The David Knight Show - 10Nov22 Why Elections Deteriorated So Suddenly & Completely

Episode Date: November 10, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESThe "horse race"…and still no winner2:12"It's not who votes that counts, but WHO counts the votes"…and guess who's going to be counting the votes — FOR WEEKS3:45How did elections deteriorate so quickly and thoroughly to such a farce?8:31Trump's pushing of celebrity candidates like Oz & Hershel Walker has turned the already farcical elections into a beauty contest11:45The "vote by mail" disaster — BY THE NUMBERS12:42The media's narrative of a "Red Wave": was it error, corruption at polls, or push-polls to nudge us into Civil War?21:36GOP press ranks on "Ranked Preference". Is that the problem or does it pose a threat to the duopoly?24:48Trump, deeply wounded narcissist, says his win in Florida 2020, was bigger than DeSantis in 2022. Is that true?33:38NY Post: "Trumpty Dumpty - Can all the GOP's men put the party together again?"49:16Infanticide, literally killing a baby after birth, won in a Montana referendum. 57:52John MacArthur and John Piper have interesting and different answers when asked about "persecution that's coming to Christianity in America" in a conference Q&A1:03:44Tennessee legislation — "Protect Children from Gender Mutilation Act". In Nevada, state constitutional amendment to open a Pandora's box of religious persecution in support of the LGBT agenda1:19:33CS Lewis' "That Hideous Strength" predicted today's culture and morality as surely as "1984" predicted its surveillance and political oppression1:22:26Tony Arterburn, DavidKnightShow.gold, joins. Tony's take on the election1:30:53"If you love electronic voting, you're gonna love electronic currency (CBDC)"1:38:23What's going on with Bitcoin. Will it survive? Can it be banned?1:41:39Goldman see gold soaring 30% when the Fed starts cutting rates. 1:46:11Availability of gold & silver now1:48:03THE GRETA SYNDROME: The insane victimhood, narcissism, grandiosity, the lack of empathy, entitlement, and hunger for celebrity of climate protestors1:58:59Alex Newman, TheNewAmerican.com, joins to talk about COP27 as he heads to Egypt where it is taking place2:03:50"Climate Justice" and the massive boondoggle of "Climate Reparations"2:06:34Do the world leaders believe what they're telling us?2:12:13Using climate to justify totalitarianism via CBDC2:15:20Are there ANY politicians left in GOP that will fight CO2 myth? How Mitch McConnell in particular has betrayed us2:20:58Daniel Webster and his Peace Party of 200 years ago2:30:08German journalist commissions a poll about vaccine injury. He finds 23% of Germans were either injured themselves (7%) or personally knew someone who was injured (16%) by the jabs2:56:43Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 10th of November. Year of Our Lord 2022, day 973 of the lockdown emergency. This election didn't change it. It wouldn't have changed it if there'd been a red wave. They don't want to get rid of the lockdown emergency. This election didn't change it. It wouldn't have changed it if there'd been a red wave. They don't want to get rid of the emergency. They're using the emergency.

So we're going to take a look today at some additional aspects of this election. Some of the amazing things that were put in and passed. We're also going to be joined, of course, today on Thursday. Tony Arterman is going to be joining us from Wise Wolf Gold. We'll be talking about gold and the financial issues. And we're going to have joining us in the third hour, we're going to have Alex Newman from The New American, who is in Egypt at COP27. And we're going to talk about what is happening with that as the globalist leaders have pivoted to the climate MacGuffin.

Stay with us. We'll be right back. I got the horse right here, the name is Paul Revere And here's a guy that says if the weather's clear, can do, can do. This guy says the horse can do. Yeah, we got all these horses. We got Paul Revere. We got all the rest of these horses. I think this is from Guys and Dolls. Fugue for Ten Horns.

And this is basically what we do in politics. We argue about which one of these horses is going to pull through for us and is going to make us rich, going to fix our life. We all know that this horse can do. Well, you get the idea. We've got, actually, one of my favorite stories that has come out the last couple days is a pennsylvania re-elected a dead democrat now this is a key that it's not about john fetterman because it's a re-election he's just brain dead anyway he's not totally bread dead uh

but um yeah why wouldn't Democrats elect a dead Democrat? Because he serves his constituency so well. He's part of them, right? Dead Democrats probably elected another dead Democrat. I guess we could call them the dead Democrats. We could call them the new silent majority, right? Well, we don't want to beat this dead horse too much, but this is the absurdity of the

elections and the other thing that's absurd about this is how long the count is going on we're down for the count right uh the the elections they still have not called uh the senate key elections that are there as a matter of fact, I imagine if you look at what's happening, you probably won't have an answer for the Senate elections and these close calls until we have a December the 6th runoff in Georgia because neither Warnock nor Walker got past the 50% mark. So that race is not going to be called. It'll have a runoff in December.

But the other ones that are there, even if they break, pretty much there's like another three races there. One of them, the Democrat is ahead. The other two Republicans are ahead. But you're likely to have a situation where the best case scenario for the Republicans would be that they pick up

two of those three seats, which goes back to 50. And, um, you know, if, um, Walker loses in Georgia, which I think he will without a doubt, in my opinion, uh, because they're not going to do anything to fix the election. Uh, this is all going to, you know, Trump made sure this narcissist thing about the election in 2020 is stop the steal, save America, grift. That essentially, and doing nothing about Georgia. We had two seats up, leaving in all the vote-by-mail election. And it's the vote-by-mail stuff that has really balled everything up. That's why you can't get the vote totals and the rest of mail stuff that has really balled everything up that's why you can't get the vote totals and the rest of this stuff and so um that is why uh you have this situation and um you know

walker is the hand-picked candidate by donald trump another celebrity who doesn't know anything about anything doesn't know how doesn't have policies positions he doesn't know anything about anything. Doesn't know, doesn't have policies, positions. He doesn't have character. He's just like Trump. He's a little Trump. Trump picked somebody just like him. It's like watching a episode of the apprentice or something. And so Walker is going to lose.

They're not going to do anything to make sure that he wins. It'll be a replay of 2020 and it'll be a Trump yet again is, uh, endless narcissism throwing the Senate to the Democrats as well. Uh, but even in the house, there's a lot of races that they haven't called. So even though everybody expects the Republicans, sorry, I had to sneeze there. Uh, even though everybody expects Republicans to win the house, there's a lot of races that are very close. They're not calling them. For example, Lauren Bobert in California, uh, not California, Colorado is trailing by 62 votes, 62 votes this morning.

That's how close that is. They've had 300,000 votes in that race, and they just can't manage to count them all in a day or two. Isn't that interesting? How did we get to that? Like I said yesterday, when I was growing up, you had the same results the same day. Brazil just had an election as Bill Maher points out. They got the same, they got the results the same day. No, we're going to take weeks to get some of these things resolved.

So, um, I had a listener Lawrence who sent me this email. He says, well, uh, what I did on selection day, since no one that was running on the ballot where I live said anything about ending the COVID clown world, stopping CBDC, prosecuting big pharmakia, politicians and the media talking heads pushing poison for almost three years, or stopping the sending of money to Ukraine, I decided to do something constructive and not vote for slave masters and overseers. I watched again Kevin Shipp's three-part lecture about the shadow government and started reading Whitney Webb's new book, One Nation Under Blackmail. He says both Kevin Shipp and Whitney Webb will open eyes on who's controlling the puppets that we're supposed to vote for.

Well, absolutely. I agree with that. So as we look at this, one of the strangest elections on the books, says Kyle Becker. But this is part of the comments here he says uh the electric does not insist on clean efficient elections even after states like florida prove that it is possible well i don't know i mean you know when you uh look at it i think the electorate would like to have clean elections. I think it isn't our passivity. I disagree with him on this. I disagree with Tucker on this.

It's the politicians who want this system. It's the politicians who whine about it. It's the politicians who raise money about it. Both of them. Democrats. Oh, it's going to be the end of democracy if ruled by Democrats ends. The Republicans, everything is stolen. You know, send us your money. And they don't even hire any lawyers to contest.

They don't even effectively contest it, let alone propose any changes over the last two years. They should have made some changes in those two months, but instead they're focused on so and so all this stuff is still in place. It's a system they want. And so the politicians are the ones who don't want any clean, efficient elections. But he goes on to opine. He says fraud doesn't explain nationwide results better to consider that the democrats take advantage of the pandemic to loosen voter rules to an absolutely insane degree

and they are absolute masters at harvesting what might politely be referred to as the indifferent voter again this is the other thing that you'll see in the partisan world that we have here. Well, you know, it's the Democrats who did all this stuff. No, it was Trump. It was Trump who was not only the father of the vaccine, it was Trump who was father of the mail election. He was the financer of both of those. He was the producer of of both of those just like he set a precedent for gun control by executive order he set the precedent for everybody sending in you know voting by mail weeks in advance looks like you set the precedents for the lockdowns uh the um the all the rest of the stuff universal basic income and even would say, even for the mandates,

because he was talking about how you needed to mandate measles shots for people to go to school, kids to go to school. That was back in 2019. All of that, all of that was there. And if you think that this is something that has been imposed upon us just by Democrats, and I'll point out the fact that in 2016,

when the Utah GOP wanted to block Trump, they brought in Smartmatic to run their primary election. And I talked about that at the time. I said, do you understand the history of Smartmatic? Do you understand how it's tied to Hugo Chavez? Do you understand how it's tied to Hugo Chavez? Do you understand how it's tied to controversial elections and claims of vote rigging throughout Central and South America and the Philippines? So why is Utah, the GOP in Utah, why are they bringing it in? Well, because they think they can get the results that they want.

Now, this guy goes on to say, this is John Hayward, goes on to say, and also, we must remember that candidate quality matters, and it matters a lot more for the party that doesn't have a massive ballot harvesting machine humming away to scoop up indifferent voters early. So maybe we should get away from this idea that we want to have a bunch of celebrity candidates like Dr. Oz and Herschel Walker and, you know, Carrie Lake. If scads of mail-in votes are harvested before there's even debates, then the campaign doesn't matter as much. You can run a tight campaign, make all the right

moves while your opponent implodes and still come up short. So, you know, this is the kind of defeatism and we don't have to have that kind of defeatism. We need to understand how the system is rigged, but we also need to understand that we can transcend any of these political systems individually. And we'll talk about that as well. But first, before we do, let's finish with what is, I think, the core of this. And there's a lot of other people who agree that the core of this goes back to this vote by mail stuff. It's taken an already bad situation, already corrupt rigged elections, and it's added a whole new level of corruption and rigging to it. 17 states changed the way they voted because of COVID fears, says Justin Hart. Universal mail-in, absentee ballots, curing ballots, deadlines, harvesting of ballots. Only nine of those states rolled things back.

The Democrats adapted. The GOP did not. And here's what it looks like in Pennsylvania. He said Democrats retained nearly half of the mail-in volume that they had from 2020. But the GOP dropped 60%. On Election Day, Fetterman got 1.7 million votes. Oz got 2.2 million votes. That really is, you know, this advance election.

Because it's not just retaining 50% versus losing 60%. It's the volume, the overwhelming volume of what is happening there. So he goes on to say, this is his conclusion. He says there's lots of core problems, but the core issue that I see is that COVID killed the red wave. What a joke. This is like saying Putin drove up the price of gas on your pump. No, it was the response of Biden and NATO and EU to what Putin did. They were the ones who did sanctions that gave a bonus to Putin. They were the ones who made it ridiculously expensive because of their sanctions.

And so it isn't that COVID didn't kill anything, especially institutions. It was a response to it. It was the lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff and the mail-in election. That's what killed it. He doesn't want to say that Trump killed it, but Trump did kill it because Trump produced the mail election, just like he produced the lockdown. He financed it. He financed it for governors to do it, for Democrats to do it, and he kept financing it as they kept doing it. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. So he killed the red way. He killed election integrity worse than it's ever been before. So all the mail-in elections, all the crappy celebrity candidates,

his toxic preening is repulsive to everybody, especially to independents. But his worshiping cult doesn't see it. And so to point out, he says, you know, the Republicans have got a 72-hour get-out-the-vote plan. But he said they need to look at this as a 72-day get-out-the-vote plan. And he says, if you look at what happened in 2018, there were 164,000 mail-in ballots, you know, when you just had a mail-in ballot because you were doing absentee voting because you were sick or disabled or something like that.

Going to be out of town on election day. But in 2020, with the Trump lockdown, it went from 164,000 the year before to 2.6 million. 2.6 million, 2.6 million. And that's just in Pennsylvania, similar situation in Nevada and Nevada lack salt is losing by 22,000. And he wrote this, uh, but the Democrats have an advantage in the mail-in of 26,000 in Georgia.

Walker is down by 35,000, but the Democrats advantage on the mail-in ballots is 200,000. In Georgia, Walker is down by 35,000, but the Democrats' advantage on the mail-in ballots is 200,000. Again, they turned over the Senate control in Georgia with a mail-in election last time. They're going to do it again this time, not to mention the candidates themselves. So Tucker Carlson says Democrats have conditioned Americans to passively accept election theft. I reject that. I totally reject that idea. Just like the other person said,

well, you know, uh, we, um, we don't really want the electorate is fine with this. We just really don't want it. Like,

no, the, the, uh, politicians, Republican, as well as Democrat want to have this kind of system. Just like I said, you know, the Democrat governors did not do this lockdown system.

Trump modeled it for them. Trump didn't want to campaign. He didn't want to have a public convention. Oh, no, everybody will die if we get out in public. He could have led. He could have done anything. But instead, what he did was he paid them to do it and he paid them to continue doing it.

And here we are two years later and we're still doing it. And we still have his executive order claiming that it's an emergency. It's still in place as well. So Tucker Carlson says, Democrats have conditioned Americans to passively accept election theft

under the threat of a civil war. Well, I see that coming from both sides. I see it coming from the neo-establishment right as well. You know, places like Infowars, Breitbart, Daily Caller, you know, they're out there pushing this Civil War thing. Even using it as their M.O., like Alex does, is engertainment. I'm going to entertain you by getting angry on air, throwing temper tantrums.

People love that. What does that do? Does that help us? Just irrationally shouting and banging on things? Of course not. But Tucker Carlson said Democrats absolutely cannot lose the midterm elections. They said this before the election. And with that in mind, they're already preparing us for election theft, which if you don't want a civil war, you must passively accept. Well, you know, Tucker is passively accepting this because Tucker's not

calling for an end to the mail elections. He's not calling for an end to the duopoly and the restrictions to the ballot, restrictions to the debate. Is he actually opposing the Great Reset? No, he's a limited hangout. He's a limited hangout on the vaccines, and he doesn't even bring up, he's totally AWOL when it comes to CBDC and climate. He's not even opposing those aspects of it. We've got a couple of people who have left comments and tips. Angus Mustang, thank you very much for the tip.

He says, voting has become a scam. They tell us there's a two-party system to make us think we have a choice. Then the elite allow us to cast a vote to make us think that we have a voice. I agree. Angry Tiger. Hey, thank you for the tip. He says this election points out the divide and conquer tactics sprinkled with a healthy helping of uncertainty and the integrity of our voting system for a heaping dish of destabilization. Bon appetit, American citizens.

I agree. As I said yesterday, you can look at this and say, well, did they get all these polls completely wrong? Or were they push polls? They do that a lot, especially just before an election. They'll put out what is ostensibly a poll, but the intention is not to find out what you want. It's to give you a question you know they do it in the form of a poll because everybody oh you want my opinion oh well let me participate that's what the elections are right and they run these kind of scams all the time uh you know i'd

like for you to participate but look at how many times there'll be some clickbait poll on a website and you know you go there well we'd like to know your information you know your opinion on this and that and in order to register your vote you have to um you have to register your email with them because they're just trying to harvest your email they don't want your opinion they want your email and that's what this is about they put this thing out there and um um, you know, many times just before the election, you know, the night before something like that, when people were going, when we had an election day instead of weeks, uh, months, uh, but they would, uh, call people up, do

robo calling and they would, um, and under the guise of asking them a question, they would state it in a way that they were telling you something and pushing you in a particular direction. And so the question in my mind when I look at all this stuff and how we saw in the Drudge report, oh, look, red wave is coming every day. And I reported it. I said, well, look at this. I actually could believe it because of how bad the economy is and how bad Biden is. I mean, quite frankly, what I find unbelievable is that anybody could vote for him.

