The David Knight Show - 19Dec22 What Changed Tucker's Mind on JFK? Why Does Tucker Believe Govt's 9/11 Fable?

Episode Date: December 19, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Why is alt media so excited that Tucker Carlson finally realizes the CIA killed JFK? 2:05 Ken explains why we need to be careful not to put our trust in people who have character issues.9:46 Listener: "The military has a saying: 'Leave no man behind' - we've left behind JFK, 9/11 victims"14:29 Tucker Carlson: “In 5 years every fifth grader will believe that 911 was committed by white supremacists”. But does Tucker STILL dismiss the mountain of 9/11 evidence as he did 10 yrs ago?24:46 Tucker Carlson's discounts 9/11 Truth because…in his own words… 28:42FBI said they didn't have Seth Rich's laptop data. They lied. Then they said they didn't have his laptop. They lied. Now they say they won't comply with FOIA order about the laptop b/c the laptop is not "a record" but "physical object". Are these the same people who are killing Assange?35:13 Could a gel made out of human protein create the next generation of bullet-proof body armor? It's better than any bullet proof vest45:12 Fauxcahontas jumps in with Republican Marshall to take advantage of the FTX collapse with a proposed Anti-Money Laundering Act treating crypto, not the Democrat Party, as criminal53:27 Lawsuit seeks to get Republican state legislator removed merely for having been a member of Oath Keepers (he never attended Jan6). Former FBI agent takes on clueless "experts" on "extremism" in court testimony.1:05:01Open borders, Dreamers, and the Death of the American Dream1:17:56 Tennessee has put right to work in the state constitution. To show why NOT being forced to join a union is important, here's my personal experience with how that worked1:23:25 Gates & Bezos invest in yet another Brain-Computer Interface company to rival Neuralink. Why are these billionaires obsessed with mind control?1:33:17 Yet ANOTHER study showing that masks don't work for surgeons conducting surgery — actually makes things WORSE.1:45:58Public health officials and media are pushing masks AGAIN, in a big way1:53:27 David Stockman (former Reagan official) destroys the lockdown and the politicians who imposed it2:02:31The new normal is an admission that we failed to stop a virus that is now circulating amongst us.2:09:07 Press and GOP establishment come after DeSantis for changing sides on the vaccine. While he's moving in the right direction, we should remember what he was saying about the vaccine just a few months ago. 2:13:44 More BigPharma deaths — Remdesivir is not safe and could be fatal to Fauci's as Mr. Science. It's far easier to prove corruption with Remdesivir than with any of his other crimes. 2:21:41 A nanotech "solution" for obesity.2:31:11Dr. Ryan Cole’s study: what's in the vaccines.2:36:07 When mRNA TrumpShots are not stored at -90F, do they become ineffective or do they become toxic?2:44:08Kissinger warns NATO about both World War 3 and autonomous killer robots2:56:22Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie At PTSP, we're making it easier than ever for our customers to save. Whether you want to save little and often, or invest a lump sum, you can open a savings or deposit account in-app today. And with the confidence that comes with knowing your money is earning interest, it all comes together for a banking experience that's altogether more human. PTSB. Open in-app and start earning. Over 18 PTSB personal customers registered for online

banking only. Number of accounts per customer may be limited and subject to a minimum and maximum balance. Qualifying criteria, terms and conditions apply. Permanent TSB PLC trading as Thank you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 19th of December, year of our Lord, 2022, day 1012 of the emergency. Today we're going to take a look at the JFK assassination is back in the news. It's amazing, but there's something very interesting about the way it's being presented, I think. So we're going to talk about that. We're also going to talk about a new move on crypto.

A couple of senators who are coming after it, wasting no time trying to capitalize on the SBF fraud. And we have Gates and Bezos investing in their own company. It's not their company, but investing in a company out of Australia that has a competing way to do a brain-computer interface. Because all these billionaires want to know what you're thinking. And they also want to control everything that you do. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, I think the Babylon Bee put it best when they said, the FBI releases all JFK documents except the one that says they killed him. Is this supposed to be news now at this point? I mean, that's the amazing thing about this.

It's, uh, and do you think the government's going to be honest with you on any of this stuff? Seriously, uh, this it's, and now Tucker Carlson who has fought for years. I don't know. I've not heard him change his mind yet about 9-11. And if he doesn't understand 9-11, he's not going to understand dark winter too, which is what we've just been experiencing for the last 1,012 days. It was a plan.

It was rehearsed. They were connected. 9-11. If you don't understand that, Tucker, you're not going to understand January the 6th. You're not going to understand the times that we live in. I mean, honestly, he seems like this is just a revelation to him. And he kind of grew up in a bubble, you know, this elitist Ivy League world that he grew up in. Very wealthy family.

His father worked for Voice of america doing american propaganda uh tucker carlson pushed pretty hard against 9-11 uh you know for the last especially a decade ago we'll talk about that in a moment but what did they put out well again as babylon b says that the direction of the fbi the national archives has released all the government's documents related to the jfk assassination except for the document that says they killed him. It's not, it's just amazing to me. I'm glad that he's coming around. But, but still Brian shall have it.

The health impact news picked up on it. He says he was surprised. Yeah. I'm didn't do anything on social media this weekend. I took some time off. It's just Christmas and we're so far behind in what we need to do in terms of the usual stuff, and just to take a little bit of time to enjoy it. But, yeah, I'd ask that you pray for Karen as well.

She hurt her ankle this weekend. She's got some other things that have happened. But anyway, when we look at this, I just stayed away from it, didn't comment on social media. I'm so fed up with social media, all of it, that I don't really spend much time on it. I know that I should, but I can't really spend much time on it. Um, I know that I should, but I can't see that it's doing anything. So anyway, um, the headline from Brian on vaccine impact news is, uh, Tucker Carlson repeats old news. CIA orchestrated the assassination of JFK. Uh, nobody believes in the lone shooter as a matter of fact, you know, and it's the FBI that was at the center. Of course the CIA orchestrating this, I'm sure that, uh,

Jager Hoover knew what was going on too. So they were involved in it as well, but, um, uh, you know, in many different ways. And, uh, you know, they concocted the idea that the label, the FBI concocted the label conspiracy theorists to shut down people asking any questions about their absurd narrative. I mean, nowhere does Tucker Carlson talk about the magic bullet. I can see, I didn't watch his program. I saw, um, you know, transcripts of what he said for about 11 minutes or so. Doesn't talk about the absurdity of that. Doesn't talk about absurdity. Maybe you should, somebody should just show him the clip from full metal jacket.

Rarly Ernie is telling the guys by the time you get finished with this, you're going to be able to shoot a moving target, no bigger than a melon, uh, and with a bolt action rifle, and you're going to be able to get three headshots off in no time at all, just like Lee Harvey Oswald. So if you believe that he'd go, if you believe that that's that happened, then go to, um, go to the school box depository and take a look at it. I've read in the past, uh, a statement by a guy who was a sniper and he said, you know, they've got that corner window all blocked off. So you can't actually stand there. And he said, but when nobody was around, he said, I sneaked up there and I looked out and it's like, there's no way. Uh, so anyway, uh, not to mention the films and all the rest of this stuff. Uh, he did touch on the suspicious aspects of a Ruby anyway.

Um, this is, uh, Brian has a quote from off guardian where they say waiting for a government, any government to release their secret files is a waste of your time and reading anything they eventually publish is doubly. So if you didn't learn that from the nothing burger that was 28 pages on 9-11 or the pathetic exercise and

revisionism that made up the afghanistan papers you should definitely have learned it today yes joe biden's administration has just released their promised secret jf papers. Turns out that Oswald acted alone. I know. I was shocked, too. Again, why is it that Trump didn't release them, right? Oh, we were told by Alex, you're just going to release that stuff. It's 4-D chess. He's just waiting for the right moment to release that stuff.

Well, the moment's gone. He never did it. And as a matter of fact, the law said that it was supposed to happen 2017 under his watch. So it's interesting. He never did it. Isn't that interesting? Don't you find, I find that interesting. So Tucker Carlson,

today we spoke to someone who had access to the still hidden JFK files and is deeply familiar with their contents. We asked this person directly. Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of JFK? Here's the reply. The answer is yes. I believe they were involved in that guy, Tucker off on a tirade. So he's got an unnamed source that told him it was true. We've got mountains of evidence.

This one person on the phone that he called tells him it's true, and all the rest of the stuff that people have been exposing for the last, what, 60 years or something. It's, um, uh, that just right over his head. He doesn't care about that. And I'll tell you why in just a second, Tucker Gosselin doesn't get that. Uh, so this is treated by breaking news and the alternative media says Brian, as if it had never been stated in the corporate media before, but see,

here's the difference. Yeah. He, uh, Brian goes back and says been stated in the corporate media before. But see, here's the difference. Yeah. He, uh, Brian goes back and says, yeah, NBC news, 2013, an inside job, CIA, a suspect for some and JFK's killing. That was NBC 10 years ago. A daily mail from 2015. Did CIA director Alan Dulles order the hit on JFK? He says, in 2020, we published an interview with RFK Jr. on Ron Paul's Liberty Report

show, where Kennedy said, not only did the CIA kill his uncle, but also his father. Well, you know, we can now believe it, because Tucker Carlson has told us it's true. Because he works for Fox News. Because he gets paid tens of millions of dollars a year. He knows. It's kind of like Tevye and Fiddle on the Roof. If I were a rich man, I would tell everybody the answers to everything, and they would think I really know because I'm rich.

So now, you know, because he's rich and he's on Fox News, I guess that's it. Is that it with the alternative media? Now we can believe it? By the way. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgambling p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. I just want to say that, you know, in terms of, you know, Gerald came on on Friday. We talked about RFK Jr. And, you know, a dream that Gerald would like to have of a third party. And I understand why he would like to do that. I mean, the RFK Jr. would bring to light some issues that really need to be talked about.

Judge Napolitano would like to, you know, would bring about some issues about the Constitution that we'd like to talk about. But their personal lives have a lot of baggage. And, you know, we need to be careful not to put our trust in men or even in a political party even in a new third party political party and we need to understand that the solution is not going to come from washington let me make that clear i had some people write me and said do you know this about um

uh do you know this about his past life and things that his ex-wife has said and so forth? And look, I understand, you know, there's, in a divorce, there's a lot of things that are said. You know, sometimes they're exaggerated. Sometimes the bad stuff on both sides is true. But I'm not taking a position on that. All I know is, and I said, well, you know, I don't agree with RFK Jr. on a lot of issues. And what I was thinking about at the time was his position on climate change. Children's health defense has been a, and you know, that's for years, they would focus on the childhood vaccines, on autism and things like that. And that was good. And I would cover their articles and they had good detailed articles about it.

But at the same time, they would also be pushing the climate change agenda. And so, you know, there was this thing. You just try to take the chicken and throw out the bones, you know. But when it comes to a situation like this, you know, besides the personal issues and things like that, we're true. Big red flag. It was a red flag for me, uh, with Trump. Um, because of the way he treated his wives and many other accusations and all the rest of this stuff.

It's like, how do you trust a person, uh, to tell you the truth as a stranger when they do the kinds of things to their wives that Trump did. That's a character issue, folks. Now, that isn't just between them. That is a character issue. And it's not just, well, this is my personal morality, and who are you to judge? No, no, no, no.

It's a character issue. He swore to love, honor, and cherish his wife, and he did that. So this is one of the reasons why JFK and all these other presidents would pretend that they had a great marriage and that they were faithful to their wives because people understood that's a character issue. If I can't trust this guy, I can't trust this guy to be faithful to the Constitution, faithful to his campaign promises, if he's not faithful to his wife. And then we find out that A, they're not faithful to their wives, and B, they're not faithful to the Constitution, and C, they're not faithful to the campaign promises who knew it's a

character issue it's a character issue do they have integrity and so when you look at some of these things that's one of the things about rfk jr because of the assassination thing and because he has taken a stand against these people and because he has taken a stand on these assassinations unlike the rest of his family. To me, that was a good sign of integrity. But there's other things that are troubling. And the climate issue, the climate issue that he's still clueless on is going to be used. It's going to be a key factor, if not the key factor. I don't know if it's going to be used, it's going to be a key factor, if not the key factor.

I don't know if it's going to be more of the pandemic MacGuffin or the climate MacGuffin, but they're going to use one of those two, war MacGuffin two, maybe, you know, they'll probably pull all the triggers on this stuff. But the one that is used without an emergency, the pandemics and the wars get people in a state of emergency, but the thing that is preparing it relentlessly moving on and on and on is the climate MacGuffin. And that's the big issue. So let me just say that about the Kennedy family.

Um, uh, Richard Williams, thank you for the tip. He said, the military has a saying, leave no man behind. Yeah,

we left Kennedy behind. We let those that have died as a result of nine 11 behind. And now freedom is leaving the American people behind. I agree. I agree. And, you know, that's what's so troubling about all this stuff. We look at the JFK assassination. We all know that the government was lying. We all know the government killed him.

We all know the government is lying about 9-11. We all know that the government used that and had to orchestrate that had to knowingly did i mean so many data points showing that the government was intricately involved i mean from the drills that were going on to shutting down the response on norad that's what um uh gorv et al. He said, yeah, my dad worked with, I don't believe that the government was involved. He said, his father set up that system. He goes, there's no way that, uh, that would not have happened. That would have happened with planes. If they hadn't shut it down, then there's all the stuff at the Pentagon. I mean, it's just so many different ways that they've lied to us.

Phone calls and cell phone calls on the plane. I mean, it's just unbelievable the amount of evidence. I don't know who took it down specifically. And nobody specifically knows. And I'm sure they didn't write it down on a piece of paper anywhere. If they did, they burned it a long time, a century ago, or half a century ago, whatever. But, you know, you're not going to find some paper that says, yeah, we did it. And, you know, I called so-and-so and we did it.

They're not stupid like that. And you're not going to find out who did it. You're going to find it out by deductive reasoning, as I've said. Just like Arthur Conan Doyle at Sherlock Holmes, say. He said, well, you rule out the impossible. And then whatever is left, no matter how improbable, is the truth. That's deductive reasoning. So, getting back to this, it was never a consideration that it was a lone shooter.

Release the villain monologue files. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, everybody thinks that. My son says, yeah, release the villain monologue files. Because that's how it's done in the movies. And we're just waiting for that to happen. You know, Alex told us that it was going to be, Trump was going to release the villain monologue files because they write it all down and they tell everybody when they think they've got the superhero, you know, he's, he's strapped in. He's going to, you know, uh, kill him.

And, uh, just before he does, he said he said now i'm gonna tell you the whole plot well that's uh we don't live in that kind of a movie someday we will get the villain monologue files released to us but not in this life uh tucker carlson recently discovered this is another one that brian pulled up here he says this is the only person i saw and the alternative media says that this is old news henry mackow on his blog he said tucker carlson recently discovered something which has been public knowledge for almost 60 years the cia assassinated jfk mary pincho meyer the woman who inspired jfk to resist the satanic power was also brutally murdered by the cia their deaths were part of an ongoing program of political assassination.

In his book, Mary's Mosaic, Peter Janney has assembled the puzzle. And the picture is disheartening, but true. You know, and that's one of the things that made me think that Tucker Carlson really did just come to this understanding because he was so deeply trusting of the government systems and everything, because it's again, where he grew up, his father being part of voice of America, uh, because it's like, you know, we can't trust anything. Yeah. It's like, yeah, that's a, once you see behind the curtain the first time, then you start seeing a whole bunch of different things. And so this is kind of the, I guess that's the story.

