The David Knight Show - 18Dec23 Anniversary of Tea Party and Bill of Rights — But NO Parental Rights in Republican State

Episode Date: December 18, 2023

(2:06) 250th Anniversary of Boston Tea Party was this weekend — take a look at the big celebration. Also, the anniversary of the Bill of Rights — what was the argument of the Constitution's Preamble that led to the Bill of Rights? (31:21) Bill of Rights? Do we even have Parental Rights? This case, in a supposedly conservatives Republican state shows how schools draw kids into the cult of the stateParental Rights vs Children's Rights — UN Agenda Pushed by Courts CPS takes a child from a Christian family who won't play along with the pronouns. The family has lost at every level in state courts, even though there was abuse. USA never signed on to the UN Convention for Rights of the Child, but courts at every level act as if it were law. But here's how you can ensure this NEVER happens to your child… (59:00) Listener comments (1:00:03) Nukey Haley wants to "tweak" laws protecting babies from being ripped apart while alive. At least the merchant of death warmonger is consist — consistently AGAINST life (1:05:00). BBC has "fun" imagining child sacrifice and cannibalism for "Christmas Special". And DailyMail tries to invent a "secret plot" in SCOTUS (dare we call it a "conspiracy") around Roe overturning. Is it because of the new case coming before SCOTUS. And what is the REAL "plot" that mainstream media (and SCOTUS) never investigated in the intrigue surrounding Dobbs? (01:17:39) Mom's abortion pill reversal — her own personal ethics trial (1:25:03) WATCH: Desperate medical tyrants create ad to scare people — that Santa died from Covid. A whole new Pharma version of "Twas Night Before Christmas" (01:28:26) Muslim gang attacks Santa in Germany — "it's OUR country now" (1:29:00) Man attacks and destroys Baphomet — in Iowa State Capitol Building(1:51:55) Is Australian government trying to sneak in Digital ID over the holidays as the Fed Reserve Act was in 1913? (1:56:15) Christmas music — nostalgia, streams — and why no new Christmas songs? (2:09:35) Reuters (and Jerome Powell of the Fed Reserve) want you to believe that inflation has been beaten since it wasn't about the Fed's actions at all. Is this why Costco sold $100M in gold? (2:17:02) "Poisoning the Blood": Is Trump Confessing His Guilt?Mainstream media says Trump is plagiarizing Hitler. But is it really a veiled confession of what he has already done as he describes himself as "Father of the Vaccine"? (2:24:12) A "Rumble in the Jungle" analogy- Who's pulling the "rope-a-dope"? - Why are we pulling punches and just taking jabs? - When will we punch harder and what would that look like? (2:31:48) Now they admit mRNA would NEVER work! But they're saying this to sell an INHALED VACCINE (2:45:55) Clarence the Angel shows takes Gavin Newsom to Florida to see what California would be like if he'd never been born.Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough. You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Want to own part of the airline you flew with on your last vacation?

Or part of the company that makes your favorite triple shot latte with extra foam? What about owning part of a company that one day could send you on a tour of outer space? Now you can. With partial shares from TD Direct Investing, you can own part of your favorite companies. Just pick a stock and decide how much to spend on the share. It's a piece of cake. Learn more at TD.com slash partial shares. TD.

Ready for you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 18th of December, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at the anniversary this last weekend of both the Boston Tea Party and the Bill of Rights. And we're going to ask the question, what rights do we have left? And what is the way that we can respond to this? You know, most people have stopped taking the jabs, but when are we going to fight back with more than just mere jabs at these people? And what does that look like?

We're also going to take a look at how we can abort the abortion pill. And I'm not talking about the Supreme Court decisions going on here. I'm talking about in reality, if somebody has taken it. And what politicians do we need to abort, by the way? You know, back in the day, Rush Limbaugh used to do collar abortions when he was beginning, when he was a bit more edgy. To illustrate the point of what abortion is really about. Well, I think it's time we need to start doing some voter abortions of these people. Beginning with Nuki Haley. We'll be right back. Well, as I said at the beginning here,

we had the Boston Tea Party anniversary was this weekend. They had a big celebration up in Boston, surprisingly. I was really surprised, especially in Boston, that they would have people perhaps perhaps from outside the area, come there to celebrate real American history, not the phony stuff from the New York Times and Nicole Hannah-Jones, if that's her name, you know, the Project 1619 lies that they have out there.

But they had a lot of people that were there. And it was the 250th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. The Associated Press grudgingly covered it. Patriotic mobs and harbored tea dropping returned to Boston on Saturday to commemorate the 250th anniversary. Scheduled reenactment of the throwing of tea leaves. They expected thousands of visitors because I guess they need to have people from outside of Boston to celebrate what this country was about. Here's a local news broadcast. The Boston Harbor being transported back hundreds of years. Saturday marks

the 250th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party and thousands of people are gathering in Boston to celebrate the historic date. Bostonians know their history. Don't try to fluff it off and try to pass something by them. They know the dates. They know the wheres. They know the whys. Some just happened to stumble upon the live reenactment. We didn't exactly know this was happening until just a second ago. This has been awesome. I mean, it's absolutely blown our expectations of today out of the water.

While others make the day a yearly tradition, like Jim Roscoe, who worked for the Boston Tea Party ship in the 80s. This was a big part of my life and a lot of my friends' lives, and we're just happy that it's here and it's thriving and ready to rock. And while the day was steeped in fun, those participating say it's important to remember the significance of the day. People in the Boston Tea Party weren't just destroying tea. They were acting in defense of an idea of liberty. And the American Revolution was about liberty. The value of the tea thrown overboard

is estimated to be about 1.8 million in today's dollars. And this day is considered the single most important event that led up to the American revolution. Yeah. Oh, that's kind of interesting. I don't know if you looked at that report there, of course, the guy that they were, you know, we heard some booze there and you had a guy who's all dressed up. That was a guy who was reading King George the third's order to close the bay. They chaired other narrators who detailed the drafting of the declaration of independence. Did you notice that?

And maybe this is why Michelle Liu, the mayor of Boston, why she had her no white allowed party, right? Because the Boston tea party was all white. Did you notice that? So I guess she figured, well,

she did speak at it. She did actually show up to uh speak to the group and it's pretty amazing what she had to say because it's very hypocritical frankly she says um this reminder for all of us uh not just here in the united states but all over the world all over the world because this is not about about American history. We've got to always focus on globalism, right? She said, we have to remember democracy is an action. Doing what's right, no matter the odds, for our friends, our families, our homes, our future, for our ethnic groups that look like me, she says. Or anybody that doesn't look white.

This is the woman who got busted because her assistant sent out invitations to all of the elected people. She wants to talk about democracy. You know what democracy looks like, Michelle Liu? It looks like people getting elected and not being punished because of the color of their skin. You see, she represents what is truly antithetical to our democracy.

The things that they project onto other people, that is what she projects, that is what the values, the racist values that she has. And so it is doing the right thing for all of our people, not just people who look like you or look like Lou. So the interestingly enough to show good sportsmanship and comedy, the East India Company, which is still in existence, I guess they got so many government subsidies back 250 years ago that they're still riding on the coattails of that.

The East India company is still around and the East India company provided tea for the reenactment. And, um, I don't know if that was just the stuff that they threw in the bay or they actually provided tea for people to drink. Maybe both of them. Again,

it was about the equivalent of about two million dollars today 92 000 pounds of tea you know they were busy weren't they what do you think the biden justice department would do to people like that yeah we know we know that's why there was a revolution and quite frankly you know this is this is the key thing and they want to have another civil war they want to have a revolution they want to have a world war and here in america the key dividing line here is our phony left right divisions and especially the phoniness of fighting over trump fighting against him fighting fighting for him. I said that before January the 6th.

Why fight for this guy? He turned our government over to Fauci. As a matter of fact, I really like the picture that was on. It was on the top of the Daily Skeptic. Is this for real? And it's a video game here. You got these little characters that look kind of like Lego figures. Okay.

And there's four or five Fauci's with a big hypodermic needle. And then there's five. There's five trumps with a red tie and a hypodermic needle in their hands and so these little cartoon characters it's called whack it's a game says yeah uh stop fauci and trump escaping from prison i need to go back and look at this if this is a real game they should be sponsoring this on my my website because i think a lot of people would like to. This is actually a game I might try to take time to play to stop Fauci and Trump escaping from prison, but we got to get them in prison first.

That's the key thing. Yeah, because, you know, when we look at what happened on this revolution, right, the taxation without representation, that was the cry, right? The taxation without representation. That was the cry, right? And yet, what do we have today? We have not just taxation without representation. Certainly, we have that. And we have no protection against excessive fines,

no presumption of innocence, no due process because we turned everything over to an unelected bureaucracy. What's the difference between having an unelected bureaucracy and an unelected king or parliament that you don't get to have a say-so that's a far and distant land and you know when you look at it uh if uh in some places in america you're about geographically nearly as far away as the british were from the american colonists just geographically but certainly ideologically and so we don't just have taxation without representation. We have regulation without representation.

And we even have medication without representation. I don't, you know, government should never be able to force medicate people. Whether you're talking about vaccines, you're talking about dumping something into the water supply for everybody to take. What an idiotic. How does that even pass the sniff test again you know you look at both of these things you're going to put out a radically new vaccine without being tested oh but i should all everybody must take it right no that's a hard no right there you're going to dump fluoride into the water supply well i don't even need to talk to you about the medical safety or efficacy of fluoride in and of itself.

If you're going to dump it into the medical supply, then by definition, it's not going to be safe or effective because you can't control the dosage to make it either safe or effective. And so we have medication without representation because this medication is being done by bureaucrats that you don't get to vote for. And they're telling you that you must do this or you must do that. See, our tyranny is far worse today. It's not just the taxation, but it's also the regulation, the medication, and so many other things that they're doing without representation. And Michelle Wu says that this is about democracy in action. She's selling you a bill of goods.

By the way, you know, when you go back and you look at the population at that time, take a look at, here's the 13 colonies, and this is population density. And so they have it in the light blue, it's two to 15 people per square mile. Uh, and the little bit darker blue, the medium color blue, it's 15 to 40 people. And then the really dark blue areas, it's 40 and over. And that'd be places like New York and Boston and things like that at the time in 1775 now this is of course not going to really change um they didn't have biden as president so there wasn't

a mass immigration that's going to add a lot of people there were two and a half million people in the united states in 1775 and we look at the population density and you think about this. I looked at it in Austin, Texas, where we used to live. Population density there, 3,100 people per square mile. When I talk about smart cities and mega cities and all the rest of this stuff, well, that's going to be even worse.

But we're pretty far along the way. 3,100 people per square mile. Whereas in the most populated areas like New York and Boston, you had maybe about 40 people per square mile 250 years ago. Even in an area where we are, out in rural areas of Tennessee and that type of thing, you know, and again, in Austin, Texas, 3,100 people per square mile. Here, it's about 160.

Nevertheless, when you look at that compared to the biggest cities at the time, population densities four times what the biggest cities were. This is a big part of our problem because cities are a problem. I know they tell you just the opposite. The CEO of Lyft was, surprise, surprise, an urban planner.

And I will never forget, I saved the essay that he did. He said, cars are the worst invention of mankind and cities are the best invention of mankind. I said, boy, is that not an inversion of the truth? You see, cars allowed people to escape the cities because people have always hated cities jefferson said cities are a threat to the health the wealth and the liberty of man they've always been that way uh dirty places you know people bossing you around and uh you know taking your freedom and so it's always been that way. And so when people got cars, you know, you had what they called urban flight.

Why did you have urban flight? It was a natural response to what people wanted. People don't like living in cities. They demand that we get packed into much higher concentrations of cities now. But we don't like that. And as an urban planner, he didn't like that either. He loves cities because he loves planning your life and controlling your life for you. And so, um, the, uh, the car companies like Lyft and Uber have always been about taking away your ability

to flee the city and to trap you in these open air prisons prisons. And he made no bones about it. But, you know, when we look at now, there was an article this week, and I didn't print it out to talk about it, but, you know, it's talking about the donut. And he said, what is happening? You know, we got the donut. It's nothing new. It's just some new thing.

They say, well, you look at the city, and the city, everybody's trying to get away as far away from the city center as they can. And so you have the population ringing the city in a donut because people don't want to live in the inner city at the core of the urban area there. It's like, well, that's nothing new. That's why we had the suburbs. And the American dream was to escape that kind of thing. It's their nightmare, our nightmare, and their dream to put us back into this. So let's take a look at the Bill of Rights and again, so Saturday was the 250th anniversary

of the Boston Tea Party. Friday was the anniversary of the Bill of Rights. I missed it. I'm not really good on dates like that. I don't, yeah, that was always a thing in history. I always wanted to focus on having your memories dates. And so I think I've got kind of like a mental block against that. I'm not really interested in the dates. I'm interested in the trends. I'm interested in what was happening, what we can learn from it, that type of thing. I really didn't care that much about the date. So December 15th was the date. And it was the 232nd anniversary for the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.

And so, you know, it's been forgotten pretty much by most people, not just the date, but the Bill of Rights itself has been forgotten. All of them have been violated. And as I say, I count the Third Amendment as being violated as well. That was about housing troops. What was the purpose of housing troops? It wasn't just to put the onus of feeding and giving them room and board to put that on us on you. That was a part of it. But the key reason that they would have troops stationed in the homes was to

keep an eye out on the people. So what are these people? They were the eyes and the ears of the government to let the government know these people were loyal citizens or not. And so what is our equivalent to that today? Well, that's the NSA and the CIA and the rest of these intelligence organizations camping out on your computer all the time

and watching everything that you do. And believe me, they do. And reporting it back to their thuggish leaders. And so I see the Third Amendment as being violated even. But it's pretty clear to everybody if you look at it that all the rest of the nine have clearly been violated. I think all 10 have, and so we need to understand

that right now we're at the cusp of a fourth turning. It already began. The fourth turning began in the mid-2000s. It's going to be concluded 2009 or so. Strauss and Howe talked about that, and I mentioned that in the early 1990s. It's going to be concluded 2009 or so. Strauss and Howe talked about that. They mentioned that in the early 1990s. They said, you know, probably sometime in the mid-2000s. Well, it turned out to be 2007, 2008. There'll be a massive economic unrest that'll kick off this fourth turning. A radical change

of government, of institutions that typically happens every 80 years. And they traced this trend back of government of institutions that typically happens every 80 years and they traced this trend back 500 years in American and British history and of course as they pointed out the entire world now has become synchronized due to worldwide communications and all the rest of this stuff so now the entire world is on this schedule our previous fourth turnings of course were the Great Depression in World War II. Prior to that, Civil War, where we had industrialization come in. That was when we switched out

an agrarian society with industrialization and the nation state. And then prior to that, we had the American Revolution. And so, as I've said, I think that this fourth turning, they say it's always accompanied by massive economic unrest, frequently by said, I think that this fourth turning, they say it's always accompanied by massive economic unrest, frequently by war. I think this one is going to be really big. I think this is going to be the first, well, not the first, World War II and the Great Depression was the first real global fourth turning. But I think that this is going to be, in this particular one, I think it's going to be world war, civil war, revolutionary war. And so we're in a very, we're right at the very end of this. And things are going to start accelerating very rapidly in the next four years.

