The David Knight Show - 11Jan23 How & Who Invented Wuhan Origin Story; The Depopulation Mechanism of the Bioweapon TrumpShots

Episode Date: January 11, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESWhat’s going on with Coinbase. 2:07Ellen Degenerate says California rains are from an angry "Mother Earth". No, she got God's gender and location wrong. 6:03Houston DA (funded by Soros) goes after man in Houston who defended restaurant patrons from armed robbery. Here's the law in TX and the (dead) robber's rap sheet. 12:45Arkansas bill would classify drag shows as adult-oriented business and add restrictions about children and locations. 14:47OUTRAGEOUS: At the wide open US-Mexico border, American citizens are being detained, fined $5,000 or having their car confiscated for going through the WRONG LANE at the checkpoint 18:44Biden scheme to target Christian schools who take Caesar's coin. 26:14Public Schools losing students as Homeschooling is Skyrocketing. 36:54Who Started the Wuhan STORY? Forget about the virus, what's the origin of the NARRATIVE? What organizations and countries pushed the lockdown/WarpSpeed/ID "problem/solution"? DailySkeptic.org has info on the origin and spread of the narrative, but I disagree with their conclusions about motives 45:35Pentagon, says FOX, has now capitulated on mandatory vaccines for military — or have they? It may be good news, but there's more to the story than what FOX is saying 1:13:23Bernie Sanders is FURIOUS over TrumpShots — price increase! He doesn't care they're killing people, neither does GOP 1:18:37What is SpayVac? Is it a Smoking Gun for Vax as Human Depopulation. The company says it's for "humane population control" but if you look at this company, its vaccine and its connection to Pfizer, maybe they mean "human population control". 1:22:02Pfizer partnered with this SpayVac for the delivery mechanism of the vaccine which concentrates in ovaries and keeps mammal eggs from being fertilized 1:30:20House Republicans vote to repeal the Democrats’ army of 87,000 IRS agents as first act of new congress. What happens next? 1:38:21 Trump wants to primary out the 18 GOP Senators who voted for the $1.7 Trillion spending bill. Remember what he demanded of the lone Congressman who opposed HIS $3.7 Trillion spending bill? 1:51:39Violence and gun control in Illinois as Democrats approve the strongest "assault weapon" ban (and other measures) in the country 2:01:23INTERVIEW: Protect YOUR Kids From CPS & Trans-Grooming. Whether your kids are homeschooled, public schooled, or even if you own firearms, Dwight Mitchell, FamilyProtectionFoundation.org, has info on what you need to know about your rights. New assaults on parental rights are coming from schools as opposition to schools grooming kids may trigger CPS. As an NRA instructor, Dwight also talks about CPS issues for gunowners 2:05:17What’s changed since the introduction of Covidid. 2:13:58Dwight on Second Amendment and what it’s like to be a firearms instructor in New Jersey. 2:38:20Unlike TX, NJ law says it needs to be an imminent threat for you to use deadly force. 2:41:41HUNDREDS of teachers in Chicago accused of rape, sexual assault and grooming 2:59:04Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 11th of January, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1035 of the emergency. Today we're going to take a look at a couple of key things. First of all, we're going to take a look at this lab leak theory. Yes, I've said all along that it is a distraction.

I'm going to show you why it's a distraction today. I'm going to show you the origins of this. This is an interesting article that came out of the UK. I don't agree with some of his conclusions, but he has some interesting information about how this began. We're also going to take a look at something called Spavac. Yeah, I thought it was a Babylon Bee when I first saw that. No, a vaccine to sterilize people. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Well, I want to say this before any of listeners today leave a tip on Rockfin. I really do appreciate your support. And it is fun to have the interaction that is on Rockfin. I really do appreciate your support, and it is fun to

have the interaction that is on Rockfin, and I do enjoy that. But I've got to say that when I look at what is happening with the war on crypto, when I look at what is happening with Coinbase and the entire crypto industry getting very shaky after this FTX affair, which perhaps is what they wanted, Who knows? But Coinbase has fired 20% of its workforce. And I just have to say that I know you don't realize this. You know, there's fees associated whenever you make donations pretty much anywhere. You know, if it's on Subscribestar, if it's on Rockfin, there's fees associated.

I have no problem with that. And of course, on Rockfin, there is premium content. It's on Thursday nights on my show. And if you sign up for Rockfin, you can see all the premium content from any producer, but it helps if you sign up through us. But the tips are a different thing. And as they come in in dollars, it's not just a fee that's applied, but Rockfin will also pay us out in crypto, their crypto. It's a very unusual cryptocurrency and it's only, I have to go through Coinbase and Coinbase has been hassling me beyond

belief. I have so much donations and, you know, I didn't say anything about it for the longest time because I know that people enjoy doing that and I appreciate any of the support that we get. And so I just went with it. But it's gotten to be a big part of our income. And it's been locked up now for a couple of months as I've been fighting with Coinbase. So we're hoping that we're going to be able to get this stuff out

because of Coinbase. It's not Rockfin, but it's Coinbase. So we're hoping that we're going to be able to get this stuff out because of Coinbase. It's not Rockfin, but it's Coinbase. But it's because of this crypto thing. And then the addition to that, in addition to the fees, there's also the fact that I've got to go through two transactions to get this out. I've got to convert their cryptocurrency to Ethereum and then from Ethereum into... And it really concerns me. So I want to stay on Rockfin, but I don't want that to be a part of our financial mix. Karen came in this morning and said, could you please tell people about the T-shirt?

Yes, we have a T-shirt. Please take a look at the T-shirt. And we've got a great coffee mug, too, that keeps everything warm. I don't like to do plugs, self-serving plugs. But I just want to say, it's become your has um not been able to flow through to us and in that way so i just want to tell people that um i i want to stay on rock fan but um that has become an issue coinbase has been hit with fines they're coming after all of these crypto exchanges i mean they are as i said 2023 is going to be the year of CBDC, I think.

And so that means it's going to be a war. All the governments are going to be coming after crypto in every possible way. That means especially these small, special purpose, individual crypto things. And the big guys like Coinbase, they're going to be cutting 25% of their workforce, 950 jobs, and they'd already cut 18% in June of last year. They have to cut their expenses by 25%, but they're cutting 20% of the workforce. So I just wanted to get that message out. Thank you so much for your comments. We're going to try to do a better job. We would always, you know, a lot of things are going on we only got one guy over here

who's uh controlling stuff travis is here today and um so we would see when somebody left a tip they would notice that there was something there and they would scroll back as they were working on something else they would scroll back and see who had left a tip and put the comments there. But we're going to try to set it up so we respond to your comments more without having a tip. So I appreciate that. Ellen Degenerate, the former talk show host, concerned about the heavy California rains. And it is very concerning. They've had people who have died in these floods, and it's just amazing.

She cut a video with the floods in back of her, and I'll show that to you in just a second. But it's kind of laughing about this on Sunday. You know, we had what was it? The it was a climate bomb or something like that. You know, when the winter was there, what was that that called and now they've got a stratospheric river you know they're just inventing these alarmist titles for all the weather to try to think and make you think that this is something that's unusual well california has always had floods of florida has always had hurricanes this last hurricane season was not a a big deal uh so um you know when you look at what is happening when somebody sees something go wrong like that they would always say it's an act of god

so why do you always blame god for everything bad that's happened uh you never give him credit when anything good happens, right? But you always blame him. Well, now Ellen degenerate is saying that as well, but it's an act of goddess. Goddess. She doesn't believe in God. She believes in the goddess of mother earth. And I mean, these people take this stuff seriously. Gaia theory.

Lovelock put that out. I've mentioned it many times we went to the uk took kids in 20 uh 2001 and uh you know the the lovelock uh gaia theory was all over the place gaia is greek for mother earth and uh they had uh videos running in some of the you know one of the museums the children's museum when the kids are playing. I'm watching this video, and they're talking about how Mother Earth is this sentient being, and humans are nothing more than a virus,

and they need to be minimized, if not eliminated. It's like, whoa. Just constantly running. Well, this is what Ellen Degenerate had to say. So, Montecito is under complete evacuation, the entire town. This is a five-year anniversary from the fire and mudslides that killed so many people and who lost their homes, their lives. This is crazy on a five-year anniversary.

You're having unprecedented rain this street next to our house never flows ever probably about nine feet up and it's going to be another two feet up we have four treads to evacuate please be nice to the mother nature because mother nature is not happy with us Yeah. Jennifer Lawrence is kind of the same type of thing. You know, mother nature is very angry with us. They all believe that they really do believe it. No, it's not mother nature. It's father. God is angry at California. If anybody's angry at California, uh, it is, uh, look, it's always been a state of disaster, mudslides, fires, floods, earthquakes, all the rest of this stuff. California is famous for that stuff. Montecito, however, is supposed to be different. This is

where Ellen degenerate lives. This is where the man formerly known as Prince, uh, Harry lives. And, uh, this is where Oprah Winfrey lives, his next door neighbor. You know, they're all neighbors with each other. How could this happen in such a nice neighborhood? You know, where all the wealthy elite live, uh, it's gotta be, uh, somebody is angry with us. Well, a couple of days ago, we showed, I think it was Monday, we showed a shooting that was in Houston. And just to remind you of what it looks like, I'll play this as we talk about the event here. But it turns out, you know, we looked at it and I said, you know, he shot this guy as a guy was holding people at gunpoint. All right. That's a key thing. But then,

uh, you know, after the guy goes down, he goes over to get the gun from him. You know, he continues to shoot. I said, you know,

it depends on this district attorney. They want to get really aggressive, but I think he's got a good case. That's what my sons and I were talking about. Um, and now you got a district attorney who was supported heavily by George Soros, funded her election, Kim Ogg. And she appears to be part of the problem that let this career criminal who was killed out on bond. And so we'll talk about his career, but first, um, it's going before a grand jury.

Uh, and, uh, a grand jury will decide says KTRK, whether an armed customer who shot and killed a robber last week in Southwest Houston is now being hailed as a hero or not, he'll be criminally chargedators say the 46 year old customer who police have not identified because he is not under arrest, turn himself in and is cooperating with detectives. He hired an attorney. He's not talking. He's got his attorney to do that. And, um, so he's so far playing it very wise. Uh, the attorney said, my client who wishes to remain anonymous was dining with a friend.

And I'll play the video here as we look at this. Dining with a friend at the restaurant. As is seen in the video, a robbery suspect entered the restaurant, pointed a weapon at my client and other customers demanding money. In fear of his life and his friend's life, my client acted to protect everyone and the restaurant. And in Texas, a shooting is justified in self-defense, defense of others, and in defense of property. So the lawyer said, we are confident that a grand jury will conclude that the shooting was justified under Texas law. This event has been very traumatic. Taking a human life is something he does not take lightly and will burden him for the rest of his life. And so this is what happens after that video where

at Freeze you see him pull the gun. He's waving the gun at everybody. He's stealing their money. He's going up to some more people. There he shoots him. Now the guy's down. Not me. Now, he did that final shot as he reached down to get the gun. Yeah, and he could say that he was still in fear for his life. The guy that he just got rid of there did a public service. As a career criminal, Listen to his rap sheet. Records show that Eric Washington had an extensive criminal history and was out on bond during this robbery. In 2015, Washington was convicted of a lesser charge

of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 15 years in prison in connection to the shooting death of a 62 year old Hamid Warwick, a cell phone store owner. This is not his first rodeo. He was, um, he was sentenced in 2015 to 15 years in prison. Let's see. That's seven years ago.

How is this guy out? He was not the only one involved. There were two others there. And he got out, actually, at least in six years. Because while he was out, he was released on parole in 2021. And while he was released on parole in 2021, and while he was released on parole in 2021, he was charged with assaulting his girlfriend in December of 2022. So the cell phone store owner that he killed had a fiancé and three sons.

When they saw this, they said, if the guy who stopped Eric had been around 10 years ago, maybe I would still have my dad. Eric was an evil criminal that took joy in harassing and robbing innocent families. The individual at the restaurant is a true hero. The victim's other son added, He did the right thing in stopping the robber and protecting the community from a dangerous predator because the soros here's my comment this is not what they because the soros elected prosecutors and district attorneys and so forth are not going to do that they're going

to go after the people who do what the government should be doing. Arkansas Bill has now classified a drag show. Well, it's not passed yet. It's been introduced. But it would classify drag shows as adult-oriented business and add restrictions about children and locations. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

This is also being talked about in Tennessee as well. Just in this area, you had local, they were already talking about labeling drag shows as cabarets, adult cabaretsts which comes with restrictions and then they did it in knoxville and um the mayor of knoxville was very happy about it but the mayor of knox i think it's knox county um glenn jacobs as well as the state representative from the area said no we're gonna. We talked to the local district attorneys. They won't do anything.

We talked to the state attorney general. He's not going to do anything. I said, we need to have a law. So we're going to make a law. To call these drag show. Oh, as. In the Arkansas legal code. That includes adult cabarets, adult theaters, and nude modeling studios.

They would also define a drag performance this way, something where a performer exhibits a gender identity different from the performer's gender assigned at birth using clothing, makeup, or other accessories that are traditionally worn by members of or meant to exaggerate the gender identity of the performer's opposite sex. The performer would be somebody who is before an audience of two or more, and the audience,

the performance is intended to appeal to the prurient interests. And, of course, prurient is currently defined as having expressing lustful ideas or desires, tending to excite lust, lascivious, lewd. I haven't seen one of these drag queen performances that isn't lewd in front of children. That's why I said, I don't understand why this, the fine points of the law escape me because the broader morality offends me. Lewd and lascivious behavior before kids,

how is that not a crime? Why do we have to have a special code for drag queen shows? Lewd and lascivious behavior has always been a crime. It doesn't even have to be in front of kids. Talked about that before. Just lewd behavior. Back in North Carolina, a judge got drunk at a party and went in the back garden and relieved himself.

I mean, he's drunk. He doesn't know what he's doing. He wasn't trying to be lewd, but he was lewd and he got busted and kicked off of the bench for that. So why do we have to look the other way for these drag performances? Is it because transgenders are worshiped now? Is that it? Well, I'm glad that they're going to do something about it. It also says the adult oriented businesses must be located on public property or cannot be located on public property or where a minor can view it. So we'll see what happens. I think that's probably going to pass in Arkansas. And I think it should pass in Tennessee as well. Meanwhile, at the border, there's a lot of people being harassed. And it's not just the people who

have been lured across the border and promises of welfare benefits and other things like that. Americans are being detained and fined thousands of dollars, threatened with having their cars confiscated simply because they used the wrong lane at the border. This is a story from WND. They shackled me to this metal bench and I had to wait for three hours and then find thousands of dollars. The alternative is to have your car confiscated. That's the experience being related by multiple American travelers who have run into a simple problem as a return to the U.S. through the Mexican border, all because they picked the wrong lane in which to approach the border, mostly by accident. They get into the sentry lane,

designated only for those travelers who are pre-approved for crossings. But once you get into that lane, you can't get out of it. There is no way to get into another lane. They have concrete barricades that keep you locked in there. One person said, I was following the directions from my phone map app, and it put me in this lane. When I get in this lane, I say I'm not supposed to be here, but I can't get out of it because there's concrete barriers there. I've had a similar situation at a toll road in Florida, in Orlando years ago.

I remember it really frustrated me. Um, again, it was directions from the map app and, um, I, you know, so toll road and, um, uh, I didn't have toll roads turned off. And so it wanted me to get on there. So that's partly my problem. It's early days of using those things. Probably about 20 years ago, 15 years ago. And I see it's a toll thing and I'm looking, I'm looking at it.

