The David Knight Show - 11Apr23 Marxist Long March Through Institutions Completed - Now Institutions Long March to Destroy Society

Episode Date: April 11, 2023

More infrastructure problems — at airports. Obsolete failing radar on runways. Meanwhile, United Airlines is doing a massive retrofit and cabins beyond any First Class today for the few elites that will be able to travel 2:09 Disney's Satanic Pedophile Cartoon combines pedophilia, teen mother in love with Satan. DeSantis was right about the long march of the institutions through society 25:17 Super Mario Bros. bringing in $377 million from Nintendo by not using the movie as a weapon of social propaganda. 32:10Media Joins "Operation Chokepoint 2.0" Against CryptoNYT and even Children's Health Defense push government narrative that crypto-mining will destroy the planet. To establish CBDC, they must kill crypto. Will "climate change" radicalism stop RFK Jr from opposing CBDC? 36:24Do you see any of these shills for the establishment who are criticizing Bitcoin criticizing this massive power usage by artificial intelligence? Or the surveillance state? Or the military in war? 47:48UPDATE: One of the legislators who was expelled for leading the Tennessee insurrection is already back. 1:07:24Reason magazine attacks DeSantis' record on freedom — not for his push against free speech but because DeSantis believes that government has a role in protecting humans from corporations and institutions that are attacking our God-given rights. Now that Marxists have succeeded in taking over institutions in their planned "long march through the institutions", they are weaponizing those institutions against us in a "long march through society". 1:26:55mRNA Food: Which Fruits/Veggies Are First Targets Not only is mRNA contamination of food possible, its already being done. Media lies about mRNA not being passing along from animals have been debunked. But genetic modification of fruits & vegetables is being done for the express purpose of passing along mRNA 1:46:18INTERVIEW BigPharma & Mass Shootings While this class of drugs has exploded in off-label uses, the psychotic havoc it unleashes on those who use it is well documented. Julie Woods, SSRIstories.org joins 1:58:37Julie shares how she got involved in this. 1:58:36What are some of the other brand names for SSRIs? 2:02:29What happens when you stop taking these drugs? What are the withdrawal symptoms? 2:10:05Effects of SSRIs on the mind. 2:13:29What has been so interesting about the evolution of journalistic coverage of these drugs? 2:20:53Dealing with your problems instead of trying to cover them up with pharmaceutical. 2:25:05No pharmaceutical executive has ever gone to jail, they’re just a cost of doing business. 2:32:56The gun is just a tool, there are many different ways to drive your kids into the water. 2:36:31After the interview…comments from listeners 2:40:21Remember "Operation Chokepoint" 1.0 — against guns. Still ongoing even as 18 state attorneys general file to stop it. And, Washington state becomes the 10th state to prohibit modern sporting rifles. 2:47:44Elon Musk’s censorship of Substack — like I said before, Musk's talk of Twitter being a "free speech" platform is nonsense and his restoring a few high profile users is simply a head fake. 2:54:28Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Come on, come on, yes, yes, come on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Oh, curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 11th of April, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1,125 of the emergency. And those wonderful shots that Trump created as part of that twin lockdown are now being embedded into your food. We'll talk about what is happening with that. We'll talk about the long march through the institutions that has given us this insanity we'll talk about how twitter has finally revealed it's uh it's it's funny i talked about how the new twitter is actually no better than the old twitter it's slightly different but it's still censorship

so we're going to talk about that i didn't't get to that yesterday. What is going on? The war between Twitter and Substack. But we will also take a look at artificial intelligence and how it is now slandering law professor Jonathan Turley and others, an Australian mayor. So this could be an interesting development to try to control AI. We'll see how that turns out. We'll begin with the news. Stay with us. Well, last week, I had Goatry, cybersecurity expert, come on.

We talked about trains. We said, look at the poor state of maintenance of the trains, just like the poor state of the maintenance of our roads. If we go back to the mid-20th century, we're building a network of interstates. They wouldn't do anything like that today for our infrastructure. They won't even repair the roads. As a matter of fact, they're going to spend tens of billions of dollars to tear down racist roads, roads that bypassed neighborhoods. That's typically seen as a good thing.

These people don't like cars. They don't like traffic. They want to have, as part of their vision zero, they want to make sure there's no cars whatsoever so there'd be no fatalities from the cars. And I guess we could get rid of bathrooms because people slip and fall in the bathroom and on and on. There's no end to it, right? But all of our infrastructure is decaying.

And nobody in government wants to do anything about it. Just as our society is being deliberately torn down, they're working on how they can tear our infrastructure down faster than it's decaying. So they're not going to build it. And we see this now with planes as well. Runway near misses. And this is from Bloomberg. Runway near misses are surging.

Radar that keeps planes apart is aging and unreliable. Like the train infrastructure. Like the road infrastructure. The plane infrastructure as well. And it's easily hackable. Just like the trains are. I talked about the fact that it's child's play. They put the manuals up.

Look at that report from, you know, that I did with Goat Tree, the long interview we did last week. They put the manuals online. They give you the passwords online. They tell you how it operates and how to do it online. Anybody could do this. Anybody who wants to be mischievous, any radical group here, any foreign operators who want to mess with our infrastructure. And of course, we've already seen the hacking of the airport infrastructure. The NOT, took down all traffic for a 12-hour period in the United States.

And that's since 9-11. That's the only two times that's happened. After 9-11 and with the NOTAM hacking. And as soon as they got it back up after 12 hours, and of course, NOTAM is just a messaging system to tell pilots if there's some issues on takeoff or landing or nearby airports, that type of thing. And so that was taken down. And then an hour and a half after it was restored in the U S after a 12 hour outage,

an hour and a half later, the same thing was done with canada's system which is an independent system they still use notam but it is an independent computer system and isn't it interesting those both happen in tandem so in the same way now we have this is not about hacking but this is just about an aging infrastructure that as bloomberg is, is plagued by outages that have left travelers unprotected for months at a time. The technology which tracks vehicles on or near runways to alert controllers before impending crashes often uses decades-old radar equipment for which spare parts are difficult to find. See, this is the other part of this. We look at things like EMP pulses and things like that.

It's going to, if you destroy some of these really big transformers, there's only one or two companies in the world that make them. And it takes them a very long time to make one of these things. They don't have them sitting on the shelf. If you blow up a couple of these, it's going to be the dark ages for a while. So therefore, we have to put everything in the world on the electric grid. That is so vulnerable to EMP. So vulnerable to hacking.

So vulnerable to the climate nuts who want to take it down from the inside with disruption iteratively, as Fauci said. So the technology tracks vehicles there. It uses very old technology, which spare parts are difficult to find. According to government data and the president of the union representing the air traffic controllers, they said this year there have been at least eight incidents involving airliners

that aviation regulators ranked as severe. Almost double the average for each full year since 2018. But again, as the FAA likes to respond, it's rare. It's rare. Just like Fauci. Who cares, right? It's rare. Well, you know, it was rare.

As I've said, I've used the analogy of the planes, the Boeing Max. I think it's, what is it? 737, uh, the one that had, uh, over 8,000 flights. And after two of those crashed and each flight, it killed all 250 people on board. They shut it down, but it was rare. It was rare. Uh, it was even more rare than these. They say, well, this thing works 99% of the time.

Well, guess what? The Boeing MAX didn't crash more than 99% of the time either. So while now those near collisions have been directly linked to the outage of this airport surface detection equipment, gaps in service can leave aviation system vulnerable. They're at least the last line of defense and preventing a massive collision between two airliners said the former head of accident investigation at the FAA. He says, I'm shocked that it hasn't been put in more airports.

Not all airports have it. The airports that do have it are having outages. They're having problems getting spare parts, Three people familiar with the runway safety system. So they've suffered multiple failures in recent years. They asked not to be identified. Why is that? Well, you know, everybody wants to talk about any failure of the government. Our corrupt government will come after them and the corporations as well. So again, the agency defended it by saying the system functions almost, almost 99% of the time.

Well, you know, if we had the same efficacy of the Boeing 737s, you got 8,000 flights. If it was 99% of the time, it worked. Well, that would be 80 crashes. We only had two crashes, and they took it down. Now the 1980s-era technology, 1980s, is prone to breaking down. Industry representatives want the FAA to add it to more airports and to also update it. There's no spare parts in the event of a failure, said the president of the National Air Traffic

Controllers Association. So, you know, as we look at what they have, here's an example. Coming out of Austin, the Austin Bergstrom International Airport in Texas. On February the 4th, pilots approaching the Austin-Bergstrom Airport in Texas on a FedEx cargo jet called off their landing at the last moment. The plane flew within 100 feet or less of a Southwest Airlines plane that had already been cleared for takeoff, according to the National traffic safety transportation safety board the austin air traffic tower has no technology showing the location of planes on or near the ground and

the two aircrafts were operating in a thick fog and they said austin is the fastest growing airport in this country needs to have that surveillance technology so you have a near miss there in austin there's enough to give a pilot a heart attack. Maybe that's why they're there. Uh, it's not the jab. It's the radar not being there. See, we can always come up with an excuse to take it away from the jab. Uh, and I guess maybe that's why Bloomberg is even talking about this.

At this year's Cheltenham glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus bet responsibly. Gamblingcare.ie All these pilots having sudden heart attacks. It's got to be the radar, not the being out, not the jabs. Meanwhile, the approach from the left is to double down on racist infrastructure. Just like they want Boudigieg to destroy racist roads that bypass their neighbors.

Yes. Uh, neighborhoods. Let's run the traffic right through the neighborhoods. That's what everybody wants, right? Uh, Buttigieg is being pressured by Democrats squad. Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, the usual suspects. She's being pressured by them to reform racist traffic enforcement. They want what they call transit equity. I want transit diversity.

I want real diversity. I want a lot of different forms. I want all these things owned by a diverse group of people, not by one or two giant corporations globally, because that's what they're headed to. So more than two dozen Democrats have joined with the squad to pressure Boudier to move our nation closer to transit equity. And I think what that's going to mean for the Democrats is no travel for anybody. See, we'll all be equal with nothing. You'll own nothing. You'll go nowhere. You'll have equality and austerity, equality and poverty. You know, the old joke, you know, when you talk

about communism, you know, and the various forms of economics and the joke about communism is the farmer has no cows and he wants to make sure you've got no cows either. You know, take everybody down to the lowest common denominator. It was around, that same idea is very ancient. It was around before Karl Marx, the founders, called that idea the levelers. That whole idea that we're going to level society down where everybody has nothing. That's ancient. That's ancient. We had all the authoritarian ideas

about, you know, in terms of stratification of society and a ruling elite and all the rest of the stuff that goes back to Plato's Republic. That's not something that was created by a brave new world, right? He had three different strata. He didn't have a plan for doing it with hatcheries and depriving certain babies of oxygen and enriching it for the other ones for development. But in this particular case, they're saying black motorists have experienced disproportionate scrutiny and excessive force under the guise of traffic enforcement. Well, look, we've had all these situations where there has been excessive use of force and they always use it for racism.

They don't use it for reform. And I've said from the very beginning, I said, if you really want to get this fixed, right, if you were a minority group and you were being unfairly targeted, wouldn't you try to get the majority on your side by saying, this is hitting you as well? You know, we look at these situations of somebody being pulled over and being shot. You can play the statistics game two different ways. You can say, well, there's a higher percentage of blacks that are having these violent incidents. So this is a black problem problem or if you really want to get it fixed you make it everybody's problem and you say well you know it may be a higher percentage of black motorists that

are having problems with excessive police force but more white people are being injured with this than black people and that's what you do to come together to fix a problem, but they don't want to fix a problem. They want to have a wedge to drive people apart. See, the problem ought to bring people together and demand a solution from the government and demand a change to the way the police are trained and the way they interact with people, because it was under Obama, the black president, where they started this shoot-first curriculum,

and they push it out to the different state police academies. I remember one of the first incidents about it was not racial. It was white police officers shooting a white homeless person up in the hills. I think it was outside of Phoenix, if I remember. And it was heinous, what they did to him. They got tired of arguing with him to get out of an area that they didn't want him in. I mean, he's just out in the middle of the woods, but it was somehow their property, public property. They didn't want him in. I mean, he's just out in the middle of the woods, but it was somehow their property, public property.

They didn't want him there. He wasn't arming anybody. And after they got tired of it, they shot him and stuck the dogs on him, and they videotaped the whole thing, and it went out. Now, one of the trainers of the police academy said, I've worked here for decades, and I just resigned because I'm not going to teach that shoot-first curriculum. So why don't we stop the shoot first curriculum that came from the Democrats

that came from a black Democrat president? Why don't we stop that? No, no. Let's use the problem that we created to realter, to alter society. That's the point. And when we look at even air traffic, we know that the C40s,

it was originally 40 cities that came together, but now it's nearly 100 cities, big cities. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet

for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T&C Supply 18+. Bet responsibly. GamblingCare.ie. That organisation, Climate Organization for Cities, they have as their goals, you'll have no meat, you'll have no dairy,

many other things. But one of them is that you will not take more than one flight every three years. And it will be no more than, it'll be less than a thousand miles, 900 and something miles. Well, the airlines understand this is happening. And so the commercial airlines are modifying their planes to make sure that they are going to be able to still make a profit. So United pull up this picture, United's Polaris premium plus rollout is only three months away from completion. And if you look at this, this is beyond first class.

Look at that. That's really nice. I don't know how many thousands of dollars it would cost to fly that. I mean, you take a first class. These are on long-haul flights like across the Atlantic or something or going down to New Zealand or Australia or something. We did that once we had, uh, decades ago, um, by about 30 years ago, uh, we bought a timeshare. Yes, we've made that mistake. And, um, well,

we enjoyed it for many years. Um, that's when we could take vacations. But, um, as part of that incentive, they gave us a flight, uh, one free flight anywhere in the world. So I was like, okay, how far away can we go? And we were thinking at the time of moving to New Zealand. So we went to New Zealand. Well, uh, we had, um, an emergency of the business and I didn't even get to sleep, um, the night before we left. And then the joke was on us because yeah, it was a free flight, but they made sure we had a lot of different connecting points. And so we had two or three stops before we even got to the edge of the U S and LA. And then we, uh, had a layover, these various stops, you know, we, they stopped us in Dallas and Atlanta,

and then they stopped it. And then we had to go to LA and then we had a long layover there. And then we had like a, you know, I don't know what it was. It was like, I can't remember. I was in a fog anyway, but it was, we, it was like, uh, 48 hours without sleep. Cause we had this long, long flight across, uh, you know, the water to, it was a direct flight from LA, but, uh it took a long time to get to New Zealand. So you would have this type of thing, pull that back up again. Look at that, at least you can stretch out. You've got a lot of, but can you imagine how much that's going to cost?

Well, that's the way this is going to go. Travel will become a luxury for the few. And you know, people who can pay six or $7,000 to take a long flight. The rest of you just stay home. I mean, we can't have you all flying around everywhere. You'd melt the planet down. You know, you can't have air conditioning either, said Obama to the black people in Africa. Y'all can't have air conditioning. I can have a private jet, but y'all can't have air conditioning.

