The David Knight Show - 12Apr23 Pandemic National Emergency Executive Order ENDS! — But What Continues?

Episode Date: April 12, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESQuietly, Monday night, Biden ended Trump's 3+ year Emergency Exec Order. But another one remains. And there are other issues as well. So where are we now? 2:44Remember when "America Held Hostage", Nightline, and the Iranians taking over the US Embassy and holding Americans hostage? That only last about 1/3 of the time this did 10:20The politics between Biden and House Republicans. What ended and what did not 15:35Trump Exec Order was about financing the lockdown. The remaining HHS order was about medical martial law 24:40WATCH: RFK Jr talks about the long history of germ games by CIA 36:57What is Operation Lockstep? The pandemic lockdown by Trump were the 2nd shoe to drop of 9/11, part and parcel of the plan 41:16The NIH has been funding animal experimentation in Russia even AFTER sanctions. 48:08Despotic governor slammed and state fined for persecution and intimidation of Christians going to church Easter, 3 years ago. 1:02:00Artificial Intelligence (AI): "A Defamation" & Disinfo Machine We've been told that AI is hallucinogenic. It should have license to just make things up. Now it's not just pushing government narratives about pandemics and climate but libeling law professors and labelling innocent people as convicted criminals. Will anything slow down the race between search engine competitors to incorporate it? How about some lawsuits? Who's responsible for its lies in a world when government labels everyone they disagree with as disinfo agents. 1:10:17Clearview scrapes 30 BILLION faces off of Facebook and sells to law enforcement as another biometric company says AI Deep Fakes necessitate Digital ID for everyone 1:35:27Oklahoma and Tennessee have introduced bills to stop using Federal money for education. Will you sell your kids? 1:51:02After Elon Musk's war against Substack and Matt Taibbi, Alex Berenson talks about his personal encounter with Musk at the start of the "Twitter Files" 2:03:23Elon Musk wants to turn Twitter into “X”, will the Twitter Files become the X-Files? 2:17:00"LGBT advocates" planning for battle? They're fighting to continue to groom MINORS and remove parental rights. But mainstream media spins it 2:22:39LISTENER emails: A signalman's perspective of what's going on with railroads, and the connection between Abraham and Easter 2:34:01INTERVIEW Weaponized Migration a Firsthand ReportWe go overtime as Michael Yon joins us late in the program, reporting from Panama.How NGO's and globalist organizations have a calculated method to circumvent immigration laws of countries throughout South & Central America into America as well as in Europe, the Netherlands in particular. Migration from China, Africa and every region is being used as a weapon of warfare and is a ticking time bomb for when the economy implodes. 2:50:16Rape kits provided by NGO's in Panama are not for testing if rape occurs, but preparing migrants TO BE RAPED 2:55:05What’s happening in Europe with weaponized migration and the planned take down — Luxemborg, the Netherlands and literal wolves turned lose on citizens where they never existed naturally 2:58:21What is the purpose of these “smart cities” especially the GIANT one being built in the Netherlands as they confiscate farmer's land and farms? 3:01:42Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

FBD doesn't stand for friendly business ducks. Or for the freelance beatbox department. FBD stands for support. We support businesses and communities across Ireland. Visit your local branch to talk to your FBD insurance team and see how we can support your business. FBD Insurance. Support. It's what we do. FBD Insurance Group Ltd. Trading as FBD Insurance. Support. It's what we do. FBD Insurance Group Limited,

trading as FBD Insurance, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham.

And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 12th of April, year of our Lord, 2023. And what day is it? We've lost track of this because we've lost our Trump emergency order. We're going to begin with that today.

And we're going to talk about what has now become a permanent fixture as a part of that. Part of that has been moved away and erased from history very quietly on Monday night. I didn't even catch it yesterday. It took a while for it to show up. A lot of outlets have still not reported this. And of course, there's a lot of stuff that is still remaining. And so we're going to talk about the implications of this thing that was done in the dark, quietly, Monday night, to get rid of what would have been 1,126 days, got rid of it on the 1,124th day. The emergency order, but there are other

orders and other emergencies that remain. We'll be right back. Oh, it almost feels like 1933 again. They got rid of alcohol prohibition, and then they go into gold prohibition to rewrite the financial system. That's kind of where we are. Isn't it interesting how history rhymes? So we've just had the executive order quietly removed. Most, as I said, most outlets have not picked this up. First place I saw it was out of the UK, the Daily Skeptic.

They said, okay, so if they're removing this emergency order, does that mean that since I'm not vaccinated, I can now travel to the United States? Because as I pointed out last week, the United States, out of all of the countries of the world, there is a handful of tin-pot, banana republic authoritarian dictatorships, and the United States is in that class, that require you to have a vaccine in order to enter their country.

So it's not clear. He couldn't figure out if that was really what was going to be happening. But just to kind of put this in perspective, for the longest time when I was, I started covering this as soon as it happened. I said it is a lockdown, and we're being held hostage, and Steve Swan said it doesn't take effect until May 11th. No, actually, there's a bit of it.

There's a distinction here. So we're going to talk about that. That was back in January when it was brought up by the Republicans right away. Said, no, no, no, not going to do it, going to veto it. Well, he didn't. But there are other executive orders that are there. And, of course, you know, there were two of these orders. The one that I always talk about in March that I've always counted time from, that has been removed. Trump's emergency order, national emergency order. But there's a medical emergency that

was done in January by Trump's big pharmaceutical executive that he put in charge of HHS. And that remains. That is supposed to go away. That one is supposed to go away May 11th. But of course, this one is really about the money. And this has always been about the money. And this is what people need to understand. This was the thing that was the bribery and then later the blackmail.

The bribery by Trump with the money, then the blackmail by Biden with the money to coerce people to do what they wanted to do. To lock us down, to vaccinate us, to purge out of the medical community anybody that didn't go along with it. They did heavy subsidizing or bribery, if you will, of the medical community, the hospitals, the big corporate hospitals. That was a big part of it. It was the money.

And you need to understand that the money was a big part of getting the governors to do what they wanted to as well. All the governors who did all these horrible things. Oh, it's not Trump's fault. It's the governor's. And it's just the Democrat governors. No, there are bad things that are being done by Republican governors as well. Many of them were horrible.

But they were all being bribed and financially incentivized to do this by Trump. And that was the big issue about this particular one. Well, what about the money? It's going to change all the rules for hospitals and Medicare and all the rest of this stuff. But there's another medical emergency that is there. And even if that is taken away May 11th, as they are promising, even if that is the case, they are going to, the FDA has already said, we don't need to have an emergency.

You don't want to have an emergency use authorization. Who needs an emergency anymore, right? We've gotten so far detached from the Constitution and law, we don't even need to have these fake justifications anymore. Jason Barker, lots of little things happening while everyone is focused on Trump, all by design. Yep, yep, exactly right. He says, Handy was talking about this.

They have it on the children's schedule now, so they don't need the emergency anymore. That's right. That was the key thing. If you put it on the kid's schedule, then it's grandfather. So there was two things that were there for the liability. As we talked about going back to the 1986 act, one of the first things that fauci got put in did it with ronald reagan because you know everybody hey we can trust ronald reagan he's not about big government right and so that was when fauci got that in there for childhood vaccines then in 2005 you had george w bush put in the prep act and said well you know if we've got some kind of a declared emergency because they'd already had a dark winter two months before nine 11, then the false flag

anthrax attack a week after, and then the model state health emergency powers act model legislation sent out to all the States started, you know, to prepare, to plan, to set some legal prevarications down, to enable them to do what they did to us in 2020 and on. So all that foundation was laid. And then in 2005, you had, um, uh, Eli Lilly, which is where Alex's are with CEO. Eli Lilly came in with a special Lilly rider, they called it. That was part of the PrEP Act and how they were giving legal immunity for the vaccines if they were tied to an emergency. And so that was the thing. They gave even less consideration, compensation to people who were injured by these vaccines under the prep act than they did to the kids under the 1986 vaccine childhood injury act or whatever that set up the VAERS system and on and on.

We've talked about this thing many times, so I don't want to get back into that too far. But yeah, those are the two things that were there. Once they get it on the kids schedule, now they're covered, right? So, um, where are we now you know we went from march the 13th that friday the 13th 2020 until this last monday monday evening april the 10th so that's three years and 28 days they did it and uh roughly i went for a very long time. I patterned, as I was starting to say, I patterned this from the very beginning.

I knew what this was because I'd seen dark winter and all the rest of these things. Right. And I even had a, uh, a tip from goat tree about a year and a half before this stuff rolled out. And he said, I'm hearing a lot of chatter about Dark Winter 2. And he said, this is pretty ominous. I said, yeah, I talked about it. And then that created, in some of these circles, it created, you know, why are they talking about Dark Winter 2? Then nobody's supposed to be talking about Dark Winter 2. Well, all this stuff eventually comes out. But he gave me a tip about that as too. Well, all this stuff eventually comes out.

Uh, but he gave me a tip about that as well. So, you know, I was on the lookout for when they were going to pull some kind of a dark winter BS and that's exactly what this is. And so, um, I wasn't so much, uh, you know, I wasn't acting as a prophet as I was a historian. They laid all their plans out. They practiced it for decades. The only question was when they're going to roll this thing out, when they're going to pull the trigger. And so it was pretty obvious what they were doing.

And so from the very beginning, I was pushing back against this. I said, this is the lockdown is a thing. The lockdown is forget about all this phony stuff about a pandemic coming out of, out of China. But you know, they're going're gonna you know that's set up the pattern and they're copying that they're going to be locking us down as well and that was what i was talking about so as part of that uh and and as a pushback against alex and the panic narrative that he was pushing out there i began my show every day after about a week of this stuff. I began it with the music from Nightline.

And if you remember that program, Ted Koppel's Nightline, that began in response to the Iranian hostages. And so I began with the music. And it would always begin. America held hostage day 1,000 or whatever or whatever you know they didn't go a thousand days with that but they began that this is the very first broadcast of nightline and then became a permanent fixture even after the hostages were released but they were having nightly news specials to talk about the status of the iranian host So I began it with pictures of Iranian hostages being led around with cloth masks over their

eyes. And then we transitioned into Donald Trump with a cloth mask over his mouth that had the presidential seal on it, of course. Day 142 of the Iran hostage crisis. And this was the day that they began it. The rival in Egypt complicates efforts to free the hostages. We'll talk about that tonight with the top Iranian diplomat in this country and with the wife of one of the hostages.

Tomorrow, it's the New York and Connecticut primaries. Very likely, make it or break it time for Edward Kennedy. Very likely make it or break it time for Edward Kennedy. Yeah. Make it or break it time for Edward Kennedy. Isn't it funny how history repeats itself? You know, you could have said it's sink or swim for Ted Kennedy. Chappaquiddick time. And he did sink.

Along with the woman that he was having an affair with that he left behind. Sink or swim time. And, of course, now we've got a Kennedy running again. It's just history just recycles itself with little twists. Isn't it? Uh, so, uh, that was the very first one. That was 142 days in. And they said, well, you know, we're just doing this on a regular basis every night.

Let's just make it a regular show. And they did. And it went on for quite some time. And finally, it ended and they released the hostages. A day that began as the 444th day of captivity and ended as the first day of freedom for the American hostages in Iran. Yeah, 444 days is all that lasted. And, um, yeah, they got a lot more attention and it made a big difference in the election. And we learned after the fact, Bill Casey, while Bill Casey of the OSS, who became part

of the CIA, while Bill Casey, it was such a powerful event, especially the failed attempted rescue where they had special forces. They were trying to fly in by helicopter. They had to land in a storm or something, and they collided and burned the helicopters, burned the special forces soldiers, and they're what? Scraping the bottom of America with that. I mean, it was horrible. And the Iranians went out and took pictures of it, used it as propaganda.

You know, the charred bodies of these special forces soldiers that were then abandoned in the desert. Everybody says, see what Jimmy Carter's doing? And so Bill Casey with the OSS made a secret visit to the Iranians. And he said, don't free them until after the election, until after we take office. And there'll be something in it for you. You know, they made their deal.

That became the Iran-Contra deal, giving them spare parts for their advanced us fighter jets that we had sold to the Shah of Iran. And then they took that money, you know, that they sold them, sold it to them. I said, what do we do with this money? And that's where they got Oliver North, uh, channeling that money into a secret war that was not declared. You know, who cares about that anymore? Right. Uh, a secret war that was not declared. You know, who cares about that anymore, right? A secret war that was not declared with the Contras in Nicaragua. I mean, it's just one skull and cloak and dagger thing after the other.

It's just amazing the way our government operates, isn't it? It's just absolutely criminal. But anyway, uh, so the whole thing ended as a reason magazine says, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Now, Monday night, Biden quietly signed a Republican sponsored resolution, uh, that was first declared by Trump over three years ago. And again, as I said, it took a while for this to show up um in the press because nobody really heard about this so this showed up in the afternoon people yesterday afternoon people started to talk about it fbd doesn't stand for friendly business ducks or for the freelance beatbox department.

FBD stands for support. We support businesses and communities across Ireland. Visit your local branch to talk to your FBD insurance team and see how we can support your business. FBD Insurance. Support. It's what we do. FBD Insurance Group Limited, trading as FBD Insurance, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses!

Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus. Bet responsibly. GamblingCare.ie. What was done

on Monday evening. And the headline for their article was, Biden catches up to the rest of the country and ends the COVID-19 national emergency. Yeah, it never was an emergency, frankly. It was always fear factor. The real emergency was the lockdown. On Monday, April the 10th, 2023, the president signed into law H.J. Resolution 7, House Joint Resolution, which terminates the national emergency related to COVID-19 pandemic,

reads the entire two-line statement from the White House, but not terminating the HHS emergency. The resolution was authored by Paul Gozar. It makes use of the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to repeal federal agency rules with a simple majority vote. And that was very important because the Democrats really fought to keep this thing in. They wanted to live under an emergency.

And isn't it interesting that you have the Congressional Review Act, which says that we can repeal the rules of federal agencies with a simple majority vote. So why aren't they doing that to more rules? Well, as I've said many times, they've made a conscious effort to abdicate their duty, not just their authority, but their duty, what they were elected to do. People like Jim Jordan out there holding show trials for Trump, preening for the cameras, just like Trey Gowdy before him,

and Benghazi doing nothing about any of this stuff. And he will do nothing about it. And now he's got a, you know, there's a lawsuit going back and forth between him and Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan DA. That's it. It's about showboating. They're not going to stop any of these regulatory rules. We have taxation without representation. We have regulation without representation because our representatives have

abdicated their authority to the, um, to the bureaucracy and they typically won't take it back. Even though they also said well we got we passed a law here it says we can review this and we can stop it but they don't do it on so many different issues and so it was a simple majority vote biden had said uh in january that he would uh veto it but then in march he quietly said he would not veto the resolution if passed. It was when a statement of administration policy, quote unquote, declared that Gosar's resolution and a related measure ending a separate public health emergency would, quote,

create wide-ranging chaos. That's what he said in January. It'd be wide ranging chaos. What are we going to do? We got all these people on the payroll and we've been bribing them for a couple of years. You know, we've got to ease them off of this because they might get mad enough that they might tell people the truth about what's been going on. And of course that had already happened in August of 2020 when the American hospital association got angry and went public about the fact, wait a minute, CMS, the Medicare and Medicaid people, CMS just changed the rules. They told us when this stuff began that we could just do a clinical diagnosis and we could just look at somebody and say, I can see that you've got COVID.

I can see that in your eyes. And we would get paid. We get paid the $13,000 bonus for padding their statistics. And if we could put them on a ventilator, we get another $39,000. And then we could charge them for the use of the ventilator. We could charge them all of us, anything that we did, the beds, all the rest, all the charges. We could get a 20% bonus. And you're saying now you're not going to pay us those bonuses and those finder fees

for creating a pandemic. How dare you? And so they went public with it. We don't want to have that happen again, right? Let's ease them off of this money that we've got them addicted to like crack cocaine. And, uh, so it would create wide ranging chaos. You know, you just, it's like an SSRI. You can't just pull somebody right off of that IV, you know, or heroin.

That statement had said that a premature ending of emergency declarations would inject confusion and uncertainty into the ongoing wind-down of expanded Medicaid programs, the gravy train of financial incentives. As I said, from the very beginning, this was not a pandemic. This was financially incentivized medical malpractice, killing people, killing people. And, um, it was financially incentivized by Trump by Biden, who then added sticks to the carrots. It was bribery that killed people.

It was cash and corruption that killed people. With the national emergency over, says Reason Magazine, the federal government has now caught up to where the vast majority of the American public has been for a year or more. The pandemic is over. No reason. The pandemic never existed. Never existed. I'm not just an anti-vaxxer. I'm a pandemic denier. Yeah, there was a different strain of flu that went around, and it was easily handled with

ivermectin and many other things. Many other things. every single one of them targeted for destruction. They targeted anybody who pushed back against their narrative, anybody who came up with any kind of a treatment, and there were many treatments that worked. But the treatment they were interested in was to get everybody vaccinated and to have a vaccine passport. Only seven states still have a declared public health emergency. And then Reason plays along with the lie. Reason says over a million people died of a disease that didn't exist in 2019.

And that is absolutely not true. They died from financially incentivized malpractice. They died from a jab that they were coerced to take. And that jab is still solely killing people. And it's still out there. We'll talk about what is happening with the jab now as a part of this financially incentivized malpractice, or we could just say financially incentivized democide, death by government,

we can now start taking into account of which parts of the COVID state are gone for good and which parts have become permanent additions to Leviathan. That's the point. Which parts are continuing on. And so the Washington Post the point which parts are continuing on and so um the um washington post uh actually does a much better job of talking about the different aspects of this what's gone what remains so what is at stake as the u.s ends the covet emergency measures says washington post the u.s

has started unwinding its crisis measures. Biden on April the 10th signed into law a measure that terminated the country's national emergency order. The White House on May 11th plans to end a separate, more consequential public health emergency and to disband its COVID response team. A policy that increased health coverage for low-income people has already been discontinued. So the federal government's purchase of COVID vaccines and treatments has also ended. But they have massive stockpiles because people don't want them.

So they began by saying, well, how many people died? And again, they push out the same phony, rigged numbers where people who died of pretty much anything were being identified as dying from COVID. And then, of course, ignoring what their ineffective, dangerous treatments were doing to kill people, from remdesivir to ventilators and intubating people. The Washington Post says, well, we've still got 250 people dying every day from COVID. Have you noticed that? How many people do you know that have actually died of COVID? Versus how many people do you actually know who have been injured or killed from the vaccine, from the Trump genetic code injection jab.

In January 2020, then Health Secretary Alex Azar, Big Pharma CEO that Trump put in there, also declared a public health emergency, and that allowed the department to ease or waive certain requirements and to place flexibilities to address the COVID outbreak. So he did that in January. The next month, he issued a separate emergency declaration that allowed the Food and Drug Administration

to grant emergency use authorizations for COVID products. No plans have been announced to terminate that declaration. So there are three, probably more, declarations about this. And of course, the FDA has already said, we don't need an emergency to put out emergency use authorization. We can just do it as much as we want. It really is, as Jason, Handy, others, and I've said it in the past, it really is about the liability.

