The David Knight Show - 18Jul23 Janet Yellen on Shrooms; Tucker, Tate, RFK, Peterson on God & Jung

Episode Date: July 18, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESNobel laureate inQuantum Physics joins CO2 Council to get people to understand CO2 (and sunlight) are vital. You don't have to be a Nobel prize winner to understand God's designand how clouds provide shade, reflect the sun, and regulate temperature (2:07)ClimateGate 3.0: A Decade Later, A Pattern of Deception What have we learned about "scientism" a decade after ClimateGate 3.0 and 3 years after CovidGate? The person who leaked ClimateGate emails tells why he/she did it (26:25)The 15-minute cities and the SMART cities — one to lock you down, the other to surveil you (41:13)From Janet Yellen having 4 serving of psychedelic mushrooms in China and unable to stop bowing, to AOC (Occasional Cortex) and Dan Crenshaw (One-Eyed McCain) pushing Ecstasy — are we returning to 60s drug culture? (57:05)Remember when Jim Carey pushed back against vaccine mandates — in 2015?WATCH him on Larry King… (1:26:09)New Alzheimer's drug being pushed. Like Remdesavir, they don't even make a case for it working. Why do we look to BigPharma and BigBro government to solve all our problems and never consider the cause? (1:33:18)The documents come out — how CDC openly lied about masks. Yes, I know, shocking (1:48:26)FL County GOP says "mRNA is THE Bioweapon"Don't get distracted by talk about the lab or a virus that targets different ethnic groups. This local GOP organization knows what THE issue is — the mRNA jab (1:52:23)A doctor doing residency, tells of the murder of a baby born after a failed abortion. (1:58:25)Tucker, Tate, RFK, Peterson: On God & Jung Desc: Why are so many public figures talking about God? And not just superficially. What do these influencers think about God? And we end up, somehow, at Ian Fleming's house — "Goldeneye" (2:13:41)BlackRock CEO cheerleading his Bitcoin ETF. What's his angle? Why a derivative of Bitcoin like paper gold and paper silver? (2:54:22)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

www.thezeitgeistmovement.com Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 18th of July, year of our Lord, 2023. Well, today we're going to talk about drugs, psychedelic drugs. Perhaps that was what was behind Janet Yellen bowing incessantly to President Xi.

And, of course, it's being talked about. They're trying to legalize it. You got AOC, Occasional Cortex. And also, One Eye McCain are pushing it real hard. Are we headed back to the 60s? Because we're talking about psychedelic drugs. Remember, that was the CIA and their LSD program that kicked all that stuff off. But we've also got Germany out there stealing cars. Not civil asset forfeiture, although it

looks like that a little bit. But they want to take everybody's cars everywhere because of climate change. And we're going to begin with that because we just had a, and I haven't talked about this, this came out a couple of weeks ago, but it's time to talk about what a noble laureate said about climate science. He knows a thing or two about science and he knows fraud when he sees it as well. John F. Clauser. He is a Nobel laureate. He won the Nobel Prize in 2022 for physics, experimental and theoretical physics, quantum mechanics, and that type of thing. A very interesting thing that has been around for a while,

and actually this is for work that he did quite some time ago, and it was done in the 1970s. And I've heard a lot of people talk about this. It's one of the interesting things that is evidence for the existence of God and an intelligence that ties things together, quite frankly, if you look at it. I've said this about vaccines and disease theory and contagion theory. We try to explain things that we can't see, and viruses are things that we can't see. Quantum physics is something that we can't see as well. One of the things that he discovered 50 years ago was that you have these different

quantum particles. He called it quantum entanglement. You have these different quantum particles and they communicate with each other at great distance. It's like they're being directed at the same time at a great distance. In other words, for this to happen, any information that would travel between them, any kind of signaling or anything, would have to travel faster than the speed of light. And so everything about quantum mechanics and quantum physics is a real mystery. They can look at what is happening, but they can't really explain it. And like Heisenberg pointed out, if you take a look at it, you actually measure it, you change it.

As you're trying to measure it and observe it, you change it. So all of it is very, very strange. It's not the neat little Niels Bohr, Adam thing that you always had on the desks of the school teachers, where you've got the nucleus, and you've got protons and neutrons there in the nucleus, and you've got the electrons that are circling around it. It's a nice model for understanding how things work, but it's a lot more complicated than that. And we don't really understand it. In many ways, it's like we don't understand God either, you know, because of his nature. Why would we expect that we would understand God? But when you look at certain things, like, you know, how

much of our life is free will? How much of it does God predestinate and control? What's the point of praying? And yet we see that it works and that God answers it many times. We have a lot of these mysteries, don't we? That we always try to work out. This is one of them. Dr. John F. Clouser, joint recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics,

has criticized the climate emergency narrative, calling it, quote, a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and the well-being of billions of people. You see, there's many ways that the COVID MacGuffin and the climate MacGuffin are like each other. They have the same endpoint, don't they?

And in the same way, they have the same misdirection. We're told with the COVID MacGuffin, and this is something that's now been revived by RFK Jr. I'm very sad to see that. Oh, you know, look at the lab. It's got to be the lab. No, it wasn't the virus. It was not the virus it was the bioweapon is the vaccine i've got a video uh sent to me by a listener where you got

the uh in brevard county florida you got people in the gop they're now saying this i'm glad to see them saying it why is rfk jr now directing us to the virus? We know what the bioweapon is. He knows that all these games were done for 20 years, going back to dark winter. He knows it's a CIA trap. Why is he talking about the lab? And again, they're not doing it just like Rand Paul, not doing it in order to stop gain of function in case they come up with something really dangerous. We know, as a matter of fact, that it wasn't COVID that was killing people.

It was the political measures that the Trump administration were taking. Financially incentivized medical malpractice, withdrawal of care, putting people on ventilators, giving them remdesivir eventually, masking people up, all of this stuff harmed people and then fauci and the cdc provided their lying statistics like they had on an annual basis for flu shot motivation this was the thing that kicked me off with info wars and alex and mike adams at the very beginning of this why are you pushing this yeah Yeah, I noticed back in December that the only biosafety level four lab that they had in China was in Wuhan,

right there at the spot where they said this began at the wet market. I thought, uh-oh, we better watch this carefully. However, when we saw the people passing out on the streets and other things like that, when we saw the lockdown measures, then I realized, no, I've seen this before. This is what they've been practicing for 20 years, and that's the lockdown measures. Then I realized, no, I've seen this before. This is what they've been practicing for 20 years.

And that's the dangerous thing. It's a psychological war against us. And they pushed that psychological war to sell storable food and the rest of this stuff and to sell the panic and to cover for Trump and all the rest of this stuff. And so now RFK jr. Is out there talking about the bioweapon. And how it didn't target Jews and Chinese.

Now, that's just stupid because you know what the political effects are going to be on that, and you know that you can't prove it, and it's not proven. Why go there? And here's the other side of that. As he talks about, you know, he's got everybody starts debating, well, it isn't leaving the Jews and the Chinese alone debating well it is isn't uh leaving the jews and chinese alone or it is leaving them alone or whatever so they start debating that but what is what are they how has he moved the narrative with this he's moved the narrative back to it was an engineered vial weapon coming from the lab now the only question is did it affect everybody equally or did it target certain ethnic groups but you're back to that same thing.

Don't look at the vaccine now. Look at the lab. No, it wasn't the lab. The bioweapon was the vaccine. Don't lose track of that. No matter what RFK Jr. And Alex is now Alex is somebody sent to me. Alex has cut a video saying RFK Jr.

You knew he was going to do that, right? You know, Alex is going to push this panic button again. He was pushing it at the very beginning. He's pushing it again for political reasons to suck up to the expectations of the audience. Oh, we like Trump. We like RFK Jr. Okay, well then I like him as well. Let's see what can I do to boost them and make you like me. I'll say good things about them even if I have to make it up. So the point I'm making here is that another aspect of the MacGuffin is that they will

misdirect you as to what they'll come up with a crisis. And it really doesn't matter what the crisis is. They will use that crisis to get the same things done at the end. But they'll also tell you that it's an existential threat to your life. And they'll misdirect you from what the real threat is. The real threat is not Wuhan. It's not the Chinese flu. It's not the flu or any of that other stuff. The real threat was the vaccine. And in climate stuff, the real threat is not CO2. The real threat are the measures that the government is taking. And in that regard, the COVID MacGuffin and the climate MacGuffin

are alike in that regard as well. The real threat to us is not CO2 or a virus. The real threat to us is the government and its plans of what it's doing to us. And it will kill us if they get a chance. These people will kill for money. They have wars for money. And they've always killed for money. And it's the corporations and the governments together, a kind of fascism, the definition

of economic fascism. They're the ones who seek to kill us for money and power. Don't ever forget that. They're not like you. They don't think like you. Don't project your thought patterns onto them. Because if you do, you wind up doing this. And the people sinned a great sin.

Yeah. For they had made them a god of gold. Yeah, yeah. Don't project them. And rejoice, saying, this be our God, O Israel. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, don't do that. That's what we always wind up doing, right?

So anyway, what did this guy say? He's looking at this. He discovers some aspects of quantum physics, quantum entanglement. The fact that these particles are moving together and coordinated in a certain way, in order for that to happen, you've got to have stuff that's moving faster than the speed of light? Yeah, go explain that. People have been kicking this around for 50 years. It's like, well, I don't understand it, but let's give him a prize.

I don't have an explanation. Maybe we give him a prize. Well, he's given us an explanation about something that he's now focused his attention on. He is now part of the CO2 coalition, talking about the value of CO2. CO2 is not a poison. CO2 doesn't have to be gotten rid of. It doesn't have to be pushed into the ground.

And we don't have to have geoengineering to reflect sunlight back and change the albion of the of the planet we don't have to do any of that stuff as a matter of fact as he points out god already did it he doesn't give god the credit necessarily i don't know if he certainly nothing in this article shows him giving god the credit but god's already done the geoengineering and he has um the guy who can observe quantum particles coordinating with each other, he's got some interesting observations to tell us about the importance of CO2 and the importance of clouds for cooling, for reflecting the sunlight back.

You see, God already created that. It gets hot, water evaporates, it makes clouds. It's kind of a self-sustaining thing here. Now, we can come in as human beings and we can mess that up, and that's exactly what Biden and his cronies are trying to do to make money. They want to come in and they want to interfere with sunlight that we need and CO2 that we need because we need the plants that are the bottom of the food chain there. So he has criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize

for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming. According to a coalition of scientists and commentators who argue that an informed discussion about CO2 would recognize its importance in sustaining plant life. What's the matter with these people? That's basic science. The people like John Kerry and others like him don't want you to understand.

They want you trying to figure out what gender you are, regardless of what your body is. They don't want you to understand basic facts. And so CO2 must not be eliminated. But you notice how, and especially in journalism, I've talked about it many times, I'll look at some little puff piece to push climate change. And they'll refer to carbon monoxide in the atmosphere. No, that's not. Carbon monoxide is what's generated in internal combustion engines. If you shut the garage door and turn on the car engine,

you can die of carbon monoxide. As a matter of fact, we've had several situations recently of people going to some expensive resorts in Central and South America where the air conditioning somehow pumped CO2 back into their room. People found them the next day dead, foaming at the mouth. They died in their sleep. CO2 is not deadly. And, you know, carbon monoxide, but they confuse it, carbon dioxide with carbon monoxide. And then, of course, they just call it carbon dioxide, with carbon monoxide. And then, of course, they just call it carbon.

It's carbon. It's dirty carbon. So carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon, they don't care. They don't know the difference. They hope you don't know the difference either. Well, in a statement issued by this CO2 coalition, and again, Nobel laureate John Clouser is on the board of directors, Dr. Clouser said, quote,

there is no climate crisis, and increasing CO2 concentrations will benefit the world. This is why Biden and his cronies are doing exactly the opposite, because they don't want to benefit the world. You see, CO2 is not the problem. Biden's a problem. The Wu flu is not a problem. Trump was the problem.

And Biden as well. He criticized the prevalent climate models as being unreliable and not accounting for the dramatic temperature stabilizing feedback of clouds, which he says are more than 50 times as powerful as the radiative forcing effect of CO2. Dr. Clouser notes that bright white clouds are clearly the most conspicuous feature in the satellite photos of the Earth. You ever think about that? I guess we're just kind of lucky that clouds are white and not dark or something. It's almost like, I don't know, God designed it that way or something.

Maybe we should leave it alone, Biden. Yeah, so they reflect sunlight, which is why he wants to put toxic materials. Maybe we should leave it alone, Biden. Yeah. So they reflect sunlight, which is why he wants to put toxic materials in the atmosphere to reflect sunlight. No, it's already taken care of. Clouds reflect sunlight energy back into space before it can reach the Earth's surface to heat it. It's already been done, Biden. God did it. Thought about it before you did.

Before Gates did as well. This creation, and the nice thing about clouds is that eventually you get particulates that come out of it. Not particulates, but what's the word I'm looking for? Precipitation. Eventually it precipitates out instead of like aluminum and whatever else they put in the aluminum and barium and all the rest of the stuff they put in their chemtrails. That stuff is not nice when it lands on the ground and you can see the concentrations of it, places where they've been doing this heavily out in California. But you know, the nice thing about precipitation out of clouds is it's called rain and it's a good thing. Anyway, according to the Nobel laureate, this creation of reflective cloud cover

provides a natural thermostat that regulates the Earth's temperature with a powerful negative feedback effect. When will we realize that we can't improve on God's design for our planet or our bodies with the big pharmaceutical products? He asserts that this temperature-regulating effect is more than 50 times as strong as the warming effect of CO2. He further adds that the IPCC, that's the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, this is this UN organization that has become the bane of our existence, literally. The UN IPCC.

Their detailed analysis of clouds and their effect on climate, he said, totally misunderstands the effects of clouds and totally ignores the dominating energy transport process. Well, again, this guy is a noble laureate. He's smart. Doesn't mean that he's necessarily right. But common sense tells you that he is right. This is real simple stuff. It's just critical thinking tells you these people are lying to you. According to Dr. Clouser,

the popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and the wellbeing of billions of people. He said, misguided climate science has metastasized like a cancer metastasized. He said into massive shock, journalistic pseudoscience. And in turn, massacized, he said, into massive shock journalistic pseudoscience. And in turn, this pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills.

It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, he said, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world's expanding population, especially given an associated energy crisis. And the latter, the associated energy crisis, he said, is unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science. They're trying to starve us of this stuff. And of course, at the UN, the climate talk guy who is in charge of it

says the world must attack all emissions everywhere especially those of you with cars now you know cruise ships we're okay with cruise ships even though just one cruise line with 60 some odd giant cruise ships uh has 43 percent more emissions than all of the cars in europe combined which is pretty amazing but you know as i pointed out yesterday they're making these things more and more absurdly large the new one that's about to hit is going to be five times the size of the titanic in both length and weight so i don't know you know maybe they're running these things off of engines that have got about as much that are about as clean as a lawnmower or a Chinese power plant. Because they're both about the same thing.

Chinese and Indian power plants. They're about as clean as an old, old lawnmower. You can see the blue smoke coming out of them. The head of this year's UN climate talks called for governments and businesses to tackle global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in all regions, all sectors. If they want to stop the planet from passing, a key temperature limit agreed on. How many times have we heard this?