It's a very, very long route before you actually get to the toll booth. And I get up to the toll booth and I said, I don't want to get on the toll road. I, you know, got here by mistake. Can I turn around? No, can't turn around. What? No, you're going to have to go. You've got to pay the toll. Well, it's, got here by mistake. Can I turn around? No, can't turn around. What? No, you're going to have to go. We've got to pay the toll.

Well, it's a lot worse with this. Listen to what happens. Residents said they were detained and forced to pay fines. So their cars would not be impounded after accidentally using the century line, which only permits pre-approved travelers to use it. A victim identified only as Rose of Burbank. This is happening at the California border. So they shackled me to this metal bench as I waited for three hours.

When we put in the address to go back home, it basically told us to go a certain way. I guess that's the fastest way out, right? You know, it's looking at the traffic. It's not looking at the fact that it's a, you know, select lane. It's just, well, there's not a lot of traffic in this lane. Go over there. Anna Salazar of Pasadena said, I've never been humiliated in my life the way I was humiliated that afternoon. A lawyer, John Manley, told the station covering this, KTTVTV, told the station he's been representing a lot of drivers who

become targets. He's basically making a practice out of this abuse of Americans by the American Border Patrol. They basically shackle you to a bench for two to three hours, he said, and then they say, yep, we're going to take your car or we're going to fine you $5,000. Yeah. You want door number one or door number two, Monty? He said that amounts for what amounts to being in the wrong lane of traffic.

Going back to Salazar, she said, when I was in the office waiting, one of the agents came in and shouted at everybody else in the office. Okay, we got another $5,000. Obviously, it was someone else that went through the same thing I did. So I just thought to myself, oh, this is just a business. No, it's not a business. It's a crime. We have border patrol officers.

We have sheriff's deputies. Whether you're talking about the war on drugs, you're talking about what's happening at the border. They confiscate money from people. They call it asset forfeiture. They're stealing it. They're thieves. They're highway robbers. You got sheriff's deputies in one California county robbing armored cars under the pretense of the war on drugs, drugs that are legal under state law. But of course, they're working in partnership with the feds, doing it over and over again. And they don't have to get a conviction.

They don't even charge you with a crime. They just steal your stuff. And if you want to get it back, you got to sue them. That's why they put the civil in there. They said, this isn't criminal law. We just made these rules up. These are the rules the bureaucracy has. Well, you know, we'd seen that kind of behavior for the longest time from the IRS.

And we'll talk about what the GOP is doing with the IRS now when they come up. But, you know, this was really kind of initiated by the IRS. That's why people said they're a law under themselves. Well, that's happened now with all these different bureaucracies. Under the war on drugs, they've decided that not only can they write the laws because Congress isn't interested in doing that anymore, they abdicate that to the bureaucracy, which writes rules. And so they write the rules, they enforce the rules,

they set up the fines, and they say, well, since the bureaucracy did it and Congress didn't do it, it's a rule, it's not a law. And since it's a rule and not a law, it's civil, not criminal. This is the same kind of lies and prevarications that you see from the FDA, saying, well, is a vaccine authorized for emergency use or is it approved for everybody? You know, authorization, approval.

Well, you know, Pfizer's vaccine is exactly the same as Cormonati, but they're legally distinct. And we're going to approve Cormonati, which is not available in the U.S., and then we're going to mandate Pfizer to you, right? It's amazing to me the way they play these games. But, you know, it's just like the people who go down the sovereign citizen path or go into the tax protester path. What you don't realize is that you're not dealing with an honest government. These lies that they put out there, even when you know what the truth is and when you

expose those lies they're just going to ignore what you have to say I saw it about 35 years ago guy who was a tax protester he says well I've got all these things about how the tax code was enacted or whatever and he said they sent him to jail and he said I got up there and I said, well, I'd like to offer this as evidence. Not accepted. Next. Well, I have this also not accepted. Anything else you got?

All right, he's guilty. Let's take him out. It's a kangaroo court process. And these are kangaroo bureaucrats who are doing this. Whether you're talking about the border patrol, they're going to make their own rules, right? Oh, well, if you were in the sentry lane, we can steal your car, fine you $5,000. That's okay because it's not a law.

It's my rule. I just made it up, right? We've got, talked about the medical dictatorship with Fauci and all these public health officials, but look, we've got a dictatorship of the bureaucracy in everything. Look at the excessive fines that the FAA was putting on people for not having masks on. Or look at the before even that happened.

They wanted to fine people $25,000 if you didn't register your little tiny little drone that was like, what, a pound or something? It wasn't even that. It was absurdly small. Well, you can register for $25 with us. But if you don't register it, we find that you're flying this thing around, we can hit you with a $50,000 fine. A lot of people push back on that, and they pull back from it, but that's typical the way they think and they act,

and typically these things are not pulled back. So we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. And I want to thank APS Radio for their their sponsorship very important at this time to us uh we will be right back stay with us at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Hear news now at apsradionews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right. Thank you, Eric. Eric left a tip on RockFan. He said, done with trying to view your show on Twitter. I think they're shutting down your show within minutes of tuning in now on rock fan.

So yeah, you know, that's why I say I wanted to stay on rock fan, even though we're having some problems getting, you know, money out of that. But anyway, it says,

thank you for letting the Holy spirit speak through you and your family in these trying times. Well, thank you. I appreciate that. A lot of times people say something and I say, did I say that? It's kind of a stream of consciousness when I'm not reading an article here. But I'm not claiming that I'm speaking for God.

That's Julie Green who does that. But I do think that things are going to get worse for me on Twitter. I'm an even bigger critic of Musk than I am of Twitter. So I never had any hope that things are going to get better for me. As a matter of fact, people are, you know, I had somebody tell Karen that, but I just looked at this and they don't have me following you anymore. And I didn't, I didn't, you know, take that off. And this just recently happened, you know, after Musk.

And so the same thing has happened. Karen, you know, before Musk, Karen was unfollowed from me on Twitter. And they were suggesting that she follow AOC. They don't have their thumb on the scales, do they? No, no, not at all. I was just talking about the bureaucracy. The new Biden scheme is now going to target Christian schools. Warns an ex-official with the Department of Education.

But you understand, the Department of Education is one of these bureaucracies I was talking about. They can just make up the rules as they want. And they do. And so the Biden administration regime, I should call it, plans to review protections for faith. So the Biden regime is going to review the First Amendment. It's typical, isn't it? And if the bureaucracy, the Department of Education, doesn't like the First Amendment,

well, they're going to get rid of it, right? Colleges and universities that are faith-based are being warned by a former Department of Education official that the Biden administration, which has pursued transgenderism and abortion as two of its primary agendas, could be coming after them. Bob Eitel, the head of the Defense of Freedom Institute and a former senior counselor for the Secretary of Education, he says his concern is the fact that the federal bureaucracy, the Department of Education, announced that it will, quote, revisit regulations issued after the Trump administration

concerning accreditation, student loans, and many other aspects. They're going to come after them with the money aspect. Where have we seen this before? They don't like what you do? Operation Chokepoint for guns. And we'll talk about what happened in Illinois as well. Somebody asked me about that yesterday, and I knew it was coming up. I knew they were talking about it. Same type of stuff that you see being enacted in all of the different Democrat jurisdictions.

But, of course, in Illinois, it's going to be one of the strictest of the assault weapon bans. But it's going to be challenged in court for sure. People are still challenging Trump's gun control by executive order, the bump stock. And even though that has been upheld, and some of Biden's that he's built on that have been upheld by some of the courts, now that we've had the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals pull that back, Jonathan Turley says this is going to go to the Supreme Court,

and it should. It should. There's absolutely no basis for what Trump did. And it's provided a very, very dangerous precedent that must be shut down somehow. Um, Congress isn't going to do anything. Uh, can't Congress can't, the house can't get anything done because they don't have, um, a Senate majority.

And they've got Mitch McConnell. Who's head of the Republicans, who's playing for the other team. There's no way you're going to get anything through the Senate, no matter what happens in the house. Anyway, getting back to this, it's always about the money. That's the way they're always going to squeeze you.

And, you know, Trump just said that. He said, look, elect me president, and I'll use federal money as a string to get them to do what I want about the transgender issues and about critical race theory. Well, those are always there, right? As a matter of fact, it was in the Obama administration that they threatened to withhold funds from schools if they didn't toe the line on transgender stuff. And that's why I said to all of the Trump cheerleaders. He wants what is happening in 2020 with the lockdowns.

He wants Main Street businesses closed down and declared non-essential by the governors and by their public health dictators and local and state level. He's funding that. So he wants it. He could stop it just like that if he didn't want it by pulling the money. That's what Obama was doing with the transgender stuff. And now Obama says, I'll do that. They suddenly have an epiphany? Did he not realize this in four years? Everybody knows that's the way you control everything, is with money. So now the Biden Department of Education will take it upon themselves to undo a consensus, he says. And that doesn't make any sense. The Biden administration has moved aggressively against Christians in several ways, trying to force doctors and nurses of faith as well as faith-based institutions to do body mutilating, transgender surgeries as well as abortions.

The result of Biden's moves against religious schools could either be disqualification from participation in federal student loans or other programs, um, you know, the decertification, um, of the, um, institutions accreditation, I guess we call it. Um, I don't know if they can do that or if that's a separate society, but you know, if it is a separate institution, it's going to be influenced by the department of education. All of our institutions are basically corrupt and controlled by the federal government. So they could get them on accreditation. But when it comes to the federal student loan thing, here's what needs to happen. People need to understand that you don't take Caesar's coin.

And if you take Caesar's coin, you're going to have to render to Caesar what Caesar wants. These colleges need to get themselves independent of this stuff. A few of them have. Hillsdale, very famous about that. You've got to get independent of the money because the strings come with the money. That's the other side of this. Trump could have stopped all this stuff, but he continued to fund it. And the funding was enabling it and encouraging it,

and it was the production of all this stuff. But you can also change people by withdrawing that. Eidel told the Examiner, these agencies often try to force their own versions of equity and diversity on Christian schools in ways that violate biblical teaching. Does he not know, even though he was a counselor, a lawyer for the Department of Education, does he not know that the purpose,

the entire purpose of the Department of Education, the entire purpose of federalizing this stuff was because the feds have unlimited amounts of money. They don't have to worry about a deficit. Nobody cares about a deficit except when you talk about cutting taxes or cutting spending, right, or cutting, you know. In this particular case, they're saying, well, we can't afford to cut the spending on the IRS. That's the hill on the establishment coming back.

I'll give you the crazy logic behind that when we get to that. But still, the point of federalizing education was to control what was taught, you know, the curriculum, set the curriculum at the federal level. And if you set the curriculum, most of the private schools will follow it. So it doesn't help you to get into a private school if the private school is going to follow the curriculum that the public schools are following. And that's often the case. That's often the case with a lot of religious schools, that they follow the curriculum that the government has set. And the government follows a curriculum that the federal government has set.

And then they have the money strings that they attach to everything. We'll do this and do that, and we'll give you the... I was arguing with... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar,

and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Homeschools.

Homeschool moms at the time. And they were saying, well, we've got to get some sports programs. And if we can't get sports programs, we got to get some sports programs. And if we can't get sports programs, we need to get money from them so we can have our homeschooling sports programs. I said, don't take the money. They will control you with the money.

The sports programs are not that important. You're going to sell your heritage for a bowl of porridge. So public schools are losing students as homeschooling is skyrocketing. Because why? There's no bribery there, number one. Public schools lost more than a million students from the fall of 2019 to the fall of 2020. Enrollment fell by about a million from about 50 million, so that's about 2%.

The trend may have started well before the COVID-19 pandemic and the Trump lockdown. They don't say that. I say that. But it sped up during the Trump crisis. Parents pulled their kids out of the public school systems after educators and administrators flip-flopped repeatedly on virtual versus in-person learning and mask mandates. In addition, they said, to frustrating COVID-related policies,

you had social media accounts like Libs of TikTok that have alerted parents to the concerning and often sexually explicit content being taught to their young children. Well, I don't denigrate what libs of TikTok have done, but I think it's more important in terms of waking up the general public to what is happening with the government-run schools that you're paying for, that are one of the major expenses of your home, or whether you own it or you rent it. You see it if you own the home. You see it as an itemized expense.

But if you're renting, they don't give you an itemized expense of how much your tax bill is. But it's huge in both cases because of the wasteful government schools that are nothing but seminaries of Satan. And so Libs of TikTok has shown that. I think that's very valuable for the public at large. But when it comes to parents, I've talked about this for decades. And whenever I talk to people about it, it's like, oh, yeah, that's pretty bad, isn't it? I know that happens in that state or it happens in that city. And even if you tell them, no, it happened in your school that you got your kids in. Well, that's not like my teacher.

I know my teacher. My teacher's great. And so even though that is happening with a school board, with a principal, even at my own school, I know that I've got a great teacher. You just could not get through to them. You know, schools are bad everywhere except the classroom where my kid is. That's what changed with the Trump lockdown. Trump meant it for evil. God used it for good. People saw on their virtual classrooms what was actually happening in the classroom. And they had no excuse. I'm surprised it's only been a million people who have gotten out. It's absolutely amazing to me to see this.

Oregon is advising schools to keep students gender hidden from families. From Oregon to Maine. Portland to Portland, right? Portland, Oregon, Portland, Maine, everywhere. They are doing this everywhere. And people, oh, well, that's only in the Democrat-run states. You want to bet? You want to bet?

Yeah, take a look at what's going on even in Texas with James Younger and his dad. All right? Well, we want to transition this kid, this young boy. We're going to put him on drugs to chemically sterilize him at eight because his pediatrician mommy wants it as part of a divorce. And his father, who I interviewed, and then I talked to him quite a bit after the interview. He's a strong Christian.

He understands what's going on. His mom, the woman he married, I didn't ask him. I got yoked to her finally she's a piece of work but because she's a pediatrician uh and because they've got even in texas especially in austin you got a lot of very hardcore left-leaning socialist judges. And so now he's concerned because she's fled to California, sanctuary city for, sanctuary state for transgender grooming. And he's afraid that even though there is a Texas order saying that she can't do what she wants to do, He's afraid that that is going to happen in California,

and that's the intent of her moving to California. Because California has said, well, you know, we're going to, I don't care what the laws are, where you came from. We'll let you transition, kids. Come here. We're going to come here, get your abortions, come here, mutilate children. You know, of course, abortions are mutilations of children as well. Fatal mutilations.

The Oregon Department of Education has released a document advising schools on how to support gender-expansive students. That's what they call them. Gender-expansive. Yeah, we have extended it from two genders. That's why that clown priest of the Church of England that I talked about last week, the guy literally called himself bingo. That's his first name that he goes by.

I forget his last name because I just kept referring to him as bingo. That's, you know, we look the way the guy does his makeup and everything. He is bingo, bingo, the clown, bingo. The clown said he came to the realization that he was transgender when he was reading Genesis one or two or whatever, you know, male and female. He created them. It's like, how in the world? That is about as binary as you can get.

How in the world does it come to a realization that there are expansive genders? God didn't say he's going to create a male and female, be fruitful and multiply. He didn't say multiply the genders. And if you multiply genders, you won't be multiplying in any other way. That's the reality of this.

We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Right back. If you like the Eagles. On a dark desert highway. The cars. Let responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. dot com decoding the mainstream propaganda it's's the David Knight show. Uh, Mark Crawford, thank you for the tip. He says, happy new year, David. I hope. Yeah, I do too. Well, you know, our happiness is, um, happiness is just circumstances. And, um, we have to understand the difference between joy and happiness, right? And we have to understand the things that transcend our circumstances. And if we do, we can get through it regardless of what happens. That's not easy. It's easily said, but it's not easy. I was just reading a very well-known pastor who's dying of cancer.