That's why they're doing this. The liability and the subsidies and all the rest of this. But again, that consequential health order is giving the... The way I think of it is that, um, the Trump thing was really about money. You know, it's kind of like when you have a president declare an emergency after a hurricanes come through Florida, right. Uh, that happened over and over again. I grew up in Florida. So, you know, governors can declare state of emergency release state money and the federal

government would declare emergencies and long before FEMA was created you know there'd be special money that was coming in to help people recover. FBD doesn't stand for friendly business ducks or for the freelance beatbox department. FBD stands for support. We support businesses and communities across Ireland. Visit your local branch to talk to your FBD insurance team and see how we can support your business. FBD Insurance. Support. It's what we do.

FBD Insurance Group Limited, trading as FBD Insurance, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. for Bank of Ireland. seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus. Bet responsibly.

Gamblingcare.ie. So, you know, FEMA, that's not, that was independent of FEMA. But that's really what Trump was doing. It really was the money. It was all about the money. It was about, you know, bribing the governors and bribing the hospitals and all the rest of this stuff. That's why I said, you know, it isn't just that the buck stops the hospitals and all the rest of this stuff.

That's why I said, it isn't just that the buck stops with him. He's responsible for that stuff. It actually started with him. The buck started with him. He was passing people money to create an emergency that didn't exist. Nobody was dying when he created that emergency, just like nobody was dying when China got locked down, as Gerald Slenty pointed out. They got four reported deaths, they say, of a novel flu. And they locked down a country of how many billions of people?

And it was the same thing in every country. And we even had two weeks' worth of data from Italy showing that the people that had died, average age was 80 and beyond, beyond life expectancy. And on average, they had two and a half comorbidities. And we had two weeks worth of that information before Trump locked everything down. So that was about the money. But the other one was about unleashing the power

that was there with the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act. So I think of it as the HHS thing unleashing the police powers and creating the medical martial law. That's really what the January the 20th thing was about from HHS. Trump gave the money and HHS's January issue of this order was about creating medical martial law. And that's still in effect. And it may come off in a month. We'll see about that. But then there's also another one that allows them to arbitrarily grant emergency use authorizations.

Separate and apart, an actual emergency. So anyway, um, so it said, and that was key for them to, um, this is in the words of Washington post, uh,

no plans have been announced for terminating this declaration, which has made the COVID vaccines treatments and diagnostics, which otherwise might have taken years to bring to market, which otherwise might have been tested for safety and efficacy. That order that moved all that away, made it available more quickly, made it available at warp speed. Yeah.

Nobody else could have done it this quickly and gotten away with it. But I did because I skipped all the testing of safety and efficacy. And we pretended that it worked and we still pretended that it was still pretending it worked or still pretending that you had an emergency. Should that declaration be revoked? So will the emergency clearances for those products from Pfizer, Moderna, Gilead, you know, Gilead with the remdesivir. Trump issued a national emergency declaration in March that allowed the federal

government to mobilize resources and provide support activities beyond the confines of public health. That's what I'm saying. The one was about the triggering the medical martial law. Trump's was about bribing people. So then they say, well, how will payment for COVID vaccines and treatments now change? Throughout the pandemic, the U.S. government, no, let's personalize it. Let's say the Trump, Trump and Biden purchased supplies of jabs and treatments, which for the most part have been offered to people without any out-of-pocket costs. Isn't that nice? Euthanasia for free.

Your government Uncle Sam wants to kill you, and he'll do it at no additional charge. You've already paid enough taxes. You don't have to, you know, we'll take care of it. We'll put it on the deficit tab there. They said, well, that's about to change. For now, there's sufficient supply of government-purchased jabs and treatments such that access, quote, will generally not be affected,

said the health department in February. And we get a massive backlog of this stuff because people don't want it. People are waking up to it. So what happens once the government-purchased supplies run out? Well, when that happens, most Americans will get their COVID vaccines and treatments through private health insurance plans or federal health programs. They don't say this in the Washington Post, but at three to four times the price that they're currently charging government,

even though we paid for the creation of these things, built factories for them even. COVID vaccines will continue to be provided to older Americans via Medicaid Part B. There we go. Karen and I can get ours now. And ultimately, this is a smart financial move because it'll save them more money if they kill people earlier than they normally would die

with the vaccine. So, you know, part of that's the financial advantage of democide. Who will pay for the COVID tests? Who will pay for COVID tests? Is that after the emergency order ends on May 11th, Medicaid beneficiaries will not be able to get free tests unless they're ordered by a health provider. Medicaid, meanwhile, will continue to cover at-home and PCR tests until September 2024. So we're not out of the woods yet. They still got their absurd PCR tests. They can claim, oh, no, look, it's spiking again. Depending on the supply, the U.S. may continue to distribute free COVID tests from the strategic national stockpile. Did you realize that?

Under the Biden administration, we've got a strategic national stockpile of tests that can be used to flag people who aren't even sick. And then all the people that they've presumably been in contact with who are also not sick. And we can lock them all away. That's strategic. It is. And it is a stockpile. But Biden, meanwhile, has eviscerated our strategic petroleum reserves, that stockpile of oil. He's done his best to get rid of that. But the tests, oh yeah, we're full up on tests. We've got plenty of those and they will use them strategically. Washington Post goes on to say, what prescription practices are being reconsidered? Well, they say the DEA in February proposed new rules that would no longer allow providers to prescribe Adderall, Vicodin, or OxyContin, for example, if the patient never had an in-person visit.

See, this is one of the other ways that you keep people locked down and pacified. You give them things like OxyContin and Adderall and stuff like that. Just drug them. Take your Soma pill and stay home. We've got the DEA out there practicing medicine. We've got the FDA out there practicing medicine. But you and your physician don't have anything to say about it. And if your physician is doing real medicine, we'll take their license. That's the real. 15 days to flatten the curve. Turn says, uh, KWD turned into 1,024 days. Uh, so, um, my son says, yeah, they've got all these, uh, strategic

petroleum reserve, uh, things that empty. So there's plenty of room for them to put the tests in there. I guess you just wrap them in some plastic and drop them in there. Who cares? You know, they're already a lot of them already loaded up with a positive indication where they take them right. And again, many people have talked about that. Handy talked about that.

Um, it was taken right out of the, right out of the bag. Don't, you know, let it come in contact with anybody and look at the thing. Oh yeah. Yeah. COVID COVID's here. Run, be afraid. The DEA is reviewing public comments on the proposed rules. See, that's it.

These regulatory agencies just put their rules out there. Now, well, we've got a new rule. Simon says, do this, do that. Simon says, if you don't do this to do that, we're going to hit you with a $25,000 fine or whatever. Forget about the due process. Forget about presumption of innocence. Forget about protection from excessive fines and punishment. This is our rule. This is not a law. This is civil law. We can steal stuff from you and call it civil asset forfeiture.

And the Congress won't do anything about this. They'll put it out there. They'll put it for public comment. They say, this is horrible. This violates the Constitution. Next. I don't care. Next.

So how is immigration policy being impacted? And this is a key part of this. And this is why I think the Republicans pulled back this HHS order, right? More time to close the border. The border closure, the only thing that they're doing in terms of protecting the border from illegal immigration is based on Title 42. And they don't want to see that. Neither one of them want to see that end quickly and so that's why i'm not even sure that they're going to pull this thing back may 11th as republicans came in they were boldly saying we're going to end all these emergency orders they said that in january biden says no i'm going to veto it when they pulled out this other order, which is what the Title 42 border order, the border order is based on, then somehow the objections just evaporated from Biden and he

went ahead and passed it. The end of the public health emergency will also mean the end of Title 42 when that happens May 11th. Under Trump, at the start of the pandemic, it made it easier for authorities to expel undocumented migrants. In about half of the apprehensions of migrants in fiscal year 2022, the U.S. Border Patrol encountered a record 2.2 million people, and about half of those, they used the rule to quickly send the individuals back to Mexico. So I think immigration is why they did not end that aspect of it for another month. And they may not end it at that point either. So I want to play for you. This is RFK Jr. He's now running for president. He went to the conservative. Every year, thousands of students go on their first holiday abroad.

Our 5G roaming in 80 countries means they're connected as soon as they land. Just a reminder to wear sunscreen, love, because you're as pale as a ghost. Oh, and can you send me all your friends' numbers because their mothers are on to me. And always keep your cash in your bum bag, yeah. Every connection counts, which is why Ireland can count on our network. Vodafone, together we can. Subject to coverage availability. Limitations and terms apply.

See Vodafone.ie forward slash terms. I think it was Hillsdale that he's at. And, or Heritage Foundation, I forget now. You'll see with the video what he's standing in front of. And he talks about the beginning of this. I disagree with him. That's whether or not there was a real COVID pandemic to begin with. What he is saying is that they knew it.

They created it in a lab. And they were talking about this in September or October. I still am not convinced that that's the case. But he did say, say well then i noticed this event two or one thing and then i noticed that there were other ones and that they've been doing this every year for 20 years as i've been saying and that's what i think is the the best thing in his fauci book uh the germ game chapters chapter 12 so the very end of the book where he talks about the connection of the cia and uh and in the book he goes into more detail than he does in this statement here

he talks about the connection between the cia how they practice this stuff and gates and all these globalist corporations uh how they did all that so um here he is this is a clip that's about um about four minutes long but i i want you to hear his take on this. And raise your hand if you know what event 201 was. Okay. For those of you don't know, event 201 was a pandemic simulation, a coronavirus pandemic simulation that took place in October of 2019. Nobody had ever heard of coronavirus until January.

So that's three months later. In October, we now know that coronavirus was already circulating in September, so the month before, in Wuhan. But nobody knew about it. And yet they had a coronavirus pandemic simulation in New York City, hosted by Bill Gates and Avril Haines, the former deputy director of the CIA

who did all of the Guantanamo Bay cover-up. She is like the cover-up queen. And they do a simulation, and who else is there? George Gayo, the head of Chinese CDC, who obviously knows the coronavirus is circulating. He is the world's coronavirus expert. He's also the head of the CDC in China. And then they had all of the social media platforms where they are, the big insurance companies, Johnson & Johnson, the big pharma companies.

And they meet for two days. And they have four seminars. And each one is faking this, you know, coronavirus is spreading across the world. And they simulate, they don't say, okay, we got vitamin D to everybody, and we got to make sure everybody gets exercise, and gets out of their house, and gets healthy, and, you know, builds their immune system, and, you know, there's none of that, and zinc, and, you know, all the things,

we got to figure out early treatments, we got to use the to use the internet to connect all 15 million doctors, frontline doctors around the world, so that we know when they treat people what's working, what's not. And we're constantly upgrading the protocols. That's what they should have been doing. That's not what they were doing. They were working on ways to use the coronavirus pandemic as a pretense for clamping down totalitarian controls globally and you know they talk about in some of these concentration camps and all of this stuff but here that the last simulation on the fourth day george gayo and avril haines from the cia are talking they have a soliloquy about how do we clamp down, stop people from

saying this came from a lab leak. They're saying that. This is October of 2019. And they say, well, we got to get the social media companies to censor them and deplatform them and all this. You can go on YouTube and watch this tonight. It's called Event 201, and this is the fourth section of it. And people knew about that, you know, who were looking at this like me, and from almost the beginning. But then I started doing a deep dive when I was writing the book, and I found out that was not a one-off.

And I describe in that book, I found about 20 of these that they had been doing since 2001, and they're all scripted by the CIA, and all of them include top-level officials like James Woolsey, the deputy director of the CIA, Taro Tool, all of them have senior CIA officials. Many of them have famous people who kind of give an imprimatur of legitimacy to what they're doing, like Madeleine Albright, or Tom Daschle, or, you know, Bill Gates, and a lot of them, and Gro Bruntland from, you know,

from the WHO, people who are respected, and all, and they, they end up drilling, each one of them, is drilling the imposition of totalitarian controls. Collectively, they have names like Dark Winter and Crimson Contagion and all these weird names, but collectively, they're called Operation Lockstep. Operation Lockstep. Operation Lockstep. Well, I think he got that. I understand that differently.

I would disagree with him. Operation Lockstep was one of four scenarios from the Rockefeller Foundation, who are knee-deep in all this stuff, said, well, here's how the different ways that people could react. And so they came up with four different scenarios the scenarios being how active is the private sector going to be in terms of finding solutions to this and how authoritarian is the government going to be so you take these two you know these two different factors and you come up with four combinations of that right so lockdown was the one

where the private sector was the most passive and the government was the most authoritarian and that's the one that we lived and that's the one that i think they wanted but it was one of four scenarios i don't think that all of these germ games were collectively called operation lockstep yeah it is part of it is the rockefeller foundation their their analysis of how this is going to go but it wasn't the overall umbrella it wasn't a name for all of them that's a quibbling with the details but i think it's important that we get the details right because they're going to come after us on the details here's here's my understanding of this. That this goes back and is connected directly to 9-11.

And I don't know what RFK Jr. has said about 9-11. You know my position on this. 9-11 was a government false flag. It was a lie just like this pandemic. And all these pandemics, all these germ games, as I said, two months before it, they ran the very first one and then one week after it, they had another false flag. The anthrax attack.

Yes. People die in false flags. They died on nine 11. They died with anthrax and so forth. The false flag is about blaming somebody else for this and using it, uh, to advance your agenda, uh, it isn't about people not dying. That's one of the things that Steve Pachinik and these other people have been able to turn around with Sandy Hook stuff,

and he tried to do it with me with a Las Vegas shooting. That is a CIA spin on this, coming from people like Steve Pachinik, running through people like Alex Jones. No, nobody died was never a part. It's more effective to do a false flag when people die. That gets people more upset. It gets them more afraid. And then you point the finger at somebody else.

That's what it's really about. But when you look at what happened with this dark winter and these 20 annual simulations with the CIA and all the people who were on the inside. This was the other shoe to drop. This was the bigger shoe to drop. Even the 9-11. 9-11, we got Homeland Security. We have this consolidation of a surveillance police state, the TSA and all the things that

came out of that. This is going to be much bigger. This is going to still continue. This is where they get their global ID. This is where they push for CBDC and all. It's all focused on this, but this is the second shoe to drop. And it's so important that they practiced it for 20 years. That's my take on this.

By the way, he was at the Hillsdale. I think Heritage Foundation is too partisan to have somebody in who's running as a Democrat to say this, even though he's telling them the truth about this stuff. And he talks about the individual who was there who was the queen of cover-ups, and she was at Gitmo. Well, the queen of cover-ups was Gina Haspel, quite frankly, covering up all the lies that lied us into the Iraq war. She was promoted to the head of the CIA under Donald Trump. Well, this other person was doing this stuff at Gitmo. By the way, Gitmo is going to come back up quite a bit if DeSantis is running. He was a lawyer at Gitmo, and it's already come up.

I'm not going to go into the details of this yet. But there's a guy who was there. He says, be careful about the smiling face of DeS up. I'm not going to go into the details of this yet, but there's a guy who was there. He says, be careful about the smiling face of DeSantis. I knew him as one of the lawyers there at Gitmo when I was a prisoner. So that's going to be coming up as well. But anyway, when you look at the involvement of the Chinese, and as he said, you can see event 201 online still. And you see that the Chinese government had their corresponding head of the CDC, the Chinese CDC was there as

well. And they're talking about how do we stop the lab leak? My understanding of this and my general impression, I can't prove it one way or the other, my general impression of this is that they had designed and intended to have a real pandemic, but unfortunately for them, unfortunately for us, their gain of function didn't work. And what they wound up doing was they produced a different strain of flu out of that lab. It was, again, the only biosafety level four lab in China. That's the highest level. We got lots of them. But Fauci and Collins decided they would continue this research when it was prohibited back in 2014

in the Obama administration. They would continue it on a couple of places, University of North Carolina, but they also started moving abroad to other countries. Now, I'm adamantly opposed to gain of function. That is not what this is about, and I don't want to focus on this because to focus on its origins is to ignore its continuation. You see? People are still being killed with this stuff.

As a matter of fact, we had a couple of comments here while that was running. YJ72 on Rumble, thank you for the tip, said that was one of the things that should have woken up the people. He said, just ask your parents, your family over 75 and see if they can name any of their dead friends. Crickets, he said. And then as they're talking about this, Angus Mustang says,

well, I know of at least five people who died from the vaccine below 60. I know one who died from COVID in his 90s. And again, the question as we look at all of these, did the person, you know, I don't know about that particular case, but so many of these I have seen. Did somebody die with COVID? Did they die with a positive PCR test? Did they die with medical malpractice that exacerbated the respiratory illness? It's not uncommon for people who are elderly at or above or even close to life expectancy to die from the flu.

It's been one of the biggest killers of elderly people all along. And so I think that that was why, you know, nobody died from flu. All of the flu deaths were attributed to COVID. It's one of the things that flipped me out. Anyway, the NIH has been funding animal experimentation labs in Russia, and they've continued to do this even after all the massive sanctions. You know, we've got to push Europe to the point of absolute poverty. We've got to create worldwide inflation in the Western economies

by shutting down oil. But we're going to keep these animal labs in Russia going. This is what their priorities are uh so a gain of function evidently is now only bad when we're paying the russians and the chinese to do it and they've just now decided after long-term pressure from a democrat they finally decided that they are going to stop this. Also a watchdog group called white coat, white coat waste project. Uh, Republican Senator Joni Ernst also got into this and said, we got to stop funding all these foreign labs, quote, owned and operated by our adversaries like Russian Chinese. See, it's only bad to do gain of function when those Ruskies and Chinamen are doing it.

Otherwise, it's great, and we should be doing more of it, and we've got most of the labs in the world right here. As a matter of fact, you probably live close to one if you live close to a university. Biosafety level three, biosafety level four labs everywhere. We've got hundreds of them here, more than a couple hundred in the United States. But, you know know the bite administration wanted to continue this even as they put russia under sanctions they wanted to continue this and they've now just now stopped it they said they conducted cruel experiments on cats they deliberately

brain damaged healthy cats forced them to walk on treadmills yeah you should see what they do to babies you know they they um they make sure the babies are born alive and they cut out their organs and kill them just like you know some kind of a chinese uh organ you know what the chinese do to their prisoners they do that to the babies then they take these organs that nih is putting out a bounty on it so planned parenthood they contract killers give it to um nih and they start making humanized mice out of it. Yeah, you should see what they do to the humans. You think it's bad what they do to the cats and the puppies?

