The David Knight Show - 16Jan23 FAA's Feeble Lie Denying the Hack That Grounded ALL Flights Last Week

Episode Date: January 16, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES FAA's feeble lie denying the hack that grounded ALL flights last week. Here's how we know they're lying. 2:40 Study shows in-person schooling increases youth suicide 15:33 Another "benefit" of government schools — Satan Clubs 19:03 Actor complains he can't get villain roles because he's not white 24:12 Are middle-aged workers and those near retirement being driven out of the workforce by the intensified Maoist political correctness? 26:42 "Beetle Burgers" - the latest marketing ploy to get people to swallow the Davos agenda to shut down farms. 33:57 Half-baked Alaskan. FEMA hires a contractor to put out a disaster notice in Eskimo language. Hilarity ensues. Then AP accuses FEMA of "racism" 40:15 WATCH: our experience with "Engrish" and copyright violations in China. 46:59 George Santos is a perfect fit for congress. SEC now investigates Santos, as FEC investigates other issues. 54:41 Malarkey 3.0 — Biden’s new cache of classified documents. 1:03:19 MalarkeyGate: Dems Want Biden Out, GOP Wants Trump Out The security state is moving against BOTH Biden & Trump over something they had no problem with Hillary doing. Are these documents the ONLY thing GOP can think of to impeach Biden? Sadly, yes 1:10:18 ATF's "final rule" on pistol braces is an affront to the Constitution but typical of bureaucratic rule, Regulation Without Representation, that is how feds operate now. The "rule" and the ways it will be fought 1:43:40 How to fight the NFA and its unconstitutional rule about barrel lengths. 1:51:01 Awkward — Andrea Mitchell lectures MSNBC reporter about using term "pro-life" 2:09:32 Baby "chop shop" FOIA lawsuit. 2:14:14 Pentagon exploring back pay for troops kicked out of military over vaccine mandate. 2:41:17 1,040 days late, Dr. Leanna Wen, MD - one of the worst Covid authoritarians, pivots away the narrative about "cases" as she did before with masks and social distancing. 2:50:48 Even as "vaccine advisors" complain Pfizer/Moderna/FDA/CDC hid data, Rand Paul teams up with Cory Booker to stop animal testing. What testing? Do they care about babies sacrificed on the altar of animal testing to create humanized mice with their organs? 2:54:40Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business.

Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 16th of January. Year of our Lord 2023, day 1040 of the emergency. And the emergency powers that have been assumed by the government and by the executive branch are now metastasizing in a lot of different ways. And yet we're supposed to worry mostly about the papers

that belong to the deep state. By all means, let's impeach the president for that. There's a lot of things that you can impeach Biden for. There's a lot of things you can impeach Trump for as well. But no, we're going to focus on the over-classification of documents. We're going to talk about gun control today and what they're doing with that. Of course, we will talk about what is happening with the malarkey over Biden. It's actually kind of a funny situation, frankly.

I'm glad that it's nothing serious. It's just deep state papers. But now they're taking it seriously, and we'll see what happens. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Well, I want to begin today's news before we get into the gun control and the document fuss that's happening. The Corvette in the garage. But there's a lot of malarkey in the news today. And I think my favorite malarkey story here is the response. We've got the official response now from the FAA through Bloomberg.

I guess you could say that's the official response. This is flowing through them. We have unnamed persons, unnamed companies. As a matter of fact, they just describe them as contractors. They don't want to get anybody in trouble. This whole thing is a CYA press release through Bloomberg to try to explain why they shut down all air travel last week, last Tuesday began late Tuesday night, did not get resolved until nine in the morning. So I don't know, what was it? 10, 12 hours that it went?

You had an amazing number of cancellations and delays. And of course it was a no-fly zone in the US. And it was the database, the NOTAM database. Notice two air missions, a cluttered, poorly designed system. Actually, the whole thing got out of control once they computerized it. It's just metastasized into a mess from what people say. When they started it, it was conveying essential information in the 1940s to people about things that might affect them on their route,

landing, takeoff, and things like that. But then as they computerized it, there was no limit as to what they could put in there, and they started creating all kinds of abbreviations and just cluttering the system up. But without that operating, they made the determination that they would shut down all flights. Now, what we're told by Bloomberg, Bloomberg reports that a person familiar with the FAA investigation. So this is an inside source. This is nobody officially saying this. They're just floating this out there. So if anybody's upset, it's not us.

It's not us. The person said unspecified personnel corrupted a file on the NOTAM system, resulting in a nationwide outage. Okay, so let's understand what happened with this. We're supposed to believe. This is what Bloomberg says. This is a Zero Hedge article quoting Bloomberg. Bloomberg says the preliminary indications are that two people working for a contractor. So this is no named companies.

And of course, the FAA is not to blame. Boudigais is not to blame. Nobody's to blame. Just two anonymous people. We don't know who they are. They're contractors. No company is going to get any trouble for this. So these two unnamed contractors introduced errors into the core data used by the system.

The person asked not to be identified, speaking about the sensitive ongoing issue. Everything is a secret, you see. This is why it gives me some kind of a dark joy to see all of the back and forth about classified documents with trump and with biden you know the trump stuff they haven't come up with anything to um indicate there's anything serious the only thing they mentioned was oh you know he had a copy of the order uh where he pardoned Roger Stone. Is that something that we're supposed to be concerned about? Is that something that should be classified? Now, with Biden, it may be different.

Biden, there are documents about Ukraine and Iran. We know they were involved in a coup in Ukraine. We know that the Obama administration shipped over a plane load of foreign currency to Iran. There were a lot of under-the-table dealings. That's a long-standing bipartisan American tradition, secret dealings with Iran. Remember Iran-Contra under the Reagan administration? So this is a long tradition of both parties to have secret agreements with Iran. But so there's something there.

And clearly, as we look at what is happening, where the documents are stored, we'll get into that later. There are a lot of indications about corrupt practices and money laundering and all the rest of this stuff and the Biden thing. But with Trump, it was, you know, I haven't heard any allegations of anything with that. But when you look at what is happening with Biden, they're making a bigger deal out of papers than they are about Hunter's laptop and information that we've known about for years. And I think both Trump and Biden should have been impeached

for what they did to the Constitution, what they did to this country with lockdowns and vaccines and mandates and on and on. But, you know, they'll focus on that type of thing. So how are they misdirecting us on this FAA thing? And why? That's the question. Why would they do that? We know the government's going to lie to people. We know they're going to try to protect their jobs

and other things like that, but there may be a bigger agenda involved here. They said the file or files were altered in spite of rules that prohibit those kinds of changes on a live system, said Bloomberg. Well, no doubt they were altered. I don't believe that it was two contractors, though. You know, when you look at this,

the system stopped late Tuesday night and did not come back up until 9 a.m. Wednesday morning. And then you had something else that happened that was very significant, which completely shows what a farce this Bloomberg story is, with these unnamed sources and unnamed contractors working for unnamed companies that did this. Because the system came back up at 9 a.m., and then Canada's NOTAM system went down an hour and a half later, 10-20.

Now, Canada did not ground all flights, unlike the United States, so there's some issues there with the FAA, with Boudigay, and the rest of them. But was that just a coincidence that that happened? That's what they want you to believe. It was just a coincidence. We've got another coincidence theory here. Because you see, you'd have to believe, if you think that this is a coincidence, you would have to believe that these unnamed contractors, perhaps the same unnamed contractors worked for both the U.S. and for Canada. These are separate systems. And again, one of them was rolling out from late Tuesday night until 9 in the morning.

The other one didn't start until 10.30. So are we supposed to believe that these are the same guys working for both of these independent systems. And after they've created absolute chaos in America and shut down the entire air system, they decided that they would go do it in Canada as well. Now, this is sabotage by somebody. It was a hack by somebody. They don't want you to believe or to know that it was hacked. And so that raises an interesting question that I think perhaps may go beyond the simple motive of trying to protect their jobs. Because perhaps it was hacked by Russian hackers or something like that.

Who knows? It doesn't have to be a state. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if

your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the

IT solutions people. But when you look at something like that, what is the payoff? There wasn't any money Innovate. The IT Solutions People. Russia's attacked Ukraine's infrastructure? Is this a shot across the bow to tell the U.S. and Canada and its other allies? We can shut your infrastructure down pretty easily in a lot of different ways. Is that what this is really about? Who knows? They're not going to ever tell us the truth. We do know the truth, though, about schools, don't we? Anybody that went to them kind of knows this, but this is actually a study,

a study that has come out by an organization. Their website is nber.org. They did a study about school, about kids committing suicide. And their conclusion is that school drives kids to committing suicide. I mean, we've seen this on a metaphorical level. People joke about it all the time, but literally, literally drives kids to commit suicide. Lyman Stone picked up the report and put it down on Twitter with these comments. He said, whenever kids are in school, they commit suicide. When you cancel school, such as snow days, COVID, summer holidays, they stop committing so much suicide. School is a suicide-generating institution.

People who never read Lord of the Flies are like, but how? And the rest of us say, did you miss the part where the Lord of the Flies is just an allegory for English boarding school? I wonder what will happen to children when we warehouse them together in competitive environments with approximately one adult supervisor per 20 to 30 kids. And that supervisor is not selected on the basis of moral wisdom, not selected on the basis of love for the child, but the ability to confer facts. I don't think they select them for that either. Frankly, they select them because they're a warm body. Uh, has this guy never been in school i mean i had a lot of teachers who are not capable of conferring facts i'll never forget my algebra teacher in junior high school like sleepwalking the entire time he wore a tie all the time but most of the time his tie was blown over his

shoulder and he didn't even know it he was just in a daze um if the guy wasn't so old, I would have thought he was on drugs. But I had a lot of teachers like him. He did not love us. He had no moral wisdom, and he had no facts to confer to us. He said, also, we cluster kids together by age group, ensuring that hierarchies are purely determined by personality-based aggressiveness without any age-related offsetting. We understand that as well. That was one of the things I remember when we were homeschooling and people said, why would you homeschool? They're not socialized properly.

I said, do you think that rigidly segregating kids by age with one adult supervisor, you think that's good socialization? I think that's a recipe for disaster. It's a recipe for, and I made that analogy to Lord of the Flies when I would talk to people about that decades ago. It's also a recipe for bullying, which drives kids to suicide. And it's bullying about everything. All these people say, well, you know, we got to we got to teach transgenderism and push it to the kids because they're bullying kids who want to dress up in a different gender than they are. It's like, have you never been to school? I mean, we were bullied about everything. There was this pecking order about everything. There could be a pecking order about sports. There could be a pecking order about academics. There could be a pecking order about fill in the blank, you know, performances, art performances or something. And so I would say that school, yes, school does drive kids to commit suicide.

It also drives them to change their gender, which has something to do with that. It also drives them to abuse drugs. Yeah, I mean, that goes hand in hand, quite frankly. You put kids in an institution where there is no supervision, where there's no parents who know them and love them, and you're shifting them around from class to class, that's a rich opportunity for people to push drugs on them. And also because they're trained to think tribally. They're trained to follow the crowd and peer pressure and all the rest of the stuff.

That is all a formula for trying drugs, whether you're talking about smoking in the boys' room. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie

Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people.

Or other things. And it also trains them to obey authority figures without question. It is the perfect training for the society that we have today that cannot take care of itself, has no respect for itself, and is completely dependent on being hand-fed stuff. Education is not the filling of a bucket. It's the lighting of a fire. But we treat it as if it was the filling of a bucket

to make people dependent on it. So here's the abstract here of the report. I'm not going to read all the data, go deep into it. So here's the abstract here of the report. I'm not going to read all the data, go deep into it. But the people who put the report out, they titled it In-Person Schooling and Youth Suicide Evidence from School Calendars and Pandemic School Closures. Yes, what we were told about the pandemic school closures is not what happened in terms of suicides and other things.

Oh, we got to get the schools open. So kids are committing suicide because they can't go hang out with their friends and all this stuff. No. what happened in terms of suicides and other things. Oh, we got to get the schools open. So kids are committing suicide because they can't go hang out with their friends and all this stuff. No. This study explores the effect of in-person schooling on youth suicide. We document three key findings. First, using data from the National Vital Statistics System from 1990 to 2019, we document the historical association between teen suicides and the school calendar. We show that suicides between 12 and 18 year olds are highest during the months of the school year, lowest during the summer months. You know, but some schools now, I guess they adjusted it for the schools that go year round. You can have year round suicide. They also

established that areas with schools starting in early August experienced increases in teen suicides in August, while areas with schools starting in September don't see youth suicides rise until September. Secondly, we show that this seasonal pattern dramatically changed in 2020. Teen suicides plummeted in March 2020. Oh, what happened then? Yeah, that's the executive order 1,040 days ago. When the COVID-19 pandemic began in the U.S., nobody had died.

It wasn't a pandemic. It was an executive order of lockdown. Anyway, it remained low throughout the summer before rising in fall of 2020 when many K-12 schools returned to in-person instruction. Third, using county-level variation in school reopenings in fall 2020 and spring 2021, proxied by anonymized, safe-graft smartphone data on elementary and secondary school foot traffic, we find that returning from online to in-person schooling was associated with a 12-18% increase in teen suicides.

This result is robust to controls for seasonal effects, general lockdown effects, proxied by restaurant and barfoot traffic, and survives falsification tests using suicides among young adults ages 19 to 25. Auxiliary analyses using Google Trends queries and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey suggest that bullying, victimization, may be an important mechanism. Well, you know, that's just the opposite of what we were told. We said, you know, we've got to get kids back in school. They're committing suicide and all the rest of this stuff. No, it is school that is pushing that.

And then, of course, there's other things that are being pushed in school. We've got the Satanist clubs that they're pushing in because um and and that's important as one school that had um uh in school christian clubs where they would um uh read the bible and things like that they said look let's not go overboard and ban the satan clubs because that's what they want we got maybe three or four satan clubs run by this idiot uh lucian greaves that's what they want. We got maybe three or four Satan clubs run by this idiot, Lucian Greaves. That's not his real name. I forgot what his real name is. Everything about him is fraud.

Anyway, so he's putting this thing out because he wants to get banned because then he can ban the Christian Bible clubs or whatever it is that they do out of schools. And so they said, let's not fall for that trap. But you don't even have to look at that as an equivalence. You can still keep the Satan clubs out because, as he's pointed out, we don't believe any of this stuff, he said. I don't believe in Satan.