It's a very dangerous point in time. It's a very critical point in time. And society is either going to tip radically towards freedom or towards tyranny, very radically. So it's time to pay attention. It's time to get active. It's not time to say, well, I hope they just don't notice me. You're not going to hide from this. So confront it. It's just like, you know, whistling through the graveyard. Well, you know, so what did so-and-so die of? Well, that's good because I don't do that. No, you're going to die. So you better confront that and think about what comes after that.

You better confront this and think about what comes after it in a civil way here. And so as he points out, he said there was a big struggle. He doesn't really talk so much in this article. This is from Zero Hedge. Let's see who wrote this hans ziger with real clear wire he doesn't talk so much about the amendments and how they've all been uh abrogated by our current government both parties but he talks about the preamble that's what this article is really about i thought it was an interesting perspective. He says, you know, when you look at the preamble, we the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union,

to establish justice, to ensure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain this Constitution of the United States of America. What are we doing on all those things? I looked at it and was like, no, that's not happening. That's not happening. That's not happening.

We've got a government that is opposed to all these things. We look at establishing justice. Look at the Department of Justice on January the 6th. You think we've got justice here? Look at the Department of Justice in January the 6th. You think we got justice here? Look at the Department of Justice and civil asset forfeiture. Take the property. Don't even charge somebody with a crime, let alone find them guilty. Just take it now and make them sue you to get it back.

Make them prove that they didn't have any connection to drug trade or anything, with the cash, with the car, with anything else that they steal. Yeah, we're not doing too good in terms of establishing justice. How about ensuring domestic tranquility? Are they trying to divide us against each other into a race war, into gender wars, into the LGBT agenda and all the rest of this stuff? Are they providing for the common defense? No, they are threatening this country by getting us involved in entangling alliances

and foreign wars abroad that we have no fight in and we don't have a good guy to fight for. We don't know what's going on. We don't even know the geography of the place, but they got to get us involved in all of this stuff. And they won't do anything to protect our borders. Even as they pick fights with everybody around the world, they let military men come through the borders unmolested. We just had a massive arrest of some of the whole bunch of AK-47s bringing them in. And they found improvised explosive devices. They're bringing in terrorism.

They're bringing in a war through our southern borders. So how about that in terms of providing for the common defense? Not doing too well there. Promoting the general welfare? No. No, look at what they do to our economy and we're not talking about the welfare state that's what the democrats read into this that's not what they were talking about at all that was not in their view at all and to secure the blessings of liberty that everything they do is to take away our liberty in the name of safety so so much for the preamble and so there was a fight going back and forth and james madison and others said you know this preamble really isn't

very good because it doesn't do a good enough job about defining the relationship between we the people and the government and so after this was put out James Madison very unsatisfied with the constitution itself and as this writer says today we can find little to argue with in such beautiful and familiar language well I can find a lot to argue with the reality of it aspirationally it's fine but the reality is something completely different he said the preamble was the subject of much debate, all initially tied to the deliberations that eventually resulted in the Bill of Rights. At first, after it was passed, James Madison recommended, let's change the preamble.

He says in the introductory paragraph before the words, we the people, we need to add government being intended for the benefit of the people and the rightful establishment thereof being derived from their authority alone. In other words, he wanted to rephrase the Declaration of Independence right there, right? Reestablish it. Now, we still have the Declaration of Independence right there, right? Re-establish it. Now, we still have the Declaration of Independence. We still know that that was the purpose, the intent of the people who put together the Constitution. But it would have been nice to have it literally there. Instead, and there were a lot of delegates from New York, Virginia, North Carolina felt that way. They felt that just saying we, the people, was inadequate.

But you had one person who fought against that, and he was a person who had a lot of clout. Not George Washington, but Roger Sherman of Connecticut, the only founding father to have signed the Articles of Association, the Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution. He had signed all those. And so he opposed it. And so that's why we wound up with the Bill of Rights, because they were still not happy with what was there. And because Madison understood that the government

was going to try to consolidate and centralize power. This is an argument that went on for a long time, even against the constitution. The anti-federalist had that. And if you look at the federalists, I mean, they're even, they would be considered to be radical libertarians today, I think for the most part, because we've drifted so far away. They were not in reality, but the types of things that they said in terms of how government needed to be limited, you don't hear that from too many people today. So James Wilson asserted the preamble as a basis for his opposition to the Bill of Rights.

He said if rights belong to the people and the people were sovereign, clearly declaring themselves to be the source of the Constitution in its opening words, there was no need to enumerate a list of rights in the Constitution. We want to talk about somebody who's naive, even though we enumerated the rights in the Constitution. It's not being, you know, you have to enforce these written contracts, if you will, and you have to enforce it when people who took an oath to defend it no longer do that. And so he finishes his article by saying, let us remember that these 10 great amendments only serve as an additional layer of protection.

The preamble itself and the entire structure of our constitution already protects these rights. Well then, so why don't we have them? See, this is a really dangerous thing about all of this. When we go back and we celebrate the Bill of Rights and all the rest of this stuff, don't pat yourself on the back and say, isn't this great? We've got this great document. Well, you know, the constitutions of the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party,

they all talk about human liberty and human rights. All of these tyrants love to talk about human rights. It isn't what they say. It's what they do. And that's the yardstick we should use against all politicians today as well. Even if you like Trump, you should look at what the guy did. The people who absolutely hate what he did still love him. It truly is insanity so uh there's no talk of impeaching trump or biden for violating our rights there's no talk about coming after

them for real crimes the things that they're coming after them they came after trump for things that are not crimes and when you look at Biden, they knew very well for the longest time about these Biden family corrupt deals. As a matter of fact, I think the most important thing about that to see is the fact that you've now got establishment papers. I think there's a Washington post. I think I don't think it was New York times.

I think it's the Washington post that came out and said, look at this, you know, James Biden is out there doing deals using Post. They came out and said, look at this. James Biden is out there doing deals, using the influence of Joe Biden and all the rest of the stuff. Are you kidding me? You go back. And I went back. I looked at, I said, this has been, they've known about this and talked about this for a long time. And the left stream media has always talked about this.

You go back to 2019. Here's an article from Politico. How, quote, quote, unquote, middle class, they put that in quotes. How middle class Joe's family cashed in on the family name. That's 2019. That's a year before the election. That's why I said, you know, when they started all this stuff about Hunter Biden's laptop and everything, just a couple weeks before the election, I said, as a matter of record, I said on air, I said, why are they waiting

why they wait this long i said i think they've waited too long this stuff needed to be unpacked well before this and people have known about this and been talking about it i'd covered it for years before that 2019 2018 you know the press was talking everybody knew about it even before that we knew about it we knew about it when he was vice president. They shut down the talk about it before the election. Then the Republicans tried to bring it up just before the election. But the mainstream media is going to mainstream itself, right? And now they're pretending because they want to get rid of this guy.

He looks like he's the albatross around their neck. Not abortion, but him. They want to say abortion is the albatross around their neck, you know, uh, not abortion, but him, they want to say abortions, the albatross around the GOP is the neck. Well, you know, Joe Biden is the albatross the Democrat party's neck. That's their problem. They're actually running an albatross, uh, the albatross on the ballot. So they're, they're trying to come up with ways to get rid of him. So now they're reviving all this stuff.

All this stuff that the leftist mainstream media has been talking about before his election. They were talking about this stuff. So there's this partisan warfare that's going on. Both parties are coming after each other and they will come after each other. When they come after Trump or Trump goes after them, that doesn't mean that you're winning. It means that they're in a Game of Thrones struggle and they'll do whatever they can to the other people and they don't care what they do to you. Both of them will poison you and your family. Both of them will enslave you with a digital ID.

And on and on and on. These are the crimes for which they ought to be charged. But they will not be charged because the people who would charge them with these crimes, the Congress were participants themselves. So that is where we are today. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and talk about what is happening with parental rights. You want to talk about rights?

Let's talk about parental rights. We'll be right back. Plant the seed in our homeland, boys. Let it grow where all can see. Feed it with our devotion, boys. Call it the Liberty Tree. It's a tall old tree and a strong old tree. And we are the sons, yes, we are the sons, the sons of liberty ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're listening to the david knight show

freedom do we have liberty in this country right now we have uh some christian parents who have taken their case now to the supreme court to intervene because they had child protective services cps come in and remove their child because we have this conflict that has been set up by the courts here in America of children's rights versus parental rights. And this is what this is all rolling out with, but they don't want you to have control over your own children. And they say it out loud. As a matter of fact,

look at this questioning of um cardona who is um the biden administration's um he had honcho at the department of education listen to this fairly quick answers here because i want to get to secretary becerra do you think parents should be in charge of their child's education as the primary stakeholder. I believe parents are important stakeholders, but I also believe educators have a role in determining educational programming. Isn't that amazing? First of all, parents are not stakeholders.

God gave children to these parents. Let's stop this stakeholder. Every time I see the stakeholder stuff, I want to take the safety off my gun. This is just, they're holding a gun to our heads and telling us, oh, we'll tell you that you have a stake in this or not. We all have a stake in this. Just amazing. And then you heard what Cardona said. Well, I think that educators have a role in the educational programming of children.

Hear that? The educational programming of children. Hear that? The educational programming of children. Boy, they said it all out loud, didn't they? Teachers are stakeholders as well. Teachers are equal stakeholders. As a matter of fact, they're superior because they can override what the parents want. They're stakeholders. And the child's programming. Programming.

Educational programming. Well, so what happened in this particular case? You had Mary and Jeremy Cox now taking this to the Supreme Court after they removed their trans-identified child. This happened in conservative Indiana, or what people think is conservative Indiana. But before we leave where the government thinks it is on all of this stuff. So that was the guy who's the head honcho at the department of education.

We've now centralized control of curriculum and education into Washington. What an abomination that is. First of all, the community, the village, should not be educating your children. End of story. That means that the state should not be educated. That means the feds should not be educating your children either. And people need to wake up and understand what is going on with this. As Melissa Harris Perry said, we've got to get over this notion that children belong to the parents well that's exactly what uh the department of education is saying there

you know we will be doing the educational programming of your children uh you can house them feed them clothe them but we will do the educational programming and how they're going to do the educational programming well here here's this is a teacher, believe it or not. A teacher on TikTok. Listen to this. She's got a rainbow colored glasses. This right wing idea of parents rights. Right wing idea. It's literally just fascism.

As far as I can tell, parents rights means allowing parents to control their kids, even in ways that are harmful to their kids. Obviously, as an educator, I believe strongly in the importance of parents and families and other primary caregivers instead of morals. She throws out a straw man there. Parents get the chance to do this, even if it means harming their kids. No, it doesn't, actually. That's the problem that CPS was created to solve. But then CPS became an even bigger problem.

Yeah. If children are being abused by their parents, now that institution is broken and you need to intervene. Guess what? The school as an institution is broken. The government as an institution is broken and is broken and we need to intervene. But it is not fascism. She is a fascist. She is a fascist. She is a fascist.

I'm going to tell you what to do. You don't own your kids. We own your kids. I own your kids. She's got her little rainbow frame colored glasses. But she is a product of this system. And so from the top at the Department of Education, people creating this curriculum,

the people who are bribing everybody to do it, because remember under the Department of Education, people creating this curriculum, the people who are bribing everybody to do it. Because remember, under the 10th Amendment, they can't tell people how to educate kids, but they can certainly get you addicted to their money and then pull it away from you. And that's the way they always do it. That's the way Trump did it with the COVID war on us. And that's the way they do it all the time to get around the 10th Amendment. And so they hire these fascists like her they say their parents are fascist look parents are not perfect there's no perfect parent out there

they're not all abusive as she wants to indicate and the simple fact of the matter is, is that parents are always going to be a safer bet. You know, you don't have perfection as an option in this world. So what you do is you say, well, who are going to be the people least likely to abuse kids? Well, I think that would be their parents, because typically parents love their children. That's why you have this. But she wants you to believe that somebody that doesn't know the kids, has not seen them grown up, has not fed them and nurtured them from birth, who just now sees them for the first time, that person has their interest at heart and can see to their welfare and another 30-plus kids just like that

better than the two parents that God gave them. And so this is the story as told by the people who have been attacked by the Indiana government, and I mean it is an all-of-government attack. The entire legal system, from the lower court to the appellate court to the Supreme Court to the Attorney General of Indiana, conservative Republican Indiana is doing this to this family. In June of 2021, we unfortunately had to become reluctant warriors when our child was removed from our home after DCS became involved in our family life.

When our son was removed it was like someone pulled the rug out from underneath us. As a father I believe one of my main goals is to keep my children safe and I can't do that when the state comes into our house and takes our kid because we can't in good conscience affirm his transgender ideology. His disappearance made a huge hole in our hearts and our family but we will always love him and pray for him. Our child was out of our home for 17-18 months altogether, ultimately aging out of the foster care system. We were able to visit with him at his discretion, basically for about two to three hours each week. Though we pushed constantly for additional engagement, attended family therapies.

We were never able to have an agreement for additional time with him. So as a mom, having limited access to your children is, it's heart wrenching. I miss his laugh. I miss being with him, talking with him about everyday things, teaching him how to bake, how to cook different things. There's so many things that we are to our children, not just their first teachers, but basically their first loves. And to miss out on that during such formative time in his life, we'll never get that time back. We didn't pursue an affirmational approach with our child because first, as Christians, we believe God created us as male and female. And as parents, it's our job to help our children to reach their full potential. And the only way we feel to do that is to raise our children through our Christian beliefs.

Secondly, we didn't go with the affirmational approach because we did a lot of research on this subject. There are many different approaches. We spoke to multiple mental health care providers and ultimately decided that affirmation was not going to help our child. In our experience, this is not an isolated incident. There are a number of families here in Indiana experiencing the same issues that we've gone through. Well, let's talk about how this began.

