The David Knight Show - 14Mar23 Crypto Prohibition at Root of Bank Closures; A "Motherless Child" - Satanic Use of Biotech

Episode Date: March 14, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Nullification — the "rightful remedy" to both Gun Control AND Drug War. 2:13 "Eye-patch McCain" (Dan Crenshaw) and Lindsey Graham want a LITERAL war on drugs in Mexico after 4 Americans killed. They want drug cartels treated as ISIS. Does that mean we will now be arming the cartels? 20:09 How Credit Card Codes Will Be Weaponized. Bank of America voluntarily gave FBI all Jan6 credit card charges from their customers in the DC area (including VA & MD)says whistleblower George Hill. Credit card companies will do the same if not prohibited. The code alone could be used to charge gun stores higher fees and intimidate customers to drive the stores out of business 34:05 Silvergate Bank did NOT fail — its "Crime" was being involved with crypto. A look at Biden Warp Speed attack on crypto the last couple of months. Operation Chokepoint 2.0 54:42 Twenty states have bills to redefine "money" as CBDC (including a foreign, global digital cash) and to ban bitcoin and other private cryptos. Remember how they quietly changed definitions BEFORE the pandemic? 1:27:21 NC using crony capitalism subsidies to bring Vietnamese electric car company plant to the state while throwing out residents, small businesses and a church that's been there since 1888 using eminent domain to take from one private owner and give to another. 1:32:20 Unlike Obama (who bought an ocean front mansion that climate fear mongers say will be underwater) these people are moving to Duluth to escape the coming "global warming" 1:46:23 Selling fraudulent "carbon credits". Yes, it's redundant, but… 1:50:20 Pastuerization without Representation WATCH Thomas Massie's bill to block FDA from prohibiting Raw Milk 1:58:46 INTERVIEW Growing Food When Government Steals Your Farm A system born out of necessity when commercial techniques failed became the lifeline when Zimbabwe stole farms from white farmersgardening without plowing or tillingthermal compost & natural organic fertilizerseight simple questions to create an easy, but effective garden planand much more Your best prepping may be in training neighbors to grow food, thereby building community. Noah Sanders, RedeemingTheDirtAcademy.com 2:02:40 Motherless Child: A Satanic Use of Technology. An engineered mouse with 2 biological fathers and no mother. A marriage made in hell between bioengineering tech and LGBT desires. 2:50:01Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Come on, come on, yes, yes, come on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Oh, curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus bet responsibly. Gamblingcare.ie. Millions of people have lost weight with personalized plans from Noom. Like Evan, who can't stand salads and still lost 50 pounds. Salads generally for most people are the easy button, right? For me, that wasn't an option. I never really was a salad guy. That's just not who I am. But Noom worked for me that wasn't an option i never really was a salad guy that's just not who i am but noom worked for me get your personalized plan today at noom.com real

noom user compensated to provide their story in four weeks the typical noom user can expect to lose one to two pounds per week individual results may vary Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's the 14th of March, year of our Lord, 2023, the 1097th of the continuing emergency. Today we're going to take a deeper look at Operation Chokepoint. I believe that what we're seeing here, the primary focus in these banks that were shut down was crypto. I believe that's really what it was.

And we'll talk about why that is, why they're coming after crypto, why they're trying. You've got legislation in 20 states to essentially outlaw crypto and establish cbdc we're going to begin with the news stay with us we'll be right back © transcript Emily Beynon Well, we have in terms of, again, I want to talk about CBDC. I think this is the center. I think this is what people are missing. Yes, Silicon Valley Bank was totally into ESG and the rest of this stuff. They made terrible loans. Remember that Silvergate was a bank that was focused on crypto.

And Silver Bank was shut down even though they were fully solvent. And we'll talk about why that was the case. But I want to begin by talking a little bit about prohibition. Because that really is at the heart of all this stuff, right? When you look at prohibited speech, prohibited guns, all the rest of this stuff, they're going to tell you what you can and cannot say. And, of course, we have now Mark Kelly, a senator from Arizona, husband of Gabby Giffords, who was a congresswoman who was shot.

He and she, both of them, have been after guns for a very long time. But as this stuff was happening, now Mark Kelly says, isn't there something we can do to censor speech that might cause a bank run or something? Well, yeah, sure, just add financial advice to the long list of things that you're not allowed to talk about because that's the heart of all this. All of this is about prohibition.

Let me begin by talking about something that I absolutely do not agree with, and that is legalizing psychedelic mushrooms. I would say not the prohibition of it. I'm just saying that prohibition doesn't work. I would definitely not recommend that you use psychedelic mushroom. That's where Joe Rogan and I disagree. Joe Rogan can get $25, $50 million a year on Spotify. They won't even allow my program to air there. Because, you know, he pushes things like psychedelic mushrooms.

I think they're very bad for you. I think they're horrific. And I also don't think the prohibition is going to stop it. And why do I think that? Well, because I've been around and alive for 50 years. I know what, a little bit longer than that. I know what America was like before drug prohibition. And I know what drug prohibition did.

And drug prohibition didn't slow down anybody from taking a single drug. As a matter of fact, it made it a lot worse. I've watched that in my lifetime happen. So it's not an issue. That's a separate issue as to whether or not alcohol is good for you or marijuana is good for you or psychedelic mushrooms or anything else. That's a separate issue from the government trying to prohibit it, trying to use the police as moral police.

Essentially, this is a spiritual issue. If ever there was one, yeah, you can say it's a medical issue. It's an addiction issue. It's a psychological issue. It's a spiritual issue, if ever there was one. Yeah, you can say it's a medical issue, it's an addiction issue, it's a psychological issue. It's a spiritual issue, fundamentally. Please don't do too well with that. They're totally clueless about that anyway. And it hasn't worked.

Look, whatever you think about it, can we understand that the 50-year experiment has failed? The decade-long experiment, or however long it lasted, of alcohol prohibition failed. But at least they had respect for the Constitution. They had to have a constitutional amendment to have it, and they got rid of it with another constitutional amendment. First Amendments are there as testimony to the unconstitutional, illegal war on drugs that has failed in every pragmatic aspect as well. But I'm talking about this because this is something that is state nullification. The Vermont is proposing a bill that would legalize psychedelic mushrooms in spite of federal prohibition. Now, we've already seen this with marijuana. First, they began with medical marijuana. Then

they moved to recreational marijuana. And regardless of what you think about the substance, the marijuana recreational use or medical use or the mushrooms, don't write me letters about it. You're not going to change my mind. It's another pharmakia, if ever there was one. I mean, it is, that's one of the reasons why that term was translated as sorcery in the Bible, because psychedelic drugs were always part of pagan religions. I believe that there is a supernatural world. I believe that it does get people in touch with that in a very negative way. So just on so many different levels, I am adamantly opposed to its use. However, prohibition does not work. And what is interesting, I think, is the fact that we have with guns on the right and with

drugs on the left when you're talking about pot or you're talking about mushrooms or anything else you have nullification of federal laws and i think that's very important because secession is going to mean war. No question about it. Our government is even more authoritarian than it was during the Civil War. Our government was founded on secession. We seceded from Great Britain. And yet you had ambitious people like Lincoln who made it a bloodbath. And that will happen here as well. We have other places on earth where the Scandinavian nations, there's four or five of them, they have at various times in their history,

they have combined together and they've split apart. Then they've combined together again in different combinations and everything. But they never had a war over it, but it'll be a war here. If you want to have a national divorce, what you want to do is you want to nullify. That's the rightful remedy. You just nullify say, well, we're not going, we've got any commandeering laws and other, uh, presidents that have been recognized even by the Supreme court. And, uh And there's no way that they can force the state government to enforce anything. And if they send federal agents in to do things that the federal government doesn't have any authority, local people can arrest them.

Now it can go the other way as well. Even though in California, recreational as well as medical use of pot is allowed, you have the federal government still coming after pot dispensaries. Using, by the way, when we talk about cryptocurrency, remember they've already done this with marijuana dispensaries, where the federal government is trying to choke them out and say we don't want them doing business with the banks. And then they partnered with a local sheriff's, um, um, local sheriff's department

in San Bernardino, California. And they actually did armored car robberies. Yes. The sheriff's department actually robbed armored cars, not once, but three times, third time, the armored car people caught onto it and the cops didn't get the money. And they said, wait a minute, I didn't have more money than this. Just stealing it. Just stealing it. Armed robbery of an armored car by the police. And so now that armored car company goes around that criminal county.

They don't pass through it. And so there's different ways that they can come after this. But the rightful way to do this is to just nullify it, issue by issue. And that may be difficult to do, but it's already rising up. And that's why I wanted to begin with this. Because I think when we're looking even at the financial issues. Even when we look at CBDC. Go on, go on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses.

Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival i declare this a most generous offering novi bet more power to you t's and c's apply 18 plus bet responsibly gamblingcare.ie and the fact that it is being pushed out and other things are being pushed down i think we need to understand that the best way to approach this for the state at least you know for us we have to understand that the best way to approach this, for the state at least,

you know, for us, we have to prepare. We have to have things that are outside of the cash that is controlled by the Federal Reserve and the banking system that is controlled by the Federal Reserve. But that's one of the reasons why I think it is so positive, this idea of a Tennessee Reserve system, which is essentially a state publicly owned bank. Senator Nicely came up with that idea to call it that. I think it's brilliant because a lot of local banks who are going to be gone soon don't understand the threat, and they don't understand what a publicly owned state bank like North Dakota does, even though it's been around for 100 years and it's got a long track record. And even though that is where local and state banks have thrived, as I pointed out yesterday,

between 19, late 1980s and the mid two thousands, you had 10,000 local banks got a business. And, um, so they don't understand that's in their best interest. If we set up a different system where they cannot blackmail us. And we'll talk about that when we get to the Operation Chug Point. Very good example of it being used to take out crypto and at the same time to push in CBDC. This is the push. But let's talk about the overall nullification of prohibition and other things. So on the left, they want their psychedelic mushrooms and drugs.

And on the right, people want guns. And it's kind of interesting. There was a documentary about a decade ago. And it was about those two things being about freedom in the sense that if we could get people to understand the principle, if we could get people on the right to understand that this is the drug problem, and it is a problem, it's not what's going to be solved by prohibition. If we could get people on the left to understand that violent crime,

much of it coming from the drug prohibition, that violent crime is really most of what they're concerned about, the drug cartels shooting it out with each other in chicago and that that's not going to be solved by taking guns away from law-abiding citizens if we could get them to understand the bigger picture and if we get people to understand the benefit of nullification so you got vermont wanting to nullify federal laws against psychedelic mushrooms ohio bill would nullify most federal gun restrictions. And this is something that's happening in a lot of States. A bill proposed in the Ohio state house of representatives would prohibit state

and local police from enforcing federal gun regulations. We have seen this over and over again. They said, um, Thomas and in this article, they referred to Thomas Jefferson's Kentucky resolutions about nullification, the rightful remedy. He said, he set out the correct constitutional relationship between the state and the federal

authorities, even naming nullification. That's Jefferson's term. as conducive to the liberty and happiness of the several states, that it does now unequivocally declare its attachment to the Union and to that compact, agreeable to its obvious and real intention, and will be among the last to seek its dissolution, that if those who administer the general government be permitted to transgress the limits fixed by that compact, the Constitution, by a total disregard to the special delegations of power therein contained, annihilation of the state governments and the erection upon their ruins of a general consolidated government will be the inevitable consequence

that the principle and the construction contended for by sundry of the state legislatures, that the general government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it. It stops nothing short of despotism, he said. If you're going to follow the course that we have for all of my life. The idea that states are merely an administrative subsidiary of the federal government, that's not true. The federal government was a creature of the states. And if we were to take that kind of logic, it would mean ultimately that we are servants of the UN, servants of the WHO, which is what these people like to have happen. And the appropriate response to those institutions is to just leave them because they

don't have the authority to raise an army and come after us. And, of course, Lincoln had to raise an army. He didn't have a standing army to come after people. But that's not going to happen right now at this point with the UN or the WHO. We should just get out of them. But we can't get out of the federal government that easily. Nullification is a rightful remedy. We have seen legislation introduced here in Tennessee that would say that it is the duty of the state to

review every rule from the bureaucracy, every ruling from the judiciary, every executive order from the president, and every law from the Congress. All of those should be examined for constitutionality and nullified, unconstitutional at the state level. That is the way to handle this. I hope that bill passes. I have to get the guy who sponsored it on. Since the discretion of those who administer the government and not the constitution would be the measure of their powers, said Jefferson, that the several states who formed that instrument, being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infraction. That's exactly what they're trying to do in Tennessee.

That a nullification by those sovereignties of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument, done under color of law, done under color of Constitution, done under color of constitution. That is the rightful remedy. And so I think it's very important that we look at this because they're coming after us in a number of ways. We have to nullify any future pandemic declarations. We have to nullify any future emergency orders. We have to nullify any public health orders. And that includes doing it at the local level. If it's something that's coming from the state, but the sad thing

is that it's gone the other way. And what we have is not people looking at this and saying, you know, freedom is the one thing we can't have unless we give it to other people, right? The people who are typically Second Amendment supporters are hardcore opponents of drug use, which is fine. I fall into that category. However, they believe in the efficacy of prohibition, and that will be the rope that hangs them as well. Conservatives have been slow to recognize the threat that drug prohibition poses to gun rights and to civil liberties in general, not just the Second Amendment, but to the First Amendment and all the rest of this stuff.

It is a consolidation of power, as Jefferson and the founders, we talk about centralization of power. They talked about consolidation of power, as Jefferson and the founders, we talk about centralization of power. They talked about consolidation of power. And so the example that Reason Magazine uses here, Jacob Sullum at Reason Magazine, is talking about how conservatives, when they look at the excessive use of force against people, especially when it comes to guns, they will speak out. But all you have to do is add a little bit of drugs to the mix, and they get confused, or they tap out and say,

I'm not going there. I'm not going to have that fight. Do you remember the guy who was, uh, Philando Castile? He was pulled over because the police officer said, uh, well, your taillights are out. You got a broken taillight, but he was really pulling them over because he thought he said that he matched the description of somebody who was wanted in a crime. And, uh, so when the police officer walked up, even though this guy had a license to carry a firearm, even though as the body camera footage showed, he said that, yes, I do have a firearm. Um, and, um, you know, and he was going to give it to the guy or whatever he wanted.

The guy shot him, the cop shot him. And he said, when he went up, the thing that really triggered him was, he said, he smelled the odor of burning marijuana as he approached the white Oldsmobile sedan that he stopped the whiff of weed from the Oldsmobile rights. That reason, uh, Yanez, the police officer later said, figured in the threat that he perceived from the car's driver, 32-year-old school cafeteria worker named Philando Castile. He fatally shot Castile, who had a permit to carry a concealed weapon,

a few seconds after learning that he had a gun in the car. And so when you look at the reactions to it, it's very telling that many of the people who support gun rights kind of take a powder when it comes to civil liberties and many other things. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs,

with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T&C's apply. 18 plus. Bet responsibly a most generous offering. No, we bet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus bet responsibly.