I don't believe any of the stuff that I'm saying here. This is just a lark. He admitted what his agenda is. This is not a legitimate religious thing that he's trying to do. So, you know, easy to boot him out on that basis. But it's not just in the schools. As The Telegraph is touting this, and of course eagerly picked up by the Drudge Report, other mainstream media, young sacrifice belief in God on the altar of Satanism. And so this is in the UK, and you got a guy who is pushing his stuff in the UK. He says, with our rituals, there's never any murder,

there's never any sacrifice, there's never any blood rites to Satan, we don't worship the devil, we don't cast magic spells. Well, I would beg to differ. I mean, there's been a lot of satanic ritual killings. But of course, that doesn't mean that his group does it. But what he is doing, again, is merely trying to, you know, they have no power, they have no beliefs, they have nothing except deception. That's their power. And if people fall for that, they said in the Telegraph that's trying to sell this, yet, while the macabre occult rituals, virgin sacrifices, chalices of blood, and belief in the actual devil are a thing of the past, are they? Satanism is luring increasing numbers of young people disillusioned with outdated and dogmatic traditional religions to join its fold

by offering an alternative to stuffy traditional faiths. Well, Bob Dylan got it right. He says you're going to worship something, right? You're going to serve somebody. The heart is an idol factory. You know, we can worship God or we can worship Satan, even if we don't believe in Satan. More appropriately, we'll worship money or success or drugs or sex or approval of crowds. That's what's driving these kids to suicide in schools. The Sunday Telegraph said they spoke to leaders and members of satanic groups around the world. They claim that the opportunities Satanism offers people to engage in activism and campaign on issues such as gender and sexuality. I always told you those were satanic agendas.

Now they admit it. That's our strength. You know, we can tell people we've got too many people, overpopulation. We've got to get rid of more people. And it's all theatrical. This guy that they talked to in the UK, a group I've never heard of before, they're trying to make a big deal out of it. See, that's the real part of the story here.

The fact that you have a large paper in the UK, the Telegraph, trying to lift up, elevate, publicize Satanism. Why? Is it just, you know, well, let's get some dog bites man story. Maybe that's it, but maybe they have other agendas here. This guy is an undertaker, and he calls himself Chaplain Leopold.

It's like Lucian Grease. He says there's been a 200% increase in membership over the last five years, so they take that from him as if it were true, and maybe it is. What does that mean? I mean, did they have four people and now they got 16? Did they have 400 and now they got 16? What does that mean? There's no fact-checking on any of this stuff. They just take his word on it. He said, I'd love to be able to claim that we could pat ourselves on the back and say, yes, we've done our infernal work

here and we're successfully declining the number of Christians. You see when he does that kind of stuff. It's tongue-in-cheek satire. This guy's a carnival barker. And that's a very useful thing for Satan as well. You can easily dismiss it, as C.S. Lewis said. You can make two big mistakes about it. You can say there is no Satan, or you can take him too seriously.

So they have no power other than deception, which you could say is the same thing about the Telegraph, the Drudge Report, and mainstream media as well. But again, the number of Christians is definitely declining. Is that because of them or is it because of us? That's the question. And I think it's the question uh and um i think it's the latter as uh that is happening we have a an actor who is very bummed he said woke hollywood will only cast white people as bad guys this is an indian actor i'm sorry pakistani-American movie star, who says that he wants to land more roles for playing villains,

but Hollywood is too woke to cast non-white actors as bad guys. This is like that Christian actor I talked about last couple of weeks. And he did not, he was a Christian actor. He had a good marriage. He didn't want to do sex scenes i refused to do them and he refused to do other things that they wanted him to do and um so um he basically got blackballed by hollywood but he found his way back in by being a villain because see he was they don't, they don't have love scenes with

villains to worry about that. And he was also white. Uh, so, um, he was able to get back in. So this guy is, um, at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with Live Score Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie

Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered.

Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. He's played Dinesh in the HBO comedy Silicon Valley, but he also does some script writing and directing and other things. He came up with a story that he wanted to produce. It's crazy, but a true crime story of Steve Banerjee, the Indian American entrepreneur who started the Chippendales before taking a dark turn. The show is based on the book Deadly Dance, the Chippendale murders by K Scott McDonald.

Um, he said, I've never gotten to play an arc like this, a character. In other words, by far the most layered, complex, complicated person I've ever played.

But he said he only got the role of a criminal because it was based on a true story. And he blames quote unquote, woke Hollywood, Marxist Hollywood for not casting more non white actors as villains. He said the role of Banerjee would have gone to a white actor, except that it was based on a true story. Well, I mean, they've done that type of thing. Um, you know, recasting people based on their ethnicity.

Even when they were doing something on a true story, they would cast people as the wrong ethnic group. So I guess he got lucky that he got through with that. One more story before we take a quick break here. Why are we seeing so many people disappear from the workforce? Why are a lot of people saying, all right, that's it. I've had it. I'm out of here. Right.

Well, in the UK, one person wrote in to the Telegraph there and said, I think it's because we're being driven out of work with this, what they call wokery. No, it's Marxism. They even refer to it in here. Talk about Chairman Mao and Maoist and all the rest of the stuff. Let No, it's Marxism. They even refer to it in here, talk about Chairman Mao and Maoist and all the rest of the stuff. Let's call it what it is. It is cultural Marxism.

That was a correct term. Political correctness and the rest of the stuff. This is a tactic that has always been used by the left. Not a surprise when we're talking about movies. Not a surprise it would run right straight through Hollywood. That was by design. The Franklin School out of Germany did that intentionally. You even have the Coen brothers when they did their satire of Hollywood

in the 1950s, I guess it was. Even in that, they played to these heavy-duty stereotypes. And, of course, the stereotype they played to were screenwriters who were hardcore Marxists. And, you know, in the satire, they're actually, this group of writers who are Marxists are actually literally allied with the Russians. Soul-destroying wokery that now permeates every workplace and makes anyone to the right

of Chairman Mao feel like they don't belong. Here's an excerpt from the story out of the Telegraph. Relentless wokery is driving the more mature into retirement before it drives us around the bin, they said. One guy wrote, said to tell me that he retired last year from his job as a lawyer. In a major public inquiry after three and a half years engaged by the cabinet office, he said, since the pandemic, this has gone into overdrive. And it encompasses the entire woke canon from compulsory unconscious bias training,

through the finger-wagging lectures on microaggressions, white fragility and privilege, critical race theory, BLM and structural racism. All these, the shibboleths of the progressive left. But he said this is happening under a supposedly conservative government. Like many members, supposedly conservative. Look at Rishi Sunak. This guy is a Davos creature if ever there was one.

Globalist, climate change pusher. And, of course, you know, everything the guy does there. There's nothing conservative about the conservative government. They're not trying to conserve anything of Britain's culture or history. They want to purge it just as badly as the other guys do. The only thing that Rishi Sunak hasn't done is shove a statue into the Thames. But that time is probably coming. Like many members of the staff his age, he was appalled by the all-pervasive propaganda.

He couldn't stand a climate. Yeah, that kind of climate change. We're having real climate change. It's political. It's social. He couldn't stand a climate in which often entirely innocuous comments were treated as microaggressions. And any deviation from the official view was treated as heretical. The civil service, the NHS, their health service, the higher education, far too many private companies have become a paradise for, quote, recreational offense takers who love to air

their concocted grievances. On one occasion, this guy who wrote, his name was Gareth, had a complaint lodged against him for using the term Anglo-Saxon. Apparently, he said it has negative connotations for the woke. Who knew? Who cares? That's the more important thing. Who cares?

And so a lot of people my age and even younger are just saying, I'm out of here. I don't want to do this anymore. Taking retirement. Of course, there's a lot of people have been killed. A lot of people have been injured as well. A lot of people are just fed up with a reset of this system. Everything about this was global. We see the same thing happening here in the U.S. that's happening in the U.K. It's happening everywhere. All the different countries are in lockstep. And all the country's leaders, as I've said many times, regardless of what they claim their political philosophy is,

regardless of their political party, they are walking in lockstep to what the UN and the World Economic Forum, which begins its meeting today, first time they've had in-person meeting, they said. Of course, you never can believe anything these guys say. Big in-person meeting, I guess, since the lockdown. Anyway, this person goes on to say, I reckon there are an awful lot of Garris out there,

talented, hardworking men and women in their 50s, 60s, 70s, who earlier in their careers were not exposed to this relentless and rather scary politicization of the workforce. And they don't want to tiptoe about in what he called this divisive, pernicious, Maoist culture. That's exactly what it is. It's Maoism. It's Marxism. That's exactly what it is.

We're going to take a quick break. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore

Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. America's energy future begins now. More American oil and natural gas means more jobs, more security, and

more innovation. America's moment is now. Learn more at LightsOnEnergy.org. Paid for by the American Petroleum Institute. We will be right back. Stay with us. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com aps radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device get the aps radio app today and listen wherever you go all right let's talk a little bit about food because since we have davos meeting i imagine this was put out in order to pave the way for their agenda to shut down farms and food beetle burgers is now what

they're calling it used to be meal worms i don't know about you but i don't want to make a meal out of worms but um they say it uses a fraction of the land and water that other things use and it has a smaller carbon footprint. Well, prove it. Prove it. We've seen over and over again, oh, we got this green thing. We got solar panels, and we got windmills, and we got EVs. They're all sold to us as green.

And then what you found over and over again is that as you start to look at the manufacturing process and the acquisition of the materials like cobalt and things like that, you find out it's not so green after all. In reality, it's just a scheme for some politically connected billionaires to come up with brand new things, untested, untried, unworkable, unwanted, that can make them a lot of money while they get the government to ban the existing ways that we've been doing it for millennia. And that's what is happening with this. Davos, at the epicenter of this, lots of articles at Davos about how we're going to change food. Sure, they'll be talking and conspiring about how they can shut down farms, shut down our

dairy and meat that we want, and make us eat worms. I mean, I think Marie Antoinette was not so bad. She said, let them eat cake. These guys are saying, let them eat worms. So Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice. Oh, no, Beetleburgers, Beetleburgers. So, yeah, it's fraudulent. But this is the way breathless selling of this by

the mainstream media robot arms automated conveyor belts transport stacks of red trays in every direction filled with billions of beetle larvae the dried critters are more than 50 protein and rich in fiber and fats as well it It's a French biotech company called Yensec. Y-N-S-E-C-T. They just changed the I to a Y. Yensec. Well, I don't have a yen for what they sell. These worms can be turned into protein powders, shakes, burgers, cereal bars, even

cooking oils at a fraction of the environmental cost of farming. So shut down the farms and let's make a protein powders, shakes, burgers, cereal bars, and even cooking oils that people have no more interest in eating than they do the boxes that you could make out of these things. Use them to make the packaging for real food. The ambitious project will bring costs down to compete with its rivals. Its rival? You mean meat and dairy? Oh, no, no.

Its rivals, soy and veggie burgers, which no one wants to buy or eat either. They're going to have to force us, and that's their plan. They're going to do it at the point of a gun, your soylent green stuff or your soylent bugs. Estimates project that the human population will reach almost 10 billion by 2050. This is where they go into the hard sell. And we were supposed to be, I remember Paul Ehrlich, you know, this old fossil that they dug up. He's still alive, still lying after all these years.

And he was telling us in the 1970s that by the 80s, you know, the population is going to explode. We're going to add another billion people. We got 4 billion people and we're going to add another 5 billion people. And they did. We did, you know, by the mid 80s. They had all these charts. It's like, look at how many centuries it took us to get to the first billion. And then the time compression is exponentially dropping down to go to each successive billion people.

Who cares? It wasn't a problem. Nobody noticed except them. Everything was working just fine until they threw a big monkey wrench into the supply chain. But what he was saying in the 1970s, actually, I think he wrote his book, Population Bomb, in the late 1960s. Scored a lot of money off of that line. And, you know, he was the inspiration for starting Earth Day in 1970. It was always about depopulation.

And what he was saying was, well, we're going to not have enough food to feed everybody. We're all going to be massive starvation by the 80s. Well, population hit 5 billion people in 1987. It increased by 25%, you know, in just a decade or two. And it freaked them out. Well, yeah, we're going gonna hit 10 billion they say by 2050 i don't care do you these people have been wrong about everything they keep selling this lie of what we need to do using the same lies and the same alarmism that they've been telling us

for 50 60 years so they said nsac protein is going to grow in terms of acceptance of it, in terms of how many people eat it, the market will grow and develop. Maybe they haven't noticed what's happening to the impossible burgers and the rest of this stuff. They're canceling this stuff left and right. Nobody wants this stuff. So you got to get rid of the profit aspect of this.

So that's the response. First thing they want to do is say, well, okay, we're going to convince everybody that you got to do this because we're all going to die and we got to do it to be green. And then people say, no, I don't want it. They say, okay, corporations, you got to stop worrying about profits. You just have to focus on ESG. And that's the other thing that you'll see all over the Davos articles

as they're meeting this week. Everything is about how we can push ESG, environmental social governance. Let's govern people. We don't want to have markets. We want to have government. And we want the government to be forcing people to do the things that we say are necessary for the environment, necessary for the society. So let's just forget about demand, consumer demand, and what the consumers want.

Let's just shove this down their throats, and that's what they're planning on doing. But, of course, it's also about destroying the supply chain. That's one of the reasons why I wanted to play that story, what the British farmer was saying, as well as what Egg Producers Association in the U.S. are saying. They said, this is supply chain issues. Yeah, there's some avian flu around. There's always avian flu. That's a factor in this, but that's not why the price of eggs have tripled, tripled. This is what's being reported by Fox at San Antonio.

They're talking to people who are bakers as well as consumers. I knew this was happening last year. We talked to a local pizzeria that we used to go to all the time in Texas, close to where we lived. And the guy, um, you know, we'd go in, it wouldn't be that busy. We'd go in the off hours because we're kind of shifted our schedule is. And, um, so we got to know him and we talked to him. He says, I don't know what I'm going to do. I mean, this is, this was like last spring before we moved. And he said, I'm looking at the prices, and they're skyrocketing, whether he's looking at flour or eggs or anything that he used to cook.

And he says, I don't know what I'm going to do. I'm going to have to really go up on price. And he said, when I complained to my distributor about it, he said, well, well, you're going to go up on price. You're going to go out on a business. And he goes, the next thing is you're going to be happy to get it at any price. It's all supply chain issue. It's a supply chain issue that is, uh, killing, uh, more birds and avian flu. As I pointed out last week. They could not get the feed. Why? Well, because you've got the railroads have decided

that they don't want to carry that type of stuff anymore, just like they decided unilaterally that they didn't want to carry some of the necessary ingredients for refining fuel, other things like that. Why is that happening? It's all out of order. It's monopolized, and who knows who they're taking orders from, right? You look at it, and maybe they're doing this for profit,

but that's not really a motivation for most of the corporations now. For most of the corporations, it's what does government want, and that's especially true when you start talking about things that industries like railroads, where they have a heavy monopolized route. That's what this is looking like. Anyway, when you want to talk about government and how it is so essential to us, especially FEMA. I loved this story. FEMA distributed nonsense emergency brochures to native Alaskans.