Maybe it's the epiphany of Tucker Carlson. If you want to go beyond what the controlled opposition corporate media is reporting about this and understand the much larger picture of how the CIA and our government operates, says Brian, at Vaccine Impact. He said the best film I've seen on this topic is the 2014 film, JFK to 9-11, Everything is a Rich Man's Trick. Now, I have not seen that. He's got a link in his article at Vaccine Impact. He says it's got 8.6 out of 10 rating on IMDb. You can still find it on YouTube. You can get it on YouTube. There's a, the, uh, um, the link to it right there embedded in his article.

So if you want to watch that, you'll see it. I may, um, I don't know if I want to watch that Christmas break or not. It wasn't going to be a real downer, but, um, I don't know. Anyway, you should go back and see it, but here's the thing. It needs a, um, go back and see it. But here's the thing. It needs an update, perhaps, don't you think? Because it's JFK to 9-11. Except we're 20 years on, aren't we? And what else happened on 9-11?

He needs an update to this. Maybe he will. 9-11 was tied directly to Dark Winter. Dark Winter two months before. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie um 9 11 one week after the anthrax attack two months later the model

state health emergency powers act they then reproduced Dark Winter every year at least once. The usual suspects, Johns Hopkins, the Gates Institute, the CIA, Fauci, all these people on an annual basis for 20 years. That's why I tell people, look, event 201, yeah, it was exactly the same thing. But do you realize that it was exactly the same thing for 20 years going back to two weeks before 9-11? These were all tied together. This is the other shoe to drop. They've been practicing dropping this other shoe for 20 years. You need to understand that to get the full context. So there needs to be another movie, part two, 9-11 and Dark Winter to the 2020 COVID games. That's the real issue here, folks. That is the foundation.

That's one of the reasons why I wanted to talk to RFK Jr. because he's got a good chapter in his book on Fauci. Chapter 12 was what I was going to talk to him. We had the interview set up, and it was set up for a couple of weeks. At the very last minute that morning, we got a call. He's got a scheduling weeks. And, uh, at the very last minute that morning, we got a call. Uh, he's got a scheduling conflict. Oh,

really? And then, um, we said, well, we'll, you know, contact him.

Well, when can we reschedule? Uh, we'll let you know. And then they quit talking to us. So I don't know what it was. Um, and I'm not,

you know, again, I, I, I, children's health defense is a good source of information. They do some good research at Alex Meyer, who is the head of the California branch on. She did excellent job explaining, uh, the whole Corminati head fake about the labels, right?

Oh, we're going to, we're going to authorize something that's Corminati, but it's not, we're not going to authorize Pfizer BioNTech, right? We're going to authorize Cormonati, which is not available in the US, but we're going to keep our emergency use authorization. And they said the two of them are legally distinct. And why did they make that distinction? Well, because they wanted legal immunity for the damage that they were doing. But then Biden, on the other hand, use that to say, no, they're the same thing. And we're going to mandate it while they were able to keep their emergency use authorization legal protections. I mean, it's, it's disgusting. There was some good research.

She did a great job with that. And, um, you know, I, you know, not against, um, you know, the information on children's health defense fund. Anyway, so an insider told Tucker Carlson, CIA was directly involved in JFK assassination. Um, so as PJ media, that's a headline from them. Um, again, um, he's going to ignore all of the factual information, but because he's got somebody he trusts on the inside, who says I've seen the documents and there's a, a villain monologue in there that says that they really, we really did it. You know, don't tell anybody, keep this secret forever. Do not destroy, keep this in the files.

And, you know, they weaponize the term conspiracy theorist. When they disagree with you, they call you misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, racist, and a conspiracy theorist. We hear that every day now, right? It's become this ubiquitous slur, except in 1976, the U S house of Representatives reopened the investigation of the Kennedy assassination with a bipartisan committee, and they concluded that JFK was, quote, almost certainly murdered as the result of a conspiracy. The U.S. House of Representatives majority did not believe in 1976 and the lone shooter thing, but they're still trying to jam that down our throats.

They don't believe that as a lone shooter, they believed it was a conspiracy. They just won't say who did it. So Carlson said he talked to somebody who has access to a familiarity with the still secret Kennedy documentation. He asked, did the CIA have a hand in the murder of president Kennedy? According to Carlson, the insider replied, the answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was.

It's all fake. So again, now Tucker's, you know, he seems to have been that naive. I don't know. I was, that was a surprise to me because, you know, just a couple of years ago, 2019, Tucker Carlson said this in 20 years, every fifth grader will believe that nine 11 was committed by white supremacists. Well, if it's the CIA, you can certainly say it was committed by people with white privilege. These are the Ivy League murderers that we have trained, right?

Running the CIA. And they were all this good old boys club in the Ivy League. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie A bunch of bespoke murderers. Who does he believe is behind 9-11? The reason he said that was because he believes 100% the government's official story. He believes that it was a bunch of Arabs from Osama bin Laden flying these planes. He believes that. And they just collapsed in their own footprint after they were hit.

One of them collapsed when it wasn't even hit. That's how good these Arabs are. Carlson's remarks came in the context of what he described as propaganda from liberals blasting President Trump for inciting violence. He said, I swear in 20 years, every fifth grader will believe that 9-11 was committed by white supremacists. Totally true. You watch. You heard it here first. They are the real

threat we need to fear and suppress them that's his quote he used that word suppress them um and this is look at this article wait wait wait pull that back up again i don't know what this is about this is is from The Hill. Now look at that paragraph there where it says, Democrats have accused Trump of inciting violence against Representative Ilhan Omar. But look in front of that. I went back and looked at that again. It's not a hot link or anything.

In curly brackets, at the beginning of the paragraph. Yeah, right there. Highlight that. At the beginning, it says Mossad's Democrats have accused Trump. What is that about? No, it's misspelled Mossad. Mossad is M-O-S-S-A-D. This is M-O-S-A-D-S. And it's in curly brackets. They're at the front of that.

I Googled that. I couldn't figure out what in the world that was about. That's just a strange somebody with a sense of humor. Um, at the hill hacked their article or something. I don't know. Uh, that is really strange. Anyway, Democrats have accused Trump of inciting the Mossad of, uh, inciting violence against Representative Ilhan Omar, one of two Muslim congressmen,

sharing an edited video on Twitter that features images of 9-11 terrorists' attack with Omar's comments spliced in between. That was when she went to the Council on American Islamic Relations, CARE, and she said CARE was founded after 9-11 because they recognize that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties that's the context for tucker carlson saying well you know mark my word in 20 years everybody's going to believe that 9-11 was done by white supremacists. So even he thought that somebody was going to release the papers about 9-11 and, uh,

you know, the villain monologues for that. That's probably what you would find in the, in the villain monologues. I don't know if they're, uh, you know, racist supremacists, but they are white privileged guys for the most part running the CIA. But let's talk about 9-11 and Tucker Carlson. This is from January of this year. This is the headline from, this is on AOL. I don't know who originally did this. But anyway, Tucker Carlson dismantled the nine 11 truthers with elegance and ease

gracefully tearing apart his opponent demanding evidence. I don't have evidence. I've got somebody that I trust on the inside who told me that the CIA killed JFK. I mean, that's, that's what Tucker went with now, right? You want evidence? We got evidence, Tucker. We've got documentaries. We got books. We got demanding evidence and exposing the holes in his argument in their radio showdown a decade ago. But one of his central gripes was that the conspiracy theorist he was debating was really just a poor storyteller. This is what he had to say. He says, it's one of those things that annoys me about these truthers said tucker carlson tucker carlson said get to the point you know make your case instead they

start indirectly by raising what they think are highly significant questions like what's the temperature which steel melts has a building ever collapsed in that way? Has anybody ever seen a building fall like that? Carlson said in his radio program, Dangerous Conversations, hosted by 9-11 truther Scott Ledger. See, Tucker, these are questions to get you to think critically. You want a good story. Well, the government's got a lot of good stories. Am I right? You can go to the CIA website and they've got scripts they've written for the movies. They'll offer that for free. As a matter of fact, you tell them, uh, they offer, they got script writing services for

free to movie people. We'll help you with your script. You know, we'll give you some juicy little details in here. Just a limited hangout of what's true. Oh, people will think you've got insider knowledge here. You may wind up like the writer who had no hands. Remember that story? Uh,

or the spine, the bag. I mean the, anyway, the, uh, yeah, they got a lot of great stories.

They got a lot of great narratives, but maybe you ought to think critically rather than just accept somebody because you trust them because they're source, because I know this person. Hey, you know, I went to school with this guy at Yale, you know, and, um, or Harvard or wherever he went, you know, Brown, you know, I don't know. Uh, you know, we're, we're schoolmates together. I can trust this guy. Maybe you ought to ask, what's the temperature at which steel melts? Maybe you ought to look at the detailed engineering study funded by the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Truth. Some actual engineers who looked at it, who modeled it.

Maybe you want to ask them, Tucker? This is just a rhetorical question saying, you know, here's a physical evidence of why the story that's been told by these authoritative figures that you trust so much, why that's not true. You rule out the impossible, Tucker, like buildings falling into their footprint, especially one that wasn't even hit by a plane. You rule out the impossible. And then what remains, even if it rocks your worldview of your privileged little past is the truth. He still isn't there. Not by a long shot.

So Tucker went on to say, well, it's like, okay, so what's your point? What's your point? What's your point, pal? You want to ignore physical evidence? You want to, you know, they tell you that, uh, you know, fairies pull down the building. Are you just going to accept that because it was told to you by somebody that you went to school with who works for the CIA now? And the point is always that there's a conspiracy of Americans using tax

dollars, usually working for agencies. They know nothing, like the CIA or the NSA, said Tucker. Or one of the alphabet soup intelligence agencies who, for reasons that are never quite clear, said Tucker Carlson, they brought about 9-11. Well, maybe ask some of your friends why they did it, but we know that it had to be somebody from the inside in order to pull that off. It's just deductive reasoning. Ledger, one of the many so-called 9-11 truthers, I think that's interesting that they picked that label, because if they're on the opposite side of the truthers, what does that make them? that they picked that label.

Because if they're on the opposite side of the truthers, what does that make them? The 9-11 liars. He pushed back. He said there's plenty of evidence. He had a raft of witnesses who said they saw firsthand a conspiracy of the U.S. intelligence agencies to launch the attack. I don't even need that.

I don't need any eyewitness accounts. We have physics. Physics. Engineering. Ten years later, Carlson has built a powerful new truther movement, says this article. One which denies the court-tested evidence of an attack on the Capitol by Trump supporters and replaces it instead with a shadowy tale which alleges a deep state within the U.S. government

launching a false flag attack on itself. They've begun to fight a new enemy and a new war on terror, said Carlson. Not, you should understand, a metaphorical war, but an actual war. Soldiers and paramilitary law enforcement, guided by the world's most powerful intelligence agencies, hunting down American citizens, purging them from society, and throwing some of them into solitary confinement. Well now, see, at that point, when Tucker started saying that, at that point, he understands what the Patriot Act was for. And that was a quote from a series that he did that was online only and you have to pay for it.

That was from Patriot Purge series that he had. Well, if you understand there's a Patriot Purge, now maybe after 10 years, you might start to understand why they called it the Patriot Act. It wasn't patriotic. It wasn't following the Constitution. It was against the Constitution. And now if you say, I want to keep my oath to the Constitution, now you're guilty of sedition. Sedition against what? Sedition against an unconstitutional government that did a coup 60 years ago that's what you are guilty of sedition against well um at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10

if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie It's not just that. for reasons my son writes for reasons that aren't clear they've taken our liberties and assumed dictatorial powers why would the good people in the cia do that exactly it just doesn't make any sense yeah that's right. So it's not just that, right? It's not just 9-11. It's not just, you know, go on and on.

Flight 800. How about this? The Seth Rich murder. The FBI reveals it has more information on slain DNC staffer Seth Rich,, but they won't release most of it for what's the magic number 66 years. Why is it that everything is like 66 years or whatever they always are. They wanted to keep the JFK papers. They wanted to keep the Pfizer papers and now they want to keep Seth rich 66 years. That's unbelievable.

Um, the FBI not only has possession of a laptop, which they denied, they had the, they now admit they categorically denied that they had the laptop. Now they admit they got the laptop. As a matter of fact, now they admit they got the laptop. They're saying, well, that's a physical thing. It's not a record. So you're not allowed to see it. That doesn't fall under FOIA request because it's a physical device.

I guess that's why they admitted they were lying about having the laptop before, right? It's the FIB, the FIB, the fibs. All they do is lie. It's a bureaucracy. It's the federal bureaucracy of investigation, except they're not investigating. They're instigating. It's the federal bureaucracy of instigation. Jagra Hoover. I really want to, I, I, I heard that interview on NPR. As I said, we're in the car and i just flipped on the radio only can get like one or two stations on our radio normally it's not a problem because normally i'm

i'm listening but i i can't jack into the radio right now because we got a blown fuse anyway the um so i'm listening to npr and i think terry gross is a really good interviewer i just totally disagree with her worldview and her politics and everything else. But she had a really good interview with a guy, and they were talking about the lead-up to World War I. And the attorney general at the time, Palmer, who had presidential ambitions and how he got this rising, ambitious guy, um, you know, he got this rising ambitious guy, Jager Hoover to carry out these raids that were, you know, perp walks and all this other to make him look good. But what it did is it made a Jager Hoover's career talking about all that kind of stuff. And, um, you know, it's just, you go back and I would love to interview the guy and just focused on that part

of it. But the guy is just such a off the wall leftist in terms of the rest of the stuff it's just anyway the fbi not only has possession of the laptop computer owned by dnc staffer seth rich who was murdered in 2016 by unknown assailants who murdered him and then you know say well you know this is washington dc it's really just dangerous here well they left his wallet and all the rest of the stuff. Right. Um, anyway, but a report detailing forensic imaging of what's being described as Rich's work computer,

the Bureau revealed in a new finding, uh, a new filing journalist, Cy Hirsch. And this is a guy who is not afraid to go where the story goes. And he is frequently been at odds with the establishment. And he has a lot of credibility in my book.

Cy Hirsch said a source told him in 2017 about an FBI report on Rich. According to the source, Rich's computer showed that the DNC staffer had relayed DNC documents to WikiLeaks.

We all knew this, right? So this is just some more corroboration of what we all knew. Julian Assange came out and made it pretty clear. You know, instead of, he said, well, we don't name sources. But he made it, what if somebody had understood? And he had a guy who used to be a British ambassador who went to Washington, D.C. about the same time, said he was given this stuff.

We didn't hack it. It was given to us. It was important for the government and for the media to maintain the lie that WikiLeaks had hacked that. Because if it was somebody who just handed it to them, now you're back to the Pentagon Papers, where the Washington Post and the New York Times

published the Pentagon papers that were given to them by Daniel Ellsberg. They tried to come after the papers, and the papers said, no, we have freedom of the press. And they fought it, and they won. And the principle was, well, Daniel Ellsberg is the one who stole the stuff, and we're going to come after him, except they didn't.

That's another story. And it got him off on a technicality, kind of like Bill Ayers got off on a technicality. And if you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. But anyway, the fact is, is that once that information, the person who committed the crime established a principle with the Supreme Court that the person who is guilty and punishable of a crime is the person who grabbed the information. And when it's given to a news outlet, you can't punish them. That's what they're doing in terms of trying to kill Julian Assange. It's all based on the lie, on the conceit that he participated in obtaining information. He didn't just publish it.

And so it's very important for them. And this is not the only information they put out there. But we know who his enemies are. We know that the Clintons were his target. He was exposing true information about the Clintons. Hillary. So he had relayed DNC documents to WikiLeaks. Hirsch, Cy Hirsch, spoke about the source's claims

during a phone call with Ed Patowski, an investor who later retracted claims about Rich's brother Aaron being a WikiLeaks source and discussed the call during a deposition. Julian Assange has suggested that Rich pass the DNC files to the group, which released the files in 2016. It's just amazing. I mean, we knew all this stuff back in 2016.