Oh, you got to act right now. Act now or, you know, we're all going to die. The oldest marketing trick in the book. Limited time offer. Don't miss this opportunity. Because if you do, we're all going to die. And then he says, we must be brutally honest. And just like Adolf out there, you know, Hitler really got into his speeches with this authoritarian zeal.

These people are talking carrots and sticks. This is what happened, you know, the end of last week right carrots and sticks at davos and then the un we got to be brutal and honest oh yeah we need to attack all emissions everywhere one two and three he said his name is al-jabbar al-jabbar oh yeah al yeah. Al-Shabang. Quick draw McGraw. The European Union's top climate official, Franz Timmermans, warned that more public and private funds are still spent on fossil fuels and on preventing and adapting to climate change. Now, here's where he's brutally honest.

You just don't understand what he's being brutally honest about. He says, we are subsidizing an attack on all of humanity. That's brutally honest. You just don't understand what he's being brutally honest about. He says, we are subsidizing an attack on all of humanity. That's brutally honest. That's a description of what their policies are. Their policies, their green agenda policies are a subsidization of an attack on all of humanity. They're going to take our food, our energy, our freedom, our liberty, our travel, everything. And they're subsidizing it. This is one of the other issues that I have with RFK Jr. Besides being a stars in his eyes, true believer of the good of government and the truth of climate change.

He says, well, you know, all these oil companies and everything, they just go away if you stop subsidizing them. The big subsidies to the green companies, you don't see that? I mean, just in Texas, you know, we had that windmill failure when it got cold. Everything froze up. And, you know, Texas has got its own power grid. They're kind of independent. One of the things that they had done is they spent billions and billions of dollars on building an infrastructure for these windmill fields that were owned by billionaires who were connected to the Texas governors, these Republicans. Just in case you think it's only the Democrats who are doing it. It was Republicans who did this. And this kind of crony capitalism, this corruption, they built this massive, expensive network

to transfer the power from the windmills for them. All these guys had to do was show up and jump into this investment opportunity that had been set up for them. Yeah, they're subsidizing an attack on all of humanity, he said. We are investing in a worse future, not a better one. And we're paying to put our children and grandchildren in harm's way. You couldn't have a more brutally honest assessment of what these green policies are.

But of course, he's supposedly talking about what they like to call fossil fuels. Understand, all this peak oil stuff, all this fossil fuel stuff, this is another CIA lie. It was the CIA that was always pushing this peak oil stuff. And they did it for geopolitical reasons. They're doing it now for still geopolitical reasons, but really more for national political reasons in order to enslave us. The CIA was saying, well, we got to get those oil supplies. That means that we got to get involved in the Middle East and we got to take this dictatorship out and that one, let's overthrow that government. They had geopolitical designs at the time.

And if you go back, again, to the early 20th century, Winston Churchill realized that their Navy needed to have oil. They were going to have planes that needed oil, things like that, not coal. And he realized that they had to get control of those areas. And again, if you ever have a chance to see the excellent series, Riley, Ace of Spies, Sam Neill played Sigmund Riley, several different interesting things in that. You see the military industrial complex,

you see the movement for geopolitical domination, wars for oil and all the rest of that stuff. You also see the trust that was set up by Felix Dzerzhinsky to entrap anti-Bolsheviks who were abroad. And he entrapped the guy, Sigmund Reilly, who was in Fleming's model for James Bond. Very interesting series. Well done. Starts out, the first episode is a little bit slow, so we give a little bit of time. But it was a very young Sam Neill at the time it was done.

But again, it begins with him in the early 20, very early 20th century, going around and getting involved in all these spy things. And now we got the spooks or ghostwriting stories about the pandemic and all the rest of this stuff. But yeah, it was interesting to see how this happened. But let's talk about the lies. I've talked many times about ClimateGate. We had ClimateGate 1. We had ClimateGate 2. highs. I've talked many times about climate gate,

red climate gate one, we had climate gate two, and there was actually a climate gate three that happened in 2013. In 2009, you had emails that were leaked from the university of East Anglia is climate research center in the UK. And, uh, it created quite a stir because there were all these emails saying our models don't work. The temperature is going down instead of going up with CO2. We've got to find some way to hide the decline. So they admitted that their models didn't work. They admitted that it wasn't warming and they admitted and conspired to lie to people.

And that was a big deal. And so, you know, they had hearings in the UK. They eventually poo-pooed it and said, well, they didn't really mean what they said. You know, it's kind of like what Pence tried to do. Oh, American cities, that's not my concern. I want to get tanks to Ukraine. You know, oh, well, I didn't say it that way. You're taking it out of context and that type of thing.

So I tried to explain it away. It looked like we had them there for a moment. And, you know, it created a big stir. And so after they tamped that down in 2009, two years later, you got ClimateGate 2. So whoever it was that was leaking this stuff did it a second time. The first time, it was about 1,000 emails in 2009. Two years later, after they had successfully protected themselves from this stuff,

because the government's going to make an excuse for them, the media's going to make an excuse for them, it is a conspiracy. They're all making money. They're all getting power out of this. So of course they're going to explain it away. So, you know, it's not what you think it is at all. The same thing, by the way, that Hillary Clinton did when Julian Assange exposed what was going on with her emails and exposed what happened with, you know, Clinton email.com where anybody could go to get their classified documents.

Hillary Clinton immediately said, who released that? Who released that? Was that Trump? Was he working with Vladimir Putin to release that? So no, don't look at my emails. I'm going to send you, you know, it's a red herring. I'm going to send you on a wild goose chase, try to figure out who released this stuff, but don't pay any attention to my emails. Well, that's what they did with a climate gate as well. So two years later in 2011, uh, they had, instead of a thousand,

they had another 5,000 emails. But by that time, everybody was, well, I'm not going to pay any attention to that. They've already told me that that is, you know, I've had fact checkers who've checked that. And they told me that even though these people were lying and, you know, cooking the books and all the rest of this stuff. And again, as I've said before, you know, got involved in it on this side because Michael Mann, who at the time was at the University of Virginia, And he was a guy who came up with the hockey stick thing, basically just an exponential increase that he predicted and CO2 driving an exponential increase in temperature. And that was used as a centerpiece by Al Gore in his lying documentary that he called an inconvenient truth. It was a very convenient lie. And so Michael Mann was a prominent American

who was involved in all of this stuff, and I was with a group that tried to wrest those data out of his hand. And that's one of the things that really nailed this in my mind, because if you're a scientist and you've already published this stuff, and it's already been used for public policy, why are you trying to hide your original data? Unless you lied to people. It just validated that. And even though we weren't able to get the emails from him,

the fact that he fought so hard to keep this quiet tells you that it wasn't science, tells you that he was lying. And so anyway, Climate Gate 3 then happened another two years later, 2009, 2011, and then Climate Gate 3 in 2013. A third batch of emails referred to as ClimateGate 3. And with the third batch of emails, the leaker revealed his motives for why he did this. And as Climate Depot, which is Mark Morano's site, noted in 2019, the 10-year anniversary of ClimateGate 1,

that despite corporate media's best efforts to ignore and bury these revelations, scientists faithful to their calling and disciplines can only shudder at what Climate Gate revealed. Those who subverted the scientific method were not fringe players, but they were at the very pinnacle. These, just like the people who subverted and lied to us about all the pandemic, They were not fringe players. They were the people at the pinnacle, at the top. They were doing the archetypal studies, quote-unquote proving,

catastrophic, human-caused, global warming, and shaping the content and messaging in six yearly reports of the UN, running through the IPCC. So when this person released them in 2013, included his own, or she included something in there, said releasing the encrypted archive was a mere practicality. I didn't want to keep the emails lying around. I prepared CGI, I'm sorry, ClimateGate 1 and ClimateGate 2 alone. Even skimming through all of the 220,000 emails

would have taken several more months of work in an increasingly unfavorable environment. First one was 1,000. The second one was 5,000. The third one was 5,000. The third one was 220,000. But, of course, it also included things that had nothing to do with ClimateGate. So he says, and we'll put this out there for you people. Look at it.

And he says, the majority of these emails are irrelevant, and some of them are probably sensitive and socially damaging. But so what? Look at what these people are trying to do to us. He said, if someone is still wondering why anyone would take these risks, or if you only see a breach of privacy here, which is, again, the tack that Michael Mann took. And we said, how is this supposed to be private?

You did this work on a government computer at work on a government funded job. Uh, you released conclusions based on your so-called data, and that has now been used to put in public policy. Now we want to see what it was all based on. Uh, there's nothing here. You've already published your work. The damage has been done. Let's let us see it. So yeah, if all you see is a breach of privacy here, then you're missing the point. If you're concerned, well, look, he's putting out a bunch of people's private emails. Well, guess what?

These are people who are conspiring to do us harm. He said the first glimpse as I got behind the scenes did little to garner my trust in the state of climate science. On the contrary, I found myself in front of a choice that just might have a global impact. Briefly put, when I had to balance the interests of my own safety, privacy, and career, and that of a few scientists,

the well-being of billions of people living in the coming decades was on the other side. And so it wasn't a difficult decision, he said. It was me or nobody. It was now or never. A combination of several rather improbable prerequisites just wouldn't occur again for anyone else in the foreseeable future. The circus was about to arrive in Copenhagen. Later on, it could be too late. Most would argue

that climate science has already directed where humanity puts its capability, its innovation, its mental and material might. The scale will grow ever grander in the coming decades if things go according to script. We're dealing with trillions and potentially drastic influence on practically everyone. Now, you notice he says we're dealing with trillions and i played for you last week john kerry when he was um you know traveling around and pushing um uh the climate stuff uh biden went to the uk remember he was using uh uh king charles as a guide dog you know hanging on to him show me where to go and he's you know getting lost in the sea of the grenadier guards who've got these you know they got actually thick soles on their shoes if you've ever seen them up close kind of interesting and um and really tall hats when karen and i went

there on a honeymoon uh they were not wearing the summer they wear the big bright red jackets right and in the winter they've got these really long gray coats which are exactly the coats that were used and the whiz ravaz and i kept expecting to see the guy in the back line you know trying to keep his tail from wagging through the split you know like when the uh when the uh the cowarded lion puts on the clothes and goes inside the uh witch's castle you know, that type of coat, but yeah, it is kind of interesting. And so, you know, they, they make these guys look really big. They give them really thick souls and have them stand up really straight. And then they've got these really tall bear skin hats that they wear

and all that kind of stuff. And, you know, Biden was just lost in these, the sea of giant soldiers. And Charles had to bring him in. Well, anyway, they, there was a clip I played for you last week where they're inside the castle. And John Kerry, you know, is got all these billionaires around him. And he's addressing a Prince Charles and Joe Biden is also there. I don't know if he understood what was going on. And John Kerry is saying, you know, he's addressing King Biden and King Charles.

And he's saying, we have represented here trillions of dollars. Mr. President and Mr. King or whatever he called him. Look what Charles Lindy does. Hey, King, King, here, King, here, King. Set, King. Set. Set, Biden. Anyway, Kerry mentioned it.

And when I played that clip, I pointed out, listen, he said trillions twice. We got trillions of dollars to invest here. And we can make trillions of dollars, right? And that's what he's saying here. We got trillions and potentially drastic influence on practically everyone. Now, this is a guy who released ClimateGate 3.0 a decade ago, 2013. Here we are 10 years later, 2023, and it's trillions of dollars, just like he said. Now, they're still lying about it, just like he said. We can't pour trillions of dollars into

this massive hole-digging and filling-up endeavor and pretend that it's not away from something and someone else, he said, said the person who leaked the climate gate stuff. It's easy for many of us in the Western world to accept a tiny green inconvenience and then wallow in that righteous feeling surrounded by our clean technology and energy that is only slightly more expensive if adequately subsidized. Well, that was a situation 10 years ago. And he's saying, look, for those of us in the Western world who have a lot of wealth, you know, this is going to be a hit. It's going to be a haircut, if you will, right?

They like to steal your money and they call it a haircut. We can live with it, especially if it's subsidized by the government. Except now it's getting to the point where we can't live with it, where now they're coming in and taking away the things that have been conveniences for us, appliances, stoves, air conditioning, heating, which are not merely conveniences, but they are necessities for life, and especially for elderly people and extreme climates, whether you're talking about Texas or you're talking about Minnesota. People die if you take away their air conditioning or their heat.

People died in Florida when the hurricane came through and cut off the power. Well, you know, these people want to do all the time what the hurricane did. They want to cut our power off permanently. He said it's easy for us to accept this in the Western world, but to millions and billions who are already struggling with malnutrition, sickness, violence, illiteracy, they don't have that luxury. Let me tell you that when they take away our power,

we will be struggling with malnutrition, sickness, violence, especially because we're suffering from illiteracy. We're suffering from ignorance. We don't understand science. We don't want to understand it. We don't want to think. We don't want to do critical thinking.

The price of climate protection, with its cumulative and collateral effects, is bound to destroy and debilitate in great numbers for decades and for generations. The price of climate protection, with its cumulative and collateral effects, is bound to destroy and debilitate in great numbers for decades and for generations. And it's going to be of such magnitude that it's going to do this to those of us in Western world. The Western world. So imagine what it's going to do to those people. They will get it even worse. He said, even if I have it all wrong and these scientists have some good reason to mislead us,

there's no question that they're misleading us. What's their motivation? Do they know something that we don't know? Are they really doing this for our good? No, they're not. He said, even if these scientists had some good reason to mislead us, instead of making a strong case with real data, he said, I think disseminating the truth is still the safest bet by far. Well, that was 10 years ago on the release of ClimateGate 3. So now where are we with these 15-minute cities and the smart

cities? It was an interesting article from Brownstone where he lays it all out. I didn't realize that they'd actually come up a little acronym acronym for the 15 minute cities. They call it F M C spelling out 15. And he points out that, you know, when we look at the gas stove debate that is being had now, he said, any questioning,

this is Thomas Buckley with Brownstone Institute. He says, uh, as we see with a gast of quote-unquote debate, because they don't want to debate, because if you question this at all, any questioning of the latest, coolest way

to reorganize society is treated as a sign of madness. You're crazy. It's been settled, right? This haughty, reality- reality shifting attitude somehow pervades the elites despite the deserved devastation of the public's trust in its institutions in the wake of the pandemic the response to which involved lies half truths spin lies mistakes

lies the threat of force lies the threat of force, lies, the threat of unemployment, the ordered home confinement, the mass destruction of small businesses, and, of course, lies. This is why ClimateGate was so important. And it's why, you know, I haven't gone through all that. God had prepared me to see what was happening with this stuff. Just another MacGuffin. And, you know, now that you've gone through this, you've seen it as well.

And so hopefully you can help other people to see this, and we're going to stop this pattern of deception. At its heart, he said, the idea harkens back to the village of yore, a place of belonging, of simplicity, of knowing your neighbors and creating a community that you can count on in a pitch. Actually, you know, that's the vision they want to sell you. The Amish village, if you will. But it's really more like the village from Patrick McGowan's A Prisoner because it's all about surveillance. It's not just about locking you down and controlling your movements.