Gamblingcare.ie. And as we're looking at this drug war, we now have, and it began with Trump. Got to give him credit for this one too. Now, he was the first one saying, we got to invade Mexico, right? We got to invade Mexico and we've got to, and it's kind of interesting to me that people aren't talking about that now. Now they're talking about the fact that it's Dan Crenshaw

who sponsored this in the House and Lindsey Graham. People were right when they called Dan Crenshaw I-Patch McCain. He is just like McCain. He's taken his place. He introduced – the only problem that McCain andain and and lindsey graham had was that they were both in the senate you know but now you got eyepatch mccain in the house and he can introduce bills in the house and lindsey can do it in the senate uh it's not a bill but they're calling for military action against mexican cartels now let's go have a

real war let's have a real drug war you's have a real drug war, you know, shoot them up. Drug war, uh, different than the shoot them up drug wars that are going on all over cities, especially Chicago, right? Where the competitors shoot each other on the streets. Graham said he agreed with former attorney general,

Bill Barr, uh, CIA lackey of George H. W. Bush, Bill Barr. Again, why? Trump was completely owned by the CIA, folks.

You look at what he did with the torture in chief, Gina Haspel, put her in charge of the CIA. Bill Barr was there. Bill Barr was the handpicked, uh, you know, underling for George H.W. Bush. When Bush rebuilt the CIA after,

you know, the church committee hearings where they were embarrassed about, yeah, yeah, we do assassinations all the time. And of course the big thing was the fact that they were spying on Americans without a search warrant from the beginning. And so was the NSA. And that's why what came out of the church committee hearings was the FISA stuff, which nobody paid any attention to

for about 30 years, actually 40 years. And nobody paid any attention to FISA. Everybody just remembered the heart attack guns and the assassination stuff. And so to rebuild that agency, they put George H.W. Bush, who had already been part of the CIA, going back to the Cuban Missile Crisis and other things like that, in the Bay of Pigs.

George H.W. Bush figured prominently in that. A couple of ships, one of them was named after his wife. Another one was named after his company, his oil company. But of course he had nothing to do with it whatsoever, but he rebuilt it. And the guy he picked to help him do it was bill bar. And then when CIA George HW Bush became president, he made bill bar a very young attorney general. And then he came back as attorney general again, under Trump, same guys,

pushing the torture in chief, Gina Haspel to the head of CIA. And so now Trump is out there. I wonder where he got this idea that it comes from the CIA. Did it come from Bill Barr? Uh, did it come from maybe Steve Pachinik who used to, you know, throw out some scenarios to Tom Clancy for his spy novels? Um, you know, there was one clear and Present Danger, I think was the name of it, that's based on covert operations, not a full-on military invasion,

but covert operations against drug cartels. But, you know, Trump talked about it. Now you've got Lindsey Graham and you've got Hypatch McCain, Dan Crenshaw talked about it. Now you've got Lindsey Graham and you've got, uh, I patch McCain, Dan Crenshaw talking about it. Lindsey said he agreed with a former attorney general, Bill Barr, who wants to declare the cartels quote, foreign terrorist organizations. Does that mean we're going to start giving them even more money than we do now? We're going to treat them like ISIS, give them more money, give them weapons as well.

Bar express support for a joint resolution proposed by Dan Crenshaw and Michael Waltz, a Republican from Florida that would authorize the president to use military force against those responsible for trafficking. So they can't be bothered to stop the war in Ukraine. They can start another one in Mexico, though. So anybody that is tainted with fentanyl, well, we'll come after them. If they're carrying out other related activities that cause regional destabilization in the Western Hemisphere, boy, this is the Monroe Doctrine writ large, isn't it? I think this could cause destabilization.

I think we're going to invade your country here. Graham said, I'm going to introduce legislation to make certain Mexican drug cartel foreign terrorist organizations under U.S. law. And I think he meant to say, there's a typo here, that they are declared to be foreign terrorist organizations under U.S. law. And I think you meant to say, there's a typo here, that they are declared to be foreign terrorist organizations under U.S. law. And to set the stage to use military force if necessary to protect America from being poisoned by things coming out of Mexico.

We should strategically strike and take out the Mexican cartels, not the Mexican government or their people. Leave them alone. You believe that? But the Mexican cartels which control them all. Now that's not Lindsay. That's Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Oh, she agrees with that. Meanwhile, the Mexican president was surprisingly not very happy about that. I'm thrilled to know we've got our finest minds on this. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

She'd like to have a civil war and a war with Mexico at the same time. I mean, she's taking us back to the 1850s and 60s all at once. It's back to the future. What's that? Somebody get me Teddy Roosevelt. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. But, yeah, when we look at this, the Mexican president has something to say about that.

The socialist Obrador has threatened to start a public information campaign in the United States against Republican lawmakers. After several have called on the U.S S military to target drug cartels, he said, I would just like to tell them either they changed their treatment of Mexico or from today, we will start an information campaign in the United States so that all Mexicans, our fellow countrymen know about this aggression by Republicans against Mexico. So notice that he says Mexicans, his fellow countrymen, who were in the United States.

And of course, they can vote. I got a major. You're talking about getting out the vote. He can get out the vote. He could send millions of people across the border, the open border, to come in and vote. So this is not an idle threat. And he's not saying, you know, you do this, and I'm going to start talking to, we're going to run an ad campaign here in Mexico and tell people how bad the United States is. No, he says, we're going to run an ad campaign in the U.S. so that

our fellow countrymen, our Mexicans in the United States, will know how to vote. August Pflugger from Texas. I wonder if he's Pflugerville. It is spelled the same, but Pflugger, P-F-L-U-G-E-R. The kidnapping and murder of American citizens in Matamoros proves that Mexico is a narco state. If Mexico can't stop the cartels, then our nation must use any tool in our arsenal to solve it for them. Well, that sounds pretty good. Um, he's got a pretty good case there,

right? But I, I know some other places where you don't have to travel so far, uh, places in the United States, for example, like Chicago, right?

Uh, if Chicago can't stop the cartels, then the United States government must use any tool in our arsenal to solve the problem for Chicago. Because we got, you know, there were four people. This is what's kicking this off is four people who were murdered in Matamoros. That's a tragedy, but it's also a tragedy when you have at least a dozen every weekend in Chicago. Usually it's several dozen. Usually it's four dozen instead of four people killed.

What is that about? It's about drugs. It's the drug war that's happening in Chicago, just like Al Capone. They're shooting their competition on the streets. It's the gangs that are there. So we could say the same thing about that. Get me. And of course they would love to,

let's not talk about this too much because if they hear this, they would love to militarize all law enforcement for whatever excuse inside our country, not just in Mexico. The cartels are at war with us poisoning more than 80,000 Americans with fentanyl every year, said Ipatch McCain, Dan Crenshaw. How many people did Trump poison with the pharmaceutical cartels, Pfizer and Moderna, right? Why don't we put them out of business? Oh, because just like the CIA is working with these people in Central and South America,

we know that from things like crack cocaine and the rest of this stuff. We know it because they tortured and killed, the CIA tortured and killed Enrico Camerata as part of their documentary. And he had Sheriff Hathaway talking about that. He had knowledge of that when he was in the DEA. Now the CIA did that. And why the CIA did that? Knowingly doing that.

So you look at that, you look at the crack cocaine epidemic, the CIA and the rest of this stuff. I mean, we're... We has met the enemy and they is us, or I should say us USA. It's a federal government, the feral government, the government that has gone,

has reverted to being wild. That is no longer tamed. That is no longer the companion, the servant, the friend. It's like a feral pack of dogs is what it's like. So I patch McCain. Says it's time we directly target them.

We got to start treating them like ISIS. Like I said, does he want to arm them now? That's what we were doing with ISIS. Giving them arms and material. It's just amazing. But again, 80,000 people dying from fentanyl if that were true i don't know if it is or not you know we've got more people than that were um far more people were killed with a trump warp speed but the gop doesn't care about the gci they don't care about the GCI. They don't care about the genetic code injection. Not at all.

No. As a matter of fact, you know, it wasn't just the DEA agent who was. You go back and look at Fast and Furious. Another one where you had another federal agent or somebody that worked for the government that was killed that blew up in their face. That was the fast and furious stuff, which New York Times said was a false flag operation by the ATF. But it preceded the Obama administration. It went back into the Bush administration. It was called Gunwalker. And then it became fast and furious. What was the point of all of that? I remember it well because I was involved in the fight at the UN. I was covering it for an organization that was fighting,

National Association of Gun Rights, and they were trying to get through a UN arms trade treaty, and the point of the UN arms trade treaty was gun control in the United States, pure and simple. It was about small arms. We're not worried about sending tanks and planes across the, because they've got a lot of money to pay people in Congress and presidents to make sure their product doesn't get stopped, but it gets promoted going across borders. But it was a small arms. It was ammunition for the small guns that people would have themselves.

That's got to be stopped, said the UN. And so the whole purpose of this false flag operation was for the ATF to transport, to walk guns across the border into Mexico and then to give them to the drug cartels. So then they could then bust them. You've seen this over and over again from the FBI, except this is being done for real. The FBI usually, uh, you know,

find some rubes somewhere and starts having meetings where they gripe about the government and things like that. And you know, what we ought to do, we ought to blow things up, you know, Hey, I've got a plan here.

And so the FBI will pull these people in. The FBI will lead the plan. The FBI will give them the plan. And then the FBI will bust them and declare themselves to be heroes. And so that was kind of what the ATF was doing, except the ATF used real stuff and gave it to real criminals. And you had a guy wind up getting killed with that. And so that kind of scuttled the UN Arms Trade Treaty.

In my opinion, what they tried to do was to pull this thing back and stage the Aurora, Colorado shooting just before they were supposed to have that vote in the UN because it had been so bad, the blowback from what happened with Fast and Furious. So then that brings us, this is where we're going to make the transition, in my mind at least today, into what's going on with the banks. And what's going on with the banks, I think, has more to do with CBDC than it does with ESG. Anti-gun activists are melting down over the pause on merchant codes for gun stores. Now understand what happens with the merchant code. You had the New York state lobbied real hard to get the international standards organization,

ISO to come up, you know, give us a number, any, pick a number, any number between 1,000 or whatever. And we will then assign that number to people who sell guns. And so if you are a merchant, you would, you know, now that they've got this code for gun stores, presumably then, you know, Visa, MasterCard, Discover, would ask retailers, are you, do you fit this code? You know, what kind of a business are you? You know, what kind of stuff do you sell? And they want to know that because they're looking at fraud and they have a history where they know that certain types of businesses are more likely to be engaged in fraud. I don't know which types of businesses are more likely to be engaged in fraud.

I don't know which types of businesses are more likely to be engaged in fraud, but they charge them a higher fee. Because of the industry that they're in, they consider the likelihood of fraud to be higher. So maybe you can think of something. Let's just say it's ice cream. Okay, it's not ice cream, but let's just say it is. So if you are an ice cream vendor and you got the ice cream vendor ISO code, uh, because you have to give them all this information when you open up your account with visa, MasterCard and discover. And so you tell them, okay, I'm an ice cream vendor and they say, oh, well, ice cream, we have a lot of people who steal credit cards and go buy ice cream,

and so they charge you more money, and that was really the point of this because the people in New York wanted to use this for a couple of reasons. There's a lot of different ways that they can maliciously use this. One of them, of course, the real object of all this was to put the gun stores out of business by hook or by crook. One way they can do that is to say, well, these people sell guns, they're risky, so they ought to be charged more. And that's one of the things that they're very upset about. But they can also use it to scare people away from going to gun stores.

Now, Visa and MasterCard, as I pointed out yesterday, have said that they are not going to do this. And, um, we're kind of gone long on this segment. So I'm going to take a quick break and we'll come back. I'm going to tell you what is up with this and why this really folds into all the CBDC and the business closures, the bank closures that have happened the last couple of days. We'll be right back. Joe, we've got a problem. What?

Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at the David Knight show dot com. Right. So basically, a mug is something that holds liquid right because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands right i i'm it's scat and they but anyone tries to mug me i i'm be ready for it you you dog faced pony soldier they say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world?

But we owe the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every mug they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, will anyway. You're listening to the David Knight Show. And the mug is dishwasher safe and microwavable,

unlike Biden and Lala Harris. But they do think, just like Trump, Trump and Biden and Lala, they all think that you are microwavable safe. That's why they can use 5G and they don't have to worry about any of the health effects. But of course, that's another story.

Let's get back to the, what's going on with the credit card company. Visa's outgoing CEO, Al Kelly said in January, he said, I've heard from everybody. I said, I don't think there's a Senator or a member of the house or an attorney

general, the United States. And I haven't heard from about this thing. He said, look, he said, guns are allowed in the United States. And we'd fully expect that anybody who wants to buy a gun should be able to buy that gun, provided all the other checks are done. On top of that, we're telling them that we don't collect that data on consumers. So if the guy goes into a store and he buys three thermoses and a tent and then if you go in and you buy a rifle and five rounds of ammo all i know is that you both went into the same

gun store he says i know when you went i know where you went but he said and i know how much money you spent but i have no idea what you bought. And so he says, I don't even know why they're bothering us with this. Well, that's a little bit disingenuous because, again, if you can intimidate people and scare them and make them think that if they go into a gun store that they're somehow on a list or they're being watched. And that's not a theory that has already been done with January the 6th.

You don't even have to get a geofence warrant. The FBI went to Bank of America, Bank of America, and said, you know, we'd like to know about the people who were there on January the 6th. And Bank of America voluntarily ratted out people, not just the people who were at, you know, in Washington, D.C., but in three surrounding states. They voluntarily gave that list. We'll talk more about that coming up. But you understand that what we're talking about here is to try to intimidate people to not go to a gun store? That's one way to harm them. Another way to harm them is to then

come in and say, well, we're going to treat them as if it is a fraudulent transfer. The Visa guy said, and raise their rates in terms of the charges that they get from using credit cards. He said, this is the outgoing Visa CEO. And I think the code was necessary. But it doesn't matter. The code is now in place. It's now an international standard. And we adopt international standards.

Understand the purpose of this is to intimidate people. The purpose of this is to intimidate people. The purpose of this is ultimately to close gun stores. And I think there is something that can be done about this at the state level. Again, what could you do at the state level if you wanted to stop this? Well, you could very easily prohibit Visa and MasterCard from doing what they say they're not going to do. You could say, you're not going to ask. Yeah, you've got this international code. But guess what?

If you ask anybody about this, we'll consider that to be unlawful discrimination and we'll punish you for that somehow. And that's exactly what needs to be done. That needs to be done here. It needs to be done in every state. That's what the gun people should be pushing. Right now, you're going to say, because look, they're saying that they're not going to ask that. Discover said they are, starting in April. And so Visa and MasterCard have had a lot of pushback.

They're not going to collect that information, but that's just a voluntary thing. And you have to prohibit them from getting that information in the first place. You have to prohibit them from using that new ISO code. That's easy to do. Quite frankly, it ought to be a slam dunk for any legislator in a Republican state to come up with that. Anyway, I'm going to contact some people about that too. Anti-gun activists are now all but blaming credit card companies for any and all future

mass shootings, says BearingArms.com. It is, this is what the anti-gunners are saying. They said, it's shameful to hear reports that credit card companies, Visa and MasterCard, have caved to the gun lobby's transparent political ploys. If true, Visa and MasterCard are choosing political expediency over American lives, having a dedicated process to flag troubling and suspicious firearm purchases, like they already do to detect other fraudulent purchases. You see how they make the equivalence there? What did I say before?

