The David Knight Show - 16Nov22 Zelensky Pushes Another "Gulf of Tonkin"; Trump's BIG SURPRISES in Announcement

Episode Date: November 16, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESMissiles near Ukraine-Poland border were nearly another Gulf of Tonkin. Robert McNamara recalls the FALSE FLAG event that was used to get us into a war with Vietnam in "Fog of War" documentary2:40Poland invokes Article 4 of NATO14:40Babylon Bee has solution to stop Ukraine war21:20UN serves notice to Russia — on the hook for war reparations. This will boost hardliners in Russia26:42We went to war on WMD lies from the CIA. Why did the UN never mention reparations for Iraq?31:59Another Trump family member threatens DeSantis. "Very messy, very raw." He should wait until 202838:17There were BIG SURPRISES in Trump's Announcement speech45:07Trump has some credibility issues with 2nd Amendment people1:08:39A police chief in Pennsylvania was shocked that he wasn’t stiffed by Trump on a bill for a rally security.1:14:49Katie Hobbs projected to win the Arizona governor’s race over Kari Lake, satirists and mathematicians puzzled by the results.1:21:10Kari Lake supporters reenacting the battle of Jericho — NOT the Babylon Bee1:24:47Democrat Campaign Chief "Let them eat Chef Boyardee" Maloney defeated.Bo-Nana Republican, Bo Hines handpicked by Trump, defeated1:31:09Why are the Republicans trying to push for preferential voting?1:45:21More sudden deaths, turbo cancers, heart attack deaths of young children: “There’s nothing that will deter them from this.”1:48:22Excess death rate rise in younger age groups in 2021.1:51:58Why are Moderna and Pfizer going back to investigate their own vaccines?2:04:04Goat Tree joins — FTX Decrypted. What’s going on with FTX is more political than tech2:10:22What do you think about Elon Musk’s idea of a "blockchain version of Twitter"?2:20:44What’s going on with paper gold and paper silver derivatives2:27:11Zuckerberg’s move to become the “de facto standard” of a world CBDC2:33:49Bezos gives multi-millionaire Dolly Parton $100 Million for charities. How about the Amazon employees who have to pee in bottles because they're driven so hard, now 10,000 laid off?2:53:50If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 16th of November, year of our Lord 2022, day 979 of the emergency And today we're going to take a look at the missiles That were reported to have fired in Poland What are the reactions on each side What is the truth of the matter, what is the fog of war

As I tweeted out yesterday, is this going to be another Gulf of Tonkin incident And then we have President Trump announcing his candidacy last night. We're going to take a look at what he had to say. And is there going to be a civil war within the GOP? And we'll have in the third hour, we'll be joined by

Goat Tree, who will be talking about what's going on with FTX. Stay with us. We'll be right back. I want to begin first with the push for war, a big push for war by Zelensky, by Poland, who really want to mix it up. They want to have full-on war, but especially Zelensky, the guy who's been pushing for a nuclear war, a nuclear exchange, preemptive nuclear attack against Russia by the U.S. And so, of course, he was all about this report of missiles

going over the border into Poland. And we're going to take a look at that. But I want to begin by talking about the Gulf of Tonkin incident. There was a documentary that was done a few years ago. It was just before Robert McNamara died. Robert McNamara was a defense secretary under Johnson. He pushed very hard for the Vietnam War. And documentary filmmaker Errol, I can't remember his name, Errol, well, he did Thin Blue Line,

was the first thing that brought him to everybody's attention. But he was disarming people in a long conversation. And the way that he would do these documentaries, when he did Thin Blue Line, that was about the murder of a police officer in Texas. I think it was Dallas. And Errol Morris was his name. There you go.

It still works. It's just really slow, my memory. Anyway, Errol Morris was a documentary filmmaker, and he had a technique that he used to get people to talk. Mainly it was just his personality and his understanding how to interrogate them. But he also had something else, which I think is kind of interesting in light of everybody using Zoom now for everything. He had a device that he created.

He called it the Interitron, and it was like a teleprompter. Uh, he would get in a different room instead of being in the same room with a person. And so it would just be a headshot, like a zoom call, but this was decades ago. And so he would just talk to them for a very long time. So he got a Robert McNamara to sit down with him and he talked to him for two full days and he got McNamara to admit to some very amazing things. As a matter of fact, the documentary Thin Blue Line,

he was originally doing a documentary about death row and the death penalty, and as he talked to this one guy, he started to believe that the guy had not actually killed the police officer, that they had essentially framed him because they wanted to have somebody, you know, they want to solve that, um,

that crime, uh, make an example out of it. And, uh, so he started interviewing him and he actually, uh, got talked to the guy who actually killed the police officer and got him to admit to

it on film that's how good he was at what he did and he got this other guy off and so he got robert magnum air to admit to being a mass murder as well one One thing Robert McNamara did, as he kind of admitted to his culpability in terms of unnecessarily starting the Vietnam War, he went back and he said, well, you know, if you look at what happened at the end of World War II, the massive firebombing of German cities like Dresden and other things like that, if we would have lost, we would have been tried as war criminals. That's what he's trying to do.

But what about that? What about that? Yeah, I may have started a war and gotten a lot of people killed unnecessarily and lost the war, but that's the only reason you're upset about it. It's because we lost Vietnam. If we'd won, I'd have been a hero. And so he tried to deflect the blame away, but he did admit what had happened at the Gulf of Tonkin.

And so I want to play for you just a little bit of an excerpt. Two days later, the Maddox and the Turner Joy 2 destroyers reported they were attacked. Where are these torpedoes coming from? Well, we don't know. Presumably from these unidentified craft. There were sonar soundings. Torpedoes had been detected. Other indications of attack from patrol boats.

We spent about 10 hours that day trying to find out what in the hell had happened. At one point, the commander of the ship said, we're not certain of the attack. Another point, they said, yes, we're absolutely positive. And then finally, late in the day, Admiral Sharp said, yes, we're certain it happened. So I reported this to Johnson, and as a result, there were bombing attacks on targets in North Vietnam. Johnson said, we may have to escalate. I'm not going to do it without congressional authority. And he put forward a resolution, the language of which gave complete authority to the president to take the nation to war. The Tonkin Gulf Resolution.

Now, let me go back to the August 4th attack. Well, there apparently have been at least nine torpedoes in the water. All missed. Yeah. No, I don't... Wait a minute. I'm not so sure about this number of engaged. Right. We'd have to check it out here.

He said many of the reported contacts and torpedoes fired appeared doubtful. Freak weather effects on radar and over-eager sonar men may have accounted for many reports. Okay, well, I'll come with the nightmare then. That's the best I can give you, Dave. Sorry. It does appear now that a lot of these torpedo attacks were from the sonar man, you see. And they get keyed up to things like this. Everything they hear from the sonar man, you see. And they get keyed up to a thing like this. Everything they hear on the sonar is a torpedo. You're pretty sure there was a torpedo attack?

Oh, no doubt about that, I think. No doubt about that. It was just confusion. And events afterwards showed that our judgment that we'd been attacked that day was wrong. It didn't happen. I just played for you the Gulf of Tonkin recounting by Robert McNamara. He later said in that documentary that decades later, he went back to Vietnam and had a formal dinner with leaders and the military leaders that he had opposed.

And he says as part of that dinner, one of the Vietnamese guys stood up and slammed his fist on the table and said, what did you think about this domino thing? Don't you know anything about history? He said, for over a thousand years, the Chinese and the Vietnamese have been fighting each other. They've been trying to dominate us. We're not going to be subsumed into them. We fought them for a thousand years. This whole war was predicated on not just the Gulf of Tonkin lie, but the lie about the domino theory. And of course, Robert McNamara, after he finished his stint as Secretary of Defense, went on to

work with the IMF. Either the IMF or the World Bank. But they accused him, in his policies, of rent-seeking. Of trying to create a trap of debt for the developing countries. Because they were loaning them money, not for projects that they would build, but they were loaning them money and then telling them to increase their welfare state. So they're not going to have any increased industry.

They're not going to improve their productivity. They're just going to go into debt to the bankers. That's what they were doing now china is doing the same thing in many ways with their rodent belt initiative they're giving people countries lots of money for big projects that don't work and of course they have to use chinese constructors uh to build the stuff contractors and um even though the thing doesn't work, whatever it is, the Chinese say, no, you're still on the hook. Let's see, maybe you've got some minerals or something here

that you could give us. So there's always that kind of trap. But getting back to the false flags, the false reports, the false information that starts these wars. Now, what happened yesterday, according to the Associated Press, pure propaganda. It's not associated. It's not press.

It's associated with the CIA. It's just American propaganda. That's what the AP is. According to the AP, a senior U.S. intelligence official, single, senior U.S. intelligence official, single, senior U.S. intelligence official, anonymous, unnamed, said that the missiles were of Russian origin. And so that set off everybody. Well, you know, consider the source. If it was true, this is, you know, there were over 100 rockets that were launched. They say that two stray Russian rockets landed near the border with Ukraine.

The rockets, they said, landed on the NATO state of Poland following Russia's mass bombardment of Ukrainian cities earlier today. Russia has denied not only the missiles hitting Poland, but any rocket strikes near the border at all. The fog of war. Will this be used to start a war? The attack could prompt Poland to trigger NATO's Article 5 provisions, calling on all the treaties members to attack Russia. According to Article 5, an attack against one NATO ally is considered an attack against all allies. Sounds like QAnon. Where we go one, we go all.

We're all going to go to hell in a handbasket. Maybe it was somebody in NATO or the intelligence agencies that started QAnon, you think? Anyway, however, Warsaw is understood to be considering invoking Article 4, which calls for allies to consult together when, quote, in the opinion of any one of them, the territorial integrity, political independence, or security of any of the parties is threatened. Russia's Ministry of Defense was quick to deny the missile strike, instead claiming that the reports were a deliberate provocation. They went on to claim that the claim

no strikes were made against targets near the Ukrainian-Polish border by Russian weapons. And so for months we have seen Poland aggressively pushing for escalation, pretty much as aggressively as Zelensky. Missile fragments and photos of what were published by Polish media outlets on the scene. There was a response from the Russian defense ministry. They said these have nothing to do with Russian weapons. Statements by the Polish media and officials about the alleged Russian missiles falling in the area of the village are, quote, a deliberate provocation in order to escalate the situation,

said the Russian military. The AP reported that Russian missiles had crossed in this, again, because of an unnamed senior U.S. intelligence official. The Pentagon, however, declined to corroborate the claim. I can tell you that we don't have any information at this time to corroborate those reports and are looking into this further, said Air Force Brigadier General Patrick Ryder. Now, what is interesting is the schism between the Biden administration, the State Department, Anthony Blinken, and the Pentagon, and people like Millie. The Pentagon is saying, you know, we need to have peace talks.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms applys apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. And you have the Biden administration and the State Department say,

Nope. Nope. Not going to do it. Don't need it. Don't want it. And you have intelligence officials saying, Whoa. Now, look at this.

We just had Russian missiles drop there. Polish government spokesperson called on the media and the public, quote, not to publish unconfirmed information. At least there's one cool head in Poland. However, Zelensky accused Russia of, quote, terrorism and said NATO needed to act against this attack on our collective security. So, as I said, they could invoke Article 4 or Article 5. Article 5 says, you know, we've got to attack or counterattack. Article 4 says we need to call everybody together and consult over this, and that's what they did.

NATO ambassadors will be meeting today at the request of Poland invoking Article 4. But the noisy little warmonger thug Zelensky is still out there pushing to escalate this. Zelensky says this is really a significant escalation. Not what he's saying, but he says what somebody did. And he's demanding action from the West. He said, hitting NATO territory with missiles.

This is a Russian missile attack on collective security. This is a really significant escalation. Action is needed, said Zelensky in a video last night. He says it's only a matter of time before Russian terror goes further. And so people asked Biden what he thought about this. Yeah, well, that was his teleprompter went down at another event, but somebody did catch somebody did catch him. And he did actually speak

without a teleprompter when asked about what was going on with the Polish claims. Here's what he had to say. Who really did say whether this missile was fired from Russia? There is preliminary information that contests that. I don't want to say that till we completely investigate. But it is, it's unlikely in the minds of the trajectory that it was fired from Russia. But we'll see.

We'll see. Unlikely. Thank you. Okay. So that's a hopeful sign because the Biden administration has been pushing hard for this in spite of what the Pentagon is even saying. And so when he says, well, it looks unlikely, and he cited the trajectory, and of course, Russia said, we looked at the pictures, these aren't Russian missile parts.

So we don't know if that's true or not. It's with a barrage of 100 missiles. Perhaps a couple did go across the border. But if that happened, hopefully, it looks like there's not any interest in pursuing this. But I think it's likely that it did not go across. He talks about the trajectory and things like that. These were cruise missiles. It was 100 cruise missiles.

And I remember back in 19, I guess it was about 79 or so, it was before I started work. I had my friend who was in the military and went to West Point, and we would always talk about the technological things that he was using. In other words, no trade secrets, nothing like that. No national security secrets, but just in general things that were declassified.

But he said, and I don't know if it was an exaggeration or if it's actually true, but he said, yeah, those cruise missiles, we can target which window of the Kremlin we want them to go into. Now, that may be an exaggeration, but they're very accurate, even 40 some odd years ago. And so these were 100 cruise missiles. It's not like they're shooting artillery shells or something like that. They're pretty targeted and very expensive. And so they are targeting infrastructure targets. And there was one cruise missile that was shot down.

And then it landed on, you know, some people. It was not an intended target. But I think in general, any country's cruise missiles are pretty much going to be going specifically to some infrastructure target. So there's massive missile strikes across Ukraine. It came less than a day after Zelensky set conditions for peace talks with Russia that Moscow called unrealistic, realistic, and inadequate. And so half of the residents of Kiev, up to 80% of the people living in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, I guess that's how it's pronounced,

up to nine Ukrainian regions were targeted in the attack. Ukraine's neighbor, Moldova, was also affected by the strike. The Ukrainian power plants that were taken out by cruise missiles led to a power line disconnection in Moldova, massive power outages across the country as it's affecting the grid. You know, it's very difficult when the grid goes down to control what happens. And so taking out that power plant, some power plants in Ukraine, has caused much of the grid in Moldova to go down. So as I said, when one of the cruise missiles was shot down, at least one person died in Kiev as Ukrainian air defense systems

took it down and it fell on a residential building in the capital. So that is again a consequence of it actually being shot down off of its course. But there is a solution to all

this. Babylon B has it. You just put up a gun-free zone sign in Ukraine, and that'll work. War solved, says Babylon Bee. So especially gun-free zone, especially the military guns that they always want to take away from American citizens. Oh, that looks like a military weapon. Well, that's specifically protected in the Constitution. Well, I guess it's over, said a Russian general in Crimea.

