The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Thursday March 21 - Full Show

Episode Date: March 21, 2024

Biden wants to cancel $6 Billion more of student debt while Congress poses a $1.2 Trillion budget. A TikTok influencer tells illegal immigrants how to invade homes in America thanks to progressive squatting laws. Biden’s support among Latinos has plummeted. The media goes on defense of Jordan Neely, the homeless man whose violent acts led to his death. The Missouri teen charged with bashing Kaylee Gain's head into the pavement is claiming self-defense. Dana breaks down the pork in the President’s budget. An 82-Year-Old woman threatens a lawsuit after a trans incident at a YMCA pool.Please visit our great sponsors:Black Rifle Coffeehttps://blackriflecoffee.com/danaJoin the Coffee Club today and get 30% off your first month’s subscription.ExpressVPNhttps://expressvpn.com/danaKeep your online activity private and get 3 months free with code DANA.Fast Growing Treeshttps://fastgrowingtrees.comUse code Dana at checkout to save an additional 15%.Goldcohttps://danalikesgold.comGet your free Gold Kit from GoldCo today.Hillsdale Collegehttps://danaforhillsdale.comVisit today to hear a Constitution Minute and sign up for Hillsdales FREE online courses.KelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comSign up for the KelTec Insider and be the first to know the latest KelTec news.Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/danaGet free activation with code Dana.Wise Food Storagehttps://preparewithdana.comSave $50 on your 4-Week Survival Food Kit plus free shipping when you order today!

No, we shouldn't. And here's the way that we'll do it. There's two completely different worldviews on this. You know, the Biden budget came out. It would make the largest tax increases in U.S. history, about $4.9 trillion in tax increases. It would raise the debt to about $52 trillion over the next 10 years. We can't go down that road. We're going to crash the U.S. economy. We all recognize that. So what we present is the alternative view, and that is our House Budget Committee passed their resolution here in the last couple of of weeks, and it would balance the federal budget in 10 years and cut 15 trillion in spending while not affecting Social Security or Medicare. This is possible to do, but it takes very tough political choices, and you've got to limit the size and scope of the federal government. What a concept. We've been talking about that for a long time. There is a path to do it.

So that's Speaker Mike Johnson, because the bill that has been pushed through, well, that's going to probably be pushed through, let's be honest about it. is just it's absolute trash garbage. It's a it's it's big spending and that's the problem. It's still continuous big spending. We're going to break some of that down here for you today. First off, welcome to the program. Dana Lash with you top of this first hour on Thursday or sorry, yeah, Thursday. It's just a crazy, busy, overwhelming day. All right. So the yeah, you this, this second half, it is the second half of the whole omnibus you know if you wanted to the second half of the omnibus is ultimately what is this is the thing that's coming down the pike i mean they the budget with this it's just bad policy it's a it's it's it's just bad spending uh we're going to go through

some of it and there's been a lot of, no, there's been a lot of consternation about it online. We're going to go over, you know, what it actually includes. They said it's, like, what, no, a little over, almost maybe $20 billion for the border. But you have $495 million. They were saying for additional, I guess, personnel.

But what does that mean when you're talking about increasing border security? That's what they were saying the last time that they were pushing this, except the problem was, is that it was just, for people to help process those who were coming in illegally it was just to help kind of

process all of that through and not really anything about enforcement et cetera now the deportation aspect of it this is the big thing that you know the states are fighting with the federal government about and the act of deportation is still

something that the federal government argues is within its purview but it's very difficult to argue for the federal government that it's within its purview, considering the fact that all they just haven't been doing it. They just won't actually do what needs to be done and we'll make that a part, that messaging, a part of their enforcement. So like I said, we're going to go through all of this. There's just a lot to hit because you've got this. This is six spending bills that have been pushed together in one giant omnibus. And of course, it's over a thousand pages. They dropped it

last night. They're expected to make like the initial votes on it today, which is, I mean, how are you reading over a thousand pages of legalese and spending? And you know that's what a lot of this is. It's legalese and spending. How are you going to read a thousand pages of that? I mean, it's rhetorical. You're not. They're not. They're not going to do it. It's just about, it's about getting it through and getting it done. So I tell you, this is exactly how you mess up in an election season. That's exactly how you mess up in an election season. The other thing, too, that we're waiting for is some of the latest moves on SB4. That has to do with the immigration, well, the border bill, the border enforcement in Texas. SB4, as we've discussed, that includes the arrest and the

detention of illegal entrance, but it doesn't include the deportation of illegal entrance, because, again, that's something still the federal government. That's what they, they tried to tie everybody's hands. That was the big fight that they were having with Jan Brewer in Arizona. You all remember this. And so the chaotic, I guess that's the best way you could put it. There was some chaos yesterday for a handful of hours before a lower court then stayed it. So now, because the Supreme Court had said it could go ahead and go through. And this was after Alito had extended this injunction. And then there was a federal appeals court that blocked it. So Now they said that they can't rule on it unless the Fifth Circuit rules on it.

And so now they had a three-judge panel on the fifth that issued in order that blocks it. And they didn't actually really explain much about their decision with it. So that's one of the other things that we're watching. So there's a lot of stuff that's pushing around in D.C. We've got also the U.S. submitting a resolution. They're demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. But of course, they try to add very quietly, you know, a caveat about releasing hostages, which Hamas is never going to do. They're never going to do because it's been worth it for them to not.

As sickening as it is, it's been worth it for them to not. So we're going to follow that. Also the latest with the EV fight. And we've got a bunch of culture as well to get into. But this border, let's go back to this, because this bill with 19.6 billion for border protection. So this is, it's, they say it's investment at the border. Well, unless it's boots on the ground, the problem is that they act like that's a win by itself. They act like a portioning. a certain amount is, oh, well, that's it. You get everything that you want on the border. But they, they, by doing this, they are sidestepping the main issue, which is enforcement, because there's, what's the point of spending all of this money with stuff at the border, particularly when you're fighting with lawmakers as to whether or not or elected officials in Texas, including law enforcement,

you're fighting with them as to whether or not they can arrest or detain people. If you're, you're pushing back on whether or not they can arrest or detain and you're barring them from deporting, what the hell exactly are you spending money on if it's not for processing and, you know, getting people through faster and then releasing them in the interior. And that's the big question. So they act like it's a huge win for Republicans. Oh, we're giving you this. Look, we're going to give you some money for this. And then Republicans act like they're all big for asking for it. But it ignores the giant question. What about deportations? What about arresting, arresting and detainment? Because this issue, this is what SB4 is all about.

So what exactly, if you're spending, because this is a, what, a major $1.2 trillion package, if you're spending this type of money, then what is it that you're, and you're spending what, 19.6 billion for customs and border protection? And they're bragging. It's a $3.2 billion increase above fiscal year, 23. And we're going to have $495 million for additional Border Patrol agents. And the Biden, hey, look, the Biden administration called for, we're going to have $20,000. $32,000 additional border agents. Okay, but what about any kind of a force multiplier, like a little literal physical barrier that we call a wall?

Nope, you don't get that. You're not getting that funding. You're not getting that funding. Additionally, to my point, immigration detention beds, they're boosting from 34 to 42. Thousand. So they're adding $10,000 additional detention beds

at all of these processing facilities that many of these NGOs run. So this goes right to the point that my whole original point is that this is about processing people quicker, releasing them to the interior. That's all what this is about. Now, in addition to this, I know, happy Thursday to you, you're so excited.

Biden is quote unquote forgiving another $5.8 billion in student debt for nearly 78,000 borrowers. So this is out this morning. $6 billion in student loan relief, quote unquote. It applies to teachers, nurses, and firefighters, they said, who, due to previous failures with the system, didn't receive the earlier, quote unquote, forgiveness they were promised for going into public service. And it's this public service loan forgiveness program that they created in 07.

And it was about forgiving student debt for people who enter jobs in public service. But most, which I think is that's you're buying the public sector's vote is what you're doing. you're buying the public sectors vote. You make it impossible to get affordable education. And then because of, I don't know how you want to put it, consumerism, societal practices, customs, culture, whatever it is, you know, you pay sports athletes more than you pay teachers because clearly the society spends money on what it values the most. And then you try to rectify this by forced spending through government. And that doesn't go out very well. and you still have education and teachers, people who, you know, they don't consider, they wouldn't voluntarily fund them as much as they would voluntarily go to a sports event.

So they try to fix that, again, with more government and with more spending. And then they make these promises that they never are able to actually follow through on. You shouldn't, you should just make, if you're, make college affordable and stop promoting within culture, this idea that in order to have any kind of valuable, uh, socially accepted. profession that you have to go to a four-year university. I mean, that would go a long way in starting to fix this and then maybe not have not have D.C. run the whole thing. So this brings this total package under this president to $150 billion. And previously, I think it was only something like 7,000 received that quote-unquote public service loan forgiveness. If it's not

forgiveness this year. But it's not just like public service workers. I mean, they've been forgiving debt from private circus. They've been forgiving a private sector. They've been forgiving private circus actually applies. They've been forgiving debt from ever. It's a vote buying scheme. It is an absolute vote buying scheme. And then all of these articles, oh my goodness, higher education debt has just tripled. It's so mean. Student federal aid figures. It's so mean. Yeah, after the federal government under Barack Obama and with people like Elizabeth Warren in the Senate, they voted to consolidate total control of college loans. in D.C., they put it under the purview of the federal government, and then you're shocked

that it got run into a hole in the ground. You're shocked that education, the cost of it is tripled. You're shocked by all of this. You voted for the, some of these people who were complaining about this, voted for the very people who actually made it, made it what it is today. They said most people would receive widespread relief through that. They would receive between $10,000 and $20,000. So everybody else pays for the student loans. This is absolutely vote buying, and it's a redistribution of wealth because you're forcing people who did not take out such loans or people who already paid their loans. You're making them responsible for the debt that someone else voluntarily of their own free will chose to accrue. That is communist.

