The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Transcript Tinkering & Swing State Showdowns: Biden, Kamala, & Early Voting Shifts

Episode Date: November 1, 2024

The White House forces their nonpartisan stenographers to edit the transcript of Biden calling Trump supporters “garbage”. The October jobs report says the US added an abysmal 12,000 jobs. Early voting in swing states give an edge to Kamala Harris. The left freaks out after Trump makes a harsh comment about Liz Cheney being a war hawk. Did Kamala Harris tell Mark Cuban to stop speaking on behalf of the campaign? Kamala’s final campaign ad in Pennsylvania features Josh Shapiro and not Tim Walz. Democrat Senator Bob Casey distances himself from Kamala Harris to win reelection. Dana explains how the 2020 US Census gives Democrats an unfair advantage in the Electoral College in its population representation. What states does Trump have the best chance of flipping to be able to win the election?Please visit our great sponsors:Black Rifle Coffeehttps://blackriflecoffee.com/danaUse code DANA to save 20% on your next order.  Byrnahttps://byrna.com/danaVisit today for 10% off and get the protection you need.  Hillsdalehttps://danaforhillsdale.comClaim your free pocket Constitution today at DanaForHillsdale.comKelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comInnovation. Performance. Keltec. Learn more at KelTecWeapons.com today.Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/danaGet a free month of service with code Dana.PreBornhttps://preborn.com/danaHelp a woman meet her baby for the first time by donating to PreBorn!  To donate securely dial #250 and say keyword BABY or visit Preborn.com/DANA. ReadyWise https://readywise.comUse promo code Dana20 to save 20% on any regularly priced item.Relief Factorhttps://relieffactor.comDon’t mask pain, fight it naturally with Relief Factor.  Visit online or call 1-800-4-RELIEF today!Tax Network USAhttps://TNUSA.com/DANADon’t let the IRS control your life—empower yourself with Tax Network USA. Visit TNUSA.com/DANA

Good morning. And we have a story about White House stenographers. First time this whole cycle. The White House stenographers come with the House. They are not political. Some of them have been there since Trump and will be there after Biden. And they are now as mad as you will ever hear a stenographer on the record that White House officials working for President Biden tried to change the meaning of their transcript. So it sounded like the president on that Zoom with Voto Latino was just criticizing a comedian. instead of all Trump supporters. So now we've got a supervisor from the stenographer's office who is saying, our stenography office transcript released to our distro, which includes the national.

So what does a mad stenographer look like? Because, I mean, if you hear, you know, you hear the word stenographer, it almost sounds like a dinosaur. I'm just like wondering what a mad stenographer looks like. What is that like? I mean, what is? And how do you, I mean, there's like the most innocuous people in the world to make angry. But that's where we're now where we're making stenographers mad.

That's where at that level of this election. And that has to do, if you remember, just a recap, the remarks that Biden gave, literally what Kamala Harris is on stage is, I can't get over that. The remarks that Biden gave when Harris was on stage at her rally and he went off and had said that it was Trump supporters that were garbage and they were trying to rewrite it. And as we've talked about ad nauseum on the show, it didn't make sense. It didn't make sense because it, I mean, you're, you're talking about one reporter and or one supporter and it was like a possessive. And I, I don't, I didn't quite understand that. And we talked about that and, and it just didn't make any sense.

because, you know, why it didn't make any sense, because he was talking about all supporters. And so the White House, in a really rare thing, they edited the transcript. They edited the transcript to make it seem like, oh, no, no, everything that we were saying, this is what he said the whole time. And when they edited the transcript, this is why the stenographers are mad, because everybody knows it's the White House stenographers that did it. And, you know, these people take their jobs very seriously because they're recording history. And you are, I mean, what they did in effect is they, well, not in effect, I mean, what really what they did is they completely compromised the integrity of those stenographers by claiming that, oh, no, it's, yeah, it's a, we just, this is really what he said. He didn't really say the other stuff. And that's, that's really bad.

And it completely compromised all of their integrity. And that's why they're so upset because they've had these jobs. Some of them have been there longer than Trump, honestly. I think there was one that had been there since like the W era, I believe. So they take their job seriously and they've been through a lot of presidents. And so it completely compromises their integrity. by doing this. And that's why they released,

I've never seen White House stenographers released this statement before. Have you? Kane? I don't think I have either. So dang, welcome to the program. That's how we're starting Friday. I mean, does it get any better for Biden Harris?

I don't think so. Welcome to the program. It's at the top of this first hour. It's Friday and we've got a lot of stuff to get, we're going to touch on a lot of things to get ready for next week, the election. And let me tell you, I'm going to walk you through everything as we get closer and closer. And the one place where you can get non-hysterical coverage where I'm not going to go with anything unvetted and I'm not going to sit here and blow smoke up your backside, like some of the

influencers out there who have to quietly revise what they say because they're chasing clicks. One of the reasons that we've been around as long as we have been is because we don't do that. we're consistent and our audience can trust that and there's no reason to change that now. So again, welcome Dana Lash here with you. You can listen obviously across the country and you can check out Channel 347 as well, DirecTV. We're getting some stuff planned so that every aspect is covered and whether you are, maybe you're at a friend's house and you're watching election night coverage or you're at home,

we're going to have a way for you to be able to get results, and completely unspunned results and know what's what as it happens. So that's one of the things that we're in the planning stages of doing. So this is how we're starting everything today. The stenographers are upset. But you know what? It serves the Biden administration right. It's insane that it, that this even had to happen. It's crazy that they even had to, you know, I mean, it's crazy that they even had to release this statement. I literally have never seen ever, like I said, them do this. And so this, the White House stenographers, and this is one of the top things that we had today.

The White House stenographers, they have this, this and the jobs numbers. So they said it was a breach of protocol, a major breach of protocol, and that this is something that we, it's never been, never been done before. very mad. It was a very terse statement. So this is the top, one of the top stories. Here's the other top story here. The jobs that were created, guys? Do you know that they were saying that they were expecting $112,000? And do you know how much there were created? 12,000. Can't correct me if I'm wrong on this. They're going to revise that down, right? So it's not even really 12. It's not even really 12, it's going to be a lot less than that, right? Historically, that's all we've seen is the numbers revised downward.

Wow. Because we all know how it works. The lie gets traveled around the world a couple times before the truth actually puts a shoes on, and everyone thinks that the original lie number is where we are economically, and we are not. So check this out. Only 12,000. Now, again, that's going to be revised down.

only 12,000 created, number one. The number of private sector jobs down by over 27,000. Manufacturing. And by the, and this, if you would have not, this would have been, I think, a lot lower had you not seen NGOs, like healthcare NGOs, like the non-government officials, like these third parties that

technically they're kind of governmental. They get government money and they come. kind of operate similarly to that of government, it would have been worse, but apparently manufacturing because they count these NGOs in, that was down 46,000. Now, they had revised August down by over 80,000, and September was revised down by 31. The labor force shrank by 220,000. This is a disaster. This close to the election. I mean, it's a disaster, anyway, but this close to the election, how do you can't fake this with people? This is really wild. And the revisions, good heavens.

I we're going to be at a negative with the with the revisions in we're going to be at a negative so again manufacturing took a hit and it would have been even lower and that's the one thing that I want to make sure that you understand it would have been lower and it wasn't because there's any kind of silver lining there there I mean I'm trying not to be like totally a bummer but it's not because there's any big silver lining there it's because it's the NGOs and government expansion that's really what it was it was government and third party NGOs that's the only reason that's the only reason that's the only reason And even then they had a loss. That's the only reason it was down.

And then it was only $46,000. So that's, you got to keep that in mind as well. This is so bad. It's really bad. And we've only added this many. It's, I mean, this being so close, like I said, to the election, these numbers. There's no way you can dance these numbers up. There's no way you can dance around it.

It's bad. So the unemployment has held pretty steady at over 4% now. And all of this is coming from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And it was the, these are the lowest, well, it's about the lowest addition, lowest, yeah, the lowest additions in four years, five years since Trump left office. It's the lowest, since Trump left office. total non-farm payroll was unchanged and the unemployment rate unchanged. So, and again, it all, the health care and government. And again, that health care sector, NGOs. I want to make, I just, I'm going to say that every single time because, and the reason why is I already see a lot of people on the left, a lot of Harris surrogates. They're trying to spend that and say, oh, look, well, it was a health care. This is a, this is really good. This is a really good signal.

It's not. It really isn't. And so that's the, that's the, that's the. is a reality of the situation. It's bad. So, and it's not, it doesn't have to do with Boeing and it doesn't have to do with the strikes on the ports either. That was another thing that the Biden Harris administration, they're trying to blame it on the strikes. And it didn't really even take a hit from Boeing, by the way, or the port. And even if, even if you, even if the strike never happened,

you would still have a fraction of the jobs required to maintain that same level in the United States. It would still be so below it. It's only a fraction of what it would require to maintain. It's still the lowest number in four years. So that people can do the math. They can see what that. It's just dumb. And by the way, when you go back, like I said, in September and in August, and you look at the previous. revisions, there was a six-figure revision in each of those. For August, it was revised down, like I said, by 81,000 from 159,000 to plus 78. And the change in September was revised down from 31. That was from plus 254,000 to 223. So it was August in September was 112,000 lower than it was previously reported. The civilian labor force dropped by over 224,000.

thousand. Again, all of this is coming from government. Any gain, government, and then the NGOs with healthcare. That's crazy. And when they try to compare it, and I think Kane brings up a good point and slack, when you, if you try to compare this with Trump, his administration, that's, you didn't, you didn't have, there was a pandemic and people were being forced to stay home. home. So, I mean, that was, you know, kind of one of the reasons why there's such a disparate, disparate comparison there. That's wild. So how does this affect Harris on Bidenomics? Notice she hasn't talked about binomics anymore. She didn't talk about it at all. That's why they've shifted so hard to identity politics because how do you touch on any of this? You can't. That's the

problem. You can't talk about any of this. I mean, there's more to it. than this. We're also going to get into some of the voting and the electoral stuff because in addition to, as we talked to Daniel Horowitz, the stagflation, now we're looking at voter integrity. And we're going to be looking. And then Harris released a sit down. It's an ad that they released in Pennsylvania. This is apparently their last ad by. And she did this ad with the governor of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro, right? they're sitting down together and Walses isn't even in the picture. He was just erased. This is pretty wild. We got this and a whole bunch of stuff to dive into as we get you set up for this Friday. As we move our partners over at Tax Network USA, they want to help you with the government theft agency because the government theft agency needs to send more money to Ukraine and they can't do that unless you give them more of your income that you earned that they had nothing to do with. This is where Tax Network USA comes in. Look, they share your views, right? But they also want to make sure that the IRS can't come at you. They've got 88,000 new agents now.

