greenland or anything else. And so we're going to make a better deal for us. There you go. Well, I mean, and it seems like that deal is being made. One last question.

I mean, just give people insight. Like, say China is able to, which by the way, I think it's incredibly abusive to dangle China out the way that Emmanuel Macron and these other so-called allies, that's not friendship. That's abusiveness. I mean, we would ghost people like that if this wasn't geopolitics, right? But the other thing is give people a sense of just how dangerous it would be. If everybody knows where Greenland is on the globe, I hope so.

But how dangerous would it be for a threat like China to have the same kind of deal that the United States has there in Greenland, with being able to have those minerals and being able to have sovereignty over different swathes of the land. Their presence at that particular spot on the globe, right above our heads, by the way. Yeah, well, if there are people who believe in the Golden Dome, and that being a really important part of homeland security, projection of American power protection of America flat out, and I do, then that geography matters. You have to have all of the key quadrants around your territory with access to space-based assets, and you have to have coordinated technology. And if you have the camel's nose under your tent operating inside that

dome, you're giving them an advantage to be able to defeat your dome. If you think of trying to win a space race 2.0. There's a lot of assets in the Arctic that are vital to what we might want to do to be able to project into space and sustain out in space. And then there's the minerals that are accessible there that we ought to be keeping an eye on. But really, it's the geography. And people just don't think of the Arctic. And the path of missiles, the path of vessels. Russia has ice breakers for a region because this is a very valuable. supply line by sea, undersea. And so just having that node tighten down for us. And after all, this is North America. It's on the North American shelf. It's not on the European shelf in terms of

technonic plates. And so it is where Alaska is on the other side of North America, just bigger. There you go. Stephen Yates at Steve Yates on X. Always a pleasure. My friend, so good to see you. Hopefully, maybe we'll have more Greenland news next time we talk. We'll just take over the whole thing. Look forward to that. Thank you, David. Thank you. Good to see. my friend. Not able to catch all three hours of the Dana Show? Subscribe to the full podcast and get news and laughs delivered in short, easy to digest episodes.

Ideal for your busy lifestyle on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. So apparently when I was talking about Ms. Rachel, some old fat never was like fighter who tried to like get in Joe Rogan's pants apparently. I don't even know what his name is. Jake, whatever, is sent like a horrid. of his little ghost accounts that he runs after me because I criticized Ms. Rachel. Good heavens.

I'm going to criticize her again. I think she's a weird, crazy predator. And I think that if you're a grown man who's offended over in, who gets upset because someone is criticizing an actual behavior of a creepy kitty show host. And if you're that sensitive and that triggered, maybe when you go see your doctor next, Jake, you can ask them to bump up your testosterone levels because you're really acting like a little bitch. And it's just not attractive at all whatsoever. By the way, if you've never met me, I will gut you like a fish verbally. Don't talk tough to me online. What you see with me is what you get in person. And I do not suffer any posers and I do not suffer any fools. And I do not suffer any of these modern day

Bacabazi Islamists who want to go after everyone that so much just says one thing in defense of one of our long-standing allies. I'm just not going to deal with it. And I'm not going to treat it courteously. I'm not going to treat it with any kind of proper manner. I'm going to treat it with the contempt that it deserves. Because these low-tee pansies have been, we've suffered their presence in our society enough. End of.

We get so tired of this stuff. Good heavens. And she is creepy. It is creepy. And to politicize all that stuff as well. I mean, that's just how tribal and crazy everything is. So just keep in mind with a lot of that. A few other things that I wanted to touch on as well before we get.

Can I, I got to play this. Now this was, Steve tells me, it's not recent. I mean, it's recent to all of us because apparently was just uploaded to social media. I really feel like the left doesn't really understand geography. This is cut 18. Just go ahead and play this. This is crazy. Oh, Maga, don't you understand? If we have another Civil War, all the blue states will control all the fresh water. You guys don't think they're through, do you?

I've got a lot of questions. I don't think that they under fresh water. I don't think that they understand what fresh water is or what she understands or what it understands. Why do people, why do they, why do they, record themselves and then upload themselves to social media like this. I will never understand this. Like people find out who you are. And that era where you could act insane without consequence has come and gone. It's not like that anymore, especially if you're in like that nurse who works at a hospital, especially if you're in that kind of a situation. I don't know why people do this to themselves. One thing that social media has done is it has convinced everyone that their opinion is worth hearing. And as you've seen from a lot of the videos that we play on this program, it's not. Really not. Really isn't. It's not worth hearing. Some of these people just need to,

yeah, some of these people just need to know, not. So I, man, I can't. I got a couple of other things to finish out, a little bit of odds and ends. I know we only have like a second or more before we have to wrap. But the New York Times ran a piece where they said, without any sense of irony, that jogging excludes black people. The New York Times ran a story. By the way, someone said that the New York City Marathon, a white guy hasn't won that in 30 years, and they still ran that story. that jogging excludes black people. You can't make this up. It's our press.

All right. Today in stupidity. Kane is out. Steve is in. Steve, what is your pick for today? Well, we just talked about the story about how they arrested those people who ran into that church in Minneapolis.

One of them being a white guy, but this is what Jasmine Crockett had to say. Cut their team want. We are supposed to be about checks and balances. It should not matter whether or not you're associated with the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, independent, or whomever, whether you're rich, whether you're poor, whether

you're middle class, whether you're a black immigrant or whatever. But it seems like we only have a political agenda in this committee. And that's why everything goes off the rails. You only love law enforcement when they're going after black, brown immigrants, that kind of you guys, well, they love law enforcement when they were shooting white women in the Capitol. She loved law enforcement then, just saying, FYI, folks, that doesn't for us today. Find us on substack chapter and verse YouTube Facebook like and subscribe and of course the podcast i'll be back with you tomorrow