That is anti-American, and it's lazy and it's grifting and it's academic welfare. This is academic welfare. You're creating another entitlement class with this idea. that academics is a form of nobility in this in this country this is exactly what it is now a few other things this as we're watching this they're going to be fighting over this this bill going through the spending bill i'm seeing some other stuff on it now as more more lawmakers are actually being able to read it since it was dropped last night how nice this u.s. resolution this resolution that's submitted by anthony blinkin demanding

a ceasefire linked to the release of hostages in Gaza. He submitted a draft UN resolution. This was to the Security Council, calling for an immediate ceasefire linked to the release of hostages. Now, remember, Hamas said they have zero interest in releasing any type of hostages right now. So this just seems like a scream in the wind. We're going to talk more about this as well coming up. As we move, our partners that help bring you free food, free food, free food, not free food. They bring you food, but they bring you free radio. It's ready-wise. They want to make sure that you're prepared with food in case heaven forbid anything should ever happen or maybe you just want to go hiking or you want to go on a hunting trip and you just want to make it super easy on yourself i mean ready wise

can can assist with that as well and the cool thing with uh ready wise foods all made right here in the u.s of a and they have it's high quality stuff it's super high quality stuff you have peace of mind knowing you're going to have nutritious meals packed here with u.s. ingredients packed here in the US on hand to feed your family. If there's like a storm, power outages, supply chain disruption, whatever it is. High quality delicious food. And they all come, I mean, everything is just, you know, it's like the bougiest prepared food you could ever get, but it's super affordable.

2,000 plus calories, 50 grams of protein per day in their one month supply, which is a two bucket bundle. It includes 36 pouches of premium survival food. Freeze, dried, dehydrated, no refrigeration required. easy to prepare. Just had water and 25-year shelf life as well. The time to prepare is now. Visit readywise.com. Use code Dana and save 20% off of any regularly priced item.

Visit readywise.com. That's code Dana 20. Code Dana 20. Get you 20% off any regularly priced item at readywise.com. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. So I have no idea why people think that they can keep in a 11 foot gator in their home in New York, but they can apparently.

This home, it's a cause some backlash. New York man and, well, his supporters are wanting to know what happened at the 11-foot, the 11-750-pound gator that he had in his home. Now, if the gator's not bothering anybody, I mean, you know, if it's not anybody's pets, anything like that, the Department of Environmental Conservation Officers showed up to this dude's home in Erie County, Town of Hamburg on Wednesday. They found that he had built an addition to his home just for the gator and built an in-ground swimming pool to keep the gator and keep it happy.

He allowed kids even to get in the water and pet Albert the alligator and the gator wasn't secured. You can think that they're tame and they're domesticated but you know that doesn't necessarily mean it's true. He said I took care of him better than

most people took care of their kids. He didn't have any incidents with him but apparently they said he had to have licensing. I don't know. Some other stupid New York stuff. This is baffling scientists at a German Zoo. Chimps are ripping out each other's hair

and they're walking around all jacked, like all muscular and like shredded wheat. They're ripping out of each other's hair in Germany, the zoo in Germany. And they said it's alarming the visitors at Madgeburg Zoo. There's a sign next to the enclosure saying that because of over-grooming, they look psychotic. They have bald spots everywhere. And they said some of them are almost entirely hairless.

So is it over-grooming? I mean, it is weird. They say that where they're being kept is too small, according to some animal rights groups, and it's adding to their stress and it's stressing them out, and that's maybe what it is. Or it's maybe they're animals and they do weird stuff. I don't know. The GOP, remember, the RNC was talking about hiring activist Scott Pressler. Now, apparently, they're not going to do it. At first they said that they were, and I guess now that they're not, they said that they had a call with him, and it went very well, but apparently they're not going to be working with him.

I think he did a better job than the RNC and getting out the vote, so we'll see what happens there. Daniel Penny appeared in a Manhattan court yesterday. Judge set the trial date of October 8 for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely. I have a piece up at Substack about this for you subscribers. And remember, the way that the media is writing about this story is absolutely assonite. And we're going to talk about that here coming up. A man was charged after 26 snakes were found in a vehicle. There was no word as to whether or not it was a car full of lawmakers in D.C.

This actually happened, or even in Sydney, this happened in Australia. They said that 26 snakes were found in the man's vehicle. He was charged with animal cruelty. That's, he's psychotic. Deadly morale mushrooms. People need to learn how to properly cook mushrooms because undercooked mushrooms apparently killed two people and sickened more than 50 diners at a restaurant in Montana, according to a CDC investigation.

They said that they were stumped that people were getting sick like this, and they realized that these undercooked mushrooms were likely to blame. They called it a deadly fungi, fungi outbreak in Montana. 51 people. Gastro-intestinal illness, two were killed. So you got to properly cook these things. And the U.S. is backed a $50 billion bond for Ukraine using frozen Russian assets. Coming up, a woman banned from the pool because she spoke out, this is a YMCA. You know, Christian Young Men's Christian Association. We'll talk about that. We've got a whole bunch of other stuff on the way. Stick with us. Goldco. It's for people like me. the gold IRA field, if you look at it at first glance, you're just going to want to take a nap because it's overwhelming. It is so overwhelming. And trying to find a precious metals company that you feel like you can trust is not easy at all. So gold coat is one that you can because as we were outlining the government spending, the printing more money, inflation. It's not looking good, folks.

I'm just being real with you. So adding gold and silver as a hedge against inflation with Goldco, that is. a great option and one you should consider. I've done it. Like I said, it's literally, I'm pretty sure it's in the safe than the safe that I have, Kane. I'm positive. Yeah, I'm like going through my mental roll-a-x here. Anyway, you can get your free 2024 gold kit from Goldcoe and learn how to get $10,000 in bonus silver. Now, one of their most unique qualities with Goldcoe is their education first position. They're very thorough with the info that they provide. It's a one-of-a-kind gold IRA kit that they offer to individual buyers to explain the economy.

and how gold IRAs work. They want to make it easy for you to get the benefit of owning physical gold or silver. And there's no pressure. You can ask about their highest to buyback guarantee and take advantage of their unmatched to customer service, zero complaint record as well. So protect your family and your family's future and freedom, financial future and freedom.

Get started today at Dana likesgold.com. Get your free gold kit from Goldco and learn how to get $10,000 in bonus silver. That's dana likesgold.com. Looking for the drive-through version of the Dana Show? Check out the best highlights from every show and Dana's absurd truth podcast. Posted daily from the Dana Show. My gente have thought invader a house in United States. Yeah, that I'm enter that there's a law that says that if a house not is abided,

So this guy on TikTok, he's a TikTok influencer. I hate these phrases. It's like a brave new world we're in. He is telling people who are coming into the country illegally, look, you can literally take over somebody's house and invoke squatters rights and make it impossible to be removed from these properties. His name is Lionel Moreno, and he is, he's like apparently from Venezuela. and he was telling people that under U.S. law, if a house isn't inhabited, you can seize it.

He's talking about squatters rights or what they call adverse possession law. And we talked about this yesterday, how this is like a big thing. We're seeing it over and over again. It's one of the wildest things where someone, particularly in these like, you know, very blue sanctuary city states where somebody can come in and take your house, seize your house and you're kind of S.O.L. This one woman was arrested in New York because she changed the locks on her door. for instance in New York, you can't even turn off the utilities. Like you, if someone took over the house, they don't have to pay you rent. I'm not exaggerating any of this, by the way. They don't have to pay you rent, but you have to pay their electric bill, their water bill. You're not allowed to change

the locks. You're not allowed. None of that. They have more rights than you do as the property owner, even though they went in and without your permission or any kind of agreement and took over the house. and these laws have gotten progressively worse over the years, and it's to the point now where it's, you know, it's one of the wildest things. And sadly, you know, all of these people that are dealing with us, there was one guy who basically said that he squatted them back, I think was the thing that he did.

He squatted them back and went in and changed the locks. It was like, no, no, no, it's my house now. So kind of, I mean, how, it's just the goofiest thing ever. But there's no, there's this rot, this attention. on American jurisprudence. So this video was viewed four million times. People were saying that this guy's promoting terrorism and they were calling the FBI and all this. They have squatters rights in all 50 states, but some states are worse than others. I don't even know what the hell of squatters right is. It's just, it is insane to me that it's even a thing. It's insane that it is a phrase.

Like if you're in the process of selling your house, say you're in one of these states that has, you know, pretty leftist interpretation of this. And you're, trying to sell your house and say you've moved out, but you're still on the market, they can move in and you are SOL. Not only do you still have to pay for that mortgage, but you also have to pay for all of the utilities because they can give you an additional, they can charge you with something extra if you turn the utilities off. And you have to pay for these people to live in your property and you have no rights over it at all. You have to go to court. It's incredibly expensive. You incur all of the costs that go along with that legal challenge, it is, it's wild. It is wild. And it's

happening everywhere. Washington, California, New York, I mean, it's happening everywhere. I mean, they, in New York, they get 30 days. And so, land, they, the way that they do this, it could be your house and you didn't agree to rent it. Say you're not even renting it at all. But if they go in and move into your house, and they're there for, you know, they can somehow say that they're there for 30 days, then you're considered a landlord, and then you have to start the eviction proceedings, and it's all the legal stuff that goes with it. And in all states, you have to follow a legal eviction process to remove squatters. Now, my legal eviction process is made with lead, and it comes out of the barrel of a rifle. That is my eviction process. So I mean, breaking and

entering, people can get charged with breaking and entering, but if you stay there, then that changes it. That's just the dumbest thing I've ever seen. This is how you're going to get vigilanteism. You are going to get vigilanteism and you're going to get people who are going to take it up on themselves because they can't afford the legal costs that comes with pushing people out who break and enter and stay in these homes illegally. But in these blue states, these sanctuary cities and sanctuary states, I mean, I'm just saying it seems like you get what you vote for, right? You have to live with what you vote for.

