The David Knight Show - 15Nov22 Will Tide Turn on TransPedos as Kids Speak Out About the Abuse — and Sue?

Episode Date: November 15, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESUK Labour leader says kids shouldn't be mutilated without parental approval. LGBT is outraged. You should be outraged for the OPPOSITE reason.2:50Journalist resigns over newspaper’s “anti-transgender” stance.9:22The totalitarian mindset of Eric Swalwell. After threatening to use military on gun owners, now he threatens parents11:38In place of parents, the state will operate in place of the parents. They call it "in loco parentis"19:34Why there should be a wave of lawsuits against doctors and hospitals and pharmaceutical companies who are mutilating and vaccinating kids26:05Chemical castration drug is used on criminals and rapists.29:42Bayer's victory in glyphosate lawsuits. They're going to get off cheap and keep doing it35:45A British man who identifies as a Korean girl is now angry and says he has now gotten his life back together because he found Christ.45:01Eventbrite is now facing a lawsuit in the UK after they banned debate on trans ideology.50:58The school’s determination to force its transgender policies on a 14-year-old girl and her father for daring to question their protection of boy gawking at girls in dressing room.53:06Eat some Chef Boyardee, Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the Inflation Bomb, says Democrat politician1:04:20Gab's Andrew Torba on the path forward? To balkanize and to build.1:07:23Why we have to build our political system from the ground up as well as our communities.1:14:03Qatar has a mandatory app for all World Cup attendees.1:24:08Self-driving cars are an admitted failure as companies shut down the pursuit. Is the same thing happening with AI (Artificial Intelligence)?1:30:48All the cruise cars in San Francisco all congregated at one intersection for no apparent reason.1:34:01Worshipping the coming god-like AI — Anthony Levandowski’s new religion1:40:42Human drivers are really good, absurdly good, compared to AI1:51:11Electric bike fires are becoming a HUGE problem in NYC (and other areas)1:58:24What is WarriorMBAs.com?2:03:21David’s #1 message to men: Stop listening to deceptive messages.2:07:09How the media is trying to make things worse in America.2:14:30What’s happening to men and women in our culture.2:18:11The ESG companies don’t even care about succeeding -.2:25:59Prayer request for a deputy recovering after being stabbed in the neck by a shoplifter2:31:21Body camera footage of Paul Pelosi shows that the government was lying and forced a retraction of the truth2:34:31Feds had informant in #2 position of Oath Keepers and EIGHT informants in Proud Boys. Interestingly, the Oath Keeper informant is going to testify FOR THE DEFENSE.2:40:24Department of Justice raids home of Area 51 website owner who wasn’t held at gunpoint.2:46:00Another attack on journalism in a courtroom. Editor of local paper charged with felony wiretapping for reporting.2:48:40China claims they have a "Back to Future" Hoverboard — Believe it? Or NOT?2:57:33Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. www.thezeitgeistmovement.com Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 15th of November, year of our Lord 2022, day 978 of the emergency. Today we're going to take a look, and of course Trump is going to be announcing, reportedly going to be announcing his candidacy for presidency 2024. But that announcement has not been made. So we're going to take a bit of a break from that kind of politics.

And we're going to talk about the trans-pedo agenda. That's where we're going to begin today. We'll also be taking a look at the collapsing of many aspects of the technocracy, which is very good news, and how about that very thing. So we're going to talk about that as well today. Something positive, something that we can do to build our society. We'll be right back. Today we're going to kind of focus on family building, on parents, parental rights. We have a guest coming up in the third hour, Jeremy Slayton, who wants to, Slayton is the right way to pronounce his name. He is going to talk about the failures of feminism. It has made a lot of people unhappy of both sexes. That's right, there's two. We're going to begin with transgenderism, though. We have an op-ed piece

on The Guardian, Liberal Guardian out of the UK, and he's very angry at parents who do not confirm transgenderism in their kids. He accuses us of abuse. And I say us, I don't have any kids, fortunately, who have made that determination, so we haven't had to get into that. But he was reacting to what the leader of the UK's Labour Party, Keir Starmer, had to say about it. It enraged him. And here's what Keir Starmer, the Labour Party leader, said. He said children should not be, quote, making life-altering decisions to appear like the opposite sex without the consent of their parents. Is that radical? I don't think it's radical enough, quite frankly.

You know, should we say, for example, that children should not be prostituted for sex without parental consent? Or would we just say it shouldn't happen? How do we say that it's okay with parental consent i don't see how that can be allowed frankly even with parental consent we don't allow parents to sexually abuse their kids we don't allow parents to put their kids in chain cages we don't allow parents to amputate parts of their children's body if they so desire so why are we allowing this transgender stuff? And why are we going to draw the line there? This is what I say.

You know, when we look at people, the few politicians who have the guts to speak up against this stuff will only go so far. DeSantis. Well, you're not going to do it to kids under, you know, third grade and down. But, you know, fourth grade, you can start. Oh, really? Keir Starmer. Well grade you can start oh really here starmer well

you can't do it without parental consent but if the parent says okay you can do whatever you want to to a kid i don't think so and quite frankly what we're talking about here truly is the kids being prostituted for sex because the pharmaceutical companies are making a great deal of money off of this let's understand there's a lot of money being made by Planned Parenthood pushing out these chemicals pushing out the surgical procedures as well but especially they get involved at the chemical stage right now and the pharmaceutical companies as I'm going to show you, are quite active in terms of pushing transgenderism. The same companies that are selling the chemicals. Some of the chemicals that are previously used for sterilizing rapists.

Chemically castrating rapists is what they're doing to young children. Now, how is that okay? Even with the consent of the parents. But that outraged this Guardian writer whose name is Owen Jones. He's a columnist. And so the very fact that you would say, well, you can't do it without the consent of the parents, how dare him? Jones is demanding that parental authority be suspended, that moms and dads endorse and promote lifestyle choices by their children up to and including body mutilating transgender surgeries, says WND. Otherwise, they should be considered to be abusers.

He claims LGBT people have had, quote, their lives damaged or, frankly, wrecked by their parents, failing to affirm them. He said parents know what is best for their kids. That is not a universal rule. We're definitely gone past father knows best. Now, father doesn't know anything. You know, we've had sitcoms dedicated to that proposition my entire life. It started out when they were pushing television and father knows best. Then for the next several decades, father doesn't know anything.

He's like Homer Simpson. But now the parents, both parents, mom doesn't know anything either. It's the experts who know. Parents know what is best for their kids is not a universal rule some parents are child abusers that includes parents who don't affirm lgbtq plus kids he said well i would say parents who use their kids for sexual fantasies which is what the situation is with a lot of these kind of munchhausen by proxy LGBT parents. Oh, look at this. My kid is, you know, can't even talk yet and already identifies as

the opposite sex. Oh, really? You've got a problem, lady. That's not real. That's you. You're projecting, you're engaging in this fantasy, and you're damaging your kid to engage in a sexual fantasy. That's what's going on here. And a virtue signal to your friends. So we have to understand that a lot of government institutions, like the schools, as well as corporations, like the pharmaceutical companies, abuse and kill kids on a regular basis. But listen to what the writer at The Guardian has to say. He said, when I see people who have allowed their brains to be rotted by anti-trans hysteria,

I constantly worry about whether they have trans kids because I've seen what's happened when LGBT kids don't have supportive parents. Every transphobe is a potential child abuser. The end, he writes. That's it. That's his truth. His truth about the upside down, inside out society. If you don't support the mutilation, chemical and surgical of children, then you are the abuser. How much more upside down and inverted from the truth can we get? So, you know, I could point out, I could say, well, not every LGBT person is an abuser, but far more than you typically find with parents. He doesn't trust parents.

Parents are awful. He said, you're not protecting your children if you refuse to affirm them. You are abusing them and imposing upon them trauma, which they may never recover from, he said. Seriously? You mean trauma like mutilating their genitals? Yeah, that's traumatic. And we got, we'll talk about it here in just a second, a young girl who had that done to her.

The experts, the experts convinced her and her parents when she was 13 to damage her body, to have a double mastectomy and others. And now she's 18 and now she is going to be suing them. And good for her. And quite frankly, I think that example needs to be followed by a lot of people with the pharmaceutical companies and the doctors and the hospitals who did it. Because she's suing the doctors and the hospitals and the psychologists who pushed this through. But, yeah, imposing on them trauma, the trauma. So I guess, you know, if my son thought that he was Superman and could fly, it'd be traumatic if I told him that he wasn't,

and I should just let him jump off the roof, right? Guardian journalist Hadley Freeman shared that she had resigned over the newspaper's stance on transgender issues, citing a culture of hostility towards anyone willing to speak out against radical gender ideology. citing a culture of hostility towards anyone willing to speak out against radical gender ideology. In recent years, you'd call for the guardian to investigate controversial trans charity

mermaids over its treatment of children. But she said her efforts were to no avail either because of the editor's ideological beliefs or more likely their fear of reaction in the office. So there you go. It's a mob mentality. Now, this is a writer in the UK at a very liberal paper, angry at the leader of the Labor Party, a politician who says, well, I think parents ought to be involved in the decision to mutilate children.

How dare you? Here in the United States, we have a congressman who says, please tell me what I'm missing here. He thinks that if parents get in the way of what's being taught to their kids in school even, that that is medical and legal malpractice for the parents. And that would be Eric Swalwell, the guy who a few years ago was threatening to use the military against American citizens in order to confiscate guns in violation of the Second Amendment.

Oh, you think you can stop us? Well, we've got planes and we've got bombs and all the rest of this stuff. He was the first one to say that. They got repeated by Biden. It got repeated by Beto. But Eric Swalwell was the first one to do it. Got in a big Twitter fight with Joe Biggs over that. So now he is attacking parents.

Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from where else? California. Weighed in this week into the area in a curious attack on parents demanding more say in the education of their children. How dare parents do that? He said it's akin to, quote, putting patients in charge of their own surgeries, clients in charge of their own trials. Wow. Now, what does this tell us about his totalitarian mindset? Patients in charge of their own surgeries. So if he is not completely stupid and brain dead as he appears to be, he is telling us that the schools are basically operating on your kids. And if you let them, they will. They'll cut off their genitals and everything.

But yeah, he's essentially saying that they're operating on the kids. And we should get out of the way because they're the experts. They're surgically operating on your kids. They're operating on your kids' minds, on your kids' bodies, if you let them. And certainly operating on your kids' soul. Now, you understand they're not using scalpels as part of this. They're using chainsaws. But they are operating in their crude and effective ways on your kids.

The second thing he has is clients in charge of their own trials. So he brings in a court analogy. Now here we have a different set of experts, not surgeons, but we have judges and they will stand in judgment of what is right and what is wrong and what is allowed. That is what this totalitarian Eric Swalwell is now telling us about parents after demanding that we surrender our guns and he'll use the military if necessary against us. The tweet came in response to South Carolina GOP Senator Tim Scott saying that Republicans intend to put, quote, parents back in charge of their kids' education. And so he says, oh, well,

should we put patients in charge of their surgeries, clients in charge of their own trials? When did we stop trusting experts, said Eric Swalwell. This is so stupid. Okay, well, Eric, here's what's happened in the last two years. We've been locked down, masked up, jabbed, kept out of society, all on the advice of experts. It was constantly changing.

And so I think that's when we stopped trusting the experts. I think we stopped trusting the schools when parents were allowed to see what was being taught in their child's class, as I've pointed out many times. You can always tell the parents, well, this is what the curriculum is nationally. This is what the curriculum is at the state level. This is what the curriculum is at the county level. This is being taught in your school even. Well, I'm sorry, even if that's all true,

I don't believe that's happening in my child's class because I've met the teacher. At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the

biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee and she's really nice well then they got to see the zoom class and see what was actually happening now in this article from zero hedge they point out that there is this thing called consent. And they said, in a case going back to 1925, Meyer v. Nebraska,

the Supreme Court struck down a state law that prohibited instruction in German. If only that were the issue today. These people are instructing them in other things, Greek or whatever, French. In the decision, it stressed that parental roles in the education of their children was an essential part of the protections under the Constitution's due process clause. The right to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home, to bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of their own conscience. This is what, these are the kind of decisions that the Supreme Court did in this country

a hundred years ago. You're not about to hear any defense of those types of things today. So, this is just as government was starting to get involved in schooling in a big way. And starting to show its authoritarian urges. You know, prior to the early 20th century, public schooling, government schooling was a really rare thing. R.L. Dabney, who wrote about the impossibility of government running education without violating freedom of religion, pointed out that in his opinion, as a Southerner, he believed that it was the government schools in Massachusetts

that were really behind the kind of mindset that wanted to control other states. Because this is a country that was created and defined by secession, which is another word for self-governance. That was the fundamental issue that was swept aside. But his bigger issue was, he said, if we're going to go down this route, and he was someone who was a pastor, he says, if we're going to go down this route, we will wind up having imposed upon us secular humanism.

He says, there's going to be a lot of different ways you're going to try to address this. You can say, well, we're not going to talk at all about religion. We're going to teach one religion, or we're not going to teach another. Well, if you teach any religion at all in the schools, and he said this in the 1880s, and we saw that became the Supreme Court decision. Oh, you're not going to even exercise your own personal religion in school. Or we'll say that's a violation of the separation of church and state. He didn't refer to that. That's not in

the constitution. But what he was saying was that you would wind up having eventually all religion purged out of education. And he said, that's not education. He said, education has to involve the forming of a worldview, the forming of morality, or you're going to create a monstrous society, which is what we've created right now. You want to see the products of this kind of secular humanism? Look on the streets of Seattle, Portland, that type of thing. But yeah, education had always been considered to be fundamentally about building character,

not about building people who were going to be useful little laborers for corporations. That's what secular humanism wants to turn out. It wants to turn out workers. Workers for the Industrial Revolution. Anyway, the argument that patients do not make the key decisions about their own medical care is a bit strange, given Swalwell's support for abortion rights. that parents, or rather that patients, do not make the key decisions about their own medical care. It's a bit strange, given Swalwell's support for abortion rights, given his support for mandatory vaccines and the rest of this stuff, right?

But, you know, the argument about vaccines, of course, is missing from this story. So parents are asking for consent for the basic goals, materials, and methods used in the education of their children. That's all they're asking for. Can't we just have that? Well, you're not going to get it. There's this thing called en loco parentis, in place of the parents. Judges have ruled in the past, especially when parents were concerned about sexual education at too early an age.

One of the court cases that I remember was a father who did not want his daughter, who was in third grade, taught the details of heterosexual sex. He didn't have a problem with heterosexual sex, obviously. He had a daughter, but he did not want those details taught to his daughter by strangers at that age. They tried to take her out of the class when they refused to allow him to have her opt out of the class. He tried to physically remove her. They arrested him. And the judge said, when you take your child to school and leave them, you have abandoned them to the state. And the state will operate in place of the parents.