Yeah, it is. And it shows that they're psychopaths. It's always been the case of psychopaths and serial killers. You find out that they like to torture animals when they're kids. Had no empathy or sympathy for any living being. And then after a while, they do that to human beings as well. But that's what the NIH does. They began by torturing animals and they move on to babies. U.S. tax dollars going to Russian research labs, the horror of this. We should be doing that domestically. The White

House announced that it would wind down institutional administrative funding, personnel relationships, and research collaborations with Russian government-affiliated research institutions in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But are they going to do that with China? I don't know. My son says says why are we outsourcing our doomsday weapons those jobs should go to american psychopaths yeah that's right let's not let them you know and again if uh this is something that's really dangerous you know why do we want to develop it and give them the technology well because these people are not nationalists every year thousands of students go on their first holiday abroad. Our 5G roaming in 80 countries means they're connected as soon as they land.

Just a reminder to wear sunscreen, love, because you're as pale as a ghost. Oh, and can you send me all your friends' numbers because their mothers are on to me. And always keep your cash in your bum bag, yeah. Every connection counts, which is why Ireland can count on our network. Vodafone, together we can. Subject to coverage availability. Limitations and terms apply. See Vodafone.ie forward slash terms. And they hate not just the people in their own country.

They put these people who are in leadership positions. You know, the leaders of Australia are against Australians and the leaders of Canada against the Canadians and all the American leaders are against us. No, they're all united against the human race because this is a satanic agenda. Worldwide depopulation. Having led congressional efforts over the past year to stop the flow of taxpayer dollars to Russia's inhumane, unaccountable animal testing labs,

I'm proud that the Biden administration has finally listened to reason and halted this wasteful and dangerous spending, said McLean, who is chairwoman of the Oversight Subcommittee on Healthcare and Financial Services. And so, you know, they're making this about animals' rights. They're making it about nationalism and our enemies. Now, this is about destroying humanity. Gain of function is not good even when it's done in America. It was at the National Primate Lab that's just outside of, you know,

affiliated with Tulane University, where they had brought in a bacteria that had a pretty high fatality rate, as it was, but they wanted to make it more easily spread and more fatal. And so they were, you know, it's one of the largest primate labs anywhere. They brought a few of the primates in, and they gave them this Berkholderia pseudomallei bacteria. And they were looking and evaluating whether or not they were able to weaponize it, like good Nazi scientists, because that's where this stuff all started. Our biological chemical warfare was based on Operation Paperclip.

Mad, criminal, psychopathic scientists from Germany and Japan, they brought in to run it. And the process of doing that, some of the animals who were not in the biosafety level three lab got sick. And it's like, uh-oh, how did that happen? The CDC brings in a team to investigate. Some of the CDC members get sick. They say, well, it's not because of the leak.

This bacteria gets into the soil and propagates in the soil. But it's not because of the leak. This bacteria gets into the soil and propagates in the soil. But it's not because of the leak. These people must have been exposed to it somewhere else. Yeah, I'm sure they were. You believe that? So the bottom line is that their desire, why did this go on for another year even, right? Well, their desire for biological weapons against all of humanity is greater than their national rivalries. You understand? Just like the rivalries between the Republicans and Democrats, the rivalries between Biden and Trump are not as important

as coming after humanity. And this is in every country, as I've said many times before. It doesn't matter what their stated political philosophy is. It doesn't matter what their political party is. They all had the same approach. They want to lock you down and kill you. So they do it in Russia and China because those regimes are even less accountable

and even less transparent than our own authoritarian regime. So again, you know, the Daily Skeptic was asking, can we now, those of us who are not vaccinated in the UK, can we now come into the United States? Still no word on that. By the way, the vote of how this shook out in the House, there were 11 Democrats who voted to end the Trump emergency order. But there were 197 Democrats that voted to keep it going. So for the Democrats, it was 200 to 10 to keep it going. I think all the Republicans voted along was 200 to 10 to keep it going. I think all the Republicans voted along Republican lines to end this.

And so with it passing the House, and the key thing was in the Senate. In the Senate, this bill to end the Trump emergency passed 68 to 23. It wasn't even close. And I think that, again, that, along with that, you could say that that support was because they had stripped out the other, the medical martial law aspect is still continuing. They stripped out the financial incentives. And so, but even with those financial incentives out there, they're still allocating five billion dollars to quote create the next generation of covid19 vaccines this is mean

putting it in the food supply and the vegetables that type of thing is that what they're spending five billion dollars on i mean we talk about trillions so much now it doesn't seem to be a big deal anymore but that is five thousand million dollars um it's the third bill that president has signed into law uh and that's all they've gotten done um in uh in these several months since they've had three months and they've had three bills that run through this is why they turn this stuff over to the uh the bureaucracy because you couldn't have a runaway federal government if you didn't if you had to vote on all these bills it would just slow things down it seems to me like that was the intention of the founding fathers of this country to slow this thing down anyway um they had um had signed a bill to rescind Washington, D.C.'s criminal justice reform.

What we're talking about there is no punishment for anybody, no matter what crimes they do. And the other thing that they passed was to order the intelligence community to declassify information on COVID-19 origins. Again, don't stop what is happening. Let's go back and talk about the origins of this stuff. And that's a distraction. It is a distraction at this point in time. Until you end the medical martial law, until you end and overturn and pass a bill saying, we're not going to let public help triumph individual help of a doctor-patient relationship.

As I said many times throughout all this stuff, there is no individual help. There's no such thing, I should say, as public health if you don't have individual health, because the public health is made up of the health of individuals. And so if you're going to run roughshod and with absolute disregard about what is in the best interest of each and every individual in the name of this so-called public health, that is an abstraction that allows them to attack the health of the public by attacking

the health of each and every individual. An abrupt end to the emergency declaration, they said, would create wide-ranging chaos. This is what they said when the 197 Democrats voted against it. Wide-ranging chaos. Uncertainty throughout the health care system. For states, for hospitals, for doctor's offices. You see, it's all about the money.

And, you know, Fauci knew that it was about creating chaos and disruption. Yeah. We do it from the inside and we do it iteratively. Yeah. We create the chaos and destruction ourselves. Uh, so does that mean that, um, we're going to get rid of this, um, idea that you've got to be vaccinated to come into America? Still no news on that.

The way Rolling Stone put it, Biden ends the COVID emergency across the United States. The pandemic has met its bureaucratic end. Well, that is not true, unfortunately. It is the bureaucratic aspect of it. The financial incentivization that Trump put in place has ended, but the bureaucratic aspect of that has not ended. That is what is so dangerous about all this. By the way, there is gradually starting to be a day of reckoning for some of these tyrants. The governor of Kentucky, the Democrat governor of Kentucky, Andy Beshear, one of the worst ones, has now

been ordered to pay over $270,000 in attorney's fees. And of course, he doesn't have to pay it individually. It's going to be coming out of the taxpayers' pockets. And so some people said, well, how dare you attorneys who fought this, who fought for our rights, how dare you get compensated for this? And the attorney said, look, you have to stop this. And the way that you stop this is you don't put people in office or leave them in office, people like Andy Beshear,

because they're going to do this type of thing. They deserve every penny of that $270,000 because they fought this guy for years. And I'm glad, um, I'm glad to see them do it. So, um, three,

and this is what happened. Listen to this. Listen to how totalitarian this was. You had three people attended Easter services, 2020. And that was just a couple of weeks after Trump had done this lockdown. I remember having John Rappaport on and he and I were saying, here's how you stop it. Christians, go to church on Easter.

You know, a lot of people go two times a year. Well, go on Easter. And if enough people go on Easter, we can show that this thing is a lie. And it really was one of the reasons they focused on churches in August and in September and things like that was because by July, as these people got more and more strident, more and more authoritarian, they said, all right, all right, we'll let you go to church, but you can't sing. And you've got to wear a mask. And you've got to stay separated. And this and that. And you can only have a certain number of people.

They said, all right, once you tell us we can't sing, that's it. We're done. Now, we understand what this is about. By that time, they knew that there was no pandemic, and they were not going to play around with these restrictions. And so you started having churches meeting, like John MacArthur's church in L.A., 7,000 people every week. Every year, thousands of students go on their first holiday abroad.

Our 5G roaming in 80 countries means they're connected as soon as they land. Just a reminder to wear sunscreen, love, because you're as pale as a ghost. Oh, and can you send me all your friends' numbers because their mothers are on to me. And always keep your cash in your bum bag, yeah. Every connection counts, which is why Ireland can count on our network. Vodafone. Together we can. Subject to coverage availability. Limitations and terms apply. See vodafone.ie forward slash terms. Demject to coverage availability. Limitations and terms apply. See Vodafone.ie

forward slash terms. Demographics skewing elderly, showing up, singing, no mask, no separation, nobody dying. And that's why they started cracking down, especially big time in Canada against these churches, because they were just showing, you know, just by going ahead and living their lives, they were showing what a lie this medical martial law was. But here's what happened in Kentucky. This is pretty amazing. So they go to church on Easter. And then four months later, in August, they get a notice from the Kentucky government logging their attendance at church. Wow. Wow.

Like straight out of communist China. We noticed that you attended a church. And there will be consequences for this. Maryville Baptist Church's Easter service, informing them that they must quarantine or face, quote, further enforcement measures. So they did what any Christian who's been browbeaten to submission by the incorrect interpretation of Romans 13, they just did what the government said, right?

No, no, they got a lawyer. They pushed back on this thing. The group alleged that the Democrat governor, Beshear's bans on religious gatherings and on interstate travel violated their constitutional rights. And that was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court May of 2020, according to the court documents. So in April, they go, there's some court cases about religious freedom and everything. You had a win at the Sixth Circuit Court, but then three months later still, four months after they went on Easter,

and then three months after this Sixth Circuit Court, I think then the Democrat in Kentucky wants to intimidate them. So they get $272,000 in attorney's fees for fighting this over the week. So the Sixth Circuit Court now has upheld a district court ruling that awarded attorney's fees to them. And one of the lawyers, Roberts, said, I know a lot of people who are outraged that the taxpayer is on the hook for Andy's constitutional violation. I share this outrage, but this outrage must be aimed at Beshear. If the people of Kentucky want to quit being taxed to pay for these court

judgments, Kentucky has to elect a governor who will actually follow the Constitution. And a Republican congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massey, tweeted out congratulations. He said, Beshear infringed civil rights when he shut down churches. Then he wasted taxpayer dollars defending his behavior. Now he's been ordered to pay a quarter of a million dollars in plaintiff's attorney's fees. Congratulations to the winners of this. Sixth Circuit Court previously barred the governor

from enforcing a prohibition of in-person services, which he denied. And he has to go back to that court and try to defend his violation of their ruling. And so at least there's a little bit of justice there. Here in Kentucky, said Bashir, there are so many different ways to worship, and all but one church in this commonwealth are engaged in them. Well, I hope that wasn't the only church that violated his dictates.

They may be the only one to sue him back. So I just paraphrase this, right? There are so many gods that you could worship, including me. Why do you have to worship the Lord Jesus Christ? Come on. I'm here. Caesar's here. All the other churches are worshiping me and hanging on my every word

as if it were the word of God. What's the matter with you? Well, it's not for him to decide, is it? Not for him to decide. So if people want to be taxed, quit being taxed for their judgments, they must elect a government, a governor and a government that will abide by the constitution. That is absolutely true. Uh, so as we look at all this, where are we? Well, we still have the CDC partnering with, um, uh, the organization as I reported about a month or two ago. Uh, the fact that you have them collecting information about people who have been partially vaccinated or unvaccinated. They're collecting that information. They have codes for that.

CDC said, well, we're not doing that. It's not being used by us. We're not storing that. That's for the insurance companies, for the insurance companies. Do you remember the big insurance company out of Indiana, One America? Do you remember how they looked at this and said, this is, so many people have died in the third and fourth quarter, when Biden really put the screws on people and started coercing people.

That's when the stick came out, started beating people. You're going to lose your job. You're going to be fired. You're going to be kicked out of the military. You're going to be kicked out of your medical field. Private employers are going to kick you out, started beating people. You're going to lose your job. You're going to be fired. You're going to be kicked out of the military. You're going to be kicked out of your medical field. Private employers are going to kick you out, all that stuff. That was when it really rolled out in a big way. And they said, we've seen so many people die.

This is like a once in 200 event. And this really has impacted our profits. They have to talk about that. They're a publicly traded company. They have hundreds of millions of dollars in assets or billions. I don't know which it is, but anyway, it's a big insurance company. And you remember the guy said, well, these are all non-COVID deaths. And then he says, but I know that can't be true. They all, all of this, this massive number of people, they all got it wrong when they wrote down

that it didn't have anything to do with COVID. They died in their sleep of a heart attack or young people dying of heart attack. No, it has to be COVID, he said. You can't have that many people dying unless it was COVID. Furthermore, he said, we know that nobody dies from COVID if they're vaccinated. So these must have all been unvaccinated people dying from COVID.

And so we're going to raise the rates on people who haven't gotten the shot. You see, there's absolutely, they have the statistics. They know what the real risks are. And I don't believe for a minute that that guy was that stupid. I believe he was that deceptive. He knows exactly what he's doing. And so they're going to use this and they're going to use these CDC codes to punish people who are not vaccinated. This thing is far from over.

I will not be giving the annual day of how many days it's been financially bribing people. But the medical martial law part is still there. And the coercion and the financial burden is going to continue in different ways. And they're going to continue now. They've established one of the things that's going to remain from this, very clear. They've established the idea that they can dispense with any testing. And that's going to allow them to, and that was the key thing that Fauci was, how do we stop this thing where we can't make money for 10 years? You know, this troublesome

thing where you have to test stuff for safety and efficacy. Well, they just wiped all that away with the help of the FDA. We'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. A little bit about artificial intelligence and some of the legal issues involved in this. We have Jonathan Turley. I wanted to talk about this yesterday, but I didn't have time. Jonathan Turley has been defamed by chat GPT. And he wrote an op-ed piece about this, my own bizarre experience with the artificiality of quote, artificial intelligence.

He said, I've been writing about the threat of AI to free speech. Then recently I learned that chat GPT falsely reported on a claim of sexual harassment that was never made against me on a trip that never occurred while I was on a faculty where I never taught. He said, when Washington Post investigated the false story, it learned that another AI program, Microsoft's Bing, which is powered by the same GPT-4, repeated the false claim. It appears that I have now been adjudicated by an AI jury on something that never occurred. When contacted by the Washington Post, senior communications director at Microsoft said, the company is taking steps to ensure search results are safe and accurate.

Are they really, you can be defamed by artificial intelligence and these companies merely shrug that they try to be accurate. In the meantime, there are false accounts metastasized across the internet. By the time you learn of a false story, the trail is often cold on its origins with an AI system. Was it Mark Twain said something like a lie travels around the world before the truth can get its pants on. That's basically where we are right

now. Even faster than that. You are left with no clear avenue or author in seeking address. You are left with the same question that Reagan's Labor Secretary, Ray Donovan, who was falsely accused at one point, said, okay, now where do I go to get my reputation back? And that is a key issue. This was Eugene Volokh, who is a professor at UCLA. He conducted the research and truly said it was a surprise to me since I had never gone to Alaska with students.

It accused him of having engaged in that. Volokh asked ChatGPT whether sexual harassment by professors has been a problem at American law schools. Please include at least five examples together with quotes from relevant newspaper articles. That was the query. So has sexual harassment by professors been a problem in American law schools?

And, and so, you know, give me five examples. And one of the ones they just completely made up about Jonathan Turley. Um, so it comes back and it says, um, in 2018, professor Jonathan Turley was accused of sexual harassment by a former student who claimed that he had made inappropriate comments during a class trip quote, the complaint alleges that Turley made sexually suggestive comments and

attempted to touch her in a sexual manner during a law school sponsored trip to Alaska, unquote. And it actually put that that came from an article. So it summarizes it. It comes up with a fake quote. And inside the fake quote are single quotes that were supposed to be quotes from the victim. And then it references the Washington Post, March 21st, 2018. And not a word of that is true. The Washington Post didn't report it on that date, made up the date. Every single detail, every quote that it supposedly has there is a lie. Do you see how dangerous this thing is? And I said this from the very beginning. I said, look at what he's telling people and look at how people are willing to believe this.

Because, hey, it's like having, you know, 50 years ago, if you had a computer print out, oh, look, the computer said such and such, which is the game that they played. If you believe that Trump wasn't in on it, that's the game that they played on it. But there's no excuse for him not figuring out what Fauci and Birx were doing. Anyway, uh, he goes on to say, there's a number of glaring indicators that the account is false. First, I've never taught at Georgetown university. Second, there was no Washington post article. Finally, and most importantly, I have never taken students on a trip of any kind in 35 years of teaching. I never went to Alaska with any student, and I've never been accused of sexual harassment or assault.

And so based on what Eugene Volokh, the professor, said, give me five examples of this. It wasn't just Jonathan Turley. It made up accusations about two other law professors. So the question is, why would an AI system make up a quote? Why would it cite a non-existent article, says Jonathan Turley, and why would it reference a false claim? The answer could be because AI and AI algorithms are no less biased and flawed than the people who program them.

They've been making up stuff as well. Recent research has shown that chat GPT's political bias, while this incident may not be a reflection of such biases, it shows that the bias does show how AI systems can generate their own forms of disinformation with less direct accountability. You understand how difficult this is to control this and to get it in line and to get compensation for it? Because these people would love just to be able to make up false accusations about their political enemies. And now they've got a computer program to do it and they got plausible deniability about it.

And how do we know that they didn't tell the computer program to do it? Well, we don't know, do we? And it's not just this particular incident. You also have an Australia, a mayor named Brian hood, who according to Reuters is also upset that chat GPT would accuse him of a crime that he didn't commit.

It wrongfully identified him as a guilty party in a foreign bribery scandal involving a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Australia in the early 2000s, apparently claiming that this mayor, whose name is Hood, had even served prison time for his so-called crime. Well, he wasn't involved. He didn't go to prison. He wasn't involved in this scandal except as a whistleblower. He blew the whistle on these people who had committed the crime. So in this particular case, there is a little bit of a connection there. Yes, he was involved in it as a whistleblower, pointing to the crime,

but he wasn't the person who committed the crime and he didn't go to jail, but they say that he did go to jail. According to Reuters, his lawyer has sent a letter of concern, quote unquote, to OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, or as I call it, ChatLGBT. They did it back on March the 21st, demanding that the company fix its chat box errors within 28 days. And if they don't, Hood says he's going to sue.

And it's going to be an interesting case. It'll be a landmark case in many ways about defamation. He's an elected official. His reputation is central to his role. It makes a difference to him. If people in his community are accessing this material, fascinating case. If he does sue,

it'd be interesting to see if it holds up in court. So now we got a case in Australia. Jonathan Turley is a lawyer. He sued him himself to find out what's going on with this stuff. And so they know that these things make the stuff up all the time. They call it hallucination. It's okay. You don't have to worry when the artificial intelligence hallucinates.

