The David Knight Show - 19May23 ADL: Defamation, Lies, Provocateurs; GOP Ignores Important Pro-Life Free Speech Case — Will SCOTUS?

Episode Date: May 19, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Egg prices have crashed. Why? (2:12) Greenhouse Gas-Lighting — You MUST RESIST Can we comply our way out of the planned slave system? People who play along with the fake narrative about "emissions" will never defeat it. NYC, London begin tracking food consumption, clothing purchases and they're being joined by American Express — why American Express? (16:12) What? Finland reduced electricity prices by 75%!! Who are they so wise in the ways of science? (33:13)The tale of the USA's forever prisoner — not found guilty, not even charged — TORTURED for over 22 years and counting… (41:47) ADL: 60 Yrs of Marxist Defamation Marxist underhanded tactics of defamation, lies, agent provocateurs, surveillance, baseless charges of racism and violence…ADL has been doing what we see everywhere today for 60 years — especially targeting the John Birch Society (JBS) who have been vindicated. (53:05) GOP has ignored one of the most important First Amendment cases ever and ignored the case that would destroy Planned Parenthood. Will SCOTUS hear the case of David Daleiden who exposed Planned Parenthood trafficking in baby parts? $6 Million in legal fees and a judge has prohibited his videos from being shown — even in his own defense in an ongoing criminal persecution that began with LaLa Harris (1:13:30)Diane Feinstein has built a $200 MILLION fortune from insider trading — just like her pal, Pelosi. (1:22:54) Congress is ignoring the double taxation of Social Security and Thomas Massie's bill to repeal the taxes. (1:26:22) Jefferson Thought 125 Federal Employees was Too Many Desc: In 1800, the US capitol was moved to Washington, DC from Philadelphia. It only took them a month. Jefferson thought it was useless and bloated and reduced it much further in 2 years. Why do progs pretend the 10th Amendment doesn't exist…and why they're wrong in their "interpretation". And why do even conservatives want everything decided and done in DC? (1:30:29) Regulator who has watched "autonomous self-driving cars" is skeptical of Chat claims (1:48:07) Bilderberg: Is AI or WorldCoin the most important thing to the globalists this year? And, who's there this year? (2:00:55) INTERVIEW Celente: AI, Gold, War or OccupyPeace Gerald Celente, TrendsJournal.com, Is AI a flash in the pan or a lasting trend? Why gold is down slightly, why and when it will go up. OccupyPeace coming in a week — push for peace, prepare for survival OccupyPeace.com. (2:05:27)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered.

Visit Innovate today. Innov today innovate the IT solutions people Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 19th of May, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, today we're going to take a look a little bit closer at Bilderberg, but we're also going to take a look at Gitmo torture. There's been some new revelations about that. There have been revelations about how the Anti-Defamation League sought to destroy the John Birch Society back in the 60s. It was very effective. They actually infiltrated it and fed information to the news media to cost people their jobs, that type of thing. Now, there are Marxist organizations that are focused on defamation. Elon Musk got that right. Just get rid of the A. They're a Marxist organization about defamation.

And we're also going to take a look at what is happening with the border. You've got Illinois, California are not only opening up their borders, but they are giving special new benefits to illegal aliens, and it's going to bankrupt them. We'll be right back. I want to start today with food information. You know, we talked a lot about egg prices. We saw them skyrocket up. And as they were skyrocketing up, everybody said, oh, you know we talked a lot about egg prices we saw them skyrocket up and as they were skyrocketing up everybody said oh yeah it's the bird flu that's what's happening why you're seeing such expensive eggs well they've now crashed very quickly and um if you take a look at the chart pull that up travis so they can see the trajectory of this thing they went back to january 2020 and you know there'd be a little bit of a spike here and there.

There was a spike that happened with, go down there, that first spike that happened as Trump shut everything down, right? And people were destroying food on the farms because they couldn't get them to the stores, and they couldn't get them in the form that they needed to have them in. So that spike there was the Trump spike, uh, the fake pandemic spike, but you notice that it just kind of bounces along until it started going up significantly. And you see that big peak up there, but now it's dropped back down to where it typically is wholesale price of 49 cents per dozen. And so, uh, they talked about the fact that, uh, well, you know, we had a USDA figure show that there were 314 million egg laying hens in the U S in April up from 308 million in December, but that's still lower than 328 million in December of 2021. So let's break this down.

Uh, is it about the number of hens? The farmers are saying this is price gouging by the middlemen and perhaps by the grocery stores. But they said, we're not getting the money. And they said, the egg production has not really dropped. They said, yes, we have lost some birds, some hens, but it hasn't really dropped that much. And so if we go back and we look at these numbers in terms of the number of hens, if you're looking there at the price, it's now gone back to 49 cents wholesale. It had gotten up to $4.65. They've gone up by a factor of 10, essentially.

850% increase. So is it due to birds dying from bird flu? No, the number of hens, if you look at it from December to December, the ones that the, uh, uh, USDA gave us figures, they gave us, they said, um, it went from a high of 328 million in December, 2021 down to 308 million in December of 2022, it dropped by 6% number of hands, 6%. If it drops by 6%, why would a 6% drop in the number of hands cause the prices to go up by 850%. Yeah. Nearly 10 times. Why would that happen? And as a matter of fact, the farmer said our per capita production from the hens has actually gone up. So the drop was less than 6%. Farmers told us that, and now you can see it in the numbers.

But of course, in New York, they are continuing down the path, very hard, of the C40 path. It was originally 40 cities. London and New York were the ones that were key in that. It has all kinds of things, you know, the 15-minute city, the smart cities, restricting your travel, restricting what you eat, even restricting the amount of clothing that you're getting, and of course restricting building and all the rest of the stuff, but they also want to restrict your food. And so New York is beginning to track food purchases, as we always said, and they're going to put caps on the amount of meat that can be served to the public in public institutions. So they're starting with this now.

Once they get to the central bank digital currency or something like that, they'll be able to take it to the individual level. Right now, the only thing they can do is reduce track and reduce the amount of meat that public institutions are giving to people. But they're all about this.

And that is their agenda. Stop the food. Stop the cars the car stop the building stop the energy production as a matter of fact before i get into this let me go back and i had a listener who had sent me an email about agenda 21 agenda 21 explanation and uh it was Patty. And she said, I've noticed in the podcast that agenda 30 is spoken of as replacement for agenda 21. I've watched Rosa Corey's videos in which she was an expert on this topic. Explain this. I've also used to think that agenda 30 was a replacement for agenda 21 until I saw a video from Rosa correcting it. Agenda 21 is for the 21st century. Agenda 30 and Agenda 50 are actually representations

of the years 2030 and 2050 for target goals that are outlined in Agenda 21 for those years. In other words, Agenda 2030 and 2050, which is the net zero thing, are still Agenda 21.

From what I've learned up to the year 2030 completion date, the goal is to eliminate all private property external to our bodies year 2050 the goal is when we take they take over our bodies and transhumanism a completion date yeah there's been a lot of talk about 6g and its role in terms of you know interacting with us on a very physical level. I'll just put it that way. The details are very vague, but they imply that that's what it is.

She says, I'm no way judging anyone for the confusion because it's unthankful for most people to comprehend this evil plan. The confusion is deliberate because it's from Satan. I wish I could go back to being ignorant of these things. Well, we don't have to be concerned about being ignorant. I think we need to double down on this stuff. But let me just clarify that. And I want to read that because if anybody is confused about that,

I want them to understand it. And I need to double down on it myself. Because I have said I never was under the impression that it was two different things. It is one long agenda to take us into transhumanism, for depopulation, for attack on humanity, enslavement of humanity. And I've said many times, and I was surprised that she thought that I thought it was two different things. I said it was always Agenda 21, and they just gave it a more specific, you know, somewhere around 2014, 2015, was when they started talking about the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. I said it's not a different thing, they just got more specific about it. I said they had this goal that they

were telling us that was kind of nebulous, But of course, they have a very specific date by which they want these benchmarks to happen. And so when they started talking about 2030, they started talking about a specific date and they gave us more details about what they want to do to us. Same thing with 2050. We're starting to get more and more details about that as well. But for now, they're getting pretty concrete about 2030 and so they want to achieve a 33 reduction in carbon emissions from food by 2030 but again

it is a continuum you know u.n agenda 21 was sometime in the 21st century they added the details they added the time frame and folks were, we're only about seven years out. And as I've said, it's not just they picked that date. I'm convinced they picked that date because that is the tail end of the fourth turning that we are in the middle of right now. A complete upheaval of society globally, all of the institutions, a turning upside down of everything. These people want to use... Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all.

Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. that that's part of the timing. They want to set this up in the time frame that Strauss and Howe in their book, The Fourth Turning, previous to that, they had a book called Generations. That's why everybody talks about millennials and Generation X, Y, Z, that type of thing. They notice this pattern of every 80 years,

all the institutions are basically reset. And so we can have a society that is a freer society. That was the fourth turning of 1776. Or we can have a society that moves towards greater centralization and control and consolidation. We had the industrial revolution that happened at the civil war, civil wars in Europe, as I've mentioned before. This I think is going to be, they're hoping it's going to be a revolution of controlling us through technology, uh, artificial intelligence and the global ID and a global coin is all about that. He calls it world coin. Sam Altman does.

I think that's what they're talking about right now at Bilderberg. They said, oh, look, AI is at the top of the agenda. Well, the list is there in alphabetical order. But I think it's not so much AI as it is WorldCoin, in my opinion, because Bilderberg had focused from their very beginning, the first time they did it was 1954, the second meeting, and it was all about how do we unify Europe? How do we do it economically? It's one of the reasons why you've got the World Economic Forum, the means of global control that these people have seized.

They will use war if they need to, for sure. But primarily, it's about financial control, financial strings and control. That's why it's so important to get outside of that system. I keep, you know, putting, you know, I, I like Tony Arterburn. He's a great supporter of the program and, uh, I'm not selling you, uh, gold and silver, uh, you know, to make money. I'm telling you, this is what you need to do to try to get out of the system as much as you can.

So, you know, Tony Arterman has set up David Knight dot gold and takes you to his wise Wolf. There's a lot of different ways that he's got there. You can do it. You can buy, you know, stuff direct, or you can set up on a monthly basis. But the bottom line is we've got to start preparing for ourselves because this is what we say Hydra, you know, it's not the password for Bilderberg. Hail Hydra.

As they whisper into each other's ear and they give each other a hug. We've got to protect ourselves against Hydra as much as we can because it's everywhere. It really is everywhere. So anyway, they want 33% reduction in carbon emissions from food by 2030, they said in New York. They're putting caps on how much red meat can be served in public institutions as part of a sweeping initiative to achieve a 33 reduction carbon emissions from food by 2030. uh you know they want to stop food you know they've been very clear the c40 agenda that new york and london kind of co-started no meat no dairy we got to stop the food we've got to stop

the cars we've got to stop building we've got to stop energy. We've got to stop the food. We've got to stop the cars. We've got to stop building. We've got to stop energy production. We've got to stop everything. Net zero. Zero you out. The addition of household food consumption data, they're now putting it in. They're building their infrastructure step by step. Right now they can only do it to the public institutions, but they're starting to collect more and more data from everybody. The guy who is doing it in new york is um the guy who founded the google smart city subsidiary sidewalk labs before the fake pandemic hit i was scheduled to go to toronto to report on the sidewalk labs up there because that's at the

center of this stuff. Uh, I canceled it because I didn't want to get stuck in Canada. I could close the borders. So I'm not going, uh, that was, I was going to go in, um, well, I got very sick in December and, um, you know, from a flu like thing, I don't know if it was what they call COVID or not, but the bottom line is, uh, I was very sick in December. I couldn't go. And then January, all this talk started and it's like, ah, no, it's likely to happen, especially in Canada. So anyway, sidewalk labs was set up in Toronto and it was a smart city experiment by Google. I think the name is very telling, Sidewalk Labs. You're going to be living on the sidewalk.

You're going to be walking on the sidewalk. There's no cars. But the people who bought into it and volunteered to be a part of that program, many of them said, well, I thought I was going to be saving the environment, doing something green. They just want to track everything that I'm doing. This whole thing is just a surveillance system. It's like, yeah, yeah, that's what this is about.

I hope we don't have to be that stupid and that dense to understand this before it happens to us. Because once this thing rolls out, and it's not an experiment that you can opt out of, it's going to be really bad. People need to understand what this is before they get entrapped into it. But we're sleepwalking into this just like the environmentalist did. Oh, let's save the planet.

Then they find out it's a technological panopticon prison surveillance system. That's what it is. And so this person, uh, a Garala, is a guy's name, Rohit Agarwala, is running this in New York City. He's running the surveillance and the totaling of what people eat. And he was the guy who founded Sidewalk Labs. And he's celebrated in a press conference the expanded data collection. He says we're forging, quote, a new standard for what cities have to do. Mm-hmm.

Have to do. So it's going to also track, not just apply a carbon score to your food, but it's also going to track things like air travel and health care. Health care. Oh. Yeah. The climate MacGuffin to kill us. You know, I think food, they said, is the third biggest source of cities' emissions right after building and transportation. Of course, Eric Adams says it's easy to talk about emissions coming from buildings,

but when we talk about beef, I don't know if people are ready to have this conversation. Hey, pal, there's nothing to discuss. It's none of your business. Eric Adams is a vegetarian. He wants to impose that on you. He likes it. He says, I love it. It's great.

It made me healthier. Well, fine. Good for you. Do what you want to do. I'd rather have meat. So he's going to force this on you. And the sad thing about this is that, you know, and I talked about much of this a couple of weeks ago. I think it's good for us to go back and revisit it again.

Children's Health Defense are the ones who wrote this article. They went into a lot of detail, and they're trying to explain because they, you know, buy into the climate MacGuffin. They are saying, well, there's a way that we can make this work for all of us, you know, and still reduce emissions. And so they say alternative grazing systems, like the regenerative agricultural systems that some people are using to reclaim the land that has been harmed by big factory type of systems. They said, no, let's do it on a different scale, in a different way, that type of thing. Land that's suitable for cattle production

is many times not suitable for growing other types of agriculture and vice versa. So they said, so let's understand different types of land had different types of uses, and we don't want to buy into this thing where we want to just purge all the animals like some radical environmentalists. And of course, Children's Health Defense is rfk junior's organization they sincerely believe that climate change is a problem and they've got to dance around this thing somehow

and so they're looking at some alternative solutions they don't understand what this agenda is about they They're naive, just like the people who volunteered to go into sidewalk labs in Toronto. They don't realize what the real purpose of this thing is. And I said that about some of the great engineers at Toyota and other places saying, oh, okay, you need zero emissions? We can do zero emissions. How about this? No, we don't like that solution. No, we don't like what you don't like that. No, it's gotta be the jab. No ivermectin, right? It's gotta be the battery electric cars so that we can control them on the grid. We don't want anything else. Fuel cells, hydrogen. No, we're not going to look at those technologies. We're

not going to, um, you know, um, improve those technologies. No, we're not going to look at those technologies. We're not going to improve those technologies. No, we're not going to support that at all in any way, shape, or form. It's got to be the battery charged off of the central grid. And so they don't understand that this is actually an imprisonment system. They're trying to work within this thing. These people are always talking about greenhouse gases. This is greenhouse gas lighting. Don't buy into the gas narrative.

It's greenhouse gas lighting. Don't argue about how many angels can fit on the head of a pen or how much unicorn farts we can reduce with this or that. It's nonsense. You got to attack it head on. That's what's dangerous about this. You get somebody who's a true believer like RFKJ, and it gets dangerous because he's going to propagate the greenhouse gaslighting.