It's what played my confirmation bias, that's for sure. But every day, oh, look, it's now at 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%. It's like, wow, this thing is exploding. Look at that. And so the question is, were we being gamed with all of that? Now, a lot of people will say, no, that was the real thing. What was gamed were the vote totals. Either way, either way, there is the purpose of this is to draw you in,

get you frustrated and angry to push a civil war. We talked about asymmetric warfare, and I went to the Asymmetric Warfare Center in A.P. Hill. I guess they're going to change that because he was a Confederate general in Virginia, so we got to purge his name. Somebody might go back in the history books and look something up and learn something, So let's just purge it. But anyway, at AP Hill, they had the asymmetric warfare center that was inside of the thing. And we went there and did a report. But I had done research before we went

about what the military was doing with asymmetric warfare. And what they would tell you is that they would admit, they said, you know, we go into these places like Afghanistan and Iraq, asymmetric warfares where they go in and, you know, overwhelming with conventional forces, destroy their infrastructure, destroy any remnants of a military they might have in these third world countries. But then the occupation begins and the nation building mission begins. And that's when you start having the roadside bombs and all the rest of these snipers, all the suicide bombers. That's asymmetric warfare.

In other words, they don't have planes. They don't have tanks. They've got roadside bombs. That's asymmetric warfare. And so they looked at it and they said, well, you know, we found a couple of different things. What motivates it? They said, most people think it's motivated by religion. I think it's motivated by Islamic extremism. That was not the opinion of the military. I looked at, uh, you can find it on YouTube. They would have these long, long, boring seminars where they would all give their opinion about what they thought and their

presentations about it. And they would have less than a hundred views. It was up on YouTube for people to see it, but nobody watched it. But if you set through that stuff, what you heard from these guys, one after the other, they said,

we found that the people who are leaders in this stuff are typically, um, in their thirties, they come from a wealthy family. They're well a wealthy family. They're well-educated. Typically, they're engineers or something. But they look at this situation and they feel that there is no hope for their country.

They see that they're being occupied and they feel helpless and out of control. And so they're resorting to this. They said, now the connections to religion come later because as the war starts, as people are dying, they turn to it, but their initial motivation is that they feel helpless and out of control. Their country has been taken over.

They have no future. They have no control of their future. Does that sound familiar? Does that sound like what they're trying to do to us with the Great Reset and with these elections? So the Alaska results will not be decided for another two weeks. And so Breitbart tells you that's because of ranked choice. It's not because of ranked choice.

This is Joel Pollack, who is like the number two at Breitbart or something. Breitbart likes to push the duopoly the republican democrat duopoly that's you know a big big big they're big partisan organization for the republicans so that's how their bread is buttered at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gambling care.e uh the two-week wait in alaska uh maybe that's what's you know maybe the rank choice and they don't have a way to uh accurately total this but what's your explanation for why this is happening everywhere right bart i mean this is not just happening in Alaska. If it was happening only in Alaska, you could say,

well, what is it that's different about Alaska? Oh, they got ranked choice. So let's rank on the ranked choice thing. That's not what's happening. This is happening across the country. So you want to take a look at something that is common to all that, like Trump's mail election. But again, they don't like ranked choice,

and it isn't because the ranked choice delays the election. That is and can be one of the issues with it. But it's the mail that is delaying it. The reason they come after the ranked choice is because this is a problem, a threat to the duopoly. And we have, it's starting, people are starting to push back against this two-party primary system. There's a referendum in Las Vegas as well about that. But they go on to say, you know, their total Republican vote was more than a majority.

You know, you had, um, uh, you had Nick Begich who ran is a Republican and Sarah Palin who's a Republican. And between the two of them, that was well more than 50%. But the Democrat will likely win again this time as she did in the, um, they've already had this election just a couple of months ago. It was a special election to replace the elderly Republican who died in office. And so it has special election did exactly the same thing. Everybody expects are going to get exactly the same results this time.

Well, here's the, you know, why did this happen? thing, everybody expects are going to get exactly the same results this time. Well, here's the end. You know, why did this happen? They said, you know, Nick baggage and, and Sarah Palin, uh, with their Republican vote, uh, split between the two of them, if you total it up, they're going to have more than 50%. But they said it likely means that a Democrat will continue to represent a largely conservative state in the U S house. Well, why is that Joel? Why? Why do you think that is? Because with ranked voting, what you do is you take the lowest, nobody goes past 50 percent, then you throw out the

lowest person and you reallocate their votes. Well, if the lowest vote total was Nick Begich, then you would throw out his votes. He's a Republican. And then you would look at the second choice of the people who voted for Nick Begich. And you would allocate those second choices to the remaining candidates, the remaining two. And so if Sarah Palin doesn't win this time, it'll be for the same reason Sarah Palin doesn't win this time, it'll be for the same reason Sarah Palin didn't win the last time, and that is she wasn't even the second choice of the Republicans who voted for Nick Begich.

The problem is is that Sarah Palin is just another celebrity candidate without any discernible principles or policies. And most of the people there in Alaska don't even believe that she has the staying power to remain in office. She resigned as governor. Oh, I think I'll do something else. Maybe I'll be a reality TV star. Yeah.

She became governor in Alaska. Then she, you know, ran for vice president and she, I don't want to do this and gets out a bit of water. So that's a big part of it. A lot of people, she's not even their second choice. That's the problem. But they can't, you know, Joel Pollack wants to keep everything inside Republican Democrats. So if a Republican candidate doesn't win, there's something wrong with the system.

Right? It's rigged. Somehow. It's rigged. It's got to with the system, right? It's rigged somehow. It's rigged. It's got to be rigged. Republicans should win everything. Well, not if they don't have good candidates. If they put up people like Sarah Palin and people like Herschel Walker,

they deserve to lose. So Bill Maher says it shouldn't take days for the U.S. to get election results. They can do it in just a couple of hours in Brazil and in many other third world countries. And the U.S. military knows how to do it. We ran elections in Iraq one day in person and counted ballots. No problem. So Bill Maher says in Brazil, he says they got to buy a guy, Bolsonaro, who very similar to Trump said it was rigged. But the election was over in three hours and they had all the votes counted.

Why can't we do that here? He says, well, I think when the voting goes on for weeks and months, says Bill Maher, whatever it's going to do, even if it's days, it just sows doubt into people because we don't trust each other anymore. We all hate each other. We're at each other's throats. We're in this cold civil war kind of nation. And that's exactly what the duopoly wants. And it's exactly what the globalists want. And it's exactly what Donald Trump gives us through these things. But there are a lot of issues with the elections that are fraudulent. Massachusetts has now become the 17th state to give driver's licenses to illegals. And they'll probably use that to vote as well. But we're supposed to believe that even though they're giving driver's licenses to foreign citizens who came here in violation of the law in Massachusetts,

we're supposed to believe that in Southern states like North Carolina, it's racist if you ask for a driver's license or photo ID in order for people to vote. These people came here in defiance of our laws and they're given driver's licenses. It's so easy to get a driver's license. Even foreigners can do it, especially in Massachusetts and 16 other states. So again, the Walker Warnock race is headed to Decembercember the 6th we'll have the trump apprentices focusing on that one aside here that i thought was kind of funny from john nolte at breitbart he said pointed out that in florida charlie christ has lost statewide as a candidate running as a republican running as a democrat and running as an Democrat, and running as an independent.

Yeah, he's got a trifecta. Maybe he ought to just run. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

No way. We'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common paths to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation,

deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com

All right. We had some more statements from President Trump yesterday. Towards the end of the day, he said, well, nobody else is saying it, so I just had to say it. You know, I got one and a half million votes more than DeSantis did in 2020. Well, this is what it looked like. Yeah, and it was a presidential election year. And a lot of people, a lot more people vote in presidential election years because we have this, one of the greatest mythologies of elections is that if we put the right guy in the Oval Office, he's going to fix everything.

We're all looking for a benevolent dictator. Instead, what we got is a couple of dictators, Trump and Biden, who are running everything by executive order. And we don't even bother with Congress anymore. They're making themselves obsolete if they ever mattered at all. And so when you look at the results in 2020, Trump got 51% and Biden got 48%. But, you know, both of them got more than DeSantis did. DeSantis got just under 5 million votes.

Trump got 5.6 million. Biden got 5.3 million. So they both got more because it was a presidential election. Trump is constantly scraping around to find something as a deeply wounded narcissist who's incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge. And he thinks it's in his perceived self-interest to constantly blow his own horn. He beat Biden by three points in the election. DeSantis won by 19 points in the election. But, you know, there's wise, damn lies, and statistics, as they say.

Looking at it from the UK, you have the Daily Skeptic and Unheard have the take on it that DeSantis' victory is a vindication of his lockdown skepticism. And I think that is largely true. He could have been more skeptical. He could have and should have done more, should have done it sooner. As a matter of fact, he should stop these injections, not just say we're not going to require, but he's the only governor, the only governor, no other Republican even,

is saying we're not going to provide these injections to children. Now, he's not going, and he's advising people against it. He and his Surgeon General are advising people against these shots for their kids. But he's not going to stop the poison. And it is a poison as i said you know if if you had some car that had injured or killed as many people as these vaccines are it would be incumbent upon government to do something to stop that and it is incumbent upon them to stop it and it is incumbent upon them to stop the mutilation

of minors with this transgender agenda but he only does it for the kids from third grade down. But after third grade, you know, they can do all that stuff too. See, this is the problem. He has a limited hangout, but nobody else is even doing that much. That's how pathetic this is. So it is something of a vindication of his lockdown skepticism. As I played his speech yesterday, his acceptance speech, he talked about freedom again and again and again.

So we should celebrate the fact that he's talking about freedom. We should celebrate the fact that he's doing a little bit, because if we do, and if he's successful, there might be other people out there who say, well, you know, maybe I could be successful if I support freedom for people. That could be a winning proposition. Newt Gingrich used to always say, well, you know, you take a look at the issues and say, where are 80% of the people on this issue?

He goes, that's where I want to be because I want to win. He doesn't have, he wants, all he wants to do is win. But, you know, it isn't, he's saying, well well this is the right thing to do and i'm gonna stand here and do it even if it costs me my job no he's gonna go with 80 of the people but uh that would be um and again we're talking about pure democracy rather than standing on principle and defending individual rights in the constitution so i don't applaud that i'm just saying that if we if we DeSantis' positioning himself as a defender of sanity and freedom, then there might be some other people who might do some of these policies as well.

And from a pure pragmatic standpoint, that would be a win. You know, so, yeah, it's a vindication of his lockdown skepticism. You know, it was interesting when Trump, before the election, said, well, if they win, it's all because of me. But if they lose, I shouldn't get any of the blame. And, you know, what he said about his endorsements is really what he said about all of his COVID policies as well too, wasn't it? You know, because Trump had endorsed Fauci, he had endorsed the CDC, he had endorsed the WHO, he endorsed big pharmaceutical companies, he endorsed the UN Davos Great Reset Agenda, he endorsed universal basic income. And he basically, just like he said about the election, if it works, I get all the credit. And if it doesn't work, don't blame me, right? You've endorsed more than 330 candidates this election cycle. Tonight, win or lose, the results for Republicans, how much of that will be because

of Donald Trump? Well, I think if they win, I should get all the credit. And if they lose, I should not be blamed at all. OK, but it'll probably be just the opposite when they win. I think they're going to do very well. I'll probably be given very little credit, even though in many cases I told people to run and they ran and they turned out to be very good candidates. You know, they've turned out to be very good candidates. But usually what would happen is when they do well, I won't be given any credit. And if they do badly, they will blame everything on me. So I'm prepared for anything, but we'll defend ourselves. Yeah, that's exactly what he did in 2020. You know, he locked everything down because Fauci said so. And he endorsed that. And then when he was running just before the election,

we could already see what chaos he had unleashed upon us with all this lockdown stuff. And instead what he did was he tried to make it look like a success. He said, I saved 2 million lives. You see, they're telling us that 200,000 people died from COVID, not with COVID, but from COVID. And it would have been much worse. You know, that simulation that Fauci, I endorse that simulation.

It's absolute truth. And because it's absolute truth, that means that I saved 2 million lives. That's the way he does it. Trained us for a universal basic income and the rest of the stuff. So we talk about skepticism of lockdown, Marshall Auerbach at UnHerd in the UK said, to paraphrase the famous Sun headline, it was COVID what won it for the Republicans

in at least one of the races. It's true in the strict sense that the immediate focus of voters featured concerns about the immediate focus of voters featured concerns about the rising cost of living, the spiraling crime, immigration, abortion, but all of this must be seen in the context of the pandemic response. You understand the response to the pandemic real or imagined whether the pandemic is real or imagined it's the response what did they do they make it worse i had this argument people when they were trying to push

through hillary clinton's takeover of health care and um the place where we lived was a heavily democrat uh congressional district and um they had a political science professor from, uh, I think, I don't remember if it was at UNC or if he was at Duke, David Price is his left wing. Is you're going to find anybody there permanent fixture. And so he began with the, um, you know, as the Clinton administration was beginning and Hillary Clinton was trying to take over health care, nationalize it. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham

just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. He was having town meetings. I remember going to them.

One person after the other getting up and saying, well, this is a problem I have with healthcare right now. And here's my problem. And they get up. It's so bad. We just got to do something. I don't care what you do.

We just got to do something. And I said, well, before you throw that bucket of liquid on the fire, you might want to determine whether or not you're throwing water or gasoline on the fire. And even if it is water, if you don't know what kind of fire it is, you could make it worse. So maybe you ought to think about what the problem is before you just throw something at it. But this is the response. We've got a pandemic response. We've just got to do something.

No time to think about it. No time to test the vaccine. We've just got to do something. Got to do it now. We've got to do something right now time to think about it. No time to test the vaccine. We just got to do something. Got to do it now. We got to do something right now about climate as well. No time to get any alternatives in place. No time to think about what it's going to cost us to do this or whether it's even going to work. We just got to get rid of the other stuff and roll this stuff in. So he said the lockdowns, that is the Trump financed lockdowns. He financed it. He financed it by giving money to the governors who were doing it, Republican and Democrat.

And he continued throughout the lockdown. So the Trump financed lockdowns precipitated huge economic dislocations, notably supply chain gaps that in turn created significant inflationary pressures, the stimulus package succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. How did it succeed? Well, it trained them for universal basic income. And so he said, so they ignored the economic context as the country came out of the

pandemic and they fueled more inflation by doing more COVID relief. Because as I said, Trump started the dumpster fire and then Biden poured our fuel on it. But going back to the unheard essay says no wonder then that the economy was a top concern for the majority of us voters but covet also exposed something else to americans the policies pushed by social justice advocates during the pandemic being at home with their children parents were able to see in a way that they never had before the hyper liberal curriculum what was being done to kids k through five and all the rest of the stuff. And I've talked about this over and over again. And the problem is, is that most Republican governors didn't do anything about any of that. They didn't give anybody any reason to vote for

them. They sat there doing nothing. As people saw the problems, we saw the Republicans in office doing nothing. And the candidates, it's essential for the candidates to say, well, here's what I see as the problem. And if you agree with them identifying the problem, even if they frequently don't come up with a solution, it's usually enough if they can identify the problems people imagine that they have a solution, whether they do or not. But once you get an office, you've got to do something about it. And they didn't. So Trump is very upset.