Of course, that's the part of the 15 minute city. And then as he goes through and talks about how this has all evolved and he says, you know, when you look at the cities, of course, you know, you've got different neighborhoods and big cities, don't you? And sometimes the different neighborhoods are organized around an activity. For example, a meatpacking district or a financial hub or the fashion center or where it used to be with Fleet Street in London or something like that or Madison Avenue with advertising.

He said sometimes, so maybe it's organized around an activity. Sometimes the neighborhoods are organized around an ethnicity. So you got Little Italy or you got Chinatown or something like that. Or maybe it is a socioeconomic cluster. He said like the west side of L.A. versus the east side of L.A. Or maybe it's around entertainment activity like Broadway in New York. He said, but the idea of the FMC is to eventually smooth out these differences and create zone after zone of similarly homogenous neighborhoods throughout a city. And isn't that the hallmark of all these New World Order central planning stuff?

Isn't it always about homogenizing everything? These people talk about diversity and multiculturalism, and yet, as I've said before, when you look at Europe, when I went to Europe, the high school group in 1973, it was amazing to me, all these little tiny countries, and each of them had very distinctive culture and dress and language and music and architecture and all this other kind of stuff, and they're all packed together.

And now it's become more and more homogenized. dress and language and music and architecture and all this other kind of stuff. And they're all packed together. And now it's become more and more homogenized. You don't have multicultural. It's just the opposite. You don't have diversity. It's just the opposite. Everybody has been dumbed down into this centrally, increasingly centrally controlled sameness.

This boring gray, If you will. I think it's very fitting that our cars that used to be all these bright colors, you know, everywhere going back and looking at cars in the fifties when I was a kid, you know, it was like a candy store looking at the, um, the street, you know, like a bag of Skittles going down the road. But now everything is white, black, and shades of gray with an occasional red car. I don't know why I was red somehow. Survive. But, you know, pretty much all the other colors are out.

You have, you know, for the Dodge, um, challenger and charger, they go back and they, they did, um, you know, like a, a bright orange and green and, and a purple and stuff like that. But you know, that's the exception. You know, we, we've now got this gray existence that has been imposed on us. I remember the film Pleasantville. I hated that film. I hated the message of that film. You know, it's like, oh, the 1950s. Everybody's, and you know,

we got this fake pretense of families that work and, you know, we got this moral standard and all this other kind of stuff. And, you know, and everything was black and white. And then when the kids discover the reality that, oh, we don't have to live in this kind of world. And all of a sudden for them, everything turns bright colors, right? It's that boy, what a twisted version of reality that is. And it's been just exactly the opposite, hasn't it?

You know, we used to watch films that were in black and white and we had, uh, black and white and we had uh black and white in terms of good and evil uh now it's just the opposite anyway so in order to implement this he says how are you going to get people to do this because everybody's kind of already in these different neighborhoods and you got different activities and stuff so how are you going to homogenize everything well he says, even the proponents know that this is not going to occur organically or naturally. It's going to need significant government intervention. This is where we get the carrots and the sticks. This is where we get the bribery and the blackmail. This is where we get the coercion and the confiscation.

That's what will happen with all of this stuff. And of course it'll be done forcefully because of some presumed emergency crisis. And we don't have time to look at, don't look at this. There's no time to look at this. We've got to do it right now. No time to test it. No time to see if it's safe.

No time to see if it's effective. Just do it. Get rid of everything you got locked down. We're going to redesign everything. And so he says one of the most important aspects, of course, of this is the elimination of personal vehicles. And we know why that happened as well. Because we experienced it in the pandemic. This is not critical thinking.

It's not a theory. It is a conspiracy. And we know that the one thing that they could not control that let us continue to move around was our automobiles. You know, can't make even for our dumbed down society, they didn't try to make an argument that if you're driving around in your car, that you're somehow a threat to other people. Although I did see plenty of people with their windows up, husband and wife in the car with masks on. Made a point of keeping my top down on my car all the time. Pointing at them and laughing.

Anyway, and then you got the smart cities. What's a smart city about? Well, it's about all the restrictions of movement combined with surveillance. And when you go back and look at the mania for 5G, right? That's about what this is all about. Who is it that was pushing 5G? Trump. Trump was pushing it hard.

Now Trump's got his freedom cities. Where is he getting that idea? Let me tell you, folks, he is a traitor. He's not an anti-globalist. He's the person who is there to repackage this stuff for his cult following, people who would typically be against the unethical, immoral, illegal, unconstitutional, and impractical things that are being pushed out there. People who would normally see, well, this is a global scheme here.

But they set it aside because it's been done by Trump. And we all know that Trump is anti-globalist. As anti-globalist as they come. There's nobody who's more anti-globalist, as anti-globalist as they come. There's nobody who's more anti-globalist than Trump, and that's why he can push all of these globalist schemes on us, and the cult doesn't see it. And the people sinned a great sin, and the consequences of it, this idol worship, are built in.

Unfortunately, you and I are in the same boat with these clowns elevating Trump. Uh, anyway, uh, the bottom line is, um, he even pointed out how, when people saw this in Toronto, uh, they abandoned the idea because that, that was Google's smart labs. Uh, sorry, uh, sidewalk labs. Andwalk Labs. And I said it at the time. You know, when you look at smart, remember that at least when it comes to the technology stuff, it stands for something. There's an acronym there. It is self-monitoring analysis and reporting technology. And so a smart city is about monitoring everything that you do

and analyzing it and reporting it to who? To your masters. That's what the smart city is about. And he finishes up his article by talking about a quote by Dr. Anthony Fauci. He wrote this in a medical publication called Cell Magazine. C-E-L-L. Although really what he's talking about here is the jail cell

that he should be in, but that he wants to put all of us in. So in 2020, he wrote an article for Cell Magazine. He said, living in greater harmony with nature will require changes in human behavior. Because again, the only science in all this stuff was behavioral science. As well as other radical changes that may take decades to achieve. Rebuilding the infrastructure of human existence from cities to homes and workplaces to water and sewer systems

to recreational and gathering ventures. So, you know, put your mask on and lock down, okay? He was all about behavioral changes, wasn't he? Oh, yes. His last thought here, he says, you know, when you look at all of this stuff and the censorship industrial complex and what was done, that we know that this is not just censorship of thought, it is censorship of life.

And I said this about Sidewalk Labs. When I saw what was being done there, it's always being done with Google. As a matter of fact, I was, you know, they had already shut it down, but I wanted to go talk to people in Toronto and I was, uh, I was fixing to do it. As they say, and a 2019 December, uh, I got sick and, um, couldn't go. And then all of this stuff happened in beginning of January. And it's like, I'm not going out of the country because who knows when they're going to lock down the borders. So I never did go up there to Toronto to do a thing about it.

But I said, when I had been talking about sidewalk labs for years prior to that, I said, Google and Silicon Valley neo-Marxists, as George Gilder calls it, have been setting up surveillance and control mechanisms for us all through the Internet. And it's just been pervasive. And I said, what they have done in cyberspace, they want to put into physical space. I said that for years. And that's what this is really about. It's about total Marxist control.

All that stuff. And just to point out, you know, Sweden at least has come to their senses on at least this aspect of it. They are scrapping 100% renewable energy goal. And said, no, we're going to bring nuclear power in. You know, we could freeze to death up here in Sweden. Because, you know, according to their game that they play, the nuclear power doesn't have any emissions. No emissions at all.

So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about this new trend towards psychedelics. Yeah. And we've got top ranking politicians who are into this and people are pushing this to say, well, this is a, you know, we could give people drugs and it would get rid of all of this hatred and racism and bigotry, stuff like that. Uh, we will be right back stay with us Thank you. Субтитры подогнал «Симон» One pill makes you larger And one pill makes you small And the ones that mother gives you

Don't do anything at all. Go ask Alice when she's friendly at all. Well, maybe you should go ask Brian Wilson about LSD, about some of these other things as a victim of that. He's spoken out about what it has done to him. Truly amazing what it has done to him. Uh, truly amazing, uh, what it does to people.

Um, so, uh, yeah, the sixties drug culture looks like it's returning, doesn't it? I'm going to show you, uh,

just how it is being applauded by the way, uh, before I, what was just talking about on rumble, uh, damage said that Trump is a rather overt globalist. When you sit down and examine his rhetoric he's calling for 15 minute cities in his stump speeches that's right and people can't see it they can't

make the connections this is why we've got to get them to see what's going on you know not only is freedom cities smart cities 15 minute cities all the rest of this stuff uh but he's fully been on board with this the 5g and all the rest of this stuff, for a very long time. Let's talk about what else is being sold to us now. We have, and this is an article from Information Liberation. I like the headline. Other people have talked about this. Ecstasy, the drug, should be used to, quote-unquote,

cure people of their hateful and anti-Semitic beliefs. And this is coming from the Jewish Daily Forward, which is an American publication, Jewish-American publication. And in this article that he quotes, he says, Can we cure anti-Semitism with Molly? And again, that's a nickname for the MDMA. Sometimes they call it ecstasy, Molly. It's been used as a party drug because they, you know,

get it and everybody evidently gets like some warm and fuzzy feeling and, you know, it's used against people. You know, when you look up the term pharmakia, which is translated in the Bible as sorcery, in the book of Revelation, it is typically translated as sorcery because it was usually mind-altering drugs that were used for religious purposes. But of course, I've pointed out that it certainly does apply to the big pharmaceutical companies as well. You know, their stuff is altering people's

minds. Even asthma drugs, driving kids to suicide. Not just something like an SSRI that's supposed to help you. If you're depressed, it drives you further in depression, drives you to suicide and murder and things like that. Now, they've got a lot of drugs that are actually messing with your mind, even if that's not the stated purpose of it. But these are some drugs that are specifically set up to mess with your mind. You know, DMT is another one that these people call themselves, psychonauts. Yeah, they're psycho, that's for sure. DMT, bringing them in contact, they think, with spiritual beings, mechanized elves. They say, you know, we keep taking this stuff, and these people have had these trips on DMT.

They keep seeing a lot of the same things, and you start comparing their stories, and it's almost like they have a common experience. So we need to double down on this. Let's deliberately take this stuff and try to find out more information about these mechanized elves, as they call them, that they experience. Well, just because it's not something that we normally see, it may be getting you in touch with something that's real,

with a dark's real. With a dark spiritual side. I know somebody who took DMT. He says it's the scariest thing of his life. Never forget it. And he believed that he came in contact with demonic forces. He said, I believe it took me to hell. So, you know, I look at this kind of stuff.

I've really been blessed in my life. You know, God has saved me from drugs and alcoholism. And he did it before I ever took a pill or had a drink. Because I've gone through this being in bands. I watch people at parties, you know, watch them stumbling around on the floor, drunk and all the rest of the stuff. It's like, I don't want that. I watched them throwing up afterwards and the hangovers that they had afterwards. I've been around that many people who took drugs, but, um, you know, talk to people who have done it. It was interesting. Uh, uh, I saw, and I've said this before, I saw The Days of Wine and Roses when I was a very young child.

And it really was a powerful film for me. And about the same time, we had a relative who was in our family, married into the family, married a cousin of my father. And this guy was in detox as a severe alcoholic, and they were telling me all the stuff he was going through. And I was like, whoa. So I wasn't interested in experimenting with any of that stuff. Why would you want to experiment with any of that stuff? I wasn't interested in trying to get in touch with spiritual beings in another dimension. Um, you know, I played those, uh, songs that, uh, Audi, um, modern retro radio at his indie film festival. And he, you know, I gave him some music and he picked, um, the one that I've split up into two different things, the, uh, unsquare dance by um and um another one both of the songs were in uh seven four time and um you know i said uh i used to always like to do that kind of stuff but it wasn't the type

of thing that uh we could play in bands you know we had to play standard top 40 but people out there drunk on the dance floor if you he started playing a 7-4 tune, we could not be responsible for the damage that they did to themselves and others. So he didn't have any liability insurance to play 7-4 songs. But you had people like Dave Brubeck and Don Ellis, who really liked to do things in a strange meter. And, of course, in the pop area, you had Burt Bacharach, who used to make his songs a lot more interesting

by changing the meter in the middle of the song, changing it back and forth. Of course, you know, people were not dancing to that type of thing, but it was nice to listen to. Anyway, getting back to this and the drug scene. This is really looking like a blast in the past for me because I was young when all this drug stuff, you know, the, um, Jefferson airplane and, uh, gray slick and everything when

they were doing all this stuff. And, um, yeah, I was watching what was going on, hate Ashbury and, uh, what happened and, um, you know, the big concerts that were happening. And I looked with it, looked at it with as much revulsion as a kid, as people look at Seattle and Portland and San Francisco today. You know, I looked just like you got all these people on the street living in those kinds of conditions. And that's what I saw from the hippies and from all this drug scene, it's like, no thanks. And so, um,

just, just a real blessing that I never got drug into that. And it's not to say I'm any better than anybody who got a drug into it. You know, they, um, uh, they may have looked at it, thought that it was something that was innocent and then found out the hard way. So anyway, this guy who's writing for this Jewish newspaper said, Can we cure anti-Semitism with Molly? If you learned that a single pill had led to a neo-Nazi to renounce his hateful behavior and attitude and beliefs, we said, Would you A, demand more research to find out if this really works, or B, ignore existing evidence and continue to outlaw the pill?

Well, if you picked the second option, congratulations, you've just described the folly of American drug policy for the past 40 years. Because MDMA, Molly Ecstasy, is still a Schedule I drug. He says it has been used effectively to treat post-traumatic stress disorder. Israel has used it for this purpose since 2019. But there's also some preliminary evidence that the drug can turn haters into lovers, making it a powerful potential tool for de-radicalization.

Or a party drug, if you're going to see Jeffrey Epstein. That's a good effect as well. The FDA is expected to approve MDMA and psilocybin, also known as psychedelic mushrooms, for PTSD therapy within the next two years.

But of course, with this, there's no warp speed rush. Anyway, you know, when you look at this, that's fine. If it can help some people, fine. Don't write me and tell me that you had PTSD and you took ecstasy and it helped you with it. If it did, fine, you know. I'm just saying that when we look at changing a neo-Nazi, for example, and, you know, they go, they talk about one story anecdotally, and this is, people have been talking about this for a couple months until it was picked up by this

Jewish newspaper, and then Chris Minahan at Information Liberation picked it up. You know, we have one story here that they've really focused on, an anecdotal story about how, you know, this guy was, he was the leader of an anti-Semitic group, and the Midwest branch of Identity Europa, a white nationalist group that played a key role in the 2017 Unite the Right rally and so forth. And so he says this guy participated in a study, a double-blind study on the effects of MDMA on social touch, as they call it.

And so when you stop and think about this, think about how many times we had anecdotal stories about somebody being helped with this 2020 flu that they called COVID. Hey, I took HCQ or I took ivermectin. And look, you know, how many anecdotal stories do we have of that? We had thousands of those and they just dismissed them. It's just an anecdotal story. But then they find one story about a guy who says, well, you know, I was a neo-Nazi, uh,

but I took MDMA and now I just love everybody. He says, they go, they call him Brandon. Let's go, Brandon. Let's go, Brandon. Let's go take some of this drug here. It's going to make us all happy and loving. He says now he says love is the most important thing. Nothing matters without love. He's turned into a 60s pop songwriter.