You'd melt the planet. So United Airlines, starting in August, every single international wide-body jet will feature the Polaris and the Premium Plus cabins. And it's the biggest retrofit they have ever done, and they're doing it to every single plane. So it's going to be very nice for the people who, you know, in the future, there's going to be our technical, uh, our technocratic overlords are going to have some really nice stuff. We, on the other hand, is to take everything away from us and to try to kill us. And we'll talk about that coming up.

What they're doing to the food supply. Uh, the IRS, uh, is going to be a big part of taking away everything that you got. And of course the army of auditors that are out there they want to ramp it up all the different auditings and and so they are threatening people because it's coming up tax season they're threatening people you better not take those types of deductions you know they did it for the longest time for home offices and things like oh you do a home, you're going to get audited. Well, not necessarily. And so what? If it's a legal deduction, who's the IRS to tell you that you shouldn't take a legal deduction?

And tax evasion is a crime if you just don't want to report it at all. But to try to minimize the taxes you pay, that's perfectly legal. And yet the IRS, who really makes the rules, they make the rules and then they try to intimidate you from actually going through it. Look, they're going to audit you anyway. If they get this, if the Republicans don't stop this thing and he gets his 80,000 IRS agents. They're going to audit everybody anyway.

Uh, so you might as well take what you are legally entitled to. And I understand people who do the tax protest game, but, um, uh, that is, um, you know, that is just, uh, if you want to do that, that's fine, but that's going to be what your life is. Just take a look at Peter Schiff's father, Erwin Schiff. He went to jail for that. He was principled on it. I think he was right in terms of what he was saying. And I remember when I first got involved in the Libertarian Party about 40 years ago, he would show up at some of the national conventions. He'd stand on a soapbox and just kind of like Lenny Bruce, you know, who was fighting censorship. He wanted to say dirty words or whatever. And they said, no, you can't.

They kept coming after him. And as they would come after him, he had doubled down on it. They'd put him in prison and, you know, Lenny Bruce had get up. He'd stopped doing comedy. He'd just stand up and read about his legal case to people. I was like, I don't want to say here this, you know, get into the weeds with all that. And Erwin shifted the same thing. You know, he'd say literally stand up on a box.

And so then they sent him subparagraph be here. You know, it's like, you know, I understand, I understand, but you know, literally stand up on a box. And so then they send him subparagraph B here, you know. It's like, you know, I understand. I understand. But, you know, don't let something like that take over your life. Brad Bryan, 325 on Rumble. Thank you very much for the tip and for being a monthly supporter now. He says, hello, David. Thinking of moving to Tennessee.

Do you think this is a good idea? Important question. What do you think of the homeschool laws in Tennessee? Do all kids need to be vaccinated? Even the homeschooled kids? Well, um, let me just say, I don't know, because all our kids are older now, they're all done and I don't know what the homeschool laws are, but I think they've changed that. Um, I remember at one point in time, we lived in North Carolina. the climate is very similar, but I liked being close to the mountains. And it has kind of a

nostalgia thing for me used to come here for vacations when we were kids, I was very young. And so we, um, we looked at it, um, you know, North Carolina had an income tax at the time, Tennessee had an income tax as well. I don't know how the two of them compared, but the thing that was a deal breaker for us was homeschooling laws. I believe those have been removed. As a matter of fact, when I had a chance to go speak to the Senate subcommittee, Senator Nicely,

who's been on a couple of times to talk about CBDC and to talk about the state bank here and other issues. He said, you know, we've had, um, there's a pretty good group here. We've had, uh, four major taxes repealed in just the last few years. And one of those was the income tax and they still have a surplus. Now they just came up with a big spending program to put police and all the schools and to fortify security, whatever that means, and all the schools turn them into fortresses and armed fortresses and that type of thing. It's just the way that I've seen education going for the longest time. And so, yeah, you don't want to be a part of the schools, but I think it is friendly to homeschooling and one of the reasons that we decided to move back here was because in august we had a relative who was very sick not from covid um and uh and um and raleigh and uh we it was august of 2020 i was beyond the end of my patience

with all this mask stuff and everything and i was i was fighting with everybody anytime i go anywhere public it was bad uh i just couldn't control it so we came uh out here and uh things were a little bit better in north carolina than they were in texas you know being in austin and um then we stopped we always whenever we would we would go from Texas back to North Carolina, either way, we'd always stop here because we love this area. And so we stopped here and went into Gatlinburg, crowded sidewalks. I mean, this is August of 2020. Crowded sidewalks and nobody basically wearing a mask.

And these are the people who'd come as tourists even. And, of course, the people who had jobs, they had to wear masks, and they had to put signs up saying you got to wear a mask. But we'd say, well, do I have to wear a mask? Do I really have to wear a mask going to a site? And they'd go, mm-mm. You know, just wouldn't say anything with their eyes. They'd nod.

They'd shake their head. No, you don't have to. And so, you know, everybody was really relaxed about it. A lot more so than in Texas, especially Austin. Austin's just a cesspool of liberals. It's like it's going to become like San Francisco. It's just a half a step behind it. So anyway, yeah, I think I've been real happy with what we've seen here in Tennessee with the

government. And we're going to talk about what happened. Um, there's an update as to what happened with these, um, these, uh, insurrectionists that led this insurrection in Tennessee. They got kicked out last week and it really, uh, upset, uh, didn't upset them. They used it, right? They loved it. Loved every minute of it. We're going to talk about that in just a second. Uh, but before we end this segment here, talking about just general news, let's talk a little bit about entertainment. Talk a little bit about, um, Hollywood. You know, we have another, uh, article here about the war, the ongoing war between, uh, DeSantis and the Florida Republicans and the parental rights bill that Disney said, you know,

fought the ones that they characterize as don't say gay. Wasn't that at all. It was about parental rights. And so that is going back and forth with Disney. Now Disney has a new show. You should hurry up and sign up for Disney Plus because if you get it in time, you can get a new show focused on, you know, oriented towards teen girls. And it's about a teen girl who has sex with Satan and an illegitimate child. And so it's nice. It covers all the new bases, right? You can mix in their pedophilia, teen sex, and Satan all at the same time. I mean, why wouldn't Disney green light something like that?

It's got all of their values. So they don't even bother trying to have witches and magic and all the other these just go straight for satan now over and over again disney does so they are built a storyline around um and and all of their franchises have gone lgbt and now with this on disney plus This is something that they picked up from some German producers. These German producers, Philipp Kasbur, if I'm pronouncing that right, and Matthias Mermann,

said this is a project that is very close to our hearts. Oh, deep into, they really wanted to do a show about pedophilia, teen pregnancy, and love of Satan. It's so close to their heart. It's a German original by the same creators who gave the world, quote, how to sell drugs online.

That was their other entertainment. So in this new story, there's the gist of it. Pauline, the main character, becomes pregnant with a one-night stand with Lucas the Devil. And this is the way Disney describes their new thing that they're so proud of. I mean, I used to watch Disney's Skip and Marty and, you know, the party boys type stuff. It's amazing with school stress the climate crisis and the downfall of society weighing heavily on her mind oh well so they're gonna bring all that up to the kids you want to know why kids are suicidal now it's the schools it's the gender gaslighting it's

the entertainment that they watch you know just like the proud family, you know, these scowling cartoon figures screaming and lecturing everybody about their white privilege and all the rest of this stuff and slavery, this and slavery, that. And it's just weaponized. It is a march through the institutions. So the Marxists have done, We'll talk more about that. But, yeah, so school stress, the climate, the downfall of society, all these things are just weighing heavily on her mind. And now something that she doesn't need at all right now is catching her feelings, especially not for her one-night stand, Lucas, who, as it turns out, is the devil himself yes this is a project that's

very close to the heart of these germans i mean this is not uh i'm sure that this is not the level of faust uh you know gerta's uh play these these guys are not uh the level of Goethe. So it's a story of a teen, a pregnant teen in love with the devil. The place, home of Mickey Mouse. This is what the Marxists said when they talked about a march through the institutions. We have to take over all the institutions at the top.

I had somebody say to me, how did this happen? How did all of a sudden these people are in control of all the institutions at the top all at the same time? Well, they were planning this and working on it since the 1960s. This is the culmination of 60 years of work to march through the institutions. That's what they called it. And they said, it's going to be a long march,

just like Chairman Mao's victory was a long march. So, you know, let's figure out how we're going to do this. And this is the culmination of it now. So, you know, it was just last year. As a matter of fact, just the end of the year, last year, it was in the fall, Disney had another devil movie, a cartoon, quote-unquote, featuring a little girl as Antichrist.

The cartoon mom tells her daughter at the time, who is 13 years old, she says, there's no more putting this off. Your dad is the devil and you are the antichrist. The adult programming is called Little Demon. One of the actors who provides voicing expressed approval that it normalizes paganism. This is from WND.com talking about this. The series, quote, features demonic witchcraft, pagan rituals, gratuitous blood, gore, and nudity. And judging by the trailer, it can easily be considered to be pornographic by definition.

That's what Disney does now. That's Disney. But, you know, as Disney is laying off thousands of people and going to war with the state of Florida, and, you know, this is the back and forth over this Reedy Creek District, which I grew up in Florida. I was there when they created it. Loved going to Disney World in the early days under the rules of Walt Disney. But these people just become so over-the-top greedy,

and now they have become, uh, incredibly corrupt. But as they are focused on shoving this kind of content down our throats, you know, these, this troubled teen, she's got all these problems at school and climate is going to kill everybody and society is collapsing. And so,

you know, Hey, best I can do is have a child with Satan out of wedlock or whatever, out of wedlock. Yeah. Yeah. Everybody pronounce you Satan and wife, uh, the church of Satan to get married. Anyway, um, illegitimacy is the least of her problems here, I think.

Uh, but anyway, the, uh, as they're doing this and flopping left and right with all this trash that they're putting out, shoving this to people that nobody wants, the proud family and all the rest of the stuff, as they are collapsing financially, as they have bought up every single franchise and destroyed it, Marvel, Star Wars, all this stuff, we have Super Mario Brothers bringing in $377 million. Did you think you're going to see figures like that ever come again from Hollywood? Well, of course you're not going to see figures like that coming from Hollywood. Because this isn't coming from Hollywood.

This is coming from Nintendo. And they're not playing that game. The Japanese companies, they evidently didn't march through the institutions in Japan. They didn't march through Nintendo. And so while Disney is laying off thousands of people, Super Mario Brothers, which is a joint production of Nintendo and I think it was Sony that was part of this. I'm not sure about that though. They made $377 million. And here's another clue. If you're ever looking for a movie,

what you want to do is a good starting place is to look at Rotten Tomatoes and look at what the audience says and what the critics say. And if you've got a show like this where 96% of the audience likes it and only 56% of the critics like it, that's a good indication that it's not propaganda crap from Hollywood. Still doesn't mean it's a good movie. I mean, you still need to check it out and see what's in it. But that is a good starting place.

And so, it's not just the critics that are opposing it, says the post-millennial. Fox News said that an actor, Leguizamo, is that how you pronounce his name? I can't remember.

He was in the old Super Mario that had Bob Hoskins in it. And it absolutely tanked at the box office. It was horrible. And he was in it, Leguizamo. He played Luigi. Bob Hoskins played Mario. And Leguizamo is very upset that Mario and Luigi are being voiced by two white actors, Chris Pratt and Charlie Day.

But I thought that Italians were supposed to be white. You know, I mean, how do you break these things up? So Leguizamo is Hispanic, but he played an Italian. And, you know, he's criticizing this. Oh, you have white actors that are doing this. Bob Hoskins was white and he was British. So I don't know what their rules are. I think it's just a lot of bellyaching from these people. We'll be right back.

Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Hey! The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. ¶¶ Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

It's true. It's true. The crown has made it clear. The climate must be perfect. All the earth. A law was made a distant moon ago here. The climate must be perfect all year. A law was made a distant moon ago here. July and August cannot be too hot. And there's a legal limit to the snow here in Camelot. Yeah, Camelot. You know the counties.

And their climate change stuff. And we don't want to see any water spouts there. That was the thing that really freaked out RFK. He said, here we are. You know, I am a sport. But, yeah, it's... He's back in the news here today with some more crazy climate stuff. I said when I talked about that yesterday,

I said, well, you know, he might just say, well, that was 10 to 15 years ago. Maybe nobody will remember that and we can just kind of go quiet with it. But now Children's Health Defense well, that was 10 to 15 years ago. Maybe nobody will remember that, and we can just kind of go quiet with it. But now Children's Health Defense had an article attacking crypto mining operations. You know, crypto is going to destroy the planet, right? And that was one of the things I was hopeful about.

I said, look, I'm not going to support RFK. I'm not going to support any politician, but I'm not going to certainly support somebody who has been an environmental lawyer. And then after the program on Thursday, I looked at it and was like, oh, I can't believe this. I missed the fact that he wants to make it illegal to be a climate skeptic. He's calling people traitors and saying they need to be put in jail. He was so radical that even Obama wouldn't put him in,

try to put him in as head of the EPA. They said, no, that'll never pass. He's too far left. Have we gotten to the point where our society has been so conditioned and so radicalized that maybe he's not out of the mainstream for the left anymore on this stuff? And so I read an op-ed piece. you know, here saying, well, you know, snow is gone. People in the Northeast are not going to see snow anymore.

And we have, um, we had a, uh, uh, a water spout off of, uh, you know, where we live up in Heinz port. And, you know, he remembers his childhood where there was not a more convenient spot for happy ever aftering than right there at Harnessport. And it was just, it scared his dog so bad. His dog was scared by the lightning and all the rest of the stuff. Anyway, so what is children's health defense doing well they're pushing this idea which as i pointed out you know when biden made that um executive order you know all the executive branches all the bureaucracy is under the executive branch right

he told every uh one of these uh agencies we'll call them uh to be polite he told every one of these agencies, we'll call them, to be polite. He told every one of these agencies to report back to him in one of four areas. One of them is how are we going to completely restructure the American financial system? Number two, how are we going to enforce it? That's for you, Department of Justice and FBI and IRS and all the rest of you. Uh, and then, um, uh, how are we going to, uh, how are we going to sell it?

Right. That's the key thing. How are we going to sell it? So, um, you know, he had four different areas there, uh,

creation, implementation, enforcement, and then climate. So why would he put climate in there? Well, you know why he's going to put climate in there because it already started coming.

We're seeing this war against crypto, Operation Chokepoint 2.0. We're seeing that ramping up as part of these banking collapses and FTX and everything. But long before all that happened, they were already setting up crypto to take it down. And so we have an article from Children's Health Defense. We have an article from the New York Times at the same time about this.

All this stuff is breaking. So these are the people that are carrying the water for the government. Sad to see this on climate. And so this is the article from Children's Health Defense report published last week by the Environmental Working Group examines how the quote-unquote mining process behind the popular cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and Monera. Since when have you ever seen Monera featured in this? Why are they pulling that small crypto coin out? Well, because Monera has the capability of making your transactions anonymous and invisible to them.

