The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - The GOP’s $2T Showdown, Concave Chaos, & India Strikes Pakistan

Episode Date: May 7, 2025

The Vatican shuts the doors by the Conclave as Catholics await the white smoke signaling a new Pope has been chosen. India strikes Pakistan in a retaliatory attack.  A massive 12 foot plus-size black woman statue is erected in Times Square that is supposed to be a subtle nod to Michelangelo’s David. The Supreme Court rules that Trump’s transgender military ban can remain in effect. AG Bondi - claims there are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children.  House Republicans send a letter to Speaker Johnson demanding a $2T reduction in spending including extending the 2017 tax cuts.  Rep. Beth Van Duyne joins us to break news about the letter the House GOP is sending to Speaker Johnson to DEMAND a $2T reduction in spending and to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent. Vanity Fair says eating protein is MAGA and a sign of toxic masculinity. The FBI classifies the 2017 Congressional baseball shooting as a “Suicide by Cop”. Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…All Family Pharmacyhttps://AllFamilyPharmacy.com/DanaCode Dana10 for 10% off your entire orderBeamhttp://shopbeam.com/DanashowSleep like never before—Beam has improved over 17.5 million nights of rest. Try it now with code Danashow for 40% off.Home Title Lockhttps://hometitlelock.com/danaProtect your home! Get a FREE title history report + 14 days of coverage with code DANA. Check out the Million Dollar TripleLock—terms apply.Byrnahttps://byrna.com/danaVisit Byrna and check out the New Byrna CL during their Mother’s Day Promotion.  Order by May 11th for your FREE Kinetic Projectiles with purchase.  A $49.99 value. Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/DanaDana’s personal cell phone provider is Patriot Mobile. Get a FREE MONTH of service code DANAHumanNhttps://humann.comSupport your metabolism and healthy blood sugar levels with Superberine by HumanN. Find it now at your local Sam’s Club next to SuperBeets Heart Chews.  KelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comSee the third generation of the iconic SUB2000 and the NEW PS57 - Keltec Innovation & Performance at its bestRelief Factorhttps://relieffactor.comTurn the clock back on pain with Relief Factor. Get their 3-week Relief Factor Quick Start for only $19.95 today! Goldcohttps://DanaLikesGold.com My personal gold company - get your GoldCo 2025 Gold & Silver Kit. PLUS, you could qualify for up to 10% in BONUS silver

First relates to gain of function research. Gain of function research is a type of biomedical research where pathogens are adulterated viruses are adulterated to make them more potent or to change the way that they function. Many people believe that gain of function research was one of the key causes of the COVID pandemic that struck us in the last decade. What this executive order does, first of all, it provides powerful new tools to enforce the ban, on federal funding for gain of function research abroad. It also strengthens other oversight mechanisms related to that issue and creates an

overarching strategy to ensure that biomedical research in general is being conducted safely and in a way that ultimately protects human health more. It's a big deal. It could have been that we wouldn't have had the problem we had. A lot of people say that, sir. If we had this done earlier, thank you. Thank you. All right. I love the guy that tells him all this stuff.

He's like the town crier. Well, Mr. President, this right here has to do with the gain of function research and the stupid stuff that Anthony Fauci was secretly doing. And he never runs out of patience explaining this to POTUS. Like he never, he doesn't, he doesn't, what am I thinking of? He doesn't get tired of it. And he doesn't edit, that's what I was. He doesn't editorialize any of it. And he's just like, well, Mr. President, this is what this is. I love, I just love it. I love that aspect of it. And I think I want him to do all of it all the time everywhere. I just wish, I don't know, you're going to hear, you know what I'm going to say. None of this matters anything of Congress doesn't do. Congress doesn't do its job. Doesn't matter. None of it matters. I know I'm so sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but at least I'm being honest with you. If the people, the other people that you talk to or listen to,

aren't telling you this stuff, you got to be questioning what their end goal is. Sorry, but you got to. Trust no B, y'all. You got to be wondering why they're not talking more about this. So welcome to the program, Dana Lash with you, and we're at the top of this first hour. And then we also have, we've got a lot to hit because we've got, Kane, we've got the Pope World series. And we're going to be talking about, I don't, I, so my high, husband's family is they are some of them are Catholic and I just we're going to get into some of what is happening because they shut the doors a little bit ago to St. Peter's. The, that were they, and it's beautiful in there. I can't imagine a more beautiful place to have to work

than the Sistine Chapel. It is absolutely gorgeous. You're not supposed to take photos there and I think it's trashy. J.D. Vance was given permission. I think it's trashy when people don't listen because the rest of us listen and we don't take photos. But anyway, it's beautiful in there. And they were explaining to us exactly what happens when we were there, the one and only time I've ever been at the Vatican a couple of years ago. But I mean, the beauty of the room cannot be appreciated enough. It is one of the most amazing things to work. I would be so distracted if I was a card. I'd be looking at the ceiling. I mean, I wouldn't be, because I'd be a woman that wouldn't happen, but you know what I mean?

I'd be looking around, looking at the ceiling, like, did you guys see this part here? I wouldn't get anything done. So all that started, they just shut the doors of the conclave and then everybody's going to be watching the smoke. And it's, I mean, it's very interesting how you have the new Pope selection happening and you have this new administration happening simultaneously. I'm not saying the two are related. What I'm saying is that there are major shifts underway. look at it like that for a moment. This is what my brain does to me at night when I go to bed, right?

This is my brain. My brain's like, do you think if we had email back and they, I mean, it asks me all, my brain asks me all kinds of stupid questions and I can't go to sleep. But then I was thinking, like, wow, there's like a major shift happening right now. And we're going to talk about that a little later on in the program with a friend of mine who is the most expert-y expert that I know. He's literally the most Catholic person I've ever met my life. And I have a lot of Catholic friends, except for maybe one of my other friends and who's a she.

But we're going to talk to Matthew Marston, who's also an actor. He's been in some stuff. But he literally is the most cat. He's got a million children. That's like the first thing. You know, that's like you're either, I mean, you're either Catholic or you're redoing cheaper by the dozen. One of the two. That old movie.

One of the two. Anyway, so we're going to talk to him about that because there's, there is a, growing number and it's really gen z and there's been a lot of rumors about this for like the past 10 years or so that they are maybe the more conservative generation you've heard this too keen right like they might be the more conservative generation because i think gen z and gen x don't like millennials and boomers and millennials hate each other gen x gets along with everybody uh we'll talk about this too because vogue had a piece saying are gen x really the cool ones and i'm like yeah Duh, welcome. But I bring this up because there's a crazy amount of young people that are

becoming not spiritual, but becoming Christian. And particularly amongst that group, there's a huge movement towards Catholicism. And I find that fascinating with Gen Z. What contributes to that? Because no one, I don't think anyone thought to study it. No one really was like paying attention. to Gen Z. And Gen Z has been raised by Gen X and super old millennials. Old millennials and Gen X have raised Gen Z. Young boomers raised millennials. So that's, it's just fascinating. We're going to discuss some of that. Oh, also, the other big thing, kind of kicked off yesterday between India and Pakistan. I don't know if you saw this. I had, I saw a lot of headlines joking about. about, well, goodbye. That was it. We had a good, we had a nice run. So India launched a military operation.

So in response to a terror attack, a lot of the headlines were really misleading about this stuff. Because see, again, it's like Hamas and Israel. You know, Pakistan commits it. They, they, they, you have people in Pakistan, they carry out a terror atrocity in India. India responds militarily. And they're like, oh, India attacked Pakistan. They didn't, though. It was a response. Pakistan has vowed, I don't know how Pakistan can vow retaliation because it's what India did. But this has to do with the Pakistan administered territories in Kashmir. India's Ministry of Defense said it was targeting specifically terrorist infrastructure because of that deadly attack last month.

And everyone's been saying it's a major escalation. Can we just full stop? I am so tired of whenever terrorists decide to kill people, that's not considered an escalation. But when good people respond to put an end to terrorism, that's considered an escalation. I really feel, I think at this point, if you're writing those type of headlines, you're also a terrorist. CNN had some terrorists describing it as a, quote, unquote, major escalation. Done with it. Done with it.

That the, I mean, this is asinine. Kane, how many times have we seen this? They protect terrorists, whether it's Hamas or whether it's these terrorist cells in Pakistan. It's mind-boggling. I mean, okay, we all learned cause and effect in, like, elementary school, right? I mean, I remember learning about cause and effect like in first or second grade. If someone does something to you, that's considered the provocation, right? That's the cause.

If someone responds, that isn't the cause. That's literally the response. That's the effect of that original action. But yet, I have a CNN headline. I have CNN. I have an Associated Press. I have an Ejean's France Press. I'm looking at, they are all saying,

India escalates. India escalates. India escalates. India escalates. Over and over again, that's all I've seen. That was a response. That's like saying Israel escalated everything after Hamas carried out the genocide against them on October 7th. It is like this every single time. Why are these people so hard up for terrorists? All over. It's crazy. So we're going to come back to this because you have two nuclear powers that are slap fighting right now. I'm just, I'm team, India, by the way, I'm team India. I'm just going to say it. You're going to see a lot of these experts, though, I'm team India just because, I mean, it's terrorism. Pakistan has been fighting over, they've been fighting over this area. Sounds very familiar, right? So we're going to

get into all of this stuff. Also, we, uh, the, I got law and order for you. And we're going to get into some of the immigration issues because this is keep, this is pushing forward in the house this idea to have people's self-deport. And I'm just saying maybe if we had harsher penalties against people who enter the country illegally, we wouldn't have to pay them an additional $1,000 in taxpayer money to encourage them nicely to go back across the border to their place of origin. Just wanted to throw that out there. Also, what if we had E-Verify? Wouldn't E-Verify also be a good deterrence against that? So we don't have to pay people $1,000. again hard-earned taxpayer dollars i'm just saying it just seems like that would seems like that

might be the the thing to do so we're gonna we're gonna touch on that as well uh we also have uh again this law and order stuff i wanted to pull this up the it's a there's a a couple of self-defense issues one of them was in was reported by fox dc and this is an Virginia where a homeowner is they're considering whether or not they're going to charge this homeowner in the fatal shooting that happened over the weekend of a teenager. Well, he's 18 years old. So he's a young adult. He's a legal adult at this point.

So they said that these three young adults were saying that they were just doing ding-dong ditch. First off, if you're 18 years old and you're doing ding-dong ditch, you're a loser. That's like, why don't you go and play with some Legos next? That's so stupid, but that's not what they were doing. Because, Kane, when you did, explain to the radio audience. Ding dong ditch. What's the practice of it?

Well, you go up to the front door of the home where the doorbell, dinger. As one blue. Right, the dingy thing. And then you press the doorbell dingy thing. Right. And then you run away. Right. Okay.