He said, yeah, I always said these things, but cancer really does focus your mind. It really does get you to understand that you are not going to live forever. That's what we saw with the NFL player there. Because, you know, both teams, they know about the vaccine and they see this and it's like, hmm. So it does focus your mind. And that is one of the reasons why we go through these types of things. God uses that to instruct us and to guide us, the tests and trials that we're going through. And again, we all say that, but when it happens to us, it's like, oh, you know, you understand that until you get hit in the face, hit in the nose, right? And we get hit in the nose.

The plans and all the bravado things that you've said that goes out the window and you've got to try to get it back. I want to talk about what is going on with the pharmaceutical things. Two key issues. One of them is fairly new. Some new research has come out from source. The other one is fairly old that I missed and I had a listener who brought it to my attention. Let's start with the new stuff. This is coming from dailyskeptic.org in the UK.

The US government identified as the original source of the lab leak theory. So what's really going on? Exactly. Is that the bioweapon or is the vaccine the bioweapon? You know, we just had another healthy young individual, an Air Force cadet, dying on the way to class, dropping dead. Because, you know, you're not going to stay in the Air Force Academy if you don't get that shot. So what is going on with this? In December of 2020, I was the first one to really talk about it. I just happened to notice that, first one to talk about it at InfoWars,

I noticed that Wuhan had the only biosafety level four lab. And it was right next to where they said that the wet market, you know, they had this ridiculous thing about it. You know, somebody ate bat soup and that's what kicked this whole thing off. And it's like, come on. Yeah. I remember they went through all the stuff. Maybe it was pangolin.

Maybe somebody ate a pangolin there at the wet market or whatever. And it's like, well, you got the Wuhan biosafety level four lab there. And I've always been concerned about gain of function. And that's why I looked at it, you know, when they were coming up with this baloney thing. And, uh, so I was concerned about that in December, 2020. But, um, when I saw the phony narrative coming out of China in January, when I saw how they were staging people falling down the streets and, you know, locking people and locking people in buildings, sealing them up in buildings, and how they were telling everybody, oh, look, the hospital's crowded. It's like, you think?

You think? This is China. I mean, I've been through Walmarts that were more crowded than those hospitals in China when we were in Nanning. You couldn't believe how the Walmarts were. And we came back to America. It's like, how do they even stay in business in America? When you look at what was going on in China, I mean, it was just wall to wall. It was like the Thanksgiving day parade in New York city or something. Try to get through that solid people everywhere.

So yeah, they got crowded hospital. So what? They're always crowded. So when I saw this funny narrative coming out of there, bingo, this is exactly. Oh, this is exactly. A lot of buzz about dark winter 2.0. 2.0. They've been practicing with their germ games for the last 20 years.

Now they're going to make it real. Dark winter to dark winter 2.0. So at that point in time, I said, this is about nothing other than locking us down until they get a vaccine and using it for digital ID. Look at what Gates has been saying. Gates has been about vaccinating everybody and using ID 2020. ID 2020. ID 2030, or rather IA 2030, is his immunization agenda for 2030,

where he is looking to vaccinate everyone, everywhere, every age. Presumably with every vaccine they can imagine. But those first three things are his subtitle. Everyone, everywhere, every age, vaccinated. So that's the point at which I said, no, the lab leak and the fear is what they want. This lab leak narrative and the fear around it is what the government wants. To push you into lockdown, to push out an untested vaccine, and to make that the requirement for living your life and having a digital ID, a vaccine passport.

So now back to this story. Daily Skeptic says, where did the lab leak theory come from? Who first promoted the idea and why? The answer to this question is surprising and may be the key to unlocking the mystery of the origin of COVID-19. On January the 9th, 2020, in a report by Radio Free Asia, Radio Free Asia, this was just days after the virus had entered public consciousness. Again, January the 9th. At the time, no deaths had been reported. Few people were worrying about the virus, including, it seems, the Chinese who were claiming that it wasn't even clear whether it was spreading between

humans. So the beginning of January, except in December, we already knew about it. They were already making statements about how it had come from the wet lab and all this other kind of stuff. And so in December I was thinking, well, maybe it's coming from the lab. But then when they started this other stuff, I thought, no, that's not it. You know, it's this other agenda. Anyway, seemingly unhappy about the lack

of alarm, Radio Free Asia, and you understand who runs that, right? Radio Free Europe, remember that? That was a propaganda arm of the Voice of America for Europe. And, of course, they have the same thing in Asia as government propaganda. And until the Obama administration, they put in a separate act and said, you will not operate in the United States because you are propaganda. And then Obama took it out sometime around, what, 2014, 15, something like that.

I'm just guessing. It was a specific act. Anyway, the Radio Free Asia ran a comment from the former head of the medical assistance department at the Chinese Red Cross. She said she was confident that it was spreading between humans. Nobody else had said that at that point. She also asserted that it was a new type of mutant coronavirus. And immediately, without pausing for breath, raised the possibility that it was a result of a Chinese biological attack on Hong Kong

using a virus developed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Bear in mind that this was before a single person had been reported as dying from the virus, and no solid evidence was presented for this claim. It was the first time that the Wuhan lab and the idea of the lab origin of the virus were mentioned in the media, says Daily Skeptic. The report then implies that Wuhan is hiding the involvement, though the basis for the insinuation is tenuous to say the least. Well, it isn't the first time that it was considered because we're talking about that.

I was talking about it in December and I think there were other people who were talking about it as well. But anyway, it is interesting that they're pushing this in early January and it is interesting what she said. She said they haven't made public. She said they haven't made public. Would you determine if it's highly contagious from the genetic sequence? Maybe that's not what she's saying.

But still, she goes on to say they regarded the relatively high number of infections in Hong Kong with suspicion, given that there have been no reports of cases anywhere in between the two cities. Or in the southern province of Guangdong, for example, where typically people go from Guangzhou into Hong Kong. But again, she thought there was a high number of infections. Well, if they haven't released the genetic sequence publicly, then how do you know that that's what this is, right? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. And of course, they claim, oh yeah, we've got the genetic sequence, and so we know this is COVID-19 or whatever. They're not doing genetic sequencing. I've talked about that as they come up with all these BS variants, Omicron and Delta and all this kind of stuff.

Oh, look, now all the cases are Delta or they're all Omicron. I point out, they're not doing genetic sequencing. They don't have the equipment in most of these places, and they admit that they're not doing the genetic sequencing. They're just assuming that, and that's what she was assuming. Well, they don't have the genetic sequencing. They don't have the equipment in most of these places. And they admit that they're not doing the genetic sequencing. They're just assuming that. And that's what she was assuming. Well, they don't have the genetic sequencing. It's like, oh, well, you know, they've got, they've got the exact fingerprint of this thing, but they haven't made it public. Well, even if you were doing testing of this, oh, we got all these cases. Are you sure?

Is it not just some other coronavirus? Is it not SARS of some sort? Is it not the flu? But you know that it's now this new novel virus? Because how? They haven't made the genetic sequence public, and you're not testing for it. Kind of sounds like what HHS told the American Hospital Association, all the hospitals. Look, we don't have any tests. We don't have enough tests.

And the tests we have don't work. So just do a clinical diagnosis. If somebody's got a respiratory illness, it's COVID, and we'll pay you for that. You know, that type of thing. So she said genetic engineering technology. This is what she said on Radio Free Asia. Again, Voice of America is propaganda. It's the CIA.

It's the CIA. So a CIA interview says, genetic engineering technology has gotten to such a point now, and Wuhan is home to a viral research center that is under the aegis of the China Academy of Sciences,

which is the highest level of research facility in China. So she's doing, she's building up this argument from authority. You know, the magisterium. This is just magic technology. Be very impressed. We got layer after layer of unique authority, and yet she doesn't know anything. Over the following two weeks, Radio Free Asia pushed hard on the idea of a Chinese biowarfare lab origin, and its reporting was picked up by the Washington Times on January the 24th, which also globally may have originated in a Wuhan lab linked to China's covert biological weapons program, according to an Israeli biological warfare expert.

Radio Free Asia this week rebroadcast a local Wuhan TV report from 2015 and so forth. The lab was the only declared site in China capable of working with deadly viruses. It's the only biosafety level four lab. Danny Shoham, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who has studied Chinese biowarfare, said the institute is linked to Beijing's covert biological weapons program. So the origins of this and the fear of this are being pushed by Radio Free Asia, run by the CIA, Washington Times, and they go to an Israeli military intelligence officer.

In other words, the Mossad. This is the CIA and Mossad running through the washington times to do what to create fear panic and alarm so that you'll go running to them for help anything you're desperate yeah we'll put cloth masks over our face we're desperate tell me what to do and i'll do it so um the washington times report indicates at one point that all this is being put out in response to rumors circulating on the Chinese Internet. And the rumors on the Chinese Internet claim that the virus is part of the U.S. conspiracy to spread germ weapons. Now, that did come later. But they pointed out that the Atlantic Council, in February 2021, published a very long document that summarized all the false rumors

and hoaxes regarding the origins of COVID. And they did it by region. And so they went through and did a whole section on China. And so this author here, Daily Skeptic, said, I went back and I looked at it. They didn't have anything about any rumors that were circulating in China saying that this was a U.S. bioweapon. They didn't have it. So why would they do that? Why would this report anticipate future charges of a lab leak,

particularly when it was in the process of making such charges? One ominous sign, said the Washington Times, quoting an unnamed U.S. official, which you can probably bet was the CIA, is that false rumors since the outbreak began several weeks ago, having begun circulating on the Chinese internet, claiming the virus is part of the U.S. conspiracy to spread germ weapons. That could indicate that China is preparing propaganda outlets to counter future charges. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie The new virus escaped from one of Wuhan's civilian 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ee. The new virus escaped from one of Wuhan's civilian or defense research labs. So he says, again, you know, this research team is put together by the Atlantic and the Associated Press.

Two sources that I do not trust. Deeply embedded with NATO. But they didn't show anything there. And China that was blaming the U.S. for the bioweapons, maybe they pulled that out because they didn't want to give any credibility to those rumors if those rumors were there. But again, I don't know if those rumors were there or not, and it looks perhaps like they weren't. So why then, says a daily skeptic,

did Radio Free Asia introduce a lab-engineered virus narrative even before the first death? Why was it trying to ratchet up alarm? And why did the unnamed U.S. official claim to be responding to Chinese rumors that turned out to not exist? Again, as I said, I looked at this stuff, and in 2020, in 2019, December 2019, I'm looking at it saying, this could be significant. They could be, you know, this obvious narrative about the wet market is nonsense. There is a bioweapon lab there. This could be something significant.

But then as I look at it and look at who is pushing this and how hard they're pushing it and the way that they're pushing it, and then the solutions that they're talking about coming along, I said, that just lines up with dark winter. That's what I think it is. And as we went through all this stuff, and as we got to March 13th, where Trump imposed that, we had already seen Italy cave under fear. We subsequently found out that there were over 100,000 bots, Chinese bots, that were pressuring the Italian public

and Italian politicians and pressuring the public to pressure the politicians. You had over 100,000 Chinese bots that were later identified and purged out of social media that were pushing this fear and alarm. That was coming from China. I think China is complicit in this. That's where I differ with him on some of this. I think China is complicit in this That's where I differ with him on some of this I think China is complicit I think that this is a globalist agenda

I think the intelligence services like the CIA, Mossad And I think all of these governments at the top level Are complicit in this, but especially China And that the pandemic, as I've said many times Is not a flu virus. The pandemic is the response, the political response. It's not medical, it's political. It's not genetic, it's political. And you want to see the bioweapon? That's the vaccine. That's the second thing we're going to talk about here. The bioweapon aspects of the vaccine.

But before we get out of this, they say the plot thickens when you realize that Radio Free Asia is a U.S. government-funded media. Of course, I knew that. Essentially CIA. The New York Times said it's part of the agency's worldwide propaganda network. Although the Radio Free Asia is no longer run directly by the CIA, it is managed by the government-funded Broadcasting Board of Governors, which answers directly to the Secretary of State. Who was Secretary of State? Mike Pompeo.

What had he done before that? He was director of the CIA. You know, when I look at this, you know, Tucker Carlson's got some really good information. And I don't know where he is right now. I just know that I didn't trust Tucker Carlson because Tucker Carlson was one of the biggest

critics of the 9-11 truth. He mocked it, right? And his daddy spent his career at voice of America. His daddy worked for a government propaganda organization, CIA propaganda, Tucker Carlson's daddy did. And,

um, and then he mocks nine 11 truth. So I don't know, you know, maybe he's had a change of heart. Maybe he's come to an of heart. Maybe he's come to an understanding. Uh, he does put out some good information, but understand most of the time when he puts out information, it's limited hangout. When it comes to things like

the vaccine, you can see it very clearly. Um, so, um, I don't know, just throw that at Mike Pompeo. Uh, I hope you know who that guy is. Anyway, the COVID lab origin narrative originated with the U.S. government security services. And did so very early, prior to the first death, as part of a deliberate effort to increase alarm in China. And this is where I was fighting with my own company for months. From the beginning of the year through the middle of the summer, when finally Mike Adams and Alex shifted. He stopped having Mike Adams on.

He started having John Rappaport on. Because John Rappaport was right about this from the very beginning. Mike Adams knew better. Mike and Alex, whether they were going with the information that's being fed to them or whether they were doing it simply because it made good business sense to sell fear so he could sell storable food. And we now know with the lawsuits that Alex had through that part there. And I knew that he was making record amounts of money

because they were selling so much storable food, they couldn't get it replaced for weeks. They had a several-week backlog on that. Never seen that before. And the people they were buying it from had to build new factories and everything. And so we see now that, you know, that fear porn gave him more money than he'd ever made before in the beginning of 2020.

I regard that as traitorous because he did know better. He was telling people that this is going to roll out through FEMA and all the rest of this stuff 20 years ago. He knew just like I did what was going on. And he betrayed the American public. He betrayed his supporters for money. Just like he would later do with Stop the Steal. Just like Trump would later do with a Save America thing. So that the U.S. government would be the source of the lab origin theory

is no doubt surprising to many people, given that within weeks the same theory would be dismissed by government officials. Why is that? These are the games that they play. Look, who bought into the lab leak theory? Now, this person says, okay, this is where we part company. Take this basic information. He and I have different takes on this.

He said, here's one possible explanation. It may not be the correct one, but it's the only one I can currently think of. Maybe you can think of something else. Well, I can think of something else. I'll tell you his idea. His idea is that this was put out by the CIA as a cover story because they really did want to do a biological attack. And because Fauci and other people had been involved in this lab, that they started pushing back on it to cover their own involvement and culpability. I don't believe that's the case. I don't think that Fauci didn't know what was going on. I think he was a part of everything, and I think it was really not about this.

I believe that there was something that was a different strain of flu that was significant. Perhaps they tweaked something. Perhaps they tried to do that and they failed. But we now know that the COVID-19 virus is not dangerous. It's their protocols. Again, you know, go home and, you know, call me when you can't breathe anymore and I'll put you on a ventilator and kill you.

You know, that type of thing. Or I'll give you some remdesivir, which will destroy your liver and kill you and not help you breathe or anything. It was their protocols that did it. They shut down, as we were talking about yesterday, they shut down easily, you know, things like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, zinc that they knew from research that had been published by Fauci could handle coronaviruses. They eliminated that.

They threatened doctors who would talk about that. They destroyed careers of doctors who talked about that. It was their medical protocols that were killing people. I have a friend who got it, a very close friend of mine, one of my longest and closest friends. He got very, very sick. But he listens to the program. He's awake.