They can walk through the blockchain transactions and find out, you know, audit it completely with Bitcoin. Dogecoin is there to, that's their other narrative about cryptocurrency. It's just a scam, right? And so Dogecoin is there for the scam aspect. Monero is there because that's an even bigger enemy for them, the fact that people would have a private currency. And of course, there's another one out there uh pirate coin that uh

also you can do anonymous transactions with but it's difficult to use them it's difficult to find them they're very obscure uh and uh so but they feature monero because it isn't about the climate at all. This is all a lie. And as good as it is to have somebody like RFK Jr. who opposes CBDC and he hit all of the talking points to oppose it, all the problems with it, he hit all of those, but then his organization. And of course, he's on leave of absence. Now he's not directly editing this, but the people that are there chose to put this out. This is from a publication called Common Dreams. It's by Brett Wilkins, but they featured it on their website.

So they support this. And he writes about this Environmental Working Group report. The name of the report was Proof of Problems, Bitcoin Mining's Pollution Toll on U.S. Communities. report. The name of the report was proof of problems, Bitcoin mining's pollution toll on us communities. And they profiled six case studies of adverse effects of cryptocurrency mining process. Now, again, it's called proof of work. So that's why they put this in as proof of problem because the central bank digital currencies are being put out there as proof of stake.

We're not going to do any work. We're not going to make this honest. We are not going to have any limitations on how much of the stuff we can create. That's why you have the proof of work because you don't want people just arbitrarily creating coins like the federal reserve creates dollars. And so that's why proof of work was at the center of all of this stuff. And I guess a better way to describe, they like to say proof of stake. We can, all we have to do is prove that we are the authorities and that we can make as much money as we want. And there's

nothing connected to that. And see, we can, we can just wave our magic wand faster than somebody can actually process a transaction and do all this stuff so i guess what we could call that is instead of proof of stake i think a better way to describe that would be poof no work you know you have proof of work and then you have the alternative cbdc poof no work and it no worky for me because I centralized control of all money and I, um, an audit trail and, um, and being able to see everything that I've spent money on,

but also to prohibit me from being able to buy certain things. So they said, uh, this amplifies the voices of those who are fighting to save their homes and their livelihoods from Bitcoin mines invading their communities. Really? Where were these people, this environmental working group, what were they doing when the NSA built that gigantic facility out in the middle of the Utah desert in Bluffdale, Utah? An area where water is very scarce.

And it used more water and more electricity than a large city because it's storing information about everybody, because it's mining that information, right? Data mining all of the surveillance stuff about you and scraping things off of social media and data mining that. They don't care when the surveillance state data mines information about you and your life. They only care when there is Bitcoin mining that's going on to keep the process above board and honest. That's all they care about. As a matter of fact, that thing came online in 2013 and 2014. Wired Magazine had an article and they said, why is the NSA so secretive about even the water that they're using? And of course, Wired Magazine likes to carry water for the establishment

and the intelligence community. Oh, well, they have to, you know, because if they were telling you how much water they use, they'd have to kill you because you'd be able to figure out then how many computers they got. And you can't know how many computers the NSA's got. You're not allowed to know that kind of stuff. And next thing you're going to want to know how much money they're given or something. Come on. You know, they got a black budget there. You're not allowed to see that. It's kind of like you go back to the church committee hearings in the Senate,

looking at the CIA, the House had a committee, the Pike committee. You never hear about that. And the chairman of that committee said to the NSA, I'd like to see your charter. I'm not showing you my charter. That's created by executive order by President Truman. I'm not showing you my charter. You're nothing but a congressman. You're not the government. We're the government. Didn't say that. Did say, though, I'm not going to show you my charter. So when you look at artificial intelligence, right, using billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars, as a matter of fact, of GPUs. This is what they're upset about.

They make a big deal out of it. Oh, you know, they've got this computer technology. It uses a lot of energy. You know, it runs really, really fast, and it runs hot, and it uses a lot of electricity. Yeah, graphics processing units. That's what the miners use. But you look at the big AI projects where they're out there, you know, looking at everything on the internet, trying to, you know, uh, figure out, um, uh, trying to educate their

AI and they're putting tens of billions of dollars and they're buying GPU units that are far more powerful, far more sophisticated, and far more energy intensive than anything the bit miners are using, I believe, because these are costing $10,000 each. And they're buying tens of billions of dollars worth of them. And they're saying, it's still not enough. We need more processing power. And that could be one of the limiting factors there. I hope it is. I hope they can't find enough computers out there, GPUs, to do artificial intelligence. But do you see any of these shills for the establishment, the New York Times, or these people here with Children's Health Defense Fund who are criticizing Bitcoin? Do you see any of them

criticizing this massive power usage by artificial intelligence or the massive power usage by the NSA and the surveillance state, recording everything that we do, saving everything that we do, data mining everything that we do. They don't care about any of that, but you better not have some money, some crypto money that is outside of our control. That's what we care about. And at that point, we'll start talking about the climate. You see how phony the climate stuff is? It's just like the Paris Climate Accord. We don't care how much energy and how much pollution.

We don't care about the emissions in China or in India, the two biggest population countries. We don't care about that at all. We've got to solve global warming. And so that means that all of you in Europe and North America need to, you know, erase your lifestyle. But China can build as many power plants as they want.

Coal power plants, they can make them cheap and they can make them dirty. And there's no limit on that. We don't care. And so in the same way, these people are having a fit about crypto and yet artificial intelligence oh yeah more and more computers let's put more the intelligence agencies more computers for that as well we don't care about that either so um and of course let's

not bring up the climate impact of war how what is the carbon footprint of the tanks and the planes and the ships and what is the carbon footprint of the rockets and what about when those rockets land on things and blow up and create massive fires and all we don't have to worry about any of that we don't have to worry about war we don't have to worry about the intelligence state we don't have to worry about artificial intelligence you know What is killing the climate is crypto. What an amazing bit of lie this all is. What these minds have in common is their proof of work,

which is wasteful by design. No, they're trying to make it honest and audible. Instead of poof, no work work they all use the same technology this computer hardware no bigger than a shoebox all competing to solve the same puzzle and earn a few bitcoins uh it's a proof of work is a source of constant noise a blight in communities across the country, a hotbed of fraud and corruption that bilks consumers and rate payers out of billions of dollars. Well, I can say the same thing about their surveillance state, and I have said it. The surveillance state is a source of constant noise on your computer.

It is constantly, it is slowing things down, wasting your time. It is living in your home and spying on you as the, I've said many times, and I was happy to see that there was an op-ed piece on the New American saying, I think this is a violation of the Third Amendment. I've said that many times. You know, it's not just having a physical soldier living in your home, right? The biggest part of that as well was the fact that that soldier was going to be looking at your life and are you a pro king or not? Are you for the king?

Are you a loyal subject to the king? And that's what they're doing. So they're occupying space on your computer. You're having to pay for the electricity when they are running background processes and spying on you because they're doing it to everybody. So they're robbing your performance, robbing you of time. They're robbing you of money. Anyway, the, uh, EWG report says the children health defense fund calls to

quote, change the code, not the climate. It highlights alternatives to proof of work, proof of stake in central bank digital currency. You see, and we have the problem solved right here. So as RFK Jr. is telling us the truth about CBDC and telling us how evil it is, you have Children's Health Defense Fund and the New York Times coming out on the same day. Telling us how it's got to be shut, how its competitor, crypto, has to be shut down in order to save the planet, you see. This is the way they play these games. They are running propaganda stories for Operation Chokepoint.

And again, this was March of last year biden tells everybody here's four areas that i want to report on give me your report six months six months they got the report immediately they go to the next phase they're rolling this thing out step by step it isn't like you know okay well let's look at the report and decide whether or not we need to do this or not no they've already decided that they're going to go to the next step. So it comes at the expense of ordinary people's clean air, water, and climate, but not the Bluffdale,

Utah thing, not the artificial intelligence, not the wars, the wars, the wars don't come at the expense of people's lives at the expense of their clean air and their water and their climate. No war doesn't do anything like that. You know, we don't have to worry about depleted uranium

or Agent Orange or any of the rest of this stuff, right? That's all fine. KWD68 comment, add some AI to that Patriot Act data. Yeah, Skynet is the mining. Aaron Moss says, Pelosi invested in NVIDIA. Yeah, one of the GPU company, the key GPU company. I'm sure she's just really smart. Somewhere that insider trading.

Uh, yeah, you're right. Aaron. Uh, that's the person you want to follow in terms of investments. Yeah. Paul Pelosi,

her husband, uh, solo cat 1980. That's why there's an ongoing high end graphics card shortage. Yeah. Government is buying them up for their control grid. Aaron Moss says Pelosi means techie in Chinese. Rhonda Tate. Hey, Rhonda, thank you for the help that she helps us with the notes on the show.

RFK can't be so fooled by the climate thing. He's saying everything right, but the new boogeyman. Yeah, it's, well, you know, Brian Shulhavi's got on Health Impact News, he's got his take on RFKs. He's a guenom for sure. I think that he's going to bring, it's going to bring some much needed, not just interesting, but needed debate about some issues that they don't want to talk about. I think he's going to bring some much needed, not just interesting, but needed debate about some issues that they don't want to talk about. I think he's going to be. So I still see it.

His running as a positive thing, but I'm not a supporter. Another former associate says Brian is headline. Another former associate of Jeffrey Epstein has filed to run for us present 2024. And he says another associate of Jeffrey Epstein. He shows a picture of Donald Trump. So he's got Donald Trump. He's got RFK Jr. And he's got Jeffrey Epstein.

So there we go. It's a club and you and I ain't in it. Air Moss says, sounds like Trump to me. He says the right thing while he signs laws that are wrong. Yep. They think you're that stupid. Yes, I agree. KWD 68.

We bought paid for all expenses for our big brother spy device and we take them everywhere. And they laughed about that. You know, one of the people looking at this reported leak that has been there since January. Isn't that interesting? You know, they had these Pentagon leaks out there

since January. But it's only just this last week that they have brought it to our attention. And so a British intelligence officer says, if this is real, this is the biggest leak since Snowden. And the Snowden leaks, as I've showed you many times, you know, the three files there, 1984, the release of the Macintosh and the Super Bowl commercial done by Ridley Scott with the 1984 theme. And they said, who would have thought in 1984, next slide,

that this would be Big Brother, and they show Steve Jobs holding a phone up, and that the idiots would line up to pay for it. And they showed a picture of people queued up at an Apple store to buy their iPhone, their Big Brother device. That was the NSA. That was NSA slides. That was part of the Snowden leaks. That was only reported in Germany. Um, I reported it, it was on Der Spiegel, but the mainstream American media

did not pick that up. It would have been too obvious, wouldn't it? And, um, you know, for a couple of reasons, they don't want to offend Apple computer and get the advertising cut off. And they don't want to offend the American government. They don't want to show Apple computer and get the advertising cut off. And they don't want to offend the American government. They don't want to show you what the real issue is. But that was the NSA laughing at us, calling us zombies who are willing to pay for our own big brother device. Well, um,

Brian's take on RFK. He says just about everybody in the alternative media who's covered this announcement by RFK jr. Running for, sees this as wonderful news. I do see it as positive for the process and for debate and for issues. But anyway, he says, while the corporate media has chosen just to criticize his anti-vax position, but as Brian points out, he's not anti-vax. He is, you know, for safe vaccines and that type of thing. And as I said last week, I do believe those two things converge. I believe that as much as anything, that is a way that they're trying to sell it to people.

Look, I'm not anti-vax. I just want to have the science done. Well, if you do the science, you're going to be anti-vax. If you really do the science, you're going to be anti-vax. If you really do the science, you're going to be anti-vax on all of them. But he said, you know, he's taking the traditional GOP line, which is that all vaccines are safe and effective, except for the COVID shots. And that is the line of Rand Paul, for example, a physician, son of a physician, and he knows better. And he says to Fauci in the hearings, this vaccine is so bad that you're making people hesitant for the good vaccines.

It's like, please tell me Rand Paul, what are the good vaccines? Let's do some of that vetting of those good vaccines. You want to show me how good those vaccines are. You want to show me that in the bears report, how good they are. This is orders of magnitude, many orders of magnitude worse than any of those vaccines.

Several times worse than all the other adverse effects reported for decades. And that's even with them putting a gag order on reporting these adverse effects. And even Harvard, in a study that was funded by HHS said only about 10% are reported, but that was before they started threatening people's livelihood. It's going to be career suicide as a doctor or medical professional. If you report this stuff. So,

uh, who knows what the real number is here, but, um, you know, that's, that's the problem I have is with the environmental stuff is here, but, um, you know, that's, that's the problem I have is with the environmental stuff. Uh, but, um, as, uh, Brian shall have, he is going into, um,

the vaccine side of things. Uh, he's concerned that Steve Kirsch has, um, been a major contributor pushing RFK Jr. to run for president. He said Steve Kirsch, who made a lot of money as a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, used his wealth to begin at least two new organizations, the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund and the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation. And he said the COVID Early Treatment Fund also had Elon Musk as a donor, and they are currently funding several pharmaceutical drug trials, including one drug that is already an FDA-approved antidepressant. And we're going to be talking in the third hour to a lady that I haven't talked to in a few years. I was talking about the shootings and SSRI stories.

She has SSRIstories.net. And we're going to talk to her about that. These antidepressant drugs. Yet another thing that's being done to our society, to our children especially. Anyway, Kirsch announced that he had started a super PAC in February to encourage RFK junior to run for president. And, uh, so then he also talks about how much money, uh, children's health defense fund has been taking in. Um, it really has exploded. And so they had, um, just over a million dollars in 2018,

then went to almost $3 million the next year, the next year, 6.7 million, and then 2021, nearly $16 million as exponential growth. But I think a large part of that is that they've been such effective spokespersons against Fauci and against lockdown and masks and all the rest of this stuff. And so they've done a great job with that. And I was really sad to see them start falling back into the climate MacGuffin again. And then he goes into a story. Actually, it was a book that was written by Jerry Oppenheimer, a very hostile, I would say, biography of RFK Jr.

And it mainly gets into a lot of the private life, and I'm not going to go after that. I think that politics is dirty enough. Let's just suffice to say that morally he's another Trump. He's not George Washington either, right? Trump's not George Washington. Trump's not Andrew Jackson, in spite of what Alex Jones likes to tell Trump. He's not George Washington either, right? Trump's not George Washington. Trump's not Andrew Jackson, in spite of what Alex Jones likes to tell you.

