The Dana Show with Dana Loesch - Wednesday December 6 - Full Show

Episode Date: December 6, 2023

Ivy League Presidents struggle to condemn anti-Semitism in front of Congress. The Senate pushes for an assault weapons ban. Kevin McCarthy announces his retirement. Dana explains how Republican voters are turned off right now. Biden continues to deny he had any involvement in his son’s business dealings.Nikki Haley says parents should be able to let their 12 year old child get a sex change operation. The Dana Show wants to try to see if they can draw artwork similar to Hunter Biden and make millions.Please visit our great sponsors:Black Rifle Coffeehttps://blackriflecoffee.com/danaChange the lives of Veterans and their families with the Boot Campaign with every purchase of the Ready-to-Drink Coffee!All Family Pharmacyhttps://allfamilypharma.com/danaSave 10% with code DANA10 when you order today at https://allfamilypharma.com/danaHeadrest Safehttps://theheadrestsafe.comUse code DANA for an exclusive $50 off. Hillsdalehttps://danaforhillsdale.comVisit Hillsdale College for a special Christmas viewing of O Little Town Of Bethlehem. KelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comSign up for the KelTec Insider and be the first to know the latest KelTec news. Nimi Skincarehttps://nimiskincare.comDon’t compromise. Use promo code DANA for 10% your order.Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/danaGet a free smartphone with code FRIDAY76 when you switch today! Wise Food Storagehttps://preparewithdana.comSave $50 on your 4-Week Survival Food Kit plus free shipping when you order today!

Dr. Cornbluth, at MIT, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate MIT's code of conduct or rules regarding bullying and harassment? Yes or no? If targeted at individuals not making public statements. Yes or no? Calling for the genocide of Jews does not constitute bullying and harassment? I have not heard calling for the genocide for Jews on our campus. But you've heard chance for intifada. I've heard chance, which can be. anti-Semitic depending on the context when calling for the elimination of the Jewish people. So those would not be according to the MIT's code of conduct or rules.

That would be investigated as harassment, if pervasive and severe. Ms. McGill, at Penn, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn's rules or code of conduct? Yes or no? If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment. Yes. I am asking specifically calling for the genocide of Jews. Does that constitute bullying or harassment? If it is directed and severe or pervasive, it is harassment.

So the answer is yes. It is a context-dependent decision, Congresswoman. It's a context-dependent decision. That's your testimony today. Calling for the genocide of Jews is depending upon the context. That is not bullying or harassment. This is the easiest question to answer, yes. Yes, Ms. McGill.

I mean, she can't answer. She knows what the answer is. She just can't answer because it compromises her. And that's what so much of the stuff is. Like, these people don't want to answer the question, and they don't want to be honest about it because they know the answer. They know what this means.

They know that, I mean, it looks bad for Harvard. It looks so bad. She's, Stefanik went to Harvard. I think she was a graduate of Harvard. She went to Harvard. I mean, they realized how bad this looks. We talked a little bit about this yesterday, all this stuff on our college campuses. And I still maintain that it's because not enough people got their butts whipped when they were younger.

Not enough people learned the hard way. Welcome to the show, Dana Lash here with you, a number of things to discuss today, including some of the stuff that we got going on with the debate, the other debate that's kind of now, the other debate that's coming up tonight. I'm going to watch it so you don't have to. But we're going to cover that. We're also going to look at some of the stuff that's making its way, some legislation that's making its way through the Senate, all of that. And so in the meantime, welcome to the program.

You can listen coast to coast. You can stream the radio program. You can check out the simulcast, all that good stuff as well. Channel 347, YouTube, Facebook. And we're still on the struggle bus with a coffee machine. Some of you are so kind. And you've been like, rest in peace, steyness coffee machine. Yes, think you, I mean, it's really the struggle bust, man. That's a whole, that's a whole segment. King, we're coming back to it. It's a whole segment, man. That is a whole segment. All right. So some of the stuff, like I said, that, I mean, they've had these ongoing hearings and I'm glad that they've been asking, you know, these tough questions and, and trying to figure out, you know, how are you, I mean, they just, they look the other way for so long. I mean, this has been pervasive on college campuses. It's been growing for quite a while. But now it's like really, you know, up in.

up in, up in your face. And so it's sad that they have to have this like song and dance around saying something that's obvious. I mean, what is the context? When she says, oh, well, there's the context to it. Like, what's the context? For real, like, what is the context to that? There's no context to, you know, from the river to the sea.

Although, I don't know if you've been seeing. They're making the river to the sea reality in Hamas's tunnels. Have you guys seen this? so there's been this ongoing strategy deliberation from the IDF on whether or not they're going to flood

the tunnels, the Hamas's tunnels, and they are. They are flooding the tunnels and there was the, I think the reason why obviously that they were deliberating about whether or not this is something they were going to do is because there was the concern that hostages are in these tunnels, but they don't even know. I mean, they can't even, I mean, part of Hamas's lying and going back and forth and not being honest about the hostages and who's alive and who isn't is that you may have the IDF have to act like this to defend themselves.

So they have these, they've gone ahead with it and they've been flooding these tunnels with seawater. People have been, the IDF has been setting up some pipes and pumps in Gaza, but they have about five, I think five pumps about a mile. north of this refugee camp and they're flooding this 300 mile network of tunnels they said it's going to be fully flooded within weeks that's how long it takes because there's so much of it weeks that's insane and they want to drive out the terrorists they want to make the terrorists the the tunnels inoperable and they have a bunch of they have footage of it they've been showing it so it's been happening it's been underway they're they hey they brought the sea to them how nice is that they brought the sea to Hamas.

You know, Israel does quite a lot. You know, they first, they leave Gaza Strip for them. Now they're bringing them the sea. I mean, good heavens. So they've been, this was something they were deliberating about as to whether or not they were going to do it. Now they're actually, they're flooding them. They're doing it gradually so that they can kind of monitor any kind of side effects,

anything that, you know, they may perhaps haven't anticipated before. And they want to make sure that they can get, that hostages have time to get out. even they even want to give Hamas the opportunity to get hostages out with the before they do before it gets too bad but this is the first round

so they're flooding the tunnels and we'll see what happens after this but they really need to eliminate that whole network that Hamas is really really used it's where they've been staging their attacks from that's where they retreat every single time they launch an offensive after they broke the ceasefire again that's where they retreated so

it's this is something that has to be done and apparently Hamas has no interest in releasing any other hostages. That's the other thing. I mean, they're not, they're not, they're not, they're not, they're not releasing anybody else. And maybe, maybe this will move the needle in the, in the, in, towards that. Maybe we'll see. But, uh, this is what's been happening at least over there now while we've been having these hearings with, uh, members of Congress. And this wasn't the only thing, too, because you had, you had the president of Harvard, you had the president of MIT, you had, uh, UPN, you had, uh, UPen.

and all of them, they kept all trying to say, well, we're just, you know, calling for the genocide. Can they name which river? If you ask these people, hey, what, when you're talking about from the river to the sea, what do you mean, what river? What river are you talking about? Out of curiosity. What river? What sea?

Can you name the sea? Can you name any of these geographical points that you've been talking about? Like that one crazy lady who was, what she's saying? from the mountains to the sea. I, there is, it's a psychological thing. And we talked a little bit about on these universities how students' minds have been seated for this, how they've been seated for this kind of intellectual corruption,

for the lack of a better way to put it. But also there's this seamster. People want to be seamsters. People really want to be viewed, excuse me, as being in the know. They want to be viewed as being in the know. They want to be viewed as being a part of something. Maybe it's because of the digital explosion

that makes it seem like it's harder to be a part of something for people. I don't know. There's a psychological answer, I think, there. But when I was listening to these university presidents dance around the obvious answer to the questions for members of Congress. Congress, whether or not it's a genocide, whether it's, there's no context you put it in, unless

you're following up with not, there's no context to put it in. None. This wasn't the only, by the way, this wasn't the only hearings that have been going around that have been happening on D.C. They have been discussing the situation with women's sports. They've been, I mean, it's been really, it's been really interesting to hear some of the lawmakers about this too. I watched Riley Gaines speak yesterday. There was this dust up that she had. So they had, I think it was daily, maybe it was daily signal that had someone there testifying before members of Congress. And then they had Riley Gaines. He was talking. And she said this, audio sound by three, because they lost their minds. They had like, the congressional member to whom she was speaking

immediately had a tantrum. And they stopped hearings because they wanted that struck from the record. Listen to this. And ranking member, Lee, if my testimony, and testimony makes me transphobic, that I believe your opening monologue makes you a misogynist. Thank you. And she was not happy. Ms. Gaines, I now recognize Ms. If you could see in the simulcast that one just showed,

she sat there. She didn't see anything for a moment. And then it made her so mad she couldn't even focus on what the next woman testifying was saying. Like the other members there, they went on and they introduced the next person to testify.

she started speaking and that member of Congress stopped the whole proceedings. She wanted that pedally struck from the record. But she didn't have any aversion when she called gains and called these other people testifying. She was literally referring to them as being as being somehow transphobic and bigoted, etc. She was the one who was saying all of this. She was the one who was casting aspersions on their characters. And then when that's the response, she gets upset. Well, tough.

I mean, that's, that's, you, if that's, you, if that's, if that's, if they're then somehow transphobic, then you're misogynistic. You're misogynist. I wanted to play this audio soundbite, too, from AOC. I, this was, this was something else. Audio soundbite, I think this is 18. We'll play some of this, because this was, this was crazy. You said there are some proposals.

I mean, we've seen this in Ohio. There was a proposed ban on trans athletes that originally allowed for genital examinations on minors in order to quote unquote protect women. Is that correct? Unfortunately, yes. And so we're seeing here in this guise, under the guise of not only trying to further marginalize

trans women and girls, we are talking about opening up all women and girls to genital examinations when they are under age. That's right. Potentially just because someone can point to someone and say, I don't think you're a girl. That's correct. And we're saying this in an environment of a post-Dobbs America where states are criminalizing access to abortion and want nothing more than data on women. She's like targeting trans women for playing sports makes all women less safe and blah.