I was at the DNC. I was reporting in the DNC. And I'm, you know, one of the reports I did was going around talking to people about all the files that had just been released. Hillary Clinton, uh, how she had violated national security and all this kind of stuff. And, uh, you know, what was in it? Oh no, no, it's Russia.

It's Russia. It's Russia. It's like, but, uh, I'm not falling for that. Um, misdirection. I'm not falling for that red herring. Uh, regardless of how the information came, what about which? Oh no, no, it's Russia, Russia, Russia. And at the time, you know, they were deeply embedded with Ukraine and Andrea Chalupa, Alexandria Chalupa, and many other DNC. And I did reports on that years after that, how, you know,

UNC and the Democrats were involved in all this stuff. And that's one of the reasons why they picked Russia as the fall guy. Anyway, the FBI now wants the court to agree to keep the new records shielded from Brian Huddleston, a Texas resident who filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act requests. Bureau officials initially claimed in sworn statements, sworn statements, that the FBI had searched for records on Rich but didn't locate any records. Then in 2020, for the first time, they admitted it had files from a computer belonging to Rich.

Some of these were then released to Huddleston and made public, including documents that appeared to suggest that someone could have paid for his death. The FBI has said that it has images from a second computer owned by Rich, which the Bureau described as his personal laptop. A federal judge in September ordered the Bureau to hand over the images to Huddleston, finding that the Bureau had improperly withheld them. And so now they're going back, and after saying they didn't have the documents, now said and sworn statements now they say they do have the documents and then when a government governor when a judge tells them they've got to hand over the documents they go um well we also have the computer which we denied ever having and because it's physical we don't have to turn it over under foyer this

is the way these people do computer is is not an actual record. That's what they said. A computer is not an actual record. Well, then why does the government, why does the FBI go in and swoop up all the computer files and everything when they raid somebody, right? I guess, you know, the lawyers need to say, oh, you don't need that laptop. It's not an actual record. Well, that's what Hillary Clinton did, right? Uh, you don't need my go away. These are not the computers you're looking for. They belong to me, right? It is not the droids you're looking for. This is not the computer you're looking for. This belongs to me. I'm Hillary Clinton. Go away. Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am. Sorry to bother you.

Have a good day. Under the FOIA request, they said the computer is not an actual record. It is a physical object and evidence that is not subjected, not subject to the FOIA request, they said the computer is not an actual record. It is a physical object and evidence that is not subject to the FOIA law. My son says, we don't have any documents. It's just physical papers with ink on them and computers with data in them. That's exactly what they're saying. It's spot on, yeah. So this is the way they lie and they cover up and they cover up for people who have assassinated other people.

All right. We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk about some, uh, some more politics, some technology about the brain computer interface. As a matter of fact, they've got a bulletproof armor made out of human cells. I guess some of the people they've assassinated would have liked to have had that. You think? So we'll be right back.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is

Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Stay with us. Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, as I said, we're going to talk about bulletproof armor made out of human cells. My son said, well, that's strange. Humans are not known for being bulletproof. That's what we're just talking about, right?

They can create a gel that stops supersonic projectiles. Well, this is a pretty amazing story. Could a gel made out of human proteins create the next generation of bulletproof body armor? Well, scientists have created a bio gel capable of stopping supersonic objects such as a speeding bullet. The protective material contains a protein found in human cells known as talon. T-A-L-I-N. It reforms in response to external forces. Each molecule has 13 switches that can unfold when force is applied.

These refold after force is removed, enabling shock absorption. Talon is a cell's natural shock absorber. It contains a series of binary switch domains, which open under tension and refold again once the tension drops. It's another amazing example of God's amazing design, isn't it? I mean, it's always been a fool who denies that there is a creator God. It's obvious in the things that are seen that there's an intelligence behind it. But as we get more and more into detail of the finer details of our body, it becomes more and more compelling, doesn't it? And yet, as we're discovering this amazing design,

we continue to walk further and further away from God. It's just amazing to me. In experiments, a piston fired tiny particles of basalt and larger particles of shrapnel at a sample placed in front of an aluminum plate. Even at supersonic speeds of a mile a second, twice as fast as firearm bullets, the gel stopped them in their tracks. And it's better than a current body armor. Current body armor is going to be something that's hard to block it, right? You're going to have something like, you know, ceramic or metal with a fiber reinforced backing and that type of thing. So it's good at stopping bullets and flying debris, as they point out,

but you still have that kinetic energy that has to be absorbed by your body. And that can cause physical trauma to the body behind the armor. So even if it doesn't penetrate your body, the trauma can be very severe. Moreover, due to reduced structural integrity, traditional body armor frequently sustains permanent damage after a hit, barring continued usage. So that's another place where this has a big advantage. Talon-based alternatives could be a viable replacement for existing conventional technologies because not not only is it lighter, but it is, it absorbs the shock and it heals itself. This is truly amazing stuff.

We'll have to see what happens with it. Um, but, um, uh, let's, let's talk a little bit about what is happening with, um, the news here before we get into pharmaceutical stuff. And we do have, uh, Eric Peters joining us with some very interesting vehicles that he has tested and some interesting insights. He'll be joining us in the third hour, hopefully. But I don't know if that's been confirmed yet or not, but we'll, we'll let you know.

Anyway, I had a couple of people send me comments, a few people about, uh, Trump's NFTs here's one of them. Uh, Trump's NFTs are actually proving very useful. For example, they can be used as a measuring device. Uh, for example, if Trump will whore himself out publicly for $99, what else would he do to little Timmy and grandma for millions of dollars from pharmaceutical industry? I think it's pretty clear.

It makes a street hooker look like Mother Teresa. Well, you know, when we talk about crypto, there has been an update to this that I didn't get to last week on the 15th, which was, uh, I think it was, um, Wednesday. You had Senator Warren and Senator Roger Marshall, uh, have, uh, Roger Marshall made some interesting comments about how crypto is just all criminal. You know, we got to stop it because we don't stop crypto. We can't stop drugs and we can't stop this and we can't stop that. It's like, wow, how did, how did the war on drugs keep going now? We're coming up to 50 years anniversary of the war on drugs, the failed war on drugs.

How did that keep going before they had crypto? I just don't know how that worked. And how did they launder money before crypto? You would think listening to these people that, you know, this is what's caused their war on drugs to fail. Their war on drugs fails because prohibition always fails. But Senator Warren, who's always there to protect the consumer, except that she isn't.

First of all, she and her Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that served her demon from hell that she created, supposed to protect consumers, while the credit card companies are charging 30% interest. Come on. That is the most obvious bit of usury I've ever seen. How we used to, that used to be what organized crime did, you know, it was gambling and it was loan sharking and stuff like that before they even got into drugs and let you know what the current banking industry is all about and the credit card companies charging 30% interest. And she doesn't have anything to say

about that. Instead, she wants to outlaw crypto and they're seizing the moment here, trying to put something together. Who knows? Maybe they will just like they put together the Federal Reserve Christmas as everybody was going home. Very concerning, the subversive ways that these people operate. And so they're seizing the opportunity of this SBF FTX fraud. They're using that to try to paint that as a picture of all crypto. If you look at SBF, he's more of a portrait of the Democrat party than he is of crypto, but that's the way they're using it. And that's the way Roger Marshall is using it with Elizabeth Warren. Roger Marshall is a Republican. The bill is referred to as the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act.

It seeks to, quote, mitigate the risk that cryptocurrency and other digital assets pose to the United States national security by closing loopholes in the current system. This is nothing other than moving, again, to take down any competition to the central bank digital currency that's what this is really about it's it's really about that it's not about money laundering it's not about drugs the proposed law would make it mandatory for u.s persons to file a report if they transacted digital assets worth more than ten thousand000 through one or more accounts outside the United States. Further, if the legislation is passed, it would extend certain Bank Secrecy Act obligations to cryptocurrencies, including the Know Your Customer rules, that will be applied to cryptocurrency participants such as wallet providers, miners, and validators. This would

be a way for them to, a justification, legal justification, for them to shut down mining. They will use the justification of climate change to get the public to agree with them. But the justification from a legal standpoint will be, well, you know, you didn't file your, uh, your TPS report or whatever it is. Okay. And so we're going to have to, uh, take you down because that means if you didn't file your TPS report, you are obviously an international terrorist.

I had someone else comment on the Trump trading cards, you know, because again, a year ago, Trump was saying... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreB is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee that cryptocurrency was all just criminal he was on the same page as elizabeth warren it's all criminal it's all criminal. It's all fraud. And then you take the most fraudulent part of cryptocurrencies,

any of the most fraudulent expression of the blockchain, I should say, NFTs, where Jack Dorsey can sell his first tweet, which you can see online if you want, if you bothered to, but he wants to, he sold his first tweet,

an NFT to it. You know, here's your, here's your signed copy of my tweet or whatever for millions. I forget what it was, but, um, Lawrence writes and says, well, those cards might be a value someday. Those NFT Trump NFTs. I don't know how many cards there are, but I imagine that if you can collect all of them, you could receive an extra serving of crickets while you're in a FEMA camp awaiting execution for having a low social credit score. Yeah. I think they, we, we should do our own line. Uh, like the, the pictures that my son did of, uh, uh, yeah, I got the, yeah, yeah. Share some of those pictures, uh, of, uh, Trump embracing his operation warp speed, you know, and there he is seriously looking at this and holding it up, offering it to you.

Uh, there he is embracing his, uh, myocarditis and pericarditis as a puppet, all the rest of these things that he did not want to embrace. Here he is with a lightning and his 5g antenna. Uh, and then, you you know we've got uh another puppet one there um we should put those out and offer them as uh trump trader cards t-r-a-i-t yeah and there he is as a buzz light year with his uh uh, space farce that he did anyway, uh, baked Alaska, uh, is, uh, waiting to go to jail. And that's his, um, his, uh, name that he was doing some broadcasting on the internet with his real name is Antony Antony Ginnett, I think is the way you pronounce that. Uh, but he goes on the name baked Alaska.

He said, I'm going to be going to jail for an NFT salesman. Well, now he is sadder, but wiser. Um, he's finally realized what Trump is about, that he's a huckster, that he's a con man who knew, you know, I mean, that's what I said about the January six people. I did my best to warn people. That's why I got fired. I said, you know, look, do you, do you think that the elections matter anymore? You are locked down by public health bureaucracies from Washington and the state and the local bureaucracies for the last year. Politicians don't do anything anymore.

We don't have a representation when it comes to taxes. We don't have representation when it comes to regulation. We don't have representation when it comes to locking us down. Why do you even care about the election? And he locked down the election, which is what everybody's fighting about. Oh, look, you know, we had this lockdown election and look at all the mail fraud who made that possible. Benedict Donald did. So I say, what's the matter with these people?

Do they think that we've got the survival of our country is contingent on keeping Trump in office? No. As a matter of fact, the election, the 2020 election, served a useful purpose for some people, you know, people who, like Tucker Carlson, naively believed in the system. It was a wake-up call. And I said, look, I've been talking to people about fraudulent elections and how they begin with a ballot, with ballot access, and with access to debates for the longest time. So this is just, you know, he just added some new wrinkles to the corruption and Trump added

those. The mail elections are a Trump precedent, just like gun control by executive order is a Trump precedent. So he says, I can't believe I'm going to jail for an NFT salesman. I couldn't believe you'd go to January the 6th for a lockdown warden. He was there on January the 6th. He's now pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building. The charge carries a sentence of up to six months.

And I'm sure they'll throw all six months at him. He live-streamed himself from the Capitol on January the 6th. He didn't mince words. He said, I wanted to make America great again, but all I got was this crappy NFT. America doesn't need a superhero. It needs Jesus. Well, he's right about that, and that's the problem. Like I said before, we're talking about a third-party candidacy. First of all, the solution, the long-term solution, and the good thing about it is nobody can stop you from the solution. Nobody can stop you from Jesus, right? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgambling p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie That's your big problem, my big problem, all of our big problem is, you know, eternity. And what are we going to do about that?

You know, we stand as rebels before God. And that's why we celebrate Christmas. Christ came. Came to die. So, that's your big problem. Now, we have other things that we have to do. We have to, we can't just stand there and not do anything when somebody's being hurt. We can't just stand there and not do anything when somebody's being hurt. We can't just stand there and take video. If you've got a group of thugs mugging a woman on the sidewalk, right?

We all know how awful that is. I mean, we see stuff like that. We go, what's the matter with that person? They're not doing what they can to help. You know, it doesn't matter if these guys are big or whatever, bigger than you. You got to do something. And if everybody felt that way, there's, you know, if all the people in the area felt that way, you could, with strength of numbers, you could do something about it. And that's the issue with our society as well. We just stand there and watch the government mug one of us after the other.

And like a bunch of sheep, we're just like, oh, well, good. It's not me this time. Okay, well, I guess I'll be fine now. No, your turn's coming. And so we can't just be passive about them. We can't give evil a free hand. We don't do this to save ourselves. We do it because we don't like to see that happening to somebody else.

So when you look at what happened on January the 6th, there is now a trial. We were talking about baked Alaska. Well, half- about baked Alaska. Well, half baked Alaska. You got a guy who's a sore loser in a political contest. Well, I don't think he was actually running this time. He was a Republican

and he got out of the Republican Party. I think he lost or whatever. But you got a guy who won by an overwhelming majority. And simply because he was a member of Oath Keepers, this guy who used to be a Republican in Alaska has now taken him to court to try to get him removed from office, even though he overwhelmingly won re-election.

By a 24-point margin, he won. The guy's name is David Eastman. He's a Republican representative in Alaska. And there is a state trial happening that says that he should be removed from office under the Alaska Constitution because he's a life member of the Oath Keepers. Milwaukee who left the Republican party in 2019 sued Eastman personally in July, claiming a loyalty clause in the Alaska constitution should bar him from office because the oath keepers allegedly advocate for the overthrow of the federal government. Well, that's pure fiction. As I said, many times, you know, it's a shame that Stuart Rhodes lost sight of what his mission was.

He had a good mission. He had a lot of, you know, it's now, oh, look, we got a lot of law enforcement officers and military and former military and former law enforcement officers signing onto this Oath Keeper thing. Well, yeah, that's, they did that when they became law enforcement, when they became military. And they're just reaffirming that. And so a loyalty clause in the Alaska Constitution does not require disloyalty to the Constitution, the U.S. Constitution. There's nothing wrong with declaring your loyalty to the constitution say i'm going to keep my oath to that and that the constitution is supreme to any unconstitutional orders i may encounter if they conflict with the constitution they are not lawful orders and i will not violate the constitution to come after my fellow man that's what that was about

and they did a lot of good things and so in trial, you got a couple of these so-called experts from groups that follow domestic extremists who are attacking him in his defense. He got a former FBI agent. This guy, the former FBI agent, my son says, Oath Keepers have sworn to uphold the Constitution. This is disloyal to the federal government that's ruling us now. Exactly. Yeah, it's disloyal to the cabal of CIA and deep state bureaucrats who are running this government. The FBI agent is John Guandolo. He handled counterterrorism and criminal investigations during his 13 years as an FBI special agent. He said he found absurd the idea that the Oath Keepers tried to overthrow the federal government.

He said some of the Oath Keepers might have broken federal laws on January the 6th for trying to delay the counting of electoral college votes. Some of them would be guilty of trespassing. Some people would be guilty of trespassing. Some people would be guilty of trespassing. But, you know, quite frankly, when you got the Capitol Police standing back and saying, come on in, you know, that's not trespassing. I'm sorry. Some of the people who are being found guilty of that, like Dr. Simone Gold, like Sam at Infowars, that's just criminal.