He thinks that that's what it's really about. And these people, maybe he understands that it is a lockdown system. Or maybe he's just been duped. I don't know. Either way, it doesn't really matter because the dangerous thing is that if we continue to propagate this lie, they're going to enslave us. So they go through this whole thing. They say, you know, if we were to have pasture-raised beef instead of this factory industrial system, we could sequester carbon. It could become a carbon sink, yada, yada, yada. We

can have regenerative livestock farming. Whatever works, I don't care, but stop with the greenhouse gaslighting. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting, and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. They said, sadly, there's a percentage of the population that for whatever reason has decided that animals in the ecosystem are bad and the way to have a healthier planet is to give up on the animal impact.

For whatever reason, it's the constant propaganda that they're being fed. The lies and the propaganda coming from the media, coming from the schools, coming from all of the gang green, right? The green gang that is turned into gang green on our societies. It's killing us. We've got to cut it off. Organization behind the 15-minute city is now mapping consumption-based emissions from New York and London. The partnership is between New York, London, the C 40 organization,

the two of them essentially formed. It initially was proposed in London. Michael Bloomberg jumped on it with both feet. So, you know, New York and London are the center of that C 40 organization, but also American express a big part of this. Why, why would a banking organization get it? Well, because of CBDC, right? That's how it'll ultimately be tracked.

Some kind of digital processing or digital payments, right? Even if you don't have CBDC, American Express can jump in there and say, yeah, we just measured what you bought, what you've used, how you traveled, clothes you bought, meat you bought, all the rest of that stuff. The press release does not make the purpose of emissions mapping inventories explicit. It simply states that the inventories, quote, will enable London and New York City to develop a suite of actions to incentivize more sustainable consumption and collaboration with people and businesses. Yeah, right. It's a public-private partnership, right? PPP.

Now, think of that as profits, politicians, and propaganda. It's not a public-private partnership. That is nothing but fascism anyway. A merger of government and corporations is just corporate fascism. So when you say PPP, think corporate fascism. And the way that works is profits, politicians, and propaganda. Building data inventories in partnership with city businesses is important for cities to measure, plan, and act

to ensure that our cities become better places to live for all people and sustainable businesses can thrive. The press release, they said bases, its claims and a report by the university of Leeds and a developer. Arup group. Arup is Rockefeller supported world economic forum, affiliated organization that uses fourth industrial revolution technologies to

transform cities. They said, this is the profit part of the fascism, the corporate fascism. They promise that immense quantities of highly detailed data can produce a new level of control. Oh yeah, they will. A new level of control. A control of people, not of gases. It's greenhouse gas lighting, making possible more efficient and sustainable use of the world's precious materials. So C40s cities are shutting down food, clothing, transportation, all this stuff. Three items of clothing per year, as I've mentioned in the past.

You'll have one plane flight every three years of less than a thousand miles. This is what they want for. Of course, you know, there'll be no restriction on what they get. I mean, we're all going to turn into Sam Britain, stealing people's suitcases,

right? Hopefully you'll get them of the right gender. Um, he just had another, uh, charge put against him, felony charge. And when you look at this, he saw this woman, he stole her suitcase in Houston.

I don't have the picture here. I wasn't going to cover the article. It just came to mind. It's so comical. He's on the run now. I can just picture him trying to run in high heels. And of course, he does stick out in the crowd you know bald head mustache heavy red lipstick he does stick out in the crowd uh wearing a dress uh but so i don't know how far

he's going to get but uh what in this houston situation it was a woman from another country nigeria or something she had this real flamboyant dress that she had designed and it had, uh, it was red, a big flowing skirt that went out and it had these big gold swishes on it, really big and all over it. Very distinctive fabric, the cut, everything about it, very distinctive custom design of hers. And so he puts it on and he wears it to a public event, gets his picture taken. She sees it in the paper. That's my dress. I mean, there's not another dress like that anywhere.

It's pretty obvious. Just the craziest. Anyway, sorry, back to this. The C40. Meanwhile, these people are trying to steal us. That's why I don't want to get too far into Sam Britton. Yes, the training agenda is a big part of this stuff. These people are trying to enslave and starve us of everything.

Liberty food, you name it. Energy, the C 40 good food cities accelerator. They said signatory cities, and there's just about a hundred of them right now, just under a hundred. Uh, want to achieve a quote, planetary healthy diet by 2030. To save the planet, you got to eat plants. Meat bans, said one person, are the most extreme policy for advancing environmental impact of meat production. Think about what we ban. We ban toxic chemicals like Agent Orange and things that we know have bad environmental impacts. Well, you know, that's, but when we think about making policies, we have to ask, what's the issue of concern?

And we want to try to target that exact issue. This is why I say, you know, this is children's health defense talking. I have some good things to say. We're going to say, what is the issue of concern? You're concerned about CO2? The plants that you say you want to eat, right? We're only supposed to eat plants.

Guess what plants need? CO2. You're not going to have plants if you sequester the carbon dioxide. They need to release the carbon dioxide. That's what we need, right? We need more carbon dioxide if we want more plants.

It's just that simple. What's the matter with these people? And we have seen as the amount of carbon dioxide has gone up, their models have failed, the temperature has not risen. That's certainly not the way they said it was going to. And so we have to say, you know, what is the exact issue here? The exact issue is that they're lying to us. Yeah. 0.4% of the atmosphere, dioxide how much of that is natural how much of that is man made by cars it's

just nonsense nonsense i think there's other options she said and other opportunities besides besides banning or capping meat products to solve a non-existent problem. It's just amazing. So, you know, we can go with things that will create less resistance than banning meat to solve our non-existent problem. That is the insanity of where we are right now. Well, if we look further beyond New York City and London, we have John Kerry, who is also saying we've got to shut down farms. He is the special climate envoy for Biden.

And he's the envoy to the climate. I don't know if he's talked to Mother Earth yet. Perhaps he walks the halls of the White House talking to Mother Earth and Eleanor Roosevelt. I don't know what he's doing. Kerry noted that agricultural production is responsible for roughly one-third of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions and argued that reducing those emissions must be front and center in the quest to defeat global warming. Oh, well. He made the remarks of the Department of Agriculture's Climate Summit in Washington, D.C. That's the thing that should really scare you.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, who is right now, as we speak, coming after an organic Amish farmer while they green light GMO pigs. And these are the people who want to tell us what we can eat. It's absolutely insane. The attack on farming by Western leaders is beyond shocking. Criminal. Treasonous. I think it is a seditious conspiracy, frankly, if ever there was one.

For his part, Kerry neglected to mention that though agriculture is purportedly responsible for roughly a third of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions, it is undeniably responsible for the sustenance and the continued existence of 100% of the world's roughly 8 billion people. But again, see, this is somebody else opposing Kerry. How do they oppose it? Well, they say that it's not that bad. You know, the emissions are, we've got to have those emissions or whatever.

We've got to stop with this greenhouse gaslighting. We've got to not buy into this and say, well, I've got a better solution than you do. No, you have to attack the lie at its foundation. In the UK, Birmingham Council is going to turn a ring road into a park to try to get everybody riding bicycles like they do in Copenhagen. And they do ride a lot of bicycles in Copenhagen. The Labour Run Council in Birmingham, England, said they want to turn what is already now a famous ring road

that goes around it into a park that encircles the city. We don't even want to have cars. I mean, we look at these 15-minute city things that are being done in Oxford and Cambridge and other places like that. They'd say, well, you can't go from these. We're going to set up these little sectors here. And you can't go from one to the other unless you go to the outer ring. Well, they're going to get rid of the outer ring now.

You see, it's always chaos from the inside and incremental. So they said, according to the plans of how Birmingham might look by 2040, they want to double their green spaces, build about 124 miles of walking and cycling routes. We'll create more jobs. We'll have better transport options. Oh, really? A bicycle is a better transport option for somebody who's got a disability. A bicycle is a better transport option for somebody who's elderly or an on and on and on. What about the people who do construction, people who do maintenance? You don't want them in there either. I guess, you know, grab your, um, your stuff that you've got to get that, uh,

got to replace the, um, well, we won't have an HVAC unit, right? Uh, I was going to say, put that on your back and, and, uh, grab your bicycle and bicycle over to the place where you're going to replace it, right? Make them balance it on your head or something. Uh, no, but they won't be an HVAC unit. Anyway. Um, we're going to map out how we will become carbon zero and how we will green our city in the future. Well, we're going to map out how we will become carbon zero and how we will green our city in the future. Well, there's another kind of green. The people running this scam, getting

that kind of green. The green money. Mr. Ward said the plan has been very well received by the people who are going to be getting the green money. But they haven't talked to any motorists. He said, they're real excited about this happening.

They couldn't find any. I don't know. Meanwhile, in the United States, back to the United States and by administration, uh, Biden has vetoed legislation to block solar panel, terrorist waivers. Is he all that concerned about the debt ceiling? Nah, nah, nah. And what is this about? Well, it's tariffs that have been put, duties that have been put on solar panels made in Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Why?

Because they're really being made in China. And China is, you know, this was about trying to have, if you think solar panels are good, we need to start making them in the U.S. instead of forcing everybody to buy them from China. But of course, China has got pretty much a lock on most of the metals that are going to be needed and materials that are going to be needed for their green agenda. The waiver stemmed from a Commerce Department investigation last year that found that major Chinese solar panel makers were trying to dodge U.S. tariffs on their products, finishing them in Southeast Asian nations.

Imports from those countries make up about 80% of the U.S. solar panel supplies. So they said, we're going to force everybody to buy solar panels, but we don't want to buy them all from China and become dependent on them for all of our energy in that way. So we're going to put tariffs on them. So China responds by shipping them to these other countries in Southeast Asia, let them do a little bit of work and pass it on.

So what is the solution? Even if you want to go along with their greenhouse gas lighting, look at what just happened in Finland. A newly launched Finnish nuclear plant sees electricity prices plunge, plunge by 75%. Where have we seen this before? Everywhere you look, energy prices going up and up and up and up because they're trying to throttle everything down. But they put just one nuclear power plant online in Finland. And Finland uses a lot of electricity. They're the highest per capita electricity consumption in the European Union.

They put one nuclear power plant online that they've been fighting to not have. What emissions does it have? Is it having these greenhouse emissions? See, it's not about that. They fight the nuclear power plants just like they will fight zero emission fuel cell vehicles or hydrogen zero emission vehicles. They're looking for things that are going to make money profits, uh, for the partners of these politicians. And so they use the green stuff as propaganda. Uh, so the austerity is a means of control. It's forced, it's fake, and they don't want any solutions whatsoever, but they caved in Finland.

It was getting pretty close to finishing and they kept delaying it. But because of all the sanctions causing electricity to go sky high, because Finland has the highest per capital electricity consumption in the EU and energy prices had risen very, very sharply. Well, they backed off. The chief executive of Finland's national grid said, well, yeah, it's got its own risks in a nuclear power plant we're happy to follow up on that but he said wind power is expected to be our largest source still kowtowing to the wind right wind and solar they that's the ones that they prefer

he said it's going to be the largest source of energy production in finland by 2027 well why why are they waiting so long? I mean, you know, they've had these windmills for a very long time. The wind's been blowing. They got the windmill solutions. Why isn't that working? He said, no, nuclear is currently being a useful and reliable substitute. And cheaper.

Cheaper. The wind power is anywhere, is not at all free, as I would want you to believe. It costs a lot of money to build those windmills. As we see, they're not lasting. It costs a lot of money to build the solar panels, and they don't last forever either. You know, they have a life cycle with them as well.

So anyway, it is useful, it's cheaper, and it is reliable. And that's a key thing because wind power is very unreliable. He said wind power is capable of attracting greater investment, however, with nuclear energy seemingly being blacklisted by a number of environmental investors. He said, nuclear, it seems, is not very attractive for the investors. This is about the bankers, the elites who are making the money off of this stuff. They're pushing us into these solutions that they've already bought into. It's not that they make any sense, even with their greenhouse gas lighting. He says, it's an option, and I'm sure that our politicians would be in favor of these decisions,

but who dares to put billions of euros into nuclear, he said. He says it's an option and I'm sure that our politicians would be in favor of these decisions, but who dares to put billions of euros into nuclear, he said. Yeah, who would want to have something that reduces power costs by 75%? No, we don't want that because it's about crony capitalism. Poland has secured $4 billion in U.S. funding to help build 20 small modular nuclear reactors across the country by 2029. Hungary has focused on expanding its nuclear power plant. Germany, however, has gone in the other direction, and they have closed their three remaining nuclear power plants last month. And so in Germany, you're seeing high inflation. You're seeing high energy costs. You're seeing a sharp decline in

industrial output. And it's causing the IMF to predict a recession, is on the card, for the suicidal Germans who are being driven by the gang green gang.

So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the CIA's torture program. We're going to talk about the anti-defamation leagues defamation program. And we're going to talk about an update as to what is going on with David delight. And he's trying to get this to the Supreme court. It is absolutely amazing. What has happened?

Civil trials against him, as well as what Lala Harris and her successor, Javier Becerra, who is now at HHS, buying the baby parts that he tried to expose the trafficking in, and then by his successor as well. We'll be right back. ¶¶ ¶¶ in a world of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act you You're listening to The David Knight Show. Yeah, I'll just say one more thing. There's a couple of articles out

about how Biden is bragging about how his EPA is going to shut down private car use and force everybody into electric vehicles. And the reason I say it's going to shut everything down, in the conservative article where they talk about it, they go, well, you know,

these electric vehicles are not zero emission. You have to power them somehow. everything down in the conservative article where they talk about it they go well you know these uh these electric vehicles not zero emission you have to power them somehow and the power plants that we have have emissions and uh so and i said this years and years and years ago talking to eric peters i said so you know they they um they think that these power plants don't have any emissions. Maybe, you know, what we should do is just let us put a big balloon on our tailpipe and we can drive around collecting all the gases. And then we can, we'll have to periodically go to one of the power plants and just take the balloon off and release all the gases there where nobody sees it. And it'd be okay. Well, they, you know, that's not a good argument to use to say, well, the, the power plants

are putting out gases. You know, the power plants are so dirty and India, and of course in China, but in India, the stats were, if you had a gasoline car that got about 34 miles per gallon. That would be cleaner than an electric car that had zero emissions because it's being powered by a dirty, cheap and dirty power plant. But the Biden administration has not only ramped up regulations on car emissions to destroy ownership of internal combustion engines in just a few years. But at the same time, they said, yeah, we see that. You're going to try to make arguments to comply with them about the greenhouse gas lighting. They said, yeah, we're going to shut down the power plants as well.

Which is why I say they're going to shut down all private cars. Because they're putting emission standards, first time that's ever been done, being done by the Biden administration, the EPA within the Biden administration, ramping up to absurd levels beyond absurd levels. So we're already at absurd levels, wrapping up to de facto prohibition, the emissions on cars, and then starting with the emission regulations on power plants. So they're going to basically shut the power plants down because it will not be able to comply. But let's talk about what the CIA is doing. We have Gitmo prisoners graphic details of CIA torture in a new report.