First off, I didn't realize the big hairy dude who's like six foot three swimming against all the women at Penn. I didn't realize that that was a baby child infant. Are we doing the leftist age characterization here? Is that what we're doing? Because you know how they tried to say that Hunter Biden is an infant baby? and he's like what, 56, something 57 years old. He's like, he can go for the early bird special at Denny's. And they're like baby infant Hunter Biden.

So is this the same thing like they're doing these baby infant children? Because the people that I've been seeing are grown dudes that have deep voices. And they're, they went their puberty as men. And they're competing as men. I watched, what is it? There were two male cyclists, cosplay as chicks who went some sort of cycling thing. I don't like bicycling. Can we make sure we have that audio safe from yesterday, too?

I forgot to play that for people yesterday. Did you guys see that? And they had this girl standing on the podium. She was third place. She was tiny compared to them. Like one of their whole legs was three quarters of her body length. They were huge compared to her. Are we talking about those baby infant children, little bitties?

Is that what we're talking about? That doesn't make any sense. We got a lot to get into. They're also trying to push an assault weapons ban in the Senate. We're going to talk a little bit about how that's not going to actually go anywhere. although now it's been become very, very difficult for us in the House because Republicans stupidly gave up

George Santos and now Kevin McCarthy says that he's done. There goes your house majority. Wow. Republicans just love kicking themselves in the beans, don't they? Great leadership, R&C, truly stunning. Our partners over at Wise Foods

this is a great actually great to have and you should have it. You should always always be prepared for whatever life may throw your way. Because when emergency strike, seriously, the last thing you want to worry about is where your next meal will come from. We had this whole state of Texas that froze over. Everything closed. Y'all remember that? That was just like a couple of years ago. Everything closed. Good luck getting some from the grocery store. Good luck. They couldn't even, grocery store couldn't even get deliveries. So where, do you know where your next meal is going to come

from? If heaven forbid something like that were to happen, this is where Wise Food storage comes in. You can save $50 on a four-week survival food kit, free shipping at prepare with Dana.com. It's a two-bucket four-week survival food kit. 2,200 calories, 64 grams of protein per day, 28-day supply, and everything is made with high-quality U.S. ingredients. Freeze, dry, dehydrated, easy to prepare, just add water, and it has a 25-year shelf life as well. Lots of different dishes. Tasty, tons of protein. Order yours today at PreparewithDana.com. Save $50 in your four-week survival food kit, plus free shipping. That's prepare with Dana.com.

And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. Steve's having a buddy the elf moment right now in D.C. He's like, guys, it's snowing. The joy in his voice when he just announced that to us. It was like, if we could box that and sell it, it would be great. Connor McGregor is hinting at a presidential election bid in 2025. He's going to, he wants to run Ireland. Well, he's thinking about it. He's hinting about it. He's thinking about a presidential run. He's criticized everybody else out there. He got mad.

He said that he'd also have privately fund weekly votes to ensure accountability saying that it wouldn't be me as power in power as president, people of Ireland. It would be me and you. And he's because he's done with the way that they were handling everything, especially after that stabbing and then the rioting. Brenda Lee's rocking around

the Christmas tree tops chart 65 years after its release. That's pretty cool. She's still like, her track still rocking it. An Airbnb host son secretly filmed a guest in the shower and then tried to blackmail her into sending him nudies. Yeah, that's according to prosecutors. See, this is why Airbnb's kind of freak me out. You know, I get a little freaked out. Like, I get it. A lot of people do it as like a side gig to get some income. I hear you, but man, it just just freaks me out. The first humanoid

robot factory is about to open. None of this ends well. If you've ever seen, I don't know, Pluto, if you've ever seen I-Robot, if you've ever seen literally any robot movie. And you US students' math scores are plunging in a global education assessment. Because that explains the economic illiteracy. Stick with us. We just like, everybody just needs to take a nice, hot, relaxing path. Go to your skin care stash. Every lady has this. They have a drawer or the cabinet where they keep all their skin care stuff. And you know what? You need to just get the hydrate and protect routine that Nimi has. And that includes the anti-aging moisturizer and the cleanser and just slather that moisturizer in your face. Closure. And just slather that moisturizer in your face.

eyes, put some cucumbers on there and just, you know, get away. That's what we all need to do. Here's the thing. This is a great Christmas gift. Nimi's skincare has great gifting options. If you're unfamiliar with them, hold up. How mad has everybody been? Because all these skincare companies have been using dudes with rough skin to promote beauty

products to women. It is unrealistic. It is not what women use. And it completely ignores that women have different requirements. So this is where Nimi's skincare comes in. They thought, oh my gosh, if skincare companies are going to walk off a cliff, women are actually going to need, you know, skin care products. So that's what they were founded to do. And that's, and they have great skincare products. I love their, uh, the hydrating, because I've dry skin.

I love how super hydrating their moisturizer is. It's not tested on animals, free of paribans, all that good stuff. Save 10% off. Get 10% off using code Dana. All made in the USA with people who think like you. And they're 100% guaranteed. So you don't have to compromise your values to have great skin. Makes a great gift. N-I-M-I-N-M-E-M-M-E-M-E-M-E-M-M-E-M-SKKKOR.com. And make sure that you You use promo code Dana for 10% off. Get a gift card. Get that winter bundle. Gift it.

Your skin will thank you. Your gift recipient skin will thank you as well. It's neemiskincare.com. We are getting our pockets picked. As we send billions of your tax dollars to countries like South Africa to stop burning coal, are they cooperating? No way. What's the climate agenda's next goal?

Going after methane. Be prepared to get our pockets picked once again. Check out the watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. Looking for the drive-through version of the Dana Show? Check out the best highlights from every show and Dana's absurd truth podcast. Posted daily from The Dana Show. We already have a decade's worth of proof that a ban on military-style assault works and saves lives, plain and simple. After I led the passage of the assault weapons ban, I carried the bill in the House as a congressman,

alongside our late colleague, Senator Feinstein, who carried it in the Senate. What happened? America saw a significant decrease in mass shootings and in gun deaths. No, it didn't. It didn't at all. That's Senator Chuck Schumer yesterday. Now, I know some of you're like, oh, it's probably not going to go anywhere. We just lost a couple seats in the house.

You might want to be careful about that. And that's why it's important to watch all this every single time they try it. Like I said, welcome back to the program. Dana Lash here with you. Bottom of this first hour. So they're introducing this. It's just another, it's just another assault weapons ban. It's in some ways, and I've gone over it, in some ways it's very similar to all the garbage that Diane Feinstein used to introduce.

And I don't know how many before she passed. She had put in a ton of these. I think every couple of years she wanted to propose an assault weapons. ban. And the assault weapons ban, just so we're clear, the assault weapons ban in the 90s didn't actually ban a specific rifle.

Everyone's like, oh, it banned AR-15s. I mean, so many people don't understand that the AR-15 is just you could make it look like anything and it's going to function like that particular type of modern sporting rifle. But I think it's people just, they freak out about it because it's black and people

put stuff on it. Accessories and things. And they think that that makes it for the lack of a better way to put it, shootier. So this thing, it's called, there's the GoSafe Act. And people keep going, oh, it's just, you know, just some modern everyday, you know, just what are they, what's the phrase that they use all the time, guns sense or just modern, you know, dissensible common sense gun control. That's the kind of stuff. There's some things in here that go a little further than some of the things that Diane Feinstein has done. They also, the gun control people also learned a new phrase, gas operated. They have no

idea what it means. They just heard it somewhere and they're like, we got to put that in the bill. So they're like, they're going out. I mean, they basically want to open the door to going after literally every single type of semi-automatic rifle. That's why they always go after things like AR-15s. Even though AR-15s are, as we've talked about, used the least. And I was talking, I had this conversation with a friend of mine just literally the other day, even though they're used the least. And homicides that are committed by people illegally possessing and illegally using firearms, they, hands, feet and fists beat them. They're most targeted because they are so commonly owned.

I wanted to take you back real quick before I dive into this, just to give you some context on it. Back in the days when the founders were deliberating the Second Amendment and how to protect colonists, these burgeoning Americans right to protect themselves, you have to remember that the founders were coming from, basically like a military occupation. You know, the founders were living under a military occupation, and they felt as though they did not have the ear of the people who were supposed to be adhering or tending to their best interest all the way over across the scene in England. And so they didn't want only the military to be armed.

They didn't want only the government to be armed. And it's why you had, I mean, everybody who, whether they were a farmer, whether didn't matter who they were, they had cannons, they had arms, they had everything. In fact, when Washington was first bringing in soldiers for his army, I mean, they were requiring that you bring your arms. I mean, they were requiring that that was an early requirement that you have to have firearms in order to be able to serve because they didn't have the ability financially to go and buy guns for everybody. So that's an important context here. Secondly, when they were deliberating the creation, the drafting of the Second Amendment, one of the things that was an understanding, between all of the colonies was a phrase called affrighting. And this, I guess you could,

you could have that mean modern day brandishing today. Brandishing isn't just, I'm accidentally showing you, you know, my sidearm. Brandishing there is intent to intimidate there. There's some careful legalities that govern how this word is brought up in a court of law. And back during the days of the colonies, the term affrighting, this is something Scalia noted in his Heller opinion. there was an observable rule on affrighting. However, it only dealt with really uncommon weapons, like things that are weird and wild that nobody else has. It wasn't for commonly owned things, things that people recognized, they knew, and there was a second part of that. It wasn't just that, you know, they had to be that it was commonly owned. You couldn't also take it and use it and brandish it

is a way to intimidate people or intimate that you are considering using some sort of lethal force against them. And the example that Scalia gave in his Heller decision was like a headax. And this was something that was observable in terms of regulation in the colonies. And when he talks about gun control and limitations of the Second Amendment for all of the gun control activists out there that have not read his opinion and don't understand the history of the creation of the Second Amendment, they tried to cite those words as an example to you to say, oh, well, look, Scalia was even saying that there are limitations, but they're not explaining to you exactly what he was talking about or the history and breadth of what he was talking about. So I feel like that's important context going in here because it's something that's going to come up continually. But I share the story with you for the specific purpose of touching on commonly owned, that phrase. That phrase is supremely important. It was supremely important during the times of the colonies, it was supremely important during the Heller case, and it's still supremely important. Why is it so important? Because if they go after the most commonly owned things, how much more

difficult for them do you think it will be to go after everything else? That is the point. So that is why they specifically target this rifle, which is used the least. Now, if they were really serious, and I don't think they should do this, they would be taught, this is what they did in the 90s before they switched it up to start focusing on rifles. They wanted to go after handguns. They tried going after handguns in the 90s, and then they realized, oh my gosh, it's going to be a disaster for us. We can't do this. Let's switch it up. And they stopped doing it because it was really, I mean, they were getting beaten to death in the polls heading into elections back during that time. That's when you had the Gingrich, Conservative Revolution and everything else. But this go safe act, I mean, it is an absolute abridgment of your rights. It's an affront to your rights. And it goes after not just your ability to keep and bear arms, but it goes after, you know, all of firearms manufacturing. You don't have to own a gun.