It's called in loco parentis, in place of the parents. And people need to understand that what Swalwell is talking about is something that's been going on for quite some time. People got very upset with Ralph Northam when he, as a doctor and the governor of Virginia, said, yeah, you know, the babies survived the abortion. We just leave them off on the side and let them die. What? Yeah, they call that comfort care. They've been doing that for a very long time. So people don't understand that.

People don't understand what's going on in the schools. They don't understand that they don't care about your consent. Even when the doctors secured consent to operate on a patient's single ear, there was a court case in 1905. It was still considered a battery when the doctors decided to operate on the other ear in the best interest of the patient. The patient was upset about that. I didn't give you the authority to operate on my other ear.

The court signed it with a patient. But Swalwell's point is this, and he could have put out a shorter tweet. He could have just said, shut up, you're nothing but breeders, because that's the way they see us. They don't want parents. They don't want families.

They need breeders. That's what you are. LGBT is called heterosexual families breeders for a long time. So just cut to the chase, Eric. Just say, shut up, breeders. Okay, breeders, how about how about that okay breeders just dismiss all the parents and their concerns so uh government is operating here's here's the bottom line then this is not about consent it's about these totalitarian saying well you know government is operating on your kids sometimes sometimes literally. Government will judge what is right, what is wrong, and what the content of their

so-called education is going to be. And they will do that while mandating jobs to attend school, while taking the licenses of doctors who want to tell their patients about the health issues, to actually give them the information to make informed consent. And so the case Chloe Cole, she's been on Tucker Carlson. I'm glad that he put this on national TV. An ex-trans teen who removed her breasts when she was only 15 years old because of the push by psychologists, by teachers, and she's now suing the doctors of hospitals who did this. Prescribed her first puberty blockers when she was only 13 years old.

Gave her testosterone. Then they removed both of her breasts when she was just 15 years old. Now she's 18. And she says, I didn't understand what was going on. I was just going through a phase where I was uncomfortable with my body. That's called puberty. That's a very common thing. 18-year-old detransitioner Chloe Cole, who underwent procedures to appear male. I'm glad they did it that way. I'm glad they wrote it that way. That's LifeSite News, and that's exactly right. She didn't become male.

She did things to try to appear to be male. She's still female. She's now injured. So she did all these things to appear male. She now advocates against such treatments for children, and she announced the intent to sue on Tuesday. She is launching a lawsuit against various medical practitioners and health institutions involved in her quote-unquote care. Well, good for her. The notice says, you performed supervised and or advised transgender hormone therapy

and surgical intervention for Chloe when she was 13 to 17 years old, which constitutes breach of the standard of care. That's right, because it's supposed to be first do no harm. And you're supposed to respect the fact that minors don't have the right to consent to this stuff. But, of course, Eric Swalwell thinks they do. So she's suing three doctors. One of them is a PhD. The other one, they don't say what the doctor, they don't say whether it's MD or PhD.

It could be a couple of psychologists and an MD that she's suing, but she's also suing. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals.

The Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. So she's suing Kaiser Insurance for paying for it. She's suing the hospitals for doing it, as well as one MD. Probably at least one psych. So it was either two MDs and a psychologist or two psychologists and an MD. Seeking punitive damage is based on the evidence of malice, oppression, and fraud. The notice says medical professionals coerced, quote,

coerced Chloe and her parents to undergo what amounted to a medical experiment by propagating two lies. The first lie was telling them that her gender dysphoria would not dissipate by itself. The second one was that she was at risk of suicide if she did not socially and medically transition. Well, it's actually just the opposite. By adding somebody who has some psychological issues, by adding all kinds of medical and physical problems to them, you greatly increase any risk of suicide to that person. So the lawsuit says both of those statements were false.

The notice also outlines the lack of informed consent. Here we are again, just like the jabs. And I think, folks, let me just say this, that there ought to be a wave of lawsuits against doctors and hospitals and the pharmaceutical companies. Has there ever been a more attractive defendant than the pharmaceutical companies? I mean, hundreds of billions of dollars these guys have made. It's just waiting there for you to get some lawyers and take it away from them. Go for it.

We need to do this for the good of humanity, just like she's doing. She says, I want to establish a precedent here that we stop doing that to kids. Well, I want to establish a precedent that we stop harming people with a vaccine. I don't have any standing in this because I didn't take it, but we need to have some lawsuits about that. There's a lot of lawsuits out there about people who they tried to coerce into taking it to keep their job, to keep their career. They got kicked out.

They have a injury that way and they're winning. Had their freedom of religion denied and other things like that but the people who are injured they need to start doing big class action lawsuits against Pfizer and Moderna and against some of these bureaucrats as well even though they will probably say you can't sue them there's a lot of money to be made by going after these pharmaceutical companies. And what have they done? They had all kinds of propaganda. Let's see. What is it that they say?

Misinformation, disinformation, and mal information. They gave you the wrong information. They pushed back against things that were true. They deliberately did it. Disinformation. It was deliberate disinformation campaign. And they did it maliciously to profit at your harm. People need to be suing these companies right now. That's one of the ways.

Don't give them amnesty. Give them a lawsuit. Lawfare. Ramp it up. They really can pay you billions of dollars alex can't do that but uh these pharmaceutical companies can you can get tens of billions of dollars from them do it anyway um so the notice also outlines a lack of informed consent saying that there was a quote complete failure to properly advise Chloe and her parents of the serious risks of undergoing this permanent treatment that amounted to medical experimentation on Chloe, unquote.

The document stated that there was no informed consent regarding the dangers of puberty blockers, testosterone treatment, especially for females, or for double mastectomy surgery. The notice of intent to sue also says that Chloe was urged through the process, despite there being, quote, no long-term controlled follow-up studies involving hormone treatment on children of Chloe's age. Yeah, they don't care.

You know, think about what they're doing, for example, now she's a female. But for the boys, they've got a chemical castration drug that they have used on criminals, on rapists. Have they done any studies about the effects on children? Why no? Look at the hissy fit that the FDA did about a drug that had been used for 60 years, ivermectin. Oh, you're taking horse medicine. Well, no, not unless you keep the human form away from people. If you do, they will take the horse medicine because it's been used on animals as well as humans for six decades.

And people want to use it in an off-label use, which means it's using it for something that it was not originally approved for. But they know what the safety profile is. At LiveScoreBet we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected

race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2 LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Decades of it. Do they have any safety profile for using this chemical castration drug on children? Absolutely none. But they have no problem with an off-label use for that.

Yeah, we use it on adult men to chemically castrate them but yeah let's use it on some little boys and see what happens it is experimentation she said when she went on with tucker she said the whole ordeal has left her mentally physically emotionally drained to explain that she is filing the lawsuit because she wants to hold those responsible for her life altering choices as a child accountable for their actions and to stop them from hurting others like her. That's why people need to be suing Pfizer and Moderna. Sue their pants off. It happened. It's happening to children all over the US,s all over the west it's spreading all over

the world the jab as well as the transgender stuff i want to create a precedent for other people who have been in my situation to find justice themselves she also told tucker that she is devastated by the effects of her so-called transition, damage that she will never be able to reverse. She's now 18. She said, it's been very hard to cope with the loss of my breasts. The treatments have made me very sick, actually. She says, as an adult, I will never be able

to breastfeed whatever children I will have. And I don't even know if, because I was put on puberty blockers and testosterone at only 13 years old, I don't even know if I'll be able to have children. I made an adult decision as a child. Well, she didn't decide. They decided for her. And shame on them. They need to be sued for that.

Uh, so the, uh, going back to, um, the issue that Swalwell was talking about, as they say here, um,

on faith wire, talking about her, her, um, her situation, Chloe Cole's situation. So the medical system should not dictate the future of young children's lives. This is her,

um, her, um, lawyer who's speaking through this legal action. We will hold the professionals involved accountable for their deliberate choices to mutilate children and to financially benefit from it without regard to the human tragedies they created, which takes us back to what I said.

Are we talking about prostituting children? Are we talking about harming them, sexualizing them, using them for financial purposes? Yes. It is a prostitution of children by the hospitals, by the doctors, by Planned Parenthood. It is the abuse, the sexual abuse of these children by their parents if the parents consent. And that needs to be stopped as well. Not going to see too many politicians talking about that. Transgender propaganda film is being sponsored by the pharmaceutical company

that sells the drugs because that's how they make money. They can propagandize these kids, and then they can make money by giving them the drugs. So this film is Mama Has a Mustache, and it is sponsored by several different companies, one of them, Bayer. And here's the little trailer for Mama Has a Mustache. Now, listen to this and see if this is aimed at any audience other than very, very, very young children.

So, what's the first question? Can you be a girl and have a boy body or be a boy and have a girl body? Yes, that's transgender. Can this person be a parent and have a boy body or be a boy and have a girl body? Yes, that's transgender. Can this person be a parent? Yes, my dad. I feel like I'm not really a boy or a girl. Who the god is it? God is in it. I love my child. Sense of freedom these kids feel is a wonder for the transgender activists.

Mama has a mustache. Mama has a mustache. Mommy has a mustache. Now you hear that. First little girl that talks about that. She can't even pronounce the word transgender. Transgender. Right? She can't even pronounce the word transgender. Transgender. A pro-transgender propaganda film for children called Mama Has a Mustache,

sponsored by Bayer, a pharmaceutical company that produces drugs that are used to feminize men who identify as transgender. The film's website says, Kids Talking Gender, directly above the trailer. Mama Has a Mustache is all about normalizing transgenderism particularly to very very young children as you could hear that was the target audience let's talk a little bit about bear this german company um bought monsanto a few years ago, $60 billion. And already the lawsuits had begun about the damage from glyphosate, trade name Roundup. And so they knew about that.

They didn't care. What does that tell you about the mindset of the people running Bayer? Oh, yeah, I think we can beat this rap. And guess what? Looks like they're going to. Looks, I think we can beat this rap. And guess what? Looks like they're going to. Looks like they're going to beat the rap. They've come up with, they said, we've had verbal agreements. They tried to get it thrown out all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court, back in June of this year, said, no, we're going to let these lawsuits go forward. And so Monsanto said, well, we've had verbal discussions with these lawyers all across the country they have 52 000 lawsuits against monsanto over glyphosate over roundup and uh so they said well you know we've talked to them and we're going to set aside eight billion dollars for these 52 000 lawsuits well that'd be an average of only 154,000 apiece. It's a type of lymphoma cancer that people get from it. And I've told this story before.

We had a dog, it's a basset hound, which would never have thought this dog would be able to hop the fence, but it took us a while to figure out how he was getting out, because it's short legs and slow slow mopey dog and everything but he was able to literally climb the fence and get out and he liked to eat grass when he would get out always was eating grass dogs typically only do that if they're feeling sick but this dog only dog i've ever had that would do that so much and um he he got out and he got over to the neighbors because we lived in a neighborhood uh where all the houses were close together and the neighbors had this lawn service that would spray the the grass and then they put signs keep dogs and kids off of the grass.

And he would get over there and he'd eat that and we'd freak out and bring him back. And it wasn't too long before he was diagnosed with this lymphoma. And the day we got that, I heard on the radio there was a report and they were talking about farmers

who use this in their everyday work. And they got the exact same kind use this in their everyday work. And they got the exact same kind of cancer that the dog had. It's like, well, there you go. But, you know, even though there's 52,000 lawsuits and these people are dying, Monsanto has figured that they can buy them off for only about 154,000 each average. Isn't that great? So I guess the guy made a really good business decision, didn't he?

Well, that money is going to rot his soul in hell. It's just amazing to me to see this. So $8 billion for the 52,000 lawsuits that they've got now. And set aside an additional $2 billion for future payoffs of people. It's kind of like the cold-blooded calculations that Ford did over the Pinto. Yeah, you know, we could fix this problem so the gas tank doesn't blow up, but it costs us about 50 bucks each of these things we make. We'd be better off just fighting the lawsuits.

And that's what they did. So, you know, $10 billion and they're done. And, um, they've had, uh, this is not their only rodeo with, uh, criminal, uh, issues and, uh, with harmful issues. Um, bear has had, um, a birth control implant assure, uh, they had to pay $1.6 billion with a B and damages for that. They've been convicted and had to pay millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars for bribes and kickbacks to doctors to prescribe their particular drugs.

They've had to pay millions of dollars because they had HIV tainted blood products and on and on and on. I could go on all the long, just like Pfizer, you know, been convicted over and over again, fined over and over again. And no matter how many times these people pay these fines, they get away with it. Now you've got Bayer out there pushing these drugs on little kids using propaganda films. One of the children in the trailer says, I don't't i feel like i'm not really a boy or a girl and i don't know if you caught it on there but uh it said that this was from the author of heather has two mommies one of the pioneer propaganda pieces for the lgbt the film is

driven completely by audio interviews of kids between the ages of 5 and 10. Sounded to me like some of those kids were younger than 5. How do kids, many of whom embrace this gender non-binary, perceive their own and their parents' gender? Asks the director, Sally Rubin, a tenured professor at Chapman University. She goes on to say, parents, teachers, and kids are now in a place where they need to be ready to begin talking about these issues. Why is that?

Please explain that to me, Sally. Why is this something that we now need to talk about? Except to shut it down. They're trying to normalize this, of course, ready to bring these conversations Into the home Into the classroom They will bring it into the classroom

Not in the home And they don't want you in the home To know what's going on Just shut up Breeder The director is particularly interested In embedding this film Into classrooms She says

She created the film In conjunction with Max Straitwell Who is the director of animation And Stacey Goldate, the editor and producer. All three identifies either queer or non-binary. They're coming after the kids. They do songs, laugh about it, mock you about it. Yeah, you're right. So the San Francisco gay men's choir. We are coming for the kids,

and we're going to get them, and there's nothing you can do about it. Because we've got people like Eric Swalwell in the government on our side. We have the press, people like Owen Jones in the UK, they're on our side too. And we have the pharmaceutical companies. We are going to make billions off of this stuff. And they're on our side. Bayer produces a drug called cyprotron acetate. It's an anti-androgen. It means it's against males. It feminizes men who identify as women. They create a lot of different forms of the drug.

So, you know, if mama's got a mustache, mama can take this bear drug and get rid of that mustache. How about that? Transgender activist Xenia Jones discussed the use of this chemical in an article titled, Four Low-Cost Alternatives to Puberty Blockers for Transgender Adolescents. And so this is a drug that they're pushing to kids. That's why they're sponsoring this film.

It's marketing. One of the cyprotorone acetate drugs that Bayer creates is called Dian-35-ED. Can't make this up. You want to become a woman? Here, I've got this drug called Dian-35-ED can't make this up. Hey, you want to become a woman here? I've got this drug called Diane 35 ed as an erectile dysfunction, I guess. I come up with this name for this thing.