And Tax Network USA, they've gone toe to toe to with the IRS and they've won. They've helped taxpayers save over a billion dollars in tax debt. They filed over 10,000 tax returns. They specialize in helping people just like you. It doesn't matter if it's personal or business. If you owe $10,000 or $10 million, regardless, they got the tools and experience to handle anything. And if you're able to pay her on a fixed income, it doesn't matter. They provide tailored solutions to help you resolve your tax burdens effectively.

So don't wait, visit TNUSA.com slash Dana or call 1,800,958-1,000, get a free consultation. Their experts are going to walk you through just a few simple questions to see how much you can save. But act now because the IRS only gets more aggressive with time. That's TNUSA.com slash Dana, 1,800-958-1,000. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. So you guys remember TGI Fridays, right? they were made famous in office space the movie because well they were lampooned because their people

wear flair right they wear the buttons on the uniforms and all of that well apparently they are nearing bankruptcy filing they've been dealing with slowing sales and a deal to purchase the company fell through earlier this year so they may be on the way i legit have not eaten at a tgia friday's cane since oh my gosh it's been 15 years maybe 18 maybe 20 the last The only one I know was in South County. The TGA Friday's there by the Rionys Theater. Remember that? It's legit the only one I know that existed.

So that's kind of crazy. Let's see. People will feel sorry for robots that make pitiful noises. A researcher finds. Okay. This is not entirely... Look, all I know is that one of the saddest little stories I ever read was about that Mars rover that was like walking around and like taking pictures and it would

sing happy birthday to itself. and the last thing before its battery ran out, it was bleeding out a little happy birthday song to itself. It was legit one of the saddest stories I've ever read. I didn't say that my eyes got misty or anything, but it was sad. So they said that participants, they did the survey on people,

and it said participants would rather do a boring task than to hurt a robot that makes sad sounds. So if a robot makes sad sounds, according to this researcher, people feel really bad about it. And they said they're hesitant to mistreat them if they think that they can feel pain or they make little sad, pathetic noises. They have no problem shaking a silent robot,

they said, but as soon as the robot made a pitiful sound, they wanted to do something boring and not even bother with that at all. So they can pantomime human emotions to manipulate them. So that's going to happen. Our robot overlords are going to have, like, giant QPIs, and they're going to make a little sad noises.

That's what's going to happen while they're killing you. That's what's going to happen. They're going to totally play on your emotions. People, you know what? I don't think that works with people, though, if people do that. We got a whole bunch of stuff coming up, including some polling and swing state stuff. Stay with us. Black Rifle coffee has the absolute best beans, the best roasts, the best flavor profiles that are, that's out there. And it's so good and it's so affordable.

You're getting really good, the world's best coffee. And you're also, you're getting it at an affordable price because they understand that. This is a veteran owned, veteran founded, veteran run and active duty. They got some active duty there too, company. And everything that they do is a tribute to those who fought for our nation. Now, right now at black rifle coffee.com, they have their freedom roast, which is smooth, full of flavor. You can save 20% on the freedom roast with Kodana, only at Black Rifle Coffee. And when you subscribe to the coffee club, you get free shipping and automated orders. You pick the roast you want or roast, how often you want it, and it ships free shipping right to your doorstep. So you are always enjoying the

convenience of having your favorite coffee on hand without having to do a last minute run to the store to get coffee that morning. And again, they're dedicated to their mission of supporting veteran and first responder causes. This is premium coffee, whole bean, K cup, ready to drink, and you can also get apparel, cuttles, grinders, mugs, and more. So get your freedom on with the freedom roast from blackwifel coffee.com. And enjoy other top shelf roast as well, like the Just Black, the Silence are smooth, whatever you decide, you're going to get 20% off using code Dana, only at blackwifel coffee.com. The Dana Show podcast, your fast, funny, and informative news companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Welcome back to the program, Dana last year with you at the bottom of this hour. I got a few things. I'm pulling these up now because I've got just some of the swing state info to look at because some of the final polls, again, you're looking at an edge to trump, but some of the swing states, though, it's so close. It is so close. and one of the interesting things is that women, not by a lot, but by enough to change potentially the outcome of an election, women are showing up more than men. So in all of these swing states, so far, men are behind women when it comes to early voting. Now, there could be a number of things that that create that. But, however, it is very interesting. I don't think that Democrats trash talking voters is necessarily

going to help, but there are a number of things I think that go into this. But they've, women have always like historically broke for the left, which is kind of sad, but you know, the truth of it. But some of this looking at the top, there's some

of the toss-up states. There was a there's some states that are leaning down, that are being, well, not by everyone universally. That's why I haven't really gone out with it, but they're being reclassified as potentially being tossed up. So so far, the national average literally has them tied. The RCP, 48.4, 48.1, definitely within the margin of error, putting Trump up by 0.3.

Now, in the Senate and the House, this is also incredibly important. Battle for the Senate, the Republicans, as everything lays now, are projected to take the Senate. And they may keep the House. super close. Only a 0.9 lead nationally in the House compiling all of this together. Very, very, very, very close. I am very worried up with the House. The Senate less so. But we're looking at, you know, maybe rejected to take the Senate, maintaining the House. And the presidential race, super close. I don't want people to think that That's another reason I want to caution everybody about believing these polls.

Because again, and I'll say it, and I'll say it until elections over. Republicans have a habit, and this is proven by hard data, hard numbers, from different Secretary of State's offices from around the country. You can literally look at the moment and kind of see, and this is one of the things I noted back in 2016 as well. You can kind of see when the messaging comes out that Republicans are doing well, look, we're ahead, we're doing good. You can, you know, take, you can exhale, you can take a breath. And then you can see the moment where it's like, oh, the kind of early voting drops off.

And then some of these other areas that people thought, because of the polling was so strong, that you were going to get a greater turnout in these areas. Republican dominated typically. You projected a greater turnout than what you ended up getting on election day or what you ended up getting total throughout the election. Republicans are like, oh, you got it. We'll stay home. Don't do that.

you need to view it like i mean you you you need to view this as maybe your vote's the literal one that it will decide everything and get out and vote there's there should be no excuse we already we already went out and voted you voted too can't you did you wear the trash bag or no no i can remember what you said i thought about it because i thought about wearing the trash moving into a new place so one of the last things you have are the trash bags right before you know head to the other place so I was thinking about it, but I ultimately did not. I had a thought about this because I actually had a friend that asked me, today's the last day of early voting in Texas.

And I had a friend that actually asked me if I wear a trash bag to vote, is that going to be considered electioneering? Because you know you can't wear your MAGA hat. And it's not just that. You can't wear any pro-Biden stuff either. You couldn't wear a hat that had a Biden slogan on it. But MAGAs just make America great against. It's not saying anybody's name.

I can't wear gun stuff. stuff. And I've been there when I've seen someone who was told to cover up. They had a pro 2A thing. Like just a picture of a gun on a hat? No, it was like it, I think it was like, I think it actually said make 2A great again. But I think they said vote something on it. So a garbage bag doesn't have any words. I mean, I don't think it would, but it actually is interesting though. Because it's, I mean, think about it. You show up in a garbage bag. Is that considered?

And I told my friend I said, no, but just like, be ready to have a shirt on underneath just in case. Because don't do anything that's good. Don't give anybody any. They live in a really strong Republican area, so I seriously doubt there would be. And do you think that people would know immediately? Because honestly, some of the day's fat, some of today's fashion legit looks like garbage. So I'm just saying. Just saying. So the, looking at some of this, Minnesota and New Hampshire, New Hampshire was the one yesterday that R.

labeled as maybe becoming a toss-up. Minnesota and New Hampshire are toss-ups. I just want to point out the incredible coincidence of this. Because Minnesota is what? Tim Walz's state. New Hampshire is what? Joe Biden's state. Are you literally telling me that Democrats can't carry the state of the vice president

and the current president? Because OMG, for real, I'm going to be watching those two states just for the shot in Freud of it. I'm trying not to like get over my seat. skis, but I do think it would be hysterical to have that talking point and just beat them over the head with it for the next four years. I'm very, I look at petty stuff like that. How funny would that be? So not funny if we lose, though. So I'm just saying, can we talk about this thing where Liz Cheney's trying to make herself a victim? So he came out and he said something about Liz Cheney and the way she

votes and she's like war ink, which she is. And he had said that, well, we'll play his remark. I think we have his remark that we can play. And I don't need to tell you what he said. You can listen to what he said. This was, this was him last night at his event. He's been everywhere. I don't even know what state he's in. So this is what audio something about 18. Listen. But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical war hawk. Let's Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrel shooting at her, okay? Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.