Look. Far out, man. Exactly. All you need is love.'s it man peace love let's let's stick a flower in your gun there um you know look you can do things like this and sometimes these drugs can have a permanent lasting effect many times like we saw with Brian Wilson. They can rewire your brain, and not in a good way. But this is a drug that is affecting somebody chemically. And I don't know if it has a lasting effect or not, or does he have to keep taking this ecstasy in order for him to love everybody.

Maybe it's a better thing for us to learn behavior. We always said this about our kids. When our kids were ready to go into school, this is another big motivating factor. We had a lot of different things that are motivating us to homeschool them and never put them in school. And one of them was the prevalence of Ritalin. Oh, well, you know, we need to help these kids to concentrate. You know, we got these boys and we're giving the boys lots and lots of Ritalin because they don't like to sit in desks. concentrate. You know, we got these boys, and we're giving the boys lots and lots of riddling because they don't like to sit in desks.

And, you know, they like to get outside and move around. I've told a story about one of our boys who, you know, when I'd be trying to do school with him, you know, he's just constantly jumping around the whole time, you know, standing on his head and all the rest of the stuff. It's like, hey, hey, are you paying attention to me? And Karen says, ask him what you just said. And so I asked him and he repeated everything I just said. He'd heard all of it, but he was teachers don't like to have somebody dancing around in the thing. And so, uh, you know,

quickly relearned that, you know, some people learn in different ways and, and some people just don't like to be confined and little boys don't like to set at desks. Girls do. They didn't get that much Ritalin. You know, they like to set at a desk and like to get their pencils and their erasers all in order and in the desk. And that's just the way they like it. You know, the guys want to do something else. So, but for the teacher's benefit, they're giving them Ritalin and they're like, Oh, you know, and Oh, well, it helps them to concentrate.

No, it doesn't. It also gets them addicted to stuff. But wouldn't it be better for them to, worst case scenario, learn some self-control and just sit at a desk if that's going to be required of them? And wouldn't it be better for this guy to really have love rather than to fake it with some chemicals? You know, I've seen people get drunk.

Some people get drunk. They're happy drunk. Some people, when they get drunk, they're angry drunk. It affects different people in different ways. And so maybe we ought to deal with reality instead of trying to mask it over with some substance, whether it's alcohol or MDMA or whether it is LSD or something like that. So in this article, this paper, they have a Yale graduate who is working as a social worker. This is the kind of person that wants Biden to pay back their school loan. You're going to yell and pay all that money and become a social worker?

Banashi has moved that to doing research at Hebrew University, developing metrics for exploring MDMA's use in conflict resolution between Palestinians and Israelis. Well, maybe I ought to just kind of get to some of the fundamental issues here, you know, about how you're splitting the land up or something, and focus on some ethical legal solutions instead of tripping everybody out on drugs. But, of course, the CIA loved to see what would happen if they put the LSD in the water supply.

They did that in one city in France. But she and another person said the results point to a big caveat in psychedelic research in general. It is not magic. In other words, giving everybody this pill is not going to solve the issue between Palestinians and Israelis. It's not a magic pill. But she says intention is everything. Couples, she said, could need to have some MDMA therapy to heal their relationship. Addicts need to want to kick their habit? Oh, they could get MDMA as well. Far more effective

than traditional therapies. Oh, is it? She says it's not a magic pill, but then she puts it out there as a magic pill for all of your problems. Occult members need it to be ready to leave their cult. Well, I said it's far more effective than traditional therapy. This may speak more to how ineffective their traditional therapies are. All of it is godless and just, well, you just got to work through things it's like great yeah great advice thanks well the other part of it is is that if it really did work everybody

would be taking it right and so it also tells you that it doesn't work it's also not a magic pill and if she says it's going to be more effective than a than traditional therapies what does it mean is it like this remdesivir thing where fauci says well it doesn't actually cure it but if you get better you get better a little faster you get better 30 faster right so this isn't going to cure relationship issues but you know hey if it helps you maybe it gets you there faster by taking the pill. I don't know what to say. But, yeah, take this drug. It's going to give us peace and love.

Or maybe it's just going to produce a temporary fleeing feeling about peace and love. Maybe if we hang apples on a tree, a peach tree, maybe that tree doesn't really become an apple tree. Maybe you're just fooling yourself, you think? But Congress is already working on legalizing this. On Rockfin, John John says, the watershed of the Timothy Leary turn on, tune in, and drop out. PSYOP is all along the streets and homeless encampments of L.A. and Portland. Absolutely.

Yeah. Our society is starting to look like that real mess when I was a kid. So Congress is tuning in on this as well. And I have seen several articles about this, how AOC, Occasional Cortex, and Dan Crenshaw, one-eyed McCain, are crossing the aisle to try to remove federal barriers that make it difficult for scientists to study this drug, MDMA. So there you go. If the two of them support this, it's got to be good, right?

A rare bipartisan way forward. Look, I'm adamantly opposed to the drug war. I'm also adamantly opposed to drug use, especially something that's going to try to hide the reality of what you are or to hide reality from you or to put it out so you can live in some kind of a virtual reality of chemicals. I am opposed to alcohol prohibition because of what it does. Just like I'm opposed to drug prohibition, drug war.

But I'm also opposed to alcohol use because of what it does. So it isn't one or the other. I mean, you don't have to celebrate the because of what it does. Uh, so it isn't one or the other. I mean, you don't have to celebrate the use of this stuff to realize that prohibiting it creates very powerful organized crime, whether you're talking about Al Capone or the Mexican drug cartels, it also corrupts law enforcement and the courts and our politicians who then take money because they look at it and they say, well, you know, if anybody wants to do this stuff, you know, like Godfather, drugs is a dirty business, but hey, if they want it, let's sell it to them.

You know, they can make some money off of this stuff. So again, the bigger picture is, stop and think about this. People want government and drugs to fix their problems in their life. We think Trump can fix our problems or Biden can fix our problems or RFK Jr. can fix our problems. They want government and drugs to fix and to shape them. Help me. I hate people or I've got problems with my marriage, or I have PTSD. So they're going to turn to government and to drugs to provide them whatever they need. Don't

you think that's strange? Well, we know how harmful drugs are, and we know how harmful government is. Why don't we turn to God? You want to know about love? You'll find it there, and you'll find it in the Bible. As a matter of fact, we'll talk about this coming up. Tucker had an interesting, before all of this forum that he did on Friday with Glenn Beck and everything. Before he got a chance to interview this half-dozen presidential candidates on the Republican side, he sat down with somebody running one of these organizations,

and they interviewed Tucker and talked to him about some stuff. Interesting thing to say about the fact that here he is at 54 years old, and he read the Bible for the first time. And, uh, drugs are harmful. Drugs, drugs are harmful. C Z A R said Travis. Yeah, that's good. Travis. Yeah. Drugs are harmful. Drugs are harmful. Both the drug war drugs are and the drugs themselves. They are harmful. That's good. Yeah, we're against prohibition and the use of drugs.

So anyway, yeah, this is not something that's going to push you through this. And just remember all the lies that everybody was sold about LSD, how the CIA was at the center of all of that. And, uh, Timothy, Larry, Ken Kesey, and his Mary pranksters going around evangelists telling everybody, you know, tune in, drop out and, you know, it's going to open mind expanding drugs. Yeah. It's interesting.

Cary Grant did a lot of LSD and he talked about it and he didn't have bad experiences with it, but you know, he was married to her living with Diane Cannon and he gave it to her and she said, and she just, it was horrible for her. And she, you know, uh, was adamant. She was never going to do it again. And, um, then, uh, yeah, for years, uh, says John, John, I've been saying Joe Rogan is a Timothy Leary of the millennial generation. That's right, because he's selling mushrooms. And, you know, we've got Janet Yellen, who did, when she went to China, this may explain, a lot of people are connecting the dots on this.

As soon as I saw that she had four portions of a type of wild mushroom with unpredictable psychedelic effects, uh, Jing show Jing, I'm guessing at the pronunciation, but you know, she went to China and I played that video for you a couple of weeks ago. You know, she comes out and she's just bowing over and over again, this little woman, and she's bowing to president. just bowing over and over again. This little woman, and she's bowing to President Xi over and over and over again. Now, that's really strange behavior, isn't it? You know, it is not protocol for an American official to bow to anybody. And she was called out about that with a lot of people.

But it turns out that this person, she's 76 years old, but she's also physically very small. And she ate four portions of psychedelic mushrooms. Now we understand. That's a pretty big dose for somebody that small. Zero H says, Janet Yellen may have been tripping balls when she fervently bowed before Chinese officials last week. According to CNN,

citing Chinese state media, Yellen nipped into a casual Beijing restaurant right after landing on July 6th, where she apparently exhibited excellent skills with her chopsticks. I wonder if that was before or after the mushrooms. Anyway, Yellen kept bowing repeatedly to the Chinese vice premier.

Oh, I thought that was she. Who does not reciprocate even once? One person wrote on Twitter, what an anti-American disgrace this administration is. And yeah, that's right. And just as John John said, you look at Joe Rogan, and I've talked about this before. This is a guy, Spotify is paying like what, $25 million a year to him? They don't like his politics, but he talks a lot about magic mushroom. And as you're right to point out, he's kind of the Timothy Leary of magic mushrooms.

He's trying to push this. It's interesting. You got AOC, who I do not trust. Dan Crenshaw, who I do, do not trust. A 10 foot pole. Uh, and these people are pushing this. Uh, you got Janet Yellen, you know, magic mushrooms by the handfuls. And look, it isn't just something she's doing when she's in China, you know.

Okay. But Joe Rogan, you know, getting $25 million a year. I can't, they won't even carry my program on Spotify. They have banned me multiple times. I've tried on multiple occasions to try to get on there. And every time I get on there for a couple of months and then they kicked me off without any explanation, no explanation at all. And, um, you know, it'd be nice to be on there because that is either the number one or number two site for podcasts. And that's where most people listen to the broadcasts via podcast and um you know uh but spotify won't even let me on but they give him

lots of money and he sells magic mushrooms so um one food expert said um talking about the mushrooms potent powers said um well you thought you were walking straight, but you just fell sideways. I have a friend who mistakenly ate them and hallucinated for three days, said Dr. Peter Mortimer. Yellins stop at an outlet at a restaurant chain. The name means In-N-Out in English, but it's not like in and out burgers here those guys are conservatives they're telling the employees take the mask off unless you've got a doctor's note take your mask off but there you go they're in and out mushroom burgers uh it sparked a flurry of posts on chinese social media network weibo a deluge of reservations as well. The restaurant said of the secretary's visit, quote,

it was an extremely magical day with those magic mushrooms. And a staffer, senior staffer from the George W. Bush White House, Bradley Blakeman, said never ever an American official does not bow. It looks like she has been summoned to the principal's office, and that's exactly the optics that the Chinese love. Well, again, maybe it's the mushrooms there. But she's had a lot of experience with fantasy stuff, right? I mean, she was the Fed chair, and now the Treasury secretary for Biden. So she's really big into fantasy finance. And, um, you know, as you look at their economic

policies, maybe you yourself have asked yourself, uh, about the Fed or the treasury department, what are they smoking? Well, maybe they're not smoking. Maybe they're eating mushrooms. I don't know. Uh, by the way, uh, go to davidknight.gold and't know. By the way, go to DavidKnight.gold, and that will take you to TonyArderman'sWiseWolf.gold. And at that point, you can cash in your fantasy fiat currency into real money. Stop taking the paper stuff from this mushroom swilling, uh, Janet Yellen and the rest of these people,

uh, get rid of your fantasy money, change it into real stuff, into real gold. Well, uh, we're going to be right back. Uh,

and, as we go out with this, um, uh, when we come back, we've got some more to talk about with pharmaceuticals. We're going to talk about some mercenary hospitals. Interesting as well. Jim Carrey, I never paid attention to his campaigns pushing back against vaccines and against vaccine mandates in the early days. I'll play you a clip of what he had to say about that and why he was pushing back against that as

well. And also, the GOP in Florida is now really trying to stress the fact that the jab the Trump shot is a bioweapon. We'll be right back. this crazy question asking me this is the craziest party that could ever be don't turn on the lights because i don't want to see yeah yeah mama told me not to come to china or go to that restaurant but i did it anyway i'm telling you stay away from the phony illusory money as well. As I said before, you know, going back, uh, Jim Carrey has been involved in this a lot. Uh, and even before Gavin Newsom, you had Jerry Brown in California who was these trippers, back in 2015. Also in 2017, he was opposing the vaccine law that would get rid of any religious exemptions or medical exemptions or any of the rest of this stuff.

He said it was fascism. And I got a clip of him. Here we go right here. This is Jim Carrey. And, of course, he's there with Jenny McCarthy. He was dating at the time. And she believed that her son's autism was caused by the vaccines. And so here's a lot of interesting truth from Jim Carrey. You know, we've got to not push somebody out because we disagree with them on most issues. When they're right about something, point it out. Just like when Ron Wyden showed us that James Clapper and the intelligence community were spying on Americans. Good for him.

I've never seen anything else that I agree with Ron Wyden on. But here's Jim Carrey on talk shows talking about the jabs. Back in 1989, the shot schedule was 10 shots given. 10 shots given. When I was a kid, what did we get? It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that?

You should educate yourself. We want to empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chickenpox? Do we need the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life? I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interests at heart all the time. Parents have to have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. When the other doctors are here and they will be on the other side in a while after you leave. Grab them and stab them, you mean? That's right.

This is my... What would they say? Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't understand. The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccine, vaccines are the largest growing division

of the pharmaceutical industry. $13 billion. They control medical schools. I mean, these doctors are not learning about prevention or vitamins or diet. What we're asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.

Yeah, Larry King, incredulous. Well, why would they do this? What could their possible motivation be? Well, Larry, you're on CNN. Did you notice all these ask your doctor commercials that are there? Yeah, well, you mean, why would the drug companies

want to keep this going then? Yeah, money, money. So at the time um this is an article that was done by the rap and and they say jim carrey didn't hold back his anger of the vaccinations on tuesday when he unleashed his wrath on twitter california governor says yes to poisoning more children with mercury and aluminum and mandatory vaccines the corporate fascist must be stopped and then they editorialize and they say said the dumb and dumber actor that's the way to kind of dismiss this stuff right uh and of course again that was jerry brown back in 2015 wanting to eliminate the state's previous exemptions from vaccinations for personal religious beliefs. I don't think that actually happened until they got Pan in, you know, this medical doctor who was a sycophant for the vaccine industry and Gavin Newsom.

I think that's when they actually got it through. And that was back in 2019. And, of course, you know, that was when Trump was saying they were doing it california they're doing it in the northeast to get the shot vaccinations are so important this is really going around now they have to get their shot yeah a corporate fascist right there uh so anyway um they said the comedian has been a crusader against vaccination since his relationship with jenny mccarthy who you also saw there and her son's autism that she believes was created by that because what does she know it's just her kid right and uh why did uh why it's a you know causal relation you know um correlation

does not prove causation but isn't it interesting that we had this explosion of autism which nobody had ever heard of uh before all the vaccine for kids. Never heard of it in my life. It was the mid-2000s before I knew a kid who had autism. But nobody ever wants to talk about where it comes from. They'll create autism societies to hold people's hand and parents' hands to some degree with autism and stuff like that. But they don't want to know where it comes from. Don't talk about that. By the way, it reminds me, we've got a listener who's a son, Daniel Jeremiah. Uh, please pray for him. He's severely injured autism seizures from vaccines as well. Um, and a string of messages stating that he is not anti-vaccine.

