The David Knight Show - 10Jan24 Meet Your New Cartel Neighbors; Talking Autonomous Car; Stealing ALL Natural Resources with Derivatives; Stealing Elections
Episode Date: January 10, 2024Public opinion crushes Biden plan to remove William Penn statue from Penn's home, and Biden relents (at least with the statue)Meet your new neighbors — Ecuador prison breaks, cartel takes over live ...TV with guns on presenters. Neighboring country reinforces border with police but don't expect BidenUK debanking goes after rural hunting and sporting clubs with British version of Operation Chokepoint Consumer Electronics Show (CES) is back and VW is touting a talking car using ChatGPT. Too bad Pontiac Firebirds are no longer made, they could call it ChatKITT.How much money did Trump give during "pandemic" largesse? $555 BILLION to California alone. How much did your state get? Here's the breakdown. Trump comes after DeSantis for lockdowns. Remember when Trump attacked Kemp & DeSantis for removing Fauci restrictions?SEC Twitter account hacked and fake tweet about approving Bitcoin ETF rocks the market. What is a Bitcoin ETF?Davos is about to begin. Here's who will be attending — some surprise inclusions. But to no one's surprise "climate" alarmism will be front and centerSome of Biden appliance restrictions go into effect as GOP pays no attention. Dishwasher restrictions are questioned by court over whether the Dept of Energy has jurisdiction over waterBreitbart, Alex Jones, and other conservative media defend Trump over Epstein. There's ONLY 1 DEGREE OF SEPARATION BETWEEN THEM and EPSTEIN, CLINTON, and FAUCI INTERVIEW Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Ballot Access is MUCH Bigger, MORE Corrupt Than What's Happening with Trump Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, Shiva4President.com, explains how completely Dems and GOP have conspired to oppose the common man participating in "democracy". This is the REAL story of ballot & election corruption neither mainstream media nor Trump media talk about. You won't believe what police did to one volunteer. INTERVIEW Courtenay Turner NYSE & SEC Rolling Out NAC — Stakeholder Capitalism Where ALL Natural Resources are Rented Desc: $4 Quadrillion in assets (according to them), i.e. EVERYTHING under their control using derivatives, crony capitalism, carbon credits to enact the old UN Agenda 21 map (renamed UN 2030 Agenda) with you locked down in "Smart" 15 minute Cities and the rest of the world locked up and off limits. Courtenay Turner, Courtenay Turner Show, joins to talk about the urgent campaign to inform people and push back against SEC approval, links below To file your comment about Natural Asset Companies https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2023-09/notice-filing-proposed-rule-change-amend-nyse-listed-company-manual-adopt#no-back To view NAC comments https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2023-09/srnyse202309.htmFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away.
Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro,
the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights,
or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap.
It's all here at BetMGM.
Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.
19 plus to wager. Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600
to speak to an advisor. Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor
free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
When you're not weighed down by high interest rates, life lightens up.
MBNA TrueLine MasterCards have low interest rates on balance transfers and purchases to
give your finances a lift. Find the credit card that's right for you. Visit mbna.ca slash truelinecards.
Give your finances a lift. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 10th of January, year of our Lord, 2024.
Well, today we've got a couple of important interviews. We're going to be talking about the way that ESG is going to be securitized
and the way these people are going to take possession of everything.
We talked yesterday about the great taking,
but there's another scheme that is running through the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC
and, believe it or not, the Rockefeller Foundation, the usual suspects that are there, they want to hold title to what they estimate conservatively to be four quadrillion dollars worth of property.
Yes, they want to monetize and take over all natural resources and a natural asset company.
So we've got an interview talking about that.
Dr. Shiva Adurai is going to be joining us as well, talking about ballot access.
Nobody really cares about ballot access, but when you start trying to get on the ballot,
you really realize just how corrupt this system is.
And I want people to understand this is far bigger than Trump.
Everything is far bigger than Trump.
We'll be right back.
We're going to talk about the national parks coming up
and how this has been a gradual rollout.
We say, well, they can't take all the assets in the world.
They can't take all the natural resources.
Take a look at what they did with the natural,
the national parks right here in the great smoky mountains.
Uh,
as I've said before,
I love going through the park.
I love the area here,
but it always grieves me to go through Cade's Cove,
a community of people who lived there
and just had their property stolen by the federal government.
They turned it into a national park.
You don't think they can do that other places as well?
It's for the common good of the community.
They have to preserve these things.
We can't leave them in the hands and private property,
in the hands of you people.
You don't know how to take care of this.
And that's exactly the way they're selling these natural asset companies
and how they're rigging this up.
And then of course, the next step was to make the great smoky mountains.
And, um, I've got the number written down in my notes here, something like 700
different parks into UN World Heritage sites.
Now, we go from private property, the federally owned, to UN protected.
And now, in order to really protect them, we have to turn them over to, we have to securitize them.
We have to create derivatives over them. We have to grant with some kind of a feudal system, a fiefdom, to these corporations that are publicly traded.
And, of course, it'll be a public-private partnership.
And they'll allow people to invest in this.
So, you know, you can become a tiny stakeholder in this, maybe.
Because this is where the stakeholder capitalism of the World Economic Forum really does tie together.
So we're going to be talking about that coming up in an hour.
So I've got a lot of news that I want to cover before we get into that,
and I just want to give you a teaser of it.
It is a very big issue, something that was not on my radar,
and Senator Nicely was nice enough to recommend,
talk to Courtney Turner, who has a show.
She's going to be joining us to talk about that as well.
And that got it on my radar.
And when I looked at what this was, it made my blood boil.
So yesterday we were talking about the National Park Service
and how they were going to purge William Penn from his own site.
They have a statue of William Penn at William Penn's historical home.
And the park that was created 40 years ago, 1982, 42 years ago,
the park that was created there, they called it the Welcome Park,
but now William Penn is not welcome there by the federal government.
Welcome was the name of the ship that brought him over.
They were going to remove his statue.
And as part of refurbishing the area and focusing on native Americans,
they were going to get rid of his statue.
There was a lot of pushback.
There's a lot of pushback from people in Philadelphia,
a lot of pushback,
even from Democrats in Pennsylvania, the place that's named after this guy they want to purge.
And so yesterday, after this was up for a few hours, it didn't take very long, people contacted them and they have now backed down.
But let me tell you, the statue final uh the final symbol of what they're
doing these marxists i can guarantee you that if this thing is run by the federal government by the
national park service everything there in the narrative will be attacking william penn and
white people and colonizers and all the rest of this stuff. They want to make this about what they say indigenous people.
Well, you know what?
William Penn is indigenous to Pennsylvania.
Let's stop this nonsense.
As Russell Means said when he created the American Indian Movement,
he said, people whose ancestors have been here for centuries
see themselves as natives, and we are.
And if you want to know why they're not, they want to denigrate us and say that we are not
native, it's because of this.
You take a look at these massive caravans that Biden is bringing in.
It's very clear that he wants to replace the Native Americans, those of us who are American
whose families and ancestors built this country
that he wants to steal and destroy.
You better believe that the reason he wants to demonize us is because he wants to take
us down below people who are coming in here illegally, two-thirds of them on welfare,
a far greater percentage than people who are Americans, legally, American citizens, or legal immigrants.
Far more people on welfare than illegal immigrants coming in.
So that's what's really behind all this, of course.
And, you know, as I said yesterday, the Indians didn't build Philadelphia.
The Indians didn't build Pennsylvania.
The Indians didn't build America. It's didn't build Pennsylvania. The Indians didn't build America.
It's a very different place than what they had there.
And we're not allowed to honor what has been done.
And I'm not just talking about bricks and mortar.
I'm talking about the principles, as I mentioned yesterday,
jury nullification, free exercise of religion, habeas corpus,
all the other things that William Penn fought for because
he was a man of character and belief.
Strong Christian faith was behind what he fought for.
And we have all benefited from that.
And it's because they want to remove jury nullification, habeas corpus, freedom of religion,
all the rest of the stuff.
That's why they're removing his statue.
This article from zero hedge with ivy league institutions finally revealed as marxists
the woke another woke ritual removing statues is in place in philadelphia well i gotta say it's not
woke it's marxist again uh the interview that i had with she van fleet where she talked about
mao's america said, this is exactly
what Mao did in China. You better understand it. The subtitle of it is a survivor's warning.
Mao's America. This is all textbook Marxism. Forget the term woke. They're not woke.
And we're not red. They're red. I can't believe how they repackage this and people think well
this is something completely different it's not connected at all with marxism no it is it always
has been stop letting them label things because when they label it they define it when they label
it they set up the um you know the the elevated positions from which they're going to argue.
They've defined the terms of the debate with their labels.
House Republican leader in the state of Pennsylvania, Brian Cutler, called this another sad example
of the left in this country scraping the bottom of the barrel of wokeism.
No, it's Marxism. People are so afraid to call somebody a Marxist
because they overplayed this with McCarthyism.
They identified a lot of real Marxists.
And of course, there was a tremendous amount of Marxism in Hollywood
with Franklin School and other things like that.
It was a deliberate subtext to a lot of things that they were doing.
But they were going around pointing, you know,
accusing everybody being Marxist. Like I said the other day the fbi calling frank capra the guy who
did the why we fight series for america during world war ii a set of propaganda films if you
will but it was white propaganda you know propaganda can be a lie that's black propaganda
or it can be telling people the truth and uh you know, presenting things in a positive way.
And it was a propagandistic film for America.
Frank Capra did that.
Calling him a Marxist because he attacked the banks.
Talking about somebody like Jimmy Stewart, who left his position of wealth and privilege as an actor and said,
No, I'm going to be a fighter pilot. I'm a bomber pilot. I think he's a bomber pilot. But anyway, he's, he achieved a very high
rank in the air force and he did battle call him a Marxist. There were plenty of people in Hollywood
who were genuine Marxist, but they expanded this so far that they discredited that. And people are
afraid to call Marxism what it it is today they call it woke
and we use their terminology these people are not awake and if you use the term woke
you're not awake to what's going on either you better use the term marxism call it what it is
so they said it could also be the residents of the city who have a final say in the matter
because they don't like what's being done but let me tell you who's going to have the final say in the matter it's going to be the
people there at the site were employed by the national park service we used to always see this
i mean we took the kids to historical places when they were young we used to go frequently
to colonial williamsburg loved it but it just got worse and worse and worse. They kept pushing this Marxist narrative of, you know,
the bad white colonizers.
And I think just got worse all the time.
Sometimes I would challenge them with the family there.
But, you know, we also went up to the Plymouth Rock
and took the tour there.
They have like a settlement that was set up there.
They've completely gone off the rail.
They hate the pilgrims.
They love the Indians.
And they see this not as a cooperative effort,
which it was for about 60 or 70 years.
And then there was a war, which was started.
You can make a very good case that it was started not by the pilgrims,
but by an Indian chief.
But again, you know, bad actors on both sides of this.
But they lived at peace for quite some time.
They don't want to focus on that.
They want to have a conflict narrative.
And so I've seen this everywhere.
And I guarantee you that's what's going to happen at William Penn's house.
You know, go there.
If you go there, make sure that you talk to your kids and contradict and counter the lies that are going to be told to them by the people who work there.
That's the bottom line.
And it's always good.
Look, it's good to let people
so that your kids see the other side and then you can expose it as a lie we've always done that
we've done that with evolution we've done that with marxism and all the rest of this stuff
teach them what the other people are teaching them then tell them the truth and tell them why
they're being uh why that is being taught is wrong.
That's an important thing to do.
Because you are to walk with your kids in the way as they go.
Deuteronomy 6.
As you're walking with your kids, you teach them about God.
You teach them what is right and wrong.
That's your job.
That's not the government's job. You know what the government is teaching them about politics economics and even their own
sexuality uh you don't want them teaching them anyway uh they said as one person on social
media said everything is a test from this memorial of william penn to the taking over
of bridges and freeways out west highways here on the east coast to ireland to the taking over of bridges and freeways out west, highways here on the East Coast,
to Ireland, to the UK and beyond,
the COVID isolation, the trampling on the First Amendment,
they're seeing how far they can go.
And they got pretty far with Trump and the lockdowns, didn't they?
Even Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro weighed in.
He said, quote,
My team has been in contact with the Biden administration
throughout the day to correct this decision,
and I'm pleased to that.
Welcome Park will remain the rightful home of this William Penn statue.
While they will subvert it with everything else that's going on there.
And as we look at this, you know, it's just this last weekend where Biden does his angry speech.
And he says that Republicans are trying to steal history.
We're the ones who are trying to steal history,
if you want to say that you're a Republican or a conservative, right?
No, it's Biden and the Democrats who are trying to steal history.
They're trying to take down monuments.
They're trying to reinterpret everything, of course.
But it's always about projection, isn't it?
It's about accusing the other side of what you
are actually doing and that's exactly what he did he said um instead of erasing history
we are making history he sounds just like carl rove doesn't he? George W. Bush's turd blossom campaign manager who said, we are an empire now.
And we will act and you will analyze.
And while you are analyzing what we have done,
we will act again because we are history's actors.
And you're just observers.
At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, They're just observers. Are you just an observer?
Or will you push back against these people?
Again, William Penn made history.
People like William Penn made this nation.
And they did it out of their convictions.
Their Christian convictions, mostly. But they did it out of their convictions their christian convictions mostly but they did it with character you know i was showing the caravan again you know when you look
at this caravan this is what um biden wants of course working very hard to do that and here's
what your new neighbors are going to be like uh you had in Ecuador, you had gunmen storm a TV station live on air.
And I'm sure that as they're having these problems and these prison breaks in Ecuador,
that they're going to give up like so many of these other Central and South American countries
and just empty the prisons into the United States.
I remember I was living in Florida when Castro did the released all these prisoners,
Mario Bolt lift and and just sent out, took people out of the prisons and sent them to Florida.
And the Cuban people who were there were very angry about that. They knew what was going on.
But, you know, Ecuador can't control these things. Venezuela, these other places, they can't control.
So just send them in.
And even if they don't send them in,
what's to stop these cartels from coming in?
You've had in Ecuador,
two gang leaders in just the last week or so
have escaped from prison.
Now, if they've got gangs,
why would they want to hang around Ecuador?
It's a banana republic, literally a banana Republic.
That's their main source of income.
Wouldn't they want to go to rich America when they want to come up here and get
free unemployment, free healthcare in California, and they could run their
criminal enterprises as well on the side.
And they could get away from Ecuador or all these other places where they are known?
Mass gunmen broke into a live TV station in Ecuador and threatened the terrified staff live on air.
Employees were forced to the floor during the broadcast by the public television channel.
Before the live feed was cut, the attackers are later seen leaving the studio reportedly with several hostages they say police have made arrests but there's not much information about the arrests
that they made a 60-day state of emergency began in ecuador on monday after a notorious gangster
vanished from his prison cell is that where epstein? It's unclear whether the incident at the TV studio was related to the disappearance from a prison the same day of the boss of the Choneros gang, also known as Fido.
Fido.
Fetch.
In neighboring Peru, the government there ordered the immediate deployment of a police force to the border.
Why would they do that? just let them come in that's what biden wants right is biden going to uh put any security of course not but you know we have somebody who's dangerous break out of prison
uh in ecuador then peru says uh put police at the border we don't want these guys coming into our
country tell them to go to america uh to prevent any of them from crossing into the country. They put the police at the border.
What a novel idea. Why didn't we think of that? Why didn't Trump think of that?
Does he really want to protect? He did nothing to protect the borders. What a poser. What a liar.
What a fraud he is. During Tuesday's assault at the TV
station, one gunman pointed a pump action shotgun at the head of one of the captives who was also
threatened with a revolver. Don't shoot, please don't shoot, you heard them say. Please, they came
in to kill us, said an employee. God, don't let this happen. The criminals are on air. The president of Ecuador said on Tuesday that an internal armed conflict now exists in the country.
And he was mobilizing the armed forces to carry out military operations to neutralize it.
You see, this is what Biden wants.
Bring in the cartels.
Bring in the terrorists.
Create crime waves.
And then, oh, well, we're
going to have to pull out the military or Trump Trump, right again, Trump border,
border, border, look at all the crime.
And any does nothing about it.
Just like he did nothing about the summer riots in 2020.
Uh, but, um, at this next presidency, that would be the opportunity for them to seize control with a different kind of martial law.