You know, they're all walkhawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee, Will, let's send, uh, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. So everyone is acting like it was a threat against Liz Cheney, which is one of the most victims seeking things I've ever. I can't stand it when women do this. when women are like, oh, he didn't say actually something about me, but I have no other way to refute it. So I'm just going to say it's a threat. So he was he was talking about her vote and she is. I mean, she's very interventionist. That was considered one of the tenants of the compassionate conservatism,

which is a phrase. I have a huge thing I've been working on for quite some time about those. compassionate conservatism is a phrase that describes Bush light or Republican light, right? It's like a W. Bush thing. And this is also where I will say some of the newer Republicans are very bushy because they want government intervention and they want child tax credits and they want welfare and all this stuff. Like paying people to have kids, it's literally called welfare. And they try to model some of what they want after Viktor Orban in Hungary. That's like a literally like that's welfare. It's a lot of George W. Bush compassionate conservatism. This is the only thing where they do differ from that big government republicanism on is interventionism. And that's what he's talking about here. He's saying that, you know, if it were up to her, we would be involved in all these conflicts. And quite frankly, if you've ever listened to her speak about certain things, he's not incorrect. I mean, maybe people don't like the way that he said it. Honestly, I got to tell you, I really don't think that anybody else has any place to criticize.

the rhetoric he uses after everybody has spent all these people have spent eight years calling him a Nazi and calling him a fascist and a bigot and a sexist and a racist and leading to two its assassination attempts and then even joking about the assassination attempts and saying that the people didn't try hard enough. I mean, these were actual Democrats that were saying this. So I really don't think that these people have any place to criticize his rhetoric, particularly when he, whether they like it or not, was careful actually in what he said. You just heard what he said. This is the very fine people on both sides. They're trying to do this again. They're trying to redo it. And I particularly do not want to hear any bitching about nuance or rhetoric from people who have literally spent the past 48 hours trying to

argue with all of us about apostrophies. They're saying that there was an unspoken apostrophe that we're too stupid to hear, but that he, but, but don't, can't believe what, you, you believe us on what wasn't said, but also believe us on what was said, like that he didn't say that here. So she apparently responded with this news, I was reading this Newsweek piece. She apparently had responded to this and she was asked. And of course, you know, it's kind of more, I hate, by the way, I am so aggravated at, uh, I'm trying to get this piece up. What was her remark? Because I had it here and now everything froze. She responded to him and of course it's,

let me pull this up, I apologize, but I'm about to shoot my computer. And it's true. I'm so done with this stupid thing. She was saying that she was responding to it and saying that it was basically more of the same from Trump, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. I'll pull it up at some point.

Unless we, I don't think there's audio of it. She didn't say it with audio. So the, it is, they're trying to make something up out of nothing. essentially is what it is. They're trying to make something out of nothing. And it really is nothing. She didn't say this. This was not anything said. She goes, this is how dictators destroy free nations was her response. They threaten those who speak against them with death. That's not what he did. That's not what he did. She said, we cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant.

you know, I can only speak from personal experience on things, and I know other people have gone through, you know, other kind of stuff, especially if you're in the media, other conservatives have gone through things. But I remember being called a domestic terrorist by a sitting member of Congress, a Democrat. They said those words, Dana Lash is a domestic terrorist because of my support for the Second Amendment. And this wasn't long after Parkland, when I already had people who were trying to break into my house to kill me. And then you have a sitting elected official who said, as something like this. Liz Cheney never spoke out against that. A lot of these very critical Republicans were very silent. And it wasn't just me when they would bring up and then they would universally smear all gun owners as potential terrorists or potential problems

or potential domestic agitators. They were really careful with their phrasing after that. I noticed a lot of these very critical Republicans never spoke up for those people. I never spoke I never heard her say anything I was kind of left to be out there on my own and a lot of you were also

she never spoke up with that and that was like an actual there's no mincing of those words there's no explanation that is needed but with this she's really quick to speak up and mischaracterize it as a threat being criticized is not an attack

upon you being criticized for your interventionist policies and saying how would you like it is not a threat. It is a criticism. To characterize it as a threat betrays your stated strength of an empowered woman. And this idea that, oh, he's petty and he's threatening people who speak against him with death. That's actually not what he did. And it diminishes the real threats from very real. tyrants who do exist in this world.

Like the ones that they just seemingly can't find any strength to speak out against when it does happen then with the example that I just gave you personally. So I just, the problem is that what he said was accurate and it stung. And she has no way to counter it except to try to invert it and make herself the victim. It's a rhetorical trick that's a beginner one. you can easily see through it and it's incredibly lame and i just expected i guess a little better of someone who's been in politics that long whose family has been in politics that long and who has the last name that she has i just either refute it properly or just be silent because this does

you no favors if your approach to everyday aches and pains is to mask them you know feel better for a few hours or only have the pain return and then repeat the cycle all over again it's time to try Relief Factor. And the good news is that Relief Factor makes that easy. Their three-week quick start is just 1995, less than a dollar a day. Instead of masking pain, Relief Factor helps eliminate it. It's a unique formula of ingredients that helps support your body's response to inflammation. And Relief Factor was developed by doctors. It's 100% drug-free. And for so many people, the results are game-changing, even life-changing. Chris, my husband raves about Relief Factor. So whether you're a cyclist, a hiker, you know, an athlete from your college days or high school,

maybe you're just active now. Relief Factor supports inflammation, reduction, and joint health. Try it today. Visit Relieffactor.com or call 1-800-4 relief. That's 1-800-the-number, the number four relief. See in how just a few weeks or even days relief factor can reduce your pain and then you feel better and then life is just better. So don't mask pain. Fight it naturally with Relief Factor. Get the lowdown on the latest news with a side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Dana Show podcast on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. Hi, you guys. Hi, Avengers.

Hey, Scarlett. I'm going to be on the cold. Whoa, whoa, whoa. I think you mean assembling. That's pretty good. No, that was funny. Scarlett, it is our pleasure to come together and to get the vote out this election. Yeah, how can we be a service?

How about we start with what our voting plans are going to be, who are going to bring to the polls with us, that sort of thing. I think Kamala Harris needs a catchphrase. Oh, yes, definitely a catchphrase. How about this? I'm just up atop of my head. I can do this all day. Shut up.

I hate it. Okay. I mean, it's original, but... What about something punchier? Like, oh, boom! You looking for this? Iron Man, too. Everybody loved it.

Okay. Again, I think we're just trying to get out. the vote. Kamala forever. That's better. Okay, how about I'm down with democracy? It's just clean, it's simple. Okay, I like that. It's hard to argue with that. Kamala Harris, down with democracy. Oh, yeah. I'm Kamala Harris, and I say down with democracy. That's exactly how I interpret that. I don't know if that sounds the way we wanted to sound, though. I think we just need, can we get some production though? Jarvis. My name's not jealous, but whatever. Oh yeah. Oh yeah, that's right. Hmm. Down with democracy. Down with democracy. Is that what we mean,

No. Yeah, together we're going to tear down democracy. When you stop saying Iraq. Actually, I know they meant for this to be funny, but this literally is exactly, that was a major backfire, I think, for them. Oh my gosh. Seriously, down with democracy. Like, tear it down. They didn't, that was the full ad.

They didn't alter that. Oh, my gosh. I know what they were trying to do, but they missed a step. Right? That was so bad. Yeah, I'm okay with them doing that. Yeah, down with democracy. Down with it.

Down with the Republic. I mean, that's, you know, really, that was honest. Stick with us. Second hour on the way. Our partners, the folks over at ReadyWise. They're always ready, even if you're not. That's what I like about ReadyWise. Like, Ready Wise is just waiting there.

Waiting up in your pantry. Waiting up in your cabinets. You know, just waiting to get going. And if you need it, it's ready because it has a 25-year shelf life. Think about, like, the weather. Think about some of this other stuff that's been happening on lately. Yeah, you always want to make. sure that you are prepared to feed yourself and your family because in times of crisis,

you never want to have to worry about where your meals are coming from. So two things for you. They have the 20% off when you use Dana 20 at checkout. Then they also have the 72 hour food kit buy one, get one. So it's $100 in value, but you're getting it for $50. And that includes two boxes. They have 12 pouches of premium survival food. You have the drinks, the breakfast, everything. You're getting everything you need for your daily needs. Your calories. all your caloric intake, your protein, your carbs. It's like 20% of your daily carbs as well. So not only is it going to power you to get through whatever you need to get through, but you get comfort in a crisis and beyond. And it's a smart choice because this is all made,

all sourced in the U.S. packed in the U.S. you know the chain of command for your U.S. food. And you're supporting U.S. agriculture and jobs. 25-year shelf life, as I said, visit readywise.com. Use promo code Dana 20 at checkout 20% off your entire purchase. That's what it gets you. Readywise.com. Promal code Dana 20 for 20% off. day one what's your first executive action well my first priority which will be probably the package of bills is about bringing down the cost of living so it's about housing it's about child care it's about what we need to do to deal with grocery prices so that it's not one it's a package that is with one singular purpose bringing down the cost of living we have to go

hmm how is she going to first off she's there now so What's stopping her? I mean, it's not even day one if she were to win. It's not even day one. She's already there. So. Yeah. Like, why hasn't she started now?

Welcome back to the program. Acquiring Minds Want to Know. Dana Lash with you, top of this second hour. And I, yeah, why hasn't she begun it now? I'm really curious about that because she's there, Kane, in the white house. She's the vice president. She could do some things.

Is she withholding this magic policy solution and holding it over her voters' heads? Because that's pretty lame. It's like I have the cured all diseases here. Can't wait to use it after you vote for me. You know what I mean? It's like you're, it's pretty lame. I have no I have no other way to interpret that.