The sign is very clear, comrades. There's no way of getting around this. Time to go back home. This is now a gun-free zone. This is a big win for peace, said Chris Murphy, the junior Democrat Party senator from Connecticut. These signs will put a stop to all fighting in Ukraine and restore stability to the region, just like they do in downtown Chicago.

The sign is fine. And I co-sponsored it, by the way, said AOC, Alexandria Occasional Cortex. But what about artillery and tanks? We need signs that say artillery and tank-free zone as well. Also, the sign should have a pride flag on it for inclusivity. The three-by-five-foot steel sign was built in Detroit, Michigan, and transported to Kiev at a cost of $40 billion. Batman B doesn't say that.

I'll just throw that in. You know that's what it would cost, right? At least, it probably would cost $100 billion because we've already chipped in $60 billion. We're going to have to pay more for peace than we do for war, right? I imagine a single sign like that would cost us tens of billions of dollars. At publishing time, fighting resumed after a Ukrainian tank inadvertently shot a tank round through the word free. Well, as I said, there is a division between the Pentagon and the Biden administration

State Department as to whether or not they want to have peace talks. And so the Biden administration has been reassuring Ukraine that peace talks with Russia don't need to happen because Biden doesn't want peace. Zelensky doesn't want peace. The State Department doesn't want peace you had the chair of the joint chiefs of staff mark milley was saying well we should have some peace talks i think the time to do it is going to be as winter is kicking in yeah because those russians can't handle the winter you know how that is right ukrainians either yeah i don't think it's going to faze either the Ukrainians or the Russians any kind of winter.

You could turn off all the heat and they'd be just fine. Like Iceman or something. But the people who are going to be feeling it are going to be the people in Europe. And maybe in the United States because of the sanctions against fuel. We're not going to be left out of this. We're not going to be left out of a war any more than we're going to be left out of the sanctions and the economic suffering. So when this stuff starts happening, the EU, the UK, you're going to have a lot of angry

people to deal with. And the government's going to have to figure out what to do about that. Maybe at that point in time, with winter and power outages and astronomical power bills, maybe that will bring the NATO side to the peace table. Milley said last week that Russia and Ukraine might recognize that victory is maybe not achievable through military means and therefore you need to turn to other means he said he said he expects fighting will slow down this winter and the movement for peace talks could be the moment could be seized at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football

the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within

48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie US officials have conveyed to Ukraine that Washington was not trying to undercut Kiev's stated war goals because, you know, they want war. Ukraine has been

plotting this war, as I've played for you many times. That guy Arestovich, he was the Ukrainian government official, a young guy, like Zelensky. And he said three years ago when he was asked by a reporter in Ukraine, you know, when are we going to have peace? You know, we've had constant state of war for the last five years since, you know, we had the coup, the Democrat coup, and you had the people in Donbass

and other places say, well, we want to secede. So there's been a constant state of war and shelling. She said, what is it that we can do to have peace? And she asked him that because Arestovich was a representative from the Ukrainian government for those peace talks. He said, we're not going to have peace. He says, it's going to escalate. He said, it'll escalate in three years. He said, in late 2021 and 2022, there'll be a massive war with Russia here in Ukraine. And she said, that's horrible.

Can't anything be done to stop that? And he goes, no. He says, Ukraine is going to be, havoc is the way that he put it, the way they translated it. It's going to be decimated, destroyed. And she was just aghast. She said, no, but that's the cool thing. We'll get to join NATO.

They didn't care what happens to the Ukrainian people. He and Zelensky get to join the club, the NATO club, the Davos club, the UN club. The report said there will be, in a broad sense, within the Pentagon, that winter will bring a chance to reach a political settlement and that senior U.S. military officials don't believe Ukraine can achieve its war games, which includes expelling Russia from Crimea. But so far, these views have not had any impact on Biden or his senior staff.

However, there is some dissent within the Biden administration. said in comments to Politico, why not start talking about peace talks before you throw another 100,000 lives into the abyss? And that's what they're doing. Hundreds of thousands of lives into the abyss, teetering right on the brink of having a nuclear war. They don't want any talks. Zelensky is pushing for preemptive nuclear strikes against Russia, as a matter of fact. So look at where the UN is.

It's not just NATO, Europe, UK, US. The UN is now calling for Russia to pay war reparations. Well, you know, they're white people, so they should have to play reparations, right? Caucasians, original sense, I guess. Uh, but no, but what it really shows you is that they're not interested in peace at all. Because when you start saying you're on the hook for billions of dollars, and when this thing ends, we're going to then take everything that you've got. If you've got anything left. They know the history of what happened after World War I when reparations were pushed on Germany.

And so by doing this resolution in the UN, what they have done is to further back Russia into a corner, to underscore the Russian hardliners who say they're not interested in peace. They want to destroy Russia. This is an existential fight, the hardliners are saying in Russia. We are not fighting anymore just for the Donbass and that type of thing.

These people, NATO, they are not going to stop until they take out Russia. That is the perspective of the Russian hardliners. And when the UN says you're on the hook for war reparations, that's only going to strengthen their position that this is a threat to the very existence of Russia, that they're going to have to defend this even with nuclear weapons. That's what the UN is. Everybody is pushing this into an escalated war,

which is why I was surprised that at least at this juncture, Biden pulled back a little bit. So we can thank God for that temporary reprieve. The UN resolution states that the Russian Federation must bear the legal consequences of all of its internationally wrongful acts, including making reparation for injury, including any damage caused by such acts. It further seeks to establish an international mechanism for reparations for damage, loss, or injury.

Billions of dollars they're looking at. So Zelensky hailed the UN measure. He said the reparations that Russia will have to pay are now part of the international legal reality. Kremlin responded and said that Russia stands categorically against the proposal, adding that Moscow would do everything possible to stop the West from seizing its frozen international reserves or plundering, this is his word,

plundering them to pay for reparations to Ukraine. Now, out of 193 members in the UN, this is how they voted. 94 countries, 49% voted in favor of the reparations. 7% voted against and 38% abstained. So it's not quite over 50%, but most of the countries just don't want to be involved in this. India was an abstention. So when you, and China voted against it. So when you start to look at the BRICS alliance,

it is starting to shape up. One wonders where the big Western push at the UN to make Washington pay war reparations over the 2003 shock and awe regime change invasion in Iraq, which by some accounts killed more than a million people. We went to war on lies from the CIA. We have a senior intelligence official immediately came out with this missile attack

and said, this is a Russian missile. Russians have just launched a strike against a NATO country, CIA, CIA tortured people, got lies, use those lines about weapons of mass destruction, uh, mass, weapons of mass destruction. Use that to start the Iraq war. And Donald Trump promoted that CIA person who oversaw the torture,

who pushed the lies, and who covered up the torture, destroyed the video evidence and did other cover-ups. Gina Haspel, after Trump said, hey, we got lied into this war bush is a bad guy yeah that's right but he promoted the person who was the instigator of those lies stay with us we'll be

at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Right back. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to

take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidKnightShow.com All right. We have a couple of people who have left tips on Rockfin and comments.

And what happens when we have a crash there? If they refresh it, if they don't refresh it, they can't see, right? See the program? But they do refresh it, they can't do comments. How does that work? Yeah, I think that's it. So sorry that we had the crash. That's going to mess things up a bit.

But Igor, thank you very much. He said, could you please try to have on Alex Christoforo or Alexander Makouras of the Duran on your show to talk about Ukraine? Well, I'll look them up, see if I can contact them. Robert Barnes would also be a very good guest. I think Robert wants to come on and talk to me. He's too tied in with Alex, frankly. But Charles, I've interviewed Robert. We've had some good discussions in the past about Supreme Court decisions and things like that. But

I don't think Alex would like him talking to me. Charles Smith, thank you very much for the tip. Let's talk about what happened with Trump's announcement yesterday. It had been teased for over a week. And as it was about to happen, it happened last night, nine o'clock Eastern time, I believe was when it happened. You had a press conference in the afternoon. We had a reporter ask DeSantis about the Trump attacks. And here's the short back and forth. I would like to know what you think about Trump's big announcement

and some of the less than flattering comments he has made about you. Well, you know, one of the things I've learned in this job is when you're leading, when you're getting things done, you take incoming fire. That's just the nature of it. I roll out of bed in the morning. I've got corporate media outlets that have a spasm just the fact that I'm getting up in the morning. And it's constantly attacking.

And this is just what's happened. I don't think any governor got attacked more, particularly by corporate media, than me over my four-year term. And yet I think what you learn is all that's just noise. And really what matters is, are you leading? Are you getting in front of issues? Are you delivering results for people? And are you standing up for folks? And if you do that, then none of that stuff matters. And that's what we've done. We focused on results and leadership. And, you know, at the end of the day, I would just the greatest Republican victory in the history of the state of Florida. I thought it was kind of interesting how you finished that up.

There wasn't a whole lot of I, I, I, like you see with Trump, right? Greatest Republican victory, that's what he was talking about. And he said, what matters is, are you leading? Are you getting in front of the issues? Are you delivering results? And are you standing up for folks? That's Trump's vulnerability. He said, we focused on results. We focus on leadership. I would just tell people to go check out the scoreboard. And again, this is both DeSantis and Trump are making claims about their win record, but it's no question about the significance of the win in the state of Florida. What I find is interesting is just before Trump's announcement, Trump's daughter-in-law, Laura Trump, who is Eric's wife, also threatened DeSantis, just like Trump did. Trump says, yeah, you know, it gets really nasty, and I know a lot of things about this guy that he doesn't want people to know.

I mean, isn't that amazing? Isn't that disqualifying? I think that was the most disqualifying thing that happened all last week, even more so than turning the Senate over yet again to the Democrats, as Trump did, by his selection and promotion of celebrity idiots like Mehmet Oz and Herschel Walker, things like that. People that Trump likes personally, or they like to watch on TV.

Trump thinks that this is a game of the apprentice, right? This is reality TV for him. And policies don't matter. Good candidates don't matter. People can think on their feet And get things done That doesn't matter to Trump It's all just about the personality

And the rest of the stuff And it's the same with his daughter-in-law Who also threatened DeSantis She said this These primaries get very messy Very raw We've experienced that before So wouldn't it be easier for him, DeSantis,

and I think he knows this, to wait until 2028? Because we're going to get very messy. We're going to get very raw. Trump says, I know things about him that nobody knows except his wife, and blah, blah, blah, right? That's what he's, he doesn't support any principles, any party he supports himself. Again, Ty Cobb nailed it.

He said he's a deeply wounded narcissist who's incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge. And that's where the nastiness is going to come in. So what we're seeing here in this last week, as people are taking polls, whether they're internet polls or whether they're other polls, you're seeing the switch or reversal of places

between DeSantis and Trump. But I think, as I said yesterday, Andrew Torbis said, forget about it. I don't think either one of these guys are going to win because of what has been done to the elections. And it's going to be very difficult to fix that because that is decided at the state level. One of the things that Trump said, and I'll talk about some of his statements coming up, but he did not focus on any real solutions. He said, we're going to go paper ballots. We're going to get rid of these machines. We're all going to vote on one day and all the rest of this stuff. Those are several issues,

but he doesn't have the ability to do that. None whatsoever. So when you look at some of the polls here, the poll was conducted November 9th through the 11th, immediately after the midterm election. Poll-making rounds on social media showed Trump with a 50-point lead. That one, though, was conducted before the Uh, DeSantis also leads Trump among Republicans in key states, such as Iowa, New Hampshire, Georgia, and Florida. If he were to beat Trump in those early states, then, you know, he would get the nomination. But again, I don't think anybody's going to win the election with a kind of mail

in ballots that have now been put into place thanks to the pandemic lockdown that Trump did. In Florida, DeSantis leads 56 to 30, an uptick from 49-42 before the election. Trump led DeSantis in every pre-election poll, including by 25 points in the Politico poll and by 38 points in a Harvard poll. But Virginia Lieutenant Governor Winsome Sears said Trump cannot win a national election again, even if you had honest elections. She said the voters have spoken. A true leader understands when they have become a liability.

A true leader understands that it's time to step off the stage. And voters have given us that very clear message. I could not support Trump, she said. And so I'm going to take a quick break because I left. I got this stuff this morning. I did a transcript of it, and I wanted to read you the verbatim quotes of this, and I left that back in my office.

So I'm going to stop this for a second, go get that, and we're going to be right back. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Stay with us.

The Common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com I'm back and I've got the list here because I wanted to, when I pulled up the transcript, and I prefer to do it from a transcript just for, even for time.

First thing I do is I start looking for keywords. You know, what topics did he talk about? And so I searched for the word vaccine, not mentioned. Trump had a one-hour speech, and the guy who has said so many times he's the father of the vaccine, it's the best thing, it's a miracle, it's a scientific miracle, a moonshot, the rest of this stuff, Greatest thing anybody's ever done in medical history. The vaccine that he produced. He is the father of the vaccine, he said. He didn't mention it.

He also, I searched for the term warp. He didn't talk about warp speed. He didn't talk about it at all. He didn't mention Fauci. Didn't mention Fauci once. Didn't blame him, as he did towards the end. Didn't cheer him, as he did in the beginning. He didn't use the term shot, except in a different sense, once.

He didn't use the term jab. Nothing about hospitals. Nothing about ventilators, nothing about masks. Trump said nothing about social, except referring to a couple of socialists twice, but he didn't say anything about social. He didn't say anything about distance or distancing, nothing about lock or lockdown. Nothing about stimulus. Nothing about mail, as in vote by mail. Except to bring up yet again Hillary Clinton and her e-mails.