That is criminal, what is being done to him. Dr. Simone gold, uh, like Sam at info wars. That's just criminal. That is criminal. What is being done to him? And of course, yeah, he's been thrown under the bus by Alex. Who's not helping him at all. Uh, because he doesn't want to, uh, you know, I'm not touching it. Just like Trump. I'm not going to give amnesty to those guys on January six that might, you know, point the finger back at me.

I'm not doing anything for them. It's all about me, right? Deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting, except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge, as his own lawyer said. Anyway, Guandolo said, to conflate what happened on January the 6th, uh,

being in the same, uh, being the same as the entire organization wanting to overthrow the U S government by violence. That is absurd. And I think it is an unprofessional assessment. You see, there's a lot of people who signed on to the vision of Stuart Rhodes.

Stuart Rhodes lost his own vision, quite frankly. Um, and when he became a sycophant for Trump and you know why he did it, right? He did it because it was the popular thing to do. He wanted to build his organization and it's a very unpopular thing to criticize Trump. Even now, even now. And so, you know, he got on the bandwagon. And it's going to take him straight to jail, perhaps for life. I don't think he's guilty of sedition.

I've said that before. Uh, I think he's guilty of self-promotion. I think he's guilty of LARPing like he's, you know, these guys, some of them kind of got into this thing, you know, yeah, we're really, you know, we can save the world here, the four of us. What a joke. An insurrection, a violent insurrection. They don't even have any guns. Anyway, all of that has been said, and there's no need to repeat any of that.

But this is what the FBI agent had to say. He said, the phrase that I saw most often in these indictments was that so-and-so intended to affect the government by stopping or delaying the congressional proceeding, which was to certify the election. That is a far cry from overthrowing the U.S. government by force of violence. Again, there are some crimes, some minor crimes, I think, for the most part, that have been committed there. And they're trying to conflate this into sedition. And as I pointed out before, that was not used against any of the people who had fought a violent war in the Civil War. And if you understand history, it was a war of secession. It was not a civil war, um, in the civil war. And if you understand history, uh, it was a war of secession. It was

not a civil war, really. That's why it's more accurate to call it a war between the states. It was a war to secede. It wasn't anybody in the South that wanted to take over the North. They wanted independence. That's why, um, um, Stonewall Jackson called it the second war of independence. Uh, they no more wanted to take over the North than the Americans during the revolutionary war wanted to take over England. They wanted to be independent. So it wasn't a civil war. Civil war is when you're trying to take over, uh, everything anyway.

Um, so he ripped the testimony of some analysts that had been from some of these violent extremist study groups. He said it was grossly incomplete. It was wholly unprofessional. Uh, he said, uh, the plaintiff's experts appeared to have preexisting ideas about earth

keepers because they failed to examine the good work that the group has done such as hurricane relief and guarding a bakery against a mob, against mob violence in Ferguson in the summer of 2014. He noted that their alleged lack of knowledge of January the 6th provocateur Ray Epps and their failure to interview even one member of the Oath Keepers as evidence. And again, this is a trial where they're trying to throw out a guy who just, a state representative, just won re-election by 20 some odd points. They want to throw him out because he had signed up as Oath Keepers a while back. He wasn't at January 6th even.

He wasn't even there. Just because he had membership in an organization. I mean, this is McCarthyism on steroids, McCarthyism of the left, uh, especially because, um, communist organization did have designs on sedition and overthrowing our government and to be a member. And that was, uh, disqualifying to say the least, but these people wanted to uphold the constitution. They wanted to help protect people during violent protests and things like that. Anyway, he said the plaintiff's focus was on specific negative acts and on opining on those specific negative acts without any mention. And again, based on their own testimony, no apparent knowledge of the positives of the mission statement across the country at the numerous operations that the Oath Keepers have

undertaken since their founding. After meeting and speaking with hundreds of Oath Keepers over the years, he concluded that the group has no bias against the government. They are not anti-government or anti-authority. They recognize the authority as the Constitution, I should say. Anyway, that's what Guandolo said. He said they're not anti-government or anti-authority. They're anti-tyranny and anti-anything that infringes on the natural rights and the constitutional rights of American citizens. He said, as a matter of fact, I heard yesterday the phrase violent extremism defined by the plaintiffs' witnesses as somebody who's willing to do violence in the furtherance of achieving their goal. He says that's problematic from a legal standpoint

because that describes any member of the U.S. military. That describes police officers. That describes U.S. citizens who are exercising their natural right to defend themselves as well as their constitutional right to do so and their lawful right to do so. The use of the term domestic violent extremism is an information operation, he said. It doesn't legally actually define anything. It's one of those things like an assault weapon. It's malleable, right? You can use it however you want. They you know they say well you know we uh we use violence to defend ourselves or use violence to achieve some well he says uh and say that about

the the government um so anyway the uh the judge asked one of these guys who that he's a a scholar a scholar at the center on terrorism extremism and counterterrorism at the middlebury institute of international studies and so he's asked by the judge why do we even have an oath to the constitution sir and he says i couldn't tell you that. Yeah, again, he's a real expert, isn't he? He doesn't know why you would have an oath to the Constitution. Yeah, see any point in the Constitution? One of the reasons why he's just trying to weaponize this. Anyway, Guandala said that he was troubled by that answer.

He said, when police officers and military people and elected officials and judges take these oaths, it literally is the foundation for our entire system because our fidelity is to the Constitution. It's just that simple. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Except for these people. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. This is The David Knight Show.

Well, last week we had Governor Newsom. Now we've got Democrat Mayor of Denver. Both of them declaring emergency both of them saying we're reaching a breaking point on the uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants democrats are very concerned about the people who broke into the capital but they're not concerned at all about the vast hordes of people coming into this country and even the democrats are saying how are we going to pay for this? Said we don't have the room and the homeless shelters.

And they've only gotten a few hundred people in Denver. And we're talking about tens of thousands a day coming across the border and anticipation. You know, they, um, uh, it's already under the more restrictive rules that Biden is going to be removing. They've been having over 7,000 a day come in. And, you know, when you look at this,

the homeless people are now being kicked out of the homeless shelters because they don't have enough room for the American homeless people here. Oh, we got new people. You're out on the street now. You're in the middle of this harsh winter. And, of course, it's going to kick us out of our homes out on the street now. You're in the middle of this harsh winter. And of course, it's going to kick us out of our homes eventually, the American dream. The American dream is going to become unaffordable, as I've said many times. They always talk about the dreamers, right? Oh, these are dreamers coming. They're coming here with a dream. Well, you know, we got our

own dreams, don't we? It used to be the American dream was owning a home. Well, if you have to pay for the education of every child in the world that wants to come here and get an education at your expense, whether or not their parents are with them, whether or not their parents are paying any taxes to, well, you're not going to be able to have a house because you're not going to be able to afford to have a house. If we got to build all these schools, I've seen it in Texas, what is happening there? And, um, you're going to have kids from all over the world coming here to get a free education about becoming a drag queen.

That's what this is really about. This is how absurd this whole thing is. There'd be one thing. If we were teaching people about human dignity and freedom. It'd be one thing if we were teaching them about morality. Instead, what we're doing is we're giving them this Sodom and Gomorrah indoctrination. America has just become hell on earth. It's just a seminary of Satan. And so we got to pay for these schools to miseducate these kids coming in here. Just insane what is happening. Anyway, Mayor Michael Hancock, a Democrat, said, we're reaching a breaking point as several hundred illegal aliens

from Central and South America arrived in the state in the past few days alone. He said, let me be frank. This influx of migrants, and again, he's only dealing with a couple of hundred. It's not thousands that are happening like it is in Texas. The unanticipated nature of their arrival and our current space and staffing challenges have put an immense strain on city resources to the level where they're on the verge of reaching a breaking point at this time. What I don't want to see is a local humanitarian crisis of unsheltered migrants on our hands on our hands because of a lack of resources according to his count more than 900 aliens have arrived in denver over the past several months it's hardly anything compared to other jurisdictions a little bit south including more than 600 since

december the 2nd so it's really accelerating Two-thirds of them in just the last couple of weeks. Another 247 aliens have arrived since Monday alone, while 75 turned up at a local homeless shelter overnight on Thursday evening, according to his office. So, again, it's a plan to take our country down. You cannot have this in an uncontrolled fashion. You cannot have a welfare state and open borders. It's just that simple. I mean, if we're going to have open borders, let's get rid of the welfare state. I would go for that.

Open borders and no welfare state. People come here, they got to pay their way. That's, you know, we didn't have an, uh, we didn't have a welfare state when that was happening with massive influx of immigration from Europe in the 1800s, early 1900s, New York city students, by the way, are, um, refusing to leave their campus building until they're given all a grades. This is the, uh, Lake will be gone movement. I guess we could say, where all of the students are above average. I know somebody who went to this school, and this does not surprise me whatsoever. At the new school in New York City,

students began occupation of the university center on December the 8th. So I would say let them stay there. They obviously have a lot to learn, and maybe the most important things they could learn are life lessons about how not everybody gets an A. Other demands include reimbursed tuition to compensate for the time instructors are not in the classroom during the strike. A tuition freeze for academic years through 2028. Cancellation of fines accumulated by students during the strike. Leniency for class time missed for health reasons and free course materials, according to the demand list. What do you need course materials for? You're going to get an A, right?

I mean, you're guaranteed to get an A if you go there. These idiots don't realize how they have made, if they were to get this, they're not going to get it. But if they were to get it, nobody, it wouldn't be, their degree would not be worth the paper it was printed on, of course, right? Students also demand, listen to this, that the president's house be treated as communal property and used for purposes determined by the non-administrative community. They're full-on Marxists, you know. They're full-on Marxists. I remember when I was a child seeing Dr. Zhivago and the love story and the adultery and all the other stuff.

They just went straight over my head because I was a kid. What I remember about that movie, besides the snow and the cold, but what I remember about that movie most vividly was when he goes back to the house, he was a doctor and they had a very large house. And when Dr. Zhivago goes home at one point, the communists have taken over. He finds that they've taken over his large house and he's got, you know, tons of people living in it. And his family who owned the house has been relegated to a corner of the attic. And, uh, as soon as he comes in, you know, his, his wife is saying, you know, be careful, be careful what you say, go along with everything.

And they're looking at him and, you know, putting a one chip on their shoulder after the other and challenging him to knock it off so they looking at him and, you know, putting a one chip on their shoulder after the other and challenging him to knock it off so they can come after him. You know, and the guy who's, uh, running the occupation of his house is following him around, watching him.

And then, um, you know, he's just totally obsequious, you know, to the guy. Yes. Yes.

And, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,

and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,

and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,

and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,

and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,

and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, guy. Yes, yes. Oh, this is wonderful. I love what you've done to this and all this kind of stuff. Right. And so he can't find anything, but as he leaves, he says to him, says, uh, you've been noticed citizen. Your attitude has been noticed. He didn't give him any reason for that whatsoever, but you know, these people say, well, we're going to take a, we're going to make the university president's house is going to be communal property. It just goes right back to Dr. Chivago and the communists. That's what they are. Forced unionization, by the way, has been stopped here in Tennessee.

They put together an amendment to the Constitution that had a law. The person who put it on the ballot said, I had seen this overturned in one state after the other, or tried to at least. He said, saw what happened in Virginia, afraid it would happen here. He said, for 75 years, Tennessee law has protected its workers from being forced to join a union and pay dues as a condition of employment.

It had been such a longstanding tradition that when I began urging state officials and business leaders to consider making right to work a constitutional protection, I was met with tremendous reluctance. Why do this now? This state law has been unchallenged for nearly a century, for 75 years. But he says, as these discussions began in late 2019, the attacks levied against right-to-work policies took the national stage. Then-candidate Biden called on Congress to override and to ban state right-to-work protections. Pelosi's House twice voted to do that via the so-called pro act.

It also took moderate Democrats in Virginia to stop an attempt by their own party to repeal their right to work law. So he says, as this is happening right across the border, uh, finally, you know, they, they uh decide they would put it on the ballot they did and it won in this last election it's now been an amendment put to the

constitution why is that important well again we're talking about coercion right if you want to get into a union you can still get into a union in a right to work state but you're not compelled to do it in order to get a job and i know what that's like i was compelled to get into a union in a right-to-work state, but you're not compelled to do it in order to get a job. And I know what that's like. I was compelled to get into a union in order to work as a musician when I was in college. And it bothered me. And even before I was compelled to get into a union because I eventually joined a union band. And what the union would do, it was all about coercion.

They would blacklist. It was, you know, Florida was a right to work place. Right. But you, if, if, um, if you had a, this was back when people had live entertainment, right? Uh, now they've got disc jockeys who play recordings, but if you had a venue and you hired non-union workers, you were blacklisted. And if you were a union member who went to work, uh, at played at one of these venues, it was blacklisted. Uh, then you got hit with massive fines. For example, I worked before I got into the union. I worked at, uh, Bush gardens, uh, one summer playing in a band there.

And we alternated with a group of, um, uh, we alternated with a group of belly dancers, but I wasn't doing belly dancing. Nobody would pay to see that. Um, no, but they had a couple of belly dancers and they had, uh, they put together a group that, um, you know, just played, uh, some music in the background live for them. And, um, they actually pulled it off. It's not as bad as it sounds. I mean, they played at Bush gardens and, um, it was, uh, they had a clarinet player who was an anthropology professor from university of South Florida.

And so he's just doing this for summer for fun and had an accordion player and some congo players and some other things like that right um so you know the the anthropology professor was an amateur he was not a professional musician so he was just doing that um for the summer he was okay uh but again black uh bush gardens was black listed by the union uh and not for a good reason. You know, they, they paid a really good wage, but according to union rules, you had to the band played for 45 minutes and we'd get a 15 minute break and you would have to pay a minimum of X.

Okay. Well, they paid just below that minimum, but what they did was they wanted to have constant entertainment. So they would have one band play for 30 minutes and another band play for 30 minutes. So instead of working 45 on and 15 off, you got, uh, 30 on and 30 off. And so when you looked at it, they were actually, if you looked at the amount of time that you're working, you're actually making better than the union's wages. But they've got their rules and they're inflexible. And so even if you only have somebody work for 30 minutes instead of 45, you're still going to pay them the minimum wage.

And so on the basis of that, they blackballed Busch Gardens, blacklisted them. OK. And so this accordion player was actually a member of the union. Now, even when you had live music, uh, not that many people wanted a court. I mean, that's what he's doing professionally. I teach, he's given some lessons to other people who think they want to play accordion, but, uh, you know, in mid-1970s accordion music is not that big and so he's struggling to find work and he's got a job and uh a union official saw him playing there they made him quit and they hit him with some massive fines and that

really bothered me and then after, I was faced with the decision that if I wanted to join this band, I had to join that union. Affiliated with the AFL-CIO, by the way. It's just, anyway, that's what we're talking about. We're talking about right-to-work laws. These people are just another level of predator, coercing you and robbing you just like the government and telling you that they're doing it to protect you.

That's what it's about. Anyway, um, I want to take a quick break. And, uh, when we come back, we're going to talk about,

uh, masks and, uh, pharmaceuticals because everything at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is Total Betting.

Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Thing is ramping up again with that. So stay with us.

We will be right back. Thank you. © transcript Emily Beynon You're listening to The David Knight Show. Before I get into pharmaceuticals and masks and medical tyranny, which is ramping up again, I'm going to talk about Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates now investing in another brain implant scheme. This one operates differently than Elon Musk's. But what is it about these billionaires that they just got to get inside of our heads? I mean, it is just amazing, isn't it? Sold their souls to the devil, in my opinion. That's why, you know, I'm just in case you think Elon Musk is, uh, on our side, take a look at his picture on Twitter. I mean, it's, it's like these, it's like that case where I said, uh, you know, the father whose daughter was murdered, uh Long Island. They were from El Salvador,

and they had all these thugs from MS-13 that came in, but they were dreamers, right? They were protected under DACA. You couldn't do anything about it, even though they knew they weren't citizens, and they crashed here illegally. They even had MS-13 tattooed all over them and they wound up with a dispute. They murdered his daughter.