He's not. And neither is RFK Jr. He is more like another Trump in terms of his private life and his morals. So I'm not interested in reading these things aloud. I'm not interested in reading um these uh things aloud i'm not interested in going into the moral failings of these people their their public feelings of their policies are bad enough uh and that's all we need to know i'm not interested in and a lot of people will read it to you and gleefully say oh isn't it you know here's all the juicy salacious details

of their um you know sexual life or whatever i'm not interested in that if you want to see it um there's excerpts from the book and the article at vaccine impact if you want to see what is um being talked about there but here's one of the key things rfk jr and his now deceased wife who committed suicide, Mary, were also listed in Epstein's black book, along with other Kennedy family names. RFK Jr. has been listed as a passenger on Epstein's Lolita Express and admits that he flew on Epstein's plane twice. And as Brian Schlavey says, like his potential opponent

in the 2024 elections, Donald Trump, who is also a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. I'm sure that Mr. Kennedy will deny any knowledge of what Epstein was actually doing during that time, as have many other public figures and big tech billionaires recently. So we will see what happens with it. But again, just so you understand where everything is, I think that he's very articulate in terms of defending some of these positions and opposing what they're doing in terms of vaccine mandates,

in terms of vaccine passports, CBDC, and other things like that. But understand that we don't have any George Washingtons out there. Most of them are like Caligula. We're in the last stages of this American empire, and our political leaders are like Caligula. That's just a given when we look at this. Audi MRR says, quoterr says quote unquote good vaccine

quote translation the worst that can happen is your kid will be autistic that's right that's right and and we'll pretend that that has absolutely no connection to it but we don't care uh gene whitworth the good vaccines the ones that cause sudden infant death syndrome and autism. Yeah. Christopher Menci, most of us were pro-vax until someone we love was hurt by a vaccine. That's absolutely true. I'll never forget that. I've played it several times, but that lady who said, you know, I just realized I killed my kid with those vaccines. I thought I was helping him. They said it was sudden infant death syndrome, and I started seeing all this stuff with sudden adult death syndrome

and the vaccine connection, and I realized what happened. Christopher Mincy. Yeah, most of us are pro-vax until someone we love was hurt by vax. I am 100% unapologetically anti-vax. My son nearly died in 2015 from Rota tech. Vax me too. Me too. Uh, Ronda Tate, a climate press would truly be in favor of climate lockdowns.

And see, that's the, that's the dangerous thing. I didn't mention that. The dangerous thing is that we look at him and we say, okay, good. He's checks all these boxes. He's anti-vaccine. He's opposing the pharmaceutical companies. He's opposing the CIA and the military industrial complex and their wars. He checks so many of these boxes, you know, opposed to the vaccine mandates and a global ID that he could, in a general election, get a lot of votes from people. Especially, you know, if Trump is

taken out of the equation somehow, uh, you know, I mean, Trump's not a spring chicken. Uh, it isn't just the, um, the, uh, prosecutions. And, and again, this prosecution in Manhattan, most people have said, yeah, that's, that's nothing. He can beat that rap. Uh, Dershowitz, when he talked about it, said, no, they'll probably convict him because, you know, it's a kangaroo court and it's Manhattan and all the rest of this stuff.

And he knows that area. But he goes, it'll be overturned on appeal. They're going to run the trial, however. They're going to delay this until we are in the election year, next year. They want to do it right in the middle of primary season. It is all political. But he does have some real legal jeopardy on some of these other things. He's got legal jeopardy there in Georgia.

He's got legal jeopardy on the documents, even though you might say, well, yeah, but look, Biden has the same problem. Are they going to apply this to Biden? Of course not. They don't have a, you don't have the same standard of justice for the Democrats and Republicans. I mean, it's not even close. So if that were to happen, if he were to become president, he would do a climate lockdown. You better believe it. I absolutely do. I don't think he's changed that much. Again, you know, when he was doing this 10 or 15 years ago, he was, you know, in his early fifties,

like me, I knew what was going on. Why didn't he know what's going on? Was he that naive? I don't think so. I think he's too smart. I don't, you know, and I don't think he's changed that much. Aaron Moss, Andrew Jackson would duel the lot of them or beat them with his cane. That's right. That would have, I'd like to see somebody explain CBDC. I know exactly what he would do. He'd tell Andrew Jackson about CBDC. He would beat you to the ground with his cane. Justly, rightfully so.

So, you know, speaking of Tennessee, a follow-up on what we talked about with this Tennessee insurrection and, you know, different rules for these people. They can come in and they can lead a, you know, mob coming in, pushing and shoving these legislators. Again, as I said yesterday, you know, can you imagine the outrage of the Democrats if the January 6th protesters had come in and started pushing and shoving them, which is what happened to the state legislators?

You can imagine if you had had, you know, some Republican legislators, let's say a Marjorie Taylor green and Matt gets, pick a bullhorn in there and said, yeah, let's take over the house and all this kind of, can you imagine what would have happened with that? Well, that's what happened at the state level. And of course the bad guys are the ones who they didn't throw their opponents in jail, as the Democrats would have done, and then keep them there without a trial for two years and torture them.

No, they just said, well, we're going to expel you. And one of them is already back, already back. They had a day of action that was planned for yesterday. And, you know, you see them fist raised in the air, you know, from Monday, April the 10th, day of action. There wasn't much action, quite frankly. Nobody reported any action that I could find anywhere. No action.

But what happened was for a couple of blocks, he had, he's one of these guys that was kicked out is from Nashville. And again, the big cities, you know, where everything is corrupt in Tennessee, just like it is anywhere else, Nashville, Memphis, forget about it. But anyway, he gets reappointed by the council there because after they kick out the elected representative, then the local council can decide who they're going to put back in their place until a special election. And so there will be a special election because the next election is November

2024 and they have to fill it. So it'd be like within the next couple of months that both of these guys are going to have to get reelected and they probably will be a shoe in for that. But so there were a few people that showed up and escorted him to the state Capitol. But other than that, nothing really happened. And so I said, um, I said, join Tennessee three, the Tennessee three.

That was like Chumlee and the penguin, uh, for a day of action, said the flyer. And, um, so, uh, he, um, is, is back. And as they were talking about this on Sunday, it was a different story. On Sunday, the Tennessee Star reported that the House Speaker, Cam Sexton, had previously stated that if the Nashville Metropolitan Council chooses to offer an interim successor to fulfill the remaining term of Jones until a special general council election is held, the House will address the issue when it is presented. Should the Metro Council vote on Monday to name Jones as interim successor to the seat from which he was expelled, House Republicans are likely to object to his reinstatement

on constitutional grounds and on the grounds of House rules. The constitutional grounds are that an expelled member of the House cannot be his own successor, and that by legal definition, a successor must be another person. Well, looks like they have just waived this aside. After, and again, the problem was that they didn't kick out all three of them. By kicking out the two young black men and not the elderly white woman, it allowed these people to play the race card.

And so I think what they're wisely doing, you know, you could say, well, we're going to hold them to the rule. My instinct would be to go to double down on this thing. That's probably not the smartest thing to do because that's going to give them a lot of ammunition and public opinion. So they just decided, all right, let him come back in and just wave it away and pay no attention. So he's there. I don't know if he's going to get any committee assignments. They'd already removed these three people's committee assignments. And they also took away the keys to the elevator and other secure areas like that

because they'd led a mob against the legislature. You know, that's an appropriate thing to do. in terms of committees i don't know you know maybe they'll make these guys hall monitor no they wouldn't make them hall monitor because um you couldn't trust them to monitor the halls and let people in maybe you know going back to uh no time for sergeants maybe they'll make this guy permanent latrine orderly plo i've just been promoted to permanent latrine orderly. How about that? And clean the toilets out from here on out. Uh, according to the reports prior to his expulsion, uh, he said he wasn't

worried about being expelled because he was confident that he would be appointed as his own interim successor by the council, the metropolitan council there in Nashville and the event that this confidence arises from a private conversation that he had with the Metro Council members, that conversation would likely constitute a violation of the state's sunshine law. So if they wanted to, they could say, oh, so you're talking to these people in a campaign in secret with this stuff? Or they could say, well,

you can't be your own successor by definition and by the rules, but they have waived all of that. Uh, by the way, uh, this story from the Tennessee, uh, this is the Tennessee star, uh, said after a physical altercation, state troopers managed to keep the rioters away, led by Jones, Pearson, and Johnson, kept them from pushing their way into the House chamber, and they had already sprayed graffiti

over the Capitol building as well. That wasn't done in January the 6th, was it? I don't remember any graffiti anywhere. So Lala Harris was there. She said three educators and three babies, nine years old, were murdered senselessly due to gun violence. No. Murdered senselessly due to transgender violence.

Let's not call it gun violence. Look, this is not a gun ban that they're talking about. It's gun prohibition. Let's call it what it is. Let's stop calling internal combustion engine bans. Let's stop calling them car bans. It's car prohibition. And it literally is. They don't want you to have any cars. Just as we know these Democrats don't want anybody to have any guns except them. They don't want anybody to have any private transportation. They want to control all the transportation. They want to control all the weapons. And they're prohibiting this. And I say that we ought to use the term prohibition because when we hear prohibition standing by itself, the first thing people think about

is alcohol prohibition and what an utter failure that was it failed to keep people from getting drunk and addicted to alcohol and it tore our country up and that's what all these prohibitions always do so let's call it gun prohibition let's call it car prohibition anyway so Nashville sent this guy back he's now become his own successor I am I am my own father. There you go. So he returned to the House floor to cheers, and the Democrats introduced him as our newest member. A small crowd that was otherwise unreported and unnoticed

accompanied him to the Capitol. They said, today we send a clear message to Speaker Cameron Sexton that the people will not allow his crimes against democracy to happen without challenge. These are the people who just led a mob to overthrow the democratic process as one of the people there said, hey, you got a problem? File a bill. You are a legislator.

Act like one. But, of course, he became a legislator because he was a member of the mob, always doing protests, and he can't get out of that mode. He's going to be a permanent protester. He doesn't know how to act as a leader of anything other than a mob. They were the people who attacked democracy. They were the people who attacked the rule of law. It was a mobocracy that was there.

And as I said yesterday, when you got the mob out there yelling and screaming, shutting down the democratic process, overthrowing the rules, and telling you that, demanding that you give up the constitutional protections for your God-given rights to protect yourself. You've got a screaming mob saying, give up your guns. You can't protect yourself anymore.

Well, I think at that point, you double down on it. So the council voted 36 to nothing to return him to a seat. And so he's back. And the Speaker Sexton earlier indicated that he would not stand in the way of appointments if the local governing bodies chose to send these two of them back to the chamber. He said the two governing bodies will make the decision as to who they want to appoint to these seats. Those two individuals will be seated as representatives as the Constitution requires. So again, they don't want to let these two narcissists become martyrs fair enough it's a smart thing they send a message to

them a strong message to them kick them out i hope that they're doing that from a standpoint not of weakness but just to take this bully pulpit away from them. So the other guy, they're not going to meet until tomorrow to send him back, but you know that they will because it's a Democrat-controlled area. Republicans accused the trio of knowingly and intentionally bringing disorder and dishonor to the House of Representatives without being recognized to speak. What happened was a travesty of democracy, though, said Jones, because they expelled the two youngest black lawmakers. You see, if your skin is the right color, you can overthrow the democratic process. You can lead a mob through the Capitol building

and no problem. But if your skin is the wrong color, you have somebody like Sam who worked at Infowars. He's now been sentenced to four months in house arrest. So I'm glad that it wasn't in prison, but I'm still outraged that they would sentence a journalist to something like that. And of course, Alex just threw him under the bus in the worst possible way, promised to defend him, then fired him. He said, I didn't even know that Sam was there. I didn't tell him to go. An absolute lie. There's absolutely no way that people at InfoWars would travel across the country to cover an event without being authorized to do it.

You say, I don't know anything about that. I did the stop the steal thing. Don't send me to prison for that, please. You know, and so everybody under the bus, I watched him throw that, uh, you know, uh, wacko, um, Buffalo guy, right? Buffalo shaman. He had him on his program just so he could, um, make that guy out to be the problem. He could, uh, get away from it.

So anyway, that's what's going on there in Tennessee. One person says Tennessee may rue the day, Chattanooga paper says this, they may rue the day when the Republican lawmakers did this. I think they'll just, you know, where they went wrong with this was not kicking out that woman. They missed it by one vote. That allowed these people to play the race card. you know they would have played the race card anyway and um but again there was graffiti that had already defaced the capital before these people led them in stood there refused to stand down yelling and screaming

with a bullhorn uh and um so i guess we should just let that go because, you know, they were doing the same thing. This is the mob was back for when they had the expulsion vote. Right. This big crowd here. That was the first time that happened. That was when they were doing the graffiti and invading it the first time. But then they came back. Let us in.

Let us in. Let us in. So, you know, that's we believe we don't believe racism affected the house vote said um a uh free press here in tennessee that's the name of the organization uh feeling that it had more to do with the two who went so far as to use a bullhorn to embolden the crowd but republicans will have great difficulty in convincing others of that opinion well the truth is the truth will the people believe you or not. State Senate's decision to move consideration of gun bills to next year's session. They also opined that the ensuing period of time should be used to craft legislation

that will move the state to the forefront of the country on gun safety reform. I don't think that's going to happen. Immediately, the state Senate said, well, we're not going to take any look at any gun bills until 2024, basically putting a cooling off period on this stuff. And that was wise. But let me say this, you know, 2024 is obviously an election year. You think that the Tennessee GOP in an election year is going to push through gun control?

Not a chance. As a matter of fact, it was just recently that they supported constitutional carry here in Tennessee. That isn't going to happen. They're not going to get gun prohibition from the GOP in Tennessee in an election year. If they do, it'll be total suicide. But I don't think these people are that nuts. They're more grounded than that. Meanwhile, Occasional

Cortex says the crime wave is in the Republican Party. Oh, really? Seems to me like it's the Democrats who are committing crimes and getting away with it all the time. Were there any J6ers that did graffiti? I don't think so.

We're seeing a breaking of the law by conservative members of the court. She said, talking about the allegations about Clarence Thomas and the fact that he had gifts that were given to him. If that is the case, she said, if Republicans decide to protect those who are breaking the law, then they are the ones who are responsible for that decision. And we shouldn't be complicit in it. Does that really? So do the same rules apply? For, you know, breaking the law. What about violence invading a Capitol?

No, there's a different set of rules for everybody. So let's talk a little bit about DeSantis. We were talking about RFK Jr. earlier. DeSantis. We were talking about, uh, RFK Jr. Earlier. DeSantis is escalating the Disney dispute. Uh, they got,

you know, as I like the headline, somebody put out there, the mousetrap, you know, the mousetrap from Disney, Disney thought they were putting, pulling a fast one.

Disney got into this dispute and, uh, and opposing parental rights. That's what it was. That was the Don't Say Gay Bill. That's a parental rights bill. Disney doesn't like that. Disney wants the government teachers to have a free hand

to sexually groom and gaslight your children. It's just that simple. Because they do it all the time with their entertainment. So why wouldn't you do that in school, right? And so as a result of that this reedy creek district which has been there from the very beginning you know when when walt disney built uh disney disney land i think it opened up in 1955 i think it was and um he was um he was upset about the fact that it was so landlocked, you know, he had this small Disneyland and everybody was coming there to see Disneyland, but all the people put restaurants and hotels and everything all around it.

And they were making a lot of money off of that. So he decided that he would do, you know, Disneyland in Florida and they had a lot of shell corporations that went around and they bought up a lot of property. And then after they had a whole bunch of property that was really, that they owned from these shell corporations surreptitiously buying it, they came to the state and they said, give us jurisdiction over all this and we will build it here. And, you know, governments are always wanting something like that built.

And, you know, today he could have gotten them to kick in tens of billions of dollars, I'm sure. And so they gave them jurisdiction over the Reedy Creek area. And they were their own government. They didn't have to worry about any building permits or anything else like that. As a matter of fact, when people get injured in the park, there'd be rumors about what had happened, but there'd be no investigation about it. And, um, you know, they could stand down all that stuff, but when they started and, and I always thought that was an outrage, you know, I liked Disney in the early days, but I always thought that was outrageous that they were given all kinds of special treatment.