But she's there now. Secondly, how are you going to bring about the cost of living when everything that you want to do? And by you, I mean Biden, but you've appropriated it, is designed to literally increase the cost of living. So that also doesn't make any sense to me. All of these individuals talk like they've never had to do. take an econ class. They've never had any real world experience. They just, it's like toddlers. They just say whatever. I want to grow up and be a rainbow. Okay. I want to grow up and everybody's going to be happy and have free money and live in mansions. That's what's going to, yay. And everyone's

going to have ponies. That's what she's doing. She's that. It's toddler 2024. It's exactly what it is. Apparently, so, Kane, what were you telling me on break? Did she tell Mark Cuban to shut up. Yeah, I saw that there was a breaking report. Now, there was no link in a story tied to it, but that apparently Kamala Harris campaign told Mark Cuban to stop speaking on behalf of the Kamala Harris campaign. Oh, you know, because Mark Cuban was saying that there's no strong women around Trump and that women are stupid if they support him. Harris Faulkner asked him, audio somebody 11, she took a shiv to him. Listen to this. Look, I don't know where Mark Cuban is today, but as a woman, I have questions.

I want to know, are you big enough? Are you man enough to apologize and take responsibility for what you said? Well, you know, I mean, a lot of people have asked that. So it's, you know, no, he's not going to, because he doesn't think he's done anything wrong. But if the Harris campaign asked him to stop speak, it hurt, definitely hurt.

That's the whole point, that's what this campaign is doing. And I have a piece that's, that I'm working on about this. I was going to come out with the last night, but it'll be out later today. it's a piece that I'm working on about this, which gets into, they got mad at my friend Jesse Waters because Jesse Waters was joking about how his wife better not vote for Harris. That would be a betrayal.

Jesse has a persona. He's got a rat pack persona. That's the persona that he has on Fox. He plays his role. You know how like with WWE you got some dudes that are the baddies that go out there? Jesse has this persona. I've known Jesse for years. And he is a super nice dude.

He's joking and people are like, Nope. The left is situationally doesn't want to have humor. Like they'll hold up a severed trump head. Who's that female carrot top? Maybe it's carrot top. Transcarat top. Who's the transcarat top lady? And she held up the severed head. I know her name, but I'm pretending not to. Oh, kidding. Yeah. They were like, no, it's a joke. You guys are so sensitive. Oh my gosh. It's just a joke. Why are you guys so ignorant? If not, you're so not funny.

But then he makes a joke about this and everyone's like, all the maga men, They're going crazy. And then they use his joke. And he was just being facetious. They use that as a way to castigate all the dudes and say, oh, my gosh, all the, that was the headline. That was literally the headlines, numerous ones that were trending. Magamon are freaking out.

Well, I don't know anyone who slaps their wife or slaps their girlfriend in the line of a valet except for Democrats. So this doesn't track. Sorry. This doesn't really track for me. and it also presupposes the worst about the women that you're trying to get to vote for you. Isn't that just like the left? Well, the reason women, any women, if there's a woman that's not voting for me, it's because she's a beaten dog.

Because why? She's an unempowered, sad, pathetic, beaten dog. That's exactly what she is. And ladies, you know, if you're beaten dogs out there, you don't have to tell your husband's who you voted for. We played that ad yesterday. because they can't reconcile themselves to the truth that these chicks don't want her. There are some chicks out there like me that just don't want her. I don't think she's accomplished.

I think she's a social climber, a ladder climber. Everything that she has ever gotten, she's been appointed to. She's not legit entered a field outright. Everything from the beginning of her career to where she is now, she was appointed there. she didn't earn it outright. She doesn't come off as strong. She doesn't come off as being confident. And she sounds kooky.

She takes and makes the worst decisions because she's a horrific strategist. Case in point. This ad that she did. I wanted to play this. So this is Audio Soundbite 27. This is her final ad that is airing in Pennsylvania. And she did it with the Pennsylvania governor and the guy who, who was shortlisted to be her VP pick Josh Shapiro.

Now, my theory is that there are two reasons why they didn't pick Josh Shapiro over Tim Walls. They didn't pick Shapiro because, A, he's Jewish. And they don't want to get into an issue with Israel and Hamas and Dearbornistan. And then the second thing is that he makes her look like a Muppet. Watch this and tell me that you disagree. This is how do you have somebody 27? Election, it's bigger than us. It's about the future.

Do you want more chaos? Or like me, are you ready for some common sense? That's why I'm with Kamala. I've known her for two decades. She's practical and she gets stuff done. As president, I will chart a new way forward and find solutions to create jobs and bring down costs. I will fight for you and your family every day. Pennsylvania, let's not go back.

This is one of the dumbest moves I've ever seen. I'm glad they made it. Like, don't get me wrong. But it's one of the dumbest moves I've ever. seen Democrats do. They picked the fud,

the goofy goober that's out of Minnesota and they didn't pick Josh Shapiro. Because look how much he had much more energy and charisma than

she did, didn't he? I mean, you got that immediately in that ad and that adds 30 seconds. Well, where was Tim Walls? Isn't it weird that he wasn't there?

Didn't think it was weird? Do you think that they were trying to suggest to Pennsylvania voters that oh no here's my guy i mean it's weird that waltz wasn't in it right everybody knew that shepiro everybody thought actually he was going to be the VP it was there were tons of democrats insiders that thought it was a done deal where was walls at that's kind of weird but do you see now

why she can't have anybody that makes her look better it it enhances her ineptacy her incompetence so to have a goofy goobber like walls on the ticket Actually, they think that it makes her look better. What she could have done is she could have had Shapiro on the ticket with her. And then she could have defaulted to a more Eastwoodian, strong, silent type and played a role, right? And had him go out there. And then she could come out with some very, you know, with some stagecraft to look really well put together and really strong and really prepared. And she could have limited that and sent Shapiro out there to do a lot of the retail stuff.

if they were smart, but they're not because they're horrible strategists. They have no idea how to do any of this. But it looked weird that they were sitting there together and she just like kicked walls to the side. I thought that was fascinating. I mean, they're just not even trying to hide it anymore. They, they just erased him entirely. But they're sitting there. They're just sitting there and they were, you know, they were, they were talking and that's just fascinating. So I don't know. I just they really need they really need Pennsylvania and that was the other dumb thing he's Pennsylvanian they need Pennsylvania they have to have Pennsylvania they really messed up I think honestly if she ends up losing that's going to be a huge part of it it really will be a huge

part of it women are dominating in a lot of these early swing states one of the things that we told you and we got the new job numbers in we talked about that last hour they're all election shenanigans have already started Lorraine has a great piece up at Substack right now that gets into the ballot box bombs and the court cases and the fraudulent donations and all the fake, you know, registrations and all of that. The ballot box bombs specifically, they were designed to burn the ballots and not explode the boxes. And then they found a note in one of the boxes saying that the boxes are going to continue to burn until Gaza was freed. And bomb it again just out of spite. So they think it's a white dude between age 30 and 40 years old, short hair or bald.

thin to medium, build, thin phase, and a background in metal working and welding. I guess what? Because you have to put it back together? I don't know. I don't understand what. Okay. So the, I'm sure that they're going to find those real quick. That's interesting that because it could hurt Democrats and Republicans at the same time, right? Because they're, the Ghazan people, the people who are pro Hamas are very upset at Democrats because Democrats are too terrified to publicly state that they are as hardcore pro Hamas as they say privately they are. so it's a little interesting but it was in Vancouver, Washington, Portland, Oregon so yeah these are leftists that are doing this

completely but they're anti-Israel protesters and they said all drop boxes will burn free Gaza well maybe you shouldn't have a drop box for your stupid ballots. How dumb is that? Right? Again, getting into the whole like I'm just going to put my vote in this easy to mess with

Dropbox here don't but we're going to do the honor. I mean, can you imagine? I was looking at some of the pictures. It says official ballot drop box. Just on a straight corner. Uncompletely.

There's like a little camera in the corner, but they're still looking for the guy. So how much does that camera's helped? You know, there you go. Just wild. Then they had some, so this is what was going on in Bucks County, where they had this fight over the ballots and all of that in Bucks County. And then you had the R&C, which they sued and they rightfully. or they were they got reversed by the court and then they uh because you had people in bucks

county that were in line and they were being incorrectly told to go home and the rnc intervened and the rnc was right to have intervened and i'm glad that they did and you had these paid canvassers york county was looking into an abundance of these like paid canvassers and people spreading you know all this uh telling trying to manipulate people standing in line which to me that's electioneering that should be a felony offense for these people And then you had the Virginia case too where they were trying to clean up their voter rolls and they ended up winning on that.

So there's been some shenanigans happening. That's why turnout is so critical because not only do you have to get over the margin of error, you've got to get over the margin of theft. But is the theft limited to just election day and the election period? One of the things we're going to be talking about on this program coming up

is this major problem, and I've brought this up before, this huge problem with the census. And I retweeted my friend Daniel Horowitz. He and I, actually, we were at an event recently together and we were talking about this in person. And you kind of have to wonder, we're not saying that this is going to happen, but what if the census errors or gerrymandering and all of this, what if that's the fix? What if, I'm just saying, Like, for instance, Texas should have a couple more seats. Florida should have one. He noted Minnesota and Rhode Island each retained a seat that they should have lost.

And Colorado got an extra seat that they should not have gotten. So what if that's the fix? And it's been years in the making. No one's talking about that. But we will. We got a lot to hit. I always carry. I'm never going to tell somebody to not carry.

I have no problem using lethal force and protection of myself or somebody else. There are instances where you're barred from carrying. And I've given you, these aren't like anecdotal, you know, things. These are, I have friends who live in D.C. in New York. And my friend who lives in D.C., she's a female. She lives and works in D.C. has to per her job. And she, even though she's got one of the very difficult to get licensed to carry in D.C., she can't carry everywhere.

And, you know, sometimes she's leaving at work at 11 o'clock at night. And she doesn't want to be a statistic. So she went out and got the Burna SD, which is their bestselling model, the most popular one that they have. And the burner gun, it deters and stops threats from like, what, 50 feet away because it shoots these chemical irritant projectiles. And when you compare it to like a stun gun, you got what, maybe one or two shots with a stun gun? You got five rounds with the burn a SD. So it shoots these chemical irritant projectiles that can disable these threats. And you have an additional option for self-defense.