So that's it. So they were in the backyard. There's no doorbell. Yeah. I mean, do you guys have doorbell? doorbells in your backyard? I don't have a doorbell in my backyard. Steve, do you have a doorbell in your backyard? Well, you're in D.C. But I mean, you know, did your folks have a doorbell in their backyard? Okay, see, just the front. This is like kind of typical. Juan, you don't have a

doorbell in the back, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I just wanted to make sure. Like, I wanted to make sure that I wasn't one of the poor, you know, losers that didn't have a doorbell on their backyard. I don't know. Maybe it's like something for fancy people. Anyway, these three young adults, 18 and up were in this guy's backyard breaking and entering. And he had no idea what was going on. He's like, holy cow. And he fires in self-defense. One of them is killed. And they're considering whether or not they're going to charge this guy for self-defense. We're going to talk about this case. Because again, it always comes down to self-defense under attack. So we have a lot to get into the ongoing conclave. I don't think, from what I understand from the Vaticanistas or whatever they call the people that monitor the

day to day, I don't think you're going to see any indication that they have concluded a round of ballots until I think it's like two Eastern. So it'll probably be like one central two Eastern because there's a whole process that goes along with it. You know, when you cast the ballot, you say the name or the Cardinals that are adjudicating it, read the name, then they say it out loud and then they, you know, they poke the hole through the thing, the red string. It's like a big thing. It almost sounds like they're making garland. But there's a whole process. So I don't think that you're going to see like any indication from first round to later today. So we have a lot to hit today.

And you don't want to miss any of it. As we move, our friends over at preborn, great, great organization. This Mother's Day celebrate the gift of life, stand with women facing unplanned pregnancies. Society tells them they're not empowered enough to raise their own children. And this is where preborn comes in. They have, they operate in actually all of the highest abortion rate area, cities, regions across the nation. And they provide life-saving ultrasounds. just last year alone they saved over 67,000 babies and this is the thing when a mother hears her

baby's heartbeat that baby's chance at life doubles and that's the only way the baby can be heard $28 provides an ultrasound this here's you're not only hearing the heartbeat you're hearing this is the baby's voice this is the mom meeting the baby $140 can help rescue five babies and your gift allows for that to happen they have a four-star charity rating so you can give confidently they are the the gospel leader of the pro-life movement and they want to say have 1,000 life-saving ultrasounds before Mother's Day. That's this weekend. So join Preborn in their mission to sponsor 1,000 life-saving ultrasounds before Mother's Day. One heartbeat can change a life forever. You're saving families. Give now at preborn.com slash Dana. Donate by dialing

pound 250 and say the word baby. Or give securely at preborn.com slash Dana. Pound 250, say the word baby to help save lives. People are able to put Gucci on layaway. luxury brand Gucci has partnered with a firm to offer tailored monthly payments for buy now, pay later. If you can't afford Gucci, that's okay, but don't do this. This won't end well. Check out the watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five.

So apparently in Ohio, police found a raccoon with a meth pipe in the driver's seat of a car. I'm not making this up. There's actual video of it. The officer couldn't stop laughing. The raccoon was trying to smoke a meth pipe during a vehicle search in Springfield Township, Ohio. Now, there is a crazy lady also in the car in the driver's seat. But the raccoon was in her lap, and it had a meth pipe in its mouth. And the lady was being stopped for a suspended license.

And then they found this, like, massive drug supply in her vehicle. The raccoon's name is Choole. Chooey, and it was making use of the meth pipe. The owner, Victoria Vidal, 55, was detained. No, Chui was not driving the car, the human occupant, whom also had, she also had a warrant out for her arrest, was the driver of the car. But Chui got a hold of the glass meth pipe,

and then officers were like, well, you know, now you're being irresponsible with your raccoon, so now we've got to go. I mean, I don't know if I can play the video for you yet, because I think there's probably some colorful language, we'll dust it up for you and shake it off here coming up because it's, oh, ma'am. Smokey Robinson and his wife pursued by four women as the stars being accused of raping staff after lowering them to cameraless rooms. Okay, I need stop. This thing's got to stop. It's Smokey Robinson.

Tears of a clown. Smokey Robinson. I mean, do you believe that at him? Do you think he did this? Dude's 85. He's 85 years old. What are they saying this took place? If he didn't move, I'd be like, he's done dead. if he didn't move I'd be like that man is deceased he is not with us because he's got this perpetually like dead look on his face I don't know anyway there I just I don't know if I buy it I think somebody's trying to shake him out for money because they've never launched these accusations against him in his career this came out of nowhere when the man's in his mid 80s

left-handed people are apparently more it's more common to be left-handed if you have a certain mental disorder a major study finds I think this is all nonsense. It's nonsense, cane. What if you're ambidextrous? I'm not asking for anybody in particular. I'm just saying we have a lot more on the way. We've got a lawn order and the conclave.

Goldco is making it easy to take that first step toward protecting your savings. Just fill out a quick form, no commitment, just free information. And then they'll ship you your free 2025 gold and silver kit straight to your door. No shipping fees. no strings, just a free info kit to help you understand how gold and silver can fit into your financial plan. I'm a big believer in doing your research, and this kit is a great place to start. So I'm really excited to be partnering with GoldCo because not only do they support my show, which I truly appreciate, but they've made the whole process of buying precious metals super

straightforward. Because if you're a fan of the show, Goldco is also going to tell you how to qualify for unlimited free bonus silver on eligible orders. If you qualify, you can even get a free half ounce silver Ronald Reagan coin. Totally free. Don't wait. Take that first step towards protecting and diversifying your savings with Goldco. Visit Dana likesgold.com to learn more. That's Dana likesgold.com.

Keep your finger on the pulse with a Dana Show podcast, delivering timely news with insightful analysis. Whenever you want, straight to you on YouTube. Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. And communicate those inner worlds that we have, and sometimes we misinterpret with one another, to try and create an understanding and basically encourage empathy. A 12-foot-tall-bron-stall-bron-statt-you-all-bondustach. A 12-foot-tall bronze statue. of a woman that's been erected in Times Square.

It's the only erection that's going to be related to this statue. It's constructing the statue, Kane, because once you put it up, it's up. What are you talking about? Welcome back, Dana Lashire with you. We're at the bottom of this first hour. I bring this up because you guys know I hate modernity, right? I hate modern art. And I hate this monstrosity.

To compare it to Michelangelo's David is like taking your thumb, grabbing the skull of all of art and shoving your thumb into the eyehole of that skull and just digging in. It's just, that's exactly what it's like. And I mean, this ain't no David, I got to say. I mean, first off, let's just talk about the factual aspect of it because Woke is infecting art, as you know. And with Michelangelo's David,

he studied anatomy and physiology to the point where you could see raised portions of the skin indicating what tendons were being used to hold his hand a certain way. Everything, I mean, down to the angle of the eyebrow and the tenseness of the muscles in his jaw, it was all pointing towards he was about to get into a fight with Goliath. It's young David. I mean, it is a masterpiece. I've seen it up close at the academia where they have the museums there in Florence. And it is amazing. It is so detailed and so lifelike.

You can't even appreciate it just from the photos of it. And they let you get right up to it. I mean, his butt's right in your face. Giant five foot butt, you know, anyway. But it's fan. I mean, it's amazing. Just the attention to detail. and for that era as well to note that for that era,

when I look at this modern day equivalent of the Staypuff Marshmallow Man, think Ghostbusters, like choose your destroyer, I don't know, that is not it. It's not it. What is it celebrate? What is this supposed to celebrate? They just put it in Times Square. and you saw some of the

the celebration or the ceremony that they had for it. It's going to be on display through June 17th. It's part of a series that's called Grounded in the Stars, and it's about stupid identity politics. Sorry, this is how they put it. It confronts preconceived notions of identity and representation, whatever the hell that means. It's garbage modernity.

It just looks like a frumpy woman who needs a better bra. That's what it looks like. I'm not going to lie. It does. And they're like, oh, she wears everyday clothes. Her stance is subtle nod to David. Shut up. It just looks like she's mad at her kids.

I don't understand. I mean, it's, could I sculpt this? I mean, probably. No. I have no interest in it. I crochet. But what is the point? I mean, David, every inch of David was

calculated and the proportions of it were all to send a message. Like for instance, the story of how it's, it's meant to be viewed from below. David is meant to be viewed from below. And there were a lot of questions as to the proportions of everything, his wrists, his hands, his head, everything. It's actually mathematically, perfectly proportional when viewed from the ground because it was supposed to be, I mean, they were, they were going to, it was actually something that was supposed to be, I think up near towards the Duomo. And then they ended up putting it in front of Palazzo Vecchio. And there, I mean, it's just perfect. There was a story of one of the rich nobleman who came to see the finished product. And when he showed up, he's like, oh, Michelangelo, his nose is just a little too big. I don't know. Michelangelo's like, oh, let me fix that for. you and he had some marble dust in his hand. And it climbed up his ladder and he was pretending to chisel on the nose and letting dust fall out of his hand. He did nothing to it. And when he got that, and this is a true story. When he got off the ladder, the nobleman was like, oh my gosh, it's perfect now. Like he was

able to, you know, with his expertise, fix it. This is not that. It's not. I mean, it's not, I don't know what it's meant to convey. What is, I mean, what does this, what does the sculpture say to you? What does it say to you? I hate one. You're like, what does art say to you? Can I just appreciate it for being for what it is does it have to always have a message just must art always preach stop i just look at like gosh i want to get her a better bra that's my first thought when i look at this stop it you know it is too i mean it just seems defeated right i don't know but they said that oh no it's um you know it's uh they're celebrating whatever identity i don't know some stupid stuff it's a bunch of word salad that's all it is so i don't know i don't know

To sit here and compare it to David is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard in my life. It's not. And the reason it's not is because there's no detail in it. It's all smooth. There's not even detail in the jeans. There's not even seeming on the jeans. Like if you're wearing pants, if you're wearing denim, you have seams on the denim. You have tailoring.

You have stitching on the arms. The arms are smooth. There's no veins on the arms. There's no appearance. I mean, they're not lifelike at all. It looks like she's covered just by, you know, like with fondant. that's it there's no detail Michelangelo had had incorporated

all of that detail into David every bit of detail so to compare them is is artistically intellectually stupid it's one of the dumbest comparisons I've ever heard in my life stop I had to get this off my chest because this sculpture is horrifying

I'm like when you're comparing it to David why like why do we sit here and devalue skill sets you know there are some really amazing sculptors out there but they don't get any attention because they don't do woke stuff. There are some phenomenal sculptors out there, some that their genius probably could,

you know, propel them up into that upper echelon with those Renaissance grades, but you never hear about them because they don't do stupid woke stunts like this. This is just an embarrassment. If I had done this sculpture and someone was comparing it to David,

I would immediately have to get out in front of that and be like, oh, dear heavens, no. I mean, all you have to do, again, look at her wrists. And there's other photos that show you what her hands look like and her arms and it's all smooth. There's no detail. There's no bones. There's no veins. There's no valleys in between the tendons that go towards your fingers. David had all of that. That's why it is so amazing. It is one of the most life-like sculptures

you're ever going to see. And this is not it. So I feel like the people making these comparisons literally know nothing of what they're speaking about, not at all. that stuff aggravates me. Gosh, I hate modernity. Modernity is just garbage. The Supreme Court ruled that POTUS's ban on transgender troops can stay for now. They lifted a lower court's decision to pause the policy, which is a significant win for POTUS and secta. And it allows the DOD to continue removing transgender service members from the military and denying enlistment. I don't think transgender you're going to get mad at me all you want to. I don't think that transgender soldiers, if you're not able to serve first and be a part of a unit without bringing that with you, then you are not fit for service. I think it's a mental illness. I think pretending to be a different sex is a mental illness. Either that or it's a selfish demand upon society that masks itself as a mental illness for greater acceptance and to avoid any kind of challenge. Ultimately, I think that's what the majority of it is. But no, if you have a mental illness, no, you should not be in the military.