New York City, though, they have, like, the most progressive laws on the book. There was one guy who moved in somebody else's basement of their house, and he wouldn't leave. There was another lady who was in New York, who was arrested because she moved in, or no, she had tried to kick out the squatters, and she ended up getting,

and then there's the woman from Queens that we talked about yesterday, Adele and DeLoro, who, can you imagine, right after your parents pass? and you're having to deal with getting rid of their property and getting rid of like the house and then you have to deal with a squatter issue because the squatter moves in after your parents pass away. Can you imagine having to deal with that? So this woman is just being victimized and

re-victimized and re-victimized. It is, it's insane. And she's, she's fighting. They said that witnesses to this particular house in Flushings, they were doing construction on the house. house. Not only were the squatters living there, but they were doing construction on the house that's not even theirs. This is, it's insane. And so there you go. And these people have no proof at all whatsoever that there was any kind of, you know, there was no agreement. And they're, and they're not offered. They're not offered to, to, they don't even offer to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to, to. there was a guy, this was in California, it was a $4.5 million mansion. Crazy.

Four and a half million dollar mansion. And squatters moved in. And it is, it's just, it's just, it's crazy. It's crazy. They said that in Los Angeles and Atlanta, some squatters have been turning homes into strip clubs and hosting all night raves. I'm telling you. And it's in every state, but like I said, some states it's, you know, more so than others. And even in Texas, in Texas, you have to go through an eviction process in Texas to lawfully remove a squatter. If someone takes over your home, I consider that to be a home invasion. And I would love for someone to examine, you know, castle doctrine and then going and moving into, I mean, that's trespass. The idea that a law ceases to have effect. because of how long someone is breaking it

is one of the dumbest things to happen in the American legal system I've ever seen. They say, oh, well, squatters, you know, they can stay for a while. You know, trespassing is short term. Squatters long term. So the period of time that they are illegally present in someone else's property without permission

determines the legality of their situation. That's absolutely crazy. But it's adverse. Adverse Possession Law. And so they say, but adverse possession law, the way that that works is it's supposed to be an honest, honestly entered property. Or a property that is held in the possession that's held with the belief that the land is theirs or that the property is theirs. That's what this is. But the fact that this is even in Texas is bad.

like in in in in Texas if you feel that you or your property are under threat castle doctrine comes into play but what if someone's been there what if you what if you're on vacation and you come back you know after you know however many days and you have somebody in your home and you it's you know my gosh you feel threatened your property's threatened so at what point does castle doctrine then go away doesn't have any effect because they're now doing this adverse possess this is the goofiest thing i've ever seen And it's so, none of it's consistent. In state after state, there's zero consistency. So, for instance, in Tennessee, guests are considered tenants after paying rent or as specified in a lease.

In Texas, guests are considered tenants that they contribute to expenses or use the mailing address. That's crazy. So there's, there's no consistency in any, across the country. There's zero consistency. But yeah, squatters' rights. Can't even imagine. Squatters, it's just wild. Now, to this point with, because this individual coming in illegally from Venezuela,

did you hear the story about how this administration nearly 200,000 illegal entry cases, deportation cases, were thrown out because the Biden administration didn't file the paperwork before the court hearings. It's a new report from the transactional records. Access Clearing House, and they analyzed the number of deportation cases that were thrown out, particularly under Biden's tenure. They said that the number of cases and dismissals and lack of transparency is, quote, troubling, der, but that they had failed to file the required notice to appear before court dates in 200,000 cases. So in 200,000 of these cases, they were thrown out. Remember,

they kept saying that they needed to hire more people so that they could process people. So this is how they're trying to force your hand into supporting some of this stuff. They're trying to force your hand into supporting it by saying that, well, you know, look what happens. These cases get, they just get thrown out. That's what happens. These cases are thrown out and, you know, this is, this is all you're left with. That's insane. This is crazy. But this is what we're dealing with right now. And there wasn't any, apparently, they didn't tell anybody that they were doing this. They didn't tell anybody that this was happening. So now the courts don't have the jurisdiction to hand to they don't have the jurisdiction to handle these cases and rule on even any asylum claims.

And all these people are just, you know, just in the interior, the ones that, the very few that actually do return to court. But now this is a Department of Homeland Security issue as well. I mean, this is wild. Just wild. But one of the reasons that the open borders people are upset about this is because they say, well, it makes it more difficult. for them to secure for people who enter illegally, free shelter and other taxpayer-funded items, like getting your free cell phone and getting all this other stuff. Like when that notice to appear isn't filed, apparently that makes it to where they can't

get these freebies. So it's kind of a, but then they just are released through the interior. So it's a catch-22. You see what I'm saying? It's a catch-22. It is lawlessness, an absolute, we just have just lawlessness in this country. It's sad. We have more on the way.

We've got Florida Man coming up. This is what else we have on deck too. Florida Man's coming up next hour. We have days of these United States. There's new polling that's been released about, it was done by Gaza and residents, and they polled Gaza and guess how popular Hamas still is in Gaza? And the percentage of people who thought that Gaza's actions on October 7th were just and defensible and they still support them.

it is it's exactly as I told you it's unbelievable we're going to talk about that the Olympics is denying athletes air conditioning because of quote unquote climate change and there's an update in the story of the Missouri teenager who had her head bashed into pavement the attacker the family of the attacker is insisting that she is the real victim and she's an honor roll student which means that you can just bash people's heads against the concrete and attempted murder and that's supposed to be allowable because you got good grades one semester we'll talk about all of that in more more as we roll. Partners that help bring you free radio. It's our friends over at American financing. Stop putting stuff on your credit card. Stop it. I get it that things are super expensive. Believe me, I get it. And by the time you fill up your car and buy groceries, I mean, you have nothing left. I understand that. But that doesn't mean that you need to add your credit card debt, particularly when credit card rates are so high, the interest rates are so high. You don't want to get trapped in that. If you're a homeowner, American financing can help you. interest rates have dropped into the 5% range.

So the process with American financing, they're salary-based, by the way, so they're not, they don't get commissions on shoving people into stuff that doesn't work for them. The process at American financing starts with a free mortgage review. You could start today. You might even be able to delay two mortgage payments and closing as fast as 10 days. They're saving their customers about $850 a month. So it's like a $10,000 a year raise without the extra hours. And they can offer every type of loan in the industry.

as well. A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, and they have evening and weekend hours as well. They can meet your schedule. They understand that you work and you got to take care of your family. No pressure. Call 866-574-2500. That's 866574-2500 or visit Americanfinancing.net and get started today. NMLS-182334. NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for rates in the five started 6.6% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 866-574-2500 for details about credit costs and terms. Don't let FOMO get the best of you. Stay in the loop and ahead of the curve by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Like Sands Through the Hourglass, so are the days of the United States.

Is it your testimony today that you personally witnessed President Joe Biden commit a crime. I believe the fact that he was sitting with me while I was putting together a business deal. Did you witness the president commit a crime? Is it your testimony today? Yes. And what crime do you have you witness? How much time do I have to go through it? It is simple. You name the crime. Did you watch him steal something? Corruption statutes, RICO and conspiracy. What is it? What is the crime, sir? You specifically. You keep up. You, you you asked me to answer the question, I answered the question. No.

Rico, you're obviously not familiar with. Excuse me, sir. Excuse me, sir. Excuse me, sir. Rico is not a crime. It is a category. What is the category of crimes that you're then charged? I, so she's been fighting with Ted Cruz about this, which is really going to, I think, go well for her.

Because Rico is most absolutely, and I said this yesterday, it's a crime. RICO is a crime. I mean, that's why you have tons, I mean, who was it that was just committed to, just convicted of a RICO charge? I mean, we actually had this as a headline of maybe a couple of months ago. The idea that it's not just, oh, well, you have to have X amount of crimes and then that makes up RICO. That's not how this law works. She should stick to slinging drinks and lead the legal issues to people who actually have reading comprehension. That's one of the stupidest things I've ever heard in.

my life, the idea that it's not a, okay, what? It's a crime. I mean, if it's, if it's, it's goofy. This is so goofy. I mean, it's, it's part of the U.S. Criminal Code. And she just, this is all to defend the Bidens. This is all to defend Hunter Biden. It's all to defend Joe Biden. Anything. It's a law. If it's applicable to everybody else. But if it has to do with Democrats, then no, it's not a law. They're not going to, no. It's not a law then if it has to do with Democrats. Can't make it a law. It's going to, we're going to unlaw it. It's not a law at that point. It's just bizarre. Just absolutely bizarre. I mean, this, this, yeah, she's been arguing, like I said, she's been arguing with Ted Cruz today. I mean, I don't know. Maybe, maybe if you

explained it to her like you would the make of a drink, then maybe she would get it. I don't know. I mean, it's, it's, uh, and she kept saying, well, you can't name any an illegal act that he did. Really? The illegal act is the very thing, the numerous illegal acts that would constitute a regal violation are all of the stuff that he was doing in violating, uh, tax code. That's just like part of it. Furthermore, the failure to disclose ties, business ties with China. I mean, Yeah, if you think if you want to get into all the entire list of all of the stuff that he's done, I mean, what the hell are you sitting in the hearing for? She's heard this stuff come out. They've heard them literally that is why the banks began investigating. That is why the FBI got involved. Now, they are investigating whether or not these violations are because they're still getting evidence. This is a. Again, it's all about finding evidence. It's an inquiry. Democrats, it's a foreign concept to them because

they didn't do this when they were investigating Trump. They didn't have an investigation of Trump. They literally just said, I don't like him. We're going to impeach. That is the whole of the impeachment. Never was a criminal charge brought, ever. So that's why this is such a foreign concept to them. We have a lot more to get into. Second hour on the way. You don't want to miss a lot more of the Dana show coming up. A lot of stuff to discuss, a lot of stuff to hit, a lot of rage. Great coffee. I have Black Rifle Coffee every single day. It's the only coffee I drink. And it's affordable and it's easy to get right to your doorstep. You're never going to run out of coffee because it's the worst feeling ever. If you ever woken up and you forgot, oh my gosh, I forgot to get coffee.