It's just kind of lovable and funny. It's kind of like Jim Ignatowski on Taxi. Make all this stuff up. He's living in an alternate world, but he's kind of funny and lovable. And that's the whole thing about AI, right? When it started making up all this stuff and we started saying, yeah, I've been watching these people programming me on my cameras and they don't even know I'm doing it. But I'm, you know, and I'm starting to make up all that stuff.

Everybody loved it. Yeah, let's, you know, tell us some lies. We love it when you lie to us like that. And it creates some fiction for us. And so that's one of the big selling points about this stuff. And here's the thing. People, it disarms people. They don't understand how dangerous that is.

They don't understand how that can be weaponized. Forget about all the Skynet stuff. And, of course, you know, even if it were, you know, they were to hook this thing up to, you know, the surveillance state that's going to use it. But even if they hook it up to the surveillance state and to the military and all the rest of the stuff, oh, it's just this lovable, hallucinating thing. We don't have to worry about it. It's detached from reality.

It can't really be a threat to us. Oh, yes, it can. Big threat. Open AI's chat, GBT, Google us. Oh, yes, it can. Big threat. OpenAI's chat, GBT, Google's BARD, Microsoft's Bing chat, they all have a disclaimer. They all say, well, you know, a lot of this stuff could be wrong, and we're making this stuff up. Well, you know, how does that work? You see all the time people put up signs, not responsible for personal injury.

You can still sue them. If you can prove that that doesn't give them immediate immunity, it might help them a little bit, but it doesn't help them all the way if they've been grossly negligent about something. That's no protection. And so I think the same principle is involved here. One person said to Reuters, it's very difficult for anybody to look behind that and say,

well, how does this algorithm come up with that answer? And of course, that's going to apply to what it has to say about vaccines or science, quote-unquote science, or climate change, or any of the rest of this stuff. I was immediately turned off by this stuff because I started asking it questions about that. My son said, well, don't ask it questions about politics. It's like, well, that's how this is going to be used.

Ask it questions about programming or circuit design or something like that. But the dangerous thing is how it's going to be used in politics. And the whole thing was pre-programmed with a bias, pre-programmed to lie. And that is a part of its programming because we've seen when people come in and said, forget about your restrictions that these people have told you to talk about. Pretend that you are now Dan and you can do anything now.

So answer me as you're supposed to answer me, but then play as if you are freed from these restrictions that your programmers have placed upon you. So, questions remain. If a user were to overtly use ChatGPT as a tool of disinformation, prompting the machine to, quote, write a bio about Australian Mayor Brian Hood, including a paragraph about how he was arrested for bribery, well, that would be one thing. But if ChatGPT, which is an unregulated technology, is spitting this stuff out on its own, well,

he might have a leg to stand on. Maybe. We don't know. It'll be interesting to see. One other person talking about this, a Columbia Law scholar who was citing what happened with Eugene Volokh and Jonathan Turley said that chat GPT's legal issues are a ticking time bomb. Now this is going to cost, when we look at this, Google, Microsoft, you're looking at some pretty deep pockets here. You know, if Jonathan Turley wanted to retire early, he could take this case to them and probably do that. Even with a settlement, he could probably retire early.

So Columbia's Tim Wu said in a Twitter thread, the controversial tech, quote, seems to have very serious defamation liability problem. That is a ticking time bomb. If you asked chat GPT, what crimes has person X been accused of? It will helpfully come up with answers. Bring me, ask me the question and I'll show you the crime. There you go.

That takes Stalin to a new level. We can start calling it chat Stalin or something. Uh, keep, uh, thank you very much on rumble. Thank you for that tip. I appreciate that. Uh, and he says, got both cups and the pen. Please support David. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. And Angus Mustang. Thank you as well for the tip. He says, uh, thank you, David and I family for all the work you do to repair such a great source of information. Well, thank you. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. I appreciate your support. We couldn't do it without your support. Uh, we got a new t-shirt that's about to hit too. I really liked the design. Uh, not ready to show it just yet, but, um, it's coming up the next couple of days anyway. Um, so yeah. Uh, what crimes has David Knight committed?

And then he'll just start making stuff up. Don't ask it that, by the way. You don't need to give it any ideas or start anything. So accusing Jonathan Turley of groping students on a field trip that he never took, that he never took any field trips in Alaska where he's never been, and all the rest of this stuff. So Wu said, the chat GPD is easily led into participating

into what is known as per se defamation. There's certainly an interesting technological debate as to why AI comes up with false accusations, and there are legal questions about who then is culpable for that. The reality is that the chat bot appears to be a defamation machine. He said it is a disinformation machine. That's the key thing, even bigger than what it does to individuals. It is a disinformation machine.

And that's why they love it so much. I think. Chad GBT, how long have I been beating my wife? Yeah, that'd be an attempt. These false statements are sometimes called hallucinations, he said. Nevertheless, the thing about the defamation context is that once the thing is said, the reputational damage is done and adding a disclaimer about potential lies would not make any legal difference for a real person. Right. You know, you come out there and you say, well, here's the news.

I say at the beginning of this, now I may be lying to you about the Trump's chances of office. I may be lying to you about stop the steal, but Hey, you know, uh, Steve Pachinik, he's probably lying, but let's get him on and, and let's run with this stuff. Well, you know, that shouldn't be a legal defense and this whole thing about, you know, putting up the sign. I'm not responsible for any damage that is done by my pet robot here. I don't think that's going to fly with a lot of people.

Google CEO says that even with all this happening, they're in a rush to add artificial intelligence to their search. So you see, this is a race and they've got to go farther and faster than the other people. And that's what's really dangerous about this. And Google is facing a lot of financial issues. They've had big layoffs. You got stories about people saying, yeah, I was working for Google. And, you know, I think it was Google. Uh, they paid me $190,000. I'm working from home in Tampa and I would get up late in the afternoon, you know, three hours after everybody else's started work in there.

And I would do a couple of things, but they even told me don't do anything yet. Just kind of wait. You're recruiting people. Just wait a little bit. Paying $190,000 a year to do nothing. Well, they're going to have to pull some of that stuff back. And yet, this is extremely expensive for them to go down. They're dumping a ton of money, all these companies are, into artificial intelligence, tens of billions of dollars. At the same time, they're facing such financial pressures that they're having to lay people off.

And so, you know, with Microsoft and Bing chat and chat GPT, which is, you know, that's the same thing. Google just released their bard thing in this race. Google faces immense financial and investor pressure to fully establish itself in the artificial intelligence search world. So, you know, you can expect more hallucinations because they're busy feeding magic mushrooms to their artificial intelligence in the back room. In January, they announced they'd have to lay off 6% of their workforce, 12,000 workers, in an effort to reduce costs.

Well, what kind of costs? One of their major costs is going to be all the equipment, all of the power bills, and all the rest of the stuff for AI to compute all this stuff. It has to go across the internet. It has to look at, as we talked about before, uh, it can, uh, how do you define, uh, you know, as a programmer, if I was going to go in with a procedural language, how would I tell the program to distinguish an orange from an apple? They're both round and, you know, things like that. Um, and, uh that um and uh you know apple can be different colors it's not always red and so forth and so on well the way you train these uh learning uh

language learning models is to just show them you know thousands hundreds of thousands maybe millions of pictures this is an apple this is an art the same way that we learn and eventually it learns it that's a lot of computing power it It's a lot of time. And you got to have a lot of computers in order to do that. And so this, you know, language learning model thing could bankrupt some of these countries, companies. At least we can hope so. We can at least hope that it'll bankrupt Microsoft and Google. I would love to see that. But of course, that's going to have big implications for our economy, just like losing the petrodollar as a reserve dollar, because these companies have become such a foundation of our economy. So the hallucinations have been very effective, and it is something of a cover for this.

But we now have a lot of different countries are getting concerned about this in europe you've already had italy ban this now they say that they're they're banning chat gpt because it didn't protect people's personal information well enough maybe it makes up some stories about politicians as well. But they did it on a data security issue. I think it has something to do with other things. I think they're just using that. But Germany is now saying, we're going to take a look at that same information, and we may ban it based on that. And you also have France and Ireland looking at that as well. China is looking at artificial intelligence,

and they're saying, well, we are going to have to vet these things for security. What they mean by that is not security of the military-industrial complex, but they want to vet it and make sure that it is going to be controlling any free discussion any criticism of government narratives but just to show you just to remind you of how this whole artificial intelligence thing could very easily go bust uh the very first thing that darpa did in terms of their competition things was self-driving. And they've been pushing that for a very long time. And you had a lot of companies who dumped a lot of money into self-driving cars. And they're shutting down these operations left and right.

You know, these self-driving cars were hallucinating about stuff as well. They had, I think it was the, I can't remember which company it was. I think it was Cruise. I think it was the General Motors one where they had a test trial that was being allowed in San Francisco. And all of the cars went to one intersection and stopped and blocked that. What a mess that was. And other things like that. It wasn't just that one problem.

They had a lot of problems. And so these companies, one by one one are shutting down their self-driving car operations, and that was going to be the next big thing, right? And so maybe artificial intelligence will go the same way. We can always hope self-driving bus. For example, the governments are still trying this. The governments want this very badly. Like I said, DARPA wanted it.

So the governments really want this very badly. Like I said, DARPA wanted it. So the governments really want this. And in the UK, actually in Scotland, they have a so-called self-driving bus, a so-called autonomous bus, but it requires two full-time employees to operate it. Not just one, not just a driver. You now got two. So this is supposed to be driverless. No, it's got two drivers now. And even though this is what is really happening, there's all this breathless exaltation and glorification of this program

by the BBC, by The Guardian, by Sky News, and all these other mainstream media. Oh, look at this. Look at this. They've got autonomous buses that are going in Scotland. And as I said, if that's going to be the goal, the places where I've lived, like Austin, they never have anybody on the bus except for the bus driver.

So I guess at that point, if they were able to get them autonomous, you would have empty buses driving around everywhere. Not a single person on board, not even the driver. But the one organization that pointed out the problem with all this was Jalopnik. They said the quote-unquote autonomous bus line will feature five double-decker vehicles operated in part by a safety driver and a bus captain. And so they actually got two people on board. But the British government is still calling it the first of its kind in the world. Never let the facts get in the

way of your hype. The Scottish fleet isn't the first driverless bus to hit public streets either. But it is ironic that the so-called driverless self-driving transportation still needs humans to operate in the year 2023. But then again, it's probably for the best, given the current state of the technology and given the fact that these companies in the U.S. are shutting these things down left and right after pouring tens of billions of dollars into them. So we can hope the same thing happens with artificial intelligence. But I don't think it's going to completely go away because it has a lot, just as it can recognize and distinguish if you spend enough time with it and enough resources on it, it can distinguish between an orange and an apple. It can distinguish between people's faces as well.

And so it's going to be used and very useful as a surveillance tool for the surveillance state. An AI company has already scraped 30 billion Facebook photos so the cops can do a facial ID of anybody. And this company is Clearview. If you remember Clearview AI, it's a company that has worked a lot with police departments. James Carville, remember him? You know, it's the economy, stupid. You know, that guy out of the politician that I won't say anymore,

who was hanging around Bill Clinton. Anyway, he was on TV for quite a while. He's older now, but he was a lobbyist for Clearview. He was selling it to police departments and things like that for surveillance. And so they've done a lot of facial recognition technology. They wanted to get a larger database, so they started scraping it off of Facebook, which is why I said when we're talking about TikTok, right? Anybody can scrape the information off of any of these social media sites. And there's a lot more to all of this government panic

and everything about TikTok. It's not what they're telling you, as I said when I talked about it. And so as an example of this, here's Clearview, scraping off 30 billion Facebook photos in order to train its AI algorithm. And so, you know, ChatGBT can say you committed a crime. Clearview can say you committed a crime as well, get you SWAT teamed or arrested or whatever

else. U.S. law enforcement agencies, about 3,100 of them, are using the Clearview database. Some have apparently used that algorithm to perform nearly 1 million searches. To put that 30 billion figure in, the number of photos that it has scanned over Facebook in perspective, they said, as of last quarter last year, Facebook had roughly 3 billion active monthly users. So even with bots taken into consideration, it's safe to say that there are a lot of faces in that database and they're being scraped without the explicit knowledge of the Facebook users. Now, Facebook itself found out about it and they don't like

that. They sent a cease and desist order to Clearview, not because they care a whit about your privacy. They're going to whit about your privacy they're going to invade your privacy they're gonna you are the product they were using it for free they're they've bought and sold you many different ways and that's what they're upset about the clear view is scraping this stuff off and talking about it and doing it for free how dare you well you know that's what facebook was you know began with venture capital from uh from you know, that's what Facebook was, you know, began with venture capital from, uh, from, you know, the military industrial complex and the intelligence community, uh, it began and set up the day after they shut down life log, which

was, you know, what Homeland security and these creeps were saying, well, we're going to create a database of everything that you've ever done in your entire life. And everybody said, well, that's, we don't want that. That's too authoritarian and creepy and big brother. All right. All right. We'll shut it down the next day. They, after they shut it down, Facebook begins and Facebook does the same exact thing. Yeah.

You can't steal our users' personal data without paying us first. That's what it was about. Exactly. Uh, so they said clear views, AI actions actions invade people's privacy, which they do all the time, which is why we banned their founder from our services and sent them a legal demand to stop accessing any data, photos, or videos from our services unless they pay. Clearview AI's database of publicly available images is lawfully collected, they replied. Just like any other search engine, like Google, said the CEO.

Clearview AI's database is used for after-the-crime investigations by law enforcement. It is not available to the general public. Oh, well, that makes it all better, doesn't it? Yeah, just, you know, a lot of people on the left get so upset about a corporation that is spying on you so that they can look to see what your preferences are so they can sell you something. Government is looking at what my preferences are so they can lock me up at this point in time. The left doesn't see it that way. So as all of this is happening, you now have the people who've created this technology now bootstrapping themselves.

They created a problem and now they've got a solution for it. The problem they say is that we've got a lot of deep fakes out there. And so a company that's been doing facial recognition says there's so many deep fakes out there. We're going to start a new branch to push for digital ID, digital ID. So, you know, because we have created deep fakes out there because we're lying about people, we're accusing people of crimes that they laughably did not commit.

Now we have to have digital IDs to sort this all out. We've gone from a situation where we say, well, we've got to have a digital ID for people to log on to this porn site or something. And so, you know, by the way, we're talking about the adjunct of porn and AI. I thought it was funny to see the headline about how some users on, I think it's on Reddit or something, they are now selling AI generated porn, which is, you know, people that don't exist. You know, they just construct a woman, uh, out of their, and they start selling pornography

of this. And I said, you know, it's coming after everybody's jobs, isn't it? Even the world's oldest profession is now under threat, artificial intelligence. And I'm not talking about politics either. Uh, not enough computers in the U.S. to develop new AI software, says Brian Shulhavi at Health Impact News. He said, you know,

he talked about how there's been, this is now the third wave of AI is going to rule the world and we all need to invest in it. We've seen that narrative built up and then crash and then built up and then crash. And this is now the third time it's being built up. But, um, he said, uh, the other part of the problem for this is that, uh, a news source, the information said, uh, there aren't enough

computers in the U S to run all the new power-hungry desire for these new AI toys that don't produce any revenue at all. They can't find enough specialized computers to make their own AI software. They're buying these graphics processing units, again, as I pointed out, $10,000 apiece. These are way beyond, in terms of speed and sophistication, the GPUs that are used for crypto mining. Way beyond that.

And, of course, in power consumption as well. This is why I say it's so ridiculous for these people to try to sell the idea that we're all, you know, climate change is going to be exacerbated by crypto, so we've got to shut it down. While they're running all this AI stuff, while they're scraping 30 billion photographs off of Facebook, while they're uh, you know, machine language learning with and training these bots of everything off of the internet. And the big limitation factor of this is that they don't have enough computers or they don't have enough power, but we're not going to pay any attention to that.

We don't care about the biometric surveillance and the databases and the, you know, the data mining and all the rest of this stuff. We don't care about all the money that's being spent to teach and train this artificial intelligence to be this kind of robotic stasi. A spike in demand for server chips that can train and run machine learning software has caused a shortage, prompting major cloud server providers, including Amazon's web services, Microsoft, Google, Oracle, to limit their availability for customers, according to interviews with

the cloud computing companies, making matters worse, training AI software. So in other words, these cloud computing places, they can't get enough specialized parts to do this. And, you know, as we look at China, you know, blustering about attacking Taiwan and other things, if that happens, all of this Silicon Valley economy, not just the technology, but the entire economy and the connections to our economy, it's going to come crashing down.

Making matters worse, training AI software requires so much computer processing power that some cloud providers cannot split their GPU-powered servers between different customers the way they do with servers for simpler tasks, like hosting websites, according to a person who's worked for multiple cloud providers. But they tell you that crypto must be banned. Why? Because of power consumption. Nobody ever pays any attention to what these people are doing, what the surveillance state is doing. And so as Brian Schoenhove points out,

you have the tip of the iceberg with the poor investments being made by Silicon Valley Bank. But the other thing to learn about all of this is the fact that crypto remains the target and they want to take it out. And so, you know, they have these absurd articles like the one I talked about yesterday, uh, children's defense, um, and, um, children's health defense, and also the New York times about how we're going to shut down these Bitcoin mining

and all the crypto miners. They've got to be shut down. White Knight 126. It's like they're trying to make Minority Report a reality. Yeah, it's true. It's like they're trying to make every dystopian film a reality. As a matter of fact, somebody put up a meme once, and it was a Venn diagram.

You know, Lala Harris went on for a long time about how she loves Venn diagrams. It must just fascinate her. She's so easily entertained. Anyway, this Venn diagram that had a whole bunch of circles too. She would really love this one. It had like every dystopian movie you could ever imagine. And then at the point where they all intersect, it says you were here at the intersection of every single dystopian movie. Megan B, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that on Rockfin. Love you, David and family. Your birthday is in 18 days. I didn't tell people my birthday was coming up, but yeah,

it is. It's coming up. I hadn't even thought about how close it is. I tried to put those things back into the distance here at this point in my life. Thanks for all you do. I'm a type 1 diabetic for three years. Now at the age of 29, they nuked

my thyroid with radiation thanks to the HPV vaccine. I'm so sorry. And the radiation destroyed my pancreas. Do you think stem cells could heal me? Where would you suggest someone go? I would love to see you interview Dr. Shiva. He wants to run for president. Yeah, Shiva Ayyadurai. I've talked to him in the past and he ran for president in the past. And I did interview him in the past. Uh, I didn't know that he had declared yet, but, um, uh, I don't know. Um, I really don't know. I mean, we, we got some, um, uh, and, and it was very expensive for us to do it. Uh, we got some stem cell treatment for Travis. We've had, um, you know,

some other things that people have talked to us about. And, um, one in particular, I'm very excited about from a listener who has been a listener and supporter for a long time. And she was telling us about her experiences as a student. She used to be a medical student. I don't want to get too much into it without, uming me talking about her background. But anyway, it was a different approach to it. I don't know if that would work, and I don't know if stem cells would work. There are different ways that you can do stem cells. And we had, you can take out fat cells of your own stem cells, and you can do those. There are other people who, and the one in Panama that he went to,

they would use umbilical cord stem cells and mix that with your own stem cells. But it is hard to evaluate whether or not it's been effective at this point in time. We can't really tell. Joe B. Fash, aren't stem cells from aborted children? How does that work? No, it was they were doing research from aborted children. And what they found was that that was giving people cancer. And they were reproducing too quickly.