And this is Abu Zubaydah. And this is the guy, by the way. You know, he's not someone, they know that they've got somebody who's not a terrorist, but they're not going to let him go. And he's been kind of the center of the torture abuses that are there. They kind of used him to practice on to establish these programs. A report published this week featuring previously unreleased drawings by Abu Zubaydah, a 52-year-old

Saudi who's been imprisoned by the U.S. for more than 20 years at CIA black sites and Gitmo. It offers new insight into the torture suffered by a man caught up in a case of mistaken identity. This is kind of like Franz Kafka meets George Orwell. The report, titled American Torturers, FBI and CIA Abuses at Dark Sites in Guantanamo, is based on sketches and descriptions by Zubaydah and other

war on terror torture victims. Quote, despite the efforts of the federal government, particularly in the CIA, to conceal evidence of this actual operation of the enhanced interrogation techniques, EITs, as they call them, deployed on detainees are a steady drumbeat of disclosures that have come out. It provided an unparalleled view into this disgraceful episode in our nation's history that continues to go on. Matter of fact, this whole cynical thing about enhanced interrogation techniques. John Rizzo was the chief lawyer for the CIA. He said he wrote a book called Company Man because they refer to the CIA as the company. And he said when he was watching the church committee hearings, you know, showing how

the CIA and the NSA had been spying on Americans without a warrant. So they said, oh, we'll stop that. We will come up with a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. We'll create a FISA court, all the rest of this stuff. No, they should have disbanded these organizations that were rogue and criminals. One of the things we should learn about the FBI right now. Conservatives understand how corrupt they've been, how politicized they've been. There isn't any room to reform them. There wasn't any room for them in the Constitution.

Get rid of them now because they're just going to keep coming back. As a matter of fact, we saw how the FISA Act that was supposed to restrain them from what they'd been doing from their inceptions, spying on Americans without a warrant, they actually used the FISA Act to spy on Americans and politicians without a warrant. That's what the FBI was using. That's what the CIA was using. And so John Rizzo watched those hearings. He was a lawyer.

He said to myself, the CIA needs a good lawyer. I said, that's why he went to work. He went to work for them because he saw the abuses in the church committee hearings, Frank Church. Just amazing to look at these guys. I mean, they truly are. And you talk about all this torture stuff and everything and the pardons. Trump was offering $2 million pardons and John Kiriakou talked about that. He blew the whistle on the torture, went to jail for that. He is not ashamed to tell people the truth about this. As a matter of fact, you know, I've interviewed John several times, and every time we talk about it, he says, I'd do it again without even thinking about it. And yet, this week, that question was asked of an FBI whistleblower. Listen to this exchange in congressional testimony.

I've sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, even if that means sacrificing my life. I've lived that oath out since first enlisting in the Army, consistently saying, here am I, send me. My oath, however, did not include sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong, beautiful, and courageous wife, and our four sweet and beautiful daughters who have endured this process along with me. In weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to a new position halfway across the country.

They allowed us to sell my family's home. They ordered me to report to the new unit when our youngest daughter was two weeks old. Then, on my first day on the new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless. They refused to release our goods, including our clothes, for weeks. All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent. To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect the innocent. But I, for one, will never stop trying.

And I'll never forget my oath. Sorry, I couldn't, my foot switch got twisted around there i couldn't sorry um he was also asked after that uh what would you say to the whistleblowers and he said i would tell him not to do it he's saying that he would do it continue to do it but he would tell other people not to do it because of what it had cost him uh john um kiryaku uh said that he would do it again yeah it had a big effect on his family as well but you see people like um um rizzo who uh uh are dishing this stuff out. And he was proud of the fact, Rizzo, that he came up with the euphemism, enhanced interrogation techniques.

It's torture. It's torture. So the report notes that Zubaydah's drawings viscerally convey the brutal reality that the CIA sought to hide with its calculated destruction of video recordings of torture conducted by its agents. And who was it that led the coverup and destruction of the information? Gina Haspel, who became Trump, Trump picked to head up the CIA after that. She produced the lies of weapons about weapons of mass destruction that were used to start the Iraq war. Trump

acknowledges that those were lies. He talks about how bad it was. And yet the person who produced the lies and covered up the torture that produced the lies, he promoted the head of the CIA. It's just, you talk about Trump derangement syndrome, this cognitive dissonance of the MAGA cult to continue to support this guy. It's just beyond belief. Zubaydah was the first so-called high-value detainee to be tortured. They treated him as a human guinea pig. Previously unseen drawings show the various torture methods used by the CIA against Abu Zubaydah, including physical, sexual assault, waterboarding, and more. Everyone agrees they tortured the wrong guy.

They went ahead anyway so they could get permission to torture other people, one person told The Guardian. And, of course, John Kiriakou says the same thing as well. He said he was there when they arrested him. He was the first one to talk to him. And he said they got the wrong guy, but they just keep torturing him. Then Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, CIA Director George Tenet gave the green light for U.S. agents to torture Zubaira, even after learning that he was cooperating.

During one discussion on the matter, then Attorney General John Ashcroft reportedly remarked, why are we talking about this in the White House? Shh, don't talk about the White House. History will not judge this kindly, right? Let's talk about this quietly somewhere we can cover it up maybe. Zubaydah was subjected to interrupted drowning technique that we call waterboarding, 83 times. Rape under the pretext of rectal feeding, shackling and excruciating stress positions, sleep, sensory and food deprivation, confinement in small boxes, exposure to extreme temperatures, loud music, death threats, beatings, being slammed into walls, sexual and religious humiliation, and other abuses, as if that's not sufficient.

Most of the torture techniques were approved by the George W. Bush administration. The people, by the way, you know who pushed in the Patriot Act? I should concern you. It included waterboarding, deprivation, stress positions, the use of loud music, dogs, slamming into walls, solitary confinement, exposure to extreme temperatures. All of these things are illegal under both domestic and international law.

And so according to a 2005 report by the National Library of Medicine, a federal agency, based on reviews of military documents, 26 war on terror detainees died as a result of criminal homicide, although the paper did not say how many prisoners died on the battlefield or while in U.S. custody. It said prisoners died of torture at Asadadad, Bagram, Gardez in Afghanistan, and at Abu Garab, Camp Whitehorse, Basra, Mosul, Tikrit in Iraq, another identified facility.

Zubaydah has never been charged with any crime. He's never had a trial. This is your American government doing this. Think about it. He's been tortured for 23 years. Brutally tortured. Has never been charged. I mean, talk about civil asset forfeiture

and the outrage that that is. And, of course, people like Joe Biden being proud of his role in it, how it began initially. Well, we've got to step things up somehow and get money away from organized crime figures because they can afford the best lawyers. And so let's start with some confiscation stuff. But we'll have to have a conviction. Well, let's not have the conviction.

And then after a few years, they keep adding other things, but they still have some restrictions as to what they can confiscate. Then they remove all restrictions as to what they can confiscate. And now they're charging inanimate objects with being accessories to crime

and stealing whatever they wish and splitting it between local law enforcement and the federal government. Here's a guy, however, who's been tortured and never convicted, never even charged with a crime, but they torture him. This is the way that it goes when we allow our government to escape the rule of law. See, all the leftists will tell you democracy is the core value. It's not the core value. The law is the core value. The king in America is the Constitution.

When these people do as they wish, and what did we see for the last three years? Oh, we got an emergency here. We got a public health emergency. We'll do as we wish. There's no law to restrain us about anything. And every time that happens, you see unrestrained tyranny. Let's take a look at what the ADL did to the John Birch Society.

This is an article from Information Liberation. But it's actually a couple of interviews, an interview and a book review. The interview was about the book. It was George Washington University professor Matthew Dalek, who was doing a book on the Anti-Defamation League. And they gave him access, they said, to some of their historical data. And it showed that they'd set up a very extensive spying and operation on the John Burt Society, infiltration, the same type of stuff that you see the FBI doing. Maybe this is why the FBI likes him so much. They're kind of a, you know, private gun for hire for the FBI. And they were pointing the fingers at a lot of different organizations and calling them

terrorist organizations, just like the Southern Poverty Law Center. The FBI loved that. Oh, look, we've got an independent source out here that points the finger at somebody. So now we can label them as domestic terrorists, but it's not us, you know, calling them these other people agree with us, right? And we got two or three witnesses out there. We got the Southern Poverty Law Center. We got the ADL.

They're saying these people are hateful. They're racist. They're domestic terrorists. So we're justified in doing whatever we want to do to them. So they use them that way. It's a partnership. So the, let's just call them the defamation league, because that's right. That's what Elon Musk said.

And he's right. Uh, that's what they do. The defamation league ran an extensive multi-dimensional counterintelligence operation. That's what the person who investigated it said complete with undercover agents with code names in order to destroy the John Birch society. And these are internal ADL documents. And so this guy, Matthew Dalek, is a George Washington University professor,

given access to these things. If you look at their tactics, you look at their goals, you look at what they hate, these people are Marxist. It is the Marxist Defamation League. They use the anti-Semitism charge. They use that to shield themselves. But they act like Stalin. They act like the KGB. They act like the totalitarian communists.

The book was called Birchers, How the John Birch Society Radicalized the American Right. And so there's an interview in this article, an interview that he did with a Jewish newspaper, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. And so they interviewed him about the book. And so they said, before we get to the Jewish aspect of the book, meaning the chapter on the Anti-Defamation League's relationship with

the John Birch Society, let's take a step back. Who are the so-called Birchers and why do they matter? They said, well, at its heyday, it had 60,000 to 100,000 members organized into small chapters. They sent out literature trying to give members roadmaps or ideas of what they could do. And, you know, I've had, I read the New American online. I've had many, many interviews with the New American people. The John Birch Society sends me their magazine on a regular basis. I look at their stuff all the time. I agree with them.

And I've never seen anything that is racist or calls for violence from them. None whatsoever. All of this is a lie. All of it is defamation. They sent out literature trying to give members roadmaps or ideas of what they could do. Yeah, telling people, hey, here's what's happening in your area, in your state, in your community, whatever. This is what you need to do. Write letters and organize and educate people as to what is going on.

It's an education and a citizen involvement movement. They try to portray them as a terrorist organization. The terrorist organization is the ADL and the FBI. They're the terrorists. They believe that the mass education of the public was needed because their traditional two-party politics is not going to be effective at exposing the communist threat. They would form front groups such as Impeach Earl Warren or Support Your Local Police. That's what I remember about the John Birch Society years and years ago.

They were very concerned about the centralization of law enforcement, federalization of policing. History, 60 years of history, has shown how far ahead of the curve they were. Yeah, prophetic, really. They tried to ban certain books. They saw pushing socialism in schools. way before there was CRT and they went open about it some birchers ran for school board seats and they protested at libraries see they were doing the stuff that some people are doing today 60 plus years ago

and they understood the threat at that point in time. Way ahead of the curve. The Nation magazine wrote that Birchers essentially had given their followers an invitation to engage in civil war guerrilla stuff. Why did they do that? Why would they say that? Well, because the John Birch Society would talk about the Second Amendment and they point out that the Second Amendment is about a check on government power.

It doesn't have to be used, right? Just as one person was talking about mutual assured destruction, and they said, well, we've got to really be worried. One person said, we've got to really be worried about nuclear weapons. The person said, well, they are being used right now. What? Oh, yeah, nuclear weapons are being used right now as a deterrent. You see, the Second Amendment and individual ownership of firearms are being used against

our government right now as we speak. As a deterrent. Because if the federal government wants to go around like eric swalwell and beto o'rourke and joe biden boasted in the last election cycle that they had a military and they could go around take the guns from anybody that they wanted to well um if they were to do something like that it'd be like launching nuclear weapons against the country. If they want to completely destroy this country, that's what they would do. But hopefully, cooler heads will prevail. And the Second Amendment is there as a deterrent to that type of thing,

without a shot being fired. As you were researching, you came across a trove of historical internal documents from the ADL and the archives of the American Jewish Historical Society in New york why did you devote a chapter to what you found in those documents what did those files reveal to you about the john burt society and the author said well these papers are a goldmine they're incredible and often detailed window and to the far right particularly the john burt society they show the adl had an extensive multidimensional counterintelligence operation that they were running against the Birch Society. They had undercover agents with code names who were able to infiltrate the

society's headquarters in Belmont, Massachusetts. They dug up financial and employment information about individual Birchers. And they also fed information to the media. Wow. Pretty extensive, huh? So who's the bad guys? Is it the guys who are talking about the Constitution? The fact that we need to keep law enforcement local?

Keep it with an elected sheriff? Don't centrally control it? Federalize it? Let's support the Constitution? We want you to be active, get involved in your school board, write letters to your congressmen. Those were the bad guys, right? Not the guys who are running this private spy operation

trying to destroy the lives of people, slanting the information. As a matter of fact, they had people who joined the John Birch Society and would make inflammatory racial remarks and other things like that, trying to bait them into stuff like this. And I'm sure they would release that and say, see, this is a Bircher who's doing this stuff. Same stuff we're seeing with January the 6th. Same stuff we see the feds doing all the time. So what exactly is the relationship of the ADL to the FBI and the feds?

Yeah, two sides of the same coin, quite frankly. They love each other. James Comey declared his love for the ADL in 2014 and again later. Some critics of the ADL today, said the paper who was interviewing him, say the organization has strayed away from its mission of focusing not just on anti-Semitism, but on a wider array of causes. But from reading your work, it sounds like the ADL even then took an expansive view of its role. Why did the ADL devote so many resources to a group like the John Birch Society? Well, because the ADL is not about anti-Semitism.

They use it as a shield. They use it as a beard. They use it to shield themselves just like they shield George Soros for what he's doing. Oh, well, don't criticize him if you do. You're anti-semitic they are not against they're not anti-racism they're racist themselves they're marxists and they are simply marxists who are using that as a beard is adore zach who helped to lead the spy operation at one point wrote to his colleagues colleagues that it was only in a democracy that the Jewish community had been allowed to flourish. And so if you want to defend Jewish Americans, you have to defend democracy.

We don't have a democracy in America. We have a Republic. We have the rule of law. And if you're going to have a mob control everything, you're going to wind up having the same types of results that we saw in the French revolution, the Russian revolution, the communist revolution, and the revolution that these communists running the ADL would like to have. So there's certainly other threats at the time, but the Birch Society was seen by liberal

critics as a very secretive group that promoted conspiracy theories about communists who often became conflated with Jews. So these people are communists who conflate themselves with just what I said about George Soros. It's like George Soros is this corruptible individual. Why would you conflate yourself with him? Well, so that they can shield him with the charges of racism. And that's what they did. They were communists who conflated themselves as Jews

and used the charge of racism against anybody that they hated. Don't we see that everywhere today? You see? You see how right the Birchers were? And do you see how the adl has and these types of marxist tactics have completely infiltrated our institutions everywhere today would you consider the adl successful in his campaign against the birchers they were successful they used surreptitious and in some cases underhanded means this is the guy who approves of them. But it's okay. You can use

dirty tricks, underhanded means. You can be dishonest about this as long as you win, right? And we see that with a lot of Republicans. That's the whole Donald Trump thing. Yeah, do whatever it takes to win. We'll do evil. So someday

maybe we can do good, right? So the ADL was the tip of the spear of a liberal coalition that included the White House, the Department of Justice, Americans for Democratic Action, the NAACP, labor unions, the union-backed group research, and so forth. See, some of the names have changed, but it's not really any different today, is it? Same coalition. White House, Department of Justice, have changed, but it's not really any different today, is it?

Same coalition. White House, Department of Justice, the rest of this stuff. The ADL was one of the most, if not the most effective at constraining and discrediting the society. You know who else was a big opponent of the John Birch Society? William F. Buckley. He really set himself up to oppose the John Birch Society. William F. Buckley, the CIA guy. He worked for the CIA. He had a program on PBS. Oh, a real rock-ribbed conservative, was he? Really, you think? The Birchers' ideas, however, never died. They lived and made a comeback.