I said they have these codes primarily. What type of business are you in? So they can adjust your fees based on the risk, based on the industry that you're involved in. What is the likelihood that somebody is going to use a stolen credit card to purchase this type of product? That's a fraudulent purpose. But the anti-gunners are tying fraudulent purposes to firearm purchases,

troubling and suspicious. And as Bearing Arms points out, note that troubling and suspicious are very different from fraudulent. A purchase made with a stolen credit card is easy enough to identify. Who, on the other hand, defines troubling and suspicious transactions? For anti-gunners, that'd be anything as routine as making a purchase of a gun shop. What Bearing Arms doesn't see is the fact that they are trying to use the same mechanism that they have for outright fraud that they're trying to use that to punish gun stores and that's the key and that's

why they should be prohibited from getting this it is a kind of red flag in many ways and it is a kind of operation choke point in many ways it's very clever it's very devious what the Democrats are doing they've got this little merchant code and they're going to really be weaponizing that he said it surprised me that none of the anti gunners none of them said anything about states like california responding in kind to red state laws that supposedly led to the cold feet on the part of companies like visa mastercard he said gavin newsom loves to pick culture war fights and if he's going to go after walgreens over abortion pills then it probably won't be long before he demands that credit card companies

either implement these codes or face the wrath of lawmakers in Sacramento. And we have to do exactly the opposite. We have to say, if you implement these codes, you're going to face fines from us. That is doable. And it is doable for these people to understand they've got to play by a different set of rules in a different state. And so the theory that this could be misused is not a conspiracy theory. It's already been done. As I said before, Bank of America provided FBI with a huge list of customers who spent money in Washington, DC on January the 6th. It's essentially like a geofence warrant and they don't have to,

again, the whole, this goes back to the CIA and the NSA spying on people from their inception, pretending that because this is information, we go to the phone company, and the phone company has got records about who called who when, right? And they don't have the information about what you talked about, but they can piece it together from that.

And so they can piece together, oh, well, these people were in this area and that type of thing. And that was, they call that PIN numbers. So we want these various numbers here. We want you to give us information about all the phone calls that were made from and to this particular phone. And so the phone companies would give that to them. So people took them to court, and the Supreme Court said, well, that data belongs to AT&T. It doesn't belong to the customers. And you can't do anything to them about it.

And under that same rule, you have, they've used social media companies to spy on us, everybody to spy on us, under that same pretense. Well, the corporation owns that information and the corporation can voluntarily give that to us. We don't even have to have a search warrant for that. And so that's what bank of America did with this. They had that information about the credit card stuff. All the FBI had to do was ask them,

oh, sure. We'd love to do that. We'd love to rat people out at the bank of American Stasi's. It would love to do that. And so, uh, how much easier is it going to be for them? If you've got this gun flag code on

the credit cards as well, the FBI attempted to sick its agents on innocent Americans after a major banking corporation data mined its own customers and voluntarily gave the Bureau a list of customers who had made purchases in the Washington, D.C. area around January the 6th riot. And so, again, it is the code that is also going to be used for this, and we know how these corporations like. They also gave the names of anyone who at any time had previously purchased a weapon. Now, how did they know that?

Because they didn't have the MCC code, the one from the merchant's category code, that's what that is. They didn't have that, right? So how would they know that somebody had used their card to purchase a weapon? There's a lot of data mining that's already going on, even without this code here. This code is just another weapon and i don't know if they put their data together with the fbi to figure out that

somebody was buying a gun is that how they figured it out yeah because um theoretically bank of america doesn't even know that you're shopping at a gun store at that point in time. This is something that just recently came out. And so this was a whistleblower who talked about this. Bank of America, with no directive from the FBI, data-mined its customer base. So this is why the MasterCard and Visa thing is so dangerous. It's why it's got to be prohibited at the state level. The FBI's Washington office, quote, pushed local offices to open criminal investigations

into Americans based solely on financial transactions that Bank of America tracked and voluntarily provided to the Bureau. George Hill identified himself last month as one of the whistleblowers cooperating with congressional investigators when speaking with John Solomon at Just the News. He gave these disclosures to the House Judiciary Committee. Hill's testimony confirms the details that the military veteran and former longtime FBI and NSA analyst told John Solomon.

It also reveals more troubling details. Hill explained that around the time of the Capitol riot, Bank of America gave to the FBI a huge list. That's his term. A huge list of people who used its cards. And it's not just in Washington, D.C. It's also in Maryland and in Virginia. They had a very, very big geofence, you could call it. You know, the phone companies can do that and did do that.

And the FBI started coming after people who were in a particular area with their phone. And they got Bank of America doing the same thing. It elevated to the top of the list those who had ever used a bank card on a weapons purchase. Now, again, was that information that the FBI had? Or did they combine that with Bank of America? I don't know how they would know otherwise anyway hill said the top of the list would have included any somebody for example who had bought a shotgun in 1999 in iowa they don't ever it's the permanent record you know that's the name of joe of ed

snowden's book permanent record uh so if you bought a shotgun in 1999 in Iowa and you used a Bank of America Stasi card with it and then used a Bank of America Stasi card for a hotel around the time of the riot, well, then they put that together and they put you at the top of the list. What did you do? Had you done anything? Did you hit any cops? Did you break any windows? Did you break any windows? Did you go into the Capitol building? No. You were in Washington, D.C.

You may not have even been at this stupid Trump and Alex Jones event. You may not have even been there. You may have just, I bought a gun in Iowa in 1999, and I happened to be in Washington, D.C., doing something completely different than this stop-the-steal nonsense on January the 6th. But you go to the top of the list for the FBI. The Washington office then sent the list to field offices across the country. And we've had an FBI agent who blew the whistle on that, said,

I'm not going to go to these people's houses and harass them over this kind of evidence. They said, um, even though there's no crime that was committed by using a bank of America Stasi credit card and the district or around the district, the DC office then pressured other field offices to open up cases against innocent Americans. Now we got cases here. then pressured other field offices to open up cases against innocent Americans, said the report. Yeah, we got cases here. Cases. I should have done a PCR test.

Some responses from those offices included, no, we're not going to open up cases based on credit card or debit card activity that took place. But the Federalist said that George Hill's deposition testimony raises another troubling possibility, that one or more of the other 54 local FBI field offices either did comply with the D.C. field office's initial request, or later they capitulated when the DC office escalated the request up the chain of command and then the SAC and that's what happened in Florida with the FBI agent who lost his job because he refused to do that. We're going to talk about the banking thing when we come back

because I've got more information about this choke point thing. And what is really going on, the twin aspects, right? It's just like it was with ivermectin or HCQ, for example. We've got to shut down and demonize ivermectin and HCQ because we've got this thing that's on its way.

The Trump shot. We've got to demonize Bitcoin, Ethereum, whatever, you know, because we got this, maybe not Ethereum because I might put CBDC on top of that. But we got this, you know, we got Bitcoin and these other things, crypto.

They're evil. And we just see what happened with FTX, right? And we got this other thing that's on the way. We're working on it right now. It's coming at warp speed. And it's coming at warp speed and it's cbdc so You're listening to The David Knight Show. Let's talk about choke point. I mentioned yesterday that you had four senators write letters to three

directors of federal agencies saying, I'm very concerned that there is an operation choke point type of thing that's being run by crypto and these four senators sent it to a pal head of the federal reserve, and then they sent it to the person who's running the FDIC, as well as the person who's running the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, who's going to be pushing through the CBDC. And the person who's taking the lead on this is Senator Bill Hagerty from Tennessee. He said, I'm hearing examples of companies in the crypto space being debanked by U.S. banks who are caving to political pressure from the left. If Operation Chokepoint taught us anything, said Senator Hagerty, is that under no circumstances should banks be used as partisan tools to kill legal businesses. But we know that that's the way the federal government operates. They create a war on drugs. They don't have any authority for the war on drugs.

But if you opt out of that, you know, based on what your legislature does or based on a referendum or something like that, you're going to legalize something that they've said is prohibited, even though they don't have any authority to do that. They got a lot of different ways to come after you and primarily coming after you by debanking you, taking you out of the financial system. That applies whether you got a pot store or you got a podcast, right? Because the sheriff's to show up and rob me at any moment you know just like paypal you know or uh or twitter or something like that i'm sorry you've had too much to say we've got to take you away here um senator haggard he also said make no mistake operation choke point 2.0 is an extreme overreach from the banking regulators

and they should expect to hear from congress soon and he had three other senators join him in that this is not a conspiracy theory it is a conspiracy fact uh and so, uh, they wrote to these, um, and you know, the article, this was happening, I'm sorry. He put this out on Twitter, um, February the 17th, things are moving very quickly. Right. Three weeks later, you have all this stuff happening with the banks. Now we have had, and you see this, oh, look, we've had, you know, two big banks. We've had the, you know, just the last few days, we've had, and you see this, oh, look, we've had two big banks. We've had the, just the last few days, we've had the second largest bank failure in history.

And the third largest bank failure in history. And then there's another one. And I kept thinking, why is it that nobody is talking about Silvergate? Because it didn't fail. It was shut down. It was shut down. It was shut down by the regulators, not because they didn't have the money. They had the money. As a matter of fact, you see articles everywhere saying, well, you know,

Silvergate had to shut down. But it's not going to cost the FDIC a penny because they've got enough money to pay everybody. It's like, well, why'd you shut them down for? Well, you know, they're ratios. Ratios? What is that? It's an arbitrary metric.

And you know, it's just like when you apply for a loan and they look at it and you know, you, you know, this, uh, from applying for a home loan, if you've ever done that process, I forget what the ratios are, but let's just say something like 20 or 25%, uh, that the, uh, mortgage monthly mortgage payment cannot exceed 20 or 25%, uh, that the, uh, mortgage monthly mortgage payment cannot exceed 20 or 25% of your salary. I don't know if that's gross or I guess that's gross salary. I don't know. I don't remember this stuff.

We only did this a year ago and I've already forgot. It's like Sherlock Holmes said, uh, yes, Watson. I know that. And, and he says, and I'll try to forget it as soon as possible. I try to put irrelevant details out of my mind as soon as possible i try to put uh irrelevant details out of my mind as quickly as possible so i can focus and keep the other stuff so i don't remember if it's 20 or 25 anyway well let's just say 20 and then they say and so that's the the mortgage payment can't be more than that your ratio can't be more than 20 and then all together uh your total indebtedness

cannot exceed let's say 40 and that would include things like your car loans and things like that so let's assume that you know you meet those ratios and you buy the house and then a little bit of time passes and let's say that you know you got a business or something like that or you've got a job and your job changes now you're not making as much money or your business changes and you're not making as much money or maybe you go in and you borrow some more money on a car it takes you up above 40% that's a real possibility because they have been making car loans to people who are sub prime which means that they don't fit the ratios, right? So let's say something happens, and now you're over the ratio.

Now your income has fallen, so now your fixed monthly payment is now above the 20% ratio, or you borrowed some more stuff, and now you owe more than 40% of your monthly income, but you haven't missed any payments. You've got the money to pay, and you haven't missed anything. But the bank comes in and says, well, your ratio's out of whack. We're going to take your home. It's like, what? That's what happened to Silvergate. They were not a single penny is going to come out of FDIC. They had the money to pay everybody, but they shut them down anyway because of their ratio. And you know, when you

look at the ratio, why do you count? I mean, if you're working as an employee, it's pretty simple. If you're working for yourself, where do you count the money? Where does that come from? That's subjective as well. The ratio is subjective. What kind of income is going to be counted? That's subjective as well. And so that's why they shut down Silvergate was over crypto. And that's why you're seeing them talk about two bank failures instead of three bank failures, because Silvergate didn't fail. It was shut down and it was shut down because it's crypto. And this is operation choke point 2.0. And you better understand what's happening with this because that's a key component in pushing out CBDC. It shows you how quickly CBDC is coming at us. Tennessee, and three others, wrote to FBI Chair Jerome Powell, FDIC Chair Marty Gruenberg,

and Office of the Comptroller of Currency Acting Comptroller Michael Hsu. Well, they said the White House and your agencies have issued heightened supervision that is resulting in unfortunate circumstances for the crypto sector, such as the closing of their bank accounts and the closing of crypto banks, banks that are set up to work with people. Senators were referring to the joint statement that was issued by those agencies on January the 3rd that said in part, quote, issuing or holding as principal crypto assets is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices.

So you see, the FDIC, some of these other agencies or the Federal Reserve can shut you down if they accuse you of not having safe and sound banking practices. Even if you got all the money, even if you're fiscally sound, if they don't like what you're doing, they can use those labels and shut you down. They said, quote, legal permissibility is necessary but not sufficient condition for banking activity. And the Biden administration's January roadmap called for agencies to ramp up enforcement. So where are we with Biden and CBDC? March of last year, he told all of the federal agencies. We want you to look at how you're going to redesign the financial system, how you're going to implement the code for a CBDC, uh, and, um, how are you going to enforce this and how you're going to sell it with climate change.

Now, uh, they all got back to him in October, six months later. I'm sorry, September, six months later. And they've now, you know, they've got their code together. They had the code written a long time ago. They're doing their pilot programs and their studies and the rest of the stuff. But some of these enforcement agencies, you know, like Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC, I imagine one of the things that they said was, you know, we've got to change what sound practices are. Because as I pointed out with climate change, that told you that crypto was the target.

Because you've had all these different central banks talking about central bank digital currencies. They're all talking about the fact that they want to have proof of stake rather than proof of work because proof of work uses too much energy it's going to burn the planet up so they should stop all their activities spying on us and saving all that information and doing all the data mining and training their artificial intelligence to mine the data because that uses way more energy than crypto does. But anyway, that's the way they're going to sell it. And so the climate change told you that crypto was the focus of it.

And then you conveniently had the Sam Bankman freed fried FTX failure, which I think was a setup. I really do, especially now. Uh, and, um, so that conveniently failed and then they come around, they say, well, you know, um, it may be permitted for you to deal with crypto, uh, just because it's legal, legally permitted. Um, that is one thing that has, you definitely must do things that are legally permitted, but it's still not sufficient for you to be considered to be a safe bank, even just because it's legal.

Oh, really? Oh, no. We have other conditions and we're going to ramp up enforcement of this. And again, that's what Biden was telling everybody to do. And so he's saying ramp up the enforcement. The senators wrote in their letter, they said the coordinated behavior seems disturbingly reminiscent of Operation Chokepoint. Federal regulators applied pressure on financial institutions to cut off financial services to certain licensed and legally operating industries simply because certain regulators and policymakers disfavored those industries. We're seeing that happening with speech and all the rest of the stuff.

You know, put pressure. I've got a list of people I want you to shut down PayPal, Venmo, right? Well, you know, David Knight's not saying anything illegal. We got the First Amendment. That's okay. Just take his banking account out. You understand how this works? Senators posed a number of questions to the regulators.

They asked whether it is possible for banks to provide services to crypto firms at all under the updated guidance from the Biden administration. They know. They know that the Biden administration is setting up to shut down all crypto. The senators are joining a conversation in the crypto community concerning the voluntary liquidation of Silvergate. You see that? Voluntary. It's probably about as voluntary as the income tax.