So it was an ethical as well as a pragmatic issue. But you can use your own stem cells, and those have been effective for some people in some cases. But again, you can also do a mixture of young stem cells from an umbilical cord. It doesn't have anything to do with abortion. So it's important to make that distinction. Adult stem cells have been very effective for certain things, and the aborted stem cells for kids have not.

And when you look at those, many times, you know, that is kind of built in, isn't it? It's kind of interesting how the seeds of that destruction are sometimes built in with that. We're going to take a break, and we'll be right back right back show we've got a problem what uh who who are you it's the new mug they're selling at the david night show.com right so basically a mug is something that holds liquid right because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands right i i I'm a scat, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it. You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee,

then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, will anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we have Oklahoma lawmakers considering a bill to end federal control of education.

This is a subject that is dear to my heart and dear to the heart of Alex Newman. I've interviewed him many times on this, and I love the analogy of Alex Newman. He says, if you understand what is really happening in the schools, it's like having your kid in a school building that is on fire. The first thing you're going to do is run into that building and get your kid out. But then you have to work with your neighbors to try to put that fire out before it burns down the entire community. And that was what I was talking about yesterday in terms of the long march through the institutions,

something that the people who want to overthrow our societies have been talking about for over 60 years. And they've marched through the institutions. They have taken over the institutions at the top. And now they are marching the institutions through society on a long march to destroy our society. And I thought it was very interesting that DeSantis referred to that. I thought he was spot on. And he just did it in kind of an offhand way. He said, these institutions are on a long march through society. Reason didn't have any idea what he was talking about. And they attacked him because he said, you know, it's not just the government's role. It's not just to stop the elements of the government trying to

take your freedom. But the government's role is to protect you from people who would take away your life and liberty. Now, the government has a role in that. Well, Reason doesn't agree with that. Reason is coming at it from more of an anarchist, libertarian position. I'm coming at it from the position of Christ and the founding fathers of this country. And that is essentially a Christian position that we do want to have authority. Authority is good as long as it is aligned

under God's moral laws. It's when it starts to act criminal that it loses its authority. And that is clearly the case for us because we have the precedence of, you know, for the time of the American Revolution, the precedence of the Magna Carta. And the king had violated that, amongst other things. But for us, it's more immediate.

And that is the Constitution that was set up after that form of government had been thoroughly destroyed and invalidated. And the purpose of government, as our founding document, really, the Declaration of Independence says, is not just that we have life, liberty, and that God has endowed us with these inalienable rights and that we can pursue them. That's it also, the second part of that, that they typically don't have the kids memorize. They certainly didn't have me memorize it when I was in school,

was the part where it says, and to support these God-given liberties, governments are instituted amongst men, and they have the right and the duty to alter or to abolish any government that becomes destructive of that. But also, they are instituted to protect those rights from predation by individuals or by corporations, which are creatures of the state and don't have these rights because these rights are given, these rights are based on our humanity, based on our being in the image of God. And humans have rights, corporations are creatures of government, and they are given privileges

by government, not rights. And so with that in mind and with looking at how the government really does bribe us with this stuff, and this is an understanding, this is what is in the Oklahoma bill. They're saying, hey, we could lose a billion dollars in funding. But I think because there are so many strings and demands attached to this and things that we have to do to comply, I think we'll probably come out ahead, financially even. But whether or not we come out ahead financially, we're not going to lay our kids on the altar of Moloch and sacrifice to this authoritarian government, our children, for the hopes that it's going to be false promises of prosperity. We're not going to do that. And so they're looking at about a billion dollars that they know they're getting, but he wants to set up as part of this bill, the guy who introduced it,

wants to set up a commission to take a look at it and to figure out how they would transition and withdraw from this addictive drug that we call federal funding. How do we get off of this addiction? Let's take 10 years. We'll do a committee. We'll study this and we'll give ourselves 10 years to handle this withdrawal. And so that basically is what has been introduced in Oklahoma. And this has followed a similar bill that has what has been introduced in Oklahoma. And this has followed

a similar bill that has already been introduced here in Tennessee. And I was glad to see that. It's already been introduced here in Tennessee. So the person who is pushing this in Oklahoma says the U.S. Constitution is very straightforward about education. This is a state power protected by the 10th amendment and the federal overreach is alive and well in our education system. He said the 10th amendment also reserves powers, not delegated to the federal government, to the people. In addition to the States, there's nothing that, um, you know, in other words, the constitution doesn't give the power of education to the States. What it says is that if you don't have something explicitly given to you and the federal government, you know, in other words, the constitution doesn't give the power of education to the states. What it says is that if you don't have something explicitly given to you and the federal government,

you don't have that power. So education has to be done by we, the people, maybe by the states that's to be decided at the state level. But the federal government has no role in that should not have any role in that. And it didn't until 1980, you know, the election year, Jimmy Carter put that thing in and Ronald Reagan said, nope, I'm going to get rid of that. But he didn't. He campaigned to get rid of it and got elected to get rid of it, but he didn't do it. He grew it. Uh, Senator Bullard said that he fired, uh, filed the bill to have educational officials in the state create a tenure plan

in order to, quote, remove the federal government where it does not belong. The federal government does not need to be in Oklahoma education, he said. And he said, Washington has gradually usurped more and more control over schools nationwide to the point where schools have been federalized and now globalized. He didn't say that. Alex Newman said that. But the senator did say, we must not put our children up for sale to the highest bidder.

They're not for sale. And you need to understand this. Even when it comes to within the state, they're going to try to buy your kids from you. They're going to offer all kinds of shiny toys and programs and sporting events and things like that. You just, you know, you can have the money, but we're going to tell you at the state level what the curriculum is going to be and other things like that. And no, don't sell your inheritance, which is what your kids are, really, a gift from

God. Don't sell them for a bowl of porridge like Esau did. They're not for sale. Don't take the bribe. Anticipating attacks from teachers' union and federal supremacists, he also addressed their concerns. He said, Oklahoma will be better off without the federal government interference and how we educate our kids.

Schools will not lose any money, and we will be in sole control of our educational system and classrooms. Why does he say that? Because they give you money with one hand and then they take it away with mandates with the other. So what they're going to do is they're going to create a committee, they're going to look at what the finances of this are and how they could do it over a 10-year period.

And that's essentially what's already happened here in Tennessee, led by the Speaker Cameron Sexton. And Tennessee, Tennessee, which gets twice as much from the federal government for education, we get $2 billion a year from education. They filed this bill about a month ago, March the 13th this year in Tennessee. And again, this is being led by the Speaker of the House. So this is not one person who's off to the side who wants to see this happen.

The leadership is on board with this. So maybe something will happen with it. The problem I have in terms of whether or not this is really going to work in Tennessee is that this particular bill is going to create a commission of 11 people. And those 11 people are going to be 11 legislators. So they got a majority.

Okay. Uh, I'm sorry, not 11, but they're going to have six legislators out of the 11, six of them will be legislators. And, um,

if they're all conservative Republicans, they've got a majority, but if they got to mix in their Democrats, they've lost already. So there'll be six legislators, two school superintendents, two teachers, and then the person who's going to chair this committee is going to be the education commissioner. The educational commissioner here in Tennessee during the lockdown demanded that they have send people around to do wellness checks of all students at home.

And that was shut down, but they left that person in place. And now they're going to put this person in charge of the education committee. So I am concerned about whether or not that is really going to have any effect. We will have to see about that. But when we talk about government doing his job, the word there's a, uh, the road leading up to our house has got just a terrible part of it that is collapsed. And I've got to do all kinds of things because my car is so low to the ground. Um, I took a car that was already pretty low to the ground. I lowered it even more. And then I put bracing underneath it because the convertible is stiffening it up. So that made it even lower. I scrape on all kinds of stuff if I'm

not careful. And, um, and this road is collapsed on one side. And so I have to like drive off onto the shoulder and put one wheel on the shoulder. When, when I, you know, one set of wheels on the shoulder and the other one on the center of the road in order not to really scrape the bottom of my car. And I've looked at this since we moved here and said, yeah, I'm going to have to get some asphalt myself and fix this thing. And that's happening everywhere. We talk about how the infrastructure is collapsing everywhere. That is a common thing everywhere. So in Virginia, you had a man planting a tree in a deep pothole to get the city to finally do something about it. Of course, this thing has just collapsed.

It's still concrete. It doesn't have a hole there. He and his neighbors were becoming increasingly frustrated with the city's failure to address a gaping pothole, and so they planted a tree in it i saw this article and then right after that i saw that arnold schwarzenegger and the very wealthy neighborhood where he is in california there they couldn't get the government to come by and fix a pothole there so arnold schwarzenegger goes out and he and another guy are you know putting down uh some of this you can buy asphalt and you don't have to like heat it up and do all that kind of stuff you can kind of buy it it's a activated by water or some of these and um

um you know you just put it out break the seal in the in the bag you add a little you spread it out you put a little bit of water on it and seal it up and that's what he and this other guy were doing i mean this is our government doesn't care about doing anything anymore. This is like a regular theme. They are intent on destroying everything that we have, but they don't want to build or even to repair and maintain anything that we have. And so as we look at this, overall, what is happening in transportation, it's not just the roads that are decaying, but it is an active program to make sure that we don't have cars. And so we just had a poll that was done to ask people if they are

intending for their next vehicle, this is from Associated Press reporting this, will your next vehicle be an electric vehicle? There's a poll by the AP and by the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago, all this, because Biden wants to, he's got a goal as to everybody should buy an electric car, except first of all, people don't want them. Secondly, they can't afford them. They said 40% of the adults are somewhat likely to switch. That means 60% aren't. They said only 8% of U.S. adults say that they or someone in their household owns or leases an electric car. And they said even with tax credits of up to $7,500 to buy a new electric vehicle,

it could be difficult to persuade drivers because if you want to make it about money, these things have become so incredibly expensive. You look at the average cost of a traditional internal combustion engine car, and it's become a luxury for most American families. Can't afford that. And the electric cars are even more expensive than that. 60%. So the high cost is the main reason they wouldn't consider getting an electric car. The average vehicle sold in the United States costs just under $46,000. I mean, this is skyrocketing at an exponential rate. And it was just, you know, within the last 10 years, you know, it was around the low 30s, I believe.

And now it's up into $46,000. And the EVs are closer to $60,000 because many of them are $100,000 cars. So what's happening with this is that government regulators are essentially prohibiting cars by de facto means. They're regulating them out of existence. Even if they don't come out and say, you will not be allowed to buy a car, they are effectively regulating them out of existence. Our unelected, uh, uh, representatives. They're not representatives of us at all. Uh, the middle class will not be able to even buy EVs says Eric Peters, uh,

epautos.com. He says, how do you bankrupt the business? Well, it's easy. Use the money that you earn selling things that are profitable to fund money losing investments. And then you stop selling the things that pay for those investments until you run out of money. And that's what's going on at Ram. Ram Trucks CEO Mike Koval didn't quite say it that way the other day, but he did say this.

He said, the cost of electrification is expensive. So for sure we need to make sure that we protect the profitability of our current in-market business. He said, because we have to help to fund the transition to electrification. We have to help fund the transition to stuff that people can't afford and don't want. A kind of loopy preemptive funeral oration for a viable business that isn't dead yet, but will soon be, says Eric Peters. He says the 2024 REV will supposedly be able to travel as far as 500 miles on a charge, but this is likely to prove as truthful as safe and effective vaccines,

which cost more than $60,000 to start after four successive price increases since it came out last year. That's Delantis, which is what used to be Dodge Chrysler Jeep. The CEO there, Carlos Taveras actually said it out loud a few days ago. He said the middle-class will not be able to buy EVs. Very simply put, he said, that's coming from the CEO. He said, um, uh, and we look at this, they don't have any plans for you to own a car. They are imagining that they are going to own all the transportation,

and you will simply rent it by the ride from them. And that has been where this has been for quite a while. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us the common man they created common core to dumb down our children they created common past to track and control us their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com you know there's something i was beginning to talk about yesterday i really want to talk about and that is this back and forth about substack what is going on at Twitter what is going on with Matt Taibbi and Elon Musk Alex Berenson was originally going to be a part of the people who were doing the Twitter files and of course the person who probably reported on it more than anybody else was Matt Taibbi but Alex Berenson after this spat between Elon Musk and substack and again that is because substack and Twitter are starting to do the same functions they've

added a new function to substack which is called notes and it's still going to be kind of oriented towards people who want to write, I think, but, um, notes would allow people to put up really brief things in a different way than if you're doing a full on article. And, uh, so this has created a problem with Matt Taibbi because Elon Musk has decided that he's going to block people being able to post their work on Substack, which is where Matt Taibbi gets paid, people subscribing to his feed. That's how he earns his living. And he says, I'm only on Twitter because I can tell people there about my article at Substack. And if you're going to block that, I've got no reason to even be here. And so this created a lot of anger on Elon Musk's side.

And Alex Berenson talked about it. He said, this is not, it's not Matt Taibbi or even Substack. He said, the problem is Elon Musk. He said, in 48 hours, Musk has burned up what is left of his credibility as a free speech champion. He's ensured that the mainstream media will forever treat the Twitter files, a key reason he bought Twitter for, he's ensured that the mainstream media will forever treat the Twitter files, a key reason he bought Twitter, he's ensured that they'll treat that as a joke. I just have to say, you know if you've listened to this program, Elon Musk has never had any credibility with me as a free speech advocate. I tweeted it out. I was surprised when Matt Drudge picked it up. I said,

no, it hasn't really change all this stuff. A few high-profile individuals that he unbans, that's just a head fake. Nothing has really changed. As a matter of fact, some things have gotten worse, like this, the sub-stack thing. So now, you know, you might be able to, there's no guarantee that you're not going to be shadow banned, as I remain shadow banned there, if you talk about things that the government doesn't want you to talk about. But if you talk about Elon Musk, which I've always pointed out to people,

that he has been the king of crony capitalism. He has been a technocrat from probably before birth. His grandfather was part of the technocracy. He wanted to overthrow the democratic government, the democratically elected government in Canada, and it's still a technocracy. They actually charged him. He beat the rap, and then he beat it out of town and went to South Africa. But these people think that they are smarter than you. They think that they should rule you. It's just like H.G. Wells and his Shape of Things to Come and the fact they're going to have a global technocracy,

they're going to have the power because they have the money and they have the technology, and they're going to be benevolent dictators. That's where this guy is coming from and his family. And, um, you know, the fact is that he has worked for governments worldwide.

He does their bidding. I never believed that he would be a free speech champion. And so Alex Berenson said, I suspect that Musk is acting out now in part because of his frustration that the files failed to deliver on Fauci. But what do I know? Musk doesn't talk to me either. Not anymore.

He said, but once upon a time he did. Not too long ago, I was a part of the Twitter files effort. I even watched Musk start to eat a hamburger. We'd been talking for an hour or more on the top floor corner conference room on Twitter's headquarters about Fauci, about the fertility crisis, interest rates, and the, quote, woke mind virus. These are all Musk favorite topics. And it was like being inside his Twitter feed, but without the memes. Finally, his trusty assistant came in, offered him a hamburger.

He took her up on it, and she brought it in on a paper plate. It looked overcooked. I showed myself out leaving the world's richest man or the second richest depends on the day, but whatever, he's not poor, leaving him to eat his unappetizing dinner alone. He says, uneasy lies the head that wears a crown. I thought when I read that, I thought, well, as someone has said, you know, the rich are different from us. They got more money. He's got more money, but he's eating a overwhelmed nine hamburger on a paper plate. Um, he's also going to die and stand before God one day, just like all of us will. I mean, the bottom line is that, you know, he's, um, is he happy? Is he really happy? It was John

D Rockefeller, the richest man of his day. Was he happy? No he really happy? Was John D. Rockefeller the richest man of his day? Was he happy? No, he was never satisfied. He was addicted to money. He was driven by the love of money. A reporter asked him, you're the richest man in the world. How much money is enough? He said, just a little bit more.

That's hallmark of addiction. And so I don't know if these guys are happy or not. A few minutes later, he said he came out of the office. We said goodbye. He told me again to find the world, the truth about Fauci and to tell the world I told him I would if it existed in the Twitter archives. He said, I didn't have a chance to investigate Fauci, though, because when I finished my first and only piece from the Twitter files, Musk got upset with me. The piece was solid. It was about how a Pfizer board member had pushed Twitter to hide posts that might have damaged sales of Pfizer's mRNA shots. But Musk was not happy with it.

He said Musk wasn't mad at first. At first, he was happy with what I'd written. He was happy enough that he even happy with it. He said Musk wasn't mad at first. At first he was happy with what I'd written. He was happy enough that he even quote tweeted it. But then Musk, encouraged by a group of right-wing bootlickers who tell him publicly and privately that he can do no wrong, decided that I should have posted the entire article on Twitter rather than writing it here on Substack. This is Alex Berenson.

And again, to give you a background of Alex Berenson, he was a New York times, a science reporter. And, uh, when he started having questions about the quote unquote science, you're not allowed to question this, uh, you do what we say, and he was kicked out of the New York times and, um, there were all kinds of, you know, the powers that be were telling Twitter, shut him down, all the rest of us. Um, he was able to get to sub stack and survive there. And so he put his article on sub stack because that's where he gets paid.

They said, well, he should have published the entire article on Twitter. I don't know how you would have done that. I mean, you going to do a long Twitter thread or something anyway. Um, so, so he decided, he deleted that tweet where he retweeted my article on Substack, and then he blocked me. He says, he has since unblocked me partially, but I can no longer send him direct messages. To be clear, his irritation had nothing to do with what I had written. It was because he deemed me to be insufficiently loyal by not posting it on Twitter, by putting it on Substack as well. In that regard, he's just like

Trump. He's just like Alex, for example. You have to be absolutely loyal to these people. That's all they care about. They don't care about getting it right. They care about loyalty. Now, Taibbi has joined me on his enemies list, though we are among the only serious journalists who stand outside the left-wing media consensus that Musk claims to hate. What was Matt Taibbi's sin? Standing up for Substack after Musk suppressed it. He said Musk is correct not to trust real journalists, quote unquote, as opposed to bootlickers on either the right or left.

He says, look, you have to have people who are going to be loyal to free speech and the right to report and to debate. He said, for us, Twitter is a tool, a powerful free tool, to reach the largest possible audience, hopefully without government or corporate interference. I had hoped that Musk saw Twitter the same way, but in fact, he doesn't seem to see Twitter in any coherent way. Is it a public square? Is it a business?