No, what has happened is people have seen that the Birchers have been right for 60 years. Everything they said is now out in the open. There's absolutely no question about it. They've come back because what they were saying is true. It's somewhat ironic, said the magazine to him, that you reveal the existence of this spying apparatus devoted to targeting an extremist anti-Semitic group in the 1960s. Given the infamy, the ADL would earn in a later era, the 1990s, for allegations.

This is the first time he's used the term allegations. You notice that? Oh, everything that they say derogatory about the John Birch Society. Oh, that's for sure. But then when he criticizes things that the ADL did, oh, allegations about that. Allegations that the ADL colluded with police agencies

in San Francisco to spy on and harass leftist activists, you see. The ADL is just an adjunct to a corrupt so-called Department of Justice. They eventually settled with Arab American, black, and American Indian groups that brought

a federal civil suit against the ADL. He said, I know you didn't study these revelations, which are outside the scope of your book, but could you perhaps reflect on why undercover tactics were seen as necessary or justified oh well it's justified because it's our side right law enforcement of the u.s he said was led by anti-semites or people who are much more concerned with alleged internal communist threats the threat from the left and so they felt that it was justified to do this there is a sense in which this work had to be done, at least outside the parameters of the government. Again, you see that the left

puts the label of racism on everybody at the same time that they're doing everything they can to create a race war because they see everything and couch everything in terms of racism whether or not it is it is a projection of what they are he says i know they they were doing a lot of spying but you know they meant really well um they expose a lot of scary things like easy access to firearms you see there it is easy access to farms uh hatred of the government if you distrust the government that's hatred if you have access to farms hatred of the government if you distrust the government that's hatred if you have access to firearms you are a danger right you're a dangerous person you're a violent person by definition so that's the basis of all this stuff again the adl set the standard and set the template for the marxists of today accusing their enemies of racism, anti-Semitism in that particular case.

But now everything is, you know, you're racist, racist. I don't even need to talk to you. When in fact, they call everybody racist when in fact the ADL and the Marxists, people like the Weather Underground, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dorn, they were consciously setting up a race war because class warfare had not worked in the United States like it had worked in Europe. So they made it about race.

And so while they're calling everybody racist, they're doing everything they can to start a race war. They're concerned about people owning firearms because they understand, like Mao did, that power comes out of the barrel of a gun and they want to have all power. So that means that the ordinary people should have no guns. And if they have guns, you denigrate them as extremist, violent, dangerous, so forth. And so he goes on to say, anti-Semitism is on the rise, and the ADL's budget has almost doubled over the past seven years.

This is why they see racists under every rock. That's why they point every person that they target. They call them a racist. They are projecting their values. They're a racist hate group themselves. That is their raison d'etre. That is how they grow by a factor, you know, double in seven years by doing that type of thing. If you go back and you look at Trump's closing 2016 campaign ad, it's textbook anti-Semitism, they said.

He shows wealthy Jewish international bankers. The Jewish stuff is irrelevant, in my opinion. They're international bankers. Look at Klaus Schwab. Is he Jewish? But, you know, they don't ever pull that back. Instead, you know, they say, well, you know, all this talk about globalism, that's just anti-Semitism.

Against a guy who is a literal Nazi? His father and these other people? It's just a beard. There's a conspiracy of these global elites who are stealing the wealth of honest Americans, they said. Well, this is textbook stuff, they said. So they said there's importance of having institutional guardrails. And what they mean by that, he says, for example, the Department of Justice prosecuting 1,000 January the 6th insurrectionists. Fully on board with that.

In another review of this book, City Journal, this is also in the Information Liberation article, says he notes how the so-called Birch Watchers tried to bait JBS leaders by issuing racist statements in their presence. How they even, quote, posed as disgruntled birchers to infiltrate white supremacist groups to assess the society's existing ties to them. In addition, the FBI and the press received reports that compiled the most unflattering material

that the targets of such operations sometimes found their careers in jeopardy. All the stuff we're seeing today. Oh, you said something hateful on social media. We're going to get you canceled. We're going to get you fired from your jobs. It's all the same Marxist tactics. They obtained chapter member lists.

They ran credit reports on individual birchers. They ferreted out their employment records. They traced their financial transactions. They wrote down their license plate numbers. They obtained a codicil to a bircher donor's will. They stumped them with tough questions during call-in radio shows. They set up a birch chapter meeting on false pretenses so the ADL target could be interviewed, quote-unquote, and they studied their personal and professional associations. Some of the scariest and most unflattering bits ended up in the press, which is why they're rightfully called the Defamation League. Underhanded, criminal, what they're doing.

If not criminal, should be. Immoral. One suspects that some of the scariest or most unflattering bits did not enter into this book. Dalek's book. Says Chris Minahan. I'm sorry, this is the other review. He notes in his acknowledgements that the

ADL kindly allowed me to review some of the historical records in its archives. Some of the historical records? Maybe there's more stuff. That's even worse than this. All these years later, the ADL has basically merged with the FBI. Together, they're using the same Stasi-like tactics to suppress the rights as

information liberation. FBI Director Comey, in 2014, delivered a speech in which he described as a love letter to the adl and in 2017 he told the adl ceo jonathan greenblatt during another speech three years later i can say from the perspective of the fbi that we are still in love with you again they love it's a partnership a public private partnership for tyranny. You have fought against anti-Muslim prejudice and cyberbullying. You have stood up for LGBT and gender equality, said Comey. You have pushed and prodded for hate crime legislation.

The people who hate everybody push for hate crime legislation. The people who use racism charges level that against everybody and use it as a shield. They project, they defame. You know, they smeared me back in early April 2020. Tried to. I took it as a compliment at the time, and I'm glad that they did it because now it is on record that I said

at the end of March, as soon as this stuff happened, I said, there is no pandemic. This is medical martial law. And they go rent snooping out that stuff, sending it to the press. And it was reported in some of these left-wing magazines. So thank you very much. I appreciate it. You have shown that I was right in 2020.

You have shown that the job Birchers were right in 1960. And you have shown yourself for what you truly are, the despicable Marxists. We've got one more report here before we take a break. David Daleiden, who is going through an amazing ordeal. He's asked the Supreme Court, as lawyers have, to reverse a decision against him for exposing the abortion industry. Literal murder for hire.

And the real attack is on the First Amendment as well as life. Thomas More Society attorneys have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case of undercover journalist David Daleiden, whose 30-month investigation generated videos and evidence that spurred congressional hearings, criminal referrals, policy and law changes, along with vigorous national debate on the buying and the selling of baby body parts. And so the Thomas More Society is seeking a reversal of lower court decisions

that are permanently prohibiting Daleiden from publishing videos that he took of National Abortion Federation trade shows. These are trade shows attended by the public. Big open thing. No, you can't show any of that stuff. They put a gag order on them in violation of the First Amendment. So they want the Supreme Court to get involved. But anyway, the court prohibited these videos from being shown and put a civil judgment against him of $6 million.

So they've hidden the videos that they don't want you to see about Murder for Hire and hit him with $6 million. And the National Abortion Federation sued him in 2015. The district court entered, and the Court of Appeals affirmed a sweeping permanent injunction against the release of any of the over 500 hours of recording at the NAF conference without applying any level of First Amendment scrutiny. And again, I go back to Fox News firing Matt Drudge because he showed that pro-life video of the little hand grabbing the pinky of the surgeon. They don't want you to see the truth.

It's very simple. The truth is very simple. They will do anything to hide the truth. But's very simple. The truth is very simple. They will do anything to hide the truth. But it doesn't just stop there. He is also facing criminal charges from the state of California. So they hit him with $6 million. They cover the information up,

and there's still an ongoing criminal investigation, and he's not allowed in his defense to show the videos to defend himself. As a matter of fact, he was saying the reason I did this investigation was because there's already talking correct congressional hearings about how this was being done. There was concerns that this was being done. So he set out as an investigative journalist to show that it was being done

and then they've gagged at all. And of course, guess what? The people buying it were the NIH. Thomas More Society explained how the lower courts ran roughshod over his First Amendment rights, made it impermissible value judgments against his videos, claimed that there was minimal public interest. Really? Really? Why are you so adamant about covering them up? They said the First Amendment prohibits courts from stopping journalists from publishing their work. Courts were quick to denigrate Daleiden's videos and speech and to silence him on an issue that is of supreme public importance. The American people have a right to all of the relevant information on an issue, not just what certain judges think they should see and hear. These are not private videos.

They're videos of an 800-person abortion trade show. Daleiden was invited to attend that. videos of an 800-person abortion trade show. Wow. Daleiden was invited to attend that. David Daleiden is one of the most notable undercover journalists of our time, reporting on one of the most contentious political issues of our day, abortion. If the high-profile work of someone like David Statcher can be banned, no undercover journalist is safe from the risk of ruinous financial sanctions and never-ending lawsuits.

The Supreme Court must step in to save undercover journalism. Where are the politicians in the GOP supporting David Daleiden? They're running away from abortion as fast as they can. Let's not be too extreme. That's too harsh, says Trump, all the rest of this stuff. When Roe v. Wade disappeared, they ran for the hills. They ran to scrub their websites, and none of them are standing with David Daleiden. If you, just from a political standpoint, since Lala Harris was the first one of these California attorney generals to

come after him, wouldn't you do it for the political capital that you could make out of this by showing what a criminal she is? Because it is criminal what they are doing to him. Why wouldn't you do this and get this work with him to get this information put out? As I've said before, when Karen was working for a pro-life pregnancy counseling thing,

I said what they need to do is they need to get all their money in. This is back in the 1980s. I said they need to put their money into ultrasound and visual stuff so people could see what's going on. Well, you need to be able to see what's going on with your own government doing murder for hire so they can do these Frankenstein transhumanist mice and other things like that. The Fauci and the NIH are pushing. We need to be able to see this stuff.

Where are the Republican politicians supporting David Daleiden? Where are they demanding to see what the public needs to know that is relevant to this debate? They're just like Fox News, covering it up. I'm so sick and tired of the lies and the hypocrisy. And then Tucker Carlson covers himself by saying, you know, they're lying to you. Yeah, we know that. And you know it too. And you did it as well. It's just amazing to me. It's amazing. The American people deserve to see and hear what the abortion providers of this country are willing to say and do to skirt and to even violate the law. We are asking the high court to rectify this situation, to restore respect for the First Amendment, and to vindicate David Daleiden. The petition states that Daleiden should be allowed to freely introduce

the court-banned video footage in his defense to pending criminal charges against him, instigated by Lala Harris and Javier Becerra at the behest of NAF and Planned Parenthood. The injunction has already inflicted irreparable harm by forbidding Daleiden from proving his innocence to the public. He can't even use this stuff to defend himself against Lala Harris's baseless persecution.

Just amazing to me to see how the Republicans run away from this stuff. We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show welcome back we have uh diane feinstein is in very bad shape, uh, but it's not just the corruption of her body, uh, that happens to all of us. And I think in her particular case, I think she may be vaccine injured. I mean, it's looking like they say, well, it's shingles and so forth. Uh, that has been a very common, uh, injury from vaccines, but especially from COVID-19. She's got facial paralysis. She can't walk anymore. She was gone for quite some time. But let's take a look at

what she did when she still had her full faculties. Cheating in broad daylight. Aaron Rogers and David Bakhtiari, I i guess i think they are a couple of football players maybe i don't know um aaron rogers i know he is i don't know who the other guy is anyway uh they're upset over a claim that diane feinstein used unusual trades to build massive wealth responded to a tweet from an account, Unusual Whales, which posted information that they claim shows that Feinstein used unusual trades to build a net worth of over $200 million. Very much like Nancy Pelosi.

It's very interesting. You know, the whole thing about Pelosi and Paul Pelosi making so much money, Nancy Pelosi, insider trading. She was a poster child for all that stuff. And Pelosi is very, very close to Feinstein. I mean, they're in San Francisco and that type of thing, even to the extent that Pelosi wants Adam Schiff to replace her in the Senate. And if she were to step down now, Gavin Newsom says that he would replace her

with a woman. So, you know, Adam Schiff is not quite there yet. You know, he's going to start stealing suitcases and do the whole San Britain thing, but, uh, you know, Adam Schiff close, but not quite a woman. So he would not get the, uh, uh the tap on the shoulder to do that. Nancy Pelosi, however, wants him there, so she wants to keep Dianne Feinstein there as much as she can. She's got her daughter basically as the personal assistant of Dianne Feinstein to keep her going or maybe to keep the illusion going that Feinstein is capable of doing the job, even as people have said

to her, you know, talked to her about her absence. Oh, I wasn't gone. I was working the entire time. You mean from home? No, I was here. You know, she doesn't know anything that's going on. And so Pelosi is shielding her from that. Pelosi has her daughter there running Dianne Feinstein because she wants Adam Schiff in there.

But when you look at this insider trading thing, isn't it interesting that Dianne Feinstein is right there with the insider trading as well? I think it's also interesting that Matt Gaetz and AOC, Occasional Cortex, that's why I call her Occasional Cortex. Sometimes she gets it right. The two of them came out and said, we've got to stop this insider trading stuff. I said, look, we disagree on pretty much everything, but we're not crooks. The rest of them are really, uh, I don't know if AOC is a crook or Gates is a crook, but they're not a crook when it comes to the, uh, insider trading aspect of this. And so, um, you know, Feinstein has now a net worth of $200 million. And she got all of that from stock trades and other things like that. You know, while this type of stuff is happening,

Thomas Massey is trying yet again to, um, help the small people, right? These legislators who are doing insider trading and all the rest of us making hundreds of millions of dollars. And yet Thomas Massey says, I've introduced a bill, uh, HR 3206, a senior citizens tax elimination act. This bill will assist middle-class seniors by eliminating the unjust double taxation on social security benefits. And so, you know, this is the situation where they want to tax you on social security money that you're already taxed on and you were forced to put into the social security system.

And then we take it out, they tax you on it again. Before 1984, social security benefits were exempt from the federal income tax. Congress then enacted legislation to tax a portion of these benefits with a share gradually increasing as a person's income rose past a specific income threshold. Although seniors have already paid tax on their social security contributions via the payroll tax, they're still required to list these benefits as taxable income on their tax returns, said Representative Massey. So while they make hundreds of millions of dollars on insider trading, they double tax you and hit you in retirement. And again, the question is, since these Democrats don't think that the deficit matters, that we've got the modern monetary theory,

we can spend as much money as we want, doesn't really matter. Why do we even have a tax? Well, it's because they want to keep you dependent on them. The cost of living for seniors is rising, he said. This will bring immediate relief, said one person who signed on to it, Representative Alex Mooney from West Virginia.

Representative Daniel Webster, a Republican from Florida, said for decades, seniors have paid into Social Security with their tax dollars. Now, when many seniors are on a fixed income, struggling financially, they're being double taxed because of income taxes on their Social Security benefits. This is wrong. I'm pleased to once again co-sponsor this legislation to repeal this tax. This isn't the first time it's been done. It's been done over and over and over again.

And the people like Dianne Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi, who become nearly billionaires with their insider trading, don't want this to happen. They're going to come after you for your small Social Security stuff and tax it. And of course, it's not just Social Security. It's also railroad retirement benefits. It's just the larger issue there. Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act was originally introduced in 2003 by Ron Paul. That's why I say the real successor to Ron Paul is not Rand, unfortunately. It's Thomas Massey.

Thomas Massey. Representative Massey has introduced this bill in every Congress since he has taken office in 2012. The real successor to Ron Paul. But there was an interesting article. That was really about the 10th Amendment. And I think it's worth taking a look at. It's from Chuck Norris.