Trump already instituted medical martial law in 2020.
In the early hours of Tuesday, nearly 40 inmates, including a convicted drug lord, broke out of a prison.
At least seven police officers were kidnapped in a video circulating on social media shows three of the kidnapped officers sitting on the ground with a gun pointed at them as one is forced to read a statement addressed to the president.
You declared war.
You will get war, says the officer.
You declared a state of emergency.
We declare police, civilians and soldiers to be the spoils of war. And as one person said,
in Ecuador, we've never seen this kind of a thing.
This is new.
Well, we're going to see some of this new stuff
in America as well.
Because Biden wants everybody to come in.
We are not criminals, they said.
I'm sure there's not any criminals
in those thousands of people, as far as you can see, packed shoulder to shoulder across the border.
There are not any criminals in there. I'm sure there's no criminals, don't you?
I can't possibly. There's so much better than Americans are, aren't they?
We're the criminals. We're the ones who have to be controlled.
They said, well, we've never seen this type of thing before.
So what kind of security situation are we in?
If a television station is capable of receiving this type of robbery, this type of insecurity, imagine restaurants and shops, said one person on social media.
So again, meet your new neighbors coming in now the same time gun control is ramping up everywhere
especially in the uk and in the uk they have traditionally had people who are in the
countryside who have shooting clubs and hunting clubs and things like that they have been allowed to have some firearms but that is now being
cancelled with a british version of operation choke point which began under the obama administration
where they said we're going to debank anybody who is a gun retailer or a gun manufacturer some other
things like that but of course now they're using debanking against their political opponents in the U.K.
like Nigel Farage and other things like that.
So they're using this very extensively.
So as we open up the borders, as we open up immigration all across Western civilization,
bring the barbarians in the gate and disarm the Native Americans, disarm
the Native Europeans.
The shooting businesses, including shops and clubs, have blown the whistle on cancel happy
banks.
Isn't it funny how Obama and the UK and all these people are using the same tactics and really doing it at the same time, too.
The English country stalwarts like gun shops and shooting syndicates and gun
clubs are being treated like criminals, said the British Association for
Shooting and Conservation. So this is what happens.
This used to be what the NRA was. They've now got Wayne LaPierre on trial.
I have no opinion about the accusations of irregularities,
except that I'm suspicious since it's coming from Letitia James
and people of her ilk, political prosecutors there.
I do have to say that I've never been a fan of the NRA.
I felt they were limited in terms of what they wanted to do.
I was much more
impressed with gun owners of America.
Uh,
and,
even though the national association for gun rights and other groups like
that were all,
I thought better than the NRA.
But,
um,
uh,
when Wayne LaPierre went there,
give him credit for saying it's not about hunting.
Right. And, uh, because saying it's not about hunting.
Right.
And, uh, because if you make it about hunting, this is what you wind up with.
Uh, the only people in the UK with really who have legitimate guns, I guess, or the British association for shooting and conservation is simply,
you have to have people who own guns in order to defend gun ownership.
You have to have people who own cars in order to defend car ownership and on and on.
You have to have people who value the anonymity and the privacy of cash in order to continue
to have cash.
You have to use it.
All of these different things.
If we don't use them, we lose them.
The paper notes that gun
clubs and shops are being treated exactly like prostitutes of course they call them sex workers
the banks are refusing to do business with them and actually had memos where they equated
sport shooting with prostitution adult entertainment including prostitution, adult entertainment, including prostitution.
So the British Association of Shooting and Conservation hit back at this moral equivalence that was made between the shooting industry and sex workers, quote unquote,
a spokesman saying, just because a very small minority of people oppose shooting,
it doesn't become a reputation risk for banks to have this on their books.
The association warned against banks discriminating against perfectly legal and respectable accounts
that have been run for years on a proper basis.
They said you wouldn't expect your water, electricity, or gas to be shut down because
of your interest in shooting.
So why should banks be allowed to get away with politicized politicizing fundamental
financial services to the taxpayers
that are not long ago had to bail them out well of course we all know the answer to that
and now people do expect that they will get shut down on social media or youtube or other things
like that i've made the the alleg, uh, in terms of talking about censorship
on social media, I said, well, you really want to know what this is like. It's like the phone
company. And, you know, you've got, uh, Lily Tomlin, the operator who's sitting on the phone,
you know, listening in on all the conversations. And if she doesn't like what you have to say,
they cancel you. That's really the metaphor for social media.'t like what you have to say they cancel you that's really the
metaphor for social media so yeah you do go back to these utility companies that are there before
we take a quick break i just want to you know the consumer electronics show is involved and
everything has commenced again this year beginning of january and they haven't done it for the last couple of years
because of the pandemic scare.
But it's back on, and it's all about artificial intelligence.
A few years ago, it was all about electric cars
and autonomous driving cars.
And now Volkswagen has unveiled their innovation.
They want to integrate chat GPT into their vehicles and when i laughed
about this my son said if only they still made pontiac firebirds
maybe they'll call it cat or chat k-i-t-t instead of gpt to do kit from night Rider, Volkswagen's voice assistant integrating chat GPT into its cars will be able to converse with users in a back and forth dialogue by the middle of the year, said Volkswagen on Monday.
And they presented this at Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas.
Isn't that great? It's like taking the nagging backseat driver, putting them in the front seat,
and of course, it having the capability to snatch the wheel out of your hand in any moment or stomp on the brakes.
That's exactly what I want in a car.
Isn't that what you want?
Of course, you'll pay more for it.
So I said from raising the temperature when it hears I'm feeling cold to showing the nearest Indian restaurant upon
hearing I want butter chicken. But of course, it would never nag you about going too fast or
breaking too quickly or taking a corner too quickly. I'm sure that at BetMGM, Ontario's
best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro,
the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights,
or try to score
in Gretzky Goal Lucky Tap.
It's all here at BetMGM.
Visit BetMGM.com
for terms and conditions.
19 plus to wager.
Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions
or concerns about your gambling
or someone close to you,
please contact Connex Ontario
at 1-866-531-2600
to speak to an advisor.
Free of charge.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. That's not in the works.
We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
Well, I had a listener send me an email to correct something I had to say.
He said, you said that states like California got tens of billions of dollars from the Make America Sick Again Trump.
He says, and I stay tuned.
Um, I got a t-shirt coming up, uh, but he said, uh, uh, California, however,
didn't get tens of billions.
California got a whopping $555 billion.
Half a trillion.
He said more than twice their annual budget of 225 billion.
And of course it doesn't take a long for Gavin Newsom to go through that and to
get them into a budget crisis again, you know,
doing things like offering unemployment to illegally, uh, you know,
illegal foreign citizens and, um, uh,
free healthcare and all the rest of this stuff that hasn't even kicked in yet.
That's an, and they've already got a budget deficit, but he said, uh,
California got a whopping, uh he said california got a whopping a
half a trillion dollars essentially 555 billion and then he said um and how come dc got 22 222
dollars per person when um hayseeds like me he said in ind, only got $9,971 per person.
Travis, pull this up.
How much coronavirus funding has gone to your state?
This is a website that he referenced that has all this information there.
Just to repeat, it's over $22,000 in D.C.
And then in places like Indiana and also in Tennessee, about $9900, about half of what DC got.
Places like Texas and Florida got about 11,000, 14,000 per person in California.
So again, when you look at this, what I think may be the difference, because I was not,
you know, when I was talking about, and when they break that down is every coronavirus
program that Trump came up with and the people who work for him that he is responsible for.
Okay.
Let's not try to excuse what he did.
It's just insanity to try to excuse that.
Look at it, ask him questions about it.
Ask him if he's going to do it again don't excuse it
don't excuse it and just say but Biden did this and and I don't want to see what
Trump did the same thing they do with the Epstein stuff but what I think the discrepancy is and what
I was talking about was the money that you know some of this money went to the PPP program, and that was allocated to businesses and stuff like that.
But the Trump administration gave tremendous amounts of money directly to the governors,
and it was at their discretion how that money was going to be spent.
Boy, you talk about a powerful political situation.
That's why when you look at what happened in Idaho with Brad Little,
he had three or four times what the entire state budget was
for his own discretion.
And it was a very powerful thing.
It was solely under their control.
And so that was one of the things I was talking about.
But it's also interesting to see the massive amount of so that was one of the things I was talking about. But it's also interesting to
see the massive amount of money that was there. And then the question is, why is Trump now,
as they're getting close to the election, a couple of strange things. They keep saying
that DeSantis doesn't have a chance. So why is Trump running all of these attack ads on DeSantis?
If that's the case, what is he worried about?
And so one of these attack ads that he just came out with was the,
as a matter of fact, I don't see that in here.
Do you have that, Travis, the attack ad that,
where Trump came after DeSantis on lockdown um see if
you've got that maybe we missed that in the in the deck uh but uh you know trump has um runs some ads
from the very beginning of lockdown and i remember this and i covered this and i talked about it and
i criticized desantis i said look he's shut down travel coming from the north on I-95,
and he shut traffic coming down on I-10.
He had roadblocks, and in the video that they had, they've got people backed up,
and the police are looking at them.
Are you a resident?
If you're not a resident, you can't come into Florida, that type of thing.
It was ridiculous.
But that was like the first two weeks at the beginning of april governor kemp and georgia and um the um governor kemp in georgia
as well as desantis at about the same time started removing those things and DeSantis, even though Kemp
started DeSantis removed more and did it more quickly than anybody else by
September, he had removed everything.
So they began removing the restrictions in April.
Trump doesn't want you to know that.
This is one of the reasons why you testify.
They say, will you tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
And on one of those occasions, in this Trump ad, they are telling the truth about what DeSantis did, but it's not the whole truth.
And they add some false conclusions and spins to it as well.
So they add some lies to it.
But the question is, if Trump disagreed with DeSantis, why did he keep sending him money?
If Trump disagreed with Newsom and with Cuomo, why did he keep sending them money?
Trump has talked about cutting funds off to states when he doesn't like what they're doing.
And he has done it.
He knows that mechanism, as all of the executives do.
DeSantis did that within his state to people who he thought were being too restrictive.
They all understand that they have the power of the purse, and they can punish people if
they don't do what they want.
And that's how the federal government always gets around the Tenth Amendment restrictions.
And that's why they were giving so much money to these governors.
But the bottom line is, if you go back and you look at what happened as
DeSantis and Kemp started taking down these restrictions that Trump and
Fauci wanted,
Trump went public and criticize them.
I strongly disagree with what they are doing in terms of ending these
restrictions.
And that was at the very beginning of April.
And by the way,
Trump used Fauci. He used Fauci. these restrictions and that was at the very beginning of april uh and by the way um trump
used fauci he used fauci to attack those two governors and now he accuses desantis of being
complimentary of fauci and desantis was complimentary of fauci at the beginning
but then he began to criticize him.
And of course, Trump, even though his supporters begged him to fire Fauci, did not fire him.
He craved Fauci's praise.
And he gave Fauci a medal on the very last day of his presidency.
Unbelievable in terms of the hypocrisy.
You've got the clip there. Let's play just a little bit of it here.
There we go. There's a mandatory checkpoint at the state.
Backing up traffic for miles. Yesterday, we saw huge delays there. Some people waiting
hours to get to that checkpoint.
Kim, no state border checkpoints in Alabama, but as you can see here in Florida, Governor
Ron DeSantis issued an executive order.
I am recommending to the Board of Governors who are going to talk to the university presidents
about going to remote learning for the rest of the spring semester at all Florida universities.
Restaurants, we're going to do similar to what California did.
Bars and nightclubs, effective 5 p.m. today.
They're going to be suspended for 30 days.
I work with Miami Beach Mayor and Fort Lauderdale, supported their closures of some of their beaches.
More restrictions put in place tonight in Miami Beach.
The entertainment district between 5th and 15th streets is getting an 8 p.m. curfew.
Okay, so that is a Trump commercial.
All of that is true.
But that was the first two weeks.
And then Trump criticized him when he stopped doing it.
And Trump kept giving him money, whatever he did, and kept giving money to the most restrictive governors.
So just when we look at this, it's all about the money, isn't it?
It's how you control things.
We're going to be talking about that coming up in the next hour, the natural asset companies.
But before we get into that, and before we get into the SEC's role in that,
the SEC has got a role in creating this new derivative structure
that is going to be how they're going to monetize ESG.
Yeah, everybody is looking at ESG and saying,
this is fraudulent.
They are telling people they're all about making money,
but they're virtue signaling to the government on the environment
and on social issues and things like that and they are essentially blackmailing the companies whose
stock is publicly traded and whose stock they have bought they're essentially blackmailing them
well they're coming up with a structure where they're going to be making a lot of money
an unbelievable amount of money but uh before we get to that, just to talk about what is happening with the SEC,
and we've seen a lot of volatility in Bitcoin in the last couple of weeks, that volatility,
for the most part, has been based on people saying, well, what is the SEC going to allow
us to do or not allow us to do? And they're talking about having a Bitcoin ETF.
And when we talk, when Tony Aardman of Wise Wolf Gold is on,
we talk about paper gold and paper silver.
That is an ETF.
You have these people, and one of them is GLD for gold,
and the other one is SLV for silver.
They were there first.
They got really big, and that's one of the things they're talking about with this let's have the sec just to prove this in general instead of
doing it like they did with these paper gold and silver things so the people who got there first
made the most money they say well we've got a lot of gold and we got silver and we own this and
we've got it trust us it's there in the vault in shanghai and you can trust us and so we own this
gold and um we will sell you i think it's something like one tenth of an ounce or something like that
so if gold is you know uh two thousand dollars a share they'll sell to you for 200 or maybe it's
one one hundredth of an ounce i don't know anyway, you can buy shares and you can do it very quickly and and and economically compared to the way that you could get Bitcoin.
Right.
You don't have to go through.
If they set this up as an ETF, you could instead of going through Coinbase and waiting for all this stuff to transfer, you could just buy these derivatives from somebody who says they've
got a bunch of Bitcoin, whether they do or not, because that's the issue with the paper
gold and silver.
It doesn't seem to track the price of gold and silver.
And there's been a lot of, we've talked about this many times.
I've talked about it with Tony Arteman on the show.
There's a real question as to whether or not they've got the gold or silver.
If you've got an ETF of Bitcoin, there might be a question as to whether or not they've got the gold or silver. And if you've got an ETF of Bitcoin,
there might be a question as to whether or not
they've actually got the Bitcoin
that you can just buy over the exchange.
And so Bitcoin fluctuated quite a bit.
And yesterday it fluctuated a lot
because this has been going up and down
based on rumors about what the SEC is going to do
about an ETF Bitcoin.
And so somebody took over, hacked their Twitter account and announced that they were going to approve the Bitcoin ETF.
And it was a very quick pump and dump from somebody that was there.
I wonder if they will track that down and see who made the shares.
Maybe they will.
They never did it for 9-11, right?
They didn't do it for October 7th either.
You had the same thing kind of happen.
You had a lot of people who seem to have prior knowledge about what was going on with 9-11 as well as October 7th and played it in the stock markets.
But with this, they may look at that to see who made the money.
But again, this is all part, I think, of the great taking.
Every time you look at one of these Wall Street scams, it's based on derivatives.
If you want to know what happened with the 2007-2008 crash over the real estate stuff,
The Big Short is a very interesting movie that kind of lays out a lot of what happens,
but you also see just how corrupt the sec and these organizations are, you know, they're
like the FDA in terms of the regulatory capture.
And so, um, uh, this is, um, you know, going to be yet another derivative scam, uh, not as big as the natural asset companies that we're going to be talking about.
Crypto advocates contend that the launch of the spot Bitcoin funds could bring a new type of investor into digital assets.
Oh, yeah, you better believe it will it's going to bring a new level of non-transparency potential fraud and the kind
of investors that always hover around that stuff last year the sec lost a court case against crypto
asset manager grayscale which wants to convert an over-the-counter trust holding Bitcoin into an ETF. The SEC declined to appeal the ruling, fueling speculation that the regulator would soon
approve Bitcoin ETFs.
And so this speculation, whether they would or whether not, has been driving it back and
forth.
Seven years ago, the SEC denied the first spot Bitcoin exchange traded ETF application. But the tweet that went out yesterday caused a rapid pump and then a plummet.