Because that's missed in all of these articles that I saw about what is happening here. The people who are rightfully coming in on the side of the parents. And a great injustice has been done to them. But when I look at this, it reminds me of the stories that we have about the people who have been severely injured or killed by the jab. And I look at this and I say, if only we could have gotten through to these people about what this is truly about.

And if you put your kids in a school, they're going to inject their ideology into them, a poisonous ideology. She said, and she's talking about what happened, and she said, yeah, they removed the child from our home. And, you know, we were able to get maybe two or three hours a week with the child. And we tried to get an agreement for additional time, but we couldn't get it. Well, this child was out of your involvement throughout the day for at least 10 years. This kid was 16 years old, and you turned him over to a school,

and you didn't have an agreement for additional time. We all fool ourselves by thinking, well, when the kid is at home and in his room doing whatever he wants or sleeping, that's our time with him. It's not. It's not the time that you're engaging with him. As a matter of fact, they're Christians.

And we should heed the words of Deuteronomy 6 that says, when you are walking in the way with your child, you explain things to them, you teach them the way of the Lord. They missed that opportunity. They're weeping because the last couple of years that the kid has been going through all this,

this happened at 16, they put the kid in foster care or whatever until the kid became 18, and now the kid is gone. They said, well, you missed out on these formative years. Yes, you did. You missed out on 10 formative years before this stuff happened. They said, well, you know, we, as I was jotting this down as they were talking,

we miss being with him. We miss his laugh. Yes. You miss all of that. If you put your child in a school, an institution, that's one of the key things. It's not an easy thing to make that decision, but I don't know anybody who homeschool their kids who regrets it. And I mean that I know a lot of people have homeschooled their kids. None of who regrets it. And I mean that. I know a lot of people who have homeschooled their kids. None of them regret it. They don't regret that they gave up some corporate job so they could hear the laugh of their

child, so they could be with their child, so they could instill the values in their child that are going to protect them from this dark world. We were his first love, she said. And yet, they passed the child off to others. And then the child became bonded to that institution. Became bonded to their peers at school instead of their siblings at home, became bonded to their teachers or their counselors who told him they was in the wrong body. Yeah, the formative times of the kids' lives are what we have to look at. And so, again,

I feel for them. I'm not saying that they deserved any of this. They don't deserve it. I'm just saying you have to understand what is out there. You have to understand the dangers of the schools, just like you have to understand the dangers of the jabs. And yeah, you can get lucky. You can have people who go through the school system and aren't changed by it. I went through the school system, and I regret going through it.

I wish that I'd not have my time wasted, and I considered it wasted time. I can't believe I got to sit here with all this stuff. I can't believe that I can't pursue my own interests here. I can't believe, and it wasn pursue my own interests here i can't believe and it wasn't anything like what this is today i mean we just had a kid who was failed in his history class because he said women he said a couple of questions only women can get pregnant he said that's true another one was all men have a male genitals so that's true and because of that this kid was fired up not fired failed same thing i guess but um you know this is uh this is the where this all begins and i understand when they take advantage of people's uh ignorance and it is an

unjust thing and i certainly just in the same way as i support people coming after and suing the people who deceived them and who damaged them with a vaccine i support these people's efforts to get justice for this but and to stop it from happening to other people. But we need to understand that we have to have discernment, and we are the front line of protection for our children and for ourselves. So the trial court removed the child from their custody, cited concerns over the child's well-being. Well, what was it that they said they were concerned about?

They said, well, the child is self-isolating. In other words, going to his room and pouting is what we refer to this as. Um, and, and then refusing to eat.

I don't know if it vegetables or whatever, just refusing to eat. So that's the charge from CPS. And they took it to court and the court said, that's not true that's your your as cps does cps exaggerates these things the court said no there is no abuse that is happening here whatsoever but then the court still gave the kid to um foster care Why did the court do that? Well, again, it goes back to this UN agenda, the UN agenda, the Convention for the Rights of the Child, which is antithetical to parental rights.

That's how they use this. They say, well, we're just helping children with their rights. No, you're not. You're denying the rights of the parents to whom the children belong to whom god gave them who have the child's best interests at heart and we understand that more than any temporary bureaucrat that they're going to come in contact with for nine months of a one year the parents are there and if the parents are abusive, that's a different story. But that's not the case.

And even here, after they said there is no abuse, they still took the child away. So the trial court removed the child, even though there was no abuse. Then they appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals, lost that. They went to the Indiana Supreme Court, which declined to review the case. And so now they are seeking the Supreme Court to intervene here. And there's an organization in Indiana called the Indiana Family Institute. Their general counsel says this is about protecting parental rights, about protecting free speech, and the free exercise of religion.

You see, these are all involved here. The case has sparked controversy in Indiana, a state where trans rights and parental rights are a hotly debated topic. Again, we tend to think of Indiana as being a conservative place, and yet, you know, Governor Pence, Vice President Pence came from there. And yet, when you look at Indiana, do you know where the Kinsey Institute, this Institute of Perversion, do you know where that is? It's an adjunct to the University of Indiana. And just to give you a little bit broader perspective as to what is happening, the guy who they brought over a few years ago to run the Kinsey Institute was a guy from Italy and, uh, they had him running the Kinsey Institute and then they

decided they wanted to get into, um, uh, censorship. And so they took this guy who was at the Kinsey Institute and they put him in charge of their observatory on social media. Their mission statement says they develop tools to analyze and counter misinformation. Their social media account on Twitter, probably still there, they don't get purged, is OhSoMe. Observatory of Social Media, Oh So Me. And I know about all this stuff because they were very involved with censorship five years ago, in 2018, just before the term elections.

And they were one of the central figures working with the Democrat Party to push through a list of 800 websites and of course this is two months after we got hammered at infowars two months later 800 institutions are purged off of social media because of people like this at the indiana university the observatory of social media just one of several of these institutions, but still one of them. And I always thought when I started looking up, I'd say, who is it that's giving these lists of people to be purged? And we know, again,

they were not people who supported Trump necessarily. The vast majority of them didn't of that 800, but these are people who oppose the police and surveillance state. And I thought it was kind of interesting that they would pull this guy over from this perverted kinsey institute to run social media censorship and yet now we see why because a long-term game was they were going to be censoring people who push back against this transgender gaslighting of young children. So prima facie grooming.

I mean, it's just, anyway. So again, the Indiana Attorney General's Office is also defending child protective services in this. Again, these are people, their parents have seven kids, and I guess they didn't homeschool the other kids either. So when you look at this, one out of seven, that's a 14 kids. And I guess they didn't homeschool the other kids either. So when you look at this one out of seven, that's a 14% failure rate, or I should say 14% rate of grooming,

which is getting, you know, it's about what these people are doing. It's going to go up because you're getting this concentration of transgenderism and LGBT stuff. But this grooming that is happening, it's already gotten up to the younger generations, about to that level.

So this family's experiences are about par for the course. You're going to lose about 15% of the kids to this stuff, if you put them in it. And so 14 years ago, I was talking about this issue. I was doing videos on this issue. Nothing has changed except that it's gotten much worse because at the time we were trying to push not just for a law. Now there's a law in Indiana where they want to try to constrain the Indiana government there. And this same institution that is protecting this family.

They have had some Republicans introduce a House bill there, House bill if you're in Indiana, House bill 1407 if you're in Indiana. And as they describe it, they said it would elevate parental rights to a fundamental right. No, you don't elevate rights. You recognize them. Rights are God-given. If they're not God-given, they're not rights. They're privileges. We're not asking for privileges from the government. We're demanding our God-given rights over our children that don't belong to the state, don't belong to the state's schools, or to any other school for that matter we're not asking and we're taking first thing you do to take back your rights is to take back your kids

take them out of the schools you can do it you don't have to submit to this system the only exceptions i said would be to allow government involvement in legitimate abuse and neglect and of course you know that has always been there and that's what that teacher tries to mischaracterize the bill clarifies several key areas that are not appropriate reasons for government involvement these include a parent raising a child according to the child's biological sex not allowing their child to receive medical care or counseling that affirms a child's gender identity.

We got to lose that language. Don't use their language. Don't. This is the institution that the organization is trying to fight for parental rights. Don't fight them on their turf. Don't let them define the debate by using the terms. Affirming gender identity. It's not a gender identity. We don't have gender identities.

We have sex. We have biological sex. Stop this gender identity being something else. Stop this language of affirmation of gender identity. Or you're going to lose. Just like the people who try to fight back against the climate mcguffin well i think this is going to be better for emissions no don't play the emissions game it's not about emissions it's about omissions it's about omitting everything

from you and then finally omitting you yourself which they've now gotten around to by saying you know humans breathe out carbon dioxide. Oh, really? Yeah. Yeah. And they breathe out nitrogen and methane and all these other things that are going to cause the planet. Just so we got to get rid of the people. So anyway, the bill also clarifies a child may not be removed from their parents custody if the parents are fit guardians and do not consent to the removal. It also provides means of legal recourse for parents whose rights are violated.

Under the standards, the bill sets forth. And I hope that as part of this, they have the presumption of innocence. Because once you deal with a bureaucracy, whether you're talking about the IRS or the CPS, you always lose the presumption of innocence. When you have regulation without representation, we have taxation without representation, we have medication without representation. All of these different things, and again, it applies

especially with CPS, there's never a presumption of innocence. They don't have to, you have to prove that you didn't do what they accused you of. And so all these things need to be opposed. And this is not a new fight. This video is 14 years old. I've been fighting this longer than that.

No government, no matter how well-intentioned, can replace the nurturing love of a parent. Yet in the United States, judicial activism and a pending UN treaty are poised to tear apart this most fundamental bond of society. These foreign and domestic threats would undermine the parental role and overrule parental wishes. All parents would have the legal status of an abusive parent, with the state and not the parents deciding what is in the best interest of the child. The relentless encroachment of judges and UN treaties that assume that government, not parents, has the best interests of the child at heart, will be stopped by nothing short of a constitutional amendment

explicitly stating the rights of parents. Decisions affecting the child should be made by those who know and love that child, not by a distant bureaucracy. You can help protect children by helping those who care the most for them, and those who care the best for them, the family. Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.

Check out the Jazz Channel at apsradio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. Terima kasih telah menonton Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Wow, I just saw on Rockfin, Audi with Modern Retro Radio. Thank you very much. That's a very generous tip. Thank you. He says, Hi, David. Modern Retro Radio will buy five free downloads of your new Christmas album via Bandcamp. Just email the station via modernretror.com and that's from audi thank

you very much that's really kind of you i really do appreciate that i don't know if i sent you individual songs or not if i didn't let me know um audi if you'd like to play them on your station i know had and anybody who wants to play them on a station, let me know that. I know that APS is going to start playing individual songs of it, so I appreciate that. Also on Rumble, BravesGirl00, thank you for the tip. Merry Christmas, David and family. God bless you all. Thank you so much.

And then a comment from Rumble, Distorted Perceptions says, wonder where all the personality disorders are coming from. Yeah, yeah. That's why they don't want you to see the manifesto there in Nashville. Somebody that they've taught, first of all, to hate herself. Hate the skin she's in. Hate the gender she's in. And get her to the point where she can look a nine-year-old in the face and pull the trigger.

It's amazing. And they don't want you to see what their programming has done. We're talking about bullying. Are you kidding me? A psychological operation on our children is pure evil. The internet is a weapon to condition minds. I agree. Speaking of conditioning minds, we now have Nuki Haley, the warmonger, is now taking

a, at least she's consistent. You know, you got to look at this. It really bothers me when I see conservative Christians who push for war. At the same time, they're trying to stop babies from being ripped up. And I just don't understand this, you know, or or on the left you got people who push against war but then they push to rip babies up i don't understand that nuki haley i understand she's just this person who's been taken over by satan and wants to kill everybody everywhere every age let's kill him in the womb let's kill them in that country let's kill them in that other country her i understand i don't understand these people who

are pro-life in one area and pro-death in another but nuki haley she's pro-death everywhere gotta hand it to her that's why she's loved by people like the Koch brothers and by Jamie Demon and JP Morgan and by all these big Republican donors who say, you know, DeSantis, you can't protect life. I'm not going to support you as a candidate. You're, how is it that Trump put it? You're sanctimonious. Yeah, it's just too harsh, as Trump said.

We're not going to support that. See, you understand where these people are coming from. The people who serve the prince of this world, who have unlimited amounts of money, we've never seen this kind of concentration of wealth in the hands of the few. And how do they use it? To start wars and to rip babies apart inside their mother.

That's how they use it to start wars and to rip babies apart inside their mother. That's how they use it. So she went on the Sunday program this week, said state legislatures will have to tweak their abortion laws to avoid women having to carry non viable pregnancies. Well, I think it's time we start doing some politician abortions and I think we should start with aborting Nikki Haley. And I hope the people in Iowa abort her heavily, heavily abort her.

She said, I appreciate that Texas went more on the pro-life side. Oh, does she? But as we go through this, she says, these states are now going to have to take a look at this because we don't want to see what we don't want to see is a woman with a rare condition having to carry a baby until term instead of just ripping it apart she says you know i can i can relate to this my heart broke because i had trouble having my children she said well if that's the, Nuki, you should talk to some of the, or listen to some of the women who have had children with fatal conditions that knew that their children were not going to live. I talked about those last week on LifeSite News. I had testimony of many different women who had gone through this heart-wrenching thing and it is horrible one of them as a matter of fact had a child who had trisomy 18 and knew the

child was not going to survive but she said she was not going to rip that child apart and add to its suffering and she said and I can live with that and I'm happy for the few moments that we had with him before he died maybe nuki haley should listen to those people it is heartbreaking but that's the reality and you can make a bad situation much much worse for both the child that you rip apart and for the mother who thinks about it at some point in time. And they will think about it at some point in time. So she was asked by Jonathan Karl on, I think it's ABC this week.

Yeah, it's ABC this week. So was this the right decision by the court? And always the clever politician, Newky says, well, the court and always the clever politician nuki says well the court had to follow the law the law said that she couldn't have the abortion now it's time for the legislature in texas to say uh how do we make sure that there are no more kates that have to go through that so in other words so the law is wrong the law needs to be changed the law needs to be tweaked uh no uh nuki needs to be tweaked right out of there uh she is um she is uh planned parenthood with an r behind her name that's what she is and then we have doctor who the bbc and and just imagine've got these writers at the BBC who hate babies.