You don't have to be skilled, have a great skill set as a marksman or anything else to understand that this is a doorway that can go after everything else. again, I reiterate, firearms are merely a variable. If one of your natural rights can be compromised, all of your natural rights can be compromised. That's just the way it is. And so this is no different. Now, I don't know, you know, I, I, this, I mean, there's, there's, there's a potential that this won't even make it through the Senate, because you do have people like Kirsten Cinema. You do have people like Joe Manchin.

I can't imagine that Joe Manchin, support something like this. And previously, he hasn't been on board with some of these other things that, you know, the Feinstein gun ban stuff. But I mean, I just don't know if they have you, I mean, in order to stop a filibuster, they have to have 60 votes. And I seriously don't think. There's no way that they got 60 votes. You cannot convince me that they've got 60 votes. So I, you know, and I think that it's, it's, this is stupid for them to do this. They're, they're, they're making a gamble here. They're, they're hurting so bad. in the polls with their own base, Democrats are, that they have to go, this is a Hail Mary for them.

If you've ever noticed, whenever times get tougher Democrats, when it concerns economics or even foreign policy, they always run to the well of gun control so that they can give the appearance of doing something, without actually ever doing anything. If they wanted to get a handle on crime, you would see serious judicial reform. If they wanted to get a handle on crime, you would see, the demands for a mandatory minimum for a lot of these repeat offenders instead of risk slaps and here you can get out on a tenth of ten, you know, one percent of bail, et cetera, et cetera. They would actually be really overhauling the judicial system instead of constantly targeting law-abiding gun owners, which brings me to the point that this is a gamble because

it's going to hurt. It could hurt them with their base. They are hemorrhaging independence right now. Now, they're not hemorrhaging independence to a specific candidate on the right. They're just hemorrhaging independence. People who are ranking them super high with negatives. Every single time there's a survey and they're asked, what do you think that? the Democrats' job performance is on the issue of crime? What do you think the Democrats' job performance is on the issue of the economy? I mean, they're getting hammered by specifically independence. And as we've talked about before, elections are lost in one in the margins. That's what determines it. People are wanting to protect themselves. You have members of communities that

typically are not communities that are found to be synonymous with Second Amendment and firearm ownership that are flocking to gun stores and purchasing firearms right now. And when you're talking about limiting people's ability to not only do that, but to defend themselves while not doing anything to strengthen the laws or not even so much the laws, strengthen the enforcement of said laws from a judicial perspective against these repeat offenders to protect the innocent. That's a problem in these people's minds. So that's why I say that this is a major gamble for them. That's how you know it's so bad economically that they have to run to this well, which is historically in an election season, hurt them every time that they have tried. it. So it's a gamble. Now, whether or not this, you know, if it goes through the Senate, whether or not it goes through in the House, I don't know. I'm going to, I have another two-way thing I'll talk to you about here coming up later. But then you've got this issue with the House and Kevin McCarthy, which we're going to dive into because Kevin McCarthy's leaving. They just, Republicans just removed George Santos. Kathy Hochel in New York is going to replace Santos with a Democrat. So Republicans literally shot themselves in the foot. It is one of the stupidest things I've, I've seen. I have never seen a party that is so afraid to fight the culture war, a party that is so

afraid of candidates that are in the primary, a party that is, the party that is more concerned about keeping politicians happy right now than the voters. The leadership of the RNC is disastrous. I don't know what else to say. People will get mad at me for saying it. Y'all can just kiss my grits. I don't care. Deck my halls. Because it's true. Somebody's got to say it instead of, you know, everybody's so busy butt kissing because they want to make sure that they get an invite to the big you know the cocktail Christmas party they want to make sure that if there's you know the Republican convention they want to get invited to all the cocktail parties at the convention you need to be a little bit more concerned about having a country to have a vote in before you know a little bit more than you are about your power adjacency and your popularity good grief none of that stuff's going to matter if the country falls by the wayside so we'll we're going to hammer that but the other thing I was going to bring up real quick and I talked about this very briefly on Fox business last night was this a couple of you've emailed this all these nuns you've seen these activist nuns which i'm kind of on the bench as to whether or not that's a great punk band name so there's a group of activist nuns that are bringing lawsuits against a couple of firearms manufacturers and they're

trying to accuse them of deceptive advertising which i think is a frivolous lawsuit and a stretch i want to remind everybody that back in november of 2021 when you had this this dude drive his fort escape through a christmas parade and walk a shaw did you see everybody going out and blaming ford Did you see people filing lawsuits against Ford saying Ford needs to make their cars in a way that doesn't inspire third parties to use them in a criminal fashion? Did you see any of that stuff? You didn't, did you? Because that would be stupid. That would be dumb for people to do that.

But yet, they'll do it with things like firearms manufacturers. Gun companies do not make firearms to be used by criminals or to be used in an illegal fashion. And it's, you know, it's specious to say otherwise. And did marketing being deceptive? The reason they're hitting that's because that's the, only weak read that they think that they can get them on, but I think it just demonstrates a vast misunderstanding and a lack of, these people don't grasp the concept of that law that governs advertising, truth in advertising. These companies are only responsible if they have defective products

or if they lie about what you're getting, you know. I mean, that's what the law entails. But these nuns, all this is, is they're shareholders, they're small dollar shareholders in these companies. They've been going to shareholder meetings and filing proposals. This lawsuit, I think, is frivolous. It's not going to go anywhere. But they're playing the long game here, you know, because these are nuns. There's a couple hundred of them. They are doing all of this because you can. You're going to work. You don't have time to, with all the stuff that your 401K is invested in, do you, do you have time to go to shareholder meetings for these companies that you might have investments in for retire? You don't. That's the whole point. They can and they do. But I really

do think that if they believed in what they're, if they believed in their stated mission as much as they say they do, I think that they would probably speak a little bit more truth instead of political propaganda whenever they get in front of the press on this, which makes me not only doubt their mission, but it also makes me question their commitment to their faith, which might be kind of ignorant to say, but it's no less honest. Looking for a proactive solution in a battle against COVID-19, well, Ivermectin is now available at all family pharmacy based in Boca Breton, Florida, with a growing interest in its potential benefits, Ivermectin has emerged at the forefront for its antiviral properties. Supported by robust research and real-world experiences, it has gained

new attention as a possible ally in managing the impact of the virus. For reliable information and access to quality products like Ivermectin, visit allfamilyfarmat.com slash dana and say 10% with promo code Dana 10. Your health matters, so stay informed. Visit all familyfarmat.com slash Dana. Navigate these challenging times with informed choices and proactive steps. All Family Pharmacy is U.S. based and safe. Embrace the possibilities with Ivermectin. Save 10% with Codana 10 when you place your order now at allfamilyfarma.com slash Dana. That's allfamilyfarma.com slash Dana, co-Dana 10. That's Dana and the number 10. Don't let FOMO get the best of you. Stay in the loop and ahead of the curve by following Dana on Apple. Spotify.

or wherever you get your podcasts. Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of the United States. Would you be running for president? I expect so, but look, if he is running, then I just, I have to run. You drop out of contempt as though. No, not now. Boy, that's like a lot of, um, gives you a real boost of confidence. Democrats and your guy, doesn't it?

No, this guy's running, so I've got to run. I gotta run. It's not, I'm running because of you or because I want to, no, it's just because that. Dude, that's like some low energy Joe right there. Honestly think he needs

some of hunter's crack or cocaine. Is there a difference? Okay, hold up, sidebar. Is, like, crack, just like the great value version of cocaine? No, I think it's actually a more concentrated version of cocaine. I don't know, because, see, I just remember

that one interview with Whitney Houston and she was talking about whether or not Bobby got her on the booger sugar. And like they had, the way that she was appalled and offended, when she was asked if it was crack, she was like, crack is whack. And it almost sounded like she didn't think it was boozy enough. Right.

You know? Yeah, crack is less boozy. That was my takeaway from that. But I think more dangerous. I don't know. I mean, I was to give any, you know, love to cocaine. The healthier drug cocaine. Yeah, exactly.

Yeah. No, they're both horrible. Stop talking. about this. No, I'm just, I was fascinated because I'm like, is there, I don't know, is there a hierarchy of, you know, I don't know anything about this. You know, there's certain things I don't know about.

The bottom line is Biden needs uppers. He needs something. He needs something. He's like one of those, I had this robot when I was a kid, and it would walk, kind of, but when the batteries would wear down, it was round, long.

It just was just real move, real so. I just get, I have this impression. This just seems like he seems very similar. He needs new batteries, man. And some something. I don't know. His wattage. Whatever makes Hunter look completely tweaked and suspicious all the time, paranoid, that they need to give that to Joe.

Just to make him awake. Get him awake. All right. So coming up in our second hour, Kevin McCarthy is leaving Congress. So we got George Santos is out. That's a seat. Kevin McCarthy is stepping down as well. And he says, you know, is the next chapter's beginning and all this stuff.

And he just, he's, you know, he's going to do something different. Meanwhile, the majority that we have in the house shrinks ever more. Stay with us. We're going to discuss that coming up. Our friends at Black Rifle Coffee. This is the coffee that I drink every day because it's the best coffee that you can get. It's boozy coffee without the boozy price. And by boozy, I mean that they're nerds about how they roast,

They're beans. This is like the only coffee company of its type where they actually bring the beans to the United States and roast them all throughout the week at their two locations. Everybody else out there are white labels. What does that mean? It means that they have other people in foreign countries roast the beans and then they bring it into the U.S. And white label it and try to act like it's a big thing to sell.