I guess we could say that FEMA is like a half-baked Alaska. They hired a California government contract. Another one of these contractors. You know, first they did this with the Eskimos, and now they shut down all of our stuff. And we don't even know who they are. But the same guys work for Canada, apparently. Anyway, FEMA hired a California government contractor

to translate disaster assistance information into two native Alaskan languages. But all the natives got was a heap of nonsense. After a typhoon hammered the west coast of Alaska in September, FEMA hired a Berkeley-based company called Accent on Languages to translate instructions for applying for disaster aid. Now, they actually did name the contractor here, and this is believable, as crazy as it is. FEMA quickly turned the company's work into a trifold glossy brochure. They skipped the testing thing, you see.

They had to have a warp speed brochure. So these people provide the thing for them, and they don't get somebody who speaks the language to actually look at it and review it. Nah, they just turn it into a glossy brochure with phrases like this. Your husband is a polar bear, Skinny. Tomorrow he will go hunting Alaska very early and will bring nothing. When she said so, the dog ran farther off from the curtain. These are the people who are going to tell us how to survive emergencies and disasters like nuclear war and things like that, right?

University of Alaska Fairbanks linguist says one of the translations is just a random assortment of phrases copied from a compilation of Far Eastern Russian folklore. Yupik Eskimo texts from the 1940s. He said, they clearly just grabbed the words from the document, then put them in some random order and gave something that looked like you pick, but made no sense. So, um, uh, uh, they were only paid $5,100. So this is one of the smaller frauds against the federal government

that's been out there. But, of course, FEMA compounded that by rushing off and printing the glossy trifold brochures and distributing them. Lee said that when the horrifying botched, this is the CEO of Accent on Languages, the contractor. Contractor CEO said that when the horrifying botched translations came to her attention, that her company hired a new team of translators to do the project over again. But FEMA has fired the company.

But then it gets even crazier than this. Because the Associated Press presented the fiasco as new evidence of systemic racism. It's a systemic racism. You did not have the respect for their language. No, this is just the way the government works. Reporter Mark Tyson called it, quote, an ugly reminder for Alaska natives of the suppression of their culture and languages from decades past.

And quoted the CEO as she linked the bogus translations to her mother being beaten in school for speaking her native tongue. I'm sorry, that's not the translator. That was one person who brought it to their attention. Yeah, that's what it was. It was racism. The Affirmative Action Driven Contracts was how accent on languages got its job. They tout themselves as a female minority-owned business.

So there you go. You do some ESG hiring and you get ESG language. Kind of reminds me, Travis, of when we went to China. Their translators typically didn't know what they were doing either. It was a thing, and it was also, I've heard, a thing in Japan. People liked to get English words printed on their T-shirts and stuff. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Term bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee and um it didn't have to mean anything at all i mean you know we could have given him one of these fine t-shirts that say the david knight show and that has plenty of meaning on it show people that but um no they get, and when we were in China, someone got walking around with a t-shirt that says, crying gorilla, written real big in English. Remember that? It's kind of like that same thing where Americans get Japanese kanji tattoos that don't mean anything.

It's like an egg salad or something like that. Exactly. My favorite one, though, was, and we we actually i bought this when i saw it i said i've got to have that it was it's a very common thing you know in china part of the china price is to steal intellectual property and so you would see all kinds of um disney stuff stolen. You know, just like they had Mickey Mouse and Minnie on a shirt and pair pants. And it said, Mickey Mouse Bird Sanctuary. And then underneath it, it said, a manifestation of ignorance and greed. Because that person knew what they were putting on there.

They weren't just grabbing English phrases and words out of the dictionary. They actually had an inside joke when somebody said, come up with something to put underneath that. Yeah, it is a manifestation of ignorance and greed. So we bought that. We never had our daughter wear that because it was just too too good i saved it i've showed it i've shown it on the uh program many times but uh that was too good to pass up another crazy thing about culture here before we get into uh malarkey um final records making a comeback oh k, Karen's got it. Yeah. Just to show you what this looks like.

Yeah. Here it is. Um, Mickey mouse bird sanctuary. And let's see, it's got, um, here it is written down here on thing. And of course it, you know, it came with a shirt that said, oh, here it is here. So here's Mickey down at the bottom. And, um, here it is. Uh, Mickey mouse and they do the Mickey mouse. Uh, the Mickey is done in the Disney font, which you can pick that up anywhere.

Uh, bird sanctuary, the way they did the bird, the font they did for bird looks like it's a horror film or something. Bird sanctuary, a manifestation of ignorance and of greed. So they had a, we do not sell that. Um, if we were to sell that, it would be a lot of fun to sell that on a t-shirt, but, uh, we would get trouble. I guess, uh, we'd have to change it up somehow and not use the term Mickey mouse and it would lose its meaning. Anyway. Uh, another thing that absolutely makes no sense is the, uh, vinyl comeback LP records. And I've got a lot of records.

They said that this last year, 43.5 million LPs were sold. I don't have that many. My family thinks I do when we're moving these things around. They're pretty heavy and bulky. But they said it was up by 48- fold compared to 2006 when the comeback began. And they were basically driven out, but now people want to go back and get vinyl. And this is the most interesting thing about it. They said only 50% of vinyl buyers even own a record player. They're not listening to these things.

They're collecting them simply for the art and simply because they want to have something physical. So here we have music that you don't listen to. You watch it. It's kind of like MTV. This is a metaphor, I think, for MTV. MTV turned music into something you watch instead of listen to because you can't stand to listen to the auto tuning i can't anyway i find that really funny

because uh when i had my record player set up i found i actually listened to it more because if i've got the phone on my song i can rewind it immediately jump back 10 seconds however frequently i want to but the record player actually want to pay attention to it because i can't just easily go back and jump back you don't have a lot of distractions with it. As a matter of fact, this thing that I'm using for paperless, that's what people say about these writing things. And it is true. Uh, if you use it for writing, if you use it for reading and taking notes, you're not tempted to go jump and do something else, you know, like you are, if you've got a, uh, an iPad or something like that. Um, so yeah, that, that kind of focus is true.

And, um, I mean, I, you know, grew up with records. I loved records, but when, and I love the fact that it's a, so should we all dust off our old record players? Well, that's the whole thing. It's the dust, isn't it? I mean, that was the bane of our existence dust. And so we had all these rituals to try to keep static away from them and sealing everything up and cleaning the needles. And it was a real quest to try to get the best sound and detailed sound and not have wow and flutter and rumble and all these other things that were there in the analog world. And, um, you know, I don't think that the technology has gotten any better.

Frankly, I haven't been able to find any, any turntables that look anywhere close to what I used to have. Of course, the long sense lost them. But, um, the thing that was missing when CDs came in, they, they sounded great. And I know there's some people that like analog amplifiers and all the rest of the stuff, but I'm saying without having all the extraneous stuff and, um, and it was less compression as a matter of fact, as well, because part of the manufacturing process to, to transfer it onto a vinyl record, uh, they had to, um, compress the music quite a bit and try to

decompress it on the other end to try to get the real sound there. They didn't have to do that with the CDs. But the thing that was missing, and we all said it was, you really missed the album covers. Because you get these little tiny CDs, and you'd sit there, you'd read the back of the album. There'd be a lot to read about who was in it, who the musicians were in the band band and all that kind of stuff.

And all that stuff was missing when they went to CDs. And evidently, that's what's really behind this, because half the people are just buying it for the cover and the artwork and all the rest of the stuff writ large and not getting it because of the music quality, not even listening to it. So LPs accounted for 43% of album sales in the U.S. last year. The thing is, most people, again, stream or they buy, you know, they don't even buy individual songs anymore, they just stream it.

So album sales are very small. As a matter of fact, less than 5% of album equivalent music consumption. So if you factor in streaming and download, so if you then cut that by half, you get like two and a half percent. So it is still really small in terms of musical consumption, but it's physical goods. People are looking for something tangible. They're looking for the artwork. They're looking for the jacket cover. Only 50% even have a record player. And then we would talk about kind of phony placeholders. I have to bring it up. George Santos again.

He's just the gift that keeps on giving George Santos. He's now got the SEC investigating him. He's got the FEC investigating him because he claimed to get $700,000 from his family's company that didn't exist. So it's like, okay, so where'd you get the money? And then he has several dozen statements where he spent $199.99. Why? Because $200 is the level at which you have to provide receipts and details. I mean, this guy's not even a smart crook.

So he's now being investigated by the SEC, Security and Exchange Commission, not just the Federal Election Commission. He was hired in 2020 to raise capital for the company Harbor City Capital. And now we find out that it was not a safe harbor. He landed at least one significant investment from a wealthy investor. When the investment failed to deliver on the promised returns, according to one of the people, Mr. Santos sought to reassure the investor by saying he had personally raised nearly $100 million and had invested his own family's money in Harbor City. Well, I think he's a perfect fit for Congress.

I think, as I mentioned last week, the most important part of the story about George Santos is the fact that Kevin McCarthy has completely owned him. Well, I'm not going to kick him out. Voters elected him based on lies and fraud and all the rest of the stuff. We got a lot of people here that didn't tell the truth about things. We don't want to start down that road. He literally said that. He did not use those exact words, but he said, hey,

there's a lot of people here that made false claims about things. So Harbor City has now been in receivership since the SEC accused it of being a Ponzi scheme in a 2021 civil lawsuit. Santos was paid for the work he did at Harbor City, according to the receiver. She declined any further comments. But people who raise money from investors are paid in the form of commissions generally have to be brokers or registered to work with a licensed brokerage firm. Santos did not do anything like that. So not only was he out there raising money for a company the SEC has alleged and started a lawsuit against saying it was a Ponzi scheme. He's raising money for this fraudulent company that's gone bankrupt. And he didn't have the license to be a broker for that either.

You have to imagine so many of these guys in DC are horrifically jealous of Santos. They work so hard to lie and create these backstories and these personas. And he didn't have to do any of that. Maybe Lindsey Graham can finally just admit he's a warmongering homosexual. Maybe we've reached that point where it just doesn't matter anymore. It doesn't matter if he admits it. We all know. So, but here's the thing. I think that George Santos is a perfect fit for Congress because everything Congress does is a Ponzi scheme. Everything they do is a violation of law. We'll be talking about that when we get to the gun control. The hour has produced the man. Yes, yes. He is a perfect reflection of Washington in general,

Congress more particularly, and especially of Kevin McCarthy. We're going to take a quick break. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

In fact, we'll talk about Bideniden's malarkey so stay with me Thank you. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz Channel at APSradio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. Alright, and we do want to thank APS Radio. Not only can you stream music, even if you don't have a record player. I've got all these great records and I haven't heard them for the longest time.

Anyway, but you can get all kinds of music but you can also get this program there. And they have an app as well to help you to listen to things. So it's very important because we're always having issues with different platforms. And so it's great to be on a APS radio. If you're having any issues with Twitter or with Odyssey or with the live

rock fan, any of them, you can also go to APS Radio. So just keep that in mind. We appreciate his support of this program. Geesebusters, Geesebusters, thank you very much for the tip. He sent us a story about his company, which I thought was very interesting. And, of course, Geesebusters is used to – he told me once before

that he had been hired by Trump at his, um, uh, years ago at this golf course. They said, uh, they wanted to make sure all the geese were gone when, uh, his friend, Bill Clinton came to play golf with him. That's the whole thing about it. It's such a charade. All these people think Trump is our hero and they don't realize how close he is with the other side. They don't know. Yeah, he's playing a foursome, at least. Anyway, it's very interesting, his story, about how that all came up, and also interesting about how he discovered this and patented it.

And he's had several situations where he's done it for government entities who have basically screwed him over on some of the stuff there as well. But it's an interesting thing that he does where he basically doesn't kill the birds. He scares the birds and gets them to go somewhere else. And it's very interesting how that works. Thank you, Susie Moody. Appreciate the tip on RockFit. She says, the homeschool socialization myth makes my eye twitch. Yeah, I know.

Wasn't it funny how they just completely did a 180, you know, with a so-called pandemic. Do you send a boxer into a fight without any training, hoping that they will learn the skills by just competing with other boxers? No. My goal is to train them up in the way they should go. With God's grace, I hope to do that. That's exactly what it is. As a matter of fact, when we were in North Carolina doing homeschooling at the time, the organization, North Carolina Homeschoolers Association, had a publication that they put out. I forget whether it was monthly or quarterly or whatever, but the name of the report was the Greenhouse Report, because that's the analogy, right? You take some tender plants

and you grow them to a certain stage before you put them out in the harsh environment. And that's exactly what the family is about. And that's why people choose to do the education in the family. You're taking the tender ones, and you're, and that's, you know, you talk about the socialization thing. That makes my eye twitch. The other thing that makes my eye twitch was the Christians who would say, well, we see our kids as being missionaries. Well, really?

You're going to have your kids do something that you don't want to do? You're going to have your kids, you think your kids are going to be able to stand up in this classroom against the other 30 kids and the teacher? You think they're going to change things there? Strengthen them up a little bit before you do that. Then they will train them up in the way they should go. Give them some training instead of just sending them out to the battlefield, ill-equipped and untrained. Well, let's talk about Biden's malarkey, because now we're up to malarkey 3.0. We've had three different releases of malarkey from him. A third set of classified documents found at his home,

says the White House counsel. Third trove were discovered on Saturday. And it is really just a slow drip in this growing scandal. I thought it was very funny when the first group of them hit. And he was telling everybody that he takes it very seriously. Listen to this. Mr. President, thank you. Thank you, Mr. President.

Mr. President, classified material. Next year, Corvette. What were you thinking? Let me, I'm going to get a chance to speak on all this, God willing, soon. But as I said earlier this week, people, and by the way, my Corvette's in a locked garage. Okay, so it's not like they're sitting out in the street. But anyway. So the Corvette was in a locked garage?

Yes, as well as my Corvette. But as I said earlier, this Corvette matters. People know I take classified documents and classified material seriously. I also said we're cooperating fully and completely with the Justice Department's review.

As part of that process, my lawyers reviewed other places where documents from my time as vice president were stored and they finished the review last night. They discovered a small number of documents of classified markings and storage areas and file cabinets in my home and my personal library. This was done in the case of the biden pen center the department of justice was immediately as was done the department of justice was immediately uh notified well anyway

it goes on you know how that runs and that's one of the things jonathan turley said he said yeah his legal staff gave him this carefully awarded statement to read, which he was attempting to do there as I stopped it. Because we've heard all this stuff before. And instead he decided he would ad lib about his Corvette. He said, that's a really bad move. But I thought it was funny when I heard that. He says, I take these documents, I take classified documents seriously. It reminded me of the story of the pastor who had

a new convert who'd been a thief. And when they got to the passage there where Paul says, steal no more, work with your hands. He says, I think they got that. He goes to his pastor afterwards and he says, I think they got that wrong pastor. He knew this guy was a thief. He said, I think they got the comma and the period in the wrong place. It should read, steal. No more work with your hands. And so when I saw this from Biden, I thought, I take classified documents. Seriously.