I mean, for crying out loud, if you have flat feet, I don't even know if that works anymore, but they used to deny you for that. They would deny you if you had like scoliosis. They would deny you if you had like a number of other, even what we would consider to be minor ailments, minor physical issues, you would be considered unfit for service. and the whole purpose is that the unit is only as strong as its weakest member and you want your weakest member to be tough

and to not have any vulnerabilities at all whatsoever and I just this it's either about having a fighting force and caring about the lives of the other individuals who selflessly said that they were going to serve or it's not I think it's selfish to demand that everyone else lower their expectations and endanger their lives to accommodate costs play. That has no, it has no position in the military. I don't care. It has zero, zero belonging in the military. So I'm glad that the Supreme Court did this. They said that, so it's this, because this is all

from that executive order that was signed towards the end of January. And you know, they immediately started, started in on that. They immediately started to litigate it. And they had, obviously Sotomayor Kagan and Jackson would have they indicated in the filing that they would have decided against them. But so this, this is a big, this is a big celebratory thing because we can now maybe start to get back to restoring the purpose of our military. Of course, again, broken record. If Congress doesn't do any of this, this will all revert in three years. If you have a Democrat president, heaven forbid, all of this is gone. every bit of it every bit and now do you know the excuse that i'm hearing from some not hearing but reading

from some republican lawmakers when they're pushing back against voters who are demanding action and stop dragging their feet you know what they're saying oh we got to wait till after midterms that is actually i told you i told you i told you i told you i told you they're going to constantly use that as it because they don't want to do it. They don't want to do any of this stuff. You know, sometimes you've got to ask, is the real opponent Democrats or is it other Republicans within the party? I think that's the big, that's the big question. This is also the historic anniversary of the ending of all hostilities. I mean, the Nazis gave up today. This is, there's a lot of the ending of World War II.

And I think most, it's, I think most everybody sells it on May 8th, but actually, it apparently happened at 2.41 a.m. local time on May 7th at a.m. in Reims, France. And that's when Eisenhower, who was at the time the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe, had actually, that's when he actually officially accepted the unconditional surrender, surrender of Nazi Germany. So most everybody celebrates it the VE day on the eighth, but technically it was 241 a.m. local time May 7th is when it happened. The unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany. And how sad that we're seeing such a rise and some bigotry and all of this stuff worldwide all these years later. We have more on the way. Keltek Generations 3, Gen 3, Gen 3, Sub 2K, 10

millimeter. We've been waiting for this for a long time because we, you know, we were telling you about the, the 57, F-E-D-D-D-Y, the 57. This is the third generation of the sub-2K. It's a folding carbine. It's available in variety of calibers. Now, even more versatile with its new 10-millimeter chambering. Single twist and fold motion of that rotating four, and it folds really quickly and a half optics and all. And it just as quickly deploys zeroed and ready to rise. It folds down to 16.5 inches for easy storage and transport. It takes Glockmags. Standard 15-round Glockmag. You've got a lot of capacity for most shooting needs. You've got an optional extended mag, 50-round drum also, you know, for more freedom, fewer reloads. And an internal buffer for softer recoil, lighter, five-pound trigger pool, integrated M-Like. It got Picatinny rails up top for accessory attachments, all kinds of stuff.

And it's ideal for everything. Church security, camping, backpacking, law enforcement, home defense, and everything. is made right here in the USA. So tariffs ain't affecting this. American materials, American labor, and they stand behind everything that they make. We need more companies like Keltec. Learn more at Keltecweapons.com. Innovation performance, Keltec, www.com. Tell them Dana sent you. Get the lowdown on the latest news with a side of laughs. Whenever you want, subscribe to the Dana Show podcast on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States.

The FBI, they're reviewing there are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn. And there are hundreds of victims. And no one victim will ever get released. It's just the volume. And that's what they're going through right now. The FBI is diligently going through that. I don't believe any of it. I'm sorry.

I'm so tired of hearing this stupid nonsense. I don't believe any. Didn't she have this stuff on her desk? Like a month ago? No, didn't she tell everybody? She tweeted it out. She had the stuff on her desk. Where is it at?

An effort to make sure that those hundreds of victims do not get... All they are are a bunch of damn pimps that use this stuff for clout. And they don't release a single bit of it. Who's reviewing what? Put it all out there. Put it all out there. It doesn't jeopardize a damn thing. Why are you looking to me like that?

these victims, they have to redact all the information out of there to make sure these victims are protected from identity. How long they had these files to redact on the case? I don't know how long. I don't know how many files there are. For forever. This stuff's been sitting on this chick's death since January. What do you think is a reasonable amount of time to make sure these victims don't get their names in? It's not difficult to do. You can use AI, strip the names out. But how much time do you think it takes? Five seconds. Yep. Use AI, strip the names out. These people think you're stupid. They think you're stupid. They're wasting time. Yeah, they are.

They're wasting time. Remember when they were like, oh, we got this on our desk. Yeah, we have them in our possession. Then where did that talking point go? That was over a month ago. All I hear are a bunch of political pimps that are just using this stuff for clout. That's all it is. I'm tired of it.

I'm so tired of the press conferences about it. Well, we've got it. Yeah, we're still reviewing it. Okay, y'all said that a month ago. I'm also hearing rumors of thousands of documents and records being destroyed in regards to this Epstein. All they have to do, the files that they have, it's not difficult. You can control F it. Control F it.

Find the names. Get them out. Use AI to strip out any names. Control F FET. It's not difficult. That's actually one of the easiest things you could do. Just F it. To redact it.

That's not even an issue. The issue is that they won't do it. Because they, I don't know. Give me a good, I have no faith in anyone. So clearly you need to understand my perspective on this. I have no faith in anyone, be they right or left. I completely understand your perspective on it. But I don't have, I'm not going to sit there and say Pam Bondi's lying.

I didn't say she was lying. You said she's not telling the truth. I said that these are, I said that this is like a political pimp stump stump stump. I'm so tired of hearing about, oh, we got it. Yeah, wink, wink. Yeah, we're going through them. Okay, you said that a month ago. You said you don't believe them.

And then a month ago, you said that a month ago. You said you don't believe them, which would imply that they're lying. Yeah, I don't believe them. I didn't say lying though. There's a difference. I don't believe them. You can have misdirection, which technically isn't a liar if you're omitting certain information.

Government certainly knows about. misdirection. Yeah, I just, show me the files, man. That's all we've been asking for. There's always some kind of excuse that they got. And now they're re-victimizing the victims more by acting like they can't redact their names. Come on. Maybe some ghost stole this. Okay, yeah. So we've got, that's a whole other thing. My husband insists that in the last night, he heard what was a bone chilling sound. And he has spent all morning being Detective Lash, looking at all the security cameras, trying to figure out where. And then there was a lot of fog last night. So now he's like got these images of like the driveway and different parts of the property.

And he's like, look at this white, this white fog smoke stuff. You guys have a ghost. Like it's fog. There's a fog advisory out there. I'm just saying I'll let you. We'll talk a little bit about that coming up because it's funny. We got a lot more on the way. Second hour, stick with us.

And home title lock, look, your house is your biggest asset. And in today's world, unfortunately, with AI and all of the, how digital everything makes it easy. Scammers can steal your home's title. And your equity is the target. They'll forge your signature on a document. They'll use a fake notary stamp. They'll pay a fee with your county.

And before you know it, your home title has been transferred out of your name. It only takes one forged signature. You're not even going to know that it happened. There's not going to be any warning or notification. In fact, the only time you will be made aware is when you start getting foreclosure notices, collection calls.

Sometimes people even have their properties sold out right from underneath them. And in order to stop it or to save yourself or to try to claim your property back, you have to hire a lawyer and it gets super, super expensive real fast. You need to be proactive and make sure that you have home title lock, particularly you need to get the million dollar triple lock protection. And that means that they're going to have 24-7 monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes. and if fraud should happen, they're going to spend up to a million dollars to fix it. Now is the time to lock down your title. Protect your most valuable asset before someone else claims it. Use promo code Dana at HomeTitleLock.com and make sure your title first.

Make sure it's still in your name. And then you'll get a free title history report and then a free 14-day trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. They'll monitor it and they'll send any kind of urgent alert if they detect anything. And again, spend up to a million dollars to fix it. Go to HomeTitleck.com and use promo code Dana. What's been confusing on this is some people see due process like as an American citizen. That's a right to a jury trial. That's all those different things. That's not true for due process for someone who's not a citizen in the United States.

It's a different process. It's often just literally what people call it immigration judge is not a typical federal judge or a state judge. This is someone that's in the bureaucracy that they're task for DHS is that task on it. So they're a government employee career that's an immigration judge. So it's a very different. process for it. But yes, there's a need to be able to give an opportunity for someone to be able to make an argument before they're removed in the country. It's just... No, I think he's wrong. Sorry, I disagree with him on this. And I like Lingford. He's a Republican out of Oklahoma. And he's saying, yeah, people who come into the country legally should do process is what he's saying. I'm sorry, what? And he was talking with CNN on that.

Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash with you. We're at the top of the second hour. Yeah, he says there's a different process, but yeah, we got to have an opportunity to make an argument. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. You lose that the moment you break the law by entering illegally. Let's talk about the due process of American citizens who are robbed of due process by having this injustice perpetrated upon us to the tune of billions of dollars a year. Let's talk about that absence of due process for all of these people who fetishize illegal immigration and constantly want to kiss the ass of people who break into the country illegally. that's the due process is entering the country illegally when you forfeit that you forfeit any claim

because you're not a citizen you have or you have no legal standing here this kind of accommodation is for people who have legal standing when you break into the country illegally when you break and enter you forfeit that and then the due process of the people who are here legally must be respected and i need these lawmakers to get this stuff straight They sit here and they bend over servicing the people who can't vote for them legally at the expense of the people who can. I was very disappointed to hear this answer from Lankford. Incredibly disappointed. And there is a reason why we have this system and we have law and order.

And you are equal before the law and you are equal underneath it when you violate it. And when you enter illegally, you are not part of that legal framework. The end. I'm so tired of everyone thinking that you can sacrifice the due process of law-abiding Americans to accommodate this criminality. And it's disgusting to see a Republican from Oklahoma, no less, give lip service to this trite nonsense. Now, I have in my digital hands a letter that pulled us up is apparently now we've got a commitment to framework and reconciliation. A number of lawmakers have sent a short letter to Speaker Johnson and Leader Scalese about a reconciliation bill that goes after certain objectives while extending the president's tax cuts, growing the economy, securing borders, continuing unleashing domestic energy production, and emphasizing peace through strength. Although I will say I wish it was made permanent.