I think we ought to have a level playing field for everybody and equal protection of the law. But when that dispute happened, the Florida legislature, under the urging of DeSantis, decided that they were going to take over the government of Reedy Creek. And Disney would no longer be a government to itself. Everybody said, well, what are you going to do? I mean, how are you going to fund this? It was like, well, they'll pay taxes like everybody else for the roads. It's just that they won't decide when and how the roads are going to be built. And which, you know, maybe it'd be better if we could all decide that.

But again, a level playing field for everyone. And so as they were supposed to turn that over at the very last minute, what Disney did was they had a meeting and they took all the power away from the Reedy Creek District and then handed over this empty shell to the state of Florida. Said, here, it's all yours. But according to these rules that we just passed, it has absolutely no power.

And so that really outraged DeSantis and the Republicans. On his remarks on Thursday evening, he outlined that there'd be more immediate actions pending. DeSantis also said the new district he appointed would explore developing property it owns adjacent to Disney property. He also contended that the Florida legislature was prepared to void the development agreement that had been approved by the outgoing board. And they're saying he's looking at hotel taxes and road tolls. I hate road tolls.

I mean, I got one, one time I got stuck on a toll road there. One time I got stuck on a toll road. I want to be on was in Orlando once in the nineties. So I'm not a supporter of toll roads at all. Disney released a statement to media outlets last week stating that, quote, all agreements that were signed between Disney and the district were appropriate.

They were discussed and approved and open. We gave public notice in the newspaper and all the rest of the stuff in compliance with the Florida Sunshine Law. So, you know, they said this is going to be a fight. Well, Florida lawmakers may be taking that on. So it's going to be an escalating fight. And it really is about parental rights. And Disney wants to take that on.

So you have Reason Magazine. The reason I mention that is because Reason Magazine says, what freedom means to Ron DeSantis? There are some jarring contradictions in the Florida governor's pitch to voters, they say. And it's kind of interesting that I think when you come to freedom, I think the one place where he has been open to a lot of criticism is in his selective protection of speech.

And the fact that, you know, I don't know how he's going to come across on this, but we've already had it at the very beginning of his term. He passed some anti-free speech bill that would criminalize anti-Semitism. And now some of the legislators from the predominantly Jewish area are pushing that through to another level. Because you've had some truly anti-Semitic trolls that are putting out flyers and stuff. So they're going to try to make that a felony, a hate crime. And again, I do not support censorship for hateful, racist statements,

for false statements, for anything else. The way that you combat bad speech is with more speech and better speech. Noam Chomsky was always saying that. Don't shut down these people who are pushing against the Holocaust. We want to not lose our free speech. That's the wise approach to all this. And Ron DeSantis did not take that approach.

But they don't criticize him about that in reason. Isn't that interesting? What they criticize him over is statements that he made. He said, freedom is not just about the absence of restrictions. We have to understand that threats to freedom are simply a result of what happens in, not simply a result of what happens in legislatures. Yes, you have to win those fights, but the left is trying to impose its agenda through

a wide range of arteries in our society, including corporate America. This is the problem that reason has. You see, as I've said many times, the problems with the Democrats are they think the government can do no wrong and corporations can do no right. And the problem with the libertarians is just the opposite. They think that corporations can do no wrong. And so that is what Reason Magazine is defending. And this is what blinded

them for the longest time to the real censorship that was going on on social media. You would have Reason Magazine, you'd have John Stossel and others who would say, well, I hate the fact that they shut down my report, and I think it's awful, I think it's reprehensible, but hey, they're a big corporation, they can do whatever they want to, and I support their right to do whatever they want to. It's like, no, you are a human being endowed by your creator with certain inalienable rights. The corporations that are shutting down your free speech are created by government. They are an artificial construct.

They have a government-granted privilege, not God-given rights. And the purpose of government is to protect our God-given rights, and not just from our own government, but to protect our rights to life and liberty that would be taken from us by other individuals. They're supposed to protect us from murderers. And that would include if the murder was going to be done by a corporation, they would still have to protect us. I don't know, maybe Reason wouldn't want them to,

if it was a corporation, protect us from murder. But Planned Parenthood is probably the biggest murder for hire, uh, organization that's out there, you know, bigger than, um, what was it? Not Black Rock, but the other one, um, uh, the, uh, huh? Yeah, nevermind. But anyway, the, um, you know, they talk about these mercenary groups. Uh, there's nobody more mercenary. Nobody's got a bigger body count than Planned Parenthood.

But again, they don't like the fact that he is going to protect Americans from some of the actions of corporate America. And I think that is exactly what is required. That's what our founders believed. They didn't have the kind of corporate construct that we do now. So they said, reason writing about this, said DeSantis talks a lot about freedom, even more about the supposed threats to it.

And again, they could not acknowledge for the longest time that censorship on what Jack Dorsey and others were saying was the digital public square, privately owned, but public square nevertheless. We'd already had a Supreme Court decision in 1946, Marsh v. Alabama. You cannot take away free speech even if the public square is privately owned.

That's the principle. And I agree with that Supreme Court decision. I mean, everything Supreme Court decisions, every Supreme Court decision is not the Constitution. It's not the law just because they have an opinion about it. But in that particular case, they were right. And it governed our approach to things for a very long time. And it should still govern our approach to things.

But they could not understand the idea that the corporations were operating as a deputized state for censorship. Finally, when the Twitter files were released, Reason, Heritage Foundation came along and said, okay, yeah, they were doing what the government wanted to do. We knew that was what was happening. But the reality is, is that even if that wasn't happening, even if they weren't being given orders in the background from the government,

because it was the de facto public square. They should not have been kicking people off. And that was what Section 230 was all about originally, was to say, we're not going to treat you as publishers. We're not going to hold you responsible for what people say. But then as soon as they put that out, they said, you're going to take down who we tell you to take down, right? So they're talking out of both sides of the mouth.

Anyway, DeSantis, they said, says reason portrayed Florida as a place that has been able to withstand the myriad assaults of freedom because he's been willing and eager to deploy the power of the state. Well, the state needs to, going back to the Declaration of Independence, and I agree with it. I disagree with reason. And they are at odds with each other. In the preamble of the

Declaration of Independence, they said, governments are created, we're endowed with these God-given rights, and governments are created to protect those rights. And when the government becomes hostile and destructive of those rights, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or to abolish that government. So a non-functioning government is a government that doesn't protect our rights and liberties. That's the fundamental purpose of government. Government is not there to make the trains run on time or to keep the roads paved or do any other good stuff that's out there. They're not there to run a welfare state.

They're not there to run a warfare state. They're not there to run a warfare state. They're there to protect our rights. Anyway, they said, he went on to say, they quote DeSantis, saying, elected officials who do nothing more than get out of the way are essentially green lighting these institutions to continue their unimpeded march through society.

You see, I thought that was very interesting. It's why I mentioned a couple of times in this program already the march through the institutions. I think it's interesting that DeSantis would understand that, where this march through the institutions is coming from, and that he would throw this out there for the people who are aware of what's going on with a slight variation. And he was saying the institutions are now marching through society.

He's exactly right about that. As a matter of fact, we go back and look at it. I mentioned it earlier. Let's look at this a little bit more detail because it's got a lot of fact we go back and look at it i mentioned it earlier let's look at this a little bit more detail because it's got a lot of connections to the democrats it's got a lot of connections to booty gay and his father and harvard where he trained this whole idea of marching through the institutions um this was something that was put out by rudy deutsch i think is the way he pronounced his name. It was German.

Around 1967, this was his strategy. He called it the Long March Through the Institutions. And he referred to it. Chairman Mao was a hero of his. And part of his military campaign was the Long March of the Army across China and the rest of this stuff. And so what he was saying was, rather than conquering society with a military operation like Mao was going to do, we're going to do it with our long march is going to be through the institutions.

We are going to subvert society by subverting the capitalist domination of society. We will get into the institutions and take them over. And that's what we've seen, haven't we? We've seen all these corporations, whether it's Nike or Disney or anybody, Budweiser, they've all been taken over by the woke mob. The woke mob has gotten these jobs at the top of these corporations because they went through the colleges. The colleges enabled this.

You know, you have the most radical colleges are the quote unquote the best ones. Oh, you want somebody who's a graduate from Harvard or Yale, don't you? Oh, they're the best schools. They're the best at radicalizing people. And so these people, they go through, they get that degree. You know, they, one of their friends at the dorm is a daddy who owns the big corporation that I want to go to work for. And they get hired with this.

Now, the interesting thing about this is that even though this communist in 1967, Rudy Deutsch, even though he did not ever refer to Antonio Gramsci, most people believe that his ideas, his ideas were identical to Antonio Gramsci. Gramsci had as his fundamental revolutionary principle, the war of position. Now, who is Antonio Gramsci?

He was the founder of the Italian Communist Party. And in the early 20th century, the Antifa radicals were coming from Italy and they were the stormtroopers of Gramsci. Now, this is relevant to where we are now because Boudigal's father, who taught college at Notre Dame, his entire life work was about Antonio Gramsci. He made this guy,

the founder of the Italian communist party was the person that booty gaze father focused on with his life's work. And when you look at the, um, the Italian immigrants in the early 20th century and how radical so many of them were, uh, and,

um, Sacco Vanzetti was a key one of those. And so Buttigieg's father got him into Harvard and made sure that his mentor was a guy who changed his name to honor Sacco and Vanzetti. These heroes of the Italian-American communists in the early 20th century. He changed his name to Sackvan. Sacco and Vanzetti.

Went to court to legally change his name to that. It was Sackvan Berkovich. And Sackvan Berkovich is unalterably opposed to our, you know, the 1620s, right? The Mayflower Project, the Puritans, the Christians who came here for religious freedom. He is unalterably opposed to that. He is the antithesis of that. As a matter of fact, he views all of American history through the lens of, it's all a problem, everything that's a problem, whether it's Vietnam

or anything else, it's all a problem of the Puritan Protestant Americans and this whole Mayflower thing. And so he didn't create some phony slavery narrative like 1619 Project. Instead, he went straight after the Mayflower in 1620 and said, those pilgrims, those Christians, that religious freedom, that is the problem with America right there. They are our enemy. That's the guy that Guttigay studied under. That was his mentor at Harvard. And his father, who spent his entire life elevating and studying, pushing this Italian

communist founder, Antonio Gramsci. And Gramsci's war position, all the people who look at it say, it's exactly the same as Rudy Deutsch's long march through the institutions. Deutsch collaborated with Herbert Marcuse. And Marcuse said about the strategy, he said, let me tell you this. I regard your notion of the long march to the institutions as the only effective way. Effective way to what?

The effective way to put communists in charge of our country. So the strategy, the long march to the institutions, was working against established institutions while working within them. Is that not where we are today? But not simply by boring from within. Rather, by doing the job, learning how to program, how to read computers, how to teach at all levels of education, how to use the mass media, how to organize production, how to recognize and eschew planned obsolescence, how to design, etc., etc.

At the same time, preserving one's own consciousness and working with others. The long march includes the concerted effort to build up counter-institutions. And, of course, we saw this in entertainment through the Franklin School coming out of Germany as well. In the middle of the 20th century, these things were, you know,

a lot of part of the 20th century, you had the Italian communists, you had the German communists, very influential in terms of taking over our society. And, you know, this is when DeSantis says that these institutions are marching through society. He's exactly right. The communists marched through the institutions. They took them over from the top. And now the institutions are marching through society and overthrowing society.

I thought that was a very powerful thing that he had to say. And of course, reason just goes, they don't care about that. But wait, he's going to attack a corporation. Yeah, he's going to attack some of these institutions that have been taken over by Marxists that are hell-bent on destroying our country and persecuting Christians as well. That's a part of the Marxism stuff. But it's about leveling everything, leveling our economy, leveling our society, leveling our families, leveling our churches, everything. These people want to destroy everything so they can build their utopia. And they've already taken over the institutions and the institutions are marching through society. That's the takeaway

from all this stuff. And he is spot on about this. He gets it. The reason hasn't got a clue. When we talk about this, parents, we talk about God-given rights. Parents have rights. Parents have been given children by God. Parents have God-given rights as individuals and as parents. Children do not have rights. Children do not have responsibility. Children do not have responsibility. Children do not have judgment. Children are not adults. And that is the essence of what this fight in Florida has been about with Disney and the LGBT and the other Marxists. And this is why I combined them.

You know, it's not just Sodom and Gomorrah. It's Sodom and go Marxist. These Marxists. And this is why I combined them. It's not just Sodom and Gomorrah. It's Sodom and go Marxist. These Marxists have combined with the LGBT. The LGBT at this point are the shock troops for the institutions to march through society. That's the thing we need to focus on. Don't focus on Dylan Mulvaney. Focus on the fact that these institutions taken over by people

revolutionaries who want to destroy our society are now marching through our society and they're using them as shock troops, they're using them to distract you from what they're really doing we will take a quick break and be communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away their most powerful weapons are isolation deception intimidation they desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us it's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide please share the information and links you'll find at the David night show.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,

please keep us in your prayers. The David night show.com. A couple of comments on Rumble and on Rockfin. Joe B. Fash says, I am expecting more trans massacres of Christians because the killer was given sympathy and not vilified. Absolutely. Uh, and, uh, you know, you have to, um, uh, you have to, um, make way for this person and they, there are core values and they are shaping the soul of America. That's what we heard. And they're entitled to vengeance. They're entitled to violence.

They're entitled to have guns. I don't support guns for anybody except the trans, said Stink Uyghur, the young turds. Exactly, said KWD 68. They will never be condemned for their actions, never corrected. Instead of correction, they got attention, which they crave, and support as well. And that is why every institution you can possibly think of from your childhood has been subverted.

Let's talk a little bit about the subversion of our food supply. I should have picked back up on this. I remember when this came out in January, we had Robert Malone and others were talking about what is being done with the vaccines, but it is escalating now. And because it is escalating, you now have the establishment media pushing back on this. USA Today says, fact check. Vaccines given to animals are metabolized before they are used for meat and for milk.

So, no, that's not true. They're flat out lying to you. And we now have a study that shows that. And so, excuse me, USA Today referenced a article from Dr. Malone saying mRNA vaccines are being injected into our food supply. That's not even a theory. That's true. And they don't try to debunk that. Well, they say, well, it's okay.

You know, we can inject it in the food supply, but it'll be metabolized before it gets to you. You know, because you've got to keep getting boosters every 30 days. If you don't give the animal a booster in 30 days, hey, it's fine. It's good. It's golden. Well, that's not the truth either. We know that the mRNA spikes that are produced by that continue to be produced. They're

not being metabolized because they're staying level and increasing. We know that this genetic modification is ongoing, even if people don't get boosters. And we've seen that as well. That's also been reported. So what is, the, what is happening with this? It's the same type of thing we see with geoengineering or with a CBDC. They say, well, you know, it would be possible for us to do this. And, uh, we should have, uh, programs where we study this and we, you know, prepare for it and everything, but we're not doing it. We're not doing it. We're not doing CBDC. Oh no, it's nothing to worry about. We just did a feasibility study. We just had everybody in government prepare for what, one of the four areas that they're going to be responsible for to roll this thing out.