Seriously, I do. I take classified documents. That's what I do. And what does he do with them when he gets them? Does he sell them to the Chinese? He seriously takes classified documents. We now know that at least three different times. At least some of the papers found in the private office were marked top secret.

It's unclear whether additional materials remain undiscovered. The continuous finding of classified materials in different private locations belonging to Biden is presenting a serious problem for the president, who is now under investigation by the Department of Justice, they say. Do you believe that? If you do, I've got a bridge to sell you. Previously, Biden had expressed shock and disbelief following the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, remarking, you've had it troubling that Trump could be that irresponsible.

What do you mean by that? Hey, dude, how could you leave them all in one place? I mean, I've got my classified documents scattered all over the place. Meanwhile, the Republicans have signaled that they're not confident in the DOJ's investigation to Biden's handling of the documents. On Friday, House Republicans launched their own investigation into how the Department of Justice is dealing with the matter, Reuters reported. They've also raised questions regarding whether Biden's scandal-ridden son, Hunter, may have had access to the documents. Now,

before we get into that, let me just say this. Does anybody still remember Clintonemails.com? Where she put classified documents and documents that were so secret that, you know, they're born classified? Discussions between her as Secretary of State and other heads of state? That's born classified. It doesn't have to have a marking on it, but she did have classified documents and they were not locked away in boxes with a Corvette or in Mar-a-Lago. They were on the internet.

Why is that not being talked about? Well, you know why, right? The, the Clintons have a lot of people who are covering for them. And so the question is, as we look at this, and everybody is turning on Biden and the Democrat Party,

you know there's something else going on here. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ee. And they're more than happy to lose this case. They've got so many different things that they're coming after Trump for. They're happy to throw away the Mar-a-Lago thing and to get rid of Biden. That's a reasonable trade-off for them. There was absolutely, I think, nothing there with the Mar-a-Lago papers. Yeah, technicality, and as Judge Napolitano said,

it's a law that he has frequently talked about and opposed, saying that if you have anything that is, doesn't he have to be top secret or anything like that, any classified documents or just other government documents. If they're in the wrong place, that's a crime. Well, that's a ridiculous law. And judge Napolitano has pointed that out, but he also says, but it is a law. And if they want to push it, they could push it against him, but they're

willing to let that go, uh, in order to get rid of Biden. Or they're willing to say, well, you know, we have to prosecute Biden because we did it against Trump. And maybe that is really where this all began. Maybe that's why they did the Mar-a-Lago raid. How long have they known about Biden's stuff? Well, they knew about Biden's stuff before they did the Mar-a-Lago raid. We know that. So perhaps they followed up with the, uh, they, they started the Mar-a-Lago thing, get

that out of the public. And then they do Biden. It's like, well, you know, now we're going to have to treat them at the same standard and so forth. We've got to get rid of him. He's going to have to step down because down because he's circling the drain and they don't want him in the next election. They're still several years off. He saw how he was struggling to read that statement. And that is essentially what David Gergen said as well when he went on with

Anderson Cooper. Start with you. How big a mess is this for the Biden administration? It's very, very big, not legally, but politically, it's a very, very big deal. You know, this is a president who was marching upward for the first time in his presidency. He's got his numbers up. People are feeling better about the economy. Oh, really? Sorts of reasons to believe that he can now present himself. The fears that people like me have about how old is he and can he govern well those fears will be dissipated if you were able to stay on that track but now along comes this this this gigantic story

which was totally unexpected and it's not that the knock for six yeah the original plan now but i do think that they um that the button people i they may be making a big mistake. I may be wrong about this. I think they've done a wonderful job of being cooperative with the government. And they've done it, quote, by the book, as they were saying. But I don't think sitting there hunkering down now,

they're just acting like it's not out there. As they go, they're just going to get cream doing it. There's also been the drip, drip, drip of information. Some of that unpreventable because they didn't know a special counsel was coming. But they did know when they had the president talk about the first batch of documents that were found, they'd already known that there were other documents found. You would think they might have just jumped, announced that all at once. Exactly. That's why they could have put that and put that out there and as matters now stand that long delay in putting it out there is going

to encourage people to believe what are they hiding yeah yeah what are they hiding no that's not really the issue uh the issue is that they got david gergen they say former clinton advisor that's the way media reports him but of course, David Gergen is the establishment, bipartisan establishment. He's been there forever. He worked for Nixon. He worked for Ford. He worked for Reagan. He worked for Clinton.

And he works now for the World Economic Forum. You see him there. That's where he hangs out for the most part now, and with CNN. This guy is the very definition of establishment. Bohemian Grove and all the rest of these places. I mean, he is always there. So when he comes out and says, well, you know, this is a very, very big deal. It is a very big deal.

That interview, we talked about that. That shows that this is the establishment system coming after Biden. Still, not talking about Hillary. I mean, if we're going to care about classified documents, we still don't care about Hillary, right? Ben Theis, thank you very much for the tip. He said they do a great job of entertaining both sides of the show. Yeah, it is. And it is a side show, isn't it?

We got both sides, and it turns into a complete side show uh so he got his numbers up people are feeling better about the economy really see david gergen saying that it's like yeah democrats are doing a great job is that that biden guy yeah we'd be doing great i mean the economy is doing great. No inflation. Eggs are not triple the price they were a couple of years ago. We're not talking about banning stoves. Um, no, everybody's happy with Biden. And then this happens out of, you know, out of the clear blue sky, the fears that people like me have about how old he is. I think David Gergen is older than Biden. He's 80. What is it? Biden is 79 or something, I think. I don't know. Who's counting anymore at this point? I can't count that high. I better be careful. If I, with any luck, I'll be there soon myself. Those fears would be

dissipated if he were able to stay on that track. Joe Biden is 80. Oh, he is. Okay. Well, they're there. They're the same age. Neck and neck. That's right. That's McConnell that's neck and neck and neck and neck. Multiple necks. Gigantic story. A question why the president's team did not make more of an attempt to try to conceal this or cover it up. Come on. You're not even trying to get ahead of this.

Well, I thought they did the best they could. You know, they did release this information on Fridays and Saturdays, right? You know, they know that you had a Trudeau, uh, you know, they had announced it's because of an emergency. We will have to close the border to non-vaccinated truckers in two or three months. And then when that happened, Trudeau announced it on a Saturday. And then the following Saturday, Biden announced it.

They know when to release news that they don't want people to pay attention to. Cooper called the appointment of a special counsel in the case unpreventable, but questioned why Biden did not announce that the documents had been found on multiple occasions all at once to avoid the drip. Yeah, Gergen says that long delay in putting it out there encourages people to believe what are they hiding? And again, it encourages me to ask, why is the establishment so eager to dump on Biden now? After all that we have known, and again, the most incriminating parts of this

have to do with Hunter and his involvement with his house that had the locked garage with the documents and the Corvette, what he's paying to rent it and all the money trail that's there. That's been there. That's been there for a couple of years. That was there before the previous election. Why is it that now that is being talked about? It was never talked about before.

The whole thing, you know, the Biden family is a crime family, just like the Clintons. But they got to find a way to get Biden to gracefully exit out of this stuff without bringing up all of the money laundering stuff that Hunter did. Maybe he'll have to sacrifice Hunter. But they want to get Biden out, say, well, you know, he got caught up in this stuff, Didn't know what he was doing. His son is a drug addict who is selling influence, but you know, Joe didn't have anything to do with the money laundering and all that stuff. And he wasn't giving classified documents to people like Hillary Clinton. Oh, I mean, he wasn't giving classified documents.

Forget about Hillary Clinton. Let's not talk about that. By the way, the guy that has been chosen as the special counsel by Merrick Garland, Robert Herr, son of Herr, Ben Herr, I guess. Now, anyway, he was a partner with Christopher Wray in a law firm. Later, he became one of the top lieutenants for Rod Rosenthal. So we know where this guy is coming from. But let's talk a little bit about the Hunter aspect of this that I find interesting. Why was Hunter paying Joe Biden $50,000 a month to rent a house?

Where the classified documents were found. This was discovered by New York Post's Miranda Devine. She said Hunter began listing the Wilmington home as his address following his 2017 divorce from his ex-wife, even falsely claiming that he owned the property on a July 2018 background check form as part of a rental application. Well, he didn't seem to take these background reports very seriously. You know, he, he lied about his drug addiction when he got his gun. That's a big crime, not just the drug addiction, but lying about it on the gun form. Uh, so he lied about, uh, owning the property or was he lying about paying the rent? Did he lie about how much rent he paid?

Was he strung out on drugs with all this stuff? Who knows, right? Hunter listed monthly rent as $49,910. Or if you look at it for the 11 month period that he indicated that he lived there, he would have paid $550,000 to the big guy. A Zillow search shows that the most expensive homes currently for rent in Wilmington, Delaware, the most expensive one is going for $6,000 a month. That's a 4,200 square foot home. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Six bedrooms, four baths, $6,000 a month to rent that.

But you can, you know, for $5,875, you can get a 2,400 square foot home. For $3,800 a month, you can get a 2,150 square foot town townhome in Wilmington. So there you go from about just under 4,000 to $6,000. So why was he paying $50,000? If you can rent them from under 4,000 to 6,000, most expensive 6,000, and he's, uh, paying the big guy $50 thousand dollars a month. Biden's home is worth about two million dollars and so as a zero hedge says well could Hunter a crackhead have accidentally listed the annual rent payment to his father for the house that contained classified documents? Sure

but why was his wealthy ex-vice President dad charging him rent in the first place when he was already allegedly broke? Was this Hunter's way of funneling money to his father? After his divorce was finalized in May 2017, he was included in an email from his business partner, James Gilliar, about a venture with Chinese state-funded energy company CEFC China Energy. The email stated that Hunter and his partners would receive 20% of the shares in the new business, with 10% going to Hunter's uncle, James Biden, and the other 10% being, quote, held by H, Hunter Hunter for the big guy.

And of course, you know, of the, uh, of the email that he, that are, you know, when he told his daughter, uh, I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything, this entire family for 30 years, but don't worry. Unlike pop, I won't make you give me half your salary. So the year after he said, you know, after he got divorced and he said that he was staying at that house and paying $50,000 a month. The following year, federal investigators began looking into whether Hunter and his business associates violated tax and money laundering laws during their dealings with China and in other countries. So, again, as we look at what is not being done and the things that just completely go unnoticed and how they focus on something,

they completely forget, with all this stuff about Trump and Biden and the documents and everything, they forget about Hillary Clinton's Clintonemails.com, where anybody can get their stuff. And when you look at this and you look at the long, well, I guess it's called paper trail, except it's on his laptop. When you look at the long trail of documents that suggest money laundering and influence peddling by the Bidens, remember that the reason they've got to force CBDC on us and the reason they've got to shut down crypto is because they've got to attack money laundering. You know, the things that people like Biden do and probably is what Hillary Clinton was doing.

She probably had Clinton emails there because, you know, she gives somebody an idea where they could find the documents. Anybody could get the documents. It's kind of like the, you know, doing a document drop when you go to the park bench and you leave this, you know, you leave your, uh, your newspaper there and the newspaper has got the microfilm in it, you know, and you get up and then somebody else sits down and picks the thing. I mean, that's just a drop off spot for her probably. Anyway, the laptop doesn't contain any direct evidence from such money transfers, but it does show that Hunter was routinely on the hook for household expenses, including repairs to that home. Recent reports have indicated investigators believe that they have enough evidence to charge Hunter with tax crimes, as well as lying about his drug abuse on federal forms so he could buy a gun. No, Hunter is just another reason to get rid of Biden. So was the $50,000 monthly rent a simple crackhead mistake?

When in fact the annual payment amount, or did Hunter create Exhibit A for any honest prosecutor to pursue, says Zero Hedge? Well, it's not just that. You know, when we look at how it was reported on Joe Biden's tax return, so was $50,000 what he was paying him for the entire year, and he put it down monthly by mistake because he's kind of out of it, right, obviously? Well, if that were the case, then you look at Joe Biden's 2017 tax return, Schedule E only listed $19,800 in rents received. And in 2018, he listed no rent received.

So that doesn't check either. That doesn't line up either. That doesn't explain the $50,000. I mean, you could just chalk it up to Hunter lying about it for whatever reason, but it was not that he put it down monthly when he meant it to be annually, because it's like $20,000 for the whole year that he got paid. According to former Utah U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, rather not Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, rather, not Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, Brett Tolman, the Biden family's payment mechanism may reveal the core of an entrenched business enterprise, which could involve legal predicates for racketeering charges.

Yeah. Adam Schiff, when pressed on the issue, couldn't think of anything to say. So he said, well, I can't exclude the possibility without knowing any more of the facts. And so you have some people pick that up and look. Even Adam Schiff admits that it could be. Of course, he's going to say that. He's not going to be. That was no commitment to anything.

And then he goes on to say the Biden approach was very different from Trump and the sense that it looks that it was inadvertent that these documents were at these locations. See, Trump did it knowingly Biden did it with a mistake, but what about Hillary's emails? I just don't know how that fits into this whole thing. Do you just, uh, don't want to look at this.

Just like she told the FBI when they come to collect her disk drives. No, these are not the drives you're looking for. Go away. You know, she does the Jedi mind thing on it. And she's still got that Jedi mind thing going on. The entire government is under her Jedi mind control. All the mainstream media is under her Jedi mind control. All the mainstream media is under her Jedi mind control. These are not the documents you're looking for. Anyway, going back

to Schiff, he said there was no effort to hold onto them, no effort to conceal them, no effort to obstruct the Justice Department's investigation. Well, look, we know that Clinton sent in Sandy Berger. I always called him Sandy Burglar in the National Archives to get out documents about 9-11 that were incriminating. Sandy Burglar went in and stuffed the document. They left him alone because, you know, this guy was a high-ranking official in the Clinton administration. So they left him alone and he stuffed all these documents into his pants, took them out. They got caught destroying the documents,

admitted it and all the rest of this stuff. Now the national archives uses Sandy burglar as an example. They said, look, even if somebody comes in and they're, you know who they are and they're very high ranking, you still follow all the protocols. You do not leave them alone with the documents and all this other kind of stuff. And so they use him as an example.

So he stole and destroyed documents that could have been incriminating to the, to the Clinton administration. That's one of the reasons why I say, well, what was it that, why are these guys stashing this stuff if it's something that is incriminating? It may not be incriminating. Certainly there's been no indication of the subject of any of the stuff at Mar-a-Lago except maybe, you know, a souvenir copy of the Pardon for Roger Stone. But, you know, if it's documents about Ukraine and about Iran, as I said, you got all the under the table cloak and dagger stuff that's going on with Iran as well as the coup in Ukraine. So there could be stuff that's there.

But why didn't they just destroy it? Why did they save it? That's the thing that puzzles me. If you got some incriminating information there, why would you save it? So Jonathan Turley says, the president just said the documents found in his garage aren't in a locked garage like his Corvette. The Corvette standard is actually not in classified protocols. Well, neither is the ClintonEmail.com standard and the protocols as well.