And by the way, comment from Rumble. I should have mentioned this. The original Karen says Ron DeSantis was stationed at Gitmo. He was in on it. And there's been some testimony. I didn't talk about that. There's been some testimony of some of the prisoners who were there as they're talking about the torture stuff and everything. One of them said, I saw that guy.

He said, I can't forget his face. I remember when he was standing there and I was being tortured. He was talking to some other military personnel. And he said, laughing as I was being tortured. Remember that. Thank you for reminding me. I should have talked about that. Chuck Norris.

When 125 feds ran the whole country, well, that's not a good title. I should say they ran the whole government the entire government had 125 people and he does understand that's the difference it's a bad title uh chuck norris had this is on wnd.com he says on may 15th 1800 then president john adams the second president ordered the federal government to pack up and leave Philadelphia to go to its new location in the new capital, Washington, D.C. History.com reported that even the transition and the move of the entire federal government was relatively easy, remarkably fast.

After Congress adjourned its last meeting in Philadelphia on May 15th, Adams told his cabinet to make sure that Congress and all federal offices were up and running smoothly in their new headquarters by June 15th, one month. Philadelphia officially ceased to serve as a nation's capital as of June 11th, 1800. Can you imagine an entire federal government moving 150 miles away without modern trucks and equipment and being up and running smoothly. One month later, moreover, official documents and archives are transferred from Philadelphia to the new

Capitol by ship over inland waterways. I guess they didn't wind up with any of them in Biden's garage either. No, made it to the destination. Most will find this next fact fascinating. At the time in 1800, there were only about 125 federal employees. Today, 223 short years later, the federal workforce is composed of an estimated 2.1 million civilian workers.

Think about only 125 federal employees in the year 1800, 24 years after declaring independence from England, 13 years after the U.S. Constitution had been written and ratified. There were only 5.3 million people in the U.S., but if you extrapolate that out to now a population that's gone from 5 million people to 331 million people if we had the same ratio of federal employees to citizens that would mean that we would only have 7 750 federal employees in government instead of 2.1 million that's the bloating that's there and of course if we had put the 10th amendment in practice, what he doesn't say, which I think is interesting, this is John Adams in 1800, the second president, moved the entire government, 125 employees. Now Jefferson was the one who seceded him, and Adams did grow the government.

But how much did he grow it i mean if it was 125 uh you know while he's there um and so when jefferson got in he started cutting as he said useless offices with just 100 200 people he thought it was bloated. Jefferson did. And he said at his inauguration of his second term, he said, I've eliminated all internal taxes by shutting down all these useless offices. He said, so that no farmer, no laborer, no mechanic knows a tax man. All of the taxes were collected at the border. There was no internal taxation. And of course, the globalists want to make sure there's no taxes at the borders, and they are the ones who turned the machinery in on us, and they're still escalating it.

But again, Chuck Norris understands what's going on here with this and uh but i just think it's amazing to think that as small as it was thomas jefferson saw it as bloated because he understood the constitution norris says particularly apropos here is the 10th amendment which is also part of our bill of rights and it was ratified in 1791 the powers not delegated to the u.s by the Constitution or prohibited to it by the states are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people. So he says, so how did we get past this? And I've always wondered that as well. I mean, of course, we just, you know, ignore it now. I talk about it typically when I talk about prohibition and how the entire country agreed

when they did the 18th Amendment to prohibit alcohol, they agreed that, well, the federal government doesn't have the power to prohibit alcohol, so we've got to add that power as a constitutional amendment. And then they removed it with the 21st Amendment. That's a lot of problem to go through. But they had respect for the Constitution much more than we do today. Not 100%, but much more than we do today. Today we don't care.

We just invent explanations. And he points out that the Supreme Court in 1941, he said the progressives will say the 10th Amendment doesn't apply. And they'll quote the Supreme Court in 1941. The Supreme Court said the amendment, it's a U.S. versus Darby. The amendment states only a truism, that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than a declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution.

That's an absolute lie. What they're saying is it's just a truism. It's like, well, if they don't have it, they don't have it. No, it was not descriptive. It was not to describe what the situation was. It was to proscribe the federal government from bringing in power to itself that it did not have. And that was the real purpose of the 10th Amendment. We know that from history. We know that from their writings. We know that it was to prohibit,

clearly to prohibit it from what they're doing now. So Chuck Norris says, so returning to 1791, the year the 10th Amendment was ratified, Thomas Jefferson said, I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground, that all powers not delegated to the U.S. by the Constitution nor prohibited to it by the states are reserved to the states or to the people, 10th Amendment.

He said the foundation of the Constitution was the 10th Amendment, you see, and quoted it explicitly. He said to take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specifically drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition. Norris says Jefferson's concern against the overreaching bloated federal government was representative of most of the framers. This is why the 10th Amendment exists. A decade later, during his presidency in 1802, again, you know, that was 1800 that they moved the government and had 125 people. And he takes office two years later. How much could they have grown

the government in just two years from 125 people? And he said it was bloated. And he was able to reduce the bloat of the Adams administration and get rid of internal taxation. So in 1802, Jefferson still shared his earlier passion to inhibit an overreaching federal government. He said, I was in Europe when the Constitution was planned, and I never saw it until after it was established. Upon receiving it, I wrote strongly to Mr. Madison, urging the want of provision for an express reservation to the states of all rights not specifically granted to the Union. So he was concerned, and others were concerned, maybe the Anti-Federalists were concerned, that there were clauses there that were going to be used, and so were concerned, maybe anti-federalists were concerned, that there were clauses there that were going to be used. And so we've seen those.

Oh, well, the Commerce Clause means that we control all commerce. No, what it meant was that you weren't going to have states set up arbitrary trade obstacles in interstate commerce. But no, they say that gives us power over all commerce. But no, they say that gives us power over all commerce. So they use it for power instead of using it to prohibit restrictions of commerce. They use it to control commerce. And on and on. The General Welfare Clause, you hear that all the time, or the Supremacy Clause, or what. They saw these flaws, and so he contacted Madison, and Madison wrote, you know, put together the Bill of Rights, and they got that in. Chuck Norris says, we unfortunately live in an age of the nanny state

in which far too many Americans expect the feds to solve their personal problems. This is why I said, yeah, let's not federalize the abortion issue. We got it out of the feds' hands. Let's not put it right back in. We don't want the federal government in spite of all the abuses of this transgender thing we don't want the federal government defining what a woman is because you know that just as they did with marriage they will redefine what a woman is and they'll do it the wrong way and it won't take them but a few years to do it we don't want to have everything solved in washington that's why the 10th amendment is so important jefferson was speaking directly to washington today just a few years before his death

when he wrote the following words at roughly 80 years of age in 1823 to supreme court judge william johnson and um he said um imagine this is chuck Chuck Norris, imagine Jefferson sitting there, a ripe old age, a wise sage, in the very middle seat between all Democrats and Republicans. He listens to all the proceedings without uttering a word. And then, right near the end, he respectfully calls on the president and others gathered and politely and sternly utters these words. That's his imagination. If only he could say this today in a joint session of Congress.

Yeah, like the Hall of Presidents or something, right? Stands up. The states supposed, and this is what he actually wrote to Justice. The states supposed that by their 10th Amendment they had secured themselves against constructive powers. They have not learned from the past, nor are they aware of the slipperiness of the eels of the law. I ask for no straining of words against the general government, nor yet against the states. I believe the states can best govern our home concerns, and the general government are foreign

ones. I wish, therefore, to see maintained the wholesome distribution of powers established by the Constitution for limitation of both and never to see all offices transferred to Washington, which is what everybody wants. The Democrats want it. Now the Republicans want it. Everything must be there. We even want them to define marriage and what a woman is for us.

It's absolutely pathetic. Tell us, when does life begin? When and by what means can we kill babies? Please tell us. Further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold as at market.

Which is what we see, being bought and sold, at market. Which is what we see being bought and sold. The Biden administration. The corruption of the Biden family. You talk about being bought and sold in secret. Just last week, Comer and other top Republicans laid out evidence of a vast network of Biden family dealings. $10 million in payments from foreign nationals, a network of shell corporations.

I've talked about this. 20 LLCs while Joe Biden was vice president, at least 15 of them after he became vice president. These LLCs accepted payments ranging from $5,000 to $3 million. The committee would like to know, what legitimate business was the Biden family in? Yeah, all of us would like to know that. We'll be right back. me so Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move And now, The David Knight Show I want to talk about what is going on with artificial intelligence

and when Gerald Slenty joins us, I think he wants to talk about that as well. Even before all the things that happened, you know, in going on now in Bilderberg, as well as what was happening at the end of last week, this cover is about artificial intelligence. That's the focus of this month's or this week's Trends Journal. But before we do, and before we get into what is going on with artificial intelligence, world coin, Bilderberg, the rest of this stuff, I want to, um, uh, just, uh, ask you again, if you like the program, please click a like button wherever you're watching it. That helps to boost the program. And, um, we look at, um, rumble.

I've had, uh, some people say, Hey, there's a, uh, there's a creator revenue sharing. And yes, there is. We looked into this. And as they set up the, you can get a badge if you are, if you, you know, pledge support to a monthly support to a particular program. Through the end of 2023, 100% of the revenue from monthly subscription badges on Rumble, those are $5 per month. And there are no fees with that. So 100% of that goes through to us. So just to let you know, the new subscription badges award users with a special badge for live chat.

And we do put the show up live on Rumble. In the near future, it will also turn off advertisements for subscribers on content by the creators that they support. So, again, that is something that helps us. They've put that up there through the end of 2023. Other ways that you can support us. Again, DavidKnight.Gold takes you to Tony Arderman. Arderman has been a big supporter of this program. We really do appreciate everything that Tony does.

And Wise Wolf Gold is where it takes you. And you can start making some preparations for your own. And of course, Gerald Salenti will be joining us at the top of the hour. And he's kindly put up a code. If you want to subscribe to Trends Journal, you can save 10% off the price of Trends Journal if you use the code KNIGHT. And Gerald has always supported us as well in many different ways. I'm very happy to give you that information and to tell you about what

they provide because I think Tony does a great job. He's got great prices. He's an honest guy. And Gerald Salenti is honest in his information and comprehensive in it as well with trends journal. Let's take a look at Bilderberg. And, uh, at the top of the agenda at a secretive meeting of Bilderberg is AI. But of course, you know, AI is there from an alphabetical standpoint. The key thing is, uh, Sam Altman, who was there last year as well as back. Uh, so as Henry Kissinger and, uh, uh, we're not missing you this year. Ken Kissinger is there next year.

Probably be a big, big party for him. He'll turn a hundred years old. Uh, so I think that, uh, yes, they may be looking at artificial intelligence, but I think it's also the global crypto thing that Sam Altman is putting out. I talked about yesterday. The Iris scan, a world cryptocurrency tying in global ID to universal basic income that checks all the boxes for the World Economic Forum, Bilderberg, all the rest of these people. Google CEO Eric Schmidt is there. DeepMind head is there. Microsoft CEO is there. The head of CISA is there. And as they point out in Breitbart, they said CISA played a key role as a source of government pressure in the big tech censorship regime that harmed President Trump's chances in the 2020 election.

Well, that's funny. I remember Steve Pchenik saying that CISA was the ones who set up this blockchain watermark stuff on all the ballots to help Trump. Yeah, right. No artificial intelligence at this point, I think is really science fiction baloney. And I'm going to talk about why that is. There's an interesting article from a, an individual who worked for many years with self-driving cars. And of course, Brian shallavi has also talked about this.

He's said, you know, look, we've had three waves. This is the third wave of hype about artificial intelligence that we've had since the 1980s, I think was the first one. And I'd forgotten about those. I'd heard bits of hype about it, but I didn't realize how much money was put into them and then dissipated. And I guess you could say if you include self-driving cars and this article from Wired Magazine, Wired Magazine is always cheering big tech and global control and all the

rest of the stuff. And they're very skeptical about AI. And so they interviewed this woman who is a former fighter pilot, an engineering and robotics professor at George Mason University. And she used to work for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. She said, people don't understand how ridiculous this self-driving stuff is. It's just hype.

And so she poured cold water on all of this. But, you know, Wired Magazine says, well, you know, this is last week. We've had U.S. senators hearing alarming testimony about how AI is going to steal jobs, spread disinformation. And in the words of Sam Altman, it's going to go quite wrong, whatever that means right he and several lawmakers agreed that the u.s may now need a new federal agency to oversee the development of this technology so um he says uh interviewed missy cummings provider pilot engineer robotics professor she studies the use of ai and automation and safety critical systems such as cars and aircraft and earlier this year she went back to academia after a period of time

at the national highway traffic safety administration and what she had to say about it is very damning to this big hype and i think it's one of the reasons why they're having the congressional hearings why they're telling everybody AI is going to take over everything and it may cause, you know, maybe more dangerous than nuclear weapons and all the rest of this stuff. They were saying, yeah,

we got to have something like the FDA and we need to have something like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission because it's as dangerous as nuclear weapons. That's a lot of hype to build up what they're doing. It will have some uses. And of course, Microsoft and open AI want to make sure that they and Google, you know, they're,

they're together open AI and Microsoft, and their only competition is Google. They want to make sure nobody else gets in competition with them. It will be useful for some things. It's not going to be as powerful, as extensive as they say, I don don't believe and here's why cummings told me this week after she left the nhtsa with a sense of profound concern about these autonomous systems being deployed by car manufacturers she said we're in serious trouble in terms of the capabilities of these cars we've seen this over and over again We're talking about Tesla, which is out there first. You have even people like Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple, saying, I love my Tesla, but don't put it on autopilot. It's trying to kill you. Cummings says they're not even close to being as capable as people think they are.

As a matter of fact, most of these programs that are out there, the cruise program, so I've talked about before in San Francisco, they did their experimental program. At one point, all of the cars went to one intersection and stopped. And we've heard a lot of the same stuff from the self-driving autonomous car programs that we're hearing about AI. You know, they would tell us, well,, well, whenever one of these cars is driving, it's learning. And as it's learning, it's sharing that knowledge with all of the other cars. So it's a collective consciousness, a shared knowledge. And so they would multiply all the miles driven by all the cars

and total those up and say, you know, you as a human, you may have only driven, you know, 500,000 or a million miles in your lifetime, but these cars, they've done a hundred million miles. Well, then why are they all going to one intersection and stopping? Why can't they negotiate how to get across a four-way stop with human beings if they're so good? She said, I was struck when I looked at the autonomous stuff, I was struck with the parallels with chat GPT

and with similar chatbots that are stoking excitement and concern about the power of AI. Automated driving features have been around for much longer, but like large language models, they rely on machine learning algorithms. They're inherently unpredictable,

hard to inspect, and require a different kind of engineering thinking to that of the past. Also like ChatGPT, she said Tesla's autopilot and other autonomous driving projects have been elevated by absurd amounts of hype. Heady dreams of a transportation revolution led by automakers and startups. It led investors to pour huge sums into developing and deploying a technology that still has many unsolved problems.

And there was a permissive regulatory environment. Remember, she was in the, I call it NHTSA, the National Highway Traffic Safety traffic safety administration she was there the people who are supposed to be regulating them like you know the fda is supposed to regulate pfizer and she saw how they had been captured you know i mean uh when i think about this this myth that was sold by google you know where one of these cars goes they all go yeah it sounds just like q you know, where, where one of these cars goes, they all go. Yeah. It sounds just like QAnon, right?