There are people within the Trump organization that are talking to Jim Acosta. And I know, is Jim Acosta and anonymous sources, is that something that is credible? Well, actually, probably yes. Because as they point out in this story, they said Acosta and Trump were constantly fighting publicly. During the 2016 campaign and during Trump's term in office. And Trump tried to throw him out of the White House briefing room. He took it to court, and the court said, no, you can't do that. But, of course, they have the White House, you know, that press, the group of people who are allowed in the White House to ask questions.

That is carefully controlled by a little click of, uh, highly, uh, establishment, highly liberal, uh, journalists. Uh, so they're able to control it, but the president can't say who's there. So, you know, he kind of rubbed Trump's nose in it a little bit there, but the key thing, and they're right about this, Acosta became a conduit for disaffected Trump White House staffers who would leak negative information to him in the latter part of Trump's time there. So it is reasonable that people who have a gripe with Trump would continue to leak this to Acosta because we've seen that going on for quite some time. One Trump advisor told him that Trump hates DeSantis with the fire of a thousand

sons. Trump's ire has been building in public and in private as the Florida governor becomes a greater and greater threat to his bid for a second term. Acosta wrote on Twitter, Trump is livid and screaming at everyone after last night's disappointing midterm acosta wrote on twitter trump is livid and screaming at everyone after last night's disappointing midterm results for the gop says a trump advisor the advisor went on to slam the former president's hand-picked contenders he said they were all bad candidates and candidates matter said the advisor yeah exactly and it's not just that he is upset with his staffers he appears to be very upset with Melania he blames her for his endorsement of Oz because she evidently used to like to watch him on tv and this is you know politics is about being a celebrity. It's about the apprentice, right?

And that's the way he picks his candidates. So who's he going to blame for Herschel Walker? You know, Herschel Walker, he didn't just endorse Herschel Walker. He got Herschel Walker to move back to Georgia. So he's handpicked, groomed, endorsed Herschel Walker. And he's an empty suit. I mean, Warnick is a hardcore fascist, Marxist, racist. He's a horrible candidate.

If they can't find somebody to run against him and win, he does poorly even against somebody like Herschel Walker. And so the New York post came up with a, uh, a, a brutal front page picture. Look at this. Trump D dumpty. President Trump is Humpty Dumpty. Trump D dumpty Don who couldn't build a wall had a great fall uh can all the GOP's men put the party back together again as part of this op-ed piece uh the um the writer of this so that Trump is toxic the most profound vote repellent and recent memory.

So, yeah, can all of the GOP's men put the party together again? As part of the New York Post article, he says, hey, lying Ted and sleepy Joe meet toxic Trump. You know, if the former president had any self-knowledge or even the slightest ability to be self-deprecating, he might consider giving himself this alliterative nickname. After three straight national tallies in which either he or his party were both hammered, it's time for even his fans to accept the truth.

Toxic Trump is Is the political equivalent. Of a can of raid. What Tuesday night's results suggest. Is that Trump is perhaps the most profound. Vote repellent in modern history. The surest way to lose. In these midterms. Was to be a politician endorsed by Trump.

That's basically what I was saying yesterday. It helped people. To not be endorsed by them. I think it was the anti-endorse endorsement of DeSantis by Trump. I think gave him a big boost. I think it's going to be important for people to succeed, to distance themselves from Trump, especially because of his toxicity with the independence.

Yes. The Democrat, the Republicans love him and the Republican press is afraid to criticize him. I understand that. I mean, you know, people accuse me of criticizing Trump for viewers. There's no wiggle room in that. I mean, we have such a hyper-partisan environment, Republican or Democrat, and there are so many people in the Republican Party.

Yeah, I know a lot of you understand what's going on with Trump, but it really does limit my audience. I have people telling me all the time, they've been doing this since I began the show. They did it when I was still at Infowars. Oh, I hate this guy. He doesn't follow Trump. It's like, look, I'm going to tell you what he's doing good or bad. And after he had done so much bad in 2020, it's like, no,

we're done. We're done. I never trusted this guy based on his own personal character and the rest of this stuff. I said, all right, you know, we got the alternative is Hillary. Let's take a look and see what he does. Same thing that Julian Assange said, well, you know, we got the alternative is Hillary. Let's take a look and see what he does. Same thing that Julian Assange said. Well, you know, they tried to kill Julian Assange. And, um, you know, I was accused of having Trump derangement syndrome. It's like, no pal, you're the one with Trump derangement syndrome. You don't understand that he's going to run again. You don't understand that he is not going away. He made so much money off of you guys.

He's going to continue to do it as long as you keep sending him cash and love. And you've still got people who are camping out in their cars and showering and exercise. You know, they got a membership in an exercise club and showering there so they can follow their idol around the country at these different rallies. It's just beyond belief, the groupies. Anyway, voters have their own problems, said the New York Post. This election was about them, not about toxic Trump's pathological inability to accept his own failure, except that it wasn't about our problems. It wasn't at all, just like Lawrence said.

Now, anybody wants to talk about what's coming? I mean, this, the, the CBDC stuff is coming at us. We can see the light in this tunnel and it is coming at us like a, uh, high-speed rail train and Republicans pretend not to notice really so um again trump blamed melania over this according to new york times maggie haberman she's somebody else who he gave a lot of access to she's she put a lot of stuff in her book and she's got recordings of trump saying that uh so um trump puts out tweets saying, from my personal standpoint, it was a very big victory. 219 wins, 16 losses in the general. Who has ever done better than that? Well, again, he endorsed so many different candidates. It's really the big races that are the issue.

It's the big races, like the gubernatorial races and the Senate races where he went in and he picked a candidate that, um, because not because they were, had any principles that he agreed with it, because he doesn't care about that. It was simply whether or not they were loyal to him. And if they ever said anything that he perceived as being disloyal, if they didn't tow the line on the fact that he was, the election was stolen from him in 2020, but he threw him out. So, um, yeah, just like, uh, COVID we could say, well, did these people die politically with you die with covid or from covid with a covid positive test you know did you die with a trump endorsement or without it uh no it's um we'll wait have to wait and see what happens uh with the senate but it might actually

not even have to wait that long depending on how some of these races uh go out but it is an outrage it is a disgrace that it takes this long to count the votes it absolutely is and it needs to be fixed and um they won't even focus on that instead what they do is they focus on one company dominion and then they get lawsuits from dominion. It's not even about one company, and it's bigger even than all the voting issues from the computer voting. The computer voting needs to stop, but so does the mail stuff. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Has your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again? Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?

It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to thedavidknightshow.com. There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at DLive and every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. Eastern. Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube. New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show at Podbean,

iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, and more. But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will run out of gas. The links to support the show are at thedavidknightshow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via or donate via Cash App, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box. Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far.

Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. Yeah, listen to that commercial. We've had to beep out a lot of different places where you could donate, but you can still find it at thedavidknightshow.com. And we had a lot of people ask for merchandise, and so we do have a lot of merchandise that is there as well. But I just want to draw people's attention to the fact that we're now putting in outlines on the full show. I understand there's a lot of different things that are talked about, a lot of

different topics, and so we have an outline. So about every five to 10 minutes or so we tell you what's being talked about. So you can go to that particular spot. And so we put that long description is there in all the videos. It's there on the podcast. If the place that you download the podcast is swallowing that up, uh, there's other places where you can get that list. And you can find that list at the David night show.com. If you go to Odyssey, uh, the, uh, it's the only one of the video platforms that we have that recognizes the time codes.

And so you can look down that outline and you can see what's being talked about and you can click on that clickable time code. It'll take you to that spot in the video. So I just want to let you know that. And that if you go to Odyssey, you can go directly to it. I want to talk about some of the ancillary things here. We talked about a lot of personalities and candidates, but I think this is the most amazing thing to me out of the election. You know, we had a lot of referenda on abortion. And everywhere they put abortion on to make it a constitutional state right,

you know, and put it in the state constitution, a right to kill babies. It succeeded. But I think the most amazing piece of abortion legislation that was put on the ballot was out of Montana. Montana voters, apparently, I mean, they're still counting votes, of course, but there's a big difference. With about 80% of the votes, it was 53-47. To say that if a baby survives an abortion attempt,

and so the baby is outside of the mother's body, and it's fighting for its life, they put in a measure that said, outside of the mother's body and it's fighting for its life. They put in a measure that said an infant born alive is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the state and is entitled to the protections of the laws, including the right to appropriate reasonable medical care and treatment. And the people of Montana said no. No. Now, this is not what is typically talked about with abortion.

Oh, well, this is my body, my choice. This is a baby that is outside of the mother's body struggling to live. It's probably been scalded with some kind of a chemical or it's had limbs that have been ripped off of it and it's dying. And the voters of Montana say, kill it. Don't give it any help. They're pushing and accepting infanticide. You know,

these people have always tried to make the case that it's the mother's body. I always said, no, it's not the mother's body. It's a different body. Half the time, it's a different sex. Always, it has unique DNA, unique fingerprints, and all the rest of this stuff. It is a person. And, oh, no, it's the mother's body. Well, it's not.

This shows more than anything. Just like all this stuff. Look, I don't want the government in there with my doctor-patient relationship. It just ought to be all my health decisions ought to be between me and my doctor. We saw what a lie that was for the last two years. And now we can see all this stuff about my body. It's my body. No, it's not your body.

And they know that. And they know that even if the baby is outside, they will kill it. I don't know what's going on in Montana. I always, for some reason, thought Montana was a conservative area. But I saw in the, not just this, I saw in Missoula, Montana, that they're proud of the fact they've got some state representatives now. They've got a transgender representative and a non-binary representative going to represent them in Missoula, Montana.

And they're voting to kill babies that are born alive, voting for infanticide. It all goes together, doesn't it? It all goes together. Ensuring newborns who survive failed abortions are not left to die is generally regarded as a moderate proposal, writes LifeSite News. Pro-lifers are facing defeat on all statewide abortion-related ballot measures this election, which in addition to Montana, were voted on in Vermont, California, Kentucky, and Michigan. Yeah, all of these.

The unanimous position here, even in places you would think like kentucky um or montana they're not supporting it and even in montana to support infanticide let me tell you god will judge this nation and i think the judgment's already begun just take a look at what is happening in this country already. We're already in the midst of judgment. The degeneracy, the depravity, the murder of innocent, the taking of innocent life, the shedding of innocent blood. I mean, we are storing up wrath for ourselves and for our future generations here in this country. So Vermont has enshrined a constitutional right to kill babies, 133,000 to 42,000. It wasn't even close in Vermont. Similar things in California and Michigan.

Fundamental right put in the state constitution and passed there 56 to 44%. This is a snapshot of america uh don't complain when um god takes everything away from us charles hugh smith says regardless of who's elected imperial corruption is ruling the nation and he's right he's got what he calls an s chart and it looks kind of like a bell-shaped curve really but he just cuts off the end of the you know the right end of the bell-shaped curve I'll do it with my hand this way since you're looking at me but he cuts off the right side of the bell-shaped curve and

he talks about the typical life cycle of a of an empire and or state you know you go through an expansion phase you go through a maturation stage diminishing return stage and then a collapse and you know this is what we're seeing as well with the fourth turning you know four generations that type of thing uh this is a little bit longer type of thing in terms of an empire. Typically, they last longer than a fourth turning. They can go through and survive several different fourth turnings,

but that's where we are. And it is part of where we are that we embrace this kind of degeneracy that we see all around us, as well as in fantasizing. There was an interesting back and forth between John MacArthur and John Piper. You know, these are two guys pretty elderly now, both of them. They've been writing books and pastoring churches now.

Between the two of them, 86 years of experience. And so they don't agree on everything, but they were on a question and answer session where they got some questions, and one person asked the question, how American Christians can prepare for persecution that may come in a culture that is hostile to Christianity without hesitation. MacArthur, John MacArthur, and if you don't remember who he is, he's the guy who had about 7,500 people in his church in LA.

And by the time they got to July, he says, okay, we're done. We know this isn't a real pandemic. And you're not about to ease up any of these restrictions. And so they started going back and having church again. And elderly demographic as in most churches, but some people were wearing masks. A lot of people were not wearing masks and attending on a regular basis. And so after several months of this, L.A. got very upset about it, just like the tyrants in Alberta, Canada, a conservative area. And they decided they were going to punish them.

They did not decide that they would. John MacArthur is pretty well known. He's been on Larry King many, many times. At Live Score Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total

betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee and he's um in his early 80s so they decided that it might not be a wise thing to arrest him and put him in jail. So they started accumulating massive fines against them. And they fought them in court and eventually got that returned, as did many other churches in that area. But John MacArthur's church was very high profile in it. And so MacArthur, without any hesitation, when they asked him about the persecution that's coming to Christianity, he said he believes American culture no longer has any vestiges of Christianity.

He said, they're gone. I wouldn't even call this a post-modern culture. I would call it a pre-Christian culture. I like that. You go from post-Christian, post-modern, where there is no such thing as truth. And we're actually now in the pre-Christian stage. Going to come back, but it ain't here yet. He said, this is like paganism 2.0.

It's as if Jesus never came. It's as if there was never a cross or a resurrection, a New Testament, a church, a Bible. This is like Rome or like Moloch worship or Baal worship. This is blatant paganism. And it's the kind of paganism that has levers to control everything. And let me just say, you know, if you're going to have Montana saying that babies who are born alive, we're going to kill them. That is no exaggeration to say that this is Moloch worship,

that this is Baal worship. That's exactly what that worship was about. It was about sacrificing your kids, putting your kids on a burning idol and burning them alive. So now we burn them in the womb. And then if they survive that, we kill them. We leave them there to die. That's it. And that's really how the early church was recognized in Rome.

It was a common thing. If there's something wrong with a baby when it was born, you just take it out there, leave it on a rock to let it die. Now, Ralph Northam calls that comfort care. But it was standard procedure in Rome. The Christians would wait there, and they would see if the people left the baby there. They would go out and take the baby, and they would raise the baby.

They would adopt the baby. Because adoption is the picture of what Christ came to do for us. So they would adopt the kid. The Romans, the pagans, did what the people in Montana want to do. And people in California and Virginia, people like Ralph Northam, he's a doctor. He said, oh yeah, just leave the baby there and let it die. He knew that was the case. A lot of people don't know that's the case, but there's no excuse in Montana.

They know that's the case now, and they voted for it. Anyway, going back to MacArthur. He said, this is a kind of paganism. It's a new kind of paganism. It's got levers to control everything. He argued these levers are technology and social media. He cited his church's legal battle with the state of California over the repeated violations of the COVID pandemic safety restrictions

involving masks and social distancing and shutting down. He said that is an evidence of a culture that hates the truth. MacArthur shared that it was only when Grace Community Church's lawyers wanted to depose L.A. health officials that their charges were dropped, including all fees and fines levied against the church. The state also paid the church's legal bills, which amounted to over a million dollars. He says, here's the one thing they couldn't cope with, the truth. That's the truth about COVID. They're trying to control everything in order to sustain the

narrative. He gets it. He understands now. He's lived it. And a lot of other pastors have as well. So the same thing that was happening in Canada. We can't have these churches meeting. It shows that we're lying to everybody about the pandemic. And so we've got to shut them down and punish them and arrest the pastors. So the one thing they couldn't cope with was the truth. He said the faithful biblical church is going to very soon become the target

because we don't accept anything. Describing Vanderbilt Hospital's gender reassignment surgeries as brutalizing to children, MacArthur said he can't envision faithful Christians in today's culture becoming, quote, anything but the arch enemy of everything these people want to do. We have had a couple of hundred years in America when it's been different than most of history and most of the world. But we're there now.