He says, I'm anti-thimerosal, anti-mercury. They have taken some of the mercury-laden thimerosal out of the vaccines, but not all. And he said this, interestingly enough, before Trump became a thing, greed trumps reason. Again. As Governor Brown moves closer to signing a vaccine law in California. Sorry, kids, it's just business.

That's right. Greed trumps reason. Several other celebrities, including Kirstie Alley, selma blair jenna elfman have also voiced their opposition to the bill that was back in 2015 eight years ago jim carrey says they say mercury and fish is dangerous but forcing all of our children to be injected with mercury and thimerosal is no risk does that make a sense as a matter of fact i um i didn't know what thimerosal was when i i told you the story about it. I had some soft contact lenses, and I put it in my eyes,

and my eyes had turned blood red. And so it's a good thing that I didn't get thimerosal when I was a kid. Probably would have done something to me. I didn't understand that until much later in life when I was talking to my optician about, he says, you ought to get some contact lenses. I said, oh, no, I've tried those things. It turns my eyes blood red.

I'm allergic to thimerosal. And he goes, well, thimerosal is mercury. I was like, no. You never know what these people are going to do. He said, the CDC cannot solve a problem that they helped to start. It's too risky to admit that they've been wrong about mercury and thimerosal. They are corrupt. And of course, if they take that out, they take out the formaldehyde,

and they take out this, and they take out, they'll still put something else in there. And now they've got a new Alzheimer's drug. And this is being pushed by all the mainstream media, telling you that it is now going to be the beginning of the end for Alzheimer's. Oh, just in time for the baby boomers, right? They've got a drug that they're pushing now. This is Eli Lilly.

They've announced this in May. Of course, most of the pharmaceutical companies have come up with their own version of this stuff. I love the way they name these things. This is Donamamab. Donamamab. It reminds me of, I remember Bill Cosby when he was funny and not a predator. He had that routine where he went to the dentist and they gave him Novocaine and his lips were blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. You try to pronounce these drugs that they come up with.

You sound like you've just come back from the dentist with Novocaine. Anyway, incredibly expensive. They don't mention in this article how this alone could bankrupt for many people, giving it to people who are on Medicare, Medicaid. And so incredibly expensive. But, you know, we can't tell the drug companies to sell it cheaper. No, no, no. We just have to suck it up and, you know, expand the debt for this. But it doesn't really even work, if you read the fine print.

It's got the same kind of thing that Fauci did with remdesivir. It says it was found to slow mental decline by 36%. This is coming from Eli Lilly again, one of the best connected pharmaceutical companies. It was Alex Azar who Trump put in as head of HHS. It was Alex Azar who kicked off his emergency order to kick off the pandemic lockdowns in January of 2020. There was absolutely no evidence of a pen of an epidemic anywhere, let alone a pandemic when Alex is are from Eli Lilly, former CEO of Eli Lilly. You know, lots of people, you have the CIO, CEO of Eli Lilly. He goes to the Trump administration and you got the Goldman Sachs CEO.

He goes to the Trump administration and on and on, but you know, Trump says, well, next time I'm going to do a better job of picking people. Who's he going to buy? Find a richer crew or something. That's the closest that Trump has come to admitting that he failed. He failed to pick good people. He said, and then he failed to pick good people, he said. And then he failed to pick good people when he replaced them. And then when he replaced that replacement, he failed to pick a good person.

How does that work? How did he just keep failing? And yet people believe that he succeeded. I don't think he failed. I think he got the people that he wanted. I think he got the people that paid him the most money. But when you're getting back to this, okay, so it's going to slow mental decline by 36%. Whoop-dee-doo. Again, the Ren and Desivir standard. The standard for a therapeutic type of thing is that it's supposed to cure the disease. But Fauci didn't make that case. It wasn wasn't like okay well you know we gave this and it cured the disease in

50 of the cases no it didn't cure the disease in anybody's cases and it was blowing people's organs out as we had already seen when fauci tried to sell it for aids and he tried to sell it for ebola and it was killing people directly. Instead of what he said was, well, nobody's getting better. Uh, it doesn't have anything to do with that, but if you do survive somehow, you get better 30% faster. This is what they're going to sell the Alzheimer's drugs. They're going to tell you that same lie. Well, it doesn't stop Alzheimer's, but it slows it by 30%.

So, you know, give me a million dollars a year out of Medicare and Medicaid. The WHO is a real and pleasant danger. This is from David Bell, again, on the Brownstone Institute. This reminds me of the language of this. You know, Tom Clancy came out with that novel, Clear and Present Danger. I think they even made a movie out of it, I think. I remember, I didn't see the movie, but I read the book. And the whole idea was, you know, we got these out of control Mexican cartels that become extremely powerful because our drug prohibition war has been going on for 50 years. You know, we created Al Capone and the big Chicago gangsters and the mafia and everything. We created that with an alcohol prohibition that only lasted about a decade.

This thing's been going on for five decades now. So it was very powerful. And so Tom Clancy came up with the idea in Clear and Present Danger that we would have a covert war against the drug cartels, which has now become kind of the pet project of these GOP candidates. Oh, yeah, let's send the military into Mexico. Well, at least Tom Clancy was thinking about it. He says, if we were to do that, we'd have to do it covertly.

They want to do it overtly, I guess. But, yeah, the WHO is a real and present danger. It is a clear and present danger. David Bell writes, our governments intend to transfer decisions over our health, our families, and our societal freedoms to the Director General of the World Health Organization. Whenever he or she declares it necessary, they will take all that away. And of course, who is it that is paying the budget of the WHO? Well, countries do it. Bill Gates is one of the biggest financers of it. And so is big pharma.

In late 2019, the WHO issued a new recommendation for pandemic influenza. They said in 2019, just before all this stuff happened, it's a severe pandemic, they said. It may be necessary to close businesses for up to seven to 10 days. And then in just a few months, we heard Fauci say, yeah, yeah, we got to have two weeks to flatten the curve, right? The WHO cautioned against strict measures

like locking everybody down, which they had, you know, the intelligence communities, pharmaceutical communities have been practicing their germ games to do just that for 20 years, ever since dark winter, two months before 9-11. But this could be dangerous. This might have some unintended consequences, they said, because it might have a minimal impact on the spread of any aerosolized respiratory virus, while inevitably increasing poverty, especially harming low-income people. And I said that on the Monday following the Friday the 13th. And I began with the statements, you know, from the analogy to

the Battle of Britain. Keep calm, carry on, that sign, you see them t-shirts on and then of course the one that they don't make into a t-shirt which is liberty is in peril defend it with all your might and that was a real and present danger you know the germans were right across the little english channel and they were going to be coming in, perhaps landing, but bombing and all the rest of this stuff. I said, keep calm. Freedom is in peril, defend it with all your might. And I said on that Monday, look, if we lock down, first of all, if it were a real virus, we would not be able to respond effectively to it. We have to have our society working. We have very complicated supply chains. And then we saw what happened when Trump locked everything down. We saw people

destroying food on their farms because they couldn't get it to market. And they couldn't get to market in the right format. They were selling perhaps to restaurants and there's no way that they could take the food that they didn't have any way to package it to put it on the shelves of the grocery store so you know there's nothing left to do but destroy the food on the farm it was insanity what trump did in 2020 was insanity and i will never forget or forgive the lies that were told to push people into fear. Oh, yeah, we don't have any food in the grocery store, so buy my storable food here at InfoWars.com. A few months later, the WHO advocated for everything they had previously advised against

in order to combat COVID-19. Recommendations are based solely on reported experience from one city in China. This was followed by appropriate propaganda that was taken up by the world's media people dropping dead in the streets of just yesterday's one person pointed that out again, you know, said it many times. I knew it was phony when I saw the phony falls. I know a phony fall when I see it. Yeah. These people that they had doing these videos in China were not professional stunt men and stunt women. It was an obvious dive. It's ridiculous.

So international public health priorities are currently being set and upended by the specific aim of allowing the WHO to do this again. So with all this stuff, we've been conditioned with the first one. There's a pause because people say we don't want it again, but that's there. And they bragged about the fact that once they get you to do it, you know, we've got Matt Hancock and the UK saying, yeah, we knew what we were doing. We had, um, had people go through this. And so now the next time we scare them, they're going to do it again. It's muscle memory, right? And the same way, you know, you train to defend yourself if there's an intruder in the house. And so you're going to fall back on it. Public health officials, they like, you know, public health itself.

Understand. Just like the whole idea of herd immunity. Public health, herd immunity, all of that collectivist stuff. It's not about our health at all. It's a way to control us. If it were about our health, they'd be concerned about the health of the individual. But when they put the quote unquote public health, what is that? When you divorce, when you divorce public health from the health of the individuals, what does that even mean?

And in the same way, you know, they talk about herd immunity. Well, you know, you got to have the vaccine because if you don't get your vaccine, then I'm not protected, even though I get a vaccine. If you don't wear your mask, I'm at risk, even though I'm wearing a mask. Pharma and their private investors increasingly funded the WHO itself, not just Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins or CEPI out of Switzerland. They now provide about 25% of its budget.

Discarding basic immunology, the WHO claimed in late 2020 that only vaccination could lead to higher herd immunity, and then they shut up about the herd immunity. Did you notice I pointed that out at the time? I said, how long has it been since they talked about herd immunity? You haven't heard that for a very long time. They stopped talking about that when they, you know, they wanted to try to justify the mandates and everything with herd immunity. But after they started doing it, after everybody realized it didn't work, they shut up about it. They couldn't hide the fact that it wasn't doing anything because they couldn't really control both sides of

the narrative. They wanted to keep people panicked about this thing continuing to spread. But then if it's continuing to spread, that means that your vaccine's not working. And we saw that, you know, anyway, the only real question is whether and how this society wrecking pandemic train can be stopped. The public health professions want careers, they want salaries, and so they're not going to stop this. They're going to go along with it.

You know, try to explain it to Larry King if he was still around, right? They have proven that in previous manifestations of fascism, the public has to educate itself and refuse to comply. It's just that simple. When we refuse to comply with the masks and everything else, that's when it worked. So Kerry was right. Jim Kerry was right.

It is just corporate fascism. Health care group is calling for the return of face masks. You see, they want all this to come back. And they want to do all this to come back and they want to do it at a higher level. They want to do it at a global level. They want global lockdown. It's not enough to have it done at the federal level. And this is one of the things that the people in the Trump cult still don't understand.

Oh, Donald Trump didn't do it. It was a bad Democrat governor. It's like, are you kidding me? He paid them. He paid Republicans to lock people. Republican governors are paid to lock people down. Democrat governors are paid to lock people down. Take a look at the deficit if you don't understand that. But that's the way they get everything done. You know, the federal government has very limited powers and they know it and they don't want to have a direct challenge to their orders. So what they do is they bribe people,

and they give them money to bribe them to do something. That's what Trump was doing. He was bribing all the governors to do the lockdown. And he said, oh, they didn't do it. They did it. Because you paid them, they did it. Just like, you know, when Hillary Clinton went to his wedding. I paid her to be there.

Well, he paid Newsom to lock people down. And he paid Whitmer. And he paid Cuomo. And he paid Republicans like Brad Little and Mike DeWine. And on and on. He paid them all. He was the producer. So now in the UK, a lobby group of healthcare workers has warned against the

decision to remove face mask guidance in healthcare settings. The Scottish Healthcare Workers Coalition. Well, maybe they will, you know, and this is happening at the same time that In-N-Out has come to its senses in such a way they said, all right, stop with the face mask. We want to see your smiling face here as an employee. They're behind the counter at In-N-Out Burgers. And so if you want to wear a mask, go get a note from your doctors. You got a medical condition that the doctor is going to tell you the mask is going to help, then fine. Give us a note.

We'll let you wear it. Other than that, if you want to work here, you got to take the mask off. Scottish health care workers, they're going to force people to start wearing kilts as well? I don't know what's going to happen with that. Travis has got a quote here from G.K. Chesterton, who he loves. Chesterton is wise. He says, there is no fear that a modern king will attempt to override the Constitution. It is more likely that he will ignore the constitution and work behind its back he will take no advantage of his kingly power

it's more likely that he will take advantage of his kingly powerlessness and of the fact that he is free from criticism and publicity yeah sounds like somebody we know, doesn't it? For the king is the most private person of our time. It will not be necessary for anyone to fight against the proposal of a censorship of the press. We do not need a censorship of the press. We have censorship by the press. G.K. Chesterton, early 20th century. Yeah. Yeah, human nature does not change does it so the cdc in terms of pushing their mask data this article from epic times

by megan redshaw says that they used unreliable and unsupported data from journals to push the lies about the quote-unquote science. Same thing we saw with the climate stuff, remember? A new analysis of studies at the CDC and their flagship scientific journal found that the agency promoted the effectiveness of masks using unreliable data with conclusions that was totally unsupported by evidence. And so this journal that they put out is the MMWR. It's the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, MMWR.

And so they made positive findings about the efficacy of masks 75% of the time, despite, listen to this, despite the fact that only 30% of the time, despite, listen to this, despite the fact that only 30% of the studies actually tested masks. Just making this stuff up. And the same way they made up, we got the cases here and we got test results and we got scientific studies here about masks. Only 30% of them tested masks, but 75% of the time in these reports, they were talking about this.

Less than 15% of them having statistically significant results. None of these studies cited by the CDC in their morbidity, mortality weekly report. No studies were randomized. in their Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report. No studies were randomized, yet the CDC and over half of their MMWR studies made misleading statements indicating a causal relationship between mask wearing and a decrease in cases or transmission, despite failing to show evidence of mask effectiveness. The inappropriate use of causal language in these MMWR studies by the CDC was directly

adopted by then-Director Rochelle Walensky to promote masks and recommendations urging Americans to mask up. The MMWR is often called the voice of the CDC. It is the agency's primary vehicle for, quote, this is how they describe themselves, for scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations. Ha, ha, ha ha ha ha ha. It's an antithesis of every one of those.

It's unreliable. It's unauthoritative. It's inaccurate. It's not objective. And it is timely. I got to say, they did get it timely. They used it to push their lies in a timely manner. Of the 77 reviews cited by them to promote masks,

they found the following. Only 23 of 77 studies assessed the effectiveness of masks, yet 58 of the 77 studies claimed that masks were effective. So 23 of them assessed the use of it, but 58 said it was effective. Yeah, because it's just a, you got to just say that. Of the 58 studies,

41 used causal language and 40 misused causal language. Causal language is where an action or an entity is explicitly presented as the influencing another, whether it caused it or whatever, not merely associating. And so it goes on and on.