He only mentioned the term gun once. He said in that context, he said there are gang members, MS-13, that will kill and they use knives because a knife is much more painful than a gun. That's the only time he mentioned a gun. He didn't mention Second Amendment gun rights. He didn't use the word trans in any form, way, shape, or form. He did talk about parental rights being under attack. He didn't say anything about electricity or electric or car or anything like that. He did mention supply chains. This is what he said about supply chains. He said, that's why we will launch an all-out campaign to eliminate America's dependence on China. We will

bring our supply chains, which are a disaster right now. You can't get anything and good luck getting a turkey for Christmas or for Thanksgiving. Number one, you will get it. And if you do, you're going to pay three to four times more than you paid last year, but we will bring our supply chains and our manufacturing base back home as we were strongly doing during the Trump administration. So we're going to fix the supply chain thing. It seems to me, though, that the supply chains got messed up

right after his executive order, which he also doesn't want to talk about, of the emergency. Right after his executive order of the state of emergency, I spent a great deal of time on iPencil because we had a situation where people were destroying food at the farm and at the dairy, but we had empty shelves, just like we did with toilet paper, because they couldn't get it to people in the format that it could be put in the stores and sold to them

in retail format. And so all that food that these people were hooked into the supply chain for restaurants and things like that. And the restaurants were closed because Trump and his director Fauci directing the pandemic, this movie, this dystopian film for us. Trump was a producer. Fauci was the director. And in their dystopian film, you had to shut down everything,

all these restaurants. They'd let you go get groceries at the grocery store, but you know, the grocery store didn't have enough of those. And you can't just send the food in. It's kind of like, um, you know, difference between a metric and English. Tools or wrenches. I just didn't fit. He didn't have the right way to get the stuff there, but it wasn't his fault. It wasn't his fault at all.

That stuff had been going on. That dumpster fire had been going on for a year before Biden even got in and then poured our gasoline on the dumpster fire. He amazingly said, he said some things about COVID. And of course, you know, COVID is his alibi. Had to do all of it. Still saying he had to do all of it because of COVID. It all happened. The bad stuff all happened because of COVID. Not because of his reactions to it. But he had the amazing, he said, we're going to bring people together. We're going to unify people. Can you believe that

Donald Trump said this? One of the most toxic, dividing personalities we've ever seen. Certainly the most toxic, dividing personality I've seen in my lifetime. That's what everybody's complaining about him about. Democrats absolutely hate him. The majority of independents absolutely hate him, which means that the Republicans are going to lose if they run him. The majority of independents absolutely hate him, which means that the Republicans are going to lose if they run him. No matter how much the Republicans love Donald Trump, they're going to lose because everybody else hates him. So he says, we're going to unify people. And it was happening in the previous administration, previous to the previous, and what was bringing them together and success prior to COVID coming in, the people were calling me, they were calling me, you wouldn't

believe it. People that were so far left, I figured they'd never speak to me and I would never speak to them. But our success was so incredible, like never before. And then COVID started coming in from China. We call it the China virus. The best of all was what we did to China. We made an incredible deal. But after COVID, I don't even bother talking about it because the devastation with that caused for the entire world was too much to bear. So it was China. So did he own China or did China own Trump? If China did the virus and if it was the virus that took everything down,

then I think if you go with that narrative that he's trying to put out, there's an alibi. He got owned. We will build the greatest economy ever. And if you remember, I did it twice. I did it before COVID. And then I handed off something where the stock market was higher than just prior to COVID coming in. And we did it twice.

As commander in chief, this is the only time he talked about any of the restrictions and things like that, that he'd get rid of. He talks about the COVID mandates from Biden. As commander in chief, I will get Biden's radical left ideology out of the military. And I did. I did. And in the first day, they put it back in. They signed the executive order and they put it back. It was gone. We will abolish every Biden COVID mandate and rehire every patriot who is fired from our military with an apology and full back pay. That's all he said about the issues and the effects of all this stuff out of a one-hour speech. Out of a one-hour speech, the only thing he talks about

with the deleterious effects of this Trump shot, warp speed, genetic code injection thing. We're going to roll back the COVID mandates, and we're going to rehire the people who were kicked out of the military because they didn't want to take it. Well, why wouldn't they want to take it? It's the best thing ever, isn't it? It's like the best medicine we've ever had that he produced.

So that is something that he could do. It's something I imagine any Republican candidate, I would hope, would do, make that right. But the other thing that he points to is the LGBT agenda that is overriding everything in the Pentagon, and certainly it is. But I've got to say, I don't trust Trump on that either. He virtue-signaled by putting in, as Director of National Intelligence,

Grinnell, who was openly homosexual, and cheered about it. You know, put that out just like a Democrat would. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. crap would. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

Saying, look what I did. I appointed the first of fill in the blank in this position. The first of this LGBT. He did the same stuff that Biden is doing. Just not as radical or as many as by you know the rachel levine people and the sam britain people he didn't put anybody in who was you know rick grinnell uh dressed in a suit he he didn't um wear a dress he didn't uh uh wear leather bondage clothing and high heels you know biden Biden is just taking it.

Again, it's just like Trump created the dumpster fire and Biden poured the fuel on it. And so he's pouring the fuel on the LGBT stuff. But understand, the log cabin Republicans and the, you know, Melania bragged about the fact how Trump supported homosexual marriage. They have been given awards at ceremonies that they held at Mar-a-Lago with the law cabinet Republicans. He's not on our side on this radical stuff that is happening to our society. And why would he be?

Again, he's a pagan. He doesn't understand anything about what marriage is about. He didn't understand that with any of his three marriages, he doesn't understand anything about a commitment or an oath to somebody that he marries or an oath that he takes to the constitution. And he certainly doesn't understand the purpose of marriage. He's not a Christian. I don't blame him. Uh, he's got a lot of false prophets around him who never bothered to speak any truth into his life So why would he understand any of that stuff? But again, he says, to further drain the swamp, I will push for a constitutional amendment

To impose term limits on members of Congress It's time for that Well, he can't make a constitutional amendment happen. What he can do is escalate this dictatorship by executive order all the time. And he's not going to do an executive order to stop term limits. He'll do it for a lot of other stuff, like he did it for guns. He said when he was talking about the elections, he said only paper ballots. France just had an election. 36 million people voted. It was all done by 10 o'clock in the evening.

No complaints. You had a winner. You had a loser. The loser went home. The winner, it's a friend of mine. Nice guy. Macron? His friend?

Yeah. Yeah. Mr. Davos. Yeah. How is it that, you know, Trump gets along better with the Davos people than he does with other Republicans. Did you notice that? Anyway, but he was happy and there were no complaints.

And if there is a complaint, you check it out and you can fix it very easily. You can find out what's going on. No paper ballots. Same day voting. Voter ID. It's so simple. And we want all the votes counted by election night. They spend all the money for machines and all this stuff. And they end up two weeks later, three weeks later.

By that time, everyone forgot there was even an election. It's horrible. This doesn't happen. I said it before. It doesn't happen in third world countries. They do better than we do. It's horrible what's happening with our election and our election process. And I'll get that job done. Why are we voting by mail? It's because Trump locked everything down. Trump played along with the Fauci says rules. Fauci says this. Fauci says that. Well, I can't have any rallies. I can't have a GOP convention because Fauci says no.

And we got to have elections from home because Fauci says no. And that's a state thing. Again, in Texas and maybe in Florida, they said, no, you're going to go and vote in person. You can go vote in person. You don't even have to wear a mask. Well, the Democrats are happy to do that. The Democrats are going to be happy to continue how that is done. Look, the states run the election. That's why when Steve Pachinik was out there saying,

well, you know, we got this blockchain watermark balance and we're all printed up by Trump. It's like absolute lie. You are a liar. Forget about the blockchain watermark nonsense for a second. Just throwing out these buzzwords. Steve Pachinik and Infowars. Forget about the blockchain watermark nonsense for a second. Just throwing out these buzzwords, state patrician info wars. Forget about the blockchain watermarks. The idea that the ballots are printed up by the federal government, that's a lie.

The states take care of the ballots. The states set up the rules for the elections. It's a state thing. Every state's got different. Some states you're required rules for the elections. It's a state thing. Every state's got different. Some states you're required to have voter ID. Some states you can't have voter ID. The amount of time that you have the election, that's done by the state. All this stuff is controlled by the states.

And so he's writing checks he can't cash because that's what he does. He can't do anything about that what he did was he modeled and he enabled the democrats to set up this vote by mail thing and even though there is no pandemic no emergency and there never was he is they're still going to continue this and they're never going to stop it that's why he's not going to win. Why DeSantis isn't going to win. And why you need to forget about these grifting liars and the idea that you're going to get somebody in Washington to save you. Even if you had one of these guys win. We've already seen what Trump does. I don't think DeSantis is going to be much different once he gets there. He's got some very, very big business interests

that are aligning behind him already. They will own him when he gets there, I think. So either way, we don't want to put all of our baskets in one centralized position. We've got to grow this at the local level, build our businesses, raise our food, create and build our communities. Just as I was talking to you yesterday, I've been saying this for a long time. Andrew Torba did a great op-ed piece about it. That's the path to the future. Watch what's happening with these people, but don't get drawn into it. Don't let them grift you on this. They have ruined the elections. Trump set that precedent just like he set the precedent for gun control by executive order and so many other things.

So he goes on to talk about the wall and he did mention the wall several times. As I said, you know, most of these terms that you could think that he would say something about, he didn't say anything about it, but he did talk about the wall. Listen to what he said about the wall, however. He says, the Latino voter has been unbelievable, great people, very entrepreneurial people, and they want security. And everyone thought, when I did the wall, I built the wall.

And they thought, oh, that would hurt me with Hispanic vote. No, it helped me because they understood. They wanted safety. We are going to restore and secure America's borders just like we had them before. Best ever. We built a wall. He did. He says he built a wall.

And now we will add to it. Wait a wall. He did. He says he built a wall and now we will add to it. Wait a minute. If you built the wall, what do you need to add to it for? Are you going to build it out into the Pacific and the Atlantic ocean? What are you going to do with that? We're just at the Gulf of Mexico. Yes.

Um, uh, so we built the wall, but now we're going to add to it some more. We built the wall, we completed the wall, and then we said, let's do more. This guy, he can't even do two sentences without contradicting himself in a lot. And President of Mexico, great gentleman. By the way, socialist, but but hey that's okay you can't

have everything but he's a great man and a great friend of mine but 28 000 soldiers while we were building the wall and when then when the wall was finished that's how we set all these records wait a minute is he saying then that if you were to put 28,000 troops on the border, you could secure it because the socialist president of Mexico did that? Where would Trump get those 28,000 troops? Could he have brought them home from Afghanistan and Iraq and Europe and other places like that where we don't need to be to protect our border? Yeah, he could have done that.

I said that in 2017 when he wasn't doing any of that. And so then CNN fact checks him. Now, I thought this was interesting because CNN doesn't so much fact check Trump as they defend Biden against Trump's accusations. Yeah. And Trump dings Biden for the Afghanistan withdrawal and how it was done. And so CNN defends Biden over that. Trump claimed Tuesday evening that the U S left $85 billion worth of military

equipment in Afghanistan on the military withdrawal. Oh, well, you know, I think it was, they said it was far less than that. Pentagon estimated that it was only, you know, some of this stuff was 7.1 billion and a chunk of about 18.6 billion worth of equipment provided by Afghan forces and so forth. So, you know, it wasn't 85 billion.

It was only about 8 or 10 billion, maybe, you know. That's their defense. What about the people who died? Was Chinese fire drill pullout that he had? And then you could, as I've said before, when Trump criticizes Biden over his idiotic failed withdrawal, why were they still there? Well, it's because Trump had not withdrawn. He had his chance. He had a chance to fulfill his promises from 2016. He chose not to do it. And he had his chance to do it in an orderly fashion without people dying.

But he chose not to do that and then biden at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee pulls out not because he chose to do it but because by that time they were being forced they were losing that war that That's the unpopular thing to say.

They had to leave. They didn't want to leave. They were planning on staying there. It's a massive store of lithium and opium, and they love that. They love having both of those things. Then on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Trump rightfully criticizes Biden on that in the speech. And CNN defends Biden and his draining of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

There is no defense for Biden's draining of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It's only been done, as I pointed out before, three times. And the biggest withdrawal was less than 10% of what Biden has done. And that was when we had, that was under Obama. And that was when a hurricane had come through and devastated some refineries. And that's what the Strategic Patrol and Reserve is for, an emergency like that. The other two are far smaller, but that one was only about a tenth of what Biden pulled out for the purpose of manipulating the price before an election.

It was not an emergency. It was a political move, and he took out a massive amount of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. CNN criticizes Trump because he said something about the sea level. And because Trump accurately pointed out that these people are more worried about the climate and global warming than they are the threat of nuclear war. Yeah. He says, they say this might affect us in 300 years. They say the ocean will rise an eighth of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years.

But don't worry about nuclear weapons. It can take out entire countries with one shot. Okay. This is the kind of non-factual hyperbole, even though the essence of what he is saying is true. It is ridiculous to be fixated on this non-problem of global warming. But he puts up an inaccurate statement

of what they're saying, uses it as a straw man, which makes it very easy for them to say, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about. It's only effective with his base. This is why independents and Democrats reject him completely, because he won't get factual evaluation of stuff.

They're not saying it's going to go up an eighth of an inch. They're talking about it going up a lot more. And they're not talking about it happening in 300 years. And they're totally wrong. But state what they're saying accurately and then talk about how they haven't got a clue and they don't believe it because if they are saying that it's going to go up by a foot and the next 30 years, which is what CNN says, then obviously Obama doesn't believe it or any of these other people who are buying these

mega mansions right on oceanfront property they don't believe that why should you uh trump went on to cheer the draconian punishment in china for drug use funny he was silent about their zero covid policy and their punishment for many other things uh trump claimed that Xi Jinping had told him that China has no drug problem at all because of its harsh treatment of drug traffickers. So here you have Donald Trump pushing the failed war on drugs. It's been an absolute failure, 50 years of this stuff. And in the 1990s, I kept telling Alex when he was pushing Trump in the 2016 election, I said,

you ought to ask him if you ever get a chance to talk to him again publicly. I said, ask him where he is on the war on drugs. Because he said in the 1990s that the war on drugs is just a scam that the government was running uh the drug stuff he was honest about it in an interview for playboy magazine i said so ask him about that interview where he he pointed out that uh the war on drugs was uh the government was running all that stuff. Oh, well, he was afraid to ask him that. Didn't want to ask him that because then he would have to pretend he didn't believe that anymore because that was when he was being candid and truthful.