And Bitcoin's prices traders tried to make sense of the apparent approval.
Fraudulent announcements like the one that was made on the SEC's social media can manipulate markets.
And we need transparency on what happened.
Tweeted Senator Cynthia Loomis, Republican of Wyoming.
So are these ETFs transparent?
Or are they easily fraudulent?
That's the question.
You know, the interesting thing is how they are allied against all things crypto as being fraudulent.
And yet, I think the ETFs and what's going on in the New York Stock Exchange, the rest of the stuff is far bigger fraud than anything that's going on here.
But it's just another example.
You know, we look at paper, gold and paper, silver questions surrounding that.
It's another reason why you really want to have this stuff in your physical possession.
Things that once you pay for it, they can't track it.
They don't know where it is. When you look at the great taking, you know, they're saying, well,
if this goes through as this guy is saying it will,
they would say, well, anybody who's got money in the bank, we're taking that.
We're going to flush out all the bank accounts.
Even if you own something, if the people declare bankruptcy,
they may come back and take those assets back from you. Like I talked about the builder, you know, the builder
was having problems and people had given him deposits and to build a house. He didn't still
have those deposits, by the way, he had said, um, and I forget what the timeframe was, but it's just
under, I don't know if it's like six months, but it was just under the, the bankruptcy court's
ability to grab stuff. Uh, these people had given him cash and he said, I can't know if it's like six months, but it was just under the bankruptcy court's ability to grab stuff.
These people had given him cash.
He said, I can't do it.
He returned the cash to them.
And then, you know, six months later, he declares bankruptcy.
And the bankruptcy court came back and stole that cash from the people that he had returned it to.
They were trying to build another house.
And so when we look at the great taking, that's one aspect of it.
But again, all of these things that are digital assets, things that are encumbered with debt
in one way or the other, or tied to the fiat currency or the financial system, they're
all vulnerable.
And especially these things that are derivatives.
That's why it's very important that Tony has set up DavidKnight.Gold
to take you there and to WiseWolf.Gold.
And, of course, as we mentioned in the past,
you can engage in a gradual pattern of saving with wolfpack at a lot of different levels and
of course he will do small as well as big transactions uh on a regular basis not even
on right on you know an ad hoc basis as you need it or you can set it up on a regular basis with
those savings plans and um so again you know when you look at the ETF, and we've had experience with this with the gold and silver, it looks a bit shaky.
But, again, the advantage that they're trying to sell to people was that they can go to these ETFs and do a very quick transaction.
Of course, they'll pay for that fee,
but they don't have to go through Coinbase and wait for it to transfer. But again, you don't know if you really own this, right?
And that's really a key thing with gold and silver,
if you don't have physical possession of it.
So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back,
we're going to take a look at the climate and Davos.
Yeah, it's probably cold and snowy there,
but it's really about the climate czar John Kerry
and the rest of these people who are on their way
and their private jets to Davos
scheming about what they're going to take away from us.
We'll be right back. © transcript Emily Beynon Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh Analyzing the globalist's next move.
And now, The David Knight Show.
Well, Davos is about to start.
It's going next Monday.
We have the Iowa caucuses and we have Davos.
On the way are Vladimir Zelensky of Ukraine.
He's going to be speaking to people there.
Also, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken,
EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen,
French President Macron, UN Secretary General Guterres.
You'll have the Israeli President Isaac Herzog.
So it's all the usual suspects going to Switzerland to the World Economic Forum.
More than 60 heads of state will be there.
And the head of the US delegation is going to be none other than failed presidential
candidate and climate crazy john kerry flying in
on his private jet there's also some surprising people there perhaps argentina's new president
javier malai is going to be there at davos oh well it's okay you know we were told it was okay
when trump went it wasn't okay however you know when uh brian kemplett everybody said he's a davos guy look at
that he's at the conference they said the same thing about the virginia governor yunkin look at
that he's at davos he's a shill he's a sellout i think they're right now both of them said i'm here
to uh get jobs for my state, which is what Trump said.
But of course, we judge Trump by a completely different standard than anybody else.
It doesn't matter what you see him do.
It doesn't matter what he does.
Even if he does it to you, you give him an excuse.
Don't the MAGA people.
I'm not talking about my audience because those people I think have long since left,
but it truly is amazing to see that.
So again, when we look at Javier malai i'm concerned about that i wouldn't be caught dead as a speaker or a guest or head
of state at davos what are these people doing there it's very concerning also open ai ceo sam Also, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who is pushing WorldCoin and, you know, not just AI, but pushing CBDC globally.
Microsoft's CEO, they'll all be there.
And they'll be discussing.
This is the way the Associated Press puts it.
They'll be discussing big ideas and hundreds of public sessions.
And then they go on to assuage your concerns.
There is also more secretive backroom deal-making in the upscale hotels near
the conference center that hosts the gathering.
Uh, they talk about big ideas, but they make little headway world economic
forum says the associated press.
Okay.
Yeah.
Except that they seem to get everything that they wanted in 2020 didn't they so yeah
they don't have any condemnation about the fact the secretive backroom deal making
that is going on no condemnation of that whatsoever instead they tell you yeah there's a
lot of big ideas there well uh you understand what the big idea is, don't you? The big idea is to kill us or enslave us.
That's the big idea.
That's what these people are all about every time.
But AP thinks you don't know that.
What was his name, Anthony?
I forget his name now.
The guy who says, yeah, they think Richmond, north of Richmond,
that they think we don't know, but we do.
Yeah, we do know, don't we?
Climate crank, as Jordan Schlachtel says, climate crank John Kerry is going to lead the Biden administration delegation to 2024 Davos.
He will be the special presidential envoy for climate, as he always is.
That's his official title in the Biden administration. He will be the special presidential envoy for climate as he always is. You know, he is.
That's his official title in the Biden administration.
But he'll be leading the delegation because the climate MacGuffin is the way that they are going to push to save the earth and everything.
So we're going to be talking about with the natural asset companies.
That's their push right now.
To enslave us to make sure that we own nothing.
You'll also have Penny Pritzker there of the Pritzker crime family, you know,
the people who own the Hyatt's and, uh, you know, pushed, uh, the, the, uh,
LGBT and sanity and funded that kind of stuff. And, uh, the governor of Illinois, the very extensively connected, uh,
cement, the power will be there as part of the CIA's USAID.
That's a CIA front organization.
That's what Obama's mother worked for.
Senator Chris Coons will be there.
Senator Mike Rounds, a Republican from South Dakota.
Governor Brian Kemp, Republican of Georgia.
He'll be going back again.
A real Davos regular.
Eric Johnson, the Democrat who just turned republican he's mayor of
dallas i remember a few years ago they had the mayor of atlanta it's like who's this guy uh at
bilderberg i think it was it might have been davos but i think it was bilderberg uh so you know
they've got the guys that they're grooming for this stuff i i guess there's no word whether or not Kevin Spacey would be there. He was always referred to as the King of Davos, a regular raconteur, and he was a regular at Davos,
even with the Christmas special that Tucker did to bring him back and normalize Kevin Spacey.
Maybe that didn't get him an invitation to Davos this year.
Kerry is the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate
has refused to disclose the name of his staff members, says Schlachtel,
leading to concerns of possible collusion between his office
and radical environmentalist groups. Jordan Schlachtel
said Kerry is a depopulation activist who seeks
to surrender america's sovereignty to the esg mafia well that's exactly right uh and then of
course we have the u.s department of energy as they as guard pointed out when he's hosting show
so they got really busy they dropped a bunch of rules over the christmas holidays uh they have
finalized these rules.
You know, put things out.
They've got a comment period or whatever.
They finalized these rules in the Department of Energy
for refrigerators, for freezers, for fans.
You know, they sold the government takeover of health care.
They called Obamacare.
We called it Obamacare.
They called it affordable health care.
Why don't we have some Republicans who pick up the moniker and call this, you know, push back against this and say, we need to have
affordable energy. So shut down the Department of Energy that is doing everything to make
all this stuff expensive, these appliances expensive. Shut down the Department of Energy
that is shutting down our so-called fossil fuels.
I call them functional fuels.
And going with these very expensive, very unreliable renewable energy sources,
we need to have affordable energy.
As a matter of fact, we need to have affordable appliances.
We need to have an affordable life.
It's a wonderful life.
It's an wonderful life. It's an affordable life. I can bring some AI clips of Jimmy Stewart out to explain how this is great.
We've got appliances here.
Look at this.
It's great.
Don't you want to keep these things there?
Vote for me.
Maybe what we ought to do is get some people who really know what they're talking about to run for office. So the news comes weeks after the COP 28 climate summit,
where over several scores of nations signed a pact to curb emissions from a number of appliances.
Isn't it interesting?
It's almost like there's some kind of a global conspiracy.
They're all doing the same thing at the same time, just like they did during Trump's lockdown.
Isn't that interesting?
Of course, you know, Trump is not a part of that crowd.
We all know that, right?
Because we have his sycophant media telling us that.
Two energy efficiency actions that will save American households
and businesses $5 billion per year on their utility bills,
says the Department of Energy.
So if you buy these really expensive appliances,
some of which, you know, ceiling fans don't even exist, except in the imagination of the Department of Energy bureaucrats.
If you buy that stuff, well, it could theoretically save you money on energy, but how much is it going to cost you to buy the new stuff?
And the reality is, is that they're making both the appliances and the energy more expensive and doing it all the time.
Coming out of the Department of Energy.
So the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, when it comes to some other things like dishwashers, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals says energy? Well, you're saying that people got to, we got to completely redesign dishwashers because of the amount of water.
How is that your jurisdiction, Department of Energy?
Well, I got a question for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Where in the Constitution do you find the authority for the Department of Energy in the first place, let alone the water part of it?
And so they tossed out the rule about dishwashers.
They call the rule arbitrary and capricious.
Well, that's pretty much describes everything that the federal government does.
It's all arbitrary and capricious and also unconstitutional.
They sent it back to the Energy Department to address these issues.
However, they did not appear to eliminate
the existing rule in the mean time and of course it's jennifer granholm who is pushing all of this
stuff it also implies said the court that the department of energy may be far more limited
in the uh i'm sorry some competitive enterprise was saying this uh it implies that the department
of energy may be far more limited in the regulation of water use for dishwashers and other appliances outside of shower heads faucets water closets
urinals and so forth but again um they're limited by the constitution to not even exist
where in the constitution does it give them authority to regulate our water use or energy
use or anything else like that and it's kind of interesting isn't it you go back and look at it i mistakenly said in the past
that uh it was created by reagan no it was created by carter just before reagan became president
kind of interesting that carter created um two does he created the department of energy and the
department of education created the department of energy in 1970 70 created the Department of Energy and the Department of Education, created the Department
of Energy in 1977, he created the Department of Education in 1980. And they've been very
destructive. There's no authority for them. And, you know, he created the Department of Education
in 1980, an election year, you know, Reagan got elected in 1980, but didn't take office until
1981. People get confused about that.
A lot of times I remember when the dot-com crash happened and we were having some work done in our house.
We had a problem with our well pump.
We had the guy come out and I was out there talking to him and he starts griping about Bush.
And it's like, yeah, I understand.
But his gripe with Bush was um 9-11 or the war on
terror or homeland security his gripe with him was that he caused the um the dot-com crash it's like
no that actually happened while he was campaigning for president people uh it's it's um look at this
stuff and when they say the court has called into question legality of repealing the Trump era loophole.
Loophole.
No, there's not a loophole about this.
There's no authority in the first place for this agency to even exist, let alone these rules.
So it's not a loophole that Trump put in if they pull this stuff back.
But again, this is the way the two parties operate.
When Biden comes in and says the IRS has
got a $13 billion budget, and I'm going to give them an additional $80 billion. And Republicans
say, you can't do that. That's too much. We're only going to give them 60. We're going to cut
$20 billion from that. And say, look at that. Aren't we good guys? We cut the $80 billion down
to 60. And then you have the new speaker come in and say, well, I've cut down Kevin McCarthy's $60 billion down to $46 billion.
But you're still giving $46 billion additional dollars to an agency whose total budget was only $13 billion.
That's not a cut.
And so when you leave these things in place and when you allow them to make these rules and you get rid of a couple of things around the edge of the rule,
that's not a loophole that you created,
but that's the way that it is portrayed by of course the hill.
So we're going to take a quick break and we're going to be joined.
I got the order of the guests mixed up. We're going to have,
we're going to talk about um natural
asset companies in the third hour dr shiva is going to be joining us and we're going to talk
about ballot access uh the real issue about ballot access that nobody is talking about
and he sees it as a candidate it truly is amazing what is happening. We'll be right back. Thank you. Making sense common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
All right, joining us now is Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai.
He is running for president, and I tell you, it really is an eye-opener when you get involved in the political system like this.
His website is shiva4president.com.
Shiva for president.
And, you know, as we're talking about, we want to talk about ballot access specifically,
but there's broader issues that are involved here as well.
And you look at the headlines, and the Republicans are going to go on offense to yank Biden from the ballot in various states.
And they're cheering that in the MAGA press.
And then you even got DeSantis saying, well, if they kick Trump off the ballot, we're going to kick off Biden off the ballot in Florida.
They're angry about this because these two parties have been colluding for the longest time to control ballot access. And that's what Dr. Shiva is running up against.
So thank you for joining us, sir.
Great to be here, David.
Thanks for that background.
Yeah.
You could tell people what's going on right now with this immediately, you know, with the ballot access.
But I know there's other issues there. But, you know, what is happening with that? What is it like to try to get on the ballot? It's crazy, isn't it?
Well, what's interesting, David, is, you know, in the United States, if you're running for some office, let's say in your local state or city or county you know county etc um and it varies from state to state county to county the election
people run the election typically who's known as the secretary of state they set up different
requirements for you to get on the ballot i'm making an example if you want to run for dog
catcher there's four people um and let's say it's a voted election seat you have to before you can even run as a dog catcher you
have to get certain number of signatures to be on the ballot if you're running for the united
states senate in massachusetts the number was you need to get 10 000 signatures that are bona fide
signatures that they validate right right and you have to pay them to validate these signatures as well, right? Yeah, in some places you do.
You have to pay a fee, etc.
And typically, if you need to get 10,000 bona fide signatures, you actually better collect 20,000.
That's right.
Because they want to, if you're an outside candidate, they're going to start throwing away your signatures.
Oh, the slant is wrong.
Oh, we can't read it.
So they have all these methods.
But what I want to let everyone understand is to get your name on the ballot they have a hurdle one of the hurdles and I want to talk
broadly about this hurdle but then more broadly about all the hurdles they set up so working
people everyday people can never get someone like me one of their own even winning an office
seat and I want to talk about that but ballot access is one
who gets visibility is another piece and even if you make it over there to those things they have
all these mechanisms on election day to flip votes and we'll get to that but ballot access is the
central aspect of democracy here which is you have to get, you know, fulfill the requirements of the state
to get X number of signatures,
and they're called ballot nomination petition signatures
to get on the ballot.
So I have experienced this level of what I call election fraud,
the larger framework at every level over the last five years.
So let me begin with the ballot access process, right?
So when I ran for office
david in 2018 against elizabeth warren we needed to get 10 000 signatures to get on the ballot
guess what we did it how did we do it we actually had amazing volunteers who stood out in the cold
and rain in front of the shopping centers and collected how did they get on the ballot well they actually collect money
and they pay consultants to do that and the interesting thing David is I never saw Elizabeth
Warren I never saw any of the other candidates ever collecting signatures so part of me is
convinced that they have another method where they probably have a boiler room where they have people
writing signatures I can't prove that yet but I can tell you over the last four years, I never saw
them collecting signatures. I don't know how it works in Massachusetts, but I know that in North
Carolina where we worked, the Democrats and Republicans had to do nothing. They didn't have
to collect anything. They grandfathered them in and they said, they had a thing set up so they
kicked all the independent and third parties off each election cycle.
They said, you've got to get a number of votes. It's equivalent to 10 percent of the votes cast for president or you're not going to stay on the ballot.
And we said, that's crazy. And so every time you'd have to go back in and they eventually had a lawsuit and got that lowered.
But they still have to go out and collect the signatures. The Republicans and Democrats do not have to collect the signatures.
They just, they just float through it.
And so it is something that is an extra burden to waste your time.