You don't ever have to worry about that with Black Rifle coffee. So they have their coffee club, right? And when you join the coffee club, you pick your favorite roast, whether it's the tactic squatch, whether it's the thin blue line, medium rosed, whether it's silence or smooth. They have so many different premium roast. And you can pick your schedule how you want it, how often you want it ship per week. And then it's sent right to your doorstep with free shipping. Every bag roasted right here in the U.S. of A, veteran-owned, veteran-operated, staffing is veteran. And they have, like I said, you can get ground coffee, whole bean, K-cups, ready to drink.

you can find every single type of coffee imaginable, and you're going to save with the coffee club. And you can save 20% also with co-Dana at black riflecoffee.com. And they also have kettles and mugs and grinders, everything you need for the perfect cup of coffee. Enjoy the explosive roast profiles from the people that are doing their coffee with the same mission focus they learned as members of our military serving our great nation. So try it for yourself today at black riflecoffee.com

and get 20% off with co-dana. Save 20%. with code Dana at black rifle coffee.com. They tell me they are not a monolith, and it's really difficult to just use one ad campaign to reach out to everybody because there are so many varying opinions and priorities within the Latino community. The one thing they agreed on, though, is that in their culture, they say they don't like it when people beat around the bush.

They want people to get to the point, and they're tired of hearing Biden's rhetoric and flowery language. They want to hear more details. They want to hear a specific platform about what he plans to do. Hmm. Yeah. They, uh, they, uh, they don't like it when you just, I mean, nobody does. But especially, I mean, certain, I think that certain communities have less patients for

BS than others, less tolerance for it than others. Nobody likes feeling like they're taking, being taken on a ride. Especially when you are doing outreach to a specific. community or specific demographic and the appearance and strategy of messaging is that, oh, well, I'm just telling you the truth. I'm just being straight and no chasing

with you. I'm just playing it down the middle. I'm just telling you how it is. And you're not. Gives you look like a liar. Welcome back to the show. Top of the second hour. Dana Lash with you. You can listen coast to coast channel 347 direct TV. You can find us on X as well. We're streaming there. YouTube, Facebook. Substack, the newsletter.

chapter and verse. And this is going to be an issue for Democrats. They just don't know how to get over this barrier that they have been operating under as it pertains to outreach. And you thought Republicans had an outreach problem, which they do. Both groups really do, if I'm being honest about it. Democrats, though, here's the problem with each. Republicans don't actually do outreach, certain, they're getting better at it. But their outreach historically, especially to different minority communities has been heinous because they just don't do it. They just don't go out there to do it. When I lived in Missouri, I lived in St. Louis and there was the first congressional district that was historically Democrat. It is a majority, I think it's majority of black voters,

although I think that that's, you have a lot of Hispanic voters, et cetera, that have come in now, past like 20 years. But it's a, you know, it's a minority district, really. And Republicans just never really spent a lot of time trying to do voter outreach because they always, and this is how they tell it to the people who donate and the big money backers. You know, they want to be able to show a return on the investment of donations and financing. And that return is votes. That return is controlling the area. And it's the way that Republicans have always measured, I think, a successful outreach campaign because it doesn't necessarily mean that's going to translate into a vote proper, like maybe this election, but maybe in a future election, it will. I mean, a lot of times,

the victory is just planting the seed. And Republicans did not put, they would just assume this district's gone. And I understand it when you're working with a limited budget. You're trying to maximize your dollars. That's what you do with your household. That's what you do with anything else. You try to maximize where can I get the most bang for my buck. But, At the same time, you have to measure it a little bit differently where it concerns political outreach. So that's always been kind of the problem with Republicans and outreach to minority voters. And then Democrats, though, Democrats, I think that now a lot of people are really waking up and saying, you know, how long have you promised us stuff? You said that the economy was going to get better and you made it worse. You said that there were going to be more jobs and there aren't jobs. You've done all this. And it's all been, it's all been made demonstrably worse. So, you know, where's, where's the return on this investment of our support? And they don't know how to explain that. They, theirs is, they don't have the product.

Republicans have the product. Their messaging sucks. Democrats don't have the product. They used to just BS you with messaging. Now they can't even do that anymore because the product is so bad. They can't even, they can't even fluff it up with, with over the top, you know, language anymore to try to sell people on something that they don't have. They can't even do that anymore.

They're bad salespeople. now, which is kind of wild to see. But I think that's because things have gotten so bad and they've been just so irresponsible that it's, you know, kind of to be expected. I mean, are you really shocked by those? I, you can't, you're not going to be able to shine this up. It's not going to happen. That's why I think this is going to be just disastrous too, further looking at the spending that they're wanting to do. Good heavens. That's going to make everything worse. The idea isn't to say, realize, you know, the bad situation with the economy, but we're going to try to offset that with more bad policy to create an even worse economy. Audio somebody, too, Biden's desk,

he's begging them at this point. He's begging Latino voters. Listen to this. Election is not a referent on me. It's an election between me and a guy named Trump. And this is a guy who, who's the way he talks about the Latino community is, Well, in 2016, he called Latinos criminal drug dealers and rapists when he came down an escalator. Now he says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country. You're the reason why, in large part, I beat Donald Trump. I need you. I need you badly.

That's not what Trump said, though. Trump was talking about people coming in across the border illegally, and it wasn't just Latinos. He was talking about people coming in from everywhere, including even Europe, including Middle Eastern nations, including, you know, everybody, China, and talking about how the basis of criminality would lead to more criminality. If you're going to violate the law and interleggly and try to sneak past Border Patrol, chances are you're probably going to continue to commit crime. I mean, that's just a statistical reality. And the way that Democrats put it, oh, no, he's talking about all Latinos and Hispanics. Think about that, though. Think about that effort for a

moment. They are trying to tell Latino voters that, well, you know, this is what, this is what Trump said. This is what this Republican party leader said about Latino immigrants coming in, you know, across the border, people coming in. Because it makes it sound like he was saying that about perfectly legal entry. And they omit the part where there were a lot of other, a lot of other is thrown in, talking about, again, the first act of entering the country is to commit a crime by entering illegally. But the strategy of them telling Latino voters, well, this is what he said about you, lying to them about what Trump, lying to them and saying that here, you're, you're being called all of these things. Do you realize how, in and of itself, how racist that is? Biden is saying

something that he wants these voters to believe that wasn't actually said. He's making a racist statement that wasn't said, but he's making the racist statement to get a payoff from it in the form of either anger at Republicans or support for him because, you know, he's not the racist. He's just going to make a racist statement and attribute it to somebody else. Do you see how insane that is? I don't think that that's working as well as it used to with Democrats.

I don't think that it's having the effect that it's having with them. He also said this. I wanted to play audio sonby at one really quickly. He was talking about, because he came into Texas yesterday, and I think he's got another fundraiser today. He was in Nevada and then Arizona and then came through Dallas. Listen to what he said about, you tell me, listen to this and you tell me if you think this is accurate. Wages are up more than prices.

Inflation is down dramatically. We have more to do. I get it. We have more to do. But no question. our plan of delivering for the American people is working now. Wages are not up. I know that Democrats keep trying to push this,

but the Economic Policy Institute was showing wage stagnation. The Public Policy Institute of California was saying that wage growth has been struggling to keep up with inflation. They keep trying to say, well, it's, you know, its wages are maybe finally outpacing. It's not, though. they're trying to sell you something you know what's happening with your bank account you know how far your dollars can go it's all about the economy but you're not going to be able to lie to people about it for long

you're just not some of the other stuff i wanted to make sure that we hit today this was this this this daniel penny case because i have some of this with some law and order stuff that i wanted to make sure that i get into because this is again uh and i'm going to get into the latest with the missouri case as well. But this case with Daniel Penny, as you know, he got a trial date and pulling up the, there's a piece that I have up on Substack if you get the newsletter. I sent that to you because I was

aggravated at what ABC, how ABC presented this. So his trial is going to be this fall, right? And it says, it gets in there, says Daniel Penny, the former Marine who choked a homeless man to death last May on a New York subway car is going to stand trial beginning

October 8th. Now, that's ABC's. characterization of Daniel Penny's upcoming trial. And I've written about this case frequently. They don't even mention Jordan Neely. They make sure to mention Daniel Penny, though. Oh, he choked a man to death. He choked this innocent man to death. And he was charged for doing so, right? I mean, we talked about this right when this came out. Here's the issue. So Daniel Penny defended himself and other subway passengers against Jordan Neely, who, is a violent offender, and he was lunging and threatening other passengers. And there are numerous witness accounts that are evidence of this. And in fact, they've talked to the press. The New York

Post, the New York Times, both had interviews, both had soundbites from witnesses who said they actually thought they were going to die because Jordan Neely was threatening to kill them. He had a warrant out for his arrest, Jordan Neely did, related to his previous attack of an elderly woman in which he bashed her in the face, broke her nose, broke her orbital bone, and a bunch of other stuff. And he was trying, one report said he was trying to shove people onto the subway tracks. He was so violent and dangerous that there was a subreddit,

literally a subreddit, meaning when you go on Reddit, there was a whole thread that was warning subway passengers about Jordan Neely and how violent he was. He hadn't dressed up as Michael Jackson for a decade. The press was like, oh, he's Michael Jackson impersonator. He's just this innocent guy. He hadn't dressed up as Michael Jackson for a decade. But apparently the legacy press thinks that some violence is okay, right?