He got ivermectin. He had to wait a little bit for it. He was getting a lot sicker. As soon as he took it, he said, I could almost feel like there was a release in my chest. He said, it was amazing. It was almost like it was immediate you know, the release in my chest. He said it was amazing. It was almost like it was immediate. And he got better.

And, you know, if he had gone to the doctors and gone through those protocols, they would have killed him. And that is the virus. But the bigger conspiracy is what they practiced for 20 years and what they're rolling out exactly according to plan lock everybody down rush a vaccine force everybody to take it with draconian measures and set up vaccine passports because we've got to get to digital ids and we're going to do it in 2020 says bill gates that's the plan That was what the pandemic was. It was a political pandemic. I think China was very complicit in that. I think they'd been partners with the globalists and CIA

and the rest of these people for the longest time. But they wanted to spread fear, panic, and chaos, you know, from the inside. Remember this guy? You have to prove that this works, and then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, is going to take a decade. Why don't we blow the system up?

I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet. It's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way.

At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie COVID-19 was an inside job. COVID-19 was an inside job and it was a political pandemic. They wanted to spread fear and chaos.

And it was very important to have Trump in place. Because nobody would believe that Trump would work with the globalists. They could believe that any politician except Trump. So it's very important to pull this off with him there as a complicit member of this. And it was also very important for them to run this fear through the alt-right media, which normally would have opposed this had always opposed vaccines would especially oppose a vaccine that was rushed out without any testing.

And so you had to do that fear from the inside. And the inside also means the conservative organizations, the alternative right-wing media had to push that out as well. It was necessary for them to do it that way. Fauci was always at the heart of the conspiracy. Fauci and the NIH was always at the center of all of these germ games, just like the CIA was, always at the center of it. So, you know, you can go back and look at it as he points out.

In November 2019, secret intelligence report claimed to show a large respiratory outbreak in Wuhan that was used to brief the U.S. government, NATO, and Israel. Why Israel? You know, U.S. government and NATO? Why is Israel brought in? Well, again, Assad. Importantly, the alleged evidence for this outbreak has never been produced. And what is evident, what evidence there is, suggests that in reality,

there was no detectable outbreak in Wuhan in November 2019, one month after what you just saw Fauci say. He said that in October 2019. One month later, the CIA, Mossad, they're telling you there's an outbreak in Wuhan. And that's when they started talking about this stuff. By early April 2020, media briefings from unnamed intelligence sources about the November intelligence reports. Uh, these briefings were particularly odd because by that point, the main origin story being pushed by us official channels was the wet market theory. Again, you had to do it from the inside with disruption fear, and you had to do it step by

step. So, um, anyway, he says, so here's what I suggest. The November, 2019 secret intelligence report was intended to forewarn the U S government of the potential need for epidemic preparations. No, no, I completely just, I do not believe that at all. Forewarning the U S government about preparations. That's what happened in 2001 after the anthrax attack one week after nine 11, they said, oh, we got to warn everybody about it. They put out the model State Health Emergency Powers Act. They had practiced dark winter two months before that,

two months before 9-11. And they were warning everybody for 20 years with these CIA, NIH, Johns Hopkins, Bill Gates games. And they weren't warnings. They were practice on how to pull out the real thing. That was what was happening the entire time. The biological jab, the jab was the biological weapon. The jab is the attack.

No doubt about it at this point in time. And that's why I find it interesting to go back and look at how the CIA was involved in disinformation campaigns at the very beginning of this. But understand as we move forward, and I'm afraid this is going to consume a lot of press, it's going to misdirect people away from the vaccine if the GOP decides that they're going to focus on Fauci and the origins stories. We need to focus on the vaccine that they don't want to talk about, except to say, well, it's been oversold to the point that people don't want to get the really good vaccines

that we have for you about everything else. Oh, well, okay, then if that's going to be your tact, whether you are Rand Paul or Nancy Pelosi, you're working for Bill Gates, if to be your tact, uh, whether you are Rand Paul or Nancy Pelosi, you're working for Bill Gates. If that's your tact to say, we're, you know, this is causing a vaccine, um, you know, people to reject the vaccines in general and the vaccines in general. Just great. And we had to go out and have them for everything else.

No, the Pentagon, by the way, before I get into the details of this vaccine bioweapon, uh, the Pentagon has now ditched the COVID vaccine mandates for troops says Fox. I'm somewhat skeptical, but, um, Austin has put out a memo giving commanders discretion saying we encourage it. And, you know, if you want to do it locally, we're not going to say that you can't. But, you know, our memo has now been repealed. So we can't do it from the Pentagon.

But you as a commander, if you understand how important this is to preparedness, perhaps you can still do that, right? Biden signed the defense policy bill just before Christmas that included a provision included by the House and the Senate to repeal the military vaccine mandate so they say fox news says the pentagon is formally dropping the vaccine mandates for troop according to this for troops according to this memo um but you know i've i interviewed davis yance who has been fighting for several branches of the service. You know, he is a former JAG officer, highly decorated JAG officer in the military.

And as an attorney, he's been fighting on these cases. He knows exactly what's going on. So I brought him back and we played both of those interviews around Christmas time. I said, so what is this, you know, the effect of this NDAA prohibition? And he says, well, they're saying that it's not going to affect anybody who is currently in process. And he goes, pretty much everybody's going to be in process, right? After a year and a half of this, you're either going to have, you will have had

to either take it or have filed some kind of a religious objection or something. So you're going to be in process. So I don't know how that's really going to affect anybody, he said. So, you know, Fox News is saying it's going to happen. And they quote the memo now, because it's now a new memo. So maybe this is going to change things from what their position was right after the NDAA was passed. The legislation gave Defense Secretary Austin 30 days to rescind the vaccine mandate.

The Defense Department had already stopped all related personnel actions, such as discharging troops who refused the vaccine. But, of course, they're not reinstating anybody. And everybody knows this. They're not reinstating anybody that they kicked out. They're not reinstating any of the benefits that have been cut. They kick people out with less than honorable discharges, which are going to impact their lives in many, many different ways.

But now this is what the memo says. The department will continue to promote and to encourage COVID vaccination for all service members. Vaccination enhances operational readiness and protects the force and has people like this Air Force cadet dropping dead on his way to class. Austin's memo still gives commanders discretion in how or whether to deploy troops who are not vaccinated. So they can't force them to be vaccinated, but they can leave them behind.

You know, take other disciplinary actions against them. Commanders, he said, have the authority to maintain unit readiness and a healthy force so they can make that decision. And that's going to be a real, have real career implications if they do that for people. The defense secretary instituted the mandate in August, 2021, uh, after Cormonati, which the FDA said was legally distinct from the available Pfizer vaccine, was approved. Cormonati was approved, legally distinct,

but now they're going to force the vaccine that is legally not approved on you. And it wasn't just the military. They did that sleight of hand for everybody, private corporations as well. They say roughly 99% of active duty troops in the Navy, the air force and the Marine Corps have gotten the vaccine 98% of the army they said, but it's different for the guard and for the reserve and that's where Davis was focused. He said, it's really bad there. Why? Because there, they only got 90% of the people.

And so they're coming after them hard. And what is not in this Fox News report that I've reported on is the fact that the Pentagon is now trying to say, well, the NDA specifically talked about our memo, which I think was back in September, right? And said that will be rescinded. However, we did a memo after that that was targeted toward the reserve and the guard. And the NDAA doesn't say anything about that. So we're going to still come after the reserve and the guard. I think that's going to be the case. But Austin wrote in the memo,

no individuals currently serving in the armed forces shall be separated solely on the basis of their refusal to receive the COVID vaccination if they sought an accommodation on religious, administrative, or medical grounds. Do you believe that? We'll see. The military departments will update the records of such individuals to remove any adverse actions solely associated with denials of such requests, including any letters of reprimand. So we'll see if that's going to happen. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders is very upset about the vaccines. Not because they're killing people left and right, but because they're going to increase the price and he doesn't want to see anybody making a profit.

Well, I don't want to see these people making repatients profits either. But, uh, seriously, that's the only thing that Bernie Sanders can find to criticize in this. This is as bad as Rand Paul and the origins of the virus thing. Perhaps even worse. The price hike. The price hike. No, Bernie, it's the spike, not the hike.

You take a hike, stupid. In a Tuesday newsletter sent to Moderna CEO Boncel, Sanders urged the company to reconsider its decision and refrain from any price increase, quote, in light of the role that the federal government has played in the development of the vaccine. You know, Trump, CIA, DARPA, you know, hey, we made that stuff up for you guys. He says, as you know, the federal government over the years has supported Moderna every step of the way going back to 2013. Yeah, that's what I said yesterday.

DARPA was involved in this mRNA stuff going back to 2013. Yeah. That's what I said yesterday. DARPA was involved in this MRNA stuff going back to 2013, perhaps earlier when your company reportedly only had three employees, right So now in the midst of continuing public health crisis, he says, it's not over says Bernie. And we also have a growing federal deficit. This is what did he care about the deficit when he was running for president? He had programs like all the Democrats did to spend $50 trillion. But now he's worried about the deficit, and he thinks the public health crisis is continuing.

He says, now is not the time for Moderna to be quadrupling the price of this vaccine. Well, it's even worse than that. They're going to go up to $130 per dose. It's currently 26. That's more than four times. And, of course, they're going to match what Pfizer said. They're going to charge. Both of them are going up by a factor of about five.

So here we are now. I said, I was going to talk about what was really a real concern about this stuff. And that is depopulation. One of the first medical pushbacks against this stuff was by Dr. Michael Yadin, who had been a VP at Pfizer. And the first thing he said before anybody started talking about myocarditis and heart attacks and blood clots and all the rest of this stuff, first thing he said was, this is going to sterilize people.

Why did he say that? Well, as I said before, this is an article that I had not seen before. Breaking-news.ca out of canada there's an organization i hadn't seen i had a listener who was from australia and he was scolding me about not reporting about this well i had not seen this reported anywhere and i don't see everything that's out there so i do appreciate people uh sending stuff to me but you know uh this guy kind of went over the top you don't report on this you're you're a traitor you're on the inside and all the rest of the stuff and it's like well um thanks pal but thanks for the information but um let's talk about what the reality is here and

this this came out and it's been around for a while and i didn't see it i haven't seen any other outlets talk about this, November of 2021. And what Breaking News Canada found was a connection between a veterinarian vaccine called Spavac. You know, when I saw this, I thought, is this a joke? Spavac. I guess they could have one for males. They could call it a nanoneuter or something, you know have your i guess they could have um uh one for males they could call it uh a nano neuter or something you know for the nanoparticles neuter your neuter your pet with nanoparticles or you can uh spay your your pet with this stuff well this is not for pets yet

this is they say for wildlife and the subtitle of this company, and it's a real company. This is real information. The subtitle that they have there, you know, Spavak for Wildlife Incorporated. It says contraceptive vaccines for humane population control. Well, you get the real idea if you just take off the E off of humane. Contraceptive vaccines for human population control. They are doing this under experimental use they have an emergency use authorization for animals to do this spay vac does uh but the um the interesting thing about this when you look at their website and you can look at it yourself, spavac.com. They talk about the need for this, and they say they immediately start by attacking humans. This is why I say this is a program for human population control, not humane population control.

Because they immediately start talking about humans. And you know, when I played Ellen degenerate, um, you know, saying, Oh, mother earth is in charge. And you know, all this, all this Gaia theory and everything, humans were a virus considered to be a virus by these people who want to reduce population. This has been at the heart of the climate change thing. Paul Ehrlich is still selling that line to people, the population bomb and all the rest of the stuff. And so the first thing they say when they talk about the importance of their product,

here's why you need Spavak. Humans have had a profound impact on the Earth's ecosystem. Well, I thought this was about controlling harmful wildlife. No, humans are bad. We are the virus. And so they say when they, you know, this is about population control of wildlife. They go on to say the Anthropocene is proposed as the current epoch, which is viewed as the period during which human activity has been dominant influence on climate and the environment.

Many wildlife species, even if they are considered endangered, are in overabundance and an ever-shrinking habitat and the habitat ranges that they occupy. SPAVAC is an effective tool to manage overpopulation. Well, it sounds to me like the humans are the problem. You know, we're crowding them into these, um, you know, even, even though they're considered to be endangered species, they're still overcrowded and, uh, they're shrinking habitat. Who's shrinking their habitat? Those evil anthropoid things, you know, human mankind, they on to say, overabundant species, even native ones, can reduce biodiversity by monopolizing resources,

spreading infectious diseases, changing species composition, or relative abundance. That sounds still like humans. You know, they will tell you that we're the ones who are spreading diseases. We're the ones who are changing species composition. As a matter of fact, we're doing it by genetic engineering in many cases so if mankind is the problem and the anthropocene is the problem we got to change that right i mean that'd be the logical conclusion with all of this stuff uh but um they talk about their cases and they focus on deer

and wild horses which don't really seem to be that big of a problem um you know i mean they have uh wild horses that the bureau of land management says that they can't control and so they want to reduce that but not nearly as much as as the Paul Ehrlichs and the Georgia Guidestone people want to reduce the human population. They only want to reduce the wild horse population by about a third, whereas they want the human population to be about one-sixteenth of what it is. Seems to me like the problem is humans, don't you think, from these people's perspective? So they say, what is Spavac? Spavac, according to

Spavac, is an immunocontraceptive vaccine that uses the PZP antigen in a patented liposomal delivery system to create an immune response. We'll unpack all that for you. The immune system of the inoculated animal, and of course this is focused specifically on

mammals. Mammals, important to understand, only on mammals. The immune system of the inoculated animal or mammal will produce antibodies to ZP. These antibodies competitively bind to the ZP surface matrix, thus blocking sperm from being able to bind and therefore preventing fertilization. So they refer to it as ZP, P-ZP because they get it from pigs, porcine. And the way this thing operates,

there's a glycoprotein, which is found wrapped around all the eggs of mammals, including humans. One of these glycoproteins, ZP3, is a critical receptor protein for sperm and therefore key to fertilization of the egg. The porcine ZP vaccine is derived from pig ovaries,

and therefore when referring to this antigen used in the vaccine, we call it PZP. And so the bottom line is that they are going to focus on the eggs. Where are the eggs located? you know, the ovaries. Where does the vaccine accumulate in the ovaries? But there's a lot more coincidence to this than that. If you, and this is what Breaking News Canada did, and this is why I think it's important. As I pointed out, this vaccine from Spavac requires being kept cold at minus 40 degrees centigrade. You know, like these other, you know, Trump shots. And it also has to be given as two shots a month apart.

Wow. Just like the Trump shots. And those are two of the things that I really question. It's like, we've never seen this before. And any vaccine that has to be kept at these super cold temperatures, and you get two shots one month apart? And it was very important for the CDC to keep track of that. You know, they wanted that reported by all the state health organizations,

by all the individuals who are going to be out there vaccinating people. You tell us they wanted that reported by all the state health organizations, by all the individuals who are going to be out there vaccinating people. You tell us when you give them that first shot. We want to make sure they get that second one a month later and type of thing. We'd never seen that before. And that always was a red flag to me. This is highly unusual. But we had seen it before with Spavac, a vaccine designed to sterilize mammals.

In addition, they talk about the fact that this vaccine does not stay at the injection site, but it accumulates in the ovaries, because that's the purpose of it. It wants to change these proteins and bind with these things. And it's an antigen there that gets the immune system to make sure that it's going to block sperm from getting into the egg. It gets even deeper. Pfizer actually partnered with this company for the delivery mechanism of this thing. And they use the same technology,

the same liposome technology. And then we find that, you know, you recall, and of course they point this out, and they had a link in the article at breaking-news.com, Canada, that link in the article to a report that was set up to debunk, because a lot of people were talking about it. Steve Kirsch talked about it. Michael Yadin was the first one to talk about it.