It wastes your money to do that because we had to pay for the signature
variation validation as well.
So it really, when we, they had it in the lawsuit, the argument was,
this is like the Greek Sisyphus legend, right?
Where the guy pushes the boulder up the hill and then it rolls back down he's going to do that for eternity that's what
exactly what it's like in most of these states yeah so in 2018 we had amazing volunteers we got
on the ballot and that blew them away right in 2020 we got on the ballot again hard work we had
working people every one of our volunteers none
of them was paid david they had full-time jobs mothers retired people people working class people
and then they would go after work and stand for two hours and very diligently collect signatures
so we played by the rules yeah now when you run for president as i'm doing right now as David you mentioned Shiva for president.com
people can go look at what we're all about but every state right has different requirements
to get on the ballot there's no uniform set of requirements in Utah for example we have to get
a thousand signatures to get on the ballot in Massachusetts we need ten thousand in Florida
we need a hundred and thirty 000 they make it a percentage
of the last governor's race right so if you add up all the things it comes close to 1.5 million
signatures you need yeah all right so again as you mentioned david the democrats and republicans are
two multi-billion dollar trillion dollar parties whatever you want to call them with all the
backing they don't have to collect any signatures they're de facto ruled in and this is anti-democratic if
they're going to all follow the rules if you are an outsider independent candidate or anyone else
you have to collect those 1.5 million signatures now how do you do it well if it's legitimate
you have volunteers who love you who are willing to be dedicated they go out and collect now i call
him booby effing kennedy you know he's acting like he's an independent but he's totally supports
zionism he's you know he he is for full vaccination of all americans he's a complete
duplicitous individual so he has positioned himself as a anti-fake anti-establishment
candidate so in utah david you needed just 1,000 signatures.
And so what he did was he went and did backroom deals.
Oh, I don't have, I can't collect these signatures.
And then goes online and begs for people to give him money.
And some big pack gave him $15 million.
To collect 1,000 signatures.
Right, right, 15 million.
I mean, that means he has no support you
see these people don't have real working people support they're from the swarm from above and so
for him he's got a war chest and he'll go pay consultants who are his friends 10 bucks a
signature that's how he calculated it 10 times 1.5 million in our case so um in utah i actually went out there we in a few days we
collected we trained our volunteers 500 600 signatures boom done in a couple of days all
right so how do you collect signatures well this is where it gets even more interesting
so for ordinary people like us to collect signatures, we have to go out into the world, into the public.
Well, the typical place that people have found consistently the best place to collect signatures, if you have a retailer like a grocery store, like a Harmon's in Utah or a Whole Foods or a Star Market, you typically go stand outside.
You have your pad and you say, hi, would you like to put a candidate on the ballot?
Most people who sign say, well, yeah, I want to, even though they may be Republican or Democrat, the egalitarian nature of people, yeah, I want to see more people and they sign.
They do.
Now.
They do.
And that's the thing that's interesting is, and we saw that when we would do signatures, they'd say, well, I don't necessarily necessarily support them but i think we ought to have the choices that we need to open exactly yeah exactly
and it wasn't about so now what happens for the a young volunteer who's enthusiastic they come to
your campaign when they typically go out in front of let's say a whole foods or a store
the store manager will come out hey you can't be here collecting
signatures this is where the intimidation begins the store manager doesn't know the rules
and then the the typical volunteer will say oh really and they'll leave because they're afraid
yeah and but the educated volunteer will say no i have the right to be here because there have been
supreme court rulings state supreme court
rulings and so it gets very interesting since going back to 1939 1980 2014 many rulings where
the courts did the right thing here david they said okay in fairness for everyday working people
to get on the ballot they have to go to these areas where there's lots of people and what the courts did and
they did the right thing they said during an election cycle so that's the first predicate
and second predicate you're collecting nomination signatures put on the ballot
and the person collecting is not harassing people obstructing the way guess what that private
property gets superseded the private property
rights get superseded by the individual individual's constitutional rights quite amazing
so the issue is the court said okay yeah that person owns that parking lot yes it's private
property but you know a lot of people going through there it's a town square and so the
court said during an election cycle and when they're collecting nomination signatures and they cannot be obstructing harassing people
they have the right to collect nomination signatures one of them was a pruneyard ruling
that went up to the supreme court let me let's go what was the date on that because that's uh
19 1980 that's good because you know I talk many times when I talk about censorship
in the digital public square, as Jack Dorsey said eight or nine times under oath when he's being
asked about it. You go back to 1946 and there's a case called Marsh versus Alabama. It was a
company-owned town and somebody was handing out religious tracts and they, you know, banned them
from doing it and they fought it to the supreme
court the supreme court said even if the public square is privately owned you can't stop free
speech in the public square and so it's very similar to that and i wish we could broaden that
out it's good that they did that right to say i think the 1946 thing was was perfect i think this
ruling you're talking about allowing people to collect signatures in a public place yes it's
also appropriate.
We need to extend this out to the social media and other things.
Yes.
Yeah.
But the thing is, these have been ruled.
They've been Supreme Court rulings.
The one before, after Pruneyard, which was 1980, was Batchelder versus Allied Stores to collect signatures.
So anyway, now what's happened is David think about
this you would think every law enforcement officer before they get their badge and they get their
guns would be trained on this basic fundamental ruling because it's so connected to democracy
elections and constitutional rights so this is how the elites work they make sure they don't train
the cops they make the cops us versus them right that's right or the fake us versus work they make sure they don't train the cops they make the cops us versus them right
that's right or the fake us versus them they make them our enemy so i've had many instances because
i'm articulate and i know the law i always win these arguments so i'll give you an example we
were at whole foods once you know the store manager says you have to leave we say no we have
the right to be here would you like to sign my papers okay
and then they say oh you're trespassing we said well please call your supervisor or please have the police come we'll explain it to them um cruisers will show up guys with it all puffed up
hey you can't be here you have to leave typically the lower lower of our officers we said no
we want to let you know that we have a
right to be here there's been the pruneyard rulings of glovski rulings during an election cycle you
know when we're collecting signatures we're not harassing anyone this area becomes a public square
and then he go whoa no you have to leave i said please call your supervisor so this keeps
escalating the supervisor shows up and then typically those guys
will say hold on they call the attorney and they'll most of the time if you're you know stand
firm and you're able to articulate they say okay you have the right to be here but you can't harass
people and they'll go tell the store manager that happened to us when we were collecting signatures
just eight weeks ago in utah okay our volunteers are collecting the store
manager says you can't collect i said we have the right to collect three police officers show up
start wanting everyone's ids and then i said please bring your supervisor the supervisor is
quite nice he said oh i'm really interested in case law we said this is a reality he called up
the state attorney he said you have the right to be here he
reprimanded actually the store manager that is a reasonable way but think about what we have to do
david we have to do this education yes right we have to do all this work democrats republicans
and others don't booby kennedy doesn't have to do that he just pays people to collect signatures
but if you're an ordinary working class person like me and if you have working class supporters think about the barrier to entry first of all getting volunteers to go collect
signatures on a cold day is difficult then they have to face the police they have to face all this
intimidation and this is where the election fraud really begins now it got quite egregious and the
reason i called you david i'm very kind that you wanted to discuss this is because january
7th which was this sunday which was really the 12th anniversary of my mom's passing i was doing
a memorial service at the house and i get an urgent call from our state leader in kentucky
okay amazing one of the most well-mannered young gentlemen i've ever met he works as a full-time electrician right gets up at seven
in the morning works until four working class guy he's seen all my videos loves our campaign
you know went through all of our training and became the state leader in kentucky we have a
couple hundred volunteers here well he goes out to a walmart by himself on a sunday because you
know we need 5 000 signatures so he's standing out in front of the Walmart, not inside, outside, very respectful, waving
to people, collecting signatures.
He'd collected around seven signatures.
What ends up happening is a Walmart store employee comes out, again, a multi-billion
dollar company who sells all sorts of Chinese crap, okay?
Excuse my language.
Comes out and says, you can't be here.
And he says, no no i have the right
to be here here's a pruneyard ruling um etc then the supervisor comes out you know harassing him
and he goes no i have the right to be here again this is a working class american citizen
who has been trained in the first amendment stating i have a right to be here yeah all right
then police show up and he
said and the officer says you're trespassing you have to leave he goes no officer i have a right
to be here guess what they do david they handcuff him put him in the back of a cruiser i was on the
phone with the police officer nick you know he called me right and i said officers please let him go right he has a right to be here
and they take him to the police station take off all his clothes strip search him
cavity search him wow okay wow this is in the united states put jail clothes on him
and then i did a live and i said hey people call the kentucky police and i think they got a
little bit concerned hundreds of calls came in so they released him that evening he leaves a police
station he opens up his wallet his money is missing wow they don't give him money they stole his money
and then he had to walk back to his car at walmart and this is an American citizen a working class person who
supports someone like me so the issue is it's obvious the swarm the elites do not want us David
having one of our own in any level representing us and think about the scene here Walmart multi-billion
dollar company who made billions hundreds of millions during the pandemic
while small stores were getting shut down here's a police officer who's supposed to defend the
constitution and the rights of the constitution what does he do he serves a multi-billion dollar
company's rights doesn't purposely was never trained or did choose not to train takes advantage of a young 28 year old working
class u.s citizen electrician who on a sunday has not done any crime handcuffed put in the back of
a cruiser strip searched cavity searched wow and his money stolen wow and this is the the level of how the elites do not want any one of us david i mean i think i
deserve to have a shot at being president okay yeah you have to get on so they have the ballot
access it's like a king has various ways the peasants can't get in he's got the big walls
and he's got the moat and then he's got other whatever alligators right so the first
so when you step back at this and i've experienced all four of these things number one they deny
visibility to outsiders meaning you don't get on mainstream media you don't get to be on the debate
stage i experienced that in 2018 we collected 20 000 signatures we got ballot access i was the independent candidate i was
supposed to be on the stage i hit all the poll numbers elizabeth warren the republicans and the
democrats colluded that's right to keep me off the debate stage they've always done that i had
to take 20 000 out of our bank account hire a lawyer that lawyer as he was representing us he turned out he was a big paul ryan supporter
so he actually screwed up the case on purpose so we were denied all the mainstream media visibility
all the debate because they knew if i got on i would win so one is who gets visibility and right
now you can see the elections they trump gets visibility biden gets visibility
haley they even went and found a brown-skinned guy who looks like me who speaks anti-establishment
but is the most pro-zionist establishment guy you can imagine vivek the snake i call him comes out
of nowhere yeah you see overnight they give visibility to people he's a martin so visibility
he's a martin squarellilli big pharma bro as well.
Yeah, not only that, he's a liar. He's a
cheater. He said he was against affirmative action, took
affirmative action scholarships. He made up a bogus drug with
his mother, took it public, tanked the drug.
This guy's a complete scumbag. But they knew,
hey, there's that guy, Dr. Shiva. He's truly anti-establishment.
So they have literally watched what we do.
He's the chat GPT, okay, version.
So the first step of election fraud system is who gets visibility.
Second step is who gets ballot access.
Now, what occurred to us in 2020 was we got ballot access and we had massive visibility, David.
We raised $2 million in a federal election for U.S. Senate and we challenged the GOP establishment.
We had bumper stickers. We had huge billboards. We put about a million bucks in the billboard signs.
Our opposition GOP establishment candidate couldn't even raise 200 grand.
The GOP had to give it to him. think about that we overcame the visibility we overcame the
uh the ballot access and then what do they do to us in 2020 they flipped the machines they stole
our election in the in the nine counties in massachusetts we won overtly in the hand counted
paper ballot county everywhere else 60 40 60 40 that resulted in my famous lawsuit
where we exposed how the government colludes with social media i'm not going to go there but
i've experienced as a hard-working american all levels of these four levels of election fraud
they have the election fraud on election day which i've talked about and written about and
done major papers about right which is a signature verification the chain of
custody but the real election fraud begins with who gets visibility and who gets ballot access
so in the united states right now we have to get on the ballot in every state the unfortunate thing
for them david we have about a hundred thousand volunteers working people and this is what scares
them so much is that we will actually do it legitimately we don't
we don't notice i've not asked for money one time during this conversation people want to volunteer
great our movement for truth freedom and health as a part of our campaign wants to mobilize americans
to wake up and realize that these hard-fought rights no other country has and so what they do is they make the
law enforcement officers ignorant they make people ignorant to assert their rights when you assert
your rights they do cavity searches and they strip it's it's crazy so anyone listening you can tweet
all day you can talk about how bad the world is but we are actually on the ground actually where the
rubber meets the road fighting one of the most important fights which is ballot access that's
right and doing it the legitimate way not begging for money like booby kennedy or the democrats or
republicans we're actually mobilizing people who go out in the midst of their busy schedules
stand out on the cold 100 people pass by by, five people will sign. That's
a lot of effort, David. But that's the kind of people that have come to our campaign. I agree.
Yeah. And you know, when you look at this, it is, it's always made me so angry. It's one of the
reasons why I don't like Democrats or Republicans, especially the institutions that are there,
because you go back and you look at the ballot access and then being able to get
into the debates even if you jump through all these extra hoops that they set up for everybody
else then they still won't let you in the debates and the debates used to be run by the league of
women voters and then they would apply a different set of rules and you would get a few independent
and third party candidates in the debates and so then the the republicans and democrats looked at
this and said oh we can't have. So they created a presidential debate commission and other state commissions.
What they did in North Carolina was they created their debate commission was run by the media, by the press.
And the press colluded with them to keep anybody except for Republicans and Democrats out of the debates because they're looking at the people who are going to give them money and who always give them money. And so they would set up these different constructs.
They would change who was there. And they say, well, you know, we've created this presidential
debate commission and it's a private entity funded by the Democrats and Republicans. So they can make
any rules that they want. They can exclude anybody that they want. And they did the same thing with
the press. And we saw the same game being run when they were censoring people on
social media they said well these are private companies they can do whatever they want and we
knew that the censorship was coming from the federal government we knew that the exclusion
was coming from the democrat and republican parties when it came to the debates and when
it came to the ballots it's so transparent but they always use these fake constructs to bamboozle people. It truly is annoying.
Yeah, and David, they know now people are waking up to this,
and so what they're doing is they create the fake anti-establishment people,
what I call the not-so-obvious establishment.
People who have gotten very good at watching the videos I do, you do,
and saying, oh, people really like that.
So you have now people
just talking the talk booby kennedy just talks the talk right or trump or all of these people
or alex jones or joe rogan they have the media that you know and the media is a part of that
they have the you know but they create mainstream alternative media if you will i call them the
moga bird press you know operation moga instead of mockingbird yeah right so now they have the old media and now they have the neo-establishment
media of the grifter media network right and so we're in a very important time but our campaign
david is giving people this unique opportunity to understand this dynamic to become truly enlightened citizens and
then we say hey look get on the ground get on the ground hand out a flyer you know people go to
shoot for president.com let people understand that what's been going on in this country for the last
60 years the lifespan of your child now is less than you if you have a child right now oh it's
going to be short we want people to exercise these rights
yes it's hard to go collect signatures but do it because you will have this incredible experience
because you have to realize wow i have to collect signatures i gotta collect 150 000 signatures
in florida how do i do that well that means you gotta have you know 100 volunteers who each collect
1500 signatures well how do i do that that means you got to have, you know, a hundred volunteers who each collect 1500 signatures. Well, how do I do that? That means you got to make sure you got to mobilize people. Then you got to motivate people to go out. That's a lot of work. They don't have to do anything. These people are all cheers. They never work. They never work. They never work. They talk about working. You know, we're patriots. We want to work, right? And by the way, it's like a God created Trump thing, you know, talking about how he works all day and then he delivers his grandchild.
And then he has to, you know, make lunch for himself and everybody else.
I mean, it's like, what in the world?
It's totally made up, you know?
Anyway, I'm sorry.
Yeah.
Well, David, I think this is a key.
What they're doing is I was on a video interview with a young gentleman,
you know, he's in his 20s,
and he was like, yeah, Vivek,
the snake says a lot of good things.
I said, listen, your generation better realize
you start, you have to look at not what people say,
but what they do.
That's right.
Because they're watching chat GPT,
they have predictive analytics.