Now, at the website, they have different models. They have different projectiles, accessories. and you can get 10% off when you go through Burna.com slash Dana. And they don't care about Gunfrey's own signs, the Burna Sun. You can get it shipped right to your door. There's no waiting period.

There's no background check. It's legal in all 50 states. And this is great for when your options are limited and not by your choice. Burna.com slash Dana for 10% off. That's B.RNA.N.A.com slash Dana for 10% off. And now all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5.

So Liberty University is being sued by a former IT staffer because he's a dude who's pretending to be a woman. It's Liberty University. It's a Christian university. It's a private business. They can do what they want. And no amount of harassment by lawfare is going to make them do otherwise. So this dude who wants to be a chick is mad because he got fired by the evangelical Christian school, a private business. And they, I mean, obviously, I would imagine. that when you agree to work there, you know, usually you send contracts and things like that. They have an expectation of behavior and, you know, things like that. And so the dude who's named Eleanor Zinsky, he's working with the ACLU, and he's saying that it's

discriminatory of him, of them, to fire him. And he was only there. He applied for the IT job. And then four months after started transitioning. And he apparently, he did know. notify them of it and then requested that the school like depart from its doctrine and mission. That's what Liberty said, which I agree with. And so now they're like, oh, he's, you know, they fired, they fired the dude. And now the dude's like, oh, it's discriminated. They can do what

they want. It's a private business. You cannot force people to associate against their will. We have freedom of association. And sorry, but you knew this going into it. I think he purposely did this. Really did. A car crashed in a Billy Corrigan's tea store, at Madam Zuzu's. This was in Chicago. His son and his wife were in, or his son and his mother-in-law were in there at the time that it happened. I write about this over the weekend. It happened at like 12 p.m. And it was in Highland Park, Illinois. And a car legit crashed right in there. His son was okay. I think his mother-in-law had some injuries. And they showed the vehicle half inside and half outside of the store. And they said they're still investigating it. But they drove around the curb and

right up into the store. So thankfully, his son was not injured and was out of the way. Thankfully, good heavens. We have more on the way, including, interesting, this is interesting. Some Democrats are starting to disassociate from Harris and try to play up some Trump connections. Not kidding you. Stay with us. Hi, I'm Lillian, an English major at Hillsdale College. Here's Hillsdale President Dr. Larry Arne with a Constitution Minute. America's founders believed in a separation of church and state, in that the country was not to have an official religion or an official sect. But that did not mean that government was to be hostile to religion,

or even indifferent to religion, as many today argue. In fact, America's founding document the Declaration of Independence includes both a reference to God as the author of the laws of nature and a confident assertion that human beings are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. Far from being hostile or indifferent to religion, America's founders understood the theology of the Declaration to be an essential part of the education of citizens. To learn more and get a free pocket constitution, visit constitutionminut.com.

This Constitution Minute was furnished by Hillsdale College. Keep your finger on the pulse with a Dana Show podcast, delivering timely news with insightful analysis. Whenever you want, straight to you on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. I was reading this story and welcome back to the program, Dana Lash, with you. We have the chat at Rumble, 347 DirecTV for listening torestrily also everywhere around the country. I was reading the story about this dude who survived for 10 days lost in the California Mountains. And I really don't think that he got lost. Not all who wander are lost.

Some just want to get the hell away from you people. You know, if I wanted to add not you people, the drive-bys, if I wanted to add all the Tolkien's quote from Lord of the Rings, the what is it the riddle of strider the makes me I was like is there really didn't maybe he was just like I'm done and I'm just walking to the woods we're almost there collectively as a nation I think we're right there we're really close

so we've been talking about some of the election shenanigans I wanted to share this story with you too this is very interesting so Bob Casey who's a Democrat and he's in Pennsylvania You have Shapiro, Josh Shapiro, who did this final ad, and we play that for you with Kamala Harris. But the headline here from the Wall Street Journal, Bob Casey plays the Trump card. The Democrat from Pennsylvania finds himself in the fight of his political life. And they said that because he's going up against Dave McCormick.

So, you know, McCormick, obviously working with Trump is a Republican. So, you know, there's some crossover. But Casey, Bob Casey is also trying to jump on the coattails for Trump, even as Kamala Harris is doing these ads with Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania. I think this is incredibly telling that they're doing this because this is not the only Democrat that is doing this. This is what I tell you when I say, you can't just look at these national polls, okay? And some of the state polls, I think, don't tell the true story. Stuff like this tells you the true story. So he's, Bob Casey is a Democrat running for Senate and he thinks that distancing himself from Kamala Harris and trying to cozy up to Trump is the way that he's

going to stay alive. They're trying to do the Joe Manchin thing. Joe Manchin had to do that, though, because he's West Virginia. He had to do it. So you have four Democrat senators in four different states that have been actually citing Trump in their ads and trying to get close to them. That includes Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, Alyssa Slotkin in Michigan. Ah, wait, Dana, do you mean those states where Democrats are having some trouble, these blue wall battlegrounds? Well, yes, Dana, that's a exactly what I'm saying. I find that fascinating. So he's definitely, he's trying to, definitely trying to make this move and kind of get close to Trump like this. That's, and a lot of down-ballot Democrats in these tight races are doing the same thing. This is similar to what

happened with Barack Obama in 2012. When Barack Obama was running for, or when This is midterm election under Barack Obama. Or no, this is the general election, Barack Obama. Midterm election is when it started. So like in 2010, that's when they had the great shalacking. And that was part of the Tea Party. The Tea Party made that happen. The Tea Party took back the house during that time.

But in 2012, there were people, and these were actual stories. And it was funny because leftist entities like Daily Coast and all that were trying to hammer of these Democrats from disassociating themselves with with Obama. It's not that they went and they were trying to get like Romney or McCain or anything like that. They just, they just didn't want to do any events with Barack Obama. Claire McCaskill was one of them because he was a drag on down ballot races. He did not have coattails, his entirety of his two terms. He did not have any kind of pull until after he left the White House. And even then, it's arguable in how much pull he had. Bill Clinton had like double his pull. So I'm looking at that effect. She's so toxic that these down-ballot Democrats

in these very tight races don't want anything to do with her. So you have Casey, Casey's been there for three terms. He's an incumbent. So he runs an ad. He tries to say, yes, I agree with Trump on this. And, you know, on some of these policies that are maybe a little bit more practical and common sense. But then literally he will echo what the party bosses say and say that he's, he's a threat to democracy. It's like he has different ads running on the airwaves right now that say completely contradictory things. And again, he's not the only one doing this. Now, if Harris takes Pennsylvania, this is the race to watch. You need to watch Bob Casey's race in Pennsylvania. Actually, let's pull it up right now. You really need to watch his race because he has the,

he is the one that has the momentum. He's on the ballot, not Shapiro. Shapiro can help. but Casey is the one that has the momentum on the ballot, not the top of the ticket. And if she can hold it in Pennsylvania, it will be because he did. Because he did well and he performed as expected. Let's look in Pennsylvania right now. We're going to look at the Senate. Looking at the Senate in Pennsylvania. And, I mean, because they're close.

This is super fascinating to me that they're. I mean, it is something else. Casey is only up by, it's within the margin of error. He's only up barely, he's not even up by two and a half right now in Pennsylvania. It's not even two and a half. He has led the entire time, but not by a lot. And he's never led beyond the margin of error. There's only, there are only two poles.

And I think that the sample size for both of them was relatively small because the UMass Lowell poll that was done in early, early mid-October. that was only 800 likely voters. And in looking at, and that had KCF6. And then the other was a CBS News poll. And again, that only had 1,273 likely voters. Margin of error was 3.6. So that would take his plus six down quite significantly. And the other one that UMass poll, the margin of error was even higher.

That was 3.7. And so, I mean, they, that's it. Casey is only ahead. The last Rasmussen poll that was taken October 25th to October 28th has them tied. The USA Today Suffolk had him plus three. So the RCP average is 2.4. It's really tight there. So if she ends up taking that state, if she does well, it will be because of Casey.

And McCormick has rightfully been saying Casey's flip-flopping to as much as Harris is. You know, Casey's, you know, he's, which he is. I mean, he literally has two different contradictory ads running right now in Pennsylvania. And it's funny because Casey at the time back in 06, he was running against Rick Santorum. And Casey blasted Sanatorium because he said, you voted with W. Bush 98% of the time. But guess how much now he's voted with Biden? Casey is literally the exact same. He's voted with Biden 98% at the time. That's something McCormick has pointed out. So I just find it hysterical that Casey thinks the right response is to hug Donald Trump with us. And again, he's not the only one. So these are the races that you need to watch that are going to give you a better idea, I think, as to the health of the top of the ticket in these battleground states.

So you got to look not only at Pennsylvania, you got to look at Michigan and Wisconsin. Because, you know, like, let's look at Wisconsin. I mean, Harris is only up RCP average 0.3 right now. It's tough. It is tough right now. Only up point three. Very, very, very, very close. and in terms of the Senate with Baldwin versus Hoved, Baldwin is only up by one point in the RCP average.