You know, they always tell you it's voluntary. What happens if I don't volunteer? They said that getting your vaccine was a choice as well. You know, if you don't get the vaccine, you get fired. You can't travel. You can't go to school. You can't do all this. But it's your choice.

You don't have to do it. It's voluntary. It's a voluntary system. So again, not a single dollar is going to be spent out of FDIC for Silvergate because they were solvent. They voluntarily shut down from pressure. From pressure. They took the CBDC genetic code injection, didn't they? Hagerty introduced the Digital Trading Clarity Act

in the Senate in October. That act would provide a safe harbor for cryptocurrency exchanges from some of the Security and Exchange Commission enforcements. Coming up, I'm going to talk about the Security and Exchange Commission. The Security and Exchange Commission

is allowing this bogus company to sell bogus carbon credits. I mean, it is. And there's an interesting article from Daily Caller talking about how, well, you know, carbon credits, this company called South Pole selling carbon credits. Kind of reminds me of, what was it? You had the tulip bulb thing and you had the South sea adventure, right? Well, this is the South pole adventure where you can buy carbon credits.

You can do whatever you want, right? It's an indulgence. You just pay them money and they'll plant a tree for you somewhere in Africa. They said, or something like that. Okay. And now the sec says, well, wait a minute.

Uh, I, I think that was fraudulent, not the whole carbon credit scheme, but they didn't actually really plant a tree or something. Okay. And so that's what sec, sec allowed this stuff. So the people who blew the whistle on it, um, the whole thing about carbon credits is all fictitious, but then, you know, on top of that, you've got, uh, a fraud and why wouldn't they think that they could get away with a fraud?

Like this is only certain people that are allowed to pull these types of frauds and stack too many frauds on top of the other one, or they, they cancel everything out. Uh, but, um, again, the SEC is not worried about these fictitious carbon credit things, but they do want to shut down crypto. Crypto is now having to scour the globe for banks to replace the ones that had been taken out. Now SV, uh, it was a signature bank. Um, again, people distracted.

Oh, signature bank did some stuff to Trump. So there you go. There's the Trump karma and all the rest of the stuff. Look, Signature Bank was a very big bank in terms of crypto. That's what's going on. Everything in the world is not about Trump, fortunately. No, Signature Bank was heavily involved in it. Silvergate was heavily involved in it.

SVB had involvement in it as well. Crypto is now, the people in crypto are now looking to, where can we go bank? Crypto hedge fund executive Marco Lim spent Monday racing to open bank accounts in Hong Kong after the sudden collapse of three U.S. lenders. He said the two biggest crypto-friendly banks are now gone. See? Signature and Silvergate. They also had many crypto clients, and they're going to be liquidated. I've been through too many of these crises, he said.

The loss of Silvergate and Signature is particularly grievous for digital assets as the two operated real time seven day a week payments network for the crypto industry. See, that's why this happened. They're doing 24 seven and doing crypto stuff. They shut them down. They didn't keep bankers hours. Aiding the flow of money to and from crypto stuff. They shut them down. They didn't keep bankers' hours. Aiding the flow of money to and from the sector. Many crypto firms are now combing for banks outside of the U.S. Why is that?

Because they know, just like these senators, that the Biden administration is going to, by hook or by crook, shut down crypto. They'll do it gradually. They'll do it,. They'll do it as Fauci said. Do it from the inside. Do it with chaos and disruption, you know, shutting down some banks and having FTX exposed as a fraud. We all knew it was a fraud. But we had to shut it down right at this point in time. And then we go in and we shut down some of these other banks. And then we do it iteratively, incrementally, incrementally,

with infringements, razor cuts on what we're doing. So many crypto firms are now coming for banks outside the U.S. with lenders in Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates, among those in the spotlight. This tilt away from America had already begun due to the growing regulatory heat in America after the implosion of FTX. The U.S. isn't as accommodative as it was toward crypto, said Richard Galvin, co-founder and a fund manager at Digital Asset Capital Management. It makes sense to diversify across jurisdictional grounds. So this is another thing that we don't need to have anymore.

We don't need to have energy. We don't need to have manufacturing. We don't need to have a crypto industry to make money. We need to just offshore all that stuff, let other people have it. But they don't want to have us us let us have it either. So Barney Frank, you know, again, you, you see the people who want to play the left, right Republican Democrat game and say, Oh, look at Barney. Thank him. He was, um, he was, uh, on the board of this bank that failed signature.

And that's true. Uh, and they say, well, you know, it was, Elizabeth Warren says, no, it was Trump's fault because Trump changed the Dodd-Frank, that's Barney Frank, the Dodd-Frank bill. And so that's why this all happened. I talked about that yesterday. I said, well, that's not why this happened. The reason we got the kind of banking consolidation we do is because of

things that were done by clinton and by carter especially getting rid of the prohibitions on banks operating between states operating on a national level that was something carter took away took away the usury laws clinton took away the um it started setting up the big uh okaying the merger the big merger for bank of america you know, the Stasi Bank, and then took down Glass-Steagall so they could engage in speculative investments. But Barney Frank was on the signature board at the time, and he was a proponent in 2018 when this was changed in the Trump administration. He was a proponent of raising the asset threshold from $50 billion to $100 billion, where they would come under greater scrutiny. So they had different tiers and different amount of scrutiny based on the size of your assets.

That's what changed under Trump. It wasn't anything other than that. Elizabeth Warren, wrong as usual. But I think she knows what's going on as well, because she's been a part of this Operation Chokepoint as well. Congress ended up changing the framework so the banks would be eligible for greater scrutiny once they reached $100 billion in asset. So Frank said on Sunday that he didn't think changing the threshold had any impact.

He said, I think if it hadn't been for FTX and the extreme nervousness about crypto, this would not have happened, even to SVB or to us, that signature bank. Warren, however, is holding these two banks up as reason why Congress and regulators should reverse any light-touch bank supervision. Well, what about Silvergate? They didn't fail.

And they don't need a bailout. And they're all crypto. That's the common thread. Again, they're misdirecting you. And they're also using the FTX sign. Is the U.S. coming for crypto? And all these things have happened in just the last couple weeks or just last week, a couple of days before this happened. This is an article from CryptoNews.net that came out on the 7th of March. I remember it was the 10th that they started shutting these banks down over the weekend.

In this CryptoNews article, are they coming for crypto? Biden's White House, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, and the Department of Justice, you see. These are the people that were tasked. You know, the Federal Reserve had the issue of redesigning the financial system. Department of Justice was on the enforcement side, things like that. FDIC would be on the enforcement side as well. So they are, alongside influential members of Congress, they're all in cahoots, hell-bent on yoinking crypto's fiat access

to suffocate the industry once and for all. That's the theory. Posited by longtime crypto supporter and venture capitalist Nick Carter. His post, Operation Chokepoint 2.0 is underway, and crypto is in its crosshairs. It outlines a string of bearish headlines, which, when you add them up, seem to indicate a concerted government-backed effort. What would be another name for that?

A conspiracy. A concerted government-backed effort. It would be a conspiracy. The silence to pull these out. To discourage traditional finance institutions from servicing the crypto industry. A letter to Silvergate, again from Senators Roger Marshall, Elizabeth Warren, and John Kennedy, preceded its rival signature, halving the, cutting in half, the total value of crypto-related deposits in December.

And even then, they shut it down. So with FTX going out of business, they send a letter, Elizabeth Warren and Republican John Kennedy is on this as well. On the wrong side. Who's the one who came out and said, well, I can't say what's going on here with these UFOs, but if I was you, I'd lock my door tonight. And you better lock your door tonight, too, if you have any crypto, because John Kennedy is going to be snooping around your house anyway. So, you know, they sent letters to intimidate all the businesses that were dealing

with crypto and so signature cut in half what they were doing in terms of that back in december and then it's elevated then in january you had the joint statement from the fdic that i talked about the federal reserve and the occ theroller of the Currency, strongly discouraged, quote-unquote, banks from supporting crypto. Even plans for a crypto-native company to control its own fiat destiny have all but unraveled at the hands of the U.S. government, as the Fed formally denied Crypto Bank Custodia, formerly known as Avanti, application to join the Federal Reserve System in late January.

That application had been processing for two years and they finally denied it. Custodia appealed it and they denied the appeal as well. Ring-fencing U.S. crypto that is to separate it from sorely needed banking rails echoes the Department of Justice's operation choke point from last decade, said Nick Carter.

Sometime in 2013, the Department of Justice came out with an eerily familiar goal by way of red tape to cut off undesirable business sectors from the banking system. And gun retailers and gun manufacturers were one of the front ones up there see how this all ties together the credit card codes and all the rest of this stuff the ones with a risky reputation for money laundering and fraud and predominantly payday lenders but also guns

operation choke point has had a demonstrable chilling effect on Congress, said one person from the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Most such banks cannot afford the extra supervision that comes with a chokepoint subpoena. So many times they'll just shut down. Perhaps that's what happened to Silvergate. So when suspiciously choke pointy headlines crop up, like Bybit suspending U.S. dollar deposits, or Circle ceasing automated clearinghouse payments. You see, even if SVB, Silicon Valley Bank,

even if they weren't dealing directly in crypto, Circle had $3.3 billion in there. So to shut down SVB might have been really coming after Circle. And then to kick out headlines with everybody saying, oh, well, the banking system is shaky. It's all going to fail. Oh, and then they've cut down, you know, two more of these things. And everybody's looking at the interest rates and the interplay between inflation and recession and all the rest of this stuff. And everybody is focused on that when the real target, I believe, I really do believe it, is crypto. And crypto's the target because they want to push out CBDC.

So, at this point, there's no tangible evidence of a government conspiracy, writes Crypto News. But whether they're all in it together may be moot. U.S. lawmakers, regulators, and assorted agencies are noticeably staunch in opposing crypto. Their individual efforts could very well outweigh the potential sum of their efforts and some sweeping secret government mission. They're not making much of a secret

of their opposition anyway. There's a consensus in the Biden administration, said Nick Carter, and among the bank regulators that crypto should be marginalized. So it's possible the House could ask questions about overreach here, the House under the control of the Republicans. And so here's kind of a quick timeline that was put together by the Cato Institute, Cato.org, about this move against crypto, this operation checkpoint.

So December 6th, you've got Senators Elizabeth Warren, John Kennedy, Roger Marshall calling out Silvergate, again, just forced to close even though they had all the money, for providing services to FTX. December 7th, Signature Bank announced that they were going to shut down cryptocurrency deposit acceptance. Right? We've had it. You know, they tapped out. And then you had on January the 3rd, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, OCC, talking about that joint statement that was put out. On January the 9th, you had Metropolitan Commercial Bank announced,

we're shutting down our cryptocurrencies. On January the 27th, the Federal Reserve denied Custodia Bank's application, the ones that wanted to have a focus on digital assets. January the 27th, same day, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City denied Custodia's bank application for a master account. The Federal Reserve also issued a policy statement to discourage banks from holding or issuing cryptocurrencies the same day they denied that. The very same day, all this happening on January the 27th, the White House National Economic Council issues a policy statement to discourage banks from interacting with cryptocurrency. So, again, Federal Reserve, the White House, all of them are saying, don't do it, don't do it. And some of them are getting the message and voluntarily shutting things down. Silvergate Signature did it, and it didn't help them anyway.

February the 2nd, I'll cut down half of it should say uh february 2nd the department of justice announced an investigation into silver gate bank because of ftx and again they had all the money uh to pay all the depositors uh they did not do anything other than supposedly fail a reserve test or a ratio test uh the new York Department of Financial Services on February the 13th orders Paxos to halt the issuance of stablecoin. February the 14th, Elizabeth Warren labels ShapeShift a decentralized exchange, a money laundering haven, she said. February the 16th, the FDIC releases a report that notes that the FDIC has

identified 136 federally insured banks that, quote, had ongoing or planned crypto asset-related activities. These people have crypto activities. They're either going to shut this stuff down or we're going to shut them down. You see, they're targeting them, obviously. February the 23rd, the FDIC, OCC and Federal Reserve joint statement to discourage banks, again, from encouraging in cryptocurrency due to safety and soundness. How many of these have we had? I mean, we're only talking about a timeframe here that's just a couple of months. And look at how many times and how many different ways the Federal Reserve, other institutions being driven by the Biden administration, say, don't do crypto, don't do crypto, don't do, and some of them tapping out already. February 23rd, the Federal Reserve Board denies Custodia's request for reconsideration.

And so it's pretty clear, I think Hagerty, he said, this really feels reminiscent of Operation Chokepoint. And they said, Cato Institute said, reminiscent is the right word. More evidence will need to be secured through Freedom of Information Act requests. The scrutiny could be in response to complaints after FTX appeared to have defrauded its users. Except that maybe FTX was designed to take down the crypto industry. Anyway, or rather than going after cryptocurrency broadly, perhaps it's an effort to save face and to distance themselves because they took donations from FTX. Either way, said Cato, there is another issue that needs more scrutiny here, and that is the discretionary and arbitrary powers of regulators. Do you see what's going on here? Have we had a debate

in the Senate and the House over whether or not we ought to outlaw crypto? No. No such thing. This is all being done by rules. Rules by agencies. Rules by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Rules by the private corporation, the Federal Reserve. Rules by an executive branch office, the office of the comptroller of the Federal Reserve, rules by an executive branch office, the office

of the comptroller of the currency. These are rules coming from the bureaucracy under the executive branch at the orders of the Biden administration. This is a problem. This is regulation without representation. These people are making what is essentially law without any input, except for a protest from four senators. But they don't even bother anymore to go through the legal process. It's just like Trump's gun control, the bump stock stuff.

Well, I can do executive, I can do gun control by executive order and I can use the ATF. You know, I'll issue the thing and I'll have the ATF do it. Well, this is what Biden is doing on the monetary side. He's issuing the directive to these organizations and they're running with it. They're coming up with rules to prohibit and to shut down banks that are still solvent. So Cato says this is the issue. When you're talking about financial stability or some other vague mandates, this is the issue. When you're talking about financial stability or some other vague mandates, this is the issue.

And so they're changing the rules very, very quickly. And here's the example. I'll just say one more thing and we'll go on to another topic. There was an interview that Tucker did with Kristi Noem, Republican governor out of South Dakota. And there was a bill that was introduced and it was actually passed. It was passed by the South Dakota legislature. Now, she's a Republican.

I don't know if the South Dakota legislature is Republican or Democrat, but they passed the bill. She vetoed it. The bill would classify central bank digital currency, CBDC, as money. And at the same time, it would exclude private cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. You understand? Same thing we've been seeing for the last three years. That is going to be prohibited. You can't say that. You must say this. You can't buy that. You must buy this. You can't have this medicine. We're going to force you to take this medicine.

Same thing. And here's the worrying thing. 20 other states have legislation just like this. To declare that CBDC is money and to prohibit Bitcoin or any private cryptocurrencies. She said on Tucker, she said, I vetoed a bill that, I'm sorry, she said this on Twitter. I vetoed a bill that changes the definition of money that opens the door for the federal government to adopt a central bank digital currency. But more than 20 other states are facing the same legislation.

By defining money in this proposed way, the bill opens the door to risk that the federal government could more easily adopt a CBDC, which then may become the only viable digital currency, she said. It's not going to be as obvious. It's just going to be a vague definition. You know, like the way they redefine vaccines, the way they redefine women, the way they redefine everything. It's just we're going to redefine money now, right? That's a tactic.