The bottom line is that, uh, yeah, we were lied to the last three and a half years. Um, and finally Brevard County is, County is pointing out that the Trump shots are bioweapons. The vaccine turns out it's back in the news. Republican Party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders

to ban mRNA-based COVID vaccines immediately. I-Team Chief Investigator Mike Magnoli has more on what exactly is going on. Mike. Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 630, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take mRNA vaccines in Florida. In this four-page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite

sources which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words. Government agencies, media and tech companies and other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID-19 injections are safe and effective. Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that COVID-19 and COVID-19 injections are biological and technological weapons. If approved, this letter will be sent to Tallahassee at a time when a grand jury requested by Governor DeSantis is investigating those very same vaccines. That grand jury's job is to determine whether pharmaceutical giants who brought the mRNA vaccines to market broke any laws and should face charges. It's already illegal to require anyone to get the COVID vaccine in Florida, but if state leaders go along with Brevard's request, no one in Florida would be allowed to get those vaccines. Today, the federal government sent a very different letter to drug companies calling on them to make the COVID vaccines cheaper and more accessible, anticipating an increase in demand come flu season. Yeah, is there any evidence that they have taken this stuff out?

If even the batches that they know are responsible for all of the injuries and deaths, they're not banning those. And this is one of the things that we said about DeSantis. We congratulate him for doing more and doing it sooner than anybody else. We also condemn him for not finishing the job. You know, he said, well, there's absolutely no reason for any young people to be taking this. They don't have any risk from this. It's very dangerous. We know that. So the benefit risk equation does not make any sense. We're not going to allow this to be done. We're not going to allow this to be

done. We're not going to allow this to be mandated. He was the first one to come out and say corporations can't mandate this. However, he and his surgeon general, I think the guy's name was Latipo if I remember correctly. They came out, they talked about how it was dangerous. Don't take this because it is a very risky vaccine or anything. And yet we know, we know that there have been tens of thousands, at the very least, of deaths and injuries worldwide with this. Very well documented in the CDC's own database. Why didn't they stop it? As Brian Shulhavi of VaccineImpact.com pointed out, he said, look, you know, we had situations where we had nine states ban a previous flu vaccine. I think it was flu because you had three people die. We're way beyond that.

I've talked about this for years. I said, look, if they shut down the, the Boeing 737 or 767, whatever it was, the max, the Boeing max, they shut that down. You had 8,200 flights, only two of them crashed, but there was a problem and they shut it down. Everybody died on those two flights, but it was only, you know, that's 500 deaths. And again, that's peanuts compared to what has happened with the Trump shots. Peanuts, but they shut it down. Two flights out of 8,600. I think it was, 8,682. Again, it's been a while since I've seen the stats on it.

But, you know, if you were Fauci, you would say, well, it's rare. It's rare. We're not going to do anything about it. We don't care. And that's what their response to all this stuff has been. It's rare. Well, it was rare when you've only got, you know, two out of over 8,000 flights that happens to. So I'm very glad that the county department is saying this is a bioweapon.

They're trying to force DeSantis to do something about it. Again, you should not have kicked this over to the Supreme Court, told them, set up a grand jury and investigate this. You're the governor. You do it. You have the authority to do that. You can set up an investigatory committee to investigate anything you want. So again, you know, he's, he's playing, um, DeSantis says all the right things. Uh, but when you look at some of the things he's done about censorship, about hate speech in order to get donors from Israel, you look at how he says, well, okay, look, the vaccine is harmful, but we're not going to ban it. We're just not going to recommend it. And then we're going to ask somebody else to investigate it. No, that's your job. That's your job. Uh, so again, uh,

just calling the shots as I see him, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. Well, I tell you one thing that DeSantis has been good and uncompromising on, and that is pro-life legislation. Pushing back against the mutilation of children with the transgender stuff. He's been very good on that. And both he and his wife, is it Casey, I think, are taking a lot of heat for that from mainstream media,

drudge other people like that. But we're talk about abortion. This story that's on WND, actually originally came from Live Action News, a pro-life group. She could have been president, but the hospital just leaves a baby to die, quote unquote. We know what this is.

This is what they cynically call comfort care. This is something that amazed the jury in the Kermit Gosnell case. They had, you couldn't be on that jury unless you were fine with abortion. They said, we're not going to make this trial about abortion. It's going to be whether or not Gosnell did things according to what the standard accepted practices are. And so the jurors, as a matter of fact, if you see the film that was done, had Dean Cain in it, and it was Phelan McAleer who produced it. His wife, I believe, had written a book about the Gosnell case, and then they did a movie about it.

And the movie focused on the courtroom aspect of it, the trial aspect of it. And really, the key moment in that trial was where a physician who performed abortions all the time, let's just call her an abortionist, not a physician. So the abortionist, who is an MD, explains to the jury what the standard procedure was of comfort care. And said, no, when a baby survives the abortion, you stick it over there on the table and you let it die. Kermit Gosnell actively killed the child. And that's what he's on trial for. And that's what they convicted him. They convicted him of doing that twice,

two kids he murdered with his bare hands after they survived the abortion that he was doing with his bare hands and forceps or whatever. And, um, and then of course there was also the death of an illegal immigrant woman of color who bled to death in his clinic because there was complications with the thing. He called the, you know, he was late, I guess,

in terms of calling the emergency services, but the key thing was that the ambulance people couldn't get the gurneys through the narrow doorways and hallways. And so she died. She died and he actively killed two babies who survived his initial attempt to kill them. And so in that case, when they were describing comfort care, the jury in real life and also in the movie just gasped. They couldn't believe it. And then later, and it was a couple of years after the book, after the movie, and after I'd interviewed fellow McAleer a couple of times about this, you had Governor Ralph Northam, Ralph Northam out of Virginia, and he was an MD before he became a dangerous politician.

And he talked about comfort care. And that was the first that many people in the United States had heard of it. And they were just amazed at what he had to say. And so this op-ed piece is from a person who was an emergency medicine resident working in a hospital. And she wrote about what she saw. She said, while on my OBGYN rotation at an outside hospital, a woman experiencing a failed abortion came to the hospital. The mom had an abortion injury and they transferred her to the hospital. While there, she ended up going into labor.

She was 21, 23 weeks along when she delivered a beautiful baby girl. You understand the mom was injured during the abortion and had to go to the hospital, but the baby wasn't injured. She said the staff expected the baby to expire immediately, but she began crying. I walked into my night shift, and the baby lay in a bassinet alone. I asked who the cute baby was,

and this is what I was told. It, quote-unquote, it, was an abortion attempt, and they were just waiting on it, quote-unquote, to die. The attending doctor, put the doctor in quotes, the attending doctor claimed palliative care is medical care and left the baby to die. You know, this is something that the pagan Romans did.

You know, when they had a baby who had some kind of a birth defect or something that was immediately obvious, they would just take the baby and take them out and leave them on the rocks Romans did. When they had a baby who had some kind of a birth defect or something that was immediately obvious, they would just take the baby and take them out and leave them on the rocks to die. And the Christians would grab the baby and save it and raise it. After a while, they started giving the babies to the Christians. And now we have some places where they have a place where you can abandon your baby and the firemen will get it or the emergency workers will get it.

I don't remember if I read that story on air or not, but I read the story about a family that, you know, the guy who they had a baby that was abandoned and it was the first one in that area. And he took charge of the baby and just fell in love with it when I first saw it. You know, it just, our eyes locked and there was just something. His wife had tried for a long time to have children and talked about his experience, about how he stayed with a child and got it. And then to his surprise, they asked, could we adopt the child? And they eventually were able to adopt the child. And he said he wrote the story because he wanted the mother to know that the child was

just fine. It's fine. Anyway, she said the attending doctor claimed it was palliative care. Palliative care is medical care. I'm not giving medical care to an aborted fetus. But the child was 21 to 23 weeks along. She said, for the extent of my rotation, the attending OBGYN doctor criticized pro-life states and talked about how she is working for legislation to have better

quote abortion care unquote she claimed palliative care is medical care based on the law and when the baby was born alive she did nothing she didn't call pediatrics or a rapid response but stated the baby was an abortion attempt and unwanted so she would, so she would not provide palliative care. Anyway, I picked up the baby, said this person, and was berated by one of the residents who instructed me to, quote, put it back. The nurses need to keep checking on it to document when it dies. I declined, and I sat there crying for the remainder of the subsequent shift. I was helpless, she said, and there was nothing I could do. She'd already been alive at that point for a few hours, but without respiratory support, I knew she was already experiencing organ failure.

In other words, this is a child that was mature enough to survive on her own for several hours. But in order to have long-term survival, she needed a little bit of medical care, which they would not provide, and she couldn't take the child in and hook it up to the equipment. So she said, I gave the baby in my mind the name Ada. I often think about the baby's mother too, the mother who heard her baby cry before they rushed the baby from the room.

She was later discharged after being treated for complications. I know she is likely suffering and was left without any support or counseling. I don't think people realize, she said, these types of situations are happening even in our hospitals. Oh, yes. In our hospitals. Our for-profit hospitals. Who have the financially incentivized malpractice, the death protocol.

They're more than willing to kill you. Kill who knows how many tens of thousands of people for money that Trump paid them. You identify somebody as a COVID patient, give you $13,000. You put them on a ventilator, I'll give you $39,000 and I'll pay you for every day that you keep them on the ventilator. If they just didn't pay them for treating them, didn't charge them. If they didn't get paid for the hospital visit, the treatment, everything, they'd already be in the black. They pay $50,000 for this thing.

Just to identify somebody as a COVID patient, put them on a ventilator, you get $52,000, but they got 20% on all medical care that they gave as a bonus that Trump gave them. So she said, this little girl clearly looked like a baby. I don't understand how anyone could see her and do nothing. I'm hoping that Ada's story can shine light on what is happening every day. With these sorts of things being done, even by medical professionals. Again, why would we expect they wouldn't do that?

You look at their death protocol. In the same way that they abandoned this child and left the child to die, they did that to adults. You know, they had been doing that for years to babies, and we didn't care because it was abortion. How many times have I said, if you allow them to kill people at the end of life, or if you allow them to kill people at the beginning of life, all in the name of, well, you know, it's not a, uh, there's no, um, quality of life here. If you're going to allow them to kill old people, young people, sick people, handicapped people, they will kill you.

And it's no longer a theory. We saw it happening through the COVID lockdowns and the hospital death protocols that Trump paid for. They abandoned people. They isolated people from their families, left them to die alone, left them to die of neglect. And they also helped it along, just like they help along the babies that they abort.

You know, the remdesivir, the ventilators, and all the rest of this stuff that Trump is so proud of, just as deadly as forceps or chemicals to burn the child to death. Yeah, people are left to die alone, left to die of neglect. As a matter of fact, you know, when you look at what is happening and, you know, everybody is rightfully concerned about child trafficking and Sound of Fury has gotten this, you know, it's now become, I said Sound of Fury, Sound of Freedom. It has become a Sound of Fury, hasn't it?

Signifying nothing. A lot of tale told by idiots signifying nothing. But, you know, we look at that and it's like, how many different ways do we have to see the abuse of children sexually with trafficking or sexual abuse with our own schools and libraries, subjecting them to pornography, gaslighting them psychologically, mutilating them with chemicals and surgery, ripping children apart, all of this across the board.

When does it end? That's why when you look at Tucker Carlson interviewing this Arkansas governor, Asa Hutchinson, you know, he asked him, as I pointed out yesterday, you know, well, you vetoed this legislation. You know, what's the deal with that? And he says, well, you know, I think that you could go too far with this. There have been some bills that said you should never have transgender surgery as a minor. And he said, I wouldn't sign that in a minute because no parent should be able to consent to that kind of a permanent change.

But this bill did go too far. It was unconstitutional and it interfered with parents. So I sided with the parents. Parents, if they want to, they can mutilate their kid, he said. I stand with the parents, you see. Virtue signaling about parental rights to mutilate and sterilize their kids, minors. So Tucker pressed him on that. He said, but this is permanent physical alteration.

Carlson said, I think we've learned that hormone therapy for prepubescent children is permanent. And then as he continued to press him on it, and that was a good thing about Tucker, that he pressed people on these answers, Hutchinson said that he hoped that we'll be able to talk about some issues. I talked about that yesterday, but here's what Tucker said. He said, this is one of the biggest issues in the country.

And I think every person in this room would agree that it is a central issue, because if these are children who are being altered permanently, and you can defend that alteration, that you can change if you like, but there's really no debate about whether or not it's permanent. And he said, and so I think that it's fair to ask you in a calm, rational, and I very much hope polite way, why you would support that. But of course, it's not just Asa Hutchinson, but it's also Chris Christie. You know, the two things that ended these campaigns, if they ever had one, of Asa Hutchinson, but it's also Chris Christie. You know, the two things that ended these campaigns, if they ever had one, of Asa Hutchinson and Mike Pence.

Asa Hutchinson ended on, well, I would let parents mutilate kids. Well, Chris Christie agrees with that. And the thing that ended Mike Pence was, well, I think that, you know, we got to just do everything that Ukraine wants. And Chris Christie agrees everything that Ukraine wants. And Chris Christie agrees with that as well. Chris Christie said, well, I would tell this to Tucker, except then when Tucker said, well, come on, let's have an interview.

Oh, well, silence, right? He doesn't want to tell it to Tucker's face. I would like to see that interview. That would be a Tucker Carlson program I would watch. Chris Christie prides himself on being a tough guy when it comes to stuff like that. A tough guy who wants war and he wants to mutilate kids or let parents do it if they want to. So anyway, when we look at where we're going,

talking about Tucker, like I said before, it was a very interesting thing. I think perhaps maybe the most interesting thing that happened, happened at the beginning. That's what Tucker Carlson said about where he is as a person. I certainly hope that things are changing for him. And, you know, he's somebody who is smart enough, he's got a big enough following, that if he really gets a strong moral foundation underneath him, that would be really powerful, and I hope that does happen.

Geesebusters, thank you very much on Rumble. I appreciate that. That's very generous and kind of you. Thank you. But let's talk a little bit about what Tucker Carlson had to say. I'm going to play you the clip for it. It's about three minutes long, but I think it's very interesting to hear what he had to say. And I think it's interesting that there's been so much you know, it's not the kind of God and country mom and apple pie type of stuff that you expect to hear from politicians or people in public life.

But I mean, sincere soul searching stuff, you know, from Tucker Carlson, from RFK Jr. And we'll talk about that a little bit as well. But here's what Tucker had to say. Most important election of our lifetime. How do you explain? We always hear that, don't we? Well, I'm clinging to the hope that elections still matter. I really want to believe that because I'm American in a very fundamental way. And so I believe in the actual mechanics of democracy, like the people

should rule, you know. So but leaving aside even elections, I think it's clearly a pivot point in history. And I don't think the issues that we debate and really are in some ways distractions are the core issues at all. I mean, it really, there are forces, unseen forces acting on people. It's funny in February, I was like trying to think about what to do for Lent. I'm not a particularly faithful or virtuous person, but like you try to do something. I already quit smoking. So like, what's next? And I thought, well, I'm just going to read the Bible and no, I'm not going to do a Bible study. I'm a Protestant. So I feel like I have a right to kind of read it myself. And I'm sorry, I feel that way. And, uh, and so I've been reading it since February and I'm like about halfway done

and, and I haven't talked to anyone about it and I haven't been in it, just been myself reading it. And I've all kind of, it's like the most interesting thing I think I've ever done. It's unbelievable. The amount of drama in those books that has been hidden from me as a regular churchgoer in the Episcopal church.