And he said, I thought if we came here, we could get away from them. It's like, well, yeah, I understand where you want to come, but you know, if you don't have border patrol, that's going to check and sort, try to sort out, at least try to sort out the good guys from the bad guys. And that means that the father with his family from El Salvador can't escape MS-13 because they can come here as well. And they do. And they killed his daughter.

And so, you know, when you look at this, as absurd as it was, they wouldn't do anything about it with these kids with MS-13 tattooed all over them. What is it about Elon Musk that conservatives don't get when he's got when he's got satanic Baphomet symbols all over his picture on his profile? What is it about that? That you don't know? That's as dense as these law enforcement officers. You don't understand Ms 13.

Come on. Uh, before I get into that though, I do want to think of the people who have sent cards and donations, I received several of these. Thank you to Regan, Marla, and Molly. Thank you for the cards. Some very nice cards. As well as James and Patricia G. Thank you very much.

We got Corrine C. here. And Kelly. Thank you. And I just want to say thank C. here and Kelly. Thank you. And I just want to say thank you to Tom and Nancy. They sent a picture of their kids. They've been supporters from the very beginning of this show. Very, very good supporters. And they sent a picture of their children who I remember when they first sent pictures of them.

It's amazing how they've grown. But what a great age they are right now for this Christmas. So thank you for sending those pictures as well. So Tom and Nancy and the kids, Tom F, Russell and Sherry E, James and Patricia G, Corrine C,

Kelly M, Ty S. Thank you all of you and have a very Merry Christmas. And to all of you, um, uh, we are going to, um, we're going to take a one or two days off. I haven't decided yet when that's going to be.

We got some, possibly some out of town guests coming, but we don't really know for sure because of weather. Some friends from North Carolina coming and the things are supposed to get pretty cold this weekend. And if you can to get pretty cold this weekend, if you can believe the weather report, which, you know, every time we look at it, it winds up not being true. But they're predicting snow this next weekend, kind of a white Christmas, as well as temperatures down to 2 degrees here.

So we're hoping that they're wrong this time, but maybe snow would be nice but um i don't want temperatures that cold well let's talk about gates and bezos and um well not necessarily what's on their mind but what they want to put on your mind right a chip so this is another company yet another company besides Neuralink. This one is called Synchron. I guess they want to get us all synchronized in the matrix, right? The Synchron switch is a brain computer interface. There are so many of these, as a matter of fact, they just referred to it as a generic

class of things. BCI, brain computer interface, because there's a lot of different companies that are working on this seeded with money. Many of them by DARPA, you know, this has been, you want to talk about the CIA and the NSA and our secret government.

This has been their mission from their inception mind control, where they're doing it psychologically, doing it chemically with LSD, that all that stuff that came out of that, or manipulating us on the Internet and on social media, those kinds of psychological tools and other things, even grasping at the occult to try to control people's minds, to try to read them, to try to manipulate us by our minds.

And now they're going electrical. And that's what this is really about. And it's going to merge, I believe, with the pharmaceutical industry. Once I started looking up when all this stuff started breaking about Monsef Slaoui, I knew about Fauci. But I didn't know about Monsef Slaoui, I knew about Fauci, but I didn't know about Monsef Slaoui that much. So when I started looking him up and Fauci and the things that they'd been doing, uh, just before this, uh, pharmaceutical lockdown, they were having, uh, the, the big thing right now, even

though they're not talking about it, you know, they're, they're little, uh, when they all get together and you have Francis Collins and Fauci and Monsef Slaoui and many times Bill Gates, and they all get together and talk about the future. Well, the future that they've been talking about several years before even the pharmaceutical lockdown of 2020 was electroceuticals. They have,

and that's when Fauci left, um, sorry, notci uh moncef slowy when moncef slowy left operation warp speed you know he and he and fauci go back a long ways again they had um there were partners on this 2009 pandemrix vaccine that injured a lot of kids and part of the swine flu stuff so they've got a long history going back even before that. But, you know, Fauci got him in there with Operation Warp Speed. He did that. He made a lot of money with a pump and dump on his stocks and everything. And then he goes back to the pharmaceutical industry,

and he goes to work for an electroceutical branch again, because that's what they've been talking about for years. And he got fired because of sexual harassment allegations. But, um, electroceuticals are what they're going to be focusing on. And so it's just one of the ways that is the way that they're selling this brain computer interface, by the way. Oh, well, we can, uh, make the lame walk in the blind sea. Oh, sounds like, um, an invitation to Christ, doesn't it?

Yeah. This company was founded by a couple of professors from Australia. And on December the 16th, they announced that they'd closed a $110 million Series C funding round. And investors included the Bezos Expeditions, Gates Frontier, and ArchVenture Partners. Once set in place, this interface will detect and wirelessly transmit information from the brain, allowing severely paralyzed individuals to control personal devices without needing to use their hands. Well, that's a, um, I would imagine that they would like to have something

that they can, uh, you know, some kind of an exoskeleton or something like that, that they control so they can move around rather than just being able to telepathically control some electronics or something. Uh, but, uh, let me tell you, this is not the purpose. The purpose of the DARPA projects, and we've had several different DARPA projects. We've had the first one they had was self-driving autonomous vehicles because they wanted to move to autonomous killer robots, right? But that was the very first DARPA thing.

It wasn't that, you know, they had envisioned a future where Uber would be able to get rid of that other dude in the car and offer you a cheaper ride. No, they were looking for autonomous killer robots. So that was their very first project. They've also had other robot projects. They had a, after Fukushima, they put together a contest and it didn't have, they use that as a beard, but it was not about that. Uh, you know, the, the robots that they're creating are not about helping little old ladies across the street. And they're not about going

into damaged nuclear reactors and being able to shut them down on their own. It's not about that at all. And this is not about helping paralyzed people, even though that's the way that they're selling this. That's not why these guys are spending tens of billions of dollars. They said the problem of paralysis is much larger than people realize. 100 million people worldwide have upper limb impairment. Well, yes, that's the CEO of the company, Synchron.

But here's the real problem. You got 8 billion people out there who have minds of their own. They have freedom, they have dignity, and they're not taking orders from the government, and they're not taking orders from these billionaires and that's their problem. Yeah, they've got 8 billion people out there that are not under their control and that's what they want to change. This is not about helping paralyzed people.

They're going to use that as a beard. This is about paralyzing you, your every movement, locking you in a so-called smart city. They said, how does this compare with Musk's Neuralink? Well, we don't need to remove the scalp and the skull or put electrodes directly onto delicate brain tissue. Well, that would be an advantage.

I never see this. Elon Musk thing. I think of the Steve Martin comedy, the man with two brains. He's got screw top surgery or something. He can unscrew your skull and screw it back in. Anyway, we've come up with a clever way of getting to the right place in the brain just by using the body's naturally occurring highways and blood vessels, he said. So they have had four Australian paralysis patients

have received implants since 2020. He said all those patients were able to control a computer with their mind and there were no serious device-related effects. Huh. I said even Musk has approached Synchron about a potential investment, but no deal is on the table. Well, I don't know about device-related effects,

and I don't know just how safe this thing is. I certainly would not be interested in it myself. But as we pointed out, Goat Tree came on, we started talking about, you know, first he talked about the wireless Bluetooth headphones, specifically the Apple ones, and how much radiation they have, and how when you're using those things, you're sticking that in your ears, really close to either side of your brain, and you're subjecting your brain to some pretty high radiation. It's up to the level of a cell phone when you look at the two of them.

We had a listener who, after that program, put up a thing on Twitter and showed the radiation levels of one of them. As soon as he takes it out of the box, it goes pretty high. And as Gautri pointed out, yeah, you do it of one of them. As soon as he takes it out of the box, it goes pretty high. And as Goatry pointed out, yeah, that's, um, you do it with two of them and you're up to the level of a cell phone. And we know that Apple and all the other cell phone manufacturers say, don't keep the phone next to your head when you use it. That's not even talking about how often you use it.

Keep it away from your body. You know, use these wired headphones or use a speaker mode or something like that. Keep it away from, but don't keep it away from your body, you know, use these wired headphones or use a speaker mode or something like that. Keep it away from, but don't keep it next to your head. We've had a lot of situations, people who use their phone quite a bit, getting a tumor on that side of their head. So you might want to think about not using these wireless earbuds, but Goatry said, all right, now think about this chip that's on your head it's communicating wirelessly like those earbuds and so you're constant that's setting right on your brain and then he said and then think about the

fact that it's going to be what about the power how do you recharge this thing well you know you're gonna have to charge it with electromagnetic induction, right? An inductive charger. Yeah, you've seen those types of things around, you know. A lot of electronic consumer devices, some phones can charge inductively that way. Toothbrushes, you know, electric toothbrushes, things like that. You don't have to actually plug something in. You just set it there on the charger.

Well, that's the way they'd have to recharge this chip on your brain or wherever it is. These people have got another device. It's going to have to be charged the same way. And these things have batteries. And, you know, those batteries, what happens when you charge up a battery? Well, it gets hot. I mean, all of these things should be issues for people to think about but the biggest deal is the fact that

it's not just going to be you controlling things it's going to be a two-way street and so the problem of paralysis is much larger than people realize 100 million people worldwide have upper limb impairment and yet it's really about controlling the problem of paralysis is much larger than people realize a hundred million people worldwide have upper limb impairment, and yet it's really about controlling the minds of everybody. They said, we've come up with a clever way of getting into the right place in the brain, uh, by doing it through the blood vessels. And so what they do is they, uh, inject this into your jugular vein. And, uh, that doesn't sound, um, if that, if that sounds, uh, like something that you

would like to have, uh, it's implanted in the blood vessels at the surface of the motor cortex of the brain via the jugular vein. And it's not going to be an occasional cortex. This is going to be full on. Unlike, uh, Alexander Alexandria, uh, it is going to be something that's going to be there all the time, all the time. So, um, there's, uh, an article and I could get it. I'm not going to get into this today.

I'm gonna save this for another day. Uh, talking about the consequences of all these satellites that we're launching, the health consequences, you know, Elon Musk, it's not just the brain computer interface. Elon Musk has government permission to put up, I think it's now 20,000 satellites. You've got people who are concerned and say, well, I mean, I'm not going to be able to see the stars. I'm just going to look up there and see you know his satellites and kind of a uh a matrix well there's also the fact that he's beaming 5g at all of us you're not going to be able to get away from it it's going to be um it's going to be like

these people in new york city uh, who, uh, as they're putting up these antennas, uh, they go to bed one night and they wake up the next morning. There's one right outside their window, not even 10 feet away, which is supposed to be the minimum distance that they can put these things, but they put them right next to the window. And he's like, my baby's crib is right here. And then they look out and they see a sticker on it says, uh, uh, don't get within X number of feet of this thing. So they called up and say, do you realize, you know, this thing even says it's not supposed to be that close.

Well, we'll send a technician out. They sent a technician out and they took the warning label off and that's their response, right? If I warn you about what's going on with the radiation effects of this, they'll send out a technician on social media to take me off. That's what they will do. I'm the warning label here for you. But I'm not going to talk about that part beyond that. I want to go to, in this article that Brian has of vaccine impact, he talks about that and mentions briefly a prior paper from this guy, Arthur Furstenberg. And he said he'd had at

the beginning of all this nonsense in 2020 about masks. He said Arthur Furstenberg had an interesting article about the efficacy of the masks and how they aren't effective and how it worked out better in the hospitals. They said, why is it that surgeons who wear masks? I said, well, a lot of them don't. And they did a study to see if there was a difference. It turned out there was. It was worse in terms of infections for the patients who had doctors who wore surgical masks. I was not aware of this. This is a study that went back to August of 1980. And I want to get into the masks, but let me just say, you know, I'll tell you about this study.

I've talked many times about the 2002 Australian study as well as legislation there in New South Wales, where Gladys went so crazy. And as SARS was kicking off in Asia, and that's the first time we saw populations wearing masks all the time, and I thought it was idiotic. And there was a doctor there who did a study and she said, and I've mentioned this many times, that if you wear these masks, even if it was effective, if you wear them for 20 minutes or more, then the mask gets saturated with your spittle and the spittle then gets pushed out and you have smaller particles that stay airborne longer, travel farther, and it's a bigger problem. We had a German doctor who did a study a year ago, and he said the same thing about the masks, except in a different direction.

He said, you know, your body is exhaling waste out of your mouth, okay? That's one of the ways that your body eliminates toxins and bacteria and things like that. You breathe it out. He said, the mask is collecting all that stuff. And as it gets saturated, same, same physics that the other doctor talked about in 2002 in Australia, as it gets saturated, you're going to inhale smaller particles. They will go further down into your lungs than they would have otherwise.

And so he said, people who are wearing the mask are getting sicker because of the physics of this thing. They're collecting things that they would have normally exhaled and would have been dissipated because other people are further away or they're not getting that much of it but you're going to get it in a concentrated form and um so you know there was that but now there's another study august 1980 uh dr or was a surgeon uh and the surgeons and staff in that unit in Colchester decided to see what would happen if they did not wear their mask during surgery. This is coming out of England, the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, and they compared the rate of surgical wound infections

from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. They discovered to their amazement that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half of what it was when everyone wore masks. I've just explained the physics to you of why that works.

Their conclusion was it would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all, and that wearing a mask during surgery is a standard procedure that could be abandoned. I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke, and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise, the medical literature for the past 45 years has been consistent. Masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease. And if anything, they are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and virus. And so that's

Arthur Furstenberg. So where does that leave us today? Well, masks are back in vogue again, and they're pushing them again. You got an MSNBC medical analyst says it only makes sense for Americans to mask up again. Why does it make sense? Where's the data? I can give you a lot of studies that show that it is worse to have that. And of course, in 1980, why did those surgeons say, hey, let's not wear our mask? They already had an intuitive sense that it was not working.

And they also knew that it was a bothersome thing to them personally. That's one of the reasons they did it. But of course, there is no end to people who want to capitalize on this. Look at this, for example. This is coming from Dyson. Dyson's zone air purifying headphones start at only $950. One person took a screenshot of that and said, just kill me now. So this model is wearing noise canceling headphones. And then there's this thing that you can attach that goes around your face.

From the headphones, you know, runs from one ear to the other and covers your mouth and your nose. And it is supposed to purify the air that you breathe. Now, this thing was designed, interestingly enough, before all the pandemic fear. And they're now just rolling it out. They'd already started designing it, they said.

And they started designing it not for the purpose of protection from pandemics, but they did it for people, you know, pollution and, uh, that type of thing they said, it reminds me of, uh, uh, you know, the 1600s and 1700s and stuff. People, one of the reasons perfume was, um, so, uh, sought after people would put it on their handkerchiefs when they would go through stinky parts of town, uh, and having to walk. Or even if they're in a carriage or something, you know, they're not moving very fast. They don't have a sealed carriage and with air conditioning, all that kind of stuff. So they're using the, the perfume thing to, uh, uh, get rid of the smell of where they're traveling. So now, you know, the equivalent to that today, it's a thousand dollar Dyson headphone set. So you can also listen to music and not be bothered with ambient sound or breathe

and not be bothered with ambient smell. So no answer there, if that is supposed to protect against imaginary pandemics, but I'm sure that it does. So MSNBC medical analyst with MSNBC said on Friday, Americans just need to mask up again and said, it only makes sense. Does it? Does it make sense? Public health officials need to accept that we and I know that they privately

communicate this all the time. It's just that we need to have the courage to say this publicly, even if it's unpopular. That communities, especially with hospitals, children's hospitals that have little stock in their system, need to protect those hospitals. This is Dr. Vin Gupta, who is saying this on MSNBC. Now, we need to be just as adamant that this is nothing other than a

bunch of feel good superstition. Uh, if you want to feel better about it, instead of putting a mask on your face, just throw some salt over your shoulder or something. Uh, the long beak mask. Yeah, that's right. It says my son, uh, the plague doctors wore were filled with dried flowers or other nice smelling things. They thought the diseases were carried, uh,

by smelly stuff. Yeah, there you go. So, you know, if I, we're back to that and I'm sure that, uh,

those people would be welcomed by MSNBC as commentators. I've got a new design. I've got the long beak mask with some nice flowers, dried flowers at the end to get rid of the, the bad humors and the odors that are getting people sick. So we went on to say schools need to lead by example with the masks. School officials, I'm looking at you. Public health officials at the local level, it only makes sense. It's our only buttress here in addition to vaccination.