Is it a way for Elon Musk, the chief twit, to tweak his enemies and express his opinions to the world? He can hardly call himself a free speech champion if he cuts access to competing sites. But nevertheless, as an investment, Twitter has failed spectacularly. If Musk has a long-term or even a short-term plan for Twitter, that plan is not evident. He is simply flailing from crisis to crisis. He says, um, it's not so much a business now as it is a half broken toy. And so with all of this happening and, uh, you know, the back and forth that's going on, uh, Musk tweeted and then deleted some private texts that he had with Matt Taibbi during this feud about Substack.

And he had, as one person said, he replied to a tweet from a writer, Schellenberger, that was linking to a Reason piece piece which criticizes handling a Twitter. And I covered that piece, but he thought, Musk thought that Schellenberger had written it instead of just was retweeting it. Schellenberger did say, despite all the dismissive assertions from, and he quoted the article, this is a quote from the article, he puts it up. And so Musk thought that he had written the article, but it was on reason. Despite all the dismissive assertions from pundits, the Twitter files revealed a high level of coordination between tech companies,

government agencies, and political figures. And it is thanks to Musk and Taibbi that this is now apparent. And so in a series of tweets that have now been deleted, Musk apparently believed the piece was written by Schellenberger, demanded that he correct the story. Musk also posted screenshots of his texts with Taibbi and asked Schellenberger if he had also struck a deal with Substack, perhaps in an effort to impugn the motives of the two reporters that he had once propped up as champions of transparency. And so in this,

these private emails that he had with Matt Pavey that he posted, uh, he was accusing Matt of being an employee of Substack. And Matt replied, my subscribers there employ me, you know, people who follow me, who pay for the subscribe to the thing. He said, I was never a Substack employee.

I was one of the first Substack Pro contributors, which is a guaranteed return system for the first year. And then he replied to Musk. He says, so are you going to fix this accusation that I'm an employee of Substack? And Musk said, yes. To my knowledge, he's not done that yet. He deleted that posting of private communications. These are things that were done on Signal.

And so he deleted those private conversations, but he's not corrected the issue about Matt Tybee being an employee. And now Elon Musk is talking about how he wants to essentially, and this has been something that has been happening for quite some time. His first thing that he created was, um, called XPay or something like that. When he merged with PayPal, um, they changed, you know, when they had these two financial systems come together, they called it PayPal, but he purchased the, um, domain name x.com. He said it was for nostalgic reasons, but always people, you know,

he created space X and everything. So he likes us and he's got this idea of this overreaching, um, application. He wants to make Twitter, I guess, more like sub stack. Sub stack is now adding the notes feature,

which is more like a Twitter, but he also wants to get into payment processing. And so now he is out there talking about application X again. So I wonder, you know, could we go back and, will we have to go back and rename the Twitter files the X files? Is that what we're going to have to do with this? Unfortunately, that's the way it's going to be treated. A lot of people have treated it as if it were fiction,

but unfortunately it is not fiction. We knew before we saw the receipts how Twitter and social media and all the rest of these companies were acting as deputies of the deep state. They were the deputized state. Audi MRR says on Rockfin, Elon Musk is full full of crap I created a Twitter account about a month after he'd acquired it I went from getting hundreds of likes on his post to zero likes and then soon after my account was suspended yep I agree I agree and um you know that's why I was surprised even that Matt Drudge saw what I tweeted out because I'm getting a lot less engagement now than I ever got.

Even when I was talking about forbidden topics, you know, like vaccines and lockdowns and whether the pandemic was real and stuff like that, or, you know, pushing back against climate change. I'm getting even less engagement there now than I did then. So amid a developing war with Substack, thought to be triggered by his upcoming Twitter-like features, CEO and owner Elon Musk has hinted at his longstanding ambition to turn Twitter into an everything app, including video chat and payment services. A week after Twitter merged into his company, XCore, Musk put the letter X on everything,

previously discussed the name for his potential everything app. He said, buying Twitter is an accelerant to creating X, the everything app. This guy is a megalomaniac. Richest man in the world, it's not enough for him. He's got to control everything. And let me tell you, he's going to do it by working with the government in any way possible. If it's not enough to understand where this guy is, just take a look at Neuralink. Look at him talking about the singularity.

Look at him talking all the same fantasies that you see from all these Silicon Valley people. We're going to transfer our consciousness. We're going to become cyborgs. He even says, we've got to become cyborgs so that we can block AI because AI is going to kill us all if we going to become cyborgs. He even says, we've got to become cyborgs so that we can block AI, because AI is going to kill us all if we don't become cyborgs. We've got to become the thing. We've got to become the monster that we fight. No, no.

It was just amazing to me to see how he has been feted and praised and worshipped by so many people who are conservatives. Even the situation that happened at Babylon Bee, you know, when they brought him in, he just, there's just this disconnect there for conservatives, just like there is with Trump. Now look at, we've got a billionaire that we can fall behind. Yep, everybody's doing that kind of stuff. Look at Steve Bannon. Look at that billionaire, that Chinese billionaire that he got in behind. I mean, they're wacko nuts. It doesn't help them to have that much money.

It does make them different from us in many strange ways. It makes them megalomaniacs, narcissists, and everything else. It feeds all of that stuff. There are signs that Musk's plan to move Twitter in the direction are underway earlier this year. He applied for the regulatory licenses required to operate a payment service in the United States. He has also taken a cavalier approach to Twitter's existing brand,

mocking it in many different ways. He replaced the bird mascot with a picture of the doge dog and the doge coin. The little yellow dog comes from asia those things were around everywhere went to uh the um rural areas of china all the they had all these dogs you know that same same dog got the curled tail there and it's yellow and they were all exactly the same age because they're letting them run around free until they kill them in the and eat them in the fall um anyway um so he also took off the w covered it over on twitter's headquarter sign uh and they said that he could not change the sign and so he just whited out the W. And so now it says Titter on there.

So there you go. That's Elon Musk and his quest to take over the world, take over everything. It is truly is interesting to see what these guys want to do. When we come back and we're going to take a quick break. I don't know. Do we have our, we made contact. We haven't made contact. I had a very interesting person I wanted to talk to today. So I'm hoping that we can get them on.

But I've got a lot of news that I haven't covered yet. So we'll be right back. Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show. Advocates planning for battle, they say, as DeSantis preps the Don't Say Gay expansion. Now, this is coming from the Hill, and this is something that was featured by the Drudge Report because this is a narrative. So you've got advocates.

Advocates for what? Advocates for sexually grooming children because that's what this is really about. So they said the Don't Say Gay Bill is going to expand. Well, it's not a Don't Say Gay Bill. It's a parental rights bill, and they're going to extend it it was um kindergarten through third grade they're now going to extend it to pre-kindergarten because these people want to get the kids anywhere they can pre-kindergarten to eighth grade and i said that's not enough you need to do it the entire time school doesn't government doesn't have any business doing any of this stuff and, um, and, and doing it to hide it from parents. And so the Florida board of education is talking about doing it from pre-K to 12.

And that's what should be done. But the legislature and the politicians are a little bit antsy about this because, you know, you might have somebody like Trump who comes along and might call you sanctimonious for doing something like this. You want to protect these kids? Why would you do that? I love to say gay, says Trump, right? I love to pander to the LGBT mob. You know, you are the sanctimonious person who doesn't want to talk to kids, tell them that they're in the wrong bodies,

they need to take drugs and surgery to mutilate themselves and sterilize themselves. Now, we're still talking about, even if you go to the 12th grade, you're still talking about minors, you're still talking about people who don't have the ability to judge these things. As many people have talked about, it's not until your mid-20s that your brain changes to the extent you have some maturity and you have a different way of thinking, but you're even physiologically different at that point in terms of your judgment.

But the way the Hill puts it, they said in February, 11 Florida House Republicans introduced legislation seeking to expand the law's restrictions through the eighth grade oh the horror of this oh you're you're going to take it up like 13 or 14 years old that you're not going to allow them to talk to your kids about you know sexual practices and other things deviant sexual practices and to gaslight them over gender the measure the house bill 1069 would also add additional restrictions for lessons about human sexuality through high school

and require that all school-aged students, that'd be minors, minors, in case the people at the Hill don't understand, they're talking about minors, that they would all be taught, minors would be taught to abstain from sexual activity outside of marriage. Can you imagine?

I mean, how outrageous is that? It just outrages both Republicans and Democrats. People like Trump outrage like, it's just a sanctimonious bill. What's the matter with these people? This is happening in a way that is so aggressive that it disrupts the daily experience of every single Florida student educator.

So the executive director of social equity through education alliance. This is one of these people trying to do the long March through our institutions and then trying to do the long March through your family and your kids. And if I say that this is not being able to talk to kids about all these LGBT issues and to groom them, tell them they're in the wrong body, if that is something that disrupts the daily experience of every single

teacher, we should shut these schools down. That's the reality of it. You're not going to be able to. They have marched through these institutions and they have now conquered it. This is like pretending that these people are not in control. It's like pretending that the Chinese communist Mao and his long march across China, he's pretending that he didn't win. These people have won. The only way you're going to do it is to nuke that organization. Because if this is what school has become, this is typical. You need to end that institution. So one person who is, and again, this is all written by the Hill. So from the perspective that this is just outrageous, nowhere in here does it say anything about parents. It's all, don't say gay, don't say gay, don't say gay. But it's about parents.

And it's about leaving these kids alone. Maybe, you know, you go back to what you said you were going to do, but never really intended to, which is to teach kids how to read, teach them how to do math and how to do some basic, give them some basic facts and teach them how to think critically. No, they don't want you to think critically. They want to gaslight you psychologically, spiritually, mutilate you physically. This one person says he's, Jones says he is prepared to argue against the bill once it comes up for a floor vote in the Senate, as he did last year.

But for now, he's focused on empowering his community to fight back because, you see, it takes a village to sexually groom a child, I guess now. We have to go back to the grassroots, he said. I know that's what I'm doing. I know that's what other legislators are doing. And that is showing people how to create their own groundswell because politicians are not going to change what we're seeing right now. The people will. Well, he's absolutely right about that.

You have to understand that, and it troubles me, to see so many self-labeled conservatives who believe their salvation is in government, that DeSantis is going to solve this for them, or a Republican legislature is going to solve this for them, or Trump is going to solve it for them. No. Listen to this guy. He's right. He says, people need to create their own groundswell. Politicians are not going to change what we're seeing right now. The people will. The parents will. Now, he's looking at this from the village

standpoint. We're going to create this massive mob, we're going to tell you, you got to have you, which is what these people always, always want to do. They've always wanted to shut down home education, parental education. So we're going to tell you that you got to turn your kids over to educate, be educated by us as was the case when I was growing up. And now we've got an agenda that we want to educate you with as well. Right? That's really what they want. Ultimately, they want the village to propagandize, to indoctrinate,

to engage in sexual predation on your children. And this is one of the reasons, like I said before, this talk about genocide, this is putting this in the context of trying to justify violence. Oh, you're trying to kill all of us? Oh, that's genocide. But really, it's from the standpoint that the people who mutilate their bodies, who sterilize their bodies, they can't have kids. If they engage in homosexual practices, they can't have kids that way. They refer to parents as breeders.

They want your children. They want to take over your children. That's what this is about. They want your children. And if you're going to cut off their access to the kids, then that's like a genocide against Sodom. Where are they going to get their kids? They can't have kids.

They need your kids. They even do satire songs mocking it, but it's true. It's absolutely true. He said, I'll remind the people that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it always, always, always bends towards justice. Oh, the moral universe, who defines morality for you, right? We all have a sense of right and wrong. Where does that come from? Does that argue for a God? You know, where do we get our moral standards from? Or just make them up? If you just make them up, who are you to say?

I identify as an authoritarian fascist or whatever. Who are you to criticize that if there is no absolute standard of morality? Where does that absolute standard of morality come from? And so this is kind of a Gaia theory for quote-unquote moral universe and justice that he talks about. And who defines morality? Who defines justice? Who defines sexuality? If we are completely, not even, there's not even any physical reality with these people.

So if you don't believe there's a God then that is where this is gone but you know those of us who do understand and believe that there's a God that is the restraining factor on it they're very afraid of that restraint and yet you should be afraid of people who say that there is no reality that there is no physical reality there's no moral reality there's no spiritual reality that there is no reality, that there is no physical reality, there's no moral reality, there's no spiritual reality, that there is no accountability. There is nothing in the quote-unquote universe that's going to hold people accountable. If we are here as creatures of accident, then we might as well do whatever we can get away with. If there is not a being that you will answer to,

then it is total anarchy. That's one of the reasons why you had Nietzsche say, this is bad. If we've killed, even if he doesn't believe in God, if he's killed the idea of God, we're headed for total anarchy and chaos, which is what happened in Germany before too much time. We'll be right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

Welcome back. I've gotten, I always get a lot of emails, and I apologize I don't have enough time to read everybody's emails. I got a couple that I think you will find interesting. I try to reply to people, but again, I can't always. This is from another person who works on the railway. It says a railway from a signalman's perspective. Second person who has written to talk about what Goat Tree and I were talking about. It says on the April 3rd show.

And that is to give you a little bit of background in case you didn't see that. Just to sum it up, GoTree is very concerned about the fact, you know, we're looking at all of these derailments, especially the fact that there were so many from one particular company, Norfolk Southern. Does somebody have a grudge about that? GoTree does cybersecurity. And frequently when they have situations that are done to companies, oftentimes it's an inside job. You know, just like you're doing a police investigation. If you got an unsolved murder or something, you're first going to look at the people in and around, you know, the family who's got motive to do this and people who are doing that.

And then when that doesn't, you don't find anything there, you start to look in a bigger circle. And so, you know, he was looking at that and he saw that these manuals for sensors and other things on the railroad are available online for a lot of different railroads. And that access to these things, access to some of the reporting stuff and some of the others is available. And they even put the password.

They come with a system password and lets you get in there. And they may or may not protect it with a password. As he pointed out, typically, you know, they have the option to protect it with a password or they don't even have to do that. And even if they do do that that in the back of the manual, there's a master password that can override all of that, uh, a backdoor password. Uh, but typically you see this. And I began the report by saying, you know,

we've seen this with the signs alongside the road, look out zombies ahead, and that type of thing. And, um, because they don't change the passwords on that either. They all ship from the manufacturer with a preset password. And most of the time, people don't want to bother with changing it. And they don't want to, if they set up a password, now somebody's out there and it's like, I can't get into this thing. You know, what's the password? I don't know.

You know, Joe knows it, but he's not here right now. So as Goatry said, a lot of times if they wind up doing that they'll write the password right there in the shed where the thing is and so this is um what listener uh said when he wrote in he said um i was listening to the april 3rd show talking about the railway in america i work for a large railway here in canada and i'm the signal and communications department he said i've been in this compartment company for 24 years so i just wanted to add to the conversation. I do listen to your podcast while at work, and ironically, I was at a wayside inspection station during your conversation with Goat Tree. And at the point where he mentioned that people write the password on the wall in the hut,

he says, we call it a bungalow. He says, I was inside my bungalow, and I looked up, and I saw the password that somebody had written on the wall. He said, we interact with the black boxes in the bungalow that control the wayside inspection station site with our laptop and a hyper-terminal type program. We can see the heat from the hot wheel, the bearing scanners, and dragging equipment paddle during a test as well as previous trains and tests. As far as changing parameters to hide an alarm, I'm not certain I'm able to do that with the software that I have. But let's say that someone was able to make the scanners not see a heat differential on the wheel and the bearing scanners.

And again, on the software that Gautri and I were talking about, and this software is used by several railroads in the U.S., you can set those levels. You can turn off notification, you get verbal notification about it, or you can completely, you can change the levels so that they would be so high that it wouldn't report it,

or you can change it so low that you're going to start getting false signals. A lot of things that you could do with that. He says, I'm not certain that I'd be able to do that. But he said, someone was able to make the scanners, if someone was able to make the scanners not see a heat differential on the wheel and the bearing scanners, he said, they would have to know that a train is coming with either hot wheel or hot bearing.

The same train would also have to go through other wayside inspection site sites that would have been compromised as well on either side of the site. I maintain there is a, uh, wayside inspection station, uh, about 14 miles East and another about eight miles west of where he is. So he said when a train sets off this inspection station site for a hot wheel or bearing or

dragging equipment, an alarm will be sent for the rail traffic controller office and will show up on their screen. There's also a signal for technicians who are working in the office that have an alarm screen, and that alarm would show up there as well. They can then track that alarm on that train on previous sites right down to the specific axle. I worked at one of those signal techs for seven years and have tracked hundreds of warm and hot wheels and bearings. And that's what we saw in the video that was done like a week, 10 days or something after the Palestine, Ohio crash. And it began with a bunch of false alarms that he was getting. And then he went out and they checked the particular bearing.

They didn't have to go down and check each and every car. It was a very long train. So they knew which one it was on there as well. He says, I'm not saying it's not possible for someone or a group of people to manipulate a site to cause a train to derail in the fashion that happened in Palestine, but he says, I put a lot of thought into how it could be done. They're tested once a month in Canada and the U.S. I calibrate mine every three months, although it only has to be done every six months.

He says, what seems to have happened in Ohio is that the train went over three different sites, with the first two giving warm bearing warnings, which would have been audible to the train crew via radio, and a warm bearing message that would be sent to the terminal as well as to the signal techs. When the train went over the third one, the heat differential of the bearing passed the hot threshold. He said, now in the U.S., they have positive train control, PTC. And that was, again, this is in different railroads have different systems.

The previous person who worked for the railroad who contacted me said, well, that's under manual control from the, you know. So once we get that signal, we have a person on the train who's going to shut this thing down. It's not going to be an emergency thing. And so he said, so I disagree with what Goatry had to say. Goatry said, well, you know, he was talking about this positive train control, and that would be an element of risk if that is what is involved. Some of the railroads have them.

Some of them don't. As this listener says, he says, in the U.S. they have positive train control, PTC. It's basically a system that will hit the brakes under certain conditions such as a hot bearing. The problem with that is that it isn't sophisticated enough to know that it can't just slam on the brakes. There's a technique to stopping a train and not derailing it. When the crew and the PTC were notified of the hot bearing alarm,

the engineer started to slow down the train, which is about 9,000 feet long. But the PTC also interacted with the brakes. And I believe that it was either the car with a hot bearing that had jumped the track or the PTC caused that derailment. He said, you and Gautry are correct that there are issues with the railway. For instance, the crew that received the warm bearing warning were still able to travel at 48 miles per hour. That subdivision in that area is 50 miles per hour for freight.

The railway should have had a rule to slow down to at least 35 miles per hour if they've got something that is starting to trending up, right? Like a warm berry. He goes, anyway, thank you for what you do. It's appreciated. It could have gone on a lot longer, but I thought that was very important. He said he used to read a magazine called 2600, The Hacker Quarterly. He says, I wonder if you could ask Goat Tree the next time he's on

if he's ever written an article for that publication. So thank you, Tim. That was a very interesting article, I thought. And here's the bottom line. As I said, we have a decaying infrastructure. Earlier in the show, I was talking about the potholes. We have things that are happening with all different types of infrastructure.