They will just say anything now that's
right oh yeah january 6 was um you know uh was a conspiracy against us okay they'll just say that
they don't know what they're saying they'll say anything they need to say to win people back to
the establishment that's right and that's what this is about as people break they want to bring
people back in yep and they do not want people in closing what i want to share david what we're doing is we're telling people we got to build this bottoms-up
movement we have to go do the work and what you realize is that the establishment does not it's
it's really class war in some ways they do not want they have started the class war the elites
in this case protected walmart a multi-billion dollar company
quote unquote property rights versus the individual's constitutional right to rightfully
collect signatures during an election cycle and validate that's what the cops are trained to do
or not trained to assert the constitutional rights and this is deliberate let me jump and say that, you know, when you look at this situation you talked
about in Kentucky where they violate even the federal law, they don't care about that.
Just like they often violate the Constitution, don't care about that.
And when you experience that and when people see that happening, even if you're not the
one who's arrested in strip search and cavity search, you see that happening to somebody
else.
And I think that another thing that's very important about this, I've said it has to be from the bottom up, from the grassroots up, like you're talking about. And it drives home the point
to them that I've said all along. I said, it's very, very important who is at the local level
because they can make things better or they can make them much worse. In this particular case,
you got a federal law that was making things better.
And then you got the local officials there, the police and whoever is over those local
officials.
They need to be held accountable in this next election.
And I hope that is something that people who are watching this and your signature effort,
I hope they pay attention to those local elections, whether it's somebody who's a sheriff or whether
it's a town council that's going out and hiring these police.
They need to be held accountable for that particular situation.
You need to find some people who are going to support individual liberty or at least promise that they're going to do.
And then you evaluate them by what they do the next election.
But that's the other part of it is to see this tyranny that is happening and to understand that that's another thing that needs to be addressed from a grassroots up.
Yeah.
Yeah.
What's interesting,
David,
Kentucky is a home of Rand Paul,
Thomas Massey.
And I tweeted at both of them.
Okay.
Now,
in my view,
they say some good things,
but in my view that,
you know,
just like you have certain tokens,
you know,
Massey's their token constitutionalist.
Okay.
And Rand Paul just sort of mimic certain things, but this occurred in kentucky a red state
where people are supposedly patriots think about what i'm saying and they didn't reply when you
tweeted at him they didn't have anything nothing nothing and you look he went to mit i'm an mit
alumni with him okay so this is a point here because he's part of the republican party i'm
not part of that club. Right.
But you should defend the rights of Americans, whatever they are.
And what I predict is going to happen in 2024, the elites know that they have been conducting class war against working people in the United States.
And people are waking up to that.
Yeah. So in order to subsume that reality reality they're going to have blacks versus whites fighting
red versus blue and that's how you started this conversation david oh trump versus biden trump is
somehow the victim to biden and biden you see so they're going to create the red versus blue
quote unquote you know civil war and it's very vital to them not just for their political control
but even for their economic control jordan schlechtel has an article saying, look at the Washington Post.
They're going bankrupt before Trump.
And then they had a real boom during Trump.
And now that he's gone and they've got a cadaver in the White House, Washington Post is on the ropes again.
So it's to their advantage, just like it's to Biden's advantage and all the rest of them, to come after Trump to make him a victim because it energizes their base.
It energizes Trump's base.
They get everybody involved and it's all over the personality.
It's not over anything that has to do with them at all.
It's not about any issues.
It's about these two competing personalities.
It's wrestling.
It's professional wrestling.
Exactly.
And this is a very important point, David.
I think I've made for a long time when I figured this out when I was 17 that this is wwf you know we should be called wwe wrestling and the promoters of the
fights are the ones who make money because they got to hype it the promoters here are the media
companies yes right yes the washington post new york times without this fake dialectic they make
nothing and what's even more interesting is when you actually peel away the layer and you find
out that the person who owns wwe the person who owns ufc i'm talking about the actual person the
person who owns the biggest hollywood agency which owns all the actors and the person who owns many
politicians is one guy arie emmanuel harry Emanuel Rahm Emanuel's brother owns formerly known
as William Morris agents he owns all the a-list actors Joe Rogan all these people in fact he was
Trump's agent for his books Trump was going to bring him as his chief of staff but one gentleman
who's by the way pro-zionist you know very close connections with mossad etc one person in the united states
whose brother is rob emmanuel and you can go study the history of this person is a pro-ultra-zionist
who owns wwe which is to entertain the masses he owns ufc to again distract the people and he owns
pretty much every a-list actor in hollywood
who zips up yeah and he's the agent he was the agent of obama he's the agent of joe rogan and
the agent of donald trump you can look at this one individual so they are literally conducting
political theater hollywood theater worldwide wrestling theater and this is how they're keeping
people entertained yeah while
they want to suppress hard-working people like me you and others david who actually want to build
these bottoms-up movements or our volunteer who takes time off from his work or or you know on a
sunday goes collect signatures so this is anti-american working person yes that's what this
is about they do not want us having our own leaders
they want to control it top down so they have this media enterprise that gives who gets visibility
okay speak anti-establishment rhetoric after you know joe rogan will talk about stuff five years
later after it's you know or even or tucker yeah it's like you know it's funny i couldn't talk
about building seven all this time and it's like you can't ask questions about that or they'll fire
and he's still not saying what he thinks happened with it yeah well whatever you're not a journalist
because you should be putting your you're making 20 million yeah if you're a journalist oh do you
need that much money why don't you move out of your house and be a real journalist sacrifice
something oh i couldn't do that well why couldn't you do that because you needed to have close relationships with hunter biden live in the
same area so you're so hunter biden could write recommendation letters for your son you're a
sellout you were always a sellout don't talk about now you're a martyr you never put your ass on the
line and that's what these people are they make themselves and to be fake martyrs all theater
but what happened in
franklin kentucky was not theater what occurs to our volunteers every day when they go out
and any independent candidate who really is bottoms up the intimidation they have to face
the education we have to do on the basic laws that should be unnecessary in the united states
that's right but that's what that's what become, David. And this is where the real election fraud begins, with ballot access, with who gets visibility. And then they have the other election
fraud on election night. And I've experienced all four versions of election fraud as a federal
candidate. And then, of course, it got a lot worse with all the lockdowns and you can't vote in
person and we're going to mail out ballots to you. That was a whole new level of fraud. That's right. And I said to people in 2020, I said, I'm not voting for Trump. person and we're going to mail out ballots to you that was a whole new level of fraud that's right and i said to people in 2020 i said i'm not voting for trump oh you're
going to support biden it's like no i don't support biden either with this stuff but i said
look at why are we even having an election if he turned over the government to a bunch of unelected
bureaucrats and then he adds this layer of corruption and everybody was talking about
what was going to happen months before that it was going to be total chaos total fraud and it was and then they motivate they they mobilized everybody
into a fundraising aspect that culminated into you know from the save america to the stop the
steel in january the 6th it's such an amazing fraud all the way through this talk a little
bit though about what you tell people in terms of, you mentioned the life issues and things like that.
You've got a much broader message than just politics.
Yeah, you're talking about health and truth and freedom, those things, right, David?
Yeah, look, so, David, I have been a student of understanding systems, all systems, systems of power, engineering systems, health systems all systems systems of power engineering systems health systems systems
and what i you know having grown up you know in a caste system right having seen this having
grown up as a working class kid in new jersey i realized there are these hard-working people
who keep getting mistreated so i was really interested in understanding these systems of power
and i
realized that if you're ever going to change if you're ever going to build anything like build a
new world change the world you always need scientific principles and engineers know this
if you're going to build an iphone you better understand some basic physics right right if
you're going to build anything and what i uncovered david was the foundations of all systems in the world all systems in the world
david come down to engineering principles which were discovered in the 1920s they actually date
back thousands of years and and what i i used to teach it at mit we've started educating people on
understanding systems principles it should be tarred at kindergarten and what those systems principles reveal david without getting into the physics of it but simply put there's a deep connection between
freedom truth and health freedom and when you study the systems principles it's the aspect of
motion movement of things in engineering we call it the word transport movement of information
matter and energy freedom
is an important principle for any society me being able to talk move freely physically move right
information pattern energy you know communicate through media now with freedom you can have
or transport as we say in engineer you can have another process which is essential nature called conversion taking things from one form and converting them so in the area of truth
you and I can have all sorts of ideas why an apple falls to the earth right but when you
have freedom scientific freedom where you can have discourse we have to put all of our ideas
you have to apply the scientific method you have to do experiments and then you have to validate it that's the conversion process in this case right of taking ideas you know in the open marketplace
of ideas you come to truth truth is really a verb right because it's always being refined right
because you may find today that you know um that the laws of motion relate to a certain body of
laws but when things move at the speed of light
you have to change them that was einstein's right it wasn't newton was wrong but you have to refine
it so truth is a process that cannot exist without this process of free flow of information
but when you have freedom and truth now you can talk about your physical infrastructure
health your physical health right the health of your economy
your country but you need all three without health you can't really fight for freedom or truth
so you need all these three so our movement our campaign um as we have in our bumper sticker by
the way quick little pitch i want everyone to go get one of these because you can reach a hundred
thousand people if you place this on the back of your car it's a way that you can have a lot of freedom but truth freedom and health basically says
you can't just talk about the first amendment and second amendment you have to physically take care
of your health you have to learn how to take care of your economic health and you have to learn the
process of science how you achieve truth right so that's why david i think you and i concur when you
look at it from a truthful standpoint.
Trump is not one of us. He didn't fight for us.
OK, he did. Alex Jones is you and I've talked about this is is theatrics.
He knew Trump was bad, but he was making money selling his supplements to the MAGA grant.
Right. That's not a truthful person.
That's right. So when you are willing to truly be a fighter for truth, freedom, health, you concur and you come to the conclusion that we need to build a bottoms up movement.
So our campaign is number one based on health.
One of the areas is health care.
And by the way, every Thursdays, David, we do orientations, open house.
Thursday at 11 a.m. or 8 p.m. people can go to shiva.com and sign up or va.com.
We do these open houses.
And our open houses, David, rotate.
One open house is on health care.
And when we talk about health care, David, we don't say after I get into office.
We actually teach people what the immune system is, how they can take care of their immune system.
As a Ph.D. in systems biology biology it's my full-time job you take care of their immune system
you take care of your entire body the immune system is deeply linked with aging systems so
we're teaching people that david we're teaching millions of people right now becoming president
i'll use a bully pulpit of the white House to reach billions. The next thing we talk about is environment.
What is our environment policy?
Support your local farmers.
Support local food.
You know, once you get into that, a different economy establishes.
We teach people how to do that at our open houses.
Next, we talk about education, David.
Since 1970, after the Department of Education took over, people are not learning
how to think. They're being told what to think. Now, how to think is the systems process.
We live in a world of complex systems. So I built a whole body of curriculum that I've been doing
for years at truthfreedomhealth.com. We train people we it's free for anyone 13 through 18 and if you're an
adult you take it you can give it away free it's in homage to one of my mentors jay forrester who
believed that at the young age we have to teach people how to think system sinking is the way so
we teach people that innovation david innovation you don't need to be in silicon valley you don't
need to go to mit you know here's my copyright for the invention of email. I did this before I came to MIT when I was a 14 year old kid working
in Newark. So they're very smart people outside the bastions of major academia. And that's where
most of the great innovations came from. A 14 year old boy actually created TV in Franklin,
Idaho, right? So it's important. So we teach people as an innovator,
what are the seven key critical things to innovate, right?
But we are doing these in these open houses, David.
We're doing more than the National Science Foundation.
And then we teach people governance.
What are the attributes of a leader, right?
Do you say the right thing at the right time?
You know, Tucker Carlson is not any leader. He know tucker carlson is not any leader he delays
truth glenn greenwald is not any leader he watches which way the wind blows right these people are
using when they expose truth it's for entertainment value they never say the right thing and in fact
when they expose truth they expose a little piece of it yeah and then finally dave when we talk
about the economy you know last open house we actually taught people what compound interest is.
OK, why you should take, you know, what is a diversified portfolio?
No other presidential candidates teaching people.
We are teaching the working people how to take care of their bodies, how to eat the proper foods, you know, how they educate their children from a system standpoint and so on.
So our campaign
is already delivering solutions and the entire you know our movement is delivering solutions
to win truth freedom health that's what we're about and that's what i've been doing all my
life david these people create problems i create solutions right they create problems we create
solutions it's very simple and if you can look at this
graph david look at the problem they've created since 1970s 60s to today the light if you have
a child today your child's lifespan is going to be shorter than yours that's right they create
problems that's right they create problems in valid access everywhere they go they create
problems and then like you said david they create the dialectic oh i'm gonna solve the problem left and right and give me money send emails give me money so they
create problems they create the chaos and they need that to run their business model yeah oh
absolutely yeah it's uh you know and it's by design i mean they're not they're not stupid
they're not flunkies they weren't deceived it's a very clever calculated
thing and so that's why it's important for you to counter this and and to show people you know i
talk frequently about just the free speech aspect and propaganda and how this has grown from
newspapers to radio to television and then when they go to social media what does that bring to
the to the table now they've got a closed loop feedback system. They can precisely measure their propaganda and they can fine tune their narrative in real time.
And they don't have to try to approximate it with polls or anything like that.
They've got it exactly.
And so that's what we're up against.
We're up against people who are very calculating, people who are very smart designing.
They've got a long time frame that they're working on this stuff.
And so that's why it's very important what you're doing in terms of pointing this out
to people, getting people, educating them to make their life better.
And of course, a part of that, I think, is the politics.
We've got to stop these people from coming at us.
And it's important to fight that at every level, from bottom up.
And I think that's exactly what you're doing.
I really do appreciate what you're doing, Dr. Shiva.
Thank you for coming on and explaining that to us.
It's very important how this system is rigged from the get-go.
You know, they get little things and they blow them up and micro-focus on them.
And the micro-focus is simply talking about how it affects Trump.
We don't even care about anything else.
That's what's truly amazing.
Thank you for joining us again.
It is for president dot com.
Thank you very much, Dr.
Thanks, David.
Thanks for doing God's work, man.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Be well, David.
Thank you.
We're going to be right back.
Stay with us.
If you like the Eagles.
The cars. And Huey Lewis and the News,
you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. សូវាប់ពីបានប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្� You're listening to the david knight show well we've got a few minutes before we're joined by
our next guest and so um even though i've really beaten this topic over the last couple of days
the epstein thing there's different angles of it and uh as i said um when uh i spoke yesterday i
said you know that alex is going to come back. I was amazed to see it come up.
It was reported that, well, I don't know what to tell you about this.
I was just told over the break that Trump has compromised, so we're going to have to come back with that.
Well, Alex did.
He came back that evening, and he came up with a very interesting way to spin it.
We were all laughing about it yesterday, how he might come up with some kind of 9-D chess.
This is one of the ways he spun it he basically split his face there with a trump so it's trump on one side and alex on the other side and of course they're both victims victims of the system
you know he's in a court battle with a rape accuser. And it is completely ridiculous, isn't it, for us to ever imagine that Trump could have any relationship with Jeffrey Epstein,
that he could be some kind of a debauched playboy
who brags about his sin and makes it part of his public persona,
brags about his greed, brags about his adultery,
brags about betrayal of his wives
as i said for the longest time before any of this stuff happened i said you know
when we talk about these pride parades i used to say before trump i said um you know you don't have
isn't it interesting that they have these parades where they're proud of their sin
so you don't typically see that you don't have an adulterer parade or something like that.
But actually, then I had to adjust that when Trump came along, because he does parade his
sin.
He is proud of what he does.
And I have to just say, when you look at this, and I said yesterday that Trump and Clinton
were two sides of the same coin.
I said both of them closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
And so, you know, there's zero degrees of separation.
You know that old game, six degrees of separation between Kevin Spacey,
not Kevin Spacey, Kevin Bacon.
And people would say, well, you know, Kevin Bacon was in this movie.
And you take a look at all the actors that are there,
and then you look at all the movies that they were in,
and you pretty much could at all the actors that are there and then you look at all the movies that they were in you pretty much could relate all the actors most of the actors in
hollywood six degrees of separation from kevin bacon is what somebody did well you know the
degrees of separation between trump and between bill clinton and hillary clinton are zero and so
if you want to make yourself part of a trump, guess what, Alex, the degree of separation between you and Bill Clinton is one.