I'd love to see that made permanent. but this is a good step. Now they list in this, and I'll tell you who these lawmakers are here in a moment, there's only a handful of them, the minimum criteria for their support. They said the reconciliation bill must not add to the deficit. Now this letter's not yet public. You're hearing about it first here. Under the House's framework, they write, the reconciliation bill must not add to the deficit. The House budget resolution assumes that enacting the President's agenda, it's.

extending those 2017 tax cuts will generate about $2.5 trillion in additional revenue for economic growth. Now, I know it's not abolishing the IRS, but when you talk to me about tax cuts, dude, my dudes, what? That's how we become friends, just like this. See how easy it is came to be friends with us? We are, but simple creatures. They said that they, it has to include, now this is a kicker. they write this means that the reconciliation bill must include at least two trillion in savings either through spending reductions or scaling back the size of the tax package if savings falls short what they're saying is look we got to get these people tax cuts no one's going to agree to give them tax cuts if you don't stop spending because they're going to try to misrepresent that as a cost

and they get the deficit reduction in other committees and the maximum ways and means instruction. They said, bottom line, a $2 trillion reduction in spending may sound substantial. However, it only equals 2.3% of projected federal outlays over the next decade and only reduces the rate of growth in spending. Even with these savings, annual spending is expected to grow from $7 trillion to $10 trillion over the next 10 years. and debt will exceed $50 trillion by 2035. They said the House Reconciliation instructions are binding. They set a floor for savings, not a ceiling. And we must hold the line on fiscal discipline to put the country back on a sustainable path.

This is good. It's signed by Lloyd Smucker. All these are representatives. Andy Biggs, Lauren Bobert, Josh Breaching, Timberchette, Eric Burleson, Michael Cloud, Andrew Clyde, Elijah Crane, Brandon Gill, Paul, Paul. Gossar, Andy Harris, Mark Harris, Diana Harshberger, Clay Higgins, Morgan Latrell, Rich McCormick, Mary Miller, Ralph Norman, Jay Obernault, Andy Ogless, Robert O'Dar, Scott Perry, Chip Roy, David Schweiker, Keith Self, Victoria Sparts, Greg Stuby, Marlin Stutzman, Tom Tiffany, Beth Van Dine, and Ryan Zink.

Now, these are all pretty fiscally conservative lawmakers. And we, I mean, Sparts also, if she didn't like it, she would sooner spit on it than sign it. And I think to get her to get bigs to sign on it as well, I think some of these others, I think that's pretty significant, Van Dyne McCormick. So these are all, and Chip Roy, these are all pretty fiscally conservative lawmakers. And this is a really good first step. So what you're getting insight into is some of these lawmakers, they're brawling with some of their other fellow Republicans in Congress because some of them don't want to, don't want to pass any meaningful cuts. And then to that point, they're not going to pass any meaningful tax reform.

They're not going to give you any kind of tax relief. What they're calling for is, look, you've got to reduce this if you want to help out taxpayers. Because we don't have enough money in the pot to keep spending the way y'all are spending. They're spending like a bunch of drunk sorority girls getting ready to go rush at Alabama. Come on. No offense, ladies, but come on. You can't be spending like this. You got to cut it back.

You got to roll it back. so I'm happy to see this and we'll see how we're going to see how this kind of rolls out but this is this is so far pretty significant they're talking about look this is the reduction that we're going to need in order to accommodate this for the tax cuts now of course because this is we're all going to have to fight over this bill again that's why it's an extension and on a permanent cut because that's the framework of this reconciliation bill that's going to have to be a separate fight. And that's, you know, again, I don't know if that's something that they're going to actually be able to do, unfortunately. I mean, right now, I already see some of the

moderate Republicans making excuses. So they said that this, they said the spending level, any additional tax cuts or increases in spending has to be offset. That is a reality. I hate when people say that tax cuts cost, and this is how Democrats finagle it to pull the wool over everybody's eyes for that talking point. Tax cuts, this is your money that the government, storts from you under threat of injury. They steal your money and then they spend it on a bunch of stuff that is actually not under Article 1, Section 8, the enumerated powers. Everything that the government can do that then is relegated to the states, if it can't. And so the argument always from Democrats is, well, tax cuts costs.

If we give you more of your money back, that costs us. They act like that's an expense on their behalf. That's your money. That's an expense on your behalf, not theirs. expense that they accrue is when they don't stop spending. That's the big issue. The major issue. So I'm very happy to see this.

It's a small number of lawmakers, but they're all fairly fiscally, they're all very fiscally minded. So this is a very good thing. Now we're going to wait and see what happens because they're going on break. When do they leave? Tomorrow's when break starts, right? They got four days. What are you shaking your head like that? What do they need?

Tell us, what do they need the time off for? We have a lot of work. to do here. What is this extra day for? I don't get it. I don't get why they have to take off and get a four-day weekend here when we have a lot of important work right here on the cusp of everything. The issue is whether or not they can get some of these other, it's not so much Democrats. If Republicans could keep their caucus together, they could make this happen. So are they doing like vote whipping or what are they doing at this moment? Probably, I would imagine. but this isn't committee though.

So we'll see if this, they got to get it out onto the floor, but they're, I mean, it's a great step in the right direction. And this would be a major, major talking point for POTUS if they can give it to him. Can you imagine Trump going out there and saying, look, we've come to an agreement. Now, yes, sidebar. Is this bill what I wanted? No. But it's, I get it.

It's incremental step by step. step by step, even if it's like a little baby step, but still, you got to have the optics of a win. If you have POTUS go out there and say, look, we got an agreement about the reconciliation. We're going to reduce spending by X amount, and that means we're going to be able to extend these tax cuts for you because we know you're hurting right now. You're going to get people that are going to say, oh, okay, we got relief with taxes. We'll be able to hold on for a little bit more with the tariff issue. We'll be able to hold on a little bit more. What are Democrats going to say?

What is the argument that they would have in the media to fight to fight this and try to spin this as something bad? This isn't that positive for the voter if Republicans in the House can give this to POTUS. I mean, hell, he can walk out there and say, look, we got we got some great savings for the American people. We're extending these tax cuts. That's going to help them. It's going to help sustain them as we finalize all these trade deals. And we start winding down our strategy. if we maybe potentially wind down our strategy of enacting tariffs so that we can equalize the playing field.

And this is going to be a shot in the arm to Americans who have suffered from everybody else's bad trade deals and under the last administration. We're here to help. This would be a huge talking point for him. I hope someone in the administration is telling him this and saying, Mr. President, you have this group of lawmakers that are about ready to give you a major talking point. He could go out and say, happy Mother's Day. Oh my gosh, dude. I almost gave myself chills over that. Can you imagine? I hope that people can put their petty partisan bitching over the last primary aside and someone can get in his ear and be like, POTUS, this is a major talking point. We got to get this done. Can you imagine him going out?

like I have in my hand, this letter, framework for reconciliation. We need to get this done, Republicans. You need to follow the example of these lawmakers and get this done for our voters. It's like, you know, I would do it, but I can't. They'd call me a tyrant, so you've got to do your jobs. I mean, good night. Just push him out there to say it, someone, please. Because this would be good.

This would be a great first step. And then, you know what, how the market's going to react to that? Consumers have a little bit more discretionary spending. You know how many people were doing the pay later stuff, a quarter? a quarter of Americans doing the pay later for things like groceries and all of that compared to 14% last year? You know

what a boon this would be for them? Come on. Come on. We have a lot to hit today and you don't want to miss any of it. And I think we have Senator Rand Paul on later. Is he on with us today? No, not today. Later this week because he's been admired in voting. But we do have Matthew Marsden on later. As we move, our partners

that will bring you the program. It's our friends over at all family pharmacy. Oh my gosh. I love. I love. love these people so much. If you have not ordered from them or if you have not signed up to order from them, you definitely need to remedy this. Here's why. All of the medications that you need, including the ones that the government tried to keep from you, like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which are great therapeutics, by the way. And when I caught the rona naturally, they were incredibly helpful for me. But they have all of those. They also have your daily medications. you can get them fast. You go online. You order. It's so easy. You can get it in like two to four days or you can get it overnight in a pinch if you if it's like a serious situation and you need some you need some medicine. Like for me for instance when I was hosting for Thanksgiving, I started getting struck throat. I've had it a million times. I know exactly what it is. And I'm like, oh my gosh, what am I going to do? So I overnighted antibiotics to myself from all family pharmacy and started my regimen.

And literally by noon the next day, I was fine. I was able to do what I need to do because I had a ton of family coming to my house. They saved Thanksgiving for me. I really have relied on all family pharmacy and I cannot recommend them enough. Also, everything is made in the USA. All precursors, everything. You're not getting anything from India or China so you can worry. You don't have to worry about any of it.

High standards of quality and safety. Visit all family pharmacy.com slash Dana and get 10% off using promo code Dana 10. Always be prepared. Protect yourself. All family pharmacy. dot com slash Dana coupon code Dana 10 gets you 10% off. If you're navigating restrictive gun laws, the burn a gun is a great addition to diversifying your self-defense plan.

It's like having another tool in your kit. You carry knives. You carry different. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So the Kentucky Derby winner's sovereignty is going to miss the Preakness Stakes, thwarting any potential triple crown bid. And that takes place in Baltimore on May 17.

not going to run. Sovereity is not going to run. That's like a weird, that's a weird move, right? I mean, to not run and have the chance for Triple Crown. They said that they were going to decide if the horse is going to be fit enough to race in Preakness. They're going to lead that up to the trainer. They said that the trainer is in the Hall of Fame for a good reason. And they said that, you know, when you have a pace like sovereignty had, you got to lay off the body on the line a little bit and they're going to see, you know, how he was doing. So it sounds like it may be an issue with fitness, like they're protecting that horse a little bit, which is small. You know, it's just not, you know, sometimes the best decisions aren't necessarily the most comfortable ones.

Near-death experiences radically change how people view their careers in today's stupid idiotic headlines. Duh, I would think it would probably extend beyond how people view their careers, right? Tesla sales are plummeting across Europe, even as the new model Y ramps up. It seems like these attacks on Tesla are working. This is making me want to get a Tesla just so I can hide in my car. and if anybody tries to key it, come out with a bully club and whip them on the sidewalk. I'm not saying I would do that. I'm not saying I wouldn't either.

But they said that the sales are sliding across Europe because everybody's a poser. It's so lame. And the Fetterman attacks are also working. We told you about this headline yesterday. Federman did respond to it saying that I'm perfectly fine and my doctor says I'm fine, but the left isn't going to lay off. You know that. See, we also have, I go one more, I go one more.

the White House says no final decisions have been made on movie tariffs. They're still exploring all options. And the photographer behind that iconic Trump image when they were trying to kill him. Remember, finally, he won a prize for it. Finally, because he deserved to. Best photo of the year. Stick with us. I always carry, and I have no problem using lethal force.