On presidential records, instead of defending himself, he says Obama took a lot of things with him. And so CNN says, no, that's not true, that's not true. Why doesn't Trump either defend what he did or if he wants to play whataboutism, he could talk about Sandy Berger who was stuffing documents in his pants

and stealing them out of the National Archives for the Clintons. Documents about 9-11 and destroying them. And they still use Sandy Berger as a case in point to the people who are working at the National Archives. Saying, don't be impressed by somebody coming in here because of their title or their position or their former position. You know, you still have to enforce the same rules with somebody. Even if it's somebody like Sandy Berger, you got to do that. So anyway, it's just more of the back and forth, this partisan back and forth,

where these people don't even talk about the real problems. And they, of course, attack him on the wall thing because it is hilariously ridiculous what he had to say about the wall i read that to you now they said he built uh uh after trump left office about 458 miles of wall had been completed well see the problem is they don't even mention this in cnn uh the problem is is that we got what about a 2 000 mile border so you got about 500 miles of um four or five hundred miles of wall and 1600 miles of door right how did if he built all this stuff he completed the wall he said and then we decided that we would do more. Really? So anyway, that's the reality of all this.

Gun rights groups. There was one gun rights group, the American Firearms Association. So I had to poll of its members on social media. So it's not a scientific poll. But they have moved big time away from Trump. They had supported Trump. Now they support DeSantis. And they had supported Trump just recently. And asSantis, and they had supported Trump just recently.

And as I said, Trump didn't mention guns at all, except the fact that gangs prefer to use knives over guns because knives are more painful. Isn't that bizarre? Anyway, I guess it depends on where you get, where you get shot. Uh, so that, that organization has switched on a social media poll, but as a bearing arms points out, they said, a lot of people are not thrilled with Trump at the moment. He's launching attacks on popular governors right after he delivered one of the popular governor DeSantis after he delivered one of the popular Governor DeSantis, after he delivered one of the few wins on what

turned out to be a bad night, he says, that's not a good look. Further, we have to face the fact that Trump was more than willing to throw away the Second Amendment in order to ban bump stocks, and that he would likely do so again. He didn't just throw the Second Amendment away on bump stocks. He set a precedent for gun control by executive order. And let me just say this. The Constitution is the Constitution. We can all read it.

It's not written in a foreign language. We all understand what it means, even though they pretend that they don't know. We can all read it. It's not written in a foreign language. We all understand what it means, even though they pretend that they don't know. We know what it means. It's the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It's just that simple. And shall not be infringed. Now, you can talk about the militia and all the rest of this stuff, but it's the right of the people that will not be infringed by the government. So that means that the Congress cannot do gun control.

Any gun control regulation coming out of Congress is specifically prohibited. Even if it's just a tiny infringement, even if it's something just around the edges, that's prohibited. Assault weapon bans, prohibited under the Constitution. Rules about carry, prohibited under the Constitution for the federal government and for the state officials

who've taken an oath to the Constitution. So no governor, no congressman, no president, nobody can infringe that and still keep their oath to the Constitution. The courts can't take it away either because it's in the Constitution. We all see it there.

And so what we see is their hypocrisy, their oath breaking. But in the past, the ways that they have violated the Constitution have been limited because they didn't have the kind of boldness that they have now. So they would limit their violation of the Constitution. They would limit what they did by pretending that they had the authority to do it because it was passed by law by Congress. Well, all laws by Congress are subject to the Constitution, or because it was done by the Supreme Court. But never before Trump did any president presume to have the power and the authority to do any kind of gun control. And he did it. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18plusgamblingcare.ie. In a very deceptive way. He did it over something that nobody cared about, the bump stock. He had the NRA, didn't care to defend it. Of course, gun owners of America understood what the precedent was going to be, and they did push back against it. But Trump did it by executive order, and now Biden has done it twice in two years. That is a Trump precedent, and that's what they don't talk about.

They said, yeah, he threw the Second Amendment under the bus for bump stocks. But even more importantly was a precedent that he set. That precedent of gun control by executive order is very dangerous, just like the precedent of doing elections by mail. It's just astounding to me, and it's why I can't stop talking about Trump, what he did to our country, the precedents that he set. And he was able to do it because the Democrats wanted these authoritarian things done. The globalists wanted them done. They didn't oppose him.

And his own people who should have and would have opposed this if it was done by a Democrat just fell in behind him because they were told by people like Alex Jones, he's playing 4D chess. Just stay with him. He's got it. He knows what he's doing. I know it looks like betrayal. I know he's stabbing you in the back, but he's really not stabbing you in the back.

A police chief in Pennsylvania was shocked that he wasn't stiffed by Trump on a bill for a rally security. This is the type of thing we always would see with Bilderberg, for example. All these government leaders from all over the world would come in, and you would have all these captains of industry, we say, but really mostly bankers, you know, people with big hedge funds and things like that, people like David Petraeus, who's now with KKR and things like that. So, you know, they've got to have all the security.

Who pays for that? Well, the taxpayers get stuck with that. And so this police chief said, I was shocked. I sent him a bill for the rally, and he paid it. Because it isn't that they'd never tried before. In this same jurisdiction with the same police chief, they had had a rally back in 2018, a Make America Great Again rally, and he sent them a bill for that, and they stiffed him on it.

Nobody from the Trump organization paid for any of that. But he said, I'm going to do it again. And so he sent a bill asking for a new payment of $9,820.62 to cover police and public works overtime at the rally that he did in September. So when the checks arrived weeks later, he said he briefly considered bronzing a copy of them and hanging it on the wall to forever memorialize the fact that we got reimbursed. He said, I fully anticipated this one would not get paid either, but we were shocked, he said. It's obviously a huge benefit to the taxpayer. It's unclear how or why the town apparently got lucky with Trump

because there are reports from all across the country that they have stiffed other organizations, just like they stiffed this police chief, uh, in Wilkes bear township, uh, that stiffed him back in 2018. So why he got paid? I don't know. Maybe it's because his comptroller's in jail or something. I got somebody else there. It's right in the check. And he doesn't know what the policies are. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be back here, but I just want to read some of the comments. Uh, people have left here. Uh, Jacqueline Hogan. Thank you for the tip.

Uh, she writes Trump betrayed us, but I don't trust DeSantis either. Yeah. I'd rather have Janice bowling of Tennessee for present. Janice bowling would be a great guest as would Gary humble and Brandon Lewis, the Tennessee conservative. I don't know any of those people. Uh, so I got, I got to say, so yeah, you know, there's, there's a lot of good people. If you look again at that Pennsylvania race,

you know, and I forget what the lady's name was, young black lady. And she called out both, uh, Oz and the number two guy. I've forgotten his name as well. He's a businessman who was running multimillionaire. She called them both out for being Davos globalists. They attended Davos together or not together, but at different times. And, uh, I think she was, um, uh, much more authentic. I wouldn't be surprised if she was the real deal, especially because she got passed over by Trump and, uh, you know, support the other person, MJ Nichols, uh,

with a trucking organization. Good to see you. Thank you very much for the tip. He says, uh, Barnes referred to me as a doomer and a loser the other night, his bourbon with Barnes program. Uh, for simply pointing out that conservatives will not make meaningful inroads and national elections. Again, he has sound legal analysis, but his political insight is hindered

by hindered by his misplaced optimism. I'm beginning to think Barnes is grifting the same as AJ. I think David spot on Barnes won't come. No, he won't. He won't. Um, yeah, it's, um, again, it's always interesting to talk to him about his legal ideas. I disagreed with him and, you know, we talked about it when i was uh talking about the um

the 1946 case over free speech and uh marsh versus alabama 1946 it was a coal town uh the town was owned by the coal company but they had a square. And there's a lady there handing out literature, Seventh-day Adventists or something. And they said, you can't do that. And she fought them to the Supreme Court and won. And Supreme Court said, even if the public square is privately owned, you can't shut down free speech in the public square. And I said, and these people like Jack Dorsey and many others have said over and over again under oath what we all know, that Twitter is the digital public square. And we know that

YouTube has now become a de facto public square as well. And Barnes says, yeah, but that's not true because we've had other court cases subsequent to that where they say that you can't pass out literature in a mall and things like that. That's different. The mall is not a public square. The mall is retail space. Even the areas in the center of the mall where people are walking, they have kiosks and all the rest of the stuff. It's all, that's no different to ban them in those areas than it is to say, you can't go into Sears.

Well, you can't go into Sears now because they're closed now, but I don't know if there's a surviving, uh, big box, a retailer like Sears. You can't go into that one either. Right. Because you can't go in there and start, you know, doing your soapbox because that's retail space. And the outside of that store, but still in the mall, is the same thing. So, yeah, we've had some disagreements about some things like that. I think that's a pretty key issue, frankly.

And I don't think that those rulings about malls have any effect whatsoever on the digital public square. Annie Breton, thank you very much for the tip. We will be right back, folks. Stay with us. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move next move. And now, The David Knight Show. Alright, just a little bit more about the elections before we move on.

I enjoyed this from the Babylon Bee. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat in Arizona, projected to win the Arizona governor's race over Kerry and says with 108% of precincts reporting. And mathematicians were puzzled by the plausibility. Indeed of the results, Democrats are quick to hail Hobbes win as a victory for democracy itself. Yeah, that's about right. Yeah. Because we know that democracy is now defined as rule by Democrats, but this is not the Babylon B. And when you, a lot of people are talking about this on social media, the fact is that

the Arizona treasurer got more votes, significantly more votes than did either Katie Hobbs or Carrie Lake, significantly more. And when you look at the, um, um, Katie Hobbs and Carrie Lake, they were separated by about 19,000 votes. And yet, when you look at the, um, number of people who voted for this Republican running for Arizona treasure, Kimberly Yee. Kimberly Yee won with 1,371,000. Carrie Lake got

1,252,000. So, people are saying, how did that happen? 115,000 more people voted for Yee for treasurer, but not for Kerry Lake for governor? As Josh Barnett, running for Congress, said, apparently the treasurer's race was generating tons of excitement that I didn't know anything about.

Yeah, I don't think anybody knew anything about this treasurer's race. And yet, that person got 115 000 more votes than carrie lake and uh so that is suspicious i mean it could happen because uh carrie lake is um uh you know a lot of people might have been offended by her you know we can't assume just it's kind of like the um when you look at what's going on in Alaska, for example, this preferential voting where everybody, they have three candidates, let's say, on the ballot, and everybody gets a ballot. They rank their first choice, their second choice, their third choice.

And so if their first choice doesn't win, they take those people who's, and they've got to get more than 50%. Right. So, um, if nobody gets more than 50%, they take the person, uh, who had the least number of votes, they eliminate them and they take all the people for whom that was the number one choice. And they reallocate those and they say, well, who was their second choice? And they reallocate those second choice votes. It's a perfectly fair process if it's done,

honestly. I mean, all of these voting schemes come down to an accurate count, of course, but there's nothing inherently wrong about that. The Republican party doesn't like it and they've attacked it. They said, it's going to give all the elections to the Democrats. No. Their evidence and the reason that they're saying that is because Sarah Palin was, there were two Republicans running and one Democrat and the Democrat won. So therefore, this is something that's going to help the Democrats. No, you need to get a candidate who's different from Sarah Palin because she was not the second

choice of the Republicans who voted for the other candidate, for Begich, Nick Begich. So the Republicans who voted for Nick Begich, Sarah Palin was not their second choice, the Republican. Their second choice was the Democrat. And so that might be the phenomenon that you're seeing there, but it is suspicious. And I don't trust these, uh, the vote by mail stuff, but Carrie Lake and Donald Trump are going to continue to use that. She will now go on a, she's going to have a big afterlife career.

Uh, she will be going around to these Reawaken America tours with Michael Flynn and all the rest of them. And she'll be making big bucks doing that. And she'll be much happier because she can always go and talk to people who love her and agree with her. And she doesn't have to fight with people over any policies and she doesn't have to take any losses.

She will forever be the winner who had the election stolen from her and she'll be able to raise money permanently off of that. And I never supported Carrie Lake. I always had the sense that she was a Democrat carpetbagger. You know, all of the people who knew her all the years as a newscaster said she was never a conservative. She donated to obama she took pictures with obama and all the rest of the stuff i just think that she's an opportunist saying you know i can i can do trump better than trump and she probably can't uh so that's what i think is going on meanwhile this is also not the babylon b you had kerry lake supporters You had Kerry Lake supporters reenacting the Battle of Jericho.

They marched around Maricopa County Tabulation Election Center in Phoenix on Saturday. That's not how it works. They're just making a mockery of Christianity and the Bible and the rest of the stuff by doing this. Cause at the cops, a nonsense is happening on the environment. You have some of these idiots coming out with environmental 10 commandments and they came out with these tablets that were green.

Interestingly, they didn't have anything written on them. Because, you know, these, I guess, are the commandments that are coming from Mother Earth, from Gaia herself. And since she can neither see nor speak nor write, the tablets are blank. But they did paint them green. And so they had their new environmental tablets. And it was a mockery, right, of themselves, frankly, because environmentalism is a religion,

and they keep showing that it is a religion, and they keep coming up with these phony little stunts that they do. But these people who are doing this Battle of Jericho thing, marching around and playing a Christian song, Our God is an Awesome God, Rich Mullins did it. People who knew Rich Mullins said he would be spinning in his grave if he knew this. He would not be getting behind this use of God, trying to use God for your political purposes, the use of the prosperity gospel. This is just the political version of the prosperity gospel.

And it is a disgrace. I think if they want to get an analogy, but we'll go analogy for where they are. I don't think the battle of Jericho is the right one. I think you want to go to like the next chapter or so where they have a victory and they're told, you know, not to keep some of the spoil. And one of the, one of the people that keeps the spoils, the next one that they go to the next battle, they get wiped out because they disobeyed God because of their idolatry,

because of the greed of one person, right? That's the analogy. If you want the analogy for what's going on with that and the false prophets and the rest of this stuff, right? Yeah, that's the true analogy anyway. So, you know, she'll be able to go to all the reawaken america events with mike flynn and they can read their prayers to ascended their occultic prayers

to ascended masters they can plagiarize elizabeth claire prophet i guess you know since she was supposed to be alive until the end of the world and it was a nuclear doomsday cult but she died anyway but since she's dead i guess nobody's coming after flynn for copyright infringement on her nonsense so yeah they're just free to keep that stuff up house democrat campaign chief maloney was defeated i played for you yesterday you know uh we're having beef aronis made like macaroni, you know, Chef Boyardee thing. Because he was the guy. This guy who was the House Democrat campaign chief. Well, you know, the Democrats have now lost the House. And he lost his seat. He was the guy who said, hey, just suck it up.