Uh, so yeah, as a matter of fact, uh, somebody did a joke video. Uh, Jay Leno went for a ride with, um, Joe Biden and his 1967 Stingray, uhray Corvette. And so they put together this video. It said, fun fact, fun Corvette fact, the 1967 Stingray can lose 60 classified documents in 4.7 seconds. Go back to the manufacturer and say, hey. That's right. Oh, there go all the documents out the back. They're flying out of the car as he's driving.

I can relate to that, having a convertible. So what's your dad? That was very funny. So yeah, you can lose 60 classified documents in 4.7 seconds. By the way, before we get away from the Corvette, I just got to throw this in. The Taliban has a supercar and believe it or not. At LiveScoreBet,

we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race

that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee it has a nice looking body, but then, excuse me, they made this mistake of actually. It's a, it's a kit car. Uh, they made the mistake of actually showing the chassis and the engine without the body. Here's what it looks like. And as some people pointed out, if you look carefully, this is their supercar.

Look at the smoke. It's actually a Toyota engine or a small, compact, older Toyota. Very old, secondhand Toyota engine or a small compact, older Toyota, very old secondhand Toyota engine that is a blowing blue smoke and a white smoke, I should say. And, uh, so yeah, that's their super car. So at least there's one thing we like about Joe Biden. He's got a cool Corvette, right? Except he wants to take my car.

Oh, that's the problem with them. Uh, even as a, even as a car guy, you can't like Joe Biden. Except he wants to take my car. That's the problem with him. Even as a car guy, you can't like Joe Biden. Master Ergaster says on Twitter, he says, yeah, it's behind the Corvette, near the boxes of old clothes. Also, the neighbor's weed eater that I still haven't returned. Oh, and there's a bag of kitty litter because the Corvette started leaking oil. It's only open and unlocked when the gardener is mowing the lawn.

This is, uh, yeah, there is no end to the jokes about Biden's Corvette. Jonathan Turley went on to say the Corvette statement was remarkably ill-considered. It was a cringe-worthy moment. After being given a carefully worded statement by his

lawyers and staff, the president ad libbed and suggested that his locked garage was a secure space for classified material. Biden is so much like Trump, isn't he? I just cannot keep from going off script and, uh, you know, incriminating themselves one way after the other uh so yeah if you go back and uh look at the 67 corvette stingray that was really an amazing car and it had the zero to 60 to zero fastest uh on record but any there weren't any other cars around that time that i'm aware of that were

close to it in terms of performance, but certainly nothing held a candle to its looks. And I think that's true even today, my favorite Corvette out there, but you know, be that as it may, um, they're not promising. Um, they're promising a swift investigation. They're going to go from zero to 60 documents on biden in no time at all the house oversight committee chairman james comer is chomping at the bits a swift congressional oversight he said is coming we first learned about the penn biden center classified documents months after they were found in an unsecure closet he said then it took the white house weeks to inform the public

about the documents found in president biden'smington garage. Again, I think that delay, which they found out about it, they kept it secret, not just because they didn't want that to come out before the election, but then they went after Trump and Bar-Lago with the big raid and all the rest of this stuff. And I think that was all deliberate. I think they were laying the foundation. But yeah, we go after Trump. We have to go after Biden. We get Biden out, clear the way for Lala Harris.

Seriously, they think they can win with her? Now, days later, we are learning that there are more documents at the Wilmington residence. Are there more classified documents coming, he says. And again, that is the drip drip that was being talked about by Anderson Cooper and David Gergen. More classified documents found in President Biden's home, yet still no FBI raid. The double standard is apparent, says Republican Ashley Henson, Congresswoman. Americans deserve to know why President Biden had these documents and who had access to them.

Representative Mary Miller, another Republican, says, Where is the FBI? We have two systems of justice. Representative Diana Harshbarger, Tennessee, said, Biden's home is a crime scene. So why is the FBI not raiding his home the same way they did president Trump's the FBI owes the American people answers. Diana, you need to ask the same questions about Hillary as well.

Uh, and then Ted Cruz full FBI raid happens. When, when does that happen? Yeah. When do we get the documents? Uh, when do we get the disk drives from Hillary?

You know, she wiped them like with a cloth, you mean? And so you had the House Oversight Committee, Chairman Comer, saying we're going to do this very quickly. And then you've got the House Judiciary Committee is going to be conducting its own investigation. You got the Republicans are fighting each other over who gets to do the show. A sideshow. Again, it's a sideshow. While this is all happening, while he's got a money laundering operation that we all know about,

they want to force us into CBDC. They want to destroy crypto. Oh, it could be used for money laundering. Oh, so can his garage, okay? Anyway, Jim Jordan, Mike Johnson wrote a letter to garland on friday the house judiciary committee we are conducting oversight of the justice department's actions with respect to former vice president biden's mishandling of classified and documents they wrote so um you know this is uh he's staking his claim to having the prime time spot. It's unclear when the department first came to learn about the existence of

these documents, whether it actively concealed this information, they continue. So again, you look at this, there is too much classification. That is a problem. It's a problem for everybody.

Maybe it's also a trap for their political enemies. Maybe their political enemies, Trump and Biden, have now fallen into that trap, along with the IRS as well. Another thing to come after political enemies with. The Roger Stone pardon that Trump had, while Biden's got Ukraine and Iran, I understand. That is not an equivalence there. that Trump had while Biden's got Ukraine and Iran. I understand. Um, you know, that is, um, that's not a, uh, equivalence there. It seems like, uh, at least from what we know now that Biden has, uh, more, uh, to hide there. But again, it's the over-classification of everything. Uh, the house should start an impeachment investigation of Biden. I absolutely agree with that.

And we're going to talk about in the next segment, why he should be impeached, not over, you know, necessarily documents and how they were handled, but over trying to do gun control by executive order over trying to force us to mandate vaccines for that were unapproved. There weren't any,

there weren't any Cormenati vaccines that people in the military could take. The whole thing was a lie. And so, you know, you could come after they come after Biden and impeach him for trying to shut down our energy infrastructure for trying to even talk about banning gas ovens. I mean, come on, seriously, where does he get the authority to ban guns and ban ovens and ban cars and ban fuel and all the rest of this stuff? And for that matter,

where did Trump get all that authority? You see, they want to focus on these documents, which are non-issue for anybody other than the deep state. The stuff that we care about. The stuff that they were just unilaterally destroying and banning. They take us to war unilaterally. They go to war against the things that we use in everyday life from our food to our fuel. And there is no outcry from Jim Jordan and the rest of the Republicans over that. But then over this paperwork thing? they're all upset about that.

Again, I think, you know, when you look at the Republicans getting involved in all the rest, the Republicans would love to see Trump gone. The Democrats would love to see Biden gone. That's what this sideshow is about. They don't care that they violate the law. They don't care that they violate the Constitution. They don't care that they violate Americans, that they violate us law. They don't care that they violate the Constitution. They don't care that they violate Americans, that they violate us with their vaccines, that they violate us with their bans

on everything from food to fuel. They don't care about that. This whole thing is not just a sideshow. It's just Machiavellian politics. The Republicans would be happy to get rid of Trump and the Democrats would be happy to get rid of Trump, and the Democrats would be happy to get rid of Biden, and that's what this is about. So let's take a quick break, and we'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

Looking for better information? APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world. APSradioNews.com All right, Mike Castellano, thank you for the tip on Rockfin. He said, should I worry? I took the Tdap vaccine in November. The inactive ingredients for them, aluminum hydroxide, formaldehyde, sodium chloride,

polysorbate, AD, or it's aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, glutarol, phenoxyethanol, etc. Well, I think you answered your own question. But in terms of worrying, I would not take these things. But if you have taken it, I have had vaccines in the past that did not have an effect on me, but I've known other people who have, in our family, for example. And so you never know. I would just suggest to everybody, stop taking I would just suggest everybody stop taking them. All vaccines.

Stop taking them. MMR, the whole lot. Now is the time to wake up and understand what this scam has been. I've been talking about the scam with MMR and the rest of these vaccines and the, you know, the. Fauci putting in the legal immunity as part of the child vaccines back in 1986 for them. Um, as soon as I understood that, that was it for me. Anybody that's got, has to be given legal immunity, uh, for their products and the whole way that that quote, unquote vaccine court works. Um, that's enough of a red flag.

And so they've run this thing for a very long time. And I think people are starting to look at the danger right now. This is what Brian Shulhavi of Vaccine Impact pointed out. He said the danger right now is that we've got a lot of people out there who are telling the truth about these mRNA vaccines, the Trump shots, the genetic code injections, whatever you want to call them. They're telling the truth about that. But they're lying to you about these other vaccines.

And that includes people like DeSantis and his surgeon general there in Florida. Well, you know, we don't want to have people, and Rand Paul, saying the same thing, Fauci. You know, what you're doing with this stuff, you're putting people off from taking the good vaccines. There aren't any good vaccines. You want to inject the aluminum hydroxide, formaldehyde, things like that into your veins and see if it kills you or not?

Again, you know, people have different thresholds of tolerance for these things, and you never know. Play Russian roulette with it if you want maybe it'll create some kind of an adverse effect that might take years and give them plausible deniability but um you know i would just say i would not do that um and they ask if i could have bart sabrell on the show actual proof of the moon landing with stage very important people know it he's a born-again christian well i'll take a look at it. Um, um, see the guy that did the man in the moon thing. I got a, somebody sent me a book with that. And, um, uh, it is interesting, but you know, right now I'm focused on trying to stop people from injecting themselves with poison. Um, that's

unfortunately where we are right now. And there's been ample evidence that our government lies to us about everything. But why wouldn't they lie to us about the moon landing? They lie to us about everything else. But the ATF has declared that brace pistols are illegal and they demand registration or jail time. This is coming from Gun Owners of America. And they've been good at fighting these types of things. This is why I say impeach both Trump and Biden for this abuse of power. High crimes and misdemeanors. Well, I would put this in the category of high crimes if you're going to start doing gun control by executive order,

which is the precedent that was set by Trump. Precedent trumps precedent. It's also regulation without representation. What does it take? These people can come up with fees that we have to pay them. They can come up with excessive fines because of their rules. They say, well, it's not a law, so you don't have any due process. We're going to hold you guilty.

You got to prove your innocence. You got to sue us back. We're going to take your property first. All of this stuff by this legal prevarication of saying, it's not a law. It's a rule. I made the rules. So you're going to follow my rules and you're not going to have any due process protection whatsoever in that.

What's it take to wake people up to this? This is a game that's been played on us by both Republicans and Democrats for a long time. It began with the war on drugs for the most part. Well, actually, it began before that. It began with the IRS. The IRS would write the rules. The IRS would take you into their court. The IRS would say, you're guilty. Prove that you didn't have that income, right? And they would steal the money from you before you had any due process. You would have to sue them, come back. So they extended that to the war on drugs.

They've extended it to everything now. And so the ATF unveiled its quote-unquote final rule on pistol braces on friday again you put out news like this on the weekend so people don't see it uh it's the rule is called quote factoring criteria for firearms with attached stabilizing braces well you know kind of your eyes kind of glaze over with the technical talk, but here's what it means. It means that 40 million guns could bring up criminal, serious criminal charges, massive fines, up to $250,000 in fines, and a hefty prison sentence. For each of these 40 million guns, if you do not register, if you do not register. We've kind of seen this before with the FAA.

Remember that? We want everybody to register their drones. Here, we're going to, it'll cost you a minimal amount. What was it, $5, $10, $20 or something like that to register drones. And they took it down to a very, very low level, very lightweight drones. But they said, you know, hey, it's no big deal. This is a couple of years ago. They said, register your drones and you'll be okay. But if you don't register your drone and we find you flying it

and it's more than this weight limit, which to make the point, there was one organization of people who fly drones or something like that. And they put together, they said, well, here is what they're talking about. And they put together like a paperclip airplane or something,

you know, to, uh, so it's anything that's this heavy or, or more. Um, but anyway, if they caught you flying it without it being registered,

that shoots you with a $25,000 fine. The FAA has done stuff like that to people who are not wearing masks on airplanes as well. Where's the protection against excessive fines? Well, you don't have any protection against that because that's our rule. That only applies to laws that are passed by Congress, but Congress doesn't pass laws anymore. They create bureaucracies, and the bureaucracies now write the rules. And so this final rule, gun owners who possess braced firearms will have 120 days to destroy reconfigure register or turn in

their firearms to the atf or they will face nfa violations that's the National Firearms Act going back to FDR the 1930s NFA violations which include $250,000 in fine and a hefty prison sentence why are they so intent on registration well because the next step is confiscation

registration so they can confiscate that's what's coming they've said that they want to confiscate. Of course, they would, for the longest time, they'd say, well, we don't want to take your guns. I'm not going to do that. Well, we caught the mayor pro tem of Austin

in a gun control rally with his people there. There was one protester in the crowd. He had a sign and said um, said, um, uh, something about gun confiscation. And, um, I was at the rally with, uh, Karen and Jakari Jackson. We were covering it. And, uh, the mayor pro tem points at him and he says, we're not coming for your guns, but you keep that sign. You're going to need it later.

We are coming for him. And, um, that, that was the first time they admitted it, but you keep that sign. You're going to need it later. We are coming for them. And that was the first time they admitted it, but now they all admit it. You know, Eric Swalwell, Biden's candidates are saying, yeah, make me president because we can come take your firearm. We got a big military to do it with as well. Well, they got to know where those firearms are before they confiscate them. So they need you to register it. In addition, the ATF has released a list titled Commercially Available Firearms

Equipped with a Stabilizing Brace that are Short-Barreled Rifles. So the logistics of this final rule have been called into question by even the anti-gun corporate media. It is a well-known fact, says Gun Owners of America, that ATF's NFA division consistently misses its own performance benchmarks and routinely waits, routinely the wait times for ATF form approvals and tax stamps in the 300 to 400 day range. So, you know, you can register certain weapons with them. You know, if it's a fully automatic weapon or a short-barreled rifle

or something like that or a silencer, you have to register it with them. And what they're saying is that they're backlogged on this stuff. And so they say if 40 million firearms are added to that list, it's logical to assume that gun owners will be forced to comply with this unconstitutional registration scheme. We'll have to wait years to get approval. Now, when I first saw that, I thought, come on. Come on, gun owners of America, you're better than that.