We're not doing CBDC. It's in July. Yes, we're going to put out Fed now, but that's just for the banks to go back and forth with each other. It's not the CBDC coin that you're doing, but you know, Fed coin, we've already got a nameCoin, we've already got a name for it. We've already got a name for it. We've already written the code for it, but we're not rolling it out just yet, so don't panic about this. They're playing that same game with us. They do it for all this stuff,

the global ID, the passports, the CBDC, the geoengineering. Don't worry, we're not doing that. So USA Today says this is false. There is no evidence that the human food supply contains mRNA vaccine. And they quote a guy who was a professor of veterinary medicine at the University of California, Davis. And he told them in an email at USA Today, he said,

Due to federal guidelines, neither milk nor meat can be harvested from animals receiving any kind of vaccine until several weeks after their shots, giving the animals time to fully metabolize the vaccines. Except that that doesn't happen, right? People are not fully metabolizing the vaccines or the spikes continues to go on. And so what he's saying, don't worry, you know, the federal government's got guidelines and regulations to keep this stuff from happening. Are they testing it to see if they have any of this stuff still active? No, no. I'm sure there'll be plenty of time.

If you wait 30 days or 60 days or something, that's no problem. Even USA Today says, well, however, it can be as short as 21 days. So you vaccinate an animal and you harvest the animal within 21 days, I'm sure there's nothing at all to worry about, right? Of course, that's not true. And Peter McCullough, Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, tweeted this out.

He said over the weekend, he said the Chinese have successfully loaded cow's milk with mRNA and it was absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract of the recipients. And he references an article from Trial Site News, where the Chinese loaded up cow's milk with mrna and then they use that to quote unquote immunize mice except of course you know the mrna doesn't immunize anybody but they saw the traces of it when they tested the animal uh and what he says the nation's food supply can be

manipulated a great example is the fortification of cereal grain with folic acid, a synthetic form of folate, which successfully reduced the incidence of neural tube defects, things like spina bifida, for example. But these Chinese scientists, Zhang and his colleagues, have demonstrated that shortened mRNA code of 675 base pairs could be loaded into phospholipid packets called exosomes derived from milk and then use that same milk, feed it to the mice and the mice gastrointestinal tract absorb the exosomes and the mRNA must have made its way into the bloodstream and the lymphatic tissue because antibodies were produced

in mice that were fed this mRNA to produce the spike protein. Now, we know that this is being done because cattlemen and pork associations in several states have confirmed that they are using mRNA now on pigs and cows. So, we don't know the impact of this, right? We do know based on the Chinese study that they've been able to get that into the mice. But, you know, just don't worry about it, says USA Today. Eat your vaccines, your vegetables.

This is Tom Rince's article from about a week ago, April 2nd. He said, look, the NIH has been talking about this for a while. They've published an article even talking about which foods they want to do. I'll give you the list of foods that they have targeted here in just a moment. But he said they're talking about foods under, quote-unquote, under application, which right now they are working on. See, they're working on particular foods to put vaccines in these foods, just like they're working on CBDC.

Oh, yeah, we're working on the application. No, we're not doing that yet. Yet. And to genetically modify them to become edible vaccines. And of course, it's all about genetic modification. I've called these Trump shots genetic code injections for the longest time. So what are we going to call these things? They're not even really vaccines. They're completely different from any traditional vaccines. You know, always in the past, you would give somebody a, um, uh, you know, dead or weakened

pathogen. That's the theory. And then your body would create antibodies for it. But in this particular case, what they're trying to do is turn your body into a manufacturing facility to manufacture a spike protein that in and of itself is a toxin. This is completely different. It's genetic manipulation, and it's forcing your body to create a toxin. A very dangerous thing, the spike protein.

So it's not the same thing. But now they could do it directly, right? We can also modify your food sources to make this, not just your body. The fact that food can be altered is not disputable. They are clearly saying it can be done. The question is, will they do it? And because you've got a bill that's been introduced in Missouri right now, and it's a labeling bill, and it, you're going to have to label the food, tell people it's

just like a, you know, genetic, you know, an organic bill or something like that, you know, non-GMO food. Well, we want to know that you haven't put a vaccine in these foods as well to modify them. It's just because they want to label it like that. Everybody is attacking this Missouri bill. And you've got Republicans along with Democrats. The establishment is trying to shut that bill down in Missouri because if it's done in one state, other states are going to pick it up. It's going to set up a precedent. The mRNA vaccines do not help in any way with anything. And so as Tom Rents says, so ask yourself,

why if it doesn't do anything, uh, and, um, why are we now talking about a new level of genetic engineering with unknown effects? Uh, why are we going to do this again without any long-term studies, without any pandemic that's out there right now? Oh, everybody's die like they everybody died with the the spanish flu or whatever 1918 says trump oh we got to do it we got to do it at warp speed no time to test it we got plenty of time to test it first of all they've been proven not to work so why would you even do it and so um he says well you know just they're going to continue to work and promote a failed product why would they? Well, because they have so much money and because there are other agendas that are at play here. You know, the food and drug administration is now going to become the food with drugs and food administration. That's what it's going to become essentially. And so, um,

before we break in and go to our guest, uh, let me just give you an idea of what they're looking at, putting vaccines into which foods. Coming from the NIH paper, this is the abstract from the paper on the NIH website. In recent years, edible vaccine emerged as a new concept developed by biotechnologists. Edible vaccines are genes that are introduced into the plants, and then the transgenic plant, that's what they call something that's been genetically modified, transgenic, is then induced to manufacture the encoded protein.

Foods under such application include potatoes, bananas, lettuce, corn, soybean, rice, legumes, beans. They're easy to administer, easy to store, readily acceptable delivery system for different age group patients. Yet they are cost effective. Edible vaccines present exciting possibilities. And so the purpose of the rest of the paper entitled edible vaccines is how they would do that and discussing in great length each of these foods i just mentioned potatoes bananas lettuce corn etc we're going to take a quick break and when we come back we are going to be talking to

our guest about ssri stories i think you're going to find it fascinating. This is something that has been a big part. Everybody wants to talk about school shootings. Nobody wants to talk about why this is happening. They want to react with gun control. And yet the SSRI stories include murder and suicide that did not involve a gun. And that's what we should be concerned about. We'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to the David Knight show.

All right. Joining us now is a Julie woods and, and her, the organization is SSRI stories.org. You will find the website at SSRI stories. I said.net, but it is.org. That is where your,

your website is. Thank you for joining us. Thank you. Thank you for joining us. Thank you. Thank you. Tell us a little bit about how you got involved in this. And was it family members that got involved? Because that's what we've seen, people who get involved in exploring what is happening with pharmaceutical damage. Typically, when something happens to a family member. And of course, we're talking

about pharmaceuticals here, the SSRIs or the serotonin reuptake inhibitors, something that they give to people who have depression. Tell us how you got involved in this. I got involved because in 2008, my son died as a result, ultimately, of taking two SSRIs that he was prescribed. At that time, I knew nothing about it. But after his death, my research led me to reading about this whole issue, and I ended up meeting Dr. David Healy, who's a world expert was new in the mid 90s had had a terrible experience herself on prozac which is one of the ssris her name was rosie meisenberg and she collected stories hundreds of stories the mid-90s, and those stories are no longer

available on the internet. So it's kind of a treasure trove that we have those early stories, because journalistic reporting of SSRIs and their impacts has changed dramatically during the intervening years. I got involved because Dr. Healy is now part of an organization that my husband and I started with him, Risk.org, which has grown into TaperMD, MD that's all about safely identifying the use of pharmaceuticals, excuse me, and getting off those that aren't necessary. But Rosie Meisenberg died in, I think it was 2011, and David then, David Healy then asked me if I'd like to take over the site. And I said, yes. And I've been collecting the stories ever since.

Well, I'm very sorry about your loss, loss of your son. There are a wealth of stories on it. How many stories do you have on ssristories.org? Well, we've got well over 7,000. Wow. And they're varied. As you've pointed out, they cover suicides, homicides, but there's other stories too. People whose personality changes and they become thieves when they never, ever did anything bad in their life. There's a range of negative changes that SSRIs can cause.

And we collect the stories that are reported in the press, and we put them up. Now, tell us a little bit about Prozac. You mentioned that. That's probably one of the best-known SSRIs. What are some of the other brand names that it goes under so people know? Well, there's brand names that are different in different countries. Let's talk about America. There's Zoloft. Its common name or its generic name is Sertraline. Prozac is Fluoxetine because these things are now generic.

They're off patent and you'll see those generic names now. There's citalopram, which used to be called Celexa. There's duloxetine. There is Effexor, venlafaxine. There's a number of these things. so it's difficult uh there's so many different names because all these drugs have a brand name they have a generic name as well you know for the the actual substance there uh so so people need to take a look at this and understand whenever a doctor prescribes something for you better do your due diligence to find out what is

involved in this what are people typically describe prescribe these for it's usually for depression is that right or the other things that they do as well oh my goodness that is such a good question and i'm so glad you asked it they started their lives as quote antidepressants and we could all think about what depression really is and what it might be. But what it turns out to mean is that if you're scoring badly on a test, like the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, your doctor can prescribe you an SSRI on the belief that this will somehow improve things. And there's scant, if any, evidence that that's true. However, the uses of these prescribing and partly through just expanding diagnosis.

So they're now prescribed for things like, quote, social anxiety or... And we see this over and over again. This is very similar to what is happening with a lot of the uh transgender counseling of kids at a very very young age you know it's like oh well you know we just have to um uh we got these different um you're you're kind of you're depressed because your test score or you're feeling uncomfortable in your body because you're an adolescent you know you may be in the wrong body uh we need to do some surgery here or something like that. And I'm laughing about it, but it's not a joke,

but they victimize kids like this. And they've been doing this with the SSRIs for a very long time. One of the things that you see in terms of side effects for these SSRIs that were given out as antidepressants, one of the things that they say, well, this may make you depressed. It may cause you to become suicidal. And it's like, oh, wait a minute. And we've seen that over and over again.

I mean, I even hear that on these, you know, ask your doctor commercials that fund all the cable news channels. You know, they'll talk about a condition, then they've got this drug for this particular condition. And if you listen to the side effects that they rattle off very, very quickly, many times that side effect is going to be exactly the thing that you're taking this drug for. It's going to make that absolutely worse.

Plus, it'll give you a lot of other potential things. Tell us a little bit about some of these stories. What has happened to some of the people who have been on antidepressants? Give us a couple of stories. Okay, well, I'll start with one that is a well-known story but it's typical in many ways um we remember the colorado movie shooter james holmes yes oh yeah dr david healy was um an expert witness on that and he reviewed all the records and what happened to James Holmes was that he was prescribed sertraline or Zoloft and his thinking started to change.

He began to get ideas that he'd never previously had that involved violence and shooting people. This is not a common side effect, fortunately. However, between 3% and 5% of people who take these things do experience these these kinds of reactions and we all know what happened and as so often happens when he went to court the horrible nature of the crime overrode the the evidence that it was a drug that was the problem. The natural reaction of judges and juries who were ill-informed about drugs is to just discount their role in terrible crimes. And the taker of the drug shoulders all the blame because the people who prescribed the drugs,

the people who created the drugs and weren't honest about the side effects are not in court, and somebody's got to get punished. Yeah, that's right. So James Holmes was a very high profile and very serious, because of the number of deaths, example of what can happen. But there's lots of sort of ordinary, not well publicized stories that have the same plot line.

And the thing they all have in common is that nobody ever looks at the drug and what its role might have been. That's right. Yeah. Before you even started talking about that, the fact that it's always ignored. One of our listeners made that very point, said every time the psychological drugs are ignored in every shooting, a leading common factor, and yet they don't want to talk about that. And the shooting that we just had

with the transgender student attacking the Christian school, killing the six people in Nashville, he was being treated or she was being treated for by, you know, on the care of a psychologist. I looked at that and thought, well, you know, possibly that's involved there as well. And so there is a common factor here that we see happening with this. And you're the person who founded this. You're pointing out Rosie Meisenberg, her story. She was given Prozac to help her quit smoking.

What happened to her when they gave her Prozac to quit smoking? What happened to Rosie was that after a very short time, she started to develop the idea that she wanted to kill herself. And that is a not uncommon reaction. Between 3% and 10% of people have that reaction. And she started to talk to her very sensible husband, Jean about the benefits of them jointly committing suicide. Wow.

And Jean recognizing what the problem probably was because the only thing that was different in Rosie's life was this drug. He marched her back to the prescriber, I don't remember the doctor, and said, guess what? I want my wife off this. This is a problem. And Rosie remembered her thoughts while she was taking Prozac even after she quit taking it wow and it alarmed her so much that she dedicated a good part of her life to trying to show people through other examples what these drugs can do yeah Yeah. Yeah. It is amazing. And,

um, you know, when, when you look at getting off of it, because a lot of people have, you're, you're talking about really strange psychological effects that people have, but a lot of times people have physiological effects and they will understand that that is the pill that they're taking.

And, uh, so they will change their medication themselves. Maybe they'll stop taking it. Maybe they'll take less of it or something like that. What happens then when they do that? Well, it depends how long you've been on it. And there is a range of reactions.

But Dr. Healy was among the first to lobby hard that the message that the drug companies were given that there was no withdrawal, serious withdrawal effects, was wrong. That some people experienced terrible withdrawal effects. One that he emphasizes because he believes that if people knew they would never start on these drugs, is that going on the drugs causes 50% of people to have serious sexual dysfunction. And that doesn't necessarily go away when you stop taking it, the pill. There were others, some people who were prescribed the drug for menopausal hot flashes. That's one that is a really odd off-label prescription and yet now it's been approved by the fda wow when people try to stop taking it they can't sleep they get terrible agitation they have headaches they feel unwell these are all withdrawal effects and and uh some people

um it really sends them over the edge uh just by changing that medication if they've been on it for a long time i would liken it to and i've mentioned this before it's kind of like um when you're scuba diving and um you know you go down and if you stay down long enough at a particular depth the nitrogen starts to dissolve into your bloodstream and if you come up too quickly off of it it bubbles out and it gives you the bends and it can kill you and and so i would say that you know because these withdrawal symptoms are so severe physiologically psychologically especially that is something to be very aware of. If you or your loved ones are on this SSRI stuff, you got to come off of it very, very

slowly. It's very difficult to get off of it because the, uh, the withdrawal symptoms can be fatal to you and to other people, you know, again, the murder suicide. Uh, but talk a little bit about that. We've had a lot of cases, some of them where people nearly committed a mass murder, suicide type of thing, but they caught it just in time and it was all triggered by the SSRI and the changing of the medication. By the withdrawal. Yeah. Absolutely. And there's a few studies of the effects of SSRIs that badly understate the negative impacts of them because they don't look at the withdrawal period. And so they fail to realize that withdrawing from the drugs can cause the very things that the drugs were taken in the first place to prevent. That's not just SSRIs either.

That's also true of so-called antipsychotics, which can definitely cause psychosis, both while you're taking them and in withdrawal. And it's especially unfortunate because everyone, including the prescribing doctors, tends to say, oh, it's relapse. The person killed his neighbor because he was depressed. common is this really low threshold tolerance for any kind of irritation or inconvenience. It's as if people become three or four times as angry or more than they would have had they never had the drugs, and they'll way overreact to things. Wow. You see that in many stories. It is amazing, isn't it, how they can affect us at such a deep level and affect our mind

and how ubiquitous it's become. And of course, everybody has a different reaction to different drugs. And so they always come back and say, oh, it's rare. You know, we hear that all the time. But because as one listener says, drug companies sponsor everything, they own the media and they have the studies that can prove their goodwill. And of course, they fund the studies. And I've seen this over and over again.