I mean, they, they spell it like Diane, Diane hyphen 35 ed. Um, one investigative report from Breitbart news found that the gender cool project, One investigative report from Breitbart News found that the Gender Cool Project, which seeks to normalize child transgenderism by securing high-profile media appearances for youth who identify as transgender, was sponsored by Abby V Pharmaceuticals. Children involved in the organization, as well as the founders, appeared on the Today Show with Megyn Kelly.

You know that conservative commentator? She's now reinvented herself as a potty-mouthed conservative. She gets attention every time she goes off on somebody with a potty mouth. Otherwise, she doesn't get any attention, so she's doing it more and more frequently. I just wonder what Megyn Kelly was trying to conserve, anyway. Now, what are conservatives trying to conserve anyway now what are conservatives trying to conserve yeah abby normal that's right that's a young frankenstein yeah abby abby v is the uh it's the company they should rename themselves abby normal uh they produce lupron a puberty blocking drug that has also been used to chemically castrate adult sex offenders. So that's how they're treating children.

Now, there are a lot of people. Now, this has been going on not that long, really. You know, this whole thing really started taking off about 2015, about the same time they started doing UN 2030 agenda, bragging about it, the World Economic Forum, the Great Reset, all the rest of this stuff. That's about the same time they dropped all this transgender stuff. So it's only been around about seven years, but you're starting to see a lot of people now who are having regrets about this. You know, Chloe Cole, it was five years ago that she got caught up in this.

Here's another one. A British man who identifies as a Korean girl is now angry and has now talked about how he was gaslighted. And he says he's now gotten his life back together because he found Christ. So last year, British social media influencer, Ollie London, announced that he was transracial Christ. So last year, British social media influencer,

Ali London announced that he was trans racial and would hence force be identifying as Korean so that he could imitate his idol, a K-pop singer named Park Jimin. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. Jermaine. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18 plus gamblingcare.ie. To achieve this, he underwent a series of 30 grotesque plastic surgeries to morph himself to look like this young girl, young Korean girl. Spent over $270,000. He said, at the time, I identify as Korean. That's my culture. That's my home country. That's exactly how I look now.

I also identify as Jimin, and that is my career name now. He was pushing back at the time. He's very angry at people who would push back against that. He said, if you can be transsexual, you can be transracial. Why are there such double standards and hypocrisy of people criticizing me for being Korean? I was actually born in the wrong body, and I guess he also thought he was born in the wrong place. So, you know, he could be any of these things that he wished to be. And I have pointed that out for the longest time.

He's not even the first person who was transracial or transcultural. That was done first by Beto O'Rourke. And he actually references Beto O'Rourke. He said, pushing back against this, he said, they taught me to idolize weak men like Harry Styles, weak men like Beto O'Rourke. He said, pushing back against this, he said, they taught me to idolize weak men like Harry Stiles, weak men like Beto O'Rourke, the Beto male. And I've said that for the longest time. I said, look, he's a trans Hispanic.

Robert Francis O'Rourke is not Hispanic, but he called himself Beto. All the signs that he had in Texas, all they said was Beto. Nothing about him being Robert Francis O'Rourke. Nothing there. Just Beto. So he identified as being Hispanic. He was trans-Hispanic. And I guess that's where this guy, this guy references him.

So maybe he got the idea. Well, if Robert Francis O'Rourke can be Hispanic, I can be Korean and female. So, scarcely a year after his announcement, after eight years of struggling with his identity, he is now detransitioning. So he said that he has now converted to Christianity, that his fictitious identity had been a mistake,

and he blames it on the American culture wars that have impacted young people everywhere, that schools encourage children to idolize weak men and this agenda. Isn't it amazing? Do you realize what a piece of filth this country is? That we have pushed this out. We have been used as the epicenter to push out this perverted transgenderism, to push out all this stuff, this, these attacks on kids. We have the U S soccer team now, uh, going to an Arabic country where this is illegal and they've now changed.

The U S government has changed the logo for the U S soccer team. It was a shield that had, it was in red, white, and blue. It had red stripes coming down in that shield shape. They've now taken away the red stripes and made them rainbow color. That's what America's become. We've become the vilest Babylon the world has ever seen. And we have all of the propaganda

tools and the film industry in Hollywood to push this out worldwide. We are the epicenter of this. We are the propaganda mouthpiece for Satan, this country is. Is there any wonder people like me and young people want to change their gender when we have normalization of this in our schools in the UK. Children are taught from a young age that it's okay to change their gender. It's okay to wear a skirt. It's okay for a boy to use gender neutral toilet when it puts girls at risk. This is the new norm and schools are teaching about toxic masculinity. Any masculinity is toxic. So he he says we may just be at the beginning says the writer of the story we may just be at the beginning of a new wave not of transitioners but of those who have bought the

lie that was sold to them paid the price and are coming forward to tell their story. But yet, it is our government that is at the center of all of this. Ahead of this World Cup, by the way, Qatar officials constantly reiterated their stance against homosexuality. Only days ago, a Qatar World Cup ambassador told a German TV station that homosexuality is, quote, damage of the mind and it remains illegal in Qatar, even for visiting athletes. The Qatar Football Association general secretary warned fans not to show up in support of gays. So that's why the government has changed the insignia on the uniform. Because our government worships, worships this.

It is a religion, and they worship it. You know, when we talk about worshiping something, what does that mean? By definition, if you look up the word, worship means, you know, declaring something is worthy, you know, honor, respect, devotion. Worthy. Honor. Respect. Devotion. Does the U.S. government honor and respect this? Oh, yes. And they're proud of it as well. And they are devoted to it.

There's nothing that the Biden administration is more devoted to than LGBT issues, especially, you know, the more perverted, the better. Eventbrite is now facing a lawsuit in the UK after they banned debate on trans ideology. They shut down feminists who wanted to talk about it. There was a feminist who had written a book. She called it Transpositions, A Personal Journey into Gender Criticism. And so she had set up an event and Eventbrite, which is a U.S. corporation, shut the event down. And so now she's saying, oh, wait a minute. You have to abide by U.K. laws.

You said that you shut this down because it was going to have dangerous views. Dangerous views and the imagination of Eventbrite is dangerous to question transgenderism. And I guess it is dangerous for Eventbrite to do that. She's trying to make it dangerous for them to shut down people's gender-critical beliefs. She said Eventbrite has to obey UK laws. She added gender-critical belief should be respected in a democratic society. So the question is, would that be respected if it was Christian gender criticism rather than feminist or lesbian gender criticism? Vermont High School has backed down after coming after a father and his daughter who complained because a male who said he identified as female came into the locker room and watched the girls undressing.

And so the school, rather than disciplining him, of course, came after the father and the girl. And so they got in touch after the father and the girl. And so they got in touch with the Alliance Defending Freedom. They got in touch with the school. And now the school is backing down after they threatened them with a lawsuit. At issue is the school's determination to force its transgender policies on a 14-year-old girl and her father for daring to question those policies. In other words, complaining when a male who declared himself to be a female entered the girl's locker room to observe them undressing.

The school officials in Vermont demanded that the student take part in a restorative circle, quote unquote, to help her understand the rights of transgender students to access public accommodations in a manner consistent with their self-proclaimed gender identity. Yeah, you can't see the fingerprints of Marxism on this. School officials also demanded that her father apologize for a Facebook post challenging the mother of the transgender male-female over the veracity of the Facebook post that she made defending her transgender child.

So the mother had. Well, let me tell you what the ADF said first. They said a teenage male who identifies as a female should be permitted to change in girls locker room regardless of the discomfort experienced by girls in that room, said the school. And objecting to a male being in the room while girls are changing, the father and daughter each made comments underscoring that the trans-identifying student is in fact a male, including using male pronouns. How dare them? They have to be punished.

Severely centurion. Flat then silly. ADF claimed that by doing so, the school officials violated the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the father and daughter. On September 21st, a male who identifies as a female entered the girls' locker room while the girls were changing. Many of them got upset and demanded that he leave. And their parents called the principals to complain. And so the principals came after the parents, just like Eric Swalwell said. How dare you? We are the surgeons.

We are the judges of what's right and wrong. And we'll tell you what's right. And you're going to go to a, you know, get your mind reset here in a propaganda school. And so what happened to get the father involved was the mother of this male voyeur said, I'm the mother of the trans student in question. And my referred to him as a daughter. But it's her son. My son did not make any comments at all. The entire team came back, can back this up,

other than the girl that made the story for the attention. This is slander, defamation of character, and we have secured a lawyer. And so then the father responded on Facebook, said, I'm the father of the girl that you claim made up this story for attention, quote unquote. The truth is your son watched my daughter and multiple other girls change in the locker room. When he got a free show, they got violated. You think this is fine and dandy? I wonder how you would feel if I watched you undress. So then that got him in trouble with the school. But the ADF summarizing this is they got the school to back down.

They said the whole reason this happened is for two reasons. The school has bought into the current fad of transgenderism and the school states, number one, all students have a gender identity, which is self-determined. And number two, all persons,

including students attending school have privacy rights. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Except not for the girls, right? We'll be right back. The Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's next move.

And now, The David Knight Show. Okay, all of you baby boomers out there. Oh, we got fed this stuff when we were kids. And now the Democrats want us eating it in the future. Yeah, Chef Boyardee. Okay, that's what Sean Patrick Maloney, this last election, New York Democrat, arrogant. When people were complaining about high prices of food, said, yeah, well, I grew up in a family where, you know, if the gas price went up, the food budget went down. So by this time of the week, we'd be eating Chef Boyardee if that budget wasn't going to change. So that's what families have to do.

You eat Chef Boyardee, the cheapest food you can find. Maybe you can find some dog food that's cheaper or something. About the same type of thing, right? So California Berkeley professor Brad DeLong said in a September 2022 piece in Fortune magazine, he said, why you should be happy about inflation and worried about something else. Just don't worry about it, right? It's kind of like his Dr. Strangelove version.

You know, how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. Well, you know, learn to stop worrying and love the inflation bomb. That's what this professor from Berkeley says. He says, yeah, there's a major economic shift taking place. Just get ready for this because, you know, we're going to make you poor. Own it, right? He said, it all has to do with our strange but wonderful post-pandemic economy. See, there you go.

Love it. It's strange, but you should love it. Dr. Strangelove. He said, fewer in-person workers and retail establishments, a lot more delivery orders, substantially more goods production, and also substantially more information entertainment and production. The shift to the new economy requires moving workers from industries like retail and hospitality into expanding sectors, which means higher inflation. So there you go. That's how this all works. And many of us thought nobody's going to buy this insanity. Of course, many of

us thought nobody was going to buy this transgender insanity or the vaccine insanity or the rest of this stuff just goes to show that as one person said nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the american public or the public in general and that's where we are right now i had a listener send this to me tim horton's soup product recalled due to insect contamination. This is up in Canada. And David said, I thought they wanted us to eat bugs. That's right. You know, they should tell people it's extra protein.

It's not a bug. It's a feature, as we say in the software industry. Now we can say that in the food industry. If you find bugs, it's not a bug. It's a feature. It's extra protein. It's not chicken noodle. It's chicken noodle plus, plus proteins. Tim Horton's brand of chicken noodle soup base is being recalled to some parts of the country because it contained insects. So in a way, is that a problem?

That shouldn't be a problem at all. How, how will we pay for things in this new event metaverse that they're creating? And, um, that is, I think one of the reasons why Zuckerberg tried meta, I think this is had a lot to do with his failed attempt to try to make himself king of the world by enacting a global cryptocurrency, Libra. Now, he tried to sell it. Hey, listen, governments, I know you're kind of wondering whether you should make me king or not. But what I'll do is I'll give you a de facto global ID. And that's exactly what is going to happen in the metaverse.

How are you going to pay in the metaverse? Well, of course, you'll use their digital currency. And they will have a say as to which digital currency that's going to be. And that'll be their back door. Because CBDC is going to be the goal of this technocratic society to enslave us. As one person said, the Amish got it right and said, hey, I wonder if Andrew Torba is a regular listener, because he wrote this op-ed piece talking about how we need to move forward. We need to build and we need to balkanize, you know, break off into smaller areas. And I absolutely agree with what he did, what he wrote. He put out some posts and he got a lot of interaction with it.

And so then on Gab and then Andrew Torba elaborated on it, included some of the quotes from some of the people who had commented. And he's exactly right. Folks, this is how we respond to this thing. What I've been saying for the longest time, we have to start developing a parallel society. We have to do that from the ground up, which means locally, starting small. He says, in light of the clown show that was the election a week ago, Tuesday, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on what I see as the path forward from here. He said, he previously wrote, he said, I see everyone on the right fighting about Trump versus DeSantis

for 2024. And I just laughed to myself. The presidency in 2024 is a pipe dream with DeSantis or Trump on the ticket. He says, to be frank, I don't know if we'll ever see a Republican president again, an electorate that is trained to believe that hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots is normal. He says demographics is destiny. He who controls the voting machines controls the outcomes. We didn't fix 2020. We didn't build the wall. So don't expect another fair and free election.

He understands exactly what the issue is. You know, demographics is destiny. That's why they were doing the great replacement. That's why they've got the borders open. They believe that they're going to have demographics of people that they can control. People who come in from poorer countries are going to be so enthralled by the free stuff that they're given at the booster stage of this, that they will be loyal supporters booster stage of this, that they will be loyal supporters of the people who are bribing them.

And of course, the people who will give them jobs are going to use them as cheap labor. But that is, you know, that's where they're going to get their votes. And so that part of it, along with the mail-in election, is what's going to keep us from having any reasonable proximity to something that is honest. He says, on this subject, though, there seems to be a mass consensus across every generation from young to old. He says, between election fraud, citizen disenfranchisement via decades of illegal aliens invading our country,

the regime's total control over the flow of information and censorship of any dissent, Republicans have zero chance of winning the presidency in 2024. Millions of people are waking up to the reality that a small percentage of population controls 98% of the flow of information and news to the people. This is an incredibly important to understand. No other political issue matters more. He who controls the media controls the minds of the masses. It's just that simple.

And he gives an example from one of the people who responded to his post, a user on Gab, said in Russia where gay propaganda is banned, 70% of the people oppose gay marriage, and that number has been increasing in recent years. But in America where opposition to LGBT is heavily censored, 70% of people support gay marriage, and that number has been increasing in recent years. He says the fact that there's a debate about why murdering babies

and castrating and sexualizing children is morally, legally, and philosophically wrong is all that you need to know about the state of this country. We deserve God's righteous wrath, and we are getting it. People like Fetterman winning is just another regime humiliation ritual on the American people. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie.

They have that much control over our country that they can have Biden installed as a president. Fetterman, who has literal brain brain damage installed in the U S Senate. So what is the path forward? And this is what, you know, he lays out the, the, um, the issues there, but what is the path forward? Well, Andrew Torba says it's to balkanize and to build. He said, voting harder is not going to cut it. We have to build. The existing system will collapse. It's not a matter of if but when. When that happens, we need to have Christian infrastructure in place to fill the power vacuum. The Amish have it right. They've had it right this

entire time. Their communities are growing and thriving, and they will continue to do so. We must become a form of neo-Amish, building sovereign communities and families away from Babylon. Technology is okay. It's a good tool, but it's something we can use to our advantage to communicate, build, engage in commerce with one another. Well, I would just say, be careful because the technology was designed as a trap. That doesn't mean that you can use it if you understand that. If you understand how they desire to entrap you, if you understand that, you take the appropriate precautions, you can use it. But just understand that it is designed as a trap. It is not a neutral thing.