But, you know, I have friends that don't live in Texas. One of my really good friends lives in Washington, D.C., and by the nature of their work, they're a big kid. They've got to go places where they have to for their work. can't always say no. But it's like, doesn't matter if you have a license to carry there. Gun-free zones abound because of private property and municipal restrictions. My friend went out and got the Burna SD. Now they want the Burn to CL. That's the new one that they have. It arrived just in time for Mother's Day, too. It is the smallest and most powerful compact launcher that they have. It's only, I mean, it's like smaller. It's like this actually same size as my 43X. It's like almost maybe seven inches long,

super slim and if you're unfamiliar with the burn a gun it shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can disable threats from up to 60 feet away they have the SD which is and they have different models but I think for the purpose of this for self-defense when you can't carry I think the CL and the SD make the most sense and the CL it I mean same as the others can disable threats with these chemical irritant projectiles up to 50 feet away and it doesn't care about gun-free zone signs or there's no background checks there's no waiting period they can send it right to your door, so it's accessible for everybody. Do not allow yourself to be rendered defenseless. I mean, if you can't carry, you need to always, it's good to have a diversified

weapons array. You carry knives, right? I mean, you have different caliber of firearm. You have rifles and pistols. This makes sense as well. This is the new CL, the compact launcher from Burnah. Visit burnah.com slash Dana. Check out the new Burna, C-L-L-B-Y-R-N-A. It's a cutey little thing, but it doesn't have a doesn't shoot cutie little things uh... burna dot com slash dana order by may 11th for your uh you get some free projectiles with your purchase burna dot com slash dana keep your finger on the pulse with a dana show podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want straight to you on youtube apple or wherever you get your podcasts welcome back to the program dana lash with you

at the bottom of this second hour and you can listen across the country, the stream on channel 347. I always get that wrong. Channel 347 direct TV, X, Rumble, all that good stuff. So if you're just joining us, we've been talking about a lot of stuff, but particularly what's going to happen in Congress. You know, Trump keeps wanting his big, beautiful bill. We have some Republicans that don't want to cut spending, some Republicans who do. I can't even imagine being in D.C. right now, especially if your colleagues are some of those who don't want to stop spending. So we have this amazing, big, beautiful letter. It's a commitment to House framework and reconciliation. We were just talking about this because there are some members of

Congress who can do math and like to save taxpayer money. And they're warning everyone, look, we have to have serious and substantial cuts. We have to have these. And this is what we need. And hopefully we can make this happen. Joining me now is one of the signes to this letter, Representative Beth Van Dyne, Congresswoman out of the Republic, Texas. It's good to see you. Congresswoman, thanks so much for joining us. So this, I mean, this bill, what you're talking about with this, this reconciliation framework, reduction in spending, commitment to extending the tax cuts, which I think

we absolutely have to have right now with this ongoing terror for. And I mean, I love that there's so many names on it, but I'm also sad that apparently there are only that amount of lawmakers in the House that want to save taxpayer money. Tell me about the strategy on this. Oh, look, what we continuously do since I've been up here is we have these negotiations, we have these negotiations. We try to compromise and then we wait until the very last minute, it falls apart and we end up voting for basically a Democrat bill. And I think what the 32 members who signed onto this letter are saying is we're letting you know in advance. This is something that we have been championing for a last year that we've been talking about this reconciliation.

this tax bill, we have got to cut spending. We look at $7 trillion that we're spending per year, $5 trillion that we're collecting in revenue. It does not balance. And we're not just continuing to add to the $37 trillion debt. We're growing it. And so even if we can get to a bill that is deficit neutral, you're still not attacking the debt. And then we have got to start taking that seriously. I got elected in 2020 during COVID when they added trillions and trillions of dollars that we were not making, that we were not generating to our debt and we're not going back to those pre-COVID levels of spending. This package, this reconciliation package, the extension of the tax cuts and jobs act, pretty much 100% of that focus is focused on economic growth, making sure

that we are not having mom and pop small businesses shut down because they're facing some of the largest tax increases in our nation's history, making sure that 90% of working Americans that pay taxes aren't going to see their taxes increase, largest increase that they've ever had in their history as well. We have got to get this tax bill passed, but at the same time, we can't ignore that we are spending so much more that we're making in putting on this debt to future generations. You note in here, a $2 trillion reduction in spending may sound substantial, but then you put the context with it. it equals only 2.3% of projected federal outlays. I'm trying to do this math. This is insane.

And that's just over the next decade. And it only reduces the rate of growth in spending. That's how out of control this is. That, I mean, that really puts it in stark terms. Well, when you start thinking about how much we spend, we talk about the debt. What does the debt mean? It means that we're actually having to pay to service the debt every year. We are almost at a trillion dollars on our debt service, which is more than we pay for Medicare or on all of our. our defense put together. Those are significant dollars that we are spending, basically if you have a credit card, how much you're paying an interest. We're not getting a program for that. We're not getting a service. This is not going to anything other than simply our debt service. We have got to get control over it. And we saw it spike during COVID. We're not in a pandemic anymore. We are seeing the

economy grow. We are seeing our markets grow. That needs to mean something and we need to stop spending, like, and I don't want to offend, you know, Navymen. Drunken sailors. Drunken sailors. I don't think they're going to be offended. I don't think they'll be offended. We're talking with Congresswoman Beth Vianne out of Texas and this framework for reconciliation. I know that there's a mini break for Congress coming up.

Is this something that you all are tackling today or is this where the big fights next week? Look, I've been in meetings. I'm on the Ways and Means Committee and we're coming up with this tax bill. We have been in hours and hours and hours, days long meetings. and we just had one today. We're going to have another one tomorrow. We have got to give this tax bill package. This tax bill done in a draft put out.

We need it sooner rather than later to give some kind of security to our businesses. While you mentioned earlier, they're going through kind of the shuck and jives of what we're looking at with tariffs right now, they need some kind of stability in having a very strong tax bill is one way in which we can aid them. But at the same time, we want economic growth. We've got to be able to do what we can to prevent that from eroding, which is what we are up against. At the end of this year, you're going to see the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions expire. That includes things like research and development, expensing, the 199A pass-through,

which for small businesses means that they're at the corporate rate, which is 21%. If we allow that to expire, it jacks up to almost 4%. 40%. So you're talking about, you know, you know these mom and poppies, these small businesses, these job creators in all of our communities, many of them have come and talked to us and said that they will be driven out of business if this is allowed to happen. So it's within our ability to not let that happen. We've got a framework, but we also have to stop fighting amongst ourselves. And when there are areas that we can cut, that makes sense, such as in Medicaid, when we can draw, you know, make sure that people who are here illegally are not getting those Medicaid

dollars that we need for other members of our, of our population, which means when we've got people on there who are able-bodied, able-age, who could be working instead of living on, you know, living on Medicaid benefits, we have to get them back into the workforce. Those are things that I would hope, not only can Republicans and Democrats both get behind, but that the entire Republican conference has to get behind. You would think so. And I would assume that, you know, when you talk about the $2 trillion in cuts or $2 trillion in reduction in spending, does this include any of the Doge stuff? Because I know so far those have only been recommendations to Congress. Well, right now, a lot of it, a lot of the Doge cuts, a lot of the Doge savings are

stuck in courts right now. And so that's going to be a while until we find out whether those dollars can actually be put into an equation. The same thing with tariffs. A lot of people want us to use a tariff revenue as a payoff. But the pay force have to be. legitimate numbers. And the tariffs right now, it's so dynamic, you know, whether or not it's, it's 125 percent, is it 20 percent, is it 50 percent? You know, are we going to give a 60-day, 90-day, you know, pre-leaf, why we negotiate? We don't know what those numbers are yet. So we're trying to be as conservative as possible at all, but also as realistic as possible. So we're taking the numbers that we know. And I'll give you a perfect example.

The, and I'm going to call it the Inflation Act. I know that the Democrats call it the Inflation Reduction Act, but we all know what happened to it. But the numbers that were in the IRA, which is basically a green new scam bill, had all sorts of tax deductions where you had the government putting its thumb on the pressure, on the pulse of what was happening in on the scale of what was happening in the energy sector and just favoring a ton of green new energy programs that got us nowhere but it were extraordinarily expensive. All Republicans voted against that bill. But We've got some of us now who are fighting to get this provision or that provision. That is a huge pay for if we could get all of us on board saying it was a terrible bill at

the time, which is why we all voted against it. And we can't sit here and pick and shoes. Well, this might be good for this business that's in my district. We all have to understand at the end of the day, when our spending is such that it is, everybody is going to have to put a pound of flesh on the table because we cannot sustain it. And the government has grown at such a rate that it's quite honestly, we have. are outspending our ability to ever be able to pay it off. And it's putting us in really dangerous territory. Well, and to that point as well, apparently, so there's, I know some,

some of your more moderate colleagues that are apparently jousting back and forth over funding, for just as an example, Planned Parenthood in the reconciliation package. There's a couple of them, apparently, I think it's Brian Fitzpatrick, Michael Lawler, and Jen Kiggins that are some of the ones who've made it clear to leadership that, and this comes from a couple of different sources, that they made it clear that they oppose a measure to cut federal funding to Planned Parenthood and the reconciliation bill. I mean, they've been getting a half a billion dollars annually for, I can't even remember how long. I mean, that's not sustainable. I mean, are you privy to that fight? I am not privy to that fight. I know where I stand in that fight. And the fact that, you know,

95% of more of the services that Planned Parenthood provides is abortion and that they spend over $500 million dollars a year on marketing and who are they supporting our democrats i don't know why our republican colleagues would want to defend that kind of an animal but it has long been a you know a fight of ours we're a pro-life party there's a pro-life for a reason and what we're trying to do with this this tax bill is make sure that we are supporting working american families now whether or not it's through a child tax credit whether or not it's looking at ways of being able to grow the economy giving really good nice high paying jobs, supporting those institutions that support families. That's what we're trying to do with a tax package. So I am going to stay away from support of Planned Parenthood because I think

it's a technical organization. I think there's a lot of birthing centers that if we're really interested in providing for a healthy place for moms to go, we have those within all of our communities that we can give to. I know Texas does a great job of being able to help supply them with the resources that they need to be able to grow and to service that population. There's a lot better places in plan. Without funding Democrat campaigns, either. Last question for you're talking with Congresswoman Beth Van Dyne from the Republic of Texas. Is this something that that POTUS would support?

Because I keep thinking he needs a bigger victorious talking point other than, well, we have some trade deals coming. Because I think, you know, people have been waiting this out, waiting to see what happens, but they need something. They need something because, you know, tariff, no matter how people want to slice it, it is double taxation. And to be able to give voters a shot in the arm like this, I would think that the White House would want to be able to come out. I would love it if they said, oh, happy Mother's Day, we're extending the tax cuts, we're going to be reducing spending, we're cutting two trillion. I mean, that would be amazing to have that.

Is that something that you think the administration would support? I know that they're still kind of, you know, forming what they won and kind of, you know, weighing out and some of the things that they would like to see in it. But I would love to hear from the White House on that. Do you think that this was something that they would embrace? He definitely, look, this president has definitely said what he wants to do with a tax bill. He has not been shy at all, whether or not it's two reconciliation bills are one. He wants one big, beautiful bill to make sure that we can get it over the finish line. We're looking at not Mother's Day.