And you say, well, are you talking about, is that what you're talking about, CBDC? Well, I'm just redefining money. You know, they redefined immunity. They redefined what vaccines were. They redefined what was going to be included in different areas. And they did that months before even anything happened in China. Anybody even started talking about things that were happening in China.

They knew. It was a plan. And Trump signed it. The bill, which is sold as an update to the guidelines of the Universal Commercial Code, backed by all of our financial institutions, she said, it defines money as, quote, a medium of exchange that is currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. It makes money. And that's the other thing they didn't talk about.

Something that's defined by foreign government. You see, this allows them to create a global crypto, a global CBDC. You know, it's a foreign government. And that's going to be money now. But not anything that is private, like Bitcoin. It could be any kind of fiat currency, whether it is American or whether it is foreign. That will be your money now, but not crypto. It also expressly excludes decentralized digital assets known as cryptocurrencies

as money. It would make them more difficult to use, she said, and it would put South Dakota citizens at risk. All right, we're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Nutt Show. Let's talk a little bit about eminent domain. Something that I generally don't support. There's a few cases where they would use it for infrastructure, that type of thing. We've got to build a road.

We're going to take your home. Central to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. They needed to build an intergalactic space highway, so Earth had to be destroyed. You know, that type of thing. But North Carolina. Not too far from where we used to live in north carolina this is in chatham county travis uh they have um there is a vietnamese electric car company because you know it's not too hard to make electric cars anybody can make them this is electric cars by the way are going to be like the ibm pcs and the

microsoft uh dos machines you know you you wound up having a situation where um you know bill gates stole the software from digital research cpm software even i didn't even bother to change the syntax the command line interpreter didn't bother to still called it bios all the rest of this stuff and um they all used intel microprocessors and uh you know ibm started doing it but everybody realized hey we can do that stuff too it's pretty simple you wound up pretty soon having computers that were made by everybody and it became something of a commodity same thing's going to happen with the electric cars except for the fact that there's not going to be enough electricity so the whole point is to have a few uh people that none of them actually even want to sell cars they they want to sell mobility uh they want you to rent by

the ride uh any of your transportation but but uh that's just a side part of this. Because the state of North Carolina, and they have a Democrat governor, a Republican legislature, and they all agree on one thing. They love big corporations. And they really despise small businesses, individuals, and even in this particular case, an historic church building. And so just as we saw in Connecticut, we had the case, if you remember this going back a few years ago, Kello versus New London, do you remember that case? It's the first time you had a jurisdiction come in and say, we're going to take private land,

and we're not going to use it for a public purpose, you know, like a road or something. We're going to give it, We're going to take your private land so that another private developer can come in and put it to a better use, according to the way we feel about it. I always thought that was one of the most outrageous things. It was approved by the Supreme Court.

Now, this is another one of these bad decisions by the Supreme Court. It needs to go like Roe. We could have a T-shirt with that. Go like Roe. We got a long list of Supreme Court decisions that need to go like Roe into the trash can. But that was why they did. And then things got even worse with a Keystone pipeline. And I've said many times, I said, look, I, you know, I'm all in favor of using oil.

And I think that, uh, transporting oil by pipeline is one of the most cost effective and safest ways that you can do it. I mean, you put it on a ship to send, If you don't put it on a pipeline and send it to the U.S., it's going to be put on a ship and sent to China. What happens when that ship sinks? Well, we've seen that type of thing happen with the Exxon Valdez and other things like that. It is much better to have a pipeline. If they've got a leak, then you can fix that leak more easily than you can fix uh some catastrophe with

a train derailing or a ship sinking or something like that but the problem i had with a keystone pipeline was the fact that they took the kello versus new london decision where we're going to take your property for private use and that was what they were doing with that. And even worse, they gave eminent domain powers to the corporation. Wherever you want to put your pipeline, you can just take anything that's in your way. So farms that have been in the family for many generations, they just took them. And it was a foreign corporation that was doing it. It's a Canadian corporation running that. So you've got a Canadian, a foreign corporation coming in with the powers of eminent domain

to confiscate property from people. I had a big problem with that, with the Keystone Pipeline. So that brings us to the North Carolina story. Last year, they announced that this Vietnamese electric car company called VinFast would build a factory in North Carolina to manufacture both electric cars and batteries. Then last week, the company said it won't be able to get in production until 2025 rather than the initial start date of summer next year, 2024.

North Carolina government has pledged to use eminent domain to evict multiple homeowners, businesses, and even a historic church. The governor there, Roy Cooper, Democrat, announced a deal in March of last year. He called the project transformative, said it'd bring a lot of good jobs to our state because, you know, people who are small businesses, they don't create jobs. It's only the big businesses. And that, of course, is an absolute total lie.

That is always the lie that they use to give money to their friends, whether they're going to build a sports stadium or whether they're going to build a battery factory or something like that. They always say, well, you know, this is going to create jobs. Everybody knows small business creates more jobs than big business. And yet they keep using that lie for some reason. Because they get away with it. press was marveling that a Democrat and a Republican general assembly could come together and strike a deal to give away money to a big corporation.

Who knew they could do that kind of thing? Because that's something that they both agree on. They both agree that they want to give away money to big, they want to give away your money to big corporations. There's no disagreement about the unity party on that, is there? So while it was only founded in 2017, this is a company that is only six years old. They have the backing of Vietnam's wealthiest citizen, you know, the Vietnamese version of Elon Musk. They've been valued somewhere between $20 billion and $60 billion.

For the North Carolina factory, the company pledged to spend 4 billion and create 7,500 jobs within five years. We've seen this type of thing happen many times before. In exchange, the state promised incentives totaling $1.2 billion, including $450 million to preparation, $400 million from Chatham County, and a $316 million grant over 32 years in which the company is reimbursed for the state income tax money that its employees pay.

But taxpayer money isn't the only thing the state is giving away. The Department of Transportation is planning big roadway improvements. Those plans would require displacing a total of 27 homes, five businesses, and a Baptist church, Mary Oaks Baptist Church, which has stood on this spot since 1888. They call it Mary Oaks because it's got some big oak trees that are there. I see a lot of people save the trees. They don't care about the church building. But, you know, that should offend everybody, right?

We've got to have those trees to save us from CO2. While multiple concepts were considered for the transportation improvements needed for this site, they said none of these will avoid the relocation of the church. And so when we look at this, besides this corruption, this crony capitalism, and all the rest of this stuff, just remember that when you go back and you look at the Kello versus New London, Connecticut case, where the Supreme Court said, yeah, the city can take this and give it to another individual. Who was that company? Pfizer. Who was that company?

Pfizer. Pfizer was that company. And Pfizer decided that they weren't going to build. And we've seen this type of thing happen over and over again. We've seen, as a matter of fact, there was one of these things that during the Trump administration, oh yeah, they're going to come in. They're going to billions of dollars. We brokered this deal, did the press coverage. Foreign corporations are going to come in and spend billions of dollars.

They had the governor and the president there, and then the company backed out of it, decided that they weren't going to do it. The same thing happened with Pfizer and this precedent setting Supreme Court decision of New London and Kelo. So the interesting thing with this is whether or not this is even going to be built. I mean, this is a brand new company. They could easily renege on this. While we're on the topic of EVs, I mentioned this once before briefly.

They're getting rid of AM radios and electric vehicles. Because, you know, you may have had this type of situation happen in your car before. Sometimes, if everything is, I used to have this happen. I'm trying to listen to a classical music station. The music volume can get really, really low. And, you know, it's not compressed like pop music or something like that. And they had the full dynamic range there. And so you're cranking it up as you crank it up to the maximum and you're accelerating, you hear electrical cross noise, you know, from the

alternator or whatever he has, as you're going up and down, you hear that coming through the radio. Well, that's a big time issue with the electric motors on these electric cars. And so Tesla and Ford and some other ones are saying, we're not going to put an AM radio in it because there's just too much noise and people are complaining about the noise. And of course they could shield the motors, but they'd prefer not to. So, because that's going to be extra, extra money. Remember the exploding Ford Pintos, you know, that was like, uh, you know, $20, $30 part that they could have put in to keep that from happening, but said, we're not going to do that.

We're going to sell millions of these things. That's going to cost us tens of millions of dollars to, to put that in. Let the, you know, we'd rather pay the lawsuits of the people who die in the car crashes. Uh, so definitely they're not going to spend any money to isolate. That's just going to remove the AM radio. AM radio courses really were conservative talk is based off of AM radio, but the people who are having a big problem with this and writing letters to Pete booty gay or FEMA.

FEMA says, Hey, don't take these things out. That's we've got a lot of stations and we've set this thing up over the years where we can, we've got 75 radio stations,, and we've set this thing up over the years where we can. We've got 75 radio stations, high-power radio stations, AM radio stations around the country, equipped with backup communications and generators to allow them to continue broadcasting information to the public during an emergency. And they're broadcasting this. This is very different than people, you know, when you have something that is a massive disaster like 9-11 or something, everybody gets on their cell phone, they're trying to talk to each other, they can't get through in some cases because it's overwhelming the network with traffic.

That's not the case with broadcast. You can have an infinite number of people listening to that signal. And so they've already, they spent a lot of time with radio stations, backup communications, backup generators to keep them going and to keep information flowing out there. So FEMA is saying, uh, we want to make sure that these AM radios stay in. And so Ford has said,

it's taken out of all their, uh, the newer 2023 model year F one 50 lightning electric trucks and all the rest of these things. We'll see what happens with that. I thought that was an interesting aside. By the way, as they're banning cars in EU and Germany and Italy have pulled back. Italy, I don't know if it was, I don't remember, was it Ferrari or Lamborghini?

And then also Porsche, they said, hey, we've got this special e-fuel. It's made using electricity from windmills. And we take carbon dioxide and we do our magic stuff to it. And then we turn it into an e-fuel. And of course, when you burn it, it creates carbon dioxide and all the imaginary unicorn farts that they're worried about. But it started with unicorn farts, and it ends with unicorn farts,

so it's a net zero. Nope, can't do it, they said. They want to ban cars so badly they won't do that, which is basically what all of this stuff about carbon credits is all really about as well. But they want to ban that, and Spain is very disappointed, very upset about that. So you can't just say that you want to opt out of this.

That's going to set a very bad precedent. We have to have an all-powerful European Union. So before we have our guests come on, we've got a great guest we're going to talk about, and I should have plugged this earlier because I know a got a great guest we're going to talk about. And I should have plugged this earlier because I know a lot of people are going to want to hear this. This is a guy who is going to be putting together some seminars to teach you a lot of very wise things about growing your own food and creating a community at the same time. And if you're a Christian, having that as a way to share the gospel with people.

I think it's going to be an excellent interview because he's got some great things to talk about in terms of growing your own food. So he's going to be coming up at the top of the hour. So before we go to him, let me just talk a little bit more about this climate stuff here. We have a lot of people who are now going to Duluth, Minnesota. It is so cold up there. These are the climate refugees, the crazy people from California, who think the world is going to melt.

But these people actually believe it, unlike Obama and the Clintons and stuff, who are buying property, oceanfront property, that all their maps show. Oh, everything, you know, everything's going to melt up. Polar ice caps are going to melt and you're going to be underwater. We don't believe that go by them. Well, these people really believe it. These are the true believers and they're acting on their faith on their green faith. Hundreds of like-minded residents have gone from California, Colorado, New Mexico, because, you know, it's going to be just too hot there, to climate-proof Duluth. They said surfing is just like surfing in Southern California,

as long as you ignore the ice sickles on your wetsuit. So these climate migrants are moving away. And I think this is a very positive sign. I would like for them all to move away from us. They can all go to Duluth, Minnesota and wait for the coming warming apocalypse. The second half of the 20th century, Duluth's population fell off a cliff,

but now there's been this massive exodus going up there. I said, real estate agents in Duluth say that nearly every out of town client is now mentioning concerns about rising temperatures and natural disasters. And even though they got water there, it's landlocked water. So they don't have to worry about the effect of the melting ice caps. Real estate and climate change cannot be separated. They said, well, good, because maybe, because maybe you know i wonder i've got a bridge that i like to sell some of these people i'm talking about selling real estate like this

i i know about it but these are the true believers unlike obama the hypocrite uh who doesn't believe any of this stuff and um when you look at um um Thunberg, she's had to now delete another one of her end of the world tweets. A 2018 tweet in which she shared a warning that climate change, quote, will wipe out all of humanity unless fossil fuels are abolished by 2023. So now she said, quoting a top climate scientist we don't know who the top climate scientist was but she did have a link to um a story or to the organization that no longer exists where this top climate scientist is working or writing or something like that uh but she said climate change will wipe out all humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.

So is it fossil fuels that have to be wiped out over the next five years, or is it humanity? Did she miss that? Regardless, we know that one failed prophecy after the other by these prophets of doom. And RT has got some of them here. An inconvenient truth from 2006. You had Al Gore declaring that melting polar ice caps would lead to hundreds of

millions of people being made refugees by 2013, 10 years ago. Didn't happen, did it? And then they put this, I thought this was kind of funny. RT put this and said, Paul Ehrlich claimed in the 1970s that rising temperatures would cause mass starvation in the UK by the year 2000.

Well, actually, they got that wrong. In the 1970s, Paul Ehrlich was pushing a global ice age, and he was saying we were going to have a famine in the 1980s. But then in the 1980s, he switched sides and he went to global warming. But he always had the idea that he wanted to kill everybody. We had too many people. They got to die. So this gets us to the carbon credits, which I really wanted to get into

before we finish, before we get our guests here. The SEC staff consulted with a green financial firm accused of selling, quote, fictitious carbon credits. How do you tell the real carbon credits from the fictitious ones? I would like to ask that daily caller. That's an interesting headline. And they treat this as if this was somehow fraud but the idea of carbon credits is not fraud the idea of climate change is not fraud that's the odd way that daily caller reported

this stuff so sec officials met with representatives of a swiss climate firm that is now under fire for allegedly selling fictitious carbon credits to discuss climate regulations. Millions of dollars worth of carbon credits issued by the Swiss firm called South Pole. These people aren't Santa Claus. They know who is good and who is bad, and you can buy your indulgence from them. So South Pole. South Pole could not be reliably tied back to actual greenhouse gas reduction. As if any of these things could be.

According to a report by a Dutch investigative journalist. And so SEC officials met with representatives of South Pole in January of 2022. And the company was cited multiple times in, um, proposed rulemakings issued by the agency two months later. So I see, see, doesn't have a problem with them, but they have a problem with our banks that are selling, you know, dealing with people in crypto. I don't know. We shut you down, but anybody wants to come up with a meth method whereby you

can get indulgences for your unicorn farts you know you come to these people and say wait a minute i paid you millions of dollars for my skyhook where is it well skyhooks don't exist there's no such thing sec officials met with representative of the south pole i wonder if this is from penguin press or something. Anyway, January 2022 to discuss how the SEC might estimate the cost companies would face if they were made to include data related to their greenhouse gas emissions and their regular financial disclosures. So they're so differential to this company.