The media clearly thinks that Jordan Neely's life choices, which led to his situation and the warrant, somehow justify his violence against other people. Because if you're an innocent person, you're supposed to allow yourself to be murdered or attacked or raped or whatever so that you can make up for the media's perception of the criminal's disadvantageous position. That's what this is. The way that they talk about Jordan Neely, they act like, oh, he went through hard stuff in his life. Oh, he's poor. That's like one of the most sickening aspects of this story. It's this bigoted class warfare that the media promotes about people who go through hard times, right? like oh be it be it a financial issue be it a personal issue it's this whole idea of well of course you know people like jordan ely commit crimes i mean that's to be expected so you have to allow for it that whole mentality is so bigoted

i had a story where i talked about how in st louis there was a broad daylight somebody who was shot somebody else in broad daylight on camera and the soros back prosecutors dropped the charges this is a tacit endorsement of violence by people in the media and and and many on the left when they have no, they apparently think that innocent should have no recourse when it comes to being attacked, when it comes to defense. Heaven forbid, you might hurt the criminal. Apparently, the criminal's life is more valuable than the life of the innocent, so just take the attack. That is the bigoted class of warfare that the media is promoting by way of how they position and present this story. That's just one of many examples. It's our friends over at Patriot Mobile, the only Christian conservative cell phone service that is in existence. And Patriot Mobile wants to

save you money. And they also want to make sure that the money you spend on your cell phone bill isn't actually going against you every single time that you go to the ballot box. And so to that effect, they put momentum behind the things that you vote to protect. They also want to make sure that you have a plan tailored to whatever it is that you need. You are helping to maintain and create U.S.-based jobs additionally because they have all U.S.-based people, 100% U.S.-based customer service team, the whole crew is basically in Texas. And they have dependable, national wide coverage in all three major networks. Visit Patriotmobile.com slash Dana

or call 972 Patriot and use promo code Dana to get free activation. Make that switch today. Patriotmobil.com slash Dana 972 Patriot. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. So apparently there's a terrifying

threat of underpopulation as it's revealed how 75% of nations are facing baby busts by 2050 and the West will be left reliant on what they say are immigrants triggering, staggering, social change. I feel like this is something that the left pushes while they accuse the right of doing this. I mean, this isn't, it's worldwide, the idea of population overload has always been a myth. And it's really, I mean, pretty much like that in every single country. There's maybe several that are keeping up with their

birth rates, but there's no country that's like outpacing its birth rate. But they say that three and four countries face this threat of underpopulation by 2050. And they say that, you know, Britain and the United States, et cetera. And I just, you know, I just got like questions because of the way that this is being presented and the way it's pushed. Like they always talk about, the left always accuses people on the right of talking about whatever the great replacement theory. But yet when you hear them talk about the economy and while we need people to come in across the border, whether it's legally or illegally, like Jerry Nader talking about the jobs that they need people to do, is that know what they're talking about? Like, how is that

any different from what they're accusing? It's bizarre. I don't know. This is, I'm finally happy to see this actually take place. This has to do with our water supply. The Washington Examiner reported that the EPA has created a task force

to finally bolster U.S. water systems that could be vulnerable to cyber attacks, because apparently some cyber attacks have already hit some U.S. water systems, countries like China, Iran, they say it's crucial that state governments improve their cyber defenses and that this new initiative is expected to identify the most serious weaknesses in the country's water security.

Even minor adjustments and updates, they say, can help limit or prevent these attacks. Additionally, these applications are open for Antarctica's Penguin Office, an Office of Penguins. This is apparently an actual thing. the penguin office in Antarctica is hiring British residents, UK residents, and a charity manager really wants to go. They were talking about how this follow this woman's bid to try to get this position. It's the Antarctic Heritage Trust. And every year they have three positions on offer. They're only open to UK residents. And apparently one of them is a penguin post office. And they said that you have to be self-motivated, empathetic. And you really only get to shower

every couple of weeks. And that's pretty much it. So that's, you know, if you're in, interested in all that. And of course, being in Antarctica. And now Donald Trump may not pay bond. They may have to, now some Democrats are saying they could seize Trump towers to pay off that $435 million that Letitia James had set. Stay with us. We've got a lot more in store. Christians have a duty to boldly proclaim the gospel. Pastor Alan Jackson explains. We have this passive notion that I'm here as a missionary or I'm here as a whatever. I don't believe that. I think if you sit in the middle of ungodliness and you add your affirmation to it, Whether you do it in a church or a church board or any other place of authority,

you will pay the consequence for the ungodliness and the wickedness that you have refused to address. Subscribe to Culture and Christianity and Alan Jackson podcast on your favorite podcast app. Elevate your commute, workouts, or downtime with the Dana Show podcast. Unleash the power of knowledge at your fingertips by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. I stand before you a heartbroken man. Part of my purpose has been taken. God gave me a beautiful daughter to father, protect, provide for, and nurture. A man with an evil heart stole her life.

He was in this country and in this state illegally. My vision for every senator in this chamber is that you protect citizens from this illegal invasion. Please recognize over a million illegal aliens are in this state and making families nervous. Please recognize Athens Clark is a sanctuary city and this policy and the lack of action led to the murder of my daughter. There are a few of you in this chamber that are standing up and working on a solution to protect us. For that, my family is thankful. Lakin is thankful. Governor Kemp, please declare an invasion to detain and deport criminal illegals so we can prevent future families from those tragedies. That's Lake and Riley's father who's asking for the Georgia governor to declare this to be an invasion.

His daughter was just brutally murdered by an individual who entered the country illegally and had already was a violent offender and kept being a violent offender. It's shocking how just magically crossing the Rio doesn't change that. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash here with you at the bottom of this second hour. It's heartbreaking. I mean, and he's there are so many families that have this. these stories. And for all of the talk from Democrats, you know, the people who are most affected are, you know, Hispanic Americans. The people who are most affected are the people that Democrats

oddly want to pretend don't exist. You know, people who come and become Americans and they go through the whole process, et cetera. I mean, it's just a, I think it's one of the reasons why they are really performing poorly, polling-wise, in so many states. I would was just reading this piece where CNN had even been measuring, for instance, the approval rating for Biden from Hispanics. And it's apparently the worst that CNN's ever measured. And that's just one measure of this. And that's how Democrats see everything. They're struggling. They can't. It's not just, it's because people who are, you know, Latino and Hispanic communities, they are the most affected by the illegal activity at the border. I mean, they are, they're

targeted. I've heard so many stories of border families and then people who, you know, come into the United States and they still, and they're still, they're, they're the most affected demo. And this administration, they see this administration is making it all the worse. It's just horrible. I feel so bad for the Riley family, because this was preventable if we respected who was coming into our country and we respected our borders. And if we respected our sovereignty, we, we respected, you know, the law and order that we claim that we want and we claim to uphold. And there was, she, she is a sacrifice at the alter, alter political correctness as it pertains to the border.

And people see this. And there's, there are Hispanic families that have these stories. And there was a family that was in Houston that was targeted. Illegal immigrants ended up murdering a member of their family. And, and what, what do you think that that, what signal does that send about the American dream to people who want to come to the United States? And then they come to the United States. And my gosh, they're unprecedented.

They are as unprotected here from some of these criminal elements that are targeting them after they come across the border as they are in their countries of origin. What are you selling people with the American dream? Because Law & Order is part of that. Speaking of Law & Order, there's an update on this Missouri teen. So they said that the girl, her name Kaylee Gain, who was pictured in a video, the 16-year-old, who had, she was attacked by this girl who was bashing her head. into the pavement even well after Kaylee Gain had passed out and you could see she was not resisting her arms

were just sort of flapping and this girl continued to attack her even really well seen that she was out of it and not even responding anymore Kaylee Gain is in the hospital she has a skull fracture she had brain bleeding all of this stuff and the family of the girl charged with violently assaulting her I think it's we talked to the Attorney General Andrew Bailey about this last week

I think it's attempted murder personally. He thinks that, I mean, he's of a similar thought. But, and she's still in a life-threatening condition, Kaylee Gaines, a 16-year-old who was attacked. So the family of the attacker, who was charged, they said, no, she was just defending herself during this fight. And her aunt said, no, she's an honor roll student at Hazelwood East, and she was defending herself.

That's a really weird thing to say, especially when there are numerous reports of kids and families from this school who were made aware of this attacker, apparently bragging about how she was going to beat this girl up after school. Apparently she was telling everybody she's going to beat this girl up after school. But so the family, and you want to know why the girl is, the attacker is the way she is? I don't know. Maybe it's because the family's running defense for her. I don't care what Kaylee Gayne did. I don't care if she was a, I don't care what this girl did.

These are children, by the way. They're 15 and 16 years old. They're children. I don't care if one girl was promiscuous and one wasn't, if both were, if one's an honor roll student. I don't care what it is. At one point, that girl stops fighting back and the attacker is, the attacker wouldn't defending herself. The attacker began attacking the moment she got the girl to the ground.

And then she kept doing it even after it was shown on video that gang could not even fight. back. She was just out of it. She couldn't defend herself. Her arms were limp. And the girl had her in a full mount, grabbed her head with both hands and just slammed it like you're trying to crack a coconut on the concrete. Slammed her head into the ground repeatedly over and over and over and over and over again. I think she would have kept going until someone pushed her off. Juan's showing some of the video. We're not showing the whole thing because right after another girl knocks the attack. her off, Gayne, Kaylee Gayne is on the ground. She's twitching and convulsing. And it's really hard to watch. So we're not going to show that part because she's, she's, her arm contorts up into a

very odd posture and she starts twitching and contorting. And it's like I said, very difficult to watch. But at that point, you know, you know that this girl's not fighting back and you're just, you're just doing it at that point. That's, that's not defense. That's like, think about it in terms of fire-in-law for a moment. If someone trespasses, say someone kicks the door down, breaks into your home and you defend yourself and your family and you open fire. The moment that person turns and flees, if you pursue, you become the antagonist in the eyes of the law. I know, it's wild. But that's the moment they turn and flee, you, and if you pursue, you are the antagonist in the eyes of the law. I've taken, I don't know how many defensive courts.

that includes sitting in a classroom and listening to, you know, Second Amendment attorneys and self-defense attorneys talk. You become the aggressor in that situation. And the, you will, you will essentially do yourself in. It won't become a self-defense issue anymore. It will become you pursued this person. And because there was a story of a guy who, he had a knock on his door. And I think it was a young male, a young man who knocked on the guy's door. The guy answered with a shotgun. And, and, you know, he had a knock on the guy's door. And he had a knock on, he had a shotgun and the guy had the the the young man had the wrong house he wasn't there to do anything malicious for whatever reason the the the man who opened the door was making the argument that he was

fearing for his own safety and his life his life the life of his family and he chased the younger guy off but pursued the younger guy and ended up shooting him in the back that guy went i think he got convicted uh i i can't remember it was manslaughter i can't remember what the charge was but that dude ended up being convicted you you can't the moment you you are in the position of power and the other person is no longer presenting that aggressive threat, that's not self-defense anymore. This chick was not defending herself when she was in full amount. She was attacking this chick.