Like, wait, why didn't you ever mention this? This is like unbelievable. What? But the two things I have come away with after reading the entire New Testament and I'm up to Deuteronomy in the Old Testament, is the every, with the exception of Jesus, every figure is like really flawed. Big time. Like flawed in a way where you'd be like, I don't know if I could be friends with that person. You know what I mean? Abraham enters Egypt and he's like, oh, it's my sister actually. Take her. What? What? I was saying to my wife who was a religion teacher, I was like,

why didn't anyone, what is that? And she's like, maybe the point is that God takes people who are not perfect people, not only not perfect people, like they're so imperfect again, I don't think I can have dinner with them and uses them for these grander purposes. That's the first thing I noticed. The second thing I noticed is that people, while they have free will, of course, and they can make decisions and they live with the consequences of those decisions. They're not really in charge of the arc of history at all. They are being acted upon a lot. Amen. And I never really appreciated that because I'm American.

And so I grew up with this feeling that we're the sum total of our choices. Well, that's not what I'm reading at all. People's choices matter. You need to do certain things and not do other things. On the other hand, you are not in charge. You are being acted upon by a world you can't see. And that, by the way, is consistent with my life experience. Like I've seen that, I've lived that, I'm 54. And so I feel like it's really important to approach politics with that in mind. Like a lot of these issues are symbols of this much larger battle. And the final thing I will say is I do think we should approach these questions with humility. Amen. You know, we don't always know. I was at dinner last night at 801, which I strongly

recommend. Surprisingly good lobster, kind of weird for Iowa. I'm like, is this from the coast of Iowa? No, but it was good. But anyway, we were talking about candidates, and I was eating with someone who's a Christian, and I said, I can't, honestly, I can't tell if this person is a tool of light or darkness. You know what I mean? So we don't always know actually at all and we should always admit that you know i've got very strong feelings about all kinds of issues but it's so

important to be open to the possibility that i'm completely wrong and that what i'm espousing is actually destructive not constructive um so just to approach it with with humility like we're all about a hundred times more ignorant than we yeah well that is interesting isn't it i think it's interesting that he's always identified as a lifelong episcopalian it's like why didn't you guys ever tell me anything about this you know you know we're all going to answer to god at some point in our life and we say you know they told me the wrong thing. And God's going to say, you know that I gave you a Bible to read? You didn't want to bother to open that up and look for yourself?

Yeah, you are responsible for figuring that out yourself. And that's not just a Protestant thing. You know, that is a God to you type of thing. I thought it was interesting that it begins with this guy saying, you know, this is the most important election of our life. Haven't you heard that every single election, every single, and even the off year, midterm elections, even when there's not a presidency, this is the most important election of our lifetime. Well, in a sense, I guess it is true. In the same sense that, you know,

we can't do anything about tomorrow. We may not even be here tomorrow. We can't do anything about yesterday. That's done. That's history. And so right now is the most important time, but it's not just the election. Every day, today, is the most important day of your life. To a large extent, it doesn't matter what you did before. And you don't have any control over what you're going to do tomorrow, but today you can do something about it. And if you failed yesterday, there is forgiveness and a new beginning in Christ. That's a key part of the message. He said he realized that human nature really hasn't changed much, that all these people were flawed in the Bible, except for Christ.

They're all presented right there with all of their failings for us to see and understand that we, like them, are in many ways the same way. But we know that God can use imperfect vessels. He doesn't call us to remain imperfect. He takes away the stains and the dirt of the past if we repent. It's not just cheap grace. It's if you repent. It's based on what Christ did. And so you can move forward with that. But it was very interesting, I thought, that, you know, again, he says he's 54 years old. His wife is a religion major.

They never read the Bible? That's really kind of strange. He said, it was hidden from me as a regular churchgoer. And there's a lot of churches that are like that. It's one of the reasons why the churches have become LGBT clubs. They don't read the Bible. And a lot of the people who are leading those churches don't want you reading the Bible. And they

push against what the Bible has to say. It's difficult for them to kick against the goads, but they will do it, and they will hide it from you if you let them. It is your personal responsibility, because it is the word of life. You're not going to come to faith unless you read the Bible. You're not going to know what to believe, or who to believe, or what to do unless you read the Bible. You're not going to know what to believe or who to believe or what to do unless

you read the Bible. And it is a, you know, we talked about this ecstasy drug and how it's going to make people love other people and all the rest of this stuff. Well, the real thing is there. The real thing is there. It can really change your life. God can really change you. God can give you the power to change your life, but you've got to look for it. You've got to look to him. And so he said, you know, he's aware now of how powerless people are and how there are bigger things that are acting on us, both good and evil, that are acting on us. But it doesn't mean that we don't still have a role to play. You know, there's always been this tension, and there always will be this tension in terms

of the nature of God, the nature of our relationship with God, the sovereignty of God and man's will, and people have written a great deal about that. You know, one of the big debates early on was between Martin Luther and Erasmus over the free will of man or the sovereignty of God. The way Martin Luther explained it and the bondage of the will, he says, yes, you are free to do what you want. But is God free to change what you want? I think that is the case. And it was kind of interesting to see RFK Jr. being asked by a listener, like in an interview, rather. I've got a letter from a listener as well,

which I thought was kind of interesting. Let me read that first. This is from Marty, and I thank you, Marty, for the, and I've already mentioned his name before, but I didn't read his letter. It goes back to June 29th. It's just before the 4th of July. And he says, my biggest, most important personal news is that I've begun reading the Bible. You know, it really is transformational. You know, Tucker couldn't wait to talk about it. Made a big deal. Marty wrote me about it. I know from personal experience how life-changing it is as well. And there's been a lot of people. One guy who's written a book called cold case Christianity.

It was a cold case detective in California and his wife became a Christian. And he was determined he was going to get her out of this mind numbing cult. And he was going to apply logic and he was going to deconstruct the Bible before he started reading it. And now he's, he quit being a detective and he's telling people about the bible um and so it's interesting and so marty says my biggest most important personal news is that i've begun reading the bible i finished reading dennis prager's genesis and exodus portions very

enlightening in various ways one being that people haven't actually changed since ancient times psychologically he says well again spiritually you know spiritually you haven't changed by the way marty and everybody else i would suggest you know especially dennis prager's got some real blind spots here uh you know he he came out a couple months ago i talked about it bablin b had a lot of fun with it you know he was essentially saying that you know pornography is good for a marriage and lets you escape and all this kind of stuff and bablin b said uh after this has gone around people are reluctant to shake dennis prager's hand at some of these think tank meetings and stuff. Now, he really, he's missing some major, major issues here. I would suggest, if you think Genesis is interesting and enlightening,

take a look at some of the stuff that you'll find in Answers in Genesis. I've mentioned many times about Werner Goethe, a German scientist who talked about in the beginning there was information. They've got a lot of very interesting stuff there. They contrast the viewpoints about evolution with what the Bible says about creation and give you some very, very thought-provoking insights into Genesis that will show you that it's not just a bunch of made-up stories that we tell kids in Sunday school. It's really grounded in reality. It's grounded in

history and geology and archaeology and so many other things that we see everywhere. But again, you know, when you look at the Bible, it really is about not necessarily just, you're right, that people have not changed because we have the same human nature. But also, when you read the Bible, I would suggest that you look at it, first of all, what does this tell me about God? And what does it tell me about my relationship with God? And then secondly, what does it tell me about myself, not about other people? Don't get into the habit of reading the Bible, Oh yeah, look at this. Look at this really bad person. I know somebody like that as well. Have you looked in the mirror? Right?

It's there to hold a mirror up to you. Not so that you can use it as a camera to take pictures of other people in your mind. And you won't get anything out of it that's useful unless you use it as a mirror. And so I thought it was interesting in this long interview that RFK Jr. had with Lex Friedman. He is a scientist who's worked on artificial intelligence and other things, but he gets to interview people like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, and so RFK Jr. went on with him.

He got like a million views. And it was pushed to me by YouTube. I thought that was kind of interesting. So I watched a little bit of it. And it was interesting. He flat out asked RFK Jr. about God. It wasn't that he brought it up like Tucker did, wanting to talk about, wow, I really read the Bible. It's really amazing. Instead, he was asked, and really read the Bible, and it's really amazing. Instead, he was asked, and he didn't shy away from it. He got into a real philosophical conversation, and he talked about how he had struggled with drug addiction,

how he just could not handle it, said RFK Jr. And he said, you know, when I was a kid, I gave up some things. He was Catholic, and he said, I gave up some things for Lent. I gave up candy one year, and I never went back to it. And then he said there was something else that he gave up. I don't remember what it was and never went back to it until he got into college. And evidently in college, that's where he just kind of gave it all up because when he got to college, uh, he started doing drugs. He didn't talk about his sex addiction, which we all learned of as his diary was discovered and released publicly to his embarrassment before his first wife committed suicide. And he had this long list of women and he rated them from one to 10 and all this other kind of stuff. But he also had these asides in his diary.

And he talked about the demons of lust. He said, I just can't help myself when I'm around women. You know, I just, and then he would write things like, oh, it was a good day today. I didn't, I was away from women or something like that, right? Can't control myself with that. Or he'd have a situation where he'd go off on a trip that was kind of isolated.

It was a good, it was like three or four days, you know, no women and that type of thing. How do you handle that kind of addiction? And so he was addicted, even though he may have had an iron will when he was a kid. It just all flew out the window when he got into college, got addicted to sex, addicted to drugs. And so when he was talking to Lex Friedman, he said he had a friend who he had done drugs with. And he said they'd been apart for some time. He came back later on.

And he said this guy had become a moony. And he said, you know, we're there. And he said, I started doing drugs. And he said the drugs were right in front of him, and he didn't have any interest at all in doing them. He said, I just couldn't believe it that he wasn't drawn to this, that he wasn't compelled to do this, but he said, and he apologized for it, he said, but I decided that I would rather die than be a Mooney, but then he started thinking, well, maybe there is a God, and maybe there's something we could do. He said his father, R.K. Senior,

he said they used to take him to Mass all the time, and he would actually read them the Bible as kids. And my wife, Karen, grew up Catholic, and she thought that was really strange. You know, to them, the Bible was just something, you know, that, you know, you have it on your coffee table, you got it in a place of reverence, but you don't touch it, you don't read it, you don't make notes in it,

you don't do any of that stuff to it. You know, that'd be sacrilegious to make notes in a Bible that you're reading or something. But anyway, he said, yeah, his dad, you you know would read it to him but he said he didn't believe any of it and he was into jungian psychology and he said um jung carl jung had this idea of synchronicity and he said uh jung believed in the supernatural he believed believed that there were um you know things that were synced up experiences that were synced up and he said he'd had kind of some spiritual mystical things that he couldn't explain any other way

and he said jung tried to recreate this with experiments to prove that there was god but he was never able to do it. But he said, but I know that God exists, or there's something out there that is supernatural and organizing. And I thought that was really an interesting take on it, because I've seen and talked many times about Crick and Watson who discovered DNA. And they said, well, we know that this is an intelligent design, but we're going to reject the God of the Bible. It's got to be something else. It's got to be space aliens who came here.

We'll call it panspermia or something. And Jung would do the same thing. I'm not going to look at the Bible. I know that there's something out there. And of course, if they would read the Bible, the Bible would say that there is no excuse. We all know that there is a God. Creation speaks to us night after night, day after day. It utters speech and the way that, and the things that we see. So everybody knows that there's a God, but do you know God? Has he spoken? Has he spoken through the Bible?

And unlike Tucker, RFK Jr. didn't do that instead he said i just decided i'm going to live my life as if there is somebody who's watching me somebody that i'm accountable to even though um i'm you know not i i don't know who that god is essentially i thought that's really strange. But you know, even that helped him. It's one of the things I've said about politics and prerequisites for having somebody who is a believer in God.

And that was something that was written into the law of most states. You know, when we first began in the United States, people were coming here to escape religious persecution. Sorry, Nicole Hannah-Jones, it was not about slavery. They came because they wanted to escape religious persecution. A big part of the evidence of that, of course, is the fact that you had different established churches in different states. In Rhode Island, it was Baptist. In Maryland, it was Catholic. In many of the New England states it was Congregationalist,

in Pennsylvania it was Quakers, and on and on. And they were very concerned. The First Amendment is to say that, all right, we're creating this national government, but the national government is not going to establish any church. And it's going to be prohibited from doing that because we don't want to fall in the same thing that we just escaped from in England and other countries. And so, you know, an established church was something that you're going to have to pay money to, and sometimes you'd be compelled to attend or have to pay more money, I guess, was the penalty.

And so they didn't want that at the federal level, but it didn't do anything really to stop it at the state level. And it continued well into the middle of the 20th century that you would have embedded in, and again, established state churches continued in Massachusetts and one other New England state. I think it was Connecticut, but I'm not sure. Up into the 1830s, they still had a state, an official state church that was supported with state money. That's what establishment is. And the First Amendment didn't stop that, even that. So it certainly doesn't put a mask or a gag on somebody who wants to freely exercise a religion as a school teacher or as a government employee. That's not what establishment of religion is about at all. But it also established the idea that we wanted to have moral people who were going to lead us.

And so you had in a lot of state constitutions the idea, well, you know, first it said they've got to be at least a Protestant, okay? And then later on they said, no, it can be a Catholic as well. And then later on they said, okay, it's just somebody who believes in God. And then in the 1960s they removed the last of these and said, you know, we're not going to have any moral issues about this. And of course, anybody could lie about any of that kind of stuff. You have to evaluate as a voter, you have to evaluate somebody's character and then sincerity. Anybody can, you know, do God talk, right? But it was kind of interesting to me. He said, you know, Jung, Carl Jung,

could not prove God by his scientific methods. But again, the Bible, you know, nature shows us that there's an intelligence that designed things, and the Bible itself has so many different things in it that attest to it, you know, from the standpoint of fulfilled prophecies or archaeological stuff and all that kind of thing. But I think I'm absolutely convinced of it. And it's not just that I had a feeling about something.

It's both feeling as well as intellect. You can't trust your feelings. You've got to have something that is absolute standard, and it can withhold that standard. But anyway, he said, Carl Jung said, I can't prove it, but I'm going to just, but I know it's there. And so R.F.K. Jr. said, so I decided I would fake it until I make it. He said, even though I don't believe in God,

I'm going to pretend that there is a God that's watching me as I do things. And that's one of the reasons why you would have these requirements for somebody to have a political office. That's why I've said that even though the mainstream media and the left wants to panic when they see somebody talk about God, and you should be concerned that somebody is going to use that as a kind of demagoguery. Again, evaluate their sincerity. But if somebody really believes that they're accountable to God, it's going to change the way they behave. And even with RFK Jr., he said it changed his drug addiction.

Just to get up every day and to act, even if he didn't really believe it, that he was going to be held accountable, that someone was watching. The problem is, is that again, he doesn't really ever talk about reading the Bible. So one day he really will stand before that God that he's pretending exists, and he really will be held accountable for what he does. And he better find out what it is that, you know, God offers so much stuff to us for free, but he does have some requirements, and you might want to figure out what that is.

But I also thought it was interesting because, you know, we've had a lot of back and forth about Jordan Peterson, who said, you know, I had this vision or this or that, and, you know, and I had this idea. You know, Jordan Peterson is a Jungian psychologist, He's from the school, not Freudian. He's not Sigmund Freud. But he believes in Carl Jung's idea of psychology. And so to me, that helped explain some of the disconnected mysticism of Jordan Peterson in terms of talking about that. And the name of the book that Jung had written was Synchronicity.