And the first thing, as I said, that Michael Yadin had a problem with, he said, I think this is designed to sterilize people. And so Steve Kirsch talked about how it was accumulating in the ovaries. And so they linked to an article that was supposedly debunking Steve Kirsch. And they said, pay attention to the second table. And when you look at the tables in this debunk article, they drew big red squares around the table. This came out of the Pfizer report where the people said, hey, look, this concentrated in the ovaries. And so in the Pfizer report, they had a list, different rows where all the different places in the body, all these different organs and locations where this stuff could accumulate. And then as you go across, they got the column headings as you go across,

talking about concentrations, first of all, and then the percentage of the vaccine that was found in those locations. So for each location, they would look at it over a period of time. You know, what happens immediately after injection? What happens, you know, six hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, that type of thing. And they would show what was happening with the concentration. Then they had another section that said at those periods of time, you know, six hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, that type of stuff. What was the constant? What was the percentage of the vaccine that went to these different places?

And so what they did was they drew a square around the concentration thing in red and said, see, it's not true. Most of the vaccine does not go to the ovaries. However, if you look at, and what they said was, don't pay attention to that. Pay attention to the first stuff, which is showing the concentration of where it goes. And the place that had the highest concentration was the spleen, which is not surprising since the spleen is going to be filtering the blood, right? And so it had, forget about the units here, it had 23.4 in terms of the concentration of the vaccine was 23.4 in the spleen. Number two, in terms of concentration,

was the ovaries, 12.3. The spleen makes sense because it's filtering the blood but then it goes 12.3 to the ovaries and you look at all the other categories of locations and organs in the body where it could go and the next one from 12.3 was 1.5 and that was a small intestine every other location of the body was less than one so spleen which is filtering the blood, gets 23.5 concentration. Ovaries gets 12.3. Small intestines gets 1.5. And everything else, less than one. Many of them, much less than one.

So Pfizer's delivery system was designed by the people who set up a vaccine to sterilize mammals. You find that interesting? I find that interesting. Just a coincidence, I'm sure. So they said, has it been tested? Well, a single dose of Spavac has been demonstrated to have long- contraception and here's what they found they said that when they did it with a deer that a single three single dose deer trials demonstrated fertility control deer are a problem they they said, because cars hit them and they're destructive to vegetation.

They can transmit disease and so forth. So we got to control their population. They said 41 free-ranging fallow deer were vaccinated with a single injection. None of them became pregnant for three years. They did it with another control group. Five captive white-tailed deer were given a single injection of Spavac. None of them became pregnant during the next three years of the study compared to the control deer population where 100% of them got pregnant.

Well, isn't that interesting? And yet they have to keep doing this over and over again. So again, going back to the technology, the liposome is the nanotechnology that is a part of this. They call their thing VaxiMax. It is a patented vaccine delivery formulation that provides controlled prolonged exposure of antigens plus adjuvant to the immune system.

It has a no-release delivery system utilizing highly engineered liposomes, which mitigates the propensity for antigens to break down, thereby extending the stimulation of the immune response. In other words, what they're doing is they've got a delivery system that means that it's not going to, you know, the immune system is not going to get to it until it gets to where it wants to go. And then at that point, it gets released by those membranes that are around the egg and does its thing. Spavac.

Maybe that's what we should study. The Trump shot, the genetic code injection. Now we got another aspect of it. The Spavac. So thanks for sending that information, even though you're very mad at me for not covering it. I just did not see it. Again, I don't see everything that is there.

We've been able to kind of figure out what is going on nevertheless, but this is damning details. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz Channel at APSradio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move And now, The David Knight Show All right, Geesebusters, Geesebusters, thank you for the tip. My coffee tastes better in my David Knight mug. Yes, it does. That is a proven busters. Thank you for the tip on rock. Fanny says my coffee tastes better. Am I David Knight mug?

Yes, it does. That is a proven scientific fact. I don't have Fauci's word on that. Angus Mustang. Thank you as well. Uh, the video Fauci and the other minions makes me sick.

It does me too. I'm sorry. You're playing it so often, but people have got to hear this. It was done. It's an inside job. Chaos and disruption from the inside. inside, doing it iteratively. William Gardanas, thank you very much as well.

Karen contacted us and said Twitter has just cut us off now. Travis just looked at it, and he said broadcast seems to be still working for him. I don't know if this is anything that is targeted to us or if this is just Twitter problems or things like that that are happening, but this is the kind of stuff that happens when you get pushed into the dark recesses of the internet because what you say is not approved. Just life as we live it here, you know, in the little areas that they let us participate in. Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the McCarthy House. The GOP voted to repeal the army of 87,000 IRS agents as, quote,

its very first act of new Congress. Well, I'm glad that they did it, but it's simply virtue signaling, and it is simply symbolic gesture because nothing is going to happen it's not going as people looking at this it's not even going to be brought up probably on the senate floor for a vote because chuck schumer is in charge and his pal mitch mcconnell doesn't want to do this either? And even if they were to pass it in the Senate and in the House, Biden would veto it. And they certainly would not have the votes to override a Biden veto.

So it's not going to happen. House Republicans just voted unanimously to repeal the Democrats' army of 87,000 IRS agents, announced McCarthy. This was our very first act of the new Congress because government should work for you and not against you. Promises made promises kept. Steve Scalise said every Democrat voted no, just so that you understand.

And so again, this goes back to the August 2022 $700 billion inflation reduction act. I know, I know spending money is not, um, is not inflationary, right. According to them. Uh, but of course they believe that they can keep that under control. Again, modern monetary theory, which is what all the Democrats are pushing right now, so as a deficits don't matter, but if they do get out of control, and this is what most of the people are looking at and saying, this just absolutely makes no sense.

Well, it does. It makes sense just like Nancy Pelosi saying, we've got to pass Obamacare so we can find out what's in it. Because they're just setting it up as a program, and the details are going to be put in by the bureaucracy. These people, when they say this is an inflation reduction act, they say that because they're going to be putting the IRS out there with $80 billion to steal money from people. And that's how, in modern monetary theory,

if things get out of control with all the money that you give to your friends, you go tax your enemies to get it back under control. That's the only thing they do. So now the GOP and Kevin McCarthy had said, that's going to be our very first order of business. It was, and it doesn't matter whatsoever. It really doesn't matter that they pass this. That's it. They can brag about it.

They can virtue signal about it, but nothing is going to happen. The congressional, and now I like this. This is interesting because the Hill and mainstream media pushes back against this, which is not going to happen. Uh, they say, well, you know, just like Bernie Sanders said, you're looting the treasury with a tax cut, right? No, that money doesn't belong to the government. It belongs to us, first of all. But they push back on it and saying, this is going to cost too much money. If we don't spend $80 billion to add 87,000 IRS agents, we can't afford not to do that. It's going to cost us money if we don't do that. Why? Because they're going to try to squeeze money out of people with these 87,000 IRS agents.

So the congressional budget office estimated on money that the legislation would eliminate about $71 billion of the $80 billion that was allocated for the IRS. And let's understand that, you know, they're increasing the size of the IRS by a factor of eight, eight, eight times bigger. And so they were still going to give them a $9 billion, which was going to be about a 50% increase. And the IRS's budget, uh, without the massive army of IRS agents, uh, but the congressional

budget said, even though this would save you $71 billion, it's going to cost us $186 billion, which means that when you subtract out the $71 billion saved, it's going to cost you $114 billion over the next 10 years. So what? We just gave more than that to our corrupt political puppet, Zelensky. In just nine months, they're talking about, you know, this is what it's going to cost us in 10 years. Who cares? You didn't care when you gave that money to Zelensky for whatever he's going to do with it, his own personal corruption scheme. They didn't care about that.

Why do you care about this? Stretched out over the same amount of money. Stretched out over 10 years, not over nine months. But first of all, they don't even know. How does a congressional budget office know? How much more additional tax revenue the IRS is going to be able to squeeze out of people? How do they know that? How do they know that people are underpaying their taxes by that amount of money over a

10-year period? They have absolutely no way to know any of that. It's all made up. I'm sick and tired of all these experts that they go to, to give them made up stuff. And, you know, I talked about it even when we had, you know, what is the travel going to be like for Thanksgiving or Christmas? And so they go to AAA, the American Automobile Association. And AAA gives them numbers about how many people are going to be traveling by car, by plane, and all the rest of the stuff over the holidays.

They have no way of knowing that. It's just a guesstimate. But this is by the, you know, reporters go out there. Now, I've got a source. And they're an authority, but this is by the, you know, reporters go out there, and I've got a source, and they're an authority, and this is what they say. So I've done my fact-checking, and be afraid, be very afraid, or be amazed. Look at the numbers coming out of this.

The IRS commissioner, to bolster their case, the Hill, the Hill says, well, first of all, we can't afford this. And secondly, the IRS commissioner said that this is going to be used only to audit large corporations and high net worth individuals. And furthermore, we had the White House say they weren't going to raise taxes on anybody and do any more enforcement on anybody that's not making more than $400,000. But this is all a lie. I mean, it was even put on the Drudge Report, the Reason Report, talking about how they do their focus more on very poor individuals

than they are on millionaires and above. They do more audits of the poor, the people at the lowest income level, get more audits than the millionaires. Why would they do that? Because they're easy to victimize. They're not going to go out and hire lawyers. It's the same reason why you have all these jurisdictions that are doing civil asset forfeiture and coming after poor people, confiscating their cars that are about $1,000. Because if you want, again, they don't charge you with a crime.

They certainly don't get a conviction. They don't even charge you with a crime. They just steal your car and say, well, if you want to get it back, you've got to sue us. And if you want to start the lawsuit, it's going to cost you $900 to begin the process. And they look at it and say, well, my car is only worth $1,000, and I'm only going to break even, even if I win and I may lose a thousand dollars and not

get my car back. Who knows? I don't know what this process is. And I can't afford a lawyer over and above the $900. And I have to spend to do this. That's why the government victimizes the poor. They do it with civil asset forfeiture. They do it with the IRS. And this has been a long established thing. As a matter of fact, if you go back and look at it, it's not just this recent article from Reason. That article said, from Reason, they said 1.1% of millionaires are audited. But of the lowest income wage earners, 1.27% of them are audited. And they probably get more money from those people who don't have any money

than they get from the millionaires because the millionaires lawyer up and hire accountants, an army of accountants. The IRS had said, as a matter of fact, this is a common thing. People are doing this all the time in 2020. The IRS even said it's easier for us to go after the poor. And so the Republicans, again, the guy who put this in is, um, uh, representative Adrian Smith, Republican of Nebraska. And this is what he had to say.

He said, the IRS needs to fix its customer service. Yeah, that's the problem. We just need better customer service. Americans want an IRS that works for them, not

against them. I would have thought that that was a Democrat saying that, but no, that's a Republican. That's a Republican who put in this virtue signaling going nowhere bill that you want an IRS that works for us. How does the IRS work for us with anything? These people are never concerned about a deficit. You know, look at the, oh, the Congressional Budget Office says it might cost us $150 billion over 10 years.

So what? No, actually, it's $114, right? So what? You're not concerned about a $4 trillion bill that you just put out there. Since when do you care about a deficit? This is why I say you need to get rid of the IRS because these people don't care about deficits at all. Unless you start talking about cutting taxes and say, well, I can't cut any tax. I can't cut any spending. I can't cut any taxes. Um, uh, yeah, we'd have that deficit thing,

you know, um, they bring that wheel that out. Uh, so the house passes a bill. Now it goes to the Democrat controlled Senate where it has little chance of progress, and it will not even be brought to the floor, I'm sure. And then, of course, Biden is not going to sign it either. So now the House Republicans are going to vote on a bill to abolish the IRS and eliminate the income tax. In the 1990s, when I was working with the Libertarian Party, that'd be the first thing we would say. I want to eliminate the IRS and the bomb. You guys are not serious. Come on. You're just a bunch of jokers saying stuff like that.

I think it's interesting that now this has become something of a mainstream idea. It's an idea whose time should have come a long time ago. Republicans, however, want to replace it with a consumption tax. Since when do deficits matter? They don't matter. They don't matter. You know, when Harry Brown was running for president with the Libertarian Party, he would address the groups and say, would you get rid of the IRS and the income tax? Would you give up your favorite government program to get rid of the IRS and the income tax? And he would preface it by asking the audience, you know, what is your favorite government program?

Yes, yes, sir. Yeah, yes, ma'am. You know, the post office or this or that. Well, you know, the post office doesn't have to be funded by the income tax. The weather service. One person said one of these things. He couldn't believe it. The weather service.

You know, we're going to know about climate change. But, you know, would you give up your favorite government program? Would you actually cut government spending? Assuming that the deficit matters, right? Because that's the way they're going to go back to climate change. But, you know, would you give up your favorite government program? Would you actually cut government spending, assuming that the deficit matters, right? Because that's the way they're going to come back. Oh, you can't have that because of deficit. Okay. Well, you can fix the deficit by stopping spending, you know? And so would you give up that favorite government program? Do you really need government that much is what he would say. But it's gone beyond that now because as they focus on the modern monetary theory and all the rest of stuff uh just just look at their disconcern

about all this as a matter of fact you got donald trump saying that we need to primary out all these 18 Republicans who supported Joe Biden's latest spending spree. McConnell, all these Republican senators that voted with him to push in this $1.7 trillion spending bill. Those people need to be kicked out. They're profligate spenders. Do you remember when it wasn't $1.7, but when it was $3.7 trillion? Donald Trump. And the only person who pushed back against that was Thomas Massey. Do you remember when it wasn't 1.7 but when it was 3.7 trillion dollars? Donald Trump?

And the only person who pushed back against that was Thomas Massey? Do you remember what Trump said? Primary him out. Now he's doing the opposite as a candidate. Oh, we got 18 people who voted, 18 Republicans who voted for a 1.7 trillion

dollar bill. Let's primary them out. When in 2020, he wanted to primary out the only Republican, Thomas Massey, who voted against his $3.7 trillion bill. He doesn't care about deficits. None of these people care about deficits. So why would you replace the income tax with anything? It is simply there to make sure that the middle class doesn't get any higher up, to take away any savings, to take away any disposable income. It's to keep us from getting more independent of them.

They want everybody poor and dependent on them. That's the only purpose of the IRS. Well, not the only purpose. The other purpose of the IRS has always been as a surveillance agency. But of course, that's become, you know, they have so many different ways that they're surveilling us.

As I pointed out yesterday, they call it maintaining custody of us. Constant surveillance, they call it maintaining custody of us the public because they view this as a prison system that's their euphemism for it maintaining custody they want to maintain custody of us with the irs they want to surveil us and they want to be able to send us into the big house with actual physical bars on it uh if we are enemy of them. It's always been about that. Always has been about that.

So some of the stuff that the new, the six holdouts got against McCarthy, well, I should say the 20 got against him. The 20 some odd people that made this thing go like 15 rounds, like a prize fight. Well, what did they get from McCarthy? You know, McCarthy is bragging about what these people coerced him into giving up. This is politics in Washington. You know, he fought them for 15 rounds and finally gave in and then becomes speaker.

And now he brags about what he's done. Empowered members to debate. Increase transparency. Reopen Congress to we the people. I don't know what that means. Does that mean they're not going to, you know, if you go on a sightseeing tour, they're not going to lock you up

in a jail in Washington, D.C. and torture you for several years before you even get a trial? Reopen Congress to we the people. They're going to replace rules that silence representatives' voices. They're going to keep deal, that keep deal-making hidden behind closed doors. Oh yeah.