Where we go one, we go all. It's another imaginary hype. Uh, just that's where the QAnon, uh, creeps got it from. Anyway,

after billions spent on the technology, self-driving cars are still beset by problems and some auto companies have pulled the plug. Cummings says the public is often unclear about how capable semi-autonomous technology is. She said chat can be remarkably good at answering questions and solving problems, even if they have significant shortcomings, including confidently fabricating facts. Yeah, there's that, you know, it's a big, big red flag. Isn't it? My worst fear, she said, is that we cause significant, I'm sorry. She didn't say that, but, uh, Sam Altman said my worst fear is that we

cause significant harm to the world. It is so dangerous. Protect me, protect me from myself. No, we need to protect him from the competition, and we need to incentivize this, is what he was saying. Fund him out of fear that he's putting into these senators who don't understand anything's happening. That's the whole point.

And I said, hey, the senators need to understand what this stuff is. Let's talk to somebody who's been using and looking at and there to regulate artificial intelligence for a long time and self-driving stuff. And I think and I hope that all this stuff is going to go the way of the self-driving cars. Cummings warns that there's a significant risk of regulatory capture if major AI and tech companies have too much influence over the direction the regulators take. She said, quote, I heard it said more than once inside NHTSA that they needed to proceed extremely cautiously because they didn't want to move markets. She said that's probably the best sign that regulatory capture has happened. Well, no, actually, if you look at the senators talking to Sam Altman, begging him for advice as to what he would like to do, how would you like to have this new agency that you want created

structured to keep your competition out? How would you like to be incentivized to do all this stuff? Because, you know, we've got to keep up with the Joneses. They've captured, there isn't a regulatory agency yet. They're talking about creating, he's captured the senators that are there. Some experts believe the latest AI systems may not only replace office workers and spew out disinformation, but they may also pose an existential risk if they get too clever and willful. However, Cummings, who has worked with these things, is more worried about the risk that once again we will put too much faith in the technology that isn't fully baked. People

everywhere are going to start writing code with generative tools. She said, there's going to be a whole career, uh, field for computer scientists just to root out bad code. I will have job security for life. So what she's saying is even though there's some things that it can do good, like writing code, it's also going to put a lot of bugs in just like it makes stuff up. Yeah. It's not going to be a hundred

percent accurate people who trust it. Uh, it's going to be AI is going to become a machine version of George Santos, you know, just making stuff up or, you know, you say Donald Trump, I mean, machine version of Trump or Santos. That's what we're looking at here. You know, the interesting thing about this as well, Brian Shulhavi has been very skeptical of this stuff, as I have been, but also concerned about the potential for deception and control and propaganda

and how it can be recklessly turnover stuff to it. And when you look at these autonomous killing machines, and even Peter Charest, who I talked to, for Battlegrounds and everything, and they were talking about how they could do a great job at dogfights and their simulations and stuff like that. But he said there's going to be pressure to turn over fire control to them because the other side will, if you don't. And so they'll be pressure to turn over fire control to them because the other side will if you don't.

And so they'll be able to react more quickly, and they'll kill your stuff. So there's that arms race aspect. So if we turn over the kill decisions to the machines, how do we get it back? And what does it do? And there's another parallel in all of that to the self-driving cars, right? You turn over the driving of your car and you got to keep both hands on the steering wheel, right? Why? Well, because if something happens and it doesn't know what's going on, it's going to turn control back over to you. Oh, well, I got to, you know, and you're not ready to take control of that thing. I mean, as we were, uh, we went to North Carolina this last week to see my,

um, 98 year old aunt who is doing better than Dianne Feinstein. Uh, she didn't get the jab. And, uh, so as we're driving back, we went past a car where a woman was in a Tesla and she was sitting there playing on her phone. It's like, let's get out of here. I don't trust that. Even though she trusts it, I don't trust it. If anything were to happen, she's not going to be able to get control. Same thing if they put weapons under the control of artificial intelligence. How do you get it back? And what if it makes the wrong decisions?

And so Brian Schilhavi, talking about this, said, when you look at all the hype that is coming out, and Goldman Sachs is really hyping this stuff. Goldman Sachs is saying, we're coming into a major, major recession, perhaps already in it. I don't see, and laying out the financial issues and all these different areas and say, the only place that it looks like you can make money right now is investing in artificial intelligence.

And Sam Altman and Google want to make sure that they're the only two out there. They want, regardless of whether they produce a product or not, you're going to have all this investment money, which is already happening, big hype about all this stuff, and the big gains that are coming. We would have a stock market that was way further down if it wasn't for all the hype and investment and artificial intelligence. But if that's just a scam, as we suspect,

and if it doesn't deliver any benefits as self-driving autonomous cars did not deliver on their promises, then what happens to the economy and the stock market when the thing that is propping it up goes belly up? That's going to be a real interesting development to see. Well, while we're waiting for Gerald, some of the participants participants in 2023 when you go through and you look at everything's in alphabetical order at the top of the list was Stacey Abrams well that's good news because

now I guess maybe we don't have to worry so much I mean she's a puppet that they're grooming right underneath her Sam Altman you have staff writers for staff writer for the Atlantic, Ann Applebaum, and of course if you look her up, you find out that she

is an unceasing propagandist for NATO and the Ukraine war. Albert Borla, CEO of Pfizer. You have the president of the World Economic Forum is there. A big military industrial complex like BASF is there. You have the director of CISA, Jen Esterly, the former head of British spy group GCHQ,

Chrystia Freeland. You know, this World Economic Forum babe who was confiscating the bank accounts of people when they protested the vaccine mandates that Trudeau had. Chrystia Freeland is at Bilderberg as well. You have these interlocking people, World Economic Forum and Bilderberg. The CEO of Merck, we already talked about the CEO of Pfizer. You have the Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines.

You have, in terms of artificial intelligence, the CEO of DeepMind, Alex Karp, who's become a fixture at Bilderberg for many years. He has Palantir, which is a big data mining company that works for the military industrial complex and also for law enforcement here. Very, very, very well, uh, they,

again, Palantir, they take the name from the Lord of the Rings and, uh, they use this data mining technology in the same way that Sauron used the little Palantir's crystal balls to communicate Henry Kissinger, of course, there again,

uh, uh, Henry Kravis of KK are in company, but no, uh, David Petraeus this year, of course, there again. Henry Kravis of KKR and Company, but no David Petraeus this year. He went with KKR, but he's not there this time. You see the editors-in-chief of Bloomberg and The Economist, the CEO of Microsoft, the Financial Times, of course, there as well. Mark Ruta, Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who is shutting down the farms.

He's there. You have Eric Schmidt, who now is Mr. Military Industrial Complex. Probably the person who has more influence than anybody else because of this move to artificial intelligence with the military industrial complex. Peter Thiel, that people say, well, wait a minute. He's a good guy, right? He supports Trump and he's a conservative. No, he's a transhumanist and he makes no bones about it. Goldman Sachs, CEO, all the usual suspects right there at Bilderberg.

And we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk to Gerald Slinty. Again, the cover of Trans Journal this week is about artificial intelligence and what they seek to do to us. We'll be right back. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move Music And now, The David Knight Show. Welcome back, and joining us now is Gerald Sente. Always a pleasure to have him. TrendsJournal at TrendsJournal.com.

Always ahead of the curve, and of course, he's right there on top of it right now with artificial intelligence, as that is the big topic at Bilderberg. It's been a big topic in the Senate last week. And I think it is joined hand in glove with this world coin thing. But I want to get Gerald's take on this. Thank you for joining us, Gerald. Thank you. And thank you for all that you do.

You know, I was listening to you about the Bilderbergs. I almost wasn't going to be able to make it today because I got to go over there. I'm going to be with the Bilderbergs. Yeah, it's just a friendly meeting. I've told the story to my audience this week, but I don't know if you know this, but when we went to the one in Copenhagen, we were real close. It's just a four-lane road between where the journalists were and where the hotel was. So we could see everything that was going on. Karen got a picture of Ed Balls, who was the shadow chancellor of the Exchequer,

showing up, and he didn't have his ID. And he's fumbling through his suitcase, and his suitcase contents spill out, and it's nothing but paperwork, Gerald. No clothes, no toothbrush, nothing. It's all paperwork. And so you know that it's just a friendly meeting, and it's all off the record, and Cham House rules and blah, blah, blah.

You know, but it's a lot of business is being discussed there for sure. Yeah. As George Carlin used to say, it's one big club and you ain't in it. That's right. And, you know, I have to, as you well know, you know, I was the first person to call RFK Jr. for president. And back in december and one of the things he's really coming out against is the bigs taking over everything and he even talked about climate change saying it's not climate change that they're working on it's the bill gates it's all the

billionaires doing what they want to do oh yeah and so he's really coming out against these uh maniacs that are in charge of our lives. And they are. They've taken control of the world. And as I say, all we are are plantation workers on the global plantation of slavelandia. And it's disgusting what's happened. And there's hardly any fight, you know, all this stuff about Tucker Carlson, the, um, and an article here, they called it here. By the way, talking about being on the slave plantation, I was talking earlier in the program about how in New York, uh, they're starting already tracking the meat consumption of people and limiting it right now it's through the public institutions they don't have a way to do it but once they get a you know some kind of digital currency that'll be their

mechanism to do it but they're gonna you know they're in the process now of making new york city a 15 minute city of controlling whether or not you know what you eat and how much you eat and all the rest of this stuff as part of the c40s agenda yeah again it's it it's it's we've lost our freedom. Yeah. You know, I want to mention this because the importance of people listening to your program and subscribing to the Trends Journal, because we don't do what anybody tells us to do.

We just speak for ourselves and the facts we put out. You know, I don't make up stuff. It's a magazine. I put the facts in there as they're being reported and then we give you our analysis and forecasts but this is a headline in yesterday wednesday's new york times without carlson at fox far right loses foothold in the mainstream. Huh? Again, whether you like Tucker Carlson, agree, disagree with him, not the issue.

Far right loses a foothold in the mainstream, which means it's not only far right. It's anybody that doesn't agree with the mainstream. How dare you? Yeah. We're talking one guy, one guy that's not repeating what 99.999999% of the prostitutes, the media wars that get paid to put out by their corporate pimps and government whoremasters repeat. One person. That's right. And it's news.

That's right. Yeah, everybody's got to say the same thing, eat the same thing. We can't have, got to drive the same thing, right? It's just like we saw with the pandemic. No, no, we can't have any other alternative forms of treatment. Ivermectin is horse medicine. You got to have the shot. We can't have any electric cars that are hydrogen or fuel

cell. You got to have the one that charges off of the grid. And oh, by the way, we're going to shut the grid down. That's what they're doing. You know, you got to have, there's one thing that they're going to push on you and you've got to say the same thing that everybody else says, or you get purged out. And that's the cover of our magazine. It's the chat GPT. We'll tell you what to think. Don't think for yourself. That's right. Yeah. I think that, you know, with all the stuff that we've seen over the last three years, this whole idea that we've got experts and we've got authorities, uh, that's been driven into the ground with people like Fauci and the rest of them, you know, Dr. Scarf and, uh, Redfield and all the rest of them. And so what are we going to do to have some kind of a believable authority?

Oh, well, chat GPT. And they're going around shopping this stuff around as if this is, you know, they're inventing some superhuman intelligence and we're all going to bow down and serve the machine. That is the thing that's really dangerous because I know a lot of people are going to fall for that. Of course they are. They've already done it.

You know, you look at, you look at, at you know i don't carry a cell phone and the reason i don't is because the research on it that shows how deadly they are not my research university of california berkeley university berkeley california rather if you're on it for 17 minutes a day for 10 years your chances of getting a brain tumor only increased by 60 percent yeah. But again, again, going back to everybody, they, this is how you walk down the street. This is how your life is.

That's right. This is how little kids, little infants playing with the screen. They're addicted to it already. Yeah. It's already. So the chat is just taking him to another level of obedience. And, you know, now the governments are trying to stop some of it.

And you know why? Why? Because only the governments are allowed to tell you what to think and how to think. And now they're fighting against chat. They don't want chat to, to, to take over their roles in telling us what to think. Yeah. Yeah. It'll be pretty easy for them though.

They've got, you know, one of the things that we're saying to the Senator as well, you know, we, we, um, want to make sure that we got licenses. Not everybody can get into this. It's just too important. It's too powerful. Not everybody should be allowed to do this. And so one of them says, well, you know, the concerns that I've got is that we're going to have a concentration. We're going to have like this little monopoly or oligarchy or duopoly or whatever.

And he goes, well, that's actually a good thing, said Sam Altman, because now they'll have fewer companies to oversee. Could you believe this? Yeah, I know. Isn't that amazing? And that's what everything's become monopolies yeah yeah i mean what's the big news in the markets oh home depot sales went down target sales went down oh my god you know but how about the mom and pops who cares about them nobody cares because they've all been taken over the big zone everything yeah again as we've talked many times when we were young guys

there were hardware stores stationary stores drug stores grocery stores and now they're all chains drug chains stationary chains drug chains grocery chains the chains own everything and we're in chains that's what i said we're the plantation workers of flaylandia we're in chains. That's what I said. We're the plantation workers of Flavilandia. We're chained. Chained by Wall Street. And that's an interesting point as well. Brian Schilhavi made the point when he was talking about all of this mad rush of Wall Street to invest in artificial intelligence and to funnel all this money into just one or two companies. And yet, you know, we've had these um you know pump

and dump uh stories about artificial intelligence going back to the 80s this is actually the third wave it'd be the fourth wave if you count self-driving and uh cars and the failed promises of those things but before people really saw how that was failing they brought on chat gpt and that may be one of the reasons why they rolled it out so quickly because they didn't want people to start to get skeptical of this autonomous stuff. And, um, so, you know, they roll that out. And, uh, I think it's probably going to go the same way as these other two waves.

I think it's going to go the same way as the autonomous cars, but if that happens and it turns out that this is, you know, the, a lot of the gains are illusionary and it isn't going to be the big deal that they're telling everybody, that's going to have big implications for the stock market. I think it's going to keep going. Oh, you think it will? I really do. You know, I played with it a bit.

You know, I'm a writer. I've been writing, you know, for a long time, selling books, a magazine. And I wrote it, and I said, let me see what chat says about what i wrote and one of the things i wrote and we put the information could you improve what we just put here and make it more blah blah blah and i gotta tell you it what it did was holy i couldn't believe it i could not believe it they gave us some really good strong points. And what you're going to see, that's on one end.

I mean, I know how to write, but young people aren't going to learn how to write. They're not going to learn how to think. They're going to go to chat for everything. Look at the dependence. I'm telling you, this thing, does it do a perfect job? No, but it's going to take for people that don't know how to do it, to do certain things, they're going to rely on this, again, particularly the younger kids. Yes.

That's their lives. Their lives are high tech. That's right. We grew up when there was nothing. I remember, I'll never forget the guy's name,, was Mr. Sorrentino in the 10th grade. And there were academic students and general students in New York. And I was a general student. I barely got out of high school.

I left back in the fifth grade. And he said, most of you kids aren't going to learn much here. He said, you really should learn how to do something. Whether you take a shop class, you used to have shop classes in those days where you learn to make things and fix things or, or become a secretary and learn how to type. I took a typing class and I became a writer. But anyway, now you don't have to take a typing class.

People go on these things like this yeah it's their lives yeah again one time you one time you had to learn how to type you don't have to do that it's so what i'm magazine, one of the top trends for 2023. AI, we own you. It's real. And it's only going to get worse because the people don't think for themselves already. That's right. And they want others to think for them.