But that's not what Black Rifle Coffee Company does. These guys are legit coffee nerds. This is a veteran-owned company. They employ veterans. they employ active duty and all their families, and they are super focused on making the best coffee in the nation, and it truly is. They're also continuing to raise money for the boot campaign,

one of the most renowned veteran focus, non-profits in the country. They have all these programs that treat the invisible wounds of war. A lot of stuff that our vets deal with today. That's what the boot campaign treats. They're raising money for it through their ready to drink coffee over a black rifle coffee, so you buy a, get a 12-pack of that through the coffee club, and that money goes right to the boot campaign. And the coffee club, by the way, this is a great Christmas gift.

If you're looking for something for the person who has everything, the coffee club is where it's at because you can get, you know, a year subscription. You can choose the roasts and you can change them too online, however you want to do it in your account. You can choose your roast frequency of shipment. That coffee is sent to your house. You never run out of coffee. The best coffee, free shipping, and it's affordable. So make sure you visit black rifle coffee. Black Rifle.com slash Dana, feel your caffeine fix and help make a difference in the lives of vets and their families.

That's black rifle coffee.com slash Dana. Today I am driven by the same purpose that I felt when I arrived in Congress. But now it is time to pursue my passion in a new arena. While I'll be departing the house at the end of this year, I will never, ever give up fighting for this country that I love so much. To all those who have supported me through the years, especially our constituents, thank you from the bottom of my heart. Wow. So Kevin McCarthy is stepping down. He's not going to run for the election. He's, he's,

this is getting crazy because this is, it's actually, it's going to make it to where the house is going to be more in play than ever. Welcome back to the program. Dana last year with you, top of the second hour. I was reading his piece. He's got this piece. in the Wall Street Journal, where he says that I'm leaving the house, but I'm not leaving the fight. And he says that he's going to resign after he was housed at his speaker. And that news coming this morning, he'd made the announcement in the Wall Street Journal in this opinion piece. He said that, quote, no matter of the odds or personal cost me to the right thing, et cetera, et cetera. And he says that I'm going to continue to recruit our country's best and brightest to run for elected office. and I'm committed to lending my experience to support the next generation.

And so he said that he's an optimist, elicited his accomplishments. And so now at the end of the year, our majority is now just two seats. I think I said five yesterday I meant four. Our house majority is now at two seats. So going into 2024, we are going to have two vacancies, two 13, Democrats, 220 Republicans. And you got to have

218 majority to pass legislation. So we could only, if we're, if Republicans are passing a bill going into this, that means they, you literally have two votes to spare. That's it. And if they can't, if they lose more than two votes,

that legislation's not passing. Great time for Chuck Schumer to introduce that assault weapons ban in the Senate. I'm telling you. So we're going down to two. And there's already a special election for Sandos's third district on February 13th. She was saying that they could appoint somebody, you know, but they're going to do a special election. And that seat, I don't, I mean, there is literally like a 50% chance that Republicans will lose the house in 24. Just going to be honest with you.

There are so many seats that they have to defend right now going to. into the going into 2024 there are so many seats that they have to defend and there are a lot of seats and purple areas here's the thing about making a coalition i don't like the term big tent i know we say big tent but i think the more accurate way to describe this is a coalition you got to look at it like that because in a coalition when you make a coalition you're having people from that that are coming together that agree maybe on 70 or 80 percent of those things now reagan famously said that my 80% friend is not my 20% enemy. That is how you have to look at this stuff.

It's strategic. Everybody wants purity. You will lose all the time by demanding purity. Now, that's not to say, do not do a drive-by like progressives do. That's why you know you're not like that. That's not to say that there aren't issues worth fighting for and digging in on. That's just assumed. But on some of these other issues, not even so much the issues, I think the bigger issue isn't the particular topic that, you know, Republicans might be fighting on, but rather the approach, rather the strategy, the tactic that they're using.

That seems to be where Republicans get really bogged down because not everybody agrees on the best way to go forward with certain of these strategies. And that's, I mean, it's kneecapping them. So this, it's all about incrementalism. Incrementalism is the name of the game. You got to baby step it. And when you're making a coalition and you have all these different people, especially in 2016, there were a lot of new Republican voters in 2016. When you have that many new Republican voters come in and they were, and populism contributed to that. I like populism in small amounts.

too much and it gets out of control. That's with anything really, except capitalism and freedom. But when you're building a coalition, you got a lot of new Republican voters. You got to keep those voters. And then it gets really, really tricky. It gets tricky because you have to be consistent

on selling freedom. You can't just slap slogans on everything and do a bunch of nonsense. You have to be consistent in selling freedom. And here's the other thing, that the Republican Party doesn't want to seem to acknowledge, you got to have results. You have to talk about solutions more than criticisms. You have to have a record of achievement.

You have to be able to bring receipts. Because for independence, you all need to consider this, for people to switch their vote in 2016. Remember, when Hillary Clinton ran, she lost a huge segment of blue-collar voters. These were people who were reliable Democrat voters. They showed up. They voted for Democrats. They showed up. They voted for probably Dukakis.

They showed up and they voted for Al Gore. They showed up and they voted for Bill Clinton. They showed up and they voted for John Kerry. They showed up and they voted for Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton was a little step too far. She'd always been unpopular. You need to understand that. She is one of the most unpot.

She probably has negatives higher than Kamala Harris, if I'm being honest. And after all of those years of dutiful party line votes, how did Democrats repay and think that voting block, when that voting block was like, Hillary's a step too far for us. She didn't even go to a lot of the blue wall states that she, that's why she lost blue wall. She needed to go to a lot of these states in order to maintain Democrat hold. She didn't even do it. and the Democrat Party responded by questioning and impugning the character of all those voters. They were racist because they didn't vote for the old white lady who fell down in the street and lost her Tory Birch flat.

They were racist because they didn't vote for her? After being so reliable, were they racist when they voted for y'all? Like all up until that point? Like, I'm curious. But that's how they treated them. And they wonder why they made so many of them mad. Here's the thing, though. You got to keep those voters.

if those voters are going to risk everything, if they're going to risk being ostracized, if they're going to risk having their characters impugned, being called racist, maybe being given the cold shoulder at the water cooler at work, being invited to fewer events with friends because that's how tribal everything is and that's how deep some of these political affiliations run, then you got to give them something for the return of that investment of their vote. and I'm going to be honest, a lot of them were real mad about immigration. They didn't think enough was done. You got to be, you can't say that I'm going to do all this stuff and then that you were hampered and you weren't able to do it. Either you can do it and you're enough of an ass kicker that you can get it done or you're not.

This is why you have to manage expectations as a politician. You go in there and you oversell in a time like this. I know that this time is the only time I think that you would be able to say that. because these independents are used to seeing something at the end of a hard work day. They're used to seeing receipts. You can't just, you can't do people like this. So this is, this is, I mean, this is crazy. So there's, Republicans have to manage expectations and they got to talk solutions and they have to, they have to show a record of deliveries.

And they're hurting with independence right now. too. It's not just Democrats. There is a malaise and this is what the press wanted. This is what I was warning you about months ago. This is why on this program I have refrained from getting heavy into the primaries until we get closer to Iowa and I'm very slowly moving in that direction because there is a measurable malaise with the voting block right now. People are tired and that doesn't just extend to Democrats. It extends to the Republican Party too. They get tired and then you know how you keep hearing the same stuff over and over again? Your eyes kind of glass over. They're tired of hearing about everything. They're tired of hearing about the day-to-day machinations of D.C.

And Republicans have got to deal with this butter. They have to deal with the coalition. They need to focus strictly on results. They need to be focusing on the things that build a coalition. everything else you can attend to in that 20% margin. But they need to focus on the economy, having a strong foreign policy, the economy, they need to focus on the border. These are top three things because that's going to retain. You'll have people who are independents that maybe they don't feel as strongly about life as you do. And I hate to say it, maybe they don't even either that or maybe they don't feel as strongly about the Second Amendment as you do. but they are voting their wallet

they're voting their jobs they're voting not sending their kids to war that's that's how they're voting you have Republicans have to play to that specifically first then the other things because you want those voters to go maybe I don't agree with you

totally on being pro-life but I do want to make sure that I'm not taxed to death so I'm going to vote for this Republican that's how Republicans have to approach this. This is how voters, if you're out there to liberty evangelizing, this is how you got to approach it. You're not to the diminishment of these other issues. Rather, you're protecting these other issues. And you're focusing on the strong tent poles that keep that coalition together. Keep everybody under the same tent. That's what you're focusing on. This is strategy 101. Unfortunately, there are some people that think you can

Leroy Jenkins the hell at everything. And then they're shocked when they live. lose. I'm not kidding you all. This is it. I don't want to be like all. I honestly believe in my heart of hearts. And I've never said this before. I think that this might be it. 2024's it. I'm not saying that to be sensational. I'm not saying that because I'm trying to entertain you. I'm saying that because I truly believe it. That's why I'm so dower about some of the stuff at the primary. When I see people act in fools and taking petty shots, I want to just slap the hell lot of some people. Because it is serious. We have fun and we talk about fun stuff and I like to keep it light because I'm, you know, a smart aleck by nature. But there's some serious stuff that's

happening around this world, folks. There's some serious stuff happening here at home. And we are on the edge of a knife. This is it. I don't have time for loyalty to candidates in a country that overthrew a monarchy. I don't have time for any of that stuff. Where's the loyalty to us? Where's the loyalty to America's future. Where's the loyalty to our economic security? Where is the loyalty to our border security? Where is the loyalty to making sure that we are secure against geopolitical foes? That's the security that I'm looking for. Now, when I look at the house, everything is on the table. Guys, everything's on the table. There are so many seats that the RNC has to defend in the house. It's crazy. And a lot of them are in purple districts where Republicans are falling all over

themselves trying to get messaging correct. That's why Democrats are trying to corner Republicans on life so hard, by the way, because they want that to be the crack in the coalition. Our side will respond to that more than their side will. That's what you need to realize. And I see all these people, I see how these Republicans and these strategists and these want to be influencers, these damn influencers on social media have never moved the needle ever. If they move the needle as much as they did on social media in meat space, we'd be winning elections right and left, we wouldn't be losing paltry stuff that we normally win. Golly, it's turned into such a scam.