All right. Uh, Thomas Massey said, uh, and of course getting rid of unconstitutional proxy voting, Thomas Massey said proxy voting has ended in the house. It was rarely used for its stated purpose of dealing with COVID. So this would be a situation where I guess somebody said, well, I'm afraid to come in, so I'm going to give my vote to Nancy Pelosi and she can decide what to do with it. He said it was frequently abused by members to attend fundraisers, to campaign, to go on vacation, to avoid going to work.

I'm one of a small minority who never voted by proxy. But again, when we look at where this is headed, it's theater. It's absolute theater. You have a Texas Republican has filed articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, because of the border. The resolution claims that Mayorkas engaged in a pattern of conduct

incompatible with duties, complaining that he's failed to maintain operational control of the border. Why didn't the Republicans ever bring articles of impeachment against Obama? Obama's Janet Napolitano, when she said, I'm going to do deferred action for childhood arrivals. I'm not going to enforce the law for childhood arrivals. Why didn't they do that then? She says, you know, I took an oath to uphold the constitution and to enforce the laws,

but I'm not going to do it. And then when Trump gets in, he says, well, I'm going to have to ask the Supreme court, whether or not we can do anything about that, because you know, that was the executive order from a subordinate of Obama and the previous administration, I, as president, as the current president, can't do anything about that, I'll have to wait to see what the Supreme court says. The Supreme court says, yeah, that's right. You, you can't get rid of us of a statement from the head of Homeland Security saying, I'm not going to enforce the law.

DACA was a political hot potato, but it was an amazing lie about everything that was happening. They said, House Republicans will investigate every order, every action, every failure, will determine whether we can bring impeachment inquiry, says McCarthy. Again, you know, they're going to have show trials about the border. They're going to have show trials about Mallorca's. They're going to have show trials about Wuhan. And they're probably going to have show trials about Hunter. Will they do anything?

I seriously doubt it. You have one congressman who wants the U S to use military force against Mexican cartels in 2017. When Trump says, well, I'm going to have to ask Congress if they're going to let me have any money to build a border. I said, take it out of the military budget, right? What's the military for? If it's not to protect our borders, take it out of the military budget, do what you said, end the wars and our involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq and all these other places, bring the American troops home. And if, um, you know, you can't save enough money to build your wall, which isn't going

to work anyway, put the military on the border to stop the wholesale traffic in human trafficking and drugs. But this is not what this congressman wants. He wants an authorization for the use of military force. Another blank check authorization for the government to go anywhere and do anything that it wants. Representative Mike Waltz, a Republican from Florida, said we need to go on offense against them

since the cartels are destabilizing our neighbor and ruining our border, running our border, I should say. Well, they're ruining it as well. Walt said that he'll introduce legislation to authorize the use of military force against these cartels. An American military response might include cyber, drones, intelligent assets, naval assets, but it won't involve sending U.S. troops to fight the cartels. Yeah, I heard all that stuff in Vietnam as well. Trust us. We're from the government.

We're here to help you and to make peace. That's what we're here for. We're just here to make peace. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. Do we have our guest lined up yet? Okay. Well, we'll be right back with some more news. We're going to be talking, by the way, to Dwight Mitchell about CPS.

He's somebody who's been there at ground zero. It's been a while since I've talked to Dwight, so I'm interested to connect with him and see what he's currently looking at. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKradio.com all right welcome back let's talk a little bit about what's going on in Illinois. We had a listener yesterday who said, what do you think about this Illinois gun control stuff? And, of course, they'd been kicking around for quite a while. They're always trying to do gun control in Illinois. And they got it through.

It went through yesterday. And as far as I know, it may even be signed by the governor there. They're very anxious to get this thing through so one of the legislative bodies approved it yesterday they expected the other one to quickly follow suit and the government the governor as well but let's just talk about control gun control and the society that's there you know as i've talked about this whether you're talking about the Christmas parade attack with an SUV or the attack that I talked about yesterday

where you had a guy making a literal terrorist attack on a solar power plant. I mean, how much worse is that? This guy is attacking the heart of what is going to save us. You know, solar panel and windmill farms, they are the heart of our salvation. We're all going to die without those things. This guy attacked that?

Well, it doesn't get any worse than that, except nobody cared. He attacked them by driving a Camry into the area, setting it on fire with that evil gasoline. Can you imagine taking a gasoline can to the sacred ground of a solar farm? So he took that dirty fossil fuel and put it all over that dirty fossil fuel burning car, the Toyota Camry, set it on fire, even put some of that fossil fuel gasoline on some other

components there, hoping that he could get a bigger fire because, you know, the solar panel fields are very, very large. Didn't work. Nobody wants to talk about what Mohammed did. But, you know, when you look at what is happening in Chicago, is the problem in Chicago guns? Is that the problem? Or is that just a tool that they use? Is it just the weapon of choice by some people, not by all the people?

Four people were killed on Monday alone in Chicago. You have a woman in a car, 30-year-old woman shot in the head after an argument. She was taken to a hospital, pronounced dead. You have another second fatal shooting, a double homicide. Police discovered it about 2 p.m. They found a man and a woman fatally shot inside a home. Both of them had been shot in the head. Fourth fatal shooting of the day, 21-year-old man wounded,

shot in the head while he was walking down the sidewalk. So we got to get rid of the guns, they say. Well, you know, the violence is the problem. We saw on New Year's Eve in New York City, we saw a guy take a machete to three police officers, who, by the way, were armed. And, you know, got him by surprise. But one guy in the hospital, but hit all three of them with a machete.

The guy who was armed was able to take him out. But, look, you can use an SUV to drive through a Christmas parade. You can use a Camry to attack a power facility. You can use a machete to attack police officers. The issue is the person. And we'll talk more about what this gun control is later. But we have Dwight Mitchell who is ready to join us. So let's take a quick break and we'll get Dwight on the line. We will be right back.

Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. All right, and joining us now is Dwight Mitchell and his organization. Best way to find him is familypreservationfoundation.org. Did you say? Dot org. Dot org. Dwight is somebody, it's been a couple of years since I've talked to you, Dwight.

And just to let the audience know, Dwight is an excellent source of information about what happens with CPS. He's got a lot of information about how to handle it. If you've got a, you know, somebody, family member or maybe a neighbor who doesn't like you or your family because maybe you're homeschooling or they just don't like you and they sick the CPS on you and you haven't done anything. Your first response is to, well, come on in and investigate. See, I've got nothing to hide. He explains why that's not the right approach because that type of thing happened to him. So he's got a lot of stuff to help you about that. And he's constantly working. As that type of thing had happened to Dwight, he realized just how big this was. He said at first you'd think it's just this out-of-control CPS worker that's there.

But this is a nationwide thing, billions of dollars being involved. So thank you for joining us, Dwight, and you for telling people how the right way to handle this. Thank you. Thank you for having me, David. I mean, uh, I seem to be an activist on, on most fronts. I've been doing CPS for the better part of 10 years now. Most people don't realize I'm also an NRA firearms instructor. Oh, good.

I'm constantly giving classes on that. And so I was listening to the program and, you know, you're talking about gun control and gun violence and just as I've done at CPS you know I've gotten to the numbers I'm like what are the numbers mm-hmm when you look at the numbers the numbers don't belie the story the propaganda that's that's being provided by our government mm-hmm but it's not that I'm anti-government. I think it's certain people within that institution who are not doing what they're designed, you know, what they're supposed to be doing.

That's right. It's like the politicians that say, you know, we're going to uphold the Constitution. The very first thing they do is go in and try and do right the Constitution. I'm just like, well, you swore to uphold the Constitution. The Second Amendment is right the Constitution. I'm just like, well, you swore to uphold the Constitution. The Second Amendment is in the Constitution. You know, you CPS workers, you swore to uphold, you know, the duties of your office. You know, we know about the Fourth and the Fourteenth Amendment. We know about due process.

So we know about all of these things. That's right. Just recently, this past year, which was a huge win for parents in the state of New Jersey, which is where our second office is, is the New Jersey Supreme Court has finally said that CPS workers need to stop taking children away from parents based upon allegations. It has to be based on facts. Parents are not required to show why they should be a parent. It's a presumption of innocence. I mean, the Supreme Court actually had to say, if you're accusing a parent of not being fit, then you must show through evidence that this parent is not fit. Not the other way around. The parent doesn't need to show you why they should be allowed

to keep their children. And yet that's what we're seeing everywhere. I was talking about that earlier in the program, Dwight. The fact that because this is coming from a bureaucracy, you've got to prove that you're innocent, right? You've got to prove that you don't have a virus or something. You've got to prove that you're a good parent to them. And they can just confiscate your car with civil asset forfeiture.

They can confiscate your kids. And then you've got to come back and sue them. There is no presumption of innocence. They shut down due process. They won't talk to, you know, as you've talked about it many times, this is very difficult getting information from CPS to even find out why they came to your house. Correct. I mean, we, out why they came you know to your house right correct i mean we the last

case you know we just finished two in minnesota and that we won and in new jersey won our last case also it's more difficult in minnesota because it still has that old regime but in new jersey you know you can literally come to the prosecutors now and you don't have to say anything you don't have to prove anything they have to provide all the evidence to the court and then you have the ability to refute it. So that's wonderful progress. Still it's getting people, our biggest, especially since COVID,

but one of the things that we've been very difficult is getting in front of the parents and getting our message to the parents and getting them not to talk. And I get so many calls on a daily basis, hundreds. And it's like, where are you? And they'll call three, four, five months down the road and they'll say, but the CPS workers X, Y, and Z. And I'm like, but i can't help you now because you've already you know gone into an agreement with the government so any document that you signed from the very first day saying i will work with you i will do whatever it is to get my children back now you have entered into a

formal agreement and um when i tell the parents i wish you had contacted us earlier so we could have advised or guide you. You know, they said, well, I do speak to a lawyer. I spoke to a public defender. And I'm like, well, he works for the government, the same government that's prosecuting you. And their goal isn't to defend you. Anything you say can and will be used against you. I mean, that's the I was talking about the shooting in Houston, you know, and you just have the Soros, uh, uh, you know,

district attorney who is going to try to charge the guy who shot the person who was involved in an armed robbery, you know, and, um, and so, uh, he's not talking to them. He, you know, me, had a lawyer go in and say, yeah, the guy that you're looking for is my client. He's got nothing to say. He's innocent. Prove it. And that's the way it needs to go. But the problem is, and this is one of the key things that people need to understand about every government interaction now, is pretty much an interaction with a bureaucracy,

a bureaucracy that created the rules, a bureaucracy that has excessive punishment at the end of it, a bureaucracy that says, this isn't a law. This is a rule from us. Therefore, you have no presumption of innocence, and you have no protection against excessive punishment or anything else. And we're going to just assess these things to you. That's what people need to understand. That has now become a common baseline throughout our government in terms of its interaction.

It's been adopted everywhere. And the federal government and the state governments as well, they've all taken that approach. And it is a complete inversion of the way things are supposed to work. But they've been able to eradicate all due process and constitutional protections by saying, well, we're a bureaucracy. We're not. And we've got rules. But, you know, you only get protection for laws. And that's the thing. And that's why people need to understand. You don't participate in this process, and you've got to just be silent.

Even when you say, well, I've got nothing to hide. That's everybody's instinct, but you can't do that. Understood. And I tell my clients that all the time, Dave. You're 100% correct. I'm like, keep quiet. If you need to consult an attorney, consult an attorney. If you can't afford one, still keep quiet.

They have to prove things against you. You don't have to say, well, I can just resolve this with a conversation. I'm like, no, it's a machine. It's a money-making machine. It's a self-preserving machine. They need to have children in order to have jobs. And so I've spoken to many social workers and many social workers have come forward saying what you're saying is 100 percent correct. We will actually put in a recommendation that the child be left at home in the parents custody. Maybe we do some special services. We'll go back and our reports will be overridden by the supervisor. Our supervisor will tell us to change our reports and to recommend the child be removed. And then they find out later on well why is this

being done it's being done because based on the title 40 funding act the only time the states receive their 50 percent uh allotment from the federal government is when the child is removed from the home on that very first court hearing so you know when people say i don't understand i'm like well because you don't understand you know when people say i don't understand i'm like well because you don't understand you know the game that's been put into play that's right uh and it's trying to get that message out you know you know elon musk now it's coming forward and you're looking at all of the things that are being exposed that you know happened behind the scenes so you know how people are being canceled. All the pharmaceutical companies are saying,

don't tell people about natural remedies, you know, for health. The same thing is with CPS. It's just like, you know, I have a feeling, and, you know, it's just my own personal feeling. We were doing very, very well prior to COVID. We were growing exponentially. We were able to help a lot of parents. COVID has come

back and turned things on its head. We are still helping the parents, but I feel, quote unquote, that I'm being canceled or censored by the government. I'm constantly being sent grants and opportunities to obtain money, but whenever I apply for the money, I'm told, well, we decided to give the money to something COVID related or something you know, or something of that nature. I'm just like, but, you know, you still have all these children that need to be represented and that you've taken from their parents, even during COVID. You know. Yeah. What happened with COVID?

I mean, you know, you've got a situation where everybody's supposed to be afraid of the virus and nobody goes out and interacts with anybody. And yet the government doesn't seem to have that concern. They still go out and interact with people. And they were confiscating kids during COVID, right? They were. You know, they were confiscating kids. And it was more difficult because now they're trying to do this via Zoom. So you can't visit your children because your children have been put into a foster home.

COVID restrictions were in place. So it was 100 times worse than it was prior to COVID because the parents couldn't visit their children. And then CPS had total control. And so the judge does everything under the guise of CPS supervision. And so he gives them the ultimate decision. You know, even though visitation, as an example, is a requirement by law, they always put in this stipulation, you know, under the supervision of the guys at CPS. So CPS can say, yes, I know the George ordered visitation, but we don't think, you know, visitation is appropriate or in order.

So we're not going to allow visitation. And that happens, you know, quite often also. So during COVID, the parents were just being hammered. They were separated from their kids, couldn't see their kids. All the hearings were virtual. And so they were having problems with the meetings. The parents who worked, a number of them didn't have discretionary income to have these high-end laptops and things of that nature to communicate with the course they're trying to do things virtually on their phones and things of that

nature it was it was a mess david and i imagine that um you know to some of the usual charges they make a lot of these charges against people homeschool people say oh you know you're homeschooling your kids you must be evil uh trying to hide something uh i imagine there were a lot of, uh, charges brought by CPS against the parents because they did not want to get their kids vaccinated as well. That is correct. And what the parents needed to do is, and New Jersey's different than other states. You know, I'm, I'm back in New Jersey from Minnesota. I moved back to New Jersey.

And so now I'm finding a whole whole another regime, which is quite different. But you had to write a letter. At least New Jersey hasn't taken away that religious exemption that New York, New York has said no more exemptions based upon religion. New Jersey still has it. So you need to write a letter based upon religious exemptions. So you can still deny vaccinations, but if a doctor recommends it, now you have to go get another doctor to refute it, whatever that vaccination that you wanted.