They love abortion. They decide they're going to do a Doctor Who Christmas special. And so it's going to be about celebrating the eating of babies. That's the way they'll do it. You know, that's the interesting thing about Christmas, isn't it? That it focuses around a baby, motherhood amongst other things of course but those are really central to it and so they these writers the bbc just imagine how they enjoyed writing the lyrics of this little song that is chanted in there i'm not going to play

it for you it's a stupid uh but um and anyway, the Christmas special for Doctor Who is titled The Church on Ruby Road. Well, guess where they're going to kill and eat children? In a church, not in a clinic. The Doctor Who thing is not the clinic on Ruby Road. No, it's the church. And so Doctor Who and his companion infiltrate a church. And as they enter, they hear music. And what transpires is a song sung by a cabal of goblins, writes liveaction.org,

who are celebrating their upcoming meal, a human child. The Doctor does not express concern about the situation. He simply remarks, amazing, and then is chided by Ruby, who is with him. The goblin singer is singing. Here's the lyrics that the BBC writers got to write. We've got a baby we can feast. We can dine three days at least. Baby blood and baby bones, baby butter for the baby scones.

Well, let's complete that. Maybe we can sell some parts to Dr. Fauci. Ingredients for his new ouchie. They call us jabs. Look, this is just disgusting. It's even more disgusting every time I look at somebody talking about baby parts and utilizing them. We know that it was our own government and Fauci and the NIH and Francis Collins who were doing that very thing at the University of Pittsburgh. Going to Planned Parenthood and saying, I need this organ, I need a head, and I need

all these other things so that we can do our Frankenstein mad science experiments. But the thing that got everybody really upset was not that. It was what he did to torture puppies. And yet these babies were tortured. These babies were born alive and vivisected alive because that's what you do when you extract organs you don't you don't poison the patient you don't put them through trauma by ripping them apart because um that sends out uh releases the body releases chemical signals that are going to contaminate the organs. When the Chinese kill somebody for organ donation, they do it with a patient being alive.

And that's the way that they did these abortions as well for Fauci. So, yeah, truth is not just stranger than fiction. Truth is more evil than fiction. And so as this little plot progresses after their baby eating song goes, Dr. Who and Ruby crawl through the rafters of the church. The chilling yet absurd song continues, writes live action, with each verse getting stranger as it is revealed that the baby is a sacrifice for the King Goblin. Who is the King Goblin? Is it Fauci?

Is it Francis Collins? Is it Trump? Is it Biden? I don't know who the King Goblin was in their story, but we know who the King Goblins are in real life, don't we? The lyrics continue. A banquet for a king on high. Oh, little baby.

Oh, little baby, say goodbye. Boy, these people are clever, aren't they? Before Doctor Who then interrupts it not because he's trying to save the baby but because he falls through a crack in the ceiling he's just going to watch it happen evidently so the youtube channel comments they said are say that it's insanely catchy delightfully cor And yet the reality, as live action news points out, is that in England and Wales, the birth rate has been steadily decreasing. The 2022 numbers are the lowest they've been in 20 years. In contrast, abortions in the two countries have skyrocketed.

There were 123,219 abortions between January and June of 2022, a 17% increase from the 105,488 abortions between January and June of 2021. You know, I find this interesting. You go back and look at history. And I was reading about Nineveh this weekend and Nineveh was the most populous and again we had city-states right there were the center of these empires so Nineveh and Assyria was like that for you know a extended period of time a couple of centuries they were the most populous city on earth and when the british empire was at its peak

and becoming uh you know uh the british empire they had london was the most populous city on earth do you notice a trend here you know people like Putin, people like Kim Jong-un, who was weeping to try to get mothers to have more kids and everything. People like that, even Elon Musk, they know that the strength of a country is in the people. And the more people you have, the stronger that nation is, whether you're talking about the British Empire or the Assyrian Empire. And so do you think that our leaders don't know this? Do you really think they're that stupid? I mean, they could be that stupid, but I don't think they're that stupid.

I don't think they're any dumber than Kim Jong-un. And if Kim Jong-un has clued into all this stuff, I think they know it as well. I think it's just another example of our Western leaders who have been chosen for deliberate democide of the West. I think that's what's going on. I don't think that they're stupid. I think they're evil. We understand that we don't wrestle against flesh and blood.

But you can understand who's controlling these leaders. And I don't mean the World Economic Forum or the UN. They're under principalities and powers, that's for sure. Children in the United Kingdom are being sacrificed not to a king goblin, but to a widely disproven conspiracy theory promoted by eugenicists and population control enthusiasts who want the Earth's population to decline. But only in certain demographics. You go back and look at Deagle.

They want it to decline in the West, but they want it to increase elsewhere or in some places to remain the same. They put their plans out there. It's almost like that's part of the requirement that they have to do this. And so as all this is happening, I see this curious statement,

this article from the Daily Mail that was featured by the Drudge Report. How Roe v. Wade was overturned. Justice Alito's secret plot to get other Supreme Court conservatives on board. I'll spare you the details and give you the summary. What this amounts to is I'm saying, you know, Alito has very strong convictions about this. And he went around, he talked to other justices and he lobbied them on it. Is that a secret plot? Is that something that is any different than what Supreme Court justices do on a case-by-case basis?

They always do that. They always talk to each other about the case. They always lobby for what they believe is the right thing, especially if they have strong beliefs in it. And that's what he did. You know what the Daily Mail did not look at as they try to manufacture and create some kind of a secret plot to get rid of Roe v. Wade? Roe v. Wade was a secret plot to get rid of 60 million babies. Roe v. Wade was a plot plot to get rid of 60 million babies. Roe v. Wade was a plot to get rid of the Constitution and the 10th Amendment, which is what Alito's decision actually restored. More so than saving lives.

You know, some lives are saved in some of the states where this is not happening. But this is about restoring the Constitution, which they had aborted that as well. And so what they did not say in the Daily Mail, you wanted some skullduggery about all this stuff? Why don't you ask yourself why we have never found out who it was that leaked this decision in order to sabotage it? Because it was not a secret that Alito was going around and talking to these various judges. They all knew it. It was not a secret that he had gotten people to agree with him. They all knew it. Somebody leaked that. And don't tell me they can't find the person who leaked it. And isn't it odd that Daily Mail and Drudge and the establishment media now want to pretend that

there's some kind of a secret conspiracy? Yeah, there is. It's right in front of them. The one they're not talking about. The one that the dog's not barking about. And that is John Roberts, in my opinion, is the one who leaked this thing. And I talked about that at the time. I won't go back into it as well. But I think that was very interesting that they would ignore all of that and try to create something new. And this is part of a pressure campaign because we've got the abortion pill coming up before them now. And so this is another way to do a pressure campaign, public pressure campaign against these people in the same way that the leak was. So ignore the leak. Instead, pivot to a made up secret plot to get rid of row to abort row

and so you know when we look at this as live action says you know how do we how can we celebrate baby jesus but kill pre-born kids this time of the year they got a lot of people who will go to christmas programs and all the rest of this stuff, talk about that. But, yeah, there is this nagging inconsistency in the way we live, isn't it? You know, a lot of people will go and sing about Jesus and about Christ and then go live their life in the opposite direction. They'll look at a baby in a manger. Isn't that beautiful? The baby and Mary.

And as I mentioned, all these Christmas songs about babies and mother's love and all this stuff that used to be core to our societies. But they have been so effective in their psychological brainwashing that they brainwashed women to not even want children, so many of them, and to hate their own children. This truly is amazing. Even as this birth is front and center during the holiday season, the world somehow manages to compartmentalize. You have to wonder how the general public can celebrate the birth of this very special baby while supporting the torture, the dismemberment, the death of millions of other innocent, tiny babies.

All of them made in God's image. Well, so then that's why you bring in Santa Claus. Because, you know, Santa Claus, seriously, Santa Claus is about what? He's not about family. He's not about babies. Santa Claus is about me getting my wish list, right? Let's teach the kids to be all about themselves. Lovers of self.

Little narcissists everywhere. Yeah, and it's all about, you know, Santa is all about prosperity. You know, the thing is, you've got to, and this is the way it's always been. You go back to ancient times. Moloch. You want prosperity? Sacrifice your kids to Moloch. You want prosperity? Sacrifice your kids to Moloch. Put them on this burning altar.

Burn them to death alive. That's what it's truly about. So before we take a break, I just want to play this for you. This is, as I said before, I tell you that you can actually abort an abortion. You can actually stop it after it started you have to you don't have much time to do it but interestingly it can and and it's not so much about that as it is as the supreme court is debating the abortion pill this is the story of a mother who had her own internal debate about the abortion pill this is about a mother who had her own internal trial he was the piece that i never knew was missing and i can't

imagine life without him i have been in a relationship for only four months and found out i was pregnant and i found out I was pregnant. And I found out I was pregnant right after I broke up with my partner at that time. I was feeling really conflicted on... I was already a single mom for my two older children. And so I felt like if I were to bring another baby into the picture, their needs would really be sacrificed. Plus, I wasn't in a relationship, and I felt just unprepared and overwhelmed with everything.

He didn't want another child either, so we decided that abortion would be the best route. Even though I knew that it didn't necessarily align with my morals and how I want, what I would want to do, I felt like in order to give my two older children the things they needed, that it was the best decision on my part. So I went ahead and made the appointment, and I went to the abortion appointment alone. And so the doctor came into the room, and she told me, once you take this pill, you can't reverse it. There's dangerous side effects if you were to try to keep the baby. So I just want to make sure once you take this pill, you are aware of that.

And I took the pill and immediately felt such strong regret and I started crying and she patted my back and said, you did the right thing and left the room and it made me so upset to hear her say that because I was feeling such immense regret and shame and emptiness and for her to say that I felt like how would she know if it was the right thing because I felt right away that I knew it was the wrong thing to do. I walked out to my car and I was just bawling and I texted my child's dad and I told him and he responded. He said there was a part of me that wished you didn't go through with it and I just pulled out my phone and started googling if there was ways to reverse the process.

Scrolling I saw the APR hotline and so I immediately called and got in contact with one of the nurses and she was able to get a prescription for me at progesterone and I had it within like 15 minutes and then she set up an appointment for me at one of the pregnancy resource centers that same day and that's where I had the ultrasound to see that my baby was okay still and I just felt so much hope finally like the moment I talked to the nurse on the hotline I just felt so much hope that I could make it right that was exactly what I needed in that moment because I was just feeling so regretful I know it can be like overwhelming and it feels like a lot but

if there's a part of you that's saying this isn't the right thing to do, listen to that part so you don't end up regretting it. And if you're already past that point and you did take the pill, reach out to the APR hotline or to a pregnancy resource center who can help get you to the resources that will make you feel more comfortable having the baby if that's what you decide you want to do. And then in June of 2020 I had my baby and then I got engaged to his father. You're changing people's lives you know I can't imagine my life without my son and I owe it to this network. Terima kasih telah menonton! Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story all right let's talk a little bit about christmas here we got a couple of comments i want to get to first on rock finn a little ford schoolhouse says we knew that michael was going to have a severe congenital heart defect before he was born and that didn't change anything for us. Well, good for you. Good for you.

It's good that, and that's the way that it should be, isn't it? You know, I mean, we all, do you know that your child isn't going to be killed by a car or paralyzed by a car when they're six years old or something? This is just life we take it a day at a time and we try to celebrate it and roll with the punches but we don't we don't kill children it's just that simple on rock fan John Henry three seven seven seven I purchased a David Knight Christmas music download this weekend excellent well thank you very much thank you for the compliment and thank you for purchasing it. We're going to talk about that coming up here in a minute.

We've got some Christmas news that's coming up. And so I really do appreciate that. It is available at the David Knight show.com for download. And thank you very much, John. And we appreciate that. Billy the kid part two, my uneducated sister says she wants nuki for president well you better get busy educating her real quick uh but uh i don't think she's going to make it past the um the primaries i think that this uh

as much as i don't want to see it i think our choice is going to be trump and biden or trump and some other democrat i think that's basically what we're going to wind up seeing. On Rumble, Hazel Kitty, 57. These medical personnel don't realize they are so brainwashed and lost, they don't see that they're actually Satanists. They have signed a death warrant and God will carry it out. And yet, you know, we should be praying for them because it is never too late, as long as we're still alive.

God can, you look at people who have run abortion clinics and uh or people who were a part of that become christians and god can take the things that we have done that we regret and he can cast them as far as the east is from the west and so we should wish that for them, rather than the judgment that is coming. Let's talk a little bit about the left. And this is the way they want to celebrate Christmas. They want to pull it in for their propaganda purposes.

They want to scare you into getting a vaccine. And this is something that's coming out of England. They actually put together a little video here to warn people that Santa Claus, because he was careless. And I guess it's because, can you imagine, other than this Santa Claus, what an evil person. He doesn't lock down and isolate, right? Instead, this is like this disease spreader that's going house to house.

And either he's going to get sick or he's going to get sick and kill everybody else because he's going from one house to the other. I guess that's why they had to kill him. And that's what they did. And I would call this the covid clause it's not the santa claus but it's the govind clause that got santa a very covid christmas is by somebody called the john snow project before christmas santa took a deep breath if only he'd known it would lead to his death can't breathe always listened when the famous doctor spoke.

Wash hands before entry for the elves. Too bad they didn't mention that the virus spreads like smoke. Yeah, what nonsense. There you go. And these little Christmas decorations of an n95 of clean indoor air and get your injection get your latest vaccine and they got the little gender bread people there regular testing all these little uh computer generated things there isn't that wonderful the john snow project.org well you know it is a, isn't it? It's been a snow job from the very beginning.

They describe themselves as reliable, honest information on COVID-19 from public health, clinical, and research experts. I think we've had anything but reliable information. And I think that little ad there shows you just how desperate the pharmaceutical companies and the medical tyrants have become. The creepy voiceover says, "'Twas the night before Christmas. Santa took a deep breath.

If only he'd known it, it would lead to his death. Santa always listened when the famous doctors spoke. Too bad they didn't mention the virus spreads like smoke." I think I fixed that last line there. Too bad they didn't tell him the virus is like smoke. I think I fixed that last line there too bad. They didn't tell him the virus is a joke about that. I think that's the way it should end. All right. And then we could continue with it.