You don't like inflation? Go out and buy some Chef Boyardee canned garbage. Well, they canned him. He's gone now uh one of the other people that is now gone is uh remember this guy uh this uh this is somebody that president trump backed bo hein you get the congress is it going to be? Are we actually going to be willing to defund IRS, FBI and things of that nature? Well, I mean, we have to. I mean, we're at a point in our country now where we have a unregulated fourth branch of government that's targeting middle class Americans on a daily basis. I mean, it's unbelievable what we're seeing. A lot of people have likened the situation that's going on right now. They say we're in a banana republic. I think that's an insult to banana republics across the country i mean at least the manager of banana

republic unlike our president knows where he is and why he's there and what he's doing so now i think he is free since he's now lost this trump backed candidate who thinks that calling this country a banana republic is an insult to the retail mall outlets that he's familiar with he's got such a shallow understanding of history he doesn't know where the term banana republic comes from uh he thinks they're referring to the retail stores so this guy's name is bo heinz and i was calling him when i played this i called him uh bo nana heinz well bo nana heinz is gone and he was one of these people that trump why would trump pick somebody like that it was so green that he's should not be picked off of the

banana tree frankly bonanna is too green to for office maybe he'll get there i mean he did he started out so well you know he said we got a fourth branch of government it's absolutely unaccountable unelected yeah he's right you know what's going on with the irs what's going on with all this stuff right uh all the executive branch is unleashed you know all these alphabet agencies and everything they're under the presidency they're under the executive branch and now you know the the atf can do gun control thanks to Trump without ever having to even pretend that they've got legal authority by using the Congress or the Supreme Court, who don't have the authority either to do gun control. But, you know, they used to have to pretend they had that kind of authority.

Now they don't have to. And so Trump has actually made that worse. But he was right to identify that as a problem. He didn't know what the phrase banana republic was why would trump pick him well he's a very young guy uh he's a great looking guy former north carolina state football player so of course donald trump would endorse him it's just his kind of candidate because the guy's just like Trump. So he was defeated by Senator Wiley nickel and, uh, for North Carolina is 13th district. Um, so now the, they've gotten enough results in, I mean, there's still a lot of results out for, uh, after a week, uh, but they've got enough in that they can call the House for the GOP. And so there was a push against the leadership of McCarthy, who will now become the House

Speaker. They haven't had that vote yet. They had a vote for who would be the leader of the Republican Party. And McCartney wins the GOP nomination for House Speaker. So the only way that he's not going to be House Speaker is if some people within the Republican Party wanted to make an alliance with some of the Democrats to, I don't know, keep Nancy Pelosi in.

Can you imagine such a suicidal thing? You know, that's a, Democrats were fantasizing over that. I can't imagine that there's any chance that that would happen. That'd be absolute suicide. But he had been, he'd faced a challenge from Andy Biggs of Arizona. And, but he stayed in. Steve Scalise will be the next House Majority Leader. They had those elections.

And Mark Levin got very angry. Got very angry because Matt Gaetz was saying, we need to challenge McCarthy's leadership. And so Mark Levin said, hey, why don't you run for speaker? And we'll see how many votes you get. Shut up, Matt. You know, how dare you? So he's always going to be the establishment cheerleader.

Yeah, he was a never Trumper when Donald Trump was saying the right things. And then after Trump got elected and was doing the wrong things, then Mark Levin started cheering him on and continued to cheer him on after Trump was out. He was saying, you know, Trump needs to take credit for these shots. They're great. They're the greatest thing ever. Don't let Biden get the credit for the shots.

So, yeah, by all means, listen to Mark Levin. They're great. They're the greatest thing ever. You know, don't let Biden get the credit for the shots. So yeah, by all means, listen to Mark Levin. And I would expect that if Matt Gates wanted to push back, he could, uh, you know, Levin says, Hey, let's see you, you run for speaker. See how many votes you get. Well, I think, uh, what Matt should have said is, uh, Hey Levin, why don't you run for Congress? And let's see how many votes you get. Well, I think what Matt should have said is, hey, Levin, why don't you run for Congress? And let's see how many votes you get. That ain't going to happen. Not at all.

So this also from the Babylon Bee. Babylon Bee says, Joe Manchin is projected to retain control of the Senate. Actually, I don't think he will. I don't think he will. I don't think he will. Uh, I think the Babylon B got that wrong. So Joe Manchin's control was based on a 50, 50 situation. And, uh, you know, nobody could mention and, uh, Kristen cinema, if they weren't with the Democrats, then they didn't have their 50.

And so they could be deadlocked as they were at least once on one important bill. And then Lala Harris would have the deciding vote as vice president. But they needed to have every single Democrat on board. So he was the one who was usually out there saying, well, I'm not going to go along with that unless there's something in it for me. But now that's not going to be the case anymore. Thanks to Trump endorsing spineless, mindless celebrities like Oz and Herschel Walker and others. Thanks to his endorsement of those. I mean, Herschel Walker, that has not been decided yet. But if you look at these races, those are the two that really stick out to me.

And, you know, that and a couple of others have turned over the Senate to the Democrats. And I think they'll wind up with, it'll be 52-48. Because I think Walker's going to lose. But when you look at who he's running against, this guy Warnock, he is a hardcore racist Marxist. He's an absolute hypocrite as a pastor. They're ejecting people out of their church, not out of their church,

out of a church-owned building for small amounts of money that they're behind on their rent. He's also got issues like Herschel Walker. He's got an ex-wife who's charging, accusing him of abuse and all the rest of this stuff. And I think maybe child pay, something like that. But there's a lot of domestic issues with him, just like with Herschel Walker.

Anybody other than hand-picked Herschel Walker, I think would have beaten him handily. But instead, you know, Trump was the one who picked him and promoted him and moved him to Georgia and all the rest of this stuff. And the same thing with Fetterman. Seriously? There isn't anybody who is running in the Republican primary

that could not have beaten Fetterman, I think, except for the guy that Trump picked. And so they've lost control of the Senate, and that's what everybody is talking about. You know, what Trump talks about is win-loss record. I do want to point out that in the midterms, my endorsement success rate was 232 wins and only 22 losses. You don't hear that from the media. Yeah, well, the reason you don't hear it is because those 22 losses were the most significant races, races for governor, races for Senate that cost us, I say us.

I'm not really a Republican, so I can't be a rhino, right? Not registered as a Republican. And I don't support the Republicans in general. I support individual candidates or more so even individual policies. Uh, but what I'm saying is that, um, you know, the Democrats, I'm a hundred percent against them. So, uh, Harps, thank you very much for the tip. He said, David, I'll show you how bad preferential voting is in the next week. It is corrupt as heck.

I'll send you a photo of our election form and how, or who you preference gives them the power to put your vote where they want instead of where you wish. That's the problem. It takes a very long time to determine how that's going to operate when you're doing it in that kind of a format. And since we don't have any control over how the votes are counted, the preferential voting, and we don't have any way to audit how our vote was tabulated, that's where the problem comes in. But see, that's a different problem. Even if you don't have preferential voting, if you don't have accurate counts of what's going on, that's where the problem is going to be. And so they can stuff the ballots and play the vote by mail game forever,

whether or not you have preferential ballots. It just adds another level of complication that makes it easier for them to hide what they're doing. I understand what you're saying. And I say that because I've been in situations where we had preferential voting and it was in a room where you had a show of hands and everybody is counting and that type of thing to winnow out the different candidates. And it works perfectly fine under that kind of a situation. But, you know, we're not in a situation where we're going to have everybody with a show of hands and count them manually. It's kind of like when you talk about solar power, right? I think solar power is great for use by

the individual. It's great when you use it to get off of the grid, but it's the worst possible thing you can do to put it on the grid, to try to run the grid off of a social, yeah, solar power. It is social. That's what they're doing at the ESG stuff. But to try to run the grid off a social, they're doing it, the ESG stuff, but to try to run it, uh, to run the grid off of social, it's not going to work. As a matter of fact, a big UK wind farm has just had to shut down. Uh, this is not like Solyndra, you know, where they're bringing in a lot of money and they're going to sell the solar panels and, you know, they're getting government subsidies, uh, that are being given out to people who buy the solar

panel. No, this is a company. They bought the things, they put them in place and now they're getting government subsidies that are being given out to people who buy the solar panels. No, this is a company. They bought the things. They put them in place. And now they're just getting the free energy, as they think. The free energy from the sun. Well, there's no free energy, just like there's no free lunch. And so these things are expensive to operate.

They've got other issues involved in them. You know, how do you explain the fact that you're getting free energy? And I've heard this over and over again. When we were traveling to Texas, as I said, we had an issue with a car. We couldn't get the wireless to feed into the radio. So we're just skipping around listening to a radio station. And I heard people calling in this one radio station, just arguing with the host saying solar power is free. I said, no, it's not. You have to build all this other stuff and you have to, and it doesn't last forever and

all the rest of the stuff. There's nothing that's free out there. This is like the green equivalent of a perpetual motion machine, right? There's no such thing as a perpetual motion machine, and there's no such thing as free energy for the same reason. And he couldn't get this caller to understand that. And so how does a solar farm go out of business? Well, anyway, it's people's perception. The reason I got into that is because what works in a room where you have a bunch of candidates and you've got maybe a couple thousand people doing votes, you can do preferential voting. But it adds another level of complexity if you're doing it with ballot stations all across the state and all the rest of the stuff.

I understand. I understand. In order for preferential voting to work, you'd have to have some kind of a thing where it's done on blockchains or something where you can audit your own vote and you have some trust and confidence in that. Even then, as we see with these cyber criminals, and we're going to have Goat Tree joining us to talk about what's going on with FTX at the top of the hour. But even then, I mean,

I still would have issues with trusting, you know, blockchain. Is that really what I'm seeing? Or have you put some kind of a phony front end on this thing to show me a tabulation? So it becomes very complicated. Again, I think the safest thing we can do is have a paper elections. And, um, if we do paper elections, it's going to be too cumbersome paper ballots and counted one day. And if you do something like that is going to be too complicated for

preferential voting, but all the stuff where the, um, the reason that, uh, the reasons that are being given by the Republicans are off the wall. They're just trying to push this duopoly. And one of the reasons that you have this push for preferential voting is because people are trying to get away from the control by two parties, which is something that's kind of uniquely American.

Everybody else has, um, uh, a different approach to it. So, um, you know, got Blake master, very angry masters, very angry, ripping McConnell, blaming him for the loss. You know, you know what on Tucker Carlson, as I said before, Blake Masters, you deserve to lose. You've got no backbone. You won't stand on principle. And just like the rest of the GOP, you ran away when you had an easy case that you could have made about being pro-life. You could have defended life. Did Mitch McConnell, and here's the thing that Blake Masters won't talk about.

He didn't give me money for my ads. Did Mitch McConnell or the Republican National Committee, did they allocate ads to show what abortion really is? Did they allocate any money to defend their position that we will not allow the murder of innocent babies? No, they don't want to put any money in that. And so as a result, that was a big losing issue for them because they didn't want to tell the truth about it. They would like to avoid that issue. And so, again, they deserved to lose.

Pro-abortion groups targeted moderate voters, says the Washington Post, using the language of personal freedom. That's exactly right. They used the language of personal freedom. They championed abortion as liberty. These same people who hypocritically were trying to lock everything that we did down, who wanted to deny us medical treatment, surgery, transplants, who wanted to fire us, purge us out of our society, who demanded that we vaccinate with an experimental Trump shot. These people were allowed to put abortion out as personal freedom.

And the Republicans didn't do anything to push back against that. And the individual candidates, like Blake Masters, ran as hard as they could, scrubbing the stuff off of their website. And now he has the audacity to say that he didn't get enough money given to him? Yeah, useless, empty suit. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, a 10-year-old boy has shown up in the VAERS database. 10-year-old boy dying of cardiac arrest seven days after a Moderna shot. How many does it take? You know, we've had in the past, vaccines have been pulled off the market

because we had less than four dozen people who they could tie to this. But we've never seen a situation where you've had thousands of people, maybe tens of thousands, die immediately or immediately have severe, life-altering adverse effects. We've never seen that before. And yet, nothing that we can show them that will deter them from this. As I tweeted out yesterday, at this point, it's just become nothing other than murder. And they will not repent of their murders. They'll not repent of their pharmakia or their lies or their thefts, just as it was written 2,000 years ago.

So we now have 31,961 reports of deaths in their own database. And we've seen estimates anywhere from only 1% of these things being reported to maybe 40% of them being reported. I think it's closer to the lower number. That was an estimate even before there was all this pressure, thou shalt not say anything bad about the Trump shots. And so 32,000 or is it 3.2 million? Uh, 265,000 serious injuries. As of November the 10th, 31,000 point, uh, 31.4 million people have received the updated bivalent booster dose. And we're waiting to see what will happen with that.

But, um, I want to play this way. This sudden death, sudden death, is that something that we've seen before with these vaccines? No. Is it anything that the government wants to stop? No. I mean, they will stop a crib, as I pointed out to you. One baby dies. We're going to stop it. We're not going to say, well, it's rare. I don't care. Keep selling it. But when it comes to the vaccines, it doesn't matter how many 10-year-olds die of cardiac arrest. They'll keep going. Data shows some alarming trends. Excess death is up in most of these countries that I'm talking about, the UK, Europe, and US, there seems to be an excess death rate rise, especially amongst the younger age folks in 2021 and 2022. It did not occur in 2020.