We need to do it. And that's why they're focusing on the kids with vaccination and why they're focusing on the kids with this mask stuff. They got to train them early, train them early for a security blanket, train them early that in order to go anywhere, you got to get a shot. And I mean, think back about this. And, you know, that's been a key requirement for, you know, a passport for entry into other countries. Do you have all your vaccines? They had a shorter list then, but this is something that's been going on for quite some time, something that injured my family.

In order to travel, take a vaccine. That's what I'm saying. You, um, as nice as it is to be able to see the world and get a perspective on things. It's not worth it. It's not worth the vaccine, but the vaccine that the things that they were doing to people, the lies that they were telling them about this year's flu epidemic, uh, the mandates to travel. We've been seeing this gradually rolling out.

It's just that they've brought everything together pretty much now. David Stockman, remember he was the director of the Office of Management and Budget. He had issues with Reagan's deficits. He's talking about how this is a descent into public health totalitarianism. I've been calling it medical martial law for over a thousand and twelve days. I was calling it that before it was imposed by Trump because that's exactly what it is. Medical martial law. I was flagged by the ADL and I was shamed by the Daily Beast for calling it medical martial law. But it is medical martial law. We can all see that now.

David Stockman calls it public health totalitarianism. From the very beginning of the pandemic, he says, there were legions of pedigreed epidemiologists and other scientists, many of whom later signed the Great Barrington Declaration, who correctly held that viruses cannot be extinguished via draconian quarantines and other clumsy, one-size-fits-all public health interventions. And that when it came to viruses in particular, it was doubtful

were there even vaccines, which had never been successful with coronaviruses, could defeat the latter's natural propensity to mutate and spread. So he's still accepting a lot of this fairy tale. But he understands that this was doomed to failure. And I said from the very beginning, we follow what China is doing way before Trump did it. I said, if we follow what they're doing, even if this is a weaponized bioweapon, deliberately released,

even if it's got a very high fatality rate, it's going to cripple us to have a lockdown. It'll cripple us from a medical care standpoint. It'll cripple us even from food, and we saw that happening immediately afterwards. From its earliest days, he says, there was no reason for sweeping intervention by public health apparatus at all, nor for the coercive one-size-fits-all state-driven mobilization of quarantines, lockdowns, testing, masking, distancing, surveilling, snitching, ultimately mandated mass vaccine with experimental drugs developed under a dangerous multi-$10 billion government subsidy scheme

called Operation Warp Speed. And who was it that did that? Was that Biden? You know, I criticized Trump for his Operation Warp Speed. As a matter of fact, we put some of those NFTs up last week. You know, Trump in his white coat. He's not a doctor, but he plays one when he's in the White House, you know, that type of thing.

I mean, people have a problem with gates and they should yeah why is he the public health expert for the world he's not even a doctor he didn't even go to medical school well you know next best thing he bought the world health organization but uh you know donald trump did the same thing why don't they have a problem with him doing that why don't they have a problem with him doing that? Why don't they have a problem with him implementing Gates's program? So I had some parents say, well, you're just nothing but a Biden supporter. It's Biden who mandated him. It's like, well, what's the problem mandating them if they're so good,

as your guy says, right? So he says it was then followed by an open-ended emergency use authorization. Who did that happen under? They got Operation War an open-ended emergency use authorization. Who did that happen under? They got Operation Warp Speed, the emergency use authorization. That happened under Trump as well. As a matter of fact, he berated Hahn, said, you know, you're going to be fired if you don't do that today. Shielded the pharmaceutical companies from any and all liabilities.

Because, I'm going to say, there existed the screaming real-time evidence from the stranded Diamond Princess cruise ship. Do you remember that? I haven't talked about that for a long time, but boy, I sure did talk a lot about that in the spring of 2020. 3,711 souls, he said, aboard skewed heavily to the elderly. And I talked a great deal about that because Karen and I had just gotten back from our ordeal on a cruise.

I've given it three tries now and it's been a disaster. Personally, I think she liked it except for me i was she had to keep me there but uh i was griping about it the entire time um but uh yeah the cruises in case you have never been on one are heavily skewed toward the elderly but even on the diamond princess the survival rate was known in mid-March of 2020, the survival rate was 99.7% overall, 100% survival rate for those under the ages of 70, in short, only 0.19% of the elderly skewed population succumbed to the virus. So the facts which were known to the White House,

the Trump White House, or should have been, made absolutely clear that COVID was no black plague type threat, full stop. But we did know about Dark Winter and we knew what that threat was and we knew what they've been practicing to do for 20 years. That's why I was out of my mind, angry about this stuff. And the people that I worked with at Infowars, like Mike Adams and Alex, who just for the purpose of selling storable food,

played along with this plague stuff. Look, you have this situation. You remember the Diamond Princess? It was stopped off the coast of Japan. These people hold up in that thing. And you had a guy, he says, well, I was, um, he, he was, um, uh, a doctor who had been to, um, uh, had gone in to Africa where they had an Ebola outbreak. And he says,

I was even more afraid on the diamond princess because they didn't have any, any, uh, kind of precautions from spreading this. Everybody is locked together, tightly sealed in this thing. You got air ventilation. They're all sharing the air ventilation and all the rest of this stuff. He goes, I was scared to death. Why? Because he believed all the stuff about COVID that everybody was putting out. And, but the, but the takeaway I said, I said, now, you hear what he said? He said, there's absolutely no precautions. You know, these people are elderly.

I've been on a cruise. I've seen how infirm people are that typically do cruises. And it's just, and the fact that they were not dying, and they were locked there for quite some time. So he says, we're now 30 months in from Donald's foolish empowerment of Dr. Fauci and the virus patrol in mid-March of 2020. 1,012 days, I might count today. All doubt has been removed. If there were two countries on the planet which had

diametrically opposite policy approaches with respect to COVID, it was Australia and Sweden. Australia degenerated into an outright public health tyranny. Sweden, the officials kept their minds open to facts and to social institutions, And they kept open the social institutions of schools, churches, shops, theaters, malls, factories, et cetera, open to the public. I remember some mainstream media reporter going to Sweden and doing his report with his mask, muffling his voice and all the rest of the stuff. And all here in Sweden and they're not doing anything. You know, he's looking around and,

and people are walking down the street and they're looking at him like, what's the matter with this guy? The answer, of course, when you look at it, I'll pull up that chart. Um, in that article there, look at that chart. There's Sweden, the United States and Australia. And so if you look at the number of cases of what they're testing for, again, this doesn't mean that this is the case fatality rate of this thing, if you test positive,

is negligible compared to virtually anything else that's going to kill us. And so, but you know, they're out there testing and because everybody is isolated because they got full-on martial, medical martial law in Australia. It's staying down there low as it's going up in Sweden and the United States.

And all of a sudden they let everybody out and it shoots up really high and goes up much higher. Why? Well, because now all of a sudden everybody's getting out, they're going to get this virus, but it's not going to kill them. The cumulative rates of cases per million in Australia soared by 51 times.

As soon as they stopped all the medical martial law. He said it's not as if the late eruption of cases in Australia was owing to the nation being suddenly overrun with anti-vaxxers either because they were leading in the vaccination rate parade, as he calls it, as well. So again, the lockdown, all it did was delay people who are testing positive for this thing, not dying from it, but testing positive. Yeah.

Remember flatten the curve? Yeah. Well, they did flatten the curve. Didn't they? Did it make any difference? No, it didn't. And did they die from this? No.

And, um, the vaccines did nothing, nothing. So, um, they, um So they led the vaccination parade. They administered 242 doses per 100 people. Wow. Wow. It's amazing. So is the COVID pandemic finally over? This is an article that's up on the Drudge Report.

Thank you, Patricia. Patricia Bailey, thank you for the tip on Rock on the Drudge Report. Thank you, Patricia. Patricia Bailey, thank you for the tip on Rockfin. I appreciate that. Thank you very much. This is from the Jerusalem Post. It was featured on the Drudge Report. Is the COVID-19 pandemic finally over? And I knew because it was on the Drudge Report, the answer is going to be resounding. No, it's not. You may think it is, but it's not. It's still around. It's among us. And it's most deadly right now because people are letting their guard down and not

wearing their face masks. And so this person on Jerusalem Post, it does not surprise. That's exactly what they're saying. Of course, I know that COVID is not really over. People are still getting sick every day. The U.S. is on track to see 150,000 COVID deaths this year. Deaths from COVID?

Or deaths from treatment? So, you know, they say, well, we're still masking up in Jerusalem on public transportation, on planes, in crowded locations, which leads to an awkward place. Mask wearing has been relegated to a sharply shrinking sector of society, writes Catherine Wu in The Atlantic. It has become once again a peculiar thing to do. A thing which, by the way, for the last 40 years,

doctors, for the most part, have known there's no purpose to it. That's why it's peculiar. How could it not be when influential figures like Joe Biden declare, as he did on 60 Minutes, that the pandemic is over? He said, if you notice, no one is wearing masks. Well, the Jerusalem fearmonger, Jerusalem post fear monger says, but wishful thinking is not epidemiological accuracy. Yeah, it's just wishful thinking, is it? It's okay.

You can take your mask off here has become an increasingly common refrain, even when it is clearly not okay. I first encountered this during the height of the pandemic when I flew to Florida for a treatment, an experimental laser procedure for eye floaters. The doctor with whom I was in close physical contact said just that while not wearing a mask himself. Maybe he was aware of the many many many studies in the medical literature talking about the fact that masks are not effective even in a surgical environment when you've opened somebody up and um i think that is um we've taken that as a sign when um she said um um the doctor with whom i was in close physical contact said just that while not wearing a mask himself, this despite the sign at the front door clearly stating that masks must be donned.

That is also my metric for whether this is a real doctor or not. Right. That to put that sign up to satisfy the bureaucrats. But we've had situations where they'll say, yeah, you don't have to wear a mask in here. Right. Especially when they get you in private, as I did here. I fought with a dentist that I already paid for the rest of my procedure to be done. And I went to, I was going to Houston to get it done from Austin. So it was a long drive and, um, I'd already paid for the stuff to be finished and they didn't want

to let me in the office. And I said, uh, without wearing a mask, I said, you realize I'm going to be sitting in the chair soon and you're going to have, you can't do anything with a mask on. And, um, and I fought back and forth with them. Finally, they gave up and they let me in. Uh, I said, you know, I'm going to sue you for the money or what, you know, and I got a, I got a text from Alex in the middle of all that and said, I need you to do a report on this. I said, no, I'm fighting over this mass thing. He goes, well,

maybe this isn't the hill to die on. I said, no, this is the hill to die on. This is the hill. Um, anyway, so this person said, well, I wore my mask during the procedure on their eyes and I didn't get COVID yet. I felt a strong urge to conform and to take my mask off because he was a

doctor. After all, you can feel it when you're the only one doing something. Yes. Don't we all know that it's noticeable. We know it from the other side. A person said, typically there is no big sign on our foreheads that says this person doesn't have a functioning immune system.

No, that's what the mask is for. They said mask could become exactly that kind of sign. No, this is a sign saying this person is unable to think critically. You know, when you talk about all these cases and everything, they're non sequiturs. Was it COVID? Was it the treatment? I'm going to talk to you about remdesivir now in just a second. This person doesn't have a functioning brain.

That's right. They've taken the chip and they're under orders from billionaires. You know, billionaire president, a billionaire pharmaceutical guy. You know, I'm doing what the billionaires tell me to do. And I don't even have a chip in my brain yet. I've just got a mask on my face. So finally, in this article, I say, yet this new normal is also an admission that we failed. We have failed to stop a virus that is now circulating

amongst us. Be afraid, be very afraid. Now circulating amongst human beings forever. There are, after all, still DNA remnants of the 1918 flu pandemic and today's annual flu outbreaks. And yet, your point is, if that's true, failed to depoliticize science, such that mask wearing along with vaccines became a matter of public safety, but one of red versus blue, right versus left. Well, it's because there is no science to it. We have lots of scientific studies that say that masking is not effective. And even OSHA, as they are demanding to make this permanent for medical staff, as I pointed out last week, violating their own rules that said, Joel, you're not going to wear this for more than 20 minutes because people need to have a break and

be able to breathe when you're using it in an environment that those masks were intended for, a very dusty environment with big particles that could stop. And finally, we fail to embrace good governance over populism, vilification, and victimization. So this person definitely is not suffering from a left-right paradigm, right? No, that's exactly where they are. Before I get to the remdesivir, the articles about DeSantis

reversing himself on coronavirus vaccines. This is coming from the Washington Post. He moves to the right of Trump. Well, you know, Trump is, um, the father of the vaccines. He, he, that's what he called himself, the father of vaccines. So now DeSantis is moving away from the vaccines. They said, well, just consider what he was doing in the past. And I think it's important for us to understand this.

Maybe DeSantis has seen the light. Maybe he's afraid to do any more than he's doing. Maybe he's just, you know, making little baby steps because he's afraid somebody is going to, uh, knock him down. That, that would be the equivalent of me saying he's playing 40 chess. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to make any excuses for him. People are still being injured and dying with this stuff. And to take a very cautious approach and to say, well, I'm going to ask the Supreme Court if I can convene a grand jury. You're the governor.

You don't have to ask for that. It's just like Trump said, well, I'm going to have to ask. I know I campaigned on ending DACA and other things like that, but I'm going to have to ask the Supreme Court for permission to do that. No, you don't. You're president now. You can get rid of the previous president's executive order. It does not bind you.

You can do any order. You can get rid of all the executive orders. Instead, what he did was he left us with a whole bunch more. So, yeah, focus on the issues. Focus on what they're doing. But don't make excuses for them when they tread lightly on this tyranny and this murdering agenda, because they're still murdering people. But here's what DeSantis had done in the past.

According to the Washington Post, they've got his record of when he was a big vaccine supporter like Trump, not that long ago, the governor's office pushed for $480 million in pandemic resources, including media campaigns to promote the shots. That's DeSantis a half a billion dollars. A lot of stuff, including promoting the shots.

DeSantis, a Republican even lauded the Biden administration for helping to expand access to vaccines. He says, we're having more vaccines because of this, which is great, he said, of a federal program shipping shots to pharmacies February 2021. Well, again, maybe now he has seen the light and let's applaud him when he does the right thing, but let's also understand when he does a limited hangout and takes baby steps that we don't excuse it. But right now he's taking a fire, even not just from Trump. He's taking fire from this complete sellout outgoing governor, Asa

Hutchings, Asa Hutchinson, a Republican in Arkansas. This guy has been a full-on establishment pharmaceutical cheerleader throughout all this stuff. He's been horrible, Asa Hutchinson. He was on Meet the Press yesterday, and he said that DeSantis should not try and relegate the COVID vaccine. He said, you spent a lot of 2021, I said, Chuck Todd to him, you spent a lot of 2021 trying to get some skeptics to take a backseat in Arkansas. So I'm curious what you think of this. In other words, Asa Hutchinson was a diehard vaccine pusher, and he still is. And so, again, we need to applaud people when they move the right direction.