The degree of separation between you and Jeffrey Epstein is one.
That's how close you are.
And when you excuse what Trump did with the, what you called it, sugar water, the vaccine.
Well, the degree of separation between you and fauci is one as well so you want to ally
yourself with fauci with bill clinton with donald trump go ahead go ahead that's exactly what this
stuff is about now brian shulhavi pointed out that what people are not looking at and this latest
well before i get to that i was also not surprised to see the people who, and the reason I talked about it again yesterday was because on Monday, when the stuff came over to the weekend, you had all these people saying, Trump has been exonerated.
I saw this on Breitbart.
I saw it on World Net Daily and all these different places.
Look, his name's not there.
And I said, well, of course, it doesn't have to be there.
They're not even saying that uh clinton's
name is on the role of people going to the island he was on the lolita express quite a bit but i
said um you know they can engage in these types of activities at his mansion they can do it as
clinton did in the oval office uh but um's what, uh, these allegations that were doubled down on one of the victims had to say.
And yet you have this kind of pushback, for example, from Breitbart.
And it is a total lie.
And Breitbart knows it.
This is the headline.
Media outlets bury revelation that the Epstein accuser retracted the Trump allegations.
They know that's a lie.
And they don't say what she's saying now.
And they don't show the letter that she wrote at the time
to the New York Post reporter saying,
I'm afraid for my life.
I'm afraid for my family.
She no more retracted this,
you know, legitimately saying,
yeah, I just lied to everybody.
That wasn't a legitimate retraction it was done under duress you can even pull back um you know confessions made to the
police they were made under duress like that uh but ross perot they're playing the same game that
the establishment played with ross perot with this victim and it disgusts me to see Breitbart and Alex WND calling these women
liars and bimbos just as Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton accused his accusers of being liars and
bimbos that's what they are doing they know very well what she has been saying, but they say other things. And then you've got a lot of people who are coming after even Steve Doocy on Fox News.
Look at Steve Doocy.
Here's a headline.
TDS.
That means supposedly Trump derangement syndrome.
But these are the people who are deranged.
These are the people who are absolutely lunatic about Trump.
TDS lunatic Steve Doocy starts a fake news rumor about Trump and Epstein.
I see this everywhere.
It's just about me.
They say this kind of stuff about me.
The hate for anybody who would suggest that Trump has engaged in the kind of behavior that he has openly engaged in
and made a career out of.
And this is what Ducey said that got them so upset.
If I said what I know about both candidates running in 2016, meaning Hillary and Donald Trump,
they'd have to cancel the election, Epstein's brother said.
Now, you know, Tucker had Epstein's brother on, as I pointed out,
and never asked him about that quote.
And he's not the only one who said that.
This woman that they're slandering as a bimbo said the same thing.
Sarah Ransom has doubled down.
She has not, the allegations that she made before have not been disproven.
She said, I can personally confirm that I have with my own two eyes seen the evidence of these sexual acts,
which clearly identify Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Richard Branson having sexual intercourse with my friend.
I will be more than willing to swear under oath and testify in court over these sex tapes.
She also included Trump in that before.
She says it will break your heart into a million tiny pieces when you watch this footage.
And I know that what I watched yesterday will haunt me for the rest of my life.
She then claimed to have copies of the footage, but said she would not share them because
of her friend's consent.
She said, I backed up the footage on several USB sticks,
securely sent them to several locations in Europe.
She said, on one visit to the island, the sexual demands, the degradation,
and the humiliation ensued me to try to escape by jumping off a cliff
into shark-infested waters.
She said in one email, I want to walk away from this.
This is when she takes it back.
And this is what the Trump defenders are saying.
Why did she want to walk away from this?
She said, I shouldn't have contacted you.
I'm sorry.
I wasted your time.
It's not worth coming forward.
I will never be heard anyway.
They they'll not listen to me because if you say anything negative about Bill Clinton,
or if you say anything negative about Donald Trump, nobody's going to listen to you.
The Republicans will listen to you about Clinton, and the Democrats will listen to you about Trump, but nothing's going to happen to either one of them.
Bill Clinton hasn't even bothered to respond to any of this stuff.
She said, this will just create pain for my family.
Only bad things are going to happen as a consequence of me going public. And I and they have already helped me pick up the pieces once before. I can't
ask them to do that again. And so it actually is far more information when you see the actual
memo that came out in these documents.
She said to the New York Post at the time writer,
Dear Maureen, I've spoken to my family at some length this morning,
and I would like to retract everything I've said to you and walk away from this.
I shouldn't have contacted you.
I'm sorry I wasted your time.
This is the full letter.
I just read you excerpts.
They're typically put out there by the media.
It's not worth coming forward.
I'll never be heard anyway, and only bad things will happen as a consequence of me going public.
I know this to be true.
This will just create pain for my family and I, and they've already helped me pick up the pieces once before.
I can't ask them to do that again.
I'm disappointed.
Listen to this.
This is the new part that you haven't heard.
I'm disappointed that you have made little contact or didn't do anything to help me this week as is it as it has been a little terrifying for peter and myself but i understand
your stance and we managed to get through it perhaps if i was in your position i would have
done the same i guess one person can't make a difference i wish you the best of luck on catching epstein
and company sarah ransom so um far from being an exoneration of donald trump
this shows us how corrupt the system is and yet when you look at the son showing that letter, and they follow up with this, and they say,
Ms. Ransom's deposition misstatements demonstrate that she manifestly lacks any
credibility. For example, she says this, my emails have been hacked. I have reached out to the
Russians for help, and they're coming to my aid. Thank goodness for anonymous. I will make sure that they all get behind bars. I have already
said everything I need to. So the CIA hacking my emails were too late. I also have numerous devices
with systems that are unhackable and I have film footage that I've distributed all over Europe that is itching to be released.
She said her friend was approached by men sent directly by Hillary Clinton in order to protect her presidential campaign.
See, they're playing the same game again that they played with Ross Perot.
When he said he was threatened, his family was threatened, they said, oh, he's just a paranoid lunatic.
And that's exactly what they're saying about her.
Now, one final thing about this, and that is the, um, uh, what Brian
shall hobby has to say.
And he says, you know, we've seen a lot of this stuff before, and it's been
there before we've had some names that have been revealed that we hadn't seen
before, but that's not really the most important aspect of this.
It says, take a look at the banking system and look at these lawsuits that involved JP Morgan.
And he said, that is the real aspect of banking system that is built on top of global child sex trafficking.
And so when we come back, we're going to talk about this corrupt banking system.
And we're going to talk about the next shoe to drop, uh, where they are moving.
And I think as it is a natural extension of ESG, you know, you look at ESG and it's like,
so how do they really make money from this?
And you're looking at, well, they don't care.
They're playing a really long game.
Well, here's where they roll it in and here's where they cash in.
And that's what we're going to be talking about when we come back with
Courtney Turner and the Courtney Turner show.
And just a moment before we go,
let me just say real quickly.
I've got say thank you to Greg talent.
Thank you for the tip on rock fan.
Thank you very much,
Greg and Audi modern retro radio.
As we were talking about the arrest and the strip searching
and the cavity searching of a person who is simply collecting signatures
within his legal rights.
Audi says, cops aren't trained to uphold the Constitution.
They're trained to skirt the Constitution.
They're incentivized to victimize.
Well, unfortunately, that is true in so many jurisdictions.
And that's one of the things that I think is important about
what Shiva is doing. It's waking people up to see that even if you have something that is right at
the federal level, and they had Supreme Court, they had court decisions that upheld that right.
If you've got the wrong people at the local level, they can make everything worse. And so you have to be involved, especially at the local level, because that's where the tyranny meets the road.
We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Thank you. Sous-titrage ST' 501 You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
Find it now at apsradio.com.
All right, joining us now is Courtney Turner of The Courtney Turner Show.
And you can find her.
She spells her last name C-O-U-R-T-E-N-E-Y.
And thank you for joining us, Courtney.
We got something very, very important that escaped my view. uh view and uh it was brought to my attention uh by you and uh by uh senator frank nicely who uh
was nice enough to forward this information so you need to cover this nac stuff and i sent it
back to you i said so what is an nac and uh then when i saw what this was i started doing my own
research and it is truly amazing people really need to understand what this is. So thank you for coming on to explain what the natural asset companies are.
This, folks, is where they start to roll in their ESG and all the rest of this stuff to cash in big time and to take everything from us.
Thank you for joining us, Courtney.
Tell us a little bit about how you caught on to this and and it seems like as i look at it uh this whole
thing started kicked off a couple of years ago with new york stock exchange which is a minority
partner in this scheme and it is a scheme uh but now um in the fall the sec was talking about
uh you know authorizing this where are we now in this process well firstly thank you so much for
having me um yeah this only was brought to
my attention a couple of weeks ago maybe two weeks ago and uh then i scrambled to learn as
much as possible so i'm i'm very much still scrambling trying to navigate all of this it
does seem to have slid under the radar of most people i think by design you So, yeah, so we're trying to really figure this out and sound the alarm.
So I did a show on it about a week ago, knowing very, very little, but just knowing that this is absolutely horrifying.
And it really looks like, as you said, an extension of the ESG because there is so much ESG money, but it's not nearly as popular as I think they had hoped it would be.
And this is part of the big land grab.
There is something called the 30 by 30 agenda, which is where by 2030,
they hope to seize all of the water, land and natural resources for the purposes of what they call conservation.
So conservation means that it cannot be used.
And it sounds lovely.
We're conserving the land.
However, this means that there can be no productive use of the land.
So they want to do that by 2030.
And then this is just a stepping stone to get towards what they call the half-Earth agenda, which is where half of the Earth cannot be inhabited by humans.
Now, some of you may have seen this map that was going around circulating.
I certainly did in 2020.
And they were calling it like the FEMA map.
Yeah, I've got the map right here, I think.
Okay, perfect.
And because this has been going around since this was first done in 1992.
And it was at that point in time, everybody was talking about the UN Agenda 21.
Sometime in the 21st century, this is really what we want to have.
We want to restrict everybody from these different areas.
No human use when you see this in the red.
The yellow is a buffer zone.
And then those few places that are blue that's
normal use so they and it's so little it's almost non-existent it's not even half they're not even
gonna of course these people are so greedy they're not going to be happy with the 30 percent in 2030
they're not going to be happy with the 50 percent of the earth they want everything and and you can
hardly see any blue areas uh in this in this map because they want to take everything from us.
And so they talked about UN Agenda 21.
We've seen this map for quite a while, going back to 1992.
And then about 2014-15, they said, okay, 2030, that's when we want to do it.
And now we see how they're going to monetize this stuff, including the ESG stuff.
So I'll bring up one thing.
You mentioned 1992.
Pelosi actually started a bill in 1992.
This goes way back.
So this is like so many things that we see.
Unfortunately, it comes to our radar, you know, almost too late.
On this one, I don't think it is quite too late, but we are close.
We really do need to sound the alarm to everyone possible to do everything possible to stop it.
However, this has been been the work for decades
so 1992 pelosi did a bill uh that she proposed this bill at the health earth summit that was
part of this whole agenda um and then back in uh two so when i was talking about the half earth
this is it was there was a book uh by eo wilson uh called half earth and i think that was back in
2016 or i may be confusing that with
the Dieter Helm who that one was definitely 2016 and that was called a valuation of nature
uh it's something like that but that's essentially what this is and what it's based on is in 2012
the UN proposed a new form of accounting and it's called uh they call it sea a sea a ecosystem accounting so that
stands for uh systems economic environmental accounting ecosystem accounting and it's
essentially just like a made-up accounting system because gap generally it is it's totally
nonsensical because the generally accepted accounting principles would not work for this because generally accepted accounting principles are based on productivity, right?
You produce something that has value and then it can be sold.
And this is completely the antithesis of this.
This is valuing Mother Nature. And so they proposed this and there were, I think at the time, 90 countries that did sign on to NACs or some people are calling it NAC, which stands for the Natural Asset Company. the Biden administration last year in January of 23, they created something called the National
Strategy to Develop Statistics for Environmental Economic Decisions. And this, they proposed a
executive order. This was in January of 23. And it was based on this to put nature on the balance sheet.
So this is terrifying because it now means that we can use the land in America under these natural asset companies to offset debt.
So this means, yeah.
This is how they close the loop on this stuff.
And as you pointed out, Nancy Pelosi releasing this stuff in 1992.
But of course, they've been planning it long before that.
But they've been gradually rolling this out, setting up bogus legal frameworks, creating what this is.
Essentially, it's like the derivative stuff.
And if people think that this sounds too fantastic, just think about what they did to us to create the mortgage crisis, right? They create these securitized mortgages and created all this
ambiguity about who actually has the title to it and hide this stuff and do it in a derivative way
and look at the damage that they did. This is what they're trying to do with these natural
asset companies. And there is, you know, it's the Rockefeller Foundation and two other groups that
are involved in this, but a minor party is the New York Stock Exchange.
And so they're all in this together in this casino.
They're all in this together.
It truly is amazing.
It is amazing.
Not in the most positive of ways, but it is amazing.
No.
So you're right.
The New York Stock Exchange, you would think that's sort of a conflict of interest.
But they are a partner in this. So you're right. The New York Stock Exchange, you would think that's sort of a conflict of interest, but they do.
They are a partner in this.
They partnered with the IEG, which is the Intrinsic Exchange Group.
And I encourage people to go and look up lots of videos from Douglas Ecker, who is the CEO of the IEG.
And here are the words from the horse's mouth.
And he talks about this partnership with the Rockefellers.
So you're right.
It is the rock.
It's being funded. The IEG is being funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, as well as the IBG Lab and IBG
Bank.
They do a lot of work in South America and they're another funding entity.
It's called the Inter-American Development Bank.
And then Aberdeer Ventures.
Now, I don't know too much about Aberdeer Ventures,
but it's very curious to me because they're involved
in healthcare technology.
So I, you know, have to wonder.
I looked them up and they're a venture capital firm.
But primarily with health care technology.
Right. But it's the digital health care stuff. So this really fits into the whole thing.
You know, I talk about MacGuffins. You know, it doesn't really matter what the so-called crisis is.
That's just to motivate you. You know, just like Hitchcock would say, could be the Maltese Falcon.
It doesn't really matter, but you've got to get people motivated to chase this thing.
And so you've got to get people motivated about the health care MacGuffinin right or the pandemic mcguffin or the climate mcguffin
and so these people this uh abradare ventures they have been involved with this they started
pouring money into uh health care ids and passports and things like that and now they're
jumping on board with this on the climate side because this is going
to be the justification to actually take this stuff from us.
And for everybody that doesn't think this is going to happen, again, think about the
mortgage derivatives and financial crisis that they created.
But then on the other side, look at the power of government to just come in and take land.
I said earlier in the show, Courtney, I was talking about how here where I live, the Great Smoky Mountain National Park, I love to go there, but it bothers
me when I drive in and I see what they did to steal the land of the people who lived in Cades
Cove and other places like that. They just took it. And so that's the power of government. They've
already done it. You know, they did it 100 years ago. They can do it again. and then what happens is you've got the un coming in and declaring it a world heritage site and
doing that with several hundred parks across the country so that how easy would it be for them to
come in as they're talking about with these nacs they said well you know we will do this if it's
public land this is how we'll run it if it's private land this is how we'll run it. If it's private land, this is how we'll do it. They don't have to buy the property.
They can come in.
No, it's about management.
Yeah, if the government comes in and says,
okay, you can own and manage the Great Smoky Mountain National Park.
And what do they do?
Well, they're going to collect carbon credits and things like that
and keep people off of it.
And they will collect all that money, and then they'll kick 50% of it back
since it's public land.
They'll kick 50% of it back to the public and everybody will be just fine
with that.
Look, this is great.
And it's this massive scheme.
The other thing I see in this is that they're going to bet by selling this
on wall street.
If we don't stop this quickly,
anything that the sec has done could be undone,
but if they start selling this, you're the SEC has done could be undone.
But if they start selling this, you're going to have pension funds invested in it.
You're going to have individual investors invested in it. And they're going to fight big time to make sure this doesn't get undone.
So that's why we've got such a short timeline on this, I think.
We do.