And she has not led the whole time. They've kind of gone back and forth, both within the margin of error, but they've gone back and forth. And these are the top battlegrounds for the Senate, Arizona, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Wisconsin. in these are one of the things I'm going to do over the weekend is I'm going to put together an electoral map because I have a couple of different ways that I think this can go and I'll publish that I'll put that up in a separate piece it'll come out Monday I'm I'm always curious to see how correct I was I was pretty spot on by the way in 2020 just got to say but these are I mean west I mean these are this is wild but they all think that Biden's doing a horrific job

they all think the direction of the country is bad. So the toss-up, those are the toss-up states. Those are the states where it's really, really close, where it's really close. In Maryland and New Mexico, Leans Dem, Leans, GOP, Florida, Montana, and Nebraska. And you've got Scott in Florida. I'm not worried about the likely dim states,

New Jersey, Virginia, and Missouri, because Josh Hawley's been doing incredibly well. By the way, speaking of Josh Hawley, audio summit, one, he had a debate with Lucas Coontz, and I just witnessed a murder when I saw this video. Listen to this. It's a little bit of courage to share a stage with Lucas Coons after he

shot a reporter last week. I guess he wants to go out with a bang. Now as to the question of the economy. And then not only did he stick him with the shiv rhetorically, then he twisted it because he just buried him with policy. And Coombs

stood there on the stage looking completely dumbfounded. I mean and it was because the whole audience was that that was a murder that's what a murder looks like that was a wild he's holly is he's beating the the pants off of coons he's beating him to death rhetorically politically polling wise so i'm not even concerned about that race at all whatsoever holly's going to cruise he'll get reelected it's not even an issue but i do think it's funny because he provided a great

opportunity for us to illustrate how idiotic the anti-gun gun gun control democrats are because they are I mean, it's just, you know, crazy and crap. By the way, apparently they didn't even like call the police or do any kind of emergency or anything like that after. Like, more stuff keeps coming out about that whole failed campaign staging op. It was horrible. Now, looking at, so we're looking at Wisconsin. I want to look at Michigan real quick because that's where looking at the, that's where you got Slocken versus Rogers. And Slockeen's leading by 3.5.

Alyssa Slokin may turn it out. Again, it all comes down to how much of a drag will Harris Walls be on these tickets, on these down-ballot races. How much of a drag are they going to be? And yes, that is absolutely, it has absolutely happened before.

I tell you, I've been there, I've seen it. I have looked at raw data, numerous election, because it's been my job in doing some of this election analysis, whether it's not just for my program, but if I'm doing it for Fox and when I was a token conservative at CNN. And you can look and you can immediately, it's like looking at the matrix. You can immediately spot the trends when you get all this hard data. And I'm looking at it. And you can see where a lot of these close races previously, Obama would just tank them. Just tank them. That's Shalacking that they

took, the one midterm where they lost majority in the house. Oh my gosh. It's like the people that he campaign with lost harder. So they had like this unspoken rule after that where they didn't really do a lot of campaigning with Barack Obama after that because everybody was like, oh, yeah, he's kind of a drag. Harris is the same way. That's why you don't see her doing a lot of these events. Like when Trump gets out there, they'll bring up these, either the candidates or the incumbent that's running.

They bring them up on stage. Harris isn't doing that. Have you seen her do it? Who was it? Whitmer, but Whitmer's not running. Is it? Has she done an event with Slokin? No.

That's a battleground state. Don't you think that that would be, think of it? If it was helpful, don't you think Harrison Walsh would be doing an event with Slokin? Don't you think they would be doing an event with Bob Casey and Pennsylvania? Don't you think that they would have been up on stage? Don't you think that they would have been in Wisconsin or Michigan? They would have been with Baldwin in Wisconsin. Don't you think so?

Because she's a drag. Our partners that help bring you free radio. Kaltek, the P15. If you don't have the P15, you need to get it because this is like one of, it literally is the lightest. thinnest double stack 9mm on the market. This is ideal for concealed carry, especially for you ladies. I'm not excluding you guys because you guys may want something light and thin as well to carry, but for ladies, it's a lot harder for us to conceal. And so knowing that you have the stopping

power from 9mm, but that it's sleek, it's compact, that you have that extra ability for ultra concealability is amazing. And I have both the metal and the polymer version. But it is the lightest and then. It comes to two magazines. So you have a standard 15 round with minimal pinky extension, and then you have the standard 12 round that's flush fit and double and also double stack mag. That's for ultra concealability. Treating in fiber optic front site,

fully adjustable fiber optic two dot rear. Strike or fire? I mean, this is a great trigger. It's from the inventors of the micro compact pistol category. Innovation Performance, Keltec. Learn more about the Keltec-15 at Keltecweapons.com. That's KELTECWeapons.com. Tell them. Dana sent you.

It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida man. I just feel like if I got bit by a shark one time at a certain beach, I wouldn't go back to that beach. You know what I mean? Like I would maybe, I'd probably find somewhere, if I went back in, I'd probably find somewhere different.

Well, that's not what happened with Joe Fryer. So this dude, apparently, he got bitten twice by sharks on, at the exact same beach, like 11 years apart. He's a competitive surfer. And he got bitten again. And he had to go, I mean, look like he was pretty bad. He was okay when he was up and he was like, you know, talking to everybody, but he got bitten again. And the same time, like the same, it's a, this Florida, it's the NBC reporter, Joe Fryer.

This dude got, I mean, 11 years apart, bitten twice in the exact same beach. This was Treasure Coast News. And they, yes, I know shark by chances are very low. But the guy's name is Cole Toshman. and he when it bit him the second time he was using he's punching the shark's head and he had it was it mangled his hand so he got 12 stitches in a cast and he had to like get a tourniquet and all of that stuff but I'm just thinking like you know maybe I wouldn't like surfing looks really fun but at the same time I think that's the what if you're on the surfboard there's a big

giant shark and you just see it in the wave and I'm like oh my gosh right I would surf all the way to shore and up a mountain. That's what would happen. Just saying. It's just that kind of stuff makes me nervous. I don't know. We had the spit mask guy yesterday. This, I think we had, oh no, this is another guy with a machete. Is this a new machete one? Here we go. 18-year-old Caleb Williams was arrested. Why are they saying allegedly brandishing a machete? Because they have a photo of him literally brandishing the machete. He was brandishing a machete at an elderly woman during an altercation at an early voting site in Neptune Beach. He raised it over his head. He got into an altercation with the two women, one of whom was 71 years old. And he was taken into

custody, improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. So brandishing basically aggravated assault on a person age 65 years or older. He was with a group of six. They were there to, I don't know what site he was for, but apparently they were protesting and he was smiling and holding the machete aloft in the parking lot. You've got to be careful around polling sites because they will get you at a polling site. Like, they're literally people who just watch what everybody does and they watch where the boundaries are. We have our third hour on the way and we've got the latest with now the Liz Cheney victim. We've got a whole bunch of stuff. The transcript gate, ballot harvesting, the census and more.

Stick with us. Welcome back to the program, your lovable crumagine with you at the top of this third hour. Dana Lash. You can find us at Substack as well, chapter and verse, a lot of good stuff that happens over there. And you can also find us Rumble where the discussion happens, YouTube, Facebook, all that good stuff. Channel 347, Direct TV, the podcast, Absurd Truth, which has some of the different moments from the show all in one. One of the things that I don't think anyone's talking about. The only other person I've seen talking about this is actually Daniel Horowitz, and I think Ron DeSantis mentioned it briefly. once. But I haven't, but no one's really actually hitting it, particularly Republicans or the R&C, which to me they really need to. And here's why. What if, let's just say, because, you know, we got the election Tuesday. Now let me speculate for a moment. There's been a lot of discussion about voter integrity. And I get it. I mean, I've seen, I saw a video. I tweeted about it actually. When was, I think this was yesterday. Was this yesterday? Where Georgia said, it was video.

of like one of their people and one of their election officials and Georgia was saying, well, you know, we may not be able to have the results by election and it may take a couple of days, as what they said. And my point is, I had said that that's absolutely ridiculous for that to take that long. That's ridiculous. There's zero excuse because if you want to a sage voter suspicion of compromised election integrity, then you've got to get it counted by the end of election night. That's just asinine to think that, you know, that there's, there's no. reason for it. There's no reason. So you have people who justifiably have issues already and are suspicious and are concerned about voter integrity. And I get this. And a lot of people are curious about

are watching the machines and making sure ballots are counted. But, and again, I'm speculating, but you need to ask these questions because there's a lot of concern about the census. What if there was a fix in, but it was years in the making and not just election night. What if election night was the final piece de la resistance? What the piece of the resistance? What if it was just the last piece of the puzzle? You could have Trump that could lose due to an unnoticed form of shenanigans. And like I said,

Daniel Horowitz is the only other person he was on. We ran out of time because there's so much to get into. But he's going to come back on and we're going to talk about this next week. What if Republicans saw that there was fraud happening, but they didn't address it or weren't able to address it or whatever immediately? And one of the things that we've seen this election, and I was actually looking at some of this, is that blue wall.

So you keep hearing these phrases like the blue wall and the sun, belt. Like Kamala Harris was, she was trying for some of the sunbelt states. They think that they're going to hold the blue wall. Democrats wanted to try for the sunbelt when it was Biden. Now that they got Harris, her chances are slimmer. And you keep hearing about blue wall, et cetera, et cetera, Democrats have always, the crux of Democrats victory has always been that blue wall. And yes, California is great, but it's always been Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin. And I think only one time since Duke caucus, have they ever had it pierced, right? Now, migration trends, demographic shifts have really done a lot to beef up

Republican positions in the Sunbelt states. It's Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, you got North Carolina. And if Democrats keep the blue wall, say that Trump ends up with 268 electoral votes. That's like almost, almost a win. Two 70s. is what is needed. That's an actual possibility. But what if the states that Trump would win could actually have more electoral votes without having to base any kind of strategy on piercing or piercing the blue wall or winning a rust belt state? And that's the issue. That's one of the issues that Horowitz got into. Because when you use this, when you look at the census report and determine apportionment based on population. He noted in April of 2020, Texas got two congressional seats, Colorado,