So it was the night before Christmas. We say on ventilators on remdesivir on Pfizer and Moderna. Now dash away, dash away, dash away all because the treatments are coming and death comes to call yeah this is a cult of death that wants to kill not just santa claus but you you know in the past we would have the year without santa claus a little well it was you know santa caught a cold i imagine that's where they got this idea or something if i

can remember these things um santa gets a cold and he can't go around and do it or or they have no snow or something so there's a year without santa claus well uh that's what these people are fantasizing about yeah death is going to come to call for everybody as a matter of fact um it's not just um these uh crazy medical murderers and their medical martial law. They're trying to kill Santa Claus. In real life, you've got a bunch of teens beating up Santa Claus and shouting,

this is our country. These are Muslim teens. And guess what country they're in? They're in Germany. And they beat up a guy who's dressed up as santa claus on his way to an event for kids as new american points out they say is santa claus soon only going to be safe at the north pole that is unless that icy region is also strengthened with diversity you know because diversity is our strength so um this is an attack on a middle-aged man who was dressed as santa claus by muslim youth

who obviously didn't care that santa was making a list and checking it twice says uh selwyn duke he says what's more the victim states that during the assault the teens shouted this is our country well uh he said that um according to the victim the gang comprised several teenagers of a migrant background about 15 years of age he told the police that they insulted him they called him an sob and a fat man well you know there's that you know if you say it out do you's that you know if you're saying do you is that an insult if you're saying i thought santa was always uh proud of his uh weight and his cookies and milk and they ordered him to remove his santa claus costume they said they were muslim and that germany was their country said the victim and he refused, the gang turned violent and struck him, resulting in injuries to his

neck, tearing his costume. In self-defense, the man hit one of his attackers in the face and they all ran away. Oh, well, that's interesting. The victim noted that several people witnessed the attack. And rather than intervening, they laughed at him and applauded the migrant attackers. Well, were they also migrants? I don't know. They went on to say that while the victim, Santa Claus, was able to attend his scheduled event,

photographs with kids were canceled due to the injuries, his injuries, and the damage to his costume. But the performer vowed to carry on. You know, this is not the first time santa claus has been attacked as a matter of fact we were just talking about this um uh recently it's one of the one of my family's uh favorite uh clips from a movie short clip if you remember the very beginning of Scrooged, the reworking of A Christmas Carol, where they have Bill Murray as a TV executive. And they're playing him all these concepts for Christmas TV specials that are coming up. And do you remember the one, the night the reindeer died? All the little elves doing their elf thing, you know? It's my very special recipe.

We're not going to make it if we don't hurry. Do you realize how late? I told you you're going to break those toys. Oh, well, wait. Santa Claus, those toys. Hold on, Walt. Wait. Santa Claus, come quick. Look. Incoming. Uh-oh.

Hey. Hold on. Let's get out. Come on, I't be scared! Hurry up! Going to the armory, breaking out the rifles. Uh-oh, who's this? It's Lee Majors.

It's Lee Majors! The six million dollar band. Santa, is there a back way out of this place? Of course there is, Lee. But this is one Santa that's going out the front door. It don't matter a hill of beans what happens to me. The world couldn't afford it if anything happened to you. Now you stay put. Oh, that's very nice of you, Lee.

And Lee, you're being a real good boy this year. Yes, you sure have seven o'clock psycho c santa's workshop this and only lee majors can stop them the night the reindeer die yeah there you go i'd like to see that show that's one i watch every Christmas. As a matter of fact, that little clip there. So the Santa Claus, who was attacked by this Muslim gang,

vowed to carry on, he said, as Santa. But in the future, he will arm himself. Unfortunately, not with an AR-15, but with pepper spray in the future. But at least he's got that spirit. You know, he says, this is one Santa that isn't going out the back door. So American thinker Olivia Murray wrote about this and said, so since when has orchestrating the saturation of destitute Muslims with third world mentalities in a Western nation,

since when has that ever benefited the hosting population? Well, we know it's like never. And we know that just like Henry Kissinger, who before he died said, you know, maybe we went too far with this. Well, they knew exactly what they were doing. They always knew what they were doing. It's just another front in this bipartisan war against western nations the democide against these western nations and uh so again as you look at this it's like well this is our country but they got to

destroy santa claus you know it's it's important for marxists it's important for muslim, it's important for Marxists. It's important for Muslims. It's important for revolutionaries of all sorts. When they want to build their society, they've got to tear yours down first. And that's what we're in the process of. And that's really the bigger picture that's going on here. They must eliminate and tear down the monuments, the statues, the history. It must all be rewritten and eliminated in order to establish what they wish to establish. Got to wipe out what's there now and then build their

new thing. And of course, we've seen this as Islam has invaded various countries throughout history. They come in and they build their mosques on top of the existing churches or um you know temples or whatever that other people have and then when you look at this again going back to this this thing in uh in the iowa capital put up by this phony church of satan and you had a former republican candidate goes in and chops the thing up cuts the quote-unquote head off they had a goat's head thing they're trying to create baphomet and everything so it's this goat's head skull that is sitting on top of a red cape and all the rest of this stuff with pentagrams and things like that for the Satanists. And so you understand that what this statue is really about was about marking its territory, right?

Marking their territory just like Islam does. But it's also about a phony religion. You know, everything that the temple of Satan is doing, whether it is putting up these satanic displays, they do it wherever people allow the free exercise of religion. They have to come in and put theirs up. Hopefully, people will be disgusted by what they put up. That's what they hope.

Their purpose is to disgust people and have people say, well, we don't want that there, so we'll take away yours and we'll take away these other people who have the right to freely exercise their religion. If it's a private display, you can put that up, right? And that's their purpose. And they go into the schools where they have an after-school Bible club, and they want to set up their after-school Satan club for the purpose of shutting down the after-school Bible club. And as I pointed out before, the people who actually run these things and have been doing it

for many, many decades says that it's actually helped them. When the satanic people come in, it creates an awareness that, hey, there's a Bible class there, and people are so disgusted by what they're doing that they actually send their kids to the after-school Bible class, and it's had a real positive effect on them. And yet, at its core, we have to understand what this truly is. This is not about freedom of religion. We have another group that's called the organization freedom from religion and um i remember we attended the opening of uh answers in genesis creation museum when that happened and the group called freedom from religion rented a plane and you know they tried everything they could to try to keep it from being built you know legal challenges zoning challenges all kinds stuff. And then on the day that they headed there,

the group, they call themselves the Freedom From Religion Society or group or whatever. But that's not what the Constitution says, right? That's what they've been trying to tell us that the First Amendment says. And it doesn't say anything at all like that. They've been trying to tell us that since the middle of the 20th century, that the First Amendment is about freedom from religion. No, it's about the free expression of religion, the freedom that we all have,

and it's about protecting that God-given freedom. But they want to turn it upside down, and they want to purge religion everywhere. And that is the purpose of the temple of Satan. You know, they talk about, oh, well, we have the right to have free expression of religion, but the only purpose that they have is really to shut down the free expression of religion. And so we need to understand that's the fundamental fraud that is at the bottom of it. As I've said before, it's not a religion. It's a sham.

It's a fraud. And it is there to shut down your First Amendment rights. There's a big difference between the establishment of religion and the exercise of religion. And that's what they don't want you to understand. That's what it's critical for us to understand. It's also critical for us to understand. And I mentioned this last week, and I'll mention it again because people are still talking about this. You had a guy, Michael Cassidy, and he went from Mississippi

up to Iowa. And they've now charged him with fourth-degree criminal mischief because he beheaded and toppled the goat-headed effigy that they let be put into the Capitol building of Iowa. He faces a maximum sentence of one year in prison and a $2,560 fine if convicted. But as I said before, when you look at people who had legitimate religious, uh, concerns about the jab, and there's many of them, uh, Jason Barker jason barker who now has knights of the storm foxhole report with angry tiger who also has the tiger and snake report but the two of them do the

knights of the storm together and uh but you know got to know jason because he was pushing back against this stuff when he was in the military. He wrote a great letter outlining the many different religious issues that he had with this. And I was never in support of corporations or the military bringing somebody in and trying to argue religion with them and trying to trip them up. Oh, you take aspirin, don't you? Well, aspirin was tested with baby fetuses and that type of thing. It's like, well, no, it wasn't.

Aspirin goes back to the 1800s. They did some tests after it had been put out, but those tests were not about putting it out there. And anyway, they came up with some false things like that, but they were testing people. It's like an inquisition. Well, let me see if you're really sincere in your religion. And I absolutely hate that. There's no an inquisition. Well, let me see if you're really sincere in your religion. And I absolutely hate that. There's no way that the government should do that. However, if you had somebody who was fighting the vaccine and saying, I'm going to do it and say I need a religious exemption, when they don't really have a religious belief that it offends and they publicly say so. Right? So let's just imagine that you've got somebody out there and they're trying to help

people who don't want to take the jab who are nurses. And they set up some kind of a church or they set up even just a website and say, here, pay me, and I'll show you how to game this thing. And I don't believe any of this stuff, but this is what we'll tell them. And he publicly says that. And then he goes into his employer, and he says, yeah, here's, and he gives him his list

of whatever he wants to say, so I don't need to get the jab. The employer says, but you said publicly that you don't believe any of this stuff. And you see, the temple of Satan doesn't believe in Satan. And the temple of Satan doesn't believe in the First Amendment. And the temple of Satan doesn't believe in the free expression of religion. So let's not give it to them. Let's understand this whole thing as a fraud and a sham and oppose it on that basis.

And I don't see anybody saying that. Everybody is there is like, well, what do we do? This is a conundrum. Because on the one hand, we have to respect the freedom of free expression of religion. But on the other hand, we don't like what these people are doing. That's not the issue. This is not even a legitimate religion. They don't believe any of this stuff.

If they don't believe it, don't play along with their fraud, with their sham. You don't have any of this stuff if they don't believe it don't play along with their fraud with their sham you don't have to do that there are going to be cases where you have uh where that may be an issue this ain't one of them this is not one of those cases so uh there is um you know i don't like to see religious cross-examination so to speak and that's what they're putting a lot of it's an interesting play on words isn't it when you have a christian who is being pressured what do you really believe i would call that a cross-examination where do you stand on the cross uh anyway the world may tell christians to submissively accept the legitimization of satan but now the founders would have considered government sanction of satanic altars inside the Capitol buildings as protected by the First Amendment. He said, my conscience is held captive to the word of God, not to bureaucratic decree,

and so I acted. Well, good for him. You know, he's not speaking about the objections that I have, but, you know, it offended his conscience. And so, hey, that's his religion. His religion is going to be destroying this phony thing here. Anyway, the governor of Iowa, Kim Reynolds, insisted that she was bound by the U.S. Constitution to leave it in place. And this is the argument that I want to destroy. This is the argument I want to destroy, like this guy

destroyed the little effigy thing. It's far more important for us to destroy the argument. We don't wrestle against flesh and blood. We don't wrestle against little Baphomet displays. We wrestle against principalities and powers, and we cast down the false ideas. That's what we should be wrestling with. And so the false idea is that they've got some constitutional right to destroy the Constitution. No, you don't.

And that's the purpose of the so-called satanic temple. But Kim Reynolds doesn't understand that, the Republican governor. She said, like many Iowans, I find the satanic temples displayed in the Capitol absolutely objectionable. But in a free society, the best response of objectionable speech is more speech. But that's exactly the opposite of what these people want. So, and again, you know, Cassidy, the guy who shut this thing down,

that was his eloquent speech in the same way that, you know, Cassidy, the guy who shut this thing down, that was his eloquent speech in the same way that, you know, somebody doesn't like some governmental entity or some nation or whatever. What do they do? They burn the flag. They burn the flag of that country. You know, you got people burning Palestinian flags, burning Israeli flags. You got people who burn American flags. And the Supreme Court have said that's speech. Well, that was his speech.

He basically burned the flag of the, uh, satanic temple. But the key issue is that this is not about the free exercise of religion. This is about an attempt to suppress the free exercise of religion. She doesn't know, or she won't tell you. Uh, anyway, this guy who took it down, The free exercise of religion. She doesn't know. Or she won't tell you.

Anyway, this guy who took it down, he ran a primary campaign. And he came within 300 votes of beating the incumbent. So they had to have a runoff election, which he then lost. According to his campaign website, he is a former fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy. And is a Christian conservative, he says, who loves our nation and is committed to preserving the blessings of liberty bestowed upon us by the founding generation. Well, specifically, God gave us those liberties through the founding fathers. We're grateful to both of them. The founding fathers fought, but God gave the victory. From the beginning, the battle we were winning as the Thanksgiving song goes, right? We gather together those same praises to his name.

He forgets not his own. And that's what we should remember. And we shouldn't shy away from these fights. I think there's different ways to fight this fight certainly he's gotten more attention than anything that i'm going to say about this but i think the issue that we need to understand is what is truly at stake here and what these people are trying to do well we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back tell alex Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere. From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at APSradio.com. 🎵 🎵 © BF-WATCH TV 2021 You're listening to The David Knight Show.

I'm delighted to present something born from my love for music and the Christmas season. Christmas night is a perfect accompaniment for anything from family gatherings to moments of peaceful reflection. My hope is to provide a fresh take to the soundtrack of Christmas. This collection of 20 instrumental songs brings new life to timeless Christmas classics, with With original orchestrations alongside lesser-known, yet equally enchanting carols. For the listeners of The David Knight Show, this is more than music. It's part of our shared journey. Christmas Night is available at thedavidknightshow.com. May it bring a little extra joy and peace to your Christmas season. Thank you for your unwavering support

and for joining me in this new musical adventure. Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good Christmas night. All right, and I want to thank Audi at modernretroradio.com who said that contact him and he'll buy it. What was it? Six or five. Yeah.

Five, five albums on band camp, which you can also find it at band camp. Appreciate that. Thank you very much, Audi. And that's at modernretroradio.com. Serge the Purge says, thank you for the tip. And he says, Merry Christmas, David. So tired of hearing happy holidays at work. Yeah.

It's Christmas, not Xmas as Elon would have it. It's been on Twitter. Is he doing that now? Xmas, I guess he is. He's all about X. That's the only explanation i guess that really makes any sense about his obsession with x because he can replace christ himself i mean this is the guy who wears a baphomet costume for halloween and makes that his thumbnail on twitter so i guess

he would like to replace christ is that what the x is it's really an anti antichrist thing i don't know uh but thanks for your work he says god bless you and your family well thank you very much and that is a blessing thank you for the for the tip sergey appreciate that uh it's christmas time and we have to be aware of political skullduggery of course at a time like this it was coming up on the 23rd it was 110 years ago that the federal reserve snuck in that they snuck in the federal reserve act just before christmas when a lot of people had gone home there had been a lot of discussion about having a central bank you had jp morgan had tried to manipulate things a great deal that's why i talk about that and um the report that i play every year um did it originally back in 2013 on the 100th anniversary now we're at 110 years and i talked

about how it was very similar you know the the banker and it's a wonderful life is very similar to jp morgan he even manipulates a run on the bank to try to drive his competition out of business. And I talked about all the opposition at the time to the Federal Reserve Act, and they knew there was a lot of opposition. And so they waited until a lot of people had gone home. And then they passed it when a lot of congressmen who would have opposed it had already left. A similar thing looks like it's shaping up in Australia. But this time it's not about central banks. The central banks have long been established,

and now the central banks are going to the next step, which is the CBDC, which is a global digital ID. And so now in Australia, Stephen Andrew, member of parliament from Queensland, has alerted the public to a sneaky tactic being employed by the Australian Stephen Andrew, member of parliament from Queensland, has alerted the public to a sneaky tactic being employed by the Australian government to push through the digital ID laws over the Christmas period. Be careful about this. He said Labor's digital identity bill, 2023,

was introduced to the Senate last week without any fanfare by the Minister for Finance, Katie Gallagher. He said the Digital ID Bill 2023 and the Digital ID, the Transitional and Consequential Provisions Bill, they said, was immediately referred to the Senate's Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by the 28th of February, 2024. Once passed, the scheme will be up and running by July 2024. However, the government has invited the public to submit their objections to the bill.