And they are. They are. I mean, that's just one thing they mentioned. You know, it is, they understand the real problem is the National Firearms Act. But they're just trying to get people to understand that even if you say, that's okay, that's fine, I'll register with it, I'll comply with the rules, even though they're unconstitutional, I'll comply with it. If that's the tack that you want to take, well, be prepared to wait years

for them to grant you the privilege of having a firearm that is your God-given right recognized by the Constitution. Also, you can bet before you see that actually come through, they'll pass another law. So you want people to have that anyway. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. This is just about getting people, suckering people into registering their guns, really, because people don't want to give these things away or destroy them or whatever. Uh, so again, you know, why do we accept the national firearms act? And that was something I've talked about that before. The Miller case is a big part of that sawed off shotgun, short barreled rifles and things. It was a guy who was

a criminal, um, and, um, you know, committed robberies, armed robberies. And they came after him for the sawed-off shotgun. He died before the case got to the Supreme Court. It was a Miller case and violation of the NFA and that type of thing. And they continued the case anyway, even though he was dead, because they'd already determined that they were going to use this to establish a precedent. And the argument that they were making was that he was not allowed to have a sawed-off shotgun

because that was not a military weapon. Now things change, right? These people don't care what they tell you. They got an agenda, and that is to get rid of the firearms. And so they'll say, well, you got to ban this because it isn't a military weapon, or they'll say you have to ban it now because it is a military weapon. Now that's the narrative that we have. Well, these things look like military weapons, so you got to ban them. Well, back in the 1930s, they said, well, it's not a military weapon. So you got to ban it, except it was a military weapon. Trench warfare, cavalry in World War I,

cavalry charges in civil wars I've mentioned many times before. So, again, where is it? I missed that part in the Second Amendment where it says the right to keep and bear arms, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed unless the barrel is shorter than X. I missed that part. Did you see where that was in the Second Amendment? I didn't either. And so, you know, the question is, where did they get the authority for that? This is the very definition of infringement, which was talked about in the Second Amendment,

not the length of your barrel, but infringement was talked about in the second amendment not the length of your barrel but infringement was talked about so the first work they said with members of congress is to overturn this rule via a congressional review act so gun owners america is good i was upset when i first saw that but then they they uh talk about what the strategy is you know right there they're trying to just address it to people who think they can comply with this and it's going to work for them. But so the first thing we have to do is try to work with Congress and the Congressional Review Act. The Congressional Review Act allows members of Congress to introduce a joint resolution of disapproval to reverse any agency rule or action they deem to be unconstitutional. Did they do that with the Trump bump stock ban? I don't remember anybody disapproving of that, and formally.

You had one or two people who spoke out against that. But for the most part, Congress just didn't care. If Congress doesn't cooperate, gun owners of America will not give up. We're prepared to file a lawsuit immediately and to fight the subversion of the lawmaking process in the courts. So that's two different strategies. Then there's a third one. They're working with members and Congress as well. That is Representative Clyde and in the Senate, Senator Marshall. They have a bill. It's called, and again, I love these acronyms that they've got it's called the short act which stands for stop harassing owners of rifles today but the short part of it is harassing

people over the length of the barrel right going back to the n. And they understand that the core of the issue, Gun Owners of America's Director of Federal Affairs says, Biden just initiated the largest federal gun registration scheme in our nation's history. We continue to lobby lawmakers to support this short act because the real issue, they said, fundamentally, is the National Firearms Act. We have to strip the ATF of its

ability to regulate these types of firearms. So we're targeting the core of the issue, the National Firearms Act, the outdated, unconstitutional NFA that allows the ATF, the leeway, to make these unconstitutional rule changes. And so that is what the short act is. It would remove short barreled rifles and shotguns from the NFA. So they're right. You fight them any way that you can. You fight them by trying to get people to understand that it's going to be impossible for them to try to play along and appease these people. Then you fight them by saying, let's get somebody in Congress to review this and to shut it down. And then finally, you know, and then we can do a lawsuit. If that doesn't work, we can do a lawsuit to try to overturn this.

And then finally, we need to understand the real problem is the National Firearms Act. Many different aspects of that need to go. The whole thing is unconstitutional. So, uh, again, they finalize this rule on Friday, the 13th, um, gun control by ATF bureaucrats, a president Trump precedent. So what will you have to do to comply with this? This is what the ATF wants you to do. If you've got a gun that, you know, that you've attached a stabilizer brace to,

or that comes with something that they say is a stabilizer brace extension, then you can, you have four different options here. You can turn in the entire firearm with the attached stabilizing brace to ATF, or you can destroy the entire firearm because of the attachment, or you can convert the short-barreled rifle into a long-barreled rifle, or you can permanently remove and dispose of or alter the stabilizing brace from the firearm so that it cannot be reattached.

For some of these guns that were manufactured with something that extends it, that may be tantamount to destroying it. So, as a matter of fact, when you look at it, and you start removing stuff like that whenever you're doing it, you may compromise the gun and make this thing truly dangerous. But anyway, the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit struck down the bump stock ban a week before. So January the 6th, I talked about it last week,

the Fifth Circuit Court, and we'd had other circuit courts that had approved of Trump and the ATF doing gun control by fiat. And so you'd had several appeals courts that had said, yeah, that's okay, got no problem with that. Finally, we got one that did, and so as Jonathan Turley pointed out, now that we got different appeal courts with different opinions, now it looks like it'll need to go to the Supreme Court. But I think it's amazing that it was one week exactly after the ATF lost on gun control by, you know, their rules,

that they went ahead and introduced this next one, which is exactly the same type of thing. You know, you're talking about a bump stock, you're talking about a stabilizing brace. The judge at the Fifth Circuit, writing for the majority judge, Jennifer Walker Elrod, said the ban came as myriad demands for the ban were being made following the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas shooting. The ATF published the regulation at issue, short-circuiting the legislative process, they said. Well, you know, the reality is, I don't know why the judge

thinks that you can infringe the Second Amendment with legislation, right? I mean, I don't agree with that. I think rights are absolute, and if you start infringing them, cutting them off, death by a thousand cuts, and as I said many times, I think that's one of the reasons why in the First Amendment they said, shall make no law. They could come in and say, all right, that's it. We're done with free speech. You can immediately make a law. But when it comes to firearms, because that's really where the rubber meets the road, they knew that it would be a gradual process of infringement, death by a thousand cuts. And that's why they use that terminology. They understood how power works. And it was a warning to us that it would be a gradual process.

So the legislators don't have the authority to do it either. That's why I disagree with that opinion. But I think it's interesting that that happened one week. And then next week, the ATF goes on with another one. But I also thought it was interesting, and I didn't know this, this is the first time I saw this mentioned, the appellant was Michael Cargill. I know Michael. I've interviewed him several times.

He was in Austin. He surrendered several bump stocks to the government following publication of the regulation at issue. He now challenges the legality of that regulation. And so he was the, um, person who was, uh, the complainant in the lawsuit. I took it out there. Um, I like, um, Michael Cargill. Do you remember the name of his gun store there in Austin? I don't know if he still got it or not, but anyway, um, um, he, uh, we interviewed him many times, and he actually ran for local office there, city council or something. And he was talking when he ran for office.

He wasn't talking about even the gun thing, although we knew that was where he was coming from. But he was trying to make a case for people to elect him. He said, look, everything that you're doing here in traffic doesn't make any sense. You know, they had this major, uh, expansion with, um, that they wanted to run through some kind of public rail system or something is going to go East West. And he goes, if we look at this, where the traffic jam is, it's North and South. And he's, you know, just practical stuff like that. And when Michael Cargill couldn't get elected, um, in was clearly the case that there's no hope left for that place.

Central Texas gun works. Yeah, yeah, Central Texas. I bet he still got that there. So good for him. Good for him for that big win that he put in through there. You know, we're talking about Biden's stingray. Well, you know, there's other stingrays that are out there besides 67 Corvettes. These are the stingrays produced by Harris Semiconductor to surveil you.

And they claim that they don't need to have a search warrant in order to do this. And we know that law enforcement agencies have been doing this for quite some time. This article that was written by Ken Silva says that this is a relatively new thing. No, it's not a new technology. This technology has been around for at least a decade. At least a decade, they've been having situations where law enforcement would use information that they got with a stingray tracking, and they would use that to try to bring somebody to court. I remember a few years ago, um, many years ago, I should say, uh, they came in and, uh, the defense,

um, said, uh, well, um, you got this information about our client. Where's your search warrant? And they said, um, well, um, we didn't get one. We got this information with a stingray or whatever, and the judge said, well, I want to see that information about the stingray. Judge, I can't show that to you. We've got a nondisclosure agreement with Harris, so I can't tell you about the stingray. And he said, well, you don't have a nondisclosure with me.

You're either going to tell me what that's about, or we're going to shut this case down right now, and the defendant's going to walk. And I said, okay, shut the case down. We'll let him go. They don't care about busting crime, right? They care about their stakeholders and their partners and their surveillance. That's the thing that's more important.

Their ability to surveil us without a warrant is far more important than their interest in shutting down crimes. It's not just that one case either. They want to, how's it the DARPA put it? Oh, yeah, they said maintaining custody. That's what they call mass public surveillance without a search warrant. That's maintaining custody of us. And so now we find out that the ATF, the ATF is using stingrays to track Americans.

They don't just want to track you with registration. No, no, no. They want to track you everywhere registration. No, no, no. They want to track you everywhere all the time. The information released by the ATF confirms that the agency is indeed utilizing Stingray technology. This

is from the Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability. They filed a FOIA request and they got some documents back from ATF and they said, yeah, they're using stingray technology. Although the agency attempted to minimize the usage of stingrays, it is clear that they are being widely used against Americans. Why? Because you are a gun owner?

The ATF stressed that the stingrays are not precise location trackers like GPS, despite the plethora of information stingrays can still provide. Well, I don't think that's really true. I've had a cell phone from the early days, and when I first got the cell phones, the early, if you remember, pretty much from the early days. And when I first got the cell phones, uh, the early, if you remember pretty much from the very beginning, uh, iPhones and things like that were able to, um, give you, uh, you know, the mapping locations, the driving instruction location, uh, or apps and things like that. They were able to tell you where your location was pretty accurately. I mean, they'd even know which lane we were in. And they did that simply by triangulating cell phone towers.

It's not a question really of precise location. It's a question of where it's going to work well. That's why they went to GPS, started adding GPS receivers into the phones. Because if you get somewhere where there's not a lot of cell phone antennas, then it gets a bit spotty. But, you know, they use that on the map apps, so the ATF could certainly do that, number one. Number two, there's a lot more cell phone towers out there now

than there used to be. So Stingray can pretty much track you anywhere you want to go. Kind of interesting. You know, I, about 40 years ago, almost went to work for Harris tracking satellites. I would have had to change careers. If they decided instead of tracking satellites, they wanted to track Americans, you know,

and that's what they're doing now. Shame on them. Anyway, answers to questions from the Senate Appropriations Committee about the ATF's usage of stingrays and license plate reader technology are entirely blacked out in the ATF documents. Here we are, back to the everything's a government secret now, right? Especially because I'm the one who's breaking the law. We're going to keep that secret.

We're not going to, you know, there's big prohibitions on government agencies cracking Americans. And that's what we had the church committee hearing about. Anybody want to, they say, well, we're going to have another church committee hearing on the FBI. Well, why don't you do something with the original findings of the church committee hearing? Now that you know that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was created on the, you know, that was what it was all about.

It wasn't about the assassinations and the heart attack guns. It was about them spying on American citizens. It was about the CIA and it was about the NSA spying on American citizens without warrants. And so why don't you go back and fix that and then have another church committee hearing? Because until you do that, until you correct the fact that the very instrument that was supposed to keep the CIA and the NSA in check from spying on Americans, that very thing was turned into an enabler and to give them legal cover to do exactly what they've been prohibited from, spying on Americans, Mr. and Mrs. Verizon.

So go fix that and then have another church committee hearing. Otherwise, it's just another sideshow. So anyway, again, the fact that any government agency can black out anything they want to, because everything is concealed from us while they surveil us. That says it all, doesn't it? Well, I want to know everything about you, and I don't want to get a search warrant,

but you're not going to know anything about how I did that or why I did that. I'm not going to tell you anything about me breaking the law, the ATF. When is the ATF going to be held to the, to, uh, obeying the law, right? Well, I guess never. When an ATF agent interviewed by a defense attorney revealed the use of the equipment, a large group email was sent out saying this was obviously a mistake and is being handled. Don't tell people about this. And so that's why this privacy group said, I want to know just how much you're doing

with this. Civil liberties activists have noted that the use of stingrays by law enforcement dramatically increased after the Supreme Court ruling in 2018, that case was Carpenter v. U.S., which found that law enforcement's warrantless collection of cell phone geolocation data violated the Fourth Amendment. Instead of obtaining warrants, police agencies have used stingrays now as a workaround. Well, that's the way it goes. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move. And now, The David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass,

APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. Jason Barker. But David, it's really going around now. They got to take the shot. I don't even have to play these things anymore. Maybe I'm overplaying those things, but look, you got to know that Jason knows you got to know where this all started. Yeah, it's going around. They got to take the shot. The MMR, it's exactly right. Let's talk about pro-life issues. Oh, you're not supposed to say pro-life issues. Remember we have the Associated Press has rules about proper usage of terms.

And so you don't say things like illegal immigrant. You say somebody like an undocumented migrant or something. You know, all these different rules. And, of course, you're not supposed to say pro-life. You're supposed to say anti-abortion rights. That's what you are. You're anti-abortion. You're not against killing babies.

You're against my abortion rights. And so we saw this repeated on MSNBC. Andrea Mitchell, who has been there forever for NBC. She's the wife, by the way, of Alan Greenspan. He's a Federal Reserve chairman, former, who was part of Ayn Rand's inner circle. Yeah, so much for that. Anyway, an awkward on-air moment just before NBC News reporter Garrett Hockey used the term pro-life while quoting a Republican congresswoman. He was explaining why Representative Nancy Mace voted for the Republican abortion legislation, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act,

a resolution castigating assaults on pro-life pregnancy centers and churches in the post-Roe era. Again, they put this up. This has created a lot of interesting statements on either side of this. That was where that Democrat congresswoman named Hillary read from the Bible, I knew you, created you, knit you together in the womb, that type of thing. I said, see, I'm pro-abortion. I want the government to get out of the womb.

And as I said, well, what she doesn't realize is that she just read that passage and it undermines the argument of the abortionist. This baby is just a clump of cells. It's not a person. And you've got to get your laws off my body. Get out of my womb. Well, the baby is out of your womb with this law. The baby is in the room and the baby was mature enough that it was able to survive a murder attempt on us in the womb. But now the baby is in the room and it's dying and you won't give it any medical care.