I mean, Tucker's getting to the point now where he's become a skeptic about, well, he doesn't believe the JFK assassination story anymore. He may be the last person on earth who believed it, but he doesn't assassination story anymore. Maybe the last person on earth who, who believed it, but he doesn't believe it anymore. And, uh, you know, uh, DeSantis has moved away from the vaccine. So let's applaud them for that, but remember where they were and remember the gradual steps that they're taking, you know, just like Carlson has not connected the dots about nine 11, not connected the dots about 9-11, not connected the dots about dark winter and the pandemic and the rest of this stuff either.

So Chuck Todd said, The Florida governor is leaning into vaccine skepticism at a time when I know health officials are trying to get people to take these boosters so we can prevent 300 deaths a day. Come on. Come on. Hutchinson said we shouldn't undermine science and medical community that's important to our public health. Well, let's talk about what is really killing them. Are they dying of COVID or are they dying of something else? Uh, before I get into Remdesivir, though, let me just say, while we're still on DeSantis, I got a letter, an email from a listener, Randy. Thank you for sending this. He says, I was just listening to your December 16th broadcast. It's Fridays. And after I heard

you mentioned DeSantis, I wanted to share a very troubling tidbit of information that no one seems to be talking about. The 2018 Florida statute, and he's got the whole thing here, 381.00315, title 29, public health chapter 381, section so forth, right? And he's got the quote, and he's got the links to it. And he's right. Here's what the quote says in Florida. If the individual poses a danger to the public health, the state health officer may subject the individual to isolation or quarantine. If there is no practical method to isolate or quarantine the individual, the state health officer may use any means necessary to vaccinate or treat the individual. He says, if I'm not mistaken, DeSantis signed this bill.

Is this true or not? Let me know. Well, DeSantis was in the legislature in 2018, and he may have voted for that. I don't know, but he did not sign it as governor because he won in 2018, but he became governor in 2019. However, that has been updated on pretty much an annual basis and um as a matter of fact so here is the original uh i should have put this

up while i was reading it okay if you're a severe danger to the public health individuals who are danger to the public health uh and are unable and willing to be examined tested or vaccinated treated for reasons, whatever, maybe put into quarantine. If you can't get somebody in quarantine, you can force them to be vaccinated. So that's what the law was in 2018, by the way, do you know why that was in the law? And do you know why that's probably in your state's law right now because of the model state health emergency program, right? The act. And they came up with model legislation.

You had dark winter again, dark winter, two months before nine 11, one week after nine 11, the anthrax false flag attack that killed several people. And then they use that to put together model legislation like that, with that kind of language got enacted in one state after the other to give these kinds of powers out there. Now that was 2018, but I don't know when it was done. It could have been done a decade earlier than that, that, uh, we're going to quarantine you under the orders of the public health department and a state department, and we can force vaccinate you if necessary.

So I kept looking at it. This is what it is in 2022. So you notice that in this, it says, um, it makes a very slight change. It's still very dangerous legislation, but the,

the force vaccination has been removed. So it talks about, well, if you're a danger to this, we can put you in quarantine, we can isolate you, and we can examine you or test you or treatment for this. If you pose a danger to the public and there's no practical method to isolate or quarantine you, the state health officer may use any means necessary to treat the individual. You notice that it doesn't say vaccinate. But you also notice that it doesn't say you can't vaccinate somebody. It says any means necessary.

Now, this is something, again, this is a 2022 version of it. And I'm assuming, I believe, that this is a Florida state statute. So I think this gets changed every year. I found an annual version, an update of it every year. So I believe that's a law that would be passed by the state, the Republicans in Florida, and signed by the governor every year. So in a sense, it is true. It is still really there.

And I think that is a lesson about DeSantis, right? They can still quarantine you, isolate you on the directions of the public health guy. They can still use any means at their disposal to treat you without your permission. All they did was remove the language that said, and we can vaccinate you. They took that out, but it's still there. You see? That's what I'm saying. You got to watch out for the head fakes.

Watch out for the head fakes. It can look like, oh, they got rid of the vaccines at least. Well, the other stuff could be just as bad, right? Instead of giving you a vaccine, they could force you to get something like, you know, remdesivir. And this is what a doctor has said about that. In my hospital, I was banned or discouraged from using off-label drugs, which we use every day, methylprednisolone, vitamin C. My hospital would not allow me to use vitamin C. We're talking about basic safe drugs.

And it's an outrage. What they wanted me to use was remdesivir. Where remdesivir we know, and this is not controversial, we know according to the WHO, remdesivir increases your risk of kidney failure 20-fold. Remdesivir will increase your risk of developing renal failure 20-fold. Remdesivir will increase your risk of developing renal failure 20-fold. It increases your risk of dying by about 4%. It has no place in medicine, yet the federal government will give

hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if you prescribe this toxic medication. So you can see how the hospitals and the healthcare systems are now subservient to industry rather than doing what's best for their patients. Remdesivir ought to be the nail in the coffin for Fauci. He is all over this. This is so easy to forget about Wuhan. Forget about any of that stuff. You can even forget about the vaccines for the moment. Talk about remdesivir. And I have

talked about remdesivir endlessly. And I'm going to talk about it one more time. Just summarize what I've told people over the years about remdesivir. This was something that Fauci and his friends at Gilead pharmaceuticals had tried to push for HIV. People looked at it and said, it's not effective and it's harmful. That's really got a lot of really bad. Like you just heard how it increases, um, you know, the, uh, kidney failure 20 fold and, um, very toxic to the liver and other things like that remdesivir can kill you.

It's just that simple. Doesn't do anything to help HIV. Then they tried it again with Ebola. Didn't do anything to help with Ebola, but it killed people. So then Fauci comes around because his friends at Gilead are now looking at about the end of their patent period. And they still haven't found a customer for this stuff. And so Fauci starts making some noises about, you got rim desire here you know all this kind of stuff and so there

was a paper out of china where they did it and they said well uh it's completely ineffective as a matter of fact we had a few more people who took remdesivir died than the control group. And, um, uh, but it's completely ineffective and not safe. That went up on the world health organization's website and then was taken down the same day. One week later, Fauci comes out and single-handedly approves this. Fauci works for the NIH. He does not work for the FDA. He does not have the authority to approve a drug, right? And what we're talking about is approving

the drug for a specific use. This is what they got so horsey about with ivermectin. Oh, well, that's an off-label use for this thing. Well, they didn't have any on-label uses for remdesivir. They tried it for one thing after the other. It hadn't helped anything. It had actually harmed people. He got the World Health Organization to take down that study. Somebody in Congress, get him on the stand and ask him about that. If they really wanted to nail this guy to the wall, you could nail him to the wall with remdesivir.

It's very, very clear what happened. You know why they're not going to do that because ran paul's wife bought stock in gilead before remdesivir was put out there that's why ran paul isn't going to nail fauci to the wall because he's playing the same game with remdesivir it was totally fraudulent even to the extent that Fauci said, well, I'm pronouncing it the standard of care. Who gave him the authority to do that? Nobody. And what did he base that on?

Remdesivir is not a vaccine. It's not supposed to prevent you from getting anything. Of course, they've now changed the definition of vaccine so that it used to be, well, vaccine is going to be something that prevents you from getting whatever you're vaccinated for. Well, you know, that's not doing that. Well, let's just change the definition of vaccine. Well, it's not a vaccine. It's not designed to prevent you from getting anything.

It is a therapeutic. By definition, the efficacy of a therapeutic is that it treats and cures the disease. Since they couldn't make a case of that, and since Fauci with his own personal, he produces his own personal study one week after the study that the Chinese had out. And his study also shows that it is not effective. He has one or two people less who die,

but it was statistically a draw, saying that it doesn't do anything for COVID. Just like it didn't do anything for HIV, didn't do anything for Ebola. But he pronounced it the standard of care. Why? He said, well, it doesn't cure COVID, but the people who recover get better 30% faster. That's never been the standard. The standard for a therapeutic is that it cures it or it doesn't cure it.

And it was cherry picked data and he had no authority to put this in. And if you want to look at some of the people that are supposedly dying with COVID it's because of remdesivir. And yet it is very expensive. Thousands of dollars for a course of treatment. It's like three or $4,000. And they get a 20% bonus. As he pointed out,

where did that come from? The Trump administration, that's Trump rules, CMS, 20% bonus on any COVID treatment. So find a COVID patient and that's your ticket to money, right? That's all the corporations, you know, all the hospitals, rather, being run by a handful of corporations.

It's all about the money. It's not about medicine anymore at all at the hospitals. It's all a bunch of greedy bean counters and accountants doing whatever the Trump administration financially incentivized. Those rules have been continued with Biden, but they originated in the Trump administration. So forget about Wuhan. You can even forget about the vaccine for the moment. If you want to get Fauci,

you go for him with remdesivir. It'd be very easy to prove a criminal conspiracy, fraud, doing this kind of stuff to enrich himself. And yet you've got people like Rand Paul who aren't going to go there because it would also point back at them as well. Sad to say. Okay, so you're feeling really good about all these medical enhancements. We got DNA altering vaccines that are going to cure cancer, supposedly all

the rest of this stuff. Uh, we got some new brain computer interfaces and now we've got a, um, we've now got a treatment to cure fat. You know, everybody, most everybody believes that they're overweight, could lose a little bit of weight. So we'd all like to, uh, lose a little bit here. Well, now they've got some nanotech to make that happen. Remember the technologies that are really threatening us now that are coming together and they're coming together in a way that it's going to be a perfect storm. Genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology. You remember that by grain, G-R-A-I-N. Well, here's the nanotech stuff.

They're saying that you can cure fat with their new nanotechnology. Here's how supposedly it's going to work. These are scientists at Columbia Engineering and engineering and columbia university irving medical center they discovered that there is an extracellular matrix a matrix a framework of nutrients surrounding and supporting cells white fat cells and they found that these this matrix that surrounds the fat cells is negatively charged. So they hypothesized that a positively charged nanomaterial could leverage the negatively charged extracellular matrix to bind to fat tissue. So they injected this thing they call PG3 into obese mice with very positive results the substance also inhibited lipid storage and white fat cells preventing them from expanding to an unhealthy

size mice lost 20 percent of their body fat after six weeks of this p3 treatment, they did caution that the research done in animal models does not always transfer to humans. Well, yes, that's one of the reasons why. You do an animal test, then you do a phase one safety test with a very small population, then you do a phase two and a phase three, increasing the population and the timeframes. That's why it takes 10 years to get one of these things done.

But of course, Fauci said, we got to get past that so we can make money. I mean, we don't want to have somebody like Remdesivir that's bumping up against the end of their patent, right? You'd be making money that entire time. So how do we do it? Well, we do it from the inside. We do it with chaos and disruption and we do it iteratively. Okay.

So that's what these people say. Well, just remember, you know, we've done this, but that's just an animal model. It doesn't always translate to humans. Well, that's not what they said with the vaccines. And even if it does, in this instance, it could take years before a safe and effective treatment is available. These people are just so old-fashioned.

Don't they understand the new rules today? Don't they understand the new normal at our bought and sold FDA? There is a growing consensus in obesity research. They said that fat tissue is a source of obesity and associated with metabolic diseases. It begins and it ends with a fat cell and its functionality. Does it? Does it? Has something happened to change the genetics of everybody lately? When you look at a generational thing, I mean, Gerald Slint, he talks about this a lot, but I mean, you know, just go back and look at pictures of people.

I like, I like to go back and look at old footage on YouTube. A people, um, you know, the beginning of photography turn of the century, maybe a little bit before that in some of the bigger cities, or you look at, um, you know, the beginning of photography, turn of the century, maybe a little bit before that, and some of the bigger cities, or you look at, um, you know, people just, just look at some pictures of the 1950s or something, right? And look at teenagers then look at the teenagers now. I don't think there's anything genetically that's changed. You know, we have a less active life. You know, people sit in front of the computer all the time now, chained to our computers. That's a big part of it. But it's a big part of it are the things that we eat, like high fructose

corn syrup. What has changed? Why do we have so many young kids that are so obese? I really can't believe it. I went back and I looked at the high school that I went to because I was wondering what they were doing. Our mascot was the chief Indian chiefs. And so we had a couple of drum majors who, instead of wearing a traditional drum major thing, they, they, uh, dressed them up like, uh, Indian chiefs. They had this big headdress that went almost all the way down to their, you know, went below their knees in the back and they went bare chested and they would, you know, rub red, uh, red, uh, coloring on their skin, you know, dress them all up before the football game, put war paint on them and all this other kind of stuff. Uh, and I saw, I thought, well, that's,

they gotta be all over that today. And of course that is gone. But when I looked at the site, I couldn't believe how obese the people who are, the girls who are dancing and the drum people were and everything. I mean, it was amazing to me to see that. And that was a real shock because it's almost like, boom, what happened to the population? I think a lot of it is, it, a lot of it is, uh, not getting a lot of exercise, but of course it is, um, also the food that we eat, but they're going to make it about the fat cells.

And then I'm going to say, now we've got some nanotechnology that can fix your fat cells. Um, so yeah, it's not the nonsense food pyramid. We sold you called it science. It's just your genetics have another donut and take an injection that's right that's what my son says so he nailed it absolutely that's true um so uh yeah so they said uh uh they emphasized that they're going to have to prove that the nanomaterials are not toxic that's why it's going to take some more time than just animal studies.

But we said, we don't care when it's a vaccine. The mRNA and the spike, they can be toxic. We don't care. And then they said that right now the best treatment is bariatric surgery. That's a surgery that's going to remove part of your stomach or something in your intestines, I think, to make sure that you pass the food through. So, well, wait a minute.

If it's the cell and it's not the food, why would bariatric surgery be better? Because, again, the problem is the food. The disease is in the food. And this particular disease, obesity, is in the food. It's in the way the food is made and the additives that they put into it to a large degree. It's not just the quantity that we're eating and not just the exercise, but it's the food. It's in the way the food is made and the additives that they put into it to a large degree. It's not just the quantity that we're eating and not just the exercise, but it's the food. Because if it wasn't the food,

how would shortening your intestine make so much of a difference? It's in the food. And yet they continue to come back and say, but you know, we don't have enough surgeons to operate on 40% of the population. Why do we have this epidemic? That's the food.

It's the food. Anyway, uh, harps. Thank you very much for the tip. He says, I hope Karen's ankle gets better real soon. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that. And, uh, Mark Droba, thank you very, very much for the tip as well. Uh, we're going to take a quick break and, uh, when we come back, uh, we're going to talk a little bit more about some insights from Dr. Ryan Cole, the pathologist.

He's now done a study looking at the vaccines as to what is really inside of them. Because we've seen a lot of amazing stuff, right? Is it graphene? Is it, you know, what is this that's happening? There's been a lot of, uh, talk about that. So we'll give you his opinion as a pathologist who has, um, um, you know, I mean, certainly he could be wrong, but he has not tried to shy away from, uh, any of this, um,

in terms of bowing down to the narrative just out of political correctness. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Thank you. you're listening to the David Knight show. All right. So Dell big tree, uh, with the icon network, uh, and I've interviewed a Dell many times.

Dell has been on the vaccine thing for a long time. I remember last time I interviewed him, he said his mother-in-law used to give him, why are you into this vaccine thing? How do you realize how this is, um, you know, uh, making you a pariah everywhere and anything he said after this COVID thing happened and the banks, the Trump shots and stuff, he said, um, she came back to me and she said, well, I guess you were over the target the entire time.

So this is an article from Brian at vaccineimpact.com. He said, I've not previously published any articles about the alleged contents of the vaccines, mainly because I'm not sure that anyone can confidently state what's really in these proprietary vaccines by simply analyzing them with a microscope. I agree. I've felt the same way. Even those who've endeavored to examine them, how do we know if the vials were stored properly or if they were contaminated before being examined?