Before I get to that, because that is so incredibly important, I do want to address the 2050 agenda. So if you look up agenda 2050,
you mentioned agenda 2130, there is a whole proposal for agenda 2050 for, it's like a,
it's a healthcare system using all this biometric data. They do it under the name of like helping
the EMTs so that they can locate people. But it really is a grid.
Yeah, I know.
But it really is a grid.
And if you're familiar with the UN's centennial plan, the UN 100,
they're talking about the centennial of the UN, which would be in 2045.
So 2050 is after that.
And they are working in partnership with the Boston Global Forum
to create what's called an AI World Society.
And the book has already been written.
It's in conjunction with a former Massachusetts governor,
Michael Dukakis.
And yeah, I know.
He just celebrated his 90th birthday,
but he's not slowing down.
So he's going strong.
She's like Henry Kissinger.
He'll keep going until he dies on Saturday.
There's always a neutral suspect.
These same names keep coming back to haunt us.
Over and over again.
But they're doing, it's called Remaking the World,
the Age of Global Enlightenment.
So if that's not a nod to the whole New Age movement,
if you know anything about Lucius Truss,
which was formerly Lucifer Publication,
it is the underbelly uh it's
a consultancy to the un so makes perfect sense there but they talk about this ai world society
which in my view looks kind of like a cyber satan if you will um and it's a they they did a whole
symposium on uh rebuilding ukraine they talk about how ukraine was decimated in the war we need to
send more money and rebuild ukraine so that ukraine can be the hub for this AI world society, which will make a grid in conjunction with all of these other smart cities around the world.
So I just bring that up because it's interesting that Abadir is one of these funders in this because it looks like, you know, of course, region smart also just went through.
They passed a bill.
It was 2716, I believe, was the Senate bill that passed through to allow Region Smart, which is owned by BlackRock.
And it's a tri-state quasi-government, essentially, but they're using smart sensors.
I know Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas have already created this consortium.
And there are several other states that are moving forward with this.
So that's something else for people to look into but to get back to this so that's
abadir venture and then there's uh entertaining ideas and i've never heard of them i could not
find any information on them i don't know anything about them unfortunately um but they are uh but
then of course the rockefeller foundation and then the the wildlife Foundation, which was the brainchild of Julian Huxley of UNESCO, who is the one who coined the term transhumanism and who is also a very openly known eugenicist.
You know, of course, they all subscribe to this Malthusian worldview, which is essentially what this is all about.
And I think you had read an article yesterday that was about David Webb's
book. And it looks very relevant to this. This to me does look like how they're going to create
another financial crisis, just like you mentioned with 2008. It's very similar to the derivatives.
This is made up valuation. So they're trying to put a value on things like air, the air we breathe, water, as you mentioned, the natural
parks, the mining resources.
But here's the difference.
You talked about like the carbon credit.
So what they'll actually do is you will have, you can buy natural, you can invest in natural
asset company, and that will provide an offshoot to carbon, to your carbon expenditure.
So it becomes an offset sorry an offset it becomes
an offset and that's where the value that's how they're going to monetize it as an offset to
carbon you know it's interesting because you keep seeing this uh public private partnership type of
stuff that's what it is the government gets a cut on it you know so uh as they're saying you know if it's a private land
they can participate in this carbon tax stuff and they uh they put five percent of it if it's
private land they put five percent of it in a public trust if it's public land that they turn
over to them you know like a national park or something 50 will go to them but they're still
going to make 50 or 95 you know as a profit on this stuff and they're going to be able to sell
it out there as a carbon credit and the governments're going to be able to sell it out there
as a carbon credit and the governments are going to require people to buy it what is interesting
about this is it's it's this odd mixture of communism and capitalism that we've seen yeah
exactly kind of fascism and which is the mixture of government and corporations and we've seen this
in technocracy and we've seen this in china
but now they they've gonna they're gonna put it on the stock market and that's the innovation
rather than it just being tightly uh held like the chinese do it they're gonna try to broaden
the support by putting it on the stock market that's the the diabolically genius thing that
they're going to do with this stuff. It is.
And so here,
here's the other thing that makes this really,
really terrifying because as you said,
they put it on the New York stock exchange,
which now opens it to a global market.
This means that our foreign adversaries can now invest in domestic land.
And of course it,
you know,
when I kept reading these articles saying,
Oh,
the United States hasn't signed on yet,
but you know,
we're working on them that I think it's because the United States hasn't signed on yet, but, you know, we're working on them.
I think it's because the United States is so rich in natural resources.
So they want to scoop this up so that they can put a hold on it.
Essentially, you can't produce on this land.
Remember, now here's the other thing that is incredibly diabolical is that private land is encompassed in this and primarily through conservation easements. So let's say you
own a private piece of property and then a lot of people, and there's this major push right now for
conservation easements. And I think it's, you know, really it was back in 1980 when the Conservation
Act was passed through that, you know, laid the groundwork. Again, we're talking, you know,
it's like the Fabian Socialists, they're talking you know they they're they're it's like
the fabian socialists they're masters of incrementalism they keep building building
building uh and then they pull the trigger so you know proverbially um but i this conservation act
i think will pave the way for all these conservation easements so essentially you could
have private land and let's say you put a conservation easement on your land in order to get a tax credit or
you know for whatever reason now this becomes your private property can become part of a natural
asset company which means that they have access to manage the land I think that's really important
for people to understand it's not just about ownership of land they can manage it which means
that now it would be like in your house, not renting rooms out, but you've actually sold rooms to other people.
Now they have total purview over what to do with those rooms in your house.
And that's what happens with this.
And when you talk about the communism, fascism, I think it is also technocracy because we're putting it on a digital stock exchange, right?
So it is very, and, you know, with all the other technology that could be implemented in this, I think there's a reason Avedere Ventures is involved.
I don't know enough yet to make that claim, but I have my suspicions, certainly with what we've seen already. Well, they seem to be right there at the center, wherever they're pushing the problem crises of people.
They've got the digital global solution that they're going to be able to market.
You know, we look at this and people have talked a lot about how companies like Nestle or whatever are grabbing the water, for example.
OK, they don't actually have to do that with this.
That's, I guess, the genius of this.
You know, they can get control of this stuff without actually having to lay the money out. And that's what makes it really a part of this. This whole great taking perspective is that they've got a derivative for control. And that's how they can monetize it. They can sell it to people. People can come into it. And really, when I looked at this, it's like, that's what they're talking about with stakeholder capitalism.
Yeah, you got it. in it and that's exactly what this it's amazing to me to see that like i said it's diabolically clever and and and we've got to stop this thing as as soon as possible as you see the cola the the
the um uh the cooperation between the new york stock exchange and securities and exchange
commission they're going to just give them a green pass on all this stuff exactly and so you know it
is communistic in the sense that you know this is not about productivity
so i really wanted to rule that to people this means that this land we can't mine resources
you know you can't mine gold lithium but what happens if uh say china buys a natural asset
company that has a ownership of large land that's very rich in lithium so what happens then right so
we wouldn't be able to use it but who knows what you know they might do later down the road
so they want to withhold it so that they can you know monetize their especially farmland you know
we talked about water but farmland as well this is how they starve us as well you know not only
owning everything but but locking down
and making it all limits to us sorry you can't do any farming are you gonna have to eat the
soylent green that bill gates has got for you you got it yep i at the farming uh the production the
oil i mean imagine they buy buy a lot of these natural asset companies in Texas where no oil can then be extracted.
So they are putting, so yes, this is a ruling.
The New York Stock Exchange has appealed to the SEC to have it listed as a new category
of companies on the New York Stock Exchange.
And there is hope because this has been extended so there's clearly been outcry not enough
unfortunately uh but enough to extend this and derail them slightly so it has been extended
right now to january 18th so people do need to move quickly and to go under the sec the
securities exchange commission to file their comments also i encourage everybody to put
as much pressure one of the reasons this was extended was because uh marlo oaks who is the
treasurer of utah uh got 22 other financial state officers together to uh to make a complaint
and so they have now extended it.
So it's January 18th is the last day for comments.
And then you can have rebuttals of comments,
I think is extended to February 2nd,
but it is really,
really time sensitive.
So put as much pressure,
not just on your federal representative,
state representative,
but I really encourage even like county because there's a lot
of land ownership through the counties and that's you know the more locally we can take some action
i think the more power we might have and certainly write comments and you can under the sec
website you can find there's like all the comments they're open they're public
to read so you can read uh all of the comments that have been made if you need suggestions and ideas of what to say.
And then I encourage everybody to go to AmericaStewardsForLiberty.us.
I'm actually having Margaret Biefeld on my show tomorrow.
She has been a very loud voice against all of this and really uh, you know, really outlining this very,
very clearly,
but their website is phenomenal and they have a link to the comment they made,
which is about eight pages long,
uh,
eight or nine pages.
Uh,
and they go through all of the really just horrifying possibilities of what
could happen with these naturalized companies and why.
And let me say,
it's good for them because they understand it and because they are educating people.
But if you as an individual want to make this comment, just as I began the program talking about how there were so many comments criticizing the federal government, the national park system, removal of that William Penn statue.
And within hours, they pulled it back.
It's like, whoa. And I've seen this with homeschooling against a very, very powerful teachers union lobby in North Carolina.
They were and it was a state that was completely controlled by Democrats that were allied politically with this teachers union.
And they wanted to shut homeschooling down. And a small group of homeschoolers, everybody wrote in letters and swamped them with this stuff
and they backed off.
And so it's always possible
that something like this can happen.
And so, you know,
you can go there and look at some issues
and you can push back against it,
but you don't have to make a real erudite argument
or something that's very complicated.
They're going to measure the response
by the quantity,
by the weight of these letters and responses.
And it's probably more weight if you can get some people who are, like you said, local government officials to chime in.
If they can just send in a small letter or something like that, that would also be important as well.
But we only got eight days now on the day.
I know.
So it's really getting close.
It's amazing.
I will list just for people, if you don't mind, just the seven in their article, in their comment.
They explain all seven, but I can read just very briefly what the seven are.
Go ahead.
Just to give people a sense.
So the first one is the proposed rule authorizes federal lands, including parks to be enrolled in nac or nax
proposed rule gives management authority so this is what i was talking about it's not just about
ownership it's management so and management for them means conservation which means you cannot
produce on it you cannot use the water you cannot use the land you can't farm on it you can't extract the minerals um so then the biden administration
is preparing to enroll federal lands in nac and that's what i talked about with their accounting
system um you know they have a whole and this accounting system i don't know if we can see this
but this is the front page of it and it is a u.s system of natural capital accounting associated environmental
economic statistic office of science and technology policy office of management and budget department
of commerce and this was january 2023 and this was also part of uh biden had done a 15 year
green economy plan and part of that was uh this was like six days after he got
into office he started something called america the beautiful which is part of this whole yeah
they're they're masters of language they always make it sound really nice
but it's part of the 30 by 30 agenda um and then while you're talking about the management thing
you know going back to the
bundy ranch standoff and the bureau of land management all that kind of stuff is as uh
clive was saying you know what they're managing is trying to manage us off of the land uh they're
not doing any land management they want to get everybody off and he was the last farmer there
that'd been about 50 some odd farmers he's the last one here between here in california and so
we were looking into the time and it's like, okay, so what are they up to?
We had seen the government turn over the Tonto National Park in Arizona.
John McCain was a part of that at the time.
And they had found copper and, you know, they had set up these national parks.
They're going to be there for recreation for people, but also for the Apaches.
It was of great historical
importance to them as well as religious importance to them but for the people who wanted the parks
as recreation they came in and said well we don't care about that we're going to give it to an
australian company they're going to do a copper mine it's going to be a strip mine thing and
they're going to create a crater that's so large you can see it from space and so this is the kind
of stuff that we have seen our federal government do and try to do.
And we were scratching our heads and saying, okay, so what is it that they know about this area?
Have they discovered some valuable mineral, uranium or lithium or oil or something?
What is it that they want with this scruffy desert area?
But, of course, that's what this is all really about.
And so when you look at this,
then it all comes together. They're going to manage it, and then they're going to create this
massive public fund that everybody has to pay carbon taxes for whenever you do anything.
If you use any energy, you've got to pay them a tax, and then they'll kick it back to the
politicians, and they'll split it. That's what this public private partnership is about.
It's about this fascist splitting of it.
And they've added this ingenious side thing of the stock market to do it.
It's just crazy.
I'm sorry.
Go ahead with the other.
No.
Yeah.
You're spot on.
It's terrifying.
So then the proposed rule invites foreign interest to invest in nacs
and that is really really scary i i don't know if you're familiar with uh it was uh
chi hoshan i might be mispronouncing that but he was a chinese uh minister of defense and he had
written a secret memo and the epic times released it.
And he talked about how a lot of the elites in China have deeds on American property already.
And they're waiting for the right.
So I was like,
well,
now they don't need to wait.
They can just invest in natural asset companies and take management over the
land.
They already have something like 250,000.
People are starting to
wake up to that and put in some local or state restrictions on that so yeah they can just do an
in round uh an end run around with these uh nacs exactly and not just china of course there's you
know russia saudi arabia lots of uh foreign adversaries who we may not want having controlling
rights to our land and then the fifth one is land trust can enroll conservation easements without landowners permission.
And that one, I really just it's so diabolical.
You know, it's antithetical, in my opinion, to everything this nation stands for.
You know, the the notion of private property rights. And that is literally saying that without your permission
or possibly even awareness,
that now they have purview over your property.
And let me interject here and say,
we've seen this type of thing already.
We've had situations.
First, we had the Kelso, I think, was in Connecticut,
where they came in and they said,
we're going to do eminent domain for private corporation, right?
And then it got worse with the TransCanada pipeline that they were going to do.
And TransCanada was a company, they were doing the Keystone pipeline,
and they were going in and letting this foreign company condemn property,
farms that people had had for over a century they would let
them condemn it and take it for their use and so this is not a theory that they would do this kind
of stuff they've already been testing the waters and they've already got established some precedents
and gotten the courts to go along with them on this stuff yeah that's absolutely right and they
do i think that's a really important point they do do a lot of this like beta testing to see what they can do, how will people respond, and then they tweak things. So they lay out plans, you know, decades and decades earlier, and then they start building the foundation in order to execute those plans. But along the way, they do lots of tests so they can refine those plans.
So then the sixth one is exclusive rights to natural processes will be monetized and assigned to natural asset companies.
And that's what we're talking about with the carbon offsets.
And then the production of resources is prioritized over human flourishing.
And this one is, you know, just to spell it out, essentially what they're saying is that to protect that land, again, their term is conservation, is more important than any productivity.
In fact, there can be no productivity.
So as you mentioned, this is a way they can starve us out.
And that's exactly what they're saying.
They're admitting it.
And that's a hallmark of everything they're trying to do with this climate stuff.
You're going to have to shut down your farms.
You can't have meat or dairy because, you know, we've got nitrogen or CO2 that we've got to worry about, right?
And so they can come up with any kind of bogus MacGuffin and tell us, you're not important.
We've got to save the earth, you know?
And that's, again, that that is this is all about the
environment and climate uh mcguffin that's where they're they're rolling this thing in and i think
it's worth noting that you know i i'm sure you're familiar with the club of rome's document uh the
limits to growth in 1972 well their document global reformation in 1992 admitted that they
created it uh the the as propaganda, because they
realized nobody was going to, I'm paraphrasing, but essentially they said nobody was going
to buy the junk science that they were promulgating.
But they said if they created a common enemy, that people would rally behind it.
So they decided that the enemy of humanity was man.
This is why you are the carbon they want to reduce.
And they admitted this in their global reclamation document in 1992.
I mean, they flat out admitted it.
It's a hoax.
It's a lie in order to push their Malthusian agenda.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And by the early 2000s, they were pushing this Gaia theory.
And I mean, we had our kids were young and we went to the UK and it was filled with all this stuff about.
And I recorded.
So I haven't found the recording yet, but I did record it because of this is crazy.
They had this loop playing in a children's play area, propagandizing the kids, telling them that Mother Earth Gaia was this sentient being, essentially, and that human beings are a virus.
And so we've got to be eliminated.
And so that's how they see us.
You know, as part of this depopulation thing, it's how they justify it, that we're just
a virus and the earth is more important than you.
And the earth is actually this sentient being.
It's absolutely crazy, but that's what they're pushing with people.