Florida, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon gained one. I mean, that's, that's the estimation for April 1st, 2020. The shift benefited Republicans, but what he's arguing is that it didn't actually capture the massive migration from blue to red states. And this is never more before, never so harder felt than in the sunbelt. He noted, that this, this is this bombshell report from the census. And the RNC should have looked at this. They admitted, the Census Bureau admitted that they overcounted in eight states and that they undercounted in six states by an unbelievable margin. Five of the six undercounted states were red and six of the eight undercounted states that he noted were blue. And you had the largest errors

affecting red states on both sides. So he listed the error states, undercounted states were Arkansas, undercounted by over 5%, Florida by almost 4%, Illinois, by 1%, Mississippi by over 4%, Tennessee, almost 5%, Texas, almost 2%. Those were undercounted states. Overcounted states, Delaware by almost 6%, Hawaii by almost 7%, Massachusetts by over 2%, Minnesota by almost 4%, New York by almost 3.5%, Ohio by 1.5%, Rhode Island, by over 5%, and Utah, by almost by 2.5%, over 2.5%. So the errors that they had in this bombshell census report singularly affected red states by an egregious margin and favored blue states by an egregious margin.

and favored blue states by an egregious margin. Hans von Spakovsky from the Heritage Foundation had written about this and said that due to these errors, Florida did not receive two additional congressional seats. Texas lost out on a congressional seat. Minnesota and Rhode Island each retained a seat they should have lost. Colorado completely got a brand new seat that it didn't deserve. serve. Now, you're looking in a crystal ball and trying to speculate to figure out how much this

affects the congressional district boundaries and the control of Congress. But when you look at the electoral college, it does. What if the race is distorted because of that? There hasn't been a single hearing held on this. Trump hasn't even focused on this really himself. He's talked to, I think he's maybe mentioned the census a couple of times. He hasn't even focused on this. But if, I mean, there was a note that in the previous census, there was an over-account of only 36,000 people nationwide. That's a negligible.01% and it didn't affect reapportionment. Now the error is way much more egregious and it's very much more favorable to Democrats. Republicans could have taken the two years before this election to challenge it.

And they didn't. They didn't hold any hearings. They didn't try to correct it. they didn't introduce legislation. And I have to say, I understand that the Trump camp was litigating certain things. This was the big thing they needed to litigate. Because if there is something that's off, I suspect that it will be through this. Now, they could have, Republicans could have introduced legislation. They didn't. They could have held hearings. They didn't. They could have had a legal battle. Horowitz notes that the Supreme Court ruled in Utah,

Evans that the census clause doesn't forbid using statistical methods to enhance accuracy beyond a direct count. And then, of course, the population of illegal aliens. California, there are some estimates, and I'm going to pull this up. There are some estimates that California has additional seats. Politico has a story on this, how non-citizens decrease Republican chances of winning the White House next year. This was published in October 3rd of 2015. And they noted that that's not the, this isn't the only issue, that California, they believe, might have an extra five seats in the house simply due to the population of illegal immigrants alone. Now, I will say Trump did try to exclude from the census people who were here illegally, but he was blocked in the courts. And everyone was basically kind of

shrug their shoulders. I guess there's no legal way to fight on this. So there you go. This is a real problem. And I mean, even back in this October 2015 piece. And this is in October of 2015. This is before his big win against Clinton. It says the math gives strongly Democratic states an unfair edge in the electoral college. The math that the left uses and that the census has been using and the way that they're trying to rig this. The states with the largest populations of illegal immigrants and other non-citizens gain extra seats in the house at the expensive states with fewer such, quote, whole number of persons. And yet, you've barely heard anything about the census fight. The last thing was the fight to prevent illegal individuals, but it had nothing to do with the apportionment and the irregular math used to make the determinations of allocating seats.

etc. That's the problem. And it's a big issue. I mean, you would have to reallocate some of these states that have more citizens are losing out against states that have fewer actual citizens and or have more illegal aliens present than the states that are losing out. That's insane. So I am not sure how this is will I mean it remains to see how this is how this is how this comes to pass I mean this is you know it's it's very troubling but this is the reality of the situation and the Republican Party does not have a strategy to say nothing of a long-term strategy they do not have a strategy to deal with us I don't know what they're going to do And as Kane noted, staying on defense is a huge issue for the Republican Party.

So this was important enough to spend an entire segment on because I still don't know what. It's a lot harder to change this after the fact. Is it not? After the election, it's a lot tougher to say, well, the census, now you have flawed electoral account because of the census. That's a lot harder to make that argument after the fact, isn't it? why didn't they do anything two years before? So like I said, if watch those electoral counts,

that'll be a very clear sign on this. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. This is wild. So this guy, this Italian dad, Luciano di Adamo, did not, he woke up from a car crash. He was in a coma since 2019. and he was in a hit and run, and he woke up from it.

Again, in a coma since 2019, he thought the year was 1980 and that he was 23 years old. He did not know that his parents had, his mom had passed. He did not know any of the stuff. He legit, he was shocked when an older woman came in and addressed him. And the guy's 68 now. He was like speechless. He could not believe that that was his wife.

And he did not understand how he had a 30-year-old son. And he said, I thought I was crazy. He's like, this is. And then he was shocked when he saw his reflection and did not even know that he was a 23-year-old man. Can you imagine? That's crazy. This, apparently, so you can, we were talking about political clothing at the polls. Election workers at a Hamilton township, was this in Jersey? They said, you can't wear political clothing. And so this woman voted on her bra. She had to take off her hat and shirt. And then she voted in her bra.

And then, yeah, we kind of have to know that, though. Like, anything that's like a slogan or anything like that. And that's both sides. That's not just against Republicans. It's against Democrats, too. It's to protect voter integrity and prevent intimidation, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. So there you go. Let's see.

This Halloween costume, it's a child's mind-bending Halloween costume that looked even adults baffled. They were shocked over this. And they said it was a schoolboy. It was a Halloween costume trick so impressive. It's a photo that's circulated on social media. I wish they would just tell you instead of making you scroll down past their stupid advertising. So it was just him standing next to. So it was him holding his waist and legs.

Yeah, it looks really weird. I don't know how he did it. People were like, how did you do that? It looks so great. You have to be squatting or something? But he only won third prize. Someone was like maybe it looks like it was obviously a dull. made. But was it? I mean, the other costumes sucked. One of them, I think, was supposed to be Wednesday

Adams. It's easy enough. I'm just saying it. And it's just, you know, just feel like that kid was robbed, I've got to say, because you know that their parents help them. Did that little girl go by her Wednesday dress? No, she didn't. A New York woman was charged with pepper spraying a Muslim Uber driver as he prayed. Jennifer Gilbo was charged with second degree and third degree assault as a hate crime. He was praying on July 31st at a red light. and she sprayed him. She pled not guilty. Good heavens.

Stick with us. We're finishing this third hour. On the go and need a quick news fix with a fun twist. Follow Dana's absurd truth podcast for bite size and formative episodes. Perfect for your busy schedule on Apple or wherever you get your podcast. Welcome back to the program. Bottom of this third hour. Dana Lash here with you.

We're just days away from the election. Days away. and we've been getting into a lot. I still want to, you know, encourage you to not take a lot of the voting stuff, a lot of, or a lot of the polling about voting as gospel truth. For real, please do not. Because so much of it is just up for interpretation.

I mean, they're just trying to do the best that they, people are trying to do the best they can. And others are just, well, it's a, it's a, an industry. I don't know how else to put it. It's just, it's an industry. Looking at a couple of things, including this USA Suffolk poll. I don't know. I mean, so much of it, up a point here, up a point there. I don't know. I just, some of it just, they looked at 300 likely voters. This is meaningless to me. 300 likely voters. This is stupid. Why are we doing this? This is just people trying to put their finger on the scale

and tip it for narrative purpose. This all this is. 300 likely voters. They've already been voting. Are they registered? Clearly not. They would have said it. Not all of them are registered.

They would have said it. So you don't even know if these people voted. They're trying to say it's tied at 49 to 49. I just, these I just toss into the trash. They're not even worth it. And yet I'm reading, I'm looking at a whole article that's like deep diving into this. And what does this tell us? I'm going to tell you what it tells you.

Nothing. 300 likely voters. That's it. And women are over sampled. Do you think that they're trying to go for a narrative here? I just see this stuff and I just toss it. It's trash. That's why we got to be careful with us. I mean, it's, I don't know, it's like I said, people are going to look and see what thick tea leaves. They're going to just read whatever they want to read out of this. There was, there's one polling entity, Atlas Intel. They weren't too bad back during 20. In fact, I think that they were considered the most accurate pollster of 2020. But they were saying that the way that they were looking at it is that Trump was plus five in Arizona. And then it's a lot tighter in Michigan and Pennsylvania where he's basically that where he's plus one. I think they, I don't think you can argue with with that small of a lead that he's leading in these in those states where he might be only

plus one, especially when you have margin of errors at 3.5 and 3.7. I mean, that's kind of significant. So, I don't know, they basically, I think the most accurate reading is that the states that Trump really needs to win is where he's the tightest. I think that's probably the most accurate to look at. I will say that his momentum has been consistent, whether it's a 538 aggregate or an RCP aggregate or if it's measured by, you know, Cook or if it's measured by, you know, like Quinnipiac, which tends to lean left. I mean, it's, that's been pretty consistent. But I have everybody sitting here telling me, well, what do you think it's going to happen? What do you think is going to happen? What do you think is going to happen? I don't know.

I mean, the blue wall states, that's a problem for Trump if he cannot close those out. I was looking at, remember what I was just telling you about the census stuff and how, like, what if Trump gets to 268? because of some of these states with the census. A friend of mine did their own electoral map and he had, guess what he had Republicans at, Kane? 268. Interesting.

So, interesting. So this, he's got to close out. He's got to get one of them. Wisconsin, Michigan. Minnesota's is a toss-up, which is crazy to me. Pennsylvania is going to be tough. It could be a 270 to 268 type of thing. I will say, again, I said this yesterday,

you would rather be Trump in this situation than Harris right now. That is for certain. That is for certain. She's only plus five aggregated RCP for Michigan and plus 0.2 aggregate for Wisconsin. I mean, it's tough. Cancos, the Amish are going to give Trump the advantage. But they've been voting.