The closing date is the 19th of January, 2024, when families are focused on Christmas and the New Year. So during this time, when everybody's not looking, it's the comment period for the most part. And so this is part of the sneakiness of it. They're not going to be quite as sneaky necessarily as they were in putting in the Federal Reserve, but still it's something to pay attention to

if you are in Australia. Mr. Andrews said, apart from the introduction of a digital currency, I can, that's the CBDC, apart from that, I can think of no other issue more crucial when it comes to human freedom than the worldwide push for a digital identity system. And understand that this is part of the iterative process,

as Fauci said. Remember, in October of 2019, before they rolled out this fake pandemic, Fauci said at the Milken Institute, they asked him, how do we get people to take an untested vaccine? He said, you do it with disruption. You do that from the inside. And said you do it with disruption you do that from the inside and then you do it iteratively and that's what this is about the digital id which has already been approved in the eu and as soon as they got it approved you know the eu bureaucrat said all right the next thing is we need something to put inside this wallet right And so they want to get the digital ID, and then the next step is the CBDC, because the two of those things go hand in glove.

So since 2015, Canberra, at the Australian capital, at the behest of the UN and of the World Economic Forum and of other globalist elite institutions has been crafting a digital identity system this is the key thing that they're focused on and understand that this was gates agenda as well id 2020 that's when they kicked all this stuff off that's when we got the first digital id passports for people whether or not they had been vaccinated that was in 2020 now the the Senate, via its Standing Committee on Economics, is holding an inquiry into this digital ID bill, and they want to hear from you.

We must take this opportunity to tell the Senate to reject this bill. Absolutely. Well, we were talking about music, and I thought this was kind of interesting. Before we leave Christmas stories here. Tis the season Christmas songs are climbing the charts. And they said, when does America start listening to festive music? And they've got a chart there. That's kind of interesting. And it starts picking up, they said, in about the beginning of November.

It starts to pick up from where it is all year people listen to christmas songs all year there's some round the clock channels on these streaming things but um uh it starts to pick up november 12th christmas music comprises more than two percent of u.s streams and then it peaks on these weekends where they've got the little dots there. Those are actually little Christmas trees. If you zoom in on it, people can see that. And it's gradually increasing and then just goes straight up to Christmas Day and then drops off.

But they said about 35% of traffic during the holidays is Christmas music. And so it was kind of really about the economics of it, which I thought was kind of interesting. They said, beginning to sound a lot like Christmas, 53% of Americans consider Christmas music to be essential in any celebrations. November the 12th is when it starts to ramp up. But then I thought it was kind of interesting how they analyze what people are looking for in Christmas music. All I Want for Christmas is You by Mariah Carey,

the 11th most listened to song on all of Spotify globally on Wednesday, racked up 3.3 million streams on that day alone, worth about $8,000 to $10,000 of royalties to the right holders, it's estimated. It's estimated that she makes millions every year off of this but it's kind of interesting as i point out that another person wrote a an op-ed piece about the economics of christmas music talking about copyright issues and other things like that but especially what it is that people are looking for. I said, you know, why aren't there any new songs? And I said, well, because a key part of Christmas music is nostalgia.

And I mentioned that. I said, you know, when I was talking about this the other day, I said, it's kind of interesting because Christmas time is one time that you're going to hear Bing Crosby or Frank Sinatra, Perry Como, or Handel. And you'll hear this all mixed together with Tin Pan Alley stuff like Rockin' Round the Christmas Tree, written by the same guy who wrote Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. And it's kind of interesting because they said as popular as Mariah Carey's song is, and I've never listened to it all the way through. I haven't been able to do that yet. I mean, it's just so bland and generic.

It's like a music video. Here's Mariah Carey all dressed up and prancing around so you can watch Mariah Carey. But I don't know. But it took 25 years for it to become a top christmas song because there's that element of nostalgia there and i think that's kind of interesting you know it's uh we used to have that kind of common experience where i listened to radio stations and you had a few radio stations in your car and you were kind of um kind of had to set through a lot of songs that you didn't really like. Because there's only so many stations.

And then after a while, they start to grow on you. You start to like them. And I think that's really kind of what happened with Rockin' Around the Christmas Tree, the Brenda Lee thing. She finally hit number one this year for the first time after 65 years. And it was, I remember when I was a kid, I really didn't like that song at all. But I guess now, you know, people like it because it's, and that is one thing I do like about Christmas music

because they pull back all this nostalgia and everything. It's a wide variety of styles, which is something that I like. But as they're pointing out, you're trying to balance nostalgia with trying to get something that's a little bit new. A lot of popular Christmas songs, like White Christmas, are even written about nostalgia. That's the key thing. Like Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas and everything.

Which, by the way, that reminds me, i don't know if don is listening or not but don uh is somebody that um and i can't i can't remember his last name i haven't been able to find his song he did a really nice rendition of have yourself a merry little christmas don is a jazz musician and plays upright bass and i came across his music um looking for um stuff to play when i was able to play licensed music when i had the radio channel there and um i came across his rendition of have yourself a merry little christmas it was kind of a jazz rendition had a woman who was singing and uh what i liked about it and what i played about it because i would only play like about 30 seconds or so of music as an intro and um i liked about it was instead of the line um uh you know we'll all be together if the fates allow that type of thing

and they just put in there if the Lord allows. And I always thought that was, that was another thing that always was an irritant to me, you know, listen, it's like, so who are the fates that we're talking about here? I mean,

is this some kind of a Greek tragedy that we're talking about here? Is this Christmas time? What is this that we're talking about here? It just seemed to me to really grate against, but of course that's Hollywood and the 10 pan alley songwriters who don't want Christ in Christmas. And so he put Christ in the center of it you know if the lord allows i like that a lot and then i found out he contacted me and he said hey i'm the guy who did that song and i'm a listener and it's like oh great that's cool and so i used to play it and um uh i lost my email contact with him

when I got shown the door at InfoWars. Subsequent to that, when I went up and spoke in Kingston, New York that first summer when Gerald was having his Occupy Peace thing, I spoke there and he came to see it. So I got to meet him personally, but I don't know.

So Don, if you're still there and still listening, let me know and I'll play your song for people if um uh if you let me know where it is but i've looked all over youtube and i can't find it because i can't remember his name and and that was one of the things they were talking about how many different versions of the top 25 songs there's something like 25 and a half thousand versions of, I think it was silent night or something was number one. And, um, and you know, so there's, we look at the streaming services and there's, you know, 25,000 versions of this and there we go. Yeah.

Was silent night. Thank you. White Christmas, 20,700 jingle bells, 19,000 of those Christmas song, 13,000 on, on you go down the top 25 and there's still thousands at the very bottom is blue christmas uh and that is uh six thousand nine hundred sixty four uh that's the elvis song but i actually prefer the porky pig version if you've ever heard that one look it up if you haven't um but uh it's like stammering porky pig singing blue christmas without you but uh anyway the uh when i looked at those songs uh out of those top 25 uh only five of those are

ones that are on my album so it's a little bit different and i tried to do that was the thing i was trying to do traditional songs uh and um uh car, that type of thing, that would have Christ in it. And you look at some of these things, like Hark the Herald Angels Sing or Joy of the World, which I haven't done yet. But Hark the Herald Angels Sing, Joy of the World, they've really got some strong theological stuff in them. They could be sung all through the year, as a matter of fact. And so a lot of these and so um you know a lot of these things are about nostalgia a lot of these things are about vacations and holidays and celebrations but um you know i think that uh you know some of these older ones that are of course

in the public domain uh i think they paint a very rich picture of Christ, and I think there's something that's there all through the years. As a matter of fact, one of the comments on this story I thought was interesting. A person said, I'm a singer performing mostly live, and therefore I have to expand my repertoire constantly. Your post confirms my choice of songs based on a few of my observations. People do ask for very well-known timeless tunes like Silent Night or Ave Maria more often than they do for the newer hits. Even us singers and musicians can't get bored with performing Christmas songs all the time in one season if, all uppercase if, those tunes are really good. I believe those very old songs could survive centuries.

See, that's the key thing. I'm always looking for the stuff that has survived for centuries because there's something there. Whether you're talking about a folk song or you're talking about some of these other things, there's just something there that resonates with people. So these are songs that have survived for centuries because singing them is indeed a great joy. Their melodies are so excellently done that regardless

of the religious lyrics, and this person who wrote this comment said, those don't mean much to me, to be honest. They still like these ancient Christmas carols. The melodies are so excellently done that it really is a spiritual experience to sing them. And when a crowd sings them, let's say hundreds of people in a church, it creates a wonderful, strong, and uplifting energy. The wavelength of aesthetics is a highly powerful one. This powerful spiritual energy cannot be found in today's pop, hip-hop, and other popular genres. Please correct me if I'm wrong, he said. Or she.

I don't know. It was Jadrian. So I'm not sure what the person is, male or female. And those are the only two possibilities, by the way. But I thought that was an interesting comment. Here's somebody who doesn't care for the lyrics at all. Like I said, some of these lyrics are real, you know,

theological tour de force, capture everything, you know, why Christ came, who he is, um, why he died, all this,

but, uh, you know, this person doesn't care, but these are songs that have survived. And, you know, a lot of them like,

uh, park, the Herald angel sing was originally done by Mendelssohn. And so it was adapted by a, you know, the lyrics were done by a Christian who was familiar with Mendelssohn, who is Jewish, familiar with his classical piece and wrote those lyrics. And then, I think they were done originally by wesley but it was the second ones that were done in the 1840s that were the ones that everybody does now uh finally one person here says that blows my mind that christmas music is already one percent of u.s streams at the start of november is it at that level all year round are there really tens of thousands of people

streaming christmas music in july person said well there's entire radio stations that reproduce christmas music 24 7 all year so yeah the answer is yes and i gotta say i started uh you know some of these songs uh i wanted to do some longer ones instead of just the 30 second ones and so i started some of these in july put them together and uh and it really was nice to be able to do uh some christ back in the, even in the summer. So it's kind of interesting as I always think that, you know, our life does need a soundtrack. And I'm always, I'm always looking for one. We'll be right back. Thank you. The End And now, The David Knight Show. If you like the Eagles,

the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the harder rock and roll is competing. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. The Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. Okay, it's kind of interesting as we look at what's been going on economically and with the Federal Reserve doing a rapid pivot. I even saw an article where somebody, I forget the guy's name,

but they said, here's this guy who was really kind of the sock puppet for the Federal Reserve and Powell. He always throws this stuff out there and is always talking about how genius they are and the go-to guy who releases the stuff for them. And even that guy was, what? They did what?

When? He couldn't believe it. And so now this is coming from Reuters. Here's why bringing down inflation has been different this time, according to Jerome Powell. They're telling us that inflation's done. Yeah, that's right. You know, just like we were talking last week with Tony Arderman of Weiswolf Gold.

Yeah, after you look at what has happened to the American dollar as he held up that little gold coin. And the fact that we have lost over 99% of the value of the American dollar since the federal reserve. And now listen to this guy, Jerome Powell, who was telling us that this time inflation is different and this time they have beaten it. I remember how intractable it was when they set this thing off by messing with the energy supply and, uh, Nixon and all his people couldn't get it in control. And Ford took his place and his grand strategy was to print up little buttons that you could

all wear that said whip inflation now, remember that? And it, uh, was an acronym for when whip inflation now. Well, it turns out that, um, they want us to all believe that Jerome Powell has whipped inflation now. He's winning. They won. It's over. There's no more inflation. Federal Reserve has signaled in its latest economic projections.

There we go. This is a projection. You know, like they project how many people are going to die from COVID, not how many people are going to die from their jabs. Now they project what the weather is going to be like in 50 years from now, all going to die, all the rest of this stuff, right? Well, this is an economic projection. So they will cut interest rates in 2024, even with the economy still growing.

Well, that's different, isn't it? Yeah. Well, normally they would say, well, you can't heat up this economy. You know, it's okay for China to grow at 8%, but you can't do that in America. You can't have more than 2% growth. So, you know, if you start growing too fast, we've got to pull this thing down. So all the rules are new now except they're not i mean this is really about the election this is just purely an election play a political play a political ploy uh cnbc is uh repeating all this stuff reuters is repeating all of this stuff. It's just propaganda and it's just nonsense.

This inflation was not the classic demand overload, says our overlord, Jerome Powell, pot boiling over kind of inflation. So this is not the classic demand pot boiling over kind of inflation, he said. This was a combination of very strong demand without question and unusual supply-side restrictions. What? He doesn't mention quantitative easing? He doesn't mention taking interest rates down to zero and leaving them over there for a long time?

He doesn't mention all this expansion of the monetary supply and everything else? No, no, it was just very strong demand and unusual supply-side restrictions. Well, this doesn't exactly breed confidence, does it, about what's going to happen in the near economic future? I don't think so. Anyway, Costco, I thought this was interesting. A lot of people picked up on this because we had mentioned before that Costco was selling gold. And they said they sold out of it.

And now, as part of their, you know, because a publicly traded company, they have to talk about, you know, things that are impacting their business. And they said that they sold $100 million of one-ounce gold bars last quarter. They said, with persistent inflation, this is what people really believe, is what they actually do, not what Jerome Powell is saying. But they said, with persistent inflation, consumers snapped up the gold, which would sell out within hours. And, you know, we talked about this. I had Tony on.

And Tony Aardman, he set up David Knight.gold. Tony's got great prices. They don't beat Tony's price. And he doesn't sell out in a lot of different ways. He doesn't sell out to the system. And he doesn't sell out of inventory system and he doesn't sell out of inventory because if he doesn't have it he can lock the price in and he'll get it for you eventually and so it really is as he pointed out it's about availability uh these people are going to costco

they sell out within hours and um then costco is not going to take the order and uh you know freeze the price there but tony can do that for you. And Tony also has, um, uh, ways that you can gradually accumulate gold on a regular basis. Just make it a part of your budget. That's the Wolfpack thing. He's even got a thing where you can train kids in terms of economics. And he's got a lot of little cool little things there. A lot of Christmas gifts.