Mother's Day would be great. We're looking at a memorial day as our deadline to get this out of the House and hopefully on the president's desk by July 4th. You know, those are the dates that we're working with. So we've got a lot to do between now and then. But again, it has to be a bill that the majority, we can only afford to lose three votes. So you brought up three members who are, you know, fighting on Planned Parenthood. We've got another group that's fighting to keep the salt or to lift the salt cap from places like New York and California because they are getting, you know, their constituents are getting overtaxed by their local and state agencies.

but Texas shouldn't have to pay to make up for these really bad decisions made by Democrats that are elected in blue states. But the sole cap deduction is one that we're a fight that we're having. The fight over the green new scam tax cuts. Those are decisions that we're having to make right now to put into this bill making sure that we being fiscally responsible, fiscally conservative and being able to move forward. But the White House has been very clear they want to have a tax bill and they want to have it sooner rather than later, which means Memorial Day. Now, can we get everybody on board when you only have three members? I don't know.

That will be left to have. I'm on the whip team. I'm also on the deputy whip team. We're going to have a lot of conversations one-on-one with members who are pretending to be holdouts right now. But the 32 members that signed onto this letter have been very consistent. They have had conversations with the White House. they've had conversations with the president, with vice president advance, with our leadership. I just want to make sure that we are very clear.

I think that's the purpose of this letter. This is what our expectation is. We want to be team players. We are 100% on board. We let this president administration want to achieve, but we have to do it in fiscally conservative manner. Yeah, exactly. And we need to get these other people on board.

So it seems like there may need to be a pressure campaign against these other three lawmakers. If they don't want to go willingly, then maybe the voters need to drag them. Congresswoman Beth Van Dine appreciate your consistency, your transparency with everything and your fight for voters in Texas and everywhere else. Thank you so much. Good to see you. We'll talk soon. Thank you. We have more to come, folks, as we wrap up the second hour. Our partners that help bring you the program, our friends over at Super Beats. You guys are familiar with the Super Beats, folks. The Super Beats are choose. Well, now they have the Super Barreene, and it's available at the Sam's Club. And your metabolism affects everything. You can support it with Super Barreene. It's $5 off at Sam's Club through April, 29th. It's just 2498. It's plant-based doctor formulated. It has a unique form of berbering and Italian olive fruit extracts. You get additional antioxidant and cardiovascular support. It's a unique berberine. They've clinically studied it and it delivers nearly 10 times higher absorption than standard berbering. So that means you only have to take one capsule a day. It's highly concentrated, easy to swallow. And if you're worried about GI distress, it includes grape seed extract

for greater tolerability. Visit Sam's Club to restock your heart. heart health support with Superbeats, heart shoes, and expand your routine with a new Superboreen for healthy metabolism and blood sugar support. And don't forget, SuperBoreen is $5 off at Sam's Club through April 29th. Snag this offer at Sam's Club while it lasts. Start today and get on the road to better cardiovascular health support. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida Man. Florida Man with a cardboard license tag. That'll Fulham was arrested after two pipe bombs and drugs were discovered in his vehicle. You know, I thought this was America.

No, no, you can't do that. He was pulled over while driving a car. He had a cardboard license plate with the word private on it. A piece of cardboard with the word private scrawled onto it. That doesn't work. His license. Yeah, it doesn't really work that way. His name is Ben Root.

She was taken to the Walton County Jail, charged with making a bomb, possessing explosives, possessions of controlled substances, tampering with evidence, possession. Oh my gosh. A ton of charges. There's just a lot. He's got a lot. But yeah, they said that they immediately noticed the cardboard plate.

And then they said that he had no identification, but he had a birth certificate that identified him as Benjamin Roach, 37. And then they found meth, all kinds of meth, probably going to distribute it. And then they found, they took pictures of it, basically cylindrical objects with caps, PVC with caps on each end, wrapped with black electrical. tape. Yeah, and he said, oh, they got gumpowder in him. And they go, well, do they have a fuse? And then, yes, they did. So, yeah, they had a ATM. They had to go, Baft. They had to show up. They had to disarm them. And we, they have no idea why he had this stuff. That fake paper tag was the least of his worry. Yeah, the paper cardboard license plate. Yeah, it was probably, yeah, that's probably the least of his concerns with all of this, I would say. Oh, I don't, this sounds like a bad news, bad news. Disney World's announcing a rare adult only experience at the park. It's called Blankton Kids.

And the experience will offer guests lavish drinks and bites in the new lounge at Epcot. It sounds like hell because it's going to be sugary and overpriced. Everything's going to have way too much syrup in it. It's not going to be an actual like properly mixed cocktail. like an entrance fee or something. This sounds, oh, the elevated, I hate the word elevated for anything. Stop saying it.

The elevated experience is only $179. It includes theme park admission. I would rather chew off my own foot than to do something like, to have an elevated experience. Steve, add that to the list. Yeah, to then to go to a theme park. I don't like, I like theme parks, but I don't. I just want to go and ride roller coasters and then,

not do anything and not experience anything elevated. Stick with us. Third hour next. We have a lot to hit today and you don't want to miss any of it. And I think we have Senator Rand Paul on later. Is he on with us today? No, not today later this week because he's been admired in voting. So, but we do have Matthew Marsden on later. As we move, our partners that will bring you the program. It's our friends over at all family pharmacy. Oh my gosh. I love these people so much. If you have not ordered from them or if you have not signed up to order from them, you definitely need to remedy this. Here's why. All of the medications that you need, including the ones that the government tried to keep from you, like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which are great therapeutics,

by the way. And when I caught the Rona naturally, they were incredibly helpful for me. But they have all of those. They also have your daily medications. You can get them fast. You go online. You order. It's so easy. You can get it in like two to four days. Or you can get it overnight in a pinch if you, if it's like a serious situation and you need some, you need some medicine. Like for me, for instance, when I was hosting for Thanksgiving, I started getting struck throat. I've had it a million times. I know exactly what it is. And I'm like, oh my gosh, what am I going to do? So I overnighted antibiotics to myself from all family pharmacy and started my regimen. And literally by noon the next day, I was fine. I was able to do what I need to do because I had a ton of family coming to my house. They saved Thanksgiving for me.

I really have relied on all-family pharmacy, and I cannot recommend them enough. Also, everything is made in the USA. All precursors, everything. You're not getting anything from India or China, so you can worry, you don't have to worry about any of it. High standards of quality and safety. Visit all-familyfarmacy.com slash Dana and get 10% off using promo code Dana 10. Always be prepared. Protect yourself.

All-familyfarmacy.com slash Dana, coupon code Dana 10 gets you 10% off. If you're navigating restrictive gun laws, the burn a gun is a great addition to diversifying your self-defense plan. It's like having another tool in your kit. You know, you carry knives. You carry different. What did you make of those scenes in the Oval Office, President Trump and President Zelensky? I found it sort of beneath America in the way that took place. And the way we talk about now that, well, it's the Gulf of America. maybe we're going to have to take back Panama.

Maybe we need to acquire Greenland. Maybe Canada should be. What the hell's going on here? What president ever talks like that? That's not who we are. We're about freedom, democracy, opportunity. Not about confiscation. We're about freedom to talk about whatever the hell we want to.

And that is our gulf. Sorry, but it is. Actually, I'm not apologizing. Why is he still talking? Like he's still, I will say no other president is doing what, I mean, even Obama, who loved the spotlight, didn't go out and seek out to do these interviews the way Biden is, right? Yeah. It's messed up. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash, with you.

We're at the top of this third hour. I'll have a piece coming out here shortly on Substack, Chapter and Verse, The Newsletter. If you're a subscriber, you get my prep in the morning and you get other stuff too. but you'll be able to read this letter for yourself, go follow through their math and then see who's signed on. And then I have included in that the story of the lawmakers. We're talking about this framework for reconciliation. There's a small number of fiscally conservative lawmakers

that are demanding $2 trillion in cuts and extension of the Trump 2017 tax cuts. And you have three people holding up negotiations. They can only lose, spare three votes. They're holding up any kind of momentum because they don't want to stop defunding Planned Parenthood. that receives a half a billion tax dollars every damn year. And then what do they do with your tax money?

They rerout it into Democrat campaigns. So you're being extorted by your government under threat of death because they'll shoot and kill you to death. That's why they have all the guns, the IRS, and thousands and hundreds of thousands around. Remember, there were a house oversight was sending in some letters about, why does the IRS need all these guns in ammo?

I mean, it's the IRS. But under threat of death, you have to keep paying the government. who then in turn takes your money and supports abortion on demand and really Democrat campaigns. So you're funding Democrat campaigns against your will. Tell me how that that's how, tell me that that's taxation with representation because it isn't. We went to war for less. So there are three lawmakers who absolutely refused to stop funding up.

Mike Lawler, Brian Fitzpatrick and Jen Kiggins. And I'm going to have their contact information and X handles and all that fun stuff. So you can go and tell them to pound sand digitally. politely and call their offices and tell them they better get on board. Otherwise, I'll be happy to go to their districts and help raise money for anybody who wants to primary them. Yay! All right, I'll pay my own way. That's right. I ask for nothing. All right. So a few things, oh, gosh, there's a lot actually to hit still that we didn't get. I don't know if you saw this.

Wokes gold stuff. Cane, do you have protein? Do you eat protein? in the form of steak and eggs and chicken and stuff yeah yeah you have protein so apparently um protein is right wing it's probably fascist what it's literally a piece at vanity fair that talks about how if you eat protein then it's like apparently right wing here's the headline why are americans so obsessed with protein blame maga who's the lady who wrote this Let me look at this idiotic lady. Why wouldn't they blame survival? Or the survival mechanism. I don't know.

This woman, her name is Keziah Weir. How much you want to bet that she's not fit herself? Oh, she's not. Yeah. Anyway, she's kind of a, she's a senior editor at Vanity Fair. And, you know, kind of a mid, I guess. It's important for the discussion of protein. Shut up.

anybody who's ever wanted to be healthy has always eaten protein has always I mean you know that I've had protein drinks even before Trump was in the White House they act like Trump invented protein and it's bad because Trump invented it this is so stupid this is a broad who no like a woman not like overseas this is a broad who clearly has not paid attention to anything in culture and thinks that history began the day that she became self-aware she literally just now realize that people consume protein for health. And because she only just now realized it, she thinks that it's MAGA related. Oh my gosh. This is embarrassing. And it's in Vanity Fair. So she starts talking about how people hawk protein powder and she gets into protein foods and

protein bars. You know that's like been a big thing for a while. Tell me that you sit on your fat backside all day without telling me that you sit on your fat backside all day. I just did didn't even know that people were consuming protein. It's so weird. But they're taking a fart. They're saying people are obsessed. Usually they weren't obsessed with protein. That's like saying someone, oh, you're obsessed with drinking water every day.

You're obsessed. It's like, no, I'm obsessed with survival. She literally tries to say, this is a sentence. Are you ready? I need everybody to just hold onto a table because I'm going to hit you with the sentence. Are you ready? Oh, boy. Here it goes.