This is a pagan country. And they don't want to be confronted with biblical truth. And there's going to be some price to pay for that. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie i'm confident of that and we have to be ready for that and we have to be faithful and then we have to have the joy of watching the hand of god and providence do what it's going to do. He said, I think the cultural protections have been pulled away.

We're now where the early church was, and we have to expect to have the level of hostility that paganism gives when it dominates a culture. And Christianity is the most severe threat that it faces. You understand that tolerance is not a virtue of paganism. It's not a virtue of most religions or most societies or most cultures. We've grown up thinking that, you know, that is just the world in which we live. But that tolerance is based on the people, the Christians who founded this country. And that is part of the foundation that's been ripped away.

Thank you, Rhonda. Appreciate the tip. Rhonda Tate, thank you very much. Appreciate that. He said, MacArthur goes on to say, Jesus said it this way. He said, when the world hates me because I tell them their deeds are evil,

and if they hated me, they'll hate you. And if you stop telling them how wonderful they are, if you stop the sentimental slop that you hear from Joel Osteen and prosperity preachers, and you tell them their deeds are evil and they need Jesus Christ and he alone can save them from eternal hell, they will hate you. And that hate is going to show up in the same kinds of hostility that's been characteristic of other periods of time and other places. It's time for faithful Christians to stand up for biblical truth. He said, I read the end of the book and we went. Now, John Piper doesn't exactly agree. He says, He said, you preach the fact that suffering is to be expected. You preach the flip side of the prosperity theology.

I talked about it yesterday. I said one of the things that we've got to reject of this Trumpism, soundly reject, are these false prophets and false preachers, people like Julie Green, who are a reproach to Christ, a reproach to the church, a reproach to anything that is called Christian, spewing out their false lies over and over again, every election cycle. And I said, what they have is a gospel of prosperity and politics. They are the GOPP.

They are the Trump cult of false prophets and false teachers. And many of them, like Michael Flynn, are pure-on-New-Age pagans. And they'll put some Christian lipstick on when they have an event at one of these giant prosperity gospel churches. Piper said, you're going to suffer. This is just plain biblical teaching, and it's not peculiar to America. All over the world, people are suffering. So he said, so I want to prepare martyrs.

You know, when we think about that word, that does not mean somebody who is a suicidal murderer, a suicide bomber, who's going to kill themselves and as many people as they possibly can. That word has been co-opted. The Greek word for martyr was witness. And it was the witnesses in ancient Rome who would refuse to recant what they knew, what they had seen, what they had witnessed. That's why they were called martyrs.

They were killed because they wouldn't lie about what they had witnessed. They would rather die. They'd rather die than live by a lie. And so that is what a martyr truly is. It's not somebody who's out there who's violent. Piper pointed out that MacArthur's response could lead Christians to anger rather than seeing suffering as a blessing from God. He said, I know you believe this, he said to MacArthur,

but what you just did for the last 10 minutes there, I think, can have an effect of making people angry and sowing the seeds of, and he just clenches his face and goes, I'm so angry, right? He says, well, how do you turn back to Christian hedonism, he asked MacArthur, if you're seething with anger at the culture? Well, I would just say this. Do you think Jesus was angry when he went into the temple and he turned the tables over and he beat the money changers that were there? Do you think he was angry about that? Should we resolve to tell the truth? Should we defend innocent life? This is again, you know, Piper and a lot of these people have embraced, just love your neighbor, just go over

here and live in a monastery or something like that. I don't think we're called to do that. I think we are called to, yes, put Christianity first, but part of that is just like the people would go take that baby who was left on the rocks to die. You don't turn your back on people who were cold and hungry and starving and in prison and being murdered. That's not Christianity either, John Piper. That's not it at all. You know, I was starving, I was in prison, I was sick, and you did nothing to help me.

You show your faith by doing that. That doesn't become, and again, you've got to keep it in line. You have some strains of Christianity, they've become all about the social gospel. They've all become about, well, all we're going to do is just help the sick and the needy and that type of thing. And we're going to forget all this stuff about how do we get right with God? How do we establish a relationship with God? We'll forget about what Christ did to make peace between God and man. We'll forget all that.

We'll just focus on the needs of humanity. No, that's going off on the wrong side as well. But we don't divorce ourselves from that. We don't say, well, I'm going to live this life of piety and go to a monastery. No, that's not it either. We're going to fall off either side of this thing. You've got to keep it balanced. So what MacArthur did, what the Canadian pastors did, what many others did during the lockdowns when Trump paid tyrants to lock them down and to say that worshiping God was not essential. That is important. We have to resolve to tell the truth. We have to resolve to protect

innocent life. And so then we look at the other side of this, and you have the establishment press saying, despite Doug Mastriano's loss, don't count out Christian nationalism. Look, this is a label that he has always rejected. And so I never tried to put that on him. And I never paid that much attention to what he was doing. He kept a very, he didn't run a lot of ads. He held these rallies and everything, but they were kind of closed. And so I saw some good statements from him, probably on policies, we would agree, on many other things, except for the fact that he embraced these false teachers and these false prophets. When you do that, you have t again, they're still trying to taint him as a Christian nationalist while they will come back and say, well, you know, he he he was very vocal about the anti pandemic restrictions. Well, OK, I agree with that. He was had pro conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.

Well, again, I think, you know, we need to take a look at what went wrong. There's a lot of things that were put in that went wrong. And I blame Trump for a lot of those. But it should be talked about. And, of course, the Democrats have been skeptical about 2016 and so forth. And he was dubious of the separation of church and state. So, again, they don't give any concrete examples of what he has to say. They just throw the label Christian nationalist at him.

I don't think, as I've said before, when we talk about separation of church and state, I know what the left wants. The left wants to shut down your free exercise of religion. They want to fire you if you pray silently on the 50-yard line. They want to put a gag in your mouth. They want to put you in the closet while they have parades about their degeneracy. And we're not going to do that. We're also not looking to establish a particular denomination or church or religion either. So again, the whole thing was tainted with these false teachers,

false prophets that he brought in on a regular basis. So let's take a look real quickly at something that happened on the good side or maybe on the good side here in Tennessee. In Tennessee, there's been legislation that has been put in. It was not part of the election. But Republicans in Tennessee have introduced legislation to ban pediatric transgender treatments. It's called the Protecting Children from Gender Mutilation Act. Good for

them. The legislation would also permit courts to impose a $25,000 penalty per violation. Well, you know, again, big difference when you look at what is happening with different states. This is one of the reasons why I do not want to make the abortion situation legislation or whatever. I don't want to make that a federal case again because I don't want my lot thrown in with the people who will kill a baby like in Montana that's been born.

And I don't want to throw my lot in with the Sodom and Gomorrah people in Las Vegas that's why I'm here in Tennessee where we say that it is we're going to ban these the mutilation of minors at live score bet we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie.

But in Nevada, they're about to add protections for sexual orientation and gender identity into the Constitution. They have an LGBTERA, if you will, Equal Rights Amendment. And, of course, that's going to have sweeping prohibitions against anybody having any choice in the matter because of religious issues. It's going to coerce. It's going to be used to coerce and to punish people. We've seen how this works.

We know how it's going to work. Is it any surprise that Sin City would do something like this? So it is on its way to passing. And when you look at the transgender issue, we do need to have these kind of regulations to stop this. Not only is it horrific if it was done to one child, but this is big business. They're expecting the transgender surgery industry to grow to a $5 billion industry. They think that it's going to grow at the rate of 11% through 2030. It was nearly $2 billion industry in 2021.

And so as a result, you have the American Medical Association is calling on governments to crack down on any opposition to this kind of mutilation because there's money to be made. They're just like big pharma. I enjoyed this essay here, and I'm going to read this to you. This is Welcome to the Objective Room. And this is from world.com. It's wng.org. He says, you ain't tucked away in C.S. Lewis's novel, That Hideous Strength. It's an image that I can never quite get out of my mind. It's a description of a strange painting in a strange room.

The painting is of a young woman holding her mouth wide open to reveal that the inside of it was thickly overgrown with hair. I wonder if this is even before we had COVID and the black hairy tongue. I mean, that's a real thing now. Anyway, he says it was very skillfully painted in the photographic manner so that you could almost feel that hair. Indeed, you could not avoid feeling it, however hard you tried. This portrait is clustered among other odd pictures, a giant mantis playing a fiddle while being eaten by another mantis,

a man with corkscrews for arms bathing in a dingy sea. Other pictures in the room seem ordinary, but would inevitably have some odd detail that threw the whole thing off. Feet pointed in the wrong direction or an odd arrangement of fingers. In the novel, the combination of apparent innocence on the surface of something more ominous made the pictures supremely menacing. I thought about these pictures the other day while watching the President of the United States being interviewed by Dylan Mulvaney, a self-declared male-to-female transgender TikTok comedian and content creator. Indeed, I think about it every time transgender assistant secretary for health,

Admiral Rachel Levine, is in the news. Or any time an advertisement on television shows a same-sex couple romantically killing. Or most accurately, I think about it any time that another family-friendly drag show makes the news. Show the picture at the top of the article there. Yeah, that's really what we're talking about right there. Right there. Perfect illustration of what he's talking about. The reason I connect these paintings to sexual insanity in our culture

is because of their function in Lewis's novel. The paintings reside in what he called the objective room. Inside the headquarters of NICE, NICE was a sinister organization, ostensibly declared to the reform of British society, but that is in in fact, a tool in the hands of mysterious dark powers. The novel's protagonist is drawn by his own ambition into the machinations of nice. Eventually, he is offered initiation into the fullness of the organization by means of systemic training in objectivity, and the first tool of his training is the objective room. The room itself is a little

bit off, too high, too narrow, with an arch over the door that is slightly off-center, just enough to bother and unsettle the mind. The ceiling and table are both covered with spots arranged to suggest regularity and pattern, but always frustrating the expectation once aroused. As he surveys the room, he realizes its purpose is to eliminate all specifically human reactions in him, so that he might become fit society for the dark forces. In other words, exposure to the seemingly innocent yet profoundly disturbing paintings, the lopsided architecture, the other irregularities,

is designed to detach him from his natural human responses to the world, to kill the nerve of his normal and instinctive preferences, and thereby separating him from his humanity. You know, Lewis wrote this stuff really before. I don't think he would have known about the CIA's program for art, for architecture. Roger Scruton opposed that type of modernism and brutalism and architecture and other things like that. Talked about the importance of beauty.

But there is a very sinister purpose to all of this type of modern art. And C.S. Lewis was able to discern it, even without the advantage of hindsight seeing what the CIA has been doing and some of their documents. He was able to discern that. This diabolical goal to sear the imagination by exposure to the unnatural and the abnormal is the same as that of President Biden's interview, the advertisements, and the drag queen story hour. The aim of our cultural elites is to turn the entire public square into one giant objective room where the human and the humane, the normal and the natural, are suppressed and smothered. Biden himself noted that a key way for politicians to advocate for trans people is simply by

being seen with them, thereby normalizing such identities. As Christians, we must not be naive about this strategy, nor about its potential success. It is possible to sear the conscience and the imagination. Wicked custom can smother the light of natural understanding. We can choose madness, and tragically, we can foist such madness upon children, the most vulnerable and the impressionable among us. But Lewis doesn't merely show us the smothering, searing, and severing effect of the objective room on our humanity. He also shows how the objective room can awaken us to reality,

as it did for his character. As the desert first teaches men to love water, or as absence first reveals affection, there rose up against the background of the sour and the crooked some kind of vision of the sweet and the straight. Something else, something he vaguely called the normal, apparently existed. He had never thought about it before that, but there it was, solid, massive, with a shape of its own, almost like something you could touch or you could eat or you could fall in love with it. He finishes and says, by the mercy of God, may we do the same. Yeah, are we living in a pre-Christian culture? Will we rediscover beauty and truth

and value them again as we look at the twisted and the perverted? Before we take a break, and we're going to get Tony on, I just want to say thank you to some of the people who have left tips. Igor, thank you very much for the tip. Jody, thank you as well.

She says the ghost of John McCain is torturing us in Maricopa County, it seems. Yeah, yeah. Louis Tart, thank you very much. And Harps, thank you. He says, G'day, David. Queensland at 12 a.m. two hours ago has brought back face nappy recommendations. Oh, there you go. It's the middle of the night there in Australia.

So they got masks back on again. And if dictator Dan wins the election in 15 days, he'll try to do the same thing here in Victoria. Well, yeah, that's it's not ending. It's an unending tyranny and it wasn't on the ballot at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the wasn't on the ballot. Not even in Florida. We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.

Stay with us. Thank you. You're listening to the david knight show all right welcome back and joining us now is tony arterburn no stranger to this show he frequently guest hosts and tony has wise wolf dot gold and he's also graciously set up David night dot gold, which will take you there and, um, let him know that you came through us and it's always good to have Tony on and talk about what is happening with what is essentially the end game with all this stuff. They've got different ways to push us there with the pandemic, with climate and the rest of this stuff.

And we're going to be talking at the top of the next hour to Alex Newman, who is in Egypt at COP 27 about the climate MacGuffin. But the end game here is the financial game. They can take everything from you, take away your money, reset the currency, then they control you. Thanks for joining us, Tony. Always great to be with you, David. What's your take on the election, first of all?

Let's talk about that. Well, you know, the Republicans didn't run on anything. I mean, you've covered this. I've covered this. They had a golden opportunity. You have the highest inflation in the history of the United States. You have a president taking us to the brink of nuclear Armageddon. You have a border that's wide open.

Shortages, economic uncertainty, everything. And they can't run on that. They ran on what? Hunter Biden's laptop and we're not the Democrats. I mean, just an epic failure. But I think that's probably part of this fourth turning where the politics have shifted away from what we normally understand as our elections and political process into the financial sector. What we're seeing with the hidden politics of currency manipulation and geopolitical strategy and things like that with foreign policy, that's what I'm paying attention to. Like the BRICS

nations, as I always bring up here, the petrodollar in waning and, uh, the hegemonic dominance of the United States waning. And that's what's, that's what is on my radar right now, as I'm seeing central banks buying up gold, I'm seeing, uh, people that are, that are stuck in normalcy bias in the, uh, Jim Kramer economy are going to get caught flat footed is all this is changing. And it's going to change faster than I think people realize. Yeah, that's right. Yeah. It's going to happen gradually than suddenly. And, you know, when you talk about that, you know, Hunter Biden's laptop and all the rest of the stuff, if they're going to do anything about it, they would have done something about a long time ago.

They could have easily opened some investigations, but they're not going to do that. Instead, they will grandstand. And it's not just Trump. He's probably the best example of it, but it's not just Trump. You go back and look at what was done with the Benghazi hearings and Trey Gowdy. He parlayed that into a Fox News show, but they never did anything about Benghazi. It was an absolute sham what all those trials and investigations were about. So they simply run this reality TV show there. That's one of the reasons why Trump is so good at this stuff, because he's been doing reality TV for a long time.

And he does it on steroids. And it's become hyper-toxic because he is so good at it. But these other guys have been doing it on both sides for the longest time. And so, you know, that all distracts us. You know, this whole thing about, you know, all the investigations of Trump and the January 6th committee and all the rest of the stuff, this back and forth of personal attacks and investigations. And it's all just smoke and mirrors. They never go anywhere with any real legal investigation.

They're just dog and pony shows to keep us from looking at the real issues, isn't it? Yes. And I used to pay attention. There used to be strategy in politics and there isn't any more that should be that should be evident to everyone you have golden opportunity for the gop to retake the house and the senate and they just failed epically i don't know what's going to happen with the house i mean are they still trying to count the votes i mean we it was supposedly a first world country with uh yeah you know this technology we can't count the votes but yeah they didn't run on anything. The election is two days and counting,

as I would say, right? And you're so right. We know how to have a fair election. We did that in Iraq. Just before I left Iraq, we'd set that up where you go in and dip your finger in the purple ink and the election is on one day and you have to show up for it.