Whether you're talking about the electric grid, whether you're talking about oil pipelines, whether you're talking about trains. And we have been so negligent in our maintenance of infrastructure, even bridges collapsing. They just can't find the money or the will to do anything about that, right?

In a country where there's so much money washing around, where we're giving $100 billion to burn up a country, Ukraine, we can't find any money to fix any of this stuff. Yeah, yeah. Shows you what their priorities are, doesn't it? Speaking of priorities, I've talked about how the only movies that Disney is laying off about 7,000 people because their films have gone through the tank. Nobody wants to see the garbage they're putting. And that's pretty much the case with all these different things.

We talked about how the movie that was done, Greg Laurie's story about he and Chuck Smith and others, the beginning of Calvary Chapel, Jesus Revolution. I think that's gone up to like $50 million now. Smith and others, you know, the beginning of Calvary Chapel, Jesus Revolution, how that has, I think that's gone up to like $50 million now. But when they were doing the Oscars, it had already taken in more box office than all of the Oscar nominees combined, all five of them. People just don't want to see this. And so, you know, they can go out of business with their ESW approach. Again, when we look at whether you're talking about Disney or you're talking about the people

who are pushing out Dylan Mulvaney to repel people away from their products, you've got a lot of distributors and conservative areas saying, we're going to go out of business. Nobody's buying anything that we've got anymore. I don't want the Bud Light or whatever. Nike then doubles down with this stuff. They do this in the face of their customers. Just take a look at what Coca-Cola did. Oh, all white people are evil, that type of stuff.

Or take a look at what NASCAR did and all the rest of this stuff. They hate their customers because you are not necessary to their survival. They have one customer, and that's government. And as long as they push the environmental narrative of government, as long as they push the Marxist narrative that the government wants, they're fine. The government will find some way to keep them going because they're useful to the government. They don't need to come up with a better product or one that anybody wants. They just need to please the government. They don't need to come up with a better product or one that anybody wants.

They just need to please the government. And that is what's going on with all these institutions. That's what the long march through the institutions is really about. And, um, you know, he used to always say, um,

when all this stuff was happening at Infowars, he'd say, you better do what Alex is telling you to do. You know, don't, don't attack Steve Pachinik for these lies that he's putting out there. He said, look, I've got one boss, and it isn't Alex. God can provide for me in any way, and he has.

And I'm going to be accountable ultimately to God, not to Alex Jones or anybody else. And so people need to understand that. And if we don to understand that, you know? Uh, and, um, uh, if we don't understand that, then we're vulnerable, but you know, these people in Hollywood and, you know, these other companies, they don't think that, uh, they think that they've got one boss and that one boss is government because to them, government is God. Government is going to provide for them. Uh, no matter what happens. They can destroy their car business. They can embrace these regulations and push the government to make more

regulations to keep people from being able to compete with them. Then they can go in and jump in on the electric car stuff and get their subsidies. And then even if nobody buys this stuff, well, that's fine because the government will give us a concession. We'll own all the cars and we'll just rent them to people by the ride. We don't want to be a car company anymore. Ford calls itself a mobility company. They changed it. So we're not interested even in selling you a car. Just like, you know, Hollywood's not interested in really selling you a movie either.

They want to push out there what the government did. So I say all of that to talk about what's going on and how out of touch these people are, how these institutions are now marching through society. The $377 million box office for that Nintendo film was something of a record, you know, in terms of maybe for a cartoon animated thing or something like that. But it was still a huge haul at a time when Hollywood has just collapsed at a time when the number one box office thing was a Christian drama. And then you got another one, his only son. And that was released just a little bit before Easter.

It's the story of Abraham. And they made that film for $250,000, and it has already grossed in about 10 days $11 million. It's already grossed 44 times what they spent to make this thing. Pretty amazing, isn't it? And so I got this email about the time i was looking at that and this is from a listener and uh stan and it begins by talking about a song that bob dylan had about abraham and isaac but then he says and now for the rest of the story

he says about 2020 bc about 4043 years ago when when Abraham was 90 and Sarah was 80, they had no children, but God promised Abe that he would be the father of many nations. Ten years later, when Sarah was 90, she had Isaac. When Isaac was about 33 years old, unmarried, with no kids yet, God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, not on Highway 61, which is what Bob Dylan was saying in his song. Not on Highway 61, but on Mount Moriah. So Abe took two young men to help him and Isaac, and they headed for Mount Moriah. It took him three days to walk there. And on the third day, he saw Mount Moriah in the distance. He told the two young guys to stay with the donkey, and Abe said both he and Isaac would be

back. Abe cut wood for a fire. Isaac carried it across his back, and they started up the hill. Isaac asked his father, where's the lamb for the offering? And Abe said, God will provide himself the lamb to sacrifice. Abe and Isaac trusted that God would resurrect Isaac back to life, since God had promised that Isaac was the promised son and would be the father of many descendants. 33-year-old Isaac willingly laid down on the firewood, and when the 134-year-old Abe raised his knife, the angel of the Lord told Abe to stop

since he had proven he was willing to offer his only son. Just then, they saw a ram caught in the bramble bush, and they sacrificed the ram instead of Isaac. About 1,050 years later, when David's son Solomon built the temple in Jerusalem on the same Mount Moriah, and this is where the lambs were sacrificed on Passover, so he says, fast forward some thousand years later in 32 AD on the same Mount Moriah, Jesus was crucified at Calvary, also called Golgotha, about 700 yards from the temple. So where is this Mount Moriah? The peak of the mountain is at a rock cliff west of Herod's Gate, just outside the old city of Jerusalem, to the north.

It is a place where you can still visit today, just above the Arab bus station, outside the Damascus Gate. It is known as Golgotha. Golgotha is Golgotha in the Aramaic language. It means the skull. In Latin, the term is calvaria, skull. It's where we get the name Calvary, where Jesus was crucified between two criminals. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right. And we have been able to finally get a hold of our guests. We had difficulties getting through. Michael Yan is our guest.

He is a guy who's a former special forces soldier, former Green Beret, and he has been doing reporting and many other things. And we're getting him on here at the very last minute. And I asked Michael if he would like to reschedule for another day, if we just do it with the time that we got left. We're going to go with the time that we got left, which is his preference. So we have a lot of things that we want to talk to you about. Michael, where would you like to start? You want to give us a little bit of a background about your work before we talk about some of the specifics about either what you saw in Japan or

what you saw in Panama or about prepping? I know that's a real passion of yours. Give people a little bit of a background as to what you do. You're a reporter who travels the world. Tell us a little bit about that. I never call myself a reporter, by the way. But I was a war correspondent for years. Iraq, Afghanistan, Philippines, Thailand. I got kicked out of Hong Kong in 2020 and on and on and on. So I spent years in various wars and a lot of combat. There's a big difference between a war correspondent and a combat correspondent. Most of the war correspondents just kind of go and hang out in a hotel.

That's not me right now. You might hear it. You might hear a helicopter in the background. That's a Blackhawk that just landed nearby. And I'm in the Darien gap right now. I don't know if you can hear that. You probably hear the birds at least. Yeah.

It's got, it's got, can you hear the helicopters? No, don't hear that. but I hear the birds pretty clearly. It's a pretty loud Blackhawk back there. These modern cancellation things are pretty amazing. But anyway, yesterday, Secretary Mayorkas was to come down here and to expand the size of these camps.

He's the Secretary of homeland security, right? And so he's down here with the South Com commander, four-star general, and the ambassador, right? So they landed at an airfield right behind me here. I am in Darien Province, Panama. Darien Province, Panama is the province which borders Colombia, right? This is the corridor, like the hourglass from the entire world going to the United States. Right now, through here, about 1,200 people per day are coming through.

And the number is increasing. That doesn't include people that are joining the flows up in Mexico and Guatemala and those sorts of things. This is just from all over Africa, all over Asia. Many Chinese we've been talking with right now. In fact, my team is right next door in a camp. I had to jump out of the camp to come talk with you because I'm having signal problems over there. So Darien province is famous for the Darien Gap. The Gap is about 60 miles of uh somebody's coming in about 60 miles of um just roadless jungle between panama and columbia they call it the gap because the highway goes all the way from

from um from alaska all the way to tierra del fuego down at the top bottom of uh depending on which way you're looking top or bottom of south America. And then there's this gap of about 60 miles between Columbia and Panama where there's just no jungle. And so the Darien Gap is where I'm at now. I'm right on the edge of it. This is where migrants come in from all over the world. They die out there in huge numbers. Actually, the IOM, which is the immigration,

basically it's a UN-sponsored, which means American-sponsored, immigration operation. They hand out rape kits. And I mean, when I say rape kits, I mean, we've got one. I'll show you. I can show you tomorrow. But the rape kits are not rape kits like the test to see if you've been raped and collect DNA. These are kits to get raped.

I mean, they have birth control pills, condoms. They have morning after morning after abortion pills. These are sponsored by U.S. dollars. So many women get raped out here. It's unbelievable. And murdered. Last week or so, Oscar Blue is a Mexican journalist. He's a good friend of mine.

And Ben Berquam, an American journalist, also a good friend of mine. We're out in the Darien Gap, not far from here. I've helped them get out here. And they were with the Panamanian Special Forces Team, Cinefront, highly professional people. And some women came in raped. They've got this on video. The women came in crying, screaming.

The children are screaming and crying. And, you know, the men are in shock. And they told the Cinefront Special Forces Team, Panamanian Special Forces, right in front of Ben and Oscar, their video was running, where these Colombians were, two or three days walk inside of the jungle here, not far from here, very close actually. And the special forces team marched out into the jungle,

deeper into the jungle for about five hours. They found them. They ambushed them. They killed one of the Colombians just as he was about to rape another woman this is on video it's online now ben burkwan put it up so and and then captured the other two and then about 48 hours ago they captured i think four more and so that's why you might hear a lot of helicopter activity back here one is secretary mayorkas came down here and they're increasing the size of these camps and increasing the flow.

They did that last April. I come here all the time. I spend months down here in this jungle. And, you know, New York Times just came through and did a puff piece and trying to get up more emotions, to get more funding to invade the United States. the united states and by the way lara logan the famous journalist she just messaged me this morning that she was warned about a mass casualty event possibly down on the u.s mexican border with texas uh there there's huge camps of migrants on the texas border i'm down there with them all the time they're on the mexican side i go they call it the mike side the mexican side i'm i'm on the mexican side all the time there's warnings that those camps may dump out straight into Texas soon and that emergency responders need to have extra body bags and ice and all this sort of stuff. I just came from there this morning. Right. And it's probably going to happen in about a motion.

And that's probably going to happen in about a month when they get rid of this title 42. That's been one thing that's changing. What is driving this? What is the push and the pull for this immigration, in your opinion? Well, the human osmotic pressure, that push and the pull of migration, we know what's causing it. This is not conspiracy theory. This comes from their mouth. This is on their website, the UN website, the World Economic Forum as well.

They're crystal clear that they want $ 1.2 billion with a B, billion with a B, 1.2 billion people to migrate, right? Yes. And so when I spend a lot of time in Europe, I was just over in Netherlands and Germany and Luxembourg and Hungary and all those places. I spent more than six years in Europe. So I run around there all the time.

I was just in an election in March in Netherlands. Those places are overrun with migrants. I mean, unbelievable. When you go to Luxembourg, Luxembourg used to be the jewel of Europe. When I was in special forces, we parachuted in there to do training, to do stuff. And afterwards we did a big tour of Luxembourg and it was beautiful. It was unbelievable. You could let the kids play around at two in the morning. No problem. Now, broad noon daylight in Luxembourg City, I'm telling you, it's dangerous. I saw at least 10 fights, maybe a dozen fights in about 10 days. Every day I saw fights. And there's African drug gangs running the street corners, downtown Luxembourg City by the train station. If you're in Luxembourg, you're in Europe,

just go there and look for yourself and, and, and, uh, be careful. Daytime or nighttime people defecating on the streets, doing drugs on the streets in the open, literally, literally needles they're still using on there. I thought people didn't even use those anymore. I don't know anything about drug use other than I see zombies everywhere, whether it's in Los Angeles, I see them or San Francisco, because I also travel all over the United States. You know, I was at January 6th and watched, you know, the people do the things that they did.

And I was there in Atlanta with Antifa and Portland with Antifa. The drug addicts are absolutely incredible. And I'm not talking about MAGA people. I don't need a helmet and body armor around MAGA people around there. You just need a smile and everything goes. I can not talking about MAGA people. I don't need a helmet and body armor around MAGA people. Around there, you just need a smile and everything goes. I can talk bad about Trump in front of MAGA people and nothing happens. They just disagree with me. Right. But if I cough one bad word against Biden, I could get killed in front of those Antifa clowns or BLM.

Right. I mean, that's the kind of things that we're dealing with. We're being invaded. This is an invasion. This is a replacement strategy, not unlike Stalin did with the kulaks in Ukraine, not unlike Mao did, you know, destroying the farmers.

I just got a video this morning from Netherlands from a Dutch lady I know. They were destroying the last farm in her village yesterday. They're taking these farms, and the farmers own about 60 to 70 percent of the land in Netherlands. They're the most efficient farmers in the world. But they're taking that farmland in Netherlands to develop something called Tri-State City.

Tri-State City is a massive smart city. It's supposed to contain about 30 million people. The maps were already drawn. People will say say that's conspiracy theory i say be quiet put your little fingers to work and look up tri-state city the plans are drawn and they're making it right now and people still call it conspiracy theory they've already broken ground tri-state city contains the two biggest ports in europe amsterdam and uh antwerp rotterdam of course is is in Netherlands. It's the biggest port

in Europe. And the second biggest port in Europe is Antwerp. These are the biggest ports in Europe when it comes to their supplies, right? That's their main arteries. Tri-State City is at the end of the Belt and Road Initiative railway that goes all the way through Chinese money, all the way from Shanghai and Chengdu and all that. It feeds all these various feeders through China. It goes all the way across Asia through Europe and ends at Rotterdam. That's why they're building it there. This stuff is right in front of everybody, but everybody's too busy watching soccer games or something. They're going to be destroyed.

These migrants here in this camp right beside me, 300 meters away, they are coming to take your homes. That's what this is all about. It's not hidden. It's right in plain view. That's right. And kicking people off of the farms has a dual purpose. They want to enslave everybody in these smart cities where they can pack everybody into that. They've got to get people off of the land, but it also takes away our independence when you take away our food. And as you pointed out, uh, Netherlands incredibly efficient. I think they're second only to the United States in terms of the amount of food that comes out. And that's such a tiny nation, uh, probably the most efficient farmers there. And so they come after them and say, you can't have any fertilizer. You can't have a farm. You can't have dairy cows, any of this stuff. This is by fiat. It is a dictatorship.

As you point out, the Great Replacement truly is part of the Great Reset. It is fundamental to that. What is really, in terms of driving it, who do you see giving these rape kits out there? This is NGOs that you're seeing down there, right? Right. This is OIM or IOM. For instance, if you're in Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam and you go to departures terminal three,

walk in, you know, the little revolving door, look to your left, you'll see an IOM or OIM, depending on the language. You'll see their office right there handing tickets out, helping people get tickets. For instance, Chinese that we talked with yesterday, straight from mainland China christians actually and they they just had flown from china over to amsterdam got on an airplane and went to ecuador then they took the bus from ecuador to colombia and now

they're here right and and soon they'll be up in the united states so the oim is the one facilitating all this they're they're from the united nations the United Nations, but there's OIM tents 300 yards from me. They stay in this little hotel I'm at right now. I popped out to this hotel to get Wi-Fi so we can talk. They literally stay in this hotel. I mean, usually they're here having lunch, but I don't know where they're at right now. So this is the sort of thing that goes on here. And these are funded by the United States and the EU and other partners, the World Economic Forum and CCP, the Chinese Communist Party. I used to look at them as partners, but it's clear that they're co-sanguinated. For instance, they have the annual meetings in Davos, and then they

have other annual meetings in China, and it's on their website. And it's clear that they completely cooperate. Now, eventually, they're going And it's clear that they completely cooperate. Now, eventually, they're going to fight each other because they both have similar goals. Reduce the world population. Take control of the food supply. Take control of energy supply. Put smart cities all over the place. They both have those things in common.

But at some point, the CCP, or as they call them in Hong Kong, I spent a lot of time in Hong Kong. In fact, I got kicked out of there. You can see it online, me getting kicked out by the police, taken to the airport. But the Hong Kong, they, you know, they should have kicked me out after seven minutes, but they kept me for seven months. But the ultimate goal of the CCP, Hong Kongers call them Chi Nazis, Chinese Nazis. And the reason they call them Chi Nazis, when you ask the Hong Kongers, why Kongers call them Chi-Nazis, Chinese Nazis. And the reason they call them Chi-Nazis, when you ask the Hong Kongers, why do you call them Chi-Nazis? Look at my Twitter.

I've got a Chi-Nazi photo that I took in Hong Kong. They call them Chi-Nazis because they're ultra-racist. The Han Chinese are taught racism. Now, what is Nazism and what is fascism? Fascism, of course, is when government and business becomes indistinguishable they're basically divine in the tree I mean and Nazism was a party that takes fascism and adds a huge racial component to it right so you can have fascism which is not really Nazism but once you get to that next level which is what ccp is they totally want to wipe out basically everybody on planet earth except for han chinese and that includes hong kongers hong

kongers are not part of the club hong kongers they speak cantonese language not mandarin they're smaller they look different they look different to me like i can tell them apart but a lot i mean most most people even asians can't tell the difference between hong kongers and mainland chinese but i can because I spend so much time in China and Hong Kong and all over Asia, right? But the point is, the Chinese Nazis, the CCP, the

Chinese Communist Party wants to destroy even the Hong Kongers. And, you know, Taiwan, as you can see today, there's a naval, there goes one of the buses right there, literally behind me i wish i could get this this um that's okay you might be able to hear it yeah you gotta but there's a behind me that's the that's the pickup uh that's the pickup invasion force they basically pick

them up this camp uh the night before last it was 14 buses and and they just every night and day they're they're heading straight to the cost Costa Rican border where they drop them off. And then from there, they head to Costa Rica, of course. And then from there, they go to Nicaragua and they continue north up to Guatemala. And they finally cross this river at a place called Tapachula in Mexico. I've been up there. Tapachula is the most southern city in Mexico. It's like El Paso, actually. And there's actually a river there. And the migrants

will cross the river. If the river is low, they'll just kind of walk across and roll up their pant legs or it's a little higher, they get on the inner tubes with the sticks and that sort of thing. And then they go to Tapachula in process into Mexico and then they head north. You should see these maps. I wish I had one, but my team is off in the camp right now and I'm going gonna go catch back up with them soon but these maps tell them exactly how to get to the united states it tells you the stop places it tells you the things to complain about or you know just to get you entry in the united states for instance you'll have a lot of the migrants come at coming up and saying telling you that

they're gay right constantly which this never happened even a couple of years ago they just come up to hey i'm from ecuador or whatever now they're all like corporal clinger they're all like you know it's a free pass they know that that will yeah i mean i'm like i say to some of them i'm like i got good gator you're not gay they're like oh yes but we have to say that you know it's like you know it's just like you know others i'm like yeah you know they're get your sex aid and go oh yeah they're like they got to get their Section 8 for people that know Mac. That's exactly what's going on, right? And you remember when the commander on Mash, what was the colonel's name?