The intertwinement of masculinity. and red meat is strong and deep-seated. Yeah. Called the beginning of humanity to now. I know this is going to be shocking. Women also like red meat. I pretty much eat just meat and vegetables. Pretty much it's all I eat.

I don't really do a lot of carbs unless it's with pasta and then I'm really particular about my pasta. If it's not homemade, then it has to be Italian import because I don't do all the chemicals and all that stuff. I think a lot of the gluten sensitivity is actually chemical sensitivity from all the stupid junk they put in the stuff that we manufacture here. But the idea that wanting to eat red meat means you're more masculine, again, I'm just insulted that this chick is so culturally illiterate

that she's been unaware of the existence of protein powders and consuming protein for health and having like a heavy meat diet that she thinks that that is like a maga thing. Like no one did protein until Trump was in the White House. Are you kidding? I mean, I'm not exaggerating. She's literally arguing this. This is the actual story. This is what she's actually arguing.

Oh, wait, there's more. Are you ready? Check the sentence out. That men who have what they describe as a strong meat-eating identity also tend to perceive themselves as more masculine. An obsession with a protein affords a masculine-coated cover on the feminine-coated world of body image and dieting, a subject over which men can bond as bros. You kidding me with this.

and then she talks about, because only everybody, anybody ever talks about Joe Rogan. Joe Rogan's done this for forever, by the way. And I, I'm just shocked. Like she has apparently literally never paid attention to any of these people before until just now. I find that incredibly sexist. Not only is she embarrassingly uneducated and unaware, like I said, culturally illiterate,

these people who think, I just not realize. so no it must not have existed until I realized it. I find it sexist because it ignores the fact that women have amazing health advantages from Whole Foods diets, healthy diets where you're getting your protein, you're getting, you know, your roughage, all of that, like healthy eating. It's just not even dieting. It's called healthy eating. And I hate the word dieting. I don't diet. I just eat healthy. I eat what I want, but I have trained myself. I eat in between certain hours. So I basically do intermittent fasting all the, every day. I eat during certain hours. I eat stuff that's going to fuel me because I have to go, go, go. And I have a very, I'm a very, even though I'm a situational

extrovert, I'm a very wound up person. Like I'm, eh, all the time, like in a good way. But I have to feel that. I have to have energy. And, I that's that's that's not dieting that's healthy eating it's not feminine coded and the idea here's the other absolutely insane thing that she's promoting here is that somehow if a man wants to eat healthy then he is doing so he only talks about protein and eating red meat to as a veneer because he doesn't want it to look feminine that he's eating this is the stupidest thing I've ever heard Have you brought this piece? Have you perused it, King? I have.

Reluctantly, because it was... Actually, I thought it was a comedy piece. Well, she has, like, no muscle tone. So I'm not surprised that she's unfamiliar with any of this stuff. I thought it was parody. I went and looked at pictures ever. What? I thought it was comedy parody.

I thought she was just... I literally did, too. Yeah. That's how I thought it was at first. And then when you get about halfway through, you're like, oh, geez, she's serious. This is how pathetic the left is. They will literally kill themselves with bad cholesterol. and greasy foods because eating healthy is Trumpian.

No, we're not going to eat healthy. We're going to smoke crack. That's basically what they're saying. I mean, the article would actually made more sense. Instead of she said MAGA, she would have said MAHA. If she said MAHA, then I would be like, okay, I guess make America healthy again. You're against that. But it's like you're trying to attribute this to a political movement?

This is so ridiculous. I've always eaten healthy. I don't work out as much as I did, but there for a while, I was, we were, and You know this. We were in the gym six days a week. I'm not, sometimes seven, six days a week. And I did kickboxing three days a week. Oh, we were like hardcore.

It got to the point where I didn't want to look like Madonna. And I was like, mm, I started getting a little bit too muscly. And I didn't like that for me. It's totally, I mean, it's totally fine if other, you know, but I'm like, I wanted to maintain a certain level. I wanted to maintain a certain fat percentage. And I have a crazy high metabolism, crazy high. And I could look like, you know, real, what am I thinking of, vascular,

real quick. And I didn't want to do that. So I got to be very careful about that. So I started pulling back. But she acts like if you're going to the gym and working out, like even moderately, that that's like a maga thing. If you're eating protein, that's a maga thing. If you're talking about protein drinks, that's a maga. Maybe stop being a bigot. And again, like I went and looked at pictures. She has no muscle tone. So I have, I, you know, she doesn't follow the stuff. She doesn't follow, you know, healthy eating and working out. And she doesn't, this is not her beat. She's just a political bigot. And she wants to cast dispersions on the character by using

this uneducated stereotype as a way to do so. Can you imagine like you can, if you're just a moron about everything, you can fabricate yourself a little straw man for whatever issue you'd like. Good heavens. Yeah, I just, and it's a gender thing and a MAGA thing. This woman would fall over. I mean, I eat protein. I have protein drinks, I have protein powders.

I do all that stuff. Like it's just about being healthy. I want to just be healthy and have energy. That's what it's about, you know, and have muscle tone. That's my whole thing. I want strength and I want muscle tone. That's it. So she just, that's just so stupid of all the things to politicize.

Why would you politicize health? That's how the left is. They're like, oh, we want to be healthy and all have strokes and heart attacks because not doing that is MAGA. they will literally kill themselves to not have common ground on anything. These people are nuts. I do have Red State rhinos coming up. Wait until you hear this audio.

I got that coming up at the bottom of this hour after a headline. So we're going to have that as well. You don't want to miss as we move. Oh, wait, no, we also have Matthew Marsden. So we're going to balance it out because I got some big stuff for you on that. Goldco is making it easy to take that first step toward protecting your savings. Just fill out a quick form. no commitment, just free information. And then they'll ship you your free 2025 gold and silver kit

straight to your door. No shipping fees, no strings, just a free info kit to help you understand how gold and silver can fit into your financial plan. I'm a big believer in doing your research, and this kit is a great place to start. So I'm really excited to be partnering with Goldcoe, because not only do they support my show, which I truly appreciate, but they've made the whole process of buying precious metals super straightforward. Because if you're a fan of the show, Goldco is also going to tell you how to qualify for unlimited free bonus silver on eligible orders. If you qualify, you can even get a free half ounce silver Ronald Reagan coin. Totally free. Don't wait. Take that first step towards protecting and diversifying your savings with

Goldco. Visit Dana likesgold.com to learn more. That's Dana likesgold.com. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. So apparently, man, a second grader ordered over 70,000, 70,000 suckers. Accidentally, apparently. That is the, that's the headline that they ordered over 70,000 suckers. That's doing a lot. You said that it's doing a lot of work.

Yeah, the word accidentally. The mom said that Amazon called and they are refunding the money. And yeah, he ordered 70,000 dumb, dumb suckers. Lexington, Kentucky. And he was playing on her phone this weekend. She tried to stop the order before it came to her house. But it was too late. Her son said, my suckers are here.

Now he has some developmental delays. So she said his condition affects his decision making. So he wanted to run a carnival And so the Cases had 2,340 suckers inside And they retail for $130 each on Amazon Eight of the 30 cases Were unaccounted for

Oh my gosh Look at your face Yes, Kane I don't just say that I don't think it was a disability Or anything that led to this I think the kid wanted a bunch of suckers I think that's what it is

He just wanted a Pepsi man You know the kid just wanted a all he wanted was a Pepsi. That's all he wanted. Let me pull up the other one, but Safari is the worst browser that's ever been created, and the people need to be jailed. Who created it? Let's see here. I'm waiting for this to look. Okay. So, in addition to that I can't even, I mean, you can make a Ford out of those. Burger King is facing a lawsuit over Whopper ads because they're apparently the size of the

burger. In a Roman horse cemetery, dating back 1800 years, was discovered, just recently discovered. Coming up, our friend Matthew Marsden, on the conclave. I've seen the amazing changes relief factor has made for so many people, and I've seen it firsthand through my husband Chris's pain relief from using Relief Factor. Right now, it's easy to give their product a try because Relief Factor makes it pain free with their three-week quick start for just 1995. Get rid of pain and start living better.

Relief Factor is a 100% drug-free daily supplement that helps your body fight pain naturally. Developed by doctors, it works by supporting your body's response to inflammation. It doesn't just mask pain for a short time. It helps reduce or even eliminate it. It's safe to take daily, and in fact, the longer you take relief factor, the more effective. Whether it's neck, back, joint, or muscle pain, relief factor can help. Over 1 million people have turned to relief factor. Give relief factor a try.

With their pain-free trial, you can get a three-week quick start for only 1995, less than a dollar a day. Call 1-800-4 relief. That's 1-800-the-number-4 relief. With their pain-free trial, you can get a three-week quick start for only 1995. call 1-800 for relief or visit relieffactor.com. Not able to catch all three hours of the Dana Show? Subscribe to the full podcast and get news and laughs delivered in short, easy to digest episodes.

Ideal for your busy lifestyle on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lashithia. We're at the bottom of this third hour and that conclave has started. They shut the doors to this. Sistine Chapel and it is underway. We had a little bit of technical difficulty so I don't think we're going to be able to have Matthew Marsden join us because we're not, we weren't able to get him in and all of that and there's no audio. So it's not going to work out, unfortunately. But we are, we're, they started, I don't think what I had heard from folks is that it's supposed to be like the first

round of balloting isn't really supposed to, you're not really supposed to see any results from that until like, really like now or in the next hour. And that is if everything, you know, went pretty expeditiously. So I don't know. I mean, you got the black smoke if there is no Pope chosen, the white smoke, if there is a Pope chosen. And there are some that a lot of people are pulling forward that are a little bit more conservative and, you know, the, so we'll see as we, as we roll through. I don't think that they would ever decide it like that fast, though. I don't think that they would ever kick it off that quickly where the first round of

voting you're going to have somebody. But it's, you're in the Sistine Chapel. I mean, the most beautiful place I can think of to work and have a meeting. I don't even know how people could be focused on having a meeting with that. So, uh, we have a couple of other things to touch on as well. I wanted to play audio sound bite 18. because this is Congressman Steve Scalese. I don't know if you saw this, but the FBI apparently was classifying that 2017 attempted assassination of him as suicide by cop.