That's right. That's the key thing I think is going to drive it. They don't care if it's right. And they want others to think for them. That's right. That's the key thing I think is going to drive it. They don't care if it's accurate as much. And I've had people send me stuff and say, hey, this did a great job of computer coding for me. It did a great job of circuit design. I had a listener who's an engineer said, hey, we gave it this circuit design. It did a great job of that. The woman who was interviewed by Wired Magazine that I talked about just before you came on said that as she was looking at autonomous vehicles

and things, she says, um, it's the same type of hype she said that I've seen with chat GPT that I saw that people don't see the flaws, they don't talk about the flaws and she said, when you start using this for writing code, she said, um, people who are going to debug that stuff are going to have a long career because it's gotta be really precise and it's going to be interesting to see how this breaks out. But as you're pointing out, people have a lower standard of what they're looking for as well. And when you look at what has happened with GPS, we, we use our phones for directions and that type of stuff. People have forgotten how to use a map, even to the extent that 50 years ago, when I went with a high school group to Europe, and we were all on a bus, and we had a tour driver.

And she would get disoriented wherever we would go somewhere. And she'd start to take us to there, and we'd say, no, no, the bus or wherever is over this direction. And she'd say, oh, you know, Americans have such a great sense of direction. Well, that was because we were driving cars, you know, and we, you know, we were actively engaged to that. You can actually see what happens with a London taxi driver. There's certain parts of the brain that get developed. And when you don't use that, they atrophy and they die and they shrink. And that's what's happening right now.

We've got shrinking minds. Yeah, I agree. Exactly. And again, I had maps all over. I used to buy, you know, everywhere I'd go, I'd buy a map and take all the back roads and, you know, try to do different things. And I don't, again, I don't carry a phone. I wouldn't know how to use a GPS.

If my life depended on it, I wouldn't know how to use a cell phone i got an old flip phone that i take with me when i you know travel so i could you know tell the car to pick me up at the airport but uh and again you know so this this chat gpt and the others they're putting countless billions of dollars into this and in a lot lot of levels, it's going to work. There's a study that came out, and they're showing, I think it was Goldman Sachs or one of them, over 300 million jobs will be lost globally because of this. And then the robotic thing picking up as well. But you know, they made a big point of,

I think it was IBM laid off 7,500 people or something. So we're going to maybe replace these jobs with artificial intelligence. But then the next week they, and other companies like Google that had big layoffs, they go to Washington, they're lobbying for more H1B visas so they can get in cheap foreign technical help. You know,

so part of that, they got their own agenda. There's two things going on. There's something that's real there, but there's also something that is being used by these people for their own purposes to try to monopolize this, to try to have an excuse for firing people and bringing in cheap labor, all the rest of this type of thing. Oh, that's why, you know, that's what happened with Bill Clinton that gave us the H-1B visas, if I remember correctly. And it was Lyndon Johnson, may he rot in hell, who gave us the Vietnam War. And then what happened was, again, I'm of that age.

We were either going to college to beat the draft or getting drafted. So you didn't have a lot of young workers. And that's when they, that's the guy that did away with our immigration rules. They were very tough before that. And he's the one that killed it. And they're doing, that's one of the reasons why they're letting so many people in is to bring in more cheap labor. Again, you don't have to believe me. You can listen to the words spewing out of the crap head mouth of Jerome Powell and Janet Yellen. They're blaming inflation not on the zero interest rate policy or the trillions and trillions, countless trillions of dollars, well over $7 trillion, that the

government's dumped into the economy to fight the COVID war. No, that didn't cause inflation. Stay home. Here's free money. No, that didn't cause inflation. What caused inflation, according to these two clowns, are higher wages. Yeah, I know. I know.

What a joke that is. Isn't that amazing? Yeah. Higher wages. The only people getting higher wages are the CEOs, and they're getting a lot higher wages. Yeah, I know. I know. What a joke that is. Isn't that amazing? The higher wages, the only people getting higher wages are the CEOs and they're getting a lot higher wages. You know, their wages went up 7%, almost 8% this last year, but they'd gone up 20 or 30% the year prior. I mean, it's just amazing how much they're making, but the workers aren't getting a raise, but that's what they say. The raise of the workers is about 4.2%. The official inflation number is 5.9%.

When you look at the real inflation number, you go to John Williams shadow stats, you got it at what? It's about 14%. Wow. So your wages are way below inflation. And that's the other important thing. When they report the retail sales, they're not putting any inflation into it. So they're saying that people spent 1.3% more in the last quarter. No, they didn't.

They spent 1.3% more to buy less. Yeah, that's right. Because the prices went up. up that's right but they don't say that yeah right yeah they don't adjust it for inflation you know when you look at what's happening with the border it's a crisis and even in new york on long island where karen is from same same county she was in they've declared a state of emergency because there's so many people that are coming in they said we can't handle this we don't have the police facilities we don't have the housing facilities we don't have the medical facilities and uh and it's happening everywhere they're trying to stop it there but of course most of the places are not in illinois uh gerald they're going to spend a billion dollars on med. And they put it in the headlines here for undocumented seniors.

No, they're aliens. They're foreign citizens who have come here illegally, but they're going to give them Medicare. They're going to give them Medicaid. They put this out about a year ago, and they spent more the first month than they anticipated they were going to spend for the entire year. And then you got California. They're extending unemployment benefits to illegal aliens

who come across the border. This is an entitlement program for everybody in the world. It's amazing. And again, look at the freaks we have running the show. Yeah. And by the way, it's not only in America. Yeah, that's right. They're flooding into Europe.

That's right. and here's the deal when they when the nobel peace of crap prize winner barack obama and hitler clinton samantha powell susan rice i love this baloney if only women were in charge, there'd be peace. What a load of crap that is. How about Condoleezza Rice? The next mushroom cloud you see, we have to stop Saddam Hussein from launching it, right? Yeah. Anyway, going back to that, Gaddafi warned when they overthrew Libya. He warned the Europeans, anything happens to me, you are going to have a refugee crisis

you will not be able to handle. Because he had made a deal with Italy and other countries that he would not allow people to come in through Libya and then into Europe because that was the shortcut right in. And he stopped it. After they assassinated him,

I go to, I, last time I was in Italy, I couldn't believe I couldn't believe all the, these once upon a time, Germany had German people, French had French people, the Spanish had Spanish people.

That's right. No more. No more. You got, because of the Bill Clinton and the murderous, what they did to Syria, we want that guy Assad out of there. They have over 5 million refugees have left. 5 million. And now the Ukraine war. So what I'm saying to you, David,

this is global. And it's going to get worse because let's look at the economic data. Now hear this. You don't have to wait until it becomes quote official before they announce we're in a recession we're in and it's global the numbers came out today in austria i think the inflation number is like 9.5 percent in in in the uk it's over 10 percent your unemployment rate of young people in China is over 20%. Wow. Yeah. Wow. So the recession's already begun.

Now, let's look at the economy. interest rates in early May, May 3rd, 25 basis points, as the street had forecast. The word was they weren't going to raise interest rates again. They're going to pause when they meet next month. I think it's about June 13th. Now, the street's changing their mind.

And they say the Federal Reserve's going to raise interest rates. Really? Wow. If they raise interest rates, Really? Wow. Yeah. If they raise interest rates, that's why you're seeing gold prices going down. Gold prices are going down because the bet is they're going to raise interest rates. So when interest rates go up, the dollar gets stronger. That's all it is.

When the interest rates go down, the dollar gets weaker, gold gets stronger. So now the bet on the street is they're going to raise interest rates another 25 basis points. If they do that, this recession is going to get a lot worse. It's very important to understand this, that when they start raising interest rates, you don't feel the effect right away. It takes months and months and months and months. And now that time has come. Yeah. Yeah. It's been a big avalanche that's been building and, um, and they just keep pouring more and more snow into the end of the pack. Uh, that's going to come, uh, crushing down on it. So,

you know, if they, uh, if the word on the street is that they're going to continue to raise interest rates, it's creating something of a little bit of a buying opportunity for gold, I guess. The silver lining that we could look at, you know, the gold and silver lining. Yeah. Gold is going to, prices are going to get weaker as interest rates go up and the store. And another important thing,

again, you know, we, we don't, we look at things to the way they are, not the way we want them to be. And following the midterm elections, we said that the standard imposed the s&p 500

would go up and the reason we said it is because of the facts over the last past 40 midterm elections 40 midterm elections the s&p 500 has gone up over 16 percent now we're halfway little more than halfway through we're in november right december january february march april may six halfway through it's up almost eight percent the s p yeah they find out the data doesn't make a difference it's how the game is played that's right that's right they'll find a way to pump it up uh just like you know whatever they got to do they got to uh yeah empty out the strategic petroleum reserve they'll do that whatever they need to do they'll find some way to uh to jack it up for the election purposes you're absolutely right yeah now talking about the election what they're going to do and i will bet my life on it is they will

start to radically lower interest rates in the run-up to the presidential reality show next year they do it all the time because the person in power they want to keep in power because they're running the show and they don't want to deal with anybody else so again the person playing our treasury secretary is facha brut as we call her in italian that means a dumb ugly face the uh janet yellen what was the last job sitting at the head of of the Federal Reserve. Yeah. And now she's our Treasury Secretary. You call her fascist brute. Yeah, fascist brute. Fascist brute.

Brute force. But anyway, so they're going to lower them. There's no question about it. When interest rates go down, gold prices spike. We could see gold easily hitting $2,200 an ounce. Easily, easily, easily. And you've got to also understand that the game is rigged. And I'm not making that up.

They find J.P. Morgan Chase, $900 million for rigging the precious metals market in 2019, which is in ancient history. That's right. Yeah. And, of course, the big thing thing you talk about rigged markets, you know, you look at the, uh, you look at the derivatives, you know, like a GLD and, uh, and silver and that type of thing, you know, where they're selling those things, uh, and they're supposedly holding them on the Shanghai gold

exchange and stuff like that. And people find out that, uh, there's not really any gold those paper gold, uh gold stocks and stuff. You know, there's only a small fraction of it. It is a fractional system, like a fractional reserve system when they sell those, uh, that, that paper gold version of it. Right. And think about it.

They won't let us look at go into Fort Knox to see what's in there. That's right. Yeah. They won't allow us plantation workers of slave land here and not allowed to see it. Yeah. Yeah. You can't see, uh, can't see the Shanghai gold exchange, Fort Knox. Uh, you can, you can't, but you can't audit the federal reserve.

No, no, no, no, no. How dare you ask? Well, you know, one thing that you've been right about for a very long time. And every time I talk to you every couple of weeks, there's big news about commercial real estate. San Francisco just had, uh had a major auction last week, the Union Bank building. It went for 75% less per square foot than comparable building sales prior to the pandemic. This is gradually rolling out.

First, we see this from one corporation. Then another corporation drops all the money that they're losing in commercial real estate. You've been saying this forever, and it is trickling out bit by bit. We're starting to see where the true crisis has been now, 75% down in San Francisco. Here's the deal. In San Francisco, they have nearly, I'm not talking about people going back to work. That's only about, I think it's about 45% around there, 43% of the people returning to work. But that's the office occupancy rate is around 40%, 45%.

Globally, nationally, the 10 largest cities is 49.6%. That's office occupancy meaning people going back to the office the vacancy rate vacant buildings in san francisco in la around 30 percent vacant wow vacant now people keep repeating the line well they'll turn them into housing no you won't the buildings built in the last, well, they'll turn them into housing. No, you won't. The building's built in the last 50 years. You can't convert them.

It's too expensive. Can't do it. They're ugly, stupid things, just steel and glass. You don't have windows. You can't do it. It doesn't work. So now the commercial office building is going to bring down the banks as well. And there is about $5.6 trillion worth of commercial real estate loans. Now you have less tenants. You got a mortgage to pay.

Oh, they're floating rates, most of these mortgages. So now interest rates went up. They got to pay more on their mortgage as they have way less income coming in. Yeah, yeah. This is going to be like we've never seen before. We warned this when they began the COVID war. That's right. People are staying now at home when they said you can't go to work,

stay home. And people have gone, they're saying to themselves as they're staying home day after day, week after week, month after month, waking up and saying, Oh, I've been getting up at five o'clock in the morning to

drive an hour and a half to work i'm not going to do that anymore i'm not doing it anymore and so now i'm the i'm the the employer i say okay stay home two days a week because i you know i have employees work for me. I don't want to, I'm lucky if I see one or two a day. I don't, I got other things on my mind. I don't care if they're here, just do your job.

I don't care where you do it from. Now I could save rent on the office. I don't need all the space anymore. The big tenant. So there's some leasing and they're not renewing their lease. Again, there's over $5 trillion worth of loans coming in and interest rates have gone up they have to pay more on their on their mortgages on their loans so

they're going to say to the banks here you keep the building man i'm buying i don't want it yeah and again the bigs that own these they don't lose any money. The rich don't lose it. It's the people that invest in it. So they don't care. So what I'm saying to you is the banking crisis has just begun. And it's not only in the United States. It's global. People aren't going back to work like they used to.

Oh, and I forgot. Oh, I was just down the city on Wednesday, down in New York City. Midtown, 50th. For rent, for lease, for lease, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent, for rent. All over the place. All over the place. Stores. Because once upon a time, you had commuters coming in.

Yeah. You don't have them anymore. Mm-hmm. So all the businesses that were serving them lunch and all the rest of the stuff, they're going out of business. Let me ask you this. While we're talking about the banking industry and knock-on effects of some of these things that are happening and potential failures, when we look at Silicon Valley Bank and the Cayman Islands, I think it was, they had a branch and there was a lot of money that was at that branch,

mostly from Asian investors, most of them from China. And they were told, you know, we'll wait. We're not really sure what's going to happen. The Wall Street Journal said this last weekend that they got word that the FDIC is not going to cover any of that stuff. They said the FDIC is there to cover only domestic stuff. And so if they've got their money in an American bank and that American bank goes belly up, then there's no FDIC coverage. And of of course, they went well beyond the FDIC coverage. They extended coverage for billions and tens of billions of dollars

for some of these people when it's only covered for $200,000. These people thought they were going to get it because it was Silicon Valley Bank. They said, nope, it's a foreign branch, so we're not going to do it. Now, here's the other part of it, Gerald. They said that you have JP Morgan and Citibank, between the two of them, Citibank's got $600 billion in that kind of a situation of deposits that are in Citibank branches that are in foreign countries, like Cayman Islands or wherever, right? And JP Morgan has got over $ over 400 billion there so between the two of them just

those two banks over a trillion dollars like 1.1 trillion dollars that is not going to be fdic protected for these depositors and as they're looking at that they're saying was this going to create a massive run on even big banks like jp morgan as people want to get their money out of that and put it into something else. I don't know. What do you think? I think to some extent, but the money is really pouring out of the small and medium-sized banks and going into the bigger banks. You know, so they don't like, you know, like what you just said, most people have no idea about that.

If it's in a foreign country, you don't get any coverage. I think it's 250,000. I'm not sure of the FDIC. And like you said, they bailed out the bigs that had money in there, that, again, our money to give back to those who should have lost it. Yeah. And, again, the whole game is rigged. That's right and so but i i you know i don't i

don't think yeah i don't think that's going to be a predominant effect that the fear that people had that you know the the two big to fail banks are going to be supported so i got to get my money out of this regional bank i think that's going to be a bigger factor just one and and maybe there'll be so much of that happening because jp morgan was was one of the big winners. J.P. Morgan and Bank of America were the recipients of so much of the deposits that were shifting out of the small regional banks, midsize banks, that maybe that'll offset foreign investors who decide they want to pull their money out and put it in something else. Right. And yeah. And again, we have to look at who made this happen. You mentioned Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Chase. again we have to look at who made this happen you mentioned uh bank of america and jp morgan chase

once upon a time not too long ago banks were only interstate banks they weren't intro internal in trust state not interstate bank of america was only on california and then you had jimmy carter and reagan are the ones that started changing that and allowed them to go across the country. And they put all the small banks out of business, or most of them. So again, when this thing hits, I said that the commercial real estate business sector, it's in mostly small and medium-sized banks that have those loans. So they're the ones that are going to get hit the hardest. So the bigs are just going to get bigger. And again, look at it.