But it's a hard truth. It is a very hard truth. We may lose the House. I think we'll probably lose the House. And I'm not telling you this to get you said. If we stay on the same trajectory right now, we will lose the House and we'll lose the Senate too. And I dare say the White House.

I'm being honest with you. not, I know you're so mad at me because I'm being a cynic right now. I'm not giving you opinion. I'm giving you insight. My opinion is I want something totally different. I'm giving you insight, though. That's why I keep saying it has to change. And we're not all the way past that exit yet, but we will be in November. It's got to change. We need liberty evangelism. And the Republican Party's got to get its head on straight. Because we got this. We got Patrick McKinery. He's out. He's leaving. you got Santos out it's tough stuff we got to move whenever someone's wrong on the internet rest assured that I'm telling them they're wrong using Patriot mobile and I get great satisfaction

out of the fact that not only am I telling somebody that they're wrong on the internet but I'm using a phone service that actually doesn't donate our my your all of our collective dollars to promote and protect the things that we vote against they they don't they don't fight against us at the ballot box, which I appreciate. So there's this immense satisfaction in saving money, an immense satisfaction in a great service so I can tell people that they're wrong and tell people who need to be told no matter where in the world I am. And then also the great satisfaction of knowing that I'm actually putting financial momentum behind the things that I vote to protect. They also have a 100% U.S.-based customer service team. So I also am satisfied that I'm helping to create and maintain

U.S.-based jobs. Now, they have some great deals that are happening right now. First off, you can keep your phone, keep your number, you can upgrade the choice is yours. They have the Black Friday promotion. You get a free smartphone using code Friday 76. Now, this is limited time only. I don't even know if it's going to last through the week.

I'm just telling you act now, if that's something that you want to do, just visit, make sure you hit patreonmobile.com slash Dana. And don't forget, Friday 76 is the code that you got to use to get that free smartphone. So PatriotMobil.com slash Dana or call 972 Patriot. Again, that's code Friday 76 for the free smartphone make the switch today. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick 5. I love Mars now.

All right. So first up, a new Department of Defense report says dozens of soldiers were suspecting of advocating or overthrowing. This looks like, this is from vice. It's a dumb story that I don't care about because I think it's fake news. they said, oh, these soldiers were suspective of advocating

or supporting overthrow of the U.S. government. Yeah, I feel like this is. Also, Spot Gold rises to record on, but do the Fed remarks. Let's see.

I'm not going to get into some of these other headlines because they're garbage. But this, we had this yesterday, Americans tapping into retirement savings. Hardship withdrawals.

It's a phrase? Hardship withdrawals. Stay with us. Our partners over at Keltech, the sub two, great firearm, great company, incredibly innovative with the stuff that they make based right in Florida. And so this is for all of the hikers and the backpackers and the campers and all of that out there. Because for a couple of decades now, the folds in half, Keltex Sub2K carbine, this has been filling that pistol caliber carbine gap because with options for several popular magazines including Glock and Smith & West and Six Hours, it's so much easier to take along and you're taking along a lot,

less as well. And so from now until March of 2024, Caltech is offering a $100 rebate program and any newly purchased sub 2K from a licensed dealer. So you get yourself a sub 2K, you get 100 bucks. And that goes all the way until March of next year, that $100 rebate. And the sub 2K, it's just awesome. I mean, you got the ballistic advantage and distance accuracy with that 16 inch barrel. It's easily disassembled for cleaning or inspection. Intuitive sites, adjustable stock, field stripping, super simple. To learn more about the sub 2K and the $100 rebate program, just visit celticweapons.com. That's KELTECWeapons.com. Tell them, Dana sent you. Elevate your commute, workouts, or downtime with the Dana Show podcast. Unleash the power of knowledge at your fingertips by following Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Well, we've committed as a NATO member that we defend every inch of NATO territory. Then we'll have something that we don't. seek and that we don't have today. American troops fighting Russian troops. American troops fighting Russian troops if he moves into other parts of NATO. I don't think he's moving into

he hasn't moved into any part of NATO. That's Joe Biden being war monger with that. He hasn't moved into any part of NATO. And I'm not saying this as somebody I hate whenever you say something obvious like this. Someone's like, why do you love Putin? And I just like

why is assault illegal? It's And we're stating something He hasn't moved into any of this Welcome back to the show by the way You're super cremogen Dana Lash here

I'm somewhat Like partially lovable Today At the bottom of the second hour You can listen coast to coast You can string the radio program You can watch the simulcast Of the radio program

Channel 347 direct TV Facebook YouTube as well I mean they haven't moved anywhere. Where's, where's he gone? I mean, it's a failing, decrepit, just shell of a regime. There's nothing left there. I mean, I, the guy, if you've seen him, I just can't be, I, I get that, you know, we got to worry about tyrants. It's very difficult to be worried about tyrants that are, like, afraid of Winnie the Pooh or you know inject so much filler

into their face that they look like Jocelyn Wildenstein don't Google her don't do it Kane did it you did it once it was scary he still has nightmares you're scarred you can't unsee things there's no backspace key for that but I'm just where does he tell

they're not moving anywhere they're not moving anywhere this is about this disputed region that they've been going back and forth over and I really a lot of I don't think enough people that you see on cable news even know enough about the history of the area to even comment on it, which just muddies the discussion even more. But it's not anything that affects us.

That's how I look at it. That's not anything that affects us. And we definitely don't have any interest that are, we don't have any interest that are affected. And I'm certainly not going to watch everyone send their kids over to go and die for somebody else's foreign land and a foreign dispute. There's nothing to do with the United States. They're not interested in picking a fight with NATO. I mean, not right now. If they did, it would be as China's lackey. China's the biggest geopolitical

threat, and it's like so few people realize this. Nobody in this administration apparently seems to realize this. They're, they're, and I'm not saying this as a reason, let's go to war with China. I don't want to go to war with anybody. I war as hell. And it should not ever be on the table unless it's the literal last recourse because we're all going to die. I am very much anti-war. And most of the reason why a man die war is because a lot of the suits that run things can't prosecute a war. They're a bunch of pansies. I think that if you're going to go to war,

there should be no rules of engagement. All bets off the table. And you just let loose the hounds of hell and let them do what they need to do. I mean that quite literally. I don't believe in any. War is war. And when you mess up to the point

where you provoke an armed response from a nation, you deserve the full heat of that nation's response. That's the end of it. I don't believe in any kind. I don't believe in manners or rules in war. That's that's, that's, those are rules made up by people who push pencils that aren't in the

battlefield. And those are people who get people killed and make wars costly and make them drag on and on and on. People who can't bust grapes and fruit fights shouldn't determine the rules of engagement for those who can. Now

that said, China is still the biggest geopolitical threat. They're not in a position to do anything just yet, but they're making moves to be in that position. And in the meantime, you've got Biden sitting here talking about, oh, Ukraine, we need more money for Ukraine. For what? Not to totally sound like Shorzy, but really, for what?

For what? Like somebody's pension? What is it paying for? Do we know what, Kane? What did your tax dollars go for? Do you know? In Ukraine? I feel like we should get itemized receipts.

You know what I'm saying? Yeah. I think we'd have a lot. I think pensions were just a small part of it. Well, and then there was that one dude's daughter's vacation home for some reason. Several yachts. Yeah, I mean, like, probably. Who knows?

I just, I don't, I don't understand. I just don't understand about it. I don't get it. But I wish we had a, wish we really did have an itemized list. That would be great. So we could see where some of our cash went. Speaking of cash and where it goes, that's the other thing that they've been investigating is the,

and this is new audio, correct, Kane? Yes. Because how... He just had a press conference and how he ended it. How many times has Biden said, oh, I don't know anything about my son's business. I don't know anything about it. Oh, man, ever since the campaign trail, 2019, 2020.

Listen to this audio. Listen. Brandon, also China. There is polling by the Associated Press that shows that almost 70% of Americans, including 40% of Democrats, believe that you acted either illegally or unethically in regards to your family's business interests. Can you explain to Americans admit this impeachment inquiry why you interacted with so many of your son and brothers' foreign business associates? I'm not going to comment that. I did not. And it was just a bunch of lies.

Didn't interact with naive business associates? I did not. There's lies. There were lies. Wait, what do you mean there are lies? I mean, they're literal actual emails and receipts. That came from your son's computer that you guys admitted was this computer. So, which is it? They can't all be lies. Come on. They can't all be lies. Why is it? It's not all like that. I mean, the more that he denies it, the worst that looks. the worse that it looks, the more he denies. And they're still, like they have, let me pull this story. I've got a bunch of new notes here for you.

Because they've got, what is it? They've confirmed Hunter Biden's one of his contacts. They figured out, and this is the IRS whistleblower, and the House Ways and Means Committee, have been doing the legwork on this, because they're like, well, he's getting cash in that. Somebody's giving him money. to stay, you know, just to kind of, to live.

Where's he getting this money from? He's had all these money problems. And when his dad, you know, now that he's in the White House, like, who's been giving him money? Well, there was like a big list of people that they suspected. And they had this IRS whistleblower and now the House Week and Means Committee. And there was the story that came out in New York Post that they identified. They figured out who it was.

This guy named Kevin Morris gave him like $5 million. dollars to keep him afloat. And it's a very substantial increase that he got from his so-called, quote-unquote, sugar brother, says the New York Post. They said the guys met for the first time in 2019 in a December fundraiser. And the IRS agent Joseph Ziegler, he shared the figure and he had receipts at the Houseways and Means Committee. And it said that Morris paid about $2 million in tax debts for $100,000. Hunter. And remember the artwork that we're not supposed to know who bought what and when and all that? Yeah, well, he purchased tons of the guy's art. He purchased some of a lot of Hunter's art.