I know. In larger numbers. Can I tell you, did I talk about this, the Pennsylvania thing? How when I went out there? So I went out there for a 2A event, right? We have affiliates out in Pennsylvania. And you go through Amish country. And I do not say this with any disrespect at all.

In fact, I say it with, Kane will attest to this. I say this with sheer awe and aberration. I've never seen Gothor people in my life. I felt like I had driven into a Tim Burton movie. We were driving through this beautiful, hilly country. and I saw a woman in a black dress with a bonnet on in a field. Dude, she had a scythe. I was like my little goth heart saying, like that's the coolest thing I've ever seen in my life.

And it was like these very like American Gothic clapboard houses and Yamashrut. They're doing their chores and their carriages were black and their horses were black and they had black. I was like, this is the goth this thing I've ever seen. It's like little goth on the prairie. It's amazing. and they had Scyth and these because they used the old timey stuff it was like and I wanted so badly

to take photos but isn't it I think that's like disrespectful is it? I don't know like I didn't want to be like leaning out of the car window because I was telling the driver is slow out because they pick you up the affiliate to pick you up and they take out this event I was like I didn't want to be like stop I want to take a picture because it's not kind of disrespectful I've been jealous of the Amish for a long time

I'd love to be that off grid dude the gothist stuff I've ever seen in my life like nobody all these other people are just posers It made me feel like a poser. I'm like, wow. They are so tough and so goth. Anyway, but Keynes like the Amish are going to come with their sights. They're going to come out.

I mean, a for real sight, not like an actual in-use one in the field. They're not going to the polls with their sight. Don't say stuff like that. No, they shouldn't do that. But I'm just like, it's cool. It was so cool. It is. I mean, I was in awe.

I was like, this is the coolest thing I've ever seen in my life. It was really, it was beautiful. Anyway. But you think that they're going to bring it in in Pennsylvania? So I think I've seen a lot of videos where they're like we're talking six figures of Amish voting where before you only saw like. Are there six figures Amish in Pennsylvania? Yeah, there's like 30,000 that were voting like in the last election. Well, 30,000 is not six figures.

No, no, no, I know. This is the last election I'm talking about. This election, they've already, apparently their numbers are closer to 300,000. I wonder. Well, apparently there are only 92,000 Amish of all ages in Pennsylvania. So I don't know if it's going to get into six figures. I don't know. not what I'm hearing.

That's, uh, that's, maybe the post I saw was a collective because not all Amish. Well, Politifax says that 180,000 new Amish voters is false because there's not that there's not 180,000 of them there apparently. Yeah, in Pennsylvania. Yeah. Now, collectively it's different. They were saying in Pennsylvania. Yeah, there's a lot of Democrat states and like you, like, you know, Pennsylvania is a very

important state that there are a large Amish population there. If you get those who haven't been previously engaged in voting, you know, that's going to be a good thing for the campaign. So I'm telling you, this is, it's going to be very interesting with all of this. I'm just, you know, we'll see, but got to get to that magic number, 270. You have to get to 270. It's going to get crazier as we get closer because early voting, like I said, early voting ends in Texas today. And I think they've all been making, I just think it's wild that the last big headline from Biden,

Harris the week before election is the job numbers just horrific 12,000 everyone's like wait a minute everyone woke up this morning maybe I need glasses does this say 12,000 because I thought for sure it was going to be 122,000 yeah we're missing something here what or 120th something like 12th and that'll be revised down completely so we'll see about all of that but I don't know I really don't think that hitting out at the women is helping it all, for sure. Not at all. I don't think so. I wanted to get a couple

of these. I was going to play 26, but I think I'd rather jump off my roof than play it. Yeah. I don't think so. I don't think I'm going to play that one. I will say, let's get into this is audio. Oh, do, do, do. Oh, audio sound bite 9.

The, they were mad about the garbage. This was last night. They were mad. This is how they opened their evening news. Listen to this. Vice President Kamala Harris rallied in North Carolina and Pennsylvania today and is in Wisconsin tonight. Former President Donald Trump was in North Carolina earlier and tonight is also in

Wisconsin. He landed in Green Bay just a short time ago and then pulled this campaign stunt, speaking to reporters from a garbage truck, proof they, he and his supporters are giving no grace to a gaffe by President Biden, where he and his explanation inadvertently called Trump supporters garbage. Inadvertently? Gosh, could you bend over more for this administration? That's Nora O'Donnell.

No grace for it. You mean no grace for the people who called us Nazis and garbage? Are you kidding me? It's a stunt. Clearly no grace said inadvertently. No, he literally says. said it. It wasn't inadvertently. He said it. Stop trying to put a band-aid on this gaping wound. Quit. It's worse. They try to spin it. They're acting like somehow it was Biden that's the victim because

he was given no grace. This is unbelievable. I don't know. I can't. Oh, by the way, in case you forgot where Tim Walz was, here he is. Audio Soundbite 5, the guy who can't load a shotgun. Listen to to this. That's what they're plan is. He also's talking about putting a national sales tax on everything. Things to buy every clothes, food, toys, whatever you buy. $4,000 a year that it adds to your family.

Now look, this dude's nearly 80 years old. He damn near killed himself getting into a garbage truck. You Damiener kills yourself trying to load a shotgun while bragging about how much you use that same shotgun to go shoot with.

And then you were like, oh, fun, fun, fun. Come on now. CCP. Come on. Oh, man, I can't. I can't. This is just going to get crazier. Going to get crazier and crazier. That's all I got to say. On the go and need a quick news fix with a fun twist.

Follow Dana's absurd truth podcast for bite-size and formative episodes. Perfect for your busy schedule on Apple or wherever you get your podcast. Kane said he's going by Mr. Garbage. Vue et Monsieur Garbage. That's it. It must be pronounced a garbage. You're with Monsieur Garbage. Thank you.

I'm Madame Garbage. Just to stay. We already voted sadly, so you can't show up in your garbage bag and do that. It's been great. I should have done it. I'm Monsieur Garbage. Yes. Can I have my ballot, please?

Here's my ID. They'll look at you. Look, you're nuts. I need a fake ID with the last name Garbage. Trash people. Trash, trash, trash people. I love it. I mean, it's just the.

I mean, the dumbest gaffe to ever make. And then they're still, they're still. Chevron's moving their HQ from California to Texas after 145 years. Oh, look at that. Chevron moving to, okay, your employees cannot vote lefty. So let's like make that. Just to see, I would be like, no, I'd be at the border. Oh, you're coming here with your Democrat bump.

Get out. You don't get to come here. Go learn to code. You can't come here. Stay out. No, it's, I don't want that, I don't want the, I don't want the, I don't want Texas to turn into the needles and feces. I saw a joke, I think it was a Babylon B that made it.

And they said that parents in San Francisco were shocked. They were shocked to find a piece of candy in their child's, uh, Halloween bag of needles. It's couldn't believe it. Just insane. I, I don't know, man. I, I don't know. I saw this piece from Politico. Can Stacey Abrams still deliver Georgia?

She couldn't even deliver the gubernator. hermitorial race for herself twice. Why does anybody think that she can deliver the state for Kamala Harris once? I mean, that's, oh wait, she is the president of Earth, though, or the Earth's governor, Stacey Harris. I forgot that, or Stacey Abrams. That's right. She is the president of Earth or the governor of Earth. That's right.

She's the governor of the United States. She won that race. Every time she lost, she was, it was stolen from her. I tell you what. There was another joke, too. It said which campaign after Tuesdays, it's a race to see which campaign gets to claim voter fraud. That is kind of funny, though.

But the winners of that have been the left, like since W. I will never forget the hanging chat and how long it took to make that determination and all the lawsuits that happened, et cetera, et cetera. Oh, my gosh. But they've been doing that. And then they've been doing it since 2016. Just saying, since 2016. And then, of course, right before we go into elections, we've had really one of the worst job reports that we have had ever.

Ever. How many, how much of that 12,000 jobs that they said that was supposed to be 112,000? How much of that do you think is going to be revised away into the ether cane? Oh, man. Probably all of them. Yes, we lost actually 11ty per Killian jobs. It's more than a decimillion. We just started making up quantities because we just, we just,

just couldn't quantify it. There's no shutdown. There's no pandemic. So these losses are really unprecedented. Yeah. Oh, there's a in the, the lockdown of inflation. That's for sure. But yeah, that's, that's going to be, that's the final, this jobs report is her final argument. That's the final argument. You can't lie about these numbers. Oh, but they're trying to. Oh, it's this is good jobs report. It's good. Just slow. What? You thought you were going to have 112,000 and that was still slow. That was even by your own estimations. It was slow. 12,000 is just like non-existent. And like we said, when that's revised down to nothingness, even more so. I don't know. I'm telling you what. I think you know what I'm going to do. I think

I'm just going to put my Christmas stuff up this weekend ahead of the election. I think so. Yeah. Wow. I think I'm just going to put my, because it's going to be nuts. And I want after election night, I just want to look at my Christmas tree. I think I'm going to do it. Yeah. If you get me any heat over and I'm just going to be like, I guess I love Jesus more. It's okay. It's all right. Did you get your giant 20 foot nativity scene or no? No, I want a giant inflatable nativity scene.

Don't tell me about how I say nativity. It's just not going to change. Stop. Just like milk is milk and pillow is pillow. Just don't. I want a giant just big giant one. Like bigger than my front door. I want you to have to literally look around the baby Jesus to get to my front door. It's what I want.

I'll find one. It'll happen. Today's stupidity cane. Sorry. I'm going to play that. It is our vice president, Kamala Harris. Let's hear what she has to say here. Sure. Play this. All right. Okay.

Say it again. Yeah. Moving forward. Understand the difference here. Oh, I didn't mean like literally. Okay. What we are looking at is a difference in this election. Let's move forward and see where we are.

So she said move forward in this. Okay. What did I just hear? I'm not sure. I don't even know. That's, that does it, guys, for this week. week election next week god bless back with you then