And we're going to make that a crime because that's murder. That's infanticide. But, you know, if you say that, you're not pro-life. You're anti-abortion rights. And so we now know that abortionists support murder and infanticide. Anyway, he said Mace described herself as believing in protecting the unborn and called herself pro life and andrea mitchell was very upset about that listen to this was after the fact that at the end of the day she was as she described herself pro-life and that she felt that it

was important uh to vote for these measures despite their uh potentially politically damaging or politically unappealing appearance, if you will, for future voters. Let me just interrupt and say that pro-life is a term that they may, that an entire group wants to use, but that is not an accurate description. I'm using it because that's the term she used to describe herself, Andrea. I understand. Anyway. Yeah, well, no comment about that except to say that don't use that term pro-life. And you notice she said, let me just interrupt and say that pro-life is a term that they,

an entire group wants to use. What group would that be? Oh, yeah, that'd be the people who don't want to kill babies after they're born alive. Don't call them pro-life. She didn't say, call them anti-abortion rights, but the AP does that. The AP has their speech rules. What a propaganda organization. And so all 210 votes against that, it passed 220 to 210.

All of the no votes were from Democrats. Just to verify that they support infanticide and murder. This is not my body, my choice. There's no question at that point that that is not your body. Organs harvested from unborn babies are now the target of a new lawsuit to try to get information. This new lawsuit is from Judicial Watch. It says that they filed a Freedom of Information Action lawsuit

because the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, will not turn over the records as required by law. Typically, you have to file a lawsuit to get them to comply in a government agency, and so that is the case here. But it's especially true because HHS is now being run by Javier Becerra. Javier Becerra, prior to being put in by the Biden administration as the head of HHS, was the attorney general. And he's not by training. He doesn't have any medical background. He's a lawyer, an attorney general.

He was the person that was put in charge of HHS. I said when that happened, I said, yeah, he's putting him in there because Biden is going to mandate the Trump shots. Trump put in as head of HHS Alex Azar, who was a pharmaceutical CEO of one of the biggest, most politically connected pharmaceutical companies, Eli Lilly. And so I said, you know, for Trump, he's putting in pharmaceutical CEO for the building stage of the vaccines. And Biden is putting in a lawyer

for the coercion stage of the vaccines. But he was also in California. He took the place of Lala Harris as she got elected to the Senate. So now Vice President Lala Harris was Attorney General in California. And she went after the people who exposed this trafficking in body parts. The Center for Medical Progress, David Daleiden, went after him to destroy him. Had absolutely nothing to say about the trafficking and body parts. But as part of that legal action against him, when he did discovery, what we found was that

the NIH was partnering with Planned Parenthood and with University of Pittsburgh in order to run what Judicial Watch calls a fetal organ chop shop. Pretty good way to describe it. So they said, well, we'd like to get some more information besides what has now come out with the ordeal that David Daleiden is being put through. And that is an interesting thing for us. You know, when we look at things like that, I don't buy into the prosperity gospel stuff at all.

That's not our life. You never know what's going to happen. You have to have the determination to go through it whatever the trial is david delighted in order to expose this um his suffering in terms of this political persecution not prosecution resulted in the discovery of these documents that we would not have seen if he wasn't being attacked. And so I hope that he is protected, but we have to understand that there is a bigger issue here involved. And even though he is suffering through this persecution, that has resulted in the discovery of truth.

And that's the way things really do work in this life. So in regards to the harvesting of the organs of unborn children, let's say that first came out in 2015. When I read that, I thought, has it been that long? I mean, we're coming up to eight years ago. I remember it like it was yesterday. Remember the undercover videos that David O'Light and his people got? We had the lady saying, yeah, I want to get a Lamborghini, right? I want to get a Lamborghini. Well,

a lot of videos that they took undercover of abortionists talking about their profit motive for harvesting, how much they get for the organs, how much they wanted. Now we know that it was coming from Fauci's organization, Francis Collins NIH. The lawsuit involves communications from the NIH's Office of Extramural Research. Extramural Research. On the topic of human fetal organs, we have already established collusion between the University of Pittsburgh and the NIH over the fetal organ chop shop in the University of Pittsburgh, paid for with federal dollars, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton,

the Biden administration turned the spigot back on for taxpayer funding of this barbarism, and we want the details. That's the only problem I have. Okay, fine. Yeah, the Biden administration did turn the money back on, and the Trump administration did stop it, but did the Trump administration do anything to the people who had done it? Francis Collins, and he was still there, still celebrated by Trump as an expert. Same thing

with Fauci. Fauci was heavily involved in this. He's taking the organs, in fact, and using them to create transhumanized mice, which would then be experimented on, you know, to do drug testing and that sort of thing. Which, by the way, we've got a story about that coming up here. But February 2020, NIH records reveal the agency paid thousands of dollars to a California-based firm to buy organs for unborn children to create humanized mice. And so Trump was so outraged by that that he followed all of these guys into the pandemic.

Yeah, it's a bipartisan problem. As a matter of fact, pull this article up. Show people what this thing looks like. Somebody put together this graphic to show a baby. And you'll see this on the WND article here. You can see they got dollar amounts for the different parts of the body that they can get and how many of those they sold. So you got it. It's kind of like, um, you know, you lay out a diagram of a pig and you show her all the, you know, this is where we get the bacon.

This is where we get the pork chops and all that kind of stuff. Right. Cause that's the way they're treating the babies. Fauci, NIH, federal government, Planned Parenthood, University of Pittsburgh. So you get $22,610. If you get a brain, They got 18 baby brains. $7,140 for hearts. They got 12 baby hearts.

$2,975 for livers. They got five baby livers. For pancreas, $7,140. They got 12 baby pancreases. $2,670 for baby limbs. And they were able to get three of those. So you total that up, you're over a million dollars. $1,533,425.

I could get several Lamborghinis for that. Crime pays, doesn't it? The watchdog is looking for, quote, communications concerning, this is a FOIA request, communications concerning human fetal tissue between the Office of Extramural Research and any of the following entities, the University of Pittsburgh, Pitt University,

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the National Abortion Federation, and any Planned Parenthood entity. Now, the extramural community research funds, whatever you want to call it, what does that mean? Well, that's any researchers that are not inside the NIH. They're extramural, outside. And that could be U.S., or it could be any foreign labs as well

that they're paying to chop up babies and sell them the parts. The Biden administration said, quote, all research applications for NIH grants and contracts proposing the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions will be reviewed by the Ethics Advisory Board. But that was not a statement saying we're going to be watching what you do. That was a statement saying we've turned the spigot back on, as he said. handed out contracts worth nearly $100,000 to Advanced Bioscience Resources to purchase, quote, fresh, never frozen, unquote, tissue from unborn babies killed in abortions. So, yeah, the FDA, you know, same people looking at cuts of meat

and things like that. Maybe they could go to the USDA, the Department of Agriculture. More deals came during 2021. They uncovered Judicial Watch and the Center for Medical Progress in a separate case, uncovered HHS documents that revealed nearly $3 million in federal funds spent on the University of Pittsburgh's quest to become a, quote, tissue hub. Tissue hub.

For human fetal tissue. Ranging from six to 42 weeks gestation. 42 weeks. You know, nine months, that's 36 weeks. It says six weeks beyond maturity. Anyway, also involved were communications from the FDA involving humanized mice research with human fetal heads, human organs, and human tissue,

including communications and contracts with human fetal tissue provider Advanced Biosciences Resources. Judicial Watch said last year an executive at the University of Pittsburgh asked Francis Collins, then head of NIH, to help fight, quote, efforts to undermine important science using fetal tissue. And apparently he got what he wanted from this guy who bills himself as a Christian. But, of course, he's a Christian who believes in evolution, not in Genesis. Funny how you sow the seeds of this, isn't it?

Francis Collins. He's also a Christian that has no problem putting out untested vaccines for people and selling those things as well. Now, as we've talked about this, the important thing to understand, and it comes to light when people talk about organ donations, people who are declared brain dead and that type of thing, that when they remove the organs,

it's very important for the organ donors when they're getting them from somebody who's been in an accident, maybe they're brain dead, but the organs are functioning, they time it very important. It's very important for the organ donors when they're getting them from somebody who's been in an accident, maybe their brain dead, but the organs are functioning. They time it very precisely and they've got everything lined up. Well, okay. We want, you know, we got somebody who's waiting for the heart and somebody who's waiting for the kidneys and somebody who's waiting for the liver, all this, whatever. Right. And so it's like go, and they're all ready to go. And the people on the other end are ready to go as well. And you do that because the organs, once the person dies, certain things start happening to the organs right away. Which tells us, and we know this, John Rappaport did some excellent articles showing this and showing them talking about doing this. They have to set up when they're going to harvest these organs from babies, they have to do it very deliberately. And they also

have to have the baby be born alive, which takes us back to that legislation that they're so upset about, right? The baby has to be born alive, intact, not harmed, and then you go after the organs. It's one of the reasons why the Democrats are fighting this so hard. You know, for people like Francis Collins, well, he's not at the NIH anymore, but, you know, there's plenty of people like him. You know, he's a dime a dozen in Washington, people like him. So this is where we are in our country now.

It's absolutely amazing. We'll talk about what is going on with the animal experiments in just a second here. But before we get off of this, just understand you were looking at ATF and using stingrays to track

gun owners or whatever. I don't know what that's about. They'll use it however they wish. They say, well, I don't have anything to worry about. I'm not violating any laws. Oh, you think? As Harvey Silverglate pointed out, most people commit three felonies a day without even knowing it.

Well, we have in Scotland, people who are being put into the police database, even though they haven't committed a crime, except that they don't like what you say. They don't like your politics. They don't like your religion. During 2021, the most recent statistics available, police in Scotland logged more than 900 cases without a single crime.

That means that more than 900 people were identified in police records as having offended, even though there was no crime committed. And of course, wasn't it Scotland, I think, where that lady was arrested because she was standing silently outside an abortion clinic? Praying? Silently? Just standing there? No signs? No nothing? Police come over, are you praying, no signs, no nothing. Please come over. Are you praying? Well, I might be.

All right, come with us. You're under arrest. They have things that are crimes that shouldn't be crimes, but of course these are supposedly hate incidents. The so-called hate incidents must be recorded when the behavior that is not criminal is perceived. Perceived. I perceive that you may be praying in front of an abortion clinic. I think that you probably believe in heterosexual marriage

and not chopping babies up. I think you need to come with us. It says, it's motivated by malice or ill will based on race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, transgender identity, and on and on. And so one columnist said, well, the law does not exist to protect us from feeling offended. That's Ewan McComb. If we do not defend the principle that the right to free speech is fundamental to a healthy democratic society, then we are on a slippery slope. And of course, you know, if you are only going to allow speech that you agree with, then there is no such thing as free speech.

Free speech is the ability to offend people, to have people disagree with you. So right now they're collecting the data. They're just reporting these people. They're not charging them with a crime. I think what they're doing is, just like you've got the ATF wanting people to register their guns so they can then go around and confiscate them. It's the next step.

I think registering these people, saying, well, they know, they have beliefs about religion and sexual orientation and things like that, you know, gender. But they have beliefs that we don't like. They have beliefs that we hate. Let's register these people, because we're going to make that a crime. And we're going to come after them, just like they're going to come after guns after they register them. Well, they're registering the people that they don't like, gun owners, people who don't tow their new culture, their new religion. The reason I reach for these statistics is to underline the scandal of officers being involved

in recording incidents where no law has been broken. In 2021, Police Scotland logged 928 incidents of malice and ill will where no crime had been committed. This is Scotland's new yardstick, I guess. More than twice the number that they had in 2017. The recording of these so-called hate incidents means that people who have adhered to the laws of the land now have their names on a police database. A reporter said, this is chilling.

The Free Speech Watchdog Index on Censorship thinks so too. He said, it is undoubtedly true that some people seem to revel in causing offense, but there is no law against being an arse. The law does not exist to protect us from feeling offended. All significant social progress down through the centuries has offended someone. Often it has offended powerful groups. If we do not defend the principle that the right to free speech is fundamental to a healthy society, then we're on a slippery slope. And of course, that applies double to any science, right?

Science never advances without skepticism. Science never advances without challenges to the status quo. But as we've seen in the last 1,040 days, you're not allowed to criticize science. And of course, it goes before that as well. These same rules were being applied during the climate MacGuffin. You are a denier. A denier of what? A denier of our religious beliefs that we don't want to have challenged

because they're not scientific beliefs. If you don't want to show us the data, if you don't want to have a debate about this, if your data can't withstand the scrutiny and debate, then we're talking about something that is dogma that you're imposing on other people, your belief system. Nick Ellenbecker, thank you for the tip. Does this government overreach imply the failure of our Constitution? Well, the Constitution is not a self-enforcing document. You know, as Jefferson said, every generation is going to have, the constitution is a blueprint. It's a plan.

And it is an excellent one. It is not perfect, but it is an excellent one. And there's not going to be any document that you have that is self-enforcing. Russell Means said in his book, Where White Men Fear to Tread, he said, he was talking about these types of government overreach. And he says, white man, your government has broken every treaty with the Indians that ever were made. The Constitution is your treaty. And the government has broken every aspect of that treaty,

what are you going to do about it? That's the question. What are we going to do about it? I mean, do we pick up arms and go attack the Capitol building or something? I don't think so. Because that makes us the aggressors in most people's opinion. The rightful way to do this is with nullification. And what the Constitution does and still represents,

it represents the standard by which their actions can be judged. And so we can have a lesser magistrate have the superior legal position as well as the, but you have to do it physically. You have to actually interpose at the state level. But the law and the Constitution are on our side. Everybody, everywhere that works for the government at any level swears to uphold the Constitution. If they violate that oath to the Constitution, they have lost their authority. They haven't lost their power.

So we still have to, and may have to do it physically to oppose that with nullification. But it can't be as simple as what is happening in Illinois. We have a massive number of sheriffs saying, we're not going to enforce this law. As a matter of fact, it's about half of the sheriffs in Illinois. They've got just over 100 counties and 50 of the sheriffs, as well as the Illinois Sheriffs Association, whatever the exact title of that is, I don't know. But it is the State Association of Sheriffs. I said, we don't like these new gun control laws. We're not going to enforce them. And that's the way you stop this. And if necessary, those sheriffs need to stand in between any state officers,

because now Governor Pritzker is very angry about it. Well, I'm not going to use them to enforce it. I'm going to use the state patrol or whatever, highway patrol, whatever, state police to do it. Well, there's also the threat during the lockdown. As I pointed out, I interviewed early on this process a church that refused to shut down. And he said, yeah, the sheriff here in town, I've known him since high school, and he knows everybody that's here. And he's got his police cars circling the church in case Pritzker tries to use the state police to shut us down.

They're going to stand it down. And they didn't have to use force. It's called nullification. That's the right way to do it. Alexander, thank you for the tip. He says, a while ago, a police department in northern England displayed a, quote, being offensive as an offense poster. That country is long gone. Yeah, that is true. It is as Orwellian as you can get. We'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

If you like the Eagles, on a dark desert highway, the cars, let's go, and Huey Lewis and the News. They say the harder rock and roll is the beating. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.