Again, you can find all that at davidknight.golf. I'll take you to Tony. Support somebody who supports our causes. Support somebody who supports our program, really, if you're looking to try to make sure that you're going to be outside of this trap that they're setting up for everybody. And that's what this thing truly is. And so we're going to take a quick break.

And when we come back, we're going to talk about the Pharmakeia. So we will be right back. La Revolta E con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con amati, con am? Qued osati, com'un vento, Parancio, quid osati? You're listening to The David Knight Show. Looking for better information? APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the that Trump said over the weekend. And he repeated it a couple of times in a couple of different ways. Trump says immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country.

Poisoning the blood of our country. Poisoning the blood of our country. Now, who would you think? And when you think of somebody poisoning the blood of our country, would you think that perhaps it was the father of the jab? Trump himself? The poisoner in chief? Isn't that an odd choice of words? And, of course, it is something that the the left uh is oh look this is adolf

hitler language but you know i think there is a compulsion with mass murderers and uh psychopaths and serial killers i think they are compelled to tell people and you always have these people like these serial killers they have to send something to the police and kind of taunt them or whatever you know and um and there really is a compulsion to talk about their crime and quite frankly i don't think he's referencing adolf hitler i think he's referencing what he's doing poisoning the blood of our country and not just our country every country in the world trump has been poisoning the blood the life is in the blood and he's been out there actively poisoning it but he says immigrants coming to the u.s are quote poisoning the blood of our country and so the democrats say well that's the kind of stuff

that adolf hitler said and yes it is and I think that's another aspect of this. I think that Trump is openly flirting with this. And he's not just mocking these people. I think that he really wants to escalate this. There's this back and forth. They want to send him to jail. They want to indict him. And he understands how much that helps him. Remember James Carville, who was Clinton's,

uh, you know, junkyard dog. And, James Carville, when they started talking about impeaching Biden, he goes, how'd we get so lucky?

Yeah, that's going to help Joe Biden. He's going to, you know, it's going to energize his base. How did we get so lucky to have them impeach Joe Biden's best thing could ever happen to him? Well,

they know that's the best thing that could ever happen to Trump. And, you know, all these criminal indictments, which are nothing, right? They're not, they're not legitimate. And regardless of whether or not you got this judge in Manhattan or whatever, whether it'll be appealed. But every time they do this, Trump makes millions off of this stuff. And it gets both of these bases energized over Trump, the people who hate him, the people who love him, they all get energized over this. And so they're doing this stuff. And it gets both of these bases energized over Trump, the people who hate him, the people who love him, they all get energized over this. And so they're doing this

deliberately. And now Trump is doing it as well. Trump is throwing out this stuff. I'll be a dictator for a day or I'll be a dictator on day one and that type of thing. Right. And, and you actually have a guy who's going around and, um, there was a clip somebody picked up. I don't have it here in the deck i had it on friday didn't play it and i forgot to put it back in but anyway the this guy is at a trump rally and he goes how many people want trump to be dictator from day one and of course what trump had said was i'll be a dictator for one day but how many days do you have to be a dictator to be a dictator? I mean, he, you know, he put out that executive order on Friday, the 13th of March,

2020. And, uh, you know, you put out these executive orders and those things stick around. Nobody undoes them. So, uh, one day is enough,

but he's playing around with that. Joking about that. Oh yeah. They say I'm Hitler. Well, I'll be a dictator for one day. How about that? And then you've got these people who jump on it on the MAGA side and they say,

well, you want him to be a dictator from day one? All these people, yeah, yeah, we want it, yeah. America, America, it's great. And they jump in on this thing and they cheer him being a dictator. And so he's playing this game and the more he he talks, it flirts with this dictator. You know, I could be a dictator. What do you think about that? Well, these people think a lot about it and they talk a lot about it. And then that gets their base energized and it energizes Trump's base as well. And so he talks about poisoning the blood of our country. And this is a phrase that was used by Hitler. You know, he's putting that, that's, that's a big part of it. But I think there's one aspect of this that the people are not looking at. And this is a phrase that was used by Hitler. That's a big part of it. But I think there's one aspect of this that the people are not looking at, and that is the fact that he's actually compelled to say that he poisoned people's blood with his shot.

That's the way I read this thing. He said, they let, I think the real number is 15 to 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we've got a lot of work to do. They're poisoning the blood of our country, he told the crowd at a rally in New Hampshire. That's what they've done. They poison mental institutions and prisons all over the world, not just in South America, not just to three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world. They're coming into our country from Africa, from Asia, all over the world. Well, you know, he can be,

he can portray himself as being nationalistic, you know, and opposing all this, being xenophobic and populist and all the rest of the stuff, even being a dictator. But I think that we all know that he's not going to do anything about the border. He didn't do anything about the border the first time. He said, I'm going to get rid of DACA.

But of course, DACA was an executive order from the previous president, Obama. He has the power to get rid of executive. Presidents can create and destroy executive orders. Instead, he said, well, I'll ask the Supreme Court what they think. And they told him, no, you can't do it. Oh, okay. Well, I won't do it then. Anyway, Trump repeated the use of the term poisoning

in a post on his social media, Truth Social. In all caps, he posted, Illegal immigration is poisoning the blood of our nation. And so the term blood poisoning, they said, was used by Hitler in his manifesto, Mein Kampf. But again, I think this has to do more with his being a psychopath, serial killer, and doing the bidding of psychopaths and serial killers. That's, that's really what I think.

I think, you know, we look at these people, um, they want to get us involved in race war. They want to get us involved in a civil war. They want to talk up on both sides this whole idea of dictatorship. And they want a civil war, and Trump is their Mason-Dixon line. He really is. And so, you know, I guess it's better to have the poisoner that you love, right? This is really kind of like Stockholm Syndrome, isn't it, with the MAGA people?

They hate the poison, but they love the poisoner. And now he's out there talking about poisoning the blood of our country. Stockholm syndrome, maybe if we have to have something that is going to be, you know, something like that, we could call it maybe the mana maniacs. The MAGA people really are maniacs about this. If we want to have some alliteration, Stockholm syndrome, we go MM. So Richard Kelly, writing at Brownstone, says we've got to dial up our jabs against the tyrants. And again, when I see terms like jabs and poison, it automatically makes me think of the Trump shot.

That's not what he was talking about, though. He was talking about, in terms of his jabs, he was talking about a boxing match. And he begins the article by talking about the rumble and the jungle that was Muhammad Ali and George

Foreman. You know, it's funny, I was not a boxing fan, and I remember, though, you couldn't not hear about the Rumble in the Jungle. And you couldn't not hear about Muhammad Ali and George Foreman. But I never really knew anything about that. There was an excellent movie that was done about George Foreman's life, which I really enjoyed that. His comeback story and all the rest of the stuff.

And so I would highly recommend that if you haven't seen it that's one of the best movies i've seen in a long time anyway in that um which i guess most of you know i it was news to me when i saw in the movie that's why i mentioned it you know uh the rope-a-dope that ali did was to just sit there and take all the body blows. And George Foreman wore himself out just by punching Muhammad Ali, but he just kind of guarded himself and took the punches for seven rounds. And then when George Foreman was exhausted, he comes back in with a few quick punches and takes him out. And so that's his analogy here, Richard Kelly at Brownstone.

He says, I previously compared the strategy of making submissions on proposed bills, on signing petitions, on writing letters to the editors and the MPs, etc., etc. I've compared that to Ali's tactic, the rope-a-dope. He says, while protesters write and march and post on social media, the objects of their protests might be lulled into thinking that the protesters are on the ropes, doing the best they can, but to no effect. He says, meanwhile, the protesters are planning and rehearsing the five-punch combo to take these other guys up. I look at it and I said, or is it the other way around? You know? I mean, when you put this stuff out there, they're enticing us into this system.

And you see this happening many times. You see it happening with the Ed Snowden leaks. Oh, look it. Here's all the information about how they're spying on everybody. And everybody takes jabs at them. And we're punching them and saying, look at what they did here. Look at what they did there. Look at that.

Look at that. And they do the same thing in these congressional hearings. You know, they'll put somebody up there and use them like a punching bag, but they just got their arms pulled together and yeah, nothing hits them. Nothing knocks them out. They're fine. And then when it's all over, they've done their five punch combo to knock us out because now they've sat there and nothing has been done about it.

We've established it as a new precedent. And so I've seen this the other way around. And that's what I fear is happening is that we're getting in a lot of ineffective body blows. And so what do we do about all this stuff? He said, well, he did give an example of how we need to go for the, for the punch instead of doing these body jabs. He said, for example, take a look at a couple of different letters and how you might write

this. And so here's one that you might write. And he says, I've written these types of letters and so have a lot of other people, uh, to your elected representatives. I'm writing to express my deep concern over the preservation of our individual freedoms and our national sovereignty, which the proposed World Health Organization

pandemic treaty threatens. The scope of the proposed authority from the WHO undermines our national sovereignty, raises significant concerns about the dilution of Australia's rights to self-governance and health and policy. And this would enable unelected, anonymous, and unaccountable institutional bureaucrats to determine our health policy, medical practices, and freedoms.

And so he says, you write a letter like that. He says, that's good. And it lays everything out. There's nothing wrong with that, except, he says, you know what comes next? The stock response. Well, thank you for informing us. We'll be looking at that and that type of thing. Instead, he said, go directly for a punch to the face.

He says, write him something like this. Very specifically, I request that you state clearly whether you support or oppose each of these proposed amendments. And then he, in a very brief way, he characterizes these amendments. There's 10 of them. For example, the first one, to change the nature of the WHO from an advisory to a mandatory. Or number two, potential rather than actual emergencies that they'd be able to shut us down with. Number three, disregard for dignity, human rights, and freedoms. Number four, an allocation plan that would require developed states to supply pandemic

response products as directed by the WHO. Or the mandatory medical treatments that would be a part of this. Or the global health certificates. Or the loss of sovereignty, or the unspecified, potentially enormous financial costs, the censorship, and the obligations of duty to cooperate. So he lays these things out, and he's got references to it and everything, but those are the 10 key points.

And then he finishes up with this, and he says, unless you speak out against these proposed amendments, I will be forced to assume that you support them. Silence is consent. Now, again, it's still just a letter.

It's still just a letter. But a lot of these times, again, they look at the response from people. They weigh it by the pound. And it usually isn't even what is in there. Regardless of what you write, you're going to get a canned response. Nevertheless, I think that's still a better approach to take.

And I think we need to speak out. And this is one of the reasons why they are so hell-bent on censorship of social media. You know, if you send that kind of a letter to them and you get back a canned response, you put those two up on social media. And if everybody starts doing it, eventually somebody's going to do it that's not shadow banned and it's going to go viral. And we will see what these people are doing. But the key thing is we've got to educate so many people

who still don't understand what is happening. And I saw this headline. I thought it was the best description of warp speed. A car with no brakes or steering wheel. Just a big gas pedal. That's what Trump did to us. Never forget that Trump Trump with his lockdowns and his mandates and his mask and his ventilators and his remdesivir and all the rest of the stuff,

it was a car with no brakes or steering wheel, but one great big gas pedal. And he just wants to run that thing as fast as he can what could possibly go wrong no steering wheel no brakes yeah just setting us up for the great crash that was what that was all truly about i think that's the best description of warp speed that's not the way they put it there but i think that is the best description of it um a new study has just revealed the true horror and the lies behind the vax this is from hans monkey i guess the way pronounce his name m-a-h-n-c-k-e he says there is a scandal of epic proportions brewing here a new study in nature now asserts that mrna quote-unquote vaccines were by their very nature never able to stop the spread and impossible in theory and in practice yet that was the excuse used to force everybody to get injected with this

stuff you know the um poisoning of the blood that's what we should start calling this we should grab it and get people understand what his real meaning is with this. And so you see now studies, frequent booster injections, intramuscularly injected vaccines cannot induce immunity in the mucosal tissues of the airwaves, which is the site of the virus,

if there is a virus. Now, that is being put out by the companies because they want us to not inject the vaccines, but to breathe them in. And so now they're telling us, you know, these things never worked, never had a possibility to work. If you've got a respiratory illness, injecting something into somebody's muscle ain't going to work, you know, these things never worked, never had a possibility to work. If you've got a respiratory illness, injecting something into somebody's muscle ain't going to work, you know?

Yeah, the toe bone is connected to the foot bone, foot bone connected to the ankle bone, ankle bone, but they ain't connected. None of them bones are going to connected to the respiratory issue here. Dim bones and dry bones, endomuscular vaccines cannot induce mucosal immunity in the airwaves, they're now telling us. So therefore, you need to suck them in. The next wave is going to be inhalable dry powder COVID vaccines. Well, and of course, you and I will not be signing up for that, of course,

but that will allow them a delivery system, which will make it harder to avoid. As other people are looking at this in detail, they pointed out written papers, a nature publication by Mulroney, has the authors have shown that the mRNA translation via ribosome stalling results in the production of multiple unique and potentially aberrant proteins. And the bottom line is they say there are no desirable proteins being generated by this. In other words, everything that it makes is bad.

The vaccines produce off-target proteins. And then that produces immune responses that elicit safety concerns. Safety concerns, yeah, because it is... But don't expect the FDA to care. It has also been shown that their manufacturing process was dirty and faulty, and they had DNA adulteration of the vaccines, but the FDA says, we don't care. We don't care.

Robert Malone's written a very long article, which I will not go into detail of, but again, they will never have any concerns about adulteration or about concentration or the active ingredients there. They're varied by factor of 33 from jab to jab. They don't care about any of that stuff. And then the dirty little secret of Pfizer, says the expose, is that graphene oxide is in the COVID vaccines and has fatal shedding effects. This is something that's been said for a very long time. I have not focused so much on the ingredients because I can't prove any of that. I try to focus on the things that I know. And that is, if you're going to tell me you've got a warp speed car,

that's got no steering wheel and no brakes, but a big gas pedal on, which is step on it and just keep it on there, you know, or are you, I want you to take a novel vaccine that has never been tested. That's going to modify your DNA and it's going to turn your body into a factory to manufacture spikes.