You know, we know that what you're doing is of the utmost importance, and you are going to save the world. But would it be too much of an imposition if we had to ask you for some data We know that what you're doing is of the utmost importance, and you are going to save the world. But would it be too much of an imposition if we had to ask you for some data in your financial disclosures about this imaginary scheme that people are paying you for? The company is an international powerhouse. It has clients such as Gucci and Volkswagen. They may have sold millions of dollars worth of carbon credits

on the promise of environmental protection efforts that never actually occurred. Well, here's the thing, Daily Caller. The environmental threats never actually occurred either. They're supposed to protect you from it. As I've said before, these old carbon credits they go back to reminds me of the indulgences that were being sold in order to build the uh saint peter's basilica right and and they again in germany they would go and say well you know um and not just germany

but everywhere uh we we got a a holy day here and you can't work on a holy day. Okay. Well, and we got another holy day and we got another one and another one, another one. And they wound up to the point where the, you know, if you didn't buy an indulgence from them to be open on a holy day, which we now call holidays.

If you didn't pay an indulgence to be open on that holiday, you would basically not be open. You wouldn't be able to open enough to have a living. So people paid the indulgences. That's what this is about. This is a big shakedown for the green religion. South Pole manages the world's largest portfolio of carbon projects, allows companies to offset their greenhouse gas emissions by investing in projects that reduce carbon emissions elsewhere, allowing them to meet their carbon emission targets without changing their business model.

Indulgences. Indulgences. So now these people have been hoisted by their own petard or their own skyhook. They were built on the well-established recommendations from the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. And that task force has close personal and business connections with the U.S. Treasury Department and with Michael Bloomberg. Yes, Mr. Climate Control, Gun Control Billionaire.

Look, it's all just a grift. The point is to force you to pay for new designs that don't work. We've got to rush into these things, and we've got to do it at warp speed. And it's all to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Isn't this something we've seen time and again? So the company argued that its project was independently verified by climate standards firm Vera. Vera is also facing allegations that some 90% of its rainforest offset credits

did not translate into actual carbon reductions. And the SEC doesn't want to talk about it. Look, why is Daily Caller even talking about this? It's fraud packed on top of fraud. These people are getting exactly what they paid for. Meanwhile, we have a giant seaweed blob, the blob that is twice the width of the United States taking aim at the Gulf coast of Florida, where I used to live. Um, that reminded me of that old movie, uh, the blob with Steve McQueen, right? It's the first thing he was ever in. Anyway, this blob is now 5,000 miles wide, so large that it can be seen from space.

And it's a blob of seaweed, sargassum blooms. It's nothing new, but it's bigger than it's been before. A thick mat of algae drifting, a potential providing habitat for marine life, and absorbing carbon dioxide. So who could complain about this? Well, the problem is, as it's decomposing and you're getting bacteria, getting red tides, causing dead fish to wash up, and then, of course, as the stuff is so large and as it decays, it starts putting off a toxic gas,

that hydrogen sulfide, which is not toxic, but it creates respiratory issues for people who are breathing it. They said following the big blooms in 2018, they had thousands of people going to clinics with breathing problems. And so I'm having breathing problems and I don't even have any sargassum around here. As far back as we have records, sargassum has been a part of the ecosystem, but now it's much bigger. What we would have thought was a major bloom five years ago is now no longer even a blimp. So I guess maybe what they could do, maybe they could pay somebody to plant a tree in Africa. I'm sure that that would take care of it. Or maybe they could just eat it, right? I'm

sure that Bill Gates could find a way. He's got this massive chunk of seaweed that's 5,000 miles long. I'm sure that he's going to want us to eat that pretty soon. He's now admitting that going to vegetarianism will not save the planet. Well, he's not actually admitting that. That's the headline. What he's actually saying is that he can't get enough people to go vegetarian to save the planet. And they're still pushing, again, this whole idea that we've got to get rid of meat and dairy and other things like that.

By the way, while we're talking about this, and before we bring our guest in, you remember a couple of weeks ago I had an interview, a very good interview. We were talking about raw milk. And I thought it was interesting that Thomas Massey is going to be introducing a bill to get the FDA off the backs of people who are trying to sell raw milk. Here's what he has to say.

So here we are in the 118th Congress. I can't wait to reintroduce some of my best bills. One of them, I call it pasteurization without representation. This is the raw milk bill. You know, there was never a law passed by Congress to ban raw milk. It was the result of a lawsuit in the 80s that the FDA took it upon themselves to just condemn all fresh milk. And so the federal government has been raiding farmers who have been so audacious as to sell products straight from the cow to somebody across state lines. My bill is simple.

If you sell raw milk from a state that's legal into a state where it's legal, i.e. there are no state laws against it, then the feds won't come raid your farm. Seems pretty simple to me. But it ticked off a lot of the milk lobbyists up here. And they said, I would be responsible for death and carnage in the United States by enabling more people to drink raw milk.

Well, my wife texted me that day and she said, I never realized the lactose lobby was this intolerant. He's my Congressman. I think of all the Congressman he's, you know, I used to say that about Ron Paul. He would be the guy who would vote against the war or whatever, the spending.

He'd be the only one in Congress. And Thomas Massey's found himself in that situation many times yet. Trump get very angry with him. We got to get rid of that guy. We're going to primary him out. How dare him vote against my massive stimulus bill, that type of thing. He's not afraid to go it alone. And he's got a good sense of humor, as you heard there.

I'm surprised that he didn't do that little announcement there with some white on his lip, you know, got raw milk. But I love what he had to say, you know, pasteurization without representation. But what he was saying overall, if you heard what he was saying, that's what I was talking about earlier, regulation without representation, bypassing Congress and bypassing Congress in order to shut down crypto, for example. We're going to take a break. And when we come back, we're going to talk with our guest about raising real food, not

seaweed, not impossible burgers or any of the rest of that stuff. We'll be right back. The common man. They created common core, dumbed down our children. They created Common Pass to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the Communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

thedavidknnightShow.com And our guest joining us now is Noah Sanders. And he has, I think, something that all of you are going to be very interested in. His site is redeemingthedirt.regfox.com. And he's talking about farming. And he's also talking about pulling community together. And even talking about sharing God's gift of the early spring, showing God and the growing of this food. But he's got a lot of details. There's going to be some seminars that are going to be coming up. He's got April training, May training,

and we'll talk about that, where you can go there and get hands-on experience in doing a lot of these things. It is something I think is incredibly valuable, something that I look at with a jealousy of the people who are able to do this type of thing. I come from a different background where this is all new to me, and so we're trying to get our family up into the Foundations for Farming. But that is the name of his training, his Foundations for Farming. So joining us now is noah sanders thank

you for joining us noah thank you i appreciate you having me on the show today let's talk a little bit about uh some of the things that you cover talking about scaling up for homestead level food security what do people need to do because that's what a lot of people are looking at home you know food security people very concerned about that. A lot of uncertainty, but it's better to be able to grow your own than to stash it, I think, and get better quality stuff as well. Talk a little bit about what people need to think about for food security. Yeah, so in the U.S., we have, you know, kind of a generational disconnect now from a lot of that connection with the land. Historically, God's provided, you know, an amazing way that you can put seeds in the ground and they'll produce

food without any huge complex industrial, you know, economic system. And throughout history, that tends to be what people always revert to, whether it's in World War II at the Victory Gardens. You had that in the Civil War in the South here. You had people have to go back and learn how to grow flax and make their own linen all the way back in the Revolutionary War. It's the only way that we were able to separate from Great Britain. So food has always been linked to freedom. And I think it's encouraging to realize that this is something that has been, when times are good, people tend to move to other disciplines from agriculture, tend to get disconnected from the soil, and then have to rediscover that. It's not unique to our generation.

It may be we have unique circumstances because of our technological situation, but it's something that's had to be done over and over again. And I think the biggest key for all of us in trying to get back to improving some of the food security in our own areas is to be willing to do what God loves to see, which is to be faithful with little first before we try to do everything. And a lot of people get burned out trying to do that. So that's what we really focus on with Foundations for Farming is teaching people the basics of success so that they don't burn themselves out trying to do too much too fast to underestimate how much skill it takes to grow food. Yeah, and I've talked to people in the past, they said that's the rookie mistake, is that you go out

and you try to grow all your food simultaneously at the same time. You got to pick something and you got to start with that, pick something as simple. So what is simple? What do you tell people to start with? Yeah. So we kind of break it down to three different levels of agriculture. One is,

you know, growing some of your own food successfully. That's like your first, you know, thing. And normally that's a garden is the best place to start with that. The next level up is what we would call a homestead where you're trying to actually grow a lot of your own food, maybe a larger percentage. And that is more of a lifestyle commitment. You're really going to have to make some sacrifices to do

that in terms of maybe where you live and how free you are to travel. And then the third is where you're actually getting other people to pay you to grow food for them. And that's when it's actually a business venture. A lot of people, we try to, you know, we get right into farming when to start a business and anybody can learn to farm, but it's kind of like, I love to play the fiddle or the violin and anybody can learn to play one, but you don't quit your job tomorrow and buy a violin and how to play violin book and expect to make a living, right? It's, there is a learning curve. Yeah. How'd he get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, right? Right. And a lot of mistakes.

And that's where starting small is, is nice because it's a whole lot easier to make a mistake where you lose half your chickens. If you have only 10, then if you have a hundred. Yeah. Yeah, that's right. Yeah. And, and as you talked about that, uh, you know, lifestyle choices, you've got a lot of farm animals. If you go real big with a homestead, that's going to tie you down on that homestead, taking care of those chickens, taking care of, uh, cows. We we've done, um, our first, uh, dip into this was chickens and we've lost, you know, a couple dozen, two different times,

uh, to predators that were there. And that, that does our biggest concern. Other than that, we were doing great. We liked liked the chicken they liked us and they gave us lots of eggs but it's uh you know we had some predators in texas who love the chickens even more than we did and uh so that that was our big issue uh but we're getting ready to try to do some some gardening uh but um when you talk about just starting to get into it with a garden, what type of things would you recommend that people do to start out in a garden? Yeah, so we really take the approach of trying to understand that a lot of us, when we get started in this day and age of information, some of our biggest challenges is an overwhelm of information. You know, you go on YouTube and you try to be like,

what's the best way to grow a tomato plant? And you get inundated with all these conflicting ideas of what's the best way to do that. And I faced that same situation when I started farming was it wasn't as simple as, you know, when I used to do some blacksmithing and there wasn't a whole lot of controversy on how to make a knife or how to make a nail, but you ask people how to grow a tomato plant or raise a chicken, and there's some real, you know, different battling perspectives, which really boils down to worldview, whether you view that nature has all the answers or you view that science and man has all the answers, and those impact the way that you view life and the way that you make decisions about how life should or shouldn't be treated. And so as Christians, I think it's important for us as we come to the land, not only just to say, well, practically, how can we make a success of this, but we've always really

said it starts with the heart of us recognizing that to become the greatest farmer requires the greatest humility. And the farmer that I learned from the most is a guy from Zimbabwe, Africa named Brian Oldreve, who founded Foundations for Farming. And he actually was a failing farmer who was losing money in Rhodesia in the early 1980s on their farm. And so he finally got to a point that he just went to the woods where everything was growing perfectly fine without all the plowing and the fertilizer and everything that he was trying to do in his field and he just asked god because he saw in romans 120 where it says that god's eternal attributes are clearly displayed through what has been made and he said show me how to farm god and he just felt like god showed him two simple principles that were different than what he had been doing and one was that there was no regular deep inversion

plowing in natural creation and And secondly, that there was always this beautiful blanket of mulch covering the ground that protects the soil. So he just applied those two simple principles to his farm on a small scale first, and then they implemented over the entire thing. And they were so profitable and successful that at their height, he was managing the second largest privately owned farm in Africa. And then as if you know the story of Zimbabwe, the farmers, you know, lost the white farmers, lost all the land. And so the foundations for farming kind of was born out of some of these white farmers who love Jesus saying, if a man takes away your tunic, you let him have your cloak as well. So how do we apply that?

If a man steals our farm, let's teach him how to farm. So they took the principles they had learned on a large scale and brought it down and began teaching it to the last, the least, and the lost. And that's really had a huge impact in the poor. And so for us, when we teach people about approaching gardening, we build it on three heart attributes of Christ. The foundation of Foundations for Farming is Jesus Christ, and it's his humility, his faithfulness, and his unselfishness that he displayed when he came. So we display the humility by saying, like Jesus said, I only do what I see my Father doing. So when we face any problem, we look at creation,

we say, well, what does my Father do? What kind of way, how did he design it to work, you know? And then when faithfulness, recognizing that we've got to reflect who God is and the way that we do things, and we do that by doing things on time to a high standard with minimal waste, and then with joy, because that faithfulness is what God adds to to produce a profit. And then the unselfishness comes into play when we realize that the land God's given us is not just ours to do it for our own, you know, um, selves and our own benefit, but we want to be able to use that to bless others and to teach others and to pass along

what we've learned so that the skill of growing food can be a community thing, not just an individual thing. Boy, that's fascinating. And, you know, that is an example we've seen over and over again, uh, people copying what God has done in creation you know you take a look at velcro for example right they'd look at stickers and things like that and and copying his design his aerodynamic design uh in terms of um airplanes or in terms of even submarines uh looking at how he's done the contours, uh, that is, uh, that is really interesting,

very interesting, uh, there. And I, what you began with saying, you know, you can go to YouTube and you can get all these different, uh, perspectives on stuff. Part of that, you know, you can, the old phrase for that is analysis paralysis. You can do so much analysis that you actually paralyze yourself from actually getting anything done. And, um, so I think that's an important thing as well to have somebody who has, um, a system that they know works and just follow that system without trying to pull this stuff together ad hoc, but talk a little bit about what happened, uh, as, uh, when they had their land taken away. Uh, so what did they do to, um, the people there in the local areas of white farmers had their land taken away. So what did they do to the people there in the local areas

of white farmers had their land taken away? What did they do? How did they engage the people there in Zimbabwe? Yeah, so it actually started a little bit before he had his land taken away. He felt like God was like, I gave you this simple system of, you know, minimal tillage and using a mulch, not just so that you could be a successful farmer, but so that you could share with the, you know, the village across the river here. And so they began to go in and share. They would take a farmer and they would plant a field for them and show, you know, hey, just take care of this and you can compare it with your plowed plot and see how much better it is when they came back at the end of the season they began to realize that it um every year they wouldn't have neglected the field and not taking care of it

and what they found eventually is that because they were selecting one person they were creating jealousy and the neighbors would have the witch doctor come and curse the field and then the family would be too scared to come and work in it so they realized it wasn't just a technology issue there was also a spiritual element that you've got to address when you come you know to to looking at some of these broken situations and there's also we want to share with everybody and invest in people who are faithful with it so that's kind of what they began doing is just having, right now, they have a model farm there in Zimbabwe, where they apply these principles, and then they bring in the kind of the forgotten communities, the last, the least, the lost, which is where God

loves to start, you know, in rebuilding a nation. And they invest in those people, not only in farming, but in stewardship in general. Found farming were ministry partners with crown financial ministries which is focuses on stewardship of money because we're teaching stewardship of the land so when we bring these communities in communities in and they're discipled in faith farming family and finance then they're sent back as a community, they really have a huge impact. A lot of times when they've seen and the trainers and the love they have for them, and they hear the gospel, many of them, you know, will, you know, put their faith in Christ and start a church when they go back. And so recently, they've developed a very simple model of growing food called Fumvudza.