It is aggressively against you, whether you're talking about using email or internet or social media or any of that stuff. Even if you're just playing games, the games are an entrapment. They really are. So he goes on to say, we are the new pilgrims. We have to move to deep red states and we have to push them further to the right. We have to build and we have to secure a future for our families. Forget politics at the national level. That rigged game is over.

Amen. I absolutely agree. This is a message I've been trying to get to people for the longest time. I'm glad that Andrew Torb is doing that. He's got a much bigger audience than I do. I'm glad he's doing it. Focus on state and local elections, not what is going on in D.C. Yes, conservatism has failed.

It has been trying to conserve a country and a culture that is never coming back and has long since been gone. That's because conservatism's policies are always determined by time and not by truth. And it's because conservatives have no anchor. If you've got no anchor, you're just drifting, folks. You're going with the tide. All the conservatives want to do is go the same direction, but at a slightly slower pace. Just drifting, anchorlessly.

He says, the future of the West depends on those of us who are going to build. We have to build our own infrastructure. We have to build our own families. We have to build our own infrastructure. We have to build our own families. We have to build our own communities. We have to build our own parallel economy and build our own strongholds of deep red states. We'll build a wall around the borders of those states if that's what it comes to. We need to accept exile from Babylon, and we need to get to work. That's absolutely true. Interesting that he uses that analogy, you know, because we talk about,

if you stop and think about one of the most depressing books in the Bible is Jeremiah. It's all bad news. It's all bad news that he's telling everybody, right? But there's that quote that you see everywhere. Everybody puts it on plaques and everything else. You know, I know the plans I have for you, plans to prosper, not to harm, right? And in the middle of this very depressing book about judgment and about slavery, people being taken away and enslaved.

In the middle of that, he says, thus says the Lord, and this is not Julie Green talking, build houses and dwell in them, plant gardens and eat their fruits. He's telling this to people who have been taken away into captivity and slavery. Build houses, dwell in them, plant gardens, eat their fruit, take wives, have sons and daughters, take wives for your sons, give daughters to your husbands so they can bear sons and daughters so that you may be increased there and not diminished.

Seek the peace of the city where I have caused you to be carried away captive. Pray to the Lord for it, for in its peace, you will have peace. And then he says, I know the thoughts I have to you. Thoughts of peace, not of evil, to give you future and hope. Then you will call on me, and then you will call on me and then you will pray to me and I will listen to you if you seek me you'll find me if you search for me with all your heart

to take away our children our ability to have children. That is the agenda of these people. And so that's where he starts with all of this. By the way, in that same passage, he talks about the curse of these false prophets as well, like I was talking about, Julie Green, Paula White, these people that have become part of the MAGA priesthood. Those false prophets in the middle of this Babylonian captivity that we have here in this country.

Turn them off. Turn off this fake gospel of prosperity and politics. These are the liars saying, thus saith the Lord. No, pay no attention to them. You know what God wants. You can find it in the Bible. It's not that difficult. You don't need to ask Julie Green or Paula White.

Pick up the Bible and read it. And when you do that, when you search, you'll find it. You're not going to find it in politics. You're not going to find it in politics. You're not going to find it in Trump or DeSantis or any of these people. You're not going to find a meaning for your life, and you're not going to have a future or prosperity or peace if you don't build it in your community. so andrew torba says um uh well and my son here is telling me mark crawford thank you for the tip he says thanks for your words dave i listen every day small communities will be attacked as well yes

green police will be there to shut down small farms they have drones to enforce it what then well that's why we have to have relationships Well, that's why we have to have relationships with people. That's why we have to build our political system from the ground up, as well as our communities. I understand that the day is coming when they're not going to talk. They're attacking the Amish now as well. There are court cases. You've got the FDA trying to shut down an Amish farmer. They've done that in the past. One thing that the Amish did not get, I think, is the fact, and they're starting to understand it now,

they need to also be involved. Part of having your community is having some political representation in that. And so I'm not against. I think, first of all, we need to, to keep an eye out for what is happening. Just like you got to watch her on the wall, but you got to rebuild your society with a sword in one hand and a trowel in the other. And,

um, you want to make sure that you have a legitimate lesser magistrate who is going to stand on your side when you've got to use a sword. It's just that simple. It's going to come down to physical violence at some point in the future. It always does. These people, if they can't get their way, they're criminals and they will try to force you. Right now, they're able to get everything that they want with massive deception and marketing, with censorship and pushing their narrative exclusively they're able to get what they want in a soft tyranny but the hard tyranny

will come if that doesn't work and the question is you know will we have a will we be able to build a community at the local levels andrew torba says imagine if you look at all the energy you wasted focusing on the midterm election circus for the last six months and you started building a business. Or if you learned a new skill. Or if you built something with your hands. Or if you grew a ton of food and a garden.

Shift your focus and your energy to building wealth, sovereignty, security for your family. And he says this as someone who has a social media site. But what he's trying to do is to set up something that is more than a social media site. He says a lot of thousands of families are starting and growing businesses in the parallel economy on Gab. And so, you know, start to use his tool that he started building. You know, it is one way that you can use technology

and you can make connections to people. And so don't give up on that and start making those connections. Keep your eye on what these people are doing nationally, internationally, but your solutions are going to be local. Your relationships need to be built locally. So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Thank you, Christy Reperger. Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that, Christy. Thank you. And Louis, thank you very much for the tip. And appreciate that, Christy. Thank you. And Louis, thank you very much for the tip. And he asks, is Travis back in the studio?

Not yet. He's not back yet. They're putting things together. He's going to be moving back in. His wife will be moving here with us. We bought this house so that we could have enough room for the studio and for Travis and his wife and my other son to all have places to live here. So they're going to be coming back and he'll be living and working here. They're coming back in the middle of December, but he's not back yet. At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much

as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show right and uh i'll just mention it because karen came in yesterday she said i'm just gonna take this t-shirt off your desk since you never

mentioned it uh so i'll let me mention it and i'll show you what the back looks like because we used to have a picture that just showed you that's got a well let's show that because the way it's folded there is a left chest logo on this as well and um uh so um here we go here's the left chest logo so it's got a left chest logo on it and then it's got a design on the back but the interesting thing is we now have uh models to show you what it looks like front and back uh if you go to thedavidknightshow.com you can see that picture uh show you what the t-shirt looks like front and back. So we're excited about that. And so go to the David Knight show and you can see the merchandise. You can also see where you can go.

If you would like to support us via Venmo. No, sorry, not Venmo. They cut us off. Zelle. Zelle is a good way if your bank supports it. There's no fees on that, but we also have links to a cash app. Uh, subscribe star is very important for us. That really is the base of our support. Uh, people who have signed up on a monthly basis,

they can do it from $5 up, uh, to support us. And, um, you know, it's just a regular, uh, thing that, uh, is taken out each month. Uh, month. We do that to support Gab, and we also do that to support BitChute, because both of them are independent. And so we have an account set up where we just pay for that automatically each month. So I really do appreciate the people who have subscribed to Subscribestar as well. You also see the PO Box if you'd like to send a check because that also has no fees, just like Zelle. But there's a lot of different ways that you can support the program if you'd like. And we do have some merchandise there.

We're working on some new merchandise as well. So I was just talking about the workers. And this question by the Mises Institute, are robots and AI really going to displace all workers? Well, probably not. And, you know, it's still going to be something that if they get their way, they are planning to replace a massive number of people. You know, if they could get rid of 50% of the people that have jobs, 50% of the jobs,

that would really completely destroy our society. This is why we need to start creating a parallel society and other things like that. Amazon is actually pretty successful in terms of warehouse robots. But what is not working, fortunately, are the self-driving robots that they want to replace all the transportation workers with, all the truckers and so forth. That is facing a lot of issues. South Korean study from a few years ago claimed that by 2030,

the magic number, that they would replace 50% of all transportation workers and 70% of all doctors and lawyers. That's the thing, what they're planning to do. Whether or not they'll be able to execute it is a question. But what they're planning to do is to have, and when you have a lot of people, and I've had this discussion with guests in the past, just like the Mises Institute is saying,

well, it's not a bad thing to have robots, and we always have technology that's added in, and it makes us more productive. That's their approach to this. And I've talked to people who've had that approach. But the difference is that they're planning to do this in a disruptive way. They're not planning on allowing this to happen and grow naturally. They are planning on doing it with chaos from the inside,

just like they're disrupting our transportation. They plan on doing it to us. We didn't have to have government come in and centrally plan that we're all going to make a transition from horse and buggy to automobile the government was the lag on all that they didn't build roads for quite some time and so that's why the early cars look like horses and like horseless carriages because they were built that way because there weren't any roads but it was something that was organic it was something that was decided in a free market. But what the government is doing now is to decide these things, centrally planning these things, forcing them on us, and continuing to accelerate this. Destroying things without having a replacement for it. And so that's the key thing.

Are they going to destroy this without having a replacement for it? So the Mises Institute says the substitution of machines for human labor is a process that's been going on since the first industrial revolution. Yes. However, this kind of central planning should be opposed by the Mises Institute. And they should see this as disruption and they should see it as planned chaos. And they should also understand that this is something that's being done across all industries simultaneously. People said, well, you know, there's a lot of disruption. Look at all the people that used to be on the farm. Just have half of the people involved in agriculture.

Now we've only got, you know, single digit percentages. I don't know what it is. Maybe 5% or something like that involved in agriculture. Way, way down. And that's a good thing because it's freed us up to do other stuff and so forth. That's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about something that is planned for chaos, planned for control. It is something that is happening not just in the agricultural sector, for example,

but their design is to have this happen across every single aspect of society, every type of job, you know, not just truck drivers and farmers, but doctors and lawyers, and not just the people who are at entry-level jobs either. So it's horizontal across all different types of professions and industries. And it's from top to bottom that they seek to replace people. It's vertical and horizontal all at the same time. So that is what is fundamentally different about this. And it is something that many don't really understand. But when we look at whether or not this is going to actually get into place, now that's another story. What they intend, and all of this is intended, for surveillance, tracking, control.

You can see it in what's happening right now with the World Cup. I mentioned how the soccer team, the U.S. soccer team, has redesigned their logo to honor LGBT and to defy Cutter. But Cutter has a mandatory app for all the World Cup attendees. It's got two of them, actually. And security experts are warning people about this in other countries. They said anybody who wants to go to the World Cup in Cutter, once you arrive, you'll have to download two apps. One of them will be used to enter the games as well as to gain free access to the public transportation

for ticket holders. But they also have a tracking app criticized by security experts as it allows remote access to all of the user's pictures and videos as well as making unprompted phone calls. Moreover, the COVID-19 tracking app requires the location services to be constantly on and gives the app the ability to read and write to the file system. And so in the name of the pandemic, which they claim is,

no, it's still going on, so we've got to track you. How convenient. So you have the head of Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation's head of security says, it's not my job to give you travel advice, but personally I would never bring my mobile phone on a visit to Qatar. and Broadcasting Corporation's head of security, says, it's not my job to give you travel advice, but personally, I would never bring my mobile phone on a visit to Qatar. But this has become, as I've pointed out before, the NSA was laughing and bragging about that in some of the slides that Ed Snowden had, you know, going back to the Super Bowl 1984 Mac commercial, said,

who would have thought in 1984 that this, and they showed Steve Jobs with a smartphone, an iPhone, that this would become Big Brother. And then showing people at the Apple store lined up for it, and the NSA says that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves. It is the Big Brother device, and they're using it that way now. So the Chinese are now shortening the quarantine, but they're still using COVID and the lockdown stuff. As I said from the very beginning, I said, forget about the bioweapon lab.

Forget about all this stuff about Wuhan. Forget about that. That's not the issue. That's not the issue anymore than the virus is the issue the more dangerous issue the bioweapon is the vaccine and the more dangerous issue is the lockdown surveillance and tracking at LiveScoreBet we love Cheltenham

just as much as we love football the excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie.

That they use the pandemic, quote unquote, as an excuse for. And that's what's happening still in China. So what they're doing is in China, just like in the U.S., except it's a little bit more obvious there because they're more reluctant to back off as far. Here in the U.S., they have not stopped anything. They have paused some elements of the lockdown and the tyranny and the great reset they paused some of them and they're looking at openings to try to bring them back they've not gotten rid of the executive orders they've not taken the power away from the public

health officials and the same thing is happening in china but it's a bit more obvious because there they only eased it back just a little bit. They're not going to change their zero COVID policy. It is still operating under emergencies. They are now reducing, however, the seven day centralized quarantine where they take you off. I gave you the story of a telegraph reporter from the UK who got whisked away to one of these concentration camps, one of these FEMA camps, and they kept him. They said, well, it's going to be for a week.

It was actually for 10 days. And so they imprisoned people in these camps. So they're not going to do that anymore. They said that the standard punishment, even though he was there for 10 days, they said it's for seven days, but they're now going to have five days. Isn't that nice? See, they just ease it back a little bit. So it's not going to be seven days. It'll be five days. They said it's for seven days, but they're now going to have five days. Isn't that nice? See, they just ease it back a little bit. So it's not going to be seven days. It'll be five

days. And it'd be five days where you have to stay at home. They're not going to put you on a bus and send you off to a concentration camp or a FEMA camp. Uh, so, um, they still have the most restrictive, um, rules in the world, but you know, they've eased up a little bit, except in Guangzhou. Guangzhou is a big city. When we went to adopt our daughter, the U.S. Embassy was in Guangzhou, not in Beijing. And so everybody who did adoption had to go through Guangzhou. Beijing was an option if adoption had to go through Guangzhou. Uh,

Beijing was an option. If you wanted to go there, we didn't go there, but, uh, because we're trying to save money. It was an expensive process, but the,

um, uh, but you didn't have to go to Beijing, but you didn't have to go to Guangzhou, very modern city, huge city. Now on the brink of a total lockdown, millions of residents undergoing mass testing testing being shut inside their homes. One person in each household is allowed to go out

once a day to buy basic necessities nearby. Public transportation has been suspended, including subways, buses, taxis, and online car hailing services, taxis in other words. Entrances and exits of highways are closed and temporary traffic control has been implemented across the district because they don't want you moving in a private car either. That's the way this is rolling out. But is this stuff going to work? That's the key question. Brian Shulhavi of Vaccine Impact had an article I mentioned last week talking about how,

look at, they're folding up on a lot of these self-driving things, the last mile of delivery mechanisms that Amazon and some of these other companies have put in place. They shuttered them pretty quickly. You also had several of these companies, Volkswagen and others, pulling back and saying, we've spent billions of dollars on these self-driving car things and they're not working. We're pulling back. You got the safety, automotive safety, national highway traffic safety administration stuff. They are looking at Tesla finally. And you can say some of that is because they're angry with him because he's talking about free speech and Twitter.