It's an epidemic of sudden death. And it was told to me the month of August in the Society of Actuaries for the Group Life Policyholders, the excess deaths was 36% for 18 to 44. Let me repeat that, 36%. Now, if this was a pandemic that we are told is winding down, natural immunity and vaccines, suppose they worked, that excess mortality should be turning back to zero or even better than zero. It's stubbornly high and it's a problem. And again, Dr. Drew, this is a population that is much healthier than the general overall population, as their studies have proven beforehand in 2016, that they experience the mortality rate of 30 to 40% that in any given year of the general US.s population so they're experiencing crazy amounts of excess death

yeah and they didn't have any problems during this uh presumed pandemic either but they're now having it because the pandemic the bioweapon is the shot this is uh dr ryan cole the pathologist who's been warning about this since the spring of 2021. Here's what he just recently had to say. With cancers, and that was the next signal I saw that was concerning to me, is I do a fair amount of women's health biopsies, and I see a handful of cancers every month of the uterus, and all of a sudden I realized, wait a minute,

I usually see maybe two or three of these a month, and all of a sudden, I was seeing two or three a week. And in my area, we weren't as locked down as as much as other parts of the world. And so a lot of these clinics that I do pathology lab work for, they stayed open, their patient flow stayed steady. So my first thought was, well, is this a delay to treatment or delay getting into clinic? And, you know, I looked at my numbers and statistics and, you know, very little slowdown in some of these laboratories. And then my next signal was, okay, I'm seeing an increase in these women's health cancers. But then I started seeing them in younger ages as the shots rolled out. And, you know, we know here it was the military and the elderly in the nursing homes that got the shots first.

But then they opened it up to each age group. And as it opened up to each age group, that age of cancer kept going down. And I thought, oh, dear, we have a problem. The other concerning thing is I'm seeing more of it after that second or that third shot. So like in young men getting heart inflammation, myocarditis, it's usually after that second shot that they get that heart inflammation. Same thing with these cancers. I've been in the last week, I've been in Paris, France, I've been in Miami, been in Houston, been in LA. Everywhere I go now, I have somebody come up to me and say, look, I've been in Paris, France. I've been in Miami, been in Houston, been in L.A.

Everywhere I go now, I have somebody come up to me and say, look, I have a brother, a sister, a friend, a colleague who had a stable cancer, just got their third shot and their stable cancer. Usually an oncologist could manage that cancer and keep the patient going just fine for five or 10 years. After this third shot, all of a sudden they have what was a stage one cancer located to just one organ. Now it's stage four everywhere. And some people call these turbo cancers or wildfire cancers, and they're scratching their heads trying to figure out, well, gosh, what could be causing this? And I just look and go, are you kidding me? And I could go through many pathologies.

Yeah, and of course, when he was warning about that back in the spring of 2021, Dr. Ryan Cole was saying, because I'm seeing these killer T cells are missing and the people who've had the vaccine, and I personally know two people in that category. Facebook is censoring posts on vaccine harms because they, quote, make people feel unsafe. So this is an article from Daily Skeptic out of the UK. So this morning, a friend published a short post on Facebook drawing attention to how it seemed to him the company was not even bothering anymore to refer to the so-called independent fact checkers to justify their censorship.

He had reposted a clip where Tucker Carlson discussed the negative effectiveness of the vaccines, referring to peer-reviewed studies. And he said there's no reference to the 20-something recent graduates of the censorship agencies, but only this label. Your post goes against our community standards on misinformation about vaccines. We have these standards because misinformation about vaccines can make some people feel unsafe on Facebook. So again, um, so much about this event, the fact that Tucker Carlson talking about, you know,

these things don't work. Well, no, actually they do work. Tucker, they're killing people. There's there, you know,

sterilizing the population. They're crippling people. That's exactly what they were intended to do in my opinion. But again, far more important about than the efficacy is the safety issue but he's not going to go into that because um you know we wouldn't want to identify your sponsors as murderers which they are but it doesn't just make people feel unsafe. It also makes them feel angry. And this is one of the reasons why you've got Chip Roy in Congress

talking and focusing on this amnesty thing. And we should talk about that. We should talk about the fact, you know, these people are trying to exonerate themselves. They want to move on to this so they can go to the next pandemic. And we can't let them get away with this however at the same time why aren't the people why isn't fox news why isn't uh the republicans in congress even the best of them why aren't they talking about stopping this because people are still dying i'm gonna go ahead i'm gonna move a little bit out of order i'm gonna offer a few

thoughts to set the stage here i was gonna do after'm going to move a little bit out of order. I'm going to offer a few thoughts to set the stage here. I was going to do after remarks basically to buy a little bit of time for Jay. And then I'm going to turn it over to Dr. For the first time in American history, public health bureaucrats ground the strongest economy in the world to a halt, shut down businesses they deemed, quote, non-essential, and forced an initial 14 million people out of work. They then demanded, and Congress provided, $5 trillion in spending to try to save what they had broken. They masked up our healthy children, kept them from going to school, forced them out of playgrounds and off athletic fields and from walking across the stage at graduation, and in so doing set them academically back a generation. They prevented us from attending church, from even attending funerals. They prevented us from going to public parks, getting fresh air and exercising. They forced the elderly to die alone in hospitals and nursing homes

with no loved ones at their side. They forced the elderly to die alone in hospitals and nursing homes with no loved ones at their side. They forced fathers out of delivery rooms, separated from mothers and labor with their own children. They forced Americans, including our military, our border patrol, our nurses and first responders, to choose between losing their paycheck and taking a vaccine. Okay, and there joining him on that. Deus was Matt gets Gates, um, Marjorie Taylor green, Thomas Massey.

Thomas Massey was the only one in Congress who voted against, um, trillions of dollars said, you know, let people go back to their lives. And for that, uh, an angry Trump in 2020 said,

we're going to get him out of office yeah he was the only one who said to do the right thing so we look at this and is the problem the fact that you got some people talking about amnesty yeah we don't want to give them amnesty we don't want to have amnesia about what happened but we've got to stop the murders. And we have to stop the censorship because that is what is facilitating the murders. And so going back again to this Daily Skeptic article, it says, how on earth can peer-reviewed results that Facebook flagged and removed, how can peer-reviewed results constitute misinformation? The peer-reviewing process is not perfect, far from it, but after all, it is the accepted standard.

A first conclusion, therefore, is that the word misinformation does not refer to misinformation anymore. It simply refers to any information the censor wants suppressed, and the word has become meaningless. Oh yeah, we've been saying that for quite some time. But it is that ability to censor and to have a single narrative that is at the heart of this. And it is also something that the GOP has been unable or unwilling to really adequately address. And so to say that people are unsafe is something that is very different than saying, we don't want you to have them feel unsafe. No, it is very unsafe. These vaccines are very unsafe.

All of these things that they've been doing to people are very unsafe. The medical community has been killing people with the vaccines, with the ventilators, the rest of this stuff. That is what is unsafe. And that is what you're not allowed to talk about. And they want these people to have a false sense of security, of trust. They drive them with censorship and a monopolistic narrative. They drive them to fear. And the fear drives them into the arms of these killers. That's what they need to address.

Instead, they will talk about things like, well, let's talk about the Wuhan lab, and let's talk about Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function stuff, and let's talk about this and that. They will not talk about what the issue is. UK government has clarified that the vaccine injured can sue manufacturers, even though they hastily put in an update in August of 2021.

Amendments made to the human medicines regulations of 2012 were made according to the UK government. Although the legislation provides partial immunity from civil liability for vaccines, they said we are still going to give you some money. It preserves individuals' rights to sue. And so they point out that in the UK, if you say that you were injured,

you can get a payment, a £120,000 lump sum one-off payment. But it's not designed to cover lifetime costs. The people who certainly is not much compensation for the family of somebody who's died, but it certainly doesn't help when somebody is crippled for life, as many are with this. And so because of that, the UK government is coming back and saying, well, we've indemnified and protected Pfizer and Moderna and AstraZeneca from any financial liability. Because if you sue them, we didn't take away your ability to sue, but if you sue them, the government, meaning the taxpayers, will foot the bill. So again, the corporations don't have to pay anything, but the

taxpayers are saying, well, they said, even though the COVID vaccines have been developed at a pace rushed. In other words, at no stage of development has safety been bypassed. Vaccines have been satisfied and full all of the necessary requirements for safety, effectiveness, and quality. All of that is a lie. They skipped everything. They didn't do it. And that's why they're trying to cover this up for 65 years.

That's why they redacted all this stuff. Because they didn't do any of the standards. And again, it would take decades for them to go through this. That's what Fauci and his co-conspirators were talking about. Pfizer and Moderna are now going to investigate their own vaccines for myocarditis risk. Why are they doing that now? If they followed all the safety procedures, as the UK government says, as Trump says, as the FDA has said, CDC, all the rest of these people, the media, they did everything they needed to do.

Well, then why are Moderna and Pfizer going back to investigate their own vaccines at this point? And again, I think this is simply about them trying to get out ahead of this massive wave that is coming at them. I think they're doing this to say, hey, mistakes were made. It was a complicated situation. I just now noticed something that I didn't see before. I was doing due diligence. I was diligently trying to examine the safety of these things and the efficacy of them, and I just now realized that we got it all wrong.

Mistakes were made. Nobody's bad. We've got laws to protect us. So let's move on. I think they're doing this because they're worried about the exposure they have for fraud, for criminal fraud. Before the year 2020, the average vaccine was tested and retested by pharmaceutical companies and the FDA for 10 to 15 years before it could be released to the public. This was done not only because testing is a complex process with a lot of red tape involved, but because it's also the only way to discover any long-term side effects. And because you can't do challenge tests on vaccines, and the purpose of a vaccine is not to cure something, right? It's a different process for the testing of a therapeutic

that is meant to ameliorate or heal something than it is for a vaccine that is meant to keep you from getting something. And so it was even more imperative for vaccines because they couldn't directly expose somebody, challenge them, expose them to a disease because half the people were going to have been given a placebo, and you would know that you were going to give them whatever you were exposing them to.

So they would just have the two groups mill around for several years and see what happens. So absolutely essential that it runs for many years. Suddenly, though, after 2020 and the advent of public activism against the COVID mandates, a host of medical professionals and bureaucrats began arguing that the mRNA vaccines do not need the same lengthy testing timeframe. Because government funding allowed for everything to be accomplished much faster. This is a lie. You know, it's another one of these financial things.

All right. Well, I'm running over time here. Um, I want to, uh, connect up with, um, uh, goat tree. And, uh, before we, uh, stop here, uh, Jacqueline Hogan, uh, left some more information about Janice Bowling. I'll have to take a look. She's a Tennessee state senator who's been fighting for medical freedom, protecting children from jabs and genital mutilation. Bill Lee is a rhino.

I'll take a look at that. Thank you very much. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. And we'll have Goat Tree joining us. You're listening to The David Knight Show. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavid David Knight show.com. All right. Welcome back. And joining us now is goat tree. We haven't had goat tree on for a while. I contacted him. He'd been sick. And, uh, so, um, you're feeling us now is Goat Tree. We haven't had Goat Tree on for a while. I contacted him. He had been sick, and so you're feeling better now?

Are you doing good? Oh, yeah. Yeah, I had kind of a rough winter thanks to Uncle Sugar. Well, we won't go into that, but I know what you would suspect, but I'm glad you're feeling better. And we talked about this and you said, yeah, I'd like to talk a little bit about what's going on with FTX. You're very much involved in the computer business, crypto and other things like that. You were telling me as we were connecting off air, you said this is looking more political than technical. What are you seeing in all of this?

Well, I, you know, when we spoke, I said, let's look at the technical aspects of this. Well, technically, this is kindergarten level technology and scam. So I said, I can't put this on David's show. Let's go dig around and see what I can find. And I got into their bankruptcy filing and the stuff I'm going to be putting out there for you to put your critique on come straight off their bankruptcy file. Oh,

that's interesting. Oh yeah. And it's, uh, well, I talked about it the other day. I talked about the, the family ties and the political ties that, you know, Bankman, I keep calling him Bankman Fried,

because he likes to call himself, it's kind of like Frankenstein, Frankenstein, he calls himself freed, but he isn't going to be freed. He shouldn't be freed. Elon Musk thinks that he'll be freed because he's got so many political connections, but he should be freed. Uh, Elon Musk thinks that he'll be freed because he's got so many political connections, but he should be fried. Yeah. You know, I was talking to a friend earlier and, uh, I said, Nikki, how am I going to kick over this bucket of, uh, extra money?

So I'm just going to put it out to what you have at it. Sure. Go ahead. Tell us what you know. What'd you say? Well, first off, you know how you were talking to that Ukraine? We got them dead rights on how they're bringing the money back into the country. This is off of a foulings.

This is their disclosure, not mine. So how it starts is Biden or Biden's only one has been proven sending mid billions of dollars to the Ukraine. The Ukrainians then we'll go on and place orders or quote crypto, which really never get executed because technologically I can show why. So at this moment, and this is what we can prove, in the 2022 election, FTX was the second largest Democrat donor.

And they had access to at least $40 million proven, but probably a lot more unproven. So this went to various reelection campaigns, political pockets, who knows why. Okay. That was one thing that, now mind you, Ukraine is a foreign entity. Sure. And what they just did was interfere with elections, I would think. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.

Yeah, it's been an amazing revolving door over the last few years. In the 2020, I'm sorry, 2016 election, you had Alexandria Chalupa of the DNC because that really was what they were doing with Ukraine. And there's so many connections to all these people in the DNC and Ukraine. And some Ukrainians came forward and talked about that. And I interviewed them at the time, some whistleblowers right after that election. We're talking about that. So, yeah, Ukraine has been involved in our elections. Absolutely. And it's not just,

you know, Burisma and these other things that are happening with Biden's it's, it's a direct connections with the DNC in Ukraine and Democrat donors. I can't find any references to the, uh, Republicans or I would drag them out of their hole too, so I'm not being biased. But it gets better. The Ukrainians are really the small players in this because the World Economic Forum, which is also a foreign entity, partnered with FTX, not a passive partner, but they actually partnered with FTX. And when the wheels came off this scam,

the WEF removed all their information, the pages and whatnot, mentioning their FTX partnership. And they forgot about this internet archiving that a big brother put together. So everybody was able to generate the pages. They deleted. Now they have some explaining to do, but this is where this is where the real stink and this mess starts.

FDX declared its goal was to invest a billion. That's what the B billion dollars into the Democrats for the 2024 election. Wow. This is straight off their file. Wow. And yeah, that's what I said. Yeah. So yeah, when you stop and think about the amount of money I mentioned before that in the 2000 election, we had Bush and Gore, right?