I've seen studies, essentially three drug companies with three different drugs to treat the same condition and they all three run uh studies showing running all three drugs and guess what the winning drug is always the uh from each individual study the winning drug is the drug that's produced by the company that funded that particular study you know what a coincidence isn't it yeah it is a coincidence. Yeah, tell us some more studies. I remember there was one last, it was years ago.

I talked to SSRI Net. I don't know if I spoke to you or if it was somebody else, but we were talking about a study, an incident rather, of one young man who took a rifle to his school classroom and stood in front of the classroom, and he was pointing it at the classroom and then pointing it at himself and pointing it at the classroom.

Finally got the rifle away from him. He didn't shoot himself or anybody in the class. And after he came off of this hallucinatory incident, he had absolutely no recollection of what he had done, but it was just changing his medication triggered that. There's other stories like that as well, right? Very many stories, and

there's some drug combinations that will almost predictably give you that problem. Zolpidem and any SSRI can have terrible effects. And it seems, and I don't pretend to understand this,

but there are a lot of studies, or there's some studies, not that many. What was that drug again? We need to let people know what that is. What was that? Zolpidem. Zolpidem. Zolpidem. Okay.

Yes. Ambien is one of its brand names oh okay all right um and it seems to cause semi-sleep states in some people so that they're not really asleep or awake they appear to be awake um but they're not. And that combined with the SSRI, for whatever reason, there are a number of cases teachers accused of sexual liaisons with male students and SSRIs were often mentioned as a part of that. out before, they typically don't want to talk about the influence of drugs and the commission of these crimes, which I find kind of interesting because they're so big on the war on drugs, but not on the war on drugs made by pharmaceutical companies. There's no war on those drugs. You're not even allowed to look at those drugs, right? That's right.

But, you know, everything else, oh, that's reefer madness time. But when it comes to something like this, like SSRI, for decades it's been harming people. I don't see anything. There's nothing to see here. Move when it comes to something like this, like SSRI, for decades it's been harming people. I don't see anything. There's nothing to see here. Move along. There's nothing to see. And so when we look at this and we look at a crime that's been committed, especially a heinous crime, people want to punish the person who's done it.

And in many cases, nobody wants to talk about anything other than their own responsibility for this because they want the person to be punished. And of course, um, you know, it is, uh, it is the pharmaceutical industry that is really the instigator in this, in terms of if this is the drug that had triggered an incident or something like that. And nobody wants to talk about the pharmaceutical industries being complicit or partner in a crime about something. So that is one of the reasons why they have completely shut this down. But talk about some of these other things besides the shootings as well that we see. Well, I will. That's great.

But I'd like to make the point because what you're saying is so important. I think it's really important to understand how these things work. What do SSRIs do? Do they make you happy? Well, no. What they do is they suppress frontal lobe functions so that the area of your brain that looks after conscience, empathy, fear, all the kind of the social feelings that we have are disrupted. And studies show that what these drugs do is they make you not care.

That's really not the same thing as making you happy. And in fact, if you look, there's a series of three films done years and years ago called Who Cares in Sweden, and they're in English, and they examine exactly that. What do these SSRIs do? And now that the use of SSRIs has increased 3,000-fold between 2001 and 2018, we've got a percent of the population on drugs that makes them not care. Yeah. Yeah. That might be an issue, people. Oh, yeah. Absolutely.

I mean, in a sense, you're talking about it coming after your conscience and your empathy and other things like that. It's like doing a selective chemical lobotomy of people. Yes. Just severing these human instincts and severing their judgment as well. I have a listener here who said that he'd taken SSRIs. He said, my girlfriend at the time told me I called her crying and all kinds of stuff, and I had no memory of it whatsoever.

He said it was very frightening. He said, I think the difference is that I had family praying for me. It truly is amazing to see the effect of these drugs and to see how long they have been allowed to be used and how everybody has covered up for it. Truly is amazing. It is amazing. And you raised the question of a recent situation that may well have involved drugs.

But what has been so interesting, David, is the evolution of journalistic coverage. I cannot find anymore, or very rarely, any mention that people are on SSRIs. Back when Rosie started to collect stories, Prozac and the other SSRIs were referred to as, quote, controversial drugs, drugs with known problems um people were referred to in the articles as victims of the drugs but not anymore that's sort of gone away little by little and now it's as if the drugs aren't relevant nobody even sees that they might be playing a role so they never are mentioned as the use of it has gone up by 3 000 the reporting of it has gone to zero that's kind of interesting and we see that over and over again again it just shows the power of the unbelievable wealth of these pharmaceutical companies and how they control the media. Actually, it may have gone up more.

That was up to before the pandemic. And then it seems without direct numbers that people are saying that it went up even again in the pandemic. Oh, I would imagine so because we were being told, people being locked down, scared to death about what was going on. You know that people are going to be looking for something to try to medicate that away. And as you pointed out, this is not a drug that makes people happy.

It's an antidepressant, but it doesn't make you happy. What it does is it just shuts off certain parts of your brain and makes you very dangerous to yourself and to other people. It's absolutely crazy that we allow this type of stuff to happen. But again, it is still there, and this is still happening, even though these things have been around for a long time, and I guess they're now generic drugs, and they're still making money off of it, but not nearly as much as they did at the beginning, but they're generics now, I guess.

Are they? But what interests me is that as a society, we used to know things that we don't know anymore. And something you said at the beginning of the program reminded me of this, that we used to understand that adolescents are moody. We used to understand that, you know, it's okay to feel sad when your spouse dies. We used to understand that, you know, sometimes you're going to worry if you've got financial problems and you might lose your house or, you know, there's something bad going on in your life that you can't control or you don't know what you're going to do. You're going to worry. And you know what?

That may be a good thing. That may be that we're hardwired to have those reactions for a good reason. And these drugs block those reactions. And somehow now we've come to believe that that's a good thing. I don't know exactly how it happened. I know it's some kind of marketing. It's hard to exactly put your finger on, but whatever happened to common sense and knowing that people have ups and downs? And that's especially true of young children. I remember when, and one of the people here said that his brother was on Ritalin. I remember when our kids were young and one of the reasons that really, one of the things that really galvanized us, we had other reasons for homeschooling,

but the thing that really galvanized us, especially one of them was Ritalin and how they were giving that away to all the young boys. I said, you know, you have to have a situation where if you've got a behavioral problem, you've got to learn how to deal with it, not to medicate it away. But that's the approach that our society takes. Any kind of a problem, you have a problem with adolescence, as you pointed out, or you've got a financial problem, or you've got a spouse has died or something, oh, let's medicate over this. No, you have to deal with your problems instead of trying to cover them up with pharmaceutical stuff, because the pharmaceutical stuff is very dangerous. It comes with a lot of strings attached, physical and mental. Give us another example of someone who, one of the SSRS stories, as you point out, there's

7,000 of them. Give us another example. Well, I'll give you a couple more themes that I think, I'll mention one that I don't bother posting the stories. I think I posted three, but there's so many thousands and they're all the same story that there's really no point. And that is that a husband or a wife or a girlfriend or a boyfriend will go to their psychiatrist and be prescribed an SSRI and they become and they're very satisfied with their treatment, but the family, the spouse, let's say, is often devastated at the personality change of their partner who no longer cares, who no longer has any interest in them,

who's become selfish, who spends the family money on themselves. That's a story that happens over and over and over, and there's whole chat rooms dedicated to it. Why don't we officially acknowledge this? I don't know. Another one is that people will start gambling, and that's such an odd thing. Once their normal feelings of excitement from regular, just ordinary events, you know, you feel pleasure in thinking of having lunch with a friend.

You look forward to the weekend because you're going to go somewhere. For those of us not on drugs, that's enough. That's fine. This is what makes our lives go round. But if you've had all your feelings flattened, you have to thrill seek or you have to, your threshold for getting some excitement goes way up and you may need to gamble just to feel anything. Yeah, yeah. Kind of like the hurt blocker. This could have terrible consequences for you financially.

We have a number of stories on the site. I can't even remember the names, but it's quite common where people start stealing from their employer. These are people who've been honest employees for decades because they start gambling. Because they're on after they start on SSRIs. It's amazing. I got a comment here from a listener said, doctor told my ex-husband, Zoloft was a happy pill. And he didn't talk to me for three years. That's why he's my ex now. It's just,

you know, breaking up marriages, but you know, also murder, suicide, completely altering somebody's personality. One person here says doctors don't know anything about these drugs either. They're just pushed to sell them. And I think that a lot of that is, is there as well. Doctors don't really look at or really even care about the adverse effects of these things and don't advise people about it. It's a long, long list, but any of us who've been prescribed something by a doctor, we never had the long disclaimer read to us like they do at the end of the commercials and wrap it. Doctors would not have time for that, I think, because they can't talk that fast. But that's the other part doctors are busy people and drug reps that offer them the drugs um in their free little packs um

never mention the the less common side effects and the people who come back to the doctor are the ones who aren't going to are are not out shooting people. David Healy points out that about 50% of people who are prescribed SSRIs by their doctor just go away, take them a couple of days and hate them and never take them again. But those guys don't go back to their doctor so the doctor doesn't hear. People don't go back to their doctor and go,

these are awful, I'm not taking them. They just don't do that. They just quietly go go away and there's a lot of herd mentality about all that stuff as well you know it's not as you mentioned it's the reps who are encouraging them and incentivizing us why we had the opioid epidemic you know it's a pharmaceutical drug reps encouraging the doctors to do it and the doctors was like well everybody's doing it this is standard practice and the safest thing to do is to do standard practice, right? I don't want to go off on the radical fringe here. Most doctors don't want to look at it.

They don't really look at what they're doing. And patients as well. Yeah. You know, you talked about the drug ads. In Canada, we see ads from the U.S. And in the U.S., they definitely see ads from the U.S. where they look at the happy Zoloft rock and you know these ads that involve beautiful people having exciting wonderful lives on screen

and the message is these things can only make improvements so patients take responsibility and they'll go to a doctor and say I I'd like Zoloft or I want to know if Zoloft is right for me. And if the doctor says, listen, I'm concerned. I think you should just wait a while. I don't think it's going to be helpful for you. That person may well just discount the doctor and trot off to someone else. So it's people's expectations have changed as well. Yeah. That's the, that's the real damage of these ask your doctor things that as long, along with the fact that, um, it has worked so well. I mean, the pharmaceutical companies would not be running these ask your doctor ads

if they didn't work. And, uh, they were allowed to do that. What was it early nineties or something when that happened? And, uh, I remember we, we didn't have a a tv uh that uh got broadcast we just would rent movies and we would watch the movies that's all we used television for at the time and i remember we were on vacation we stopped at a hotel and we turned on the the tv and it was just one commercial after the other so i've never seen anything like this before what's going on with this you know it was really strange uh because we hadn't watched for a couple of years and it had really taken off and it's been very profitable for them. And I think that's one of the key things that has driven patients to do this, but it's also driven their control of the news media.

Because they're all brought to you by Pfizer or they're brought to you by Johnson & Johnson or whatever. They have become the, they've essentially bought the media through these ask your doctor commercials. And they're very, very dangerous. As you point out, if you ask your doctor and he's like, well, you know, I understand, but I've had some bad issues with, just go to another doctor because you saw that commercial. That's right. And just back to something you said earlier, which I think is really important. So I just like to spontaneously interject that,

you know, we talked about courtrooms and how we want to punish the perpetrators. GSK, for example, other drug companies too, have been fined billions for fraudulent misrepresentation of their drugs. And Dr. Healy has been involved in a number of those cases. But no pharmaceutical executive has ever gone to jail. Yes. These fines are not punishing anybody. They're sort of a cost of doing business to the drug companies.

So we don't, even as a society, have an effective deterrent to the things you're describing. That's right. Even when you catch them red-handed with the opioid stuff, right? You have the Sackler family and you have Johnson & Johnson that made this stuff for the Sackler family, and both of them were treated with kid gloves. They were able to go in and negotiate a settlement with state attorneys general, um, all over the country. And, um, you know, if, if it had been, I've made these, the comparison many times to El Chapo, right? What'd they do when they got El Chapo? Uh, they took everything he had under civil asset forfeiture, but these guys, uh, they're able to come to the table and negotiate

this stuff. And then after they negotiated a settlement, the government comes back and says, oh, yeah, we didn't realize they had this. They took us to the cleaners on this thing. And so they negotiate from a position of strength, from control. They're not treated the same as the war on drugs drug dealers. They get a special treatment. There really isn't any way that you can shut these guys down.

They really do own the government. It truly is amazing. I mean, you look at the revolving door between pharmaceutical companies and the FDA who should be doing this. I remember when they were rolling out the warp speed vaccines and you had Children's Health Defense said, hey, you're encapsulating these things in polyethylene glycol, and that's going to cause anaphylactic shock with a lot of people. And they contacted the FDA, and the FDA said, we don't care. Contact Pfizer. Well, of course Pfizer didn't care because they didn't have any liability. They were given a complete wash of any of this stuff.

So the government agencies that are supposed to be in an oversight position have been completely captured by them, and they've become their co-marketers, and they've become pushers of their drugs rather than looking at anything that they do. That has become, that is across the board. But I wanted to draw people's attention to the SSRI issues because, as you point out, it's never discussed. I think one of the issues with it is that, from a reporting standpoint, the doctors won't talk about what their patients are taking. And you might hear that from the family, while they were under doctor's care, they don't follow

up and ask them, you know, what drugs were they taking? And, you know, that information, they may not even talk about that. But sometimes they'll say, well, you know, it's not our fault. We had him under psychiatric care or something like that. Typically, that's where these SSRAs are coming from. That's right. And I think in the worst cases where there's murders and suicides, and Dr. Healy always points out that, remember you talked about the case where the boy was pointing the rifle at himself and then at someone else.

It's the same phenomenon. The drug causes such thought distortion that this urge, it's a suicidal urge, but it can be turned on other people. And this is where you see moms, um, killing their children and themselves because their, their thinking has become so distorted that they get really strange ideas that, that they're all going to be better off if they leave the earth.

Yes. Um, yes. And when we see that many times, mothers killing the kids and typically they're not using guns. They're using other means. And that's the key thing. You know, we need to understand that, you know, the gun is just a tool.

There's many different ways you can drive your kids into the, you know, jump off a bridge with your kids in your arms or something like that, or drive them into the water, you know, with you and that type of things. And we see that type of thing happening over and over again. And again, nobody wants to go back and take a look at this, this drug that's being prescribed for all different types of things. It's metastasizing into all different kinds of off-label uses now as well. Well, that's right and in the case of moms it often starts with people um confusing normal um postpartum um emotional instability with a need for continuing ssri use and now they're trying to back it up into pregnancy. And it's not the moms who had a few crying spells and had somebody there to help them who do these things. It's the people on the drugs who weren't getting what they actually needed, which is somebody to help them because they're getting up in the middle of the night.