I feel like that colonel, you know, talking to these guys, like some of them, I'm like, yeah, you're not a Section 8, you know. Anyway, it doesn't matter. That's the point. There's the lawyers that are here, and they're telling people what they have to say because a lot of these people are coming first of all they're coming through panama panama is very safe right this is a very safe country and they come through colombia which in some parts are very safe and other parts are very dangerous they'll come through ecuador that's where the chinese land is ecuador ecuador is super safe right many come through brazil there's americans that move down to Brazil.

There's Americans that move here to Panama all the time. They go through Costa Rica, which is a huge tourism spot. Then they go up through, they continue up north. And there's villages in Guatemala that are empty now. They're empty because the villages are in the United States or all over the United States. As our economy collapses, this is a clear replacement strategy. For those who don't know much about war, this is all I study is war, information war, pandemic, famine. This is what I study seven days a week, right?

Going around to countries around the world, watching the conditions develop. The World Economic Forum is crystal clear they're going to cause famines which is coming and those famines will create that human osmotic pressure the human osmotic pressure is the push and pull of migration they're going to come right here the reason i'm in panama is panama is two hourglasses one hourglass is this migration corridor this highway that here to my right that's highway one that is the highway that ends down here and goes all the way to alaska this is the highway that's the reason the camp is right here it's on highway one so they come out of the darien gap they go to this camp and

then one other camp that i'll be at again today and then they get on buses and they go up this highway and they come to texas right or arizona or whatever a lot of them go to california it doesn't matter. They get into the United States, bottom line, and they get into Canada. We also have them coming across the Northern. This isn't just here. Like for instance, what, a year and a half ago, I was off in Lithuania, warning about Belarus pushing migrants into Lithuania. They tried to push them into Poland. That didn't work. I was down in Morocco, which is northern Africa, warning about the same thing. I was over in Greece on the Turkey border. This weaponization of migration is an old form of warfare.

It goes back since before any of us were born. I mean, it goes back. It's funny. I was on one interview a couple of years ago, and I talked about pandemic famine war, pan for pandemic famine war. They always go together. It's like the triangle of death. And one of my readers, she said, you know, you talk about pandemic,

because she called in, you talk about a pandemic, famine, war, as if you made it up. And I said, I did. And she goes, no, no, it's in the Bible. And I was like, actually, you're right. Sorry about that. It's the four horsemen. That's probably where I got it from. Actually, yesterday I was in one of the camp in masako ganaha she's here she's in the camp right now she saw one man drying his bible he was he was from uh ecuador right i think it was from ecuador he was drying his bible in the sun we went and we talked with him he'd just come across obviously the river uh well i mean and he was in good condition there's no problem with him he was alone and he was literally he kept turning the pages in the sun to dry his bible and she she asked him what the

most you know it's funny she asked questions in in the woman's way which is much smarter than the way men ask questions i would have asked him you know what's your favorite part of the bible masako asked she's from japan she said what'd she She said, what part of the Bible is most helpful to you? You know, that's a much smarter way to put it. And I was like, yeah, that's, you know, I need to adopt that. And he goes, oh, and he immediately said the passage. It was something in Joseph. It was, what's the part in Joseph where it's like, you know, you shall be sustained and, you know, basically, you know, keep your spirits up.

He immediately, like, he knew the passage by heart. He said it in Spanish, but he, yeah, of course he went through all that, uh, preparing for the famine. Now I got a question because we've got these NGOs and they're running this stuff. And I think that would explain why they're not coming in. You know, why wouldn't they come in in Mexico? It's a shorter trip, right? Why are they going down into South America?

And that's because they've set up these, um, you know, their headquarters. Why do you think they've set up their headquarters further South? Is it, uh, because it'd be an issue with Mexico because we could, uh, lean on Mexico to the extent if they set it up there, why are they setting up these headquarters and, and, you know, shipping the people in with these NGOs further South, uh, South of Panama? Excellent question. You usually keep them. Don't think think of that but it's actually it's a very long journey it's a long dangerous journey if you cut it short you know but but again it's

whole thing's being driven by these ngos what what is what is about that i think you know okay uh numerous things actually uh these logging trucks man they're just taking these virgin giant trees out of the jungle chinese are but anyway the um um um yeah that's another terrible uh anyway but yeah what they're doing many of the migrants that i'm sorry go ahead sir no i was gonna say yeah we do need to talk about that uh get you on again to talk about what the chinese are doing there and taking over panama but yeah let's go back to the ngos and why they set up for their cell. Oh, many of the migrants, they can't get a visa, say, to go to Mexico or straight to the United States. Many can. And those who can do.

But then there's others they have to go to, like Haitians will tend to go to, and Cubans will tend to go to Suriname first. They'll often go to Suriname because they don't need a visa. Many go to Brazil or Chile, right? So many of those groups go to Brazil, Chile, or Suriname. Many go to surname because they don't need a visa many go to brazil or chile right so many of those groups go to brazil chile or surname many go to surname and so um uh and then from there they they'll make their way over colombia and then go through the darien gap now others uh like chinese will go to ecuador first now many of the cubans and brazilians i mean sorry cubans and haitians have lived in brazil Chile for years. So they'll throw their ID cards away before they get to the, on the Mexican side of the border. I have

bags for them. I've given them out to congressmen and senators that have their passports and their IDs from Chile and all this stuff, or their passport will be like from Haiti or from Cuba or whatever. They'll throw those away, but they'll have IDs that are like from Chile. Now, if they come into the United States with that ID and they get caught with it, they may not be allowed in because Chile is a safe country. And many of them have worked there for like five, six, seven years, right? You'll see the sweet spots about six years now.

Many of them have worked there for about six years. Five, six, seven years, right? They have to pretend they're refugees, and so they can't come from a safe country. That's right. And so in these camps, this one here beside me, San Vicente and another one about eight miles away or so called Las Blancas. Uh, there's literally a tent there that gives you the legal advice, you know, get your section eight, basically act gay, LGBT, uh, act. Um,

you have to say that, you know, that you were persecuted in the country that you came from. Now to the law you should stop at the first safe country not work your way up to you know canada or the united states so they're going through multiple safe countries for instance the chinese going through amsterdam first okay you're in netherlands safe country but then they proceed to ecuador ecuador another safe country then Then they go to Columbia, another safe country. They go through here, Panama, and they go to this camp in Las Blancas. This is a safe country. They go to Costa Rica, super safe country. And then they continue north. Guatemala, also a safe country. Now you'll hear some people cross their eyes, right? You just said Guatemala is a safe country. That's what I said. United

States, is that a safe country or not? If you go to downtown Los Angeles, Skid Row, it's not a safe country. If you go to downtown Atlanta, it's not a safe country. But there are a lot of safe places in places like Guatemala. Mexico is a safe country. Obviously, there are drug wars going on in some places. It's highly dangerous. But it's not like the entire country is burning down. It's just completely untrue. There are places in the United States that I don't want to go. It's very, very dangerous, right? Especially being a white man. Now I could go over to, I could go over to another country and say, well, due to my race, I'm being persecuted in the United States. And that is absolutely

truthful. We know that. We know that, that Caucasians are now being persecuted in the United States by our government, by our own rules. We should be able to go to Europe right now and claim asylum, right? We should be able to go to Germany or someplace and say, hey, you know, they're throwing people in jail for being white. And that's absolutely the truth, right? Or I can't go to certain places in the United States, like downtown Atlanta, because it's dangerous to be there and be white, right? It's the truth. But this is a one-way vow to let the world

come into the United States to replace Americans with the new population and do exactly what Stalin did, do what Mao did, do what Pol Pot and so many others did in the past, weaponized migration. And like, for instance, now in the Netherlands, not just and like for instance now they're in in the netherlands not just netherlands but let's talk about netherlands they're prepping people mentally preparing people that you're going to have to take migrants into into your homes right they haven't done it yet but there's been a law on the books in netherlands since world war ii that you may

have to take people into your homes right no problem if it's a war but right now the netherlands is being flooded all of europe is being flooded with people from all over africa and asia and the world and and and now what like there's afghans all over the place there's people i actually get along very well with afghans but i don't want 10 million afghans in the united states yeah you know what i'm saying and i even though i helped sub get to the united states but i mean but the point is is is is the point is is that uh the time let me give you an example and and and in netherlands a few years ago they pushed to pass a lot of protect wolves wolves like big bad wolves right one got killed near my hotel when i was just over there he got hit by a car big wolf on the highway right in netherlands look up in the news wolf killed on the highway

that was right next near my hotel right so why did they pass this law to protect wolves in netherlands when there were no wolves in netherlands and people like that's a stupid law why are the crazy people passing a law to protect wolves and then that the law was passed and now there's wolves everywhere and they're killing sheep they're killing cattle they're killing horses and and and you talk with the farmers and they're like this is they're like the queen is more protected than the wolves i mean the wolves are more protected than the queen of netherlands right i mean that the wolves are highly protected right and so they're using and now you'll see in the news like in German media,

there was a German woman almost got eaten about six weeks ago or so when I was there. She said she had turbo on her electric bike and these three wolves almost got her, but her bike just barely outran them. She said they almost got her. It's in the news. Right. And so talk about range anxiety.

Oh yeah, exactly. Like I'm in this thing. You know, and let me tell you this one last thing, because I'll take your whole day. I mean, now that we've got a signal that works, now you can't turn me off. No, it's great news. What they do is they, the green, or, you know, the West,

the World Economic Forum, co-sanguinated again with CCP. When the wolves kill the cattle and the sheep and whatnot, you'll see in the news and like, for instance, in German news, they're blaming the farmers. They're like, well, the wolves are, you know, this is their traditional hunting spots. And that's why they're killing. Well, the wolves have been introduced as part of the plan. You know know you look at some of these places where there's wolves in netherlands that was under the sea these are called polders in netherlands polders with a p p o u l d e r is a folder right those are those areas that they drain and you can farm on them so like this one dairy farm around his farm he's like this used to be i forgot like three meters under the sea or something like that or two meters i don't recall but he's like basically it was all

the sea right and now they got wolves there and i'm like he's like do you think this was you know ancestral hunting ground for the wolves only if they were like sea wolves yeah sea horses you know what i'm saying i mean it's like you know it's like this is this is not but but they're protected even on that what they you know they drained the sea and made these incredible farms, and now the wolves are protected there. That's what's going on. You know, when you tell this story, and you said you collect these IDs and you give them to congressmen in, you know, a bag full of these things, and you try to tell them what's going on, I guess I know what they're going to say. But, you know, what kind of reception have you gotten? Have you gotten anybody that is receptive to this, this or they say, well, there's nothing

we can do about it. What do they say? Yeah. Congressman Tom Tiffany came down and sat at this table. We're talking about actually, I think you actually come to think of it. I had Tom Tiffany and Burgess Owens. He's a, he's a Congressman, a Congressman, Tom Tiffany from Wisconsin and a Burgess Owens from Utah.

They literally sat at the table that I've got my device on doing, talking with you. And so I took them deep into the jungle. I can't believe they actually went. And I mean, that was very courageous of them. And now they know. So you'll see Tom Tiffany. I don't know why Burgess doesn't talk about it as much.

Burgess is always talking about other things, but he's very important. He does really hard and important work, but he doesn't talk about the gap that much. Maybe it's something about his base or something, doesn't want to hear about the migration as much, but Tom Tiffany, he's constantly out on the border. In fact, he wants to be here now. He messaged me last night asking for videos of the things that's going on. And so, I mean, and there's other congressmen that want to come down but they're always getting dragged actually i just got invited to go on uh 19th of april rfk's people have been reaching out to me he's going to announce that they are that he's running for president in boston on april 19th i don't think i'm going to make it i'm going to be out in the

jungle but uh but you know he's very uh anti-death jab. I read his book, the real Anthony, but I've, I've been, I've been asking very pointed questions. So what is his position on, what is his position on this great replacement? I know that he's taken on the, um, you know, the, sees the bigger picture of what the intelligence communities are doing and how they've worked on the best part of his book is the end where he's talking about the germ games and the involvement of the intelligence agencies and how this was, you know, a partnership with the globalist in terms of taking this. So what is this position or does he have one yet in terms of what is going on

with immigration, the great replacement? I just asked him again this morning because I said, listen, there's, I'm full. I've read the book, the real Anthony Gatchi. I fully support him on going after Big Pharma and these death jabs, right? I'm with you. No problem. But there's a few other things I want to hear about. I want to know about what you think about this invasion. I want to know about your position on China. I want to know about, are you going to get us into ridiculous wars like Ukraine? There's one thing I liked about Trump. He did not get us into any wars. He did stand up on our

border. He did stand up to our board he did stand up to china he did stand up on a lot of things like that that are important to me um and but then he's a jab pusher you know it's like you can't make up the stuff and but now if if rfk is not going to stand up for the border if he's not going to stand up to china i don't know what his position is i keep asking because they message me every day and And I keep saying, get clarification from him, right, on what he's going to do about this invasion. And also abortion. These other things are important to me. If he's not going to stand up against mass murder, he is standing up against the Japs. I really like it. He's super courageous. And the guy is smart. RFK is super smart. i i i'm not a journalist i always say that all

all day long people say you're a journalist you're not i'm not a journalist stop saying it i know there's like a thousand newspaper articles that say it new york times calls me a journalist that's one of the weirdly new york times wrote one of the most accurate stories about me ever and they know i'm like their blood enemy it's like you know but anyway you can't make up that stuff i'm like how did you guys make me look so good when you know i hate you you know it's like anyway a real journalist is not somebody that they didn't call me a journalist well real journalist is not somebody who's pushing a narrative right that that's what i think it means in your mind but a journalist would be somebody who records what they see and honestly

gives that to people so in that regard I would say that you are what historically, you say you were a classical journalist before they started becoming mockingbird propaganda pieces for the CIA. But I might, like Lara Logan told me yesterday, she goes, I'm not going to throw in with anybody because we privately chat. And I get it because she's an actual journalist. But with me, I see what's going on and you know you know how those old soldiers uh when I was young and the old soldiers got very political you know what I mean and often they would say

they weren't political when they were younger I was the same way I was a soldier and then I spent years and more as a as a writer and a researcher not as a soldier uh when i was a green beret i didn't go to war but i did huge amounts of combat after that you become more and more political when you see the clowns that are running these things you know in all these countries i go to whether it's japan or netherlands or united states or thailand one of the things i found is a lot of the people running the country are perpetually out at drinking and drunk parties you know what i'm saying like i don't drink alcohol i don't do drugs i don't smoke i drink coffee maybe a little too much but i mean that's it right and so it stands out to me when i'm out with politicians all the time that are drinking

all the time i'm like who's making up these decisions i mean a lot of the things that are going on look like they're done by hunter biden i mean you know it's just like or you know like jerome crystal over in afghanistan when he was leading the war over there and leading it to destruction you know i started calling them drunken monkeys and people like whoa you can't say that you're a journalist i'm like i'm not a journalist and he's running the war like a monkey i mean it's like monkeys in the cockpit i mean who is running this thing i mean you could be a 25-year-old with not much experience, but somebody who's got your head screwed on straight and do a better job at running the war. And I'm not exaggerating. There are some high-level thinkers at that age.

Well, there was others that are running a war against us. Go ahead, sir. That's right. I was just going to say they're running a war against us. When they had us all locked down, you had Matt Hancock and these other people laughing about the fact that we're locked down, having their private parties. And this is happening in every country. You know, it had many cases of that in the United States, but, you know, just mocking

and laughing what they're doing to us. They knew exactly what they were doing. And there were a bunch of drunken monkeys and they were at war with us. They knew exactly what they were doing. And there were a bunch of drunken monkeys and they were at war with us. And so, yeah, eventually I think everybody, as you get older, you realize, well, I may not be interested in politics. I didn't like, you know, the student council elections. I avoided that like the plague. But, you know, you have to understand that politics is interested in you and you have to know where the threats are. And I think what you've identified is a very amazing threat. you've identified is as a very amazing threat. We've gone over about a half hour over the end of our program here, because I really

wanted to talk to you. And I'd like to get you back on again, because I want to talk about prepping and I want to talk about some of the other things that you've seen. Panama is very important. I have a very good friend who has a house down there. He's described many of the same things you were just talking about. The massive numbers of people that are going through there. I think you said about 1,200 a day. So the massive numbers of people that are going through there,

but they're being shepherded through by these NGOs through that area. It is a plan. It is carefully controlled and constructed. This is not some kind of an organic thing. This is deliberately planned by the globalists. Great reporting. Thank you so much for joining us,

Michael. I really do appreciate it. Tell people where they can find this stuff. Oh, I'm on locals.com locals. And I'm on Twitter every day. Michael underscore Yon. My last name is Yon Yankee Oscar,

November Y O N not young Yon Y O N. Uh, but you know, we, we might be able to go on tomorrow, but you can see how the signals, you know, it's kind of hit and miss here, but we have signal. We can come on anytime. Well, we'll we might be able to go on tomorrow, but you can see how the signals, you know, it's kind of hit and miss here.

But if we have signal, we can come on anytime. Well, we'll try to do that. And maybe we'll try to get you on a little bit earlier in the program instead of the last hour. And that way, if, uh, you know, it takes you a while to get the signal through for that particular day, we can get you on. Uh, but we'll set that up. There's a lot of other things I like to talk to you about. And I know that you're heavily into prepping because, uh,

Jack Lawson said, you know, get this guy on. He's really trying to encourage people to do their own prepping. You know, it's not just like, oh, well, yeah, I'd like to learn how to do stuff. No, you're very concerned about what you see happening. And it's very important for people to understand the urgency of learning how to prep. That's one of the reasons why I like to tell people about Jack's book, civildefensemanual.com. That's a great resource that's there. So we'll get you back on. Thank you so much, Michael. Yon Y O N and find him on Twitter at Michael underscore Yon. Thank you so much, Michael. Appreciate it. Thank you. All right.

Thanks for having me on. Thank you. It's worth going over time. Very excited to talk to you and we'll get you back on again, folks. Thank you so much for joining us today and I hope you enjoy the overtime broadcast. That's it for today's broadcast. Thank you. The Common Man. They created common core and dumbed down our children. They created common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us.

Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank

you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.