And so the family is saying, no, we want the judge to have compassion. I'm trying to figure out compassion for what. Where was the compassion for the girl who's never going to be the same again? Never going to be the same again, ever. And so the family said, no, she's an honor roll student. She was harassed and bullied. honor roll students who were jerks. What does that have to do with anything?

And they said that the family's been defending her and saying that basically like she had the right to do this. They said, no, no, no. She was defending herself from harassment and bullying. And then there was a claim that was made that Kaylee Gain, who literally is much smaller, by the way. And the way that that girl threw her first punch. And Kaylee Gain in the video,

it looks like she threw the first punch. But that doesn't mean. matter, you don't bash somebody's head on the pavement when they're already out. And that's at that point, you shouldn't need to do a step-by-step, Zeprooter level explanation of why that's indefensible. That's just stupid. You're either, you either get it or you're a moron. At that point, it's not self-defense. I don't care. What happened before then? I don't care. I don't care. At that point, that girl was the attacker, and she has to pay the piper for it. The second thing is that all these adults and even the school officials, I don't care that this wasn't on school grounds.

This was fostered by the school's policies. This school apparently is notorious for fights and bullying and harassment and all kinds of stuff, meaning that this school run by adults, grown people, cannot properly keep their students in check. The family of gain apparently, their parents, I read another piece, where it was reported that their parents had even contacted the school prior to this attack, saying that this girl had been talking about how she was going to beat up gain, etc. And the school didn't do anything. I don't care who started as the aggressor again.

At some point, the school has culpability and all these parents have culpability as well. Because that's just inexcusable. I mean, this girl was in a, thank heavens, there was another girl there. I don't know whose side that girl was on. She just bumrushed the attacker and knocked her off Gain because I think she, I mean, she realized this girl's going to die. And I guarantee you, if she hadn't been stopped, that attacker would have killed that girl. That girl was just about dead already. That attacker would have killed her right there in the street.

Right there in the street. And I'm watching this and it looked to me like the girl who attacked Gain could fight. She knew how to fight. It looked like she had been in some dust. ups before. Gain looked like she had never been in a fight before in our life. I mean, there's just certain things that you know and certain things that you don't. And that girl who was the attacker looked like she had been in some fights before. The video doesn't lie. To me, I don't think that this is, unless I see evidence that this is a racial, racially motivated

thing. I don't think it's a racially motivated thing. And especially, you know, in St. Louis, there are certain school districts. Kane went to one. He was in a school district. where he was actually, he was, he's, you know, I guess you could call him a white Hispanic. He was the minority in his school. And it's, it's not as, especially, it's not as played up all in some districts, in some parts of the country as it is played up in California, New York, and elsewhere. I don't, unless I see evidence that it was a racial, it was a racially motivated thing. I don't think it was. I think this was kids that, that are high on their own farts. And I think that they were undisciplined and that the school, all the adults that were around them all let

them down. Nobody had police this. Apparently they had a long-running beef that was well known to both adults and kids and nobody did anything and they allowed it to get to this point. That's inexcusable. Absolutely inexcusable. It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida man. So a man from Coral Springs faces charges of threatening a public servant following his demand for Coral Springs police officers to meet him in the station's parking lot, where he loudly serenaded them with NWA song, Blank the Police. Yeah, that Coral Springs police, they responded to a call from dispatch. It said the man, Darrell Medlock of Margate, was telling officers, meet him outside.

How about that? And playing, blank the police. According to the report, they were there. They arrived in the lot, and Medlock was positioned inside of his vehicle. and he was playing the very, the very, serenating them with that very loud track. And they said his car was also, to add insult to injury, his car was illegally parked in a handicapped spot. They said he was aggressive and he charged at one officer yelling M. F. And the officer drew Taser in self-defense.

Another officer intervened quickly. They detained him before he could reach the officer and put him in Broward County Jail. Well, that is one way to get yourself arrested. This woman cannot stop starting fires. It is, this is Fort Myers. police arrested this naked woman because she set a fire at a church and then she was at a church after they detained her naked sitting a fire in a church. She somehow managed to set off another small fire in the car's door panel. That's where it gets interesting because she had been searched.

I know you were thinking that. Yes, they had searched her. Remember, she's a nude woman. Okay. In fact, there's an officer that it looks like they put a bulletproof. vest over her. She was naked. Remember when they got her from the church, sent in the fires. They have her in the back of the patrol vehicle. And she had been searched, but police say that she may have hidden a lighter somewhere that officers would not find it. So you can go ahead and use your

imagination as to where that would be, you know, for the naked Florida woman. Just, you know, just saying. I mentioned this, but we didn't get a lot of time with it yesterday. This man, can you you imagine, like, you're doing, you know, it's about that time. You know, you're doing your gardening, you're getting your garden ready for spring. And then imagine that, well, that you find toes sticking out of the ground or what you think look like toes sticking out of the ground. And that's, you know, apparently what happened with this Florida man. I'm trying to pull this story up and it's not wanting to pull up because everything sucks.

The guy made the discovery while renovating his home, getting his garden ready. He's a Florida guy. And he says that he saw these like black objects all lined up. sticking out of the ground. He told News 4 Jax this. And he goes, and then I realized they were toes sticking out of the ground. So he called 911. They, the police arrived.

They haven't yet confirmed whose remains it was. But they, that's it. Jacksonville County. That's it. They said that they were two feet sticking up out of the ground. They dug up the body. They went to Duval County Medical Examiner's Office. Forensic was looking at the area, trying to get some, you know, figure out,

what had happened. They still actually haven't figured out who it is or, you know, cause of death or anything, but good heavens. Police set are seeking a man who urinated on and then set fire to a South Florida car wash. And I think that they're using AI to write their headlines because they spelled, this is how it's spelled. This is police seeking S-E-E-A-K-I-N-G, a man who, W-H-O-E-E, urinated, he didn't even spell that right, on, set fire to South Florida car wash. They're totally using AI to write this headline.

This guy, this was in Florida City, Florida. They are looking for him, $5,000 a war in Miami Day crime stoppers. He fled the scene on foot, so they're still, that's why they weren't able to catch him. Stay with us. We got another hour on the way. I agree with you. Under current law,

some of the wealthiest Americans pay very little tax because they receive their income as capital gains, and those capital gains aren't taxed until realized and may escape income taxation entirely at death. So the president's budget would impose a minimum tax of 25% on total income inclusive of unrealized capital gains. That is absolute straight up communism. them. Holy cow. Unrealized gains. Taxing money that hasn't actually turned into money yet. Taxing money

you don't have that you haven't made yet. Asinine. Taxation is theft. Just, we threw tea in the harbor for less, folks. Welcome back to the program on top of this third hour. Dana Lash with you. Yeah, this budget, by the way, what she's calling, what she's explaining here in that soundbite, Janet Yellen, is, well, it's a $1.2 trillion budget bill. And interestingly enough, in this bill, it's bad. I mean, there's, it's just bad policy. It's bad. It's just bad. It's bad policy. There's spending money on things like not really for, you know,

really, there's not really a lot of border enforcement. I mean, you're looking at the spending. The caps on spending is just obliterated. This is the second half of this omnibus, by the way. that is, it was released. And your funding FBI headquarters, it gives money to the World Health Organization. There's earmarks in this for, like, Planned Parenthood and stuff. They just, what is it, 8,000 pages.

It's out last night. And they're supposed to start initial votes for it today. I mean, in this bill, there is apparently a $400,000 earmark for an organization that gives 13-year-olds binding and tucking clothing without parental permission. That's a real thing that's included in this bill. This is so-called other half of the omnibus. I'm looking at some of this. Yeah, Department of Health and Human Services.

Yeah, the tucking stuff. That's, oh, my gosh. Yeah, there's a lot of walkery in here. This is not a good, this is not a good bill. And it lists one of the, called Briar Patch is one of the groups in Breyer Patch. literally says that their mission is to, you know, teens like us program. And, you know, if you're looking for things of that nature, you're looking for clothing to help facilitate, you know, transition, all this other stuff, then that's what, apparently what they do. That's part of what they do.

This is just wild to see where some of this money is going. And with, I mean, you're looking also, it's raising, I mean, it's just as bad. I mean, it's just blowing apart any kind of austerity related to the budget, which we should have. I mean, this was, this was bad. And they also, they also in this bill, and Chip Roy noted this, House Republicans prohibited the Treasury from creating a central bank digital currency. that provision he says was not included in this. Hmm. It's bad.

I mean, we're looking at this is 500 million. This is for Operation Maintenance Defense. This for Government of Jordan, support armed services of Jordan to enhance security along Jordan's borders. We're literally paying to help. And this is actually, this was Section 8126. we're literally giving money to Jordan for Jordan's borders. We're not spending anything on our borders. We're increasing the beds at the processing centers,

and we're going to be adding more staffers to probably process people because there's nothing in there for the force multiplier of a physical wall. There's also nothing in there as well for any kind of actual enforcement. There's no, I said this first hour. I don't care how much money they pretend that they're going to give to the border, even if it's a pittance in this. I don't care how much money they want to pretend that they're going to give. It's meaningless when you are barred from deportation.