It's like, no, that's just as stupid. So I think we can look at this and we can attack it from that standpoint, I think even more effectively, just like I was talking about now that fluoride is now back in the news. We've had a lot of studies that prove, epidemiological studies that prove that fluoride in the water at a certain concentration, at a very low concentration as a lot of studies that prove epidemiological studies that prove that fluoride in the water at a certain concentration at a very low concentration, as a matter of fact, will degrade the IQ of children who are developing.

But again, the, we don't even have to argue that because we look at that and they say, well, this is the concentration and, and we don't put that much in the water. It's like, oh, really? You don't?

Well, how do you control the concentration of a medication when you dump it into the water? You have no control over it. And so what is, by the way, you're going to give the same dosage of a medication to a 250 pound man as you do to a toddler? No. So none of that even passes the sniff test. And so when we get into this and we look into the details, like is there graphene oxide in it? What kind of proteins is it making? We can look at the results and we can see the massive increase in deaths that are timed with the introduction of the vaccine. And we can, people are starting to understand that the increases in death that were attributed to a virus were actually the hospital death protocol that was being rewarded and or dictated.

In other countries, it was dictated. Here in the United States, Trump and Fauci were rewarding the hospitals to give people a protocol that would kill them. You know, non-treatment, and then when it gets really bad, then we're going to do these other things that are going to be killing people, like the ventilators and things, and remdesivir. And so we understand the two different stages. You know, the first stage, the hospital death protocol killed a lot of extra people that would not have died from annual flu shots and flu, well, flu shots, but the flu going around.

And then they ramped it up significantly with the vaccines. And so we can look at that kind of stuff, and we understand what this is truly about. We can look at the way the FDA has responded to any documentation of contamination or manufacturing errors or irregularities in terms of the concentration of this stuff. And we can see that their total disregard of all this. And this was there from the very beginning.

As a matter of fact, it was in the fall when Children's Health Defense saw that they were going to be pegylating this stuff, putting it in polyethylene glycol. And so we can't do that. If you do that, people are going to be pegylating this stuff, putting it in polyethylene glycol. And so we can't do that. If you do that, people are going to have allergic reactions. They'll go into anaphylactic shock. And sure enough, a lot of people did. But they reported it to the FDA, and the FDA said, we don't care. Contact Pfizer.

And they contacted Pfizer and said, we don't care. The FDA doesn't care. We don't care. And so when you look at that, you know right away. And that was before these vaccines rolled out. That was in the fall of 2020 when they were talking about what was going to be in the vaccine. So we knew from its very inception that they had absolutely no safety or health concerns, no concerns about efficacy. So we can get into the details of whether or not there's graphene oxide in it or not.

But we've known this stuff for a very long time. It's important that we have the stuff continue to come out, but still we've, we've known this from the way they respond to it. Time and time again, anybody talks about any of this stuff, you're labeled a conspiracy theorist, you're kicked off of media. And yet the real conspiracy was between the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies and the NIH and Fauci and Trump, wasn't it? Weren't they the conspirators, the grand conspirators that gave us the jabs? They're poisoning the blood of our country.

The FDA attempted to delay the release of all this stuff for 75 years. That's another tell, isn't it? Isn't that enough right there? Any one of these things would be enough. Just like if we look at this stuff and say, look, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, all the rest, any one of those would be enough. And then when you look at these things collectively, you understand this is a mass murder program, nothing less.

And let me tell you, if we're going to talk about hitting body blows on people, we don't want to keep talking about, isn't this amazing that the FDA is not doing anything about this? No, let's call it what it is. Let's call it murder. I called it murder, and I got my entire podcast shut down over the weekend. Not this last weekend, but it's a couple of weekends ago. I was just going back and looking to see why revenue was down on it, and I saw that it just took all my revenue down to zero because I called it murder.

And it is murder. I put murder in the title, and I stand by that. I've been calling it murder for three years now. And we have to hit them in the face with that we don't want to pull any punches here uh this is nothing less than murder it's nothing less than poisoning the blood that murdering politician well he'll tell you the truth about some things money not quite in the way that you want it uh so the fda wanted to keep this all covered up for 75 years, but it turns out that along with many other things, graphene oxide is in the body and is in the jabs.

And it is something that is perhaps a part of forming the strange blood clots. This article, if you want to look it up in detail, I'm not going to go in the details, but expose-news.com has it. Pfizer's dirty little secret graphene oxide is in the COVID vaccines and has fatal shedding effects. That's the other thing they said. Well, unfortunately, this graphene oxide is also sheddable. In other words, you can transfer it to people who have not gotten the jab. And they go through about 25 pages of pictures and

other things to explain this so if you don't think that's graphene oxide take a look at their their article but we know without that we already know what this is and have known for a very long time um on rock fan audi modern retro. And again, thank you, Audi. He gave us a very generous tip, and he said that he will buy five albums if you email him there at Modern Retro Radio off of Bandcamp. He said, the predator class wants the Civil War to be between illegal immigrants and natural-born citizens. It is so obvious that it's what's afoot.

Don't take the bait, patriots. Exactly right. And that is part of what this is about, right? They want a civil war over Trump, and Trump is going to make it about the immigration stuff. That's what he ran on the first time. And of course, he didn't do anything about it. The immigration momentarily hesitated when he got elected because people thought they're going to be thrown out. And then when they figured out that he was a paper tiger at best or a globalist at worst that's when the caravans began and they want to use this and they want to make this a civil war you can see what this is what is happening in europe and all the rest of the places we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back whether you're

feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. PIANO PLAYS Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, I like this Babylon Bee storyline. Clarence the Angel takes Gavin Newsom to Florida to show him what California would be like if he had never been born. I said, yeah, you're going to be given a great gift, Gavin, to see what California would look like if you had never been born. Look at the unvarnished beauty of nature. Walk the streets free of feces. See the livelihoods unruined.

Hear the laughter of children allowed to live. You see, Gavin, each man's life touches so many other lives. See all the wonderful things that don't exist because of you. It's really a wonderful life here in Florida, isn't it? Yeah. And this is apropos, I think, to what is actually happening in California. Remember, California was already deeply in debt with all these programs. Tens of billions of dollars in debt with all these programs, tens of billions of dollars in debt. And now, and then they got bailed out by Trump, right?

Big time. And he wound up with this massive surplus. But in just three years, he's burned through that. No problem at all. You know, Trump bailed him out, literally did bail out California, but they only kicked the can down the road for about three years. And they've come up with all kinds of schemes to spend money.

And now, and of course, one of those was the reparations garbage that was there. Again, you know, this is racist, so ambiguous and all of this stuff. As I've said many times before, you know, just take a look at the Obama family. Uh, what do you do with that? You know,

um, uh, Brock has got a white mother or you take a look at Angela Davis, the radical Marxist trying to push a race war for a very long time. She finds out that, uh, both of her grandfathers are white. It's like,

no, her own personal L she hated white people so much. And then she found out she are one. And then, uh, you know, so you look at all this stuff and it's like, how does this even supposed to work? Ignoring for a moment, uh, the injustice of trying to punish people for what their great grandfathers did, or even worse, what people who looked like them maybe did,

even though their ancestors weren't even here in America at the time. And so, but now they've run up against another problem. And, you know, so there's a practical problem about it. Well, what do we decide? You know, does Barack Obama pay reparations to his other self you know what's the deal with that um and you know so you have the the practical aspects of of how do you determine who pays who gets the money um the um the unfairness of all this stuff but now you got the deficit issue and now that they've spent through all this COVID cash that Trump dumped on them with

all these helicopters, now they can no longer afford to do that, but it's not going to get in the way. You know, we, we saw again, um, Michelle Wu had her segregated party and bragged about her no whites allowed a party that she had. And as I pointed out at the beginning of the program, she went to the celebration of the Boston Tea Party. And to her consternation, the tea did not stand for trans. IBM is getting a big lawsuit because we saw that it was James O'Keefe busted a leak where the CEO of IBM is saying, well, if you want to get bonuses,

you're going to have to follow these DEI ratios very carefully. And if you don't, you're going to get fired. And they had a guy there who was bragging, yeah, yeah, we fired people for not doing that. Well, now a lot of people are going to sue them because this was now released. And then we look at the other part of the Civil War, which goes back to the original Civil War. There was a monument that was put into Arlington National Cemetery, the big military cemetery. And by the way, Arlington, they made that a cemetery because that was part of Robert E. Lee's property.

It was something that he inherited through his wife who was descended from Custis Washington. I think it was his name anyway. He was the adopted son of George Washington that passed down to him. And then they gave this to Robert E. Lee, this hot potato. And as part of the, um, you know, passing it down, the person who wrote the will said, okay, well, I want you to free all the slaves, but then I want you to pay everybody else a stipend. It's like, how do I do those two things?

Right. I can't make the kind of income that is going to provide these stipends to all these people if i free the slaves uh so this is hobson's choice that he was given this impossible thing but his virtue signaling by the guy who handed it off to him his his wife's father uh but anyway that was Arlington. And then when he was the leader of the Army of Virginia, Northern Virginia, they took over his plantation and they turned it into a cemetery so that he could never take it back. And now after the war, they set up a massive reconciliation monument. And as I said before, nothing says civil war more than the fact that they don't want reconciliation. You look at this monument, and you look at what is happening to the January Sixers,

and they're calling them insurrectionists and all the rest of this stuff. And this was, again, something that's put into the 14th Amendment. And it said, you know, if anybody's been involved in insurrection and so forth, they're not going to be eligible for public office. We see people trying to use that against Trump, even though he wasn't convicted of insurrection. But also, you know, the punishments that were there. And yet, I said, you know, when you look at that, by that point in time, they were over the fourth turning.

They were over the Civil War. People had lived through this massive carnage and they didn't want any more of it. And so even though they had the opportunity to come after the people who they said were insurrectionists, they saw themselves as fighting for secession in a country and self-governance in a country that was born out of secession and self-governance, as we're talking about. But nevertheless, from their perspective, as they wanted to label them, they were insurrectionists, but they didn't go through and give the leaders or the soldiers of the Confederacy, they didn't give them the treatment that they're giving all the January the 6th protesters. And what does that

tell us about our society? It tells us that we are at the beginning of this civil war, where people are itching for a fight. They really want this badly. They want to escalate it. Whereas when they put that stuff through the 14th Amendment, it's like, we're done with this. Yeah, yeah, but let's just move on. Can we just move on and stop the killing? Eventually, you get to that point, after a lot of people have been killed, get to the point where it's like, all right,

we're just going to look past this, we're going to move on past this, because we don't want to perpetuate the killing. So we're going to let these injustices go on. In a sense, you're going to forgive this. And that's really where we have to go with this. But that's not where our government is right now. That's not where the Pentagon is. That's not where the Department of Defense so-called is. So they went to the Arlington Cemetery, this massive reconciliation monument. Pull up a picture

of that, Travis, because it really is very ornate. Not anything that we'd be able to do today, you know, with our meager skills. And I'm demanding Secretary Austin pause the removal until the appropriations process is complete as we fight to defund this misguided move, said Representative Andrew Clyde, who was ignored. And they demanded that they stop this. 44 House Republicans calling on the Pentagon to stop this. But why would the Pentagon stop it? You just gave them everything they wanted. You just gave them the biggest budget they've ever had. You just gave them nearly, well, and if we count the money given to Ukraine and Israel, it's over a trillion dollars you gave to

them with no strings attached, no need to do an audit. They've supposedly had audits now for six years, the Pentagon, they've never passed one of them. They've never passed a single audit. So you're going to give them a trillion dollars a year and you don't really care what they do with it. Why would they care what you have to say? I mean, ultimately the, um, uh, the Congress is only real leverage on any of this stuff is the person. You just gave them a blank check and said, there'll be no accounting for any of this. And so person you just gave them a blank check and said there'll be no

accounting for any of this and so the army just blew it all off and said we're going to destroy this and again you know monuments are important in the sense that uh they are markers for how we got to where we are and what can we learn from those things, right? What could you learn from the massive cemetery there and all the dead people from the Civil War and the Reconciliation Monument? What could you learn from that? That you don't want to have another civil war? Well, they don't want that, right?

And so they just keep pushing this stuff. It truly is amazing. And everywhere you look, they're trying to divide us against each other. And then they come back with this. This is from the Western Journal. Somebody did a study, and guess what they found? The Institute for Family Studies did a study and said, neighborhoods with strong

families are safer. That families that have traditional values are safer and so forth. Well, who would have thought that? Ward, I'm worried about the beaver. Well, I'll have a talk with him about this. this i mean you know that's just common sense we know what is happening we know how it is um you know tearing the family apart uh what schools are involved in what media and entertainment are involved in what disney is involved in example, when you look at Disney, they're actively encouraging and modeling rebellion against the family, against society, in terms of their cartoon characters. This is their focus.

And so we know what has happened as we've seen this go through the mid 20th century. It sounded like it was designed to help people. Oh, we got people here who are poor. Let's put them on welfare. Well, it broke up the family. It gave an incentive for there to not be a family,

just as certainly as Trump's lockdown and subsequent stimulus check gave an incentive for people to think, well, maybe I don't want to work. You know, you give people, uh, people start to see that you don't have a family here, but you got a kid or multiple kids and you can still get Uncle Sam to be the daddy

in terms of a paycheck. And so, yeah, let's just not even bother with getting married anymore. You know, that type of thing. And the universal basic income is just that kind of destructive welfare on steroids. You go back and you look at Anthony Burgess and other people who have talked about how, you know, he said, I was growing up. I was in a black community and it was great. We had a lot of entrepreneurs. Things were, you know, we weren't maybe as rich as the white people, but we had intact families.

Everybody was happy. We didn't have the kind of crime we've got now. We didn't have this scourge of drugs, all of those things born from the destruction of the family. And so do we really need to have another study to tell us what is so obvious that we've seen? I mean, isn't it clear where this is all heading? You just take a look at the uh the drug issue uh the guy um from um um friends i didn't watch it so i can't remember the guy the guy who just died you know they found out that he was uh horrifically addicted to not only ketamine but a lot of others they found this massive amount of ketamine in his bloodstream, poisoning the blood.

Said that it was as much as you'd give somebody to anesthetize them, and he's in his pool and he drowns in his pool. But he had a long history of alcoholism and addiction and other things like that because we have atomized society, even for the wealthy, let alone for poor kids that are there. We have become so focused on ourselves and without having a family that this is the outcome. So from the richest to the poorest, we see this. Is this really news that we should have intact families? Is this why the government is so dead set to attack the family?

Quite frankly, I think it is. I think a lot of this is deliberate. A lot of the people who are leading this attack may not realize just how deliberate it is because of where it is coming from. It is satanic. Thank you for joining us. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com.

That's a website.