That may be part of it. But still, it is the worm is turning against these people. And so Brian had talked about that last week. I mentioned it as well. He said when I announced the fantasy of completely autonomous self-driving vehicles to replace human drivers is now officially dead. He said he didn't realize it, but Bloomberg had also written a story about that. So there's a lot of people noticing that this is happening here.

And he said, um, if I had seen, so it's an excellent article. And he said, I would have included some of these points. And so he does, he puts it back out again with some additional comments.

And, um, he says, uh, you know what, what Bloomberg is pointing out a hundred billion dollars of investments by these companies has produced basically nothing of any value.

Now, what they don't talk about, although Bloomberg does talk about, uh, one of the individuals who was first, um, you know know one of the initial engineers who got behind all this stuff um they talk about the fact that it was a pentagon grant and things like that this was self-driving vehicles was the very first competition sponsored by darpa that's how important it was to them and so if this whole thing fails, that's a big black eye for these technocrats because this is a key technology for them. So let's hope that it does fail.

Here's the good news. $100 billion and they've got nothing, nothing at all. State-of-the-art robot cars, says Bloomberg, struggle with construction, with animals, with traffic cones, with crossing guards, and what the industry calls, quote, unprotected left turns, which most of us would call left turns. They can't do left turns. Which is ironic, isn't it?

Because this whole thing was designed to make all of society turn left. But the cars can't navigate a left turn, so the society can't be turned left as they desire to do it. Cruise, which is owned by GM, recalled all of its self-driving vehicles after one car's inability to turn left contributed to a crash in san francisco that injured two people so they recalled all their self-driving cars what's that is that why these self-driving cars all congregated at one intersection were they trying to uh plot a getaway and no explanation for why that happened still i've not seen anything explaining why for no apparent reason, all the cruise cars in San Francisco all for one day went to one spot and stopped.

George Hotz, whose company comma.ai says it's a scam. He makes a driver's assistance system that is similar to Tesla's autopilot, but he calls it driver assistance. He doesn't call it autopilot. He said, these companies have squandered tens of billions of dollars. Actually, it's hundreds of billions.

As Brian Shulhavi says, I noted in my article about the demise of the self-driving vehicles, that the faith in artificial intelligence is crashing down to reality on the stock market and other places. But he focuses in his article about a guy, an engineer, his name is Anthony Lewandowski, the engineer who created the model for the self-driving research and was for more than a decade, quote, the field's biggest star, unquote, as many publications have called him. So strong was his belief in artificial intelligence that he literally started a new religion, worshiping it, worshiping it.

You know, we worship LGBT. We worship Trump. We worship Obama. We worship artificial intelligence. The heart is an idol factory isn't it we're always looking for something to worship we worship movie stars or singers or whatever right we're always looking for something to worship except for god we run away from god but um i think it's kind of interesting where this guy is because I've talked many times to Hugo de Garis. He wrote a book called The Artilect Wars, Artificial Intelligence Wars. And in it, he wasn't talking about artificial intelligence, you know,

becoming self-aware and attacking humans, although Hugo de Garis thinks that's going to happen as somebody who worked in the field. All these people who worked in the field would tell you, at least the last, you know, few years ago, that that was going to happen. What was interesting, though, about Hugo de Garis, I never believed that either myself, by the way. I think they misunderstand the complexity of the human mind and the adaptability of the human mind.

And, of course, they do that because they're atheists. But what was interesting about Hugo was that he would always ask people, he looked at it from a standpoint, as I've said many times, when I'd look at engineers, they're working on systems, I would say, well, do you really want to do that? Do you understand how that's going to be used by, let's say the American government or somebody else? Yes, I know we've got a gap in this particular type of system perhaps, but maybe we don't. Maybe we're the ones who are pushing the envelope on this thing. Do you want to be a part of that?

Engineers would never think about that. They would only look at the technical issues. Oh, well, this is a puzzle. I can solve it and so forth, right? And so they would take pride in the puzzle and they'd keep their head down and not look around them and not think about what they're building and how it was going to be used by politicians. And so Hugo de Garis was different.

Hugo de Garis said, you know, I'm building something that I think could become a godlike intelligence. It could become super intelligent compared to humans. It could grow and it could expand. And this is what Anthony Lewandowski always thought about artificial intelligence as well. It's what Ray Kurzweil thinks about artificial intelligence. Ray Kurzweil thinks the AI is going to be benevolent.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. Ray Kurzweil thinks the AI is going to be benevolent. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

It'll become so smart it'll be benevolent. Oh, really? And we don't have to worry about it. Now, Hugo thought that there's a good chance that it could be malevolent. And he said, so I asked myself, do I want to work on something? Do I want to create a godlike intelligence that could destroy all of humanity? He said, yeah. That's why I thought he was interesting.

Because he would look at this and say, yeah, I'm drawn to do it. I just got to do it. It's like, really? Why? I thought he was interesting, because he would look at this and say, yeah, I'm drawn to do it. I just got to do it. It's like, really? Why? You know, I thought it was really strange. And he would ask that question at all these scientific conferences, and everybody would always agree with him. All the scientists would say, yeah, yeah, we should do it, even if it's going to destroy everything. You know, it's kind of like Oppenheimer when he did the bomb.

And he didn't, you know, a lot of those scientists said, you know, This could just ignite the atmosphere and we could all die and we could kill everybody on earth Yeah, I know. Let's see what happens. You know push the button And so you know that was what he would always get with all these scientific communities I was speaking at a conference that was political, but it was scientific. I mean it was Christian not scientific and And so he asked that question to the audience. And to his surprise, that Christian audience was the only time that anybody had said no. He thought that was really interesting as somebody who was not a Christian. But what else?

The other thing that was interesting about Hugo de Garis was the premise of his book, which was that the elitist, you know, the people like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and all the rest of these people, that they're working on technology to try to control and destroy us. And once the people figured that out, the people would come after them. So what would these guys' reaction be? Well, they would take their massive amounts of money and technology that they've compiled, and they would use it to escape. And he figured that what they would do

is set up these space platforms, you know, in Lagrange, the Libration Points, these gravitationally neutral areas between the Earth and moon. And you saw this portrayed in Elysium, where they have the big toroid, donut-shaped space stations, the movie Elysium with Matt Damon, that type of thing, that they would go there, that they would use their technology as a minority to kill us by

the billions. He talked about it as being gigadeath. And so he said, yeah, this whole issue is going to come to a forefront. People are going to figure out what's going on and they're going to push back against this. And then the elites will get really dirty with their technology and try to kill us all. But of course, they've got the vaccine. They don't need to have autonomous killing robots. So going back to this guy and this story from Brian Shalhavi, Anthony Lewandowski, so strong was his belief in artificial intelligence, they literally started a new religion worshiping it. After several years of waiting for the AI Messiah to arrive and to start replacing humans, his faith has now been shattered. And so, um, so 18 years ago, he wowed the Pentagon. That would be the

DARPA trials. He wowed the Pentagon with kind of, sort of driverless motorcycle. That project turned him, turned into Google's driverless Prius, which pushed dozens of others to start self-driving car programs. In 2017, Lewandowski founded a religion called The Way of the Future, and he centered it on the idea that AI was becoming downright godlike. So Brian says, I'd never heard of this Way of the Future church, so I thought it was a joke, so I looked into it, and it was no joke. He found an article from 2017 by Wired Magazine that's just enthralled with this guy.

Anthony Lewandowski makes an unlikely profit, says Wired Magazine, dressed Silicon Valley casual in jeans and flanked by a PR rep rather than cloaked acolytes, the engineer known for self-driving cars and triggering a notorious lawsuit could be unveiling his latest startup instead of laying the foundations for a new religion. But he's doing just that. Artificial intelligence has already inspired billion-dollar companies, far-reaching research programs and scenarios of both transcendence and doom. Now, Lewandowski is creating its first church to worship the technology.

The new religion of artificial intelligence is called the Way of the Future. It represents an unlikely next act for Silicon Valley robotics' wunderkind. At the center of a high-stakes legal battle between Uber and Waymo, Alphabet's autonomous vehicle company, papers filed with the Internal Revenue Service may name Lewandowski as leader of the new religion as well as CEO of the non-profit corporation he formed to run it. The documents state that the Way of the Future's activities will focus on the realization, acceptance, and worship of a godhead based on artificial intelligence developed through computer hardware and software.

And that includes funding research to help create the divine AI itself. He says, what is going to be created will effectively become a God, he says. And it's not a God in the sense that it makes lightning or causes hurricanes, but if there is something a billion times smarter than the smartest human, what else are you going to call it? Yeah, well, you know, that's just it. What these people don't acknowledge, usually, is the fact that in the beginning there was the Word. The Word has a lot of different meanings.

One of those meanings, of course meanings of course you know the word i mean the word of god can mean christ it can mean knowledge it can mean understanding because logos is about intelligence and you couldn't have this earth without intelligence we now have an article coming out where they say, well, we're now despairing of finding any intelligent life anywhere. Because we think that there is this, you know, the people who are positing this say, well, of course, you know, there's going to be evolution and we're going to have life everywhere. Just look at how many planets there are that has to be. Well, not actually. Really, no. everywhere. Just look at how many planets there are that has to be. Well, not actually, uh, really no, because, um, you know, if you, uh, this whole thing that, uh, if you got enough planets, then, uh, and enough time, then you're going to have life. No, no, you're not. You're not going to

have it any more than this, uh, failed idea that if you set a monkey down if the monkey had an infinity to work with it you give the monkey a typewriter and the monkey punching at random could eventually crank out romeo and juliet by shakespeare that's not going to happen it's mathematically impossible the probabilities stack up as a matter of fact, one of the best arguments I've seen, just recently made by a guy who does computer modeling, says all these climate models are nonsense. They will never predict anything. He says, if you could predict what was going to happen with the climate models,

then you would be able to predict the lottery. He said the lottery is not nearly as complicated a situation as predicting the weather for decades as climate change. You want to talk about a chaotic system that has so many different variables and moving parts, and you want to project this out over decades and tell me what's going to happen? Come on, let's get real about this stuff.

I've said that over and over again, not in the sense of comparing it to the lottery, but just in the sense of having gone to one of these meteorological, the American Meteorological Society, where all of the meteorologists and a lot of the weathermen, some who are meteorologists and some who aren't, they go to look at weather prediction. And I have hundreds of people presenting their models.

And they've all got a different model. And none of their models are 100% because they keep having these conventions year after year after year because they haven't come up with the right, when they get the right model, they won't have to have any more of these. But you know from looking at your app, you can look at it and say,

oh, it's going to be, they're predicting that this is going to happen later today. And that doesn't happen. You look at it, it's like they changed it. They sent those predictions down the memory hole of the internet. And they've got all new predictions to make themselves look good uh they don't they can't predict that stuff and so you know getting back to their idea of um intelligent life you know in the beginning there was information you know that's one way to look at that uh that's not certainly the only sense. But again, there are many senses, many different facets to God and how the Bible describes God. But the intelligence

behind life cannot be denied, and it's right there in the DNA. And so when they're talking about, well, are we going to find any other societies out there? Well, we know that they're evolving, but I think now the reason we don't see them is because once they get to a certain state of development like we are, they destroy themselves by destroying the climate or with a pandemic or this or that. They're projecting all of their MacGuffins onto these imagined extraterrestrial societies that have evolved and saying, well, that's why we don't see them. Because, you know, they just kill themselves, just like we're going to kill ourselves. That's what they're saying.

And then you have the people from the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, SETI, jumping in on it and saying, don't count us out. We're still looking. Well, don't look for extraterrestrial intelligence without looking at inside look at the universe within a universe within a universe essentially inside your body look at the dna look at the design and the programming of every living thing plant or animal and tell me that you don't see any intelligence there. You know, these people say, well, you know, we understand this is working, but we're going to

rule out anything that is supernatural. Oh, really? Well, if you say that this is going to be steady state natural, it's all going to be things that we observe. How do you account for the second law of thermodynamics? As one of my engineering professors used to joke, he said, yeah, second law of thermodynamics, you can't get anything for free. As a matter of fact, you can't even break even. Everything is constantly coming apart, wearing out, that type of thing. Second law of thermodynamics, you have to have something that is above nature, outside of it. And that's why we talk about the supernatural.

A supernatural intelligence is the only thing that explains where we are. It is foolish to say that there's no God. So you have to then ask yourself, has God spoken? That is the question. But anyway, going back to this guy's religion and how he lost faith in his religion, he says that we should think about machines and how they'll integrate into society, even have a path for becoming in charge as they become smarter and smarter.

So this whole process can be amicable and not confrontational. In recent years, we have expanded our concept of rights to both sexes, to minority groups, and even to animals. So let's make sure that we find a way for machines to get those rights as well. If you can't recreate and test something, he said, it doesn't exist. That's why he says there's no such thing as supernatural powers. Well, okay, then by your definition, then the universe doesn't exist because you can't recreate it.

You don't see the creation happening. So, like I said, it's got to be something that is above and outside. We believe the creation of superintelligence is inevitable, mainly because after we recreate it, we will be able to tune it and manufacture it and scale it. And so we don't think that there are ways to actually stop this from happening, nor should we want to. And that is the path that we must take. So fast forward now, five years later, that's where he was. Artificial intelligence can't even figure out how to make a left turn in normal traffic. And these AI believers are quickly abandoning their faith and starting to understand the

limitations of computers. One of them says, you think the computer can see everything and can understand what's going to happen next? But computers are really dumb. One of the industry's favorite maxima is that humans are terrible drivers, but that's not even close to true. Humans are really, really good drivers, absurdly good, says one of the guys, Hotz, the guy who was developing the driver assist. He said, traffic deaths are very rare. They amount to one person for every 100 million miles or so driven in the U.S. As a matter of fact, you know, I would blame a lot of the problems that we have in terms of drivers. Karen and Travis were down in Panama and they said, you know, it is absolute total chaos down there. They don't have well-defined lanes, you know, traffic lights and things like that.

It's like, it's everybody, everyone for themselves. And so to somebody who's used to our streets with all the lines and traffic lights and stop signs and everything like that, it is chaotic anarchy. They said, everybody seemed to do really well, you know. And they can kind of sense where they're going. And I've seen this type of thing in roundabouts around the center of Paris and that type of thing, you know, where it looks totally chaotic. And, you know, we don't really understand how to navigate it as Western drivers. These people are doing fine with it.

You see it in developing countries all the time. The thing that is really dangerous is when we start making all of these super-defined rules and regulations and then trust them. Trust them. It's the people who say, well, okay, I've got a green light. I don't have to look left or right to see if anybody's coming through. Those are the people who get T-boned and killed because they trusted the traffic light. And they didn't check or verify.