And, you know, the other thing that concerns me about this, Courtney, was the fact that
Wall Street involvement in this,
and we go back and we look at the presidents, especially with Trump, you know, everything
about the kind of the only metric that really mattered was how is Wall Street doing, right?
That's how these people are focused on this. And we saw during the lockdowns, Trump's lockdowns in
2020, the Wall Street companies, they were essential, but you are not essential. This is the mindset of all these politicians in both parties, including Trump.
This is how this thing is going to roll out.
They don't care about anything but Wall Street because that's how they're going to exercise their control.
That's how they're going to make sure that we own nothing and that we're kicked off of all the land.
I've watched this for so long, and I kept thinking, how are they going to do it?
Well, now we know.
Now we know. Yeah, this is exactly how they going to do it? Well, now we know. Now we know.
Yeah, this is exactly how they plan to roll it out.
And that's right.
And I think that is a really important point for people to understand.
You know, I talk a lot about the Hegelian dialectic.
They hit from both ends, but both sides are marching towards the omega point.
You know, Hegel would call it the omega point which is uh for him he said that
state equals god and uh for uh these people i call them the parasite class the uh state the state is
the worldwide governing body the centralized governing body of the world that they're trying
to create along with their centralized world religion which from my vantage point looks like
they're trying to create a AI
god. That seems where they're going. And I think also when you look at this and the stock market
aspect of it, you know, I said for the longest time that I really don't think it's going to be
like a centralized government in anywhere more so than the UN. They're exercising a lot of control.
I said it'll be a global governance. And this global governance will be,
as they keep telling us, it'll be a public-private partnership between the governments and this
corporatocracy that is over and above everything, and how they're going to sell shares in it and
all the rest of the stuff. And now we can see how they're going to sell the shares in it.
Now we can see how the corporations and the governments are going to ally i think this uh this natural asset company thing
that is uh really the way they're going to roll this stuff out and they're talking about how they
see it as a four quadrillion dollars worth of assets out there they do unbelievable you know
you're talking about four thousand trillion dollars that are out there. That's the kind of money that these people are looking at by locking everything up, taking control of water, of air, of farmland, of everything.
Yeah, absolutely.
And that number, as astronomical as it is, it is made up.
I mean, they're literally just placing a value on things that, you know, of their own admission cannot be evaluated.
They've always said that was the problem.
And how did they achieve this valuation?
By creating a voodoo accounting system.
Yeah.
I mean, it's literally a made up nonsensical accounting system because of their own admission, their own words, the generally accepted accounting principles do not work.
Why do they not work?
Because they're based on production.
They're based on actually having a product to sell.
And now they're doing the opposite.
This is about the degrowth agenda.
This is about having no production.
And, you know, in their words, conserving.
And, of course, they're using the climate narrative
as a means of pushing it through the climate crisis, as they call it.
Yeah, it really is a feudal system.
And they get these grants from, you know, I guess the king now is a stock market.
It's going to grant them access to this stuff.
You still have the nations that are there, and they're going to play a role in terms of administration of this.
But the governance will be global, and it will be this kind of stakeholder thing.
What were some of the other things that they were talking about in their seven or eight point?
Those were the seven points that they outlined.
And then they go into detail on, you know, what that would mean is a pretty long article.
So they do go through what each of those are.
Um,
but let me see if I can find any other thing.
Let me just say too,
we'll put this in the video,
um,
on rock fan.
Thank you very much,
Jen Jones.
Thank you for the tip.
And she also,
uh,
gave us a link to file your comments about the national asset companies that
we got a link there.
We'll put that in the,
um,
and the description and link to view the comments.
So she's already given that to me.
Thank you for saving me the time of looking that up.
And on Rockfin, Serge the Purge, thank you for the tip.
He says, if anyone wants a lesson in what one stock market move
can do to kill a currency, look at 1815.
Nathan Rothschild's claim that Britain lost the war to deflate the currency
so he could buy all of it at a lower price,
which led him to have more of a stake in government than anyone else.
He can,
who controls the money supply controls the government.
That's absolutely true.
It's going to be a financial takeover with this stuff.
Well,
and Margaret Biefeld had a really great quote,
you know,
about property rights said that we either own property or we become the
property that's owned.
That's right.
That's right.
Right. I wanted to point out also, that we either own property or we become the property that's owned. That's right. That's right. Right?
That's right.
I wanted to point out also, I found this in my research, that they hired a publicity firm.
It's called Confluence Partners.
I'm not familiar with them, but it was the IEG, the Intrinsic Exchange Group, who hired
this marketing company.
And I just thought it was very interesting because they talk about it very openly on
their website, how the IEG was like a case study and that it was very important to poise
the narratives for journalists.
So they're really trying to position the media for how to relay what these are these natural asset companies and
how we should convey this to the public and then they talk about also how to market it to ngos
and i just thought that was all very interesting that they clearly realized this was not going to
be very widely popular and they needed to hire a publicity uh marketing company in order
to craft their narratives for them and they're going to be working on that quite a bit this next
week at the world economic forum uh whenever they have their meetings they uh put out massive number
of articles and all these and that's where they go together to get their talking points, to lay the stuff out for the mainstream media to pair it and to repackage and to keep feeding to the public for the rest of the year.
So that's coming up this next week.
But that's on the 15th.
And then on the 18th, we're going to be quietly rolling out this thing to do a stock market takeover of natural assets throughout the country.
Truly is amazing.
And I put up a bunch of articles on my Twitter because the World Economic Forum has been preparing for this for quite a while.
And there are several articles where they talk about the valuation of natural asset companies, the valuation of natural resources.
So you go to my profile and you type in WEF.
I linked a whole bunch of articles because I couldn't fit them into the broadcast that I did.
It was one hour long and there were several of them.
So, again, they've been doing this for a long time.
But you can see in the past two years, those articles seem to ramp up.
So the World Economic Forum and the UN are very much working in partnership on this.
It is a process.
And, you know, again, when I looked at this, State Street have been pushing this ESG stuff and essentially blackmailing publicly held companies saying, we've got a lot of your stock and we want you to do this and this environmentally and, you know, with the social agendas that they're pushing.
But that was really kind of the blackmail model.
And you're looking at this and you're saying, yeah, but where do these people get paid with this?
And we've even had lawsuits led by the Tennessee State Attorney General Scrimetti saying it's fundamentally dishonest. you know, that you're a money-making enterprise here as a BlackRock
and getting them to invest in BlackRock so you can buy shares in these companies,
but then you're getting the companies to do stuff that undermines the value of your investment.
And so you're being dishonest about this.
You're not doing this for financial reasons.
You're doing it for your political agenda or whatever.
But now you can see the financial side of this kicking in with the nac
and so that's where the payoff is they're playing always playing the long game and and just as as
people yeah as people are catching on to this esg stuff now they're going to pivot to uh this nac
stuff which is going to be not only for profit but for outrageous profit that they're going to come out with. Outrageous profit.
It's taking everything.
It truly is amazing.
I just keep looking at this.
She keeps saying amazing, amazing.
I know I'm repeating myself here, but when I saw this thing, it's like, whoa.
What a scheme.
And the fact that so few people know anything about it.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, they brought this up during i guess like christmas when most people
would not be paying attention yeah and yeah exactly uh but the fact that they've extended
it does mean that there has been pushback and they're they're feeling it um so i think that
that is encouraging we just need a lot more of it um and when you bring up BlackRock, I don't know enough about it.
I'm going to do a dive on it this week.
But Region Smart is owned by BlackRock.
And that is that tri-state quasi-government that they're creating using smart sensors.
And the Senate has passed through a bill on that already.
I don't know how it's tied to this, but I imagine it is.
So that seems to be how they work.
It's usually all connected.
It really is global governance that is planting the flag and seizing this property.
And the other thing I looked at is like, yeah, we know that they want to set up this this kind of serfdom where we
own nothing we rent everything right everything is about rental and so this fits perfectly into
that paradigm of you will own nothing and you will rent everything from us and it really does go back
to kind of a feudalism where you know if somebody had connections to the monarchy or they liked them
or whatever they would give them you know a fiefdom and, uh, you know, they kick money back to the monarch and all the rest of the stuff,
but they would just grant this to them. And that's really what is going to be happening here.
Who gives them the right to take this stuff? And, uh, but of course they've done this over
and over again within the United States and other places with their national parks
and things like that. And then, um, uh, you know, turning it over to kind of a UN supervision with the World Heritage thing.
And then to take the example of the Great Smoky Mountains, since there were roads that ran through it,
the state of Tennessee once, you know, upon a time states did exercise some authority.
And they said, well, you're not going to charge people to go into
that park so we were the last park that they didn't charge people to go into and they still
don't charge people to actually go into it but now they came up with a scheme where they said
we're going to charge you if you stop and so you can't park and so that's a way that they gradually
start monetizing this stuff and um you know and but now they're just going to turn it over to wall
street who knows what wall street will do with all this stuff it is insane really it is insane and and you're
right actually of their their own words they do use the the term governance uh global governance
so they do say that as opposed to government so that is very accurate and it is obviously
we can see it it's being being pushed through private public partnership.
Right.
And they'll keep the labels of different countries.
They won't do away with America, but America will be subservient to them in the same way that, you know, since the Civil War, we've seen the states become more and more subservient to the federal government.
They still keep them around and still give them some things that are within their purview but it is going to be this
centralized thing and um and it'll gradually get stronger and stronger and stronger as we've seen
the central government get stronger and stronger since the um uh since the civil war it's going to
be the same type of approach well thank you read yes i i just want to address that if you read
brzezinski and i think uh atali also talked
about it he was known as like the the french kissinger um they talk of yeah a french kissinger
yeah the french the kissinger of france or whatever um the futurists you know people
think they're so prescient but it's pretty easy to predict the future when you planned it you know
yeah um and when you execute it and then you execute it yeahcient, but it's pretty easy to predict the future when you planned it, you know. And when you execute it.
And then you execute it.
Yeah.
You know, it's amazing how that works out.
But they talk about this.
They talk about how they want to disintegrate nation states.
However, there'll be remnants of a nation state through power blocks.
So and you've seen this attempt to execute that through things like
nato they tried with the north america uh treaty right they're trying to create these power blocks
but they're not necessarily uh nation states anymore and that that was their goal i don't
know how successful they'll be in it but uh i think it's important for people to be aware that
those were uh written plans that they were attempting to execute.
And then, of course, you would have this public-private partnership, these corporatocracy, which is also going to work in conjunction with a technocracy.
And I do think they want to roll out like a UBI with a digital currency where you're getting carbon credits.
And I think these natural asset companies are a huge part of that agenda as well.
So it really is the real threats to us always run through the financial system.
You know, when you look at Zbigniew Brzezinski and his trilateral designs and how he wanted
to create three regions and then unite those three regions.
And we saw that attempt to put that through through the Trans-pacific partnership and the transatlantic partnership stuff fortunately those have been put on the
back burner for now but that was the idea the same thing they did with europe first we'll create a
common market for trade purposes and then we'll become more and more financially integrated then
we'll go to a common currency and so forth and then a governance and so it always begins you
know this this governance for these people always begins with a financial side to it but the scary thing of course is zabigny
brzezinski's final vision of the technocratic state exactly where he where they will know
everything that you're going to do before you do it and be able to predict what you're going to do
and watch everything you're going to do well that's that's what the CBDC is about and universal basic income.
And he was talking about this in the 1970s. That's why they selected him
and put him in the position
of really kind of controlling the Carter administration.
But these people like Kissinger
and Brzezinski and the French Kissinger.
Jacques Attali.
Yeah.
You just call him the French kisser, i guess is uh what we call this guy but
it's uh i've never heard of him before but the uh but you know that that's like you said they
can predict this because they are going to be uh as carl rove said we are history's actors
and we're going to make this happen and you can go analyze what we're going to do but now that we
know what the plan is they're 15 minute cities or cb CBDC stuff and all the rest of the stuff. Now it's time, folks,
there's not a lot of time. They want to roll this stuff out in the next four or five years. They're
going to roll it out. And then whoever's next president, they're going to roll it out with that
guy. And they're already rolling this stuff out in terms of the financial constructs. And that's
what we need to oppose. And so we'll put that stuff up on the comments of this.
And thank you so much for coming on and telling us about it again.
You can find a Courtney at Courtney Turner dot com and she spells Courtney C-O-U-R-T-E-N-E-Y
Courtney Turner show.
Thank you so much, Courtney.
Appreciate that.
Yeah.
Thank you so much for having me.
And yeah, I am bringing attention to this because
it's really important. And I think we do have some power to stop it. I did want to address,
you said, Carl Rose says that we are history's actors. You know, that, that is also what Heidegger,
Hegel and Marx say as well. You know, history uses people and discards them.
It can't be that you've got a republican campaign guide quoting marks
i just wanted to point that out yeah exactly yeah they're on the same page aren't they it's
this phony illusion of democrats and republicans and here you got this guy
george w bush's campaign guy quoting marks that is so telling isn't it thank you so much courtney
thank you for for what you do and uh
again very important issue we're going to try to get the word out and we'll do what we can about
this thank you so much you're so welcome yeah i think senator nicely who introduced us has
requested that i come speak at the capitol next week i'm waiting to hear back so hopefully
senator nicely understands what's going on very rare that you get somebody that's got the integrity and the discernment that he has.
And we really are fortunate to have him here in Tennessee.
We're going to take a quick break, folks.
We'll be right back.
Using free speech to free minds.
It's the David Knight Show.
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
From country to blues, classic hits to news,
APS Radio curates incredibly
diverse playlists for you to enjoy get details at apsradio.com well i um we've got just a couple
of minutes here before the show ends and i wanted to use that to thank some of the people who have
helped us here at the beginning of the month we did the accounting stuff and looked at it we are up to a
quarter on the gas gauge and so i want to i thank people who have helped us with that i don't have
the full list of people on zell but i just saw this this morning as i was preparing for the show
thank you so much benjamin r i really do appreciate the very generous contribution that you sent via
zell and we'll have the list of the other people who are on Zelle, but we also have the list of people who have sent checks in
January. And I just want to briefly name them and thank them. Paul H., Joel B., Michael G.,
he says the beak is what he's got underneath it, Aaron F f walter y dale l lois l jeremy w marty k rob 42
in new jersey uh george r john a tina and michael g and tamir r thank you so much all of you uh for
the support it is um what keeps this program going um let me uh just in the like i said in
the time we've got we've only got a couple of minutes um as we're talking about the elections
uh elon musk and again uh you know it's uh just take him one piece at a time sometimes he says
the right thing and when he does we're going to support him i still have concerns about where this guy wants to go where he's coming from the technocracy aspects of this singularity but
he is saying the right thing about the elections he said this is absolutely insane well what is
insane the way we do our elections he said in the usa you don't need government issued id to vote
this is a fight that we've had for the longest time.
You can vote by mail in your ballot.
And this is insane.
He said we should require government ID and in-person voting unless there is a valid medical, military, etc. excuse like other countries do or like if you want to buy beer.
He says it's very racist to say that poor people,
or as they try to make the case in southern states,
well, you know, we've had a weaponization against black people voting. He says it's really racist and insulting to say that even though they've got to use an ID
to cash a check or to buy a beer or all these other things,
that they don't need an ID in order to vote. Isn to cash a check or to buy a beer or all these other things that they don't
need an ID in order to vote.
Isn't that a tell?
When we have a government that is so obsessed with tracking everything that we do, and yet
they don't want an ID for voting.
On Rockfin, thank you for the tip, Kimberly Cordage.
Thank you very much.
Appreciate that. But also have friends with a Trump derangement syndrome.
Even after they repeat 17 million dead from the clot shot.
It is insanity blessings in 2024.
Thank you so much.
Yeah.
Isn't that,
you know,
you have Tucker who comes on and they talk about 17 million people dead,
but we must,
you know,
Trump is he who must not be named the evil
Voldemort behind this global democide and nobody wants to make the connections
and I tell you and we know why we know what it costs for anybody any politician
anybody in the press who blames Trump for anything.
He must not be blamed.
He must be worshipped.
Well, thank you for listening.
Looking for better information?
APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary,
along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
APSradioNews.com. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your
ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
that means you're listening to the David Knight show right now.
Yeah.
Good job.
And you want to know something else?
You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David Knight show dot com.
That's a Web site.