We know how to do that. But again, all the politics that were in this last election, you know, is this the most important election of my lifetime? And maybe so, I don't know, I guess as we careen towards collapse, but none of the politics that we are, we care about are in this election. Both parties agree on World War III. That's right. Both parties agree on open borders, whether it's for cheap labor or for voter roll padding, whatever, whatever it is. Both parties agree on the Fed is the savior of our economy. And that's what we're addicted to, fake fiat currency and pumping massive amounts of dollars into the system every time we get into trouble. And again, I mean, these numbers are not looking good. And we covered this last week on the show.

But, you know, we're continuing to see the Fed is going to have to. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Save the dollar because they need to save their system. And I think they're going to forego helping the economy.

So people that are going to get caught flat-footed, I use that term a lot, but we've got normalcy bias. And just this period after the election, I think, is going to see a lot of change, David. We had Joe Biden pushing out the strategic reserves to cut the cost of gasoline a bit, but there has been no increase in production as far as far as I can see. So we're going to see an increase in energy prices. And I mean, I was covering an article last week on my show, 40% of small businesses couldn't pay their rent last month. Yes, I know. Yeah. You mentioned the federal reserve. What makes people think that they're going to be able to audit the elections if we can't audit the Fed?

We've been talking about auditing the Fed. That should be an innocuous thing, right? Can't you just tell us, give us a little bit of transparency? Can we see what you guys are doing? No, you can't see anything I'm doing. And that's everywhere. Whether you're talking about the CDC or the FDA, any of these people. No, we're going to keep this stuff hidden for 75 years. You're not going to be able the FDA, any of these people.

No, we're going to keep this stuff hidden for 75 years. You're not going to be able to see any of the election data. They're going to keep all that stuff hidden from you. When I was in Texas, you had the State Board of Elections. The guy they brought in from Rose Law Firm, where Hillary Clinton was, to the Republicans brought him in. Rick Perry did. And still there under Greg Abbott. But, you know, he was telling every county, get rid of your images of the ballots. And they're required under the Constitution to keep that stuff.

But he was telling them to get rid of it. They don't want any auditing capability, any transparency. And so it is a scam. And, you know, people need to understand that. And I think we still need to follow it, to follow it to the, to the degree that we understand what they're, where they're moving. And I think the key thing is the, the money issue as well. We've seen a lot of reports lately about suspicious things being done, uh, giant, uh, gold whales, uh, in the market and things like that.

And then an interesting report saying, well, uh, you know, we've had a tremendous amount of central bank purchasing of gold. And then you look at the fine print and they say, well, uh, we didn't actually look at that. We just, uh, uh, imagined that, right. We just kind of estimated that, you know, when did you estimate on what basis did you estimate that? These are, these are unreported things that we estimated.

Everything is hidden from us. Even in the gold market, it's hidden from us as to what is happening, isn't it? Yes, and if you love electronic voting, you're going to love electronic currency. You mentioned the gold whale, and that article came out last week on Zero Hedge, and it's a 300-ton purchase from mystery buyers. And again, it's the dog that didn't bark. When they raised rates last week, that's supposed to drive the gold price down. That's normally historically what happens, but that's not what's going on.

As a matter of fact, gold's up almost a hundred dollars an ounce since I was on here last week wow it's just that again we don't talk about that but uh we're seeing massive amounts of purchases I'm doing research for a book right now and I didn't realize that because I always talk about 2021 and the the breaking the all-time record for Central Banks ordering gold since Breton Woods in 44. But the record year before that was 2019. And I didn't realize that. There was a lot of things going on before the scandemic. There was the largest amount of CEOs resigning. That was the biggest mass exodus of CEOs ever. And there's also data that I'm finding about just how many, and I think people

are going to realize this when we hit the wall, whenever that's going to be economically, just how many zombie corporations there are. And I learned that term from Jim Mars reading his book, The Trillion Dollar Conspiracy. It came out in 2010. And I'm just looking at this now. That number that he had in his book has increased maybe five, tenfold. How many just companies out there that are not profitable that are kept alive by the central bank and other multinationals? And we have an entirely fake economy, and I think that is about to start showing signs of entropy. And, you know, that can be kept alive.

These zombie corporations can be kept alive by Wall Street and by the stock market because it's kind of a confidence game as well. For about 20 years, we competed against Blockbuster. Well, not 20 years. I'd say it's about 13 years we competed against them. But after they were bought up by Viacom, which owns Paramount and many other things, CBS and all that type of big media company, after they were bought up by them, they never turned a profit. They put them on Wall Street, but they constantly lost money.

And they continued on for about another 20 years, losing money every year. But able to do it because they were able to raise money off of their stock on Wall Street by giving people stories and finding another sucker every year to fleece. And so in the same way that the central banks operate, the corporations have been able to essentially lay hold of fiat cash through stock market stories and things like that. You look at the price-to price to earning ratios and how astronomical they are because you can lose money for 20 years before you shut the thing down and continue to operate that way. But what do you think when we talk about zombie things?

What is going on with Bitcoin? I mean, there's been some massive stuff there and everybody is talking about how it's going to affect Brady, you know, and his portfolio and that type of thing. But what do you think is going on with Bitcoin? Well, I think we're seeing an adjustment. Bitcoin, unfortunately, with the massive amount of the crypto investment, got tied to Wall Street and the stock markets and currency creation and fiat. And again, that fake amount of wealth, I mean, it's all on paper. So Bitcoin, I think, is going to have a bounce probably in 2023. But right now, I think we're probably headed to the

10,000 territory. I'm a buyer at 10,000 on Bitcoin. I still believe Bitcoin has a story. A lot of the other cryptos will go by the wayside. And it has to do with these exchanges, David. I think it's the confidence that's pumped into the market through the exchanges showing their balance sheets. And people are panic selling. And again, if you're calm and you're looking at this rationally, I think a lot of the crypto, it's going to shake out a great deal of the coins that probably shouldn't exist. But the crypto market is still again it has a great future uh bitcoin i think still has a a story to tell i'm a buyer of bitcoin i like the technology um i think there's a lot more adoption going on there was an article up on zero hedge

and i thought i think it was from like the international man they talked about how you can't ban bitcoin even if you really even if the government really wanted to it's it's been adopted uh it's gone too far and uh yeah i saw that that was uh doug casey and and i've had a chance to uh interview doug casey in the past i'd like to get him on and talk to him about that uh because you know i see his argument there but you know i've also seen what happened with the miners in china you know they're able to spot them very quickly because of the amount of power that they use. And so they could identify where these people were. This went in and physically shut them down.

That's a very different. And so I'd like to, you know, get his take on that. And what is your take on that aspect of it? You know, just coming in with a rubber hose. I understand it's decentralized and that type of thing, but it is centralized in the extent that you have to have, perhaps the argument is that there's always going to be a country that's going to be friendly to miners. But the problem I see with that is how centralized everything's becoming

in terms of global governance and how everything, you know, people, as you saw with all the different countries and this pandemic that we had, they were all afraid not to do the WHO dictates over vaccines and all the rest of the stuff. Everybody was clamoring to get that because they knew they were going to be cut off from the rest of the world. So if they were to do the same type of thing with Bitcoin, I think they could get compliance just like they did with COVID. What do you think? Well, I think you and I both know history in that the totalitarian nature of man, I mean, it is possible for the governments to collude and squelch out Bitcoin. I don't think that they can actually kill it, though. I think that there's always going to be some region or some country or something that's using it at this point.

And again, Victor Hugo said the most powerful thing on the earth, more powerful than all the armies, is an idea whose time has come. Again, fiat currency, this is the answer. Bitcoin and looking at sound money like gold and silver are the answer to the nightmare that's been created of our reality through fiat currency and currency manipulation. So I do have some faith that there will be more adoption and people will start to look at this. But I'm with you. I think my pessimistic side always kicks in because we're watching our freedoms and liberties erode in real time.

And it's happening faster and faster and faster so it's it is hard to be optimistic but you like to be in the fight so you want to have a little fight in you so i i i want to root for bitcoin but i am skeptical that you know that it could not be banned i mean i think that the governments will go after it but it's kind of like the soviet union david i mean they squelched everything for a while but you know human nature and and uh the human spirit eventually conquered that. And so I think we're probably going to go into a period where there is more and more totalitarian pushback against decentralized currencies, but we'll just keep the faith and see what happens. Yeah. Yeah. They, they did their

best to squelch free speech and you had. And you had a very vibrant underground and dissident literature in the Soviet Union. But of course, their technological capabilities were very, very, very crude compared to what they have right now. There's an article on Zero Hedge, an asymmetric payoff, they say. Why Goldman sees gold soaring 30% when the Fed starts cutting rates. Do you think that's what's going to happen? Everybody's waiting for the pivot. Nobody believes that they're going to have the staying power as they keep raising interest rates and they see the suffering and the economic damage that happens when they make everything phenomenally expensive. You see it happening already with mortgage rates and the used car market and things like that so everybody is expecting that they're going to chicken out

before they could ever get the interest rates up above where the inflation rate is and so then everybody is starting to guess not just when that is going to happen but what's going to happen when that does happen most of them believe that's inevitable what do you think about that i think that's probably modest. I mean, the Fed is going, they would like to save the purchasing power of the dollar through raising rates. I mean, that to me is their primary objective is keeping the dollars the world's reserve currency. But they're also going to have to answer to the political problem of an economic meltdown

here in the United States. And that's what's, again, if they don't start pumping in again, you know they're going to do all the wrong things we're not going to cut spending we're not going to deregulate we're just going to rely on the federal reserve to pump in more currency and that will lead to more economic uncertainty and people will turn to gold i mean people are going to turn to gold eventually because that's just what happens in history it's russian's law When bad money enters a marketplace, it drives good money out until it doesn't. I think that's what we're about.

We're about to witness a currency reevaluation. And because we're in this fourth turning, because we're in this point in history, David, I believe it's going to accelerate. It's going to be faster than we think. Yeah, I think once it happens, it's really going to take off. And we're starting to see a lot of things that really take off with this. So, so tell us a bit about what is going on at a wise Wolf gold. What's going on there, Tony? Well, we have been extremely busy. I've been working to get more supply, um, and, uh, more relationships with

men. So I've mentioned that on the show and I have to thank Kenzie because she is, is working overtime, filling orders and helping me with all this. And a lot of the David Knight listeners have been very patient. We've had some large customers, like, you know, we've had some people that have had inheritances and buy silver. And some of that went out yesterday. I've been talking to them saying, look, I know you purchased it. We locked it in. We're waiting on mints, but that is everywhere right now. I mean, it, I know you purchased it. We locked it in. We're waiting on mints. But that is everywhere right now.

I mean, it's hard to get supply. We're working really hard to get that done. All orders will always be filled. That is our guarantee. Silver is a lot tighter right now than gold is, right? It is very tight. But gold is too. I mean, as far as getting orders in gold if you're gonna if you're gonna purchase

something you want gold you're gonna get it faster than silver at this point but we the good thing about my business i set up the relationships with the uh the trading houses which allows me to use my credit to lock in purchases so we can stop that price that's a good thing about me i don't just say out of stock i can still take your order you just have to wait for it. But so far, so good. We had a lot of great orders going out yesterday, and a lot of people were very happy with that. But Wolfpack is growing, and I think that will be that community that we're trying to set up there.

I'm opening up another pickup and drop-off location in Denison, Texas, just south of the Red River on the Oklahoma border. My mom's got an antique mall there. So I'm just I'm going to create a create an office there and a place where people can pick up and drop off. We're hoping we'll get more supply for our Wolfpack members that way and other Wise Wolf customers. But it's going to be a very tumultuous 2023 i believe and it's just going to be continuing continuing accumulation of precious metals david and i want to talk to the listeners real quick i was on a show yesterday and i said here's something that no one will ever tell you but i will because

your friendly neighborhood uh precious metals dealer when we get the busiest david and i i want the listeners to to think about this when i get the busiest, David, and I want the listeners to think about this. When I get the busiest, when my phone rings the most is when gold breaks records or goes high. Don't be that person. So you don't want to buy high and write it down low, right? But that's what always happens. And I've been doing this for years. And when it goes up, when it starts hitting, like if silver broke $30 today, my phone would be ringing off the hook.

And there'd be no, I mean, I can lock in trades. You can have to wait probably, you know, two or three, four weeks, but gold, when it hit 2000 last time, I just had a line out my door and people were just, this is for purchases not selling to me. So it's a phenomenon. And so I want people to realize that we're, we are in a reevaluation like we've never seen before. And again, the dollar has dominated so long, we've become so accustomed to it. population uh segment and share of the Earth's population of the bricks Nations and what they're trying to do uh throwing off the dollar as the world's reserve currency that this game we we're

in the the final stages of the dollar dominating the world and this is going to have major implications for every everyone's savings for their retirement for everything and it's not going away. It won't be made better in Washington. The Republicans, again, you have a golden opportunity to show the ruling party is a failure and you don't do it. So no one's coming. They're not running on that because ultimately the parties agree

on the fundamental problems that are really bringing America to its knees. They agree on those things. So we're having to take care of ourselves, and the best way to do that is to have information. Well, I agree. You know, we talk about people buying the stuff when it's priced high. It's not even that the value of gold is changing. It's that the value of the dollar is changing.

And I think if people have that understanding, that your Wolfpack thing that you've got, where people can buy it on a regular basis, you know, gold is far more stable than the dollar. So the kind of volatility that we're seeing there is in many cases the volatility of the dollar, but it's also manipulations that they're doing to the price of gold using paper gold uh using uh phony movements uh between central banks and that type of thing they've got so many different ways that they can manipulate the value we know what the real value is i think it's one of the reasons why it's so important to have it physically uh as a you know which is what you do uh to to not have to to uh have your gold on some exchange that um operating out of Shanghai and telling you, yeah, we really do have it here. And trust us.

I'll tell you, I mean, yesterday I was doing some inventory and I realized I had some extra cash that was outside of my normal buying parameters. And I turned it immediately into gold. That's what I bought it for myself. I mean, I don't really keep cash around. I mean, cash cash is good to have I'm not telling you not to have it or not have a bank account but me personally I'm I'm going to get the gold I you mentioned manipulation there was a debate on Kitco and I recommend people go watch it but there was a you know there's an establishment person that says there's no way that gold could be manipulated and then the others somebody like me who's more more like this is a complete fraud and the the argument from the

establishment guy was i'm sorry i don't remember his name but he came up with we said well we've had a war on drugs and and they can't win that and we've had they lost afghanistan and the government's incompetent how could they be manipulating gold for the last 50 years and i thought they didn't want to win any of those things by the way unless you can't win a war on drugs it's like uh gorba dogs he said about the war on terrors like it's a like a war on dandruff i mean you're not going to win that and uh it's just again it was it made me laugh because i'm like, that was the whole point of them with foreign policy. It never was meant to be one.

It's a long game. It's a boondoggle. Exactly. It's an excuse. It's a MacGuffin, so they can do what they want to do. It kind of reminds me of the story of the guy who was going across the border on a regular basis, and they thought it was something suspicious about it. And they kept checking everything about him. You know, see if he's, is he smuggling something over?

What is it that's going on? Finally, they realized that for a very long time, what he was doing was smuggling the bicycles that he was riding, you know, and, and that's really what's going on with the war on drugs. They just want to have an excuse to set up a police state, a surveillance state and all the rest of this stuff. And, uh, you know, the, all, all these different, uh, actions that they do, they're just like, uh, the climate stuff. It's not about the emissions at all. It's about the control. That's what they're trying to establish.