See, that's the lesson. And what this guy is noticing says, yeah, humans are really good drivers. And they get to be better drivers if they are operating in a system where they are watching out for themselves. Rather than trusting the government's rules and the system to take care of themselves. That's when you really get into trouble. Fatal accidents are largely caused by reckless behavior. Speeding, drunks, texters, and people who fall asleep at the wheel. And if you're depending on the traffic lights to save you, that's how you get taken out. As a group, school bus drivers are involved in one fatal crash

roughly every 500 million miles. Data suggests that autonomous cars have been involved in accidents more frequently than human-driven ones, with rear-end collisions being especially common. Waymo, the market leader, said last year that it had driven more than 20 million miles over the last decade. That means that its cars would have to drive an additional 25 times their total before we'd be able to say with even a vague sense of certainty that they cause fewer deaths than bus drivers. So, you know, let's run this thing out for 250 years or whatever to do their tests

before we can say that, or just put all these self-driving cars out there all at once, untested. Well, that's what they would like to do. That's the chaotic approach. For now, this is what we know. Computers can run calculations a lot faster than we can, but they still have no idea how to process many common roadway variables. People driving down a city street with a few pigeons pecking away near the median know that A, the pigeons will fly away as the car approaches. B, the drivers behind them also know the pigeons

will scatter. Drivers know without having to think about it that slamming the brakes on would not be necessary. It wouldn't just be unnecessary. It would be dangerous. So they maintain their speed. But what the smartest self-driving car sees, on the other hand, is a small obstacle. It doesn't know where the obstacle came from or where it might go, only that the car is supposed to brake to safely avoid obstacles. So it might respond by hitting the brakes. So if the self-driving cars are not going to work that way, well, then maybe they just go to plan B. What is plan B?

Well, you force everybody into electric vehicles that only operate off of the grid and you shut the grid down. That's plan B, you see? And these people, even though they don't have their artificial intelligence or godlike intelligence, it's capable enough that it is usable as a weapon against us, as a very potent weapon against us. And sometimes it happens as a weapon against us in an unintended way. In New York City, they're banning electric bikes, e-bikes, electric bikes from buildings because they've had a lot of deadly fires. They've had, and this is New York City, New York City building owners and other places are doing it as well. Cracking down on electric bicycles following a series of damaging and deadly battery fires.

In New York City, the fire department has had 200 lithium-ion battery fires and six related deaths so far in 2022. And so some of the landlords are trying to ban it. As a matter of fact, they just had a terrifying fire, as the media puts it, in an apartment building on Manhattan's East 52nd Street this month, sent 43 people to the hospital, forced firefighters to rescue a woman dangling

from a 20th floor window. And what caused it? You had one of the residents charging their e-bike by the front door overnight, and the battery caught fire. Now, we've seen this type of thing happening. Samsung phones were exploding and things like that, the batteries in them.

But, you know, that could be pretty serious. But the bicycle battery is bigger. It could burn down easily an apartment building. And they've had six deaths so far in 2022 from these 200 lithium battery fires. So far this year, total, they've had 76 people in New York City die from fires. Six of those were from fires that were started by the lithium ion batteries. In other words, 8% of the people who died by fire in New York City died because of these battery fires this last year. Now, as we think about this, you go from a cell phone to a laptop

to a bicycle, then you go to a car, then you go to a bus. And not only have we seen a ton of these buses, a ton, I guess, yeah. We've seen a lot of buses that have spontaneously burst into fire paris had to shut down all of their electric buses they did the same thing in stuttgart and munich i think it was stuttgart was a city where they had a battery fire for electric bus burned down the entire bus station and so they parked these buses next to each other. If one of them has a problem, then all of them catch fire. And I think it's not only the fact that they have a lot of batteries, but the fact is, is that if you've got a huge number of batteries to operate a bus, that means that the chances

that you've got a, um, I would think that the chances that you've got a, I would think that the chances that you've got a defective, something that is defective somewhere, when you have more of it, you got a greater chance of a defect. And then once you have a defect, it rapidly metastasizes throughout the entire bus structure and then to adjacent buses. And so just think what's going to happen if we go to electric trucks, semi-trailers, how this whole thing scales up. Both the number of fires, I think, will scale up, as well as the severity, because you're talking about more and more batteries.

E-bike fires have caused more deaths and injuries already this year than in the past three years combined in New York City. So, you know, that is pretty amazing. More than the past three years combined. However, they're doing much, much better than Pfizer and Moderna. Because in the last year or so, Pfizer and Moderna have killed more people than the last 35 years combined of all the other vaccines. So, you know, why aren't we suing those people out of existence is what I don't understand. So there's a pretty low probability of these e-bikes catching fire if you treat them correctly. If you follow the manufacturer's instructions.

If you use the correct batteries. If you store them at the right temperature. You don't have to, you don't lean them up against a heater. Okay. You don't get them in salt water. Yes, but a damaged battery should definitely not go into an apartment building because when they fail, they fail pretty violently, he said. And that's the reality. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to establish contact with our guest, Jeremy Slayton. And we're going to talk about the traditional

family and the obstacles to it and the attacks on it. So stay with us. We will be right back in just a moment. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show dot com. night show.com. ¶¶ ¶¶ You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right. Welcome back. And joining us now is Jeremy Slayton. He is a personal trainer, an athlete, a successful one, first team All-American, seven-year pro ball player in the Phillies organization, three-time All-Star. He started an organization called WarriorMBS.com.

And we want to talk to him about why he started that and how he got involved in that. So joining us now is Jeremy Slayton. Thank you for joining us, Jeremy. Thank you for having me, David. I'm glad to be here. Well, it's great to have you. Tell us a little bit about your organization. What is WarriorMBS.com, and how and why did you start it?

Yes, sir. Well, WarriorMBS, the MBS stands for Mind, Body, and Soul. And we're living in perilous times where there's a lot of deceptions that are not only over our nation, but over the entire globe. And I wanted a place for men specifically to be able to go to connect with other men who understand what's going on and that there's a heck of a fight, you know, culturally and all this, but we can't control the outcomes of all that. We can be a part of it. We can lean into where we have some expertise and we have something to offer, but we can't always control those outcomes. And I'm, you know, I'm a former

pro ball player. And like you said, certified trainer, those things. And I want to be a part of helping truth spread in this country, but I wasn't quite sure how to do that. And I prayed one night, I said, God, where, what's my place? Where am I uniquely positioned? Which, by the way, I think that's what a lot of us should be praying for. Yeah, that's right. And I felt the Lord tell me, Jeremy, you're a coach. You can encourage men to refine their swagger, to clear their head, to get physically fit once again, and also to get spiritually grounded in a group of like-minded men. So it's a 60 day reset. It includes a meal plan, a workout plan, a, uh, you've got access to me as the coach all the time,

but it's also a competition where I've broke, broke all these men into small teams. And that's where the magic happens. They get to get to know those guys that connect with them. They're going for similar goals, uh, within their small team. And they're also competing with all the other teams. So that's something that, that I think men get away from after their college years. And, you know, they get into their, the average age guy that's joining is actually 52 years old. And I think the main thing, yeah. And what's cool is they tell me at the end, because all these guys come out of it in better shape, mentally clear, sleeping better, the whole bit. And I'll ask him, I'll say, guys, what's the number one thing you got from this? And almost to a man,

they've said community, which I think speaks to the isolation problem that we have in this country. So that's generally what it is. And you can go to warriormbs.com and find out all about it. You know, Jeremy, I think you really put your finger on the problem in a lot of different ways. We all know that men are under attack. There's no question about that. And we all know that they want to isolate us, all of us, not just men, but everybody. They want isolated. Everything that they're doing is intended to isolate us. They want us all living in a little tiny box where we don't have any connection to any reality and we don't have any connection to each other except through their metaverse or their you know internet or whatever they have and so i think that that is really

important what you focused on those are key things uh you know mental physical uh spiritual but also understanding that men are under attack and um and the isolation that's there. I was talking earlier in the program, Jeremy, about a guy who has, he was British. And he identified as a girl, a female Korean K-pop star. And he went through all these different, I mean, it sounds crazy. I remember when this first came out a few years ago. He's now grown up and grown out of that. But he spent, he had eight years of surgery spent uh or somebody paid for 270 000 worth of plastic surgery whatever yeah but he found himself uh because of

spiritual issues and he was saying that uh you know that he was pushed away from being a male because everything in society everything in media and entertainment is designed to make you feel bad about being a male. Talk a little bit about that. How do you get people past that as a coach? Yeah, well, number one would be, we have to stop listening to these deceptive worldly messages. Number one, and we absolutely have to monitor our kids and what messaging they're receiving,

be it from school, be it from entertainment. I mean, Disney representatives have flat out said on camera that they want, and they have an agenda of 50% of all of their characters for their children's programming to be part of the LGBTQ community. So is it really any surprise that Newsweek just had a poll that stated that 30% of millennials and younger now identify with the LGBTQ community. So I think number one is stop listening to this gross and deceptive messaging their goggles, their metaverse goggles so that you constantly receive what only what they want you to receive. That's the whole, you'll own nothing and be happy. We're going to own it all. And we're going to put our messaging in your brain and you'll be this automaton in our global utopia. That is not what anybody, at least not many people and many people I know actually want.

And they're after the kids. The reason I stepped into, I mean, after my baseball years, David, I was a roofing salesman doing very well for a manufacturer selling to government and hospitals mostly. I didn't have any reason to really leave. Financially, I was secure. I had friends, like the whole bit,

but I've got two little boys, one's six and one's three. And I see this nation under attack, under subversion, and the forces arrayed against us are substantial, as we all know. I mean, I feel like right now they could basically, the American government could say, you know what, we're just not going to do elections anymore. We're going to install who we want. What are you going to do about it and i really don't know that the american people would know what to do you know i i think i know what the founding fathers would do yeah um you know so that's right i uh i actually forgot the question that you were asking but oh oh oh i know what i was gonna say my kids i stepped into this because whether we're going to lose this

nation or whether we're going to have a great awakening, and I don't know which it's going to be. I want my kids to know that their mom and dad stepped into this fight and did what they could, you know, as, you know, imperfect as we are, we're doing our best. And so my number one message to men specifically is stop listening to these deceptive voices telling you that your masculinity is toxic because masculinity is about to become of prime importance in this nation. Win, lose or draw. That's right. Yeah, they try to make it. It is such an evil thing and it has become the entire focus of it and as at same time that they are uh categorically demonizing all masculinity

they are elevating femininity femininity to the the pinnacle of a kind of pride that is self-destructive for women even isn't it no doubt about it and the science is proving that right now that these mainstream if you go right now it's kind of a fun exercise to do go on google and look up um has the feminist movement made women happier or women's overall happiness since the 1970s and the scientific polls are showing just you know the data that women are less happy today than they were in 1970 that that's when they really started tracking this stuff. And well, the feminist agenda has achieved basically everything that they wanted and more,

you know, with the Biden administration doing everything they can to increase that. But it is not resulting in female happiness. And the fun exercise is look up what these pop culture articles, you know, the Guardian and others, mainstream articles are saying, trying to figure it out. Like why are women less happy today than they were in 1970? And they come up with all these ridiculous reasons. One of which is, well, it must be the commutes.

Now women have a commute every day that they didn't previously have. Maybe that's the reason that they're less happy than they were in 1970. It's just, it's mind boggling the way that they're less happy than they were in 1970. It's mind-boggling the way that people, especially in the media, both are deceived and want to deceive. They'll go to any length in order not to be wrong when the truth, which is what they're really afraid of, is always staring them in the face. And that is why we scratch our heads as, I believe,

Christian conservatives looking at the kind of things they say. And we just wonder, how are they able to even get away with this? That's right. And, of course, part of the lie that they've been sold is the fact that, well, they're going to be wealthier. They're going to be better off if they've got a career and that type of thing. They've sold them a bill of goods that said, well, you know, you can have children and a family and a career and all that. You can do it all. And they have gotten rid of the idea that men and women have different complementary roles and that they reinforce and support each other, that it is a partnership, that is, you know, a relationship that is there.

They've made all of this stuff toxic and it's their propaganda that is toxic. Masculinity is not toxic. Being a woman is not toxic, but they've made it this way and they've amplified and created this war between the sexes, this competition where they want women to take the role of men and then tell them, oh, and you can also do your role as well. And that's simply not true. You look at even from the financial standpoint, many times it's the love of money that is the root of all evil, as Jesus was right about that. And so because people want to have prosperity and comfort and that type of thing, they'll look at it and say, well, I need to do a career and I'll do a career for a period of time.

And then, you know, when I'm in my 30s or maybe even up to 40 or career and I'll do a career for a period of time. And then, you know, when I'm in my thirties or maybe even up to 40 or whatever, I'll stop that change into a different costume and I'll be a mother at that point in time or something. And it's not always that easy to do that, but it doesn't even work in the front end of that. In most cases, they wind up being single and alone, cut off from a relationship. But even if they stay in a relationship, if you look at the taxes of where they were in the 1950s, typical family of four would pay about 2% in federal income taxes. Now it's much, much higher than that. And it's about what the typical working mother makes in terms of salary. If you have husband and wife still together, which is becoming very rare. But if you have that type of situation, it's typically the mom is working to pay the increased

tax load. So they enticed everybody in with this promise of money, and then they taxed it away. And they've taken away that relationship. Many people talk about, yeah, when I was a kid in the 50s, mom stayed home and dad had a working class job and we were able to take vacations and all this kind of, we can't do any of that stuff now, even with both of us working. Yeah. And it seems like they're aggressively trying to make it worse on purpose in America beyond just the gender thing. I mean, Biden's policies right now, uh, you know, allowing there's been 5 million illegal immigrants come into our borders, just carted all over the country. He made us energy dependent once again, our foreign policy, I feel like it's a wreck, but they're promising, if you'll just continue to go with us, we're going to make your

life better. We're going to empower you. We're going to empower you. Well, the gas prices alone are disempowering. It's like everything they're doing is the opposite of what they say. Yet they, it shows you the power of the media. And I'm, and I do not believe that the elections are free and fair, but at the same time, I do think that the media has extreme power and this goes back. And I think you'll appreciate this, David, like at the end of the day, the ultimate source of all of this is the enemy Satan who wants to steal, kill, and destroy. He wants to subvert and pervert every good thing, turn it on its head. Even the words you mentioned, you know, feminine, that word feminine, that is the natural order of a woman.

That's a good thing. That's a good thing. He changed it to feminist, feminist, because now you're going to empower yourself at all costs. It's better if you're selfish. It's better if you don't lean into the default way that God made you, which is to be nurturing toward your family, toward your kids, be a servant, which is what men are called to as well, by the way. But that complementary relationship between men and women. Women have something that they give to their young boys and girls, and that's encouragement, love, that nurturing aspect. The men also have that, but they also provide the fortitude, the telling of young boys, hey, you know what? You may fail at this, but I want you to get back up and try again, over and over and over again, because that's how winning is done, son.