And I said that as well. You know, Mike Adams went into a great deal of detail with some of the blood clots that were sent to him by some of the embalmers. And he analyzed them and said, you know, well, we've done trace analysis on this to see what's in it. You know, he's got a machine that tells you what's in it, but doesn't tell you how it got there. That's the key thing. Was it contaminated? How was it stored? Um, those were unanswered questions. It doesn't matter,

you know, what his machine is telling him. It's kind of the same type of thing we used to always have back in engineering, you know, garbage in and garbage out. You look at a computer printout and most people say, Oh, this is a computer printout. Well, okay. This is what it says. So that's gospel truth. No, if you, if your model is garbage, like the Imperial college of London or whatever, even, um, you know, about the vaccines about COVID or whatever, if your model is garbage, like the Imperial College of London or whatever, even about the vaccines, about COVID or whatever, if you've got a garbage model or if you didn't implement it properly, it doesn't matter what the printout says. You have to understand what the inputs are. So where was this obtained and under what circumstances? And how was it maintained? And how was it transported?

And all the rest of this stuff. Anyway, Brian goes on to say the biggest reason is it doesn't really matter much what is actually in them. What matters is how they are infecting people. And we have more than enough evidence that nobody should be injecting these bioweapons into their bodies. You understand? It's not so much that we need to focus on this. It's very sensational, the types of things that we've seen from a lot of people. But we know what it's doing to people.

There's no question about that. We know what it's not doing. It's not effective at anything. And we know how unsafe they are. End of story. You don't need to know the mechanism of it, really. Anyway, he says there's a lot of theories about there being self-replicating graphene oxide nanobots that are sending out Bluetooth signals.

He said that may or may not be true. I don't know. I don't have enough evidence one way or the other. But I do think it's important to give exposure to Dr. Ryan Cole's perspective on this because he's a pathologist who is also the owner of a diagnostics lab. And he brings some credibility to the subject since he earns his living from laboratory analyses. And I will say in addition to that,

since he has been an outspoken critic of what he sees without worrying what it's going to do to his career. So he's going to give you the, he may be wrong about something, but he's going to be honest about it. He's not intimidated by the medical establishment. He said from the very beginning, I'm looking at the vaccinated people and I'm seeing their killer T cells counts just plummeting. And he says, so this means that you're

going to have a lot more cancers and they're going to go a lot faster and other diseases like that, because the killer T cells are being decimated by this vaccine for whatever the mechanism is. We don't know, but we can see the results. And so you can see results like that, the killer T cells are, are being decimated by this vaccine for whatever the mechanism is. We don't know, but we can see the results. And so you can see results like that, but you can see people, uh, the other results that it's causing to people with blood clots and heart

issues and things like that. So, um, uh, he goes on to say from the beginning, we've known the Pfizer Moderna shots. So we're given emergency use authorization in the UK, the U S uh, they specifically authorization in the UK and the US.

They specifically said in the pre-authorization data that many of the shots did not have mRNA strands intact up to 55% of them, which means that they would not work the way they were designed to work. You combine that with mishandling the vials that need to be kept at extremely low temperatures and you probably have a bunch of shots given to people that were no better than placebos and i said that from the very beginning in august of 2020 we got a thing first it was sent out to force four states and one municipality and it was the same thing that was sent to them. And that was in August of 2020. And it was from the CDC, not the FDA, but CDC. And it talked about this is what you're going to have to do when you get the vaccines. We're going to send them to you

and it's going to be multiple doses in a vial. So you're going to have to, and they're going to be kept at this super low temperature, it's like minus 90 degrees Fahrenheit. And so you're going to have to, and they're going to be, you know, kept at this super low temperatures, like minus 90 degrees Fahrenheit. And so you're going to have to thaw them out. And then you're going to have to dilute them into multiple doses with saline. And then you're going to have to use it with the next amount of time, you know, that same day. And so I asked the question, I said, well, what are the chances that this is going to be done appropriately at Walmart

and CVS? You know, we got a lot of people in the loop there, a lot of people who don't have a lot of medical training. How are they going to keep this stuff super cold? How are they going to dilute it properly and so forth? If you don't dilute something properly, you give somebody something that's a higher strength, that's a big issue. But I said also at the time,

what happens if they're not kept at minus 90 degrees Fahrenheit do they become ineffective or do they become toxic you know when you got something that goes past the expiration date it can go either way tylenol that's past the expiration date can be very, very dangerous. But other things just become useless, like I said, a placebo. So which is it? And then you add to that the fact that when Dr. Cole looks at this, he says, look, the ingredients are very inconsistent,

and it varies a great deal from batch to batch. And the concentration of the active ingredient, the mRNA, varies a great deal. And we've seen this in the research that was done by Naomi Wolf. She said it varies anywhere from 3 micrograms to 100 micrograms in dosage. Well, that's amazing that they would have that kind of sloppy control, unless it was deliberate. Because one of the things that you want to determine in a test, if they had done a test, but they didn't, they skipped it, remember Trump said, skip the testing.

But if they'd done a test, one of the things that you do in tests is you vary the dosage too little dosage of whatever you got. And it's not effective too muchage, and it becomes a poison. And so he said there's a lot of debate among independent researchers about the ingredients found in it. For example, is it graphene oxide? Is it nanotechnology? So you had Del Bigtree with a high wire, brought in Dr. Cole.

They did some things. They tested Del Bigtree's blood, but they also did a lot of testing on the vaccines. Dr. Cole proposed why many people who are vaccinated were lucky not to get injured by these dangerous injections. He said the vials were not kept cold before administering the injection. The mRNA broke down into nothing. In addition, he said concentrations of mRNA vary between vials due to poor manufacturing processes. So not everyone has received a dose or the same dose of mRNA. Naomi Wolf, when they looked at the dosage of these different batches,

and of course in the databases of VAERS, they record which batch you got it from. They found, of course, that most of the people who were injured were injured by the higher doses. So it really is like Russian roulette. I said that from the very beginning. I said it was very appropriate that you got this Republican governor, DeWine, saying we're going to do a vaccine lottery because that's what it is. It's a lottery. Just put the gun to your head, spin the barrel, and take a shot. So Big Tree and Dr. Cole began with a discussion about the rubbery fibrous structures of the clots that embalmers have been finding.

Dr. Cole said he's never seen these types of clots before. He said they're congealed protein, an amyloid-like material. Dr. Cole referred to work done by Dr. Theresea Praetorius, who has published papers on these amyloid fibrin microclots. And then they looked at some things that look like graphene oxide. Go down the next picture there, that yellow one right there. He said it looks like a rod-shaped object, right? But when you turn it on its side, it appears as a flat plate. So is this graphene oxide?

In Dr. Ryan Cole's opinion, no. He said those are cholesterol crystals, he said. That spike protein is incredibly inflammatory to the lining of our blood vessels. All of us have a little bit of cholesterol plaque on the walls of our vessels. But when you get that inflammatory process going, now those cholesterol crystals, due to inflammation, are broken loose. And they can get cast off. And so then look at this next picture here. The one labeled cholesterol above it.

Yeah, right there. The one on the right looks like, you know, they looked at it and said, well, is this microcircuitry? Is this a self-assembling nanochip? Because it's kind of square, but it is also irregular there in that particular one. He said, no, this is just stacked and layered cholesterol. So he said, okay, are there contaminants? Asked Dr. Cole. Sure, he said.

Are there metallic particles in these? Yes. You can find aluminum, silicon, magnesium, sodium chloride, salt, calcium, titanium, iron, et cetera. Now, iron, that's magnetic, right? He said a small study was done that showed that if you took some of the fluid of the vials with a pipette and you took out with a needle, he said some of these metals are actually coming from rapidly manufactured needles. But still, I would like to ask him if I had a chance, what about those 2.6 million doses in Japan? I think it's 2.6.

I'd say the 1.3 or 2.3. There was one that was slightly over a million. It's either 1.3 or 2.6. I'd say the 1.2.3 or there was one that was slightly over a million is either 1.3 or 1.6 batch. And they just threw them all away. I mean, that's a lot of money. Um, and, uh, then there was another one that was another million that they threw away. And the reason they did it was because they noticed black particulates. Well, that could just be, you know, a refrigeration error and it could be that these, um, it was

part of the breakdown or something like that. But what was really interesting was they said that they interacted magnetically. So there's a lot of questions about this stuff that we don't know. We just know that it hurts people. So don't do it. Right. Then they talk about the PEG and he says, well, that's not the antifreeze in your car. But he said, um, a lot of people allergic to this,

they were warned about this. My, uh, children's health defense. They said, uh, one person saw the PEG and said, look, we got a lot of people going to go into anaphylactic shock with this. They contacted the FDA. The FDA said, we don't care. Tell Pfizer. They call Pfizer. Pfizer didn't care either. Then show the picture of what we've seen before. And some of these things looks like a parasite. It looks like it's got some kind of, yeah, that thing right there, multiple tendrils or whatever. He goes, well, that's not, he says, that's from the bottom of a leaf. It's called a stellate trichome. That's what Dr. Cole said.

He said, if you're doing microscopy, I struggle with that word anyway, in a living room, or if you're doing it in a non-lab setting, you're going to get all sorts of particulates in the air. And that's the bottom of a leaf that's floating around in the air. That's why I say, you know, when you go back and you, you grab these things and it's been, you know, um, at the embalmers for a while and it's, uh, you know, you have to ship it and all the rest of this stuff. You don't really know what you're looking at. It doesn't have a controlled thing. And so anyway, bottom line is, um, he didn't find any of the smoking guns about the stuff that we see all the time.

But here's a smoking gun for you, okay? Think about it not from the detail. I think it's a misdirection to try to go in and try to assume that you know what is inside these things. Look at it from a higher level. Remember Dr. Pan from California, the state senator from California, who pushed to get rid of any exemptions for vaccines in California to go to school? Same time that was happening in New York. And then they asked Trump and he said, oh, it's just going around. You got to get the shot and all that kind of stuff.

Well, it was Dr. Pan, who even though they had this massive pushback of parents there, he was a doctor and a state senator, and he was the one who rammed that through with the support of Trump and other people like that. Well, now he's landed a job with the American Medical Association as a consultant. Isn't that nice? Yeah, it pays off, doesn't it, to do that? He was always a pharmaceutical shill anyway. It would have been just a little bit too obvious if he'd gone to work for one of the pharmaceutical companies like Trump's FDA heads. Gottlieb went

to Pfizer. Hahn went to Moderna. Those are the people who ran the FDA under Trump. One goes to Pfizer, one goes to Moderna. And then you got out of the UK, you have the lead UK lockdown advisor, Jeremy Farrar, has now been promoted to be the World Health Organization's chief scientist because they want to lock everybody down. That's what this pandemic treaty thing is about. The WHO will decide if you've got a pandemic of whatever in your country, and they will just lock you down. Former SAGE member Jeremy Farrar, one of the most influential pro-lockdown advisors in the UK, considered by some to be akin to the UK's Anthony Fauci,

has now been given a major promotion, become chief scientist at the World Health Organization. Well, see, that's what you need to know. Sometimes it's not what's inside the vaccine, but sometimes it's what's inside the government that pushed the vaccine on us. You can start to get an idea of what's going on with these things by looking at it at a different level. Sometimes you can't see the forest for the microscope.

And sometimes you just got to pull back. Before I run out of time, I really wanted to get into this war stuff today. I didn't get a chance to get into my Christmas stuff. Tomorrow I'll talk to you about some Christmas news here that I really wanted to get into. I'm going to put that up early tomorrow on the show but we have even kissinger over the weekend you may have seen this is pushing back against what's being done in ukraine to avoid world war i thought that was kind of interesting um it makes me wonder when i'm on the side of Henry Kissinger on any issue. He's 99 and a half years old right now.

That young blood must be working for him, I guess. Anyway, how to avoid another world war. This is an op-ed piece he had on the Spectator that's been reprinted everywhere. He said, the time is approaching to build on the strategic changes which have already been accomplished and to integrate them into a new structure towards achieving peace through negotiation. So he's very worried about two things in this op-ed piece. He's worried about a world war. He's worried that we're going to sleepwalk into a world war like people did in World

War I. But of course, World War I is kind of different. World War I was not a fourth turning, you know. It is interesting that they were able to maneuver us into something that disastrous when it wasn't even a fourth turning. But the time is right now, just like it was with the Great Depression and World War II. Time is right, just like it was with the Civil War and what was happening globally, and that was the agrarian society being replaced by an industrialized nation state.

We had civil wars in Italy as well. Nobody wants to talk about that. At exactly the same time as we had our Civil War, and it was over the exact same issue. The rising industrial powers pushing out the established agrarian powers that were decentralized and creating a centralized nation state that was going to help them. And of course, before that, we had the changes with the Revolutionary War and things like that. But the fourth turning, as Strauss and Howe point out, we are at that point in time now.

And so we're not going to be sleepwalking into World War. We're going to be marching into it with the fourth turning. Kissinger says a peace process should link Ukraine to NATO. This is different from what he said before. He's reversed himself on that. As a matter of fact, going back to February this year when it began, Kissinger said, it was not a wise American policy to attempt to include Ukraine into NATO.

Now he's saying they need to be included into NATO. But he also warned about the continued attempts to render Russia impotent. So in this op-ed piece, he states what we all know, that the big move by NATO is to take out Russia. He probably also knows, but he doesn't say, what a lot of other people have said, that the ultimate objective of all this is China, that the U.S. and they're trying to maintain their global hegemony does not want to, sees that their real issue is China. They're the real competition.

And that China and Russia could join forces. We don't want that to happen, so we're going to take out Russia first. That's what this is really about. And then China. So he said, he warned against continued attempts to render Russia impotent. He said that could result in an uncontrollable and unpredictable spiral. He laid out that along with the sought-after dissolution of Russia would come a massive power vacuum out of which new threats to the world order would emerge as bigger powers rush in. He said, think about this. He said the dissolution of Russia,

destroying its ability for strategic policy, could turn its territory, which encompasses 11 time zones, into a contested vacuum. You see, Russia is the largest land mass in the world, largest country of physical land mass. But China, right next door, has the largest population. And they really would like to have that land and all the natural resources on. Don't you think, you know, China has,

uh, been doing all kinds of games with their belt and road initiative to try to get resources from around the world. Oh, a lot of the world's biggest resources. You know, when we talk about these sanctions against Russia, it's like,

Oh, look, they're the largest or second largest supplier of this and of that and of this and that. So China would like to have those resources for sure. And they're right next door. And so this may not turn out the way the U.S. wanted it to if they take Russia down. As competing societies might decide to settle their disputes by violence,

other countries might seek to expand their claims by force, you know, like China. All of these dangers would be compounded by the presence of thousands of nuclear weapons, which makes Russia one of the world's top two nuclear powers. But then the part that really gets interesting, I think, is what he says about artificial intelligence. Again, he talks about sleepwalking into World War II. No, we're not sleepwalking into World War II. No, we're not sleepwalking into it because this is a fourth turning. But he says, as the world's leaders strive to end the war, which two nuclear powers contest a conventionally armed country, they should also reflect on the impact this conflict has

on the long-term strategy of incipient high-tech and artificial intelligence. Autonomous weapons already exist that are capable of defining, assessing, and targeting their own perceived threats, and thus in a position to start their own war, I would add, or to give plausible deniability to people who want to start their own war. He's saying no theory for how to handle this exists. They don't care. This is the fundamental. Our politicians, as well as our engineers and technicians, don't even ever bother to think, or I guess they have. We aren't thinking about the

consequences of this, but they've got it already planned out. Thank you for joining us. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commonsons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while

they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thanks for watching.