So yeah, they're, they're not going to control anything. As a matter of fact, they want it to continue to go that way. That's one of the reasons why they, uh, when they created their pandemic, they said that it was going to be around a respiratory illness, you know, around the flu and around coal. Cause you're never going to cure the cold. And as long as you've got colds out there and you've got PCR tests, you've got a pandemic for the rest of eternity, right?

It's always going to be there. So they don't have any interest in controlling these things, but they do have an interest in controlling us. And it all goes back to controlling us and the way that we escape that particular kind of control is to make sure that we can function independently of them. The more decentralized you can become, that is the goal. Yeah.

And again, freedom is the goal. And the ability to between peer to peer. That's why I like Bitcoin. But again, that's on a public ledger. You know, it's funny that they always talk about how Bitcoin and cryptos are used in criminality. And I had a conversation with a Department of Homeland Security agent and someone from the Texas Attorney General's office that came in my shop a couple of years, three years ago when I was in San Antonio. And I said, hey, I know of a currency that dwarfs

Bitcoin and criminality. And I did this to them. And they said, you do? And I said, yeah, I know of a currency that dwarfs Bitcoin and criminality. And this is, I did this to them and they said, they said, you do. And I said, yeah, I know what it's the U S dollar. I mean, it makes Bitcoin look like an amateur.

I mean, it's like, that's what, that's what people do. But again, you know, we, we have so much on the line here.

I just want to remind people that, and I've got to shake myself out of it. We're going to start seeing the cracks in the system very soon. You're going to want to prepare the best that you can mentally, spiritually, and financially. I'm not telling you to go buy gold. I don't know what gold's going to do. I just know where the dollar's headed. I know where that's going because I have historical charts to show me the rise in the debt of the United States, its obligations.

And I know what's happening geopolitically. So I know where the dollar's going. I don't know where metals are going. I don't know about investments. I just, I, I want to reiterate that it's, it's, uh, it's going to be a, a very tumultuous 2023. So be prepared. I agree. And for me, it's all about the CBDC. We've got to have something that we're going to be able to use, to use outside of that. And you look at a lot of different countries for the longest time. It's very popular in Mexico for them to use silver parallel to the peso or whatever that they have. They frequently use that.

So it's accepted and it's customary. And we're going to have to have a parallel society that's going to have a parallel currency. And so things like that are going to be very, very important to us. Well, it's always great talking to you, Tony. Thank you so much. And again, wisewolf.gold is where you can find Tony. And he's set up davidknight.gold to take you there as well. So I really appreciate your support.

Always great to have you on, have your insights. Always enjoy when you do the show. Thank I really appreciate your support. Always great to have you on, have your insights, always enjoy when you do the show. Thank you very much, Tony. Appreciate it. Thank you. Oh,

by the way, before we go, before we go, uh, I've got a tip here from Angus and he, um, he says, buy Tony a tie.

Um, I think you're just fine. Well, the problem, the problem is, well, I need to go get some, I'm going to next time I'm in Dallas,

I'm going to go get some new suits. It's it's I've been training my, you know, I own a gym. I bought a gym last year and I've been training more. So my neck got bigger. It's hard to get tied. And so I, I don't want to pass out while I'm doing the David Knight show. So I'll get some new shirts. We'll get some new tie. Well, definitely the brain is still getting all the oxygen and blood that it needs. Cause always when I talk to you, you're a hundred percent there, but I just had to pass that on since he put it there. Uh, thank you so much, Tony. Appreciate it. Have a good day. Okay. And, uh, we're going to be setting up a contact with, um, Alex Newman in Egypt in just a moment. Uh,

thank you. Andromeda one. Thank you as well for the tip. Before we go to him in Egypt, let's just lay a little bit of foundation here. This is a young girl who films herself. I guess you put this up on TikTok or something. Just having a breakdown over climate, and she's trying to block an area here. But that's not even the issue. i want you to take a look at her and how mentally ill she is listen to this hello my name is louise i'm 24 years old and i'm here i'm here because i don't have a future i don't have a future And you might hate me for doing this, and you're entitled to hate me. But I wish you would direct all that anger and hatred at our government. They are betraying young people like me.

I wouldn't have to be there if they did their lawful duty to their own citizens. Over a thousand people in the UK died in just a few days because of the 40 degree heat because of the climate crisis we used to have air conditioning girl by oil gas coal fossil fuels yeah those things run air conditioning if you're allowed it is an act of murder an act of murder yeah yeah yeah people don't have to die from the heat. They don't have to die from the cold. They don't have to starve. That's why we set up the society that people like her are trying to destroy, and she's got some stuff strapped around her, and she's like over a bridge, and so they've cut off traffic before they can remove her. But I want you to hear this

analysis of not just her, but a lot of these kids. There's a commonality behind all of this. It's the, I guess we could call it the Greta syndrome. I'm 24 years old, and I'm here. I'm here because I don't have a future. Every single political and social movement nowadays had converted itself into a victimhood movement. They are betraying young people like me. I wouldn't have to be there if they did their lawful duty to their own citizens.

Why does it take young people like me? There are narcissists whose grandiosity is being a victim. Here I am, I'm a narcissist. I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim.

I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim. I'm a victim are narcissists whose grandiosity is being a victim. Here I am, an ordinary person, having to do this. I'm a victim, so I'm a saint. I'm morally superior to you. You think I like it? No. This is something that I feel is a duty that I have to do. Narcissism is about a lack of empathy. You think you are taking enough people with you.

This isn't a popularity contest. This is the biggest crisis that humanity has ever faced. Today, most victimhood movements are about grandiosity. They don't have any meaningful agendas. Isn't the risk that you lose support from Londoners? We don't actually need support. It's about entitlement and exploitativeness. Do you regret that, that you're shifting police work from...

Climate crisis is the biggest threat to law and order. That's an exceedingly dangerous phenomenon. I have a right because I have grievances. I'm entitled. You have obligation towards me. If we receive no response from ministers by the end of Friday the 4th, we will escalate our legal disruption against this government. Narcissists then engage in temper tantrums similar to children. I'm furious and I'm devastated.

They just want to be heard. They want to garner attention. They want to become celebrities and famous. Nobody is listening to us. They're power-oriented, power-hungry. We are on a highway to climate hell with our foot still on the accelerator. They want control. They want to have power. No more drilling.

There is no more drilling. There is no more drilling. Okay. And as you saw, the narcissists are not limited to the very young. We had the guy who just made that comment about we're headed to climate hell. Yes, we realize that. And at the

epicenter of the climate hell and the planning to go there in a handbasket is the conference that is happening, COP27 in Egypt. And joining us now is Alex Newman, the new American who is covering it live. He's there in Egypt. Thank you for joining us, Alex. It's great to have you on. Great to be here. Thank you so much, David. I was just playing the clip as we were getting you on of the analysis of these narcissists who are morally superior, who have no empathy to anybody else. And they don't want to do this, but they have to do it because they're better than us. We're seeing this stuff happening all the time.

We've got eco protesters attacking paintings and all the rest of the stuff. It's something like that happening there in Egypt? I imagine it's kind of some kind of a mixture of these mentally ill protesters as well as super security and authoritarian police state around all these world leaders. What's it like there? Well, I'm flying out tomorrow to get there, but I've been going to these things since 2009. And can tell you it's always this it's always the same they use the same formula they get their paid rent-a-mobs right so they use a lot of our tax money to pay for these rent-a-mobs that they put outside and it's these you know screeching children and adolescents they got green hair and mohawks and stuff and

then we demand that all oil be abolished right right? And then that makes the government bureaucrats inside who are busy stealing our freedom and building a one world government look so moderate by comparison because they say, oh, well, we appreciate your enthusiasm, but we're going to have to take it to at least maybe 2030

to be able to accomplish those goals. And so by comparison, with the shrieking rent-a-mobs and monkeys outside, then suddenly the government bureaucrats inside look very reasonable and very statesman-like by comparison. That's right. Yeah, it works out pretty well, doesn't it? They're pretty useful idiots, aren't they? They are. They are. And it's fun to go talk to them. Most of them are completely ignorant.

They don't understand anything about climate science. They don't understand anything about the real agenda here. They've just been brainwashed in a public school, and then they've been paid. They've been weaponized. They got offered a trip to Egypt or Cancun or Rio de Janeiro or Paris or wherever it may be. I said, yeah, I'll go protest for climate justice, right? Oh, that's the sign I should carry. Okay. But they are so ignorant. It's appalling, David, that these children supposedly got 12 years of education and yet they couldn't tell you the first thing about anything that matters. They could tell you about the infinity g yet they couldn't tell you the first thing about anything that matters. They could tell you about the infinity genders.

They could tell you the planet's going to be cooked if we continue to have freedom. But as far as real things go, they know nothing. Oh, yeah. Yeah, I remember the first Earth Day. I was in high school when that happened. And I never fell for this, but I had a lot of friends who did. But what I don't understand now is when I talk to people my age and after 50 years of failed predictions and after 50 years of being told for the first 10 years that we're going to have a new ice age and then they flip the script and we

go into global warming, I just can't understand why adults are buying into this. I can give the kids a little bit of a pass because they don't have any life experience and they've been propagandized in these institutions. That's what they're for, what the institutions are for. But, you know, the adults that are out there, it's absolutely astounding to me that this is still happening. But it is. And they're ramping this up. We've had Rishi Sunak talking about climate justice, talking about reparations. Tell everybody what's going on there with that idea of climate justice and reparations,

what they're looking for. That is the big agenda item, right? They've already got kind of the mechanics of how this should all work down, but they realize that this is going to take enormous amounts of money. Just yesterday, the United Nations and some of its partners put out a report saying that they probably need about $2 dollars to keep this clown show going. And a lot of that is being marketed as reparations. They're calling it loss and damage.

And what they're saying, this is the argument. I'm going to be very fair to their argument. Western peoples, Americans in particular, as we were developing, as we were becoming wealthy, we jumped a whole bunch of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. And they believe that carbon dioxide is a pollution. They literally believe that the gas they exhale is a dangerous toxic pollution. So, you know, setting aside the fact that human emissions of CO2 are a fraction of a fraction of 1% of all the greenhouse gases naturally in the atmosphere, they believe that the gas we exhale is a pollution because Western people, American people put out more of that than every drought, every hurricane, every fire, every flood, every everything is a direct result of us driving SUVs. It's a direct result of us having had air conditioning and power generation.

And therefore, we need to give trillions of dollars. We need to extract that from the middle class in America. And we need to write checks to the dictatorships, the kleptocrats, the United Nations, the regional governments that have kept the people of the third world in perpetual poverty through big government policies and corruption. That's literally the argument. And so they're now trying to come up with a workable solution where they can extract what's left of the wealth of the middle class in the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, etc., and hand that over to the United Nations, hand that over to the third world governments that are playing along with this whole charade, and that's going to be expensive, and so that really is the main emphasis of this summit. Of course, there's also the religious component. I'm sure you saw these weirdos are going to go to Mount Sinai, and they're going to repent of our harm that we've perpetrated against mother earth

they're going to come up with these new i didn't see that one is the pope going to be there with a pakamama or something oh the pope's a big part of it the catholic church they've got the uh it's called the interfaith center for sustainable development and they're bringing together all kinds of different religious leaders every kind of pagan pagan, the Catholics, even some evangelicals, the Finnish Lutheran Church. Their archbishop is a major part of organizing this. And yeah, they're going to come up, they say, with a new universal Ten Commandments

on how we need to properly respect Mother Earth. You know, Prince Charles, uh when um this pope first became pope and he put out the climate encyclical and the guy that he had picked i started doing some research on john schellenhuber and i found that he had been around with prince charles's earth league and they wanted to have a a world uh court they wanted to have a new global constitution all the rest of stuff so why wouldn't they have a new global constitution, all the rest of the stuff. So why wouldn't they have a new global Ten Commandments as part of this as well? They want to rewrite everything. It's crazy.

It's absolutely crazy. I mean, the old ones are just so old fashioned, right? The whole thou shalt not murder. I mean, there's all these babies that are not born yet that need to be murdered for the good of the planet, right? That whole thou shalt not steal. I mean, God clearly didn't know that resources would not be properly distributed, and so now we have to steal everything from everyone and give it to the billionaires under the guise of helping the poor.

So it's all those old-fashioned Ten Commandments. You know, there's just no place for those in the New World Order. We need some new ones. Thou shalt not eat meat. Thou shalt not exhale. Right? That's right. Or break wind, I guess.

Thou must eat ze bugs. Right? And be happy. Oh, that's crazy. No, it really is about de-industrialization and it is about a wealth transfer. And I think there were a lot of people who were true believers in this mythology of CO2 who saw through this with the Paris climate accord a few

years ago, because China was given a pass and they said, well, you know, if you're going to give China a pass, uh, they're one of the biggest emitters of all this pass. And they said, well, you know, if you're going to give China a pass, they're one of the biggest emitters of all this stuff. And they were. If you go back and you look at, if you look at, there was an animated chart,

and I talked about it briefly yesterday. I was going to put it in the deck today, but I didn't do it. But going back to 1886, they had the UK as the biggest emitter of pollution or CO2 or whatever, because they were using most of the energy, because they were doing most of the manufacturing. And then the US came up and took their place and stayed there until 1997. And then way ahead of everybody else, because we were doing most of the manufacturing and that type of thing. Then China came up, started making a move in 1997 and surpassed the US by about, I think it was 2010. And they have remained the biggest

user of energy, the biggest emitter of unicorn farts and all the rest of the stuff since that period of time. And yet there are no restrictions on China or on India in terms of the number of plants that they can add or how clean or dirty they have to be or whatever. And they're not even capping it, whereas they're not only capping us but forcing us to reduce it. And that's already having these repercussions that everybody is seeing, talking about for this winter. But yeah, it is absolutely fraudulent. These people are completely divorced from the reality of what is happening. everybody is seeing, talking about for this winter. But yeah, it is absolutely fraudulent. These people are completely divorced from the reality of what is happening. And even some of the true believers understand this is simply about the deindustrialization of the West and wealth transfer. And the people who think that this is a real issue are upset about that. They

said, you're not solving the problem problem you're just transferring wealth to yourself yeah and you know what you just pointed out david that is the key to uh proving that this whole thing is a fraud and that the ringleaders of the cult know it's a fraud that's the key see because if they truly believed this nonsense and they were making mistaken policies based on a mistaken belief that would be something that's forgivable you know we can understand okay people make mistakes you came up with a dumb theory. You fell for it and you pursued dumb policies in pursuit of your dumb theory. But what you just pointed out is the key that proves it's all a fraud. If these people genuinely believe that CO2 is bad and it's not right, I'll be the first one to tell you we need more CO2.

Actually, I spent some time with Trump's climate advisor, Dr. Will Happer. He said the planet is starving for more CO2. He said plants were designed to live in an atmosphere of four to five times as much CO2 as we have now. We need more and much more CO2. But let's look at their premise. CO2 is bad. Who really believed CO2 was bad?

The worst possible thing that you could do in the whole universe would be to shut down manufacturing, shut down production in the United States where we use natural gas, where we use nuclear power, where we use clean burning coal and ship that manufacturing over to communist China, where they're building coal-fired power plants faster than we can count them. China already emits more CO2 than all of the Western nations combined. One unit of economic output in China releases drastically more CO2 than that same economic output would in the United States. So the worst possible thing you could do if you believe CO2 was bad was say, hey, let's shut down all production in America and ship it

all over to China. That will result in drastically more CO2 in the atmosphere. So that's how you can know that this is a fraud. That's how you can know that the people orchestrating this whole fraud know it's a fraud. That's right. Yeah. Just as you said, if you believe this, the worst possible thing you could do would be to shut down these things and move it over to China. That's what I said from the very beginning of the pandemic. I said, even if you believe that this is a pandemic, and even if you believe that it is an engineered virus that was deliberately released as a bioweapon, I said, still, the worst thing you could do would be to lock everything down because then you're going to create shortages of medicine and of food and all the rest of

it. So you're not going to be able to fight even a bioweapon if you lock everything down. So these approaches that they have, under no circumstances would they even address the problem if the problem were real. But that's just more evidence, I think, as you pointed out, that they know that this is not going to work and that they've got a different agenda. And of course, all of these things, what are you talking about? Locking everybody down, requiring everybody to get a vaccine. Oh, well, now we've got to have a passport for you and some kind of surveillance and tracking.