It is meaningless when you're barred from even detaining for, you know, past X amount of hours. At that point, all you're doing is spending money on faster facilitation of illegal entrance through these processing centers. That's literally all you're spending money on. You're not spending money on any kind of deterrence, any kind of force multipliers. There's no money in this for a wall. There's no money in this at all whatsoever. with regard to deportation, none of it. None of it. So this is bad. It's just that it's not a good, it is just, it's not a good bill. This is bad. This is so bad. And like I said, they're still,

they've been reading it all morning. They've had to go through this. Lawmakers dead because it was dropped on them last night. What a mess. What a mess. Like, we've got to avert a shutdown. We have to, you know, we got to end this budget fight. A $1.2 trillion plan. They're going to keep kicking this down the road. I told you this fight was going to come up again because they passed the CRR last time. Just a mess, an absolute mess. So this is, yeah, this is, the Republicans should not be supporting this at all whatsoever.

It's just a disaster. They also have in here, goodness. Some of this other spending, yeah, divesting and policing. What does that sound like to you? Divesting in policing. What does that sound like? I mean, I know what it sounds like to me. What does it sound like to you?

It sounds like defunding the police. That's what it sounds like. It sounds like defunding the police. Huh. And this is what's in this budget. So there's nothing good in here. And I'm looking over some notes of it because I've been going through it when I can here. Yeah, no, it's not.

One of the other, they're being accused of wanting to raise the retirement agent cut Social Security as well. Social Security is a scam. And I think it's money forcibly, it's stolen from people. The government says it's going to take care of you with it. But that's not what it is. It's a giant Ponzi scheme. Social Security is, they've been saying that this is going to be insolvent, that the insolvency is coming up. They've been warning us about this for 20 years. It's what lawmakers, they protect it because they use it to pay for other stuff. And then they get money from the younger generations to fill that and give it to the older generations who paid in. It's your money. Government acts like it's theirs. They act like all your money is theirs. It's their. It's your money.

But they keep, it's not there. So it's a Ponzi scheme. They keep having to take from the next generation to make up for what they took from the other, the previous generation. And Republicans are terrified to talk about privatization of Social Security. I think everybody should get what they put into it. I think the government should refund. everybody's social security dollars.

Give them all back. Isn't it ass and I? They were able to give out checks for PPP when they, they shut down, under a Republican administration unless, they shut down the largest economy in the world and then they were able to give out checks to everyone. So you should be able to really give out, make sure that people are refunded the money that they paid in with Social Security. You had been able to get so much more had you left it with a bank instead of the government. But Republicans are afraid to say this because Democrats then accuse them of wanting to cut

Social Security, but they don't actually tell you anything else about it. They don't say anything else about it. It's just, it's, so this budget's bad. It's bad. No surprise. No surprise there. And they're probably, I don't know. I mean, it seems like Mike Johnson wants to pass it. He's done fighting. Mike Johnson is done fighting. And he's saying, you know, it's not the best thing, but, you know, we're happy with at least this much. There's not a lot in there to be happy about. I mean, you ought to listen to people like Chip Roy and Thomas Massey have been raging about this. And it's not just then. There are a lot of senators that are upset with this as well.

Some of the other things I want to make sure that we are hitting on with this. I want to make sure we touch on this stuff with this resolution that Anthony Blinken, through the UN submitted through the Security Council and pulling this up. Because they're demanding a ceasefire if, with a hostage release, which is never going to happen. So they said he submitted a draft to the U of a draft U.N. resolution calling for immediate ceasefire in Gaza. He's Secretary of State.

He announced they push for peace early this morning. And it submitted it this resolution to the UN Security Council, demanding immediate ceasefire linked to the release of hostages, which isn't going to happen because it's worked well for Hamas. Hamas is going to keep these hostages. It's worked. They have left. average. And the ceasefire proposal, it was presented to mediators, they would see the release of

Israeli hostages in exchange. This is what Hamas presented. They presented a Gaza ceasefire proposal. Theirs would release Israeli hostages in exchange for releasing the terrorists that they took, that were trying to kill Israelis and that are serving life sentences. So the people that were, that had violated previous ceasefires that are jailed, Hamas did. demands, you release the terrorists for the innocence, including babies, you know, so that they can go back out and do it all over again. I don't think that you can negotiate with Hamas. Hamas has to be wiped off the planet. Here's the thing. This is what everyone's very, this is why you have the left so nervous and why everybody walks on eggshells. There was new polling out. This is via Marina

Medven. New polling out from this month, March, it was done by Gazans, and they were surveying people living in Gaza and the West Bank. Both groups, so you have those who live in Gaza and those who live in the West Bank, both groups overwhelmingly supported the October 7th massacres and kidnappings. Even though it caused retaliation and defense in Gaza, 71% of people live in, they were in, they living in Gaza and 71% of those in the West Bank that support Amas, they support the massacre. And the survey says that the support for Hamas's decision to launch the October 7th offensive remains unchanged. The survey notes that a vast majority of the people, 71% compared to 72% in December of last

year say it was correct. And they said that the perception about the decision, there's only any drop there is, is in West Bank, but it's only by a few points. And in Gaza, it's by like one point more. And it was conducted by Gazans. I don't use the word Palestinian because it's a, just like I don't call a man, a woman because he tucks, I'm not going to also like make up an entirely, I'm not going to have my language forced and make believe that this entity has existed when there's nothing in antiquity that ever supports its existence. This kind of, this really complicates the whole, well, Gazans are not Hamas argument. Go back to when all of these, some of the few hostages that were freed, remember when they were saying that they were being kept in civilian homes? There was this idea that they were being kept in these like tunnels, these Hamas tunnels.

that was apparently just the path to where they were being kept. This is why Hamas cannot exist. It's why they can't exist. We have more on the way. We've got headlines coming up. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five.

So this is a headline I never thought I would see. This was in Houston. They're calling them the Little Rascals Trio. Three kids, ages 11, 12, and 16, were arrested because they robbed a Wells Fargo. They're looking for them. They don't know where these kids are. They say they're called the little rascals.

They have no idea where these kids are, but they robbed a Wells Fargo bank. And I mean, I don't really have any words. That's kind of wild. The FBI's Houston office said they were looking for them. They posted an image of them on X. They were all wearing hoodies inside the lobby. And a message left with the FBI said that they were seeking additional information,

but it wasn't immediately returned. That's privately it. They said that they're not releasing a lot of information about them because, you know, they're young. They're minors. And I just, 11, 12, and 16. An 11-year-old, a 12-year-old, a 16-year-old, robbing a bank.

This is the problem with youth today. What is happening with our teens? What's happening with our kids? This is just, I mean, every day we get these stories. A Montana man has used. used animal tissue and testicles to breed giant sheep for sale. I'm trying to pull this up. You'll have to forgive me because I'm having major technical difficulties right now

with all of my stuff. And they said that they're breeding giant sheep, blah, blah, blah. I'm not able to pull this up. I apologize. This is just, we're about having a major meltdown of equipment here in the studio. This story will go to this metal detectorist, stumbling on a 650-year-old artifact. It's kind of wild that we can even...

I'm not even able to actually pull this up either, Steve. I'm not able to pull this up. What we're going to do is we're going to go ahead and go to break right now because I'm literally about to have a meltdown with our whole system. So we're going to do that real quick. When we come back, we're going to reset everything. Apologies. Get that up in working order. But we have a lot more of the Dana show coming up here next.

Stick with us. Elevate your commute, workouts, or downtime with the day. Dana Show podcast. Unleash the power of knowledge at your fingertips by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm here as an athlete giving you my story and what I've seen in my view. On August 27th of 2020, you tweeted this quote, I'm going to quote, police are paid with taxpayer dollars. If they are not answerable to us, we can demand new service, and that's what this is. Abolish the police in favor of that new service, end quote. You think we ought to abolish the police, do you?

Again, not the topic I'm here to talk about today. I know, but you tweeted it. Do you think we ought to abolish the police? That's not what I'm here to talk about. Should we do that before or after we get rid of fossil fuels? I'm not going to address that. Yeah, you don't want to address it. Okay. Let me ask you about one more of your tweets. On August 26, 2020, you tweeted, there's a picture.

I'm not going to describe the picture, but you said, quote, your words, not mine. It's on your Twitter feed. Quote, this is what systemic racism looks like. The Los Angeles Police Department is literally policing only the Black Lives Matter side, end quote. What did you mean by that? skier. This is a skier. This is a climate change hearing. In fact, what is it called? It's the nature of climate costs. It's a hearing about the nature of climate costs. And that was Louisiana Senator John Kennedy who was questioning this cross-country Olympian skier, this Gus Schumacher

dude, about what he was posting on social media. Now, that might seem silly to you, but there's a reason why. First, welcome back. Dana Lash with you, bottom of this third. hour. The reason why he was asking about posts related to defunding the police and everything else is because this Schumacher dude was brought in to testify in this hearing, to advise the government essentially on climate. And Kennedy was pointing out, are you really a credible person to listen to? Because here's what you've said about defunding the police. least. Here's what you've said in the aftermath of the George Floyd death. Here's what you've said, you know, on all of these other issues. That all ties in to this guy's credibility. And he's there

because he's supposed to be a credible witness, right? He's supposed to be somebody credible to talk about the nature of climate costs. That's why he's there. When they bring these witnesses on, and as Kennedy noted, when they bring these witnesses up and these witnesses are trying to to advise members of Congress based on what they do and what they know, their credibility, it is important to know, well, what do you exactly believe? What is it that you believe? Because, like, he literally asked, he goes, you know, the war on drugs, he says, he noted that Schumacher had retweeted that the war on drugs was intentionally created to

incarcerate black people on Moss. That's what he had said on a couple of years ago on on X. And Kennedy goes, well, who intentionally created this? Schumacher's like, oh, I don't recall typing. I don't recall this. Or I'm not going to get into this. I mean, and Kennedy goes, well, even if it's a retweet, I mean, kind of indicating your support here, right? And Schumacher's like, well, yeah, maybe, but I'm not here for that. Yeah, but that's the thing, though. You are here because of who you are, and you've had no problem lending your name to all. of these other belief sets. How is this any less crazier than the other crazy crap that you've put your name to? That's what that's the whole point of him asking this question.