But it's basically a small plot that's about one sixth of an acre where you can grow where they grow corn, which is the primary staple crop that they have there in Zimbabwe and much of sub-Saharan Africa. And it allows a family for $50 worth of inputs to grow enough food to feed themselves for a year. Wow. And most people are trying to grow five acres of corn over there and they can't feed themselves. But when they're done, they do it what we call God's way by looking at God's creation and copying his nature and the way we manage it. It's amazing to see that. And the government actually came and asked them to teach into all the agritechs, and they taught it down into the communities. And they had achieved a food security for the first time since their collapse in 2008, two years ago, by applying this with a hoe, just this simple principle and simple technique.

And but it started by Brian Oldrig originally went to the top, the president, you know, the minister of agriculture and tried to sell them on the idea they wouldn't listen. But then he said, well, God's upside down kingdom. Let's go to the poorest of the poor first. And it was actually those people when the poorest of the poor were the only people in the nation feeding themselves with enough extra to sell that that's what got the government's attention and then they you know then pharaoh came calling and asked them to teach you know it into the into the public sector and i think that's a an important thing for us as the

church to remember is that when jesus came he didn't go to the rich the powerful the educated he went to simple ordinary people and he turned the world upside down that way. And that means that all of us, in whatever sphere of influence we're in, can have an impact in our nation. That's wonderful. That is a real grassroots movement. It is. They're putting this stuff in the agricultural stuff.

But you really are building the society from the ground up. And when you look at, you know, what has happened in Zimbabwe, you know, kicking the farmers out, facing starvation. And so, you know, they're helping themselves by helping others. In the long term, they're helping themselves. They would be starving and people would be fighting over food. And so they're showing people how to grow, not just their own food, but to grow their independence and to grow their community and to grow their dependence on God.

I mean, that, that's just the perfect way to do this. That's, it's wonderful to hear about that. So they have, um, how, how do they, um, since they lost their farm, uh, how did they, um, how did they survive financially, other people to do it? Did they take a share of what the other people were doing? Is that how they financially made it through? It has been different for every person. You know, a lot of what the farmers told me there is that when the, you know, there were about 5,000 white farmers white farmers i think that employed about a million people in zimbabwe and when they got their land taken away uh you

know you have three choices you can either fight and those who did died or you can flee which is what most of them did or you can stay and forgive and only a few of them chose to do that wow and so that's what some of my friends did and And there's been times that these, the team, which right now, the teams there that are training are mostly black Africans and Bob Wayans, who are really taking this on because it's the foundations for farming, we have really a discipleship multiplication kind of model of ministry. It's not a organizational, you know, top down kind of thing. and uh and so they're really the ones rolling it out and uh and some there have been seasons where they've continued to come to

work even though there was no money you know just because they were willing to serve because over there when you have a debauched currency and and and they keep having high inflation and stuff you know they're famous for that. Right. They're going through it again, and yet they just said, you know what, it really helps you to invest your treasure in heaven. That's right. Because there was one of my good friends over there,

and he said that he and his wife invested in several retirement funds, really worked hard their whole life to do that, and when they went to cash those in, it took them out to lunch barely without any drinks, you know? And, uh, but it really, the freedom then that they have to just serve and the heart change that they said that for them as being very prideful culture that they were before self-made farmers, they, this one farmer friend of mine said said he kind of got it backwards. He said he thought he loved his workers and his people. He took a good care of them and all that, the people that worked for him in his business. But he said, God told us to rule the

land and love the people. And he said he actually realized later that he loved the land and ruled the people. And it took losing his farm to get that heart change that he said he was worth losing his arm over. Wow. That's amazing. But that's the way God works, right? He takes the stuff away from us so that it opens our eyes, resets our priorities. And I love the fact that this, you know, what they're doing and what you're doing here, you're doing the, trying to do the same thing here. And, uh, and we certainly do need it and uh it'd be good for people to start preparing before something really catastrophic happens here but uh the thing that i think is is really key is the fact that you're not just trying to come in and help them

materially uh you you're looking at the whole picture as you talked about you know family uh creating a you know strong family, your faith, your finances, as well as the farm. That is the key thing. You're dressing all of this together instead of just focusing on one little aspect of it. And I think that is so important. Yeah, it is. And I think that's, you know, as the church, what people are looking for in the world is hope. And the hope is not just in some nugget of information, you know, that we can share with them, but it's in a life, a personal life that is experiencing transformation in the same struggles that everybody else is dealing with. and that we are then just passing

it along to others and unfortunately um for me i'm most i'm really passionate about agriculture uh because i feel like it's a agriculture and creation stewardship is an element of um of god's of what we've been given stewardship of as the church that we've kind of neglected and we haven't addressed and when we we if we fail to recognize the battleground that it is the spiritual like either jesus is going to have you know rule and reign over it or the enemy is and when the enemy comes to kill steal and destroy we shouldn't be surprised when when we've abdicated we fail to you know bring uh the the the principles of scripture to bear on how should we view this as christians how should we not just say well what's permissible a lot of us a lot of christians a lot of the farmers in the u.s are

christians but i've realized that many of us are reflect not reflecting our own fate in the way that we farm not on purpose but just because we haven't evaluated it and there's a lot of problems that we don't want necessarily whether it's poor health or unsustainability or lack of profitability but it all kind of boils back to if we aren't experiencing um increase or profit or or like abundance in an area in our life and not in a prosperity gospel sense, but there's this principle of if you're faithful with little God will add to you. Right. And as you measure, you'll be he'll measure to you. So if we're losing money, if we're losing health, if we're losing our kids, if we're losing all these things, maybe we're saying, maybe God's telling me I'm not being faithful because he keeps taking away from me. And maybe I need to reevaluate, you know, whether what is like I was reading the other day, if we want to shine his lights in Ephesians, it says we need to find out what pleases the

Lord. And as farmers, we're never going to do everything perfect because we live in a fallen world and we all have different starting points. But are we asking the question when I go out to take care of my lettuce plants, when I go to raise a chicken, when I go to, you know, do whatever I'm going to do? Am I trying to find out what pleases the Lord so that I can grow in that? And then not only do I get vegetables from my garden, but I also get to experience more of him in the process, which is the real reward, you know, at the end of the day. That's right.

Yeah. I think we can apply that lesson, whatever we do for a living, you know, we, we, we've seen with technology and everything that's there, we're constantly being moved in a direction where we're more obsessed with the technology that we're using. We don't see the bigger picture of things. And I think that, you know, that can happen even to farmers, how much more so to people who are not farmers, who are working on, you know, outside of, you know, God's direct creation.

You know, we're working at many different levels away from it. And I really do think that that is a key part of, um, of what we're, I certainly know that the people that I know that have started homesteading and working on, on farms are some of the happiest people I have seen, uh, especially because they're, they're doing it themselves or working with their hands or seeing God's creation and what they're doing. And so I think that is, and tell us a little bit about this training sessions that you've got. What do these things look like? You've got one a month that is happening.

How long does it last? And give us a little bit of detail about what that looks like. Yeah, so our family, we spent 13 years running a small-scale market farm where we sold kind of organic vegetables and meat and eggs. And then a couple of years ago, after some of the things that we've learned, we really felt like God had kind of here in the United States is we're trying to develop some very simple tools, very simple kind of recipes for people to be able to get started on a good foundation if they're going to get, you know, start growing some of their own food. So our tool for that with gardening is what we call the

Wellwater Garden Project. And that's a very simple 20 by 20, 20 foot by 20 foot garden that teaches all the principles of observing God's creation, of good management, of sharing, you know, genuinely your faith in the way that you do it intentionally. And it's a kind of a paint by the numbers thing.

Here's how you space your crops. Here's how you put in your bed. Here's how you take care of them because not everybody needs to be an expert in every area you know god's called each of us to different domains i'm not a you know self-defense expert but i love learning from somebody who is so that i can be adequately prepared for whatever responsibilities i have in that so i kind of feel the same thing with agriculture. You don't have to be a chef to cook lasagna. You just need to have a good lasagna recipe and how to follow it.

Doesn't mean it's the only lasagna recipe or the best lasagna in the world, but it does help more people to be able to share around their community the joy of making and eating lasagna. So that's what the Wellwater Garden Project is. And we've got some free PDF at thewellwatergardenproject.org that people can download to be able to walk through and plant their own. And then our trainings in particular, we are focused on helping impact as many people as possible to grow some of their own food by training trainers. So we really are encouraging every family who grows a garden to pray that God would bring two people a year for you to teach how

to grow their own garden using yours and your experience so far. And at that rate of multiplication, you would have a million gardens starting from one in 10 years. So when we look at how many millions of people around the world are on the verge of real food insecurity, it's really normal everyday people being faithful to do what Jesus said, not just do good works, do what Jesus said, but it says, blessed are everyone who practices and teaches these commands. And I think the commands of do we take how we grow food in our own backyard and that's that's what the training that we do in april and may is a training for trainers so it is equipping people to plant a garden to to follow you know to to learn that the whole process that we teach of like you said a simple system and then also how to go back and teach people in

their own community and to do it even if they have no agricultural experience. And of course, that's one of the, you know, you, one of the best ways to learn something is to teach it to others as well. So it really drives at home to you if you, if you know it well enough to teach it to somebody else. And if you're, if you're watching them try to do it, you talk about how, let's give a couple of samples of the type of things that you're talking about. Eight simple questions to create an easy but effective garden plan. What type of questions? Yeah, so planning, we always tell people, is, you know, daunting to some people, and it's like what everybody else sometimes lean on too heavily, but planning is

just a part of faithfulness because it's trying to answer ahead of time the questions that you're going to have to ask anyways. Right. There's a lot of questions when you plant a garden, where are you going to plant stuff? What are you going to plant? When are you going to plant it? So planning is trying to answer those questions ahead of time so that when you're actually in the moment, you don't have as many decisions to make. So we've kind of boiled it down to four questions about the garden itself and to four questions about your, the garden itself, and then four questions about the crops that you're going to grow.

So the four questions about your garden is why are you planting it? Because the motive behind it is really important. Is this, who is this for? Why is this? Is this food security? Is this just nutrition? Is this for beauty?

Is this to teach somebody else? That's going to determine how you design your garden the second is who's going to take care of the garden a garden is just a reflection of the gardener so you can't have a garden without a gardener and you need to make sure you match the garden with the labor and the skill level that you have at your disposal to take care of it then the fourth the third is where will you put it? And then what are your space, you know, space limitations and those kinds of things. And what's your site. And then how big will it be based on, you know, some of the previous questions. Then the last four questions,

once you got your garden in and you've got a good site and you've got a good foundation for that is who are you growing the food for? When I was growing for market, a big part of our success was knowing how to identify what our customers value because you can be a really good farmer and gardener. And if you grow something that at the end of the day was 100% successful crop and yielded a huge harvest, but nobody wants it, you haven't added value to anybody's life, right? So overproduction is the worst form of waste. So identify who it is you're growing for and make sure that you're not growing something that you're going to drop off or they're going to harvest and be like, I don't care about this. I had a friend of mine who was trying to serve a community with a garden and he realized nobody cared about the food at this point in time, right?

And he grew flowers again the next year. And it was one of the biggest, most popular things in the community because everybody wanted flowers because he was able to identify better, like what it is that this, that garden was for. And then, you know, based on what, who it's for, what are you going to plant? That's the second, you know, the second of the four questions. And then where will you plant each of your crops? And that has to do with rotations and, you know, organization of the garden. We give tools and help people understand how to lay that out simply. And then there's just the scheduling when you're going to plant it. And for me, like I'll have a calendar you can see in my back wall here.

And I just write down once I get all this plan, I'll just write down this week I'm planting spinach. And I can look at the way I have all the questions I've answered. I know I know the spinach goes here and this is how much I'm planting because this is how much we need. And here's the spacing is going to be, and I just go do it. And it's a whole lot of fun because there's not a whole lot of stressful questions to answer once I actually get out into the garden. That's great. You mentioned, um, the thing that, uh, was a fundamental insight was that he could do, uh, the planting without any plowing, without any tilling. So how does that work? What do you do instead of that?

How do you get the seeds in the ground? Yes. Well, it's amazing. All the plants that we see growing out here that's not part of my garden in Alabama, they grew without any plowing or any fertilizer or any chemical sprays or any of that, and they look a whole lot better than most of my stuff. So God already has in place an amazing natural fertility system. And the plowing and tilling that we tend to see today is different than what, like when the Bible talks about plowing, their plows were more like a pointed, you know, you talk about you beat your plows into,

you know, your plows into sorts and your, you know, it's just, it your plows into, you know, your plows into sorts and you're, you know, it's just, it wasn't like this huge thing. Yeah. I can't remember. There's one verse where it goes one way and one way or the other. And so it was just, it opens up the ground and scratches it where it's a minimally disturbing it, just like the birds do. Or, you know, when an animal goes and roots up in the forest, a seed that's laying on top of the leaves will get in touch with the dirt and that seed to soil contact all that's all it needs to grow and what we often share with people as we go out and we just show we look in depth in natural creation and the soil and look that natural soil has life in it It has an amazing system of microbes that are continuously fertilizing the plants.

It has strata. It functions in layers. It has a continuous application of organic matter on the top. And all these amazing things that, yeah, it's not sin necessarily if you plow it. But what we're doing is we're destroying that natural fertilizer factory that's in place. And we have to come in with a lot of synthetic fertilizers and kind of over, you know, overcome that. So when the simple method is all we do is when we're putting in our garden is we say, how can we remove the weeds initially without

disturbing the soil as much as possible? So we'll do that by either just cutting them off right at the surface and like you'd remove sod or we'll smother it you ever left something out in the lawn too long yeah coming the grass is dead right and then we'll add compost on top of that and mulch on top of that and then the worms and the bugs come in and they make the structure of the soil kind of like a loaf of bread or a slice of bread it's got air it feels right? It doesn't feel fine, but it's got up to 70% air in it. It will wick moisture up and keep it near the roots of the plants. It's stable. So it doesn't wash away. It's got plenty of channels for the microbes to do their things in. What we tend to do is plant in flour, just straight flour, you know, that's

pulverized and it seems loose and nice, but it actually is more, ends up being more of a growing medium that we have to inject fertilizer into and becomes more and more dead over time. So it's, it's a very simple system that is incredibly effective, even here in our Alabama red clay soil, that seems like you would have to break it up and plow it to be able to grow things. And you don't, it's amazing. It really is counterintuitive. Every time I do it, I'm like, this should not work, but it does. That's really interesting. How do you, uh, how do you keep the birds from eating the seed that you put out? Or do you just put out more

seed knowing that they're going to, what do you do about that? Well, we do cover the seat up and we teach people that you know from a understanding a biblical worldview a biblical worldview is just knowing the story that we live in right of history we live in a world that was intended to be one way god had intended we we turned away from that way and decided to do it our own way so that broke stuff and so then now we live in this broken world that jesus came and he provided a way for our hearts to be restored to god and then for some of those that heart to then apply a degree of redemption to creation currently but we're still in the midst of this broken world looking forward to the ultimate like restoration of anything so we're not going to have the garden of eden right now we're still gonna deal with death decay disease disorder all that kind of stuff but we will there is a beautiful picture of that redemption when we come

and apply that so part of our job as gardeners once we plant the garden is we've got I always teach you there's three peas that you've got to do once you plant your garden you've got to provide for it so that means you know maybe it's support maybe it's water like a trellis to grow up or you have to water it you got to maybe add some extra fertility through some more compost or a chicken manure tea or something to give it and then the second p is you got to protect it there's all sorts of things that want to you know threaten your garden and so i've got a fence around mine i've got some frost cover on it right now i've got to watch for the bugs i've got to watch for all sorts of things because the reality is a

lot of us are growing vegetables that are not native to the climates we live in so they require a little extra babying because they're from the mediterranean or somewhere um and then the third p is you got to pick it you got to make sure you get out there and and take care of it but as far as the birds go um we're all we cover the seed up so that we make sure that they can't actually see that but we also expect when i was doing my market garden if i can get 70 of what i plant to harvest then that's a good you know i'm always factoring in that that 30 margin of just some things aren't going to make it and that's okay. And that's part of the process of humility. That's great. You have wellwateredgarden.org. Is that correct? That's a

website where you talk about? Yeah, that's the resource, the free resource where people can download that. And then redeemingthedirt.com is where people can go to learn more about the trainings if they want to get equipped in that resource more in depth and actually learn to teach people in their own communities because we really need an army of biblically Christians with a biblical perspective on creation stewardship where we can teach people to use what they have at their disposal in their own communities to feed themselves because Once you get to the point in our nation where food shortages affect people's meal today,

there's going to be so much demand for people wanting to know how to grow their own food that it's going to be unmeetable. That's right. And so I really want to focus in this season of time that we have of equipping as many people to be in these communities to say, I can serve you.