Kept him afloat. In fact, it was almost one and a half million dollars worth of art. So that's what he was doing. He's making these crappy paintings that nobody would buy. And then they act like, oh, because he's so good. He's like, you know, it's genius. and they sell them for this crazy amount of money and then he uses that. So it's a, I mean, I think the art is worthless that he makes. It's just an exchange so that he looks like he's, oh, I'm actually buying something. I'm investing in something. He gives him this money. $5 million.

Dudes don't normally have sugar brothers, do they, King? No. I mean, I've heard of sugar bears. It's like the thing that sells cereal, right? Yeah. I mean, he's got like, sugar bears got a, smooth voice. You know he sounds like Sugar Bear, our brother Sergio? He's got that smooth delivery.

That man could sell ice to Yeties. He's got like such a smooth delivery. He's like, well, hello, it's Sergio. I mean, but I don't think that Hunter Biden's Sugar Brother sounds like that. I don't know why it made me think of Sugar Bear. Dudes don't have Sugar Brothers. That's weird, right?

Like, this is a grown man who's taken money from another grown man. If you draw me a picture, I'll buy it and give you some money. That sounds really cringe. excuse has been it's been a loan it's all every time it pops up these payments and stuff like this they say it's alone it's a loan but if they said but they got the receipts they gave him he's got like almost two million dollars for art right that doesn't sound like a loan that sounds like a purchase with no intent to pay back yeah and the fact that they don't have any documents to prove that it was a loan and obviously

all these loans must be interest free i'm guessing um this is where we are maybe we should sell art I can spit on paper I just got a brilliant idea What? I think I mean I think I could sell art You know what next hour I'll show you how artistic I am

How well I can draw Really? I feel like yeah I feel like that S&L skit You know my name is Simon Are they gonna demonetize me for that You wankers I like to do drawings

Hello my name is Simon I've done a drawing for you What do you like to say? All right, investors. Pay attention. Investors could be you. Pay attention. I mean, what's to stop?

But why can't we sell art like that, Kane? We can. I mean, if he says we can. Hey, if Hunter Biden can get, hang on, let me tell, let me tell a glave here. I need a Sharpie and some white paper. I'm going to notify Glave our studio winch.

to let him people are like wait a hook yeah it's glaive dover he's a guy that we've had like around he used to he used to hang out in the dumpster um behind the old studio that was not always sorry for him yeah that was weird yeah and he kept saying that he was locked out of his car

and we're like you don't have one but okay I think he's just trying to break in other cars I don't know we just you know we kept him we liked him anyway but uh we could do that who's to stop us from drawing pictures and getting millions of dollars cane that sounds brilliant

so I think you know coming up next hour I think we should show the people for the people watching the simulcast the people listening you can hear the reaction to our amazing artwork it's going to be like someone viewing a renaissance masterpiece I'm sure I'm sure that's you know

I'm just saying we could sell this for millions of dollars and then use the money for like a charity like for my coffee fund that's charitable thing. Do you need a straw like Hunter? No, because it's gross. I just, you know,

if it's like, I have hygienic. I just want to make sure you have it. That's, can I just say that's so nasty. That's so nasty. He does spit it right with his mouth. That is correct. That's so gross. I mean, I couldn't even be in a gallery where I'm not, I really,

COVID maybe not be a germaphobe anymore because out of spite I wanted to just lick doorknobs and stuff. And be like, to hell with your, you know, well, now I'm going to do it. If you look closely to his paintings, you're like, wow, those are weird circles and it turns out that's exactly how bacteria grows. It's nasty.

It's like a collection of all the VD he probably has. It's not good. I don't know. Or the STDs he probably has. It's just, I don't know. It's just, but we're going to, we can do this too. Let's just try our hand at it, Kane. I'll draw a picture of you.

And it'll be like a renaissance masterpiece. Yeah, it's like going to be amazing. High-priced item. Yeah, I mean, millions of dollars. This is probably going to go for it. I'm just saying we'll put it up on an auction. We'll see how it goes. As we conclude the second hour, because we've got Florida Man coming up.

It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time for Florida Man. I think we all accidentally got high from the Sharpie. Because I'm drawing cane right now since Hunter Biden can sell art for millions of dollars. I'm like, well, yeah, let's just prove that it's not total nepotism and money laundering. So I'm going to draw cane. It's brilliant so far.

All right. First up, a Florida man who exposed himself inside, this is a strong sharpie. A Florida man, so it's on brand, who exposed himself inside multiple Claremont stores. He was drugged. Was he drugged the last time he exposed himself in multiple stores? A Florida man is facing several charges. He exposed his junk in a Target, a pizzeria. all these different stores Joshua Brown 32 was arrested for indecent exposure I don't understand his mugshot

he looks like I don't get it why he is scared confused why who looks like that in a mugshot he arrived officers arrived at 7 o'clock in the evening to find a man in target identified as brown showing off his bits and pieces in the business yeah you can't be doing that anywhere like that obviously they reviewed surveillance footage and they showed him doing that and being gross he's being gross when they detained him they found oxycodone and i can't say this one quanazepam quinazepam yeah pills and then he was on probation for a prior conviction of exposing his junk back in December of 2017. And he kept saying that someone drugged him and made him do it.

Yeah, no one did. You freak. You did it yourself. What's the matter with you? What's going on with Panera? Now, in St. Louis, Missouri, it's called St. Louis Bread Company. Outside of that, it's called Panera. Nobody knows that, apparently, but it's true.

There's now a second lawsuit. I didn't even know there was a first one. Against Panera bread, a Florida man says that he kicked the bucket from the caffeinated charged lemonade. They said that it was a charged lemonade. The guy went to cardiac arrest. the guy said he was drinking lemonade for six days and was a member of their sip club where you order unlimited drinks the charged lemonade has 390 milligrams of caffeine that's near the 400 milligram daily maximum intake did they make this guy drink this lemonade this many times a day for six days why is it their fault then you absolute fruicate don't drink the charged lemonade then good heavens this is so dumb they said that they find it to be without merit blah

blah blah yeah you can't be doing that kindness this is like oh i drank hot coffee and burn my mouth i'm going to sue because the coffee's hot this is so goofy uh let's see a florida woman set tender set her tender date on fire over sixty dollars say police this was in uh miami the woman that this guy met set him on fire 25 years old got to be careful with these chicks man that she wanted the $60, she wanted the $60 he had on him, and he said, no, so she set him on fire. Stay with us. Madam Ambassador, another question is what care should be on the table when a 12-year-old child in this country assigned female at birth says, actually, I feel more comfortable living as a boy.

What should the law allow the response to be? Well, I think the law should stay out of it, and I think parents should handle it. What? I kind of got a little bit of a problem with that answer. That was Nikki Haley just yesterday. We were having this discussion. First off, welcome back to the program, Dana Lashire with you. At the top of this third hour, you can listen coast to coast.

You can stream the radio program, watch the simulcast, Channel 347 DirecTV as well as YouTube. Always good discussion. Facebook as well. And I said this on social media yesterday. because I first off, I think that the clip could have been a lot longer. This is not our people's fault. That's just the clip that was released. It was too abrupt to cut.

But there's literally nothing that she could add there that would improve it, improve upon it, unless it was not. But that's not what she said. Here's the thing. There's no way to justify that position because you wouldn't help anorexic or a bulimic child, you wouldn't help them harm themselves with their body dysmorphia. So why would or should hormone or surgical abuse be viewed or treated any differently? That is the whole point. You parents are there as the safeguards.

They're there as safeguards. they're there as gatekeepers. This isn't, to say that this should be the parents, she's refusing to call out this is a mental illness, which is what it is. And if you're going to surgically remove your appendages, how is this body, because it is body dysmorphia. How is it any different from anorexia or bulimia?

I mean, it's rhetorical because it's not. I don't believe that it is. But yet this particular body dysmorphia, which subjects people to a lifetime of hormonal dependency due to earlier hormonal abuse to say nothing about the health problems that it sets people up to have later on in life because we don't even understand really, you know, the long-term effects of all this stuff. there's literally no studies on it. And to engage in the surgical mutilation and pretend that it's somehow legitimate medical treatment, that is disingenuous at best and just incredibly disturbing and it's culpable at worst. I mean, it's just there's no excuse for this. how do you play the woman cards so often,

but you can't affirm women in this debate? That's what I don't get. How does Nikki Haley play the chick card so often? But with this, so what? If a parent wants to allow their kids to drink and drive, do you just allow that to drink underage and drive? Do you just allow that too? Should be the parents.

I mean, at what point if a parent is beating their child, physically abusing them, you allow that because it should be the parent? I mean, seriously, at what point do you, where do you draw the line? Who is she trying to impress or what votes is she trying to win by acting like that this is some legitimate either medical approach or to act like it's just simply summed up by parental privacy? I mean, if she's falling on this, where would she stand on grooming? That is, this is the kind of stuff that this is why people are not fans of Nikki Haley. This is like one of several reasons.

But stuff like this, Republicans, she's too afraid to fight the culture war. She's terrified of the culture war. She's not been in that fight. She was afraid to take on Disney. She's taken the wrong steps every single time. By the way, you know, speaking of the situation of Disney, for all the people, because she got that incredibly wrong. The issue with Disney. I mean, Disney was abusing its position to.

a heinous degree. They were using the way that they had the Reedy Creek agreement set up. They were using tax dollars to pay back dollars to itself. That's what they were doing. And then they didn't pay taxes on all the perks that they had. You would be thrown in jail for that. Disney got a pass. Disney not only skirted state law, but Disney set up allowed them to skirt federal law as well. And there were people out there who had no idea what this setup entailed that were defending this, including Nikki Haley. I guess she thinks it's okay for some companies to skirt federal law while the rest of us get bent over a barrel to pay for all the money she wants to send to Ukraine. So I, she's been on the wrong side of the culture war this entire time. And I had someone telling me, well, Dana, you know, I remember when she first got started and, you know, during the Tea Party, don't tell me about the history that I helped create.

This is where I will get snotty. Because I took a lot of heat and I closed a lot of my door, a lot of doors to myself. I ruined my husband's business because of my political activism. And they're communist people that were in the business. Because the leftist blamed me and they took it out on his business. He had a very successful business that he ended up having to sell because the leftist could not coexist. So don't tell me what happened during the Tea Party. I paid a lot for my involvement in the Tea Party.