And they want the same thing with all the climate stuff. It always comes back to the same thing. We have to control everything in your life. We have to surveil what you're doing and put restrictions on you, because that's really the end game for all of this stuff. What are they doing in um in cop 27 what are they talking about in terms of cbdc and other uh tracking and surveillance controls that you've seen so far yeah that's one of the things that's really moving now at a very high rate of speed uh the the total control grid uh just yesterday i got a press release from the un cop 27 secretariat about this new system global

satellite system that they're launching that's going to be able to monitor methane emissions all over the planet. And I thought, surely they're not going to admit in there that they're going after farmers and ranchers. And sure enough, I'm reading down in the press release, they say this is going to be able to target agricultural emitters of methane, which is so bad for the planet and all the rest of it. I mean, this is literally the prison planet that has been forecasted for so long by people in the freedom movement that they are building all around us. CBDCs are, of course, a big part of this, too. And they're talking about it all over the place at the COP 27. They're sending out press releases about it.

The Bank for International Settlements, which Carol Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor, said was going to be the apex of this system of control. It's the interoperability standards, the cross-border payments. And I think as soon as 2023, we may see some of these now popping up in the Western world. The Federal Reserve is already working on it. The Chinese have already started implementing it. They've already got their pilot program going. And the reason this ties right in with the climate fraud is because these CBDCs are going to be programmable. And so if you've already had your CO2 carbon budget fulfilled for the month, you are not going to be buying any gasoline for your car. You are not going to be air conditioning your house. You are certainly not

going to be buying any steak because, hey, you're a climate criminal. And we've already kept track of your purchases. We know that your purchases this month have already exceeded your limit for CO2. And so unless you want to give Al Gore lots of money for carbon credits, so they can evict an African village and plant some trees, uh, you cannot have any more, uh, food for dinner. You might, you have to have leaves and grass. So. Yeah.

Yeah, that's absolutely right. And of course they're going to gradually put people into it as we had a Fauci, uh, pronouncing in October, 2019. How do we get everybody to take a vaccine that's you know for flu that hasn't been tested that type of thing well we do it from the inside we do it with disruption and we do it iteratively and so that's the approach that i take with everything that gradual boiling the frogs approach and they've already got the banks that are out there in australia and some other places where they where they're tracking what people are buying

and then assigning a carbon score to it and saying, oh, good, you took a train. That's great. You saved this amount of, quote unquote, carbon. You drove your car and bought this amount of gas. You could do better if you did this other thing. Oh, you bought meat. So they comment on all your purchases. And it's supposed to be a little bit of a game. And they give you a little bit of a reward if you do what they want. So

they're going to nudge people gradually into this and they're going to start with rewards. But we saw this happening very, very rapidly with the vaccines. And I think that part of it was good. We went very rapidly from a, you know, you should get it because we're all going to die to, oh, we'll give you lotteries and prizes if you get it. And then pretty soon it's like, well, you're not going to go anywhere unless you take this stuff. And we're going to purge you out of society if you don't take it. And we're not going to give you an organ transplant if you don't take it. So we know where this is headed. And we know that they begin with this kind of gradualism and with incentives.

But after a while, they pull out the stick and they start beating people with it. That's really where this is going to happen. And it's going to be happening through the banks, through MasterCard and all the rest of them. And then I think they'll fold it into these CBDCs that all the different countries are working on, don't you think? Yeah, that's exactly the goal, David. And you're right. It will be a gradual process. I've been telling people, you know, they're going to go step by step and they're going to try to paint us into a corner.

Right. They're not going to come out tomorrow and say we're abolishing cash and you hereby must accept a microchip or you're not going to go to the grocery store. It will start just like you said. It'll start with voluntary measures. It'll be kind of the cool thing that they'll try to market it like, oh, everybody wants some, but there's not enough. Right. Just like they did with the vaccine. But you hurry up. If you buy now, you can get in line for the CBDC. And then little by little, it'll be incentives. And then they'll paint you into a corner where, okay, now we're at the point where you cannot go to the grocery store. You cannot get your paycheck from work if you don't have an account set up that can accept CBDCs. And they're rolling this out all over the world. It's happening very rapidly, even in some

countries that you wouldn't think, like Ethiopia is moving very rapidly toward digital IDs and CBDCs. Kenya, Nigeria, Colombia, Denmark, obviously the Scandinavian countries are very far along with this. And their end goal, mark my words, it may not happen tomorrow, but their end goal is to completely eliminate cash, completely eliminate privacy, create this control grid where you can no longer participate in the economy if you will not submit to these things. And it will eventually go from your smartphone to something that is embedded under your skin, mark my words, or a tattoo or something like that.

Yes, I agree. Yeah, it's going to be on your body. The good news, the only good news in all that stuff is what happened in Nigeria. Nigeria, they got ratioed, as they say, on that. It turned out, as they started pushing all this CBDC, people said, you know, I think I'd rather have Bitcoin. So Bitcoin usage went way up and their usage went way, way down on it. And that's why I think they're going to resort to force eventually, because people are going to

realize it's a trap. They're going to take some of the incentives early on, but they're going to realize that it's a trap. The thing that bothers me, you and I know this, our listeners know this type of stuff, but have you seen any signs of life in terms of the Republican Party? Is there anybody there that is even, I know the Democrats would love all this stuff, but is there anybody in the Republican Party that's even talking about CBDC

or even talking about fighting this climate stuff? Yeah, you know, unfortunately, I think that's one of the most depressing things that's happened over the last few years, David, is that the rhino leadership of the Republican Party has really come out of the closet on this, and now they're saying, we're just going to come up with conservative solutions to climate change, right? You don't need conservative solutions to a boogeyman that's designed to enslave you. You need no solutions to a fake problem, right? And for years, the Republicans did hold the line, right? I mean, the first climate conference I went to was in Copenhagen in 2009. Senator Inhofe flew in, a senator from Oklahoma who just stepped down recently. But he flies in and he has a press conference and all these fake

journalists comes in. He says, listen up, everybody. This thing is a fraud. This is not going to happen. I don't care what Barack Hussein Obama tells you. When it comes back to the U.S. Senate, it's dead on arrival. So y'all can go home. You're not getting any money from American tax. And you could see, I mean, their faces. Oh, right. Like, oh, we're doomed. What are we going to do? And during the Trump presidency, it was the same thing. He sent a delegation and they had a side event where they celebrated how wonderful oil was and how it liberated humanity from backbreaking labor. You could see the smoke coming out of these people's ears. They were losing it. But now the Republican Party, not every member of Congress, there are still some decent Republicans in Congress that are holding the line. But at the highest levels, the leadership, the Mitch McConnell's, the Lindsey Graham's, the Kevin McCarthy's, they are now basically they waved the white flag.

It's OK. OK, we believe your climate change baloney. Now we're just going to come up with conservative Republican policies to deal with it, which will be basically Democrat totalitarianism light. Yeah. And a little bit more slowly. Yeah. Mitch McConnell really betrayed us on this paris climate accord for example uh you know when you had uh carrie and obama say yeah we're just going to self-rightify it ourselves as mark moreno pointed out uh he even saying it you know in in the the period of time between uh the 2020 election and swearing in of Biden, he says, Trump needs to get Mitch McConnell to hold a vote in the Senate because they can shut this thing down.

It's a fraud. You can't self-ratify a treaty. But if at any point in time, even before Trump was president, Mitch McConnell could have held a vote and it would have lost. They didn't have more than 60 votes to push this thing through. And so they could have shut it down, but they played that game. And you had people in the Trump administration play that game. First, they didn't want him to pull out of the Paris Accord at all. Then they said, all right, well, you know, if you're going to say that

you're going to pull out, don't get rid of it. And so he didn't get rid of it until the day after the election. And it was totally meaningless. The thing really should have been shut down in the Senate. So when we look at this, as you point out, if they're going to be a lighter version of this, and they will be if they don't attack the fundamental premise. What I typically see coming from the Republicans during the Trump administration, we had some good moves in terms of developing domestic energy. They will do that because they can get votes because it's an economic issue. So they'll come in with that, but they won't oppose this whole thing about unicorn farts

and stuff. They won't come after that and expose them like you pointed out Inhofe did. And they won't shut this thing down. They'll try to navigate it. They'll try to please everybody. We'll carve out some stuff for our people who are in the oil industry so they can make money, but we don't want to offend the climate crazies or the college students or whatever. And that's a fatal error that's really going to destroy us, I think.

Yeah, it is. It's absolutely essential that Republicans in Congress stand up and say, look, we're not playing your dumb game. This whole idea that CO2 emissions is pollution is preposterous. I don't know if your listeners know this, David, but in the inflation reduction, the Supreme Court actually slapped them down. This idea that the EPA could just come in and say carbon dioxide is a pollution. Therefore, we're going to regulate power plants and shut them down. The Supreme Court said no in the West Virginia versus EPA. And so then the clowns in Congress just turned right around and they defined carbon dioxide as pollution in the text of the Inflation Reduction Act, which of course had nothing to do with reducing inflation. So we absolutely have to have Republican leadership on this saying, look, this is a fraud. The idea that CO2 is

bad is preposterous and we're not playing this game. And right now, I think if you had just the rank and file Republicans in Congress having a vote on this, we would win this game. And right now, I think if you had just the rank and file Republicans in Congress having a vote on this, we would win this vote. They would not be able to get two thirds of the Senate to ratify these crazy international agreements. But with somebody like Mitch McConnell at the helm, he knows that very well. And I think people need to understand very clearly, Mitch McConnell is playing on the totalitarians team. He's not on our team. He's not just a crummy player on our team. He is playing for the totalitarian's while pretending to be a Republican.

That's right. He's a fifth column guy. He's going to get behind you so he can stab you in the back. That's what he's really... And his wife, Elaine Chao, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, deep family business ties

to the mass murdering dictatorship in communist China that's laughing all the way to the bank by promising to continue building more coal-fired power plants, continue increasing CO2 emissions until 2030. Then America's economy will be in the toilet. We won't have a proper military anymore. And then they'll say, oh, then we'll maybe think about possibly reducing our CO2 emissions. I agree. Have you seen anybody even bring up the subject in this election cycle of CBDC? I didn't see a single Republican bring it up.

I mean, Biden has brought it up to the people who work for him. Back in March, he put out something to every branch of the bureaucracy under the executive branch. Every one of the alphabet agencies has got to come in and either tell them how they're going to redesign the financial system, how they're going to enforce it, how they're going to implement it, or how they're going to push it using the green agenda. And they gave the reports back to him beginning of September. So I think he's ready to move on something coming out next year. But did any Republican ever even mention CBDC as far as you can tell in this election?

I didn't see a single one, David. And you're right. The Biden administration is moving on this very rapidly. That executive order in March, the Treasury put together an interagency where you're working on these policies as we speak, and Republicans are nowhere to be found. They're out there tilting at windmills. It's pathetic. Yeah, we're not tilting. Tilting at windmills is exactly the issue. That's what got us in so much trouble in Texas during the winter that time. So it's the windmills. And of course, just like everything else, they give themselves exemptions.

They carved off exemptions when it came to offshore windmills. The Koch brothers and others carved out exemptions with that, just like they carved out exemptions in Palm Beach when it comes to 5G. They always make sure that they do these wonderful things for the rest of us as we see these things popping up everywhere else. Well, it's great talking to you, and I really would like to talk to you too as you get back or while you're there to give us a firsthand report of what you see there. It's always a pleasure talking to you, Alex. Thank you so much, David. The feeling is mutual.

I'll be very happy to give you an update either from Egypt. I'm heading out tomorrow or when I get back. Thank you so much for all that you do. Thank you. Yeah, I'm sure that's going to be a very interesting trip. I don't even want to think about flying, especially internationally anymore. So kudos to you for doing it. I appreciate you sacrificing yourself to take an international trip in this day and age

post-pandemic nonsense. So I hope you make it back okay without getting hijacked somewhere. Thank you. Appreciate it, Alex. God bless you. Take care. Bye-bye. You too.

Bye-bye. Okay, folks, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Pass to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. our children. They created common paths to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created

in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show.com. All right. I want to talk about an essay that I saw from, uh, Dan McKnight.

Dan McKnight has been involved in um uh pushing back against these undeclared wars and i've um talked about him in the past and uh michael meharry who's with the tenth amendment center i've had him on several times and the two of them have been partners in terms of trying to enforce the Tenth Amendment with a specific focus on trying to stop these undeclared wars. Dan McKnight is a veteran, and as part of this election, just the day before the election, he wrote, I thought, a great op-ed piece. He said, we're going to have a lot of candidates on the ballot from different parties,

the Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens, et cetera. But he said, someday I hope to be able to go into a voting booth or a polling station and pull the lever for a peace party. And he talks about Daniel Webster. He says Daniel Webster actually ran under that label in his campaign in 1814. At the time, the U.S. was at war, and a war that he thought, Daniel Webster thought, was senseless.

His neighbors felt unheard in Washington, D.C., and his home was becoming impoverished under the heavy costs of war. Does that sound like where we are today? Yeah. So when he ran for a re-election to the House, the U.S. House, he wanted everybody to know exactly where he stood, fixed and immovable. So he ran with the label peace party for re-election dan mcknight says you can soak up a lot of wisdom if you study his 40-year career in u.s politics

this man of new england served as a congressman a U.S. senator, a secretary of state under three different presidents. He believed in the U.S. Constitution as he understood it, and when he would argue in its defense on the Senate floor, audience members in the gallery would weep at the beauty of his words. Much was written about him, the fictional story of the devil and Daniel Webster. Anyway, 1814 election, he said, It will be the solemn duty of the state governments to protect their own authority over their own militia and to interpose between their citizens and arbitrary power by the federal government. Again, he understood the doctrine of interposition,

which is very important. And he understood that it was the important duty, not just the right. And states don't have rights, they have powers. And they did not abdicate those powers. So they have powers that have not been ceded to the federal government, and they have a duty to interpose when the federal government gets outside the Constitution, and especially when the federal government comes after our rights as human beings created in the

image of God. People have rights, states have powers and duties. He said, that's the logic behind our cornerstone piece of legislation, defend the guard. And that's what Dan McKnight is involved in. He says, after 20 years of the global war on terror, where multiple presidents have deployed our soldiers into more than half a dozen unconstitutional wars, it's time for the state governments to defend the integrity of their national guard. It must be admitted to be the clear intent of the Constitution that no foreign war should exist without the assent of Congress. This was meant as a restraint on the executive power, said Webster in 1847, Daniel Webster.

He knew that the president of any party had a right to go out of our limits. No president had a right to go out of our limits and to declare war for a foreign occupation of what does not belong to us. When such an action is committed by the executive, he said, it's done out of malice, out of ego, out of aggrandizement and personal power, because in the words of Daniel Webster, no man is ignorant that the Constitution of the United States confers on Congress the power of making war. We always will have people who say, well, they didn't do it out of malice. They didn't do it out of ego.

They didn't do it out of rebellion. They didn't do it out of being greedy for power and money. Really, there's some of these things that are just so fundamental that you can't say they made a mistake. They didn't make a mistake with these lockdowns, the people who are saying, well, it was complicated and we made a mistake, so give us amnesty. They didn't. They knew better than that. They knew what we were saying. They went out of their way to shut it down. And so this is not something that was done by accident out of ignorance.