So if you didn't want your child vaccinated, you could send them a letter for religious exemptions. And if you didn't send them the letter, then CPS was at your house saying that this was not in the welfare the best interest of the child and parents a lot of parents didn't know that school would say you got to get them vaccinated and then the parents would be like okay but i don't want to and then that's when the fight with cps commences yeah yeah i remember when that happened back in may of 2019 oh we got measles

going around and trump said yeah they got to get vaccinated i don't care if it's a private religious school they still got to get vaccinated so you know it's going around. And Trump said, yeah, they got to get vaccinated. I don't care if it's a private religious school. They still got to get vaccinated. So, you know, it's going around. So we really got to do this. And, um, you know, it was, uh, basically New York, I think, and in California that we're doing that, uh, coursing everybody, um, over that. So at your site, you have, uh, I think some instructional videos that you still have there talking about how to interact if, um, uh, CPS, CPS comes to your house. Is that correct? That's correct. You know, the number one thing that we

say, so I put together the CPS instructional training guides for parents. There are 11 videos out there now with PDF handouts. So if they go into YouTube YouTube I have a link on the website just to download the PDF or it is also the link is in the YouTube video but each video tells parents what to do when CPS comes knocking at your door so it's from the very first meeting all all the way through the term and see proceedings the people we've been the most successful with are people who are not afraid. The minute CPS knocks on their door, they're scourging the internet, looking for information and they contact us. Those are people we can really help because they

look at the videos and say, okay, here's what I'm not supposed to do right away. And here's how I fight CPS, here's how I counter CPS. Uh, and so a lot of people have provided accolades, uh, as it relates to that information and just things they just didn't know, which apply across the nation as it relates to due process and what they should and should not say if CPS comes knocking at the door. Yeah. And of course you're focused on, on the front end of the process. You talked about how much money there is that is being released to them. If they get custody of the child, you know, the federal government

rewards that financially. And, um, I remember in the early days of homeschooling, you know, homeschool legal defense association, because there were so many people that were getting. Uh, CPS called on them because they were homeschooling, you know, be the, you know, the school system would call CPS on them or a thing or neighbors or something like that. And they would give them the same advice and say, you know, don't talk to anybody, uh, uh, you know, say, I'm going to call my lawyer and call us that type of thing. And, um, uh, but you know, that's on the front side and it's very important for people to understand that

before the kids are stolen. But, um, you know, and, and the front side, and it's very important for people to understand that before the kids are stolen. But, you know, and that's your focus, and that's a good focus. But, you know, as you pointed out, there's so many incentives that are financial just within the government, but there's a lot of other illicit stuff that happens to kids in custody. We, you know, we're constantly getting reports. There was one just a couple of months ago about a kid. They had video of it. The person who was with the foster parent thing was, you know, trying to encourage a young girl to be a prostitute.

And, you know, this type of human trafficking is another aspect of it. But, you know, people look at it and say, yeah, that's one issue. But there's billions of dollars to be had just from the federal government if you take the kids out. But, you know, talk about some of the things that happen to kids under the custody of CPS. Well, one of the things that happens is that if your child is not vaccinated, so say you don't believe in vaccinations and you have this exemption. One of the first things that CPS does, because they have all of these contracts with doctors and psychiatrists,

is that your child gets vaccinated. So if your child is unvaccinated, they will load your child up with vaccines. And then they bill back the doctors, you know, bill back, or rather the doctors bill the insurance companies will bill back CPS, in turn, bill you back also. So, you know, you don't have custody and control of your child. You're just still required to pay for it. You're still required to keep insurance, give them all of your doctor's information.

And then they decide what they are going to do because now they have total custody and control. They almost all the children in CPS custody are given psychological counseling or therapy. And so when I question this, I'm like, I don't understand, why are you giving all these children therapy? But we're giving them therapy because we separated the children from their families. And we know that this traumatizes the children. So we have to give them therapy right off the bat because we've removed them from their caregivers. Wow. So, you know.

And I imagine that psychological therapy, since we last talked, I imagine that includes a lot of, well, are you sure what gender you are? You know, look at our chart here. We've got five dozen genders. Which one would you like to be? You know, that type of thing, right? Well, there was a, and i can send it to you it's funny you should say that though because now uh cps is allowing um any kind of couple to foster and adopt children and so i was i was actually looking at a video where they put an african-american uh boy who's about five years old with two men to to to game it and for some unknown reason I don't

and I don't know why they were filming this you know trying to you to get the child to interact with the man and say well it's okay to have two men and trying to promote this in the end the kid who was a foster kid was having nothing to do with it. And I found it comical. He was like, get away from me. You're too big. You're not supposed to be. No, I'm not going to hug you.

I'm not going to kiss you. It's all right for us to kiss. And the two men were kissing and hugging. You can do that. And the little boy was like, no way. So I saved that because I thought, I said, this is what happens. You're trying to traumatize children

under the guise of protecting them. That's right. And the boy is telling them, this is what happens. You're trying to traumatize children under the guise of protecting them. That's right. And the boy, the boy is telling them this is not wrong. This is a five-year-old. So, you know, literally the, you know. He had some parents who, who were, who were giving him an understanding of that and they took him away and put him with these other people. It is absolutely amazing what, what our government has turned into.

And again, you know, that wasn't even a thing when I last talked to you, but that is now the focus, it seems like, of schools and everything else, focus on transitioning kids, telling them that they're in the wrong body and all the rest of the stuff. It's absolutely insane what is happening. And CPS is taking the kids based upon this so we we're fighting cases like that now david would you the child will go to the counselor say i'm afraid to tell my parents that i'm non-binary or whatever and then cps gets involved and says your child is

afraid of you you know it's not the best for for your child. We will take the child. And now we will give them gender drugs or whatever they want to do because they're over 12 years old and it's their say to do what they want to do with their body. And so now CPS, unbeknownst to the parents, because your kid just went to the counselor and said, you know, I'm feeling X, Y or Z or non-binary. My high school son was having fits. He's, and he graduated two years ago, but you know, he said, I can't say anything. I don't know what to do. If I say or do anything, I'm in the crosshairs of the administration and, and CPS and things of that nature. So the parent, that's another way for CPS to come into your house now is through your children saying, I'm afraid to tell my parents X, Y, and Z. Or, you know, perhaps if you've got a kid

who's got his head on straight and he's not going along with the gender grooming and all the rest of this stuff, oh, well, you know, you must have a family where they're very hateful and intolerant and maybe we need to take you away from that family. It is amazing when you look at it, all of this stuff really goes back to parental rights. That is a central issue that is being violated by CPS and the way that they are operating

without due process, operating preemptively, and that you're guilty before you're proven innocent. But now this is metastasized, the same thing that used to be just located just you know cps primarily that's now metastasized in the school system at large and uh you know they are actively as i point out you know from portland oregon to portland maine they are actively trying to remove any knowledge of the parents in terms of they start grooming the kids with gender stuff and don't tell the parents driving that wedge there that the parents find out and want to do something about it. Now they will bring in CPS, as you pointed out, uh, to, to finish this up. It is absolutely insidious for the longest time, you know, Dwight about,

oh, I guess it was back in 2008. I think, um, a thing for an organization that was focused on parental rights, and they were talking about the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. And so it sounds like a really positive – we're going to talk about children's rights. Well, they posit children's rights as in opposition to parental rights. And if you're going to focus on the children's rights, then basically the parents have no right. And it's going to be the government that is going to be advocating for the children to maintain that they can be independent of the parent. And this UN convention on the rights of the child has been passed by every nation except for the United States,

but it was being run through, you know, when we're talking about 2008, 2009, it was being run through, you know, when we're talking about 2008, 2009, it was being run through by an activist judiciary. And now you can add to all of that stuff the school bureaucracies as well as CPS. Correct. is there's been, in conjunction with the UN agenda, there's been a parental rights amendment that's come up in committee year after year after year.

That was what I was working with, was the people were trying to push the parental rights amendment. Very simple. It was like two sentences, one paragraph and everything. And they want to shut that down. And it is a global thing, as I said. The only country that has not formally declared that they're part of this UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

is the U.S., but we have all the judiciary, all the bureaucracies, the educational establishment, they're all focused on that, on enforcing it by de facto. Correct. And that's what's been disturbing me because all of the other socialist countries, Norway, Sweden, all of these companies, CPS, people are more afraid of CPS and the police. And it's starting to become that, you'll look at it and you'll say, okay, well, the laws are written a certain way, but they haven't completely stripped parents of their parental rights. But in essence, they really have based upon the way the system works.

And so when you say you have parental rights, all of the case law that has been written as of late always leans toward the best interest of the child. It used to be parental rights, and now they've taken that out of almost all the wording across the United States and put in best interest of the child. So, in fact, they're saying you no longer have your rights. The government has the right to determine what is the best interest of the child. And so, you know, if you want to homeschool or if you want to do anything you need to understand the dynamics of what you're going to do and then i tell everyone don't let cps in your house i mean i did i literally did that i took my children out of

school and homeschooled them during covid you know and you know we were you know here again like anything cbs came knocking at my door. And I, because I know, I'm like, guys picked the wrong person to come knocking at the front door. And, you know, I won. And I'm just like, no, no, can't come in. No, can't talk to you. No, can we talk to your son? No, no, no, no.

Go prove your case. Have a nice day and so they ended up uh filing a petition and um i'm like all right and i won of course but i knew what to do i'm like prove it prove it i said here are my doctors where are your doctors not your allegations where your doctors right you can't prove it bye and the judge dismissed it. He had to dismiss it because I understood and I'm trying to help other parents understand. Just stay quiet and tell them, come up with your evidence. And that's it.

You know. And I hope that people understand that because, you know, I think a lot of people look at this and say, well, CPS, I don't need to worry about CPS. I'm not doing anything. Just like they say, they show up at your door. Uh, people will look at this and say, well, I don't need to watch, um, I don't need to watch Dwight's videos because, um, I'm never going to be visited by CPS. Um, you know, you need to be forearmed about all this stuff. And that's the reason why I wanted to have, um, have you on again, uh, Dwight, uh, people need to be fully aware of what our government is capable of,

and knowing that you can be put in the crosshairs at any time for any reason, and you don't have to do anything that is criminal, and you should actively look out for your own rights, because the government is not going to be there to protect your rights. I mean, that is the purpose of government. That's what the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is about. We create governments to defend our God-given rights. But the government is about taking those away at this point in time. So you have to understand that that is always a possibility, even though you're not doing anything wrong. And be forewarned and forearmed and, how to oppose this system and not to put

yourself and your children in jeopardy because once they take your kids away, that's just such a heartbreaking thing to have happen. And, and I say this to people understand that this is getting bigger and bigger. As you were just talking about Dwight, um, you may have a CPS get involved simply because of this transgender issue in public schools. They may use CPS as an additional wedge to put between you and your kids to take away your kids so they can transition them. So everybody in this environment is at danger if you've got your kids in a public school. And then, of course, if you're homeschooling, that's a different way that they might come after you. But you're especially in danger if you're in the public schools because of this transgender grooming that's going on right

now. Correct. And you can't say anything. You as a parent, I mean, I know firsthand, I've gone, I'm like, I don't approve of some of the curriculum. So my son will not be attending these classes. No, no, you don't have a right to say that. Once that child crosses the threshold, we, the government, the school system, what we decide is going to be the curriculum is what your child will be taught. And you have no say so in the matter. If you don't like our curriculum, your choices are to A, take them out and put them in a private school that agrees with your philosophy of life or be to homeschool that child. That's right.

And if you decide to homeschool, please do something computer-based. I'm gonna give a little tip here. Don't just say, I'm gonna homeschool. Put together a curriculum. There's a lot of online schools, Time for Learning. I'm not trying to give them a plug. That's one of the ones I use, but there's others.

Make sure you have a written curriculum and that they're doing this daily and doing tests because you don't want to open the door on the back side for truancy or neglect on that side that's right 88 of the children taken from parents are not from physical abuse or sexual abuse it's for neglect and neglect is anything the government says it is uh it could be not giving them vaccines. That is correct. Yeah. We're not following our doctor's recommendation. Amanda Weber took her child.

If you remember Amanda Weber from a few years ago, it just popped into my head. But she took her child to the doctor, and the doctor said the child was fine. And so she went home, and the next thing you know, CPS is at her door the next day. We won that case for her, but it's something as simple as you know going to the doctor you know we uh uh took you know and i'm thinking of this and the doctors now they're making the doctors our enemy

they're putting parents against doctors and i think children are not getting the well care um the pre-illness treatment because parents are afraid i'm like if i go to the doctor and i say this doctors are mandatory reporters and so took my daughter to get her last physical and the daughter my daughter was talking about like traveling to the moon and so on and so forth and the doctor And then my daughter made some comment about you know falling down and hurting her leg and the doctor immediately snap hurt your leg How'd you hurt you look what? And we're like look at the doctor like are you an idiot? She was just telling you she was on the moon and traveling on the moon Nothing the doctor like it means she hurt her leg the doctor's focus zeroed in what

happened what'd you do how'd you do it you know like yeah because kids are not supposed to be outside playing or anything you know they're supposed to be sitting on a couch uh looking at tv i guess and so you know if you hurt your leg that's evidence of neglect because you got a parent who's letting you outside the house or something. Yeah. It is absolutely incredible how things are rapidly transforming. And, um, uh, you pointed out that, you know, as we think of it, we think, well, abuse, we think, uh, violence or sexual abuse, as you pointed out, 80% of those don't have anything to do with it. That's not even an allegation.

Right? No, no, I, I found out and it was, it was alarming and this is the degree that that i i need to get across to parents so my son was going to soccer practice on his bicycle my son fell on his bicycle on his way to soccer practice he gets to practice uh the coach are like you okay you know you're like some some bruises he says yeah i fell on my way here on my bike right come to find out and i didn't know this because cps ended up disregarding it that coach called cps on my son because he fell off his bike on his way to soccer practice and i found out maybe like two years later you know with this covet homeschooling thing and it comes out and i'm just like what are you talking about i I know nothing about this. So, uh,

I guess, you know, CPS at that time, they call it ruling it out. But the mere fact that my soccer coach called CPS, you know, on me and my son that I was not made aware of when my son tells him I fell off my bike all my way here to practice. And that's why I have this scraping bruise on my leg. And the coach still called CPS. So parents need to be aware. Something as little as falling off your bike gives mandatory reporters, like doctors and teachers now, mandatory. I mean, they must call and report any injury that they see.

And so it's gotten to be a mess david it really it really has i mean i grew up as a free-range kid and our role models were the little rascals who are out there building doing all kinds of dangerous stuff all the time you know and and it's like oh that's really cool but i don't know how you know but but even if you did something like the little rascals actually did when i was a kid they wouldn't call the cops on your parents um you know but uh now it's just it's amazing how they've tightened the the noose and but especially this whole thing about what is happening with transgender issues and uh transitioning kids uh they have a fixation on that and that's going to manifest itself in CPS.

So, I mean, you're talking about, you know, sexual abuse. That's really where it's coming from. It's coming from our government, the sexual abuse in the kids and then using that as a premise to come after kids. So everybody needs to understand what is going on with this. And I really do appreciate what you do. And again, to let everybody know at your your website you have videos that go through the whole process what you can expect and how you can interact with them in a safe way what you should the right way to proceed with anything like this

if if it's something about you know some some teacher reports that your kids injured because they fell on a fell off their bike or something and they get cps after you because that does happen you know that was the discretion of cPS not to go any further with this, but if they did go further with this, and if you didn't follow the procedures that you talk about, you could wind up losing your kid and, uh, and it could be very, very serious. And so, um, uh, what, what is the name of that website again? Family preservation foundation.org.

I also have a shortcut link called fpf1.org okay that's easier for people to remember um family preservation foundation.org correct that's good um before you go though uh let's talk a little bit about you said nra and you're in new jersey correct that's got to be one of the hardest places to comply with any firearms anywhere is in New Jersey. Talk about what it's like to be not just a gun owner, but a firearms instructor in New Jersey. Well, believe it or not, we have about a million firearm owners in New Jersey out of 8.8 million people.