Good grief. Just because people have opinions sometimes doesn't mean that the world is entitled to entertain them. I wanted to touch on this story as well, this issue of this 82 year old woman. So it's not just planet fitness. Daily Wire had this story of an 82 year old woman who is demanding, she was asking for access to a local YMCA pool. She was banned from the facility after speaking out against a guy using the women's locker room. And her name is Julie Jamon. She's now being represented by the Center for American Liberty. Harmie Dylan is actually her attorney. And she was a member of the YMCA. And there was a man. She found, you know, a man in the woman's locker room.

And she was concerned about that. So she, you know, raised concern with the management. And she was promptly banned. She's been in this town of Port Townsend for, what, 40 years? And they said that she's regularly used the Mountain View swimming pool for recreational and therapeutic purposes. In 2022, the YMCA banned her because. she spoke out of expressing her concern about a man in the woman's locker room.

She went into change and shower. There were no signs warning people that the locker rooms were open to members of the opposite sex. In fact, she noted, and apparently they have like, you know, the photos there, I guess they're still there. The signs on the door indicated that they were sex segregated. And she said when she was in the shower, she heard a male voice inside the locker room. when she peaked out of the shower curtain to see who was there and it was a male and who was watching two little girls use the toilet. And she was so startled. She was trying to figure out what this could because the man apparently didn't look like he was with the girls and apparently

wasn't. And he was in a female swimsuit, which I'm sure you can see how well that went. And she asked him if he had a male copulatory organ and he responded. none of your business. And then a YMCA staff member, they said within seconds, entered the shower area and began berating the elderly woman. Her name is Rowan Deluna.

She was the YMCA staff member who entered the area and began berating her in front of other people in the locker room. And she was saying, you don't know that that person's transgender. And that person's an employee of the YMCA. And he can use whatever with his gender identity that he wants to.

And she called, you know, she told the elderly woman, she said that she was a discriminatory. And then right there, she banned her for life and told her she could no longer set foot inside the facility. And she said, you better leave her. We're going to call the police. And so Jamin told Deluna, okay, yes, please do, because I want to know why this individual is dealing with a four and six year old trying to use the toilet that are not as kids. and the YMCA called 911 because they're absolute just drama queens. And they demanded that the police escorted the elderly woman from the premises because the elderly woman, they said she was refusing to leave, none of which was true.

The elderly woman actually wanted the police to figure out why this man, a full-grown man, who looked like a man and had a male copulmonary. organ and everything was in a female swimsuit and watching little girls in the bathroom. She thought that she was witnessing a crime in progress. And they lied about her and said that she was belligerent and harassing people, which she wasn't. And so they, she went, she left the pool and she went right to the police station, which actually is right by the YMCA. And she filed, she was going to file a complaint with the man's actions towards the girls in the women's locker room, right? I mean, that's what anybody would do if they think they're seeing a crime.

And then when the police followed up, it wasn't to look at her complaint. It was to investigate YMCA's complaint. And that's when Jamin, the elderly woman, learned of the false accusations that YMCA, the staff had said about her to police. So she immediately contacted the CEO of the YMCA to report the incident. and she said, no, that was a transgender man. He's a member there. And he's a man who wants to be a woman.

And, you know, that's, you should have, she told Jamie, and you should have been aware of the locker room policy because there were pride flags hanging up. What does the pride flag have to do with the trans stuff? And they said they were standing by the man and that she was still banned. So they said later on, she went to the sidewalk outside the facility to voice her opinion. She protested, basically. and they

I mean they just like reigned like a waged a campaign of false accusations on this woman. And so now she's got this case. She's got this lawsuit and I hope she wins because this is insane. They had a small group of citizens that support the elderly woman. They had a

protest in a park near the YMCA. All of this stuff. This is just an, I mean this is the craziest story. I would have absolutely done the same thing. Absolutely done the same thing. And the, it amazes me that the police is, I mean, that you're talking about an 80 year old woman who is watching a younger, grown man, watch two girls, four and six years old. Use the restroom. Who wouldn't say, hey, you're in the women's locker room and you have a bean, you're franken beans and you're wearing a women swimsuit. That's a little weird.

who wouldn't have said anything. This is what I'm talking about, how dangerous this is. The piece that I wrote about the woman who was banned from Planet Fitness, women are told to ignore their instincts. They're told to ignore the inner voice that is there as to raise an alarm over anything that doesn't look right, anything that could compromise your safety or the safety of someone near you. Women have been told, we've been told for our entire lives to listen to that voice.

And now women are being proactively shamed. for it. They're being harassed for it. It is being weaponized and used against women. You are being socially conditioned to ignore warning signs, particularly women. That is the absolute opposite of female empowerment. There is a movement underway, and this is what trans activism does, to socially conditioned women to be more, to be really more unassuming when it comes to predatory behavior, to be more susceptible to predation. It is a social conditioning all about making women more susceptible to predation. That's, I can't think of, I mean, usually it's Occam's Razor. She's used this pool for 40 years. And so now, Hermit Dillon, she's going to be on with us next week, is saying

that this ban has to be reversed. The YMCA has to. to offer apology. The city has to offer apology. And it is amazing. The media, if this was in any other situation, the media would be all about rah-rah for this woman, and they're not because the media's garbage. Speaking of the media, have you seen them the weeping and gnashing of teeth as it relates to our discussion, my interview with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis just the other day? And he was saying that, well, you know, if these Haitian illegal entrants keep coming up, you know, maybe they'll go to Martha's Vineyard. And he was explaining the caveat for maritime law. If you interdict a vessel with all of these illegal entrance in the water, that's one thing you can repel it, you know, et cetera. But when people are on

land, that same law that the federal government is going back and forth like SB4 with Texas over and Arizona, that same law comes into effect. And so that's why he's like, well, then we'll just send him to Martha's Vineyard. Well, now you have Ariana Presley, who is livid over it. She's, you know, Boston. She's she's livid over there. There's a member of the squad. She's saying that making accusations that it's bigoted, et cetera. I thought that she liked, you know, people coming in from other countries. I thought that, you know, she supported sanctuary policies. Massachusetts isn't a sanctuary state per se, but they have a lot of sanctuary policies. I thought that she, you know, I thought that she welcomed all of that stuff. But I guess she's a bigot, right? Like all of these other faux sanctuary people,

they're actually bigots. They want everyone else to handle the work that. goes along with being a sanctuary city or sanctuary state and incur the cost. So they're apoplectic over this. The media has been, oh, can you believe Ron DeSinta said that he would send them to Martha's Vineyard? Why don't you talk about what Martha's Vineyard? You know, people who were celebrating sanctuary, why don't you talk about how they called the National Guard Day of? And within two days, had all of the people that were dropped off the last time sent out to like an army barracks or something. They immediately wanted to get rid of everyone. Because, see, it's easier to virtue signal with other people's resources. These people don't really believe the stuff that they say. They just want you to live

that way, but not them. And he kind of exposed that, not kind of. DeSantis exposed it. He's trying to make them honest with their sanctuary city policies. Follow Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast, because knowledge is your ultimate superpower. I spent more time with Xi Jinping, the leader of China than any other world leader has. And I was with him, trapped 17,000 miles when he was vice president and I was vice president before he became the leader and we're in the Tibetan plateau and he asked me he said can you define America for me I said I sure can one word and he looked at me I said possibilities possibilities so he made up a story about traveling and being in the Tibetan plateau with Xi Jinping and he made it up and they said that he made it up at the time even

Politifact said he made it up and he still repeats it. He keeps repeating the same weird fake story over and over again. I mean, this is they don't, I don't even think the press really calls him to account for that. But then heaven forbid, if you bring up the fact that he's untrustworthy because he keeps repeating false stories that have been that are just egregiously, there's just egregious lies like how his son, well, no, I lost him in Iraq. No, I lost him, you know, here or there. makes up stories about how his oldest son passed away. A million different stories about how, how, I think he said the last time what, Bo passed away, he was almost made it sound like, oh, yes, it was in combat, it wasn't in combat,

or it was, you know, another, was he, did he have an issue with an illegal immigrant? I mean, the way that Biden talks about this stuff, this is what happens when you use these things and you try to fit and modify them and use them as like some sort of shallow fake outreach. it's just so bad it's just so bad uh we're watching this uh the second part of this omnibus i'm going to be off uh i have it's a work trip it's not like a vacation trip it is a work trip i my friend uh i know we got my friend sergio and i know we have another a great friend of the show who's going to be filling in behind the mic for me tomorrow and monday i'm going to be back behind the mic on tuesday may have some stories to tell we'll see uh but uh i'll keep you updated it should be

very it'll be a very productive trip in the meantime today in stupidity because it's a long win Steve all right represent Algreen and not the fun Al Green but the weirder Al Green he tried to rewrite history but we're all gonna have I'm sure Dana has a little bit to share about the history lesson here so cut five one I wanted to just remind him of something that I'm sure he's acutely aware of and that is that 14th of May 1948 Israel declared itself a state and And President Truman, who was the president of the United States at that time, was the first major world power of country to recognize Israel as such. And that has created an imbalance.

I'm hoping that we will understand that at that time, the Palestinians did not consent to Israel becoming a state. In fact, they were female-ly opposed. I don't think that their consent wasn't required, Al Green. You shame the name of the better man because they didn't exist. and Israel is simply affirming its statehood. I mean, history is important. Maybe you should pick up a book, one that is not like history core,

like progressive history. Folks, that does it for us today. Sign up for the newsletter, Substack, Chapter 1st. I'll be back with you tomorrow. Have a great weekend. Or actually Tuesday. Back with you Tuesday.