Bush had a hundred million total spent on him. That's his personal fundraising and the, you know, what was given to him by Republican organizations and political action committees and all the rest of it. He had $100 million. Gore had $70 million. And Gore was saying he bought the election. He had 50% more money than I did. That was $170. We got six Senate races this time.

The smallest one was more than that. And you go up to Fetterman and Oz, and it was more than that. And you go up to a federal men in Oz and it was more than twice that amount. And now it's, it's not uncommon to have about a billion dollars on these presidential elections, but he was going to put in a billion dollars just on the Democrat side. Total corruption. That's just one.

Yeah. Can you imagine? But, but wait a minute, this is, this is where, where I just had a, a,

a complete mental duh moment is because right now there are 134 affiliates of FTX. I don't know what affiliates mean. Is this partners? Yeah, I don't either. I don't know what that is. Well, there's 134 of them that are being used As money mules too Wow

Well, they've already had one Was it Solana, I think Bit the Dust Because of its connections To FTX So I don't know, are these affiliates going to be that type of thing? I don't know It could be

I mean, you know i i was i i was trying to keep it just what what's revealed i mean i'm not trying to add some hype and i'm not trying to speculate this is just the stuff that was i was uncovering by their own admission are the bankruptcy filing yes part of bankruptcy filing, the lawyers are now saying there's going to be more than 1 million creditors. Well, that ought to keep the bankruptcy court busy for a while. That's all these people that were putting their money into this exchange on good faith. And I'm sure there's some athletes like Tom Brady. He's into it up to his eyeballs.

I'm sure that there's some actors mattresses that were also promoting this that are going to want to get paid. And, uh, I'm like, we'll give them the Solera coins. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I saw interviews. I saw interviews with,

uh, Sam Bankman fried. Uh, and I was not impressed with the guy at all. And, you know, interestingly enough, neither was Elon Musk.

He was, uh, he said he was approached, uh, and he had, uh, his banker said, Hey,

you know, this guy, uh, SBF will call him call him, that he's interested. He's very much like you. He's a genius and self-starter and all the rest of this stuff. And he'd like to pony up at least $3 billion, said the banker. And so Musk said, does he even have $3 billion worth of liquid assets? No, he's into you.

I do believe you'll like him. He's an ultra genius. He's a doer. He's a builder like your formula. He built this all from scratch after he did physics at MIT and all the rest of the stuff. And so Musk said, nah. He says, because the banker said, yeah, he thinks that he can engineer a blockchain version of Twitter. Musk said, a blockchain Twitter isn't possible. And he says, I'm not interested in even talking to him because I don't want to get into a laborious blockchain debate with him.

So he said, he set off my BS alarms. But he's also said he's not going to go to jail because he's too politically connected. And I think that is absolutely, Musk knows that because Musk is politically connected. He knows how all that stuff works as well. And so I don't think anything's going to wind up being held harmless, just like Hunter Biden. Well, I'll tell you,

uh, this Sam Bankman, I'm calling him Sam Bankman Fetterman. That's how impressed I am with Bankman Fetterman. Yeah. Okay. It's a impressed I am with him. Binkman Fetterman, yeah. Okay. Yeah. It's a stroke of genius, right?

Yeah, exactly. One of them got it naturally. The other one got it through a stroke. Yeah. Well, what do you think about that? Elon Musk, here's a technical thing for you, Goat Tree. Because I don't know about the blockchain thing. I'd seen this floated around when people were talking about Elon Musk, here's a technical thing for you, Goat Tree, because I don't know about the blockchain thing. I'd seen this floated around when people were talking about Elon Musk

trying to put it together, talking about how he got into this. Somebody had put it out about, well, we could do a blockchain version of Twitter. He got excited about that, and that was debunked by some other people. What is your thinking on this? Is that something that's impossible? Well, you know, we get into that. Is it a processing speed thing or something like that, user interface? Is that the limiting thing or something?

Well, yes and no, because you could. The blockchain runs off of miners and things like that. That's computers that sit there and actually crunch each transaction or each thing that is said. If you want to tweet and it was on the blockchain, it would have to go through a miner. How do you compensate the miners? Because they're blowing huge amounts of electricity for each transaction. I'm going to call it transaction just for the simplicity of it. So the amount of mining in order to generate the traffic of a Twitter

would have these green peas or the green people in meltdown mode because of the amount of electricity used, it would literally crash the grid, take that much mining to power a blockchain like that. Does that make sense? Oh yeah. Yeah, exactly. That was my understanding of it. That's one of the reasons why it set off all my my bs alarms when i heard steve pachinik

talking about a blockchain watermark ballot and it's like are you kidding that's not even a thing and it couldn't be a thing because uh of what you just described there i don't have the processing power let's let's not get into pachinik you've already learned your lesson i know i know yeah it was funny because you know talking about the tens of thousands of troops that he claimed were already canvassing the country. It's like, I think you would know, I think you would know if that was going to happen.

Uh, people would be talking about that because, uh, far less. And they were talking about it, but getting back to this, um, so,

uh, yeah, Solana is the first victim. Uh, they had, um, uh, they lost about five and a half billion dollars in market value. victim, uh, they had, um, uh, they lost about five and a half

billion dollars in market value and, uh, it looks like they're going to lose the rest of it. Um, what kind of fallout are you saying? Well, let, let, before we get into that though, let's continue with these different connections because you talked about the world economic forum. And, um, and I pointed out that, uh, Sam's aunt, uh, was also a World Economic Forum member as well. So he's got a lot of connections. He's got connections, deep, deep connections to the Democrats, deep, deep connections to Davos, deep connections to Ukraine.

People have alleged that it looks suspiciously like, as you were talking about, you know, potential money laundering going on. He was collecting money for Ukraine and then supposedly sending money to Ukraine, although nobody ever knows what happens to the money after you send it into that Ukrainian black hole. What happens to the weapons? We don't know about that either. Haven't known about that for the last eight years, but they keep upping the ante and all that stuff. So there's all these different, the usual suspects, right? Democrats, Ukraine, Davos, anything else you uncovered? Well, yeah, actually there's been a lot going on that looks really suspicious.

But the point I'm trying to make is all these politicians are saying that cryptocurrency is what criminals use. Yes. It appears the biggest criminals of the mall have embraced this. So, okay. You spoke of this missile strike in Poland yesterday. What's that a way to change the subject off of this? Yeah, exactly.

Yeah. They would know that criminals use it because that's they're the biggest criminals out there and they know exactly what they're doing but it is a way you know they're trying to demonize this interestingly enough um one of the reports that i saw said that fdx did not have a lot just like they did have a lot of solana they didn't have a lot of bitcoin so i said bitcoin was not going to be dumped uh in all this and They didn't have a lot of Bitcoin. So I said, Bitcoin was not going to be dumped in all of this. And they didn't have any David. Yeah.

Yeah. They, they, they were operating like a bank. I mean, uh, the us banks, they don't have tax in their vaults. Yeah. They've got called out. They would run off, run out and buy it off the open market. So you see that was why this went down this if you i mean i didn't want to get into tech because i don't think we're going to have time uh and also i want to point this out too first we had the missile

strike yesterday and then if that wasn't enough we had a the biggest DDoS attack ever seen, taking down Rumble and some other alternate media sites last night. Oh, I didn't know that. Yes. Oh, wow. I didn't know Rumble went down. Yeah, this is, and I'm sitting here like, why are we slinging missiles around,, why are we, uh, slinging missiles around and

why are we, you know, doc, doc thing, uh, these free speech sites. I don't know. Uh, I'm just saying it really doesn't look copacetic and you've got people talking nuclear war, wait a minute. That's a great way to change the subject. I pretty much likes all the oxygen out of the room and many other things. Back to the crypto aspect. I don't know if we have time to get into it, but have you ever seen these

online, uh, stock simulators where you are given a fake million dollars and you go buy trade stock on real time. Yeah. Okay. Well, that's what they enacted with this, uh, uh, FTX. It was just a simulator. You put your money in and you think you bought a Bitcoin or whatever, and, uh, they would give you the money, uh, 10 different ways. If you put a thousand dollars in, you had a hundred dollars supplied to your account.

Another 900 went to who knows where his girlfriend's Bahamas account. Uh, yeah, that's where he retreated to. Well, you know, that's interesting because I think there's just so many scams out there. All these derivatives, what you're kind of talking about is kind of a, you know, it's a Ponzi scheme. You could call it a derivative. I think when you look at what is going on with paper gold and paper silver that's coming out of the Shanghai Gold Exchange, I don't believe there's anything there either. You know, people thought that there were assets that were there at FTX, but it was just a mirage. And I think we're going to find

that and it's going to be very disruptive. That's why I don't like to, you know, I don't have any paper gold or silver anymore. I just get the real stuff from Tony. DavidKnight.gold, there you go. There's a plug. Go there and get the real stuff because I think we're going to have some kind of a, once people start looking, they fall back to gold and all these other currencies are disappearing. I think they're going to find that there's nothing there on those paper

exchanges, those gold and silver paper exchanges. Well, this is kind of a side note, but if you think about it, in 1971 when we went off the gold exchange, gold was $35 an ounce. And gold did not... Let me put it this way. Gold did not change its valuation. What happened was the fiat currency

has been devalued. And every time the fiat currency is devalued, gold and silver goes up due to the free market. But back before 1971, you had no free market input in it and all that money that was sitting in vaults or say money not money but gold and silver went someplace it didn't just disappear yeah that's right so what I think is that they're going to devalue this money to the point where it's a lot Confederate money.

Uh, you know, you can line your walls with it and use it as insulation. Uh, when that happens, these countries that were holding $35 gold and, you know, $1 silver, they're going to come up with the same idea Trump did and say, hey, let's go back to the gold and silver market or backing. The kicker to that is you take the free market out of it, who sets the price? That's right. Well, naturally, it's the government, and people won't question it. So they can say, well, we've determined gold is worth $50,000 an ounce,

so you have to give us $50,000 current fiat dollars in order to get one gold dollar back. Mm-hmm. And people will go along with it. They'll go, oh, okay, gold's now worth $50,000 an ounce, $5,000, whatever they value. I agree. And here, take my worthless fiat money. And if you're sitting there with gold and silver ahead of time, you're the beneficiary of the government reevaluating it.

That's right. Yeah, that's right. And, you know, when you look at where they're going, it's pretty clear that they're doing everything they can to deliberately crash the currency. The thing that really concerns had every government agency on one of four different aspects of the cryptocurrency. And is it your take in terms of looking at that versus regular crypto? One of the four areas, besides redesigning the financial system and designing the technical way that's going to work and having law enforcement there. The other part of that, that Biden had, uh, his agencies looking at the fourth component of that was environmentalism.

Are they going to, we're talking about the, um, the mining and the power usage. When we're talking about blockchain, is that the way they're going to try to push out, uh, uh, Bitcoin competition? I'm so glad you brought that up. I mean, this was a note that I had made and it blew my mind. Uh, you know, they started these ESG ratings, which is environmental, social, and governance trading corporations. Mysteriously enough, FTX got an ESG rating higher than Exxon mobile.

Yeah. That was in the filing. I'm like, seriously, the company hasn't been around, but just two or three years. How did they manage that? I'll tell you how they managed it. They got their names on football stadiums. They got their logos on major league umpires uniforms. I mean, they're, they're a pillar, pillar citizen of the U S government. Yeah.

You know? Oh yeah. It's a Ponzi scheme and political influence buying, uh, uh, for the ages. I mean, this, this is bringing in so many different corrupt, uh, angles all at once. And this one thing, 29 year old guy doing all this stuff. I mean, this guy is a record book criminal. It's amazing. Well, he was, he was the golden child of, uh, uh, cryptocurrency. Just ask world economic form. Yeah. Yeah, that's right. And the thing is the world economic form, I'm quite convinced this was a trial balloon. Uh, they really want to push in a global coin.

And I do believe that's why they partnered up with this guy and the wheels came off of it. And they found out that old Samuel Bank Betterman, uh, wasn't all that they thought. Yeah. Which was pretty obvious from the start. Well, Zuckerberg made his move to try to do that. He offered them Libra, you know, and in his white paper he said, hey, this could serve as a global ID for everybody. But they rejected him.

And I still think that's a big part of what his metaverse stuff is about. You know, if you got people pushed in the metaverse that gets you, you know, has them under your control to a large degree, but it also, how are you going to buy stuff? How are you going to pay for it? Well, I've got this Libra coin here, which they didn't want to voluntarily go in, but maybe I can establish it as the de facto standard, even though they won't make it the standard by declaration. Maybe I can make it the de facto standard. So I think they're all making their move to try to get to that one ID that's going to rule us all. You know, it's like this Saron plan, you know?

Yeah. Well, do you remember the old AOL? Yeah. Oh yeah. America online. Okay. Yes. It was the first meta universe you know you got on aol and you

thought you were on the internet no you were in their own metaverse and then you had to exit it to go on to the internet so that's uh that's what uh uh z Zuckerberg seems to be replicating. I'm not impressed by it. I mean, I'm not going to touch it. Yeah, nobody is impressed by it. He's seen a lot of market value evaporate. Let me ask you this about the CBDC

because I get the feeling that they're going to try to force this thing on us very rapidly at some point. Can it be piggybacked? Several people have talked about it being piggybacked on Ethereum. Do you see that as a likelihood? Yeah. All they do is spin off coins with Ethereum.

Basically, let's just take AT&T, for example. You remember when they got broke up and then they spun off like six or seven different companies? Right. Baby bells. They don't have to. The baby bells, yeah. Well, they don't have to break up Ethereum, but they can just spin off all these coins. So, yeah, that could easily happen.

So they could do that very rapidly uh because every country has got something in the works now i talked about this i'd like to get your take on it in nigeria uh they rolled out a um a cbdc and it was a total failure instead you know they had a fairly good adoption of bitcoin but when they put in the cbdc people said no and the adoption of bitcoin soared it was the cbdc was driving people to bitcoin and uh so that was an interesting experiment and i think when they look at that i think their takeaway is going to be well if we have both of those side by side, uh, we're going to lose. So I would imagine that they're going to go around with, uh, you know, uh, truncheons and, uh, and beat up the miners or something.

What do you think? Well, do we have time for a story? Sure. Okay. It's sort of a long one. Back in, uh, 2009, I remember this just like it was yesterday. Back in the summer of 2009, I had an employee that was looking at some of these exploits that were going on at the time, and he comes walking into my office and he says, boss, I need to buy $300 worth of Bitcoin.