I'm not in the same boat you are. Like I'm, I can, I've started with my family and I'm here with what I have to serve you. It's so easy to fall into this mentality of protect ourselves from the poor and the people who might not have anything in those kinds of situations. But in Psalms 41, it actually says, if you make a plan for the poor, or if you consider the poor, God will protect you from your enemies, provide for you in the land in times of trouble,

deliver you from your sick. But all the things that we as preppers sometimes are trying to attain, God said, I'll take care of those if you have a heart for the poor. If you use what I've given you to share with the same people who were in the boat you were just a little while ago before Jesus started helping you in these areas. And I think

that's the DNA that I want to equip the church with so that we are in a position to really have an army of harvesters for the harvest, both of people that want to return to stewarding the land well and rebuilding our local economies, but also that then are hungry for hope spiritually when what they've normally been hoping in has failed them. It's so true. And if you look at what the plan is, the plan is to isolate us. The plan is to shut us down and to have us all in our fed, whatever they want to feed us, in our own little cubicle,

small micro apartment or something like that. They don't want us meeting together. They don't want us going to church. I think this is the perfect counter example to that. Teaching people how to understand how to provide food for themselves, building a community, building faith in each other. I think it is the perfect counterbalance to everything they've been trying to push and are going to try to push against us. That is one of the ways that

you've got to push back in terms of building a community, building things up from the grassroots level. And it ultimately is going to be the food. I mean, we can talk about people storing all types of things to protect themselves and to be able to bar I mean, we can talk about people, uh, storing all types of things to protect themselves and to be able to barter with, and all that is important, but you've got to have that food. And at the same time, you're building a community. I think it's a great plan. Tell us a little bit about, um, uh, why the well-watered garden.org.

Is there something specific about the way that you're saying, setting that up? Or is that just the title that you came up with in terms of keeping taking care of the garden no i love i love that question uh the well water garden uh comes that that term is not really referring to the way we irrigate the garden or anything it really refers to to the heart behind the garden which um comes from Isaiah 58, which that whole part of Isaiah 58 is where the nation of Israel is saying, you know, God, we're having all these problems and you're not blessing us. It's like, you're not hearing us and we're rending our clothes and fasting and doing all these religious things. You know, why don't you hear us and heal our land? And he

basically comes back and says, the fast that I'm looking for is that you clothe the naked, that you feed the hungry, that you have a heart for the poor. You have the same heart that I have for others to show that you belong to me and that you care about me. And he says, if you do that, then one of the things that he promises is that we'll be like a well-watered garden in like an arid area in an arid place like this beautiful vibrant example of life of light in the midst of darkness and that's the heart we really want to have behind the well water garden project is where it's really a a an other-centered motive for planting a garden this is not a fear-based self-preservation idea, but it's an idea that if I'm faithful and if I share with

others, God will then be the one that provides for me. And at the end of the day, that's our only hope, right? In all these kinds of things, because everything's out of our control much more than we think. And we want to be in a position where God says, I will add to you if you're faithful. I will add to you if you're generous. I will add to you if you're generous. And if you prioritize what I prioritize, which is the last, the least, and the lost, because that's really recognizing that's all of us without Jesus. And as we experience in that hope and change, if we're really experiencing it, then we'll want to pass that on to other people. And so the idea of that well-watered garden is really referring back to that heart based on Isaiah 58.

I really love that. And of course, we saw that with the farmers that began all this stuff in Zimbabwe. What a different approach than you would expect, right? Rather than fighting it or running from it. Okay, you're going to take a land. Let me show you how to grow food on it so we can all eat. That's just amazing to me. But it is really the heart of Christ and the heart of God.

And I love what they did. I love what you're doing with this stuff. I'm anxious to see your wellwateredgarden.org website. I really do appreciate what you're doing, Noah. Thank you so much. And people can find out about, and I'll just give people a couple of bullet points that are here because I think it's very important. We didn't talk a lot about a lot of the specifics here, but you did mention the eight simple questions about creating an effective garden plan. And of course, there'd be a lot more detail in that with the seminars.

Clear a spot for your garden without plowing or tilling. Make thermal compost and natural organic fertilizers because that's a key thing uh that's one of the things that everybody is uh you know you when they're trying to put the farmers out of business in uh the netherlands uh they're actually turning fertilizer into contraband it's like you know just trying to smuggle drugs across here we don't want your fertilizer in here that's the way they shut the farmers down. And so, you know, making your own. Lay out garden beds with a simple system. Allow for an ease of management, space for a variety of crops, plant seeds or transplants

with simple spacing system. Easy to follow, easy to remember. Care faithfully for your garden with three simple tasks. Train others what you've learned. All this stuff. As well as alternative off-grid energy and backyard chickens. Give us agrid energy and backyard chickens. Give us a tip for protecting our chickens.

Well, I have, yeah, I could probably write a book on how chickens can die because there's a lot of different ways that they can do that. But no, just a really good fence, a really good shelter, a really good dog. There's a lot of different ways that you can you know provide physical or you know biological ways to protect uh those those chickens but a lot of this just has to do with go out and when you have a problem god sometimes gets our attention through these things because he wants us to come back and ask him there were some one more story some guys in africa uh were in a village situation they had been trained by my friend brian oldreave on uh how to put in a garden and some plots and and one of the questions he had taught them is you know to ask god when they faced a challenge you know to say what does my father do

and they had the problem of elephants getting into their garden that would be hard yeah like you can't even build a fence for that kind of thing, right? And so they just said, all right, well, we'll just, Brian taught us to praise and ask God. So we'll just ask God. Well, God showed them that elephants don't go near their own manure. So they went and collected some elephant manure, put it around their field, and they had no more problems with elephants. Wow. So sometimes, you know, it's just, that's why I say to become the greatest farmer requires the greatest humility. Because, you know, Joel Salatin is one of the greatest uh recent modern day livestock innovators and he is always like how does god design things

brian oldreave went back he kept to a point of i don't know how to do it how do you do it lord and like you said in so many other areas but most of the time you know how it is i'd rather go to my phone then stop and pray there's just this spiritual block because it requires a humiliation of degrees for us to say, I don't know it and ask God. But if we can learn to do that, God is just waiting. He's the master farmer. He has the solution to every problem and he is ready to share that with us. And if we knew personally the best farmer in the entire world and he said, you can call me up anytime. Why wouldn't we do so?

Right. And we do, we do have that. And that's those kinds of testimonies is then what gives us the opportunity when we share with other people about our own garden, that we can point back to that experience where it's not just a, oh, by the way, let me tell you about Jesus. But it's like, I was at my wit's end. And then I asked and the Lord showed me this. And then it's not just a, oh, by the way, let me tell you about Jesus. But it's like, I was at my wit's end. And then I asked, and the Lord showed me this. And then it's genuine. Yeah, that's amazing. I've seen pictures of elephants just for fun pushing down trees.

I mean, there's not anything that you're going to do to stop an elephant. But they don't like their own excrement. That's interesting. That's great. I love that story and the other stories. And I love what you're doing Noah and again people can find this at redeemingthedirt.com

that's where you can find out about the training sessions they have them coming up on a regular basis if you want to start building your community think of a better way to do it than to help other people to grow food and to all the other aspects of this.

And, of course, you have the free site at wellwateredgarden.org. Thank you so much, Noah. Great talking to you. Yeah. Can I share with you one more resource for your students? It's redeemingthedirtacademy.com. It's a free online training platform where it has a community and training videos and all that if people want to get a sneak peek and go ahead and get started in some of the

material, we have hundreds and hundreds of farmers and gardeners and homesteaders from all over the world that love Jesus and love farming and gardening on there, sharing resources, learning together. And if anybody wants to really get plugged in that community, they can go to redeem their academy.com and sign up for free. That'd be great. Okay, super. Yeah, we'll definitely check that out in our family. Thank you so much. No, I really do appreciate what you're doing. It is a real blessing to see something that is positive like this. We talk about all the different problems. We talk about the threats

that are coming. Here is a solution, folks, an amazing solution. All right, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back the common man they created common core to dumb down our children they created Common Pass to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity

created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknnightShow.com Sometimes I feel Like a motherless child

Sometimes I feel Like a motherless child Sometimes I feel a motherless child sometimes i feel yeah we were just talking about the natural order of things but we have scientists who are just focused on creating the unnatural order of things sometimes i feel like a motherless child well they're working on creating motherless children. Scientists have created motherless mice, you know, to pave the way for gay men to have children. This is kind of like the, uh, the fraudulent carbon credits here. I mean, one wonder, uh, level after the other away from what is real.

So mice with no biological mother, they take skin cells from a male mouse and turn it into an egg. So by being able to do this, and of course, this is now what your government is interested in. Your government is going to spend lots of money for this type of research so that homosexual men can have children. That's how technology is being used. This is what it's good for. And it's not just that. I mean, you look at everything that is being done now with technology. I went into engineering because I like technology. But look at what has happened. This is the military industrial complex

and academic complex that Eisenhower talked about. He said the government is taking over, research is taking over the universities, and look at what it's doing. Look at what the universities have become. Look at what the research is focused on. Artificial autonomous killing machines, what the military and the government want.

It is a nightmare scenario. It seems like everything they use technology for anymore is for this. It's not to serve us. It's not to make things better. We have the third international summit on human genome editing at the Francis Crick Institute in London, one of the two guys who discovered DNA, but rejected the God who designed it, obviously.

They said, well, obviously there's an intelligent design here, but it can't be the God of the Bible, said Crick and Watson. So they talked about their idea of panspermia. Oh, we were, aliens must have come here and designed us and everything that's living. And so, um, they said it could ultimately pave the way for a homosexual man to have children related to both parents.

In 2018, uh, this Japanese researcher produced 12 mice derived solely from male parents born. However, with breathing difficulties and did not survive for long. But this time, they did 600 implants, and they produced only seven mice.

All seven of those appeared to grow up healthy and to have children of their own. Said purely in terms of technology, it will be possible in humans, even in 10 years, said the scientist. Now, that's not a question just for the scientific program, he said, but it's also a question for society. And, of course, that was what Michael Crichton was trying to get across to people in Jurassic Park. He has a character played by Jeff Goldblum say,

just because we can do it doesn't mean that we should do it. We need to have a decision about what we're doing with this stuff because the technology is outpacing our judgment of what we want to do with things. And they said for the time being, scientists have not been able to cut females entirely out of the reproduction equation. A surrogate mother will have to carry the all-male embryo. But they said they're also working on artificial wombs, and Israeli researchers say that they had successfully gestated hundreds of baby mice and such devices going back to 2021. So again, this is how your government wants to spend your money what they want to focus on making weapons of war making weapons of nasty population making genetic genetically modified humans and all the

rest of this stuff so the good news is as we look at this kind of a Christian persecution, we've now had a little bit of a pullback in the UK, uh, the individual who was convicted and of, um, misgendering an individual, they convicted him of a crime and then they reported him to the police as being a terrorist even. Well, now on appeal, the appeal court has now reversed that. The appeal court said misgendering somebody by calling a man a man. Now, that's not misgendering. It says, you know, it says, I'm a man, but I want to be a woman.

No, you're a man. Well, that's hateful. They said that may be an insult, but that is not a criminal offense so finally they found somebody with some sense still left in the judicial system but that's not going to last for long why because we've got people who are currently being trained and this kind of thing the zeitgeist of the culture is to worship this lgbt fantasy the United Kingdom, society's gotten to the point of arresting and charging Christians who decline to call a man a woman just because he's wearing a dress.

So again, it's not enough to show words, said the court. It's not enough to show the words were insulting and that somebody was distressed. Hurt feelings are not a crime i would like to show that decision to the legislators who introduced this bill in in florida to make anti-semitism a hate crime and a felony we have to get to the point where we don't punish what we perceive to be somebody's hate. Prior to the arrest,

this street preacher had also been assaulted, abused, and had his belongings stolen. While he was preaching, he was subsequently convicted, made to pay costs of £620, forced to do 80 hours of community service despite there being no legal obligation to use a trans person's

preferred pronouns in the UK. It is believed that Dave is the first street preacher to be convicted for such an offense and to be reported as a potential terrorist. He said, I think people could have been offended, but that is not my intention. Well, the problem is, is that Jesus told us that he was an offense. He told us that the good news would be offensive to people. Why is it? Why do we call it good news? And yet we understand it's going to be an offense. Well, for a couple of reasons, a lot of people need to know the bad news about where they stand with God before they can really

comprehend and appreciate the good news. And so that means we talk about people's sin. Nobody wants to talk about their sin. Nobody wants to talk about the fact that they are completely unable to do any good that is going to erase that. They don't want to take charity. I saw this firsthand when I was speaking against Hillary Clinton's attempted takeover of the health care system I got up at one point and the thing that set

the the Democrat audience there off was when I used the term charity oh they hated that well charity simply means love but it means giving something to somebody that they cannot provide for for themselves that hurts their pride so it hurts their pride to realize that they can't provide the stuff for themselves, that you can't make up for the wrongs that you have done. Christ did that. But you have to understand that you've done things that are wrong. All of those things are offensive.

And then, of course, the key thing that is offensive is Christ's claims of exclusivity. The fact that he's not the way only, but the only way. And so we understand the culture is going to be at war with us. We understand that our government is going to be creating these monstrosities. And so it takes us back to the basic roots that we saw with talking to Noah. Go back and reclaim your basic roots. Go back and reclaim your relationships with your family, your relationship with God. That is the thing that is going to take you through all of this. That will be the rock underneath your feet.

Thank you for listening. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation,

deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKightshow.com.