And that really throws them off. You know, it is interesting. It is somebody to help them because they're getting up in the middle of the night and that really throws them off. You know, it is interesting. It is amazing to see this. And we look at the massive amounts of money, the tens of hundreds of billions of dollars that are out there in the marketing that goes through all of the Ask Your Doctor commercials. And then on the other side, there are places like this website, SSRIstories.org, where you are all doing this on a volunteer basis. There's no commercials there.

You're not selling anything. Oh, no, we don't allow it. Yeah, you're there because you've had family members who have been injured and hurt by this, and you're trying to stop this thing. I mean, it really is a David and Goliath effort here. I really do appreciate you doing that. It is such a heartbreaking situation that we have here.

And there's so much for us to learn about this. And yet it just seems to continue to get worse with the pharmaceutical companies having even more control with even more mechanisms as every year passes by. So it really is an uphill battle to try to educate people. But thank you so much for what you do and what you do on a voluntary basis. Thank you. Appreciate that. Well, thank you. This program will definitely help.

Well, thank you. Do you have, do you take contributions or anything like that there to help with that? Is there something that's there for that you don't take out? No, we put everything that we have into Database America's Limited for Taper, which is a company that has built software to taper people off all kinds of drugs. So, anyway, thank you very much for having me on. Well, thank you for what you do, and may God bless you in that. We'll be right back, folks. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

All right, welcome back. I didn't want to interrupt her during the interview, but I do want to get to some of your comments, very good comments, some of the older comments we had even before she joined us. Tommy Dogg says 13% of the population takes SSRIs, including 20% of women. And again, it's metastasizing out to all of these off-label uses. They freak out about ivermectin. Oh, that's horse medicine, y'all, or that's for river fever parasites.

We use off-label medication all the time. People look at a drug and, you know, hey, it was tested for safety and for efficacy for this other condition. But guess what? You've gone through the safety testing. Why can't we look to see if it's going to be effective with this? Oh, no, not for ivermectin. We're not going to do that. Any of the stuff during the pandemic, MacGuffin.

KWD68 said there's a lot of children being controlled with drugs. They don't need parents. Just take your pill again. This is, uh, the same type of thing. And it's very similar to what they're doing with the transgender stuff. You know, finding kids who are vulnerable kids who have peer pressure, kids who have pressures of growing up and the pressures of school and all the rest of this stuff, and then victimizing them and pushing these horrible drugs, surgeries, and other things, whether it's hormone or SSRIs. Lone Unknown says, SSRIs are political pills. They actually do or cause the opposite of what they're labeled as

or said to affect. And we see that all the time in their commercials, as I said. SSRIs are antidepressants, very telling that their use has increased about half a percent every five years. Unhappy with life? Well, take this pill and they'll all be better. And of course, they don't make you feel happy. They don't get rid of your depression either, as most of this stuff is, right? It does not address what is it supposed to occur. It gives you a lot of other problems. Antidepressants cause depression.

Insomnia pills. Well, you get worse sleep. Anti-suicide pills. Well, we won't even get onto that. He says drug companies sponsor everything. They own the media. They have the studies to prove their goodwill. I mentioned that one before.

The Sears catalog sold Tommy guns 80 years ago. No mass shooters. Families were intact. The nation was with god and not under the grips of insanity and pharmaceuticals and the pharmakia you know it is interesting there was um uh you know we're seeing more about well we had the ancient cultures they they took these hallucinogenic drugs yeah it was a big part of religious practices. It's one of the reasons why the term pharmakia is there as, you know, we get pharmaceutical from the Greek word pharmakia.

That word in the Greek New Testament was frequently translated as sorcery because they understood these hallucinogenic drugs are part of a pagan religious ceremony. But just look at what it's doing. I mean, is that a satanic thing that could sever your compassion and your judgment and essentially do a chemical lobotomy on you? It's just amazing. So one person's talking about the Aurora, Colorado shooter, James Holmes, visibly drugged up, noticeably mood and or behavior altered during his stage show of a trial. I absolutely agree. I think that he was, um, you know, manipulated and all that. He might've been the fall guy for all of that, for all we know. Uh, but when you look at him, uh, it was absolutely amazing. This was a guy,

as I'd pointed out before, when we talked about that that, he was, at the time when it happened, this was a guy who had won very impressive national scholarships just about six months before that. And he was studying psychiatry. And he may very well have been susceptible to taking some kind of a drug. Don't know what happened, but this guy goes from a national scholar to the zoned out Joker character that you saw at the trial. Truly was amazing.

And he even says, you know, my house is wired. You know, he's clearly out of his mind whether they were controlling him or not. I thought they always thought that the timing of that was suspicious because that happened just as they were trying to push through the UN Arms Trade Treaty, which was a, the stated purpose of that was to make sure that arms, small arms, you know, like pistols and rifles and things like that, were not going to be transited across the border. And that's one of the reasons why we had the gunwalking program under George W. Bush and why under Barack Obama, it became the Fast and Furious program.

And that blew up in their face when a federal law enforcement person was killed in that. And even the New York Times said this was a false flag in order to push this agenda. And yet they wanted to push that agenda. They wanted to get that UN arms trade treaty through. And it was just, that all happened in Aurora, Colorado. I mean, that thing was dead in the water. And then a week before this is supposed to happen at the UN, the UN arms trade treaty, you had the Aurora, Colorado shooting, and they tried to use that to resuscitate this dead bill. And I was there in New York at the UN reporting on it when it happened. I remember it very well. And I said at the time, you know, I think there's a connection between those things as well. But when you look at these stories, and again, these murder-suicides,

these broken relationships, these ruined lives, they don't always involve the gun. And even when they do involve the gun, you don't always hear about it if nobody is shot with it. Nobody ever heard about that story about the kid that stood in front of the class and pointed the gun at himself and his classmates. You typically don't hear about that kind of stuff unless somebody is killed. And then when somebody is killed, they won't go back and look at any connection with that. James Saunders says, it's a brave new world. Take your Soma. That is what it is. It is amazing, isn't it?

You know, the Ritalin, the antidepressants and your puberty blockers and all the rest of this stuff while we push every kind of sexual perversion on the kids in the schools. I mean, it's actually beyond Brave New World. Handy, EMS technician. She said, if I learned anything from 2020, it's that graduating medical school does not make you a smart person. It makes you part of the system. And again, when you look at it, the pharmakia, the love of money, being the root of all evil, it truly is amazing.

Another person said, I'd been on there for years after serving in the military. I almost took my life without knowing it, and that was enough. Yeah. People don't realize. Sometimes the people taking it don't realize it's other family members, as one person said. And as Joe Beef Hash says, and pray. God knows you want to depend on him and not on those nasty things. Do it very slowly, like they're saying.

You may even get extremely emotional that's the key thing you know anything that controls you enslaves you and christ is able to break that control i've seen it so many times whether the control is sex or alcohol or gambling or drugs whether they're um you know the drugs that the government says they don't like or the drugs that the government says that they like. Any of those things can enslave you. And the real power that we have is prayer and Christ to break that. And it's happened in people's lives over and over again. Let's talk a little bit about what is going on with the Second Amendment, by the way, since we're talking about this. Regulators have told banks to stop doing business with the NRA

or else. We're back to choke point, Operation Choke Point 1.0, right? That was originally about guns. Now they got Operation Choke Point 2.0 to come after crypto. Sean Rays, the Attorney General of the state of Utah, has joined 18 other attorneys general calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in order to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the National Rifle Association against a former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services, Maria Vulo, who told financial institutions to stop doing business with the NRA, quote, or else. Now, what has happened is the Second Circuit has dismissed this lawsuit brought by the

NRA, and these 18 state attorneys general are asking the supreme court to reverse that and to hear this case and it is what we have seen over and over again and as they say in their brief if the second circuit court's decision is left standing it's not difficult to imagine government officials employing similar tactics to stifle disfavored speakers whether the method of choice is to target financial institutions that advocacy groups depend on, or to engage in fulsome political advocacy or simply to target private organizations that host events for such groups.

Where will such official bullying end? Well, we know that they're trying to, that's the whole point of CBDC, is to make sure that they can do this to everyone over any issue, you know, whether you oppose their climate agenda or their pandemic claims or their vaccines or their SSRIs, any of that. When you look at these 18 states, it stood out to me that they're Republican-controlled states, but it doesn't have in there Tennessee, Texas, or Florida.

And I thought that was kind of interesting. An assault weapons ban has passed in the Washington State Senate, and the governor is going to sign it. And again, let's not call it a ban. Let's call it prohibition because we know that prohibition doesn't work. Alcohol prohibition, we know that prohibition can be ended, right?

And we need to think about how we're going to stop this. Again, the bill makes it illegal to sell, transfer, distribute, manufacture, or import a long list of prohibited firearms. Let's use the right terms. Anything, broad categories, such as the AK-47 or the AR-15 in all of its forms, and that lists dozens of specific product lines,

like the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 or the Bushmaster XM-15. And they are not the only state to have done this. And it carries pretty heavy fines. They call it a gross misdemeanor to have the gun and 365 days in jail, one day short of a year and up to $5,000 in a fine. Washington is now the 10th state to impose a so-called assault weapons ban, prohibition. Joining California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York,

along with the District of Columbia, the usual suspects who are against freedom. Now, the Biden administration is asking the Supreme Court to restore the bump stock prohibition. And this is, so going back, it's interesting in this Epoch Times article, they don't want to mention Trump's name anywhere in here. It's Biden's bump stock ban now, right? No, it was Trump who set a precedent. You know, the Department of Justice is under him. It's Biden's bump stock ban now, right? No, it was Trump who set a precedent. You know, the department of justice is under him. It's under the president. And, uh, but even that's not just

that this was something that the department of justice came up with. No, this is something that Trump proudly pushed and instigated and bragged about. And so give him the credit that he wants, give him the credit for the vaccines that he wants. Give him the credit for the vaccines that he wants. Give him the credit for gun control, gun prohibition by executive order. That's what he wants. Give it to him. And by the way, this is a lawsuit that was brought by Michael Cargill, owner of Central Texas Gun Works there in Austin. A good guy. I know him. He's interviewed him several times, and we bought guns from him there. He doesn't sell bump stocks. I mean, he sells real guns.

But he understands the danger of this. And so the Supreme Court ruled against it, and so the Department of Justice is trying to get that pulled back. They said this threatens significant harm to public safety, said the Department of Justice. Like other machine guns, rifles modified with bump stocks are exceedingly dangerous. But it's not as dangerous as a government that is lawless. No gun is as dangerous as a government that not only makes up its rules as it goes along, they become a dictatorship. Not only do they violate the Constitution,

they don't even bother to go through a legislative process to violate the Constitution anymore. There is no constitutional authority for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, and there certainly isn't any authority for them to even infringe. They're specifically prohibited. So you have a government organization, which the Tenth Amendment specifically prohibits, and they decide that they are going to unilaterally get rid of this stuff, even though they are specifically told they may not do so.

That is really where we are right now. And that is why, you know, the actions of Donald Trump, and of course, that happened in 2019 and then rapid succession. He worked to destroy the rest of what was happening in our country. Let's talk a little bit about the free speech issue here. I didn't get to this yesterday. It happened over the weekend. Elon Musk has gone to war with sub stack and what he has done in terms of what the censorship of sub stack. And I've seen this mentioned many times. He says, well, I'm not censoring it. Well, he's doing the

same thing that he does to bit shoot. And, and that started the, the attack on BitChute began before he took over Twitter, but it has continued. And this is why I stand by what I put up on Twitter. I was absolutely amazed that Matt Drudge picked up my tweet and put it up for a couple of days on the Drudge drug report where I said, nothing has fundamentally changed. I think if anything, it's worse than it was under, um, you know, before Elon Musk took over because before he took over, you could link to Substack. Now you can't, and I'm still shadow banned and you still have these same, um, you know, fear tactics, lies, and disinformation about bit shoot. They say, don't, don't follow this link. If I put a bit shoot link up there, they said, don't follow this link. This is a dangerous site.

Oh, I'm going to get a virus. No, you're going to hear some dangerous information because it's not sensitive at bit shoot and they've done that for the longest time. Now that same approach is being done with sub stack. Why? Uh, ostensibly not because he's taking orders from the government, although they're doing that as well. Uh, you just had, uh, a, uh, one individual, uh, we're going to get to

this in a minute who, who had their tweet banned everywhere, everywhere in the world. So even if you've got a VPN that shows somewhere, you still can't see what that person is saying because that's coming from the government. So he's more than willing to censor for governments. But what you will typically read is some actions on this tweet have been disabled by Twitter. That's what it'll say. Or if you try to comment on the tweet, you get a message that reads, quote, something went wrong, but don't fret.

Let's give it another shot. Now, I never saw that before Musk came in. This is why I stand by my statement. It says bad or worse for me. There's been some high profile people that have been returned. And I said, it's nothing but a beard. This guy is a technocrat. He's the king of technocrats.

He's the king of crony capitalism. He became the world's richest man by doing everything that the globalist wanted to do. He sold their green agenda. He sold their self-driving car illusion and all the rest of this stuff. That's how he became the richest. He works for the military industrial complex. The people came up with the internet and the censorship control mechanism. And so I never saw this before, but I'm seeing this a lot now. As a matter of fact, I saw it just yesterday. Earlier in the show, I talked about the fact that both the Children's Health Defense Fund and the New York Times came after crypto mining on the same day,

talking about how we're all going to die from climate change because there's cryptocurrency out there now. And so the New York Times article, I happened to see that, and I wanted to respond to it, and it was very interesting because I did my tweet, I got this message, something went wrong, but don't fret, let's give it another shot. Every time I would try to do that, I got out of Twitter, restarted it, came back, still had the same problem.

It would not allow me to retweet that New York times article with comment. I could, I could, uh, so then I tried doing it as a comment under the article and that did work, which is really kind of strange. And they say with sub stack many times it's the other way around. I mean, it's Twitter is still a tool for censorship and control of speech.

Just that simple. Uh, so the New York times story was the digital race for Bitcoin or the real cost of the digital race for Bitcoin. And they had a picture of a city with smog all over it. Yeah, Bitcoin is going to create smog. Give me a break. So those types of games are being played now on Twitter. Great smog. Give me a break. So, um, the, uh, so those types of games are being played now on Twitter.

Um, I said, we're disappointed that Twitter has chosen to restrict writers ability said sub stack, uh, to share their work. Writers deserve the freedom to share links to sub stack or anywhere else. Now,

what is interesting is Matt Taibbi, who is the real deal? Uh, he was part of the Twitter file release talking about how you brought the receipts of how the government was manipulating things. And he has now said, well, since sharing links to my articles

is the prime reason that I come to this platform, I was already alarmed and I asked what was going on and I was given the option of posting articles on Twitter instead. So I'm obviously staying on Substack and I'll be moving to Substack Notes next week. So part of this is the idea that Elon Musk, Substack, is adding a short form thing called Notes. And evidently, Elon Musk is thinking about adding a longer form thing for articles. I will be going to Substack, basically.

I need to do more with Substack. And I appreciate Angry Tiger helping us get that article up last week. I'm going to be doing more with Substack. I'm not interested in Elon Musk's little walled garden. I don't know what he could do with it. Thank you for listening. The Common Man.

They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.