I'm like, what's Bitcoin? He said, well, I don't really know how to describe it, but it's kind of like cash that gamers and hackers are using. I'm like, okay, well, that doesn't make sense. He said, they're like tokens. I'm like, bus tokens? No, digital tokens. So I told John, I said, well, if that's what we need, okay.

I gave him like $300 and he went and bought, I don't know, 150, 200 Bitcoin and went and bought the exploits off the dark web and the year goes by and we got audited. i'm looking at the audits and

here's in the range of ten thousand dollars for bitcoin that we had purchased buying all these exploits and whatever tools that we needed off the dark web and i'm sitting here thinking how the hell am i going to explain these expenses to my board of directors? You know, what's a Bitcoin? I'm not sure, but they're a token. What kind of token? I don't know. That's interesting.

But it gets even more interesting. That was back when Bitcoin was used as a currency. Bitcoin's no longer used as a currency. Bitcoin's no longer used as a currency for a bunch of reasons. Once again, Elon brings it up, the speed of the blockchain. It's simply not there.

And people have made so much and lost so much money on Bitcoin, they don't use it as currency because I go back to the summer of 2009. We had one of our hacker laptops. That was the node. I mean, we've had actual Bitcoin node, not none of these, uh, uh, was being wallets.

And, uh, our hacker computers, what we did was we would go down to the local pawn shop and buy a hacker computer. Well, by that, I mean it was pre-owned. We'd buy it for $25, $50 and if someone blew it up, we didn't care. We'd go buy another one. So we had all this on one of our hacker machines and finally one day Uh, so we had all this on a, uh, uh, one of our hacker machines. And finally, one day, uh, we were using it and the bad guys got us and they blew the machine up, you know, blue screen or death breaking it.

And we had about, I don't know, 125, 130 Bitcoin sitting in the wallet that it was owned and it was gone. So I think back and we were using it as currency. Well, I think back on it, $10,000 worth of Bitcoin in 2009, probably 2,500, 3,000 Bitcoin. And that's what we were using it as currency. Yeah. Well, when it ran up to $69,000, I'm sitting there like, you know, I must be the most stupid person in the world because we were using it as currency. And that equal to about three or $400 million that we just kind of like blew away using it as currency.

Yeah. Yeah. Like some people are buying coffee with it. Yeah. Yeah. Hey, aren't you glad you got your $69,000 cup of coffee? That's right. But the thing is, even if you're standing there buying your coffee with a Bitcoin, speed's not there.

So you're going to be standing there for a good five minutes trying to pay for your coffee. You've got everybody backed up behind you. You're standing there smiling and looking at the barista and waiting on the Bitcoin transaction to happen. That might be a good thing, though, when it comes to the competition between CBDC and Bitcoin, because the vast majority of people are going to want the speed of a transaction and the CBDCs are not going to be proof of work. It's just going to be another fiat currency, you know, uh, proof of authority. I'm, I'm the one who says this is worth this. And I'm, I clear the transaction and, and so forth. so they'll be able to process the cbdc transactions quickly a lot of people will go that route the people who want to have privacy

you know they'll they'll go the bitcoin route so that that might buy us a little bit of time before they try to come around with rubber hoses and beat it out of everybody right okay but once again now we go back into hacker mood who who's developing the wallets. Yeah, that's true. Yeah. And how many back doors are they putting in these wallets? And if, uh, let's say uncle sugar and his IRS, uh, crew comes knocking and they say, we do not like this. We're going to audit here, shut it down.

All they do is flip switch. Say, okay, no more C C B D C coins. And everybody that has. Cooling from that, uh, in those wallets, they're going to be having the next FTX or Mount docs or whatever. And I think that I've said many times, I think that's what this, uh, 80,000 IRS agents in this massive increase in the IRS is all times, I think that's what this 80,000 IRS agents and this massive increase in the IRS is all about. I think that's preparation for their move, you know, forcing everybody into CBDC, auditing crypto assets, but any other kind of asset, you know, to basically do the great reset.

What do you think? That's one of the avenues of i think the world economic forum is competing against them and they're looking and investing in the various aspects of it to introduce uh uh one of the global coins who needs to have a uh u.s digital dollar when you can have a world global coin. So you've got a lot of people competing on top shelf level ratings. And they're kind of competing with each other on the, on the IDs, you know, all the IDs are brought in the vaccine ID and all the rest of this stuff. You know, Davos had their, uh, their common pass and, uh, all the rest of the stuff.

And now Europe has got its European EU pass or whatever they call it. Uh, so you've got these different. Uh, you know, every one of these, uh, large globalist, uh, political organizations has got its own, uh, scheme for how to track and control our movement. Uh, they're going to wind up, I think initially we're going to wind up with, um, you know, a couple of dozen, uh, big coin digital, uh, CBDCs, and then they will fight it out amongst themselves as to, you know, which one of the, uh, ring race is going to have the, the, the ring of power, right?

Yeah. You've got the Chinese yuan competing against the world economic form coin competing against the U S digital dollar competing against the North Korean dones or whatever. I mean, it's, it's, it's crazy. Uh, but remember it's only criminals that use cryptocurrency right now. Yeah, that's right right now. That's what it's made. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, so what do you think in terms of this FTX thing?

I mean, do you agree with Elon Musk that they're going to give this guy a pass or is this going to be so big because so many people are involved in this and a lot of very wealthy people have lost a lot of money? How do you see this breaking? Which way is it going to go? People have lost a lot of money. You know, how do you see this, um, breaking, you know, which way is it going to go? Uh, either he's going to take his $2 billion and dig a very deep hole and hide, or he's going to end up like, uh, uh, our old friend, uh, uh, John McAfee or, uh, possibly it was a guy that

found himself with the toilet paper. Epstein. What's the toilet paper. I thought it was a supposedly a sheet that he leaned away from his bed. Oh, it may have been. I mean, I heard so many stories about it, but I'm like, yeah, you know, they've never, they still, our friend, uh, McAfee, uh, his, his wife says that, uh, they've never been able to see the body here.

We are over a year after all this stuff. She hasn't been able to see the body. Uh, yeah. Very thin sheet. Uh, says my son, very, very thin sheet of, uh, maybe toilet paper or of cotton. Who knows? Yeah. Nobody really got the true story on it, but I expect though, Sam

Bankman better men to, uh, really be sweating things. And you know, he's in the Bahamas right now. And that was another interesting aspect of it. And this was also this disclosed and let me see, let me find it on my notes because this one's a mind blower. I just cut and pasted straight out of their disclosed information. Okay, here it is. FDX allowed withdrawals for Bohemian users, saying it

was required by the regulators. This created a black market for Bahamian user attendance. Well, everybody knows that Bahamas is one of the biggest offshore generators in the world. You need small-shore banking done, It's one of the, the, the, the places to go. Right. And then interestingly enough,

the Bahamian regulator said, uh, the Bahamian regulator said, no, we did not tell you that. So they open up one country. To move all their ill gotten gains out into Bahamas, which Sam Bankman Fetterman, from my understanding has Bahamian citizenship.

So, you know, I can't say that for sure, but, uh, is he buying some protection there is the question and one of the other things too I immediately thought of you Goat Tree because some people were saying yeah he set this all up with he had his own special back door where he could get in there and do things without anybody

seeing it and that's one of the reasons why all this money disappeared and went down to the Bahamas in the first place. Right I mean everything now it's just, you might as well accept that everything has backdoors in it. I mean, you know, I was, you know, we go back to this exploit that, what was it? Microsoft Intel and the other big tech guys were pushing. I forget what they call it. They were putting back doors and Intel chips and.

Microsoft. So they could all get together and open the back doors and do whatever it is they do. Well, they do have also put together a coalition to keep us from uploading anything. You know, it's the, uh, CCPA, they call it a coalition for content provenance and Authentication. So they can stop us from ever getting anything even up.

They don't have to go around after the fact and say, oh, take this down. You won't even upload it if you're identified as a persona non grata, right? They'll just stop you from uploading anything. Yeah. Which goes back to all these, uh, ratings like the ESG rating that, uh, these guys had. I mean, who determines the environmental, social and governance rate? I mean, who does that? Yeah. Yeah. And who, yeah.

Who do you, who do you pay off? You know, who gets all the carbon taxes that we pay? Right. So go into Al Gore's pocket, you know, they've got these different things that they set up. Nobody ever asked. So where's this going to go? Is it going to go to the UN? Is it going to go to Al Gore?

Who gets that stuff? Is it go to black rock? No one would ask if they wake up one morning and the government says, okay, we've, uh, we decided that a gold for $10,000 an ounce and a exchange, your old fiat currency. No, one's going to question that. They're just going to go, Oh, okay. How do I do that? Yeah.

Just like they didn't question anything when they were told to put masks on, you know, and not only that, but not even didn't even pretend to make it a medical mask, it's just, you know, put on your handkerchief or something around your face, like, yeah, I like the ones that were wearing socks i mean boy you know they had a good time if they were using their old smelly socks with the mask no one questions that oh okay i don't want to get the get the covid i don't want to catch the rona that's right but uh no one asked these questions it's like's like, and I've noticed since these vaccines, it seems like people are in retrograde.

You know, they don't ask these questions. They just, Oh, okay. And I, I mean, I think it's a legitimate question.

Who decides the governmental, social and governance ratings? Yeah, that's right. Nobody can tell you, but somebody does. Us as people, we are going to be given environmental, social, and governance ratings too. And I expect ours is probably going to be pretty low when it comes to governance. And social.

Yeah, definitely. And environmental. I'm doing my best to use energy as much as I can. Yeah, and they're going to, they've already announced that you've got some of the bigger banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America, you know, the ones that are too big to fail, too big to fail, right? They've already said they're going to make loans at a different rate to people based on their esg rating so there

you go that's how they mean like the insurance companies are doing the what insurance companies what are they doing yeah so they've already do that you know i went to uh get get car insurance renewed it went up and i said why and they go with your. I said, I don't use credit. They go, we know they raised my rates because I don't use credit. They're pulling my credit rating. Close. Uh, my attitude is, uh, I'm a hacker, you know, I ain't got money in my pocket. I'm not going to buy it. And, uh, if I want it bad enough, I'm going to have something.

Yeah. Don't tell anybody that, but you know, as far as credit goes, no. So they're already doing that. It's really easy to roll into other aspects of life. Yes. I guess ESG ratings. Well, the bankers have us over, over a barrel. You know, they do that. The thing I think is most heinous that they do is to look at people who are having financial struggles uh if they see that you got a lot of medical expenses they will decrease your credit rating even if you don't have even if you're not behind you know so i've

seen many stories of people who are struggling with an unexpected big medical bill and they're paying it but they go back in and raise the interest rate on their credit card to make sure they can't pay it. I mean, it's just, it's predatory beyond belief what they're doing. The interest rates and even the interest rates are now way beyond what used to be illegal for anybody to do. You know, they put people in the mob in jail for these types of usury rates, but now they can go in and have been for quite some time changing, making the rates even higher if you get into some financial difficulty, just to make sure they wipe you out, it's absolutely criminal.

Well, the beauty of FTX is you hit a phone. One of those banks has got there. That may go down over this FTX thing, but FDX model was based exactly on American banking. Let's say you've got $200,000 in a bank. It's not in the bank. If you walked in there and said, I want to draw $100,000 out in cash, they're going to say, they're personally going to try to talk you out of it. And if you persist, they're going to push a stack of papers out there to you and tell you, fill it out. Once you've filled it all out and push it back to them,

they say, come back tomorrow, come back next day, come back three days from now. The armored car drops your bundle of bills off. Well, that's what FTX was doing. It was all a simulation program. So when you got ready to either take your coins or your cash out or whatever they would tell you okay well you've got to wait 24 hours and two hours whatever and they'd go out there and either liquidate cash or buy the coins and on the due date you can pull it out. So everybody's thinking, well, this is all copacetic. Uh, there's no problems here.

They're legit. And they were using the American banking model, you know? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. My son said, yeah, a fractional reserve crypto system. That's exactly what it is. Uh, yeah.

Fargo. Well, Fargo is top dead rights right now. Oh, there's a what it is. But you said Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo is caught dead right right now. Oh, they're a whole different story. They've been caught dead right laundering cartel men. That's known. Oh, like HSBC. Yes. Well, they are the new HSBC.

Well, these geniuses are taking this cartel stuff and they were putting it in the FTX. Hmm. And doing the transfers like the Ukraine was doing. Oh, okay. So who knows how much money the bad guys have lost and it would suck to be a Wells Fargo employee right now. Yeah. It's like a Bezos just gave a hundred million dollars to Dolly Parton. Right. And the,

and then his Amazon employees, 10,000 of them got the pink slip. You know, you're out of here. There was somebody commented on it and said, so what is a Dolly Parton going to do with that a hundred million dollars? She's going to donate to charity. Is there a charity for Amazon employees who have to pee in a bottle because

they're so hard pressed that if they go to the bathroom and take that amount of time, they're going to get fired. Uh, but, uh, yeah, 10,000 of them evidently took too long to go to the bathroom or something they're going to get Amazon plantation. All that we need to do is get out there and what BESOS needs to do is have his, uh, employees singing old spiritual songs, blabbing the place up all this slave away, pork barrel or something. He'd have to give him a pork barrel occasionally, you know, some kind of,

and he doesn't want to do that. Yeah. I mean, and then they lecture us about slavery yeah right you know yeah that's why they do it because they don't want people to see the high-tech slavery that they're forging the chains of right now and to the extent that we're in it yeah i've talked about what was going on in the big iphone city and i said you know isn't it interesting? Go back and look at that 1984 iPhone commercial. And that basically looks like what the iPhone city looks like right now. You know, these people who are caught in this system of slavery.

And now it's even gotten worse with the zero COVID stuff. And the worst thing is... Okay. Thanks, David. We're out of time. I'll get you back. I'll get you back. It's great to have you back, Goatry.

Good talking to you. Thank you. Had a lot of people asking where'll get you back. I'll get you back. It's great to have you back, Goatry. Good talking to you. Had a lot of people asking where you were. So it's good getting you back, and I'm glad you're feeling better. That's it for the show, folks. Thanks for tuning in. Have a good day. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us.

Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com

thank you for listening thank you for sharing if you can't support us financially please keep us in your prayers.