Listen to this, and he was almost killed from this. Audio somebody at 18. So if you go back to 2017 after the baseball shooting, the FBI had brought in the members of the team. Roger Williams was one of those members who was part of that. briefing. And at that meeting, they went through some of the information, some of it was classified, some of it wasn't, but they ultimately let us know what their conclusion was, and that's when they said it was classified as suicide by cop. And I'll tell you, I was offended. I think all of us there were highly offended that that was the conclusion that the FBI in 2017 came to because

it wasn't. What happened? that's insane and the this is criticism of the FBI over the investigation into that attempted assassination it's from a report from the house intelligence committee and they incorporated these records that were released by cash Patel now the director of the FBI and they accused the bureau the quote is acting with a complete disregard and lack of investigative integrity now back in November of 2017, the FBI had briefed lawmakers who were present for who were there when this attempted assassination happened. And they determined that it was not a politically motivated act of terrorism. It was suicide by cop. Let's full stop. First all, the guy, I'm not naming the guy,

the 66 year old nutt, I don't think he's a nuttrap, he's just evil. This evil almost murderer, the 66 year old, he was killed by Capitol Police. They were having the congressional baseball game. Remember this, let's set the stage. You had members of, uh, Congress there, House Republicans. He was a volunteer with Bernie Sanders campaign. He was super far left wing. Talked about left wing stuff all the time online. He literally had a list with him of grievances and lawmakers that he was targeting. And they included health care. He was livid over health care. Now remember what was happening at that time in 2017. There was a lot of discussion about potentially, or not 2017, when it happened, there was a lot of discussion

about the health care repealing Obamacare, all of this stuff. And the language that the left loved to use was what? It was always that, oh, Republicans are trying to kill people. They're trying to, they're going to kill people. They're going to rob them of their health care. et cetera, et cetera. And that's like, that was, that was the, the tenor of the language at that time. And I mean, that's when people were saying, you got to kind of watch your rhetoric a little bit. You have to watch your rhetoric, some at least. But this, I mean, the fact that this was the way that it was investigated and they said, oh, well, this was, you know, this was suicide by cop. This guy, like I said, had a list. He had a list of grievances. He was mad over health care. He was mad over a lot of the

Republican decision making in Congress. And he brought, he like made a big plan about it. He, I mean, this was all very methodically thought out. And he drove his van. He stationed it outside the field for weeks. Weeks. Remember that? And he pulled out two firearms, began shooting at the congressional Republicans. He almost, he narrowly missed Trent Kelly, who was from Mississippi. He hit Scalise in the hip. He almost bled to death on the field. He had multiple surgeries. He was in the hospital for weeks before he was able to return to Congress. And a lot of lawmakers were injured because they were fleeing. There was a lobbyist

that was practicing with the team. He was shot in the chest and he was seriously wounded. Two Capitol Police officers were wounded as well. By the way, they were part of Steve Scalise's security. detail because none of these people can carry there. They couldn't carry there. Steve Scalise had a security team because he has house seniority. So he's part of house leadership. If he had not had security detail there, there would have been a number of congressional lawmakers killed. Those armed security members did so much to buy some time for some of these other lawmakers. It's unbelievable. And the promotion of this,

suicide by cop is insane. It was not suicide by cop. And to say that it wasn't, it didn't involve any kind of political ideology, well, that's a lie proven by the grievance letter that this murderer, attempted murderer, brought to the field with him in his van. I guess people, you know, they didn't consider that.

They're kind of like brushing that under the rug. He had tons of social media. media posts all about this. He didn't threaten specifically lawmakers, but, you know, then he had, he didn't have to. But he had cited health care. And this idea, I mean, he sent letters to the editor, different newspapers. He was like very, he, I mean, he was like your typical, honestly, your typical left-wing lawmaker, who was nuts. And an opening fire on this, on the on the on the uh at this congressional game so the state was suicide by cop is excusing this it's excusing it and what's more it like diminishes the severity of what happened

it diminishes the severity of it and so i you know i'm not the i if i was scleased i'd be pissed because they're downplaying the fact that this guy was almost assassinated for political reasons And they're trying to excuse it and say, no, no, it wasn't political reasons. No, he just wanted to be killed by a cop. No, he didn't. He actually thought he was going to get away. I think that, I don't want to say his name, but I think that this murderer was anticipating that he was going to be able to get away.

And that's why he had all of this all meticulously planned out, meticulously planned out. And, yeah, he had a list of lawmakers' names on a list that he had in his pocket. He cited health care, cited a whole bunch of other things. things. But this is, it seems like the press found a gunman that they liked. Imagine that. They're making excuses for this guy because he was a left wing guy trying to kill Republican lawmakers. The left was not apoplectic over this at all. In fact, now they and their rogue bureaucrats that are embedded in these agencies are making excuses for it. They're making excuses for it. So this is, you know, it's insane. This is crazy. And I feel bad for Scalese, because,

because I just really don't feel like he got the support that he needed at this time. I mean, I don't. I guess, I don't know what the hell is happening with the show right now. So we're like in the bottom of this hour. How much time we have left? We have like two minutes left in the second. We have like four minutes, yeah. Okay.

So do we have his audio working? All right, we got Matthew Marsden on who's joining us. And first off, good to see you, my friend. Everybody knows Matthew Mars. And he was in all the different, he were in a million different films all around Hollywood. You were in Rambo, you were in everything. You were,

you fought aliens, you fought baddies, you fought commies. Done it all. Done it all. Good to see you. So let me ask you about this, because the conclave started,

I can't even imagine having to do my job in the Sistine Chapel. First off, can we just establish this? I'd be so distracted. I would be the worst, you know, if I were a Cardinal, I'd be the worst cardinal ever

because I would be looking at all of the amazingness inside the Sistine Chapel. I mean, we've been to the Vatican, and it's beautiful there. So my first question, I've like three questions I want to get right out. Has it ever happened that they've immediately gone in?

And they're like, oh, yes, we know who our Pope is going to be. And boom, first round, it's white smoke. Yeah, they've done it in one day once before. Yeah. Who? Yeah. Yeah, they've done it. I think it was like 1939.

It was three ballots and they got it. They got it in one day. Oh, so they were all pretty certain about that. Because there is, there is like a political, not like political in the sense of like our political system, but there is kind of a political sense to it where they lobby. They got a lobby for certain cardinals, right? Well, no, they're actually not allowed to lobby.

They're not allowed to lobby. But what they can do is they can discuss them. So in between each ballot, they have a discussion about it. So they'll say, hey, well, you know, isn't there time for like, say, an African Pope, or, you know, maybe you want the Pepsi to come back to Italy. but they're expressly held not to lobby. In fact, it's my belief

your listeners can correct me if I'm wrong, but Park John Paul II actually said if you lobby then you can be excommunicated. Wow, so they're really hardcore about this. That's, okay, my, so the reason that I wanted to talk to you because everybody knows,

you know, obviously Matthew went from Hollywood, now Texas, he's in Black Hawk down, all this good stuff, Catholic, family man. He has 11,000 children, so he's a great upstanding Catholic. They're all beautiful children. They all look like they're clones of him and his wife. There is, and maybe you've seen this with your own kids, but you've, you know, you've raised them in the church. I read this piece where a significant number of Gen Ziers are turning to Christianity, and a specific number, like a huge percentage of them are, they're joining the Catholic Church. And this is such a departure

for millennials who I think we're, I don't even think agnostic is the right way to describe like a lot of millennials. And Gen Xers are kind of apathetic. You know, we just, just trust everybody. What do you attribute that to and the dovetail part of this question? Because Gen Z is so conservative, is that something that the Catholic Church has to take into consideration when they're choosing the next pope? Because I know it's like world youth something that's all also happening simultaneously in Rome. and then you had the new saint who was like the first teenage saint who's going through that process. I know, I think he's from his C.C. And he's like the digital saint.

He's all of these, all of the youth are descending right now on Rome. They're all there at the Vatican. How does that, is that going to factor into maybe the level of conservatism that is going to be present in the next Pope's elected? Do you think? I don't. No, I don't. think so. I mean, I'd like it too, of course, you know, because of course I'm on the more conservative side, but... Slightly. Just a little bit. Just in bit. But no, I don't think it will, but I do

think that, look, be careful what you wish for, right? You always say that you get the pulp that you deserve, and I think that Pope Francis, my own personal opinion was he was very, very confusing. You know, I remember me and you and me and Chris, like, you guys calling me up and saying like, what is he saying? I'm like, hey, I always ask Matthew. We're like, what does this mean? What is this? He's like our go-to. Yeah, and I'm like, I don't know. But, but the, like I said, be careful what you wish for because we've gone, we've gone so left. We'd with the, the leftist policies and all these things that you think are ideal, you know, they put them out as ideals through Biden. They came true. And I think that they've been wholly

rejected by the youth because they're like, hey, listen, certainly for like young men, I don't want to be with a woman that's been with 50, 60 men. I don't want that. I want to return more to more traditional values. Women are now going, hang on a second. This third wave feminism has destroyed the family unit. People aren't happy anymore. Why would I want to do that? I want to be a housewife. It's almost like, like, well, we've said this savorna of it, and I know you, Dana, you come from that punk rock you and chris come from that goth punk rock background we are the counterculture now and so the youth are going hang on a second um the the conservative ideals are resonating with them more and more and more by the way forgive me i'm holding my camera so my

apologies for that but uh but i think that's resonating more and more with the youth and what they're going to as well is tradition and the catholic church obviously has a tradition of truth and beauty. So as you said, I remember when you guys came back from it, and you were like, wow, the Vatican is so beautiful. And this is I'll tell people is when people go on about the Catholic Church and the wealth that it has and the art that it has, I said, that's yours. That's, the Catholic Church is keeping it for everybody

to remind us of the beauty of humanity. So I think that that tradition, going back to traditional values, is resonating. And listen, wouldn't it be amazing when you're seeing what's happening in Italy right now with a conservative prime minister, what you're seeing in Hungary, what you're seeing over here in America, is there's this kind of cultural revolution going on. And I think that having a really strong conservative pope would be amazing. I mean, not to interrupt you, but wasn't Pope John Paul like a great partner with Reagan? Like I think Reagan, Thatcher and Pope John, defeating communism. I mean, that was like the trifecta. And I think people are kind of looking for that again. Yeah, I mean, when we were growing up, I always remember you. I mean, think about you had Reagan, Thatcher, Pope John Paul, Mother Teresa, and these great leaders in the world that were not only political leaders, but they were moral leaders. And we had clarity.

And I think under Francis there wasn't clarity with the conservative cardinals that are out there right now. They are scholars in canon law. They're very, very, very intelligent. And listen, everyone thought after Pope John Paul, we would get a very, very liberal pope. And we actually got a more conservative pope in Benedict. Yes, he's very conservative. Last quick question.

Who knows? Cardinal Sarah or Pizza Bala. Oh, Sarah. Really? Oh, yes, Sarah. Oh, yeah. All right. We have to run.

Matthew. We'd love to have you back, though, as this progresses, because the conclave is going to keep going. It just started today. So we'll see. I don't think they're going to decide it today. I don't. It's good to see you, my friend, but let's get you back. All right? We'll talk again soon. Subscribe to the Dana Show podcast, because who says you can't make fun of people while staying informed on your own personal time? Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Welcome back to the program. We're really, really short on time because of the technical stuff that we had previously. But anyway, do we have any time?

for today in Stapidity, Kane? All the cuts we had were like, kind of long. I have a crazy bit of audio pertaining to the conclave that you got to hear tomorrow. Oh, Lord. Are you going to play that? I am going to play it because I had to listen to it. Everyone else does cocaine. That's the rule.

I don't know about that idea. That is the rule. Make sure you sign up for the newsletter over at Substack. I've got this, the reconciliation framework letter going out. If your congressperson is not on the list of signatures supporting that, you need to ask them why. Have a great night. YouTube, Facebook, find us like and subscribe. I'll be back with you tomorrow.