I remember Nikki Haley coming under the state. stage after the Tea Party had been created. After we had the very first inaugural call, after we playing rallies all around the country, after I stood under the steps of the arch with a tiny little bullhorn. And, you know, actually, there's like a couple thousand people that came out to that. I remember that. I also remember how she was, nobody really knew a lot about her, her background. And she seemed, you know, she said a lot of limited government stuff and the establishment, because they didn't really know her. They didn't support her. But you know what? People changed. Times can too. And she did also.

She went from being someone, I think she recognized that the Tea Party was ascending and she patterned herself to be on that train. And that was just, that was smart maneuvering for a politician. But now all of the things, she's, I mean, the stuff that the Tea Party stood for, she seems to not be so much into it anymore. Her foreign policy is definitely opposite of what the Tea Party's was. I mean, she can't even identify what a woman is. I mean, hell, everybody on both sides of the aisle could at least do that back. in the day. So I know exactly who she was and exactly who she is. I think that there was some very careful posturing and strategy that was employed. So she could ascend and then she transitioned

into the, to the UN to represent the United States government and then now this. But she's been on the wrong side of the culture war. And if you don't understand the importance of the battle in culture, then you don't understand how government works because everything that is policy first starts in culture. Everything. It's all apart. It's all about culture. And so, you know, she's, she was on the wrong side with Disney. She's on the wrong side with this. I mean, what are we going to go for a trifecta? Is it going to be a hat trick of wrong? What are we going for here? The GOP has a problem. I was looking at some of these other numbers. So basically, actually going into the new year, we're going to be down to a vote. Because we got McKinney leaving

there's another guy who's leaving. We got Santos out. And then now McCarthy's going to be out. We're going to have, I mean, I'm telling you, the Republican Party has got to get it together. Ronna McDaniel, I don't think, is good as R&C chair. And I don't know how they have things running, but it's not good.

I mean, this is, where's the RNC been with a lot of the stuff with the universities in the Cultural War? Where were they at with Disney? where were they at with that? You know, I'm curious. Audio Soundbite 19, this kind of stuff doesn't help either. Can we play this? This is from the town hall last night.

Listen. Well, I saw one person on who I actually had a very good relationship with, but I'm sure that it would end very quickly. I saw him in your debate the other night, and he's slick, but he's got no facts. You know, he's got no facts. I thought he did well. Considering...

You're talking about Gavin Newsom. Yeah, considering that he didn't have the facts, I thought he did well. You know, he said, we have the lowest taxes in the country. We have the cleanest speech in the country. I get it that he's competing against DeSantis. And what I don't understand, I mean, I do understand it. He doesn't want to say anything that would engender any kind of support for DeSantis. But at some point, I mean, I think it's stupid.

DeSantis won that debate. And he is a way better governor than Gavin Newsom is. Nothing is destroyed by stating the obvious or acknowledging that fact. correct? What do you lose by acknowledging that yes, he clearly won the debate to Sandus did, but also the bigger point is that he's a way better governor than Newsom? What harm comes accepted Democrats from acknowledging that? This is the tribalist BS that I cannot stand. I'm going to tell you what, if you don't want to send your kids to war, you don't want to send

your grandkids to war, you don't want to tell your husband or wife goodbye. and have them go fight for a foreign land dispute. If you don't want to have to pay, you know, half of your income and taxes and you don't want a free-for-all at the border and everything else, if you don't want the progressive left determining the algorithm for AI that's going to run everybody's life here probably within the next decade, then you better be playing it serious when it comes to voting in 2024 because this, ladies and gentlemen, for all the times that everyone had said this is it, this is actually it. We don't have time for hurt feelings. we don't have time for you know

any of this stuff and so I and I look at this I look at where's the RNC out where's the RNC in directing any of this actually when you come to think of it you don't really hear a lot about the DNC either do you it's not just the RNC

that's having problems where's the DNC you have the DNC that can't even bring its party together because you have people who can't even they can't even pass any kind of condemnation against anti-Semitism that's rife within their own party. It's pretty amazing. So one of the, we got the debate tonight that, that it's going to be taking place. It's in Alabama, I believe, the debate this evening.

Goodness. So we have too many, you know, there are a couple of other debates. If you get the email newsletter, I sent this out. There's still a couple of other debates to go. I know. There's going to be another one coming up. I know. It's kind of crazy. There's going to be another debate coming up in the new year. It's a little wild. They've got more for some reason. ABC and CNN, they want each of future GOP primary debate. Goodness. And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It's time for Dana's Quick Five. All right. So Australia's first ever moon rover to be named Roover after a public competition received more than 8,000 submissions.

That's like when they were trying to name that boat in Britain, Boating McBoat face. 8,000, and they named it Roover. Roover. They named the damn thing, Roover. The other names that didn't make it were Skippy. wombat, walkabout. Oh, Rover McRover face. Of course. They said, why roover? They don't actually, they just, oh my gosh. Kangaroo. Roo. Yeah, but that seems.

Very Australian. It doesn't hop. I don't know. I just don't. Maybe it's a pouch. Okay. Well, then I'd accept it for that. Does it have a pouch? Okay. A thousand sands ditched the sleigh in favor of bikes in downtown Milwaukee. That sounds annoying. That's horrible in favor of bikes.

They made their bikes look like sleighs. I don't know. I like that they do it. It's fun, but it's the Santa cycle. Okay. I have a video where audio will play coming up that it's why people have the opinion that they do. Let's see. A disciplinary counsel seeks suspension of an eerie lawyer who said that cocaine enhances

his work. Is this Hunter Biden? I'm curious. Like it has to, they have to be. Also, let's see NASA's James Webb captures a real monster face in deep space. It's a newly discovered galaxy spewing out of the stars. I think it's a warning.

It is legit a warning. It is creepy as all get out looking. Actually, it's as this cool as all get out looking. It looks like a ghostly skull. Super cool. Also, let's see. tire-slashing spree

solved as an Italian as Italian police arrest this is a weird story this is from the Guardian. They arrested this guy. It's like a mafia style intimidation. And they

it's the way that they have the Guardian wrote this story. I want to find the person who wrote it and I want to beat them to death in the street because they were so like obsessed with being trying to write like alliterations that they couldn't write the story.

Basically this guy went around, slashing tires. And they took them like weeks, apparently, to figure out who was slashing tires. That's what a sting is for. You sit outside and you find out who slashing, and then you arrest them. It's very easy. All right, so coming up, I drew a picture of Kane. I wonder if it could fetch millions.

I mean, I'm pretty sure it's better than anything Hunter Biden did. Stay with us. Whether you're a policy wonk, a news junkie, or simply someone hungry for insightful discourse, the Dana Show podcast has your back. Follow Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Why didn't the FBI just say, hey, the laptop's real? Why didn't you just tell everybody the laptop's real?

We're not vouching for what's on it, but it's real. This isn't a fiction. Well, as you might imagine, the FBI cannot, especially in a time like that, be talking about an ongoing investigation. Second, I would tell you that, at least my understanding, is that both the FBI folks involved in the conversations and the Twitter folks involved in the conversations, both say that the FBI did not direct Twitter to suppress the particular story. But others were in government?

Well, I can't, again, I can't speak to others in government. That's part of the point that I was trying to make, because the fifth circuit's opinion. But you're the FBI. You're not part of the White House and part of Homeland Security. You're not supposed to be political. You see all this controversy going on. Why didn't the FBI say, time out, folks. We're not getting in the middle of this, but the laptop's real.

Again, we have to be very careful about what we can say, especially in the middle of an election season, because that's precisely some of the problems that led to my predecessors, negative findings from the inspector general. Did you hear a gavel? Thank you, Senator Kennedy. I like what Senator Kennedy was asking there. He's right, though.

He's right. I get it. I mean, I think that, why didn't they just say it was real? We all knew it was. they just lied about it over and over again. Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash here with you, bottom of this third hour. They lied about it. They lied about it to influence an election, really, is what they wanted to do because they, I mean, they couldn't have all this come out right before everybody was going to vote. So they had to go and say it was disinformation. Instead of just saying, yeah, well, that's his. The cover-up becomes like the bigger story. Although, I mean, really, the bigger story should be the laptop and all the stuff that's coming off of it now, including receipts about him getting money. The guy who kept giving him money, floating him money, he'd buy some art, and then Hunter Biden was rolling in

millions. A million dollars for that guy's spit art. Now, for the last hour on break, I was, made myself sick high on a Sharpie basically. These things are powerful. Whenever I have a, whenever I have books come out and I go through almost a half

a box of these things, and I sign, I have to sign books at a book event. I mean, after a while, those fumes kitchen, you got, but not in a good way. I mean, you're just, ooh. So I was wondering, because, you know, I'm so artistic. And I thought, well, but I could draw a picture of Kane.

I mean, what's the difference between us and Hunter Biden? You know what I mean? I mean, besides straws and crack. Well, yeah. Well, he's a boy and he's a male and also on lots, on the drugs and growth. And he's an infant baby son. Infant baby son, yeah. He's probably the only old dude that is.

so like they try to act like he's younger than us. And then, of course, don't forget, he's the president's son, merches out the elected office, all those good things. So I drew a picture. I've not shown this to Kane. I was like, why bet I could draw a picture of Kane? Yeah, I was getting excited about it. Because I feel like I'm at like Six Flags or some sort of theme park

where you pay the person to kind of sketch you. You know, you sit there at the bench. Well, don't get your hopes up, okay? I'm just saying, you know, although I'm super artistic. If you believe that, you'll believe anything. I don't know. I, there's certain things I can do. Drawing.

Well, I could, let's just say I can master anything. This is a Renaissance masterpiece. Really, it's a masterpiece. So I did this. I, in my defense, just to say, just to add the, perspective. No, perspective. Okay. You're in the dark over there.

True. So it was hard to get your visage. Got my what? Your visage. Got it. So I drew a picture of you. I think the likeness is amazing. That's actually not accurate at all.