What do we have? An interest rate between 5% and 5.25%. You put your money in JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, how much did they give you for depositing it there? Basically nothing. Basically nothing. Yeah. Yeah. Well, basically nothing. Tiny fraction of 1% typically. Exactly. Yeah. And I remember going back and looking, you know, when they were saying, well, you know, interest rates, when they got up at home,

mortgage rates got up around 5%. They said, Oh, look, you know, it's gotten back up to where it was like in the sixties. I thought, I wonder what they paid people who put money in savings accounts in the 60s i went back and when it was like five percent at the banks you know to borrow a home loan they would pay you four percent so then you know you like but today you know five percent uh when it was five percent to get a home mortgage it was like uh 0.01 that they would pay you i mean it's less way yeah almost negative interest rates again you know it's um one of the covers of the trends journal if anybody

find it here yeah here it is yeah yeah they're chasing the money changers out of the temple but it's a modern bank that jesus is that's it nothing's that's right nothing's changed yeah it's a crime syndicate yeah it's true right in front of our eyes so anyway we we are headed the recession has already begun people are feeling it again i talk to you know a lot of people one guy i know that has a uh he supplies the top restaurants in new york from new york city north of where i am and into connecticut and jersey huge firm and he the high-end restaurants he provides uh produce for i asked asked him, I said, how's business going? He says, slowing down. It's slowing.

So if it's slowing down at the top, you know how bad it is below that. Oh, yeah. Because what's the numbers? Some 74% of the people living paycheck to paycheck. Yeah, that's right. And yeah, the prices of things are coming down,

but they're still very high. Yeah, that's right. And what the prices of things are coming down but they're still very high yeah that's right and what does it cost a house who's what what almost four hundred thousand dollars that was a mansion when i was a kid and look at 28 acres in rhinebeck uh the town of milan right off right next to rhinebeck in 1984 three parcels, 10 acre, and 8.5 acres. And an old house on one of them. I had to redo the whole old house, but it was a beautiful old house. $28,000. Wow.

$28,000. Yeah. When I was a kid, when we moved from the Bronx to Yonkers, my father, may he rest in peace, bought this big old house, $13,000. That's right. Yeah, it is absolutely amazing. Now, of course, your car, of course, your what? $50,000.

Yes. Yep. Average price of new cars right there. The funny thing about it is the used cars are not that much less. Used cars now are just what uh what you know i remember talking to eric peters ep autos we talk about cars lot and uh you know just a few years ago we're saying look at this the average price of a new car is like thirty thousand dollars can you believe this and now it's gone up to fifty thousand and the used cars are thirty thousand

and then when you look at the interest rates that they charge being more for used car, the used car payments are almost as bad as the new car payments. It's crazy what is happening. And this is what people stretching this out for, you know, eight years to pay it back seven, eight years, that type of thing. Uh, people can't afford to get, uh, they're pricing us out of housing. They're pricing us out of, uh, cars, uh, everything. That's, that's the plan, I think. And let's talk a little bit's the plan, I think.

And let's talk a little bit about, I want to get your take on what is happening with FedNow and FedCoin and CBDC and things like that. There's no question they're all going to do it. They're going to go to digital coins. It was one of the covers of our magazine back in March of 2020, from dirty cash to digital trash. And what they're going to do, it'll be something like the Russians hacked our banking system, but don't worry about it. We got a new coin for you. They're going to come up with it. They want to know every penny you spent, what you spent it on, where you spent it. They have more control over you, but most of all, they could get their tax money. That's all they're interested in that's right because politicians never work a day in their life so they got to get your money coming in and so they're all going to go digital and they're going to go digital i really believe

when especially when the dollar crashes because the dollar is at its end the most of the world the majority of the world has had enough of amer's hegemony, being it political with their wars and what they do in countries and economics. They had enough of America. That's right. So we're going to see the dollar go down. When that happens, you're going to go digital. They're all going to go digital. There's no question about it.

And so when you look at what is happening the same guy who held court with the senate had them eating out of his hand sam altman he's only like 38 years old very much like sam bankman it's just a little bit different right he's the alternative to sam bankman but he's put together a coalition he's a big venture capital guy he's put together a coalition with some of the biggest venture capital firms out there as a matter of fact, I think it's like Andreessen Horowitz has taken the lead in this venture capital thing for WorldCoin. They say they're going to go out with that in about six weeks. But a key part of that is having a biometric ID. And the justification for putting this thing out is that they want to have universal basic income because after they take everything away from us, as you know, they're going to put us all on a uniform, universal allowance to try to keep

us from coming after them. Bloomberg said that when he was running for president. He said, hey, we're going to, we had the agricultural society. We replaced it with industrial revolution. Now the smart ones of us are looking how to get everybody out of their job. And the only thing we have to worry about is how we're going to keep them from coming after us with guillotines. That's what Bloomberg said when he's running for president. So it's always been about universal basic income. You see Elon Musk pushing this, you see Sam Altman pushing it because that's what

Andrew Yang was running on four years ago, you know, when he started his campaign. And so this push to have an ID and to have a universal basic income, as well as a digital coin, that seems to be what they're pushing. And it seems like it's coming pretty quickly. Do you think this is going to happen? When do you think this whole thing is going to collapse? You know, you can't tell when the collapse is going to come because they keep rigging the markets. Yeah, that's true. That's true.

Yeah. Again, I never heard when Economics 101, they never taught me about zero and negative interest rate policy or a thing called quantitative easing. They're buying up corporate bonds, the repo markets, all of this stuff. So they're going to do anything they can. A plunge protection team? I mean, there do anything they can. A plunge protection team? I mean, what a plunge protection team? What are you talking about? Oh, we're going to rig the markets when they go down too low.

But don't worry about it. The bigs, when the prices go up, they'll sell at the top, and then it'll go down again, and the little people will lose. See, you can't forecast this stuff. It's impossible. But it's going to happen, and it's all going to go digital. There's no question about it. Again, we began talking about the chat, GPT.

It's all artificial. Artificial currencies, artificial intelligence, artificial flavors, artificial coloring. It's all artificial. And look at the damage it's done. Yeah, that's right. You know, oh, by the way, I want to remind everybody again, I think we sent you the poster. Yes.

Of the rally coming up. Go ahead and pull that up, Travis. Yeah, we got that poster. Yeah. Is that next week that's going to be happening? Yeah, yeah. May 27th. And you've been here up in Kingston. Yeah, we got that poster. Yeah. Is that next week that's going to be happening? Yeah. Yeah. May 27th. And you've been here up in Kingston. Yeah. And it's peace and free. It's make America healthy again, spiritually, emotionally, patriotically. And we're coming at it from very many different directions because I keep telling people you're in the fight for your

life. And what you have to do is get in the best shape you can, physically, emotionally, and spiritually. And we need to fight for, as I see it, peace on earth, goodwill to all. Like I say, they have a thing called the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, nation under god stop what god you're talking about what god oh did you see the new study that came out from brown university this week god would have loved this eight trillion dollars of our money was spent since 9-11 to fight wars yeah and america killed what between they're not sure

the number 4.3 million or 4.5 million what god you're talking about uh mars the god of war i guess one nation under mars is uh yeah one nation under satan yeah that's right yeah that's right so i'm tired of this killing machine and i'm doing and again i want everybody listening it's not about me that you're coming to the rally for or donating to occupy peace for you're not helping me this cost me you've been here oh yeah that's great cost me a lot of money to put on yes

takes a lot of energy from me I'm not a kid you know and and and I'm doing it

for the spirit of America as I say my blood is Italian my heart's American if I was born in Alta Villa Pino, Vicquence, that wouldn't be me. I'm only me because I'm a Napolitano born in the Bronx, born to be free. I do everything I can to fight for the freedom that was given to me and allowed to have by our founding fathers that these little freaky nothing boys and girls have stolen

from us that's right so what you're doing you're not helping me you're helping yourself so if you don't want to do anything don't do anything but don't complain when all your freedom is stolen from you or we're being annihilated in a nuclear war because you shut your mouth and you didn't put your money where your heart, mind and soul are. That's right. So and again, I also want to thank all the people that have been donating. And because this costs a lot of money to put on. So go to Occupy Peace dot com, Occupy Peace dot com and do what you can or do nothing. It's up to you.

Yeah, it's a great crowd. It was a great event. And this year you've got Dennis Kucinich. You've got John Whitehead, who I have. I put forward his articles all the time. He's a great writer for Liberty and for the Constitution. Great speaker. I'm glad you're going to have John Whitehead there.

And by the way, Dennis Kucinich is RFK Jr.'s campaign manager. Yeah. And he let off, he introduced RFK, I call him RFKJ. He introduced him when he had his kickoff speech. That was Dennis Kucinich. Yep. Yeah. And so he's going to be talking on behalf of RFK because he couldn't make it here.

We're going to try to get him up here again, though. Probably in September, I'm going to be talking on behalf of RFK because he couldn't make it here. We're going to try to get him up here again though. Probably in September I'm going to do another one. But again, do I agree with everything? No, I don't agree. Who agrees with everything of anybody? But is it you want Biden or you want Trump?

Well, he's got some very important things to say that need to be heard. That's the key thing. And that's the thing about the election. It's gotten to the point now where, you know, I don't have any confidence in the integrity of the system. However, I do believe that the discussion part of it is very important because it gives us an idea of how they're going to be coming at us. And it lets us talk about these types of things and talk about what the problems are. And RFKJ has done a great job of identifying a lot of existential problems that other people don't really want to talk about.

It's a key thing. He's been one of those. He's almost repeating word for word the platform of Occupy Peace. And one of them is close all those 800 bases overseas in over 70 countries and bring the troops home to secure the homeland, to protect America. Yes. Yes.

Absolutely. And he's come out against the bigs taking over our lives. He is against all of these refugees coming into America. You know, there's a lot of things that this guy I'm on the same side of, you know, I've had enough of this. I don't want to,

you know, I've had enough. Well, he's spoken out against the CBDC stuff as well, you know, and, and came out against digital coins as, as a,

and it was good to see that because, you know, we don't want to only, there's been a few high profile Republicans who have talked who've talked about it there's been some people in congress and of course they can't do anything about it because biden's going to veto it they don't have the votes to override that uh de santa's talked about it i think ramaswamy talked about it but we don't want that to just be a republican issue so it's really important that rfkj is talking about this on the democrat side uh so it doesn't just become oh well

the Republicans are for that so I'm against it type of thing which we see over and over again yeah yeah so it's very yeah so again this guy's talking about a lot of stuff that I'm on the same page with and again you look at the data the people don't want either Trump or Biden that's right that's right and even the democrats don't want biden that's right and particularly the younger people i mean this is like the great grandfather you know and they don't want them so this guy could win and of course they're they're playing it down you know they always say you know long shot you know yeah we'll call a long shot what are you gonna look at again the people to me have had enough of trump and have had enough of Trump, and they don't want Biden.

Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah, absolutely. And, you know, when you talk about Trump, talking about having enough of Trump, do you see this lawsuit about Rudy Giuliani that was there and what came out as part of that? You know, he's got some assistant, and she's got a lot of allegations about sexual misconduct and everything, but she says she's got recordings of him talking about pardons for $2 million. And I interviewed John Kiriakou a few years ago. And he said,

you know, he had served his time because he exposed the torture program and he just wanted to clear his name and to get his pension that was there, which wasn't anywhere close to 2 million. I think it's like $700,000. And he said he had a meeting with Rudy and his friends and Rudy gets up to go to the bathroom and the two guys say, okay, it's going to be $2 million. You guys are you crazy?

I'm not going to spend that $2 million. Even if I wasn't opposed to that on principle, I wouldn't give that to you for $700,000. But she says she's got, uh, recordings of this. I mean that, I think that could blow up bigger than any of this other stuff they're throwing at Trump. And people are just sick of him. Look at that little arrogant jerk you just talked about yeah rudy giuliani look at that arrogant little stupid piece of crap and that oh isn't diane not so

feinstein doing great that she's dying feinstein i think is what she is right oh and and and and mitch mcconnell yeah and chucky schumer and lindsey graham look at the clown so peter shift one little clown after one jerk after adam what is it pete adam. Peter. Yeah. He is a good guy. Peter Schiff. Adam is the little clown guy up in California. And look at the jerks telling us what to do. Yeah. They're circling the drain.

And I think they're kind of a picture. They're kind of like the portrait of Dorian Gray, right? They're a picture of the American empire. All of these senileile decaying politicians. I got to show you something real quick. One second. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. It is. It is amazing. You know, and as I said earlier, uh, you know, Pelosi is,

is right there with Diane Feinstein. Uh, they both figured out how to make hundreds of millions of dollars on the stock market. And of course they're going to manipulate this thing. These are shirts that are going to be available on our site later today. Hey, politicians. Yeah, that's good.

That's good. What's on the back? Oh, there you go. Well, that should get some responses, especially if people wear them around Kingston, New York. Yeah, that's going to win friends and influence people oh yeah they love me up here i'm so adored remember when we lot when everything was locked down and i had i had rallies when everything was locked down when people were afraid to go out yeah i remember we

all died there were about four or five 500 people here. Everybody died from the COVID. It killed us. My son says you're the toast of the town there. They really do hate freedom there. They want to put the mask on my face. Save me. They're so afraid of living life. It's truly amazing.

It's so sad. Well, Peace and Freedom Rally, that's going to be coming up next week, May the 27th. Again, a lot of very good speakers there. Dennis Kucinich, John Whitehead, that you hear me covering his. I don't know, Frank Marano or Gary Null. Tell us a little bit about them, Gerald. Frank Marano has a big thing on WABC radio. And Gary Null is one of the pioneers in natural healing.

Oh, okay. And again, this is about uh yeah progressive radio network is his channel and he's what he used to be on everybody uh back in the day he's a real great guy and so and other speakers too uh we're going to have a number of people here so um uh it starts at one o'clock it'll be live streamed as well oh on occupy peace and in the Gerald Cilenti channels. So anybody, please do what you can. We're fighting for peace and freedom because World War III has already begun. Yes.

Yes, it has. Just take a look at what happened this last week. I thought it was kind of interesting, these dueling narratives about, you know, we destroyed your Patriot battery and then the Patriot side, they say, well, we destroyed your hypersonic missile. And then the Patriot side, they say, well, we destroyed your hypersonic missile. This is what this has become. That back and forth exchange, I think, was pretty typical. This looks like this is the military industrial complexes, you know, dueling weapons.

Let's see, our weapon system is better than yours. Let's sell more of these things. I mean, that's what this has come down to. But it's very dangerous because they keep uh increasing this and increasing the direct involvement and direct engagement to russia don't they yep yeah it's not a proxy we're at war again over 130 billion dollars of our money has gone to ukraine that's right you saw the numbers that came out about how much money they're stealing out of it as well. Again, as this country's

infrastructure is rotted, as people can't afford to live paycheck to paycheck, $130 billion? Yeah, no problem at all. No problem at all. Well, it's always great to talk to you, Gerald. Thank you so much.

Trendsjournal.com. And don't forget OccupyPeace.com next week. And of course, you can also donate. Thank you, Gerald. Joe, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at the DavidKnightShow.com, right?

So basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because basically, you can't hold coffee.