Do you remember last week we talked about the brave member of parliament, Andrew Bridgen, who not only talked about the danger of these vaccines, but said they've got to be stopped. They've got to be stopped. And they were very angry with him. They criticized him. Everybody in his own party, the conservative party, was criticizing him. But they didn't do anything about it until he said, this is like a holocaust or something. Here's the word holocaust. And he was quoting research from a Jewish researcher living in Israel. And after he said holocaust, they said, how dare you? You are racist.

We don't have to talk about any of the science now. We just purge you out of the conservative party. We purge you out of society because you use the term Holocaust. And he said, but I didn't deny the Holocaust. I didn't deny how many, you know, change the number of people that died and all the rest of this stuff. And he goes, by the way, the guy that I quoted is Jewish himself. It doesn't matter. Now, you know, we've got an excuse and we don't have to talk about the vaccines at all.

We can talk about you being racist. Well, now you've got a German court has ordered a Holocaust survivor to be sent to a psychiatric institution and to get a forced COVID injection. Well, there you go. I mean, the Germans are acting like Nazis, if you will. Put a lady in, you know, commit her to an insane asylum, which is what all the authoritarians do, whether they're communists or Nazis. And while they're there, you can give her a forced injection.

This is coming out of Stuttgart, reported by LifeSite News. German authorities want to put a famous Jewish composer and Holocaust survivor into a psychiatric clinic and force her to take a COVID injection. In a Zwanetskaya,

I guess is how you pronounce her name, Zwanetskaya. I guess is how you pronounce her name, Zvanetskaya, that's my best attempt, lives in Stuttgart, was supposed to be taken to a psychiatric institution, forcefully injected with COVID jabs on January the 11th. Of course, the mainstream media is not talking about this. Rishi Sunak and the Conservative Party is not talking about this. Rishi Sunak and the Conservative Party is not talking about it in the UK. But several alternative media outlets are in Germany.

According to several reports, she's been transferred to a safe place by friendly activists who wanted to prevent her arrest. She's 85 years old. She sent a video message to an organization called Report 24 saying, quote, music is my life. And if they take away music from me, then they take away my life. Report 24 also received a copy of the court order, which authorizes her forceful transfer to a psychiatric institution and for her to be forcefully injected with COVID shots, quote, for her own good.

The court order was officially appointed by her professional guardian, which LifeSite News says is somewhat contradictory, given the fact that the German National Federation of Professional Guardians, I've never heard anything like that, but they do, is strictly against forced vaccination of patients against their wishes. The court order claims that she has been diagnosed with several mental illnesses, including dementia, delusional disorder, narcissistic grandeur, self-image, egocentrism. Under these terms, we could, I guess, institutionalize Joe Biden. It sounds like a long list of things that he's got. She also allegedly suffers from severe obesity and heart disease. However, many of these diagnoses

were called into question by critics after the story made the rounds in alternative media circles. Report 24 journalist pointed out that she does not appear to be extremely overweight in the video that she sent. So at least that part of it is easily verified. And again, she is vulnerable, frightened, has lived in the state for about two years, as her legal guardian has apparently tried to institutionalize her. And so she talked about her background with that, but look, I think the important thing is that, um, you know, Andrew Bridgen again is still kicked out of society for being a racist, uh, because, um, that's, they don't want to debate his science. It's just that simple.

Pentagon, by the way, is now, they said, exploring back pay for troops kicked out over a COVID vaccine mandate. Well, this is a hopeful development, if in fact it is, and perhaps it is. I don't know. I look at these pronouncements and I get conflicting information. I don't really know what to believe. We'll just have to wait and see. If they were to do that, if they were to give people back pay that they kicked out,

that would be an admission of wrongdoing, and that would open up the door to a lot of things. Reinstatement in the military or reinstatement of benefits that have been taken away from people. The Pentagon spokesperson told the epic times in response to reports from Politico and others that regarding back pay quote, the department is still exploring this and will provide its views on legislation of this nature at the appropriate time and process. Uh, they did not provide a timetable for when they might make this determination.

So maybe it'll happen and maybe it won't. I don't know. As Zero Hedge points out, the contentious mandate forced more than 8,400 troops out of the military as top officials said they were refusing to obey an order for declining to take the vaccine. Thousands of people sought medical and religious exemptions, although a federal judge last month wrote that the number of service members who successfully obtained religious exemption is far smaller than those who got the medical exemptions. Isn't that interesting? I think that is exactly the opposite from what I've heard. That's exactly the opposite of what's been happening in private corporations, that you

had a better chance in a private corporation with the religious issue than you did with a medical exemption, especially because there were so many doctors that were refusing to write those exemptions. Anyway, White House Press Secretary Jean-Pierre told reporters in December that the Biden administration believes removing the mandate was a mistake. Again, he should be impeached. For that alone, he should be impeached. So this was a purge, as I've said many times, they're trying to purge people who have religious convictions out of the service.

I think there's a big reason for that. I think what this is all about is preparation for a mark of the beast type of thing. They don't want to have anybody who has strongly held ethical or religious beliefs that would keep them from following orders and so if you purge people like that out the only people that are going to be left in the military are going to be the people who took the jab and haven't yet had any problem with it you know people who get sick the people, drop dead, of course they're gone, and you don't want to have, but the people who are going to be there, if they tell them,

well, you forced this on people, they'll say, well, yeah, I took it. I'm okay so far. Austin's memo says that anyone who was discharged, and this is interesting, this is different as well. Anyone who was discharged can petition their military service to request a change in the, quote, characterization of their discharge. Because a lot of people were given discharges that barred them from being able to get employment or college benefits or many other types of things. So if they were to do that, if they were to reinstate some benefits, if they were to start to change the discharge thing, they're going down the path of admitting that they did the wrong thing. Whether they will go down that path remains to be seen. However, look at Leanna Nguyen.

This authoritarian Asian woman who was, before she became the darling of the press, she was president for a while at Planned Parenthood. The only time they've had a doctor as president there. She offended some of the people there, and then she went on to become a public health expert, quote-unquote, widely seen on the press, always talking about how unvaccinated people should be punished, people who don't wear masks should be punished and ostracized and kicked out of society. Now she has turned around on the mask stuff, did a complete 180, just like Fauci, but even

more so than Fauci. You know, Fauci's still trying to claw on to these superstitious rituals that he wanted everybody to do. And yet she's completely denounced them. He's gone exactly in the opposite direction. So, you know, perhaps there is some possibility that that will,

things will change within the military. We'll have to wait and see, but she wrote an op-ed piece for the Washington post opinion, how to stop over counting COVID deaths and hospitalizations. This is the expert. And again, you know, we're going to mask everybody up. We're going to vaccinate everybody. How dare you?

You shouldn't be getting any help. I mean, one of the most hateful authoritarian advocates for all of these Fauci rituals. And this is her op-ed piece. She said, according to the CDC, the U.S. is experiencing about 400 COVID deaths every day. And at that rate, there would be nearly 150,000 deaths a year. But Leanna Wynn says,

but are these Americans dying from COVID or with COVID? How long have we been saying that? I think that's pretty significant that she's now saying that. Hey, look, we got cases here, cases everywhere. I mean, just look at what happened in China. Yeah. Tens of millions of people just in Shanghai locked down and they it in one city after the other. All these cities have many millions of people. When we were in China nannying, I'd never heard of it before. Six million people, nearly the population of New York City, and never heard of it.

Shanghai, what is it, 25 million or something like that in that city, all of them locked down. They did that for months with their insane zero COVID policy. And before they reversed it, they said, well, we had somebody die, we think. Finally, a five-year-old man who had comorbidities. Well, did he die with COVID? Did he die from COVID or did he die with a PCR test saying that he had COVID? And that's now what Leanna Wynn is saying. What we've been saying from the very beginning,

for more than a thousand days, we've been saying this. Understanding this distinction, says Leanna Wynn, dying from COVID versus dying with COVID, is crucial to putting the continuing toll of the coronavirus into perspective. And she says, she quotes Robin Drettler, an attending physician at Emory Decatur Hospital. Since every hospitalized patient gets tested for COVID, many are incidentally positive. A gunshot victim or somebody who's having a heart attack

could test positive for the virus. Again, I don't know how long ago it was that I had Handy, who works at AMS, send a thanks. I just could not believe this. We brought in a guy who's obviously having a heart attack, got all the symptoms of a heart attack. We bring him into the hospital and rather than giving him aid, they do a PCR test on him first. And that's really what we've seen, right? You do a PCR before you do CPR. Why? Well, because they get paid extra.

You know, now if they got a positive PCR test on this guy, they get 20% bonus on everything they do for his heart attack, even though he's not there because he's got COVID or sick from COVID or anything. He's got a positive PCR test because they magnified it by 1.1 trillion times. So Drettler said he also sees patients with multiple concurrent infections. People who have very low white blood cell counts from chemotherapy might be admitted because of bacterial pneumonia or foot gangrene.

They might also have COVID, but COVID is not the main reason why they're so sick. As Kerry Mullis, who invented the PCR test said, look, if you magnify something enough, if we take the cycle thresholds up 40 times, that means that you double it 40 times, get you up to 1.1 trillion. If you do that kind of stuff, you can find anything in anybody. He said, so Kerry Mullis said, so he goes, you can't prove the connection between HIV and AIDS using my test. You got to do something else. Boucher is misusing this and they're misusing it when they're misusing it. When they magnify it that much, they can find anything in anybody.

And it might not be anything that is making you sick. It's got to get to a certain viral load level before it makes you sick. Anyway, he said, if these patients die, COVID might get added to their death certificate along with other diagnoses. But the coronavirus was not the primary contributor to their death, often played no role at all. We knew all of this two weeks before Trump did the emergency order. We had two weeks worth of data from Italy showing that the average person who died in Italy with a PCR test showing that they had COVID, the average person was past life expectancy, just over 80, and had two and a half comorbidities. And that's held constant throughout this whole thing.

We always knew this. We knew this 1,040 days ago, even more than that. And now Leanna Wynn is writing op-ed pieces for the Washington Post. Now, that's significant that they're pulling back from this stuff. But understand they still have the executive order foundation there. They have been able to erase our Constitution, erase the rule of law, erase the doctor-patient relationship,

and now they're pulling it back and saying, but we'll leave you alone for right now. This is the eye of the storm, folks. Do not feel comfortable about this. We have not won anything at all. We have not won until we've got some people that have gone to jail, but we've not won until we at least get this taken off of the books and everybody's still extending it.

Biden just said, I'm going to extend the emergency order of Trump for another 90 days. It's going to be his eighth extension. Trump did four extensions. He did one extension after the election, first week of December 2020. There is no truth to the conspiracy theory, she says, that hospitals are trying to exaggerate coronavirus numbers for some nefarious purpose. Oh, really?

None whatsoever? Show me the money! Yeah, I haven't played that one for a while. That's nefarious purpose. One of the most obvious nefarious purposes ever. They're paid to do it. Paid by Trump. Again, you know, August of 2020,

the American Hospital Association was complaining to CMS, the people who do Medicare and Medicaid, that said, you told us that you didn't need to have PCR tests. You told us that you didn't have enough tests. You told us that they didn't work. You said, do a clinical diagnosis and you would pay us a 20% bonus on everything. What's the matter you changed this now wow wow that's right uh thank you eric uh appreciate the uh the tip on rock fan uh we'll be right back folks stay with us Bop, bop, hip-hop Bop, bop, bop, hip-hop Bop, bop, hip-hop Hey, hey, hey You're listening to The David Knight Show. Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.

And the sweet sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com. Well, we have CNN saying that vaccine advisors are angry, disappointed that Moderna and the FDA and the CDC, and I would add Pfizer, hid data on COVID boosters. Look, what does this tell you? It tells you that rats are jumping ship, just like what I said about Leanna Wynn. They are jumping the ship. They know what's happening, and they don't want to be the last person trying to push this lie.

Hopefully, this is going to get a critical mass. And people will say, well, there's so many people getting sick with this, we've just got to pull back on it. But take a look at this. I talked about the experimentation, humanized mice, and baby parts being sold. The U.S. will no longer require animal testing for new drugs. The Food and Drug Administration will no longer require all drugs to be tested on animals. So we're not even going to do animal tests anymore, right? They did a few animal tests.

They stopped them short on Operation Warp Speed. But we don't want to do any testing, and we certainly don't want to do any animal testing, right? Because the puppies and things. And that was a situation where it was unnecessary, unnecessarily cruel, and unnecessary really to even do that test on those dogs. But that got so much publicity. And as I said at the time, everybody cares about the beagle puppies. And of course you do. They're very relatable. But nobody cares about the babies. Nobody cares about the babies being sacrificed and being chopped up or even just aborted. The new law has everyone from Rand Paul to PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, cheering it. You have Senator Cory Booker co-sponsored this with Rand Paul.

It's called the FDA Modernization Act, passed as a part of the Omnibus Appropriations Bill that Congress passed in late December. Paul said the bill will accelerate innovation and get safer, more effective drugs to market more quickly by cutting red tape that's not supported by current science. It was Rand Paul who was hectoring Fauci. So you know what you're doing with all this stuff? You know, you created this stuff in a lab in Wuhan and now you got this vaccine that's not very effective, your mask rules and everything.

You want people to get vaccinated, even if they've had the disease like me, you know, you need to back off of this stuff. You're going to make people vaccine hesitant, said Rand Paul. I said, Whoa,

that's his takeaway with this. And of course his push to focus on Wuhan. Where did this thing come from? Whoa, it must've been gain of function. All of that is a big red flag about Rand. And this is another one here. Fine. Stop this unnecessary testing, but you better do some testing. The purpose here is about safety. This is not about getting your products to market faster.

That seems to be the side in which Rand Paul is falling here lately. Previously, all drugs in development were required to undergo animal studies before being tested in human trials. Now, drug companies will still have the option to start testing experimental drugs on animals, but they won't have to. So it's not necessarily going to stop the testing. You can still have unnecessary testing like Fauci did on the Beagles. But, you know, they won't be required to do that.

Except they're not really required to do it now, are they? I mean, what have we been talking about for the last thousand plus days? Denmark secretly inserted IUDs in Greenland's women for decades. This is something they found that had been going on for quite some time. This was the native Inuit population, and that they would come in because they had any kind of medical thing and they would wind up, without telling them, putting an IUD in them so they couldn't have kids, doing it without their knowledge. Now, this is something that's going on between 1966 and 1970.

We see this type of thing happening from time to time. We don't have ethics in our society to stop this. So what makes people think that these vaccines will not be doing the same thing? I do want to make a correction, by the way, about Spavac. I have not yet, and I had somebody contact me about this, so they wanted to put the report up, but they were still having trouble finding confirmation that it was two shots and that they had to be kept at minus 40 degrees centigrade i've not been able to confirm that either that was in the original report from before news out of canada everything that i've seen says that it was a single shot. But it still remains that the mechanism that they were using to sterilize these mammals is very concerning. And we know that there are no ethical or religious obstacles to them continuing to do that.

Thank you for joining us. The Common Man The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.