That might not seem significant, but for an anti-gun state, that really is quite significant. So when the Buren decision went down this past summer and the Supreme Court said that we had the right to bear arms, there was a deluge of applications for carry permits. Because prior to last summer, no one could get a permit to carry a firearm. We could only go from our house to the range or our house to the gun store and back. So now, you know, on July 4th, I was like, here's my application for my gun permit. But everyone was just like right away. So I think they got about 200,000 applications almost immediately, you know, for their gun permits, for our right to carry. A lot of people say, well, you shouldn't tell people,

you shouldn't say these things. I said, no, I said, people need to get comfortable. It is a constitutional right. As a matter of fact, it was the second amendment to the constitution. It was so important. Free speech was one, and if you want free speech, you need two to allow yourself to be able to speak

freely so we in new jersey uh have been advocates um governor murphy just signed into law uh this sweeping gun reform bill in response to urine well we uh when say we, cause a lot of gun groups that I belong to and donate to, uh, got a TRO stopping all the sensitive carry, you know, we, it went from just government buildings and courthouses, the sensitive places like they did in New York, they did that in New Jersey as well. Yeah. Yeah, correct. So we had an injunction, uh, on Monday to say all those sensitive places are

unconstitutional and they would they will not be enforced so because everyone had stopped caring everybody got their carry permit it literally stopped caring so as an instructor i tell people that they need to understand uh their constitutional rights but they also need to understand the rights of new jersey and its gun laws because certain things will uh get locked up no matter what. It's kind of interesting. You were talking about Houston. I have about 50,000 followers on my firearms training page called Elite Noir. And I put up that video and I said, based upon self-defense and your constitutional rights, what's what this person did valid? You know, what should he have done?

And I'm not trying to be a Monday morning quarterback. You know, we all think he's a hero. I said, if he needs a legal defense fund, he should set up a GoFundMe. So that's but that's not what I'm saying. I said, I said, I'm looking at the law and what the law says he should have done. And I said, you hear what the attorney general is saying and the prosecutors are saying because of how the law is written. And the law basically says it needs to be imminent threat for you to use deadly force. Putting anyone in the back in any state in the nation is not imminent threat. If the guy had swung the gun around or started turning back toward him,

then we could say, okay, it was imminent threat. I said, but the state's going to have to prove that the guy was, you know, the guy was walking out the store, which it looks like he was doing i said but you can clearly see that the gentleman shot him from behind and i said i said while he's a hero in my regard i said i'm gonna tell you what the state is gonna say right i said not me so don't jump on me don't kill the messenger yeah i talked to my sons about that and we mentioned a couple of times the show and i mentioned that you know there's there's a Soros district attorney that is putting him up before the grand jury now. And so he showed it again earlier in the program.

And, you know, as I was talking about it with my sons, and they've taken firearms classes as well. And they said, yeah, but, you know, it's in the Texas law says not only to stop a threat to you, but to stop a threat to other people. He was still pointing the gun, even though he had his back to this guy. He was still pointing the gun at other people. So I think he would be covered with that. My only concern is how this Soros district attorney will handle the fact that he kept shooting the guy when the guy was down and didn't even appear to be moving. When he went over to get the gun from the guy, he's still shooting him. And then he's, it bends down to get the gun.

He gives him another shot, you know? And it's like, uh, that's going to be, I don't think they're going to win on the, you know, he wasn't pointing the gun at that guy, the shoe. He wasn't, they weren't pointing, he wasn't pointing the gun at the defender. We'll call him. Uh, but, um uh you know i i think that was still okay especially under texas law but i think that um they might say well you know finishing him off that way um that's you know that's that's the thing where i think he's maybe

has some legal jeopardy in that what do you think well um what most people don't know is one of the things we teach we talk about the psychological and the physiological response. You know, are you ready to take a life? So there's a lot that goes into, I teach a 16-hour class. It's the NRA basic CCW, 50-state CCW course. And so we actually go into all that, David. And what happens is that there's time dilation, sensory deprivation. There's all these things that are going on when your adrenaline

starts rushing. So I think there is an argument to be made that if you really look at the time, at the time period, it was very short. Even though it was multiple shots. It was it was still very short. And when I say very short, 30 seconds, it's not long, especially, you know, when you're. Yeah. Your adrenaline is elevated and you're you know, you don't know. And you might have thought he moved. Yeah, I thought he moved. I shot him again.

So that's right. There's a lot that goes into that. And I think an argument can be made. And I, I'm hopeful that he gets off. I know the arguments that the state is going to try to make. But I, I do think he'll be able to provide a defense and any doctor will come in and talk about these things, you know, the physiological and the psychological responses that occur when you're in that type of situation and there's plenty of research that discusses what happens which is one of the reasons why we talk about it and we talk about just that situation so I put that out to the group everyone came out you know different feedback it was it was interesting to see all the feedback that came from across the nation for the different people that followed the page um so you know i something just occurred to me as well you know when i talk about that

again i think the guy is covered under texas law even though he wasn't pointing the gun at him he was still pointing the gun at other people who knew what he was going to do next. And, and if they go back and look at this guy's rap sheet, you find that he was already part of a group that had killed a store owner, a cell phone store as part of an armed robbery. So, you know, this guy's basically doing the same thing and that owner did get killed. And so, um, you know, they can bring that up in the trial, but I think when you talk about the number of shots, as I said, you know, my, my biggest concern where he might have legal exposure is those additional shots. When I took my concealed carry class, it was taught by a guy who was former secret service. And he said, uh, let me tell you, he said, this is not like the

movies where you shoot once and the guy's down and it's it's over with and and he can use that for his um defense as well because he said um let me let me give you a true example here he said the fbi had um closed in on a guy and um you know they were in a room three fbi agents and one individual uh who was um an expert at martial arts. And rather than submitting to the arrest, he decided he was going to fight these FBI agents who were all armed. And they shot him, and he bled to death in 30 seconds. But before he bled to death, he killed all three of them with his bare hands. And he said, so, you know, if you shoot somebody,

you keep shooting until they're not moving. And so that really is, I think, I think he should be covered. But of course, you know, we're talking about Houston. We're talking about a place where they can elect the Soros district attorney. So again, you know, the political aspects of it, but I think from a legal standpoint, even from an ethical standpoint, he should be covered. But we'll just have to wait and see what happens with that. But that is the reality that, you know, you don't, this is not like, uh, the kid with his red rider BB gun, you shoot them once in the button, they're gone. You know what I mean?

This is, this is real life that doesn't happen. And even if the guy's bleeding to death and, you know, just a 30 seconds, he can still kill three people. And here's what's going to happen. I think with this case, because it's so high profile. I concur with you. I think he will be covered even with the additional shots. But what the state does is they will drag it out.

And so people who have a very short attention span, and that was what was done with CPS in our case. And when we were going to the Supreme Court, they drug it out for two years. And so the people start dropping off. And then once the following starts dropping off, then they're saying, now we can do whatever we want because you no longer have the attention. And so I'm just hoping that justice is done speedily in Houston, because as you said, with a Soros prosecutor, now we're sitting and saying he understands the government and the wheels and how it turns he understands the memory of of people are short what was in the news today will not be in the news three months from now that's right so if this is kept quiet and you know you and I both know the legal process and judiciary is long and lengthy

that's thing is a speedy trial anymore. Even to get your child back, they have 90 days. The state has 60 days to collect evidence, and then they have to present in 90. Well, if this gun case goes the same way in 90 days, how many people are still going to be talking about Houston? That's right. Very, very few. And so unless he has advocates on on the other

side you know keeping us in the news and keeping people informed or you know starting a gofundme to collect email addresses to send it out to people you know they're going to wait for this to die down and then they're going to do exactly what they want to do um that's right and so it's it's uh it's disturbing but this play this trend goes with everything now the government literally outweighs you they outspend you and they'll put in delay after delay on another adjournment on another adjournment you know this must have you know been taken care of in 60 days yeah speedy trial request yeah they wear you down i just interviewed a doctor yesterday. They're coming

after him because he talked during COVID about vitamin D and zinc. And, uh, they said, well, because you were on a radio and TV, we had, we think a 12 million impressions and we're going to find you $40,000 per impression. It's looking at a half a trillion dollar, um, you know, uh, 12 million people and $40,000 each. And he's looking at a half a trillion dollar um you know uh 12 million people and forty thousand dollars each and he's looking at half a trillion dollar fine uh they just figured that they would ramp that thing up and he just caved to it uh but it is a long drawn out process they try to wear you down through attrition and as you point out you know if everybody forgets about this guy i think uh it's going to be very important for him because the second amendment

organizations are not going to let this die out they're going to advocate about this guy, I think it's going to be very important for him because the Second Amendment organizations are not going to let this die out. They're going to advocate for this guy. And that's why your CPS, your Family Preservation Foundation organization is important. Because I've told people over and over again, forget political parties, forget politicians for the most part. We need to organize issue by issue, just as we've seen with the Second Amendment and with gun rights. We need to do that issue by issue. And that's why what you're doing with CPS is so important, because you're focusing on this attack on parental rights

that is now metastasized through so many different facets, especially through the schools. And people need to have an advocate. They need to have the knowledge of how the government is possibly going to come after any of us. We never know. And how to deal with this thing. That's why the real reality is that we got to focus issue by issue. And I think Dwight,

you've got one of the best takes on it because you experienced this yourself. Personally, you know what this is about and you know, what can happen and what and how to defend against it. And people really do need to see that. And there's not many organizations out there that really focused on CPS. A lot of people focus in terms of doing reporting on the on what happens to kids once they get stolen. You know, all this, you know this human trafficking and prostitution and abduction and all this other kind of stuff, which is horrible,

but nobody really talks about how do you keep them from stealing your kid in the first place, and that's what you're really focused on. And the part that I find so ironic, David, is that they will take a child from a family and pay a stranger $1,000 a month to take care of this family instead of giving that money to the family

if there is some shortcoming to help that family keep its child. And so that's the bizarreness of our system. And it keeps traced all the way back to the Clintons. I mean, they're the ones who signed this law into effect, Bill Clinton did. And I was looking at something a few years ago that he had put out as it relates to CPS and the prison system. And he said, had he known then what he knows now, those two laws wouldn't have been signed into law. You know, it's a little late now have been signed into law, you know? And you're like, yeah, it's a little late now.

You know, you can say that in hindsight, you know? Yeah. I heard the same thing, uh, from, um, uh, the guy who, uh, pushed the Vietnam war. Well, if I would've known now what I knew then I wouldn't have done it. You know, Robert McNamara says, uh, you know, sorry about that. Mistakes were made. We're hearing that now from the people who pushed all this lockdown and vilification of everybody who didn't do every little COVID ritual that they had for. Sorry, can we have amnesty?

You always hear that. You know, I didn't know any better. But that's the key thing. You know, they want your kids. No doubt about it. They're getting paid to steal your kids. And then, you know, they can get paid on the black market as well. But even with the federal government, they getting paid to steal your kids. And then they can get paid in the black market as well. But even with the federal government, they get paid to steal your kids.

And as you pointed out, in 80% of those cases, they just say, well, you're not taking care of them sufficiently. And as you point out, they'll give the money to total strangers who will do who knows what rather than helping the family to overcome what they say is insufficient care, neglect, and that type of thing. So it just really underscores what the true agenda is here, I think. So you've got a Facebook page about guns. It's called Elite Noir. Is that correct? Yes.

Is that a Facebook page? That's correct. Okay, good. Right. And that's also our website. It's EliteNoir.com. Good. What's interesting, just since we're talking about guns

They're using this as a mechanism in New Jersey to try and get into the homes. Also, they're trying to dictate In this new legislation. I'm not you know, it's being challenged of course in the courts, but I tell people Keep your guns locked up keep them in safeses don't keep them on the drawer dresser drawers um i'm an advocate of metal safes if you can get the larger federated safes great if not get some sort of metal safe don't just put it in a gun box or take your gun case and put padlocks on them and put them in the top of your closet this is another way they're going to use to try and come in the back door and say that um um, yeah, you know, you have unsafe housing conditions or you're neglect, you're putting your child in a dangerous position, so tell all the parents to be aware of that also.

That's another way, especially if you own guns, make sure you keep them locked up. That's right. You know, the number one thing is to keep CPS out of your house and never let them in your house at all. Like they'll use the, they'll use the public schools as a way to get in and stoop around. They'll use your fact that you own guns as a way to come in and snoop around. So you need to know what your legal rights are. And, uh, Dwight has videos talking about that,

how to protect your family because I mean, that's why you've got a gun in the first place, right? It's to protect your family. You need to know how to protect your family from the biggest enemy, which is going to be the government coming after your family. And I tell people in New Jersey, David, it's fine. I said, you saw that in Houston. I said, don't try that in New Jersey. I said, that will not work in New Jersey.

Like, what are you talking about? I said, it's specifically codified that the threat has to be to you specifically and or your loved ones. I said, you cannot play the long range or the hero new jersey i said you will get locked up yeah and i said so i've been telling people since that houston video came out i said we're not texas that's right that's right yeah yeah yeah he's covered in texas but he wouldn't be covered but i've i've covered stories in new jersey i remember one in particular a guy was moving and he wasn't even moving to new jersey he was moving between states and he was a licensed carry, you know,

guy and all this kind of stuff. And he didn't show up at his relative's house in New Jersey at the time they thought. So they contacted the police. The police saw his license plate or whatever, and identified him, pulled him over. And then they start, we, you know, can we, uh, you know, snooping around and see if they can find something that can we look in your trunk? They open up. He says, sure.

Yeah. I got nothing to hide. Right. Just like we're talking about with CPS, they open up the trunk and he's got, you know, clothes and suitcases and other kinds of possessions and everything at the very, they go through everything. And at the very bottom of the trunk locked, uh, they find some guns that were down at the bottom.

It's like, oh, you're not allowed to have these in New Jersey and they haul them off to jail. I mean, it's just, again, you know, there's so many traps out there. It's like Harvey Silverglate. He said, you know, everybody's violating. We've got so many different laws on the books. Everybody's committing three felonies a day on average. That's right.

You're 100% correct. Yeah, that's where we are now in America. But like you said, I tell everyone everyone every single one of my stunts especially if they have a gun if a police officer says can i search your car the answer is no even if you don't have a gun in your car i said i i still take lessons i've you know you know i'm a former veteran and i i also have uh i've been having firearms for like 30 years and i still take lessons i compete in uspsa so i take lessons on a friday basis but my coach who is a grandmaster was saying how he got stopped in new jersey i said and he said the same thing i have nothing to hide

the state police kept him on the side of the road three and a half hours going through all of his equipment trying to find something that was wrong they were literally like going through the statues looking at his handguns so i tell everyone i said yeah see my even my coach who's who's a grand master one of the top shooters in the united states got stopped and was held for three and a half hours so i tell everyone i said no warrant no Yeah. It's a fishing expedition, fishing expedition. Well, thank you. It was always great talking to you, Dwight. I didn't know about the firearms side of you, but, um, good for you on that as well. Uh, the organization is familypreservationfoundation.org. Uh, make sure if you've got children, make sure I, you know, you're not protected. If you've got children, no matter where you live, you need to go to Dwight's website and educate yourself about how to protect

your family from the legal snares that are out there. Thank you so much, Dwight. Great talking to you. Thank you, David. Pleasure as always. Thank you. All right, we've got just about a minute or two left, folks. And I don't want just to mention this because we're talking about schools.

And I started talking about Chicago and gun control. This is Chicago. Hundreds of Chicago teachers raped and sexually assaulted and groomed students in 2022. You see, the problem is the person, the spiritual issues. It's not the weapon.

They had 772 investigations into teachers for allegedly raping sexually assaulting or grooming students and when we talk about grooming we're not talking about the transgender stuff that's a whole nother dimension uh they were able to close 600 of them uh only 16 of the cases have resulted in charges out of 772 accusations taking kids trips, even to foreign countries. Most of them were high school. But they got some kids as young as fourth grade. This is the schools. And they come after parents

for CPS stuff. Thank you for listening. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com Thank you.