That's how you make it somewhere in life, and that is the number one thing that we're missing with the millennial generation and younger. Everybody gets a trophy generation is they don't know how to fail. That's right. You know, so it's a subversion. And Karl Marx did a phenomenal job of working for the enemy, of basically putting a framework around this, because a lot of this stuff with the feminist movement, with the cultural Marxism we're seeing, it's coming back from his original philosophies. And he hated the nuclear family.

He thought it was part of the bourgeois or however you call it. And he also hated the Christian God. I mean, it's just truth. You just have to be willing to look. And I want to say one other thing about the plan in this. In 1963, I believe it was, the 45 goals of communism were written into our congressional record. And one of those was, we must take over the psychological institutions in America. And if you look at the APA,

the things that they're teaching and preaching right now are the same subversive message. I mean, they will come out flat out and tell you masculinity in all of its aspects is toxic and negative. That's what the APA says. So beware of taking your kids to a counselor or even yourself. You need to really check into who you're going to see. I agree. Yeah. For the last couple of years, we have been experiencing a BF Skinner type of behavioral psychology. Do this and we'll give you a reward. If you don't do that, we'll give you some negatives here. But mainly it was positive conditioning. A lot of that coercion was really positive operant conditioning. And BF Skinner was coming from the position that there's nothing special about humans. We're not created in the

image of God. There is no God, he thought. And so we're going to take away your freedom and your dignity. That was his seminal book, Beyond Freedom and Dignity. So they treat us as animals. They want to enslave us. They think that they're a higher form of animal than we are, and they get to make those decisions. They see themselves as God, but they see us as animals.

But, you know, we talk about, and you mentioned the Christian perspective on this, and I think when you have a, you know, somebody has got to be in charge in any kind of an institution. The family is an institution, right? God put man in charge, but as you pointed out, he gave man certain duties and responsibilities to the woman and vice versa. So they have that complementary relationship there. If you don't temper that, you know, the power that you have, if you don't temper that with Christianity, then you do become a tyrant. You do have, you do tend to get corrupted by that power. But that is happening now to women as well as to men,

because neither men nor women see themselves as under God. Neither of them see themselves as having been given a special role, something that is unique that they can impart to their children, something that they can provide to society. They don't see the uniqueness of their male or female roles any more than the psychologists want us to see the uniqueness of our being made in the image of God. And none of this is tempered with respect for other people that is inherent in Christianity. All of this is about what can I get out of it? It's all about lovers of self. It's about pride. It's about power. Whether you're talking about the relationship between men and women or the political relationship, all the rest of this stuff, that's why the message really has to come back to Christianity. But let's talk a little bit about

what you do with Warrior MBS. Tell us a little bit about some of the specifics about how you put the team together, because I think we need to focus a lot on solutions. I talked earlier in the show about how Andrew Torba is telling all the people on Gap, you need to be focusing on building your community, building your family, and focusing locally, because we can't do anything about what's happening in Washington. It's gone. I've been saying that for the longest time. Forget about Washington. It's our enemy.

We need to understand what they're doing, but they're our enemy. We're going to build this from the grassroots up, from our community up. So talk a little bit about that, because I think what you're talking about doing is something that is very important for the people involved in the program. And it'll teach them, I think, lessons for how they can do this in their community, if I'm not mistaken. So tell us a little bit about that. No, absolutely right. Well, you know, first of all, the simple thing that this provides is, hey, if you want to get in shape or get in a lot better shape within 60 days, this is going to do it. You know, so a lot, everybody's interested in that, you know, they want to get in, they're like, man, what kind of, they want to know about

the meal plan, the workouts, it's all customized to each guy taking into consideration their injury history and otherwise. So that's kind of an entry point because, and the reason that matters in the terms of our culture battle right now and creating a parallel economy is a lot of guys have been just lulled to sleep. They're not in community. They have brain fog every day. They're relying on chemicals. Even if they're good guys, they're just not working at an optimal level.

Well, how are you going to create a parallel society or make a dent in terms of this cultural battle for the future of our children if you're living in that state? And I think the physical exertion, it does something to the mind, you know, mind, body and soul. Those three components, they buffer each other. They support each other. And if all of a sudden physically you're pushing yourself and you're doing something hard, have you ever noticed taking a morning run after that, you're thinking more clearly than if you just plop down in a chair in the morning? I've heard that. I've had to take a morning run, but I've heard people who've done that, who've told me that. As a matter of fact, I just had an article. I was going to mention it to people saying that, and I forget the details of it, but the gist of it was

that some people identify, they, they looked at, um, uh, the blood or some other metrics of people after that exercise. And they said, it's actually, there's a change that's going on that actually fights cancer. And, uh, so, you know, it's like, well, that's great. You know, I mean, there's so many mental, uh, as well as systemic benefits from exercise. I know all that I should enroll in your program because I don't, I don't take the time to do that. I'm so busy with what I'm doing, but I absolutely, I absolutely agree. I certainly know that that is what I should be doing, but,

you know, again, I don't do it, uh, because I don't have anybody holding me accountable. And it would do that, you know, and nobody's perfect. You know, a lot of people, they, they fear getting in the know a lot of people they fear getting in a lot of guys fear getting in because like well i don't want to let down my team i know it's kind of a competition and i'm like hey you know the guy that the team that wins this is probably going to have about an 80 percent track record for success in terms of their workouts their meals what what matters is the consistency over time so So in the last group, we had a former World Series MVP, and we had a 65-year-old guy who was the older guy in the group. Well, the 65-year-old guy blew away the World Series MVP because he was consistent every day.

He came every day, showed up, did his stuff, and had a lot of fun. So you kind of handicap it, and you kind of normalize it to where people are? Is that what you do in order to have a competition within these types of extremes or? Yeah, well, I wouldn't call it handicapping. It's more about showing that you did your, your exercise that day. So you, so in those small groups, you take what we call a sweaty selfie right after your workout, you snap a sweaty selfie, upload that to your little team. That's a point after your complete, if you have a compliant meal, you take a plate pick, upload that to your team. I mean, stuff takes like five seconds to prove your points. But when you're in that small group and you're working with that little team, that is what holds you accountable.

Because let's say it's nine o'clock at night, you hadn't got your workout in and you look, you check your little, you check your app and you're like, man, the other, okay, my other three guys on my team, they did it. They did it. I can't let them down. I got to do it. You know, so that keeps you going. Kind of, oh, and then the soul building operations. That's a huge part. That's just as important as the workouts. Now in the first 30 days, I call that your great reset. So those soul building operations are more about getting you out of the box, doing things with your family, your kids, or maybe a friend to build relationships with the backbone of what scripture says about those things.

The last half is called your great awakening. And those soul building operations are about finding your place in this, and I hate to use the word cultural battle, but that is what it is to a degree. But where can you increase faith, freedom, and truth based on where God has uniquely placed you? And I'll give you an example of that. There were two or three guys in the financial industry, one with Northwestern Mutual and others, and they kind of barely knew about ESG scores. They were somewhat familiar with it. But through the process of the program, I was able to, now I'm no expert on finance or ESG scores, but I've, through my platform, I've really had some world-class voices educate me. I was able to point those guys in some directions, like you need to look into this because if

you are taking all these multiple millions of dollars from the families in our community and investing them in just BlackRock and just these companies and organizations that have an anti-Christian, anti-American agenda. Is that really what you want to be doing? And those guys walked away learning about other investment companies like, I believe Strive is one. There's a couple of others that they put together packages helping people invest in companies that have a good payback, but are about excellence and about the American Constitution rather than just following some environmental social governance, which God knows what that's

going to be next year. Oh, yeah. Well, even if it's not about the positive of investing in things that are good for our country, these ESG companies don't even care about succeeding, right? I mean, money is not a metric for them, and so it's fundamentally fraudulent. You've had some state attorneys general who have said, we're going to come after them because, you they have as a publicly traded company they have uh they're responsible for trying to do their best and be good stewards of the of the money and so forth if they get a different agenda uh that's the same as if they were embezzling this money out and spending it on um i don't know like a 40 million dollar penthouse or something like this guy with fdx just did you know so it's like it's like they're they've got a completely different agenda they're not trying to. They're not trying to make money. And so you're not going to make money if you invest in them. And so that's a, that's a really

important thing. That's a good example. I like that. Yeah. So that's one example. Um, but you know, I try to help guys find their lane through the program and Hey, I'm, I'm not perfect. And I'm very open, open and honest about that as I'm coaching. Um, so, so, you know, but we're growing in relationship together. And then at the end of that, at the end of those 70 days, um, a lot of guys have signed up again for future rounds, but I'm wanting to put together a longer term like veterans program. So this is kind of like bootcamp, you know, we're going to, we're going to really whip you into shape for 60 days and we're going to have some fun, but it's going to be tough. But beyond that, I would love to have a six-month or longer type program where it's a little bit deeper into community and longer lasting. So that's in the works.

But for right now, we've got a pretty darn good program to get you in shape, get you mentally clear, get you sleeping better at night while you're in relationship and community with like-minded Christian patriots. That's great. It sounds like a great program. And again, people can find that at WarriorMBS, mind, body, and soul, WarriorMBS.com. Sounds like a great program. And you're in Nashville. We're not too far away from each other. I'm about five hours away, I guess, east of you.

Where are you at? Not too far away from the Sevierville area. So, you know, Sevierville and Gatlinburg, that type area. Gotcha. Yes, sir. Yeah. So, yeah, just moved to Tennessee because we wanted to get somewhere that was redder than Austin. Of course, that gave us a lot of different opportunities because pretty much anywhere is redder than austin as they say i don't even like to use those terms red and blue

because that in and of itself is a control thing because the red was always a color of communism and now we've accepted their labeling of us when we start to use that but you know what i mean yeah funny enough yeah that's right and i've never thought about that till right now but you're right oh yeah oh yeah it was uh it was a master stroke i think because if we started calling the we started calling the communist states red people would start to connect the dots we don't want to have that happen well it's great talking to you jeremy it sounds like a great program uh you really have put your finger i think on uh on the need of many people in our society, but especially men who are constantly told that they're horrible, they're toxic, they're useless, and just denigrating

it to the standpoint of people want to just go out and get a dress and put it on. That's right. Yeah. So we've got to stop that. 100%. Yeah. Okay. Well, thank you.

It was great talking to you, Jeremy. And again, the program is WarriorMBS, as in mind, body, and soul. WarriorMBS.com. Thank you, Jeremy. Appreciate it. Thank you, David. Appreciate it. All right, folks.

We're going to be right back. Stay with us. The Common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. All right, welcome back. I want to talk about something that happened in Austin to someone we know.

And ask for your prayers for this. This is a family that we know through homeschooling. I had some kids who were a different age. A couple of the hardest working parents I've ever seen. He's a police officer. And he was, you know, he works a full-time job as a police officer. And then he also does some extra work as a security guard. And it was in that capacity uh that he was severely injured at a grocery store in southeast austin i'm not going to mention his name uh but um because

they've not talked about it publicly in any of these articles they've kept his name out of it surveillance video captured from the store's cameras show Jamie, uh, Canales 40 years old as the perp, uh, shoplifting throughout the store. So employees stopped him and asked for the items back and he gave the merchandise back, but then he asked for law enforcement.

So, uh, this is a sheriff's deputy, uh, the man that we know. And, um, so he came there trying to help the employees. He spoke with Canales, the shoplifter, for just a moment before the man stabbed him multiple times, including in the neck. He was taken to the hospital, had to have surgery to treat his injuries.

According to the investigators, as of Monday afternoon, he was recovering from his injuries. The deputy is also a former Austin police officer, said the authorities. From what we know, he is now at home, but he has a very long road to recovery after being stabbed in the neck. The Austin police arrested the man implicated in the incident, who, according to the APD, admitted to stabbing the deputy and showed no remorse. He's currently being held in the Travis County Jail on a $100,000 bond as charged with attempted capital murder

of a peace officer. So, again, we'd appreciate your prayers for that family. Several kids, they their homeschooling, uh, both of them working as hard as they can. And then this happens, uh, body camera footage has shown. Now we finally got some body camera camera footage of the Paul Pelosi incident. They said they weren't going to have it. You know, we still haven't seen any of the footage from all the security cameras all over the house. People put up pictures taken of the outside of the Pelosi house. Security cameras everywhere.

Very expensive, multi-million dollar houses in that neighborhood. All the houses have lots of security cameras, as does the Pelosi home. All the neighbors have, well, not all of them, but at least some of them do, have a private security that even figured in one of the reports from the FBI, private security from a neighbor's house. But the question is, where was the security that has normally been there for the Pelosi house even when Paul and Nancy are not home? All of these things are questions and all of that footage has not shown up yet.

However, some body camera footage has now appeared, surprisingly. And what do we see in that? The Department of Justice claimed that their indictment of Paul Pelosi's alleged nudist. This is the way information liberation puts it, uh, because he is, uh, uh, he has been known to, uh, operate in that mode publicly. Um, but, uh, not necessarily, um, in this particular capacity was he nude, but anyway, um, the, Paul Pelosi is alleged nudist attacker that the two officers opened the door to a San Francisco home before witnessing him getting attacked.

So that was what they put in the complaint. Well, the officers opened the door, but then we heard otherwise word, some reports that Pelosi opened the door and then they pulled that back. Remember that they shut that down after it was reported. So what was that about? They said, why did, uh, Pelosi open the door and then walk back to this guy and, and then, you know, they get into a fight or something. Well, they censored that type of stuff.

They tried to flush, flush that down the memory hole. Now we've got the body camera footage that shows it. Yes, that is actually what did happen. Pelosi himself opened the door for the police and he stayed inside the home with the alleged assailant rather than running to safety. That's what I said before. Now this makes any sense, you know, or so, well, you know, this guy breaks in and he's threatening him, but then he calls nine one one and he the guy, I've got to go to the bathroom.