And I heard that, and I thought, synchronicity? Is that where Sting came up with that title for the Police album and everything? I looked that up, and it's like, yeah, he did. And he actually wrote that when he was, I thought that was kind of interesting. Look up and see if you can find, Travis, GoldenEye, and it's Ian Fleming's house there in Jamaica. If you actually go to the actual website, uh, and, um, it's like one of those tabs there, you can rent it and, and sting rented GoldenEye and he wrote some songs there and it's where

Ian Fleming retired. And, um um he built that house and is really beautifully situated with a bay overlooking it yeah there you go that's it yeah and go to the one that says uh the history because that's got shots of the house it's pretty amazing um actually scroll down a little bit um no not the history look at one of the other tabs it's got pictures of it maybe the booking um the experience there you go the experience look at one of the other tabs it's got pictures of it maybe the booking um the experience there you go the experience look at that look at that bay there it's amazing and so if people are listening to this on podbean go to look up golden eye turns out that that island there is called golden head and he called his house the villa there golden eye but he had also, when he was in the British Secret Service, he was part of or head of an operation that was called Golden Eye.

He built that there. It's on the bay there in Jamaica. I imagine it's phenomenally expensive to rent it. But he built that villa there, and there's no windows. Everything is open. And he's got, as you can see that there's shutters and doors and stuff like that, that you can close, but everything is open to get the sea breeze. They're kind of interesting, but anyway, synchronicity and, um, uh, I've gotten way

off on a tangent here. Uh, Tucker, even as he has been saying that, again, we have to look, and as he pointed out with all of these people that he's read about in the Bible, there's this mixture. We don't really know where people are on these things, which makes his interview with Andrew Tate pretty amazing as well because at the same time he says, yeah, I'm reading the Bible and I'm seeing how God is working and I've got these ideas about this. But again, there has to be an absolute standard there.

And LifeSite News talked about Tucker Carlson's interview with Andrew Tate. I talked about it as well. And they pointed out the hypocrisy of a lot of the stuff that Andrew Tate was saying. In an apparent attempt to counter the current focus to tax against authentic masculinity in the West, Tucker Carlson traveled to Romania to interview former kickboxer and social media celebrity Andrew Tate. And of course he did a two and a half hour interview. Offered some useful insights into the importance of healthy masculinity, but provides a grossly

corrupted view of this important topic in both theory and in practice. You see, you have to, like I said, when I talked about it, I said, you got to be careful that you don't fall off the horse on the other side. Yeah, the left and the society, the establishment is trying to destroy men. No doubt about it. And they have vilified masculine virtue. No doubt about it. But where is masculinity defined? Where is virtue defined? You don't have to go to Romania, Tucker,

and talk to Andrew Tate. He doesn't have the answers. The answers you'll find in the Bible that you're reading. Go through that. Think about that. Look for that. As I said before, when I talked about this the first time, I said, don't use Andrew Tate as an example. Oh, he's strong.

He's proud. He's rich. And all these other things. No, no, no. Take a look at Jesus. Jesus was not weak at all. Strongest man you'll ever find, but he was meek. He didn't point to himself. He didn't boast about how rich and successful he was, how strong he was. And this is a guy who, you know, he is a pornographer. He's a pimp. When Carlson inquires about his message,

Tate labels it as traditional masculinity. No, no, it's not. Traditional masculinity is as a protector, not as a pimp, not as somebody who exploits women that you're supposed to protect. Andrew Tate is the antithesis of what Western civilization always held up as the ideal for masculinity. And in a sense, what Andrew Tate is selling you is the phony version of masculinity that the left, by the way, condemns.

He's holding up everything that they condemn and saying, look, I'm fighting it. No, you are validating what the left says about evil masculinity. So according to his tradition says says LifeSite News, for a man to be virtuous, he must conform his soul and behavior to each and every virtue. Well, that's not according to him, but that's according to LifeSite.

It said, for example, let's say that you work really hard, but occasionally you steal. Well, why does that make you a thief? All right, let's say that,, um, you're real friendly to a lot of other people, but you like to get drunk and do other things, right? Uh, or, you know, when, uh, that that's life site news going through this Ray comfort when he goes up to people on the street, he says, oh, so, um, yeah. You ever look at a woman to lust after her Andrew Tate? Well, I imagine you did. And you probably, you probably made a lot of money by trying to get other people to do that, right? So what does that make you? It makes you an adulterer, right?

And, you know, do you ever steal anything? What's that make you? That makes you a thief, and so forth, and so on. He says, so what are you going to do when you stand before God? You know, what are you going to tell him? Look, I've done this, this, this thing. I'm an adulterer, I'm a thief, I'm a murderer because I hate people and all the rest of the stuff. So what are you going to say to God? He says, well, you know, the reality is that God can't just let you go, but somebody's already paid your penalty for you. And you need to find out about that.

And so, you know, when you look at, look at Andrew Tate, what LifeSite News, they're Catholic, but they're basically going down the same thing that Ray Comfort did. Saying, you know what? When you push this stuff out of there. What Tate is doing, you know, he may not be holding a gun to the head of these women. But he is exploiting them nevertheless. And he openly says he hates women. And he says he's proud of the fact that he's a father.

No, he's a sperm donor because he doesn't spend any time with his kids. He says he's not an actual husband. Another place with Tucker, he mentioned speaking to the mothers of my children, quote unquote, about child rearing. And sadly, he later said, well, quote, I can tell you why I wouldn't

want to get married in America. I don't see the point of being married to a woman who's had so many partners before me that she can't properly pair bond with me and then giving her the opportunity to financially destroy me. I think that'd be a bad chess movie, said unquote. Is that why we had marriage? Was that why we had the idea of waiting until marriage before you had sexual relationships? Does he see the wisdom of that? No, he doesn't. He just sees the wisdom of not ever getting married.

He doesn't see the purpose of marriage. He doesn't see the purpose of family. He doesn't see the relationship with his kids. Instead, he's just happy that he never got drawn into any of that stuff because he can just live for himself out of selfishness, pride, and greed, and then exploit women and provide an avenue of spiritual warfare against men all over the world. This is the guy that's being held up as a virtue. Is Tate suggesting, says Lifesite, that this to be the background of mothers of his children? He's conceding that he himself perhaps has not lived a sufficient life of masculine excellence

necessary to securing the love of a virtuous woman with whom he could entrust his heart and life. And they point out, as Tucker Carlson apparently has. Tucker Carlson's been married for 30-something years or something, or 40 years, I don't know how long he's been married, but he's been married to one woman. He apparently found somebody that was virtuous, that he could trust. And yet, where are we now? What are Christians looking for? Are we as clueless in our politics

as Tucker is in terms of masculinity? Christians are likely to put their faith in one presidential candidate. No one else even comes close as a Christian in politics. This is a daily news, a daily caller article. And so they're talking to people like Tony Perkins. They're talking to people like Robert Jeffries, Robert Jeffries, who worked with Curtis Chang to push pastors to get the vaccine and push the vaccine to their kids. You know, Curtis Chang, as I've talked about before, he was given tons of money

from the ad council, from the COVID collaborative. And you remember, uh, Trump gave $250 million to the ad council to push people to get the vaccine. They'd never had that kind of money. These are the people, the ad council that did stuff like, you know, um, uh, just say no to drugs, you know, during the Reagan administration, big campaign. You saw those ads all the time as a useless and as obnoxious as they were, or the smokey, the bear, um, campaign only you can say prevent forest fires, that type of thing, But they gave way more money to the ad council to push this stuff. And they were funding people like Curtis Chang, who was getting people like Robert Jeffress, who's got this big church in Dallas. And he's always hanging

around with Trump and getting his picture taken with Trump. And he's very politicized. But you know, during the lockdown, Robert Jeffress required all of his church staff to get the jab. Amazing. The lack of discernment. These people who participated with this political thing that destroyed businesses, destroyed lives, got us in debt as the government was bribing everybody. But they killed people in hospitals. They killed people with the shots. They killed people with lies. And these same people now, people like Tony Perkins, people like Robert Jeffress, are

now saying stuff like this. Donald Trump kind of raised the bar, put him behind bars, which sounds a little odd on his face because he certainly was not a candidate when given his background. Yeah, his background was the same as Andrew Tate. And we see conservatives celebrating Andrew Tate

as a pimp, pornographer. We see people celebrating Trump as a proud serial adulter, somebody who was so eaten up with greed for money. It's all he could ever talk about. Trump's alleged affair with Stormy Daniels, his infamous expletive filledfilled Twitter rants against various media celebrity political figures, and his more recent trouble with the law might otherwise preclude him from gaining support from religious circles. However, however, but, but, but what has

changed? How do we excuse any of that? Why isn't that a non sequitur? You know, when he ran in 2016, what was his opposition? Hillary Clinton. And as Julian Assange said, we know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger and a criminal. We don't know about Trump yet. So I was willing to give him a chance then. Trump's policies, I said, however, and his stances during his first term as president. So what was it that you really liked about him? Was it the destruction of the constitution?

Was it the poisoning of people? Was it the murder of people in hospitals? The lies? Was it the globalist agenda that he pushed? What was it, Robert Jeffress and Tony Perkins, that you really loved about Trump, which makes him the only person that you would even consider. Trump made waves as the first sitting president to appear publicly in the March for Life. But then he also says now that it's too harsh. What's being done by DeSantis and others. He came in celebrating, as they pointed out in 2020, his own first president come in, celebrating same-sex mirage. And, of course, in this article, where they're trying to make a case for him, they say, well, his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, defended laws like the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act, allowed people to opt out of the coercion that was being put on them to bow down and worship same-sex mirage, except that Trump has pushed that.

Trump pushed LGBT. He pushed transgenders way back. Michael Flynn pushing them back in 2015, pushing Pride Month at the Pentagon, holding up a Navy SEAL as an example to everybody, praising him. And Jim Caviezel is praising Michael Flynn. Jim Caviezel is going to go to, uh, go with Trump and, uh, talk about his

movie sound of freedom to somebody who hung out with Jeffrey Epstein. How can they not connect the dots? How can Jim Caviezel not connect the dots on Michael Flynn and what he has done on Donald Trump and what he has done? How can he not connect the dots? How can he not ask them? Are you going to renounce that? Are you going to expose these people?

Are you going to talk about that experience? Are you going to come clean on it? No. No. So, this is the article. You'll find this at the Daily Caller. You'll find it at WND. I've seen it over and over again.

There's only one candidate. Only one candidate out there. And, you know, it's got to be Trump. Well, we're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. And the people sinned a great sin, for they had made them a God of gold, and they bore him upon their shoulders and rejoiced, saying, This be our God, O Israel. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. On Rockfan, John John left a comment.

He said, I was raised Catholic and went to a parochial school. My siblings and relatives are Catholic. I was a devout Roman Catholic until I read the Bible at age 30. No longer was a papist. I'm a follower of Christ Jesus, my brothers and sisters who went to parochial school and go to mass every Sunday, even at ages 65 through 80. None of them have ever cracked open a Bible. Yeah, sad you know it was um i don't i think it was wilberforce but i'm not sure well there was a one historical character who um you know it was a thing with a wealthy people at that time you know you were expected that you were going to go to parliament

or the house of lords or something like that but it was also expected that they were going to do what they called the tour. You know, when you get to a certain age and finish your studies at Oxford or Cambridge or something like that, you would take a tour of Europe because, you know, travel was going to expand the mind and the experiences.

And so on that tour, um, and I think it was William Wilberforce. I think it's how he became a Christian. Uh, he took along a Bible with him and of course he read it in the original languages. He read Hebrew. He read Greek, this particular guy. Again, I think it's Wilberforce, but I'm not sure. But anyway, he's reading it as he's traveling across Europe, slow travel and carriages and things like that,

maybe an occasional train, still not moving very fast. He's got a lot of time on the road. And so he's reading the Bible in the original Hebrew and the original Greek. And when he came back, he said to somebody, well, either this isn't the Bible or we're not Christians. I say, Hans, are we the bad guys? There's skulls on our suits. Look at that. It is interesting to look at it as an absolute standard let's talk a little bit about money you know jesus talked more about money than he did anything else pretty much randy alcorn by the way is a great book called the treasure principle you know you don't just ignore it and money in and of itself is not bad it's the love

of money that is the issue uh this is um crypto will transcend international currencies says blackrock ceo now cheerleading it but see he doesn't want you to have the actual thing that's the thing that truly amazes me you know it's just like he wants you to get an etf he wants you to get a derivative of crypto don't buy the actual thing. Buy a derivative that I will create. What a scam this is. I mean, you look at people and I understand they're concerned about crypto. Do I understand this? And so forth. He told Fox Business last week, the role of cryptocurrency was to largely digitizing gold, suggesting that US regulators consider how an ETF directly linked to Bitcoin could democratize finance.

We know what he's planning on doing. It's the same thing they did with paper gold and paper silver, right? These derivatives they used to manipulate the price of real gold and real silver. And he's going to use his ETF to manipulate the price of Bitcoin, I think. He's gone from crypto hater in 2017. The CEO of the world's largest asset manager is now telling everyone who will listen that crypto will transcend international currencies.

He says more and more of our global investors are asking us about crypto. In his view, they have a differentiating value versus other asset classes. He says it's so international. It's going to transcend any one currency. Well, I smell a rat. I smell a fink as a matter of fact, a rat fink, uh, the CEO of BlackRock. He says, if you look at the value of our dollar, how it's depreciated in the last two months and how much it appreciated over the last five years, an international crypto product can really transcend that.

Well, again, you know what can transcend it is gold. And I'll mention, you know, David Knight.gold takes you to Tony. Do business with Tony. Don't do business with Larry Fink. It's just the craziest thing I've ever seen. But DeSantis in this interview with Tucker Carlson, he vowed to kill FedCoin on day one. That's what the Federal Reserve wants to call it, central bank digital currency, FedCoin.

Now, they've already started with FedNow, which is the wholesale version, bank-to-bank type of thing, supposedly to solve the problems that's already been solved with Cash App and with Zelle and other things like that. But FedCoin is where they go retail. And so what he said, to his credit, he said, the federal government has a responsibility to protect us from foreign threats. But if you're going to now turn the government on the American people, that is the worst nightmare of the founding fathers, said DeSantis. And he says that the Fed might try to do something unilaterally, even if Congress doesn't do it. He says, if I'm president on day one, we will nix central bank digital currency. Done,

dead, not happening in this country, he said. They want to get rid of cash and they want no cryptocurrency. They want CBDCs to be the sole form of legal tender. It will allow them to prohibit undesirable purchases like fuel, ammunition. He said, and it is a massive threat to American liberty. We're certainly saying all the right things. And again, you know, it's important when somebody is there that they do the right thing and say the right thing. But of course, he's actually taken action in Florida. You know, the U actually taken action in Florida. You know, the UCC changed that he did. It was something that he said other states need to do this as well.

And he's right. You know, we could shut this thing down at the state level. If we follow the example of what DeSantis and the GOP in Florida did, you know, they may be, you know, a little bit weak on some of these issues, but they did the right thing with the UCC. And we could look at that and use that as a pattern. States need to assert their authority and shut down the central control of the federal government.

That might be the most important thing that DeSantis has shown us. Thank you for listening. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job.

And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website.