It was a deliberate exercise of power. What he's saying is that Daniel Webster understood that at his time as well. So he says, on the day that a president does foment war for his own agenda, involves his country in a permanent foreign occupation, lands that are not our own, said Daniel Webster. And when Congress proves unable or unwilling to stop this illegal war, then the whole balance of the Constitution is overthrown and all just restraint on the executive power in a matter of the highest concern for the

peace and happiness of the country entirely destroyed. What do you think Daniel Webster would say about the executive orders and what was done under the presumed power of the executive orders? If the executive can give himself the authority to do any and all that he wants to do, then we don't have a rule of law. We have a dictatorship for all purposes. He says that's the world that we find ourselves in. It's been over 80 years since Congress declared war.

But you know, we've been in a state of constant war throughout that period of time. Bring our troops home as a veterans organization. We were founded by veterans of the global war on terror, and we advocate on behalf of our fellow veterans who aren't given a voice in the halls of power. We are proud of our service. We do not regret the time that we spent in our nation's uniform,

but our love of our flag and of our laws means that we cannot sit idly by and watch a new generation of soldiers fight, die, and be maimed in a new series of unnecessary and unjust wars. And we don't even have to focus on foreign wars. Because the war against us was brought home to us in every country, by every political party. And when you look at the types of things that are being mandated against our soldiers, in terms of the mandated vaccines, for example, we know that we don't have any governors that are really going to stand for freedom and

stand for the Constitution if those governors do not stand for the militia that is underneath them. And I'm not saying the National Guard is the militia. The militia is much bigger than the National Guard. But if they won't even stand for the National Guard that is ostensibly under the control of the governor, then what chance do we have, right? That's not where they are. So finally, this quote from Daniel Webster, he said, I honor those who are called upon by professional duty to bear arms in their country's cause and to do their duty well. I would obscure none of their fame, but I will say here and to them

that it is the solemn adjudication of nations and it is the sentiment of the Christian world that a war waged for vicious purposes or from vicious motives tarnishes the luster of arms. It darkens if it does not blunt what otherwise might be a glorious page in the history of the nation that makes it. Let us no longer tarnish the image of our nation, says Dan McKnight. Let us learn from the wisdom of Daniel Webster and

our other founding fathers. Let us bring our troops home and end this experiment in global imperialism. Let us put America first and begin rebuilding our own republic. Let us elect a future peace party. Well, that is a sentiment with which I agree, but I don't, as I said, I don't see any sense that we have anybody, including DeSantis, that everybody is now worshiping. Let's celebrate his accomplishments as limited as they are. But let's not be satisfied with that. It's not nearly enough. A sick and dying nation partakes of a November ritual called voting.

This is Brian Shulhavi's take at vaccine impact on voting. He says, it looks like we're looking for change in all the wrong places. Looking for love in all the wrong places. Looking for love in all the wrong faces. Believing that if enough people vote the way they do, positive change will be the result. This ritual is

very sacred because it's drilled into Americans from a very early point in life that it is our civic duty to vote. And that if we don't vote and the country then falls apart and goes to hell, it'll be our fault for not voting. He says, here's a comment I recently received from a reader. Reader says, well, if we all just stop voting, it would be to acknowledge that we're giving in to the fraud. So the answer isn't to stop voting, it would be to acknowledge that we're giving in to the fraud. So the answer isn't to stop voting. The answer is to fix the system so it's impossible to artificially control the outcome. Well, I agree that with some of that, I don't think we should ever be passive, and I don't

think that we should ever surrender. But I also agree with Brian that the real path to fixing what is wrong in our society does not run through Washington or through any state capitals, really. He says, so here are my predictions for this year's midterm elections. I predict that whoever controls Congress, it will not change the most important issues facing this country, and that the following will happen regardless of which political party wins. Number one, the financial system is going to collapse and there will be a great reset

as they have been planning. You will have a defense budget that will continue to increase in order to fund our support of wars and the support of our troops all over the world. As a matter of fact, they're already making moves to do that. And the Pentagon, uh,

they have already asked for and received a positive response from the Senate. Oh yes. We will put in the, uh, NDAA, the national defense authorization act, which they do every year to continue to fund the military. We'll put

something in there to put just all arms will go into the same kind of you know special funding appropriation that we have now for airplanes and for ships you know for very expensive and long-term projects they'll put that in there for everything. And they're already working on doing that. We just had a crash there, but we're still alive. Big Pharma will continue to unleash dangerous drugs and vaccines by manipulating and controlling the U.S. government agencies, such as the FDA, CDC, NIH, et cetera. We will enter a post-technological era where the technology we have will depend upon and that we have depended on for the past several decades will fail.

And supply chains will fail, resulting in food shortages and social unrest. Energy costs will soar as a green agenda is implemented and falls apart. Death rates will continue to soar from the fallout of the COVID vaccines and population growth will rapidly decline due to rising infertility rates. It will continue to be legal in all 50 states for parents to try and kill and maim their children with COVID vaccines, as well as other vaccines on the schedule.

The children in this nation will continue to be trafficked mainly through foster care and adoption. China will become the world's most powerful nation with the strongest economy. And you know, it is interesting when we look at the fact that they are going to look the other way. As I pointed out, the pushback, even by the FDA, who clearly knows that off-label usage of drugs is not an issue, calling ivermectin horse medicine and all the rest of this stuff. No, if we're not going to stop the vaccines,

then what is the justification for trying to stop fentanyl, for example, or opioids? Opioids are even a better example, because that was something that was pushed through the hospitals, pushed by doctors. That is exactly the parallel of what is happening with the vaccines. But you look at something like fentanyl, very harmful. So, you know, you're going to have the government try to interdict that and stop that. Why wouldn't they do that for the vaccines?

Well, they won't even admit what the vaccines are doing. And perhaps they will inflate the danger of these other substances. But, you know, they have, as we saw with crack cocaine, you know, they have not only created this genetic code injection, but they've pushed it, they subsidized it, They subsidized it. Then they demanded it. So Brian says the real issue is, you know, regardless of all those different things I just read off to you, none of those things were on the ballot.

None of them were discussed. CBDC, not even discussed. I never heard it. Alex never heard it. I mean, we, that's what we do. We are constantly reading the news and keeping our ear to the ground, trying to see what people are saying. I didn't see anybody in politics, either party, talk about that at any level. Not for governor, not for senator, nothing. So as Brian says, only you can change. The real change is going to come from you. And I've said this for

the longest time. Focus on changing yourself, changing your relationship with God. Then it's going to flow out into your family, into your friends, into your community. It's just like dropping a pebble into the water, those concentric circles that get bigger and bigger. We have to do this from the grassroots up, not from the bottom up, not from the top down. This is why all the stress that's happening about the elections is misplaced. He says, for decades now, the U.S. has enjoyed prosperity, mainly through the advance of technological achievements. But it's come as a cost. It has allowed a new class of globalists to arise,

commonly referred to as the technocrats. And so we now have several generations of Americans who don't know what real hardship is like. They don't know how to make sacrifices to become productive. They've become dependent upon the technology. I think the appropriate analogy, he doesn't mention it here, but I think the appropriate analogy is what a globalist technocrat, H.G. Wells, talked about in his vision of the future. The Eloi, the helpless Eloi, who were given this life of comfort by the Morlocks, who were essentially keeping them as cattle and food.

And they were too dependent upon them to even understand what was happening. I think that is the analogy. I think the technocrats and the globalists have made us as dependent on what they have, you know, this doing everything out there, putting everything out there for us, taking away our industry, sending it to be created by slaves in China. And at the beginning of all of this, I remember a lot of people identified as free market, as libertarian, all the rest of them said,

eh, it's fine, you really don't want to do that dangerous, difficult work. If Chinese people do it for next to nothing, use their slave labor. That's really the exchange, the immoral exchange that was owned by a lot of people for globalism. And now it is coming back on us. It's not sustainable. If we're going to lean on this thing, we'll find that it is a cane that pierces our hand. It is set to crash in ways that very few people are talking about today. Even the production of food, the way that we used to have a large percentage of the population involved in that. We had an agrarian society. As a matter of fact, Thomas Jefferson believed that that was essential to having self-government because the raising of food, even though it took a lot of labor,

that raising of food and other things like that were essential to making sure that you had a decentralized, self-sufficient society. The ability to have your own food is core. We don't have that anymore. As he points out, this country is being destroyed from within. It's exactly what Fauci planned. We do it from the inside, we do it disruption, and we do it iteratively. So anyway, we have these tactics, fear-based tactics to convince the world that a deadly new virus threatened humanity. And again, that was mainstream media, both political parties,

even what I would call the neo-establishment press, like Breitbart and Daily Caller and Infowars, essentially taking the establishment line and pushing the fear at the pandemic. So where are we right now? When you look at this, so many times I hear people say, well, who do you want for president? As if that's the only avenue for us to do anything about any of this stuff. Well, if it's not Trump, then who do you want for president? It's like,

that's not where the solution lies. As a matter of fact, I like what these leftists characterize it. I think this is a useful phrase. Competitive authoritarianism. Competitive authoritarianism. That's where we are right now. You know, the two political parties represent competitive corruption. And we have within our government, I think it is best described as competitive authoritarianism. You know, do you want the Corleones or the Tattaglia family to run everything? Do you want the Clintons or the Trumps or the Clintons or the Bushes or whatever? They're like mafia families. But we are still so trapped into this.

Well, if it's, you know, not that one, it's got to be the other one. You know, always two choices, always the two choices of thesis and antithesis because they want to push us to a synthesis so as i was talking earlier about the um what was going on in nevada and of course you know in nevada with vegas they have pushed this um new era equal rights amendment essentially for LGBT. And that is, we're going to be seeing a lot of court cases, I guarantee you about that. First in the nation to do that.

But there was something else that was there. They had several questions on the ballot there. One of them is, as Reason says, could be something that would smash the two-party duopoly. What they had on the ballot, and it appears that it has succeeded, they would replace the primary systems, you know, the system of primaries, where you have the Republicans and Democrats hold their primaries, and the state pays for these expensive primary elections.

So these two closed clubs that, by the way, you ain't in them, even if you think you are. You can register as a voter, but go down and try to participate in the process and see what an insular club this is. And so they run these primaries for them, and the state pays for them. In Nevada, what they would do, what they have looks like has passed, they would do away with party-specific primary elections and replace them with a top five primary system

in which all candidates compete in the same first round contest with the five top vote getters advancing to the general election. And in the same constitutional amendment, if approved, and it looks like it has been approved, it would institute the ranked choice voting for the general election amongst the five candidates who advanced past the primary phase. So you have a party-less primary. Everybody can come and get on the ballot. The top five vote getters then at the general election, uh, all run. And you have, um, you know, if nobody gets past the 50% mark, you throw off

the lowest person, you reallocate their votes that everybody has a ranked thing. So you would, you would pick, uh, the five candidates, you would rank them in order on your ballot. So if your number one choice doesn't get it, then your number two choice is given to, you know, your candidate goes away, and your number two choice then is allocated to somebody else. And that continues until somebody gets more than 50%. That's such a threat to the two-party duopoly.

That's why they keep talking about this in Alaska. They say, well, look, you know, we're going to wind up with a Democrat. This is horrible. No, it happens because Sarah Palin doesn't have the support of most of the Republicans. She's not even their second choice. As a matter of principle, it makes little sense as reason for state governments to pay for primary elections, which are nothing more than internal processes for parties to choose their nominees. Turning the primary election into what would more accurately be described as a first round of the general election,

with all qualified candidates, regardless of party affiliation, competing in the same contest in front of other voters, would eliminate that concern. I see this as a positive. I think that doing this and then having five, up to five candidates, you could then have a debate with those five candidates, and that would start to open up both the ballot as well as the debate process. That's an important first step to actually having a real election. But again, it looks like it passed, but then so did the gender equal rights amendment,

which is going to be a real Pandora's box of attacks on people. Uh, before we go to break here, I just want to thank, um, Andromeda one. Thank you very much for the tip. And also thank you, Eric. I appreciate that tip. Thank you very much. Um, I'm gonna take a real short break and break, and I want to come back and talk about some pharmaceutical issues that I didn't get to yesterday.

We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight show. Well, you know, yesterday I mentioned it briefly. And I just want to mention it again, because, you know, when we look at the things that are being pushed on us pharmaceutically, there is no end to it. We have lab grown red blood cells. And I mentioned yesterday as being pushed in us pharmaceutically. There is no end to it. We have lab-grown red blood cells, and I mentioned yesterday, that's being pushed in the UK,

reported by the Jerusalem Post, because this is something that really does go right to the center, I should say. Maybe you could say it gets to the heart of the issue, right? Because these things do actually go to our hearts um but it is uh it is part and parcel of this big pharmaceutical industry the synthetic blood uh that they claim that they can use uh and over and over again isn't it interesting how they focus on blood well, the Bible tells us that the life is in the blood. They seem to be focused on that completely. Our addiction to unnecessary medicine is letting our children down, as a daily skeptic points out,

and that is exactly what is happening. There is no reason whatsoever that they can even come up with, and manipulated statistics to have children take these vaccines. And the net result of this is that a lot of people are starting to wake up to what is going on with the vaccines. Dr. Peter McCullough has come out and he's being attacked for telling people the truth, but one of the truths that he's now telling people is what we've been saying for a while, that the sudden adult death syndrome is from the vaccines I played for you several months ago. A woman who did a clip to social media in tears and said it just dawned on her when they started talking about sudden adult death syndrome,

it just dawned on her what sudden infant death syndrome was about it truly is the same thing it's the same game it's the same mo and um again you know they're they're running these things from uh one end of the planet to the other. As I mentioned quickly yesterday, you had in Kampala a nurse arrested because of what happened with the vaccine. And yet they continue to play this same game. And nobody is held responsible for this in terms of the vaccine companies.

We have data coming out of Germany. This was a poll that was commissioned by a German journalist. Because, you know, the government's not interested in safety or efficacy. So he commissioned this poll and asked people, have you had any severe adverse effects? One question. Next question. Uh, do you know, um, people who have had a severe adverse effect and then, uh, have you had it yourself? And the fourth category is, have you had a severe adverse effect and known other people who have had a severe adverse effect? Now, the interesting thing is he said 50% of the respondents had not experienced any significant adverse effects

and did not know anybody who had. 24% of the people knew somebody who had experienced significant adverse effects, but they had not. Then you had 16% of the people who had serious adverse effects, but they had not. Then you had 16% of the people who had serious adverse effects themselves, and another 7% of people who not only knew other people who had adverse effects, but had the adverse effects themselves. So if you take those two categories, 16% of the people who knew somebody who had been harmed and another 7% who not only knew somebody who had been harmed but had also been harmed themselves, that comes up to 23%. Roughly it breaks down to 50% of the people saw no evil, heard no evil,

had no evil happening to people. So it is an important data point, I think. It's also, as we look at the future, Pfizer is now boasting that they have created a new franchise, a new business model with these vaccines. It's done something for them that they've never had before, even though they had vaccines before. They said it's going to be a multi-billion dollar franchise for years to come. They don't care how many people they hurt.

They don't care if they harm 25% of the people. And if you look at the amount of money that they're charging for these vaccines, remember, we paid for the development. The taxpayers paid for the development of this stuff and put out a contract to buy this stuff from them. And now they're going up from $19 to $30 for the shots that the government has been paying for. Now they're going to go up to $130 per dose.

Going to go up by four times or more. And not only that, I've already mentioned that part of it, 400% markup on it. But do you realize, how much do you think it costs them to create one dose? It costs them $1.18 to produce this. And they're going to sell it for $130. This is why this is all happening. With that kind of money, they can pay off every politician and every bureaucrat they need to. It's all about that money.

And they will kill people for it, as we saw through the opioid epidemic as well. This is much, much bigger, and will go on forever. Thank you for listening. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thank you.