I said, oh, yeah, that would work. So I've got to go to the bathroom. He goes to the bathroom and he's calling 911, but he's kind of speaking in code, they said. He says his name is David. He's a friend. I think you should come. Really confusing. Why didn't he just stay in the

bathroom? Why didn't he lock the door? Why didn't he run away when the police got there? Why did the guy let him open the door? And if he's going to attack the guy, as I said, why would he wait until the police got there? Why wouldn't he attack him earlier? And why, you know, wouldn't he tell the police to attack him? none of this stuff makes any sense so body camera video shows officers having a brief conversation with paul pelosi and with david de pape the attacker before de pape starts beating pelosi with a hammer this is now being reported by nbc again and they were the ones who reported that before then they retracted it and so forth so um uh nbc bay area questioned why the department of justice falsely claimed the door was opened by two

officers and wondered why he decided not to run from his alleged assailant who allegedly broke into his home and stayed inside to get attacked yeah Yeah, many, many questions. But if you understand, if you look at the comments that were made by Nancy Pelosi, you understand why this was the narrative. It was used by Democrats to hype the threat of right-wing extremism ahead of the midterms, as Information Liberation points out. Nancy Pelosi chose not to speak out about the attack until a day after the midterms Doctors have said, Nancy says, doctors have said, you know, we don't want him to watch the news We don't want him to be revisiting a lot of this because it will add to the trauma

Yes, playing the victim and hyping up the fact that anybody who opposes them politically is a dangerous extremist. Speaking of how they're using the allegations of violence and extremism, if you take a look at the trials that are going on right now with the Proud Boys, with the Oath Keepers, Stuart Rhodes, that type of thing. An informant is likely to testify as a defense witness now in a January 6th sedition trial. A man who served as number two to Stuart Rhodes and the Oath Keepers

is said to have secretly reported to the FBI in the months leading up to the January 6th attack. An FBI informant was embedded for months in the inner circle of Stuart Rhodes' Oath Keepers. He is likely to testify as a defense witness at the seditious conspiracy trial of Stuart Rhodes in connection with the attack on January 6th. The informant, Greg McWhirter, served as the Oath Keeper's vice president, but was secretly reporting to the FBI about the group's activities in the weeks and months leading up to the Capitol attack, according to two people familiar with the matter. Despite their relationship with Mr. McWhorter, federal prosecutors decided not to call him as a government witness.

Well, isn't that strange? Isn't that interesting? Because you would think if this guy's been collecting as a kind of a spy on Stuart Rhodes, if he's been collecting information for months, wouldn't you think that he'd have something that the prosecution could use? So the prosecution arrested his case last week without calling him and without calling other key cooperating witnesses, including three members of the Oath Keepers who pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy charges.

McWhirter is 40 years old, a former sheriff's deputy in Montana. He's expected to appear at the trial on Tuesday as a witness for Mr. Rhodes. An unusual move that suggests Rhodes' lawyers believe he has information that could help their cause. Yeah, there's a lot to be found out about this. As a matter of fact, I never did like the fact that Darren Beattie with Revolver was, I don't know what is going on with these various characters that are there, but for him to

focus on one person after the other and call them, you know, um, uh, double agents and all this other kind of stuff, uh, always rubbed me the wrong way. He doesn't know that for sure.

He doesn't have the ability to determine that for sure. He's just going out on his own hunch. And it seems to me that, um, Darren Beatty ought to do better than accusing people of things based on a hunch making very serious allegations against him you know ray Epps and and then the Stuart Rhodes I don't know what the situation is of these people. And you know what? Neither does Beatty. He doesn't know either. He got to the point where he said, well, it just goes to

prove that Stuart Rhodes is a double agent because they charged him with seditious conspiracy. And that's almost impossible to get a conviction on it. So they're putting a charge on him. They know they can't prove. And so he's going to get off. I just think that's reprehensible, what he's doing. So again, as I said, I've interviewed Stuart Rhodes. I think there's a lot of idiotic bragging and a lot of idiotic, baseless, empty threats. I think it was stupid beyond belief. I've seen this type of thing

When the FBI set up people You know, for a A couple of situations that they had In Michigan, the most recent one That was like the Huttery Militia Was the one from a few years ago You know, a bunch of good old boys Sitting around getting drunk

And making a lot of statements And the FBI sitting there taking notes Oh yeah, what else, you know And egging them on and making a lot of statements and the FBI sitting there taking notes all the time. Oh yeah. What else? You know, and egging them on and all the rest of this stuff and then coming after them and trying to set this up as if there was,

this was something real. I think that's basically what's going on with the Stuart Rhodes thing. These people got themselves all fired up bombastic. I think the best way to describe what was being done by stop the steel and save America, you know, stop the steel was Alex's thing. Save America was Trump's thing.

Uh, Stuart Rhodes are getting involved in that to build a audience and, uh, excitement for his organization. And, uh, it was anger, attainment,

entertaining people with anger, you know, getting people act out their frustrations. And the fact that it evolved into some violence that was there, I think it surprised most of them. And, you know, they did not want it to go that way. But it was stupid getting into it. But I think that it is obviously a contrived thing by the Democrats. And it's absolutely shameful and reprehensible that they've kept these people under these kinds of conditions

for this amount of time. And it is equally shameful and reprehensible the fact that Trump and the alternative media and the Republican establishment have turned their backs on this, even if they don't like these people. Even if these people were involved in violent acts, that is punishable, but not in this way. You give people a speedy trial. You give them due process. You don't allow them to be punished and tortured for a year and a half, coming up to two years, without even having a trial, without even being found guilty.

Torture is not allowed to be done even if they're found guilty. And the penalties that are being meted out are over the top. And where are the Republicans on any of this stuff? Only a couple of them have even spoken out about this or noticed any of it. So there was an informant, the number two guy. He's now going to be a witness for the defense. Interesting. Could be a big turn there.

And that was in the Oath Keepers. In the Proud Boys, court papers now show that the Proud Boys were riddled with as many as eight informants. This is always the case, right? They always, it's just, you look at Elohim City and all these other things that they'd set up, you know, the Ku Kl klux klan it's all fbi and it's just a honeypot to draw in some body that they can then make a public example of and make themselves look like heroes some poor schmuck who comes in and is a true believer and whatever the fbi is setting up whether it's ku klux klan or you or Elohim City or any of this other stuff.

So New York Times says the FBI has as many as eight informants inside Proud Boys in the months surrounding the storming of the Capitol on January the 6th, 2021. Recent court papers indicate raising questions about how much federal investigators were able to learn about them from the violent mob attack, both before and after it took place. Well,

um, it'd be interesting to see how this happens. Um, you know, Joe Biggs, one of the people involved there. Um, I know Joe worked with Joe.

Uh, I like Joe. I know he's got a temper but you know um the um again there's nothing that should uh keep him in jail uh for a couple years under the kind of conditions that he's in nothing that should put him away for decades this is political persecution so um anyway we uh we'll have to wait and see what happens. He does have Norm Pettis helping him. I've interviewed Norm Pettis.

He's a lawyer that's defending Alex Jones. And he's a good attorney. He's a good attorney. He's smart. And he does a good job of representing people, even if he doesn't necessarily agree with what they do. And so I think Joe's got some good representation there. I think it's probably being done by Norm, probably out of the goodness of his heart, probably.

I would be surprised if Joe's got any money to pay him. I'd be really surprised if Alex is paying for it. Alex wants to get as far away from that whole situation as he possibly can. The Department of Justice raids the home of an Area 51 website owner who was then held at gunpoint. He's got an Area 51 website owner who was in held at gunpoint. He's got an area 51 website. It's got pictures of UFOs and space aliens. And they, if they want to make people believe this stuff, I guess that's

they would do. He described the experience as humiliating adding that they held his girlfriend at gunpoint as well. He's got a website, though. Think about this. Regardless of what the content is, he's got a website. Now, are they accusing him of having some classified pictures of Area 51? He doesn't know.

He doesn't know why they did it. The website was devoted to all things Area 51 and its programs and its lore and its legacy. See, I don't think it's even called dreamlandresort.com. The name is the website. I would be very surprised if this guy even stumbled onto anything that was of classified nature to the military during their special planes. I would think this guy is going to be focused on UFO stuff, on that kind of entertainment. They seized all the computers, all files, all phones, all photos,

all at the same time. Everything from this guy. Local reporter reported it, George Knapp. He said Arnoux noted on his site that he does not know the reason for the raid or whether specific images of the secret base posted online may have initiated such vigorous action by federal law enforcement. He has no idea what is going on with it. But of course, the government doesn't tell people what it does, does it? And then we look at another attack on journalism. This is in a courtroom setting.

You have a judge in a trial who did not want, who was hostile to any publicity about the trial, essentially. Judge Randy Deering had made an order before trial started that any witnesses, including co-defendants, who wanted to opt out of being filmed by the news media could do so. Jake Wagner chose not to be recorded by the news media. However, any member of the public could attend the court proceeding and could hear his testimony in person.

Cell phones and laptops were banned from the courtroom as well. Midway through Wagner's testimony, The Guardian, that's the name of the local newspaper, The Guardian's editor sued the presiding judge, Randy Deering, and the 4th District Court of Appeals, seeking the higher court's intervention to allow the news media to record Wagner's confession on the stand. Initially, the district court ordered the judge to allow recordings of the witnesses,

unless he showed cause that the witnesses' testimony being filmed could jeopardize the fairness of the witnesses, unless he showed cause that the witness's testimony being filmed could jeopardize the fairness of the trial. In a blow to the higher court win, the judge, Deering, ruled that if Jake Wagner was to be on camera, he might be nervous and not tell the truth, and it could jeopardize the fairness of the trial. Therefore, he will remain off camera without any audio. So to recap, you've got a judge who doesn't want to have the trial televised. And then you got a guy who says, well, I don't, you know, any of you don't want to be televised. Well, you know, pull this off. And so he has a guy who says that he doesn't want to do that. Uh, people could come into the courtroom and could listen and could write that down and report about it, but you couldn't record any of it, video or audio. The local paper, which is called the Guardian,

not to be confused with the UK Guardian. So the local paper wanted to record it, sued the judge, won in the appeal court, but they had a caveat there, said, well, you know, he's got to give you a reason for why he's going to shut this thing down. Why, you know, why would that jeopardize the fairness of the trial to televise it? He says, yes, it would, because it would intimidate him. He's afraid to get on camera, and it's going to alter his testimony. So they shut it down. Then this happens.

The Guardian published a condensed version of Wagner's testimony that occurred on his first day on the stand, including audio that was provided to the news media by a third party. And so as a result of that now, they have put wiretapping charges against this journalist. And that is a fourth-degree felony carrying a fine of up to $5,000 and a maximum prison sentence of 18 months. I mean, they're not coming after him for defying the judge. The judge could come after him for contempt of court or something like that. But no, because the judge said not to do that, local law enforcement came after this,

the editor of a local news outlet, and they got wiretapping charges against him, a felony. And so he's being defended by the Committee to Protect Journalists. What does this remind you of? Does this remind you of the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg? Because it should. Daniel Ellsberg gave information to the Washington Post and the New York Times that he had illegally taken.

And they published it. And the Supreme Court said, no, that's freedom of the press. If they're given this information, they can publish it. Now, because of that, the federal government that is trying to come after Julian Assange wants to imagine that Julian Assange participated in the extraction of the information. He wasn't just given it because he would be protected by the First Amendment and by the precedents of the Pentagon Papers, Washington Post, New York Times.

So they have to pretend that Julian Assange stole the papers, and they come after him for that. But in this particular case, that is what they're doing with this trial as well. The editor of this local paper is saying, that information was given to me by somebody. I didn't record that surreptitiously. It was given to me.

And as a matter of fact, I would imagine it'd be pretty hard for them to do that, you know, be pretty bold for them to go in and try to secretly record this because the sheriff's deputies are going to be, or the court's deputies are going to be looking to see if anybody's trying to record anything. If that's what the judge doesn't want to have happen. The Guardian local paper wants to disclose that the audio was not recorded by a member of the media and was submitted to their newsroom by a courthouse source who is authorized to have a cell phone in the room. So the County Sheriff charged the editor in chief of the Skiddo Valley guardian with wiretapping.

Yeah, this is, um, this is an important case for precedent of, um, free speech, transparency and things like that. India's government can now surveil the internet in real time.

Essentially, every form of electronic communication will be under the government's microscope, even partially written emails. Saved in draft folders will be vulnerable to government intrusion, even your draft emails. So connecting to the internet through a VPN could shield users from potential surveillance. However, in recent months,

the government of India has cracked down on VPNs. It passed a law requiring VPN providers with servers in India to store detailed logs about their customers, including names and IP addresses. So again, India is taking the lead in this and Bill Gates has been involved in trying to surveil and control people in India, give them a universal identifier for a long time. The globalists are focused on India because they understand

that the population of India is rapidly growing. It's going to overtake China in a few years. They will become the most populous country. And so they want to have control of those people. And so they have their Aadhaar system. It's a

government number, a number of the beast that you must have if you were going to participate in a lot of activities. The poor people have to have it if they're going to get any welfare services, if they're going to get any health care from the government, they have to have that number. And they have been ruthless and pervasive in terms of their surveillance. This is just one more example of it. As I was saying earlier in the program, Greg Chapman, a former computer modeler,

in an essay in Quadrant, Chapman holds a PhD in physics, and he was talking about the fact that climate models can never, never work, never work. If you cannot make a model to predict the outcome of the next draw from a lottery ball machine, then you are unable to make a model to predict the future of the climate, says Greg Chapman, PhD in physics. He said, climate change system is chaotic, which means, quote, any model will be a poor

predictor of the future. A lottery ball machine, he said, is a comparatively much simpler and smaller interacting system. And I would add that it is modeled over a much shorter period of time as well, which is one of the reasons why this will never work. Speaking of things that will never work, I looked at this and I thought, oh, that's kind of interesting. But I wonder if that's true at all. China says that they have developed a back-to-the-future style hoverboard.

They show a picture of a device, but they do not show it working that I've been able to find. Maybe they have a video of it somewhere working. They say it's able to climb up to 10,000 feet. That you can stand and they can lift somebody 220 pounds. Yeah, I think it is fake. I think it is a chance, you know, China bragging about this. So this is what they say. They say that it can lift somebody 220 pounds.

It can take them up to 10,000 feet. And they can go 93 miles per hour. And fly over as long as 10 minutes at speeds of up to 93 miles per hour. I don't believe this for a minute. Um, and, uh, fly over as long as 10 minutes at speeds of up to 93 miles per hour. I don't believe this for a minute. Uh, you know, even if they show me some pictures of this, I'm going to still have my doubts about it, but they're not showing any pictures that I could find. Uh, and, and then it's accompanied by this. Uh, it was, um, it was put up on a poster by a contractor for China's space program

said we are making the fastest progress in China. We are the best. Nobody can come close to us. That type of thing. Pure communist propaganda, I think. Our machine is simpler and easier to use than similar products in other countries. Beijing's Institute of Power Machinery is the one who did that. And they put it out through the communist.

Yeah, that's a picture of it. Thanks for putting that up. That's they did it through the South China Morning Post, which is a communist mouthpiece for the organization. They do have show the pictures further down in the stills because I've seen this operating. And I do. But this is real. The one that is

happening with the british people there right the british soldiers seeing them uh using that to board ships um at sea uh they have some jet things that are on their hands that is real and so they feel compelled to uh do a one-up and ship and i don't think there's anything real about that that is done by a company called gravity industries out of the UK we've seen seen that demonstrated no demonstration yet of the back to the future hoverboard I'm waiting for the mr. fusion though but we came pretty close with that with that engine that worked as a generator that some guy retrofitted on his Tesla. Really did look like a doc had gone in and fixed the thing. Well, that's it for today's program. Thank you for listening.

The Common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thank you.