No, it looks just like, it looks just like you. We got, for the people watching the simulcast, he's always in like a hoodie of some sort. I can't really do shoulders or arms that well. It's still a renaissance masterpiece. He's got headphones on. His eyes, I can't draw eyes totally great, but, you know, it's still a renaissance masterpiece. The facial hair was a little tricky. Yeah.

So I just put it all there where the facial hair is supposed to. to go the lower face portion right could have been worse he's got the he's got the headphones the his cans that he wears for radio it's over his hair he's got

the core look at the cord I did I did a cord for those not able to look attention to detail I know the attention to I got the buttons on your shirt I got the cord that goes I mean it looks literally just like you hold on what is that what are those words at the bottom what does it read it for the audience that's listening

at home brought to you by probiotics I think that this is probably worth a million dollars. I'd say it's more than that. I might be a little biased. Yeah. I think it's worth a million dollars. I'm completely okay with the fact that it doesn't look anything like me.

No, it does. It looks totally like you. That is your shirt. I'm okay with that. Juan will agree. That's his shirt. That's a shirt. What?

That's your shirt, Kane. That's your outfit. I don't want to break the news. Those are scribbles on paper. That's not scribbles. It's Renaissance. That's lines of stinky sharpie on paper. That's what that is.

It's your face. I got your nose. Your nose is there? Your eyebrows. Yeah, those aren't exaggerated either. They're not. I can see them. So eyes and eyebrows or anything that includes eyes, I guess you have a problem with?

No. I mean, did you want me to draw something with your eyes? I mean, you mean, do you mean I want you to be more accurate with it? You know what? Should I use the Christmas car that Greg happens to me? Greg Abbott sent us a Christmas card. We appreciate the governor for that. Yeah, he says, very nice.

They sent us a Christmas car. I don't know. I'm awkward. Can you tell? Like, I was raised with y'all. I wasn't raised with them all. I'm like, and they sent us a Christmas card. I don't have any more paper.

Otherwise, maybe it's something I can do. I think it's great. I mean, if you're comparing it to hunters finished. It's better than anything Glenn Beck could do. I would say yours definitely hands down. Glenn Beck's work right here. Look at that masterpiece. So how do we get the bidding started is what I'm wondering.

I think we should start at a million dollars. You think the starting should be at a million. I mean, I'm sure we're going to get tons of takers. Like right at the start. I didn't even spit on it. A million dollars. A million dollars. Who wouldn't want this Renaissance masterpiece of Kane?

Probably if you'd spit, it'd probably be worth a million maybe. Yeah. I mean, you know what we should do? we should we should maybe gift it to one of the people that's in the YouTube chat as like you know

because it's like a million dollars we're gifting to you right here hand drawn on break by me brain cells were damaged by the sharpy scent of this image the scent is still lingering

yeah it's like what do they put in this this is wild like it's one marker and it felt we're all like dizzy it filled it the whole studio. It's a one

marker. I like it a lot. I think the bidding at a million might be a little much to start a bid, but I'm on board with it. This is a mass. Did you see my attention to detail in the background? Right. The crosshatch detail in the background. I didn't spit

through a straw. That's true. See, the Biden's could easily, you know what, Democrats could easily prove to me right now that him getting a million dollars for a painting is due to his, I mean, it's not due to his name or anything else. They could do that right now because this is better than his stuff. This has form and it looks like something. Absolutely.

And it has meaning because it says cane. Right. It means cane up at the top. Clearly a sponsored message as well brought to you by. By big pro biotics. Who doesn't sponsor us? But I think secretly they do cane. They should.

But I mean this, they could, a Democrat could give me a miller. million dollars for this right now and that would take care of any suspicions I have. Yeah. That Democrats defending Hunter Biden's work that it wasn't just because they weren't a money laundering thing. So a million dollars it is, starting bid. Now, you know, we could also, again, you know, you could gift it to somebody in the chat. I'm just saying, you know, we could gift it to somebody. It is the season.

It's a million dollar donation, a million dollar Christmas gift right here. Tis the Christmas season. I mean, I'm just, it's just, it is, there's no way I can display this, but I'm going to set it right here on the thing. So there you go right there. That's pure talent. I am actually impressed. I worked really, it took me, it took me an hour to shade your upper lip. I'm, where have I heard that before? I didn't steal it. I didn't biden it from Napoleon Dynamite at all. I didn't biden it from that at all, not at all. But for real, though, like, I mean, it's normal to draw pictures for your friends. and have them give you millions of dollars for it, right? Is it? Is it, though? I'm not sure it is. Yeah.

How, it's, that's normal. That happens all that. You guys deal with that in your friendships, right? With the Bidens. No, I've even played monopoly with friends. And they haven't, they don't even hand over. Yeah, I don't play monopoly with friends. They don't hand over monopoly.

Because I won't have any. For stuff like that. That's bandit. We can't play monopoly in our house. It always ends with tears and threats of litigation. Never. It's never going to. Uh, uh,

And we play risk and it ends with usually I, because I will dominate in risk. I will dominate. I will own souls. I haven't played risk since my teens. You know what else you haven't played? What? Oh, no. Warhammer.

Okay. Yeah. It's okay. Why'd I open that up for that? I mean, you could squat up right now, but you won't do it because you're- Right now. I couldn't do it right now. No, not right now, technically, but you know what I mean.

All right. So one of the other things, well, you know, while we've been watching what the Bidens are doing, and talking about all our demands and we got serious issues at the border. Did you know apparently 12,000 people came through the border last night or yesterday? Literally yesterday. There were 12,000 illegal immigrant encounters

at the southern border. It's the highest single day total ever recorded. Now, by the way, that part of that number includes 10,200 plus border patrol apprehensions of illegal immigrants. It's the highest for daily totals that they've ever recorded via Bill Malugin.

12,000 a day. That is insane. I don't even think 12,000 a day go into one Costco. That's like a stadium. Half a stadium of people. It's important to put the context of Biden. He's complaining about Ukraine funding because it's tied to border security. We clearly have a problem at the border.

Yet he's saying Republicans aren't serious about funding Ukraine or the border. this makes absolutely no sense this is clearly the party that once opened board 12,000 12,000 one day I'm trying to wrap my mind around it that's a town of people that's like two towns of people oh my gosh that's that's like almost four times the size of the town I was born in that's how that's how crazy that is 12 more than sorry more than 12,000 and they actually apprehended 10,200 plus one day. I mean, I'm, there are no words for this. Follow Dana on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts,

because knowledge is your ultimate superpower. That's not dangerous at all. Great job. Have you dog just sit on the bike lane. It's a great parking spot. Great job. Man, that's a nice bike you got there. Sidewalk is on your left.

Exactly. That's cross without looking and blame the cyclist. Man, that's a nice bike you got there. It's a great place to walk. That's a nice bike you got there. It's gonna walk right here. Take you time. That was him.

He didn't slow down for a crosswalk. If not look, use our eyes. If you're gonna act like you're a car. and you're going to ride your bike in the street and you have to obey the rules of the road like a car does and that means you have to stop for people in crosswalks he got mad at this chick a couple of people because they were in a crosswalk welcome back to the program dana last year with you uh we're concluding this third hour of our broadcast that was a i saw this video yesterday i don't dislike like i know p i have friends who ride cyclists, they ride bicycles? I don't know how to say it. I have friends who enjoy doing that as like a hobby. But the way they do it and the way that I see like a lot of these people in videos and some of my experiences with other people, like my friends understand they're in a bicycle and if they're going to ride with the cars, they obey rules of traffic. I cannot tell you.

So like in Texas, you got to stop when you make a ride on red, right? This was maybe three weeks ago. I was at a stoplight. I was two cars back from the person. Actually, there was a car in between us, the car that was getting ready to go. And they had stopped. There was a, I saw the bicyclist coming up on the right. And the car stopped. They were going to make, there was nobody coming.

He stopped as he was supposed to. And he was going to make a right, a turn on the red, right? This bicyclist, because there were people, it was the light for the people who could turn, they could go. So the people who were in the left turn lane, they could go. lane they could turn left and the people opposite you could turn right. There was nobody opposite us to turn right. So it was clear. This bicyclist, I watched this dude, literally all in his his like pro bicycle gear, he blew through that red light and was bicycling across in the crosswalk

as this guy is turning. And then he honked his little bicorn and flipped the guy off. And I'm like, that guy had right of way. If you're going to, and the bicyclist was not on the sidewalk. he was with the cars because it was like pretty traffic. I had something to do and it was in rush hour. And he, if you're going to be in the road like that, you have to observe the rules of the road. And thankfully,

you know, this guy turning, he was, you know, he was in a truck. He was slow. And he, you know,

tapped his brakes. But the bicyclists acted like he just, I cannot tell you how many times they've seen this. I saw a bicyclist almost murder themselves in a roundabout because they did not know how to bicycle. they did not know how to do a roundabout. Every interaction I've had with them in the road has been, they've almost gotten themselves killed.

They've almost killed somebody. Now, my friends aren't like that. Of course, they've been doing this like forever, though. Like, they've been cyclists forever, and they love doing it. They just, it's scenic and they enjoy it. But man, I'm telling you, that's why people don't like bicyclists. Is that right there? They're all leftists.

The smart ones, I think, are honestly conservatives, and I think the ones that are bad are leftists. I really do think that. Today's stupidity cane. Woo! All right. This is going to have to be... It's going to have to be Biden today.

No, actually, you know what? I'm going to hold up my masterpiece. We're going to do AOC. If you don't mind, AOC, this is cut 171, if you don't mind playing this. This is, imagine saying this and not recognizing the irony and all of it. Listen, listen, what AOC says. We're here because there's a proposal here, and there's several proposals here, to further marginalize trans women in sports.

And I think about this all the time because trans people in the United States doesn't even exceed 1% of our population. And yet there is so many resources and energy and time dedicated to figuring out how we can more finally exclude them from our sports. And I thought, why, why? Why so much effort and dedication on such a tiny portion of U.S. population? A violation of privacy? That's really not what that is, but what about the privacy of the girls who want to change in the locker rooms? That boy's being in there. Yeah.

Folks, have a good night. I'll be back with you tomorrow.